HomeMy WebLinkAboutNCS000229_Comments Letter_20170907PSNz GAw W/ C - rte /fsi-n /1/i/
'Roanoke Valley Energy Facility
Westmoreland Partners, LLC
September 7, 2017
Robert Patterson, PE
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
Energy, Mineral and Land Resources
Stormwater Program
1612 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1612
RECEIVED
SEP 15 2017
DENR-LAND QUALITY
STORMWATER PERMITTING
Subject: Comments on Draft NPDES Stormwater Permit
Westmoreland Partners, LLC -Roanoke Valley Energy Facility (ROVA)
Weldon, North Carolina; Halifax County
NPDES Stormwater Permit No. NCS000229
Dear Mr. Patterson,
Westmoreland Partners, LLC - Roanoke Valley Energy Facility (ROVA) received the draft NPDES
Stormwater Permit on August 10, 2017. Our comments on the draft permit are as follows.
1. The draft permit states that analytical monitoring requirements would be required during ash
transport. However, the ROVA facility does not transport ash on site as it does not have an
ash settling basin, an ash landfill, or ash structural fills on site. Additionally, ash is not
sluiced; rather, bottom ash is removed from the combustion chamber directly to haul trucks
by conveyor. Dry fly ash is collected in hoppers, transferred to the silos by air, and then
transferred to a pug mill where it is mixed with 10% water to minimize the fly ash. It is then
dropped into the haul trucks using misting system within vinyl curtains. Haul trucks then
transport the ash to an offsite Halifax County owned and operated disposal landfill. Ash
excavation does not take place at the ROVA facility. Therefore, we request the monitoring
required during ash transport be removed._ IwT K n -co fie/c �u oz -rM+c -r#eA0VSftA-r`"'r-
Olt' ASN VI R -r/4,K GlC Te 4NY- oi/�S!'r"L S , 3ltt
-'2. Part II, Section B, Table 1 (Analytical Monitoring Requirements for Outfalls 3, 4, 5, and 6) -Ab00
is missing footnote #5.
3. Tier One response actions are not consistent with recently issued permits for other coal fired
electric plants. Tier One in draft permit NCS000229 requires monthly monitoring of all
parameters if one benchmark value is exceeded. Other issued permits do not require
monthly monitoring until Tier Two. Additionally, Footnote 1 to Table 1 refers to monthly
monitoring for Tier Two and Tier Three status, not Tier One. The ROVA facility requests
that implementation of monthly monitoring be removed from the Tier One response actions.
_'1�(g✓'( �S co,���st K„K w.� cel✓ ��25 LSs.I.�
�1. We request that the Tier Tbree description be clarified to say that this tier is triggered if the
four occasions of exceeding the benchmark (or if outside the range) "occur within a
consecutive 5 -year period beginning with the effective date of the permit".
Roanoke Valley Energy Facility
Westmoreland Partners, LLC
If you have any comments or questions regarding this submittal or require additional information,
please do not hesitate to contact Chris Hews at (252) 536-3200 ext. 232.
Sincerely,
Westmoreland Partners, LLC
Roanoke alley Energy Facility
Donald R eisling
President Westmoreland - North Carolina Power, LLC
GP of Westmoreland Partners
EC: Chris Hews, NAES
Eric Woods, NAES
Joe Sullivan, AECOM