NCG090029_MONITORING INFO_20131210

STORMWATER DIVISION CODING SHEET
NCG PERMITS
PERMIT NO.
/`/
DOC TYPE
❑HISTORICAL FILE
�- MONITORING REPORTS
DOC DATE
a�) 13 ►a ) C-)
YYYYMMDD

NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources
Land Quality Section
Tracy E. Davis, PE, CPM
Director
December 10, 2013
Mr. Leopoldo Migoto, General Manager
Renner Wood Coatings
Renner USA Corporation
651 Michael Wylie Drive
Charlotte, North Carolina 28217
Pat McCrory, Governor
John E. Skvada, III, Secretary
Subject: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Renner Wood Coatings
NPDES Stormwater Permit NCG090029
Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
Dear Mr. Migoto:
Enclosed please find a copy of the Compliance Evaluation Inspection Report for the inspection
conducted at the subject facility on December 5, 2013 by Ms. Donna Hood of this Office.
The report should be self-explanatory; however should you have any questions concerning
this report, please do not hesitate to contact me at [phone] ext 2193 or by email at
donna.hood@,ncdenr.gov. A
Vonna
y,
ood
Environmental
Enclosure
Cc: Stormwater Permitting
DH
Mooresville Regional Office
610 East Center Avenue, Suite 301, Mooresville, North Carolina 28115
Telephone [phone] FAX: [phone] • Internet: http://portal.ncdenr.oLg/webArAand-quality
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycled 110% Post Consumer Paper

Permit: NCGO90029
SOC:
County: Mecklenburg
Region: Mooresville
Compliance Inspection Report
Effective: 12/14/12 Expiration: 10/31/17 Owner: Renner USA Corporation
Effective: Expiration: Facility: Renner USA Corporation
651 Michael Wylie Dr
Contact Person: Leopold Migoto Title:
Directions to facility:
Clanton Rd - left on Barrinager - left on Stuart Andrew Blvd - right on Michael Wylie Dr
System Classifications:
Primary ORC: Certification:
Secondary ORC(s):
On -Site Representattve(s):
Related Permits:
Charlotte NC 28217
Phone: [phone]
Phone:
Inspection Date: 12/0512013 Entry Time: 01:00 PM Exit Time: 02:00 PM
Primary Inspector: Donna Hood z�(}�3 Phone: [phone]
Ext.2193
Secondary Inspector(s):
Reason for Inspection: Routine Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Permit Inspection Type: Paints, Varnishes, Lacquers Stormwater Discharge COC
Facility Status: ■ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant
Question Areas:
■ Storm Water
(See attachment summary)
Page: 1

Permit: NCG090029 Owner -Facility. Renner USA Corporation
Inspection Date: 1210512013 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
A facility inspection was performed at the request of the permittee. At the time of the inspection, no associated industrial
activity had begun. Existing equipment was being tested with the anticipated start date in February 2014_ At the time of
the inspection there was almost no exposure from the industrial activity on site. The only exception was a roll -off container
used as a construction trash bit). The facility was advised to begin satnpiinq when production started. The facility was also,
advised to collect stormwater for analytical sampling from a curb drop inlet just outside the fence behind the facility. This
drop inlet was the closest to any pntential pollutant sources prior to nomingling from nther faritilies in the area.
During the inspection the potential for the facility to reach 'No -Exposure' was discussed. Final plans for outside activity
were undetermined. The facility is very close to no -exposure status and could consider that as an option if no further
activity occurs outside, the tank farm is not used; and the outside trash receptacles are covered. Once outside plans for
the facility are finalized, if a no -exposure status is desired, please contact the inspector for help.
Page: 2

Permit: NCGO90029 Owner -Facility: Renner USA Corporation
Inspection Date: 12/05/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
Reason for Visit: Routine
Yes No NA NE
Does the site have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan?
n
Q ❑ ■
# Does the Plan include a General Location (USGS) map?
❑
❑ ❑ ■
# Does the Plan include a "Narrative Description of Practices"?
n
❑ ❑ ■
# Does the Plan include a detailed site map including outfall locations and drainage areas?
n
❑ ❑ ■
# Does the Plan include a list of significant spills occurring during the past 3 years?
❑
n n ■
# Has the facility evaluated feasible alternatives to current practices?
❑
n ❑ ■
# Does the facility provide all necessary secondary containment?
n
n n ■
# Does the Plan include a BMP summary?
n
❑ ❑ ■
# Does the Plan include a Spill Prevention and Response Plan (SPRP)?
❑
n ❑ ■
# Does the Plan include a Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping Plan?
❑
❑ Q ■
# Does the facility provide and document Employee Training?
❑
❑ n ■
# Does the Plan include a list of Responsible Party(s)?
n
❑ Q ■
# Is the Plan reviewed and updated annually?
❑
❑ ❑ ■
# Does the Plan include a Stormwater Facility Inspection Program?
n
n n ■
Has the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan been implemented?
❑
n Q ■
Comment:
Qualitative Monitoring Yes No NA NE
Has the facility conducted its Qualitative Monitoring semi-annually? n ❑ ❑ ■
Comment:
Analytical Monitoring Yes No NA NE
Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring? n ❑ n ■
# Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring from Vehicle Maintenance areas? ❑ ❑ ❑ ■
Comment:
Permit and Outfalls Yes No NA NE
# Is a copy of the Permit and the Certificate of Coverage available at the site? ❑ ❑ n ■
# Were all outfalls observed during the inspection? ❑ ❑ ❑ ■
# If the facility has representative outfall status, is it properly documented by the Division? n n n ■
# Has the facility evaluated all illicit (non stormwater) discharges? n Q ❑ ■
Comment:
Page: 3

NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources
Land Quality Section
Tracy E. Davis, PE, CPM
Director
December 10, 2013
Mr: Leopoldo Migoto,-General Manager - - -
Renner Wood Coatings
Renner USA Corporation
651 Michael Wylie Drive
Charlotte, North Carolina 28217
Dear Mr. Migoto:
Pat McCrory, Governor
John E. Skvada, III, Secretary
Subject: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Renner Wood Coatings
NPDES Stormwater Permit NCG090029
Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
Enclosed please find a copy of the Compliance Evaluation Inspection Report for the inspection
conducted at the subject facility on December 5, 2013 by Ms. Donna Hood of this Office.
The report should be self-explanatory; however should you have any questions concerning
this report, please do not hesitate to contact me at [phone] ext 2193 or by email at
[e-mail]. n
S' ce ely,
X1
onna Hood
Environmental
Enclosure
Cc: Stormwater Permitting
DH
Mooresville Regional Office
610 East Center Avenue, Suite 301, Mooresville, North Carolina 28115
Telephone [phone] I FAX: [phone] • Internet: hft :fir ortal.ncdenr.org/webfr/land-quality
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer - 50% Recycled 110% Post Consumer Paper

Compliance Inspection Report
Permit: NCG090029 Effective: 12/14/12 Expiration: 10/31/17 Owner. Renner USA Corporation
SOC: Effective: Expiration: Facility: Renner USA Corporation
County Mecklenburg 651 Michael Wylie Dr
Region: Mooresville
Contact Person: Leopold Migoto Title:
Directions to Facility:
Clanton Rd - left on Barrinager - left on Stuart Andrew Blvd - right on Michael Wylie Dr
System Classifications:
Primary ORC: Certification:
Secondary ORC(s):
On -Site Representative(s):
Related Permits:
Charlotte NC 28217
Phone: [phone]
Phone:
Inspection Date: 12/05/2013 Entry Time: 01:00 PM Exit Time: 02:00 PM
Primary Inspector: Donna Hood z/,(}�3 Phone: [phone]
Secondary Inspector(s): Ext 2193
Reason for Inspection: Routine Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Permit Inspection Type: Paints, Varnishes, Lacquers Stormwater Discharge COC
Facility Status: ■ Compliant C) Not Compliant
Question Areas:
E Storm Water
(See attachment summary)
Page: 1

Permit: NCGO90029 Owner - Facility: Renner USA Corporation
Inspection Date: 12/05/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
A facility inspection was performed at the request of the permittee. At the time of the inspection, no associated industrial
activity had begun_ Existing equipment was being tested with the anticipated start date in February 2014. At the time of
the inspection there was almost no exposure from the industrial activity on site. The only exception was a roll -off container
used as a construction trash bin. The facility was advised to begin sampling when production started_ The facility was also
advised to collect stormwater for analytical sampling from a curb strop inlet Just outside the fence behind the facility. This
drop inlet was the closest to any potential pollutant sources prior to comingling from other facilities in the area.
Miring the inspection the potential for the facility to reach 'No -Exposure' was discussed. Final plans for outside activity
were undetermined. The facility is very close to no -exposure status and could consider that as an option if no further
activity occurs outside, the tank farm is not used, and the outside trash receptacles are covered. Once outside plans for
the facility are VlPalizesl, it a 110-e)(POSUle status Is desired, please contart thy; Inspector for help.
Page: 2

Permit: NCG090029 Owner - Facility: Renner USA Corporation
Inspection Date: 12/0512013 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Reason for Visit: Routine
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
Yes
No NA NE
Does the site have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan?
n
❑ n ■
# Does the Plan include a General Location (USGS) map?
0
n n ■
# Does the Plan include a "Narrative Description of Practices"?
Cl
❑ 0 ■
# Does the Plan include a detailed site map including outfall locations and drainage areas?
n
n ❑ ■
# Does the Plan include a list of significant spills occurring during the past 3 years?
n
n n ■
# Has the facility evaluated feasible alternatives to current practices?
n
n n ■
# Does the facility provide all necessary secondary containment?
n
n n ■
# Does the Plan include a BMP summary?
n
n n ■
# Does the Plan include a Spill Prevention and Response Plan (SPRP)?
Cl
n n ■
# Does the Plan include a Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping Plan?
n
n n ■
# Does the facility provide and document Employee Training?
n
n n ■
# Does the Plan include a list of Responsible Party(s)?
❑
n n ■
# Is the Plan reviewed and updated annually?
❑
n ❑ ■
# Does the Plan include a Stormwater Facility Inspection Program?
n
n n ■
Has the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan been implemented?
n
n ❑ ■
Comment:
Qualitative Monitoring
Yes No NA NE
Has the facility conducted its Qualitative Monitoring semi-annually?
❑
n ❑ ■
• i�Tiiii�r�
Analytical Monitoring Yes No NA NE
Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring? n n ❑ ■
# Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring from Vehicle Maintenance areas? n n n ■
Comment:
Permit and Outfalls Yes No NA NE
# Is a copy of the Permit and the Certificate of Coverage available at the site? n n n ■
# Were all outfalls observed during the inspection? 00 n ■
# If the facility has representative outfall status, is it properly documented by the Division? n n n ■
# Has the facility evaluated all illicit (non stormwater) discharges? 00 n ■
Comment:
Page: 3

NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources
Land Quality Section
Tracy E. Davis, PE, CPM
Director
December 10, 2013
Mr: Leopoldo Migoto,-General Manager
Renner Wood Coatings
Renner USA Corporation
651 Michael Wylie Drive
Charlotte, North Carolina 28217
Pat McCrory, Governor
John E. Skvarla, III, Secretary
Subject: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Renner Wood Coatings
NPDES Stormwater Permit NCG090029
Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
Dear Mr. Migoto:
Enclosed please find a copy of the Compliance Evaluation Inspection Report for the inspection
conducted at the subject facility on December 5, 2013 by Ms. Donna Hood of this Office.
The report should be self-explanatory; however should you have any questions concerning
this report, please do not hesitate to contact me at [phone] ext 2193 or by email at
[e-mail]. A
S' cc ely,
Z4
onna Hood
Environmental
Enclosure
Cc: 5tormwater Permitting
DH
Mooresville Regional Office
610 East Center Avenue, Suite 301, Mooresville, North Carolina 28115
Telephone [phone] FAX: [phone] • Internet: http://portal.ncdenr.org/webAr/land-nuali
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer— 50% Recycled 110% Post Consumer Paper

% Compliance Inspection Report
Permit: NGG090029 Effective: 12/14/12 Expiration: 10/31/17 Owner. Renner USA Corporation
SOC: Effective: Expiration: Facility: Renner USA Corporation
County: Mecklenburg 651 Michael Wylie Dr
Region: Mooresville
Charlotte NC 28217
Contact Person: Leopold Migoto Title: Phone: [phone]
Directions to Facility:
Clanton Rd - left on Barrinager - left on Stuart Andrew Blvd - right on Michael Wylie Dr
System Classifications:
Primary ORC: Certification: Phone:
Secondary ORC(s):
On -Site Representative(s):
Related Permits:
Inspection Date: 12/05/2013 Entry Time: 01:00 PM Exit Time: 02:00 PM
Primary Inspector: Donna Hood �� Z�[j�3 Phone: [phone]
Secondary Inspector(s): Ext.2193
Reason for Inspection: Routine Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Permit Inspection Type: Paints, Varnishes, Lacquers Stormwater Discharge COC
Facility Status: ■ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant
Question Areas:
Storm Water
(See attachment summary)
Page: 1

Permit: NCGO90029 Owner - Facility: Renner USA Corporation
Inspection Date: 12/05/2013 inspection Type: Compiiance Evaivaiion Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
A facility inspection was performed at the request of the permittee. At the time of the inspection, no associated industrial
activity had begun. Existing equipment was being tested with the anticipated start date in February 2014. At the time of
the inspection there was almost no exposure from the industrial activity on site. The only exception was a roll -off container
used as a construction trash bin. The facility was advised to begin sampling when production started. The facility was also
advised to collect stormwater for analytical sampling frorn a curt [trap ifilel just outside the fence behind the facility. This
drop inlet was the closest to any potential pollutant sources prim to c omingling frt,rr3 other facilities in the area.
During the inspection the potential fur the facility to reach 'Nu -Exposure' was discussed. Final plans for outside activity
were undetermined_ The facility is very close to no -exposure status and could consider that as an option if no further
activity occurs outside, the tank farm is not used, and the outside trash receptacles are covered. Once outside plans for
the facility are finalized, if a no -exposure status is desired, please contact the inspector for help.
Page: 2

I Permit: NCGO90029 Owner - Facility: Benner USA Corporation
Inspection Date: 12105/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Reason for Visit: Routine
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
Yes
No NA NE
Does the site have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan?
n
Q n ■
# Does the Plan include a General Location (USGS) map?
❑
0 n ■
# Does the Plan include a "Narrative Description of Practices"?
❑
n n ■
# Does the Plan include a detailed site map including outfall locations and drainage areas?
n
❑ ❑ ■
# Does the Plan include a list of significant spills occurring during the past 3 years?
fl
❑ ❑ ■
# Has the facility evaluated feasible alternatives to current practices?
n
n ❑ ■
# Does the facility provide all necessary secondary containment?
n
n ❑ ■
# Does the Plan include a HMP summary?
❑
❑ ❑ ■
# Does the Plan include a Spill Prevention and Response Plan (SPRP)?
o
Q ❑ ■
# Does the Plan include a Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping Plan?
❑
n ❑ ■
# Does the facility provide and document Employee Training?
n
n n ■
# Does the Plan include a list of Responsible Party(s)?
n
❑ n ■
# Is the Plan reviewed and updated annually?
❑
n ❑ ■
# Does the Plan include a Stormwater Facility Inspection Program?
n
n n ■
Has the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan been implemented?
❑
n ❑ ■
Comment:
Qualitative Monitoring
Yes No
NA NE
Has the facility conducted its Qualitative Monitoring semi-annually?
Cl n
n ■
Comment:
Analytical Monitoring
Yes No
NA NE
Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring?
❑ 0.0
■
# Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring from Vehicle Maintenance areas?
n n
❑ ■
Comment:
Permit and Outfalls
Yes No
NA NE
# Is a copy of the Permit and the Certificate of Coverage available at the site?
n ❑
❑ ■
# Were all outfalls observed during the inspection?
n n
n ■
# If the facility has representative outfall status, is it properly documented by the Division?
❑ n
❑ ■
# Has the facility evaluated all illicit (non stormwater) discharges?
n ❑
n ■
Comment:
Page: 3