NCS000454_COMPLIANCE_20131119

STORMWATER DIVISION CODING SHEET
M54 PERMITS
PERMIT NO.
C-s o O'v `mil
DOC TYPE
❑FINAL PERMIT
❑ ANNUAL REPORT
❑� APPLICATION
m/COMPLIANCE
❑ OTHER
DOC DATE
❑
YYYYMMDD

RECEIVED
NOV 2 6 2013
Town of Stallings
MAYOR
Lynda M. Paxton
MAYOR PRO TEMPORF
Rced Esarove
Div of Land Resources
TOWN COUNCIL,
Wyatt Dunn Paul Frost
INTERIM TOWN MANAGER Shawna Steele Harry Stokes 1N E-RIM 'TOWN CL.L RK
Erinn Nichols Fred Weber Lynell Hillhouse
November 19, 2013
Tracy E. Davis, PE, CMP
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources
Stormwater Permitting Unit
1612 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1612
RE: Storm Water Management Program Assessment Report Certification
NPDES Permit NCS000454
Dear Mr. Davis:
In accordance with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDFS) Permit Number NCS000454
issued for the Town of Stallings, enclosed please find a signed certification statement (in duplicate) in support of the
Storm Water Management Program Assessment Report. In addition, attached is a 2013 TMDL Annual report (in
duplicate) for the Town of Stallings as required by Section 1-1 of our permit.
The Storm Water Management Program Assessment Report for the seventh year of permit coverage (October 1,
2012 to September 30, 2013) was finalized on November 19, 2013 using the North Carolina Department of
Environment and Natural Resources web -based reporting gateway located at:
http:t/bims.enr.state.ne_us:7001/swm ogin.do.
Please contact me at [phone], if you have any questions or require additional information.
Sincerely,
rYl.
Mehdi-Jafari "MY' Namin, P.F.
Town of Stallings
Storm Water Administrator
Attachments: Certification (in duplicate)
2013 "TMDL Annual Report
Gateway to Umoi? County
315 Stallings Road • Stallings • NC • 28104 • 704-821-8557 • xvww.stallingsnc.org

Town of Stallings
G�tCW.41 y
r
MAYOR
J Lynda M. Paxton
G `
•,y�°0 CoJr� MAYOR PRO"1•EMI'ORi;
r *AV n «au �� Reed Esarove
TOWN COUNCIL
Wyatt Dunn Paul frost
INTERIM TOWN MANAGER Shawna Steelc Harry Stokes INTERIM TOWN CLERK
Erinn Nichols Fred Weber Lynell I lillhouse
Phase 11 Storm Water Management Program Assessment Report Certification
NPDES No. NCS000454
certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or
supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the
information submitted. Based upon my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system or those persons
directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the hest of my knowledge and
belief, true, accurate, and complete. 1 am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information
including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations.
Erinn Nichols
Town of Stallings
Interim Town Manager
Date
Gateway to Union County
315 Stallings Road • Stallings • NC • 28104 • 704-821-8557 • %vNv%v,stallin('sitc.oI-g

tcwTown of Stallings
r Gaa aif
MAYOR
d
Lynda M. Paxton
?�°n C004° MAYOR PRO TEMPORE
�r Prrrrtk;' (teed Esarove
"TOWN COUNCIL
Wyatt Dunn Paul frost
INTERIM 'TOWN MANAGER Shawna Steele Flarry Stokes INTERIM TOWN CLERK
Erinn Nichols Fred Weber Lvnell Hillhouse
Phase Il Storm Water Management Program Assessment Report Certification
NPDES No. NCSOOO454
I certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or
supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the
information submitted. Based upon my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system or those persons
directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and
belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information
including the possibility of tines and imprisonment for knowing violations.
f -
4-r n Nichols Date
Town of Stallings
Interim Town Manager
Gateway to Union County
315 Sialtings Road • Stallings • NC • 2810d - 704-821-8557 • www.stallingsnc.org

Town of Stallings
2013 Annual TMDL Report
TOWN OF
TA LLINGS
NORTH CAROLINA
Prepared by:
Town of Stallings
Prepared for:
NPDES Phase 11 Storm Water Permit (NCS000454)
Annual Reporting Requirement
November 19, 2013

Table of Contents
Section1.0 Introduction. ................ I ..................................... " ..................................................... I
1.1 Background of Goose Creek Watershed..................................................................I
Section 2.0 BMPs in Goose Creek Watershed..........................................................................2
2.1 Utility Crossing and Outfall Inspections.................................................................2
2.2 Septic System Evaluations.......................................................................................2
2.3 Stream Walks...........................................................................................................3
Section 3.0 BMPs in `I'MDL Watersheds Without WLAs.........................................................4
3.1 Illicit Discharge Program .........................................................................................4
3.2 Stream Walks..........................................................................................
Section 4.0 Summary of Future BMPs.......................................................................................5
4.1 Goose Creek Watershed...........................................................................................5
4.2 TMDL Watersheds Without WLAs.........................................................................5
Appendix A: Example Septic System Inspection Form
Appendix B: Summary of Septic System Evaluations

" I[1N'N of
STALL1NGs 1111 TMDL Annual'FMDL Report
Section 1.0
Introduction
The Town of Stallings Phase 11 Permit (NCS000454) specifies that the Town of Stallings will
produce an annual report that describes the Best Management Practices (BMPs) implemented to
comply with the Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs) requirements of stream segments that
are subject to an approved "rMDL with storm water waste load allocations (WLAs) and those
stream segments required to develop'I'MDLs with no specified WLAs. Table I below shows the
applicable stream segments as listed in the 2012 North Carolina 303(d) Integrated Report.
Table 1: TMDL Stream Segments Within the Town of Stallings
Receiving
Stream
'I'MDL
Reason
Use
Integrated
Waste Load
Stream Name
Segment
Parameter
for Rating
Category
Report
Allocations
(Assessment
Category
Assigned
Unit
Goose Creek
13-17-18a
Fecal
No criteria
Recreation
I(t)
Yes
coliform
exceeded
Goose Creek
13-17-18b
Fecal
Standard
Recreation
4(t)
Yes
coliform
Violation
North Fork
13-17-20-1
Turbidity
Standard
Aquatic
5
No
Crooked Creek
Violation
Life
South Fork
13-17-20-2a
Fish
Fair/Poor
Aquatic
5
No
Crooked Creek
Community
Rating
Life
/Benthos
Notes:
1(t) - Parameter is supporting uses in the AU and there is an approved TMDL for the parameter
4(t) - Parameter assessment is impaired and there is an approved TM DL for the parameter
5 - Waters for which TMDLs are required
Only those listed stream segments that are contained within the jurisdictional boundary of the
Town of Stallings are included on Table 1 above.
The main objective of the Annual TMDL Report is to describe the BMPs implemented by the
Town of Stallings to reduce non -point source pollutant loading to streams subject to an approved
TMDL to the maximum extent practicable.
1.1 Background of Goose Creek Watershed
On August 10, 2006, the Town of Stallings received written notification from the N.C. Division
of Water Quality that it is subject to the approved fecal coliform TMDL for Goose Creek. The
Town of Stallings (working cooperatively with Mecklenburg County Water Quality Program)
subsequently completed a TMDL Water Quality Recovery Program Plan for the Goose Creek
'rMDL, which was submitted to the N.C. Division of Water Quality on July 9, 2008 for
compliance with the above described permit requirement. Implementation of the Plan began in
July 2008. Input received from the Advisory Group formed to facilitate the implementation of

2012 TMDL Annual TMDL Report
STALL.INGS p
Nllmilc. iW)LINq
this Plan resulted in revisions that were subsequently submitted to the N.C. Division of Water
Quality on November 13, 2009. Implementation of this Plan began in November 2009.
The Town of Stallings has continued working cooperatively with Mecklenburg County Water
Quality Program and the Towns of Mint Hill and Indian Trail to implement the requirements of
this Program. During FY10-I 1, the North Carolina 2010 303d List was finalized. In this list, the
Use Category for AU Number
13-17-18a (Goose Creek from
source to SR 1524) was changed
from 4t (standard violation) to
1 t (no criteria exceeded) for
fecal coliform bacteria.
Category It is described as
"Parameter is supporting uses in
the AU and there is an approved
TMDL for the parameter".
Subsequent to the release of the
list a meeting was held with NC
DENR staff and the decision
was made to allow the
suspension of the WQRP for
areas of the watershed upstream
of SR1524, which includes a
portion of Stallings (Figure 1).
Goose Creek Watershed Water {duality Recovery Program Status
w
Legend
} — wunr u--w
0 90 ] 3
4,.,m.
Figure I: Map Showing Goose Creek WQRP Status
Seetion 2.0
BMPs in Goose Creek Watershed
2.1 Utility Crossings and Outfall Inspections
During the reporting period, the Town of Stallings continued to implement the Town's Illicit
Discharge Detection and Elimination program, which includes the identification of outfalls,
visual inspection of utility crossings and evaluation of any dry weather flows. "These activities
were conducted as part of stream walks. During FYI 2-13, no pollution issues were observed
with utility crossings or outfall inspections.
2.2 Septic System Evaluations
To help identify and eliminate possible sources of fecal coliform within the Goose Creek
Watershed, the Town of Stallings identified and inspected residential sanitary septic systems
(individual wastewater treatment systems) within the Goose Creek watershed in order to verify
2

0STAL.1Nfr'N�11�ol; S 2012 TMDL Annual TMDL Report
NORH I CAROLINA
that known systems were functioning as designed. Any systems identified as non -compliant, or
in need of repair, have the potential to contribute untreated sanitary wastewater to surface waters,
thereby increasing fecal coliform loading within the watershed.
The Town of Stallings partnered with the Union County Health Department (the department with
permitting authority over septic systems) to conduct inspections of all identified septic systems
in the Goose Creek watershed. To date, 74 households within the Goose Creek watershed were
identified that had active septic systems.
Each of the identified properties was visited by an inspection team, but only 63 were actually
inspected. Three (3) of the identified properties were vacant at the time of inspection. Because
the properties were vacant, the septic systems were not in use at the time of the inspection. An
adequate inspection of the system could not be conducted and the overall compliance status
could not be verified. However, no surficial problems were reported at these locations that
would indicate the likelihood of a previous or recent problem with the systems. Eight (8)
additional properties with active septic systems were not inspected because the property owners
would not allow the inspection teams to access to their property for the specified purpose of
inspection. The remaining 63 properties within the Goose Creek Watershed that had active
septic systems were inspected between June 26, 2012 and July 17, 2012. For each inspection
conducted, a checklist form was completed by the inspection team which recorded the date,
location and the condition of the system inspected. Additional notes were also recorded to
capture any significant or unusual circumstances.
Out of the 63 active septic systems inspected, there were a number of minor issues identified.
These issues included three (3) malfunctioning alarms, two (2) structures erected within the
designated drain fields, and four (4) miscellaneous issues ranging from a failing electrical switch
to overgrown vegetation in the drain field. Each of these issues was addressed with the
respective property owners and repairs were requested to correct the identified deficiencies.
Only on (1) of the systems inspected had significant issues that warranted a Notice of Violation
for non-compliance. The system had apparently malfunctioned at some time in the past and the
property owners had taken measures to bypass the failed system. Efforts made by the property
owners to bypass the system included illegal wiring, re-routing of house drains and the
installation of a bypass pump. The property owner was issued a Notice of Violation.
An example of the inspection form used to collect septic system information is included in
Appendix A. The inspection data collected on these forms is summarized in Appendix B.
2.3 Stream Walks
During FYI 2-13, The Town of Stallings walked one third (1/3`d) of all streams in the Goose
Creek Watershed. The purpose of these walks was to identify and eliminate all pollution sources
identified from storm water outfalls, creek crossings and infrastructure failures. Fecal coliform

Sfnu'N c �l°
TALLINCS 2012 TMDL Annual TMDL Report
NOR1'11 CAAUTANA ... . .— - ., , ..,,.. _ _. _. . ... .
sampling was conducted in conjunction with stream walks only when it was necessary for the
identification of fecal sources.
During the FY12-13 stream walks, the following activities were conducted within the Goose
Creek Watershed:
• A total of 3.5 miles of streams were walked;
• A total of 28 storm water outfalls were inspected;
• The entire storm drain system was inspected including inlets, pipe outlets, and manholes;
• No potential pollution issues were identified;
• No new infrastructure issues were identified.
Section 3.0
BMPs in TMDL Watersheds Without WLAs
For watersheds that have a TMDL without a specific WLA, the "Down of Stallings implemented
tailored strategies to enhance water quality recovery.
3.1 Illicit Discharge Program
During the reporting period, the Town of Stallings continued to implement the Town's Illicit
Discharge Detection and Elimination program, which includes the identification of outfalls,
visual inspection of utility crossings and evaluation of any dry weather flows. During FY 12-13,
no pollution issues were observed with utility crossings or outfall inspections.
3.2 Stream Walks
During FY12-13, The Town of Stallings performed stream walks in one-third (1/3`d) of the
TMDL watersheds within the Town of Stallings. The purpose of these walks was to identify and
eliminate all pollution sources identified from storm water outfalls, creek crossings and
infrastructure failures.
During the FY12-13 stream walks, the following activities were conducted within the TMDL
Watersheds (excluding Goose Creek):
• A total of 4.3 miles of streams were walked;
• A total of 30 storm water outfalls were inspected;
• The entire storm drain system was inspected including inlets, pipe outlets, and manholes;
• No potential pollution issues were identified;
• No new infrastructure issues were identified.
The Town of Stallings will continue implementing stream walks as described in the Storm Water
Management Program Plan within these TMDL watersheds.
4

IDS.I UN'h' Ul�
•LA.L L.[.N C S 2012 TMDL Annual TMDL Report
NORHICAROUNA
Section 4.0
Summary of Future BMPs
4.1 Goose Creek Watershed
During FYI2-13, the Town of Stallings continued to expand on efforts to reduce fecal coliform
loading to Goose Creek. Specifically, these efforts include:
• Continue to partner with Mecklenburg County and the Towns of Mint 1-1111 and Indian
Trail to implement the Goose Creek WQRP.
• Identify and inspect septic systems within the Goose Creek Watershed by partnering with
the Union County Health Department in order to identify and correct deficiencies and
failing systems.
• Continue stream walks within the Town of Stallings (including Goose Creek) to identify
and eliminate potential pollution sources.
• The Town of Stallings post -construction ordinance will be implemented to continue focus
of reducing turbidity and fecal coliform bacteria as primary pollutants of concern.
Each of these BMPs will be re-evaluated annually for effectiveness at reducing fecal coliform
loads to Goose Creek and re -initiated on a continuing basis as determined necessary. Based on
the results from the FYI 2-13 activities, the Town of Stallings recommends continual
implementation of the Goose Creek WQRP. The Town of Stallings recommends walking
streams within the Town (including the Goose Creek Watershed) each fiscal year as necessary.
The results of these BMPs will be included in future annual reports.
4.2 TMDL Watersheds Without WLAs
"The "Town of Stallings will continue to implement enhanced strategies and measures within these
watersheds including:
• Enhancing Public Education efforts by targeting turbidity and fecal coliform as the main
pollutants of concern.
The "Down of Stallings post -construction ordinance will be implemented to continue the
focus of reducing turbidity and fecal coliform bacteria through implementation of
structural BMPs. In addition, Stallings post -construction ordinance requires additional
storm water detention and peak control above that required by the state minimum
standards which helps protect stream habitat by minimizing stream bank erosion caused
by large volume flows.
• Enhancing detection of illicit discharges by having staff continue performing stream
walks to proactively look for illicit discharges and connections that can further degrade
stream water quality and habitat.

Gs
InN'N [lF TAoS 2112 TMDL Annuai TMDL Report
N01MI CAROLINA
Continuing to actively inspect storm water infrastructure to identify possible issues
within the system that could cause increased turbidity and degraded habitat.
"These measures will be continually evaluated for effectiveness and will be adjusted as needed to
reduce pollutants in these watersheds.
2

Example Septic System Inspection Form
Inspection Date: Inspection Completed By:
Site Parcel Id #: Site Address:
GWS File #: Watershed: Catchment Id:
Septic System Information:
System Classification: ❑ II ❑ III ❑ IV ❑ V ❑ VI
❑a ❑b ❑c El El El ❑g
System Description:
(Ex: pump to 25% reduction)
Year Operation Permit Issued:
Land Records)
System Age: Years ❑ Actual
Inspection Information:
(If no permit record is available use built date year from
❑ Estimated
Comments
Site accessible for inspection:
❑ Yes
❑ No
Owner present:
❑ Yes
❑ No
Drain field probed:
❑ Yes
❑ No
System malfunction observed:
❑ Yes
❑ No
Notice of Violation required:
❑ Yes
❑ No
System located <200 ft. from
❑ Yes
❑ No
surface water body:
System located <50 ft. from
❑ Yes
❑ No
stormwater BMP or diversion:
Trees/vegetation in drain field: ❑ Yes ❑ No
Irrigation on drain field: ❑ Yes ❑ No
Well(s) located on property: ❑ Yes ❑ No
General comments/observations:
# photos taken: Dye Pack Left: ❑ Yes ❑ No Signature:

Checklist:
1. Perform file review for inspection site in the office (system type, age, location, etc.)
2. Conduct field inspection & complete inspection form before leaving the site
3. Take photos (2 minimum) of the drain field/tank(s) area from multiple locations
4. Leave project brochure & literature on door
5. Submit inspection form and photographs to the Town of Stallings.
*All scanned files and related photos should be submitted to the Town of Stallings.

Summary- of Goose Creek Septic System Evaluations
Date
Parcel
Address
Class
Description
Yr
Permit
I Ace
jActlEst
Omer
Present
Failure
Observed
\O�`
6/26/2012
07033062
1600E DEEPWOOD PLACE
II
NA
30+
E
Y
N,
NT
6/26/2012
07033060
16010 DEEPR'OOD PLACE
IIIB
NA
NA
E
Y
N`T
N
6/26/2012
07033059
16116 DEEPWOOD PLACE
IIB
CONVENTIONAL
30+
E
Y
N
N
6/26/2012
07033058
16200 DEEPWOOD PLACE
IIB
CONVENTIONAL
30+
E
Y
N
N
6/26/2012
07033057
16208 DEEPAVOOD PLACE
IVB
LPP
28+
E
N
N
N
6/26/2012
07033056
16212 DEEPCVOOD PLACE
IVA
LPP MOUND
NA
NTA
Y
N
N
6/26/2012
07033044
5000 SHAFTWOOD DR.
II
CONVENTIONAL
30+
IE
N
I NET
N
6/26/2012
07033044A
5008 SHAFTWOOD DR.
II
CONVENTIONAL
30+
JE
Y
N
N
6/26/2012
07033043A
5108 SHAFTAVOOD DR
Vacant Property
6/26/2012
07033039
5116 SHAFT -WOOD DR
NA
CONVENTIONAL
NA
E
Y
N
N
6/26/2012
107033064
5117 DEEPWOOD PLACE
II
CONVENTIONAL
30-=
E
Y
N
N
6/26/2012
107057009G
5825 STEVETTS MILL RD.
IIIB
PUMP TO CONVENTIONAL
1996
NA
E
N
N
N
6/2612012
07057009H
5901 STEVENS MILL RD.
MIC
MODIFIED CONVENTIONAL
1992
NA
E
N
N
N
6/26/2012
07057009B
5912 STEVENS MILL RD,
IIC
NA
1978
NA
E
Y
N
N
6/26/2012
07057009J
5913 STEVENS MILL RD.
IIIB
PUMP TO CONVENTIONAL
1991
NA
E
Y
N
N
6/26/2012
07057641
6000 STEVENS MILL RD.
IIC
MODIFIED CONVENTIONAL
1952
NA
E
Y
N
N
6126/2012
07057640
6008 STEVEN G MILL RD.
IIC
MODIFIED CONVENTIONAL
1992
NA
NTA
Y
N
N
6/26/2012
07057639
6016 STEXT-N`TS MILL RD.
IIIB
PUMP TO CONVENTIONAL
1981
NA
IOTA
Y
N
N
6/26/2012
07057642
6024 STEVENS MILL. RD.
IIC
MODIFIED CONVENTIONAL
1983
NA
INA I
Y
I N
N
6/26/2012
07033007
7611 STEVENS MILL. RD.
1996
Owmr did not allow inspection
6/26/2012
0703300SA
7612 STEVENS MILL RD.
1977
O-wner did not allov,- inspection
6/26/2012
0703 3007E
7640 STEVENIS MILL RD.
1995
O\rner did not alloy inspection
6/26/2012
07033010A
7700 STEVENTS MILL RD.
1980
Ovvirr did not alto j*inspection
6/26/2012
07033010
7716 STEV'EN'S MILL RD.
1963
Ovmcr did not allow inspection
6/26/2012
07033008
7724 STEVENS MILL RD.
O-vner did not allow inspection
6/26/2012
07033007A
7S02 STEVENTS MILL, RD.
1986
Owner did not allon- ins ection
7/10/2012
0703303S
15004 DEEPWOOD PLACE
IIIB
PUMP TO CONVENTIONAL
20
E
NET
N
N
7/10/2012
07033036 115808
DEEPWOOD PLACE
IIC
GRAVITY
30+
E
N
N
N
7/10/2012
0703 3037
15816 DEEPW-001) PLACE
IIC
SHALLOW CON ENTMONAL
30+
E
Y
N
N
Page Iof3

Summary of Goose Creel: Septic System Evaluations
Date
Parcel
Address
Class
Description
Yr
Permit
Age
I Act/Est
10;vner
Present
Failure
Observed
NO�r
7/10/2012
07033004
15908 DEEPlVOOD PLACE
IIA
SHALLOW CONVENTIONAL
30- -
E
Y
N
N
7/10/2012
07033067
16009 DEEPWOOD PLACE
IIC
SHALLOW CONVENTIONAL
30'
E
Y
N
N
7/10/2012
07033068
16113 DEEPWOOD PLACE
IIC
SHALLOW CONVENTIONAL
30-
E
NT
NT
N
7/10/2012
07033069
16201 DEEPWOOD PLACE
IIC
SHALLOW CONVENTIONAL
30-
E
N
N
N
7/10/2012
07033055
16224 DEEPWOOD PLACE
IIIB
PUMP TO CONVENTIONAL
30-
E
N
NT
N
7/10/2012
07033054
16300 DEEP`%VOOD PLACE
IVA
LPP
1987
25
A
Y
N
N
7/10/2012
07033070
16301 DEEPWOOD PLACE
IIC
SHALLOW CONVENTIONAL
1972
40
A
Y
N
N
7/10/2012
0703 3053
16308 DEEPWOOD PLACE
IIC
SHALLOW CONVENTIONAL
30+
E
Y
N
N
7/10/2012
07033071
16401 DEEPWOOD PLACE
IIC
SHALLOW CONVENTIONAL
30-
E
N
N
N
7/10/2012
07033072
16415 DEEPWOOD PLACE
IIC
SHALLOW CONVENTIONAL
307
E
Y
N
N
7/10/2012
07033050
16416 DEEPWOOD PLACE
IVA
LPP
1989
23
IA
IY
I N
N
7/10/2012
07033005
14923 LAWYERS RD.
CKNmer did not allow inspec.#ion
7/10/2012
07033023
15601 KNOLLWOOD PLACE
IIC
MODIFIED CONVENTIONAL
1971
NA
NA
Y
N
N
7/10/2012
07033012
15623 LAWYERS RD.
IIC
MODIFIED CONVENTIONAL
1968
NA
NA
N
N
N
7/10/2012
07033021
15700 KNOLLWOOD PLACE
IVA
NA
1997
NA
NA
Y
NT
N
7/10/20U2
07033025
15709 KNOLLWOOD PLACE
IIC
CONVENTIONAL
1973
NA
NA
N
N
N
7/10/2012
07033022
15712 KNOLLWOOD PLACE
IVA
NA
2002
NA
NA
Y
N
N
7/10/2012
07033024
15717 KNOLLWOOD PLACE
IIC
MODIFIED CONVENTIONAL
1979
NA
NA
Y
N
N
7/10/2012
070330.18
15812 LAWYERS RD.
IIIB
PUMP TO 2.5% REDUCTIO\T
2002
NA
NTA
N
N
N
7/10/2012
07057638
6100 STEVENS MILL RD.
IIC
MODIFIED CONVENTIONAL
1981
NA
NA
Y
N
N
7/10/2012
07057617
6108 STEVENS MULL RD.
IIC
MODIFIED CONV)TTTIONAL
1981
NA
NA
Y
N
N
7/10/2012
07057636
6116 STEVE\TS MILL RD.
IIC
MODIFIED CONVENTIONAL
1981
NA
NA
N
N
N
7/1012012
07057635
6124 STEVENS MILL RD,
IIC
MODIFIED CONVENTIONAL
1981
NA
NA
Y
N
N
7/10/2012
07057634
6132 STEVENS MULL RD.
IVA
LPP
IM
NTA
NA
Y
Y
Y
7/1012012
07057632
6208 STEVENS MILL RD.
IVA
LPP
1993
NA
NA
N
NTA
N
7/1012012
07057631
6216 STEVENS MILL RD.
IIC
MODIFIED CONVE DONAL,
1981
NA
NA
Y
N
N
7/10/2012
07057630
6224 STEVENS MILL RD.
IIC
MODIFIED CONVENTIONAL
1990
NA
NA
NeT
N
N
7/120MI2
07033029
5525 GOLD CREST DR.
1113
CONVENTIONAL
30—
E
N
N
N"
7/17/2012
0703 3046
4208 GOLD CREST DR.
IVA
LPP
NA
NA
N`T
\T
N
Page 2 of 3

Summary of Goose Creek Septic System Evaluations
Date
Parcel
Address
I Class
Description
Yr
Permit
I Age
lActiEst
Owner
Present
Failure
Observed
NOV
7/17/2012
07033045
5009 GOLD CREST DR.
IIC
CONVENTIONAL
30+
E
N
N
N
7/17/2012
07033043
5109 GOLD CREST DR.
IIC
CONVENTIONAL
30=
E
Y
N
TT
7/17/2012
07033015
5112 GOLD CREST DR.
IIC
CONVENTIONAL
30—
E
Y
N
N
7/17/2012
07033016
51 16 GOLD CREST DR.
ITC
COi\"%,TI 7IONAL
30-�
E
Y
N
N
7/17/2012
07033041
5117 GOLD CREST DR.
IIC
CONVENTIONAL
30-
E
Y
N
N
71L /2012
07033017
5208 GOLD CREST DR.
IIC
CONVENTION;AL
30+
E
N
Nil
N
7/17/2012
07033018
5216 GOLD CREST DR.
IIC
CONVENMONAL
30+
E
N
N
N
7/17/2012
07033034
5233 GOLD CREST DR.
1IC
CONVENTIONAL
30+
E
N
N
N
7/17/2012
07033033
5235 GOLD CREST DR.
II1B
PUMP TO CONVENTIONAL
11
A
Y
N
N
7/17/2012
07033019
5300 GOLD CREST DR.
IIC
CONITEN"IIONAL
30T
E
N
N
N
7/17/2012
07033032
5401 GOLD CREST DR.
IIC
CON ENTIONAL
30+
E
N
N
N
7/17/2012
07033026
5500 GOLD CREST DR.
IIC
CONVENTIONTAL
30—
E
Y
N
N
7/17/2012
5516 GOLD CREST DR.
IIC
CONVENTIONAL
30+
E
N
N
Nil
7/17/2012
5517 GOLD CREST DR.
IIC
CONVENTIONAL
30+
E
N
N
N
7/17/2012
07033028
5524 GOLD CREST DR.
IIC
CON"ENTIONTAL
30+
E
Y
N
N
7/17/2012 1
5850 GOLD CREST DR. 111C
I
CONVENTIONAL
30+ IE
IY
N
IN
Pale 3 of 3

Town of Stallings
MAYOR
Lynda M. Paxton
co°
MAYOR PRO TEMPORE
n,
Recd Esarove
'GOWN COUNCIL
Wyatt Dunn Paul Frost
INTERIM TOWN MANAGER Shawna Steele Harry Stokes INTERIM TOWN CLERK
Erinn Nichols Fred Weber Lynell Hillhouse
November 19, 2013
Tracy E. Davis, PE, CMP
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources
Stormwater Permitting Unit
1612 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1612
RE: Storm Water Management Program Assessment Report Certification
NPDES Permit NCS000454
Dear Mr. Davis:
In accordance with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit Number NCS000454
issued for the Town of Stallings, enclosed please find a signed certification statement (in duplicate) in support of the
Storm Water Management Program Assessment Report. In addition, attached is a 2013 TMDL Annual report (in
duplicate) for the Town of Stallings as required by Section H of our permit.
The Storm Water Management Program Assessment Report for the seventh year of permit coverage (October 1,
2012 to September 30, 2013) was finalized on November 19, 2013 using the North Carolina Department of
Environment and Natural Resources web -based reporting gateway located at:
http:/Ib im s.enr.state. nc. us:7001 /swmpaflogin,do.
Please contact me at [phone], if you have any questions or require additional information.
Sincerely,
Mehdi-Jafari "MF' Namin, P.E.
"town of Stallings
Storm Water Administrator
Attachments: Certification (in duplicate)
2013 TMDL Annual Report
Gateway to Union Counti%
315 Stallings Road • Stallings • NC • 28104 • 704-821-8557 • www.stallingsnc,org

at Town of Stallings
to 3
i
MAYOR
- 6 Lynda M. Paxton
G � �
MAYOR PRO TEMPORE
ti
Reed Esarove
TOWN COUNCIL
Wyatt Dunn Paul Frost
INTERIM TOWN MANAGER Shatana Steele Harry Stokes INITRIM TOWN CLERK
Erinn Nichols Fred Weber Lynell I[illhouse
Phase 11 Storm Water Management Program Assessment Report Certification
NPDES No. NCS000454
I certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or
supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the
information submitted. Based upon my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system or those persons
directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and
belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information
including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations.
Erinn Nichols
Town of Stallings
Interim Town Manager
Date
Gateway to Union County
315 Stallings Road • Stallings • NC • 28104 • 704-821.8 57 • www.siallin�0snc.o1-g

GU� Town of Stallings
�-
MAYOR
Lynda M. Parton
G �
r+ co��., MAYOR PRO TEMPORE
liccd E'sarovc
TOWN COUNCIL
Wyatt Dunn Paul frost
INTERIM •TOWN MANAGER Shawna Steele Marry Stokes INTERIMTOWN CLl?,RK
EHrin Nichols Fred Weber Lynch Hillhouse
Phase 11 Storm Water Management Program Assessment Report Certification
NPDES No. NCS000454
[ certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or
supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the
information submitted. Based upon my inquiry of the person or persons who manage tite system or those persons
directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and
belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information
including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations.
Erinn Nichols
'Town of Stallings
Interim Town Manager
Date
Gatevva.y to Union County
315 Stallings Road • Stallings • NC • 28104 • 704-821-8557 • ww►v.stallingsnc.org

Town of Stallings
2013 Annual TMDL Report
Ga1�o*+•ir/TOWN O1
TALLINGS
NORTH CAROLINA
M�
Prepared by:
Town of Stallings
Prepared for:
NPDES Phase II Storm Water Permit (NCS000454)
Annual Reporting Requirement
November 19, 2013

Table of Contents
Section1.0 Introduction..............................................................................................................I
1.1 Background of Goose Creek Watershed.................................................................. I
Section 2.0 BMPs in Goose Creek Watershed..........................................................................2
2.1 Utility Crossing and Outfall Inspections.................................................................2
2.2 Septic System Evaluations.......................................................................................2
2.3 Stream Walks.............................................................. ...........3
Section 3.0 BMPs in TMDI, Watersheds Without WLAs.........................................................4
3.1 Illicit Discharge Program.........................................................................................4
3.2 Stream Walks .......................................................
Section 4.0 Summary of Future BMPs.......................................................................................5
4.1 Goose Creek Watershed...........................................................................................5
4.2 'I'MDL, Watersheds Without WI-As.........................................................................5
Appendix A: Example Septic System Inspection Form
Appendix B: Summary of Septic System Evaluations

2012 TMDL Annual TMDL Re ort
STALLINGS p
Section 1.0
Introduction
The Town of Stallings Phase II Permit (NCS000454) specifies that the Town of'Stallings will
produce an annual report that describes the Best Management Practices (BMPs) implemented to
comply with the 'Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs) requirements of stream segments that
are subject to an approved TMDL with storm water waste load allocations (WLAs) and those
stream segments required to develop TMDLs with no specified WLAs. "fable I below shows the
applicable stream segments as listed in the 2012 North Carolina 303(d) Integrated Report.
Table l: TMDL Stream Segments Within the Town of Stallings
Receiving
Stream
TMDL
Reason
Use
Integrated
Waste Load
Stream Name
Segment
Parameter
for Rating
Category
Report
Allocations
(Assessment
Category
Assigned
Unit
Goose Creek
13-17-18a
Fecal
No criteria
Recreation
1(t)
Yes
coliform
exceeded
Goose Creek
13-17-18b
Fecal
Standard
Recreation
4(t)
Yes
coliform
Violation
North Fork
13-17-20-1
Turbidity
Standard
Aquatic
5
No
Crooked Creek
Violation
Life
South Fork
13-17-20-2a
Fish
Fair/Poor
Aquatic
5
No
Crooked Creek
Community
Rating
Life
/Benthos
Notes:
I(t) - Parameter is supporting uses in the AU and there is an approved TMDL for the parameter
4(t) - Parameter assessment is impaired and there is an approved TMDL for the parameter
5 - Waters for which TMDLs are required
Only those listed stream segments that are contained within the jurisdictional boundary of' the
Town of Stallings are included on Table 1 above.
The main objective of the Annual 'TMDL Report is to describe the BMI's implemented by the
Town of Stallings to reduce non -point source pollutant loading to streams subject to an approved
TMDL to the maximum extent practicable.
1.1 Background of'Goose Creek Watershed
On August 10, 2006, the 'Town of Stallings received written notification from the N.C. Division
of Water Quality that it is subject to the approved fecal coliform TMDL for Goose Creek. The
Town of Stallings (working cooperatively with Mecklenburg County Water Quality Program)
subsequently completed a 'I-MDL Water Quality Recovery Program Plan for the Goose Creek
TMDL, which was submitted to the N.C. Division of Water Quality on July 9, 2008 for
compliance with the above described permit requirement. Implementation of the Plan began in
July 2008. Input received from the Advisory Group formed to facilitate the implementation of

,.�... I OWN OF�" STALLINGs 2012 TIVIDL Annual TMDL Report
this Plan resulted in revisions that were subsequently submitted to the N.C. Division of Water
Quality on November 13, 2009. Implementation of this Plan began in November 2009.
The Town of Stallings has continued working cooperatively with Mecklenburg County Water
Quality Program and the Towns of Mint Hill and Indian "Frail to implement the requirements of
this Program. During FY10-1 1, the North Carolina 2010 303d List was finalized. In this list, the
Use Category for AU Number
13-17-18a (Goose Creek from
source to SR 1524) was changed
from 4t (standard violation) to
It (no criteria exceeded) for
fecal coliform bacteria.
Category It is described as
"Parameter is supporting uses in
the AU and there is an approved
TMDL for the parameter".
Subsequent to the release of the
list a meeting was held with NC
DENR staff and the decision
was made to allow the
suspension of the WQRP for
areas of the watershed upstream
of SR1524, which includes a
portion of Stallings (Figure 1).
Goose Creek Watershed Water Quality Recovery Program Status
lYibn C.ury I� Mi.0 11 Lun
n
r-
Legend
r'
WOAP nIpHpn<•
C �
.� Pew.wna.a
0 03 1 1 i
MNO
Figure t: Map Showing Goose Creek WQRP Status
Section 2.0
BMPs in Goose Creek Watershed
2.1 Utility Crossings and Outfall Inspections
During the reporting period, the Town of Stallings continued to implement the Town's Illicit
Discharge Detection and Elimination program, which includes the identification of outfalls,
visual inspection of utility crossings and evaluation of any dry weather flows. These activities
were conducted as part ofstream walks. During FYI 2-13, no pollution issues were observed
with utility crossings or outfall inspections.
2.2 Septic System Evaluations
To help identify and eliminate possible sources of fecal coliform within the Goose Creek
Watershed, the Town of Stallings identified and inspected residential sanitary septic systems
(individual wastewater treatment systems) within the Goose Creek watershed in order to verify
2

I!)N'N ill'
2012 't'MDL Annual TMDL Report
TALLINGS n
NoR'M CARMINR
that known systems were functioning as designed. Any systems identified as non -compliant, or
in need of repair, have the potential to contribute untreated sanitary wastewater to surface waters,
thereby increasing fecal coliform loading within the watershed.
The Town of Stallings partnered with the Union County Health Department (the department with
permitting authority over septic systems) to conduct inspections of all identified septic systems
in the Goose Creek watershed. To date, 74 households within the Goose Creek watershed were
identified that had active septic systems.
Each of the identified properties was visited by an inspection team, but only 63 were actually
inspected. Three (3) of the identified properties were vacant at the time of inspection. Because
the properties were vacant, the septic systems were not in use at the time ofthe inspection. An
adequate inspection of the system could not be conducted and the overall compliance status
could not be verified. However, no surficial problems were reported at these locations that
would indicate the likelihood of a previous or recent problem with the systems. Eight (8)
additional properties with active septic systems were not inspected because the property owners
would not allow the inspection teams to access to their property for the specified purpose of
inspection. The remaining 63 properties within the Goose Creek Watershed that had active
septic systems were inspected between June 26, 2012 and July 17, 2012. For each inspection
conducted, a checklist form was completed by the inspection team which recorded the date,
location and the condition of the system inspected. Additional notes were also recorded to
capture any significant or unusual circumstances.
Out of the 63 active septic systems inspected, there were a number of minor issues identified.
These issues included three (3) malfunctioning alarms, two (2) structures erected within the
designated drain fields, and four (4) miscellaneous issues ranging from a failing electrical switch
to overgrown vegetation in the drain field. Each of these issues was addressed with the
respective property owners and repairs were requested to correct the identified deficiencies.
Only on (1) of the systems inspected had significant issues that warranted a Notice of� Violation
for non-compliance. The system had apparently malfunctioned at some time in the past and the
property owners had taken measures to bypass the failed system. Efforts made by the property
owners to bypass the system included illegal wiring, re-routing of house drains and the
installation of a bypass pump. The property owner was issued a Notice of Violation.
An example of the inspection form used to collect septic system information is included in
Appendix A. The inspection data collected on these forms is summarized in Appendix B.
2.3 Stream Walks
During FY12-13, The `town of Stallings walked one third (1/3"d) of all streams in the Goose
Creek Watershed. The purpose of these walks was to identify and eliminate all pollution sources
identified from storm water outfal Is, creek crossings and infrastructure failures. Fecal coliform
3

S(1'1N'N UI:
TALL.INGS 2012 TMDL Annual'I'MDL Report
NORHICARO UNA ...
sampling was conducted in conjunction with stream walks only when it was necessary for the
identification of fecal sources.
During the FYI 2-13 stream walks, the following activities were conducted within the Goose
Creek Watershed:
• A total of3.5 miles of streams were walked;
• A total of 28 storm water outfalls were inspected;
• The entire storm drain system was inspected including inlets, pipe outlets, and manholes,
• No potential pollution issues were identified;
• No new infrastructure issues were identified.
Section 3.0
BMPs in TMDL Watersheds Without WLAs
For watersheds that have a TMDL without a specific WLA, the Town of Stallings implemented
tailored strategies to enhance water duality recovery.
3.1 Illicit Discharge Program
During the reporting period, the Town of Stallings continued to implement the Town's Illicit
Discharge Detection and Elimination program, which includes the identification of outfalls,
visual inspection of utility crossings and evaluation of any dry weather flows. During FY 12-13,
no pollution issues were observed with utility crossings or outfall inspections.
3.2 Stream Walks
During FY12-13, The Town of Stallings performed stream walks in one-third (1/3`d) of the
TMDL watersheds within the Town of'Stallings. The purpose of these walks was to identify and
eliminate all pollution sources identified From storm water outfalls, creek crossings and
infrastructure failures.
During the FY12-13 stream walks, the following activities were conducted within the TMDL
Watersheds (excluding Goose Creek):
• A total of 4.3 miles of streams were walked;
• A total of 30 storm water outfalls were inspected;
• The entire storm drain system was inspected including inlets, pipe outlets, and manholes;
• No potential pollution issues were identified;
• No new infrastructure issues were identified.
The Town of Stallings will continue implementing stream walks as described in the Storm Water
Management Program Plan within these TMDL watersheds.
4

1o"'N` l 2012 TMDL Annual TMDL Report
STALLINGS
NORM CAROLINn
Section 4.0
Summary of Future BMN
4.1 Goose Creek Watershed
During FY12-13, the Town of Stallings continued to expand on efforts to reduce fecal coliform
loading to Goose Creek. Specifically, these efforts include:
• Continue to partner with Mecklenburg County and the Towns of Mint Hill and Indian
Trail to implement the Goose Creek WQRP.
• Identify and inspect septic systems within the Goose Creek Watershed by partnering with
the Union County Health Department in order to identify and correct deficiencies and
failing systems.
• Continue stream walks within the Town of Stallings (including Goose Creek) to identify
and eliminate potential pollution sources.
• The Town of Stallings post -construction ordinance will be implemented to continue focus
of reducing turbidity and fecal coliform bacteria as primary pollutants of concern.
Each of these BMPs will be re-evaluated annually for effectiveness at reducing fecal coliform
loads to Goose Creek and re -initiated on a continuing basis as determined necessary. Based on
the results from the FYI 2-13 activities, the Town of Stallings recommends continual
implementation of the Goose Creek WQRP. The Town of Stallings recommends walking
streams within the Town (including the Goose Creek Watershed) each fiscal year as necessary.
The results of these BMPs will be included in future annual reports.
4.2 TMDL Watersheds Without WLAs
The Town of Stallings will continue to implement enhanced strategies and measures within these
watersheds including:
Enhancing Public Education efforts by targeting turbidity and fecal coliform as the main
pollutants of concern.
• The Town of Stallings post -construction ordinance will be implemented to continue the
focus of reducing turbidity and fecal coliform bacteria through implementation of
structural BMPs. In addition, Stallings post -construction ordinance requires additional
storm water detention and peak control above that required by the state minimum
standards which helps protect stream habitat by minimizing stream bank erosion caused
by large volume flows.
• Enhancing detection of illicit discharges by having staffcontinue performing stream
walks to proactively look for illicit discharges and connections that can further degrade
stream water quality and habitat.
5

I OWN of
' 2012 TIM, Annual TM Report
STALLINCS
• Continuing to actively inspect storm water infrastructure to identify possible issues
within the system that could cause increased turbidity and degraded habitat.
These measures will be continually evaluated for effectiveness and will be adjusted as needed to
reduce pollutants in these watersheds.
6

Example Septic System Inspection Form
Inspection Date: Inspection Completed By:
Site Parcel Id #: Site Address:
GWS File #: Watershed: Catchment Id:
Septic System Information:
System Classification: ❑ II ❑ III
❑a El
System Description:
❑ IV ❑ V ❑ VI
El El ❑e ❑f ❑g
(Ex: pump to 25% reduction)
Year Operation Permit Issued: (If no permit record is available use built date year from
Land Records)
System Age: Years ❑ Actual ❑ Estimated
Inspection Information: Comments
Site accessible for inspection:
❑ Yes
❑ No
Owner present:
❑ Yes
❑ No
Drain field probed:
❑ Yes
❑ No
System malfunction observed:
❑ Yes
❑ No
Notice of Violation required:
❑ Yes
❑ No
System located <200 ft. from
❑ Yes
❑ No
surface water body:
System located <50 ft. from
❑ Yes
❑ No
stormwater BMP or diversion:
Trees/vegetation in drain field:
❑ Yes
❑ No
Irrigation on drain field:
❑ Yes
❑ No
Well(s) located on property:
❑ Yes
❑ No
General comments/observations:
# photos taken: Dye Pack Left: ❑ Yes ❑ No
Signature:

Checklist:
1. Perform file review for inspection site in the office (system type, age, location, etc.)
2. Conduct field inspection & complete inspection form before leaving the site
I Take photos (2 minimum) of the drain field/tank(s) area from multiple locations
4. Leave project brochure & literature on door
5. Submit inspection form and photographs to the Town of Stallings.
*All scanned files and related photos should be submitted to the Town of Stallings.

Summary of Goose Creek Septic System Evaluations
Date
Parcel
Address
I Class
Description
Yr
Peru
Age
Act/Est
On ner
I Present
Failure
lObserv-ed
NOV
6/26/2012
07033062
16008 DEEMN 00D PLACE
11
NA
30-:
E
Y
N
N
6/26/2012
07033060
16010 DEEPNVOOD PLACE
I11B
NA
\TA
E
Y
N
N
6/26/2012
07033059
16116 DE£PWOOD PLACE
IIB
CONVENTIONAL
30+
E
Y
N
N
6/26/2012
07033058
16200 DEEPNVOOD PLACE
IIB
CONVENTIONAL
30+
E
Y
N
N
6/26/2012
07033057
116208 DEEPWOOD PLACE
IVB
LPP
28+
E
N
N
N
6/26/2012
07033056
16212 DE£nVOOD PLACE
IVA
LPP MOUND
NA
NA
Y
N
I T
6/26/2012
07033044
5000 SHAFTIVOOD DR.
II
CONVENTIONAL
30+
E
N
N
N
6/26/2012
07033044A
5008 SHAFT -WOOD DR
11
CONVEN770ATAL
30+
E
IY
N
N
6126/2012
07033043A
5108 SHAFTWOOD DR.
Vacant Property
6/26/2012
07033039
5116 SHAFTWOOD DR.
NA
CONVENTIONAL
NA
E
Y
NT
NT
6/26/2012
07033064
5117 DEEPWOOD PLACE
11
CONVENTIONAL
30+
E
Y
N
N
6/26/2012
07057009E
5825 STEWNS MILT. RD.
IIIB
PUMP TO CONVENTIONAL
1996
NA
E
N
N
N
6/26/2012
07057009H
5901 STEVENS MILL RD.
IIC
MODIFIED CONVENTIONAL
1982
NA
E
N
'N'
IN'
6/26/2012
07057009B
5912 STEVEATS MILL RD.
IIC
NA
197E
NA
E
Y
N
N
6/26/2012
07057009J
5913 STEWNS ARLL RD.
IIIB
PUMP TO CONVENTIONAL
1991
NA
E
Y
N
N
6/26/2012
07057641
6000 STEVE.ATS MILL RD.
IIC
MODIFIED CONVENY1ONAI_.
1982
\TA
E
Y
N
NT
6/26/2012
07057640
6008 STEVENS MILL RD.
IIC
MODIFIED CONVENTIONAL
1982
NA
IOTA
Y
N
N
6/26/2012
07057639
6016 STEVTNIS MULL RD,
IIIB
PUMP TO CONVENTIONAL
1991
NA
N`TA
Y
N
N
6/26/2012
07057642
6024 STEVEN'S MULL RD.
IIC
MODIFIED CONVENTIONAL
1983
NA
I NA
Y
N
N
6/26/2012
0703 3007
7611 STE'VENS MILL RD.
1996
Ovmer did wt allow inspection
6/26/2012
07033008A
7612 STEVTNS MILL RD.
1977
Owner did nest allow inspection
6/26/2012
07033007E
7640 STEVENS MILL RD.
1993
O..iner did not allow inspection
6/26/2012
07033010A
7700 STEVENS MILL RD.
1980
Ovirr did not allow inspection
6/26/2012
07033010
7716 STEVE ''S MILL RD.
1963
O%%1w did not allow inspection
6/26/2012
07033008
7724 STEVENS MILL RD.
Ouiner did not allm;, inspection
6/26/2012
07033007A
7802 STEVEATS NOLL RD.
1986
O\viier did not alloy-.• inspection
7/10/2012
07033038
15004 DEEPNVOOD PLACE
IIIB
PUMP TO CONVENTIONAL
20
E
N
N
N
7/10/2012
07033036
15808 DEEPWOOD PLACE
11C
GRAVITY
30+
E
N
N
NT
7/10/2012
07033037
15816 DEEPCVOOD PLACE
TUC
SHALLOW CONZ'ENTiONAL•
30+
E
Y
N
N
Page 1 of 3

Summary of Goose Creek Septic System Evaluations
Date
Parcel
Address
Class
Description
Yr
Permit
Age
]Act/]Est
On ner
Present
Failure
Observed
I-NOV"
7/10/2012
07033064
15908 DEEPX','OOD PLACE
IIA
SHALLOW CONVYTTIONAL
30-
E
ly
N
N`T
7/10/2012
07033067
16009 DEEPWOOD PLACE
IIC
SHALLOW CONVENTIONTAL
30-'
E
Y
N
N
7/10/2012
07033068
16113 DEEPWOOD PLACE
IIC
SHALLOW CONVENTIONAL
30—
E
N
N
7/10/2012
07033069
16201 DEEPWOOD PLACE
IIC
SHALLOW COI�'Y''EN MONAL
30-!
E
N
N
N
7110/2012
07033055
16224 DEEPWOOD PLACE
11113
PUMP TO CONVENTIONAL
30-
E
N
N
N
7/10/2012
07033054
16300 DEEMVOOD PLACE
IVA
LPP
1987
25
A
Y
N
N
7/10/2012
070330 70
16301 DEEPWOOD PLACE
IIC
SHALLOW CONVEN nONTAL
1972
40
A
Y
N
N
7/10/2012
07033053
16308 DEEPWOOD PLACE
11G
SHALLOW CONVENTIONAL
30'
E
Y
N
N
7/10/2012
07033071
16401 DEEPWOOD PLACE
IIC
SHALLOW CO'-N,\T�'TiONAL
30
E
N
N
\7
7/10/2012
07033072
16415 DEEPWOOD PLACE
IIC
SHALLOW CONVEN ONAL
30-�
E
Y
N
N
7/10/2012
07033050
16416 DEEPWOOD PLACE
IVA
LPP
1989
23
A
Y
N
N
7/10/2012
07033005
14823 LAWYERS RD.
0%,mer did not allow inspection
7/10/2012
07033023
15601 KNOLLWOOD PLACE
IIC
MODIFIED CONVENTIONAL
1971
NA
NA
Y
N
N
7/10/2012
07033012
15623 LAWYERS RD.
IIC
MODIFIED CONVENTIONAL
1968
NA
NA
N
N
N
7/10/2012
07033021
15700 ILNIOLLWOOD PLACE
IVA
NIA
1997
NA
NA
Y
N
N
7/10/2012
07033025
15709 K'NOLLWOOD PLACE
11C
CONVENTIONAL
1973
NA
NA
N
N
N
7/10/2012
07033022
15712 kN'OLLWOOD PLACE
IVA
NA
2002
NA
NA
Y
N
N,
7/10/2012
07033024
15717 KNOLI,WOOD PLACE
IIC
MODIFIED CONVEIN'TIONAL
1979
NA
NA
Y
N
N
7/10/2012
07033048
15812 LAWYERS RD.
1II13
PUMP TO 2.5% REDUCTION
2002
NA
NA
N
N
N T
7/10/2012
07057638
6100 STEVENS RIILL RD.
IIC
MODIFIED CONVENTIONAL
1981
NA
NA
Y
N
N
7/10/2012
07057637
6108 STEVENS MILL RD.
IIC
MODIFIED CONVEYnONAL
1981
NA
NA
Y
N
N
7/10/2)012
07057636
6116 STEVENS MILL RD.
IIC
MODIFIED CON'\'E-ITIONAL.
1981
NA
NA
N
N'
N
7/10/2012
07057635
6124 STEVENS MILL RD.
I1C
MODIFIED CONi'EI`'TIONAL.
1981
NA
NA
Y
N
R'
7/10/2012
07057634
6132 STE.VENTS MILL RD.
IVA
LPP
1982
NTA
NA
Y
Y
Y
7/10/2012
07057632
6208 STEVENS MILL RD.
IVA
LPP
1993
NA
NIA
N
-NA
N'
7/10/2012
07057631
6216 STEVENS MILL RD.
I1C
MODIFIED CON'VENTIONAL
1991
NA
NA
Y
A'
N
7/10/2012
07057630
6224 STEVENTS MILL RD.
IIC
MODIFIED CONVENTIONAL
1980
NA
NA
N
N
N
7/12/2012
07033029
5525 GOLD CREST DR.
JIB
CON`VENTION'AL.
30—
E
N
N
N
7/17/2012
07033046
4208 GOLD CREST DR.
IVA
LPP
NA
?`'A
N
N
N
Page 2 of 3

Summary of Goose Creek Septic Scstem Evaluations
Date
Parcel
Address
I Class
Description
Yr
Permit
Age
IAct/Tsr
Owner
Present
Failure
Observed
INON,
7/17/2012
07033045
5009 GOLD CREST DR.
IIC
CONVENMONAL
30+
E
N
NIT
N
7117/2012
07033043
5109 GOLD CREST DR.
IIC
CONVENTIONAL
30+
E
Y
N
N
7/17/2012
07033015
5112 GOLD CREST DR.
I1C
CONVENTIONAL
30+
E
Y
N
N
7/17/2012
07033016
5 1) 6 GOLD CREST DR.
IIC
CONVENTTIONAL
30+
E
Y
N
N
7/17/2012
07033041
5117 GOLD CREST DR.
IIC
CONVENTIONAL
30+
E
Y
N
N
7/17/2012
07033017
5208 GOLD CREST DR.
IIC
CQXN;ENTTONAL
30+
E
N
N
N
7/17/2012
07033018
5216 GOLD CREST DR.
IIC
CONVENTIONAL
30+
E
N
N
NT
7/17/2012
07033034
5233 GOLD CRUST DR.
IIC
CONVE'TMONAL
30+
E
N
N
N
7/17/2012
07033033
5235 GOLD CREST DR.
IIIB
PMIP TO CONVENTIONAL
I I
A
Y
N
N
7/17/2012
07033019
5300 GOLD CREST DR.
IIC
CONVENTIONAL
30+
E
N
N
N
7/17/2012
07033032
5401 GOLD CREST DR.
IIC
CONVENTTIONTAL
30+
E
N
N
N
7/17/2012
07033026
5500 GOLD CREST DR.
lIC
CONVENTIONAL
30+
E
Y
N
NT
7/17/2012
5516 GOLD CREST DR.
lIC
CONVENTIONAL
30+
E
N
N
N
7/17/2012
5517 GOLD CREST DR.
IIC
CONVENTIONAL
30+
E
N
N
N
7/17/2012
07033028
5524 GOLD CREST DR.
IIC
COWE"ONAL
30+
E
Y
N
N
7/17/2012 1
15850
GOLD CREST DR.
11C
CCNVE-N-D Al,
30= 1
E
Y
NT
NT
Page 3af3

W14.P
Town of Stallings
W .'
MAYOR
Lynda M. Paxton
G `
ry�otr Coo* MAYOR PRO TF-MPORE
Reed F:sarove
TOWN COUNCIL
Wyatt Dunn Paul From
TOWN MANAGER Shawna Steele I larry Stokes `TOWN CI,F;RK
Brian W. Matthews Fred Weber Erinn E. Nichols
November 30, 2012
Ms, Coleen Sullins, P.E., Director
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Stornnvater Permitting Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
RE: Storm Water Management Program Assessment Report Certification
NPDES Permit NCS000454
Dear Ms. Sullins:
In accordance with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NI)DES) Permit Number NCS000454
issued for the Town of Stallings, enclosed please find a signed certification statement (in duplicate) in support of the
Storm Water Management Program Assessment Report. In addition, attached is a 2012 TMDL Annual report (in
duplicate) for the Town of Stallings as required by Section 1-1 of our permit.
The Storm Water Management Program Assessment Report for the sixth year of permit coverage (October 1, 2011
to September 30, 2012) was finalized on November 29, 2012 using the North Carolina Department of Environment
and Natural Resources web -based reporting gateway located at:
http://bims.enr,state. nc.us: 7001/swmpa/10 giE n.do.
Please contact me at [phone], if you have any questions or require additional information.
Sincerely,
Wl.
Mehdi-Jaftri "MJ" Namin, P.E.
Town of Stallings
Storm Water Administrator
Attachments: Certification (in duplicate)
Goose Creek `I'MDI., Annual Report Addendum
Gatewco, to Union Com?l.v
315 Stallin—,s Road • Stallin<ys • NC, • '28[04 a 704-821-8557 • www.siallingsnc.or-,

Town of Stallings
Ggfewa
tltlto �'
MAYOR
Lynda M. PaNt0JI
4,07 toJr MAYOR PRO'TEMPORE
Reed Esarove
TOWN COUNCIL,
Wvatt Drain Paul Frost
TOWN MANAGER Sharma Steele Harry Stokes CON'N CLERK
Brian W. Ma1111C%vs Frcd Weher Erinn 17. Nichols
Phase 11 Storm Water Management Program Assessment Report Certification
NPUES No. NCS000454
I certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared tinder my direction or
supervision in accordance with a systern designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the
information submitted. Based upon my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system or those persons
directly responsible for gathering the inllormation, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and
belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information
including; the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations.
Brian W. Mattliews Oat
Town ol'Stallings
Town Manager
Gaieiva-v to Union Cor n*v
115 Stallings Road • S(allimus • N(' • 2810-1 • 704-821-V57 �,t���a,titallingsnc.nrg

Town of Stallings
Galewa
�o f•
MAYOR
Lynda M. Parton
G �
►t Coo° MAYORl'RO"I'I:R"II'OIZG
Itccd Esarovc
TOWN COUNCIL
Wyatt Dunn Paul Prom
"TOWN MANAGER shawn"t Steele Barry Stokes
Brian W. Matthews Fred Weber
Phase 11 Storm Water Management Program Assessment Report Certification
NPDES No. NCS000454
TOWN CLERK
Erinn E. Nichols
I certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or
supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualilied personnel properly gather and evaluate the
information submitted. Based upon my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system or those persons
directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and
belief, true, accurate. and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information
including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations.
Brian W. Matthews Date
"Town of Stallings
Town Manager
17 Stallings, Koad • Stallinos 9 N� • 28I04 • 704-821-8557 < Nv\ �.st.rllin�snc.r�rg

Town of Stallings
2012 Annual TMDL Report
TOWN OF
S TALLINGS
;'oh Cac
NORTH CAROLINA
Prepared by:
Town of Stallings
Prepared for:
NPDES Phase 11 Storm Water Permit (NCS000454)
Annual Reporting Requirement
November 29, 2012

Table of Contents
Section 1.0 Introduction ..............................................
1.1 Background of.'Goose Creek Watershed..
Section 2.0 BMi's in Goose Creek Watershed..........................................................................2
2.1 Utility Crossing and Outfall Inspections.................................................................2
2.2 Septic System Evaluations.......................................................................................2
2.3 Stream Walks...........................................................................................................3
Section 3.0 BMPs in 'I'MDL Watersheds Without WI -As .........................................................4
3.1 Illicit Discharge Program .........................................................................................4
3.2 Stream Walks...........................................................................................................4
Section 4.0 Summary of Future 13MPs....................................................................................... 4
4.1 Goose Creek Watershed...........................................................................................4
4.2 fMDI. Watersheds Without WLAs.........................................................................5
Appendix A: Example Septic System Inspection Form
Appendix 13: Summary of Septic System Evaluations
Appendix C: 2012 Goose Creek 'I'MDL Stream Walk Report

'"�"• SlClOWN of: of: TA L L l N G S 2012 Annual TMDL Report
NORHI CAROLIN,1
Section 1.0
Introduction
The Town of Stallings Phase II Permit (NCS000454) specifies that the Town of Stallings will
produce an annual report that describes the Best Management Practices (BMPs) implemented to
comply with the Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs) requirements of stream segments that
are subject to an approved TMDL with storm water waste load allocations (WI -As) and those
stream segments required to develop TMDLs with no specified WLAs. Table 1 below shows the
applicable stream segments as listed in the 2012 North Carolina 303(d) h-ttegrated Report.
Table 1: TMDL Stream Segments Within the'rown of Stallings
Receiving
Stream
TMDL
Reason
Use
Integrated
Waste Load
Stream Name
Segment
Parameter
for Rating
Category
Report
Allocations
(Assessment
Category
Assigned
Unit)
Goose Creek
13-17-18a
Fecal
No criteria
Recreation
I (t)
Yes
coIifortn
exceeded
Goose Creek
13-17-18b
Fecal
Standard
Recreation
4(t)
Yes
colifortn
Violation
North Fork
13-17-20-1
Turbidity
Standard
Aquatic
5
No
Crooked Creek
Violation
Life
South Fork
13-17-20-2a
Fish
Pair/Poor
Aquatic
5
No
Crooked Creek
Community
Rating
Life
/Benthos
Notes:
1(t) - Parameter is supporting uses in the AU and there is an approved 'I'M DI, for the parameter
4(t) - Parameter assessment is impaired and there is an approved TMDL for the parameter
5 - Waters for which "fMULs are required
Only those listed stream segments that are contained within the jurisdictional boundary of the
Town of Stallings are included on 'fable I above.
The main objective ofthe Annual TMDL Report is to describe the BMPs implemented by the
Town of Stallings to reduce non -point source pollutant loading to streams subject to an approved
TMDL to the maximum extent practicable.
1.1 Background of Goose Creek Watershed
On August 10, 2006, the Town of'Stallings received written notification from the N.C. Division
of Water Quality that it is subject to the approved fecal coliform TMDL for Goose Creek. The
Town of Stallings (working cooperatively with Mecklenburg County Water Quality Program)
subsequently completed a TMDI., Water Quality Recovery Program Plan for the Goose Creek
TMDL, which was submitted to the N.C. Division of Water Quality on July 9, 2008 for
compliance with the above described permit requirement. Implementation of the Plan began in
July 2008. Input received from the Advisory Group formed to facilitate the implementation of

..: STOWN (01'
TALLINGS 2012 Annual'i'Mi)L Report
NORIIr ��AM ANA
this Plan resulted in revisions that were subsequently submitted to the N.C. Division of Water
Quality on November 13, 2009. Implementation ofthis Plan began in November 2009.
The Town ol'Stallings has continued working cooperatively with Mecklenburg County Water
Quality Program and the Towns of Mint Hill and Indian Trail to implement the requirements of
tills Program. During FY10-11, the North Carolina 2010 303d List was finalized. In this list, the
Use Category for AU Number
13-17-18a (Goose Creek from
source to SR 1524) was changed
from 4t (standard violation) to
It (no criteria exceeded) for
fecal coliform bacteria.
Category It is described as
"Parameter is supporting uses in
the AU and there is an approved
TMDL for the parameter".
Subsequent to the release of the
list a meeting was held with NC
DENR staff and the decision
was made to allow the
suspension of the WQRP for
areas of the watershed upstream
of SR1524, which includes a
portion of Stallings (Figure 1).
Goose Creek Watershed Water Quality Recovery Program Status
1 .
! legend _ --
_ . u, � YVQFP nil n [4.•
VVCFP &.WWd
O44Yq�
6 05 1
Figure 1: Map Showing Goose Creek WQRP Status
.Section 2.0
BMPs in Goose Creek Watershed
2.1 Utility Crossings and Qutfall Inspections
During the reporting period, the "Town of Stallings continued to implement the ']'own's Illicit
Discharge Detection and Elimination program, which includes the identification of outfalls,
visual inspection of utility crossings and evaluation of any dry weather flows.
2.2 Septic System Evaluations
To help identify and eliminate possible sources of fecal coliform within the Goose Creek
Watershed, the "]'own of Stallings identified and inspected residential sanitary septic systems
(individual wastewater treatment systems) within the Goose Creek watershed in order to verify
that known systems were functioning as designed. Any systems identified as non -compliant, or
061

,. STALLINGS 2012 Annual'I'MI)l. Report
V
NORTH CAROLINA .
in need of repair, have the potential to contribute untreated sanitary wastewater to surface waters,
thereby increasing fecal coliform loading within the watershed.
The Town of Stallings partnered with the Union County Flealth Department (the department with
permitting authority over septic systems) to conduct inspections of -all identified septic systems
in the Goose Creek watershed To date, 74 households within the Goose Creek watershed were
identified that had active septic systems.
Each of the identified properties was visited by an inspection team, but only 63 were actually
inspected. Three (3) of the identified properties were vacant at the time of inspection. Because
the properties were vacant, the septic systems were not in use at the time of the inspection. An
adequate inspection of the system could not be conducted and the overall compliance status
could not be verified. However, no surficial problems were reported at these locations that
would indicate the likelihood of a previous or recent problem with the systems. Eight (8)
additional properties with active septic systems were not inspected because the property owners
would not allow the inspection teams to access to their property For the specified purpose of
inspection. The remaining 63 properties within the Goose Creek Watershed that had active
septic systems were inspected between June 26, 2012 and July 17, 2012. For each inspection
conducted, a checklist form was completed by the inspection team which recorded the date,
location and the condition of the system inspected. Additional notes were also recorded to
capture any significant or unusual circumstances.
Out of the 63 active septic systems inspected, there were a number of minor issues identified.
These issues included three (3) malfunctioning alarms, two (2) structures erected within the
designated drain fields, and four (4) miscellaneous issues ranging from a failing electrical switch
to overgrown vegetation in the drain field. Each of these issues was addressed with the '
respective property owners and repairs were requested to correct the identified deficiencies.
Only on (1) of the systems inspected had significant issues that warranted a Notice of Violation
for non-compliance. The system had apparently malfunctioned at some time in the past and the
property owners had taken measures to bypass the failed system. Efforts made by the property
owners to bypass the system included illegal wiring, re-routing of house drains and the
installation of a bypass pump. The property owner was issued a Notice of Violation.
An example of the inspection form used to collect septic system information is included in
Appendix A. The inspection data collected on these forms is summarized in Appendix 13.
2.3 Stream Walks
During FY 1 1-12, The ']'own of' .Stallings began a program of walking all streams in the Goose
Creek Watershed and within the 'Town of' Stallings. The purpose of these walks was to identify
and eliminate ail pollution sources identified from storm water outfalls, creek crossings and
infrastructure failures. Fecal coliform sampling was conducted in conjunction with stream walks
only when it was necessary for the identification of fecal sources.
3

••=••• STOWN Orr
TALLINCS 2012 AnflUal'INDL Report
N R n1 CAROLINA
As a result of the stream walks, the following issues were reported:
One illicit discharge was discovered and corrected;
• Several dry weather flows were observed, evaluated, and found not to be illicit
discharges;
• Seventeen (17) storm water infrastructure issues (damaged pipes, sink holes, etc.) were
identified that could cause excess sediment loading to Goose Creek and tributaries to
Goose Creek. These issues were reported for follow-up and corrective action.
A full copy of the Goose Creek TMDL Stream Walk report is included as Appendix C.
Section 3.0
BMPs in TMDL Wtrtersheds Withottt WLAs
For watersheds that have a TMDL without a specific WLA, the Town of Stallings implemented
tailored strategies to enhance water quality recovery.
3.1 Illicit Dischame 1'ro ,r� am
During; the reporting period, the Town of Stallings continued to implement the Town's Illicit
Discharge Detection and Elimination program, which includes the identification oroutfalls,
visual inspection of utility crossings and evaluation of any dry weather flows.
3.2 Stream Walks
During; FYI 1-12, The Town of Stallings performed stream walks in the TMDL watersheds
within the Town of'Stallings. The purpose of these walks was to identify and eliminate all
pollution sources identified from storm water outfalls, creek crossings and infrastructure failures.
The Town of Stallings will continue implementing stream walks as described in the Storm Water
Management Program Plan within these TMDL watersheds.
Section 4.0
Suninurry of Future BMP.ti
4.1 Goose Creek Watershed
[hiring FYI 1-12, the Town of Stallings continued to expand on efforts to reduce fecal coliform
loading; to Goose Creek. Specifically, these efforts included:
4

•'='�• f i rU'ti fif
S TA L L I N C S 2012 Annual 'I'M DL Report
• Continued partnering with Mecklenburg County and the "]'owns of Mint Hill and Indian
"frail to implement the Goose Creek WQRP.
• Identified and inspected septic systems within the Goose Creek Watershed by partnering
with the Union County Health Department in order to identify and correct deficiencies
and failing systems.
• Walking streams within the Town of Stallings (including Goose Creek) to identify and
eliminate potential pollution sources.
• The Town of Stallings post -construction ordinance will be implemented to continue locus
of reducing turbidity and fecal coliform bacteria as primary pollutants of concern.
Each of tliese BMPs will be re-evaluated annually for effectiveness at reducing fecal coliform
loads to Goose Creek and re -initiated on a continuing basis as determined necessary. Based on
the results from the FYI 1-12 activities, the Town of Stallings recommends continual
implementation of the Goose Creek WQRP. The "Town of Stallings recommends walking 1 /3 the
length of streams within the Town (including the Goose Creek Watershed) each fiscal year. In
this manner; each mile of streams within the town will be assessed every three years at a
1111n1n1Ui11. Tic Town of Stallings also recommends conducting follow-up septic system
inspections within the Goose Creek Watershed on a 5-year cycle to ensure that existing systems
are maintained and functioning properly. The results of these BMPs will be included in future
annual reports.
4.2 TMDL, Watersheds Without WLAs
The Town of Stallings will continue to implement enhanced strategies and measures within these
watersheds including:
Enhancing Public Education efforts by targeting turbidity and fecal coliform as the main
Pollutants of concern.
The Town of Stallings post -construction ordinance will be implemented to continue the
focus of reducing turbidity and fecal coliform bacteria through implementation of
structural BMPs. In addition, Stallings post -construction ordinance requires additional
storm water detention and peak control above that required by the state minimum
standards which helps protect stream habitat by minimizing stream bank erosion caused
by large volume flows.
Enhancing detection of illicit discharges by having staffcontinue performing stream
walks to proactively look for illicit discharges and connections that can further degrade
stream water quality and habitat.
Continuing to actively inspect storm water infrastructure to identify possible issues
within the system that could cause increased turbidity and degraded habitat.
These measures will be continually evaluated for effectiveness and will be adjusted as needed to
reduce pollutants in these watersheds.
5

Example Septic System Inspection Form
Inspection Date: Inspection Completed By:
Site Parcel Id #: Site Address:
GWS File #: Watershed: Catchment Id:
Septic System Information:
System Classification: ❑ II ❑ III ❑ IV ❑ V ❑ VI
El ❑b ❑c El ❑e El El
System Description:
(Ex: pump to 25% reduction)
Year Operation Permit Issued:
Land Records)
(If no permit record is available use built date year from
System Age: Years ❑ Actual ❑ Estimated
Inspection Information: Comments
Site accessible for inspection: ❑ Yes
Owner present:
❑ Yes
Drain field probed:
❑ Yes
System malfunction observed:
❑ Yes
Notice of Violation required:
❑ Yes
System located <200 ft. from
❑ Yes
surface water body:
System located <SO ft. from
❑ Yes
stormwater BMP or diversion:
Trees/vegetation in drain field:
❑ Yes
Irrigation on drain field:
❑ Yes
Well(s) located on property:
❑ Yes
General comments/observations:
# photos taken:
Checklist:
❑ No
❑ No
❑ No
❑ No
❑ No
❑ No
❑ No
❑ No
❑ No
❑ No
Dye Pack Left: ❑ Yes ❑ No Signature:

1. Perform file review for inspection site in the office (system type, age, location, etc.)
2. Conduct field inspection & complete inspection form before leaving the site
3. Take photos (2 minimum) of the drain field/tank(s) area from multiple locations
4. Leave project brochure & literature on door
5. Submit inspection form and photographs to the Town of Stallings.
*All scanned files and related photos should be submitted to the Town of Stallings.

Summary of Goose Creek Septic System Evaluations
Date
Parcel
Address
Class
Descri tip
Yr
Permit
lAge
Act/Est
Owner
Present
IFailure
Obsers•ed
NOV
6/26/2012
07033062
16008 DEEPWOOD PLACE
II
NA
30-
E
Y
N
N
6/26/2012
07033060
16010 DEEPWOOD PLACE
IIIB
NA
INA
E
Y
N
N
6/26/2012
07033059
16116 DEEPN%�00D PLACE
IIB
CONVENTIONAL
30+
E
Y
N
N
6/26/2012
07033058
16200 DEEPWOOD PLACE
IIB
CONVENTIONAL
30�
E
Y
N
N
6/26/2012
07033057
16208 DEEPWOOD PLACE
IVB
LPP
28�
E
N
N
N
6/26/2012
07033056
16212 DEEPNVOOD PLACE
IVA
LPP MOUND
NA
NA
Y
N
N
6/26/2012
07033044
5000 SHAFTNVOOD DR.
ll
CONVEN'TIONAL
30
E
N
N
N
6/26/2012
107033044A
5008 SHAF nVOOD DR.
II
C0N- T ENTIONAL
30�
E
Y
N
N
6/26/2012
07033043A
5108 SHAFTNVOOD DR.
Vacant Property
6/26/2012
07033039
5116 SHAFTNVOOD DR.
NA
CONVENTIONAL
NA
E
Y
N
N
6/26/2012
07033064
5117 DEEPWOOD PLACE
II
CONVENTIONAL
30-
E
Y
N
N
6/26/2012
07057009E
5825 STEVENS MILL RD.
IIIB
PUMP TO CONVENTIONAL
1996
NA
E
N
N
N
6/26/2012
07057009H
5901 STEVENS MILL RD.
IIC
MODIFIED CONVENTIONAL
1982
NA
E
N
N
N
6/26/2012
07057009B
5912 STEVENS MULL RD.
11C
NA
1978
NA
E
IY
N
N
6/26/2012
07057009d
5913 STEVEN,S MULL RD.
IIIB
PL'I D TO COWENTIONAL
1991
NA
E
Y
N
N
6/26/2012
07057641
6000 STEVENS MILL RD.
IIC
MODIFIED CONVENYIONAL
1982
NA
E
Y
\
ti
6/26/2012
07057640
6008 STEVENS MILL RD.
11C
MODIFIED CONVENTIONAL
1982
NA
NA
Y
N
N
6/26/2012
07057639
6016 STEVENS MILL RD.
IIIB
PUMP TO CONVENTIONAL
1981
INA
NA
Y
N
N
6/2612012
07057642
6024 STEVENS MILL RD.
IIC
MODIFIED CONVENTIONAL
1983
NA
NA
Y
IN
N
6/2612012
07033007
7611 STEVENS MILT. RD.
1996
Owner did not allow inspection
6/26/2012
07033008A
7612 STEVENS MILL RD.
1977
Owner did not allot~, inspection
6/26/2012
07033007E
7640 STEVENS MILL RD.
1995
Owner did not allow inspection
6/26/2012
07033010A
7700 STEVENS MILD. RD.
1980
Owner did not allow inspection
6/26/2012
07033010
7716 STEVENS MILT. RD.
1963
Owner did not allow inspection
6/26/2012
07033008
7724 STEVENS MILL RD.
Owner did not allow inspection
6/26/2012
07033007A
7802 STEVENS MILD. RD.
1986 1
Owner did not allow ins ection
7/10/2012
07033038
15004 DEEPNVOOD PLACE
IIIB
PUMP TO CONVENTIONAL
20
E
N
\
N
7/10/2012
07033036
15808 DEEPWOOD PLACE
IIC.
GRAVITY
30�
E
N
N
N
7/10/2012
07033037
15816 DEEPWV001) PLACE
IIC
SHALLOW CON'VEN iIONAL
30 IE
Y
N
N
Page 1 of 3

Summary of Goose Creek Septic Svstem Evaluations
Date
Parcel
Address
Class
Description
Yr
Permit
lAge
Act/Est
Owner
I Present
Failure
10bsem-ed
I NOV
7/10/2012
07033064
15908 DEEPWVOOD PLACE
IIA
SHALLOW CONVENTIONAL
30-
E
Y
N
N
7/10/2012
07033067
16009 DEEPNVOOD PLACE
IIC
SHALLOW CONVENTIONAL
30-
E
Y
N
N
7/10/2012
07033068
16113 DEEPWVOOD PLACE
IIC
SHALLOW CONVENTIONAL
30-
E
N
N
N
7/10/2012
07033069
16201 DEEPWOOD PLACE
IIC
SHALLOW CONVENTIONAL
30-
E
N
N
N
7/10/2012
07033055
16224 DEEPkVOOD PLACE
IIIB
PUMP TO CONVENTIONAL
30-
IE
N
N
N
7/10/2012
07033054
16300 DEEPWOOD PLACE
IVA
LPP
1987
25
A
Y
N
N
7/10/2012
07033070
16301 DEEPWOOD PLACE
IIC
SHALLOW CO\1'ENTIONAL
1972
40
A
Y
N
N
7/10/2012
07033053
16308 DEEPWOOD PLACE
IIC
SHALLOW CONVENTIONAL
30-
E
Y
N
7/10/2012
07033071
16401 DEEPWOOD PLACE
IIC
SHALLOW CONVENTIONAL
30-
E
I N
N
N
7/10/2012
0703307-1
16415 DEEPWOOD PLACE
IIC
SHALLOW CONVENTIONAL
30-
1 E
Y
N
N
7/10/2012
07033050
16416 DEEPWOOD PLACE
IVA
LPP
1989
23
JA
IY
IN
N
7/10/2012
07033005
14823 LAWYERS RD,
Owner did not allow ins ecdon
7/10/2012
07033023
15601 I{NOLLWOOD PLACE
IIC
MODIFIED CONVENTIONAL
1971
NA
NA
ly
N
N
7/10/2012
07033012
15623 LAWYERS RD,
IIC
MODIFIED CON%, ENIIONAL
1968
NA
NA
N
N
N
7/10/2012
07033021
15700 ILNOLLWOOD PLACE
IVA
NA
1987
NA
NA
Y
N
N
7/1012012
07033025
15709 K\OLL%N'OOD PLACE
IIC
CONVENTIONAL
1973
NA
NA
N
N
N
7/10/2012
07033022
15712 I NOLLWOOD PLACE
IVA
NA
2002
NA
INA
Y
N
N
7/10/2012
07033024
15717 KNOLLWOOD PLACE
IIC
MODIFIED CONVENTIONAL
1979
NA
NA
IY
N
N
7/10/2011
0703304E
15812 LAWYERS RD.
IIIB
PUMP TO 25% REDUCTION
2002
NA
NA
N
N
N
7/10/2012
07057638
6100 STEVENS MILL RD.
IIC
MODIFIED CONN'EN-IIONAL
1981
NA
NA
Y
N
N
7/10/2011
07057637
610S STEVENS MILL RD.
IIC-
MODIFIED CON E\TIIONAL
1981
INA
NA
Y
N
N
7/10/2012
07057636
6116 STEVENS MILL RD.
IIC
J MODIFIED CONNENTIONAL
1981
NA
NA
N
N
\_
7/10/2012
07057635
6124 STEVENS MILL RD.
IIC
MODIFIED CON" ENTIONAL
1981
NA
NA
Y
N
N
7/10/2012
07057634
6131 STEVENS MILL RD.
IVA
LPP
1982
NA
NA
Y
Y
Y
7/10/2012
07057632
6208 STEVENS MILL RD.
IVA
LPP
1993
NA
NA
N
NA
N
7/10/2012
07057631
6216 STEV'EN-'S MILL RD.
IIC
MODIFIED CONVENTIONAL
1981
NA
NA
Y
N
N
7/10/2012
07057630
6224 STEVENS MILL RD.
IIC
MODIFIED CON VEN7IONAL
19fi0
NA
NA
N
N
N
7/1211012
07033029
5525 GOLD CREST DR.
IIB
CONVENTIONAL
30=
E
N
N
N
7/17/2012
107033046
14208 GOLD CREST DR.
IVA
LPP
\TA
NA
N
IN pN
Page 2 of 3

Summary- of Goose Creel: Septic System Evaluations
Date
Parcel
Address
Class
Description
Yr
Permit
lAge
Act/Est
Omer
Present
Failure
Observed
I -NON"
7/17/1012
07033045
5009 GOLD CREST DR.
IIC
CONVENTIONAL
130=
E
N
N
N
7/17/2012
07033043
5109 GOLD CREST DR.
11C
CONVENTIONAL
30�
E
Y
N
N
7/17/2012
07033015
5112 GOLD CREST DR.
11C
CONVENTIONAL
30=
E
Y
N
N
7/17/2012
07033016
5116 GOLD CREST DR.
11C
CONVENTIONAL
30=
E
Y
N
N`
7/17/2012
07033041
5117 GOLD CREST DR.
11C
ICONVENTIONAL
30=
E
Y
N
N
7/17/2012
07033017
5208 GOLD CREST DR.
TIC
CONVENTIONAL
30=
E
N
N
N`
7/17/2012
07033018
5216 GOLD CREST DR.
IIC
CONVENTIONAL
30+
E
N
N
N
7/17/2012
07033034
5233 GOLD CREST DR.
IIC
CONVENTIONAL
30=
E
N
N
N
7/17/2012
07033033
5135 GOLD CREST DR.
I11B
PUMP TO CONTVENIIONAL
11
A
Y
N
N
7/17/2012
07033019
5300 GOLD CREST DR.
IIC
CONVENTIONAL
30�
E
N
N
N
7/17/2012
07033032
5401 GOLD CREST DR.
IIC
CONVENTIONAL
30-
E
N
N
N
7/17/2012
07033026
3500 GOLD CREST DR.
IIC
CONIVENTIONAL
30=
E
Y
N
N
7/17/2012
5516 GOLD CREST DR
IIC
CONVENTIONAL
30=
E
N
N
N
7/17/2012
5517 GOLD CREST DR.
IIC
CONVENTIONAL
30�
E
N
N
N
7/17/2012
07033028
5524 GOLD CREST DR.
ITC
CONVENTIONAL
1
130 .
E
Y
N
N
7/17/2012
15850 GOLD CREST DR.
IIC
CONVENTIONAL
30+
E
Y
N
N
Page 3 of 3

Goose Creek TMDL Stream
Walk Report
STALLINGS
Prepared by.
Town of Stallings
Prepared for. -
Goose Creek TIODL Water Quality Recovery Report
(NPDES #NCS000454)
June 27. 2012

Tahle of Contents
Section1.0 Introduction.............................................................................................I................I
Section2.0 1'1-irpose.....................................................................................................................
Section3.0 Methodology.......................................................................................................
Section 4.0 Summary of Findings ....................
4.1 Illicit Discharges......................................................................................................2
4.2 Storm Water Infrastructure Mapping ...................................................... ....2
4.3 Storm Water Conveyance System Inspection.........................................................2
,TABLES
"fable 1: Stream Walk Inventory 1 Inspection Data
FIGURES
Figure l : Stallings Outfall Map of Goose Creek Watershed

Sh ip'1\'111�
TALLINCS CiQOse Creek TM DI. Stream Walk Report
NORnICAROLIVA
1.0 Introduction
From November 9, 2011 to February 1, 2012, Don Ceccarelli, P.L. and Jeff Price walked
approximately 9.0 stream miles within the town limits of. Stallings, during baseilow cpnditions.
The stream miles walked were all located in the Goose Creek watershed downstream of Stevens
Mill Road as shown on the Union County GIS stream coverage. The subject area was bounded
on the west by 1-485 and on the east by Mill Grove Road. The mileage walked Was bounded to
the north and the south by the town boundary, but included streams that drained the Lmerald
Lake Country Club Golf Course and a small portion ol'the Steven's Mill Subdivision.
2.0 Purpose
The stream walks were primarily performed to liiltill the requirements of'the Goose Creek Water
Quality Recovery Plan for locating; and reducing the fecal coliform loading in the Goose Creek
Watershed as required by the Goose Creek `total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) for fecal
coliform. In addition, these stream walks fulfill other elements ol'the'lown of Stallings Storm
Water Management Program Plan required by the Town's Phase II NPDLS permit (Permit #
NCS000395) such as:
• Updating; storm water outfall maps,
• Maintenance of'storm water conveyance systems,
• Detection of'dry weather flows, and
• Detection and elimination of illicit discharges and connections,
Stream walks serve not only to meet permit conditions, but more importantly help the Town of'
Stallings reduce polluted run-off from entering streams.
3.0 Methodology
Stream walks were conducted during baseilow conditions. For the purposes ol� this report,
basellow conditions are defined as less than 0.10 inches of�precipitation occurring in a 24-11our
day during; the previous 72-hour period. The last observed rainfall event prior to the November
9, 2011 stream walk occurred from November 3-4, 2011, at which time 1.00 inch of�rainfall was
recorded. The next rainfall event occurred on November 10, 201 I, however only 0.03 inches of
rainfall were recorded. All precipitation data reported here was taken from the United States
Geological Survey (USGS) real -tinge network website; raingage 4350857080383245, CIZN-67
"Thompson Rd. Mint 1-I111, NC. "Phis appears to be the closest active USGS raingage to the project
area.
During; the stream walks, staff looked for dry weather flows, discoloration, sewer fungus,
suspended solids, oily sheen, dead organisms in or around the stream and other indicators
typically associated with pollution discharges. ']'his included any odors typically associated with

'I�)H'� CAI°
"0 STALLI NCS �`Oose Greek TMDL Stream Walk Report
_...:
VUR'I II (AROLINA ..:...-. ... ..... . . -- - - - .. -
sewage, petroleum or chemical pollution. Any unusual or atypical conditions were traced
upstream to identify potential sources, and the sources were noted if identified.
During the stream walks, each component ofthe storm water infrastructure (feature) encountered
was geo-located, inspected and photographed. Geographic locations were determined using a
Geographic Positioning System (GPS) enabled camera (Cannon Powershot SX230 I -IS) where
possible. When no GPS was available, features were located using traditional mapping
techniques and coordinates were determined from Google Maps. For each feature encountered,
the following information was collected: feature ID (assigned), Latitude/Longitude (decimal
degrees), feature type (ditch, culvert, pipe, tributary), feature material (earthen, corrugated
plastic, corrugated metal, concrete, RCP, PVC, black iron), diameter (inches), shape (circular,
channel, flared), dry weather Clow present (yes; no}, outfall condition (good, lair, poor); stream
bank location facing downstream (right, left), suspected source and any comments.
4.0 Summary of Findings
4.1 _Illicit Discharges
One l-eature was identified as a suspected leaking sewer aerial (Item 9 orl Table 1), and one illicit
discharge (discharge of used oil and gollycourse chemicals) was identified at Lmcrald Lake
Country Club Golf Course (Item 26 on "fable 1). Both ofthese were reported to the "Town of
Stallings for follow-up investigation and resolution in accordance with the Town of Stallings
Illicit Discharge Detection and I-limination program.
4.2 Storm Water Infrastructure Mar)mnu
There were 168 features inspected and cataloged; including one sewer line aerial (black iron
pipe), 58 culverts, 40 ditches, 65 pipes, three pond weirs, and one tributary. Dry weather flows
were present at 24 features during the stream walk. Each of these dry weather flows was
evaluated and/or traced to a source. Based upon the evaluation, none of the dry weather flows
were from suspected pollution sources. The location of the storm water infrastructure is shown
on Figure 1.
4.3 Storm Water Conveyance System Inspection
During the stream walking activities, there were several potential infrastructure issues identified
with the storm water conveyance system:
• three corroded or damaged storm water pipes,
• six pipes with partial blockage due to sediment or debris,
• one cracked concrete headwall,
• one sewer lateral acting as a debris dam,
• one exposed sewer lateral due to erosion,
• three pipe joint separations,and
• two areas where sink holes were forming near storm drain pipes
These storm water infrastructure issues were reported to the Town of Stallings maintenance stall
for prioritization and follow-up.

Table 1: Stream Walk Inventory 1 Inspection Data
ID
Date
Feature
Material
Diameter
(in)
Shape
R/L Bank
(DS)
Latitude
Longitude
Flow
Cond.
Comment
1
11/09/11
ditch
EARTHEN
39
channel
right
35.136810
-80.607890
no
Rood
cross channel log energy dissipator
(natural)
2
11/09/11
ditch
EARTHEN
32
channel
left
35.136755
-80.607863
no
good
from dammed wetland area —
natural
3
1 1/09/1 l
ditch
EARTHEN
24
channel
right
35.135958
-80.607979
no
fair
some erosion
4
11/09/11
culvert
CMP
30
circular
left
35.135707
-80.608486
no
good
4408 Derbyshire Ln
5
l 1/09/1 1
ditch
EARTHEN
12
channel
left
35.135734
-80.607929
no
good
not on field ma
6
11/09/11
culvert
HDPE
12
circular
in -stream
35.136244
-80.609911
n/a
good
3-barreled culvert on Em Lake golf
course V
7
11/09/11
culvert
RCP
40
circular
left
35.136171
-80.61 1849
no
good
upstream from pond
8
11/09/11
culvert
RCP
30
circular
right
35.136143
-80.61 1874
no
good
some sediment buildup
9
11/09/11
lateral
BLKIRON
10
circular
crossing
35.139292
-80.606542
n/a
fair
possible leaking aerial from right
bank
10
11/09/11
culvert
HDPE
14
circular
left
35.139414
-80.606906
yes
good
very low flow
11
11/09/11
culvert
HDPE
24
circular
in -stream
35.139403
-80.607197
n/a
good
12
11/09/11
culvert
RCP
20
circular
left
35.138985
-80.608348
no
food
13
1 1/09/11
culvert
CMP
72
circular
in -stream
35.139023
-80.608448
n/a
poor
Flagstick Dr. - appears to be
collapsing at the joint
14
1 1/09/1 1
ditch
GRASS
48
channel
right
35.139568
-80.609463
no
good
Par 3 Ern Lake
15
1 1/09/1 1
culvert
RCP
24
circular
in -stream
35.141213
-80.610651
n/a
good
Par 5 pump house has underground
leak — irrigation
16
11/09/11
culvert
HDPE
24
circular
right
35.140890
-80.611658
no
good
17
11/09/11
culvert
HDPE
36
circular
right
35.142665
-80.615578
yes
good
low flow
18
11/09/11
culvert
HDPE
24
circular
in -stream
35,143086
-80.616598
n/a
poor
crushed
19
11/09/11
culvert
RCP
24
circular
right 1
35.145319
-80.617933
no
poor
partially buried with sediment
20
1 1/09/1 1
culvert
RCP
28
circular
in -stream
35.145341
-80.617890
n/a
good
cracked head wall
21
11/09/11
i e
HDPE
12
circular
right
35.143654
-80.612805
no
good
cart path Mitchell Lake
22
11/09/11
ditch
EARTHEN
20
channel
right
35.143593
-80.613631
no
good
cart path Mitchell Lake
23
l 1/09/1 1
i e
RCP
32
circular
left
35.146311
-80.605205
no
good
start of channel
24
11/09/11
pipe
HDPE
24
circular
right
35.146384
-80.604848
no
good
start of channel
Page l of 7

Table 1: Stream Walk Inventory 1 Inspection Data
ID
Date
Feature
Material
Diameter
(in)
Shape
R/L Bank
(DS)
Latitude
Longitude
Flow
Cond.
Comment
25
1 1/09/1 1
culvert
CMP
18
circular
right
35.146397
-80.604785
no
goad
under Union Rd.
26
11/09/11
culvert
CMP
24
circular
in -stream
35.145257
-80.604470
n/a
good
under Union Rd. - bright green in
color
27
1 1/09/1 1
ditch
CONCRETE
24
channel
left
35.130305
-80,623555
no
good
sewer later acting as debris dam
28
11/09/11
ditch
EARTHEN
12
channel
left
35.130557
-80.623373
no
good
29
11/09/11
culvert
CMP
36
circular
in -stream
35.130698
-80.623271
n/a
good
end ofundeveloped cul-de-sac
30
11/09/11
culvert
CMP
42
circular
in -stream
35.130948
-80.622960
n/a
good
Edgefeld Ct.
31
11/09/11
ditch
EARTHEN
18
channel
right
35.132202
-80.622584
no
ood
trash dump — old appliances
32
11/09/11
culvert
CMP
72
circular
in -stream
35.138275
-80.618275
n/a
2ood
Lawvers Rd.
33
11/09/11
culvert
RCP
24
circular
right
35. 1402 17
-80.62031 1
ves
Good
under Lawvers Rd.
34
11/09/11
ditch
EARTHEN
30
channel
right
35.141285
-80.621487
ves
good
white house backyard across from
gas station
35
11/09/11
pipe
PVC
12
circular
right
35.142047
-80.621586
no
good
back of new construction —
optometrists office
36
1 1109/11
culvert
RCP
42
circular
in -stream
35.143028
-80.623156
n/a
good
2 culverts, concrete head wall -
Millwright Ln. next to lift station
37
11/09/11
ditch
RIPRAP
24
channel
left
35.143531
-80.623768
no
good
38
11/09/11
culvert
RCP
28
circular
in -stream
35.144742
-80.625202
n/a
good
across Steven's Mill at end of walk
/beg of reach
39
11/09/11
ditch
EARTHEN
24
channel
left
35.129096
-80.630620
no
good
downstream Steven's Mill towards
Lake Dr
40
11/09/11
ditch
EARTHEN
48
channel
left
35.127534
-80,629553
no
good
41
11/09/11
ditch
EARTHEN
48
channel
left
35.126551
-W627761
no
good
42
11/09/11
pipe
PVC
8
circular
left
35.126428
-80.624318
no
fair
mudded in
43
1 t/09/1 1
ditch
GRASS
30
channel
right
35.127815
-80.624510 1
no
good
right bank of main channel
44
1 1/09/1 1
ditch
CONCRETE
24
channel
right
35.129158
-80.624360
no
poor
right bank of main channel —
downstream Lake Dr. - eroded
exposed sewer lateral
45
1 1/12/1 1
ditch
EARTHEN
120
channel
right
35.125713
-80,608439
no
good
upstream Mill Grove at waterfall
46
11/12/11
culvert
RCP
24
circular
left
35,126038
-80.603834
ves
good
upstream from waterfall
[;at
1/12/11
ditch
EARTHEN
24
channel
left
35.126353
-80.604096 1
no
good
upstream side of fence at posted
property
Page 2 of 7

Table 1: Stream Walk Inventory / Inspection Data
ID
Date
Feature
Material
Diameter
(in)
R/L Bank
(DS)
Latitude
Longitude
Flow
Cond.
Comment
48
l l/12/1 1
ditch
EARTHEN
36
—Shape
channel
left
35.126429
-80.604343
no
ood
multiple fingers /braided
49
11/12/11
ditch
EARTHEN
48
channel
right
35.126514
-80.605698
no
good
two channels
50
11/12/11
ditch
EARTHEN
24
channel
left
35.126579
-80,605983
no
good
at home where we talked to
neighbor
51
11/12/11
ditch
EARTHEN
60
channel
left
35.126473
-80.606249
no
good
52
11/12/11
culvert
CMP
52
circular
left
35,127695
-80.607383
no
poor
16009 Deepwoods PI — bottom
rusted out
53
11/12/11
ditch
EARTHEN
40
channel
left
35.127774
-80.607396
no
good
braided above — no pipe
54
1 1/1211 1
ditch
EARTHEN
24
channel
left
35.126900
-80.608977
no
I good
Garden / deer feeder
55
1 1/12/1 1
trib
channel
left
35.126933
-80.609635
yes
good
not on map
56
1 1/12/1 1
culvert
CMP
36
circular
in -stream
35,126038
-80.613049
n/a_poor
rusted out — crosses Goldcrest.
Rusted out bottom, blown out
downstream, headcut eroding
57
11/12/11
ditch
EARTHEN
24
channel
left
35.123232
-80.614813
no
ood
58
1 1112/1 l
pipe
PVC
8
circular
left
35.123501
-80.620630
yes
good
Country Woods WWTP
59
1 1/12/1 l
ditch
EARTHEN
60
channel
left
35.123564
-80.620746
no
no pipe, ditch at end of cul-de-sac
60
1 1112/1 l
ditch
EARTHEN
36
channel
left
35.124840
-80.621881
no
no pipe on Hawthorne at Quince
61
11/12/11
pipe
HDPE
18
circular
left
35.125994
-80.623.008
no
good
1525 Hawthorne Rd.
62
1/16/12
culvert
CMP
15
circular
left
35.131169
-80.631416
no
poor
63 1
1/16/12
culvert
PVC
10
circular
right
35.130857
-80.632597
no
good
64
1/16/12
pipe
CMP
36
circular
in -stream
35.130829
-80.632544
yes
good
2 x 36" pipes
65
1/16/12
pipe
CMP
36
circular
in -stream
35.130360
-80.633874
yes
good
2 x 36" pipes; other end of 964
66
1/16/12
pipe
HDPE
15
circular
right
35.130315
-80.633908
no
Pood
67
1/16112
culvert I
CMP
29x43
oblong
in -stream
35.130128
-80.634281
n/a
fair
crushed circular culvert
68
I/16112
culvert
CMP
27x43
oblong
in -stream
35.129794
-80.634452
n/a
fair
pipe corroded
69
1/16/12
pipe
HDPE
14
circular
left
35.129073
-80.634944
no I
good
70
1/16/12
pipe
HDPE
l4
circular
right
35.129128
-80,634933
no
good
71
1/16/12
culvert
CMP
69
circular
in -stream
3 5.129 179
-80.634911
n/a
good
72
1/16/12
culvert
CMP
69 -
circular
in -stream
35.128771
-80.635044
n/a
good
other end of #71
73
1/16/12
ditch
GRASS
24
channel
right
35.128551
-80.635150
no
good
Page 3 of 7

Table 1: Stream Walk Inventory 1 Inspection Data
ID
Date
Feature
Material
Diameter
(in)
Shape
R/L Bank
(DS)
Latitude
Longitude
Flow
Cond.
Comment
74
1/16112
culvert
HDPE
19
circular
in -stream
35.127487
-80.636507
n/a
good
75
1/16/12
ditch
EARTHEN
9
channel
left
35.127199
-80.636865
no
good
76
1/16/12
culvert
CMP
32
circular
in -stream
35.127135
-80.637055
n/a
fair
77
1/16112
pipe
PVC
4
circular
right
35.126353
-80.637944
yes
good
78
1/16/12
culvert
PVC
10
circular
right
35.126181
-80,638138
yes
good
79
1/16/12
culvert
RCP
28
circular
in -stream
35.1261 15
-80.638368
n/a
good
26 u str side. 27 dnstr side
80
1/16/12
pipe
HDPE
18
circular
right
35.125007
-80.639398
no
I fair
partially blocked
81
1/16/12
culvert
CMP
30
circular
in -stream
35.124921
-80.639884
n/a
good
82
1/16/12
ditch
EARTHEN
12
1 channel
left
35.124916
-80.639982
no
good
83
1/16/12
ditch
EARTHEN
12
channel
left
35.124739
-80.640543
no
good
84
1/16/12
culvert
CMP
34
circular
in -stream
35.124479
-80.640661
n/a
good
85
1/16/12
p,pe
RCP
15
circular
left
35.123686
-80.641955
no
good
86
1/16/12
pipe
RCP
15
circular
right
35.123563
-80.641871
no
fair
pariially blocked; trees
87
1/16/12
pipe
RCP
46
circular
in -stream
35.123635
-80,641907
no
fair
21" of sediment: needs cleaning
88
1/16/12
ditch
EARTHEN
24
channel
right
35.132106
-80.632364
yes
good
89
1/16/12
ditch
EARTHEN
36
channel
left
35.132825
-80,632337
no
good
90
1/16/12
weir
CONCRETE
360
flat
in -stream
35.132891
-80.632782
ves
good
30 ft. weir
91
1/16/12
pipe
HDPE
12
circular
right
35.132143
-80.634287
no
fair
92
1/16/12
culvert
CMP
103
circular
in -stream
35.131826
-80.635144
n/a
good
93
1/16/12
weir
CONCRETE
432
flat
in -stream
35.131631
-80.635406
ves
fair
36 ft. weir
94
1/16112
culvert
CMP
30x40 I
oblong
in -stream
35.132606
-80.636948
n/a
fair
unmarked trib to the left
95
1/16/12
culvert
CMP
38
circular
in -stream
35.134295
-80.638156
n/a
good
96
1/16/12
ipe
RCP
16
circular
right
35.134231
-80.638762
no
good
97
1/16/12
ipe
RCP
28
circular
in -stream
35.134774
-80.639134
no
good
98
1/16/12
culvert
CMP
107
circular
in -stream
35.131215
-80.637988
n/a
good
99
1/16/12
culvert
CMP
69
circular
in -stream
35.130986
-80.639043
n/a
fair
pipe separation; 2x69" culverts
100
1/16/12
pipe
RCP
15
circular
left
35.131023
-80.638989
-es
good
101
1/25/12
culvert
RCP
48
circular
in -stream
35.132755
-80.645455
n/a
good
2x48" culverts: minor crack in
concrete headwall
Page 4 of 7

Table I: Stream Walk Inventory 1 Inspection Data
ID.
Date
Feature
Material
Diameter
(in)
Shape
R/L Bank
(DS)
Latitude
Longitude
Flow
Comment
102
1/25/12
pipe
HDPE
15
circular
left
35.133196
-80.644840
ves
Egg'
across countv line into Mecklenbur103
1/25/12
culvert
HDPE
I5
circular
in -stream
35.132801
-80,644597
n/a
cart path undercut and cracked
104
1/25/12
culvert
CMP
27A2
oblong
in -stream
35.132768
-80.644349
n/a
fair
Trib to left at par 3 pond
105
1/25/12
pipe
HDPE
30
circular
in -stream
35.133391
-80.644172
no
good
6042 Arborgolo Ln.
106
1/25/12
pipe
RCP
16
circular
right
35. 13 1766
-80.642852
no
good
barking weenie dogs
107
1/25/12
pipe
RCP
15
circular
right
35.131848
-80,641599
no
good
108
1/25/12
pipe
HDPE
24
circular
left
35. 132 151
-80.640730
no
good
109
1/25/12
pipe
RCP
24
circular
left
35.132579
-80.640572
no
good
110
1/25/12
culvert
CMP
72
circular
in -stream
35,131845
-80,640433
n/a
good
111
1/25/12
culvert
CMP
72
circular
in -stream
35.131070
-80.639710
n/a
poor
other side of 9110; pipe separated
underground, cracked headwall
112
1/25/12
pipe
RCP
15
circular
right
35.130888
-80,639454
no
good
113
1/25/12
culvert
CMP
72
circular
in -stream
35.130866
-80.639425
n/a
good
202" culverts
114
1/25/12
ditch
EARTHEN
14
channel
right
35.130544
-80,640247
no
good
115
1/25/12
pipe
HDPE
15
circular
right
35.129612
-80.641686
no
good
116
1/25/12
culvert
RCP
53
circular
in -stream
35.129648
-80.641755.
n/a
good
117
1/25/12
pipe
HDPE
15
circular
left
35.129731
-80.641707
no
good
118
1/25/12
p1pe
HDPE
15
circular
left
35.128429
-80.642431
ves
good
119
1/25112
pipe
HDPE
24
circular
right
35.128046
-80.642459
ves
good
no follow up needed
120
1/25/12
i e
HDPE
15
circular
left
35.127310
-80.642909
ves
good
no follow up needed
121
1/25/12
pipe I
HDPE
24
circular
in -stream
35.126885
-80,643072
no
good
end of channel; no need to follow u
122
1/25/12
pipe
HDPE.
15
circular
left
35,129490
-80.642764
no
good
123
1/25/12
pipe
HDPE
15
circular
left
35.129306
-80.643055
no
flood
Overgrown with yellow flowering
plant. Roof drain PVC pipe there as
well
124
1/25/12
pipe
BLKIRON
12
circular
in -stream
3 5.1289 12
-80.643547
no
good
125
1/25/12
s illwav
CONCRETE
240
channel
right
35.128897
-W643515
ves
-ood
no follow up needed
126
1/25/12
pipe
HDPE
18
circular
left
35-130000
-80.645115
no
good
127
1/25/12
pipe
HDPE
15
circular
left
35.127647
-80.645456 1
ves I
good
no follow up needed
Pa-e5of7

Table 1: Stream Walk Inventon° / Inspection Data
ID
Date
Feature
Material
Diameter
(in)
Shape
R/L Bank
(DS)
Latitude
Longitude
Flow
Cond.
Comment
128
1/25/12
pipe
HDPE
40
circular
left
35,127041
-80.646039
no
mood
submerged pipe in pond
129
1/25/12
pipe
HDPE
30
circular
left
35.126401
-80.645715
no
good
130
1/25/12
i e
HDPE
30
circular
in -stream
35,126431
-80.645664
no
good
2x30" pipes; end of channel, upper
end of pond
131
1/25/12
pipe
RCP
24
circular
left
35.132782
-80.631524
no
fair
6" sediment buildup
132
1/25/12
ditch
EARTHEN
24
channel
left
35.133325
-80.632048
no
good
133
1 1/25/12
pipe
HDPE
30
circular
right
1 35.134522
-80.633091
yes
fair
heavv vegetation, needs to be
cleared
134
1/25/12
i e
RCP
24
circular
left
35.134626
-80.633712
yes
good
no follow up needed
135
1/25/12
ditch
EARTHEN
24
channel
right
35.135360
-80.631986
no
good
136
1/25/12
culvert
CMP
72
circular
in -stream
35.135648
-80.631375
n/a
good
137
1/25/12
culvert
CMP
72
circular
in -stream
35.135805
-80.630591
n/a
good
other end of 9136
138
1125112
pipe
RCP
15
circular
lei
35.136358
-80.629829
no
good
139
1/25/12
culvert
jCMP
72
circular
in -stream
35,136313
-80.629858
n/a
I good
140
1/25/12
ditch
EARTHEN
24
channel
right
35.136990
-80.629229
no
fair
eroding head cut
141
1/25/12
pipe
RCP
15
circular
left
33,137358
-80.628678
no
good
142
1/25/12
culvert
CMP
48
circular
in -stream
35.137358
-80.628686
n/a
good
143
1/25/12
Pipe
RCP
18
circular
left
35.138015
-80.627988
no
good
144
1/25/12
ditch
EARTHEN
30
channel
left
35.138277
-80.627700
no
good
Barbara Fest - vard/stream cleanup
145
1/25/12
i e
RCP
18
circular
right
35.138694
-80.627362
no
good
146
1/25/12
pipe
RCP
15
circular
left
35.138949
-80.627346
no
good
147
1/25112
culvert
RCP
48
circular
in -stream
35.138973
-80.627324
n/a
good
148
1/25/12
i e
RCP
15
circular
left
35.139447
-80.627095
no
poor
holding 13" water. Needs cleaning
and regrading
149
1/25/12
pipe I
RCP
15
circular
right
35,139950
-80.627194
yes
good
150
1/25/12
culvert
RCP
40
circular
in -stream
35.139970
-80.627135
n/a
good
Hunley Ridge Rd., cracked
headwall
151
1/25/12
pipe
RCP
30
circular
in -stream
35.l40726
-80.626879
no
good
next rd crossing
152
2/1/12
i e
RCP
20
circular
left
35.136642
-80.63134
no
good
upstream is a lawnmower and a
trike
153
2/1/1?
I pipe
HDPE
15
circular
left
35.137335
-80.632943
no
fair
filling in -par 3 golf course fairway
Page 6 of 7

Table 1: Stream Walk Inventory / Inspection Data
1D
Date
Feature
Material
Diameter
(in)
Shape
RIL Bank
(DS)
Latitude
Longitude
Flow
Cond.
Comment
154
2I1112
i e
PVC
4
circular
left
35,138175
-80.63273
no
good
sand trap I green under drains
155
2/1/12
pipe
PVC
4
circular
left
35.138118
-80.632719
no
good
sand trap / green under drains
156
2/1/12
culvert
RCP
20
circular
left
35.138647
-80,632637
yes
good
157
2/I/12
culvert
PVC
4
circular
right
35.138388
-80.634214
no
good
4" PVC connected to 10" culvert on
cart path
158
2/I/12
i e
RCP
43
circular
in -stream
35.140443
-80.633856
no
good
upstream end of trib, map marked
incorrect)
159
2/1/12
culvert
CMP
36
circular
in -stream
35.138936
-80,633176
n/a
poor_partially
blocked - needs cleaning
160
1 211112
pipe
RCP
16
1 circular
right
35.139004
-80.633048
no
I rood
from Green Ashe Lane
161
2/1/12
p1pe
RCP
20
circular
in -stream
35.138875
-80,632492
no
good
connects to 156
162
211112
pipe
I RCP
16
circular
right
35.139759
-80.631 178
no
-,00d
bunch grass
163
2/1/12
pipe
RCP
24
circular
left
35.139951
-80.630565
no
good
164
2/l/12
pipe
RCP
41
circular
in -stream
35.141426
-80.63001
no
good
minor crack in headwall
165
2/l/12
pipe
RCP
36
circular
in -stream
35.142689
-80,629805
no
good
minor crack in headwall - other end
of 164
166
2/l/12
ditch
EARTHEN
36
channel
left
35.142728
-80.629814
1 no
good
upper end trib by fence
167
2/l/12
ditch
EARTHEN
24
channel
left
35.143622
-80.629696
yes
I good
significant flow
168
2/l/12
pipe
RCP
30
circular
right
35.143668
-80.629738
no
good
1200 Mtn. Laurel
Page 7 of 7

rA•_,�3� S fir` ; - r i ` ' �wYC t• `y' ', rs ' n`-tcq " t
4 i �� � 1F• .5- '�'' � 4f .. � C�fy }" L �' � ' � � .. �. ' ' ;-s.� �;p-� nor Cs �4: i , � r � �! 7 �. �� � a ���
�7yYJ1�. t7y: Y� r.• 1 "`\ iF� ♦ 4 - ! •r ;. \ f
t y � s�'Z rii,y s 4� i ��" n •.� • :' � /. •? �f ' . 5, 4'' ++} ': sa• �•
r} t. _,+� r 71;': `* T •ors {"�
- ��' � s.,• �' j,S fyi.fs f'��,.. +� �V % l�"d_ y'4 F+� f g T .1 r s.
'L,rt -�' 'y'+r+ � .y �—' J � • •'s. _ail • •_ i- � 4 .- � �.�!' ,Jt � 7,(r' ��lL.. �u!`-�74 - 1: - +iP', � �. +�,{y.�•
14
- , Jl � � .'�� '� - ., �I:t .h ;��•�� F ��;��a; �y. �� .t 45`la •7.� • j F � ' �; _ ',,,4 ; �<T w ;+ ai����. '„i� I�� 4
r -406)
� s ^ 4 L'4 • ••d1.. tit
+y sYa '�'4 Ffi`-4i
71
�Qj ' q�'� .,yti '♦.f- ,.F r : +fir ` 17{, rs.,c �'_ V tt ..t13
'71 _ t•�'s ,` i -i. v' .[ -
�, rr ���. -�:'fu.u�• . y ��.7 s ,�a '�" !•._ �.'�.r 4^ ` � %' ��,� r� +'y�ri�3' � _x r l'" ��' .�..{s � ��;
ate. ,; �� ti r -4'sy ��• . ,�• � �� 4•��X �'� t-�..y'-a'-'.�^, e •,�•�' �"��j7� �s�'��Y'�,`�y � �r.! � w�i�. ,� � �{',� � f-
4•r'-�Lr`y� Y��' .;,;�;•�•s •�J,,,.at � {`• �;^ • �'. � "��•�,�{' t� S ii �F'f . � icy �'s - . Jwa �� ,� i•pi' �. �4i jC' �{ r �,� �_
`.4�` C• } `'+-a� � r - ; �y,''1 f r •fir, f - Oft- 'y 'ti y�.h e ,i
1 r
�� L ' ��'�+� - •�� � �` � �t = ! •a �G T�� {}F,-�� v i'tr'��{�,/ :i si rr / r q� z ,��
. 00. 1e
4 * T
is +s as ' _ ,t"}fr_ •'� - ! _ �* y r ssl. :L'" '`r fZ} - �r '�1.' L�'-
�•�•j a1 0 �iM' C ,fir r •o • + a..y-����.�� Z`�nlS,' � Lq�` �'-rT �i' -- �.' ,3'f C4.,,� ` le
.�:: ! '�7 `s .. Y1 - rs� � �� ' + • •i'.+�% - .� 1 � � t, - � 'nc•--4Y _=F �c� _ : � •-� �s 'is+�
�' +� • ���F 4 f : r 1,r �•` � T,� -�f 8 ; ,� _, �.r' �a.. , � x A• j �-L'� .gip,,, �� f
s' �* -�_ ? •�� yq'�-. J �,� �' _ � � ' � � .2,� ,�I��;.�'^' � _ 5".�t � "`'i I '%!'- 1rL° '�� f,�' �V� r,a� �;-
.ire f',�•i c J;�. 's;i' 1.? ��• � k �, . '� ryj� i . rr' � � i ?,��1�` � -r���i ' ����5 St `r s �' � =�'� •.,�� -�i' ' �'r
+a''��•�''* u�s"4. ; ' � l ''' -i . t _ -•' �` ?cJ .., • a ex - •- a `��� � - �•�`'' • '`i.., �r�t-i rc.�'� �• w •-'� i�,
'f} Yam: �s LKs--E�o- �"' Fi - � �4��- � �,F„� � ,^� ;�,. �' ; c �D' � •� li�3 4". �'�';S' ..- t i :s ' � f 1
�{,� •i�a.! c:/r� M•^ 1 r. 1 <3' ""fir may- r r 3 ;r ' •r
�1�y, '�s LQi �i •y G`t' >.` Eye., it' ,� 7.'j1 'ils 1• �� ~ f :i -.l('�yi.
tems s" � a"fy�4� r� [ .' %aii r t \1i.. h� i j i s�f 1 3 se 4 f } V{ S7 :g?G� ♦
ham• « E i .4� {`� ' / 3R .. Z.. �,il '�. -f' '.fit •f _�r .-�Q 1t'sA r�1i-`:.t -F {T ' .�1+"t�,i

II �
11 r� r �� f1111111
r'• ° 1,p''7 TOWN OF
STALLINGS
9on Co,c
NORTH CAROLINA
Prepared by:
Town of Stallings
Prepared for:
NPDES Phase 11 Storm Water Permit (NCS000454)
Annual Reporting Requirement
November 29, 2012

Table of Contents
Section1.0 Introduction..............................................................................................................I
1.1 Background of Goose Creek Watershed .......... ........................................................ I
Section 2.0 BMPs in Goose Creek Watershed....................................................................11....2
2.1 Utility Crossing; and Outfall Inspections.................................................................2
2.2 Septic System I]valuations.......................................................................................2
2.3 Stream Walks............................................................................................................3
Section 3.0 BMPs in TMDL Watersheds Without WI,As.........................................................4
3.1 Illicit Discharge Program.........................................................................................4
3.2 Stream Walks...........................................................................................................4
Section 4.0 Summary of Future BMPs.........................................
4.1 Goose Creek Watershed...........................................................................................4
4.2 TMDL Watersheds Without WLAs.........................................................................5
Appendix A:
Example Septic System Inspection Form
Appendix B:
Summary of Septic System Evaluations
Appendix C:
2012 Goose Creek TMDI. Stream Walk Report

rIMN (IF 2012 Al "I'MM, Report
' STALLINGS nnua''
NOR III CAROLINA .- ,
Section 1.0
Introduction
The "Town of Stallings Phase 11 Permit (NCS000454) specifies that the Town of Stallings will
produce an annual report that describes the Best Management Practices (BMPs) implemented to
comply with the Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs) requirements of stream segments that
are subject to an approved TMDL with storm water waste load allocations (WLAs) and those
stream segments required to develop TMDI-s with no specified WLAs. "Table I below shows the
applicable stream segments as listed in the 2012 North Carolina 303(d) Integrated Report.
Table 1: TMDL Stream Segments Within the Town of Stallings
Receiving
Stream
TMDL
Reason
Use
Integrated
Waste Load
Stream Name
Segment
Parameter
for Rating
Category
Report
Allocations
(Assessment
Category
Assigned
Unit)
Goose Creek
13-17-18a
Fecal
No criteria
Recreation
1(t)
Yes
coliform
exceeded
Goose Creek
13-17-18b
Fecal
Standard
Recreation
4(t)
Yes
coliform
Violation
North Fork
13-17-20-1
Turbidity
Standard
Aquatic
5
No
Crooked Creek
Violation
Life
South Fork
13-17-20-2a
Fish
Fair/Poor
Aquatic
5
No
Crooked Creek
Community
Rating
Life
/Benthos
Notes:
I (t) - Parameter is supporting uses in the AU and there is an approved TM Df, for the parameter
4(t) - Parameter assessment is impaired and there is an approved TMDL, for the parameter
5 - Waters for which TMDLs are required
Only those listed stream segments that are contained within the jurisdictional boundary of the
Town of Stallings are included on Table 1 above.
The main objective of the Annual "TMDL Report is to describe the BMPs implemented by the
Town of Stallings to reduce non -point source pollutant loading to streams subject to all approved
TMDL to the maximum extent practicable.
1.1 Background of Goose Creek Watershed
On August 10, 2006, the Town of Stallings received written notification from the N.C. Division
of Water Quality that it is subject to the approved fecal cohlorni TMDL, for Goose Creek. The
Town of Stallings (working cooperatively with Mecklenburg County Water Quality Program)
subsequently completed a TMDL Water Quality Recovery Program Plan for the Goose Creek
TMDL, which was submitted to the N.C. Division of' Water Quality on July 9, 2008 for
compliance with the above described permit requirement. Implementation of the Plan began in
July 2008. Input received from the Advisory Group formed to facilitate the implementation of

"'=''• I( MIN Or�...:
STA r NGS 2012 Annual "1'MD], Report
this Plan resulted in revisions that were subsequently submitted to the N.C. Division of Water
Quality on November 13, 2009. Implementation of this Plan began In November 2009.
The 'Town of Stallings has continued working cooperatively with Mecklenburg County Water
Quality Program and the Towns of Mint Hill and Indian `frail to implement the requirements of
this Program. During FYI 0-1 1, the North Carolina 2010 303d List was finalized. In this list, the
Use Category for AU Number
13-17-18a (Goose Creek from
Goose Creek Watershed Water Quality Recovery Program Status
source to SR 1524) was changed
From 4t (standard violation) to
It (no criteria exceeded) for
fecal coliform bacteria.
Category It is described as
"Parameter is supporting uses in
the AU and there is an approved
TMDL for the parameter".
Subsequent to the release ol�the
list a meeting was held with NC
DENR staff and the decision
was made to allow the
suspension of the WQRP for
areas of the watershed upstream
of'SR1524, which includes it
portion of Stallings (Figure 1).
i-
0 05
Figure I: Map Showing Goose Creek WQRP Status
Section 2.0
BMP.s in Goose Creek Watershed
2.1 Utility CrossinLs and Outfall Inspections
Legend
— V{QRF"Ia"p{...
Y+CPP &...+.
YWn Tr..
`� StaYnp.
IM.M.AvpC0.nt.
- M.e HiY
© C YIYiN.hea
During the reporting period, the "Town of Stallings continued to implement the Town's Illicit
Discharge Detection and I-limination program, which includes the identification of outlalls,
visual inspection of utility crossings and evaluation ofany dry weather flows.
2.2 ' Scptic System Evaluations
To help identify and eliminate possible sources of fecal coliform within the Goose Creek
Watershed, the Town of'Stallings identified and inspected residential sanitary septic systems
(individual wastewater treatment systems) within the Goose Creek watershed in order to verify
that known systems were functioning as designed. Any systems identified as non -compliant, or
2

�,,' ��x N[sS 2011 AnnkmI TMU Report
TALLI
.-": I l W 1 U
r1 i:ARoJANA ..
in need ofrepair, have the potential to contribute untreated sanitary wastewater to surface waters,
thereby increasing fecal coliform loading within the watershed.
The '[own of Stallings partnered with the Union County Health Department (the department with
permitting; authority over septic systems) to conduct inspections of all identified septic systems
in the Goose Creek watershed To date, 74 households within the Goose Creek watershed were
identified that had active septic systems.
L.ach ofthe identified properties was visited by an inspection team, but only 63 were actually
inspected. Three (3) of the identified properties were vacant at the time of inspection. I3ecause
the properties were vacant, the septic systems were not in use at the time of the inspection. An
adequate inspection of the system could not be conducted and the overall compliance status
could not be verified. However, no surficial problems were reported at these locations that
would indicate the likelihood of�a previous or recent problem with the systems. Eight (8)
additional properties with active septic systems were not inspected because the property owners
would not allow the inspection teams to access to their property for the specified purpose of'
inspection. The remaining 63 properties within the Goose Creek Watershed that had active
septic systems were inspected between .tune 26, 2012 and July 17, 2012. For each inspection
conducted, a checklist form was completed by the inspection team which recorded the date,
location and the condition of the system inspected. Additional notes were also recorded to
capture any significant or unusual circumstances.
Out of the 63 active septic systems inspected, there were a number of minor issues identified.
These issues included three (3) malfunctioning alarms, two (2) structures erected within the
designated drain fields, and tour (4) miscellaneous issues ranging from a failing electrical switch
to overgrown vegetation in the drain field. Mach of these issues was addressed with the
respective properly owners and repairs were requested to correct the identified deficiencies.
Only on (I) of the systems inspected had significant issues that warranted a Notice of Violation
for non-compliance. The system had apparently malfunctioned at some time in the past and the
property owners had taken measures to bypass the failed system. Efforts made by the properly
owners to bypass the system included illegal wiring, re-routing of house drains and the
installation of a bypass pump. The property owner was issued a Notice of Violation.
An example of -the inspection form used to collect septic system information is included in
Appendix A. The inspection data collected on these fonns is summarized in Appendix B.
2.3 Stream Walks
During I' Y I 1-12, The Town of Stallings began a program of walking all streams in the Goose
Creek Watershed and within the Town of'Stallings. The purpose of these walks was to identify
and eliminate all pollution sources identified from storm water outfalls, creek crossings and
infrastructure failures. Fecal coliform sampling was conducted in conjunction with stream walks
only when it was necessary for the identification of fecal sources.
3

'OrYlq'N OF
STALLINGS 2012 Am1Ua1TMDL Report
As it result of the stream walks, the following; issues were reported:
•. One illicit discharge was discovered and corrected;
• Several dry weather flows were observed, evaluated, and found not to be illicit
discharges;
• Seventeen (17) storm water infrastructure issues (damaged pipes, sink holes, etc.) were
identified that could cause excess sediment loading to Goose Creek and tributaries to
Goose Creek. Thesc issues were reported for follow-up and corrective action.
A full copy of the Goose Creek TMDL Stream Walk report is included as Appendix C.
Section 3.0
BMPs irr TMDL Wrrtersherls Without WLAs
For watersheds that have a `TMD11 without a specific WLA, the Town of Stallings implemented
tailored strategies to enhance water quality recovery.
3.1 Illicit Discharge Program
During the reporting period, the Town ol-'Stalling� continued to Implement the Town's Illicit
Discharge Detection and I. Irmrnation program, which Includes the identification of ol.1tf2111S,
visual inspection of utility crossings and evaluation of any dry weather flows.
3.2 Stream Walks
During; FYI 1-12, The "Town of'Stallings performed stream walks in the TMDL waterslicds
within the Town ol'Stalling;s. The purpose of*these walks was to identify and eliminate all
Pollution sources identified from storm water outfalls, creek crossings and infraslrUCtUre tailures.
The Town of Stallings will continue implementing; stream walks as described in the Storm Water
Management Program Plan within these TMDI., watersheds.
Section 4.0
Sunrnrtary of Future BMPs
4.1 Goose Creek Watershed
During; FYI 1-12, the "Town of'Stallings continued to expand on efforts to reduce fecal coliform
loading; to Goose Creek. Specifically, these efforts included:
4

•'-'•rrrwn i�r
STALLINGS 1 Ml�l. Report2012 Annual
�...= NOHIli CAROLINA
• Continued partnering with Mecklenburg County and the Towns of Mint Hill and Indian
"frail to implement the Goose Creek WQRP.
• Identified and inspected septic systems within the Goose Creek Watershed by partnering
with the Union County Health Department in order to identify and correct deliciencies
and failing; systems.
• Walking; streams within the Town of Stallings (including Goose Creek) to identify and
eliminate potential pollution sources.
• The "Town of Stallings post -construction ordinance will be implemented to continue focus
of reducing turbidity and fecal coliform bacteria as primary pollutants of concern.
Each of these BM1 s will be re-evaluated annually for effectiveness at reducing focal coliform
loads to Goose Creek and re -initiated on a continuing basis as determined necessary. Based on
the results from the F Y 1 1- 12 activities, the "Town of� Stal lings recommends c011tinual
implementation of the Goose Creek WQRP. The Town of Stallings recommends walking; 113 the
length of streams within the Town (including the Goose Creek Watershed) each fiscal year. In
this manner, each mile of streams within the town will be assessed every three years at a
minimum. The Town of Stallings also recommends conducting follow-up septic system
inspections within the Goose Creek Watershed on a 5-year cycle to ensure that existing systems
are maintained and functioning properly. The results of these BMPs will be included in future
annual reports.
4.2 TMD11 Watersheds Without WLAs
Tlie Town of Stallings will continue to implement enhanced strategies and measures within these
watersheds including:
• Enhancing Public lsducation efforts by targeting turbidity and fecal coliform as the main
pollutants of concern.
• The Town ol'Stalling;s post -construction ordinance will be implemented to continue the
focus of' reducing turbidity and fecal coliform bacteria through implementation of
structural BMPs. In addition, Stallings post -construction ordinance requires additional
storm water detention and peak control above that required by the state minimum
standards which helps protect stream habitat by minimizing stream bank erosion caused
by large volume flows.
• Enhancing; detection of illicit discharges by having staffcontinue performing; stream
walks to proactively look for illicit discharges and connections that can further degrade
stream water quality and habitat.
• Continuing to actively inspect storm water infrastructure to identify possible issues
within the system that could cause increased turbidity and degraded habitat.
Thew measures will be continually evaluated for effectiveness and will be adjusted as needed.to
reduce pollutants in these watersheds.

Example Septic System Inspection Form
Inspection Date: Inspection Completed By:
Site Parcel Id #: Site Address:
GWS File #: Watershed: Catchment Id:
Septic System Information:
System Classification: ❑ II ❑ III ❑ IV ❑ V ❑ VI
❑a ❑b ❑c ❑d ❑e Of ' ❑g
System Description:
(Ex: pump to 25% reduction)
Year Operation Permit Issued:
Land Records)
(If no permit record is available use built date year from
System Age: Years ❑ Actual ❑ Estimated
Inspection Information: Comments
Site accessible for inspection: ❑ Yes
Owner present:
❑ Yes
Drain field probed:
❑ Yes
System malfunction observed:
❑ Yes
Notice of Violation required:
❑ Yes
System located <200 ft. from
❑ Yes
surface water body:
System located <50 ft. from
❑ Yes
stormwater BMP or diversion:
Trees/vegetation in drain field:
❑ Yes
Irrigation on drain Feld:
❑ Yes
Well(s) located on property:
❑ Yes
General comments/observations:
# photos taken:
Checklist:
❑ No
❑ No
❑ No
❑ No
❑ No
❑ No
❑ No
❑ No
❑ No
❑ No
Dye Pack Left: ❑ Yes ❑ No Signature:

1. Perform file review for inspection site in the office (system type, age, location, etc.)
2. Conduct field inspection & complete inspection form before leaving the site
3. Take photos (2 minimum) of the drain field/tank(s) area from multiple locations
4. Leave project brochure & literature on door
5. Submit inspection form and photographs to the Town of Stallings.
*All scanned files and related photos should be submitted to the Town of Stallings.

Summao- of Goose Creek Septic System Evaluations
Date
I Parcel
Address
I Class
IDescriptim
Yr
Permit
Age
Act/Est
Owner
Present
Failure
Observed
I NON'
6/16/2012
07033062
1600E DEEPWOOD PLACE
II
NA
30�
E
Y
N
N
6/1612012
07033060
16010 DEEPWOOD PLACE
IIIB
NA
\1A
E
Y
N
N
6/2612012
07033059
16116 DEEPWOOD PLACE
IIB
CONVENTIONAL
30�
E
Y
N
N
6/26/2012
0703305E
16200 DEEPWOOD PLACE
I113
CONVENTIONAL
30=
E
Y
N
N
6/26/2012
07033057
16208 DEEPIVOOD PLACE
IVB
LPP
28=
E
N
N
N
6/26/2012
07033056
16212 DEEPWOOD PLACE
IVA
LPP MOU1iD
INA
NA
Y
\'
N
6/26/2012
07033044
5000 SHAFTWOOD DR.
II
CONVENTIONAL
30=
E
'N
6/26/2012
07033044A
5008 SHAFT\VOOD DR.
II
CONVENTIONAL
1301
E
Y
N
N
6/26/2012
07033043A
5108 SHAFTNVOOD DR,
lVacant Pro ei °
6/16/2011
07033039
5116 SHAMVOOD DR
NA
CONVENTIONAL
NA
E
Y
N
N
6/26/2012
07033064
5117 DEEPWOOD PLACE
II
CONVENTIONAL
30�
E
Y
N
N
6/26/2012
07057009E
5525 STEVENS MILL RD.
IIIB
PUS TO CONVENTIONAL
1996
NA
E
N
N
N
6/26/2012
107057009H
5901 STEVENS MILL RD.
IIC
MODIFIED CONVEN 'ZONAL
1982
NA
E
N
N
N
6/26/2012
07057009E
5912 STE%'E\S MILL RD.
IIC
NA
1975
1 NA
E
ly
N
NN
6/26/2011
07057009J
5913 STEVENS MILL RD.
IIIB
PUS TO CONVENTIONAL
1991
NA
E
Y
N
N
6/26/2012
0705 7641
6000 STEVENS MILL RD.
IIC
MODIFIED CONVENTIONAL
1982
NA
E
Y
N
6/26/2012
07057640
1600S STEVENS MILL RD.
IIC
MODIFIED CONVENTIONAL
1982
NA
NA
Y
N
N
6/26/2012
07057639
6016 STEVENS MILL RD.
IIIB
PUS TO CONAL
19SI
NA
NA
Y
N
N
6/26/2012
07057642
6024 STE\ENS MILL RD.
IIC
IMODIFIED CONVENTIONAL
19S3
INA
I NA
ly
N
N
6/16/2012
07033007
7611 STEVENS MILL RD,
1996
O«•ner did not allow inspection
6/26/2012
07033008A
7612 STEVENS MILL RD.
1977
Owner did not allow inspection
6/26/2012
07033007E
7640 STEVENS MILL RD.
1995
0%vner did not allot, inspection
6/26/2012
07033010A
7700 STEVENS MILL RD.
1950
0%vner did not allow inspection
6/2612012
07033010
7716 STEVENS MILL RD.
1963 1
O«•ner did not allow inspection
6/26/2012
07033008
7724 STEVEN'S MILL RD.
Ovmer did not allow inspection
6/26/2012
07033007A
7802 STEVENS MILL RD.
1986
Ov--ner did not ailo%y Inspection
7/10/2012
07033038
15004 DEEPWOOD PLACE
iIIB
PUS TO C0NVEN' IONTAL
20
E
N
N
N
7/10/2012
07033036
15508 DEEPWOOD PLACE
IIC
GRAVITY
30*
E
Ni
N
N
7/10/2012
107033037
15816 DEEPWVOOD PLACE
I1C
ISHALLOW CONVENTIONAL
30*
E
Y
N
N
Page 1 of 3

Summary of Goose Creek Septic SYstern Evaluations
Date
Parcel
Address
Class
Description
Yr
Permit
Age
Act/Est
Owner
Present
Failure
Observed
I NOV'
7/10/2012 iO7O33064
15908 DEEP%VOOD PLACE
IIA
SHALLOW CONVENTIONAL
30q
E
Y
N
N
7/10/2012
07033067
16009 DEEPWOOD PLACE
IIC
SHALLOW CON"VENTIONAL
30�
E
Y
N
N
7/10/2012
07033068
16113 DEEPNVOOD PLACE
IIC
SHALLOW CONVENTIONAL
30�
E
N
N
N
7/10/2012
07033069
16201 DEEPNVOOD PLACE
IIC
SHALLOW CONVENTIONAL
30�
E
N
N
N
7/10/2012
07033055
16224 DEEPNVOOD PLACE
IIIB
PU-Iv1P TO CONVENTIONAL
30�
E
N
N
N
7/10/2012
07033054
16300 DEEPNVOOD PLACE
IVA
LPP
1987
25
A
Y
N
N
7/10/2012
07033070
16301 DEEP\VOOD PLACE
IIC.
SHALLOW CON TINTTIONAL
1972
40
A
Y
N
N
7/10/2012
07033053
16308 DEEPNVOOD PLACE
IIC
SHALLOW CONTVENTIONAL
30-
E
Y
N
N
7/10/2012
07033071
16401 DEEPWVOODPLACE
IIC
SHALLOW CONT'EENTIONAL
30�
IE
N
N
N
7/10/2012
07033072
16413 DEE PWOOD PLA C E
IIC
SHALL0WC0NATN`T1ONAL
13,01
E
IY
N
N
7/10/2012
07033050
16416 DEEPWOOD PLACE
IVA
LPP
1989
23
A
IY
N
N
7/10/2012
07033005
14823 LAWYERS RD.
Owner did not allow inspection
7/10/2012
07033023
15601 KNOLLNVOOD PLACE
IIC
MODIFIED CONVENTIONAL
1971
NA
NA
IY
N
N
7/10/2012
07033012
15623 LAWYERS RD.
IIC
MODIFIED CONVENTIONAL
1968
NA
NA
N
N
N
7/10/2012
07033021
15700 IC\TOLLWOOD PLACE
IVA
NA
1987
NA
NA
Y
N
N
7/1012012
07033025
15709 ICNOLLWVOOD PLACE
IIC
CONVENTIONAL
1973
NA
NA
NT
N.
N
7/10/2012
07033022
15712 iCNOLLWOOD PLACE
IVA
NA
2002
NA
NA
Y
N
N
7/1012012
07033024
15717 KNOLLWOOD PLACE
IIC
IMODIFIED CONVENTIONAL
1979
NA
NA
Y
N
N
7/1012012
0703304S
15812 LAWYERS RD.
IIIB
PUNT TO 25% REDUCTION
2002
NA
NA
N'
N
N
7/10/2012
07057638
6100 STEVENS MILL RD.
IIC
MODIFIED CONVENiTIONTAL
1981
NA
NA
Y
N
N
7/10/2012
07057637
610S STEVENS MILL RD.
IIC
MODIFIED CONVENTIONAL
1981
NA
NA
Y
N
N
7/10/2012
07057636
6116 STEVENS MILL RD.
IIC
MODIFIED CONVENTIONAL
1981
NA
NA
N
N
N
7/10/2012
07057635
6124 STEV-ENS MILL RD.
IIC
MODIFIED CONVENTIONAL
1981
NA
NA
Y
N
N
7/10/2012
07057634
6132 STEVENS MILL RD.
IVA
LPP
1982
NA
NA
Y
Y
Y
7/10/2012
07057632
620S STEVEN'S MILL RD,
IVA
LPP
1993
NA
NA
N
NA
N
7/10/2012
07057631
6216 STEVEN'S MILL RD,
IIC
MODIFIED CO'N' EN'n0NAL
1981
NA
NA
Y
N
N
7/10/2012
07057630
6224 STEVENI TS MILL RD.
IIC
MODIFIED CONVENTIONAL
1980
NA
NA
N
N
N
7/12/2012
07033029
55 25 GOLD CREST DR.
IIB
CONVENTIONAL
30=
E
N
N
N
7/17/2012
0703304fi
4208 GOLD CREST DR.
1 'A
LPP
NA
NA
N
\
N
Page 2 of 3

Summary of Goose Creek Septic System Evaluations
Date
Parcel
Address
Class
Description
Yr
Permit
Age
Act/Est
Owner
Present
Failure
Observed
NON"
7/17/2012
07033045
5009 GOLD CREST DR.
IIC
CO`1'ENTIONAL
30+
E
\
\
N
7/17/2012
07033043
5109 GOLD CREST DR.
IIC
CONVENTIONAL
30�
E
Y
7/17/201-1
07033015
5113 GOLD CREST DR.
IIC
CONVENTIONAL
304-
E
Y
N
N
7/17/2012
07033016
5116 GOLD CREST DR.
11C
CO\1-EtiTI0 NN AL
30=
E
Y
7/17/2012
07033041
5117 GOLD CREST DR.
IIC
CO\1-ENTIO\iAL
130=
E
IY
7/17/2012
07033017
5208 GOLD CREST DR.
I1C
C.ONIVEN,TIONAL
30=
E
N
\
N
7/17/2012
07033018
5216 GOLD CREST DR.
IIC
CO\IN,ENTIONAL
30*
E
N
N
N
7117/2012
07033034
5233 GOLD CREST DR.
IIC
CONVENTIONAL
30�
E
N
N
N
7/17/2012
07033033
5235 GOLD CREST DR.
IIIB
PUMP TO CONVENTIONAL
11
A
Y
N
N
7117/ �01 2
07033019
5300 GOLD CREST DR.
1IC
CWTVENTION, AL
30=
E
N
N
N
7/17/2012
07033032
5401 GOLD CREST DR.
IIC
COtiT'ENTIONAL
30�
E
N
N
N
7/17/2012
07033026
5500 GOLD CREST DR.
IIC
CO\A'ENTIONAL
30*
E.
Y
N
\'
7117/201 _'
5516 GOLD CREST DR.
IIC
CONVENTIONAL
30=
E
N
N
N
7/17/2012
5517 GOLD CREST DR.
IIC
CO,VVENTIONAL
30=
E
\
IN
N
7/17/201 2
07033028
5524 GOLD CREST DR.
iIC
CONVENTIONAL
30=
E
Y
IN
N
7/17/2012
15850 GOLD CREST DR.
IIC
CONVENTIONAL
E
Y
N
N
Page 3 of 3

Goose Creek TMDL Stream
Walk Report
�_: STALLINGS
Prepared by:
Town of Stallings
Prepared for:
Goose Creek TMDL Water Quality Recovery Report
(NPDES #NCS000454)
June 27, 2012

Table of Contents
Section1.0 Introduction ................ ............... ...... ......................................................................... I
Section 2.0 Purpose.
Section3.0 Methodology............................................................................................................
Section 4.0 Summary of' Findings...............................................................................................2
4.1 Illicit Discharges......................................................................................................2
4.2 Storm Water Infrastructure Mapping.......................................................................2
4.3 Storm Water Conveyance System Inspection.........................................................2
TABLES
Table 1: Stream Walk Inventory / Inspection Data
FIGURES
Figure 1: Stallings 41.1tfall Map of -Goose Creek Watershed

ItiN tiE'
'� STALLINCS Goose Creek TMDL,Stream Walk Report
...:
NOR'I I CAROLINA
1.0 Introduction
From November 9, 2011 to February 1, 2012, Don Ceccarelli, P.E— and .Jeff Pricc walked
approximately 9.0 stream miles within the town limits of Stallings, during baseflow conditions.
The stream miles walked were all located in the Goose Creek watershed downstream of Stevens
Mill Road as shown on the Union County GIS stream coverage. The subject area was bounded
on the west by 1-485 and on the east by Mill Grove Road. The mileage walked was bounded to
the north and the south by the town boundary, but included streams that drained the Emerald
Lake Country Club Golf Course and a small portion of'the Steven's Mill Subdivision.
2.0 Purpose
The stream walks were primarily performed to fulfill the requirements of the Goose Creek Water
Quality Recovery Plan for locating and reducing the fecal coliform loading in the Goose Creek
Watershed as required by the Goose Creek Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) for fecal
colilorm. In addition, these stream walks I'ulfill other elements of -the Town of' Stallings Storm
Water Managcnient Program Plan required by the Town's Phase 11 NJ'DE-S permit (Permit #
NCS000395) such as:
• Updating storm water outfall maps,
• Maintenance of storm water conveyance systems,
• Detection of dry weather flows, and
• Detection and elimination of'illicit discharges and connections,
Stream walks serve not only to meet permit conditions, but more importantly help the Town of
Stallings reduce polluted run-off from entering streams.
3.0 Methodology
Stream walks were conducted during baseflow conditions. For the purposes ol�this report,
baseflow conditions are defined as less than 0.10 inches of precipitation occurring in a 24-11our
day during the previous 72-11our period. The last observed rainfall event prior to the November
9, 2011 stream walk occurred from November 3-4, 2011 , at which time 1.00 inch of rainfall was
recorded. The next rainfall event occurred on November 10, 2011, however only 0.03 inches of'
rainfall were recorded. All precipitation data reported here was taken from the United States
Geological Survey (USGS) real-time network website; raingage #350857080383245, CRN-67
"Thompson Rd. Mint Mill, NC. This appears to be the closest active USGS raingage to the project
area.
During the stream walks, staff looked for dry weather flows, discoloration, sewer fungus,
suspended solids, oily sheen, dead organisms in or around the stream and other indicators
typically associated with pollution discharges. This included any odors typically associated with

r rr,u°N 6r Goose Creek TMDL Stream Walk Report
>rj�,_ STALLINCS
sewage, petroleum or chemical pollution. Any unusual or atypical conditions were traced
Upstream to identify potential sources, and the sources were noted if identified.
During the stream walks, each component of the storm water infrastructure (feature) encountered
was geo-located, inspected and photographed. Geographic locations were determined using a
Geographic Positioning System (GPS) enabled camera (Cannon Powershot SX230 I -IS) where
possible. When no GPS was available, features were located using traditional mapping
techniques and coordinates were determined from Google Maps. For each feature encountered,
the following information was collected: feature ID (assigned), Latitude/Longitude (decimal
degrees), feature type (ditch, culvert, pipe, tributary), feature material (earthen, corrugated
plastic, corrugated metal, concrete, RCI', PVC, black iron), diameter (inches), shape (circular,
channel, flared), dry weather flow present (yes, no), outfall condition (good, fair, poor), stream
bank location facing downstream (right, left), suspected source and any comments.
4.0 Summary of Findings
4.1 Illicit Discharges
One feature was identified as a suspected leaking sewer aerial (Item 9 on `table 1), and one illicit
discharge (discharge of used oil and golf course chemicals) was identified at Emerald Lake.
Country Club Gol l' Course (Item 26 on `fable 1). Both of these were reported to the ']'own of
Stallings f-or follow-up investigation and resolution in accordance Willi the "town of'Stallings
Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination program.
4.2 Storm Water Infrastructure ManIling
"There were 168 features inspected and cataloged; including one sewer line aerial (black iron
pipe), 58 culverts, 40 ditches, 65 pipes, three pond weirs, and one tributary. Dry weather flows
were present at 24 Features during the stream walk. Each of these dry weather flows was
evaluated and/or traced to a source. Based upon the evaluation, none of the dry weather flows
were from suspected pollution sources. The location of the storm water infrastructure is shown
on Figure 1.
4.3 Storm Water Conveyance System Inspection
During the stream walking activities, there were several potential infrastructure issues identified
with the storm water conveyance system:
• three corroded or damaged storm water pipes,
• six pipes with partial blockage clue to sediment or debris,
• one cracked concrete headwall,
• one sewer lateral acting as a debris dam,
• one exposed sewer lateral due to erosion,
• three pipe joint separations, and
• two areas where sink holes were forming near storm drain pipes
These storm water infrastructure issues were reported to the Town of Stallings maintenance staff
for prioritization and follow-up.

Table 1: Stream Walk Inventory / Inspection Data
ID
Date
Feature
Material
Diameter
(in)
Shape
R/L Bank
(DS)
Latitude
Longitude
Flow
Comment
1
11/09/11
ditch
EARTHEN
39
channel
right
35.136810
-80.607890
no
EE�ood
cross channel log energy dissipator
(natural}
2
11/09/11
ditch
EARTHEN
32
channel
left
35.136755
-80.607863
no
good
from dammed wetland area —
natural
3
1 1/09/1 l
ditch
EARTHEN
24
channel
ri ht
35.135958
-80.607979
no
fair
some erosion
4
1 1/09/1 l
culvert
CMP
30
circular
left
35.135707
-80.608486
no
good
1 4408 Derbyshire Ln
5
l 1/09/1 1
ditch
EARTHEN
12
channel
left
35.135734
-80.607929
no
good
not on field ma
6
11/09/11
culvert
HDPE
12
circular
in -stream
35.136244
-80.609911
n/a
good
3-barreled culvert on Ern Lake golf
course
7
11/09/11
culvert
I RCP
40
1 circular
left
35.136171
-80.611849
no
good
u stream from pond
8
1 l/0911 1
culvert
RCP
30
circular
right
35.136143
-80.61 1874
no
good
some sediment buildup
9
11/09/11
lateral
BLKIRON
10
circular
crossing g
35.139292
-80.606542
n/a
fair
possible leaking aerial from right
bank
10
l 1/09/1 1
culvert
HDPE
14
circular
left
35.1394114
-80.606906
ves
good
very low flow
11
11/09/11
culvert
HDPE
24
circular
in -stream
35.139403
-80.607197
n/a
good
12
I1/09/11
culvert
RCP
20
circular
left
35.138985
-80.608348
no
good
13
11/09/11
culvert
CMP
72
circular
in -stream
35,139023
-80.608448
n/a
poor
Fla -stick Dr. - appears to be
I collapsing at the joint
14
11/09/11
ditch
GRASS
48
channel
right
35.139568
-80.609463
no
good
Par 3 Em Lake
15
11/09/1 I
culvert
RCP
24
circular
in -stream
35.141213
-80.610651
n/a
good
Par 5 pump house has underground
leak —irrigation
16
11/09/11
culvert
HDPE
24
circular
right
35.140890
-80.611658
no
Qood
17
11/09/11
culvert
HDPE
36
circular
right
35.142665
-80.615578
ves
good
low flow
18
11/09/11
culvert
HDPE
24
circular
in -stream
35.143086
-80.616598
n/a
poor
crushed
19
11/09/11
culvert
RCP
24
circular
right
35.145319
-80,617933
no
poor
partially buried with sediment
20
11/09/11
culvert
RCP
28
circular
in -stream
35,145341
-80.617890
n/a
good
cracked head wall
21
11/09/11
pipe
HDPE
12
circular
right
35.143654
-80,612805
no
good
cart path Mitchell Lake
22
l 1/09/1 1
ditch
EARTHEN
20
channel
right
35,143593
-80.613631
no
good
cart path Mitchell Lake
23
11/09/11
pipe
RCP
32
circular
left
35.146311
-80.605205
good
start of channel
24
1 1/09/1 1
pipe
HDPE
24
circular
right
35.146384
-80,604848
P'no
good
start of channel
Page 1 of 7

Table 1: Stream Walk Inventory, / Inspection Data
1D
Date
Feature
Material
Diameter
(in)
Shape
R/L Bank
(DS)
Latitude
Longitude
Flow
Cond.
Comment
25
1 1/09/1 l
culvert
CMP
18
circular
right
35,146397
-80.604785
no
good
under Union Rd.
26
11/09/11
culvert
CMP
24
circular
in -stream
35.145257
-80.604470
n/a
good
under Union Rd. - bright green in
color V V
27
l 1/09/1 l
ditch
CONCRETE
24
channel
left
35.130305
-80.623555
no
good
sewer later acting as debris dam
28
11/09/11
ditch
EARTHEN
12
channel
left
35.130557
-80.623373
no
good
29
1 1/09/1 l
culvert
CMP
36
circular
in -stream
35.130698
-80.62327,
n/a
good
end of undeveloped cul-de-sac
30
1 1/09/1 l
culvert
CMP
42
circular
in -stream
35.130948
-80.622960
n/a
good
Edgefield Ct.
31
1 1/09/1 1
ditch
EARTHEN
18
channel
right
35.132202
-80.622584
no
good
trash dump — old appliances
32
11/09/11
culvert
CMP
72
circular
in -stream
35,138275
-80.618275
n/a
good
Lawyers Rd.
33
11/09/11
culvert
RCP
24
circular
right
35.140217
-80.620311
yes
good
under Lawyers Rd.
34
1 1/09/1 1
ditch
EARTHEN
30
channel
right
35.141285
-80.621487
yes
good
white house backyard across from
gas station
35
1 1/09/1 1
pipe
PVC
12
circular
right
35.142047
-80.621386
no
good
back of new construction —
optometrists office
36
1 1/09/1 1
culvert
RCP
42
circular
in -stream
35.143028
-80.623156
n/a
good
2 culverts, concrete head wall -
Millwright Ln. next to lift station
37
11/09/11
ditch
RIPRAP
24
channel
left
35.143531
-80.623768
no
good
38
1 1/09/1 1
culvert
RCP
28
circular
in -stream
35.144742
-80,625202
n/a_good
across Steven's Mill at end of walk
/ beg of reach
39 1
11/09/11
ditch
EARTHEN
24
channel
left
35,129096
-80.630620
no
good
downstream Steven's Mill towards
Lake Dr
40
11/09/11
ditch
EARTHEN
48
channel
left
35.127534
-80.629553
no
ood
41
11/09/11
ditch lEARTHEN
48
channel
left
35.126551
-80.627761
no I
good
42
11/09/11
pipe
PVC
8
circular
left
35,126428
-80.624318
no
fair
mudded in
43
1 1/09/1 1
ditch
GRASS
30
channel
right
35.127815
-80,624510
no
good
right bank of main channel
44
1 1/09/1 1
ditch
CONCRETE
24
channel
right
35.129158
-80.624360
no
poor
right bank of main channel —
downstream Lake Dr. - eroded
exposed sewer lateral
45
1 1/12/1 1.
ditch
EARTHEN
120
channel
right
35.125713
-80.608439
no
good
upstream Mill Grove at waterfall
46
1 1/12/11
culvert
RCP
24
circular
left
35.126038
-80.603834
yes
good
upstream from waterfall
47
11/12/11
ditch
EARTHEN
24
channel
left
35.126353
-80.604096
no
good
upstream side of fence at posted
property
Page 2 of 7

Table 1: Stream Walk lnventon, / Inspection Data
1D
Date
Feature
Material
Diameter
(in)
Shape
R/L Bank
(DS)
Latitude
i Longitude
Flow
Cond.
Comment
48
1 1/12/11
ditch
EARTHEN
36
channel
left
35.126429
-80.604343
no
Good
multiple fingers / braided
49
1 1/12/1 1
ditch
EARTHEN
48
channel
right
35.126514
-80.605698
no
good
two channels
50
11/12/11
ditch
EARTHEN
24
channel
left
35.126579
-80.605983
no
good
at home where we talked to
neighbor
51
11/12/11
ditch
EARTHEN
60
channel
left
35.126473
-80.606249
no
good
52
1 l/12/11
culvert
CMP
52
circular
left
35.127695
-80.607383
no
poor
16009 Deepwoods PI — bottom
rusted out
53
11/12/1 l
ditch
EARTHEN
40
channel
left
35.127774
-80.607396
no
good
braided above — no pipe
54
1 1/12/1 l
ditch
EARTHEN
24
channel
left
35.126900
-80.608977
no
I hood
Garden / deer feeder
55
11/12/1 1
trib
channel
left
35.126933
-80.609635
yes
good
not on ma
56
11/12/11
culvert
CMP
36
circular
in -stream
35,126038
-80.613049
n/a
poor
rusted out — crosses Goldcrest.
Rusted out bottom, blown out
downstream. headcut eroding
57
11/12/11
ditch
EARTHEN
24
channel
left
35.123232
-80.614813
no
Good
58
11/12/11
pipe
PVC
8
circular
left
35.123501
-80.620630
yes
good
Country Woods WWTP
59
11/12/1 1
ditch
EARTHEN
60
channel
left
35.123564
-80.620746
no
no pipe, ditch at end of cul-de-sac
60
1 1/12/1 1
ditch
EARTHEN
36
channel
left
35.124840
-80.621881
no
I no pipe on Hawthorne at Quince
61
11/12/1 l
pipe
HDPE
18
circular
left
35.125994
-80.623008
no
Good
1525 Hawthorne Rd.
62
1/16/12
culvert
CMP
15
circular
left
35.131169
-80,631416
no
poor
63
1/16/12
culvert
I PVC
10
circular
right
35.130857
-80.632597
no
Good
64
1/16/12
pipe
CMP
36
circular
in -stream
35.130829
-80.632544
ves
good
2 x 36" pipes
65
1/16/12
pipe
CMP
36
circular
in -stream
35.130360
-80.633874
ves
Good 1
2 x 36" pipes: other end ofH64
66
1/16/12
pipe
HDPE
15 1
circular
right
35.130315
-80.633908
no
Good
67
1116112
culvert
CMP
29x43
oblong
in -stream
35.130128
-80.634281
n/a
fair
crushed circular culvert
68
1/16/12
culvert
CMP
27x43
oblong
in -stream
35.129794
-80.634452
n/a
fair
pipe corroded
69
1/16/12
i e
HDPE
14
circular
left
35.129073
-80.634944
no
good
70
1/16/12
pie
HDPE
14
circular
right
35.129128
-80,634933
no t
good
71
1/16/12
culvert
CMP
69
circular
in -stream
35.129179
-80.63491,
n/a
good
72
1/16/12
culvert
CMP
69
circular
in -stream
35.128771
-80.635044
n/a
Good
other end of,47I
73
1/16/12
ditch
GRASS
24
channel
right
35.128551
-80.635150 1
no
good
Noe 3of7

Table 1: Stream Walk Inventory / Inspection Data
1D
Date
Feature
Material
Diameter
(in)
Shape
R/L Bank
(DS)
Latitude
Longitude
Flow
Cond.
Comment
74
I/16/12
culvert
HDPE
19
circular
in -stream
35.127487
-80.636507
n/a
good
75
1/16/12
ditch
EARTHEN
9
channel
left
35.127199
-80.636865
no
good
76
1/16/12
culvert
CMP
32
circular
in -stream
35,127135
-80.637055
n/a
fair
77
1/16/12
pipe
PVC
4
circular
right
35.126353
-80.637944
yes
good
78
I/16/12
culvert
PVC
10
circular
right
35.126181
-80.638138
es
good
79
1/16/12
culvert
I RCP
28
circular
in -stream
35.1261 15
-80.638368
n/a
good
26 u str side. 27 dnstr side
80
1/16/12
pipe
HDPE
18
circular
right
35.125007
-80.639398
no
fair
partially blocked
81
1/16112
culvert
CMP
30
circular
in -stream
35.124921
-80.639884
n/a
good
82
1/16/12
ditch
EARTHEN
12
channel
left
35.124916
-80.639982
no
good
83
1/16/12
ditch
EARTHEN
12
channel
left
35.124739
-80.640543
no
good
84
1/16/12
culvert
CMP
34
circular
in -stream
35.124479
-80.640661
n/a
flood
85
1/16/12
pipe
RCP
15
circular
left
35.123686
-80.641955
no
good
86
1/16/12
i e
RCP
15
circular
right
35.123563
-80,641871
no
fair
I partiallyblocked; trees
87
1/16/12
i e
RCP
46
circular
in -stream
35.123635
-80.641907
no
fair
21" of sediment; needs cleaning
88
1/16/12
ditch
EARTHEN
24
channel
right
35.132106
-80.632364
yes
good
89
1/16/12
ditch
EARTHEN
36
channel
left
35.132825
-80.632337
no
good
90
1/16/12
weir
CONCRETE
360
flat
in -stream
35.132891
1 -80.632782
yes
good
30 ft. weir
91
1/16/12
pipe
HDPE
12
circular
right
35,132143
-80.634287
no
fair
92
1/16/12
culvert
CMP
103
circular
in -stream
35.131826
-80.635144
n/a
good
93
1/16/12
weir
CONCRETE
432
flat
in -stream
35.131631
-80,635406
yes
fair
36 ft. weir
94
1/16112
culvert
I CMP
30x40
oblong
in -stream
35.132606
-80.636948
n/a
fair
unmarked trib to the left
95
1/16/12
culvert
CMP
38
circular
in -stream
35.134295
-80.638156
n/a
good
96
1/16/12
pipe
RCP
16
circular
right
35.134231
-80.638762
no
good
97
1/16/12
pipe
RCP
28
circular
in -stream
35.134774
-80,639134
no
good
98
1/16/12
culvert
I CMP
107
circular
in -stream
35.131215
-80.637988
n/a
good
99
1/16/12
culvert
CMP
69
circular
in -stream
35.130986
-80.639043
n/a
fair
pipe separation: 2x69" culverts
100
1/16/12
1 e
RCP
15
circular
left
35. 13 1023
-80.638989
yes
good
101
1/25/12
culvert
RCP
48
circular
in -stream
35.132755
-80.645455
n/a
good
2x48" culverts; minor crack in
concrete headwall
Page 4 of 7

Table 1: Stream `'Falk Inventory 1 Inspection Data
ID
Date
Feature
Material
Diameter
(in)
Shape
R/L Bank
(DS)
Latitude
Longitude
Flow
Cond.
Comment
102
1/25/12
pipe
HDPE
15
circular
left
35.133196
-80.644840
yes
good
across county, line into Mecklenburg
103
1/25/12
culvert
HDPE
15
circular
in -stream
35,132801
-80.644597
n/a
poor
cart path undercut and cracked
104
1/25/12
culvert
CMP
27s42
oblong
in -stream
35.132768
-80.644349
n/a
fair
Trib to left at par 3 pond
105
1/25/12
pipe
i HDPE
30
circular
in -stream
35,133391
-80.644172
no
good
1 6042 Arborgolo Ln.
106
1/25/12
pipe
RCP
16
circular
right
35.131766
-80.642852
no
good
barking weenie dogs
107
1/25/12
pipe
RCP
15
circular
right
35.131848
-80.641599
no
good
108
1/25/12
pipe
HDPE
24
circular
left
35. 132 15 1
-80.640730
no
good
109
1/25/12
pipe
RCP
24
circular
left
35.132579
-80.640572
no
good
110
1/25/12
culvert
CMP
72
circular
in -stream
35.131845
-80.640433
n/a
good
Ill
1/25/12
culvert
CMP
72
circular
in -stream
35.131070
-80.639710
n/a
poor
other side of u 110. pipe separated
underground. cracked headwall
112
1/25/12
pipe
RCP
15
1 circular
right
35.130888
-80.639454
no
good
113
1/25/12
culvert
CMP
72
circular
in -stream
35.130866
-80.639425
n/a
good
202" culverts
114
1/25/12
ditch
EARTHEN
14
channel
right
35.130544
-80.640247
no
good
115
1/25/12
pipe
HDPE
15
circular
right
35.129612
-80.641686
no
good
116
1/25/12
culvert
RCP
53
circular
in -stream
35,129648
-80.641755
n/a
good
117
1/25/12
pipe
HDPE
1 15
circular
left
35.129731
-80.641707
no
good
118
1/25/12
pipe
HDPE
15
circular
left
35.128429
-80.642431
yes
good
119
1/25/12
pipe
HDPE
24
circular
right
35.128046
-80.642459
yes
good
no follow up needed
120 1
1/25/12
pipe
HDPE
15
circular
left
35.12731Q1
-80.642909
yes
good
32
no follow up needed
121
1/25/12
pipe
HDPE
24
circular
in -stream
35.126885
-80.643072
no
good
end of channel; no need to follow u
122
1/25/12
pipe
I HDPE
15
circular
left
35.129490
-80.642764
no
good
123
1/25/12
pipe
HDPE
15
circular
left
35.129306
-80.643055
no
good
Overgrown with vellow flowering
plant. Roof drain PVC pipe there as
well
124
1/25/12
pipe
BLKIRON
12
circular
in -stream
35.128912
-80.643547
no
good
125
1/25/12
s illwav
CONCRETE
240
channel
right
35.128897
-80.643515
yes
good
no follow up needed
126
1/25/12
pipe
HDPE
18
circular
left
35.130000
-80.645115
no
good
127
1/25/12
pipe_
HDPE
15
circular
left
35.127647
-80.645456
ves
good
no follow up needed
Page 5 of 7

Table 1: Stream Walk Inventory 1 Inspection Data
1D
Date
Feature
Material
Diameter
(in)
Shape
R/L Bank
(DS)
Latitude
Longitude
Flow
Cond.
Comment
128
1/25/12
eipe
HDPE
40
circular
left
35.127041
-W646039
no
good
submerged pipe in pond
129
1/25/12
pipe
HDPE
30
circular
left
3 5. 126401
-80.645715
no
eood
130
1/25/13
pipe
HDPE
30
circular
in -stream
35.126431
-80.645664
no
good
2x30" pipes: end of channel, upper
I end of pond
131
U25/12
pipe
RCP
24
circular
left
35,132782
-80.631524
no
fair
6" sediment buildup
132
1/25/12
ditch
EARTHEN
24
channel
left
35.133325
-80,632048
no
good
133
1/25/12
2i e
HDPE
30
circular
right
35.134522
-80.633091
yes
fair
heavy vegetation, needs to be
cleared
134
1/25/12
pipe
RCP
24
circular
left
35.134626
-80.633712
yes
good
no follow up needed
135
1/25/12
ditch
EARTHEN
24
channel
right
35.135360
-80.631986
no
good
136
1/25/12
culvert
CMP
72
circular
in -stream
35.135648
-80.631375
n/a
good
137
1/25/12
culvert
CMP
72
circular
in -stream
35.135805
-80.630591
n/a
good
other end of#136
138
1/25/12
pipe
RCP
15
circular
left
35.136358
-80.629829
no
good
139
1/25/12
culvert
CMP
72
circular
in -stream
35.136313
-80.629858
n/a
good
140
1/25/12
ditch
EARTHEN
24
channel
right
35.136990
-80.629229
no
fair
eroding head cut
141
1/25/12
pipe
RCP
15
circular
left
35.137358
-80.628678
no
good
142
1/25/12
culvert
CMP
48
circular
in -stream
35.137358
-80.628686
n/a
good
143
1/25/12
pipe
RCP
18
circular
Ieft
35,138015
-80,627988
no
good
144
1/25/12
ditcl
EARTHEN
30
channel
left
35.138277
-80.627700
no
good
Barbara Fest - yard/stream cleanu
145
1/25/12
i
RCP
l8
circular
right
35.138694
-80,627362
no
good
146
U25/12
i
RCP
15
circular
left
35.138949
-80,627346
no
ood
147
U25/12
culRCP
48
circular
in -stream
35.138973
-80.627324
n/a
good
148
1/25/12
pie
RCP
15 1
circular
left
35.139447
-80.627095
no
poor
holding 13" water. Needs cleaning
and re -grading
149
1/25/12
pie
RCP
15
circular
right
35,139950
-80.627194
yes
good
150
1/25/12
culvert
RCP
40
circular
in -stream
35.139970
-80.627135
n/a
good
Hunley Ride Rd., cracked
headwall
151
1/25/12
pipe
RCP
30
circular
in -stream
35.140726
-80.626879
no
good
next rd crossing
152
211I12
pie
RCP
20
circular
left
35. i 36642
-80.63134
no
good
upstream is a lawnmower and a
trike
153
2l1l 12
pipe
HDPE i
15 7circular
I
left
35. 137335.
-80.632943
no
fair
filling in - par 3 golf course fair+vav
Page 6 of 7

Table 1: Stream Walk Inventory / Inspection Data
ID
Date
Feature
Material
Diameter
(in)
Shape
R/L Bank
(DS)
Latitude
Longitude
Flow
Cond.
Comment
154
2/1/12
pipe
PVC
4
circular
left
35.138175
-80.63273
no_good
sand trap / green under drains
155
2/l/12
pipe
PVC
4
circular
left
35.138118
-80.632719
no
good
sand trap / green under drains
156
2/1/12
culvert
RCP
20
circular
left
35.138647
-80.632637
yes
good
157
2/1/12
culvert
PVC
4
circular
right
35.138388
-80.634214
no
good
4" PVC connected to 10" culvert on
cart 2ath
158
2/1/12
pipe
RCP
43
circular
in -stream
35.140443
-80.633856
no
good
upstream end of trib, map marked
incorrectly
159
2/1/12
culvert
CMP
36
circular
in -stream
35.138936
-80.633176
n!a
poor
partially blocked - needs cleaning
160
2/1/12
pipe
RCP
16
circular
right
35.139004
-80.633048
no
good
from Green Ashe Lane
161
2/1/12
pipe
RCP
20
circular
in -stream
35.138875
-80.632492
no
good
connects to 156
162
2/1/12
pipe
RCP
16
circular
right
35.139759
-80.631 178
no
good
bunch grass
163
2/1/12
pipe
RCP
24
circular
left
35.139951
-80.630565
no
good
164
2/1/12
pipe
RCP
41
circular
in -stream
35.141426
-80.63001
no
good
minor crack in headwall
165
2/1/12
pipe
RCP
36
circular
in -stream
35.142689
-W629805
no
good
minor crack in headwall - other end
of 164
166
2/1/12
ditch
EARTHEN
36
channel
left
35.142728
-80_629814
no
good
up er end trib by fence
167
2/1/12
ditch
EARTHEN
24
channel
left
35.143622
-80.629696
yes
good
significant flow
168
2/1/12
pie
RCP
30
circular
right
35.143668
-80.629738
no
good
1200 Mtn. Laurel
Page 7 of 7

y :�. �.aR•�,: -�s,•� "en'-� L-3 }�-w �'- ,• �� iF � '+� �'-� tr , -, ,w-��r .{,,-f`� � r - _ �. t,
'�i..��� Fly,% _ r' r" � �i0"e y f�'� �� �t� i � I �,..- � � �.- ��?4���,, � T�f ` � fl• �9i�'+;., yyL: �' 'S ��,1
f,}.Z+p� �� r� •,� �!� jd +' �.7 � }{. r. �.r��1'"c '�+ �hL' �F ri i s1 1 t'.�
i� Tom~ � •� .�i i .J ,i i SZ�,�i- � � � �ti •� r1 E G' `i c. --' �'' : ��.f r j '� �� a -'4 _ x
i fi ,;.frt� �,4 �` _ � � 1, � �� � '"��•' � � _� .�,i,�'!H .. � � � �;
f �` '.t � •�•v3hh-�'a"'�, µ � � 'r'• • tf'a` s� � f' Ll �n .� �r2 r7 '7`y'• � .� �� +'_r',,; ��
'i�1{y,� —� � .i'N4 ,'.}� � � J'..�:�c � � �� n "�'1' � �r�` rf. r. r ��; � �i^'-4•�' ,{ ' y �.• �� 4� � t ��R4
. ��`�'•s � � 17�SS�e.` � • 1 pia 'J"'e 'r • `��+1 ;#�" { •4 }� � �•'���`--�" /.�' � �$V4.:� �'i :1 � 4�� '
' �� 1 �_ _ "��, p- �,�, s' gip' " e� � �f _:.a y .o. 4. � - ,ti :: r c;" •�-?^�•
f� � � ��} � ti. � ���`��1'g f .`•tom A �F � �•lr�C iif' 't y�
'� - �, L �1 .{ � � 6� i k _fir r � �'�,���r• ai.. �. r��n� '1 � i> d /,� i. •v - �.
� � �—'F_ti. .�� '3 a_ �7 w � Ti iy.r' � � � .1 `'4 f• k *� .�'t .i.
• L t� •- s ��"';'i'r � �4'� ��I, ��iu� ' - fwr. �T� � as _ � �` t� ,1. 4�, F,'� err_ r } L., � � � �
s'4 r S.�' � - r" r ., « �'a � :: lll. �, t - .�J-y� `�. ' �c • w �'t_i i �•A
FQj1hA
1} V yr' -�•;;t ' � ���'/'�'y�.i�,. .r�! 1' aT' �� y��e� c. 4 p �_ _F .F�� xr. 1 •s r T,�r{'��,lr r �
- 13�"� }k'R�' I!j J.y, J' F..� � r 1 �j[;�?� !f v�T � r `�(� Y_if� �j �•� �C`• ••���'V � y 1 � �� �+. _
=K' �� ' k-4• : ,•C+1Y�y.;,{-� i �.J a .y 3" J. - 1,!• r•" . a - tj y`��-i, J:C. �,
} �� 2� "''' �`S: ~ n-?sVK �} •• � �..��54_Si �� �•���f �zK � � E; r�� ;rt-,Ir{ ,?� ^i- � '
:Fr
tirS.' • ;, rya- • i i •�1 , i� 4' •"h s:l ! !C ,,r ti"T ,a, ty
a.
oil
'��`yr °t n44+� _ _..4° r; r�' - _'t"_ �a` .� '+t(. i �y!4;' 1 ,7 rR�, �'F •k •5�'''3 )�•
�- '�c'i+r•7 = dlr =� .ct�-y�;t'+ r9''`J _ �i��-�� �h � � r ffl*i �l� �q.,, �^�.�iy i i -` r� � _
���.r�r ,lY `�' i� ' .riy *. e*4 �'°� � •�'r r �' � T� . � j;-'���•��%� '�y1 _-!1 '4,� � t r� ?� -r �y r
i ,y� Li Y - M "=`L�i�•�. �r _� i.. ��� ¢� ��•�'r�f.F }•�,�ii � of, ��- ! � r ��,-a.,
� .�. F �� r � �c�`ti��"� 1� .•y ' % � 4 - � �' �5}.:J�' �1 �� � -'� � {'�L�xt .� �4;T� ' T�� s .17 � �, f _ .,1�
�.� ! •-.r ,,•r'j��r #. ��, ft `.r f1+x!a• fi _ r�• r, r f' u '=�. r 1� -.. .c•
Zk
• ` � -.,,.ter ¢_ �' ,-, �.,,, f,_�r �' -+� .� I =� �'��'' : �,.k., �� �L"�� y ,
�� J igy�i L'C• oit
�,iy�i�4 �rT�w ";'-.A sST�Ci-�`- '}y,_ •- •,13 i.�" ..n !
C-
#i
...a Ste,',N �>r �+.- -111�5. li'L .,yam'': -. hi ` f 'j ` •'-._�� i�-:
,'°�t,,�yir�� ��� c�� 1 '��ti�>. ..�1'�'�y``. ,�•.�r'rS.° �. r. �•r �A�� -y��.� �,���� �- �� t .* 3 � .{� `�`-.�
Gr�'-�..^c+�r,,�,�-�j��'.�i+-.`•c.��-� �r�iii, t�s'' ,�� r,,..�ts � �'� 6,r�� �1 p w b!}r* � •� ..�. ,;r,, � �,
` ,y_� '�•.,z� _.�;;.�- �'',�� !'Y• ?� '�r`���."� r 3f .i�';' r� i+r. �•�. �- ,{ ,s- '�'� h�.{'�'',� ,y, 'r 5 -�a' �
i + '' x b' X _ " 4 "� • 1142 ���,i` �""'1' T i',.� "'t d � $ ' ;! r
'✓
��2. `*. �rrt`';t

o Town of Stallings
� �a1ew�k�ry
to.A&� J
:.
if t0 MAYOR
• • Lynda M. 1'axIon
G `a,
,-Iasi Co`'r,� MAYOR PRO TEMPORE
Wyatt Dunn
TOWN COUNCIL
Reed Isarove Paul Prose
TOWN MANAGER Rcnec Harris Thelma Privette
Brian W. Matthews Ilarry Stokcs
November 30, 2010
Ms. Coleen Sullins, 1'.E., Director
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Stormwater Permitting Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1 G 17
RE: Storm Water Management Program Assessment Report Certification
NPDES Permit NCS000454
Dear Ms. Sullins:
TOWN CLERK
Erinn 1?. Nichols
In accordance with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit Number NCS000454
issued Ior the Town ol'Stallings, enclosed please find a signed certification statement (in duplicate) in support of the
Storm Water Management Program Assessment Report. In addition, attached is an addendum to the Goose Creek
'fMDL annual report containing additional information for the Town of Stallings.
The Storm Water Management Program Assessment Report for the fifth year of permit coverage (October I, 2009 to
September 30, 2010) was finalized on November 30, 2010 using the North Carolina Department of Environment and
Natural Resources web -based reporting gateway located at:
http://bims.enr.state.lie. us:7001 /swmpa/login.do.
Please contact me at [phone], if you have any questions or require additional information.
Sincerely,
Mehdi-Jafari "MP Namin
zz
t7�
Town of Stallings
Storm Water Administrator
Co
a
Attachments: Certification (in duplicate)
�
G
Goose Creek TMDL Annual Report Addendum
sj
r
CrCl1Cway to Union CouniV
315 Stallings Road • Slallinos • NC • 2910.1 • 70I-821-S557 • �rw�v.stallingsnc.c�rg

5 C$'L oR Town of Stallings
!f
to J'
r
MAYOR
Lynda M. Paxton
G j r
�!on COO MAYOR PRO TFMPORE
41 on Wyatt Dunn
TOWN COUNCIL
Reed Fsarove Paul Frost
"TOWN MANAGER Renee Thirtis 'Thelma Private
Brian W. Mauhews E Earn' Stokes
Phase 1111 Storm Water Management Program Assessment Report Certification
NPDES No. NCS000454
TOWN CLERK
Erinn E. Nichols
certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or
supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the
information submitted. Based upon my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system or those persons
directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and
belief. true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information
including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations.
14-. /r 3b
G
Brian W. Matthews Date
Town of Stallings
Town Manager
Goieway to Union County
35 Stalliw-s Road • Stallings • NC • 28104 • 704-821-8557 • w),vw.siallingsn4.ur�

Town of Stallings
MAYOR
Lynda M.I'axton
MAYOR PRO TEMPORE
Wyatt Dunn
TOWN COUNCIL.
Reed Esarove Paul Frost
TOWN MANAGER Rence Ilartis Thelma 1'rivette TOWN CIXRK
Brian W. Matthews Harry Stokes Erinn E. Nichols
Phase 11 Storm Water Management Program Assessment Report Certification
NPDES No. NCS000454
I certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or
supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the
information submitted. Based upon my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system or those persons
directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and
belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information
including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations.
rian W. Matthews Date
Town of Stallings
Town Manager
Galetivo.); to Union Counit%
; I � SIallini-s Road • Stallings • NC • 28104 • 704-821-8�57 • wN\-.stallinOsttc.c�rg

Town of Stallings
Goose Creek TMDL Report
Addendum
TOWN OF
TALLINGS
NORTH CAROLINA
Prepared by:
Town of Stallings
Prepared for:
NPDES Phase 11 Storm Water Permit (NCS000454)
Annual Reporting Requirement
November 30, 2010

Table of Contents
Section 1.0 Introduction ............................................
1.1 Background ............................................
1.2 Purpose ...................................................
Section 2.0 BMP Implementation .............................
2.1 Utility Crossing and Outfall Inspections
2.2 Septic System Evaluations .....................
2.3 Stream Walks .........................................
Section 3.0 Summary of Future BMPs .....................
Appendix A: Example Septic System Inspection Form
.............................................2
..............................................2
..............................................2
..............................................3
.............................................. 3

GsTOWN 6F TA L L I N GS Goose Creek TMDL Annual Report Addendum
Section 1.0
Introduction
1.1 Background
The Town of Stallings Phase II Permit specifics that within two (2) years of'reeeiving
notification from the N.C. Division of Water Quality that a Phase I jurisdiction is subjccl to a
"TMDL for a certain stream segment, the Town of Stallings will establish a TMDL Water Quality
Recovery Program for that stream segment. On August 10, 2006, the "Town of'Stallings received
written notification from the N.C. Division of Water Quality that it is subject to the approved
fecal coliform TMDL for Goose Creek. The "Town of Stallings (working cooperatively with
Mecklcnburg County Water Quality Program) subsequently completed a TMDL Water Quality
Recovery Program Plan for the Goose Creek TM DI., which was submitted to the N.C. Division
of Water Quality on July 9, 2008 for compliance with the above described permit requirement.
Implementation ofthe Plan began in July 2008. Input received from the Advisory Group formed
to facilitate the implementation of this Plan resulted in revisions that were subsequently
submitted to the N.C. Division of Water Quality on November 13, 2009, Implementation of this
Plan began in November 2009.
The Town of Stallings has continued working cooperatively with Mecklenburg County Water
Quality Program and the Towns of Mint Hill and Indian Trail to implement the requirements of
this Program.
L2 Purpose
The purpose of the Goose Creek Water Quality Recovery Program (WQRI') is to achieve and
maintain compliance with the Water Quality Recovery Program for the Goose Creek Watershed
for Fecal Coliform Bacteria. The WQRP requires an annual report be submitted to the North
Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) documenting activities completed in progress
towards meeting the TMDL requirements.
The Towns of Mint Hill, Indian Trail, and Stallings have worked cooperatively on the
development and implementation of the WQRP. The WQRP annual report was submitted by the
Mecklenburg County Water Quality Program to NCDWQ on July 21, 2010 and updated on
September 30, 2010. This report addendum documents additional activities for FY09-10
performed in the Town of Stallings from October I, 2009 to Scptember 30, 2010 (not included in
the updated annual report) in response to comments during the annual Advisory Group meeting
held on September 15, 2010.

Gs.TALLINGS Goose Creek TM DL Annual Report Addendum
NORI IICAROI.INA ...:...<. -: :- ..».....-.. .:........:..:..... ..,-. :,-.,..
Section 2.0
BMP Implementation
In addition to the Best Management Practice (13M1") updates already reported in the WQRP
annual report submitted to NCDWQ in July 2010, the following sections highlight other BMPs
being implemented by the Town of Stallings.
2.1 Utility Crossings and Outfall Inspections
During the reporting period, the "Town of Stallings re -inspected previously identified utility
crossings and storm sewer system outfalls to identify potential sources of pollution including
impacts from fecal coliforrn. A total of 14 outfalls and six (6) utility crossings were inspected
during the month of September 2010. There were no identified issues with any of the utility
crossings. However. two (2) storm water outfalls were observed to have dry weather flow
greater than 72 hours after a rain event.
Within the next 30 days, the Town of Stallings will evaluate the two (2) outfalls that contained
dry weather flow to determine the source of non -storm water flow and follow procedures
contained within the Town's Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination program to eliminate
the discharge.
2.2 Septic System Evaluations
To help identify and eliminate possible sources of kcal coliform within the Goose Creek
Watershed, the Town of Stallings began identifying households within the Goose Creek
watershed that use septic systems as a means to dispose of sanitary wastewater. Based upon
results from septic systems in the Town of Mint Hill, septic systems can contribute to fecal
coliform load if failing or in need of repair.
As a first step in evaluating septic systems, the Town of Stallings must identify which properties
utilize septic systems to dispose of sanitary wastewater. To date, the 'Town of Stallings
identified one neighborhood, the Golden Acres Subdivision that uses septic systems. A total of
51 households within this subdivision use septic systems. `The `Town of Stallings will continue to
investigate additional properties that utilize septic systems.
The Town of Stalling is in the process of partnering with the Union County Health Department
(the department with permitting authority over septic systems) to perform inspections of all
identified septic systems in the Goose Creek watershed to determine if the systems are failing
and thus could be a source of fecal coliform. An example inspection form that could be used to
collect septic system information is provided as Appendix A. The actual form used will be
coordinated with Union County Health Department.
2

SIMIN O
Goose Creek TMDt,Annual Report Addendum
TALLINCS"
2.3 Stream Walks
During FYI OTT I1, The Town of Stallings will begin a program ofwalking all streams in the
Goose Creek Watershed within the Town of Stallings on a three-year (3-yr) rotation period. The
purpose ofthese walks will be to identify and eliminate all pollution sources. If warranted, fecal
coliform sampling may also be performed during these walks.
Section 3.0
Summary of Future BMPs
Beginning FY 10-1 1, the "Town of Stallings will continue to expand on efforts to reduce fecal
coliform loading to Goose Creek. Specifically, these efforts will include:
• Continue partnering with Mecklenburg County and the Towns of Mint Hill and Indian
"frail in implementation of the Goose Creek WQRP.
• Follow-up on identified dry weather flows.
• Continue evaluation of septic systems by coordinating inspections with the Union County
Health Department to identify and correct any failing systems.
• Performing stream walks to identify and potential pollution sources.
Each of these BMPs will continually be measured and re-evaluated annually for effectiveness at
reducing fecal coliform loads to Goose Creek.

IOWN' )F
OSTA i LUNGS
Goose Creek TMDL Annual Report Addendum
,QoRHICAROLINA
Appendix A
Example Septic System Inspection Form

a
STALL 1 N GS Goose Creek TMDL Annual Report Addendum
Example Septic System Inspection Form
Inspection Date: Inspection Completed By:
Site Parcel Id #: Site Address:
GWS File #: Watershed: Catchment Id:
Septic System Information:
System Classification: ❑ II ❑ III ❑ IV ❑ V ❑ VI
❑a ❑b El El ❑e ❑f ❑g
System Description:
(Ex: pump to 25% reduction)
Year Operation Permit Issued: (If no permit record is available use built date year from
Land Records)
System Age: Years ❑ Actual ❑ Estimated
Inspection Information: Comments
Site accessible for inspection: ❑ Yes
Owner present:
❑ Yes
Drain field probed:
❑ Yes
System malfunction observed:
❑ Yes
Notice of Violation required:
❑ Yes
System located <200 ft. from
❑ Yes
surface water body:
System located <50 ft. from
❑ Yes
stormwater BMP or diversion:
Trees/vegetation in drain field:
❑ Yes
Irrigation on drain field:
❑ Yes
Well(s) located on property:
❑ Yes
General comments/observations:
❑ No
❑ No
❑ No
❑ No
❑ No
❑ No
❑ No
❑ No
❑ No
❑ No
# photos taken: Dye Pack Left: ❑ Yes ❑ No Signature:

TON? A!
ES TA L L 1 N C S Goose Creek TM DL Annual Report Addendum
Checklist:
1. Perform file review for inspection site in the office (system type, age, location, etc.)
2. Conduct field inspection & complete inspection form -before leaving the site
3. Take photos (2 minimum) of the drain fleld/tank(s) area from multiple locations
4. Leave project brochure & literature on door
5. Submit inspection form and photographs to the Town of Stallings.
*All scanned files and related photos should be submitted to the Town of Stallings.

{ Q
a
Addendum
rya`,"'•, 1_OWN OF
�=
pp SAP
{Nk&to LI GS
NORTH CAROLANA
Prepared by:
Town of Stallings
Prepared for:
NPDES Phase 11 Storm Water Permit (NCS000454)
Annual Reporting Requirement
November 30, 2010

Table of Contents
Section1.0 Introduction..............................................................................................................I
1.1 Background..............................................................................................................1
1.2 Purpose.....................................................................................................................I
Section 2.0 BMP Implementation..............................................................................................2
2.1 Utility Crossing and Outfall Inspections..................................................................2
2.2 Septic System Evaluations.......................................................................................2
2.3 Stream Walks...........................................................................................................3
Section 3.0 Summary of Future BMPs.......................................................................................3
Appendix A: Example Septic System Inspection Form

S[OWN of Goose Creek TMDL Annual Report Addendum
TALLINGS p
'*tilt III CARE SE_f\.l .,..._ _. .. ,,.u., .,. .. .,w ,. .. -.... ?.. y,. ., _.,. _..,,... ., ..�....
Section 1.0
Introduction
1.1 Background
The Town of'Stallings Phase II Permit specifics that within two (2) years of receiving
notification from the N.C. Division of Water Quality that a Phase 11 jurisdiction is subject to a
TMDL for a certain stream segment, the Town of Stallings will establish a TMDL Water Quality
Recovery Program for that stream segment. On August 10, 2006, the `town of Stallings received
written notification from the N.C. Division of Water Quality that it is subject to the approved
fecal coliform TMDL for Goose Creek. The Town of Stallings (working cooperatively with
Mecklenburg County Water Quality Program) subsequently completed a TMDL Water Quality
Recovery Program Plan for the Goose Creek TMDL, which was submitted to the N.C. Division
of Water Quality on July 9, 2008 for compliance with the above described permit requirement.
Implementation of the Plan began in July 2008. Input received from the Advisory Group formed
to facilitate the implementation of this Plan resulted in revisions that were subsequently
submitted to the N.C. Division of Water Quality on November 13, 2009. Implementation of this
Plan began in November 2009.
The Town of Stallings has continued working cooperatively with Mecklenburg County Water
Quality Program and the Towns of Mint }-till and Indian Trail to implement the requirements of
this Program.
1.2 Purpose
The purpose ofthe Goose Creek Water Quality Recovery Program (WQRP) is to achieve and
maintain compliance with the Water Quality Recovery Program for the Goose Creek Watershed
for Fecal Coliform Bacteria. The WQRP requires an annual report be submitted to the North
Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) documenting activities completed in progress
towards meeting the TMDL requirements.
The "Towns of Mint Hill, Indian Trail, and Stallings have worked cooperatively on the
development and implementation of the WQRP. The WQRP annual report was submitted by the
Mecklenburg County Water Quality Program to NCDWQ on July 21, 2010 and updated on
September 30, 2010. This report addendum documents additional activities for FY09-10
performed in the "Town of Stallings from October I, 2009 to September 30, 2010 (not included in
the updated annual report) in response to comments during the annual Advisory Group meeting
held on September 15, 2010.

TuA4 Goose Creek TMDL Annual Report Addendum
Os
TALL�NGS P NORF I VARO YNA _ ..,ice ..............._ ,.
Section 2.0
BMP Implementation
In addition to the Best Management Practice (BMP) updates already reported in the WQR13
annual report submitted to NCDWQ in July 2010, the following sections highlight other BMPs
being implemented by the Town of Stallings.
2.1 Utility Crossings and Outfall Inspections
During the reporting period, the Town of Stallings re -inspected previously identified utility
crossings and storm sewer system outfalls to identify potential sources of pollution including
impacts from fecal coliform. A total of 14 outfalls and six (6) utility crossings were inspected
during the month of September 2010. There were no identified issues with any of the utility
crossings. However, two (2) storm water outfalls were observed to have dry weather flow
greater than 72 hours after a rain event.
Within the next 30 days, the Town of Stallings will evaluate the two (2) outfalls that contained
dry weather flow to determine the source of non -storm water flow and follow procedures
contained within the Town's Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination program to eliminate
the discharge.
2.2 S_cptic System Evaluations
To help identify and eliminate possible sources of fecal coliform within the Goose Creek
Watershed, the Town of Stallings began identifying households within the Goose Creek
watershed that use septic systems as a means to dispose of sanitary wastewater. Based upon
results from septic systems in the Town of Mint Hill, septic systems can contribute to fecal
coliform load if failing or in need of repair.
As a first step in evaluating septic systems, the Town of Stallings must identify which properties
utilize septic systems to dispose of sanitary wastewater. To date, the Town of Stallings
identified one neighborhood, the Golden Acres Subdivision that uses septic systems. A total of
51 households within this subdivision use septic systems. The Town of Stallings will continue to
investigate additional properties that utilize septic systems.
The Town of Stalling is in the process of partnering with the Union County Health Department
(the department with permitting authority over septic systems) to perform inspections of all
identified septic systems in the Goose Creek watershed to determine if the systems are failing
and thus could be a source of fecal coliform. An example inspection form that could be used to
collect septic system information is provided as Appendix A. The actual form used will be
coordinated with Union County Health Department.
2

TA LLf NGS
CD sGoose Creek TMDL Annual Report Addendum
2.3 Stream Walks
During FY l0-1 I, The Town of Stallings will begin a program of walking all streams in the
Goose Creek Watershed within the Town of Stallings on a three-year (3-yr) rotation period. The
purpose of these walks will be to identify and eliminate all pollution sources. If warranted, fecal
coliform sampling may also be performed during these walks.
Section 3.0
Summary of Future BMPs
Beginning hY10-1 I, the Town of Stallings will continue to expand on efforts to reduce fecal
coliform loading to Goose Creek. Specifically, these efforts will include:
Continue partnering with Mecklenburg County and the Towns of Mint Hill and Indian
Trail in implementation of the Goose Creek WQRP.
• Follow-up on identified dry weather flows.
• Continue evaluation of septic systems by coordinating inspections with the Union County
Health Department to identify and correct any failing systems.
• Performing stream walks to identify and potential pollution sources.
Each of these BMPs will continually be measured and re-evaluated annually for effectiveness at
reducing fecal coliform loads to Goose Creek.

IE�W\nv
►J"1'.A1,L1 NGS Goose Creek TMDL Annual Report Addendum
�.:
tiEik-1lI l':\ItEI[.It:1_
Appendix A
Example Septic System Inspection Form

Z' STALLINGS Goose Creek TMDL Annual Report Addendum
'k..i NoRM CAN{1LINA .T. ....,Y. » ,.., , . v _ .«. ,, ..,....« ... ......,_ .....
Example Septic System Inspection Form
Inspection Date: Inspection Completed By:
Site Parcel Id #: Site Address:
GWS File #: Watershed: Catchment Id:
Septic System Information:
System Classification: ❑ II ❑ III ❑ IV ❑ V ❑ VI
❑a ❑b ❑c ❑d ❑e ❑f ❑g
System Description:
(Ex: pump to 25% reduction)
Year Operation Permit Issued: (If no permit record is available use built date year from
Land Records)
System Age: Years ❑ Actual ❑ Estimated
Inspection Information: Comments
Site accessible for inspection: ❑ Yes
Owner present:
❑ Yes
Drain field probed:
❑ Yes
System malfunction observed:
❑ Yes
Notice of Violation required:
❑ Yes
System located <200 ft. from
❑ Yes
surface water body:
System located <50 ft. from
❑ Yes
stormwater BMP or diversion:
Trees/vegetation in drain field:
❑ Yes
Irrigation on drain field:
❑ Yes
Well(s) located on property:
❑ Yes
General comments/observations:
❑ No
❑ No
❑ No
❑ No
❑ No
❑ No
❑ No
❑ No
❑ No
❑ No
# photos taken: Dye Pack Left: 0 Yes ❑ No Signature:

"='� lf�tt'A�tF
Z'. S TA L L� N �iS
Dose CreekTMDL Annual Report Addendum
Checklist:
1. Perform file review for inspection site in the office (system type, age, location, etc.)
2. Conduct field inspection & complete inspection form before leaving the site
I Take photos (2 minimum) of the drain field/tank(s) area from multiple locations
4. Leave project brochure & literature on door
5. Submit inspection form and photographs to the Town of Stallings.
*All scanned files and related photos should be submitted to the Town of Stallings.