Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutNCG160143_Inspection_20240320 Compliance Inspection Report Permit:NCG160143 Effective: 08/01/19 Expiration: 05/31/24 Owner: Fsc II LLC SOC: Effective: Expiration: Facility: Kitty Hawk Asphalt Plant County: Dare 934 W Kitty Hawk Rd Region: Washington Kitty Hawk NC 27949 Contact Person:Eddie J Valdivieso Title: Phone: 252-261-3336 Directions to Facility: System Classifications: SWNC, Primary ORC: Certification: Phone: Secondary ORC(s): On-Site Representative(s): Related Permits: Inspection Date: 03/20/2024 Entry Time 02:OOPM Exit Time: 04:30PM Primary Inspector:Varun Prakash Phone: 252-948-3963 Secondary Inspector(s): Reason for Inspection: Complaint Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Permit Inspection Type: Asphalt Paving Mixture Stormwater Discharge COC Facility Status: ❑ Compliant Not Compliant Question Areas: Storm Water (See attachment summary) Page 1 of 3 Permit: NCG160143 Owner-Facility:Fsc II LLC Inspection Date: 03/20/2024 Inspection Type:Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Complaint Inspection Summary: Complaint received from a local resident via David May, Supervisor,Water Quality, WARD, Div. of Water Resources- NC DEQ. Site inspection was conducted on 3/20/2024. Met with Michael Ward, Plant Manager. Following issues were noticed at the site: 1. This site doesn't have an SWPPP plan. 2. This site has never conducted any analytical/qualitative monitoring. 3. The discharge to surface stream (Duck Pond Creek, class SC) is taking place via a ditch that collects stormwater around the periphery of the plant boundary and leads stormwater to the designated outfall. There's a berm wall around 5-7 feet high between the receiving stream and the asphalt plant. This site is storing aspahlt pile in open. Over time, that asphalt pile has encroached on top of the berm wall and is now much higher than the berm wall.This may cause asphalt to wash off with stormwater discharged into the receiving stream along the slope of the berm wall. Also, the asphalt pile has covered the peripheral ditch and thereby blocking it. 4. The weight of asphalt pile may have damaged of the berm wall around /directly under the pile. 5. Poor housekeeping around the ditch leading to blockages was observed. Following are the corresponding recommendations for this site: 1. SWPPP plan to be updated. Going fdorward SWPP to be reviewed and updated annually. Periodic Qualitative and Analytical monitoring of stormwater samples to be conducted as required by the NCG16 permit conditions. The permit requirements for NCG16 (asphalt plants)can be found below: https://www.deq.nc.gov/energy-mineral-and-land-resources/stormwater/npdes-general-permits/ncg020000-general-permit-20 10630-dem I r-sw/down load 2. The site to conduct periodic analytical /qualitative monitoring as required by the NCG16 permit conditions. 3. Asphalt pile to be moved inside of the plant so that it doess not directly touch/sit on top of the berm wall. Also, clear up the part of the peripheral ditch under the asphalt pile in order to convey stormwater to the outfall. 4. The plant management needs to inspect berm wall and outfall structure and subsequently carry out necessary repairs. 5. Housekeeping around the peripheral ditch needs attention. Page 2 of 3 Permit: NCG160143 Owner-Facility:Fsc II LLC Inspection Date: 03/20/2024 Inspection Type:Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Complaint Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan Yes No NA NE Does the site have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan? ❑ ❑ ❑ #Does the Plan include a General Location (USGS) map? ❑ ❑ ❑ #Does the Plan include a"Narrative Description of Practices"? ❑ ❑ ❑ #Does the Plan include a detailed site map including outfall locations and drainage areas? ❑ ❑ ❑ #Does the Plan include a list of significant spills occurring during the past 3 years? ❑ ❑ ❑ #Has the facility evaluated feasible alternatives to current practices? ❑ ❑ ❑ #Does the facility provide all necessary secondary containment? ❑ ❑ ❑ #Does the Plan include a BMP summary? ❑ ❑ ❑ #Does the Plan include a Spill Prevention and Response Plan (SPRP)? ❑ ❑ ❑ #Does the Plan include a Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping Plan? ❑ ❑ ❑ #Does the facility provide and document Employee Training? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ #Does the Plan include a list of Responsible Party(s)? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ # Is the Plan reviewed and updated annually? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ #Does the Plan include a Stormwater Facility Inspection Program? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ Has the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan been implemented? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ Comment: No SWPPP document exists at this site. Qualitative Monitoring Yes No NA NE Has the facility conducted its Qualitative Monitoring? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ Comment: No Qualitative monitoring done at this site Analytical Monitoring Yes No NA NE Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ #Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring from Vehicle Maintenance areas? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ Comment: No analytical monitoring done at this site Permit and Outfalls Yes No NA NE # Is a copy of the Permit and the Certificate of Coverage available at the site? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ #Were all outfalls observed during the inspection? ❑ ❑ ❑ # If the facility has representative outfall status, is it properly documented by the Division? ❑ ❑ ❑ #Has the facility evaluated all illicit(non stormwater)discharges? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ Comment: Permit not available on site. Page 3 of 3 Asphalt pile sitting on top of berm wall next to Duck Pond Creek low - f^`E 4' 5��'��,�x��'`� ��� �I k _ � '�' SIR ��-�.►� � � �'� �� ..,_ a , a, s a _. ..o .. \tip '- ,. ► a' ice,,, �wt,+ - � � -` t �c `^�` l"• s �� �, }ems -� �1X-'. .: y �, - - "� � . :-� �fir.; � -•_�.���'"�.; �� y��_. . � -� t. .- �' 'r• � R .1� ..r � r� ., •yl � ^4: 41 41 OVA" r . �+�.,. - 1 r - s tee. D Send Ry Parl - � � k F � a jol Al .� f Ok y � y� y • Kitty Hawk Asphalt plant Creek -sr halt pile sitting on top of berm wall near to Duck Pond 1 p «} !' .--. ^�� .rx 'a�t`3i r'f r• a. 2 �,�ra.�. �, � s iF,. �s "`'9� ,� •- h _ � ... '� gyp, •� ri. _ - �.