NC0089168_Brooks Pierce_Comments_20241118

104 O Ltlook
[External] M M M Vanceboro Q Larry Renew J N FE)ES Perm it, N m089168
From D aniel F. E. Sm ith <DSM [e-mail]>
Date Mon 11/18/2024 9:07 AM
To S VC_DEQ publiccom m eitsDWR<publiccom m [e-mail]>
Cc A lexander Elkan <[e-mail]>; Robert J. King III <[e-mail]>
B 2 attach ents(1 M B)
2024.11.18--M M M Com m ents.pdf; M M M-Vanceboro Renewal--Com m Ents Analysis 4857-6618-8268 v.1.xlsx;
You don't often get email from dsm [e-mail] why this is im rpo tant
CAUTION: External em al. Do not click links or open attachm ants unless verified. Report suspicious em ails with the Report
M essage button located on your Outlook m aiu bar on the Hom etab.
Dear M r. Denard:
Please see attached corn m at letter m ade on behalf of M artin M arietta M aterials, Inc.
Sincerely yours,
Daniel F. E. Smith
BROOKS
`41 PI ERCE
t: 336.271.3139
f: 336.232.9139
2000 Renaissance Plaza
230 North Elm Street
G leensboro, NC 27401
P.O .Box 26000 (27420)
Confidentiality Notice:
The information contained in this e-mail transmittal is privileged and confidential intended for the addressee only. If you are
neither the intended recipient nor the employee or agent responsible for delivering this e-mail to the intended recipient, any
disclosure of this information in any way or taking of any action in reliance on this information is strictly prohibited. If you
have received this e-mail in error, please notify the person transmitting the information immediately.
This email has been scanned for viruses and malw are by M imecast Ltd.

BROOKS6m.-- 2000 RENAISSANCE PLAZA
230 NORTH ELM STREET
PIERCEGREENSBORO,NC 27401
FOUNDED 1 8 9 7 T 336.373.8850
F 336.378.1001
W W W.BROOKSPIERCE.COM
November 18, 2024
VIA EMAIL ONLY
Derek Denard
NPDES Wastewater Permitting
Attn: MMM Vanceboro Quarry Permit
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
[e-mail]. ov
Re: MMM Vanceboro Quarry Renewal NPDES Permit
NCO089168
Dear Mr. Denard:
We write in support of the Division of Water Resources' ("DWR") intended
renewal of the dewatering NPDES permit issued to Martin Marietta Materials for its
Vanceboro Quarry.
Martin Marietta applied for its first NPDES permit on 19 October 2011.
During the extensive permitting process, questions and concerns were raised by,
among others, Sound Rivers, the Southern Environmental Law Center ("SELC"), the
North Carolina Coastal Federation, the Division of Marine Fisheries, the Wildlife
Resource Commission, and EPA. In response, DWR thoroughly studied all material
questions and concerns, requested and received additional studies from Martin
Marietta and its qualified environmental consultants, and ultimately issued a revised
permit to Martin Marietta.
Despite DWR's well-considered decision in 2013 to issue the initial permit to
Martin Marietta, this same permit was ultimately litigated for more than ten years,
with twelve different judges considering the arguments advanced by SELC on behalf
of Sound Rivers and the North Carolina Coastal Federation.) The end result reached
by the ALJ, Court of Appeals, and Supreme Court of North Carolina was that DWR
correctly issued the initial NPDES permit to Martin Marietta.
1 To avoid repetition, and to reflect reality, we will refer to all of the aligned persons and
associations as "Sound Rivers."
Writer's Direct Dial: 336-271-3139 Fax: [phone] Email: [e-mail]
Brooks,Pierce,McLendon,Humphrey&Leonard,L.L.P.
Attorneys and Counsellors at Law

Comment Letter
November 18, 2024
Page 2 of 10
Undeterred by the fulsome review that occurred over the past decade, Sound
Rivers has misinformed the general public about the terms and conditions of the
renewed NPDES permit, the conditions of Blounts Creek and its tributaries, the
applicable law, and the relevant facts. It should thus come as no surprise that many
of the comments received by DWR are pre-drafted and highly repetitive form
comments that attempt to resurrect issues that have been fully resolved with finality
by OAH and the North Carolina judicial branch. Indeed, in SELC's November 14,
2024 comment on Sound Rivers' behalf, it repeatedly references comments made
during the initial permitting process and reasserts arguments about biological
integrity and reference conditions that it made to the North Carolina Supreme Court,
which found them to be invalid and contrary to the law. See SELL_
Comments_20241114 at nn. 1-7, 10-11, 21.
Having lost these same issues over and over, Sound Rivers may not re-litigate
them now. Put plainly, Sound Rivers' refusal to accept the results of a decade of
litigation or respect DWR's institutional expertise provides no basis to change the
terms of the renewed NPDES permit.
Sound Rivers and its cohorts have had a lifetime of administrative and judicial
review, only to lose at every stage. Even if Sound Rivers were somehow entitled to a
do over—and it most certainly is not—nothing in the renewed permit warrants
further review, much less denial. Despite the calamitous claims by Sound Rivers, the
permit includes robust monitoring conditions at the discharge points (A.(L), A.(2.)),
instream (A.(3.)), and for benthos (B.(4.)). DWR, pursuant to the recommendation of
Biologist Supervisor Eric Fleek, accepted Martin Marietta's benthic monitoring data
(from a February 2018 sampling event) and noted the renewal permit's language for
benthic monitoring was reasonable. See Fact Sheet, NPDES Permit No. NC0089168,
Attachment E2. And the standard conditions of an NPDES permit—which are the
same between the initial and renewed permit—empower DWR to reopen, modify, or
revoke a permit if water quality standards are not met. See Exhibit 1 hereto, also
available at: https://www.deq.nc. ov/npdes-standard-conditions-boilerplate-
110920112/download?attachment. Thus—despite Sound Rivers' alarmist rhetoric—
water quality throughout the Blounts Creek watershed is fully protected, just as the
ALJ, the Court of Appeals, and the Supreme Court found.
As EPA instructs, and as Sound Rivers plainly knows, "commenters must
submit all reasonable arguments and factual material in support of their positions
and comments by the close of the public comment period. . . ." U.S. EPA, NPDES
PERMIT WRITERS' MANUAL at § 11.3.2, p. 1142 (Sept. 2010). And DWR, in turn,

Comment Letter
November 18, 2024
Page 3 of 10
responds "to all significant comments" when it issues the final permit. 40 C.F.R. §
124.17(a)(2).
All of that was done, and done, and done, and reviewed and reviewed for years,
and Sound Rivers lost. It lost at the agency level after exhaustive review and it lost
at the judicial level. It raised, and lost, every issue for a decade and no commenter
here has submitted any issue that was not (or could not) have been raised before.
Indeed, the 2013 Hearing Officer Report (available on Laserfiche) summarizes the
extensive comments made during the initial permitting about pH, swamp waters,
biological integrity, water chemistry, salinity, species composition, alternatives to
discharge, impacts to wells, flooding, streambank erosion, and turbidity. And SELC's
April 11, 2013 comment letter on behalf of Sound River's predecessor (Pamlico-Tar
River Foundation) (available on Laserfiche) raises concerns that Martin Marietta's
permit would violate standards for biological integrity, swamp water, salinity, pH,
turbidity, and species composition.
Here, Sound Rivers makes the same claims about how the mere issuance of the
permit somehow violates the law, an argument already rejected by DWR and the
courts over and over.And SELL attempts to persuade DWR to include new conditions
in the renewal permit on the basis of biological integrity arguments thoroughly
considered and resoundingly rejected by the North Carolina Supreme Court, Court of
Appeals, and ALJ. Sound Rivers, like Martin Marietta and DWR, must accept the
final ruling of our state Supreme Court, which provides no basis whatsoever to
require additional studies or impose new conditions in the renewed NPDES permit.
Even if Sound Rivers cannot move on, the North Carolina Supreme Court has. The
terms of the permit fully protect water quality. See, e.g., Sound Rivers, Inc. v. N.C.
Dept of Envtl. Quality, Div. of Water Res., 271 N.C. App. 674, 740-743 (2020); Deep
River Citizens'Coal. v. N. Carolina Dept of Env't &Nat. Res., 165 N.C.App. 206, 212-
213 (2004).
The remainder of our comment seeks to remind DWR and inform the general
public of the governing statutory standards and the prior judicial decisions on the
very issues Sound Rivers pretends are still in question. In an effort to identify and
address the public's concerns accurately, we have summarized the public comments
received to date in the attached excel file, which identifies frequently used form
comments submitted using templates that appear to have been prepared by Sound
Rivers.

Comment Letter
November 18, 2024
Page 4 of 10
(1) The Clean Water Act and the North Carolina statutes that implement
it recognize that society continues to discharge water through
beneficial uses like Martin Marietta's construction aggregate quarry.
The Clean Water Act aims "to restore and maintain the chemical, physical, and
biological integrity of the Nation's waters." CWA § 101(a); 33 U.S.C. § 1251(a). In
pursuing this goal, Congress recognized "the primary responsibilities and rights of
States"like North Carolina to enact pollution control laws and"plan the development
and use . . . of land and water resources." CWA§ 101(b); 33 U.S.C. § 1251(b) (emphasis
added). States establish water quality standards "taking into consideration [waters']
use and value for public water supplies, propagation of fish and wildlife, recreational
purposes, and agricultural, industrial, and other purposes, and also taking into
consideration their use and value for navigation." CWA § 303(c)(2)(a); 33 U.S.C. §
1313(c)(2)(A). EPA has recognized that an NPDES permittee like Martin Marietta is
interested "in obtaining a permit to conduct its economic activities in a lawful
manner." EPA, Amendments to Streamline the National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System Program Regulations: Round Two, 65 Fed. Reg. 30886, 30898
(May 15, 2000).
For its part, North Carolina's public policy for water pollution control
recognizes that waters will be used for economic development as well as recreation,
"affirm[ing] the State's ultimate responsibility for the preservation and development
of these resources in the best interest of all its citizens and declar[ing] the prudent
utilization of these resources to be essential to the general welfare." N.C. Gen. Stat.
§ 143-211(a).
Standards of water and air purity shall be designed to protect
human health, to prevent injury to plant and animal life, to
prevent damage to public and private property, to insure the
continued enjoyment of the natural attractions of the State, to
encourage the expansion of employment opportunities, to provide
a permanent foundation for healthy industrial development and
to secure for the people of North Carolina, now and in the future,
the beneficial uses of these great natural resources.
N.C.G.S. § 143-211(c) (emphasis added).
North Carolina statutes also empower the Environmental Management
Commission ("EMC") to grant permits that prevent pollution "so far as reasonably
possible" and that utilize "practicable" controls. N.C. Gen. Stat. § 143-215.1(b)(1),(2).
EMC recognizes this statutory policy by requiring permits to "reasonably ensure
compliance with applicable water quality standards. . . ." 15A N.C.A.C. 211.0112.

Comment Letter
November 18, 2024
Page 5 of 10
Thus, DWR's decision to issue a permit should be guided by reasonableness, logic,
rational conclusions, and a recognition that discharge for the purpose of quarrying
operations is generally appropriate.
All of the individuals and organizations that have commented on the renewal
permit undoubtedly travel on North Carolina roads and highways or make use of
concrete structures (e.g., driveways, concrete pad foundations, commercial buildings,
etc.). But they fail to appreciate that the large volumes of aggregate necessary to
construct, maintain, and expand the highway system and build their homes and
schools must come from mining.
(2) The potential environmental impacts from quarrying operations are
well studied and long understood.
Within a few years of the Clean Water Act's enactment in 1972, courts
considered the possible environmental impacts from the crushed stone or quarrying
industry. Specifically, Clean Water Act limitations imposed on existing quarries were
the subject of litigation all the way to the United States Supreme Court. When the
matter was before the Fourth Circuit, it noted that approximately "three quarters of
all crushed stone is limestone," like the stone to be produced at Martin Marietta's
Vanceboro Quarry. Nat'l Crushed Stone Ass n, Inc. v. E.P.A., 601 F.2d 111, 112 (4th
Cir. 1979), rev'd on other grounds sub nom. E.P.A. v. Nat'l Crushed Stone Assn, 449
U.S. 64 (1980). Importantly, the EPA had a broad and diverse sample set to consider
in developing regulations, because the "crushed stone industry is widespread, with
all States reporting some production. . . . Nationwide there are approximately 4800
crushed stone facilities." Id. "In developing the regulations the EPA considered the
varieties, prevalence, and environmental effects" of water discharged from quarrying
operations "and also the current pollution control practices used in the industries."
Id. at 113. EPA noted that "[w]ater which collects on quarry floors `is quite clear' and
`is typically of excellent purity."' Id. at 114 (citation omitted).
Around this same time, EPA was asked to provide a report on limestone
quarries to the Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works. On 15 June
1982, the EPA Administrator transmitted the 175-page report to Congress. See EPA,
Report to Congress: The Effects of Discharges from Limestone Quarries on Water
Quality and Aquatic Biota (June 1982), available at:
https://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyPURL.cgi?Dockey=P10119ZH.txt (hereinafter "EPA
Report"). As the cover letter summarizes, "The results of this study indicate that
wastewater which has been treated to remove suspended solids causes minimal
adverse effects on ambient water quality." Id. at iv. The study involved EPA field
studies at nine different quarries throughout the country. Id. at 3-1, 5-1. In fact,
Martin Marietta was contacted to participate in the study but not included by EPA
because Martin Marietta had "no plants with [stone] washing discharges, only pit

Comment Letter
November 18, 2024
Page 6 of 10
dewatering, recycle, or no discharge." Id. at 3-3.2 Although no Martin Marietta
facility was used, two quarries from the same ecoregion as eastern North Carolina
("Southeastern Mixed Forest-Outer Coastal Plain Forest") were studied. See id. at 5-
4.
To study the biological impacts of quarrying operations, EPA sampled and
analyzed "benthic invertebrates, periphyton [(i.e. organisms attached or clinging to
plants or other objects above bottom sediments)], attached algae, plankton [(i.e.,
floating organisms incapable of moving against the current)], and nekton [(i.e., fish)]."
Id. at 4-3.
Following its sampling and analysis, EPA concluded that"[t]he concentrations
of suspended solids found in sedimentation pond effluents and pit dewatering
discharge should have a minimal effect on water quality of receiving streams." Id. at
7-5. Turbidity levels associated with quarrying operation discharges "are within the
range of turbidities reported for natural waters." Id. at 7-6. Moreover
most, if not all, limestone quarries discharge into streams that
arise adjacent to the quarry sites in soils already appreciably
influenced by the surrounding limestone deposits. As such it is
rare to find a quarry which discharges into a system that would
be adversely affected by the chemical constituents of treated
limestone effluents.
Id. at 7-21 (emphasis added). "The TSS levels currently discharged by the limestone
quarries in this study are at levels which pose little threat to the existing ecology of
the studied receiving streams." Id. at 7-27.
As EPA's study shows, discharge for dewatering purposes to allow quarrying
poses little to no impact to stream health. A quarry is not a sewer treatment plant,
swine farm, chemical production facility, or coal ash pond. For this reason, North
Carolina has long-authorized mine dewatering through a general permit
(NCG020000). DWR decided, however, to implement an individual permitting
process for Martin Marietta's permit to study and address the various concerns raised
in the initial permitting process. See Fact Sheet, NPDES Permit No. NC0089168, p.
2 of 12. At this point, all of those concerns have been exhaustively studied, addressed,
and conclusively resolved through a decade of litigation.
2 The discharge authorized by the renewal permit is from pit dewatering, and thus only
composed of groundwater and rain water routed through settling ponds to allow any
suspended sediment to fall out of the water.

Comment Letter
November 18, 2024
Page 7 of 10
(3) The expected changes to pH are permissible as a matter of settled
law.
Pamlico-Tar Riverkeeper Katey Zimmerman is quoted by Sound Rivers as
stating that the quarry discharge "would significantly raise the pH of the stream
system, a change that is not allowable under North Carolina water-quality
regulations." See Comment Binder No. 1 (8/22/2024 to 9/23/2024) p 85. The Sound
Rivers website—in a section misleadingly called "Facts About Blounts Creek,"—
similarly states that renewal permit "is in violation of state law" because
"significantly rais[ing] the pH of the stream system . . . is not allowable under North
Carolina water-quality regulations." Id. p. 191. Following this position, the Form 1,
Form 2, and Form 4 comments state that a change in pH "is not allowable under
North Carolina's water quality regulations." Through its work, Sound Rivers
convinced approximately 311 commenters to make this same comment.
But this is wrong factually and legally, and Sound Rivers knows that. This
same argument about pH was previously considered and rejected by the ALJ, the
Superior Court, and the Court of Appeals. See Sound Rivers, Inc. v. N.C. Dept of
Envtl. Quality, Div. of Water Res., 271 N.C. App. 674, 734-739 (2020) (summarizing
Sound Rivers' pH arguments and their rejection by the ALJ and Superior Court). As
the Court of Appeals held, "The regulations do not require that the pH of swamp
waters stay the same as they currently are and that no new discharges be allowed if
the discharge would change the pH." Id. at 739. (emphasis added).
The agency and the judiciary have devoted a decade of review to this exact
same pH argument Sound Rivers now raises yet again. The conclusion by both DWR
and the judiciary was that the range of permissible pH set in Martin Marietta's initial
and renewal permits fully complies with applicable law. The permit should issue in
the form proposed by DWR.
(4) Species composition and ecosystem integrity has been fully studied
and the renewed permit still protects them.
Ms. Zimmerman and Sound Rivers also claim (incorrectly), "State law is clear
that it does not allow a discharge of waste to change the species composition of stream
from its natural state." See Comment Binder No. 1 (8/22/2024 to 9/23/2024) pp 85,
191. And they claim that the discharge risks "an entire ecosystem, designated by the
state as nursery for saltwater species and a critical habitat for fish and other aquatic
life." Id. p 85; see also id. pp. 191-192 (substantively similar comments). These points
about species composition and ecosystem integrity are also made in the Form 1, Form
2, and Form 4 comments and by other public comments that do not regurgitate the

Comment Letter
November 18, 2024
Page 8 of 10
form text but may have relied on Sound Rivers' inaccurate website information. See
Attached Excel Spreadsheet.
These purported concerns are wrong both factually and legally. This is not just
Martin Marietta's perspective. It is what multiple judges have concluded. The
biological integrity argument was made over and over for a decade before the agency
and the judiciary. Sound Rivers lost it. North Carolina administrative regulations
do "not require the biological integrity of an aquatic ecosystem to remain exactly or
even substantially the same as it had once been, for example, prior to discharge."
Sound Rivers, 271 N.C. App. at 709. The Court of Appeals agreed "with Martin
Marietta's and DEQ's interpretation of the law in that protection [of water quality]
does not require that Blounts Creek remain entirely the same." Id. at 734. When
DWR evaluated Martin Marietta's initial permit, it fully enforced the biological
integrity standard—and that evaluation was upheld by the ALJ, the Court of Appeals
and the Supreme Court of North Carolina: "The ALJ properly held that the Division
complied with its interpretation of the biological integrity standard given the
Division's expertise with respect to the facts and its conduct in its review of Martin
Marietta's permit application." Sound Rivers, Inc. v. N.C. Dept of Envtl. Quality, 385
N.C. 1, 8 (2023).
The fact sheet provided by DWR states the actual realities of the renewal
permit. "No chemicals will be used in the processing of the crushed stone or added to
the discharge." See Fact Sheet, NPDES Permit No. NC0089168, p 2 of 12. No waste—
as that term is understood by the general public—is being discharged,just"comingled
groundwater and stormwater." Id. "The discharge consists solely of mine dewatering
groundwater and stormwater, with no chemicals added." Id. p. 5 of 12.
With respect to fish and spawning concerns, the discharge "outfalls are not
located in a primary nursery area." Id. p. 3 of 12. Moreover, the CAMA coastal
consistency determination for the Vanceboro Quarry includes a requirement that
Martin Marietta coordinate with the Division of Coastal Management to, inter alia,
"develop fisheries monitoring that will assess impacts of the proposed project on fish
species and habitat in the Blounts Creek system. . . ."ALJ Order, ¶ 156. The implicit
suggestion that ecosystem health has not been fully considered and reasonably
addressed is demonstrably false. See, e.g., Sound Rivers, 271 N.C. App. at 713 ("The
whole record supports the ALJ's findings that DEQ evaluated species composition,
diversity, population density, and functional organization in accord with its
established procedures and expertise.").

Comment Letter
November 18, 2024
Page 9 of 10
(5) Other concerns raised by commenters lack a factual basis or relate
to other permits previously issued to Martin Marietta.
In addition to the renewal permit at issue here, Martin Marietta holds a Clean
Water Act 401 water quality certification issued by DEQ; a Clean Water Act 404
permit from the United States Army Corps of Engineers; a capacity use permit issued
by DEQ; an air quality permit issued by DEQ; and a CAMA coastal consistency
determination issued by the Division of Coastal Management. Those permits impose
additional requirements on Martin Marietta's mining activities that extend beyond
the concerns properly addressed by DWR for the renewal NPDES permit.
Related to these other permits, there are a handful of comments made to DWR
in this NPDES permitting process that raise concerns about the possibility that
Martin Marietta's dewatering activities will impact wells in the surrounding area.
The capacity use permit CU3148 issued November 15, 2013—and the associated
Water Supply Response Plan revised October 28, 2013—specifically address Martin
Marietta's responsibility to address any impacted water supply wells. See, e.g.
Mining Permit File, 07-57, available at
https:Hedocs.deg.nc.gov/EnergyMineralLandResources/DocView.aspx?id=3194&dbid
=0&repo=EnergvMineralLandResources. Accordingly, this NDPES permit renewal
process is not the appropriate forum to raise such concerns which, in any event, have
been fully resolved by other permits.
In conclusion, the issues raised in the public comments have all been made
before, have occupied thousands of hours of DWR, OAH, and judicial time, and have
all been lost by these aligned groups before. None of these arguments allows DWR
to decline to renew the permit, much less provides any reason to do so. The decision
by Sound Rivers to make demonstrably false and misleading statements undoubtedly
serves its fundraising efforts, but it disregards a decade in which Sound Rivers and
its allies lost multiple administrative and judicial decisions, all of which now bind
them. It is regrettable that an organization ostensibly committed to the environment
would use its position to peddle alarming claims already rejected multiple times, but
that is precisely what it is doing here.
We would like to thank you and all of the staff at DWR who have
conscientiously and tirelessly worked on Martin Marietta's renewal permit to ensure
that it satisfies all applicable requirements, protecting our State's waterways while
also recognizing that important economic activities must continue to occur to ensure
a robust future for North Carolina.

Comment Letter
November 18, 2024
Page 10 of 10
Sincerely yours,
Davie . E. xrzi.th
Cc (via email only):
Robert J. King III, Brooks Pierce LLP
Alex Elkan, Brooks Pierce LLP

EXHIBIT I

NPDES Permit Standard Conditions
Page 1 of 18
PART II
STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR NPDES PERMITS
Section A. Definitions
2/Month
Samples are collected twice per month with at least ten calendar days between sampling events. These samples shall be
representative of the wastewater discharged during the sample period.
3/Week
Samples are collected three times per week on three separate calendar days. These samples shall be representative of
the wastewater discharged during the sample period.
Act or"the Act"
The Federal Water Pollution Control Act,also known as the Clean Water Act(CWA),as amended,33 USC 1251,et.
seq.
Annual Average
The arithmetic mean of all"daily discharges"of a pollutant measured during the calendar year. In the case of fecal
coliform,the geometric mean of such discharges.
Arithmetic Mean
The summation of the individual values divided by the number of individual values.
Bypass
The known diversion of waste streams from any portion of a treatment facility including the collection system,which is
not a designed or established or operating mode for the facility.
Calendar Day
The period from midnight of one day until midnight of the next day.However, for purposes of this permit,any
consecutive 24-hour period that reasonably represents the calendar day may be used for sampling.
Calendar Week
The period from Sunday through the following Saturday.
Calendar Quarter
One of the following distinct periods: January through March,April through June,July through September,and
October through December.
Composite Sample
A sample collected over a 24-hour period by continuous sampling or combining grab samples of at least 100 mL in
such a manner as to result in a total sample representative of the wastewater discharge during the sample period. The
Director may designate the most appropriate method(specific number and size of aliquots necessary,the time interval
between grab samples, etc.)on a case-by-case basis. Samples may be collected manually or automatically. Composite
samples may be obtained by the following methods:
(1) Continuous: a single,continuous sample collected over a 24-hour period proportional to the rate of flow.
(2) Constant time/variable volume: a series of grab samples collected at equal time intervals over a 24 hour period
of discharge and combined proportional to the rate of flow measured at the time of individual sample
collection,or
(3) Variable time/constant volume: a series of grab samples of equal volume collected over a 24 hour period with
the time intervals between samples determined by a preset number of gallons passing the sampling point.Flow
measurement between sample intervals shall be determined by use of a flow recorder and totalizer,and the
preset gallon interval between sample collection fixed at no greater than 1/24 of the expected total daily flow at
the treatment system,or
Version 1110912011.2

NPDES Permit Standard Conditions
Page 2 of 18
(4) Constant time/constant volume: a series of grab samples of equal volume collected over a 24-hour period at a
constant time interval.Use of this method requires prior approval by the Director. This method may only be
used in situations where effluent flow rates vary less than 15 percent. The following restrictions also apply:
➢ Influent and effluent grab samples shall be of equal size and of no less than 100 milliliters
➢ Influent samples shall not be collected more than once per hour.
➢ Permittees with wastewater treatment systems whose detention time<24 hours shall collect effluent grab
samples at intervals of no greater than 20 minutes apart during any 24-hour period.
➢ Permittees with wastewater treatment systems whose detention time exceeds 24 hours shall collect effluent
grab samples at least every six hours;there must be a minimum of four samples during a 24-hour sampling
period.
Continuous flow measurement
Flow monitoring that occurs without interruption throughout the operating hours of the facility. Flow shall be
monitored continually except for the infrequent times when there may be no flow or for infrequent maintenance
activities on the flow device.
Daily Discharge
The discharge of a pollutant measured during a calendar day or any 24-hour period that reasonably represents the
calendar day for purposes of sampling. For pollutants measured in units of mass,the "daily discharge" is calculated as
the total mass of the pollutant discharged over the day. For pollutants expressed in other units of measurement,the
"daily discharge"is calculated as the average measurement of the pollutant over the day. (40 CFR 122.2; see also
"Composite Sample,"above.)
Daily Maximum
The highest"daily discharge"during the calendar month.
Daily Sampling
Parameters requiring daily sampling shall be sampled 5 out of every 7 days per week unless otherwise specified in the
permit. Sampling shall be conducted on weekdays except where holidays or other disruptions of normal operations
prevent weekday sampling. If sampling is required for all seven days of the week for any permit parameter(s),that
requirement will be so noted on the Effluent Limitations and Monitoring Page(s).
DWR or"the Division"
The Division of Water Resources,Department of Environmental Quality.
Effluent
Wastewater discharged following all treatment processes from a water pollution control facility or other point source
whether treated or untreated.
EMC
The North Carolina Environmental Management Commission
EPA
The United States Environmental Protection Agency
Facility Closure
Cessation of all activities that require coverage under this NPDES permit. Completion of facility closure will allow this
permit to be rescinded.
Geometric Mean
The Nth root of the product of the individual values where N=the number of individual values. For purposes of
calculating the geometric mean,values of"0"(or"< [detection level]")shall be considered= 1.
Grab Sample
Individual samples of at least 100 mL collected over a period of time not exceeding 15 minutes. Grab samples can be
collected manually. Grab samples must be representative of the discharge(or the receiving stream,for instream
samples).
Version 1110912011.2

NPDES Permit Standard Conditions
Page 3 of 18
Hazardous Substance
Any substance designated under 40 CFR Part 116 pursuant to Section 311 of the CWA.
Instantaneous flow measurement
The flow measured during the minimum time required for the flow measuring device or method to produce a result in
that instance. To the extent practical,instantaneous flow measurements coincide with the collection of any grab
samples required for the same sampling period so that together the samples and flow are representative of the discharge
during that sampling period.
Monthly Average(concentration limit)
The arithmetic mean of all"daily discharges"of a pollutant measured during the calendar month. In the case of fecal
coliform or other bacterial parameters or indicators,the geometric mean of such discharges.
Permit Issuing Authority
The Director of the Division of Water Resources.
Quarterly Average(concentration limit)
The arithmetic mean of all samples taken over a calendar quarter.
Severe property damage
Substantial physical damage to property,damage to the treatment facilities which causes them to become inoperable,or
substantial and permanent loss of natural resources which can reasonably be expected to occur in the absence of a
bypass. Severe property damage excludes economic loss caused by delays in production.
Toxic Pollutant:
Any pollutant listed as toxic under Section 307(a)(1)of the CWA.
Upset
An incident beyond the reasonable control of the Permittee causing unintentional and temporary noncompliance with
permit effluent limitations and/or monitoring requirements.An upset does not include noncompliance caused by
operational error,improperly designed treatment facilities,inadequate treatment facilities,lack of preventive
maintenance,or careless or improper operation.
Weekly Average(concentration limit)
The arithmetic mean of all"daily discharges"of a pollutant measured during the calendar week. In the case of fecal
coliform or other bacterial parameters or indicators,the geometric mean of such discharges.
Section B. General Conditions
1. Duty to Comply
The Permittee must comply with all conditions of this permit.Any permit noncompliance constitutes a violation of
the CWA and is grounds for enforcement action;for permit termination,revocation and reissuance,or
modification;or denial of a permit renewal application[40 CFR 122.41].
a. The Permittee shall comply with effluent standards or prohibitions established under section 307(a)of the
CWA for toxic pollutants and with standards for sewage sludge use or disposal established under section
405(d)of the CWA within the time provided in the regulations that establish these standards or prohibitions or
standards for sewage sludge use or disposal, even if the permit has not yet been modified to incorporate the
requirement.
b. The CWA provides that any person who violates section[s] 301, 302,306, 307,308, 318 or 405 of the Act,or
any permit condition or limitation implementing any such sections in a permit issued under section 402,or any
requirement imposed in a pretreatment program approved under sections 402(a)(3)or 402(b)(8)of the Act,is
subject to a civil penalty not to exceed$37,500 per day for each violation. [33 USC 1319(d)and 40 CFR
122.41(a)(2)]
c. The CWA provides that any person who negligently violates sections 301,302, 306,307, 308,318, or 405 of
the Act,or any condition or limitation implementing any of such sections in a permit issued under section 402
of the Act,or any requirement imposed in a pretreatment program approved under section 402(a)(3)or
402(b)(8)of the Act,is subject to criminal penalties of$2,500 to$25,000 per day of violation, or
Version 1110912011.2

NPDES Permit Standard Conditions
Page 4 of 18
imprisonment of not more than 1 year,or both. In the case of a second or subsequent conviction for a negligent
violation, a person shall be subject to criminal penalties of not more than$50,000 per day of violation, or by
imprisonment of not more than 2 years,or both. [33 USC 1319(c)(1)and 40 CFR 122.41(a)(2)]
d. Any person who knowingly violates such sections, or such conditions or limitations is subject to criminal
penalties of$5,000 to$50,000 per day of violation,or imprisonment for not more than 3 years,or both.In the
case of a second or subsequent conviction for a knowing violation, a person shall be subject to criminal
penalties of not more than$100,000 per day of violation, or imprisonment of not more than 6 years,or both.
[33 USC 1319(c)(2)and 40 CFR 122.41(a)(2)]
e. Any person who knowingly violates section 301, 302, 303, 306, 307,308, 318 or 405 of the Act,or any permit
condition or limitation implementing any of such sections in a permit issued under section 402 of the Act, and
who knows at that time that he thereby places another person in imminent danger of death or serious bodily
injury, shall,upon conviction,be subject to a fine of not more than$250,000 or imprisonment of not more than
15 years, or both.In the case of a second or subsequent conviction for a knowing endangerment violation, a
person shall be subject to a fine of not more than$500,000 or by imprisonment of not more than 30 years,or
both.An organization,as defined in section 309(c)(3)(B)(iii)of the CWA, shall,upon conviction of violating
the imminent danger provision,be subject to a fine of not more than$1,000,000 and can be fined up to
$2,000,000 for second or subsequent convictions. [40 CFR 122.41(a)(2)]
f. Under state law,a civil penalty of not more than$25,000 per violation may be assessed against any person
who violates or fails to act in accordance with the terms,conditions,or requirements of a permit. [North
Carolina General Statutes § 143-215.6A]
g. Any person may be assessed an administrative penalty by the Administrator for violating section 301, 302,
306,307, 308,318 or 405 of this Act,or any permit condition or limitation implementing any of such sections
in a permit issued under section 402 of this Act.Administrative penalties for Class I violations are not to
exceed$16,000 per violation,with the maximum amount of any Class I penalty assessed not to exceed
$37,500.Penalties for Class II violations are not to exceed$16,000 per day for each day during which the
violation continues,with the maximum amount of any Class II penalty not to exceed$177,500. [33 USC
1319(g)(2)and 40 CFR 122.41(a)(3)]
2. Duty to Mitigate
The Permittee shall take all reasonable steps to minimize or prevent any discharge or sludge use or disposal in
violation of this permit with a reasonable likelihood of adversely affecting human health or the environment[40
CFR 122.41(d)].
3. Civil and Criminal Liabilitv
Except as provided in permit conditions on'Bypassing"(Part H.C.4),"Upsets"(Part II.C.5)and"Power Failures"
(Part II.C.7),nothing in this permit shall be construed to relieve the Permittee from any responsibilities,liabilities,
or penalties for noncompliance pursuant to NCGS 143-215.3, 143-215.6 or Section 309 of the Federal Act, 33 USC
1319.Furthermore,the Permittee is responsible for consequential damages, such as fish kills,even though the
responsibility for effective compliance may be temporarily suspended.
4. Oil and Hazardous Substance Liability
Nothing in this permit shall be construed to preclude the institution of any legal action or relieve the Permittee
from any responsibilities,liabilities,or penalties to which the Permittee is or may be subject to under NCGS 143-
215.75 et seq. or Section 311 of the Federal Act,33 USG 1321.Furthermore,the Permittee is responsible for
consequential damages, such as fish kills, even though the responsibility for effective compliance may be
temporarily suspended.
5. Property Rights
The issuance of this permit does not convey any property rights in either real or personal property, or any exclusive
privileges,nor does it authorize any injury to private property or any invasion of personal rights,nor any
infringement of Federal, State or local laws or regulations [40 CFR 122.41(g)].
6. Onshore or Offshore Construction
This permit does not authorize or approve the construction of any onshore or offshore physical structures or
facilities or the undertaking of any work in any navigable waters.
Version 1110912011.2

NPDES Permit Standard Conditions
Page 5 of 18
7. Severability
The provisions of this permit are severable. If any provision of this permit,or the application of any provision of
this permit to any circumstances,is held invalid,the application of such provision to other circumstances,and the
remainder of this permit, shall not be affected thereby[NCGS 150B-23].
8. Duty to Provide Information
The Permittee shall furnish to the Permit Issuing Authority,within a reasonable time, any information which the
Permit Issuing Authority may request to determine whether cause exists for modifying,revoking and reissuing,or
terminating this permit or to determine compliance with this permit. The Permittee shall also furnish to the Permit
Issuing Authority upon request,copies of records required by this permit[40 CFR 122.41(h)].
9. Dpty to Reapply
If the Permittee wishes to continue an activity regulated by this permit after the expiration date of this permit,the
Permittee must apply for and obtain a new permit[40 CFR 122.41(b)].
10. Expiration of Permit
The Permittee is not authorized to discharge after the expiration date. In order to receive automatic authorization to
discharge beyond the expiration date,the Permittee shall submit such information, forms,and fees as are required
by the agency authorized to issue permits no later than 180 days prior to the expiration date unless permission for a
later date has been granted by the Director. (The Director shall not grant permission for applications to be
submitted later than the expiration date of the existing permit.) [40 CFR 122.21(d)]Any Permittee that has not
requested renewal at least 180 days prior to expiration, or any Permittee that does not have a permit after the
expiration and has not requested renewal at least 180 days prior to expiration,will subject the Permittee to
enforcement procedures as provided in NCGS 143-215.6 and 33 USC 1251 et. seq.
11. Signatory Requirements
All applications,reports,or information submitted to the Permit Issuing Authority shall be signed and certified[40
CFR 122.41(k)].
a. All permit applications shall be signed as follows:
(1) For a corporation: by a responsible corporate officer.For the purpose of this Section,a responsible
corporate officer means: (a)a president, secretary,treasurer or vice president of the corporation in charge
of a principal business function,or any other person who performs similar policy or decision making
functions for the corporation,or(b)the manager of one or more manufacturing,production,or operating
facilities,provided,the manager is authorized to make management decisions which govern the operation
of the regulated facility including having the explicit or implicit duty of making major capital investment
recommendations,and initiating and directing other comprehensive measures to assure long term
environmental compliance with environmental laws and regulations;the manager can ensure that the
necessary systems are established or actions taken to gather complete and accurate information for permit
application requirements; and where authority to sign documents has been assigned or delegated to the
manager in accordance with corporate procedures .
(2) For a partnership or sole proprietorship: by a general partner or the proprietor,respectively; or
(3) For a municipality, State,Federal,or other public agency: by either a principal executive officer or
ranking elected official [40 CFR 122.22].
b. All reports required by the permit and other information requested by the Permit Issuing Authority shall be
signed by a person described in paragraph a. above or by a duly authorized representative of that person.A
person is a duly authorized representative only if:
(1) The authorization is made in writing by a person described above;
(2) The authorization specified either an individual or a position having responsibility for the overall operation
of the regulated facility or activity, such as the position of plant manager,operator of a well or well field,
superintendent,a position of equivalent responsibility,or an individual or position having overall
responsibility for environmental matters for the company. (A duly authorized representative may thus be
either a named individual or any individual occupying a named position.);and
(3) The written authorization is submitted to the Permit Issuing Authority[40 CFR 122.22]
Version 1110912011.2

NPDES Permit Standard Conditions
Page 6 of 18
c. Changes to authorization: If an authorization under paragraph(b)of this section is no longer accurate because
a different individual or position has responsibility for the overall operation of the facility,a new authorization
satisfying the requirements of paragraph(b)of this section must be submitted to the Director prior to or
together with any reports,information,or applications to be signed by an authorized representative [40 CFR
122.22]
d. Certification.Any person signing a document under paragraphs a. or b. of this section shall make the following
certification[40 CFR 122.22].NO OTHER STATEMENTS OF CERTIFICATION WILL BE ACCEPTED:
"I certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or
supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and
evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or
those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my
knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete.I am aware that there are significant penalties for
submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
12. Permit Actions
This permit may be modified,revoked and reissued,or terminated for cause. The filing of a request by the
Permittee for a permit modification,revocation and reissuance,or termination,or a notification of planned changes
or anticipated noncompliance does not stay any permit condition[40 CFR 122.41(f)].
13. Permit Modification,Revocation and Reissuance,or Termination
The issuance of this permit does not prohibit the permit issuing authority from reopening and modifying the permit,
revoking and reissuing the permit,or terminating the permit as allowed by the laws,rules,and regulations
contained in Title 40, Code of Federal Regulations,Parts 122 and 123;Title 15A of the North Carolina
Administrative Code, Subchapter 02H .0100; and North Carolina General Statute 143.215.1 et. al.
14. Annual Administering and Compliance Monitoring Fee Requirements
The Permittee must pay the annual administering and compliance monitoring fee within thirty days after being
billed by the Division. Failure to pay the fee in a timely manner in accordance with 15A NCAC 02H .0105(b)(2)
may cause this Division to initiate action to revoke the permit.
Section C. Operation and Maintenance of Pollution Controls
1. Certified Operator
Owners of classified water pollution control systems must designate operators, certified by the Water Pollution
Control System Operators Certification Commission(WPCSOCC),of the appropriate type and grade for the
system,and,for each classification must[T15A NCAC 08G.0201]:
a. designate one Operator In Responsible Charge(ORC)who possesses a valid certificate of the type and grade at
least equivalent to the type and grade of the system;
b. designate one or more Back-up Operator(s)in Responsible Charge(Back-up ORCs)who possesses a valid
certificate of the type of the system and no more than one grade less than the grade of the system,with the
exception of no backup operator in responsible charge is required for systems whose minimum visitation
requirements are twice per year; and
c. submit a signed completed"Water Pollution Control System Operator Designation Form"to the Commission
(or to the local health department for owners of subsurface systems)countersigned by the designated certified
operators,designating the Operator in Responsible Charge(ORC)and the Back-up Operator in Responsible
Charge(Back-up ORC):
(1) 60 calendar days prior to wastewater or residuals being introduced into a new system; or
(2) within 120 calendar days following:
➢ receiving notification of a change in the classification of the system requiring the designation of a new
Operator in Responsible Charge(ORC)and Back-up Operator in Responsible Charge(Back-up ORC)
of the proper type and grade;or
➢ a vacancy in the position of Operator in Responsible Charge(ORC)or Back-up Operator in
Responsible Charge(Back-up ORC).
Version 1110912011.2

NPDES Permit Standard Conditions
Page 7 of 18
(3) within seven calendar days of vacancies in both ORC and Back-up ORC positions replacing or designating
at least one of the responsibilities.
The ORC of each Class I facility(or the Back-up ORC,when acting as surrogate for the ORC)must:
➢ Visit the facility as often as is necessary to insure proper operation of the treatment system;the treatment
facility must be visited at least weekly
➢ Comply with all other conditions of 15A NCAC 08G .0204.
The ORC of each Class II,III and IV facility(or the Back-up ORC,when acting as surrogate for the ORC)must:
➢ Visit the facility as often as is necessary to insure proper operation of the treatment system;the treatment
facility must be visited at least five days per week, excluding holidays
➢ Properly manage and document daily operation and maintenance of the facility
➢ Comply with all other conditions of 15A NCAC 08G.0204.
2. Proper Operation and Maintenance
The Permittee shall at all times properly operate and maintain all facilities and systems of treatment and control
(and related appurtenances)which are installed or used by the Permittee to achieve compliance with the conditions
of this permit. Proper operation and maintenance also includes adequate laboratory controls and appropriate quality
assurance procedures. This provision requires the Permittee to install and operate backup or auxiliary facilities only
when necessary to achieve compliance with the conditions of the permit[40 CFR 122.41(e)].
NOTE: Properly and officially designated operators are fully responsible for all proper operation and maintenance
of the facility,and all documentation required thereof,whether acting as a contract operator[subcontractor] or a
member of the Permittee's staff.
3. Need to Halt or Reduce not a Defense
It shall not be a defense for a Permittee in an enforcement action that it would have been necessary to halt or
reduce the permitted activity in order to maintain compliance with the condition of this permit[40 CFR 122.41(c)].
4. Bypassing of Treatment Facilities
a. Bypass not exceeding limitations [40 CFR 122.41(m)(2)]
The Permittee may allow any bypass to occur which does not cause effluent limitations to be exceeded,but
only if it also is for essential maintenance to assure efficient operation. These bypasses are not subject to the
provisions of Paragraphs b. and c. of this section.
b. Notice [40 CFR 122.41(m)(3)]
(1) Anticipated bypass.If the Permittee knows in advance of the need for a bypass,it shall submit prior notice,
if possible at least ten days before the date of the bypass; including an evaluation of the anticipated quality
and effect of the bypass.
(2) Unanticipated bypass. The Permittee shall submit notice of an unanticipated bypass as required in Part
II.E.6. (24-hour notice).
c. Prohibition of Bypass
(1) Bypass from the treatment facility is prohibited and the Permit Issuing Authority may take enforcement
action against a Permittee for bypass,unless:
(A) Bypass was unavoidable to prevent loss of life,personal injury or severe property damage;
(B) There were no feasible alternatives to the bypass, such as the use of auxiliary treatment facilities,
retention of untreated wastes or maintenance during normal periods of equipment downtime. This
condition is not satisfied if adequate backup equipment should have been installed in the exercise of
reasonable engineering judgment to prevent a bypass which occurred during normal periods of
equipment downtime or preventive maintenance; and
(C) The Permittee submitted notices as required under Paragraph b. of this section.
(2) Bypass from the collection system is prohibited and the Permit Issuing Authority may take enforcement
action against a Permittee for a bypass as provided in any current or future system-wide collection system
permit associated with the treatment facility.
Version 1110912011.2

NPDES Permit Standard Conditions
Page 8 of 18
(3) The Permit Issuing Authority may approve an anticipated bypass,after considering its adverse effects, if
the Permit Issuing Authority determines that it will meet the three conditions listed above in Paragraph c.
(1)of this section.
5. Upsets
a. Effect of an upset[40 CFR 122.41(n)(2)]: An upset constitutes an affirmative defense to an action brought for
noncompliance with such technology based permit effluent limitations if the requirements of paragraph b. of
this condition are met.No determination made during administrative review of claims that noncompliance was
caused by upset,and before an action for noncompliance,is final administrative action subject to judicial
review.
b. Conditions necessary for a demonstration of upset:Any Permittee who wishes to establish the affirmative
defense of upset shall demonstrate,through properly signed, contemporaneous operating logs,or other relevant
evidence that:
(1)An upset occurred and that the Permittee can identify the cause(s)of the upset;
(2)The Permittee facility was at the time being properly operated;and
(3)The Permittee submitted notice of the upset as required in Part II.E.6.(b)of this permit.
(4)The Permittee complied with any remedial measures required under Part II.B.2. of this permit.
c. Burden of proof[40 CFR 122.41(n)(4)]: The Permittee seeking to establish the occurrence of an upset has
the burden of proof in any enforcement proceeding.
6. Removed Substances
Solids, sludges,filter backwash,or other pollutants removed in the course of treatment or control of wastewaters
shall be utilized/disposed of in accordance with NCGS 143-215.1 and in a manner such as to prevent any pollutant
from such materials from entering waters of the State or navigable waters of the United States except as per
by the Commission. The Permittee shall comply with all applicable state and Federal regulations governing the
disposal of sewage sludge,including 40 CFR 503, Standards for the Use and Disposal of Sewage Sludge;40 CFR
Part 258,Criteria For Municipal Solid Waste Landfills;and 15A NCAC Subchapter 2T,Waste Not Discharged To
Surface Waters.The Permittee shall notify the Permit Issuing Authority of any significant change in its sludge use
or disposal practices.
7. Power Failures
The Permittee is responsible for maintaining adequate safeguards(as required by 15A NCAC 02H.0124)to
prevent the discharge of untreated or inadequately treated wastes during electrical power failures either by means
of alternate power sources, standby generators or retention of inadequately treated effluent.
Section D. Monitoring and Records
1. Representative Sampling
Samples collected and measurements taken,as required herein, shall be representative of the permitted discharge.
Samples collected at a frequency less than daily shall be taken on a day and time that is representative of the
discharge for the period the sample represents.All samples shall be taken at the monitoring points specified in this
permit and,unless otherwise specified,before the effluent joins or is diluted by any other wastestream,body of
water,or substance.Monitoring points shall not be changed without notification to and the approval of the Permit
Issuing Authority[40 CFR 122.41(j)].
2. Reporting
Monitoring results obtained during the previous month(s)shall be summarized for each month and reported on a
monthly Discharge Monitoring Report(DMR)Form(MR 1, 1.1,2,3)or alternative forms approved by the
Director,postmarked no later than the last calendar day of the month following the completed reporting period.
The first DMR is due on the last day of the month following the issuance of the permit or in the case of a new
facility,on the last day of the month following the commencement of discharge.Duplicate signed copies of these,
and all other reports required herein, shall be submitted to the following address:
Version 1110912011.2

NPDES Permit Standard Conditions
Page 9 of 18
NC DEQ/Division of Water Resources/Water Quality Permitting Section
ATTENTION: Central Files
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh,North Carolina 27699-1617
3. Flow Measurements
Appropriate flow measurement devices and methods consistent with accepted scientific practices shall be selected
and used to ensure the accuracy and reliability of measurements of the volume of monitored discharges. The
devices shall be installed,calibrated and maintained to ensure that the accuracy of the measurements is consistent
with the accepted capability of that type of device.Devices selected shall be capable of measuring flows with a
maximum deviation of less than 10%from the true discharge rates throughout the range of expected discharge
volumes. Flow measurement devices shall be accurately calibrated at a minimum of once per year and maintained
to ensure that the accuracy of the measurements is consistent with the accepted capability of that type of device.
The Director shall approve the flow measurement device and monitoring location prior to installation.
Once-through condenser cooling water flow monitored by pump logs, or pump hour meters as specified in Part I of
this permit and based on the manufacturer's pump curves shall not be subject to this requirement.
4. Test Procedures
Laboratories used for sample analysis must be certified by the Division. Permittees should contact the Division's
Laboratory Certification Section(919 733-3908)or visit https:Hdeq.nc.gov/about/divisions/water-resources/water-
resources-data/water-sciences-home-page/laboratory-certification-branch for information regarding laboratory
certifications.
Facilities whose personnel are conducting testing of field-certified parameters only must hold the appropriate field
parameter laboratory certifications.
Test procedures for the analysis of pollutants shall conform to the EMC regulations(published pursuant to NCGS
143-215.63 et. seq.),the Water and Air Quality Reporting Acts,and to regulations published pursuant to Section
304(g),33 USC 1314,of the CWA(as amended), and 40 CFR 136;or in the case of sludge use or disposal,
approved under 40 CFR 136,unless otherwise specified in 40 CFR 503,unless other test procedures have been
specified in this permit[40 CFR 122.41].
To meet the intent of the monitoring required by this permit,all test procedures must produce minimum detection
and reporting levels that are below the permit discharge requirements and all data generated must be reported down
to the minimum detection or lower reporting level of the procedure. If no approved methods are determined
capable of achieving minimum detection and reporting levels below permit discharge requirements,then the most
sensitive(method with the lowest possible detection and reporting level)approved method must be used.
5. Penalties for Tampering
The CWA provides that any person who falsifies,tampers with, or knowingly renders inaccurate,any monitoring
device or method required to be maintained under this permit shall,upon conviction,be punished by a fine of not
more than$10,000 per violation, or by imprisonment for not more than two years per violation,or by both. If a
conviction of a person is for a violation committed after a first conviction of such person under this paragraph,
punishment is a fine of not more than$20,000 per day of violation,or by imprisonment of not more than 4 years,
or both[40 CFR 122.41].
6. Records Retention
Except for records of monitoring information required by this permit related to the Permittee's sewage sludge use
and disposal activities,which shall be retained for a period of at least five years(or longer as required by 40 CFR
503),the Permittee shall retain records of all monitoring information, including:
➢ all calibration and maintenance records
➢ all original strip chart recordings for continuous monitoring instrumentation
➢ copies of all reports required by this permit
➢ copies of all data used to complete the application for this permit
Version 1110912011.2

NPDES Permit Standard Conditions
Page 10 of 18
These records or copies shall be maintained for a period of at least 3 years from the date of the sample,
measurement,report or application. This period may be extended by request of the Director at any time [40 CFR
122.41].
7. Recording Results
For each measurement or sample taken pursuant to the requirements of this permit,the Permittee shall record the
following information [40 CFR 122.41]:
a. The date,exact place, and time of sampling or measurements;
b. The individual(s)who performed the sampling or measurements;
c. The date(s)analyses were performed;
d. The individual(s)who performed the analyses;
e. The analytical techniques or methods used;and
f. The results of such analyses.
8. Inspection and Entry
The Permittee shall allow the Director,or an authorized representative(including an authorized contractor acting as
a representative of the Director),upon the presentation of credentials and other documents as may be required by
law,to;
a. Enter,at reasonable times,upon the Permittee's premises where a regulated facility or activity is located or
conducted,or where records must be kept under the conditions of this permit;
b. Have access to and copy,at reasonable times,any records that must be kept under the conditions of this permit;
c. Inspect at reasonable times any facilities,equipment(including monitoring and control equipment),practices,
or operations regulated or required under this permit;and
d. Sample or monitor at reasonable times,for the purposes of assuring permit compliance or as otherwise
authorized by the CWA,any substances or parameters at any location[40 CFR 122.41(i)].
Section E Reporting Requirements
1. Change in Discharge
All discharges authorized herein shall be consistent with the terms and conditions of this permit. The discharge of
any pollutant identified in this permit more frequently than or at a level in excess of that authorized shall constitute
a violation of the permit.
2. Planned Changes
The Permittee shall give notice to the Director as soon as possible of any planned physical alterations or additions
to the permitted facility[40 CFR 122.41(1)].Notice is required only when:
a. The alteration or addition to a permitted facility may meet one of the criteria for new sources at 40 CFR
122.29(b); or
b. The alteration or addition could significantly change the nature or increase the quantity of pollutants
discharged.This notification applies to pollutants subject neither to effluent limitations in the permit,nor to
notification requirements under 40 CFR 122.42(a)(1);or
c. The alteration or addition results in a significant change in the Permittee's sludge use or disposal practices,and
such alteration, addition or change may justify the application of permit conditions that are different from or
absent in the existing permit,including notification of additional use or disposal sites not reported during the
permit application process or not reported pursuant to an approved land application plan.
3. Anticipated Noncompliance
The Permittee shall give advance notice to the Director of any planned changes to the permitted facility or other
activities that might result in noncompliance with the permit[40 CFR 122.41(1)(2)].
4. Transfers
This permit is not transferable to any person without prior written notice to and approval from the Director in
accordance with 40 CFR 122.61. The Director may condition approval in accordance with NCGS 143-215.1,in
Version 1110912011.2

NPDES Permit Standard Conditions
Page 11 of 18
particular NCGS 143-215.1(b)(4)b.2.,and may require modification or revocation and reissuance of the permit,or
a minor modification,to identify the new permittee and incorporate such other requirements as may be necessary
under the CWA[40 CFR 122.41(1)(3), 122.61] or state statute.
5. Monitoring Reports
Monitoring results shall be reported at the intervals specified elsewhere in this permit [40 CFR 122.41(1)(4)].
a. Monitoring results must be reported on a Discharge Monitoring Report(DMR)(See Part II.D.2)or forms
provided by the Director for reporting results of monitoring of sludge use or disposal practices.
b. If the Permittee monitors any pollutant more frequently than required by this permit using test procedures
approved under 40 CFR Part 136 and at a sampling location specified in this permit or other appropriate
instrument governing the discharge,the results of such monitoring shall be included in the calculation and
reporting of the data submitted on the DMR.
6. Twenty-four Hour Repo
a. The Permittee shall report to the Director or the appropriate Regional Office any noncompliance that
potentially threatens public health or the environment. Any information shall be provided orally within 24
hours from the time the Permittee became aware of the circumstances.A written submission shall also be
provided within 5 days of the time the Permittee becomes aware of the circumstances. The written submission
shall contain a description of the noncompliance, and its cause;the period of noncompliance,including exact
dates and times, and if the noncompliance has not been corrected,the anticipated time it is expected to
continue; and steps taken or planned to reduce,eliminate,and prevent reoccurrence of the noncompliance [40
CFR 122.41(1)(6)].
b. The Director may waive the written report on a case-by-case basis for reports under this section if the oral
report has been received within 24 hours.
c. Occurrences outside normal business hours may also be reported to the Division's Emergency Response
personnel at(800) 858-0368 or(919)733-3300.
7. Other Noncompliance
The Permittee shall report all instances of noncompliance not reported under Part II.E.5 and 6. of this permit at the
time monitoring reports are submitted. The reports shall contain the information listed in Part II.E.6. of this permit
[40 CFR 122.41(1)(7)].
8. Other Information
Where the Permittee becomes aware that it failed to submit any relevant facts in a permit application,or submitted
incorrect information in a permit application or in any report to the Director,it shall promptly submit such facts or
information[40 CFR 122.41(1)(8)].
9. Noncompliance Notification
The Permittee shall report by telephone to either the central office or the appropriate regional office of the Division
as soon as possible,but in no case more than 24 hours or on the next working day following the occurrence or first
knowledge of the occurrence of any of the following:
a. Any occurrence at the water pollution control facility which results in the discharge of significant amounts of
wastes which are abnormal in quantity or characteristic, such as the dumping of the contents of a sludge
digester;the known passage of a slug of hazardous substance through the facility; or any other unusual
circumstances.
b. Any process unit failure,due to known or unknown reasons,that render the facility incapable of adequate
wastewater treatment such as mechanical or electrical failures of pumps, aerators,compressors, etc.
c. Any failure of a pumping station, sewer line,or treatment facility resulting in a by-pass without treatment of all
or any portion of the influent to such station or facility.
Persons reporting such occurrences by telephone shall also file a written report within 5 days following first
knowledge of the occurrence.Also see reporting requirements for municipalities in Part IV.C.2.c. of this permit.
10. Availability of Reports
Except for data determined to be confidential under NCGS 143-215.3 (a)(2)or Section 308 of the Federal Act,33
USC 1318,all reports prepared in accordance with the terms shall be available for public inspection at the offices
Version 1110912011.2

NPDES Permit Standard Conditions
Page 12 of 18
of the Division.As required by the Act,effluent data shall not be considered confidential. Knowingly making any
false statement on any such report may result in the imposition of criminal penalties as provided for in NCGS 143-
215.1(b)(2)or in Section 309 of the Federal Act.
11. Penalties for Falsification of Reports
The CWA provides that any person who knowingly makes any false statement,representation,or certification in
any record or other document submitted or required to be maintained under this permit,including monitoring
reports or reports of compliance or noncompliance shall,upon conviction,be punished by a fine of not more than
$25,000 per violation,or by imprisonment for not more than two years per violation,or by both[40 CFR 122.41].
12. Annual Performance Reports
Permittees who own or operate facilities that primarily collect or treat municipal or domestic wastewater and have
an average annual flow greater than 200,000 gallons per day shall provide an annual report to the Permit Issuing
Authority and to the users/customers served by the Permittee(NCGS 143-215.1C).The report shall summarize the
performance of the collection or treatment system,as well as the extent to which the facility was compliant with
applicable Federal or State laws,regulations and rules pertaining to water quality. The report shall be provided no
later than sixty days after the end of the calendar or fiscal year,depending upon which annual period is used for
evaluation.
The report shall be sent to:
NC DEQ/Division of Water Resources/Water Quality Permitting Section
ATTENTION: Central Files
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh,North Carolina 27699-1617
Version 1110912011.2

NPDES Permit Standard Conditions
Page 13 of 18
PART III
OTHER REQUIREMENTS
Section A. Construction
a. The Permittee shall not commence construction of wastewater treatment facilities,nor add to the plant's treatment
capacity,nor change the treatment process(es)utilized at the treatment plant unless(1)the Division has issued an
Authorization to Construct(AtC)permit or(2)the Permittee is exempted from such AtC permit requirements
under Item b. of this Section.
b. In accordance with NCGS 143-215.1(a5) [SL 2011-394],no permit shall be required to enter into a contract for the
construction,installation, or alteration of any treatment work or disposal system or to construct,install, or alter any
treatment works or disposal system within the State when the system's or work's principle function is to conduct,
treat, equalize,neutralize, stabilize,recycle,or dispose of industrial waste or sewage from an industrial facility and
the discharge of the industrial waste or sewage is authorized under a permit issued for the discharge of the
industrial waste or sewage into the waters of the State. Notwithstanding the above,the permit issued for the
discharge may be modified if required by federal regulation.
c. Issuance of an AtC will not occur until Final Plans and Specifications for the proposed construction have been
submitted by the Permittee and approved by the Division.
Section B. Groundwater Monitoring
The Permittee shall,upon written notice from the Director,conduct groundwater monitoring as may be required to
determine the compliance of this NPDES permitted facility with the current groundwater standards.
Section C. Changes in Discharges of Toxic Substances
The Permittee shall notify the Permit Issuing Authority as soon as it knows or has reason to believe(40 CFR 122.42):
a. That any activity has occurred or will occur which would result in the discharge,on a routine or frequent basis,of
any toxic pollutant which is not limited in the permit,if that discharge will exceed the highest of the following
"notification levels";
(1) One hundred micrograms per liter(100 µg/L);
(2) Two hundred micrograms per liter(200 µg/L)for acrolein and acrylonitrile; five hundred micrograms per liter
(500 µg/L)for 2,4-dinitrophenol and for 2-methyl-4,6-dinitrophenol; and one milligram per liter(1 mg/L)for
antimony;
(3) Five times the maximum concentration value reported for that pollutant in the permit application.
b. That any activity has occurred or will occur which would result in any discharge, on a non-routine or infrequent
basis, of a toxic pollutant which is not limited in the permit,if that discharge will exceed the highest of the
following"notification levels";
(1) Five hundred micrograms per liter(500 µg/L);
(2) One milligram per liter(1 mg/L)for antimony;
(3) Ten times the maximum concentration value reported for that pollutant in the permit application.
Section D. Facility Closure Requirements
The Permittee must notify the Division at least 90 days prior to the closure of any wastewater treatment system covered
by this permit. The Division may require specific measures during deactivation of the system to prevent adverse
impacts to waters of the State. This permit cannot be rescinded while any activities requiring this permit continue at the
permitted facility.
Version 1110912011.2

NPDES Permit Standard Conditions
Page 14 of 18
PART IV
SPECIAL CONDITIONS FOR MUNICIPAL FACILITIES
Section A. Definitions
In addition to the definitions in Part II of this permit,the following definitions apply to municipal facilities:
Indirect Discharge or Industrial User
Any non-domestic source that discharges wastewater containing pollutants into a POTW regulated under section
307(b),(c)or(d)of the CWA. [40 CFR 403.3 (i)and 0)and 15A NCAC 02H.0903(b)(11)]
Interference
Inhibition or disruption of the POTW treatment processes;operations;or its sludge process,use, or disposal which
causes or contributes to a violation of any requirement of the Permittee's(or any satellite POTW's if different from the
Permittee)NPDES,collection system,or non-discharge permit or prevents sewage sludge use or disposal in
compliance with specified applicable State and Federal statutes,regulations, or permits. [I 5A NCAC 02H
.0903(b)(14)]
Pass Through
A discharge which exits the POTW into waters of the State in quantities or concentrations which,alone or with
discharges from other sources, causes a violation,including an increase in the magnitude or duration of a violation,of
the Permittee's(or any satellite POTW's,if different from the Permittee)NPDES,collection system,or non-discharge
permit. [15A NCAC 02H .0903(b)(23)]
Publicly Owned Treatment Works(POTW)
A treatment works as defined by Section 212 of the CWA,which is owned by a State or local government organization.
This definition includes any devices and systems used in the storage,treatment,recycling and reclamation of municipal
sewage or industrial wastes of a liquid nature. It also includes the collection system, as defined in 15A NCAC 2T
.0402,only if it conveys wastewater to a POTW treatment plant. The term also means the local government
organization,or municipality,as defined in section 502(4)of the CWA,which has jurisdiction over indirect discharges
to and the discharges from such a treatment works. In this context,the organization may be the owner of the POTW
treatment plant or the owner of the collection system into which an indirect discharger discharges. This second type of
POTW may be referred to as a"satellite POTW organization." [15A NCAC 02H.0903(b)(26)]
"Significant Industrial User" or"SILT"
An Industrial User that discharges wastewater into a publicly owned treatment works and that[I 5A NCAC 02H
.0903(b)(33)]:
1. Discharges an average of 25,000 gallons per day or more of process wastewater to the POTW(excluding sanitary,
noncontact cooling and boiler blowdown wastewaters);or
2. Contributes process wastewater which makes up five percent or more of the NPDES or non-discharge permitted
flow limit or organic capacity of the POTW treatment plant. In this context,organic capacity refers to BOD,TSS
and ammonia;or
3. Is subject to categorical standards under 40 CFR Part 403.6 and 40 CFR Parts 405-471; or
4. Is designated as such by the Permittee on the basis that the Industrial User has a reasonable potential for adversely
affecting the POTW's operation or for violating any pretreatment standard or requirement, or the POTW's effluent
limitations and conditions in its NPDES or non-discharge permit,or to limit the POTW's sludge disposal options;
5. Subject to approval under 15A NCAC 02H .0907(b),the Permittee may determine that an Industrial User meeting
the criteria in paragraphs 1 or 2 of this definition above has no reasonable potential for adversely affecting the
POTW's operation or for violating any pretreatment standard or requirement,the POTW's effluent limitations and
conditions in its NPDES or non-discharge permit,or to limit the POTW's sludge disposal options,and thus is not a
Significant Industrial User(SIU); or
6. Subject to approval under 15A NCAC 02H .0907(b),the Permittee may determine that an Industrial User meeting
the criteria in paragraph 3 of this definition above meets the requirements of 40 CFR Part 403.3(v)(2)and thus is a
non-significant categorical Industrial User.
Section B. Publicly Owned Treatment Works (POTWs)
Version 1110912011.2

NPDES Permit Standard Conditions
Page 15 of 18
All POTWs must provide adequate notice to the Director of the following[40 CFR 122.42(b)]:
1. Any new introduction of pollutants into the POTW from an indirect discharger,regardless of the means of
transport,which would be subject to section 301 or 306 of CWA if it were directly discharging those pollutants;
and
2. Any substantial change in the volume or character of pollutants being introduced by an indirect discharger as
influent to that POTW at the time of issuance of the permit.
3. For purposes of this paragraph,adequate notice shall include information on(1)the quality and quantity of effluent
introduced into the POTW,and(2)any anticipated impact that may result from the change of the quantity or
quality of effluent to be discharged from the POTW.
Section C. Municipal Control of Pollutants from Industrial Users.
1. Effluent limitations are listed in Part I of this permit. Other pollutants attributable to inputs from Industrial Users
discharging to the POTW may be present in the Permittee's discharge.At such time as sufficient information
becomes available to establish limitations for such pollutants,this permit may be revised to specify effluent
limitations for any or all of such other pollutants in accordance with best practicable technology or water quality
standards.
2. Prohibited Discharges
a. The Permittee shall develop and enforce their Pretreatment Program to implement the prohibition against the
introduction of pollutants or discharges into the waste treatment system or waste collection system which
cause or contribute to Pass Through or Interference as defined in 15A NCAC 02H .0900 and 40 CFR 403. [40
CFR 403.5(a)(1)]
b. The Permittee shall develop and enforce their Pretreatment Program to implement the prohibitions against the
introduction of the following wastes in the waste treatment or waste collection system[40 CFR 403.5(b)]:
(1) Pollutants which create a fire or explosion hazard in the POTW,including,but not limited to,
wastestreams with a closed cup flashpoint of less than 140 degrees Fahrenheit or 60 degrees Centigrade
using the test methods specified in 40 CFR 261.21;
(2) Pollutants which cause corrosive structural damage to the POTW,but in no case discharges with pH lower
than 5.0,unless the works is specifically designed to accommodate such discharges;
(3) Solid or viscous pollutants in amounts which cause obstruction to the flow in the POTW resulting in
Interference;
(4) Any pollutant,including oxygen demanding pollutants(BOD, etc.)released in a Discharge at a flow rate
and/or pollutant concentration which will cause Interference with the POTW;
(5) Heat in amounts which will inhibit biological activity in the POTW resulting in Interference,but in no
case heat in such quantities that the temperature at the POTW Treatment Plant exceeds 40°C(104°F)
unless the Division,upon request of the POTW,approves alternate temperature limits;
(6) Petroleum oil,non-biodegradable cutting oil,or products of mineral oil origin in amounts that will cause
Interference or Pass Through;
(7) Pollutants which result in the presence of toxic gases,vapors,or fumes within the POTW in a quantity that
may cause acute worker health and safety problems; or
(8) Any trucked or hauled pollutants,except at discharge points designated by the POTW.
c. The Permittee shall investigate the source of all discharges into the POTW,including slug loads and other
unusual discharges,which have the potential to adversely impact the Permittee's Pretreatment Program and/or
the operation of the POTW.
The Permittee shall report such discharges into the POTW to the Director or the appropriate Regional Office.
Any information shall be provided orally within 24 hours from the time the Permittee became aware of the
circumstances.A written submission shall also be provided within 5 days of the time the Permittee becomes
aware of the circumstances. The written submission shall contain a description of the discharge;the
investigation into possible sources;the period of the discharge,including exact dates and times; if the
discharge has not ceased,the anticipated time it is expected to continue;and steps taken or planned to reduce,
eliminate, and prevent reoccurrence of the noncompliance,
Version 1110912011.2

NPDES Permit Standard Conditions
Page 16 of 18
3. With regard to the effluent requirements listed in Part I of this permit,it may be necessary for the Permittee to
supplement the requirements of the Federal Pretreatment Standards(40 CFR,Part 403)to ensure compliance by
the Permittee with all applicable effluent limitations. Such actions by the Permittee may be necessary regarding
some or all of the industries discharging to the municipal system.
4. The Permittee shall require any Industrial User(IU)discharging to the POTW to meet Federal Pretreatment
Standards developed under Section 307(b)of the Act as amended(which includes categorical standards and
specific local limits,best management practices and narrative requirements).Prior to accepting wastewater from
any Significant Industrial User(SIU),the Permittee shall either develop and submit to the Division a new
Pretreatment Program or, as necessary, a modification of an existing Pretreatment Program, for approval as
required under section D below as well as 15A NCAC 02H .0907(a)and(b). [40 CFR 122.440)(2)]
5. This permit shall be modified,or alternatively,revoked and reissued,to incorporate or modify an approved POTW
Pretreatment Program or to include a compliance schedule for the development of a POTW Pretreatment Program
as required under Section 402(b)(8)of the CWA and implementing regulations or by the requirements of the
approved State pretreatment program,as appropriate.
Section D. Pretreatment Programs
Under authority of sections 307 (b)and(c)and 402(b)(8)of the CWA and implementing regulations 40 CFR 403,
North Carolina General Statute 143-215.3(14)and implementing regulations 15A NCAC 02H .0900,and in accordance
with the approved pretreatment program,all provisions and regulations contained and referenced in the pretreatment
program submittal are an enforceable part of this permit. [40 CFR 122.440)(2)]
The Permittee shall operate its approved pretreatment program in accordance with Section 402(b)(8)of the CWA,40
CFR 403, 15A NCAC 02H.0900,and the legal authorities,policies,procedures, and financial provisions contained in
its pretreatment program submission and Division approved modifications thereof. Such operation shall include but is
not limited to the implementation of the following conditions and requirements. Terms not defined in Part II or Part IV
of this permit are as defined in 15A NCAC 02H .0903 and 40 CFR 403.3.
1. Sewer Use Ordinance(SUO)
The Permittee shall maintain adequate legal authority to implement its approved pretreatment program. [I 5A
NCAC 02H .0903(b)(32), .0905 and.0906(b)(1);40 CFR 403.8(f)(1)and 403.9(b)(1)and(2)]
2. Industrial Waste Survey(IWS)
The Permittee shall implement an IWS consisting of the survey of users of the POTW collection system or
treatment plant,as required by 40 CFR 403.8(f)(2)(i-iii)and 15A NCAC 02H.0905 [also 40 CFR 122.440)(1)],
including identification of all Industrial Users that may have an impact on the POTW and the character and amount
of pollutants contributed to the POTW by these Industrial Users and identification of those Industrial Users
meeting the definition of SIU. Where the Permittee accepts wastewater from one or more satellite POTWs,the
IWS for the Permittee shall address all satellite POTW services areas,unless the pretreatment program in those
satellite service areas is administered by a separate Permittee with an approved Pretreatment Program. The
Permittee shall submit a summary of its IWS activities to the Division at least once every five years,and as
required by the Division. The IWS submission shall include a summary of any investigations conducted under
paragraph C.2.c. of this Part. [15A NCAC 02H.0903(b)(13), .0905 and.0906(b)(2);40 CFR 403.8(f)(2)and 403.9]
3. Monitoring Plan
The Permittee shall implement a Division-approved Monitoring Plan for the collection of facility specific data to
be used in a wastewater treatment plant Headworks Analysis(HWA)for the development of specific pretreatment
local limits.Effluent data from the Plan shall be reported on the DMRs(as required by Parts II.D and II.E.5.). [15A
NCAC 02H .0903(b)(16), .0906(b)(3)and.0905]
4. Headworks Analysis(HWA)and Local Limits
The Permittee shall obtain Division approval of a HWA at least once every five years, and as required by the
Division. Within 180 days of the effective date of this permit(or any subsequent permit modification)the
Permittee shall submit to the Division a written technical evaluation of the need to revise local limits(i.e.,an
updated HWA or documentation of why one is not needed) [40 CFR 122.44]. The Permittee shall develop, in
accordance with 40 CFR 403.5(c)and 15A NCAC 02H .0909, specific Local Limits to implement the prohibitions
listed in 40 CFR 403.5(a)and(b)and 15A NCAC 02H .0909.Pursuant to 40 CFR 403.5,local limits are
Version 1110912011.2

NPDES Permit Standard Conditions
Page 17 of 18
enforceable Pretreatment Standards as defined by 40 CFR 403.3(1). [15A NCAC 02H.0903(b)(10), .0905, and
.0906(b)(4)]
5. Industrial User Pretreatment Permits(IUP)&Allocation Tables
In accordance with NCGS 143-215.1,the Permittee shall issue to all Significant Industrial Users,permits for
operation of pretreatment equipment and discharge to the Permittee's collection system or treatment works. These
permits shall contain limitations, sampling protocols,reporting requirements,appropriate standard and special
conditions, and compliance schedules as necessary for the installation of treatment and control technologies to
assure that their wastewater discharge will meet all applicable pretreatment standards and requirements. The
Permittee shall maintain a current Allocation Table(AT)which summarizes the results of the HWA and the limits
from all LUPs.Permitted IUP loadings for each parameter cannot exceed the treatment capacity of the POTW as
determined by the HWA. [15A NCAC 02H .0906(b)(6), .0909, .0916,and.0917;40 CFR 403.5,403.8(f)(1)(iii);
NCGS 143-215.67(a)]
6. Authorization to Construct(AtQ
The Permittee shall ensure that an Authorization to Construct permit(AtC)is issued to all applicable Industrial
Users for the construction or modification of any pretreatment facility.Prior to the issuance of an AtC,the
proposed pretreatment facility and treatment process must be evaluated for its capacity to comply with all
Industrial User Pretreatment Permit(IUP)limitations. [15A NCAC 02H .0906(b)(7)and.0905;NCGS 143-
215.1(a)(8)]
7. POTW Inspection&Monitoring of their IUs
The Permittee shall conduct inspection, surveillance, and monitoring activities as described in its Division
approved pretreatment program in order to determine, independent of information supplied by Industrial Users,
compliance with applicable pretreatment standards. [15A NCAC 02H .0908(e);40 CFR 403.8(f)(2)(v)] The
Permittee must:
a. Inspect all Significant Industrial Users(SIUs)at least once per calendar year;
b. Sample all Significant Industrial Users(SIUs)at least once per calendar year for all SIU permit-limited
parameters including flow except as allowed under 15A NCAC .0908(e);and
c. At least once per year,document an evaluation of any non-significant categorical Industrial User for
compliance with the requirements in 40 CFR 403.3(v)(2), and either continue or revoke the designation as non-
significant.
8. IU Self Monitoring and Reporting
The Permittee shall require all Industrial Users to comply with the applicable monitoring and reporting
requirements outlined in the Division-approved pretreatment program,the industry's pretreatment permit,or in 15A
NCAC 02H.0908. [15A NCAC 02H .0906(b)(5)and.0905;40 CFR 403.8(f)(1)(v)and(2)(iii);40 CFR
122.440)(2)and 40 CFR 403.12]
9. Enforcement Response Plan(ERP)
The Permittee shall enforce and obtain appropriate remedies for violations of all pretreatment standards
promulgated pursuant to section 307(b)and(c)of the CWA(40 CFR 405 et. seq.),prohibitive discharge standards
as set forth in 40 CFR 403.5 and 15A NCAC 02H .0909, specific local limitations,and other pretreatment
requirements.All remedies, enforcement actions and other, shall be consistent with the Enforcement Response
Plan(ERP)approved by the Division. [15A NCAC 02H.0903(b)(7), .0906(b)(8)and.0905;40 CFR 403.8(f)(5)]
10. Pretreatment Annual Reports(PAR)
The Permittee shall report to the Division in accordance with 15A NCAC 02H.0908. In lieu of submitting annual
reports,Modified Pretreatment Programs developed under 15A NCAC 02H .0904(b)may be required to submit a
partial annual report or to meet with Division personnel periodically to discuss enforcement of pretreatment
requirements and other pretreatment implementation issues.
For all other active pretreatment programs,the Permittee shall submit two copies of a Pretreatment Annual Report
(PAR)describing its pretreatment activities over the previous calendar year to the Division at the following
address:
Version 1110912011.2

NPDES Permit Standard Conditions
Page 18 of 18
NC DEQ/Division of Water Resources/Water Quality Permitting Section
Pretreatment,Emergency Response, and Collection Systems(PERCS)Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh,North Carolina 27699-1617
These reports shall be submitted by March 1 of each year and shall contain the following:
a. Narrative
A narrative summary detailing actions taken,or proposed,by the Permittee to correct significant non-
compliance and to ensure compliance with pretreatment requirements;
b. Pretreatment Program SummM(PPS)
A pretreatment program summary(PPS)on forms or in a format provided by the Division;
c. Significant Non-Compliance Report(SNCR)
A list of Industrial Users(IUs)in significant noncompliance(SNC)with pretreatment requirements,and the
nature of the violations on forms or in a format provided by the Division;
d. Industrial Data Summary Forms(IDSF)
Monitoring data from samples collected by both the POTW and the Significant Industrial Users(SIUs). These
analytical results must be reported on Industrial Data Summary Forms(IDSF)or on other forms or in a format
provided by the Division;
e. Other Information
Copies of the POTW's allocation table,new or modified enforcement compliance schedules,public notice of
IUs in SNC,a summary of data or other information related to significant noncompliance determinations for
IUs that are not considered SIUs, and any other information,upon request,which in the opinion of the Director
is needed to determine compliance with the pretreatment implementation requirements of this permit;
11. Public Notice
The Permittee shall publish annually a list of Industrial Users(Ns)that were in significant noncompliance(SNC)
as defined in the Permittee's Division-approved Sewer Use Ordinance with applicable pretreatment requirements
and standards during the previous twelve month period. This list shall be published within four months of the
applicable twelve-month period. [15A NCAC 02H .0903(b)(34), .0908(b)(5)and.0905 and 40 CFR
403.8(f)(2)(viii)]
12. Record Keeping
The Permittee shall retain for a minimum of three years records of monitoring activities and results,along with
support information including general records,water quality records,and records of industrial impact on the
POTW and shall retain all other Pretreatment Program records as required by 15A NCAC 02H .0908(f). [15A
NCAC 02H.0908(f);40 CFR 403.12(o)]
13. Pretreatment Program Resources
The Permittee shall maintain adequate funding and qualified personnel to accomplish the objectives of its approved
pretreatment program. and retain a written description of those current levels of inspection. [I 5A NCAC 02H
.0906(b)(9)and(10)and.0905;40 CFR 403.8(f)(3),403.9(b)(3)]
14. Modification to Pretreatment Programs
Modifications to the approved pretreatment program including but not limited to local limits modifications,POTW
monitoring of their Significant Industrial Users(SIUs), and Monitoring Plan modifications, shall be considered a
permit modification and shall be governed by 40 CFR 403.18, 15 NCAC 02H .0114 and 15A NCAC 02H.0907.
Version 1110912011.2

Pdf Pages in Comments—Binder species Other
Row Date Commenter 20240822 20240923 Form Comment? pH composition ecosystem fish (describe)
1 8/22/2024 Anderson, Steve pp. 2-3 Yes--Form 1 (to "US NCDEQ Division of Air Quality") X X X
2 8/22/2024 Baxter,Anne pp. 4-5 Yes--Form 1 (to "US NCDEQ Division of Air Quality") X X X
3 8/22/2024 Breiner, Diana pp. 6-7 Yes--Form 1 (to "US NCDEQ Division of Air Quality") X X X
4 8/22/2024 Cabe, Frances pp. 8-9 Yes--Form 1 (to "US NCDEQ Division of Air Quality") X X X
5 8/22/2024 Geisen, Wanda pp. 10-11 Yes--Form 1 (to "US NCDEQ Division of Air Quality") X X X
6 8/22/2024 Hamby, Greg pp. 12-13 Yes--Form 1 (to "US NCDEQ Division of Air Quality") X X X
7 8/22/2024 Johnston, Frank pp. 14-15 Yes--Form 1 (to "US NCDEQ Division of Air Quality") X X X
8 8/22/2024 Judy, Lele and Greg pp. 16-17 Yes--Form 1 (to "US NCDEQ Division of Air Quality") X X X
9 8/22/2024 Keith,Joel pp. 18-19 Yes--Form 1 (to "US NCDEQ Division of Air Quality") X X X
10 8/22/2024 Lincoln, Duffy pp. 20-21 Yes--Form 1 (to "US NCDEQ Division of Air Quality") X X X
11 8/22/2024 MacEwan,Valerie pp. 22-23 Yes--Form 1 (to "US NCDEQ Division of Air Quality") X X X
12 8/22/2024 Read, Fred pp. 24-25 Yes--Form 1 (to "US NCDEQ Division of Air Quality") X X X
13 8/22/2024 Sink, Kathy pp. 26-27 Yes--Form 1 (to "US NCDEQ Division of Air Quality") X X X
14 8/22/2024 Tucker,Jean pp. 28-29 Yes--Form 1 (to "US NCDEQ Division of Air Quality") X X X
15 8/23/2024 Alexander, Steve (1209pm) pp. 31-32 No but appears to be based on Form 1 X X X
16 8/23/2024 Alexander, Steve (1214pm) pp. 33-34 Yes--Form 1 (to "US NCDEQ Division of Air Quality") X X X
17 8/23/2024 Anderson, Elaine pp. 35-36 Yes--Form 1 (to "US NCDEQ Division of Air Quality") X X X
18 8/23/2024 Deck, Heather pp. 37-38 Yes--Form 1 plus request for public hearing X X X
19 8/23/2024 Evans, Maria p. 39 No X
20 8/23/2024 Foreman, Lonnie p. 40 Yes--Form 1 (to "US NCDEQ Division of Air Quality") X X X
21 8/23/2024 Livermon, Doreen pp. 41-42 Yes--Form 1 (to "US NCDEQ Division of Air Quality") X X X
22 8/23/2024 Lopez, Regine pp. 43-44 Yes--Form 1 (to "US NCDEQ Division of Air Quality") X X X
23 8/23/2024 Neubert, Richard pp. 45-46 Yes--Form 1 (to "US NCDEQ Division of Air Quality") X X X
24 8/23/2024 Roberson, Phyllis pp. 47-48 No X
25 8/23/2024 Rousseau, Courtney pp. 49-50 Yes--Form 1 (to "US NCDEQ Division of Air Quality") X X X
26 8/23/2024 Seals, Stephanie pp. 51-52 Yes--Form 1 (to "US NCDEQ Division of Air Quality") X X X
27 8/23/2024 Sowerwine, Margaret pp. 53-54 Yes--Form 1 (to "US NCDEQ Division of Air Quality") X X X
28 8/23/2024 Torgan, Lisa pp. 55-56 Yes--Form 1 (to "US NCDEQ Division of Air Quality") X X X
29 8/23/2024 Wilder, Sommer pp. 57-58 Yes--Form 1 (to "US NCDEQ Division of Air Quality") X X X
30 8/24/2024 Crane, Carol pp. 60-61 Yes--Form 1 (to "US NCDEQ Division of Air Quality") X X X
31 8/24/2024 Crane, Patrick pp. 62-63 Yes--Form 1 (to "US NCDEQ Division of Air Quality") X X X
32 8/24/2024 Culpepper, Polk pp. 64-65 Yes--Form 1 (to "US NCDEQ Division of Air Quality") X X X
33 8/24/2024 Dixon,Jesse pp. 66-67 Yes--Form 1 (to "US NCDEQ Division of Air Quality") X X X
34 8/24/2024 Gottschall,Tom pp. 68-69 Yes--Form 1 (to "US NCDEQ Division of Air Quality") X X X
35 8/24/2024 Harris, Kelly pp. 70-71 Yes--Form 1 (to "US NCDEQ Division of Air Quality") X X X
36 8/24/2024 Layney, Mullis pp. 72-73 Yes--Form 1 (to "US NCDEQ Division of Air Quality") X X X
37 8/24/2024 Daniel,Traylor pp. 74-75 Yes--Form 1 (to "US NCDEQ Division of Air Quality") X X X
38 8/25/2024 Dickinson,Todd pp. 77-78 Yes--Form 1 (to "US NCDEQ Division of Air Quality") X X X
39 8/25/2024 McGrew, Duncan pp. 79-80 Yes--Form 1 (to "US NCDEQ Division of Air Quality") X X X
40 8/26/2024 Website Capture pp. 83-88 Sound Rivers,Action Alert: Let's Save Blounts Creek! X X X
41 8/26/2024 Bargelt, Lindsey pp. 89-90 Yes--Form 1 (to "US NCDEQ Division of Air Quality") X X X
42 8/26/2024 Belch, Corinne pp. 91-92 Yes--Form 1 (to "US NCDEQ Division of Air Quality") X X X
4857-6618-8268.v1

43 8/26/2024 Bradshaw, Daphne pp. 93-94 Yes--Form 1 (to "US NCDEQ Division of Air Quality") X X X
44 8/26/2024 Bradshaw,Julia pp. 95-96 Yes--Form 1 (to "US NCDEQ Division of Air Quality") X X X
45 8/26/2024 Bright, Breanna pp. 97-98 Yes--Form 1 (to "US NCDEQ Division of Air Quality") X X X
46 8/26/2024 Caroline, Hannah pp. 99-100 Yes--Form 1 (to "US NCDEQ Division of Air Quality") X X X
47 8/26/2024 Cordon, Casey pp. 101-102 Yes--Form 1 (to "US NCDEQ Division of Air Quality") X X X
48 8/26/2024 Edwards, David pp. 103-104 Yes--Form 1 (to "US NCDEQ Division of Air Quality") X X X
49 8/26/2024 Espinosa, Miriam pp. 105-106 Yes--Form 1 (to "US NCDEQ Division of Air Quality") X X X
50 8/26/2024 Fincher, Renee pp. 107-108 Yes--Form 1 (to "US NCDEQ Division of Air Quality") X X X
Form 1, but significantly modified to discuss historic
51 8/26/2024 Fitts,James pp. 109-110 impacts to Pamlico River from "farm and city runoff" X X X X
that"started killing off the grass and oysters"
52 8/26/2024 Flanagan, Maria pp. 111-112 Yes--Form 1 (to "US NCDEQ Division of Air Quality") X X X
53 8/26/2024 Fussell,Timothy pp. 113-114 Yes--Form 1 (to "US NCDEQ Division of Air Quality") X X X
54 8/26/2024 Harden, Clarissa pp. 115-116 Yes--Form 1 (to "US NCDEQ Division of Air Quality") X X X
55 8/26/2024 Hicks, Mike pp. 117-118 Yes--Form 1 (to "US NCDEQ Division of Air Quality") X X X
56 8/26/2024 Hicks, Sarah pp. 119-120 Yes--Form 1 (to "US NCDEQ Division of Air Quality") X X X
57 8/26/2024 Hunnings, Karen pp. 121-122 Yes--Form 1 (to "US NCDEQ Division of Air Quality") X X X
58 8/26/2024 kbakhurin pp. 123-124 Yes--Form 1 (to "US NCDEQ Division of Air Quality") X X X
59 8/26/2024 Kearney, Barry pp. 125-126 Yes--Form 1 (to "US NCDEQ Division of Air Quality") X X X
60 8/26/2024 Long, Gretchen pp. 127-128 Yes--Form 1 (to "US NCDEQ Division of Air Quality") X X X
61 8/26/2024 Mackichan, MIL Lee pp. 129-130 Yes--Form 1 (to "US NCDEQ Division of Air Quality") X X X
62 8/26/2024 Mahoney,Jennifer pp. 131-132 Yes--Form 1 (to "US NCDEQ Division of Air Quality") X X X
Yes--Form 1 modified to explain family connection
63 8/26/2024 Martin, Cathy Gaskins pp. 133-134 X X X
to area (given Texas address)
64 8/26/2024 Marziale, Lynda pp. 135-136 Yes--Form 1 (to "US NCDEQ Division of Air Quality") X X X
65 8/26/2024 Marziale, Rachele pp. 137-138 Yes--Form 1 (to "US NCDEQ Division of Air Quality") X X X
66 8/26/2024 McEwen, Margaret pp. 139-140 Yes--Form 1 (to "US NCDEQ Division of Air Quality") X X X
67 8/26/2024 Miller, Kirk pp. 141-142 Yes--Form 1 (to "US NCDEQ Division of Air Quality") X X X
68 8/26/2024 Minshew, Mike pp. 143-144 Yes--Form 1 (to "US NCDEQ Division of Air Quality") X X X
69 8/26/2024 Molusky, Shelby pp. 145-146 Yes--Form 1 (to "US NCDEQ Division of Air Quality") X X X
70 8/26/2024 Mullis,Amanda pp. 147-148 Yes--Form 1 (to "US NCDEQ Division of Air Quality") X X X
71 8/26/2024 Owens, David pp. 149-150 Yes--Form 1 (to "US NCDEQ Division of Air Quality") X X X
72 8/26/2024 Patterson, Lesley pp. 151-152 Yes--Form 1 (to "US NCDEQ Division of Air Quality") X X X
73 8/26/2024 Ross, Martiel pp. 153-154 Yes--Form 1 (to "US NCDEQ Division of Air Quality") X X X
74 8/26/2024 Ryan, BJ & David pp. 155-156 Yes--Form 1 (to "US NCDEQ Division of Air Quality") X X X
75 8/26/2024 Ryan, Lindsay pp. 157-158 Yes--Form 1 (to "US NCDEQ Division of Air Quality") X X X
76 8/26/2024 Sarno, Elizabeth pp. 159-160 Yes--Form 1 (to "US NCDEQ Division of Air Quality") X X X
77 8/26/2024 Sheridan, Elaine pp. 161-162 Yes--Form 1 (to "US NCDEQ Division of Air Quality") X X X
78 8/26/2024 Shingleton, Gaye pp. 163-164 Yes--Form 1 (to "US NCDEQ Division of Air Quality") X X X
79 8/26/2024 Strang, Gary pp. 165-166 Yes--Form 1 (to "US NCDEQ Division of Air Quality") X X X
80 8/26/2024 Townley, Shelley pp. 167-168 Yes--Form 1 (to "US NCDEQ Division of Air Quality") X X X
81 8/26/2024 Traina, Mary pp. 169-170 Yes--Form 1 (to "US NCDEQ Division of Air Quality") X X X
82 8/26/2024 Vann, Melinda pp. 171-172 Yes--Form 1 (to "US NCDEQ Division of Air Quality") X X X
83 8/26/2024 Wakley, Rowan pp. 173-174 Yes--Form 1 (to "US NCDEQ Division of Air Quality") X X X
4857-6618-8268.v1

84 8/26/2024 White, Mary pp. 175-176 Yes--Form 1 (to "US NCDEQ Division of Air Quality") X X X
85 8/26/2024 Wicklund, Robert pp. 177-178 Yes--Form 1 modified X X X
86 8/26/2024 Wiseman,Jacob pp. 179-180 Yes--Form 1 (to "US NCDEQ Division of Air Quality") X X X
repeat 8/27/2024 Website Capture 183-188 Sound Rivers,Action Alert: Let's Save Blounts Creek! X X X
87 8/27/2024 Website Capture 189-192 Sound Rivers, Save Blounts Creek, Round 2,The fight X X X
to save Blounts Creek is not over
88 8/27/2024 Alligood, Sydnie pp. 193-94 Yes--Form 1 (to "US NCDEQ Division of Air Quality") X X X
89 8/27/2024 Anderson, David pp. 195-96 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
90 8/27/2024 Andrews, Roberta pp. 197-98 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
91 8/27/2024 Ball, Karen pp. 199-200 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
92 8/27/2024 Barletta, Kimberly pp. 201-202 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
93 8/27/2024 Blankenship,Vicki pp. 203-204 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
94 8/27/2024 Blevins,Jennifer pp. 205-206 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
95 8/27/2024 Campbell, Ruthi pp. 207-208 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
96 8/27/2024 Campbell, Sue pp. 209-210 Yes--Form 1 (to "US NCDEQ Division of Air Quality") X X X
97 8/27/2024 Cutler, Marla pp. 211-212 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
98 8/27/2024 Daw, Phyllis pp. 213-214 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
99 8/27/2024 DeLuca, Frank pp. 215-216 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
100 8/27/2024 Dobler, Alfred pp. 217-218 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
101 8/27/2024 Dobrowolski,Sandra pp. 219-220 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
102 8/27/2024 Erwin, Natlie pp. 221-222 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
103 8/27/2024 Everette, Margaret pp. 223-224 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
104 8/27/2024 Foyles, Rose pp. 225-226 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
105 8/27/2024 French, David pp. 227-228 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
106 8/27/2024 Gardner, Cheryl pp. 229-230 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
107 8/27/2024 Griffin, Mark pp. 231-232 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
108 8/27/2024 Griffin, Matthew pp. 233-234 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
109 8/27/2024 Hanifin, Sara pp. 235-236 Yes--Form 1 (to "US NCDEQ Division of Air Quality") X X X
110 8/27/2024 Helie, Courtney pp. 237-238 Yes--Form 1 (to "US NCDEQ Division of Air Quality") X X X
111 8/27/2024 Hooker, Cynthia pp. 239-240 Yes--Form 1 (to "US NCDEQ Division of Air Quality") X X X
112 8/27/2024 Hooker, Paul pp. 241-242 Yes, but modified to raise issue of lowering water X X X Wells
table
113 8/27/2024 Larzen,Janet pp. 243-244 Modified Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard"), also X X X
mentions Camp Lejeune contamination
114 8/27/2024 Lawrence, Brittany pp. 245-246 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
115 8/27/2024 Linder,Julie pp. 247-248 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
116 8/27/2024 Lucas,Jared pp. 249-250 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
117 8/27/2024 Manning, Phyllis pp. 251-252 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
Yes, but modified Form 2 to explain interest(Texas
118 8/27/2024 Martin, Mark pp. 253-254 X X X
resident)
119 8/27/2024 Matthews, Otha pp. 255-256 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
120 8/27/2024 Miller, Don pp. 257-258 Yes--Form 1 (to "US NCDEQ Division of Air Quality") X X X
121 8/27/2024 Miller, Elizabeth pp. 259-260 Yes--Form 1 (to "US NCDEQ Division of Air Quality") X X X
122 8/27/2024 O'DI, Kassidy pp. 261-262 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
4857-6618-8268.v1

123 8/27/2024 Owens,Tripp pp. 263-264 Yes--Form 1 (to "US NCDEQ Division of Air Quality") X X X
124 8/27/2024 Papia, Cyndi pp. 265-266 Yes--Form 1 (to "US NCDEQ Division of Air Quality") X X X
125 8/27/2024 Phillips, Lillian pp. 267-268 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
126 8/27/2024 Poff, Linda pp. 269-270 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
127 8/27/2024 Potter,Jami pp. 271-272 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
128 8/27/2024 Rispoli,Jessica pp. 273-274 Yes--Form 1 (to "US NCDEQ Division of Air Quality") X X X
129 8/27/2024 Roberts,Tina pp. 275-276 Yes--Form 1 (to "US NCDEQ Division of Air Quality") X X X
130 8/27/2024 Satava,Jerry pp. 277-278 Yes--but modified Form 1 (to "US NCDEQ Division of X X X Wells
Air Quality")
131 8/27/2024 Smith,Jennifer pp. 279-280 Yes--Form 1 (to "US NCDEQ Division of Air Quality") X X X
132 8/27/2024 Smith, Leroy pp. 281-282 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
133 8/27/2024 Sparrow, Tyra pp. 283-284 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
134 8/27/2024 Squires, Austin pp. 285-286 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
135 8/27/2024 Stancill, Eden pp. 287-288 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
136 8/27/2024 Stancill, Mallory pp. 289-290 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
137 8/27/2024 Stone, Kasey pp. 291-292 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
138 8/27/2024 Tarducci, Lee Ann pp. 293-294 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
139 8/27/2024 Thompson, Dianne pp. 295-296 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
140 8/27/2024 Treble, Galen pp. 297-298 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
141 8/27/2024 Treble, Kathy pp. 299-300 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
142 8/27/2024 Vinson, Brandy pp. 301-302 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
143 8/27/2024 Whaley, Melissa pp. 303-304 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
144 8/27/2024 Yonts,Joanna pp. 305-306 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
145 8/27/2024 Zentz, Clint pp. 307-308 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
146 8/27/2024 Zentz, Coryn pp. 309-310 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
repeat 8/28/2024 Website Capture pp. 312-315 Sound Rivers, Save Blounts Creek, Round 2,The fight X X X
to save Blounts Creek is not over
147 8/28/2024 Boone, Wendy pp. 316-317 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
148 8/28/2024 Bowen, Giffin pp. 318-319 No X X
149 8/28/2024 Bunch, Susan pp. 320-321 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
150 8/28/2024 Cheek, Laura pp. 322-323 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
151 8/28/2024 Choate, Wanda pp. 324-325 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
152 8/28/2024 Conroy, Chena pp. 326-327 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
153 8/28/2024 Cook, Kirby pp. 328-329 Yes--modified Form 2 X X X
154 8/28/2024 Cullingford, Catherine pp. 330-331 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
155 8/28/2024 Edmondson, Carol pp. 332-333 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
156 8/28/2024 Fleming, Emma pp. 334-335 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
157 8/28/2024 Godwin, Pam pp. 336-337 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
158 8/28/2024 Hollifield, Ruth pp. 338-339 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
159 8/28/2024 Hoyt, Howard pp. 340-341 No Wells
160 8/28/2024 Jones, Elizabeth pp. 342-343 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
161 8/28/2024 Jones, Michael pp. 344-345 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
162 8/28/2024 Lewis, Rebecca pp. 346-348 Modified Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
163 8/28/2024 McFarland, Marylane pp. 349-350 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
164 1 8/28/2024 INinan, Philip I pp. 351-352 INo I X I I Wells
4857-6618-8268.v1

165 8/28/2024 Price, Darryl pp. 353-354 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
166 8/28/2024 Rouse, Tima pp. 355-356 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
167 8/28/2024 Stox,Joanna pp. 357-358 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
168 8/28/2024 Swinson,Terry pp. 359-360 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
169 8/28/2024 Ullah, Kemberly pp. 361-362 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
170 8/28/2024 Ventura, Robin pp. 363-364 Modified Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
171 8/28/2024 Voliva, Natalie pp. 365-366 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
172 8/28/2024 Wiseman, Nina pp. 367-368 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
Sound Rivers, Save Blounts Creek, Round 2,The fight
repeat 8/29/2024 Website Capture pp. 370-373 X X X
to save Blounts Creek is not over
173 8/29/2024 Barletta, Salvatore pp. 374-375 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
174 8/29/2024 Boyer, Linda pp. 376-377 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
175 8/29/2024 Crespo, Alex pp. 378-379 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
176 8/29/2024 Curtis, Clark pp. 380-381 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
177 8/29/2024 Curtis, Yvonne pp. 382-383 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
178 8/29/2024 Fleming, Christopher pp. 384-385 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
179 8/29/2024 Gallion, Cynthia pp. 386-387 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
180 8/29/2024 Hester, Betsy pp. 388-389 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
181 8/29/2024 Hicks,Thomas pp. 390-391 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
182 8/29/2024 Hodges, Claud pp. 392-393 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
183 8/29/2024 Hodges, Ginger pp. 394-395 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
184 8/29/2024 Lewis, R.E. pp. 396-397 No X
185 8/29/2024 Mallison, William pp. 398-399 Yes--Modified Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
186 8/29/2024 Mullins, Kathy pp. 400-401 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
187 8/29/2024 Poore,Thomas pp. 402-403 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
188 8/29/2024 Poore,JoAnne pp. 404-405 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
189 8/29/2024 Price, Lindsay pp. 406-407 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
190 8/29/2024 Price,Tracey pp. 408-409 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
191 8/29/2024 Rhodes, Will pp. 410-411 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
192 8/29/2024 Schneider, Devyn pp. 412-413 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
193 8/29/2024 Shingleton,Johanthan pp. 414-415 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
194 8/29/2024 Wojciechowski, Colleen pp. 416-417 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
195 8/30/2024 Bartlett, Elizabeth pp. 419-420 Modified Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
196 8/30/2024 Clark, Alexandra pp. 421-422 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
197 8/30/2024 Hudson, Leanna pp. 423-424 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
198 8/30/2024 Mallison, Billie-Jean E pp. 425-426 Modified Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X X
199 8/30/2024 Manning, Walter pp. 427-428 Modified Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
200 8/30/2024 Mercer, Barbara pp. 429-430 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
201 8/30/2024 Mercer, Calvin pp. 431-432 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
202 8/30/2024 Moore, K'La pp. 433-434 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
203 8/30/2024 Staton,Jessica pp. 435-436 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
204 8/30/2024 Taylor, Kathleen pp. 437-438 Modified Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
205 8/30/2024 Tilson, Dale pp. 439-440 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
206 8/31/2024 Kram, Mill pp. 442-443 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") I X I X X
207 8/31/2024 Pegram, Sheila pp. 444-445 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") I X I X X
4857-6618-8268.v1

208 8/31/2024 Reilly, Devin pp. 446-447 No X X X
209 9/1/2024 Baird, Gail pp. 449-450 No
210 9/1/2024 Bowen, Bobby pp. 451-452 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
211 9/1/2024 Clayton, Dan pp. 453-454 No Subsidence
212 9/1/2024 Degennaro, April pp. 455-456 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
213 9/1/2024 Largey, Carol pp. 457-458 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
214 9/1/2024 Wall, Kathy pp. 459-460 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
215 9/1/2024 Wheeler, Cathy pp. 461-462 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
216 9/2/2024 Harden, William pp. 464-465 No X X X X
217 9/2/2024 Odom, Kathleen pp. 466-467 Modified Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
218 9/3/2024 Fox, Kim pp. 469-470 Modified Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
219 9/3/2024 Gardiner, Ginger pp. 471-472 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
220 9/3/2024 Linton, Cindy pp. 473-474 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
221 9/3/2024 Shinn, Paula pp. 475-476 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
222 9/3/2024 Silberstein, David pp. 477-489 No (multiple copies of same message) X
223 9/4/2024 Boyd, Dorita pp. 491-492 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
224 9/4/2024 Minges,John &Sarah pp. 493-494 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
225 9/4/2024 Minges, Landon pp. 495-496 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
226 9/5/2024 Curtis,Julia pp. 498-499 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
227 9/5/2024 Divine, Matthew pp. 500-501 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
228 9/5/2024 Phelan, Caroline pp. 502-503 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
229 9/6/2024 Foreman, Lonnie pp. 505-506 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
230 9/6/2024 Johnson, Elizabeth pp. 507-508 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
231 9/6/2024 McCready, Hugh pp. 509-510 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
232 9/6/2024 McCready, Linda pp. 511-512 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
233 9/6/2024 Pivar,Joseph C. pp. 513-514 No X
234 9/6/2024 Sherman, Beth & husband pp. 515-516 No X X
235 9/6/2024 Stanley, Leigh pp. 517-518 No X
236 9/6/2024 Torgan, Clinton pp. 519-520 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
237 9/7/2024 Farnschlader, Phillip pp. 522-523 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
238 9/7/2024 Farnschlader, Linda pp. 524-525 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
239 9/7/2024 McQuay, Mark pp. 526-527 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
240 9/7/2024 Smith,Joanne pp. 528-529 No X
241 9/7/2024 Smith, Robert G pp. 530-531 Modified Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
242 9/8/2024 Davis, Vivian LaNelle pp. 533-534 Modified Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
243 9/8/2024 Jackson, Sarah pp. 535-536 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
244 9/8/2024 Windle, Robert pp. 537-538 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
245 9/9/2024 Bullock, Misty pp. 540-541 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
246 9/9/2024 Claycomb, Michael pp. 542-543 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
247 9/9/2024 Dempsey,John pp. 544-545 Yes--Modified Form 2 X X X
248 9/9/2024 Earp, Cathy pp. 546-547 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
249 9/9/2024 Quante, David pp. 548-549 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
250 9/9/2024 Ratliff,Theresa pp. 550-551 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
251 9/9/2024 Skalski, Anne pp. 552-553 No X X X
252 9/9/2024 White, Steve pp. 554-555 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
4857-6618-8268.v1

253 9/10/2024 Botello, Megan pp. 557-558 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
254 9/10/2024 Foster, Linda pp. 559-560 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
255 9/10/2024 Hicks, Kaye pp. 561-562 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
256 9/10/2024 Hoffmann, Kristin pp. 563-564 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
257 9/10/2024 Holloman, Elaine pp. 565-566 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
258 9/10/2024 Huggins, Georgette pp. 567-568 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
259 9/10/2024 Pierce, Samantha pp. 569-570 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
260 9/10/2024 Smith, Danny pp. 571-572 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
261 9/10/2024 Squires,Austin pp. 573-574 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
262 9/10/2024 Tyer, Sherry pp. 575-576 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
263 9/11/2024 Barkley, Chris pp. 578-579 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
264 9/11/2024 Larkin, Ernie pp. 580-581 No X X X
265 9/11/2024 Stechschulte, Alex pp. 582-583 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
266 9/11/2024 Stechschulte, Courtney pp. 584-585 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
267 9/12/2024 Griffin, Mark pp. 587-588 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
268 9/12/2024 Lennartz, William pp. 589-590 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
269 9/12/2024 Mason, Mycheal pp. 591-592 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
270 9/12/2024 Nichols, Phil pp. 593-594 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
271 9/12/2024 Semple, Maria pp. 595-596 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
272 9/12/2024 Semple, Robert pp. 597-598 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
273 9/13/2024 Roberts,Tina pp. 600-601 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
274 9/14/2024 Staiger,Tim pp. 603-604 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
275 9/14/2024 Talbot, Marilyn pp. 605-606 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
276 9/14/2024 Tripp, Warren pp. 607-608 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
277 9/16/2024 Cooper, Lee pp. 610-611 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
278 9/16/2024 Venturini, Amy pp. 612-613 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
279 9/16/2024 White, Christine p. 614 Yes--Form 3 (paper postcard) X
280 9/16/2024 White, Steve pp. 615-616 Yes--Form 3 (paper postcard) X
281 9/17/2024 Thompson, Buster pp. 618-619 No X X Turbidity
282 9/18/2024 Tyrrell, Mary Ellen pp. 621-622 No X Wells
283 9/19/2024 Eads, Collin pp. 624-625 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
284 9/19/2024 Eads, Courtney pp. 626-627 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
285 9/20/2024 Byrd, Elizabeth pp. 629-630 No X
286 9/20/2024 Healy, Baylis pp. 631-632 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
287 9/20/2024 Healy, Kevin pp. 633-634 Modified Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X
288 9/20/2024 Healy, Margaret Ann pp. 635-636 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
289 9/20/2024 Healy,Taylor pp. 637-638 No Wells
290 9/20/2024 Johnston, Frank pp. 639-640 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
291 9/20/2024 Pietropaolo,Ani pp. 641-642 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
292 9/20/2024 Pulling, Norma pp. 643-644 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
293 9/21/2024 Borrie, Lynn pp. 646-647 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
294 9/21/2024 Brush-Zougari, Dawn pp. 648-649 Modified Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard ) fishing;
reuse water
295 9/21/2024 Kane, Evan pp. 650-651 Modified Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
296 1 9/22/2024 jAppleba, Bryan I pp. 653-654 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
4857-6618-8268.v1

297 9/22/2024 Beedle, Mary pp. 655-656 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
298 9/22/2024 Breiner, Bruce pp. 657-658 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
299 9/22/2024 Curran, Hillary no comment provided no comment provided in binder;just logged
300 9/22/2024 Dixon, Brian pp. 659-660 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
301 9/22/2024 Dixon, Erica pp. 661-662 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
302 9/22/2024 Donna, Beck pp. 663-664 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
303 9/22/2024 Gebers,Amanda no comment provided no comment provided in binder;just logged
304 9/22/2024 Kramer, Patty pp. 665-666 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
305 9/22/2024 Mayo, Robert pp. 667-668 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
306 9/22/2024 Meekins,James pp. 669-670 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
307 9/22/2024 Meekins,James pp. 671-672 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
308 9/22/2024 Meekins, Pamela pp. 673-674 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
309 9/22/2024 Parsons,James pp. 675-676 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
310 9/22/2024 Parsons,Jean pp. 677-678 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
311 9/22/2024 Risk, Bill pp. 679-680 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
312 9/22/2024 Risk,Jan pp. 681-682 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
313 9/22/2024 Starr, Michele pp. 683-684 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
314 9/22/2024 Streeks,Angela pp. 685-686 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
315 9/22/2024 Streeks,Jessica pp. 687-688 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
316 9/22/2024 Streeks, Michael pp. 689-690 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
317 9/22/2024 Tucker,Jean pp. 691-692 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
318 9/22/2024 Tyrrell,Thomas pp. 693-694 No X X Wells
319 9/23/2024 Boyer, E. Ross pp. 697-698 Yes--Form 3 (paper postcard) X
320 9/23/2024 Walkinshaw, Nellie pp. 699-700 Yes--Form 3 (paper postcard) X
321 9/23/2024 Lese, Nancy pp. 701-702 Yes--Form 3 (paper postcard) X
322 9/23/2024 Lese, William,Jr. pp. 703-704 Yes--Form 3 (paper postcard) X
323 9/23/2024 Dond, Brandon pp. 705-706 Yes--Form 3 (paper postcard) X
324 9/23/2024 Daw, Bob pp. 707-708 Yes--Form 3 (paper postcard) X
325 9/23/2024 Daw, Phyllis pp. 709-710 Yes--Form 3 (paper postcard) X
326 9/23/2024 Hicks, Foy M pp. 711-712 Yes--Form 3 (paper postcard) X
327 9/23/2024 Kicks, Kaye M pp. 713-714 Yes--Form 3 (paper postcard) X
328 9/23/2024 Harden, William pp. 715-716 Yes--Form 3 (paper postcard) X
329 9/23/2024 Harden, Clarissa pp. 717-718 Yes--Form 3 (paper postcard) X
330 9/23/2024 McQuery, Mark pp. 719-720 Yes--Form 3 (paper postcard) X
331 9/23/2024 Farnschlader, Phillip pp. 721-722 Yes--Form 3 (paper postcard) X
332 9/23/2024 Leach, Dick pp. 723-724 Yes--Form 3 (paper postcard) X
333 9/23/2024 Farnschlader, Linda pp. 725-726 Yes--Form 3 (paper postcard) X
334 9/23/2024 Tucker,Jean pp. 727-728 Yes--Form 3 (paper postcard) X
335 9/23/2024 Taylor, Marshall C. pp. 729-730 Yes--Form 3 (paper postcard) X
336 9/23/2024 McQuery, Marko pp. 731-732 Yes--Form 3 (paper postcard) X
337 9/23/2024 Foster, George pp. 733-734 Yes--Form 3 (paper postcard) X
338 9/23/2024 Reilly, Devin pp. 735-736 Yes--Form 3 (paper postcard) X
339 9/23/2024 Jordan, Ken L pp. 737-738 Yes--Form 3 (paper postcard) X
340 9/23/2024 Harris, Kelly pp. 739-740 Yes--Form 3 (paper postcard) X
341 9/23/2024 Rowe, Lauren pp. 741-742 Yes--Form 3 (paper postcard) X
4857-6618-8268.v1

342 9/23/2024 Seals, Stephanie pp. 743-744 Yes--Form 3 (paper postcard) X
343 9/23/2024 Taofer,Tami S pp. 745-746 Yes--Form 3 (paper postcard) X
344 9/23/2024 Smith, Robert pp. 747-748 Yes--Form 3 (paper postcard) X
345 9/23/2024 Manning, Phyllis pp. 749-750 Yes--Form 3 (paper postcard) X
346 9/23/2024 Linder,Julie pp. 749-750 Yes--Form 3 (paper postcard) X
347 9/23/2024 Smith,Joanne pp. 751-752 Yes--Form 3 (paper postcard) X
348 9/23/2024 Pulling, Norma pp. 753-754 Yes--Form 3 (paper postcard) X
349 9/23/2024 Reilly, Kailan pp. 755-756 Yes--Form 3 (paper postcard) X
350 9/23/2024 Windle, Steve pp. 757-758 Yes--Form 3 (paper postcard) X
351 9/23/2024 Foster, Linda pp. 759-760 Yes--Form 3 (paper postcard) X
352 9/23/2024 Reilly, Clodagh pp. 761-762 Yes--Form 3 (paper postcard) X
353 9/23/2024 Phillips, Lillian pp. 763-764 Yes--Form 3 (paper postcard) X
354 9/23/2024 Reilly, Faeryn pp. 765-766 Yes--Form 3 (paper postcard) X
355 9/23/2024 Meekins,James pp. 767-768 Yes--Form 3 (paper postcard) X
356 9/23/2024 Rowe, Mark A. pp. 769-770 Yes--Form 3 (paper postcard) X
357 9/23/2024 Skalski, Anne pp. 771-772 Yes--Form 3 (paper postcard) X
358 9/23/2024 Cabe, Frances pp. 773-774 Yes--Form 3 (paper postcard) X
359 9/23/2024 Thompson, Buster pp. 775-776 Yes--Form 3 (paper postcard) X
360 9/23/2024 Beelendorf, Alek pp. 778-779 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
361 9/23/2024 Callow, Bill pp. 780-781 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
362 9/23/2024 Ebe, Betty J pp. 782-783 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
363 9/23/2024 Enos, Denise pp. 784-785 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
364 9/23/2024 Fraley, Michael pp. 786-787 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
365 9/23/2024 George, Maryann pp. 788-789 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
366 9/23/2024 Kane, Myra pp. 790-791 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
367 9/23/2024 Marshall, Helen pp. 792-793 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
368 9/23/2024 McGinnis, Stephanie no comment provided
369 9/23/2024 Opatovsky,Jeanette pp. 794-795 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
370 9/23/2024 Streeks,Jacqueline pp. 796-797 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
371 9/23/2024 Walker, Paul pp. 798-799 Yes--Modified Form 2 X X X
372 9/23/2024 Wiseman, David & Eldred pp. 800-801 No X X X X wells
Row Date Commenter Source Form Comment? pH species ecosystem fish Other
composition (describe)
373 8/29/2024 Website Capture NC0089168—Sound No X X X wells
Rivers Comments 20240829
NC0089168 Sound No--request for two public hearings and 60-day
374 9/4/2024 Sound Rivers —Rivers Comments 20240904 extension of comment period (by Pamlico Tar
Riverkeeper Katey Zimmerman)
Sharing of comment made to NC0089168_NCSU_CALS_Coop Caller to NCSU aquaculture staff member (Steve
375 9/9/2024 NCSU aquaculture staff Ext_Aquaculture_Comments_2 Gabel in Edenton) shared concerns related to X
member 0240909 salinity and ecosystem
376 9/11/2024 SELC NC0089168_SELC_Comments No--request for two public hearings and 60-day
20240911 extension of comment period
4857-6618-8268.v1

NC0089168 Sound No--(second) request for two public hearings and 60-
377 9/20/2024 Sound Rivers —Rivers Comments 20240920 day extension of comment period (by Board of
Directors)
David R. Cox, Supervisor,
378 9/23/2024 Habitat Conservation NC0089168_NC_WRC_ No X X X X
Comments 20240923
Division, NCWRC
No--also forecasts that "[u]pon granting of a public sinkholes;
NC0089168
hearing and extension of the comment period, wells;
379 9/23/2024 Sound Rivers —Sound Sound Rivers plans to craft more robust and X X X X turbidity;
Rivers Comments 20240923 streambank
— — technical comments with more specific
recommendations. erosion;
monitoring
380 10/17/2024 Thompson, Buster 20241017 NC0089168_Comments No X X X Turbidity
381 11/14/2024 SELC for Sound Rivers N C0089168_S E LC_Co m me nts20241114 No X X X
Pdf Pages in Comments—Binder species Other
Row Date Commenter Form Comment? pH ecosystem fish
20240923 20241009 composition (describe)
382 10/9/2024 Beedle, Mary pp. 2-3 Yes--Form 3 (paper postcard) X
383 9/26/2024 Goggins, Rita p 4 Yes--Modified Form 4(to "US Derek Denard", X X X
recognizes public hearing granted)
384 9/30/2024 Daniels, Burke pp. 5-6 Yes--Form 3 (paper postcard) X
Yes--Form 4 (to "US Derek Denard", recognizes
385 10/5/2024 Geraghty,Joseph p. 7 X X X
public hearing granted)
386 10/9/2024 Griffin, Patricia pp. 8-9 Yes--Form 3 (paper postcard) X
387 9/26/2024 Hackney, Claudia S pp. 10-11 Yes--Form 3 (paper postcard) X
388 9/27/2024 Hackney, Keith D pp. 12-13 Yes--Form 3 (paper postcard) X
Yes--Form 4 (to "US Derek Denard", recognizes
389 9/24/2024 Healy, Elizabeth p. 14 X X X
public hearing granted)
390 9/24/2024 Healy, Maggie p. 15 No X X X
391 9/25/2024 Hoelscher, Katherine p. 16 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
Yes--Form 4 (to "US Derek Denard", recognizes
392 9/28/2024 Jackson, Sarah p. 17 X X X
public hearing granted)
393 9/26/2024 Larkin, Ernie pp. 18-19 Yes--Form 3 (paper postcard) X
Yes--Form 4 (to "US Derek Denard", recognizes
394 9/26/2024 Mitchell, Gerald p. 20 X X X
public hearing granted)
Yes--Modified Form 4(to "US Derek Denard",
395 9/28/2024 Overton, Lee pp. 21-22 X X X
recognizes public hearing granted)
Yes--Form 4 (to "US Derek Denard", recognizes
396 9/25/2024 Piacente, Patricia p. 23 X X X
public hearing granted)
397 9/30/2024 Pittman,Tellis pp. 24-25 Yes--Form 3 (paper postcard) X
398 9/25/2024 Rogers,Jeffrey p. 26 Yes--Form 2 (to "US Derek Denard") X X X
399 9/26/2024 Squires, Margaret pp. 27-28 Yes--Form 3 (paper postcard) X
400 9/26/2024 Squires, Michael pp. 29-30 Yes--Form 3 (paper postcard) X
401 9/30/2024 Tyrrell,Thomas pp. 31-32 Yes--Form 3 (paper postcard) X
4857-6618-8268.v1

Yes--Form 4 (to "US Derek Denard", recognizes
402 9/27/2024 Urquhart,Anne p. 33 X X X
public hearing granted)
Yes--Form 4 (to "US Derek Denard", recognizes
403 9/25/2024 Walker, Paul p. 34 X X X
public hearing granted)
Yes--Form 4 (to "US Derek Denard", recognizes
404 9/27/2024 Wilson, Carmen R p. 35 X X X
public hearing granted)
Yes--Form 4 (to "US Derek Denard", recognizes
405 9/27/2024 Wilson, Mike p. 36 X X X
public hearing granted)
406 9/23/2024 Windle,Anne &Steve pp. 37-38 No X X
4857-6618-8268.v1