SW8050516_Current Permit_20160310

Energy, Mineral
and Land Resources
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
March 10, 2016
Mr. Randy Allen, President
R.A. North Development, Inc.
3129 Springbank Lane
Charlotte, NC 28226
PAT MCCRORY
Governor
DONALD R. VAN DER VAART
secmtary
TRACY DAVIS
Director
Subject: Approved Plan Revision & Request for Information for Permit Transfer
Cannonsgate
Stormwater Permit No. SW8 050516
Carteret County
Dear Mr. Allen:
Effective August 1, 2013 the State Stormwater program has been transferred from the Division of Water
Quality (DWQ) to the Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources (DEMLR). Additionally, the
Department of Environment and Natural Resources (NC DENR) has been renamed the Department of
Environmental Quality (DEQ). Permit references have been updated.
On March 16, 2016, the Wilmington Regional Office received a request to revise the approved plans for
Stormwater Management Permit Number SW8 050516. It has been determined that a formal permit
modification is not required for the proposed changes. We are forwarding you an approved copy of the
revised plans for your files. Additionally, now that the Plan Revision has been issued the Transfer
Request that you submitted on June 15, 2015 can be accepted. It will formally be accepted on March 11,
2016. Additional information is needed to move forward with that request. Please see below.
Plan Revision Chanaes:
1. Impervious Area: The impervious area has been re -allocated as summarized in Table 1. These
changes are to reflect the access road added to Lots 60 and 61. Approval to fill the associated
wetlands was approved on January 13, 2006 by General 401 Water Quality Certification #3402.
Table 1: Impervious Summary
9/22/11 Plan
Revision
3/10/16 Plan
Revision
Inside
ORW/575ft
Line
Total
Development
Area
Inside
ORW/575ft
Line
Total
Development
Area
Drainage Area:
2,370,036
10,989,360
2,370,036
10,989,360
54.41
252.28
54.41
252.28
25% Maximum Impervious Permitted:
592,509
2,747,340
592,509
2,747,340
Total Impervious Allocated:
592,509
2,747,340
592,509
2,747,340
On -Site Buildin s Lots
429,825
1636 225
429,825
1636 225
On -Site Streets
149,185
795,035
1-49,185
798.433
On -Site Sidewalks
4,327
77,244
4,327
77,244
On -Site Other
0
221,808
0
221,808
Future
9,172
17,028
9,172
13,630
ft2
ac
ft2
ft2
ft2
ft2
ft2
ft2
ft2
State ofNorth Carolina I Enviromnental Quality I Energy, Mineral and Land Resources
127 Cardinal Drive Extension I Wilmington, NC 28405

March 10, 2016
Stormwater Application No. SW8 050516
Swales: See Attachment 1. Your engineer has assessed each swale in the subdivision and has
recommended one of the following three actions for each swale. The actions summarized in
Attachment 1 have been approved:
a. Function as a Vegetated Area [per 15A NCAC 2H .1005(g) & (h)]: The regulations
allow low density subdivisions which collect stormwater in curbs to discharge either to a
curb outlet swale or to a vegetated area prior to discharging to vegetative filters or
wetlands. The regulations also allow for alternative designs that provide equal or better
stormwater control. The swales that have been found to perform better as vegetative
areas had previously been permitted as curb outlet swales. Vegetated areas are shown on
the plans to have a 100ft radius of the curb outlet/curb end and are bound by the edge of
the pavement and any adjacent property boundaries.
b. Remove Swale: Some swales have been determined to serve no function and have been
removed from the plan.
c. No Change: The remaining swales have been determined to be necessary, and remain on
the plan unchanged.
3. Marina: During the assessment, five pipes were found discharging to the marina that were not on
the approved plan. These pipes will be capped or otherwise rendered useless and the alternate
configuration shown on the plans will be implemented.
4. Clubhouse: During the assessment, pipes draining the parking lot of the clubhouse were found.
The pipes will remain in place, but the water will be treated as shown on the plan. This
configuration is similar for the configuration for curb outlet swales which have been altered to
function as vegetated areas.
5. Sheets: The following plan sheets make up a complete set.
a. , Previously Permitted: Sheets 001, 004, and 006.
b. Newly Permitted:
i. Sheet 005
ii. Drainage Easements: Recorded with the Registrar of Deeds, Carteret County
BK30/PG78 and BK30/PG832.
Future Actions & Request for Additional Information for Permit Transfer: The Division
understands that you intend to transfer responsibility to the Homeowners Association (BOA). The
following steps are necessary to move forward with that process. Please respond to Item 1 below on or
before May 10, 2016:
1.) Swale Discussion with the HOA:
a. The Division understands that there are some swales which are not installed, but are not
needed until the homes in the area are constructed. The Division also understands that all
parties may be interested in postponing swale installation until after the homes are
constructed. This is because if the swales are installed now, they will likely be destroyed
by construction and will have to be re -built at a later date. Once you have worked
through the details of this arrangement, please create a legal document between R. A.
North Development Inc., the HOA, and the impacted lot owners (if applicable) which
accomplishes all of the following:
i. Identify the impacted swales.
ii. Specifies who is responsible for the swale installation.
1. Please specify the responsible party for swales on lot lines between to
homes.
2. Please specify the responsible party for all other swales as well.
iii. Specifies that the swale will be installed prior to the Certificate of Occupancy is
issued for the impacted lots. If the swale is between two homes please specify
that the swale will be installed with the first house.
Page 2 of 4

` March 10, 2016
Stormwater Application No. SW8 050516
iv. Specifies the design(s) of the swale(s) that need to be installed so that the
responsible party will understand what to build.
v. Specify who will be responsible for certifying that each swale was installed in
substantial compliance with the permit conditions.
vi. Legally link this document to each impacted lot.
b. Please note that this is optional. If you choose this option, please submit a copy of the
legal document to the Division for approval on or before May 10, 2016. This option is
intended to provide flexibility. It is not intended to be a means to delay the overall
process. The Division will review the document. If the document is approved, the
Division will issue a Permit Correction referencing that document in the permit text.
2.) In -Field Changes: All physical changes to the project will be completed.
3.) Certification: The project needs to be in compliance prior to transferring the permit, and a
certification is a permit requirement. Please submit the certification referencing the legal
agreement discussed above. Please clarify in the certification that the swales which will have
postponed development are not necessary until the homes adjacent to them are constructed and
that those swales will be certified at a later date per the legal agreement.
4.) Permit Transfer: A Name/Ownership Change form has been submitted. Once the project is
found to be in compliance and the following administrative items are addressed, the permit will
�e u ansferred tc the I30A:
a. Please submit documentation of the HOA's legal name as registered through the NC
Secretary of State. Please also submit a copy of the most recent meeting minutes
showing the appropriate HOA President. The transferred permit will be addressed to that
individual.
b. The following documentation is also needed for permit transfers, but has already been
submitted:
i. Name/Ownership Change Form
ii. Documentation showing that at least 50% of the homes have been sold to entities
other than R.A. North Development, Inc.
iii. Copies of the common area deeds showing that the HOA owns those areas.
iv. Recorded deed restrictions.
v. O&M Agreement.
5.) Potential Future Flood Control Actions by the HOA: The Division understands that the HOA has
flooding concerns for some streets and for an amenity pond. Unfortunately, the Division does not
have the authority to regulate flooding, and therefore flooding is not a violation of the State
Stormwater permit. If there are parts of the State Stormwater system that can be enhanced to
improve ponding or flooding conditions, then please work with your engineer to identify potential
solution(s). Then, contact the Division so that we can work together to determine methods to
implement those solutions through permitting. R. A. North Development, Inc. is not required to
address flooding concerns under this permit, and so this is an issue that the HOA will need to
look into and be prepared to implement once the HOA becomes the permittee.
Please understand that the approval of this revision to the approved plans and to the permit for the
subject State Stormwater project is done on a case -by -case basis. Any other changes to this project
must be approved through this Office prior to construction. The issuance of this plan revision does not
preclude the permittee from complying with all other applicable statutes, rules, regulations or
ordinances which may have jurisdiction over the proposed activity, and obtaining a permit or
approval prior to construction.
Page 3 of 4

March 10, 2016
Stormwater Application No. SW8 050516
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to call me at [phone].
Sincerely,
Kel yTohns�on_..�
Environmental Engmeer�
DS\kpj`.._ \\\Stormwater\Permits & Projects\2005\050516 LD\2016 03 permit_pr 050516
enc: Attachment 1: Summary of Swale Changes Approved by Plan Revision
cc: Caleb Wright, PE,
Inspector, Town of Cape Carteret County Building Inspections
Wilmington Regional Office
Page 4 of 4

State Stormwater Management Systems
Permit No. SW8 050516
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
DIVISION OF ENERGY, MINERAL AND LAND RESOURCES
STATE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PERMIT
LOW DENSITY SUBDIVISION WITH A CURB OUTLET SWALE SYSTEM
In accordance with the provisions of Article 21 of Chapter 143, General Statutes of
North Carolina as amended, and other applicable Laws, Rules and Regulations
PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED TO
R. A. North Development, Inc.
Cannonsgate at Bogue Sound
NC Highway 24, Cape Carteret, Careteret County
FOR THE
construction, operation and maintenance of a 25% low density subdivision with a curb
outlet swale system in compliance with the provisions of 1.5A NCAC 2H .1000, effective
September 1, 1995 (hereafter referred to as the "stormwater rules') and the approved
stormwater management plans and specifications, and other supporting data as
attached and on file with and approved by the Division of Energy, Mineral and Land
Resources and considered a part of this permit.
The Permit shall be effective from the date of issuance until rescinded and shall be
subject to the following specific conditions and limitations:
I. DESIGN STANDARDS
1. Each of the 525 is limited to a maximum amount of built -upon area as indicated
in- Attachment D of this permit. CAMA regulations may reduce the allowable built -
upon area for those lots within the AEC.
2. The overall tract built -upon area percentage for the project must be maintained at
25%, per the requirements of Section .1005 of the stormwater rules.
3. This project proposes a curb outlet system. Each designated curb outlet swale or
100' vegetated area shown on the approved plan must be maintained at a
minimum of 100' long, maintain 5:1 �H:V) side slopes or flatter, have a
longitudinal slope no steeper than 5 /o, carry the flow from a 10 year storm in a
non -erosive manner, maintain a dense vegetated cover, and be located in either
a dedicated common area or a recorded drainage easement.
4. No piping shall be allowed except those minimum amounts necessary to direct
runoff beneath an impervious surface such as a road or under driveways to
provide access to lots.
5. Runoff conveyances other than the curb outlet system swales, such as perimeter
ditches, must be vegetated with side slopes no steeper than 3:1 (H:V).
6. Approved plans and specifications for projects covered by this permit are
incorporated by reference and are enforceable parts of the permit.
Page 6 of 11

State Stormwater Management Systems
Permit No. SW8 050516
7. For projects within Y2 mile of SA waters, direct discharges are not allowed.
Discharge to a vegetated or natural area capable of providing effective infiltration
for the 1 year 24 hour storm shall not be considered a direct discharge.
8. You have the option to create a legal document detailing a plan to delay the
installation of some swales. This option expires on May10, 2016, and is subject
to the Division's approval.
II. SCHEDULE OF COMPLIANCE
1. No person shall alter the approved stormwater management system or fill in,
alter, or pipe any drainage feature (such as swales) shown on the approved
plans as part of the stormwater management system unless and until the
permittee submits a modification to the permit and receives approval from the
Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources.
2. The maximum built -upon area assigned to each lot via this permit and the
recorded deed restrictions may not be increased or decreased by either the
individual lot owner or the permittee unless and until the permittee notifies the
Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources and obtains written approval
from the Division. At a minimum, this will require a minor permit modification.
3. Curb outlet swales, vegetated areas and other vegetated conveyances shall be
constructed in their entirety, vegetated, and be operational for their intended use
prior to the construction of any built -upon surface, per the approved plans
4. During construction, erosion shall be kept to a minimum and any eroded areas of
the swales or other vegetated conveyances will be repaired immediately.
5. The permittee shall at all times provide the operation and maintenance
necessary to operate the permitted stormwater management systems at optimum
efficiency to include:
a. Inspections
b. Sediment removal.
C. Mowing, and re -vegetating of the side slopes.
d. Immediate repair of eroded areas.
e. Maintenance of side slopes in accordance with approved plans and
specifications.
f. Cleaning and repair of catch basin grates, flumes, piping, and the flow
spreader mechanism.
g. Maintenance of level spreaders.
6. The permittee shall submit to the Director and shall have received approval for
revised plans, specifications, and calculations prior to construction, for any
modification to the approved plans, including, but not limited to, those listed
below:
a. Any revision to the approved plans, regardless of size.
b. Project name change.
C. Transfer of ownership.
d. Redesign or addition to the approved amount of built -upon area or to the
drainage area.
e. Further subdivision, acquisition or sale of the project area. The project
area is defined as all property owned by the permittee, for which
Sedimentation and Erosion Control Plan approval was sought.
f. Filling in, piping, or altering any vegetative conveyance shown on the
approved plan.
Page 7 of 11

State Stormwater Management Systems
Permit No. SW8 050516
g. The development of any future area or additional phase(s) noted on the
approved plans. The modification must demonstrate that the built -upon
area does not exceed the maximum amount permitted under this permit
and that it meets the intent of low density development per the stormwater
rules and available guidance.
7. The permittee is responsible for verifying that the proposed built -upon area does
not exceed the allowable built -upon area. Once the lot transfer is complete, the
built -upon area may not be revised without approval from the Division of Energy,
Mineral and Land Resources, and responsibility for meeting the built -upon area
limit is transferred to the individual property owner.
8. The permittee must certify in writing that the project's stormwater controls, and
impervious surfaces have been constructed within substantial intent of the
approved plans and specifications. Any deviation from the approved plans must
be noted on the Certification. The permittee shall submit the Certification to the
Division within 30 days of completion of the project.
9. The permittee shall submit all information requested by the Director or his
representative within the time frame specified in the written information request.
10. Each lot in the subdivision covered by this permit will maintain a minimum 30 feet
wide vegetative buffer between all impervious areas and surface waters.
11. All roof drains must terminate at least 30 feet from the Mean High Water mark.
12. Deed restrictions are incorporated into this permit by reference and must be
recorded with the Office of the Register of Deeds prior to the sale of any lot.
13. Recorded deed restrictions must include, at a minimum, the following statements
related to stormwater management:
a. The following covenants are intended to ensure ongoing compliance with
State Stormwater Management Permit Number SW8 050516, as issued
byy the Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources under NCAC
2H.1000.
b. The State of North Carolina is made a beneficiary of these covenants to
the extent necessary to maintain compliance with the Stormwater
Management Permit.
C. These covenants are to run with the land and be binding on all persons
and parties claiming under them.
d. The covenants pertaining to stormwater may not be altered or rescinded
without the express written consent of the State of North Carolina, Division
of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources.
e. Alteration of the drainage as shown on the approved plans may not take
place without the concurrence of the Division of Energy, Mineral and Land
Resources.
f. The maximum built -upon area per lot is as defined in Attachment D. This
allotted amount includes any built -upon area constructed within the lot
property boundaries, and that portion of the right-of-way between the front
lot line and the edge of the pavement. Built upon area includes, but is not
limited to, structures, asphalt, concrete, gravel, brick, stone, slate,
coquina, driveways, and parking areas, but does not include raised, open
wood decking, or the water surface of swimming pools.
g. Filling in, piping or altering any 3:1 vegetated conveyances (ditches,
swales, etc.) associated with the development except for average
driveway crossings, is prohibited by any persons.
h. Ft r those lots within the CAMA Area of Envirunmentai Concern, where
DCM calculates a different maximum lot built -upon area, the governing
maximum lot BUA shall be the more restrictive of the two amounts.
Page 8 of 11

State Stormwater Management Systems
Permit No. SW8 050516
i. Filling in, piping or altering any designated 5:1 curb outlet swale or
vegetated area associated with the development is prohibited by any
persons.
j. A 30' vegetated buffer must be maintained between all built -upon area and
the Mean High Water line of surface waters.
k. All roof drains shall terminate at least 30' from the Mean Hiah Water mark.
I. Each designated curb outlet swale or 100' vegetated area shown on the
approved plan must be maintained at a minimum of 100' long, maintain
5:1 (H:V) side slopes or flatter, have a longitudinal slope no steeper than
5%, carry the flow from a 10 year storm in a non -erosive manner, maintain
a dense vegetated cover, and be located in either a dedicated common
area or a recorded drainage easement.
14. The permittee must submit a copy of the recorded deed restrictions within 30
days of the date of recording.
15. The Director may notify the permittee when the permitted site does not meet
one or more of the minimum requirements of the permit. Within the time frame
specified in the notice, the permittee shall submit a written time schedule to
the Director for modifying the site to meet minimum requirements. The
permittee shall provide copies of revised plans and certification in writing to
the Director that the changes have been made.
16. Prior to transfer of ownership, the swales must be inspected and determined
to be in compliance with the permit. Any deficiencies will be repaired or
replaced prior to the transfer.
17. The final plats for the project will be recorded showing all required easements
and common areas, in accordance with the approved plans.
III. GENERAL CONDITIONS
Failure to abide'by the conditions and limitations contained in this permit may
subject the Permittee to an enforcement action by the Division of Energy, Mineral
and Land Resources, in accordance with North Carolina General Statutes 143-
215.6A to 143-215.6C.
2. The permit issued shall continue in force and effect until revoked or terminated.
3. The permit may be modified, revoked and reissued or terminated for cause. The
filing of a request for a permit modification, revocation and re -issuance, or
termination does not stay any permit condition.
4. The issuance of this permit does not prohibit the Director from reopening and
modifying the permit, revoking and reissuing the permit, or terminating the permit
as allowed by the laws, rules, and regulations contained in Title 15A of the North
Carolina Administrative Code, Subchapter 2H.1000; and North Carolina General
Statute 143-215.1 et. al.
5. The permit is not transferable to any person or entity except after notice to and
approval by the Director. The Director may require modification or revocation and
re -issuance of the permit to change the name and incorporate such other
requirements as may be necessary. A completed Name/Ownership Change
form, signed by both parties, must be submitted to the Division of Energy,
Mineral and Land Resources accompanied by the supporting documentation as
listed on page 2 of the form. The approval of this request will be considered on its
merits, and may or may not be approved.
Page 9 of 11

State Stormwater Management Systems
Permit No. SW8 050516
6. The permittee is responsible for compliance with all the terms and conditions of
this permit until the Division approves the permit transfer. Neither the sale of the
project nor the transfer of common area to a third party constitutes an approved
transfer of the stormwater permit.
7. The issuance of this permit does not preclude the Permittee from complying with
any and all statutes, rules, regulations, or ordinances imposed by other
government agencies (local, state and federal), which have jurisdiction.
8. The permittee grants permission to DEQ Staff to enter the property during normal
business hours for the purposes of inspecting the stormwater control system and
its components.
9. The permittee shall notify the Division in writing of any name, ownership or
mailing address changes at least 30 days prior to making such changes.
10. Unless specified elsewhere, permanent seeding requirements for the swales
must follow the guidelines established in the North Carolina Erosion and
Sediment Control Planning and Design Manual.
Permit revised and re -issued this the 10th day of March 2016
NORTH CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources
By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission
Page 10 of 11

State Stormwater Management Systems
Permit No. SW8 050516
Appendix D
(14 Pages)
Page 11 of 11

, , Caponsgate at Bogus Sound
II. BUILT UPON AREA - SUPPLEMENT FORM & SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION
Total Develonmant Area
LOT
NUMBER
L^T
AREA
SQ. F
LOT
AREA
ACRES
VESTED
IMPERVIOUS
AREA SQ. FT
AREA
1
10,395
0.24
3,200
Blue
2
10,505
0.24
3,200
Blue
3
10,302
0.24
3,200
Blue
4
9,000
0.21
3,200
Blue
5
9,148
0.21
3,200
Blue
6
10,903
0.25
3,200
Blue
7
11,935
0.27
3,200
Blue
8
12,662
0.29
3,200
Blue
9
12,710
0.29
3,200
Blue
10
12,724
0.29
3,200
Blue
11
12,701
0.29
3,200
Blue
12
12,867
0.30
3,200
Blue
13
13,143
0.30
3,200
Blue
14
13,322
0.31
3,200
Blue
15
13,155
0.30
3,200
Blue
16
13,501
0.31
3,200
Blue
17
11,703
0.27
3,200
Blue
10
9,955
0.23
3,200
1 Blue
19
9,922
0.23
3,200
Blue
20
10,825
0.25
3,200
Blue
21
14,753
0.34
3,200
Blue
22
11,240
0.26
3,200
Blue
23
10,456
0.24
3,200
Blue
24
10,456
0.24
3,200
Blue
25
10,456
0.24
3,200
Blue
26
10,456
0.24
3,200
Blue
27
10,031
0.23
3,200
Blue
28
8,957
0.21
3,200
Blue
29
8,863
0.20
3.200
Blue
30
12,879
0.30
3,200
Blue
31
9,741
0.22
3,200
Blue
32
8,975
0.21
3,200
Blue
33
8,985
0.21
3,200
Blue
34
8,995
0.21
3,200
Blue
35
10,214
0.23
3,200
Blue
36
11,995
0.28
3,200
Blue
37
12,234
0.28
3,200
Blue
38
12,254
0.28
3,200
Blue
39
11,051
0.25
3,200
Blue
40
14,519
0.33
3,200
Blue
41
18,004
0.41
3,200
Blue
42
13,887
0.32
3,200
Blue
43
13,235
0.30
3,200
Blue
44
13,262
0.30
3,200
Blue
45
10,260
0.24
3,200
Blue
Form SWU-104 Version 3.99 Total Development Area
Attachment D

. Caponsgate at Bogue Sound
46
9,488
0.22
3,200
Blue
47
9,488
0.22
3,200
Blue
48
9,365
0.21
3,200
Blue
49
9,000
0.21
3,200
Blue
50
9,000
0.21
3,200
Blue
51
9,000
0.21
3,200
Blue
52
12,667
0.29
3,200
Blue
53
10,048
0.23
31200
Blue
54
9,626
0.22
3,200
Blue
55
10,000
0.23
3,200
Blue
56
9,763
0.22
3,200
Blue
57
9,626
0.22
3,200
Blue
58
10,046
0.23
3,200
Blue
59
10,691
0.25
3,200
Blue
60
13,002
0.30
3,200
Blue
61
12,139
0.28
3,200
Blue
62
9,626
0.22
3,200
Blue
63
9,890
0.23
3,200
Blue
64
9,884
0.23
3,200
Blue
65
9,606
0.22
3,200
Blue
66
10,046
0.23
3,200
Blue
67
10,663
0.24
3,200
Blue
68
9,143
0.21
3,200
Blue
69
9,677
0.22
3,200
Blue
70
9,677
0.22
3,200
Blue
71
9,677
0.22
3,200
Blue
72
9,677
0.22
3,200
Blue
73
9,677
0.22
3,200
Blue
74
9,677
0.22
3,200
Blue
75
9,677
0.22
3,200
Blue
76
• 9,677
0.22
3,200
Blue
77
9,677
0.22
3,200
Blue
78
9,677
0.22
3,200
Blue
79
9,677
0.22
3,200
Blue
80
9,677
0.22
3,200
Blue
81
9,677
0.22
3,200
Blue
82
9,677
0.22
3,200
Blue
83
9,677
0.22
3,200
Blue
84
9,677
0.22
3,200
Blue
85
9,677
0.22
3,200
Blue
86
9,677
0.22
3,200
Blue
87
9,677
0.22
3,200
Blue
88
9,677
0.22
3,200
Blue
89
10,006
0.23
3,200
Blue
90
10,006
0.23
3,200
Blue
91
10,006
0.23
3,200
Blue
92
10,006
0.23
3,200
Blue
93
10,006
0.23
3,200
Blue
94
10,006
0.23
3,200
Blue
95
10,276
0.24
3,200
Blue
96
10,006
0.23
3,200
Blue
97
10,006
0.23
3,200
Blue
Form SWU-104 Version 3.99 Total Development Area
Attachment D

L - Canonsgate at Bogue Sound
98
10,006
0.23
3,200
Blue
99
10,006
0.23
3,200
Blue
100
10,006
0.23
3.200
Blue
101
9 720
0.22
3,200
Blue
102
11,147
0.26
3,200
Blue
103
14,766
0.34
3,200
Blue
104
9,180
0.21
3,200
Blue
105
9,180
0.21
3,200
Blue
106
9,180
0.21
3,200
Blue
107
9,611
0.22
3,200
Blue
108
9,633
0.22
3,200
Blue
109
14,527
0.33
3,200
Blue
110
14,307
0.33
3,200
Blue
111
14,251
0.33
3,200
Blue
112
14,387
0.33
3,200
Blue
113
9,136
0.21
3,200
Blue
114
9,351
0.21
3,200
Blue
115
9,351
0.21
3,200
Blue
116
9,351
0.21
3,200
Blue
117
9,351
0.21
3,200
Blue
118
9,351
0.21
3,200
Blue
119
13,555
0.31
3,200
Blue
120
11,551
0.27
3,200
Blue
121
10,006
0.23
3,200
Blue
122
10,^u06
0.23
1 3,200
Blue
123
10,098
0.23
3,200
Blue
124
10,476
0.24
3,200
Blue
126
11.418
0.26
3,200
Blue
126
14,400
0.33
3,200
Blue
127
14,400
0.33
3,200
Blue
128
14,400
0.33
3,200
Blue
129
11,6391
0.27
3,200
Blue
130
13,132
0.30
3,200
Blue
131
9,000
0.21
3,200
Blue
132
9,017
0.21
3,200
Blue
133
8,417
0.19
3,200
Blue
134
9,000
0.21
3,200
Blue
135
10,200
0.23
3,200
Blue
136
9,000
0.21
3,200
Blue
137
9,000
0.21
3,200
Blue
138
9,000
0.21
3,200
Blue
139
9,000
0.21
3,200
Blue
140
9,000
0.21
3,200
Blue
141
9,000
0.21
3,200
Blue
142
10,013
0.23
3,200
Blue
143
10,707
0.25
3,200
Blue
144
10,707
0.25 _ _
3,200
Blue
145
9,297
0.21
3,200
Blue
146
8,109
0.19
3,200
Blue
147
8,109
0.19
3,200
Blue
148
8,109
0.19
3,200
Blue
149
10,097
0.23
3,200
Blue
Form SWU-104 Version 3.99 Total Development Area
Attachment D

Canonsgate at Bogue Sound
150
8,783
0.20
3,200
Blue
151
8,109
0.19
3,200
Blue
152
8,109
0.19
3,200
Blue
153
8,109
0.19
3,200
Blue
154
8,039
0.18
3,200
Blue
155
9,102
0.21
3,200
Blue
156
7,802
0.18
3,200
Blue
157
8,009
0.18
3,200
Blue
158
8,009
0.18
3,200
Blue
169
8,009
0.18
3,200
Blue
160
8,009
0.18
3,200
Blue
181
7,663
0.18
3,200
Blue
162
7,500
0.17
3,200
Blue
163
7,505
0.17
3,200
Blue
164
7,632
0.18
3,200
Blue
165
7,997
0.18
3,200
Blue
166
8,519
0.20
3,200
Blue
167
7,611
0.17
3,200
Blue
168
7,506
0.17
3,200
Blue
169
7,500
0.17
3,200
Blue
170
7,500
0.17
3,200
Blue
171
7,500
0.17
3,200
Blue
172
7,500
0.17
3,200
Blue
173
7,698
0.18
3,200
Blue
174
9,219
0.21
3,200
Blue
175
9,219
0.21
3,200
Blue
176
8,694
0.20
3,200
Blue
177
7,242
0.17
3,200
Blue
178
6,966
0.16
3,200
Blue
179
7,494
0.17
3,200
Blue
180
7,640
0.18
3,200
Blue
181
7,603
0.17
3,200
Blue
182
7,561
0.17
3,200
Blue
183
7,530
0.17
3,200
Blue
184
7,510
0.17
3,200
Blue
185
7,501
0.17
3,200
Blue
186
7,502
0.17
3.200
Blue
187
7,514
0.17
3,200
Blue
188
7,037
0.16
3,200
Blue
189
7,284
0.17
3,200
Blue
190
7,514
0.17
3,200
Blue
191
7,501
0.17
3,200
Blue
192
7,514
0.17
3,200
Blue
193
7,551
0.17
3,200
Blue
194
7,613
0.17
3,200
Blue
195
7,701
0.18
3,200
Blue
196
7,817
0.18
3,200
Blue
197
7,679
0.18
3,200
Blue
198
6,736
0.15
3,200
Blue
199
11,744
0.27
3,200
Blue
200
11,291
0.26
3,200
Blue
201
10,871
0.25
3,200
Blue
Form SWU-104 Version 3.99 Total Development Area
Attachment D

Carponsgate at Bogus Sound
202
10,8001
0.25
3,200
Blue
203
1000
0.25
3,200
Blue
204
9,600
0.22
3,200
Blue
205
9,017
- 0.21
3,200
Blue
206
8,600
0.20
3,200
Blue
207
9,000
0.21
3,200
Blue
208
9,000
0.21
3,200
Blue
209
9,000
0.21
3,200
Blue
210
9,000
0.21
3,200
Blue
211
9,000
0.21
3,200
Blue
212
9,019
0.21
3,200
Blue
213
8,905
0.20
3,200
Blue
214
7,732
0.18
3,200
Blue
215
7,800
0.18
3,200
Blue
216
7,800
0.18
3,200
Blue
217
7,801
0.18
3,200
Blue
218
7,971
0.18
3.200
Blue
219
8,639
0.20
3,200
Blue
220
7,966
0.18
3,200
Blue
221
6,860
0.16
3,200
Blue
222
7,546
0.17
3,200
Blue
223
7,653
0.18
3.200
Blue
224
9,368
0.22
3,200
Blue
225
9,512
0.22
3,200
Blue
223
3,634
0.20
3,200
Blue
227
8,634
0.20
3,200
Blue
228
8,634
0.20
3,200
Blue
229
8,634
0.20
3,200
Blue
230
8,634
0.20
3,200
Blue
231
8,634
0.20
3,200
Blue
232
10,983
0.25
3,200
Blue
233
8,909
0.20
3,200
Blue
234
7,977
0.18
3,200
Blue
235
7,977
0.18
3,200
Blue
236
7,977
0.18
3,200
Blue
237
8,839
0.20
3,200
Blue
238
8,783
0.20
3,200
Blue
239
7,977
0.18
3,200
Blue
240
7,977
0.18
3,200
Blue
241
8,839
0.20
3,200
Blue
242
10,497
0.24
3,200
Blue
243
8,974
0.21
3,200
Blue
244
9,926
0.23
3,200
Blue
245
11,488
0.26
3,200
Blue
246
10,081
0.23
3,200
Blue
247
8,591
0.20
3,200
Blue
248
8,591
0.20
3,200
Blue
249
9,414
0.22
3,200
Blue
250
7,793
0.18
3,200
Blue
251
7,793
0.18
3,200
Blue
252
7,79310.18
3,200
Blue
253
7,7931
0.18 1
3,200
Blue
Form SWU-104 Version 3,99 Total Development Area
Attachment D

r , Canonsgate at Bogus Sound
254
7,793
0.18
3,200
Blue
255
7,793
0.18
3,200
Blue
256
7,793
0.18
3,200
Blue
257
7,854
0.18
3,200
Blue
258
.8,148
0.19
3,200
Blue
259
8,579
0.20
3,200
Blue
260
8,883
0.20
3,200
Blue
261
7,640
0.18
3,200
Blue
262
7,081
0.16
3,200
Blue
263
6,793
0.16
3,200
Blue
264
6,360
0.15
3,200
Blue
265
5,839
0.13
3,200
Blue
266
5,406
0.12
3,200
Blue
267
5,093
0.12
3,200
Blue
268
5,413
0.12
3,200
Blue
269
5,404
0.12
3,200
Blue
270
6,078
0.12
3,200
Blue
271
5,384
0.12
3,200
Blue
272
5,810
0.13
3,200
Blue
273
6,351
0.15
3,200
Blue
274
6,872
0.16
3,200
Blue
275
7,356
0.17
3,200
Blue
276
9,456
0.22
3,200
Blue
277
9,386
0.22
3,200
Blue
278
9,419
0.22
3,200
Blue
279
9,452
0.22
3,200
Blue
280
9,485
0.22
3,200
Blue
281
8,594
0.20
3,200
Blue
282
11,028
0.25
3,200
Blue
283
9,339
0.21
3200
Blue
284
8,696
0.20
3200
Blue
285
8,245
0.19
3200
Blue
286
7,283
0.17
3200
Blue
287
6,320
0.15
3200
Blue
288
5,414
0.12
3200
Blue
289
6,447
0.15
3200
Blue
290
6,882
0.16
3200
Blue
291
7,500
0.17
3200
Blue
292
7,500
0.17
3200
Blue
293
7,429
0.17
3200
Blue
294
6,155
0.14
3200
Blue
295
6,199
0.14
3200
Blue
296
6,200
0.14
3200
Blue
297
6,200
0.14
3200
Blue
298
6,200
0.14
3200
Blue
299
6,200
0.14
3200
Blue
300
6,200
0.14
3200
Blue
301
6,200
0.14
3200
Blue
302
6,149
0.14
3200
Blue
303
11,363
0.26
3200
Blue
304
9,127
0.21
3200
Blue
305
7,770
0.18
2680
Red
Attachment D
Form SWU-104 Version 3.99 Total Development Area

Canonsgate at Bogus Sound
306
7,856
0.18
- 2680
Red
307
8,059
0.19
2680
Red
308
7,565
0.17
2680
Red
309
6,6-14
u. 6
268U1
Red
310
6,124
0.14
2680
Red
311
5,987
0.14
2680
Red
312
5,676
0.13
2680
Red
313
4,985
0.11
2680
Red
314
6,765
0.16
2680
Red
315
7,319
0.17
2680
Red
316
7,683
0.18
2680
Red
317
7,871
0.18
2680
Red
318
7,888
0.18
2680
Red
319
7,736
0.18
2680
Red
320
7,408
0.17
2680
Red
321
6,894
0.16
2680
Red
322
6,169
0.14
2680
Red
323
5,199
0.12
2680
Red
324
4,288
0.10
2680
Red
325
4,929
0.11
2680
Red
326
5,355
0.12
2680
Red
327
5,378
0.12
2680
Red
328
6,397
0.15
2680
Red
329
6,4891
0.15
2680
Red
330
6.599
0.15
2680
Red
331
6,748
0.16
2680
Red
332
6,900
0.16
2680
Red
333
61996
0.16
2680
Red
334
7,821
0.18
2680
Red
335
6,560
0.15
2680
Red
336
7,000
0.16
2680
Red
337
7,000
0.16
2680
Red
338
7,000
0.16
2680
Red
339
7,000
0.16
2680
Red
340
6,914
0.16
2680
Red
341
7,058
0.16
2680
Red
342
7,000
0.16
2680
Red
343
7,000
0.16
2680
Red
344
7,000
0.16
2680
Red
345
6,822
0.16
2680
Red
346
5,847
0.13
2680
Red
347
7,908
0.18
3200
Blue
348
7,908
0.18
3200
Blue
349
7,908
0.18
3200
Blue
350
7,908
0.18
3200
Blue
351
7,908
0.18
3200
Blue
352
7,908
0.18
3200
Blue
353
7,908
0.18
3200
Blue
354
7,908
0.18
3200
Blue
355
7,908
0.18
3200
Blue
356
7,969
0.18
3200
Blue
357
7,628
0.18
3200
Blue
Attachment D
Form SWU-104 Version 3.99 Total Development Area

Caaonsgate at Bogue Sound
358
7,607
0.17
3200
Blue
359
7,607
0.17
3200
Blue
360
7,607
0.17
3200
Blue
361
7,607
0.17
3200
Blue
362
1 7,607
0.17
3200
Blue
363
7,607
0.17
3200
Blue
364
7,607
0.17
3200
Blue
365
7,607
0.17
3200
Blue
366
7,280
0.17
3200
Blue
367
8,037
0.18
3200
Blue
368
9,184
0.21
3200
Blue
369
9,184
0.21
3080
Green
370
8,Q22
0.18
3080
Green
371
7,416
0.17
3080
Groan
372
8,539
0.20
3080
Green
373
8,276
0.19
3080
Gmnn
374
7,924
0.18
3080
Green
375
7,924
0.18
3080
Breen
376
7,924
0.18
3200
Blue
377
7,924
0.18
3200
Blue
378
7,924
0.18
3200
Blue
379
8,011
0.18
3200
Blue
380
8,011
0.18
3200
Blue
381
7,924
0.18
3200
Blue
382
1 7,9241
0. i 6
1 3200
Blue
383
7,924
0.18
3200
Blue
384
7,924
0.18
3200
Blue
385
7,924
0,18
3200
Blue
386
7,305
0.17
3200
Blue
387
7,865
0.18
3200
Blue
388
7,908
0.18
3200
Blue
389
7,908
0.18
3200
Blue
390
7,908
0.18
3200
Blue
391
7,908
0.18
3200
Blue
392
7,985
0.18
3200
Blue
393
19,431
0.45
3200
Blue
394
15,043
0.35
3200
Blue
395
13,918
0.32
3200
Blue
396
14,447
0.33
3200
Blue
397
15,835
0.36
3200
Blue
398
17,361
0.40
3200
Blue
399
17,410
0.40
3200
Blue
400
10,365
0.24
3200
Blue
401
9,164
0.21
3200
Blue
402
9,184
0.21
3200
Blue
403
10,803
0.25
3200
Blue
404
14,168
0.33
3200
Blue
405
15,385
0.35
3200
Blue
406
12,985
0.30
3200
Blue
407
10,531
0.24
3200
Blue
408
9,357
0.21
3200
Blue
409
8,909
0.20
3200
Blue
Form SWU-104 Version 3.99 Total Development Area
Attachment 0

Canonsgate at Bogue Sound
410
j 8,726
0.20
3200
Blue
411
9,018
0.21
3200
Blue
412
10,272
0.24
3200
Blue
413
11,273
0.26
3200
Blue
414
11,558
0.27
3200
Blue
415
11,480
0.26
3200
Blue
416
11,038
0.25
3200
Blue
417
14,880
0.34
3200
Blue
418
8,304
0.19
3200
Blue
419
7,935
0.18
3200
Blue
420
7,968
0.18
3200
Blue
421
8,537
0.20
3200
Blue
422
9,661
0.22
3200
Blue
423
10,342
0.24
3200
Blue
424
10,059
0.23
3200
Blue
425
10,562
0.24
3200
Blue
426
11,420
0.26
3200
Blue
427
10,914
0.25
3080
Green
428
9,830
0.23
3080
Green
429
9,082
0.21
3080
Greon
430
28,982
0.67
3080
Groon
431
13,513
0.31
3080
Grroon
432
12,330
0.28
3080
Groin
433
12,470
0.29
3080
Green
434
1 12,322
0.28
3080
Green
435
12,142
0.28
3080
Green
436
11,452
0.26
3080
Green
437
31,530
0.72
-5980L 16tM
Groon
438
19,989
0.46
3080
Grccn
439
22,369
0.51
3080
Groen
440
16,091
0.37
3080
Gre,an
_
441
15,611
0.36
3080
Green
442
16,794
0.39
3080
Green
443
15,596
0.36
3080
Green
444
14,480
0.33
3080
Green
445
13,717
0.31
3080
Green
446
13,266
0.30
3080
Green
447
12,989
0.30
3080
Green
448
12,887
0.30
3080
Green
449
13,112
0.30
3080
Green
450
13,903
0.32
3080
Green
451
14,950
0.34
3080
Grain
452
15,772
0.36
3080
Grccn
453
16,588
0.38
3080
Green
454
17,447
0.40
3080
Green
455
18,097
0.42
3080
Green
456
18,554
0.43
3080
Green
457
18,850
0.43
3080
Green
458
19,066
0.44
3080
Green
459
19,133
0.44
3080
Green
460
19,1601
0.44 1
3080
Green
461
19,160
0.44
3080
Green
Attachment D
Form SWU-104 Version 3.99 Total Development Area

Canonsgate at Bogue Sound
462
19,148
0.44
3080
Green
463
19,133
0.44
3080
Green
464
19,293
0.44
3080
Green
466
20,186
0.46
3080
Green
466
15,868
0.36
3080
Green
467
13,861
0.32
3080
Green
468
12,510
0.29
3080
Green
469
11,963
0.27
3080
Green
470
12,126
0.28
3080
Green
471
12,108
0.28
3080
Green
472
12,168
0.28
3080
Green
473
12,593
0.29
3080
Green
474
15,287
0.35
3080
Green
475
14,265
0.33
3080
Green
476
11,042
0.25
3080
Grr- n
477
10,803
0.25
3080
Green
478
11,111
0.26
3080
Green
479
10,202
0.23
3080
Green
480
15,005
0.34
3080
Green
481
19,572
0.46
3080
Green
482
14,756
0.34
3080
Green
483
9,442
0.22
2680
Red
484
10,817
0.25
2680
Red
485
11,3151
0.26
2680
Red
486
1 11,4341
0.26
1 2680
Red
487
11,552
0.27
2680
Red
488
11,668
0.27
2680
Red
489
11,791
0.27
2680
Red
490
12,105
0.28
2680
Red
491
12,813
0.29
2680
Red
492
12,729
0.29
2680
Red
493
11,397
0.26
2680
Red
494
10,230
0.23
2680
Red
495
9,251
0.21
2680
Red
496
8,447
0.19
2680
Red
497
7,803
0.18
2680
Red
498
7,302
0.17
2680
Red
499
6,931
0.16
2680
Red
500
6,652
0.15
2680
Red
501
6,373
0.15
2680
Red
502
6,159
0.14
2680
Red
503
6,581
0.15
2680
Red
504
7,581
0.17
2680
Red
505
8,964
0.21
2680
Red
506
7,706
0.18
2680
Red
507
7,482
0.17
2680
Red
508
8,015
0.18
2680
Red
509
9,761
0.22
2680
Red
510
9,200
0.21
2680
Red
511
6,846
0.16
2680
Red
512
6,363
0.15
2680
Red
513
15,078
0.35
2680
Red
Attachment D
Form SWU-104 Version 3.99 Total Development Area 10

Canonsgate at Bogus Sound
514
15,660
0.36
2680
Red
515
19,788
0.45
3080
Green
516
19,454
0.45
3080
Green
517
18,3891
0.42
3080
Green
518
17,709
0.41
3080
Green
519
17,308
0.40
3080
Green
520
16,949
0.39
3080
Green
521
16,635
0.38
3080.
Green
522
18,731
0.43
3080
Green
523
19,296
0.44
3080
Green
524
20,535
0.47
3080
Green
525
24,393
0.56
3080
Green
Total Number of Lots with vested area of 3200 sq.ft
Total Number of Lots with vested area of 3080 sq.ft
Total Number of Lots with vested area of 2680 sq.ft
Total Number of Lots
Total Lot Area (SQ. FT)
Total Vested Impervious Area (SO. FT.)
Total Vested Impervious Area Percentage
377
74
74
525
5,243,782
1,632,640
31.13%
Attachment D
Form SWU-104 Version 3.99 Total Development Area 11

Canonsgate at Bogue Sound
II. BUILT UPON AREA - SUPPLEMENT FORM & SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION
Area Inside ORW Line
LOT
NUMBER
LOT
AREA
SQ. FT
LOT
AREA
ACRES
VESTED
IMPERVIOUS
AREA SQ. FT
AREA
306
7,770
0.18
2680
Red
306
7,866
0.18
2680
Red
307
8,059
0.19
2680
Red
308
7,565
0.17
2680
Red
309
6,514
0.15
2680
Red
310
6,124
0.14
2680
Red
311
5,987
0.14
2680
Red
312
5,676
0.13
2680
Red
313
4,985
0.11
2680
Red
314
6,765
0.16
2680
Red
315
7,319
0.17
2680
Red
316
7,683
0.18
2680
Red
317
7,871
0.18
2680
Red
318
7,888
0.18
2680
Red
319
7,736
0.18
2680
Red
320
7,408
0.17
2680
Red
321
6,894
0.16
2680
Red
322
6,169
0.14
2680
Red
323
5,199
0.12
2680
Red
324
4,288
0.10
2680
Red
325
4,929
0.11
2680
Red
326
5,355
0.12
2680
Red
327
5,378
0.12
2680
Red
328
6,397
0.16
2680
Red
329
6,489
_
0.15
2680
Red
330
6,599
0.15
2680
Red
331
6,748
0.15
2680
Red
332
6,900
0.16
2680
Red
333
6,996
0.16
2680
Red
334
7,821
0.18
2680
Red
335
6,560
0.16
2680
Red
336
7,000
0.16
2680
Red
337
7,000
0.16
2680
Red
338
7,000
0.16
2680
Red
339
7,000
0.16
2680
Red
340
6,914
0.16
2680
Red
341
7,058
0.16
2680
Red
342
7,000
0.16
2680
Red
343
7,000
0.16
2680 1
Red
344
7,000
0.16
2680 1
Fled,
345
6,822
0.16
2680
Red,
346
5,847
0.13
2680
- Red;
369
9,184
0.21
3080
Oreei;;
370
8,022
0.18
3080
Green
371
7,416
0.17
3080
Gfoon
Attachment D
Form SWU-104 Version 3.99 Area Inside ORW Line

Cimonagate at Bogue Sound
372
8,539
0.20
3080
Green
373
8 276
0.19
3080
Green
374
7,924
0.18
3080
Green
375
7,924
0J 8
3080
Green
427
10,914
0.25
3080
Green
428
9,830
0.23
3080
Green
429
9,082
0.21
3080
Green
430
28,982
0.67
3080
Green
431
13,513
0.31
3080
Green
432
12,330
0.28
3080
Green
433
12,470
0.29
3080
Green
434
12,322
0.28
3080'
Green
435
12,142
0.28
3080
Green
436
11,452
0.26
3080
Green
437
31,530
0.72
3080
Green
438
19,989
0.46
3080
Grccn
439
22,369
0.51
3080
Green
440
16,091
0.37
3080
Gr fan
441
15,611
0.36
3080
Green
442
16,794
0.39
3080
Green
443
15,596
0.36
3080
Green
444
14,480
0.33
3080
Green
445
13,717
0.31
3080
Oroen
446
13,266
0.30
3080
Green
447
12,989
0.30
3080
Groan
448
12,887
0.30
3080
Green
449
13112
0.30
3080
Green
450
13,903
0.32
3080
Gu een
451
14,950
0.34
3080
(goon
452
15,772
0.36
3080
0- rccn
453
16,588
0.38
3080
Green
454
17,447
0.40
3080
Green
455
18,097
0.42
3080
Green
456
18,554
0.43
3080
Green
457
18,850
0.43
3080
Orton
458
19,066
0.44
3080
Green
459
19,133
0.44
3080
Green
460
19,160
0.44
3080
Groan
461
19,160
0.44
3080
Green
462
19,148
0.44
3080
Green
463
19,133
0.44
3080
Green
464
19,293
0.44
3080
Green
465
20,186
0.46
3080
Geor n
466
15,868
0.36
3080
Green
467
13,861
0.32
3080
Green
468
12,510
0.29
3080
Green
469
11,963
0.27
3080
Green
470
12,126
0.28
3080
Green
471
12,108
0.28
3080
Green
472
12,168
0.28
3080
Green
473
12,693
0.29
3080
Green
474
15,287
0.35
3080
Green
Attachment D
Form SWU-104 Version 3.99 Area Inside ORW Line

Canonsgate at Bogue Sound
475
14,265
0.33
3080
Green
476
11,042
0.25
3080
Green
477
10,803
0.25
3080
Green
478
11,111
0.26
3080
Green
479
10,202
0.23
3080
Green
480
15,005
0.34
3080
Green
481
19,572
0.45
3080
Green
482
14,756
0.34
3080
Green
483
9,442
0.22
2680
Red
484
10,817
0.25
2680
Red
485
11,315
0.26
2680
Red
486
11,434
0.26
2680
Red
487
11,552
0.27
2680
Red
488
11,668
0.27
2680
Red
489
11,791
0.27
2680
Red
490
12,105
0.28
2680
Red
491
12,813
0.29
2680
Red
492
12,729
0.29
2680
Red
493
11,397
0.26
2680
Red
494M.7j803
0.23
2680
Red
495
0.21
2680
Red
496
0.19
2680
Red
497
0.18
2680
Red
498
0.17
2680
Red
499
6,9311
0.16
2680
Red
500
6,652
0.15
2680
Red
501
6,373
0.15
2680
Red
502
6,159
0.14
2680
Red
503
6,581
0.15
2680
Red
504
7,581
0.17
2680
Red
505
8.964
0.21
2680
Red
506
7,706
0.18
2680
Red
507
7,482
0.17
2680
Red
508
8,015
0.18
2680
Red
509
9,761
0.22
2680
Red
510
9,200
0.21
2680
Red
511
6,846
0.16
2680
Red
612
6,363
0.15
2680
Red
513
15,078
0.35
2680
Red
514
15,660
0.36
2680
Red
515
19,788
0.45
3080
Green
516
19,454
0.45
3080
Green
517
18,389
0.42
3080
Green
518
17,709
0.41
3080
Green
519
17,308
0.40
3080
Green
520
16,949
0.39
3080
Green
521
16,635
0.38
3080
Green
522
18,731
0.43
3080
Green
523
19,296
0.44
3080
Green
524
20,535
0.47
3080
Green
525
24,393
0.56
1 3080
Green
Attachment D
Form SWU-104 Version 3.99 Area Inside ORW Line

State Stormwater Management Systems
Permit No. SW8 050516
Attachment 1: Summary of Swale Changes Approved by Plan Revision
Table. 1 - Surnmaty of Current Swale Determinations & Requested Revision
-['urrent _ _ _ - T rmination
Drainage Comment Veg' Delete Swale
Area Area
1 Performs us well as or butter as vc etative area. x
2 Performs as well as or better as Negetative area. x_ _
3 Performs as well as or better as ve etative area, x
4-- -.- Performs as well a¢ or better as vegetative area. x
5 Pcribrms as well as or better as vegetative area. x
6 Performs as well as or better as vegetative area. x
7
Performs no function. _ _
Perfo ms no function.
Performs no Functitm.
Performs nu function. _
Performs as well as or better as vegetative area.
_.. x
x
8
- - _ 9 -
10
x
x
11
x
_
12
13
14 _ —
Performs as well as or better as vegetative area.
Performs as well as or better as vegetative area.
Performs no function.
Performs no function, _ - -
x
_
-_x
- - -
x
_ 15
16
_ _. x
Performs as well as or better as ve etative area.
Performs no function.
Performs no function.
Performs no function. _ _.___ ....
Swale required.
Performs no function.
Swale re uired� -
x
17
19
— -. _
x
19
20
x
x
21
22
x
x
23
-�24
Performs as well as or better as vegetative area.
Swale re uircd. _
x
25
Performs as well as or better as vegetative area.
Curb outlet 25A added draining to V.A.
W
Swale required.
performs as well as or better as ve etative area.
Performs as well as or better as vegetative area.
Curb outlet 28A added draining to V.A.
x
26
- -
�
-
27
_ 28
x
x
- -
_
29 _
36
Swale required.
Swale required,
x ,
— --
-l---
x
31
Swale required. —
Swale re uired.
`Swale required. - --- - ---------
-- -
x
x
32
- 33 - -
_-
x,
34
_.
Performs no function. -
_
x
x
X
- '
35
Swale required.
Performs no function.
Performs as well as or better as M tatijc
Perfuims as well as or better as vegetative area.
Performs as well as or better ds v�e etative area.
Performs no function.
. "Totals
36
37
x
_ 38
- 38A
x
_ 17
x
39
Page 5 of 11

Permit No. - 890308,
(to be provided by DWQ)
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
STORM[WATER MANAGEMENT PERMIT APPLICATION FORM
LOW DENSITY SUPPLEMENT
This form may be photocopied for use as an original
A low density project is one that meets the appropriate criteria for built upon area and transports stormwater
runoff primarily through vegetated conveyances. Low density projects should not have a discrete stormwater
collection system as defined by 15A NCAC 2H.1002(18). Low density requirements and density factors can be
found in 15A NCAC 211.1005 through.1007.
I. PROJECT INFORMATION
Project Name
CANNONSGATE AT BOGUE SOUND
Contact Person: RANDY ALIEN - President
Phone Number: ( 704 ) 321-0401
Number of Lots: 525 Allowable Built Upon Area Per Lot*: (SEE ATTACHMENT D)
*If lot sizes are not uniform, attach a table indicating the number of lots, lot sizes and allowable built upon area
for each lot. The attachment must include the project name, phase, page numbers and provide area subtotals
and totals.
II. BUILT UPON AREA
See the Stormwater Management Permit Application for specific language that must be recorded in the deed
restrictions for all subdivisions.
For uniform lot sizes, complete the following calculation in the space provided below where:
• SA Site Area - the total project area above Mean High Water. Wetlands may be excluded when the
development results in high density pockets.
• DF Density Factor - the appropriate percent built upon area divided by 100.
• RA Road Area - the total impervious surface occupied by roadways.
• OA Other Area - the total area of impervious surfaces such as clubhouses, tennis courts, sidewalks, etc.
• No. Lots - the total number of lots in the subdivision.
• BUA/Lot - the computed allowable built upon area for each lot including driveways and impervious
surfaces located between the front lot line and the edge of pavement.
Form SWU-104 Rev 3.99 Page 1 of 2

(SA x DF) - RA - OA = BUA
No. Lots Lot
Calculation:
(SEE ATTACHMENT D)
III. REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
Initial in the space provided to indicate that the following requirements have been met and supporting
documentation is provided as necessary. If the applicant has designated an agent on the Stormwater
Management Permit Application Form, the agent may initial below.
Applicants Initials
GW a. A 30 foot vegetative buffer is provided adjacent to surface waters. Projects in the Neuse
River basin may require additional buffers.
G11 b. Deed restriction language as required on form SWU-101 shall be recorded as a restrictive
covenant. A copy of the recorded document shall be provided to DWQ within 30 days of
platting and prior to sale of any lots.
c. Built upon area calculations are provided for the overall project and all lots.
d. Project conforms to low density requirements within the ORW AEC (if applicable).
(15A NCAC 2H.1007(2)(b))
Form SWU-104 Rev 3.99 Page 2 of 2

Permit No.
s e
-8.90-308
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
(to be provided by D WQ)
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PERMIT APPLICATION FORM
CURB OUTLET SYSTEM SUPPLEMENT
FOR LOW DENSITY DEVELOPMENT WITH CURB AND GUTTER
This form may be photocopied for use as an original
DWQ Stormwater Management Plan Review:
A complete stormwater management plan submittal includes a stormwater management permit application, a
curb outlet system supplement, a low density supplement, design calculations, and plans and specifications
showing all stormwater conveyances and curb outlet details.
I. PROJECT INFORMATION
Project Name CANNONS GATE AT BOGUE SOUND
Contact Person: RANDY ALLEN - President Phone Number: ( 704) 321-0401
Curb outlets to (check one): ® Swale [] Vegetated Area
II. REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
The following checklist outlines design requirements per the North Carolina Administrative Code Section 15A
NCAC 211.1008.
Initial in the space provided to indicate that the following design requirements have been met and supporting
documentation is attached, If the applicant has designated an agent on the Stormwater Management Permit
Application Form, the agent may initial below. If a requirement has not been met, attach justification.
Applicants Initials
a. Curb outlets direct flow to a Swale or vegetated area.
C < b. Swales or vegetated areas receiving curb outlet flow are designed to carry, at a minimum,
the peak flow from the 10-year storm.
r,� c. Flow velocity is non -erosive for peak flow from the 10-year storm event.
d. Longitudinal slope of the Swale or vegetated area does not exceed 5%.
e. Side slopes of the Swale or vegetated area are no steeper than 5-1 (horizontal to vertical).
f. Length of swale or vegetated area is ? 100 feet.
g. The system takes into account the run-off at ultimate built -out potential from all surfaces
draining to the system (delineate drainage area for each Swale).
h. Swales are located in recorded drainage easements.
i. Grass type(s) for permanent vegetative cover specified on detail. 65w cob-va-, eb-r"' A4'
dell — j. Swale detail provided on plans.
Form SVIU-105 Ver3.99 Page 1 of 3

F In." DESIGN INFORMATION
Complete the following table. If additional space is needed the information should be provided in the same
format as Table 1 and attached to this form. Rainfall intensity data can be found in Appendix 8.03 of the State
of North Carolina Erosion and Sediment Control Planning and Design Manual.
Table 1. Swale Design Information
Swale No.
Drainage
Area ac
Impervious
Area ac
Grassed
Area (ac)
C
Q
(cfs
VW10W
s
VWWW
s
Flow
Depth ft
l
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
lI
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Form SWU- 105 Ver 3.99 Page 2 of 3

TABLE 1.
Swale Design Information
Swale
No.
Drainage
Area (ac)
Impervious
Area ac
Grassed
Area ac
c
Q cfs
Valhm
(fps)
Max V
(fps)
At 5%
Flow
Depth ft)
At 1 %
Flow
Depth (ft)
1
1.38
0.95
0.43
0.779
7.522
4.5
2.72
0.55
0.75
2
1.38
0.95
0.43
0.779
7.522
4.5
2.72
0.55
0.75
3
0.56
0.3
0.26
0.695
2.723
4.5
1.44
0.38
0.51
4
0.56
0.3
0.26
0.695
2.723
4.5
1.44
0.38
0.51
5
0.67
0.42
0.25
0.745
3.493
4.5
1.68
0.42
0.56
6
0.67
0.42
0.25
0.745
3.493
4.5
1.68
0.42
0.56
7
1.21
0.51
0.7
0.632
5.352
4.5
2.2
0.49
0.66
8
1.32
0.23
1.09
0.496
4.582
4.5
1.99
0.46
0.62
9
1.95
0.4
1.55
0.513
7
4.5
2.6
0.54
0.73
10
1.31
0.38
0.93
0.56
5.131
4.5
2.14
0.48
0.65
11
0.58
0.18
0.4
0.571
2.317
4.5
1.3
0.36
0.48
12
0.68
0.21
0.47
0.57
2.713
4.5
1.44
0.38
0.51
13
1.01
0.26
0.75
0.542
3.829
4.5
1.78
0.43
0.58
14
1.62
0.21
1.41
0.471
5.345
4.5
2.19
0.49
0.66
15
1.28
0.29
0.99
0.525
4.701
4.5
2.02
0.46
0.63
16
1.67
0.42
1.25
0.538
6.293
4.5
2.43
0.52
0.7
17
1.92
0.71
1.21
0.604
8.124
4.5
2.85
0.57
0.77
18
2.07
0.46
1.61
0.522
7.567
4.5
2.73
0.56
0.75
19
1.85
0.25
1.6
0.474
6.143
4.5
2.39
0.51
0.69
20
1.75
0.51
1.24
0.56
6.864
4.5
2.56
0.54
0.72
21
0.98
0.18
0.8
0.501
3.437
4.5
1.85
0.41
0.56
22
1.81
0.71
1.1
0.616
7.802
4.5
2.78
0.56
0.76
23
3.56
0.98
2.58
0.551
13.741
4.5
3.96
0.69
0.94
24
1.53
0.42
1.11
0.551
5.901
4.5
2.33
0.51
0.68
25
3.44
0.5
2.94
0.48
11.557
4.5
3.55
0.65
0.88
26
1.91
0.42
1.49
0.521
6.965
4.5
2.59
0.54
0.73
27
0.53
0.21
0.32
0.618
2.293
4.5
1.29
0.35
0.48
28
2.75
0.63
2.12
0.526
10.126
4.5
3.27
0.62
0.84
29
1.52
0.4
1.12
0.545
5.796
4.5
2.31
0.5
0.68
30
2.33
0.61
1.72
0.544
8.873
4.5
3.01
0.59
0.8
31
3.15
0.51
2.64
0.489
10.784
4.5
3.4
0.63
0.86
32
2.8
0.69
2.11
0.536
10.497
4.5
3.34
0.63
0.85
33
1.63
0.43
1.2
0.545
6.22
4.5
2.41
0.52
0.7
34
0.92
0.24
0.68
0.543
3.5
4.5
1.68
0.42
0.56
35
1.88
0.6
1.28
0.576
7.574
4.5
2.73
0.56
0.75
36
1.03
0.23
0.8
0.523
3.77
4.5
1.76
0.43
0.58
37
1.44
0.32
1.12
0.522
5.264
4.5
2.17
0.48
0.66
38
1.4
0.55
0.85
0.616
6.038
4.5
2.37
0.51 1
0.69

IV. CURB OUTLET SYSTEM MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS
1. Mowing will be accomplished as needed according to the season. Grass height will not exceed six inches
at anytime.
2. Swales will be inspected monthly or after every runoff producing rainfall event for sediment build-up,
erosion, and trash accumulation.
3. Accumulated sediment and trash will be removed as necessary. Swales will be reseeded or sodded
following sediment removal.
4. Eroded areas of the swales will be repaired and reseeded. Swales will be revegetated as needed and in a
timely manner based on the monthly inspections.
5. Catch basins, curb cuts, velocity reduction devices, and piping will be inspected monthly or after every
significant runoff producing rainfall event. Trash and debris will be cleared away from grates, curb cuts,
velocity reduction devices and piping.
6. Swales will not be altered, piped, or filled in without approval from NCDENR Division of Water Quality.
I acknowledge and agree by my signature below that I
maintenance procedures listed above. I agree to notify
changes to the system or responsible party.
am responsible for the performance of the six
DWQ of any problems with the system or prior to any
Print Name and Title: /2jqw1 > ��,�r1 .�•GE/�/ i�iJc/r..-r
Address: //0 GtJS 2641-0 ej
Phone: ;;y ' 3,2 / - fJ,440 0 Date: Y- Z'56-- 0 .S
Signature: �.•�d� /VME,1 1
Note: The legally responsible party should not be a homeowners assodation unless more than 50•0 of the lots have been sold and a
resident oj1he subdivision has been n mted the president
do hereby certify that
Notary Public for the State of f►U `County of rr��,,--
Wdo%Q% M • A 11w personally appeared before me thiso%
day of A005 and acknowledge the due execution of the forgoing infiltration basin maintenance
Witness my hand and official seal,
My commission expiresPecem6er 'I. �OO13
Form SVM-105 Ver3.99 Page 3 of 3

Low Density Residential Subdivisions with Curb Outlet Swales
Deed Restrictions & Protective Covenances
Cannonsgate at Bogue Sound
Phase I, Lot #437 only
In accordance with Title 15 NCAC 2H.1000 and S.L. 2006-246, the Stormwater, Management Regulations,
deed restrictions and protective covenants are required for Low Density Residential Subdivisions with curb
outlet swales, where lots will be subdivided and sold. Deed restrictions and protective covenants are
necessary to ensure that the development maintains a "built -upon" area consistent with the applicable
regulation governing the density level.
I, Randy Allen acknowledge and affirm by my signature below, that I will cause the
following deed restrictions and protective covenants to be recorded for Cannons -gate at Bogue Sound Phase I,
Lot # 437 :
1. The following covenants are intended to ensure ongoing compliance with State Stormwater
Management Permit Number SW8 050516, as issued by the Division of Water Quality under the
Stormwater Management Regulations.
2. The State of North Carolina is made a beneficiary of these covenants to the extent necessary to
maintain compliance with the stormwater management permit.
3. These covenants are to run with the land and be binding on all persons and parties claiming under
them.
4. The covenants pertaining to stonmwatermay not be altered or rescinded without the express written
consent of the State of North Carolina, Division of Water Quality.
5. Alteration of the drainage as shown on the approved plan may not take place without the concurrence
of the Division of Water Quality.
6. The maximum allowable built -upon area for Lot #437 is 6665 square feet. This allotted amount
includes any built -upon area constructed within the lot property boundaries, and that portion of the
right-of-way between the front lot line and the edge of the pavement. Built upon area includes, but is not
limited to, structures, asphalt, concrete, gravel, brick, stone, slate, and coquina, but does not include
raised, open wood decking, or the water surface of swimming pools.
7. In the case of a lot within CAMA's regulated AEC, where the Division of Coastal Management
calculates a different maximum allowable built -upon area for that lot than is shown herein, the
governing maximum built -upon area for that lot shall be the most restrictive of the two.
8. This project proposes a curb outlet system. Each designated curb outlet swale shown on the approved
plan must be maintained at a minimum of 100' long with 5:1 (14:10 side slopes or flatter, have a
longitudinal slope no steeper than 5%, cant' the flow from a 10 year storm in a non -erosive manner,
and maintain a dense vegetated cover.
9. Filling in or piping of any vegetative conveyances (ditches, swa/es, etc.) associated with the
development except for average driveway crossings, is strictly prohibited by any persons.
10. Each lot will maintain a 30* foot wide vegetated buffer between all impervious areas and surface
waters.
11. All roof drains shall terminate at least 30* foot from the mean high water mark of surface waters.
12. Filling in, piping or altering any designated 5:1 curb outlet swale associated with the development is
prohibited by any persons. _
*50 foot for projects l:,cated in the 20 coastal counties. CEIVIED
FormDRPC-6 Rcv2 05Nov2009 Page 1 of JUL 13 2011

Low Density Residential Subdivisions with Curb Outlet Swales
Deed Restrictions & Protective Covenances
Signature:
I, �azCf N�.L
State of
do hereby certify that
Cannonsgate at Bogue Sound
'04, Phase I, Lot #437 only
M
y Public in the
lly appeared
,
before me this the Z O day of �I X-e- , 20LL-, and acknowledge
the due execution of the foregoing instrument. Witness my hand and official seal,
SEAL
SignaturEk
My Commission expires ( ^ c-;?, z-:) -D
ECWPE4
RM
unty,NC
Nut 20, 2018
Form DRPC-6 Rev2 05Nov2009 Pagc 2 of 2

'Deu) '�CS1-Ac (l O M S
exempted from the sssessmeop, charges sod dens created herein.
The Board of Directors shad have the authority and standing, on behalf of the
Association, to enforce io courts of competent jarisdlcrioo decisions of the Cotumioee
established in Section I or this Article VM. This Article may not be amended without the
Dodarant's wrhft consent, so long as the Declaraut awns any land sabjeu to this
Declaration or subject to an,xx.i lon to this Declaration.
No construction, which term shall Wade, wMM lustif MM, 9111 g, clearing.
exeavadon, grading, and other else work, and m plantings or removal of plants, trees, or
&Mtn shall take phtce except in strict compliance with this Ardck. until the requitement:
hereof have been fitly met and oath the wduen approval of the Archinsatral Review
Commitsw has been obmined.
CW 1, AMhijomwaIRaykXC=Mj= The Architectural Ruview 00ID111itkC
(ARC) shall have exclusive jurisdiction over all eoosttuctim on mW portion of the Properties,
including but not Bolted to the audw ty to review and approve all proposed Sire plans
showing whore lmprovemeasa arc to be erected. The ARC ahail prepare and, on behalf of The
Board of Directory, shall promulgate Architectural Review Ctuiddises ('t3nideHOU") whirl'
include the Application for Prdimitwy Architectural Review, the Application for Final
Arcbkccmal Review, Caamonsgare at Bogne smW Guidelines Pattern. Book, Connonvile at
Bogue Sewall Approved Plat List and such other Rala and Reguhuieos as the ARC drams
necessary_ The Gotdermes, pattern Book. Plot Litt, Review Process and Rules and
Regulstieme shall be tkose of the Association, and the ARC shag bane sole and fall sattbm* to
prepare and m amend in its sole diaQetion Huse doemoeota. It shall mate Haem available to
Oamerx, buWml and developers who seek to engage in devedopmennt of to construction. upon
ail or any portion of the Subdivision and who shall a their %mradoms strictlY In
accor&= therewith. As hog a Dechsant owns nay Lou which are Object to this
Decluatioo or retains the right to add additk=d Phraes, the Deyckram r Mt = the VA to
appoint all membeta of the ARC, which dwR consist of at least three (3). bur no mete don five
(3) peraom. The membQa of the ARC do not have m be Owners. There shall be rso surreader
of this right prior to that time except in a TarhWn inalrttmm in record" roam eor sated by
Declarant. Upon the expiradon of snch right, the Board of Directors shell WOW the
members, of the ARC. The ARC dM nitro have exclusive jnriadictioa ova modifications,
additions, or si eeradons made on or to existing Leta, Hoffer Areas, Private Opera Spaces sad
Common Arena. The right of approval herein rarer" d and grained shall include, wMWt
dmiutioo, the right to dedgate or te.daigam which Lot line shall be the 'bunt' in the case
when a Lot is bordered by more than one street.
The ARC shall promulgate deu* d aramdards ad procedure govexalog its area of
n:spoasibility w d practice. In addition d=CtD. the fbllow9ag shall aPP1Y: Plana and
specifrutiaos showing the nature, kind, shape, color, size, materials and location of such
modifiead=, additions, or alterations shall be submitted in advance to the ARC ror approval
a to quality of worlammsWp sod design and it"Mooy of exterod design *M a xisdog
sarucntres, and as to location in relation 0 surrounding sauxmes. tape fmiah

grade elevitiem. No permission or approval shall be [egoist to repaint in accordance with an
originally approved color sew, or it; rebuild In accardam with originally approved plans
and apeciUmdons. Nothing contained hatein shall be coaitrued to limit the right of an Owner
to remodel the hurior of his/her Dwelling or to paint do interior my color desired. In the
event he ARC hiss to approve or to disapprove inch pimp or to request additional inf nation
reasonably required within forty-i5ve (45) calendar days aria submission, the plan shall be
dmnod approved; provided, however, that no SO& fallnrt to art shall be deemed an approval
of say matters specirwaW prohibited by any other provision of thin Declaration. Relbaal or
approval of plans, specifications, and plot plans or any of ihtan may be based on aqy gronutds,
including purely aestWit grounds, which, in the sole and uncontrolled discretion of the ARC,
may dean sufficient. The approvals required pursusn to'this Article shill be in writing and
are in addition to airy approvals rrxpmired by other applicable governmenhal anlhodly.
Nothing in this Doclaration shall be construed to prohibit the ARC from pramlastlog difforem
auidei"utes aodlor Procedures for each Phase or pottloti thereof of the Wopertles and the ARC
is specifically authorized to do so. Addhionalty, all reasonable costs Incurred by the ARC in
reviewing and approving applications to the ARC shall be the reaponsibility of the applicant,
Unless apxtCxally waived by am ARC, all applicadom and submissions of Plana for approval
by the ARC mutt be aaeimpanled by an architectural review fee of $M.00 or sack other "in
a is established by the ARC from time to time. Optional, preliminary plan approval my be
obtained by submitting plans accompanied by a prelimhsary review he of S10D.00 or such
other sum as is established by the ARC from rime to lime. See Architectural OoidtlhO
Article. 3.4 and 3.5.
Actual consttocxion of Dwellings and other itnprovematln sball be the responsibility of the
Owner of the Lot and the Owner's bulkier. Any permission granted for oonsritctiou under
this covenant and any designation of approved Ikea ed courraemora skill not coaadtute or be
construed as an approval. warranty or guaranty, expressed or implied, by the Declarant or the
ARC or its designated agent of the auuct sal stability, design or quality of any building or
other koprovt went or of the contractor who constructs snob buiidhrgs or other lmprovaoenta.
Sestiwa2. ' Buiminga- Peaces- 3&UL EEC No building, lbuoe, wall. deck, rellis,
gazebo, bou house, or other structure. nod no change in topography, lamdxapi138. err any other
itsas originally approved by lie ARC, shall be eonunmood, erected. or maintained upon tine
Properties, nor shall any exterior addition to or change be trade until the plans and
specWMdons showing fine nature, hind, shape, height, materials, color, and locations of the
some shall have been. submitted to and approved In writing as to the harmony of the 6x ernal
design and location in relation to the surroundinig rtructom sal tnitography by the ARC. Amy
change In exterior appearance of sty building, wall, hnce, or other unaund improvements
and stry change in the appearsotx of the landscaping shall be deemed on alteration requiring
approval.
No Cloth:. Pia.
landing, wharf, seawall/bullhead or other structure shall be constructed. placed or allowed to
remain on say body of water, water coarse or the Intracoastal Waterway, unless approved ba
writing by the Declarant.
Section 4 . All coaastanctitiz'
within Can onagate at Bogoe Sound shall comply with Title 13 NCAC 2H.1000. the Coastal
.._ _. ........... .14............._.,.

Stormwater Mansgemeat Regulation:
(a) Which is inteWed to mum ongoing compliance with State Stortnwarer
Managtmeau Permit Number s,WROM516, as issued by the Division of Water Quality
under NCAC 2H-1.000.
(b) The State of Nardi Carolina is made a bencfWmq of these covenmtm to the extent
necessary to maintain compliance with tie stormwater management pesnit.
(c) These coveaants am to ran with the h W and be binding on all parsons and parties
claiming under them.
(on The covenants pertaining to swramwa may not be altered or ramioded without the
express wrlaca consent of the State of Norrh Carolina, Dlvisiab or Water Quality.
(e) A hmition of the drainage as shown on the Mnm)ved plan may not tab plate
without the coammence of the Division or Want' Quality.
(f) The maximam. allow6le'Imih-upon area per lot is as folloo.s:
Lots 1-304. 347-369, 376.426: 3200 sgtmta feet
Lots 305-346. 493-514: 2600 square feet
Leta mg-375, 4Z7-4A 515-525: 3000 square feet
These alloned amounts include airy bttitr-upon area constructed within the lot property
boundaries. and that portion of the right-of-way between the from lot fine and the edge
of the pavement. Built upon area fnelodes, bur is not limited to, structures, asphalt.
concrete, gravel, brick. atone. slate, coquina saw parking areas, but does not include
raised, open woad dwJdM, or Ike water surface of swimming Paola.
(g) TJtia project proposes a curb outlet ridem. Each designated cot Coles Swale
shown on the approved plan mast be maiutaiaed at a miuimam of IW bug whb 5:1
(H:V) side slopes or flatter, have a 1009101dinA Slope no stetPer than 5%, carry the
Bow from a 10 year storm in a non -erosive manner. and mainWD a dense vegetated
cover.
Rd Filling In or piping of any vegvoa e'mavey— (ditches, swedes. etc.) associated
with the developmeut except for average driveway crossings, is strictly prohibited by
any persons.
(r) Each lot will maintain a 30, wide vegetated buffer between impervious arm and
surface waters.
0) All roof dmios shall terminate at bast 30' from the mean higai water mark of
surface waters.
(1t) pMWS in, piping or altering say designated 5:1 cmb outetl awde associated with
the de:velopmdaL is prrhftited by any pamm
St�iaaS. ;
. ... n� .... ...�-a. ... .. .h:. - ,a/ily'aj': �'''z�l :d'f, R�•j...1^. . . ,

hn smordanee with Tick 1SA NCAC 2H .5w, it has been dotamined that `A pardon of lot
annibena 10-1123-2A-25-26-30.31-32-33-35A6-37-3B-3940.41-42-d3.41-6MIA1-92-93-108-
109-110.111-1 Ml13-114-113-116.118-122-123-125-126.127.128-129-130-135-136-137.136-
139.140-141-142-143-144-145-292.283-U4-285-286-287.268293-394495.396.397-398299-
400.4014i-4034044OS406-407-401409-410.411-412,413 414-415.416.41741B-41%47A-
421422-423-424-425-42"n 429 479-430-431432.433434433.436.437.4387439-40.441-
442 443444, A3-"6417448-449-450331.452-453-454-4554%-457-d58.4S9460.461962-
463.464463.46636746B.469-470-471.4n 473-474.473-476.477-4784790g0.481.482.483-
484404664874M"69490.491- 492-M49449S-96-497-498-499.500-301-3a2-903-504-
505-506.507-S08-509-5 a5l l-512-513-514-515-S1W17-51B-519-SM21-522r523-524-525,
locrled in the Cumonsgatc at Hogue Sound Subdivision, Cartarot County. Noah Carolina as
shown on plum prepared by J. Davis Architects dated May 28. 2005; meet the requitemeate
for designation as a wetland, stream or protected stream bailer. Any subsequent 191 or
alteration of this user shall conform to the requirements of the state miss adopted by the State
or North Camlios inform at the time of the proposed alomfloa. The intent of this provision
is to prevent additional wetland, stream or buffo Mlutg or drahtimg, so the property Owner
should not assume that a faturc applicadon lot Filling or drab ft would be approved. The
property owner shall report fhe tame of the subdivision in any application Puuh mg to said
rules. This eoveaamt is intended to msam contlnnted aottilrib= with all rules adopted by the
Slate of North Carolina and therefore the Sale of Noah Carolina may enforce hmeitits. This
covenant is to ran with die lead and shall be binding on all Parties and all persons dhthuing
offer them.
' rtr ar7,n 'a rid �` u a nrl,tMtmn,1 Rcvfew AuLorltV
Nomidwwndiag the shove sections, Dodarard, In DwUrant's sole judgment and discmdon,
reserves the right and option to exercise ArcWjmt al Review Authority without establishing
an ARC until such time as Declarant relimpisho Class 11 membership S.
(a) rnumcigr pariormance Bond . Prior to cuMu roernm of warp, baUders
vM be required to post a Contractor paEarmatrca Staid with the ARC in the amoant of
S1000.00 or such other man 0 is established by the ARC from time to time. to taamte this tine
mom, &W* commuctim baps the property in a treat, clean, woriamanI to manner and
to ensure that the conumlor complears Improvements in aceetrdamoa with the approved plain
and qwA ieadons. Strould the am= not be done at the end of any bnaimesa day
er �the eAd a'
�
otatmturtioa, as appropriate, same or all of the bond Wray be used to bring
the oomphiatue with approved plans, and for any necessary We mILIUMM e M Any Poatiou of the
Connetos pe tmoance Bond remaiaumg at 0te end of constnuaion and btsuartoe of the
cmdG = of tartatpancy will be relimded to builder/non wtur. See Arlirautral (htidedlnos
Atdck 110.
(b) gaid,$and . Prior to commencement of ebnatraetlna, the CCmraetDI shah) submit a
$1.500.00 Prat bond. or such other sum as is established by the ARC from timeto tlmc;- to
emmre that stand curbs in *am of subjea lot are maintained, thrOaShout the t oostrtt
CdOM
proms, in the same good quality condition as they were is when conswxdou began and to
amtue the proper reseeding. and clese-Up of right-of-ways and drainage swalm for any tannage
by coalractor and its .gene. Any pardon of the road hxmd not applied to necessary repairs

COMMON -1 ioy
Melanie Arthur 3P
CARTERET COUNTY
LDL Date 09/16/22008 Time 16:P5;00
@R 1285345 Wage I of 3
40 —7K CfMf OL t lk, CPATERIET CQUN"
T%x k:ata hc. aft .., &V d* %W attW
datacax:tlrml eea Pa,�:otaor+r��tl�
fie"pap@.I i.
mb Of 99 ad!
-EV .,�„e.aa, ar dawa
Pmperaf by. )am WV Tt mp=,Ar4rnsyatlaw, 12o7-C Ama" St, Mwdmad City, NC 28557
NORTH CAROLINA
CARTERET COUNTY
Doc. StaoW NONE
Tax m # 430W0 yb4 93M
fj=j AW DEED
This Quit Claim Deal is made this day of 2008, by and
between R. A. NORTH DEVEMPMEN , INC., a North Carolina corporation, herekWta
referred to as the "Grantor'; and CANNOINSGATE AT BOGUE BOUND HOMEOWNERS
ASSOCIATION, INC., a North Carolina corporation, whose address is
elo Kwe S-rram m r va a A, elv -- �'� ok n 4-c.c.—
Ave iv&4 � �.. �_ lad i 4 VX'T Lgg: horeafierre%tred to
as "Grantee".
Tj„v' TNESSETH:
WHEREAS, Grantor is the developer of Cannonsgate at Bogue Sound, a single hmAy
residential subdivision located in Carteret County, N.C., which development contains certain area
defined as "Common Area and/or Private Open Space" in Article I, Section 1, paragraph (a) of that
instrument entitled "Declaration of Protective Covenants, Restrictions, Basements, Charges, and
Liens fbr Cannonsgate at Bogue Sound", executed on July 12, 2005, and recorded in book 1121,
page 146, Carteret County Registry (hereaft "Declaration'); and,
VAMEAS, such areas (as weilasareas designated as ` OS", meaning "openspaee" appear
upon the recorded plats ofCannonsgate inmap book 30, Pages 780-990 (Phase l) and map book 30,
rL
h{
JUN 15 2015
BY:

pages 832-839 (Phase 11), Carteret County Registry (hereafter "Plats"j; and,
WHEREAS, in oontiection with the development, the (grantor m sed to beoffi"Iychartered
a North Carolina trot -profit corporation by the name of Canuonsgate at Bogue Sound homeowners
Association, Inc., the Grantee herein, the purposes for which are more paxticuiarly set forth in the
Declaration, and include .maintenance and management responsibility of all of the Common Areas
4rWor Private Open 'Spaces (includinS.OS spaces); and,
WHEREAS, the Dec oration contemplates that the Grantor will make a conveyance of the
Common Areas and/or Private Open Spaces (including OS spaces) to Asso«ation in -order for the
Association to meet its responsibilities as set out in the Declaration, and Grantor kLends by this
instnn neat to make such conveyance; sine;,
WHEREAS, there is an area within the Cannonsgate develop tt which is shown as the
"SCaonnonsgate at Bogue Sound Boat Slip Area and Boat Slips", as defined in the'Ved arationofBoat
Slip Area, Protective Covenants, Restrictions, Easements, Charges and Liens for the Caumonsgatcat
Bogue Sound Boat Slip Association, Inc." dated July 24, 2006, and recorded inbook 1181, page407,
Carteret County Registry (hereafter "Boat Slip Declaration"), and this Boat Slip Area and Boat Slips
are pol part of the Common Areas and/or Private Open. Spaces conveyed to Grantee herein, but
rather have been conveyed to the Canrwnsgate at Bogue Sound Boat Slip Association, Inc, as
required by the Boat Slip Declaration.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual beaneftts received and to be received by
the parties in the Declaration, and for other good and valuable consideration, the Grantor has remised
and released and by these presents does remise, release and forever quitclaim unto the Granite at its
hears and assigns all right, title, claim and interest of said Grantor in and to a certain tract or parcel of

land bWand being in White Oak'Township, Carteret Country, NorthCarolina; andmompartimkdy
described as follows:
Beingall areas constituting "Common Area and/or Private Open Space" (Including any areas
identified on any Plat as "Wn as dermed in Article I, Section 1 of the Declaration, e d nai
w er the "Boat Slip Area and Boat Slips" as deCmed in the Bost Slip Declaration.
This conveyance specifically includes the "Boat Ramp" as shown apon the Plats, and also
Includes all aspects and components of the "Pump Oat Station" which is located and installed
immediately adjacent to and south of the Boat Ramp, and rs way appear an any recorded plat
of Cannonsgate at Rogue Sound. The Boat Ramp and the Pump Out Station are alsocommon
nmouldes for all lot owners at Canuouxgate..
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the aforesaid tract or parcel of landand all privileges thercunto
belonging to it the said Grantee and its heirs and assigns free aid discharged from all right, title,
claim, or interest of the said Grantor, or anyone claiming by, through, or under them.
In witness whcrcot the Grantor has executed its official signature effective for the date first
appearing above.
R. A. NORTH DEVELOPMENT, INC.
Authorcrad Corporate Officer
NORTH CAROLINA 'W
UNION COUNTY W�xmaA
`VWQvji2 u f _ , the ---J
Not pub ' and forthe above
maned State County, do hereby ccr that ►� personally
appeared before me this day and acknowledged that he is the sastddooaporate officer of R. A.
North. Development, I=, and being eatherized to do so, executed the foregoiogdeed or behaifoftbo
corporation. 9
Witness my hand and notarial seat this c- tI& day of9!,�'2008.
My commission expires: 6, -2D Qd 13
Notary Public
l�4tacaeviVaw OguedaQMVCanrw woe At bqgw Smdlg mck m.deaLA a=manArmLHOAAw

Johnson, Kelly
From: Keith Maready <[e-mail]>
Sent: Monday, December 19, 2016 1:58 PM
To: Johnson, Kelly
Cc: Caleb Wright; [e-mail]; Prestige Land Surveying
Subject: Re: Final Extension Due 12116/16: SW8 050516, Cannonsgate State Stormwater Permit
Note I've copied John Odom, Prestige Land Surveying. John is authorized agent for Cannonsgate HOA and the
communicator for this matter.
Thanks
Keith
On Monday, December 19, 2016, Johnson, Kelly <kelly.p.johnson cr,ncdenr.gov> wrote:
Please see the attached letter.
Thanks,
Kelly
From: Johnson, Kelly
Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2016 2:12 PM
To: 'Caleb Wright' <[e-mail]>; '[e-mail]' <keithmareadyC�[e-mail]>;
'mwilliams(z.ralnanagementinc.com' <[e-mail]>
Subject: Final Extension Due 12/16/16: SW8 050516, Cannonsgate State Stormwater Permit
All,
The attached permit was issued in March, and that permit allowed some flexibility to allow the HOA and the
permittee/developer to work out an alternate arrangement for the swales. That arrangement was due in
May. The date was extended in May and then again in August until the final deadline of November 14, 2016.
We have reached the point where we need to wrap this up. This will be the final extension. Please submit the
documentation itemized in the cover letter of the March permit (attached) by December 16, 2016. If we do
not receive the paperwork, I will issue a letter requesting that we move directly into implementing the in -field
changes per the current plan, certifying the system, and transferring the system to the HOA.
Thanks,

Kelly
From: Johnson, Kelly
Sent: Friday, August 12, 2016 10:53 AM
To: Caleb Wright <[e-mail] 'neering>
Cc: Keith Maready ([e-mail]) <[e-mail]>; Melissa Williams
(mwilliamsnaxamanagementinc.com)<mwilliams(abxamanagementinc.com>
Subject: Cannonsgate State Stormwater Permit
Caleb,
Thanks for calling today. I understand that you all have had trouble getting the bids together for the work, and
so you need to extend today's deadline by 90 days. The due date has been extended until November 14, 2016.
Thanks,
KJ
1ceLLc, ohvusov�.
Kelly Johnson
Environmental Engineer
NC Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources
Stormwater Permitting
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington, NC 28405-3845
Office: 910.796.7331
Fax: [phone]

Johnson, Kelly
From: Johnson, Kelly
Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2016 2:12 PM
To: 'Caleb Wright; 'keithmaready@gmail. com; '[e-mail]'
Subject: Final Extension Due 12/16/16: SW8 050516, Cannonsgate State Stormwater Permit
Attachments: 2016 03 permit_pr 050516.docx; Cannonsgate_Emails. pdf
All,
The attached permit was issued in March, and that permit allowed some flexibility to allow the HOA and the
permittee/developer to work out an alternate arrangement for the swales. That arrangement was due in May. The date
was extended in May and then again in August until the final deadline of November 14, 2016.
We have reached the point where we need to wrap this up. This will be the final extension. Please submit the
documentation itemized in the cover letter of the March permit (attached) by December 16, 2016. If we do not receive
the paperwork, I will issue a letter requesting that we move directly into implementing the in -field changes per the
current plan, certifying the system, and transferring the system to the HOA.
Thanks,
Kelly
From: Johnson, Kelly
Sent: Friday, August 12, 2016 10:53 AM
To: Caleb Wright <[e-mail]>
Cc: Keith Maready ([e-mail]) <[e-mail]>; Melissa Williams
([e-mail]) <[e-mail]>
Subject: Cannonsgate State Stormwater Permit
Caleb,
Thanks for calling today. I understand that you all have had trouble getting the bids together for the work, and so you
need to extend today's deadline by 90 days. The due date has been extended until November 14, 2016.
Thanks,
KJ
KeLL,. iOkwSOv+.
Kelly Johnson
Environmental Engineer
NC Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources
Stormwater Permitting
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington, NC 28405-3845
Office: 910.796.7331
Fax: [phone]

Johnson, Kelly
From: Johnson, Kelly
Sent: Thursday, March 31, 201610:26 AM
To: 'Caleb Wright; Keith Maready ([e-mail])
Subiect: Cannonsgate
Caleb & Keith,
I had a voicemail from Caleb that you all were trying to figure out how to work the signature authority because you have
a management company that takes care of things for the HOA. It sounds like you are going to update the transfer form
that you submitted in June 2015. That form shows that Riley Horne is the HOA President. If you want the management
company to be able to sign for the HOA, then please submit:
1.) Documentation of the HOA President's name (we usually get meeting minutes of the election)
2.) A letter from the HOA President delegating authority to an individual at the management company.
3.) The transfer form signed by that management company individual.
Hopefully that clears things up? If not, just let me know.
KJ
K.eU,JohvuSDw
Kelly Johnson
Environmental Engineer
NC Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources
Stormwater Permitting
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington, NC 28405-3845
Office: 910.796.7331
Fax: [phone]

Johnson. Ke
From: Johnson, Kelly
Sent: Monday, May 09, 2016 9:40 AM
To: 'Caleb Wright'
Cc: '[e-mail]'; Keith Maready ([e-mail])
Subject: SW8 050516, Cannonsgate
All,
My March 10, 2016 letter set a response deadline of May 10, 2016. 1 understand that you all would like to extend that
date. Please respond by,August 12, 2016.
Thanks,
Kelly
-----Original Message -----
From: Johnson, Kelly
Sent: Monday, May 09, 2016 7:38 AM
To: 'Caleb Wright' <[e-mail] ring>
Cc: [e-mail]
Subject: RE: Cannonsgate
OK. What date did you need?
Thanks
KJ
-----Original Message -----
From: Caleb Wright [ma iIto: [e-mail] ring]
Sent: Monday, May 09, 2016 7:12 AM
To: Johnson, Kelly <[e-mail]>
Cc: [e-mail]
Subject: Cannonsgate
Kelly,
As per our phone conversation Friday, we've experienced a delay in obtaining quotes and would like to request an
extension of the May 10th deadline.
R/S,
Caleb Wright, PE
(C) 252 229 0485
(0) 843 593 0242
(F) 704 972 0300
[e-mail]
www.ISEC.engineering
NC Firm No. P-1346
SC COA#5356
Sent from my iPhone

Johnson, Kell
From: Johnson, Kelly
Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2016 11:36 AM
To: 'Keith Maready'
Cc: Caleb Wright; [e-mail]; Jordan Maroules; Ken Banks; Brian
Campbell; Robert Moore
Subject: RE: Cannonsgate Storm Water Permit
Mr. Maready,
The permit is still issued to RA North. The permit (technically a plan revision) was issued to allow the access road to lots
60 & 61, approve Caleb Wright's proposals for each swale, and update pipe configurations at the Marina and
Clubhouse.
The transfer is still pending. If you will see the section of the cover letter titled, "Future Actions & Request for Additional
Information for Permit Transfer" you will see the plan for future actions. I had understood that all parties wanted to talk
about the order of operations for some of the swale installations. For instance, I understand that you all felt that there
were some swales that will get "crushed" by construction if you put them in now. So, the first item in this section was
intended to allow you all flexibility to figure out how you want to move forward with those items. Those discussions
were supposed to have been finished by 5/10/16, but it appears that you all are no longer interested in that option. If
that is the case, then the in -field changes will take place to get the swales to be the way Caleb Wright decided they
needed to be laid out. Then, Caleb will be able to certify it. Finally, we can do the inspection (although the project will
be certified at that point so hopefully this will be a formality.) Then, we will transfer the permit to the HOA.
I understand that you are frustrated with the developer and that there are some old wounds here. But, please
understand that I am actually trying to help all parties. I simply wanted to give you the opportunity to work out the
swale issues so that you would be happy with the finished product (because I thought that you all had wanted to do
that?). If you don't want to work it out with RA North, then that is your prerogative. In that case, we will bypass
number 1 of the "future actions" section and move directly into the in -field changes part after May 10tn
Hopefully that helps.
X
From: Keith Maready [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 201611:10 AM
To: Johnson, Kelly <[e-mail]>
Cc: Caleb Wright <[e-mail]>; [e-mail]; Jordan Maroules
<jorda n @stream linedevelopers.com>; Ken Banks <[e-mail]>; Brian Campbell <[e-mail]>;
Robert Moore <[e-mail]>
Subject: Re: Cannonsgate Storm Water Permit
Permit issued to who?
I have reviewed what was indicated as a proposed remIediation plan which in someone's opinion would make
the community storm water structures compliant with the issued permit. Upon completion of remediation an
engineer's seal would be required to confirm compliance and then the permit is transferable to Cannonsgate
HOA.
1

I understand the proposed remediation was approved but am very confused on "permit issued". Cannonsgate
HOA has not received said permit and we are not willing to accept responsibility for making any remediations
to get the on site structures to a compliant status.
It is evident the developer has no concern for the wellbeing of Cannonsgate and I personally do not believe the
developer has a concern if the community is compliant with the permit or ever will be compliant by any means
or methods.
We desire to be the permit holder and are willing to cooperate but not at any expense to Cannonsgate. I do not
believe "working together with RA North" has any positive results for the Cannonsgate community.
As indicated above, all Board members are copied as is Mr. Odom. Please advise on exact status of this issue
for our clarification.
Thanks
Keith
On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 10:15 AM, Johnson, Kelly <kelly�.johnson(a,ncdenr.gov> wrote:
Mr. Maready,
The permit was issued on March 10th, attached. I thought that you all were going to be working with RA North to figure
out what to do about the remaining issues?
K1
From: Keith Maready [mailto:[e-mail])
Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2016 9:19 AM
To: Johnson, Kelly <[e-mail]>; Caleb Wright <[e-mail]>
Cc: [e-mail]; Jordan Maroules <jordan@stream linedevelopers.com>; Ken Banks
<[e-mail]>; Brian Campbell <[e-mail]>; Robert Moore <[e-mail]>
Subject: Cannonsgate Storm Water Permit
Kelly / Caleb
Haven't heard anything recently on our storm water permit status.
Our board meet recently and I reviewed the info which I have current access to. As I expressed previously we
have concerns.

Those concerns remain as indicated; 1) the lack of attention to several nuisance areas which was negligent on
original plan / permit issue 2) very concerned over the aesthetic change being presented for the area between
Cannonsgate Drive and the north marina wall, also question if the proposed plan will function properly 3) the
section of Boundary Street in wetlands has been previously resolved and we do not want another 3000 square
feet of impervious area taken for our allocated extra 4) there are numerous underground structures; irrigation,
low voltage lighting and others. Yardworks Landscaping Inc has been in the community since the installation
during development period and have remained the responsible maintenance company. They should be the only
company considered to perform any proposed earthwork activity.
Due to time involvement the Board has hired John Odom, Prestige Surveying as our authorized agent to
communicate on our behalf for resolution of this permit transfer. Please communicate direct with John. His
contacts are:
prestigesurveying(kembaramail.com; 252-393-2129.
Thanks
Keith

Johnson, Kell
From: Johnson, Kelly
Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2016 10:14 AM
To: 'Keith Maready'; Caleb Wright
Cc: [e-mail]; Jordan Maroules; Ken Banks; Brian Campbell; Robert
Moore
Subject: RE: Cannonsgate Storm Water Permit
Attachments: 2016 03 permit_pr 050516.docx; 2016 03 permit_pr 050516 Appendix D.pdf
Mr. Maready,
The permit was issued on March 101h, attached. I thought that you all were going to be working with RA North to figure
out what to do about the remaining issues?
KJ
From: Keith Maready [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2016 9:19 AM
To: Johnson, Kelly <kelly.p.johnson' @ncdenr.gov>; Caleb Wright <[e-mail]>
Cc: [e-mail]; Jordan Maroules <jordan@stream linedevelopers.com>; Ken Banks
<[e-mail]>; Brian Campbell <[e-mail]>; Robert Moore <[e-mail]>
Subject: Cannonsgate Storm Water Permit
Kelly / Caleb
Haven't heard anything recently on our storm water permit status.
Our board meet recently and I reviewed the info which I have current access to. As I expressed previously we
have concerns.
Those concerns remain as indicated; 1) the lack of attention to several nuisance areas which was negligent on
original plan / permit issue 2) very concerned over the aesthetic change being presented for the area between
Cannonsgate Drive and the north marina wall, also question if the proposed plan will function properly 3) the
section of Boundary Street in wetlands has been previously resolved and we do not want another 3000 square
feet of impervious area taken for our allocated extra 4) there are numerous underground structures; irrigation,
low voltage lighting and others. Yardworks Landscaping Inc has been in the community since the installation
during development period and have remained the responsible maintenance company. They should be the only
company considered to perform any proposed earthwork activity.
Due to time involvement the Board has hired John Odom, Prestige Surveying as our authorized agent to
communicate on our behalf for resolution of this permit transfer. Please communicate direct with John. His
contacts are:
presti esurve ijng-a,embargmail.com; 252-393-2129.
Thanks
Keith

Johnson, Kelly
From: Johnson, Kelly
Sent: Friday, April 01, 2016 9:28 AM
To: 'Keith Maready
Cc: Caleb Wright
Subject: RE: Cannonsgate
Attachments: Cannonsgate HOA.pdf
Oh, I see. I misunderstood. It sounds like the individual listed with the Secretary of State is the CAMS person.
Since HOAs are non-profit, they are not required to file annual reports with the SoS. We generally make sure that the
HOA is an incorporated entity, and then we rely on meeting minutes to tell us who the current President or Vice
President of the HOA is. If you are the President, and you have meeting minutes to demonstrate that, then you have
signature authority. It isn't unusual for the contact listed on the Sc.S for an HOA to be out of date since HOAs don't file
regularly and it is usually a year -long term. It is up to you as to whether or not you want to change the contact through
the SoS's Office.
(Just FYI, the reason we require documentation for management companies to sign for HOA Presidents is because the
management company doesn't have signature authority unless you delegate it to them.)
Hopefully that makes sense?
KJ
From: Keith Maready [mailto:[e-mail]
Sent: Friday, April 01, 2016 6:42 AM
To: Johnson, Kelly <[e-mail]>
Cc: Caleb Wright <[e-mail]>
Subject: Re: Cannonsgate
I believe Caleb was referring to the name shown with the Secretary of State registry. That person is the owner of CAMS.
They are our property manager, handling administrative business only. We self manage Cannonsgate via the elected
Board of Directors.
Riley Horne is no longer a Board member and has never served as President. I currently serve as President and will be
providing signature for this process. CAMS can provide meeting minutes confirming Board members and positions
served.
Thanks
Keith
Sent from my iPad
Keith Maready
On Mar 31, 2016, at 10:26 AM, "Johnson, Kelly" <[e-mail]> wrote:
Caleb & Keith,
had a voicemail from Caleb that you all were trying to figure out how to work the signature authority
because you have a management company that takes care of things for the HOA. It sounds like you are
going to update the transfer form that you submitted in June 2015. That form shows that Riley Horne is

the HOA President. If you want the management company to be able to sign for the HOA, then please
submit:
1.) Documentation of the HOA President's name (we usually get meeting minutes of the election)
2.) A letter from the HOA President delegating authority to an individual at the management
company.
3.) The transfer form signed by that management company individual.
Hopefully that clears things up? If not, just let me know.
KJ
1-,'eLLUJ0hVUS0w
Kelly Johnson
Environmental Engineer
NC Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources
Stormwater Permitting
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington, NC 28405-3845
Office: 910.796.7331
Fax: [phone]

Johnson, Kelly
From: Johnson, Kelly
Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2016 9:07 AM
To: Joanne Steenhuis
Subject: Cannonsgate - Wetlands Issue
Attachments: Cannonsgate.pdf
Will you stop by when you get a sec? I wanted to see if you were already aware of fill in wetlands there. In the
attached, the view on the right was approved in 2007. There is no alley access to the back of lots 60 and 61. The view
on the left was generated recently in preparation for certification. They have added that alley/road through an area in
lots 60 and 61 that is shown as wetlands on the plan. He said this was done as far back as 10 years ago. I don't know if
they already got caught for that, or if this is just something that happened and they didn't get caught for it. Either way,
if that road has been there for that long then it probably isn't wetlands anymore.... Anyway... let's chat.
Thanks,
KJ
K.e[LWOhVUSow
Kelly Johnson
Environmental Engineer
NC Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources
Stormwater Permitting
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington, NC 28405-3845
Office: 910.796.7331
Fax: [phone]

fit
a y s, �► is w t+ �. a 1 ,
' r�✓aa��i � � ��� r ��" i °ter � '�y'%r� �
•a
�' '�S+ � �� , �``. ° . � ait .fir �+ ^++ �? � S� �•�. ,. � � ,• f.•
�'.
+� r �•iw �j�t �itU•:'` r,�/�y7Y� /'y'`s.' r' r °�i •,•
ir1• r.
�t •kr' ';t•f �,�,t•dt•'t7.4S'i. 'f.F 4 •••�f3�.i� 1ct i~�+ .•
rtt i. • ri+., •.+�+' Shy-^S'
�• �tti„ yea e:��'• h �A`i 'ej'.ti�a �7��,• •��•.•+ e•• ......•�,
> i •�y t r r ••'5+�: •• •�.��,ti f fKy s k�4 •e <Y., •yS'1'�• '�t� e�' yJt,w 7, . ,',:
3r� J ' • i 4 •f • Si`T• '+ry i yam• ` �• e . tt "•i{ . n, • "i. i. " ...•.. •.;....
''� at�.s �� a �r• ' �£ G. � ♦� j. , � � ' •. •ice r i�"S► i•' •A 7j. ��{ s •'• �� :•'.'.'.'. ;•' �.'•',', ,•
" Jf'if� i •e.]•• tt, :•� r � r +�•� ��•"�+� 'da,4• .�ti �'.'.•:•'�"�'�.'. •:1.-'.
'�.+� 4 �.'�1rt� ''}• 'rX�, t+ ari• ^• ` 1 a i����.1� rwffa +�.(� ? '• �• '....,
t �'•/f' yt� 1 • ®S.►•'"' 'a•.sf%t ® ♦ t �!•���. �'• pt • R, •, r! - °�,+1' ,,.t;f;•;". ::,,;•,'' �:•,; •; ••:•
• ••75gP r !' •tt•`.(Q't� . �17• a y. � rf ..��
., � G ' � � !� �^E qq r� �. yeti ' �St .." i'tkLa'. rt,,/��•,,.;. .:���.:
Sf ��,, r . •� 54:
. . . . . . . .....
AC, 9
V r�
e1
s

SW8 050516 — Cannonsgate
Record of Significant Events — 8/4/15
1.) 6/2105: Original Permit Issued
a. Issued to R.A. North Development, Inc.
b. 25% Low density with curb outlet (ORW), 1995 Rule. There are also several amenity ponds not covered by the
permit.
2.) 1/23/06: Plan Revision to reallocate "future" impervious to specific uses.
3.) 8/22/07: Plan Revision to reallocate "future" impervious to specific uses. (A lettermailing the plans for the 8122107 Plan
Revision was sent on 6116110).
4.) 5/16/11: Compliant Inspection (D. Cox)
5.) 7/26/11: Received a Name/Ownership Change Request from the developer, but it was not signed by the HOA (and it was
before the HOA transfer law).
6.) 9/22/11: Permit Modification (Most Recent Permit)
a. Reallocated "future" impervious area to specific uses (Lot 437).
b. Current 0&M Agreement/Low Density Supplement is with this permit.
c. Deed Rest(ctions: Recorded BK1121/146, received on 7/26/11. (Note, some of the lots' impervious area is
recorded at values below the value allowed by the permit.)
7.) 2/14/12: Project Return
8.) 7/16/12: Individual Permit Issued to Lot 437 (Inside SW8 050516)
9.) 9/12/14: File Review by HOA & their Surveyor, Prestige Land Surveying. K. Johnson met with them during their review. They
were trying to determine how to fix two safety issues and still be compliant with the permit. K. Johnson said that the Division
may have to look at fixing those issues as "alternative measures" per .1008. They would also like to eventually transfer the
permit to the HOA. Two issues:
a. Water pooling in a road that reportedly isn't draining properly. They want to put in a pipe/LSNFS to get the water off
of the road. Complications include that this is ORW 575, and that they will need to shorten a CO swale from the
required 100ft to get their proposal to work. The plans do not show detailed topography with spot elevations in this
area. Swales #8 & #29 look like they should receive the road's water, but they are reportedly not graded property.
b. An amenity pond does not have anywhere to overflow. (This isn't an issue under the State Stormwater permit, but
we will help them address it if there is a way to modify our permit that will allow them to fix this related issue.) They
want to put in a swale (or pipe/LSNFS?) along one side of Lot 519. They think they can get an easement from that
owner. This is also ORW 575
10.) 9/30/14: Non -Compliant Inspection Letter (B. Lambe)
a. Stormwater measures are not installed per the approved plan.
i. Some swales (such as Swale #29) is not constructed per the plan, and so the drainage to it is ponding in the
road.
ii. Many curb outlet swales are not constructed per the plan (100ft long, 5:1 etc). The inlet of the curb
commonly has a small rock pad and then steps up to a sod lip preventing drainage.
b. Submit Designer's Certification.
11.)11/7/14: Non -Compliant File Review Inspection (K. Johnson). Also see email on same date.
a. Parties Involved:
i. Current Permittee Representative: Melissa Williams, RA Management, Inc.
ii. Glenn Dunn, Poyner & Spruill
iii. Keith, Prestige Land Surveying
iv. Riley Horn, R. H. Construction, Inc. & HOA
b. Designer Certification Needed: Required per Permit Section II(8). If the site can be certified, then the site will be
considered in compliance.
i. Pooling Water in Street: Not a permit violation. Only issue is if stormwater measures aren't built correctly.
ii. Amenity Pond without Overflow: Beyond the scope of the permit. If the permit is hindering a solution, then
we can discuss that further.
c. Transfer: Permit either has to be in compliance, or we have to come to an agreement with all parties to bring the site
into compliance. Administrative items needed for transfer:
i. Common area deeds (showing that HOA owns those areas)

ii. Documentation that 50% has been sold
iii. Name/Ownership Form
d. Follow Up from the 11/7/14 Email:
i. 10/28/14: Letter from permittee (R.A. North Development): They believe that the HOA is responsible for the
stormwater permit because they assumed control in 2005. (But they are evidently unaware that the permit
must be transferred separately.)
ii. 10/30/15: Email between developer and B. Lambe clarifying that the permit is still in the developer's name
and that he is still rosponsible for It.
iii. 12/22/15: Email between HOA and K. Johnson requesting status. Developer did not respond to the 11/7/14
inspection.
iv. 2/11/15: Email between HOA and K. Johnson requesting status. Developer did not respond to the 11/7/14
inspection.
12.) 2/11/15: NOD
a. Section II(3): Stormwater features must be substantially constructed.
b. Section II(8): Certification is needed. "The permittee must certify in writing that the project's stormwater controls,
and impervious surfaces have been constructed within substantial intent of the approved plans and specifications..."
c. Section III(5): Transfer needed.
i. Common Area Deeds needed
ii. Documentation of 50% sold needed
iii. Transfer form needed
13.) 3/6/15: Response to NOD received
a. Certification & Substantial Construction:
i. Submitted by John Riggle, Project Manager with Trader Construction. He is the contractor responsible for
the work. His qualifications are unclear (not PE or PLS on letter).
ii. Some swales not built, determined not to be needed.
iii. Says that any deficiencies noted during the project were corrected.
iv. Lawyer's Points: Lawyer discusses his meeting with the State a few years ago (2011?). They discussed
the issues with the swales at that time. Lawyer says law requires "substantial compliance" and not
"compliance".
14.) 6/1/15: Continuing NOD
a. Same deficiencies as 2/11/15
b. Determination: The permit says that the "permittee" has to certify the system. In this case there is disagreement
between the permittee/developer and the proposed permittee/HOA as to whether or not the project is constructed
within "substantial compliance" of the permit requirements. A certification from an appropriate design professional
such as a PE or a PLS is therefore warranted.
i. Certification Can Be Obtained: If the project can be certified, then the permit will be considered in
compliance, and it can be transferred.
ii. Certification Can Not Be Obtained: If an appropriate design professional cannot certify that the system has
been installed within substantial compliance with the permit, then the permit is not in compliance and cannot
be transferred. If this is the case, then the permittee will have to modify or revise the permit to match the
field conditions.
1. If there are issues such as if a curb outlet swale is missing or is built shorter than it was permitted
to be built, then the permittee will have to provide justification for each change.
2. The permittee could choose to propose other changes to the permit as well, but it is not required.
For instance the HOA has brought up two safety issues. There is water ponding in the street, and
there is an amenity pond that reportedly does not have an overflow point. Another issue that could
be addressed is that some of the deed restrictions for impervious area per lot are recorded at
values below what the State Stormwater permit allows. The permittee could modify the deed
restrictions to increase the impervious area per lot for the lots affected.
c. Transfer: Common area deeds, documentation of 50% sold, and transfer form are still needed.
15.) 6/19/15: Tracy Davis (DEMLR Director) & RA North (permittee/developer) Phone Call:
a. Summary: Upheld 6/1/15 determination. Also noted that items not required to be addressed by the permit will have
to be addressed by the HOA.
2

b. Email Text: I just got off the phone with Glenn Dunn, attorney for RA North. We discussed the current situation and
we agreed that there are two options: 1) RA North obtain the services of a PE/PLS to review the SW plan and permit
vs. the site conditions and certify that the site is in substantial compliance with the permit or 2) if such PE/PLS is not
comfortable certifying substantial compliance, then a meeting will be scheduled at the site with DEMLR, RA North
rep, PE/PLS, and HOA rep to discuss work to be done onsite to make it certifiable — and once the work is completed
and the certification issued, the permit will be deemed in compliance and transferred to the HOA. The other areas
outside of the permit will have to be addressed by the HOA.
16.) 712/15: Glenn Dunn (RA North's attorney) requested an onsite meeting which has been scheduled for 7/29/15 at 12:30pm at
the clubhouse.
17.) 7/10/15: Govemor's Office, RA North, Braxton Davis (DCM) & DEMLR/WiRO (G. Scott & K. Johnson) Phone Call: Reiterated
the 6/19/15 discussion and the 6/1/15 letter. There were follow up calls/emails which resulted in clarification of previously -
mailed documents and verification of the 7/29115 meeting. Email text to RA North from K Johnson:
Mr. Allen,
As we discussed on the phone this afternoon, here is a list of the items we will need to transfer the permit. This list is
also in the 6/1/15 letter. We received a package on 6/15115, and so I have updated the 6/1/15 list as appropriate:
1.) Certification [permit Section II(8)]: Please submit a certification from an appropriate professional such as a PE or
a PLS certifying that the project has been constructed in substantial compliance with'the permit requirements.
2.) Plan Revision: If the PE/PLS determines that changes have been made in the field that differ from the permitted
plans, or if additional changes are necessary to bring the project into compliance please have him/her document
those changes in the form of a Plan Revision. This is a simple, free process. All you will need to do is to submit the
1-page Plan Revision Application form which is available online, http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/Ir/state-stormwater-
forms_docs and two sets of plans documenting the changes. We will approve and keep a set, and one will be sent to
you (or to the HOA when it transfers).
3.) Administrative Items:
a. Common Area Deed: Submitted 6/15/15
b. Documentation of at least 50% of the lots sold: SL 2011-256 requires that 50% of the lots be sold to
owners other than the declarant of the planned community. We received a list on 6/15/15 showing the deed
closing dates of the lots in the subdivision, but the list does not include the lot owner's name and so I do not
know who they were deeded to. Please provide clarification that 50% of the lots are not currently owned by
your company.
c. Name/Ownership Change Form: Submitted 6/15/15
If you have further questions please let me know.
Thanks,
Kelly
18.) 7/27/15: Change in HOA Contact. Riley Horne is stepping down at the end of July, and
a. Brian Campbell (910.862.0782, [e-mail]) is taking over.
b. Keith Maready (252.916.6986, keithmareadyOamail.com), is the onsite contact
19.) 7/28/15: K Johnson spoke with Melissa Williams, a representative of RA North, and she indicated that the permittee plans to
submit the certification and plan revision requested in the June 1, 2015 letter. Since the intention of the meeting was to
determine the actions that needed to be completed to make the site able to be certified, the 7/29/15 meeting has been
cancelled.
20.) 8/19-20/2015: Emails regarding the response due date. It has been set for 9/2/15.

Johnson, Kelly
From: Johnson, Kelly,
Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2016 12:47 PM
To: 'Caleb Wright'
Subject: RE: Cannonsgate
OK. I'll go ahead and get it ready for signature.
X
From: Caleb Wright[mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Thursday, March 10, 20161:17 AM
To: Johnson, Kelly <[e-mail]>
Subject: Re: Cannonsgate
Kelly,
You are correct. I don't have an explanation why the additional 180 sgft showed up in the future allocation. The 13,630
sqft is correct. Please make the change. I apologize for the confusion.
I will be returning from Vancouver tomorrow late and can discuss any questions you might have on Friday.
Thanks for the e-mail.
M.
Caleb Wright, PE
(C) 252.229.0485
(F) 704.972.0300
[e-mail]
www. ISEC.enaineerina
NC Firm No. P-1346
EMAIL DISCLAIMER
This message is intended for the recipients named in the e-mail. It may contain confidential or privileged
information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by replying to this
message and then delete it from your system. You should not read, copy, use, store or circulate this e-
mail whatsoever.
Disclaimer:
Internet communications are not secure. While every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that this
communication has not been tampered with, ISEC cannot be held accountable for any alterations made to the
contents of this message. If you wish to receive a hard copy of this message for comparison or should you
require any form of confirmation of the contents of this message, please contact the sender. E-mail messages
are riot sealed reports and are thus draft recommendations for comment or responses to questions regarding a
sealed report. Do not rely on e-mail message for construction, see the corresponding engineering report.
On Mar 8, 2016, at 11:34 AM, Johnson, Kelly <[e-mail]> wrote:
Caleb,

I know you are out. But, when you get back will you look at this? I think there is a typo. Your letter ?s
attached.:
9/22/11 Plan
Revision
3/8/16 Submittal
DATE TBD Plar
Inside
ORW/575ft
Line
Total
Development
Area
Inside
ORW/575ft
Line
Total
Development
Area
Inside
ORW/575ft
Line
D4
Drainage Area:
2,370,036
10,989,360
2,370,036
10,989,360
2,370,036
54.41
252.28
54.41
252.28
54.41
25% Maximum Impervious
Permitted:
592,509
2,747,340
592,509
2,747,340
592,509
Total Impervious Allocated:
592,509
2,747,340
592,509
2,747,520
592,509
On -Site Buildings/Lots
429,825
1,636,225
429,825
1,636,225
429,825
On -Site Streets
149,185
795,035
149,185
798,433
149,185
On -Site Sidewalks
4,327
77,244
4,327
77,244
4,327
On -Site Other
0
221,808
0
221,808
0
Future
9,172
17,028
9,172
13,810
9,172
If you agree with these changes I'll go ahead and get this out.
Thanks,
KJ
From: Caleb Wright[mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2016 12:52 PM
To: Johnson, Kelly <kelly.p.iohnson ncdenr.gov>
Subject: Re: Cannonsgate
Thanks Kelly,
The wetland issue is good news indeed. I'll start pulling the other documents together for a package to
send out tomorrow. One question I have is if a print of the e-mail of the scanned platt from the county I
previously sent you will suffice for the easements. The drawing I sent shows easements for all the lots
with swales. I'll forward that to you again shortly.
I'll be leaving the country Sunday so I'd like to send this package off tomorrow if possible. I think I can
get the rest together bye then but I'd appreciate it if you'd take a look at that pdf and let me know if
that'll be adequate.
R/S
Caleb Wright, PE
(C) 252.229.0485
(F) 704.972.0300
cwri ht ISEC.enaineering
wwwASEC.enaineerina
NC Firm No. P-1346

EMAIL DISCLAIMER
This message is intended for the recipients named in the e-mail. It may contain confidential
or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender
immediately by replying to this message and then delete it from your system. You should not
read, copy, use, store or circulate this e-mail whatsoever.
Disclaimer:
Internet communications are not secure. While every reasonable effort has been made to
ensure that this communication has not been tampered with, ISEC cannot be held accountable
for any alterations made to the contents of this message. If you wish to receive a hard copy of
this message for comparison or should you require any form of confirmation of the contents
of this message, please contact the sender. E-mail messages are not sealed reports and are
thus draft recommendations for comment or responses to questions regarding a sealed
report. Do not rely on e-mail message for construction, see the corresponding engineering
report.
On Mar 3, 2016, at 10:41 AM, Johnson, Kelly <[e-mail]> wrote:
Caleb,
Please see attached. Since I don't have your mailing address, this is your "official" letter.
Good news on the wetlands issue on lots 60 & 61. They got a permit to fill them. A
copy of that is included. But, we do need to account for that impervious area. I assume
that that access drive is outside the lot line (it is hard to tell on the plans). If it isn't on
the lot then that area has to come out of the "future" area that is available for the
project. (The data is summarized in a table.) If the road is inside the lot then it counts
against the lot's allocation because it would essentially be a driveway. This should be
pretty simple.
KJ
From: Johnson, Kelly
Sent: Monday, February 29, 201610:30 AM
To:'Caleb Wright' <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: Cannonsgate
1 haven't even opened the package yet because I suspect it will take a while. If you think
that meeting will expedite getting through it, then that will be fine. I will see you then,.
Thanks,
KJ
From: Caleb Wright mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 10:21 AM
To: Johnson, Kelly <kelly.p.iohnson ncdpnr.gov>
Subject: Re: Cannonsgate
Kelly,
I'll be passing through Wilmington this afternoon around 1:45 - 2 o'clock and wondered
if it would be helpful if I stopped in for a few minutes to go over the package with

you. Please let me know.
R/S,
Caleb Wright, PE
(C) 252 229 0485
(F) 704 972 0300
[e-mail]
wwvv.ISEC.eneineering
NC Firm No. P-1346
Sent from my iPhone
On Feb 22, 2016, at 2:35 PM, Johnson, Kelly <[e-mail]> wrote:
Caleb,
I received the package that you submitted on 1/14/16. 1 have not yet
gone through it. It is getting near the top of the list in line. I just need
to be able to set aside a pretty big chunk of time to go through it.
Thanks,
KJ
K.6L�iohwsow
Kelly Johnson
Environmental Engineer
NC Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources
Stormwater Permitting
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington, NC 28405-3845
Office: 910.796.7331
Fax: [phone]
<Letter Cannonsgate.pdf>
<Caleb's Letter.pdf>

3/4/16
To: NC Division of Environmental Quality
Stormwater Permitting
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington, NC 28405-3845
Att'n: Kelly Johnson, Environmental Engineer
From: Caleb Wright, Principal Engineer
Industry Standard Engineers & Consultants - PLLC
400 Harbor Drive
New Bern, NC 28560
RE: March 3, 2016 Request for Additional Information
Stormwater Project SW8 050516
Cannonsgate at Bogue Sound
Carteret County, North Carolina
Dear Ms. Johnson:
ECEIVE
MAR 0 8 2016
BY: —
In response to your letter dated March, 3, 2016 please find the information below referencing the
item numbers from your request for additional information.
1. Impervious: As per the General 401 Water Quality Certification #3402 attached to your
request, the impervious area permitted for the filling of the wetlands behind lots 60 and
61 to extend the access driveway in the amount of 0.078 acres (3,398 square feet) was
added to On -Site Streets — Total Development Area (not Inside ORW/575 ft Line) and
deducted from Future impervious area. The table provided in your request has been filled
in and included below. As indicated on the plat for the subdivision, the extension of
Boundary Street was made across lots 60 and 61 and not a com n.on. area. An excerpt of
the recorded plat is included below for reference as well.
INDUSTRY STANDARD ENGINEERS & CONSULTANTS- PLLC • FIRM P-1346 • 400 HARBOR DR, NEW BERN, NC 28560
PAGE 1

Plat Excerpt:
Impervious Area Table:
9/22/11 Plan
Revision
DATE TBD
Plan Revision
Inside
ORW/575ft
Line
Total
Development
Area
Inside
ORW/575ft
Line
Total
Development
Area
Drainage Area:
2,370,036
10,989,360
2,370,036
10,989,360
ft
a.
54.41
252.28
54.41
252.28
25% Maximum impervious
Permitted:
592,509
2,747,340
592,509
2
ft
Total Impervious Allocated:
592,509
2,747,340
592,509
2,747,340
ft
On -Site Buildings/Lots
429,825
1,636,225
429.8251
1 636,225
ft
On -Site Streets
149,185
795,035
149.184
798 433
ft
On -Site Sidewalks
4,327
77,244
4 327
77,244
ft
On -Site Other
0
221,808
0
221,808
ft
Future
9,172 1
17,028
9,1721
V 13.810
2. Plan Sheets: It is our intent to keep Sheets 001 to 004, & 006 as previously permitted.
Sheet 005 is inclusive of all the data currently relevant to the project.
3. Easements: Copies of the final plats recorded for phases one and two have been enclosed
to demonstrate that the easements have been recorded. They denote the drainage
easements with labels of "10' DE." The attached plats were recorded in Book 30 Pages
780 and 832 respectively of the Register of Deeds, Carteret County, North Carolina in
2005. The excerpt below shows an example:
INDUSTRY STANDARD ENGINEERS & CONSULTANTS —PLLC a FIRM P-1346 a 400 HARBOR, DR,, NEW BERN, NC 28560
PAGE 2

Drainage easement for Swale # 31
• . ,
, ate' ,... I � �
44F7
t!1 ui DE 7S�
• �►
® �1
� �i
7jo IF
�.4
4. Plan Reprints: As per our discussion on February 291h, I have enclosed two re -printed
copies of sheet 005 for your files.
Please let us know if there are any questions regarding the enclosures or the responses above.
Sincerely,
Industry Standard Engineers & Consultants - PLLC
Caleb Wright, PE
Principal Engineer
CC: Mr. Randy Allen
File: 014 RA North
. 4 Ell
35090 r;
�+•.'1'OINEC�.'
�irrrrr��ti�
Encl: (1 ea) Copy of Final Plat Phase One, Recorded with the County 7/12/2005
(lea) Copy of Final Plat Phase Two, Recorded with the County 10/4/2005
(tea) Reprinted Sheet 005, Grass Swale Layout with Drainage Areas
INDUSTRY STANDARD ENGINEERS & CONSULTANTS— PLLC • FIRM! P-1346 a 400 HARBOR DR, NEW BERN, NC 23560
PAGE 3

Energy, Mineral
and Land Resources
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
March 3, 2016
Mr. Randy Allen, President
R.A. North Development, Inc.
3129 Springbank Lane
Charlotte, NC 28226
Subject: Request for Additional Information
Stormwater Project No. SW8 050516
Cannonsgate
Carteret County
Dear Mr. Allen:
PAT MCCRORY
Govenmr
DONALD R. VAN DER VAART
Secrelwy
TRACY DAVIS
nireclor
The Wilmington Regional Office received a Stormwater Management Permit Plan Revision Application
for Cannonsgate on January 14, 2016. A preliminary review of that information has determined that the
application is not complete. The following information is needed to continue the stormwater review:
1.) Impervious: On January 13, 2006 the State issued approval to fill wetlands behind Lots 60 and
61 to extend the access driveway. (See General 401 Water Quality Certification #3402,
attached.) But, it does not appear that the Stormwater Permit was updated to reflect that change.
Pleasc provide the data shown in yellow below. i will update the impervious data with this Plan
Revision.
9/22/11 Plan
Revision
DATE TSD
Plan Revision
Inside
ORW/575ft
Line
Total
Development
Area
Inside
ORW/575ft
Line
Total
Development
Area
Drainage Area:
2,370,036
10,989,360
2,370,036
10,989,360
54.41
252.28
54.41
252.28
25% Maximum Impervious
Permitted:
592,509
2,747,340
592,509
2,747,340
Total Impervious Allocated:
592,509
2,747,340
592,509
2,747,340
On -Site Buildings/Lots
429,825
1,636,225
On -Site Streets
149,185
795,035
On -Site Sidewalks
4,327
77,244
On -Site Other
0
221,808
Future
9,172
17,028
ft2
ac
ft2
ft2
ft2
ft2
ft2
ft2
ft2
2.) Plan Sheets: Sheet 005 was submitted on January 14, 2016. Is it your intention to keep any other
previously -permitted plan sheets in the permitted set, or is Sheer 005 inclusive of all of the data
currently relevant to the project?
3.) Easements: Please provide easements on the plan for the curb outlet swales and for the
"vegetated areas" that are being used in lieu of curb outlets per 15A NCAC 2H .I005(g) & (h).
State Of North Carolina ; Environmental Quality : Energy. Mineral and Land Resources
127 Cardinal Drive F.xfeneinn i Wilmington, NC 29405
910 796 7215 7' i 910 350 2004 F ; htlo://oorlal.ncdenr.oruM-eb/lr/

State Stormwater Permit No. SW8 050516
Page 2 of 2
4.) Plan Reprints: I meet with your engineer on February 29, 2016 to discuss the submittal. At that
meeting we realized that the copies submitted were not completely legible because the text had
smeared at the print shop. Please submit two copies of reprinted sheets.
Please keep in mind that changing one number may change other numbers and require the calculations,
supplements, and other supporting documentation to be updated. Verify all numbers are correct to ensure
consistency in the application documents, Please note that this request for additional information is in
response to a preliminary review. The requested information should be received in this Office prior to
April 4.2016, or the application will be returned as incomplete. The return of a project will necessitate
resubmittal of all required items, including the application fee.
If you need additional time to submit the information, please email or fax your request for a time
extension to the Division at the address and fax number at the bottom of this letter. Please note that a
second significant request for additional information may result in the return of the project. If the project
is returned, you will need to reschedule the project through the Express coordinator for the next available
review date, and resubmit all of the required items, including the application fee.
The construction of any impervious surfaces, other than a construction entrance under an approved
Sedimentation Erosion Control Plan, is a violation of NCGS 143-215.1 and is subject to enforcement
action pursuant to NCGS 143-215.6A.
If you have any questions concerning this matter please feel free to call me at [phone] or email me
at [e-mail]
Engineer
GDS/kpj: G:1WQ\Shared\StormWater\Permits & Projects12005 \050516 LD12016 03 addinfo 050516
ene : General 401 Water Quality Certification #3402
cc: Caleb Wright, PE
Wilmington Regional Office
State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality I Energy, Mineral and Land Resources
127 Cardinal Drive Extension I Wilmington. NC 29405
910 796 7215 T ! 910 350 2004 F L hito://Ponal.ncdm.ore/web4r/

0� w A icheel F. Easley, Governor
to p William G. Ross Jr. Secretary
10 North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural lGources
r? r
Alan W. Klimek P.E., Director
.r Division of Water Quality
Coleen H. Sullins, Depputy Director
Division of WaterQuality
January 13, 2006
Mr. Sherrell Futral
Bluewater Associates of Emerald Isle Inc.
PO Box 4340
Emerald Isle, NC 28594
Subject: General 401 Water Quality Certification #3402
Cannonsgate Subdivision
Carteret County
Dear Mr. Futral:
The Wilmington Regional Office received your Pre Construction Notification application for a
US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Nationwide 18 Permit on November 28, 2005, and received
additional information on November 28, 2005 and January 13, 2006. The wetland impacts proposed in
Cannonsgate Subdivision in Carteret County are for the purpose of constructing an access drive for Lots
60 and 61. You are authorized to impacf 0.078 acres of Section 404 Wetlands under General Water
Quality Certification (WQC) # 3402 (attached). This Certification allows you to use your 404 Permit
when the Corps of Engineers issues it. Written concurrence from the Division of Water Quality (DWQ)
is not required provided that you can meet all of the conditions of the General Water Quality
Certification.
If at anytime during construction of your project you determine that you cannot meet these
conditions or if then are any additional impacts to wetlands or water quality not described in your
application, you must contact this office immediately.
3900.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to call me at (910)-395-
Sincerely,
, &
Noelle Lutheran
Environmental Specialist III
Attachments: WQC #3402
cc: Cyndi ICaroly, 401 Oversight Unit
Mickey Sugg, USACE Wilmington
Trentt James, DLR Wilmington
Doug Huggeit, DCM Morehead City
Kim Williams, Land Management Group
WiRo
N. C. Division of Water Quality 127 Cardinal Drive Extension [phone] Customer Service
Wilmington Regional Office Wilmington. NC 2U05 (010) 350-20% Fax 1 a00 W-774
e
An Equal Opportunity/Af@rmalive Adion Employer— 50% Recyded110% Post Consumer raper 1� Caroh 1a
�%.1�17//'s

Johnson, Kel
From:
Johnson, Kelly
Sent:
Tuesday, March 01, 2016 9:37 AM
To:
'Keith Maready'
Cc:
Jordan Maroules; Ken Banks; Brian Campbell; Robert Moore
Subject:
RE: Cannonsgate
I met with Caleb yesterday, and I have it on my desk right now. I'll be back in touch.
Ai
From: Keith Maready [mailto:[e-mail]
Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2016 9:25 AM
To: Johnson, Kelly <[e-mail]>
Cc: Jordan Maroules<[e-mail]>; Ken Banks <[e-mail]>; Brian Campbell
<[e-mail]>; Robert Moore <[e-mail]>
Subject: Cannonsgate
Morning Kelly
I haven't heard from you recently. I've met with Mr. Wright, the engineer for RA North on several occasions
and have had detailed discussion.
I undcrstand Mr. Wright has presented to your office the proposed corrective action plan for making the storm
water permit compliant which would allow the conveyance of the permit from RA North to Cannonsgate HOA.
I have reviewed the plan on site with Mr. Wright and there are some points of concern on behalf of our HOA.
As I see it there are also some areas which I would think your agency has concern.
Our first and most important concern is for the permit / plan to be made rightfully compliant with your agency's
requirements at no cost to the Cannonsgate HOA. I understand the cost topic would be a discussion between
Cannonsgate and RA North. While we intend to be cooperative, we do not intend to accept transfer of permit or
absorb cost for obtaining compliant status on permit currently issued to RA North.
Other Board members have not viewed the proposed corrective action plan but will be doing so as soon as I
receive that plan and scope of work from Mr. Wright. I have indicated to the Board the two areas of most
concern to me is; the end of Boundary street which was constructed in wetlands and the proposed
change between the north face of our marina and Cannonsgate Drive.
There are other areas of concern in our community which the storm water needs were simply not meet by
design on the permitted plan. While we believe there are several which have liability in the inadequacy of
meeting that need, we know those areas of inadequacy have become our responsibility. Those areas of excessive
standing water on our streets. for way more than normal or expected length of time have increased the
degradation of our streets. The standing water also has negative impact on the aesthetic appeal of our
community. We hope to gain cooperation from your agency on means and methods for corrections in those
areas.
Note I have copied all Board members. This is an issue we are passionate about in that we want handed to us
what was projected to be delivered and from that we will maintain all areas to the highest expectations. I, and I
think 1 speak for others, feel this has been outstanding far too long and desire the process to be expedited.

There have been many deadlines set and not met. What is your expectation for resolution on the proposed
corrective action plan?
Regards
Keith

Johnson, Kelly
From: Johnson, Kelly
Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2015 8:53 AM
To: 'Caleb Wright'
Cc: Georgette Scott
Subject: Cannonsgate Meeting Yesterday
Attachments: 15A NCAC 02H.1000 effective 199512 01.pdf
Caleb,
Thanks for meeting yesterday. Here are the notes I will leave on file:
1. General Approach: Please consider each swale individually in relation to the rule requirements, and document a
decision for each one. Options for swales:
a. Keep swales: Swales that are installed per the plan will be left in place.
b. Install swales: Install missing swales as they are shown on the permitted plans.
c. Modify swales: If, when considering full build -out, you determine that the flow rate/velocity of the
water warrants redesign of a swale then it can be modified.
i. Curb Outlet Swales:
I. 15A NCAC 2H .1008(g) sets specific requirements to "convey the stormwater to grassed
swales or vegetated areas prior to the runoff discharging to vegetative filters or
wetlands." Curb outlet swales shown on the plan cannot be removed, but their design
can be modified if it still meets the legal requirements.
2. 15A NCAC 2H .1008(h) allows for alternative designs that "provide equal or better
stormwater control, equal or better protection of waters of the state, and result in no
increase potential for nuisance conditions." This is another option for modifying curb
outlet swale design.
ii. Non -Curb Outlet Swales: These swales may also be able to be modified under the alternative
design rule.
d. Remove swales: If, when considering full build -out, you determine that the flow rate/velocity of the
water does not necessitate a non -curb outlet swale then it can be removed.
2. Complete System: We discussed that there are some swales that are not currently in place and they are
supposed to be on lot lines between homes. While we understand your concern that if you install the swales
now the upcoming adjacent construction may destroy them, we cannot transfer the permit to the HOA without
a complete system in place which can serve the community appropriately at full -build out. If the HOA, the
homeowners impacted, and the developer can reach an agreement to allow the swales to be installed after each
home is constructed then we can discuss that further. It would have to be a legal agreement tied to each
impacted lot, and it would also have to specify who is responsible for the installation, that the swale had to be
installed before the CO is issued for the homes on each side, and there would have to be a specific design for
each swale to be installed so that they one day know what to build.
3. Regulation: This project was designed under the 1995 version of 15A NCAC 2H .1005, which is attached.
4. Impervious Area: There may have been bike lanes and other impervious installed that was not originally
planned for. The project needs to meets is low density requirements (both inside the ORW 575 line and outside
of that line).
5. Pipes: Pipes are limited to draining only water underneath impervious surfaces (such as from one side of a road
to the other) in low density projects. Please keep this in mind in your design.
6. CAMA: We talked to Debbie Wilson, DCM Supervisor in our office, and she said that Ronda Bennett in the
Morehead City office, 252.808.2808x206, will have the latest CAMA permit plans.
Thanks,
Kelly
1

IzeLLUj0hVLS0w
Kelly Johnson
Environmental Engineer
NC Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources
Stormwater Permitting
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington, NC 28405-3845
Office: 910.796.7331
Fax: [phone]

''- DEMLR USE ONLY
Date Received
Fee Paid (express only)
Permit Number
$n 6 O 5 1 Ja J
co11511S I'fv� -57OW T�i�' State of North Carolina
�k31 W E P-�E�RLIZ ED ;� Q
NCO ��QSi. Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources
STORM WATER MANAGEMENT PE:31:xT'�' PLAN REVISION AT'PLICATION FORM
This form may be photocopied for use as an original
I. GENERAL INFORMATION
PJE1VE ,
1. Stormwater Management Permit Number: SW8 050516 JAN 14 2n
2. Project Name: Cannonsgate at Bowe Sound BY:
3. Permit Holder's name (specify the name of the corporation, individual, etc.):
Mr. Randy Allen, President, RA North Development Inc
4. Print Owner/Signing Official's name and title (person legally responsible for permit):
Randy Allen, President
5. Mailing Address for person listed in item 2 above:
3129 Sprinebank Lane
City:Charlotte State:NC Zip:28226
Phone: 704 L_ 847-6006 Fax:
Email:
II. PLAN REVISION INFORMATION
1. Summarize the plan revision proposed (attach additional pages if needed):
As built conditions were reflected in the plans and swales were eliminated or revised as vegetative areas
where conditions warrated.
III. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS
Only complete application packages will be accepted and reviewed by the Division of Energy, Mineral and
Land Resources (DEMLR). A complete package includes all of the items listed below. The complete
application package should be submitted to the DEMLR Office that issued the permit.
1. Please indicate that you have provided the following required information by initialing in the space provided
next to each item.
• Original & 1 copy of the Plan Revision Application Form
• Two (2) copies of revised plans (must be revisions of original approved plan sheet(s))
If avplving for Express review (only available in 20 coastal counties):
• Application fee of $500.00 (made payable to NCDENR)
VI. APPLICANT'S CERTIFICATION
I, (print or type name of person listed in General Information, item 3) Mr. Randy Allen, Presi den t
certify that I have authorized these plan revisions and that the information included on this plan revision
application ir, to the best of my 'knowledge, correct and complete.
Plan Revision Form Rev. Oct. 31, 2013

Date: / -23 - / C
GCGIVE
JAN 14 2016
BY:
Plan Revision Form Rev. Oct. 31, 2013

EI .
Narrative
Revision Request JAN 14 2016
Stormwater Permit SW8 050516
Cannonsgate at Bogue Sound BY.
Carteret County
January 11, 20116
State Stormwater Permit SW8 050516 was issued to R.A. North Development, Inc.
(Randy Allen, President) on June 2, 2005 for development of Cannonsgate at Bogue
Sound, located on Highway 24 in Carteret County. The low density subdivision with a
curb outlet system has been built and most of the lots sold to others. However, the
stormwater permit has not been transferred to the subdivision property owners
association or another entity. Therefore, R. A. North Development Inc. remains the
holder of the stormwater permit and requests this revision.
The purpose of this revision is to allow maintenance and certification of measures in
accordance with the stormwater permit while minimizing ground disturbing activities.
No changes in BUA are requested as part of this revision. A plan revision was approved
on August 22, 2007 providing for the final design of the amenity site and revision of the
swale layout and drainage areas. Swales listed on the 2007 revision of sheet 005 titled
"Grass Swale Layout with Drainage Areas" were reviewed to make determinations
regarding whether they serve a function and whether they could be revised as vegetative
areas due to their location in a common area.
SW8 050516 currently references swales numbered 1-39. A number of these swales
appear to have been permitted for the initial construction and no longer perform a
function. In addition, many of the remaining swales are located in dedicated common
areas and will function as well or better as vegetative areas rather than grass lined swales.
The remaining swales will remain as currently permitted.
Swales numbered 1-6, 11-13, 16, 23, 25, and 27-28 are all currently permitted in common
areas wider than the 1 Oft occupied by the swale. These swales are being revised to
vegetative areas subject to the same restrictions and maintenance requirements as the
swales but will approach sheet flow further minimizing velocity. Vegetative areas are
shown on the current drawing revision as a 100ft radius of the curb outlet / curb end and
are bound by the edge of pavement and any adjacent property boundaries. Vegetative
areas 3-6, 11-13, and 27 are fed by the end of the curb and gutter and are noted on the
drawing as "Curb End." The remainder of the vegetative areas are fed by curb outlets
and are shown with elevations on the drawing as "Curb Outlet."
Drainage areas 25 and 28 have additional curb outlets numbered 25A and 28A to handle
nuisance water adjacent to common areas. 100ft radius vegetative areas are shown on the
drawing serving these curb outlets.
Swales 37, 38, and. 38A are currently permitted to drain the parking lot and associated
area near the amenities area as revised in 2007. Swale 37 was moved from the curb
outlet closest to the tennis courts to two adjacent curb outlets to the West and revised as a
vegetative area. Swale 38 was moved from the south corner of the parking lot to the
north corner of the parking iot and revised as a vegetative area. Due to the installation of
drains and pipes under the parking lot, the catchments for 3 8 and 3 8A were combined
because they both have pipes that report to the vegetative area to the east. 38A remained
where it is currently permitted and is revised as a vegetative area serving two 6"

corrugated HDPE pipes and one 8" PVC pipe associated with the drains in the parking
lot.
Swales 7-10, 14-15, 17-19, 21, 34, 36, and 39 were deleted as they serve to concentrate
flow that otherwise would report as sheet flow to adjacent common areas. These swales
may have been included for control of water during initial construction but are no 'Longer
needed.
See table 1 below for a summary of the above determinations. Upon approval of this
request, activities necessary to complete a certification of measures will occur in
conjunction with the subdivision property owners association.
I�lA�021
�/i
SE L 'r•
SOpe
WR`G�'�\\��
ECEIVE
JAN 14 2016
sv:

Tol%la 1 — Cnmmnry nf CnrrPnt Rwale Determinations & Reauested Revision
Current
Drainage
Area
Comment
Determination
Veg'
Area
Delete
Swale
1
Performs as well as or better as vegetative, area.
x
2
Performs as well as or better as vegetative area.
x
3
Performs as well as or better as vegetative area.
x
4
Performs as well as or better as vegetative area.
x
5
Performs as well as or better as vegetative area.
x
6
Performs as well as or better as vegetative area.
x
7
Performs no function.
x
8
Performs no function.
x
9
Performs no function.
x
10
Performs no function.
x
11
Performs as well as or better as vegetative area.
x
12
Performs as well as or better as vegetative area.
x
13
Performs as well as or better as vegetative area.
x
14
Performs no function.
x
15
Performs no function.
x
16
Performs as well as or better as vegetative area.
x
17
Performs no function.
x
18
Performs no function.
x
19
Performs no function.
x
20
Swale required.
x
21
Performs no function.
x
22
Swale required.
x
23
Performs as well as or better as vegetative area.
x
24
Swale required.
x
25
Performs as well as or better as vegetative area.
Curb outlet 25A added draining to V.A.
x
26
Swale required.
x
27
Performs as well as or better as vegetative area.
x
28
Performs as well as or better as vegetative area.
Curb outlet 28A added draining to V.A.
x
29
Swale required.
x
30
Swale required.
x
31
Swale required.
x
32
Swale required.
x
33
Swale required.
x
34
Performs no function.
x
35
Swale required.
x
36
Performs no function.
x
37
Performs as well as or better as vegetative area.
x
38
Performs as well as or better as vegetative area.
x
3 8A
Performs as well as or better as vegetative area.
x
39 _
Performs no function.
x
_
Totals
17
13
10
W se
W
141
cJ

ISEC
1/12/16
To: NC Division of Environmental Quality
Stormwater Permitting
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington, NC 28405-3845
Att'n: Kelly Johnson, Environmental Engineer
From: Caleb Wright, Principal Engineer
Industry Standard Engineers & Consultants - PLLC
400 Harbor Drive
New Bern, NC 28560
r�0514
RE: Stormwater Project SW8 0
Revision Application Submittal
Cannonsgate at Bogue Sound
Carteret County, North Carolina
Dear Kelly:
ECEiVE
JAN 14 2016
BY:
As per our recent communications please find the enclosed permit revision package for
Cannonsgate at Bouge Sound.
I have attached a copy of the approved drawing from the 2007 revision that is the basis for this
revision. They were on file with R. A. North Management and are provided for your records.
Sincerely,
Industry Standard Engineers & Consultants - PLLC
Caleb Wright, PE
Principal Engineer
INDUSTRY STANDARD ENGINEERS & CONSULTANTS- PLLC . FIRM P-1346
O\A +CAI I rRo�af,
r
ti �°,' •Orr E t .� •:�
EAL
509
400 HARBOR DR, NEW BERN, NC 28560
PAGE 1

CC: Mr. Randy Allen
File: 014 RA North
Encl: (lea) Original Stormwater Management Plan Revision Application Form
(1 ea) Copy of the Stormwater Management Plan Revision Application Form
(tea) Revised Sheet 005, Grass Swale Layout with Drainage Areas
(1 ea) Narrative
(1 ea) Copy of approved drawings from the 2007 revision from RA North files
(1 ea) Copy of August 22, 2007 letter indicating that sheets 4 and 5 should be replaced
(1 ea) Copy of June 16, 2010 letter providing the approved drawings to RA North
ECEIVE
BAN 14 M16
BY:
INDUSTRY STANDARD ENGINEERS & CONSULTANTS- PLLC • FIRM P-1346 • 400 HARBOR DR, NEW BERN, NC 28560
PAGE 2

SW8 050516 — Cannonsgate
Record of Significant Events — 7/28/15
6/2/05: Original Permit Issued
a. Issued to R.A. North Development, Inc.
h 25% Low density with curb outlet (ORW), 1995 Rule. There are also several amenity ponds not covered by the
permit.
2.) 1/23/06: Plan Revision to reallocate "future" impervious to specific uses.
3.) 8/22/07: Plan Revision to reallocate "future" impervious to specific uses. (A letter mailing the plans for the 8122107 Plan
Revision was sent on 6116110).
4.) 5/16/11: Compliant Inspection (D. Cox)
5.) 7/26/11: Received a Name/Ownership Change Request from the developer, but it was not signed by the HOA (and it was
before the HOA transfer law).
6.) 9/22/11: Permit Modification (Most Recent Permit)
a. Reallocated "future" impervious area to specific uses (Lot 437).
b. Current 0&M Agreement/Low Density Supplement is with this permit.
c. Deed Restrictions: Recorded BK1121/146; received on 7/26/11. (Note, some of the lots' impervious area is
recorded at values below the value allowed by the permit.)
7.) 2/14/12: Project Return
8.) 7/16/12: Individual Permit Issued to Lot 437 (Inside SW8 050516)
9.) 9/12/14: File Review by HOA & their Surveyor, Prestige Land Surveying. K. Johnson met with them during their review. They
were trying to determine how to fix two safety issues and still be compliant with the permit. K. Johnson said that the Division
may have to look at fixing those issues as "alternative measures' per .1008. They would also like to eventually transfer the
permit to the HOA. Two issues:
a. Water pooling in a road that reportedly isn't draining properly. They want to put in a pipe/LSNFS to get the water off
of the road. Complications include that this is ORW 575, and that they will need to shorten a CO swale from the
required 100ft to get their proposal tc v ork. The plans do not sho wdetailed topography with spot elevations in this
area. Swales #8 & #29 look like they should receive the road's water, but they are reportedly not graded properly.
b. An amenity pond does not have anywhere to overflow. (This isn't an issue under the State Stormwater permit, but
we will help them address it if there is a way to modify our permit that will allow them to fix this related issue.) They
want to put in a swale (or pipe/LSNFS?) along one side of Lot 519. They think they can get an easement from that
owner. This is also ORW 575
10.) 9130/14: Non -Compliant Inspection Letter (B. Lambe)
a. Stormwater measures are not installed per the approved plan.
i. Some swales (such as Swale #29) is not constructed per the plan, and so the drainage to it is ponding in the
road.
ii. Many curb outlet swales are not constructed per the plan (100ft long, 5:1 etc). The inlet of the curb
commonly has a small rock pad and then steps up to a sod lip preventing drainage.
b. Submit Designer's Certification.
11.)11/7/14: Non -Compliant File Review Inspection (K. Johnson). Also see email on same date.
a. Parties Involved:
i. Current Permittee Representative: Melissa Williams, RA Management, Inc.
ii. Glenn Dunn, Poyner & Spruill
iii. Keith, Prestige Land Surveying
iv. Riley Hom, R. H. Construction, Inc. & HOA
b. Designer Certification Needed: Required per Permit Section II(8). If the site can be certified, then the site will be
considered in compliance.
i. Pooling Water in Street: Not a permit violation. Only issue is if stormwater measures aren't built correctly.
ii. Amenity Pond without Overflow: Beyond the scope of the permit. If the permit is hindering a solution, then
we can discuss that further.
c. Transfer: Permit either has to be in compliance, or we have to come to an agreement with all parties to bring the site
into compliance. Administrative items needed for transfer.
i. Common area deeds (showing that HOA owns those areas)

ii. Documentation that 50% has been sold
iii. Name/Ownership Form
d. Follow Up from the 11/7/14 Email:
i. 10./28/14: Letter from permittee (R.A. North Development): They believe that the HOA is responsible for the
stormwater permit because they assumed control in 2005. (But they are evidently unaware that the permit
must be transferred separately.)
10/30115: Email between developer and B. Lambe clarifying that the permit is still in the developer's name
and that he is still responsible for it.
iii. 12/22/15: Email between HOA and K. Johnson requesting status. Developer did not respond to the 11/7/14
inspection.
iv. 2/11/15: Email between HOA and K. Johnson requesting status. Developer did not respond to the 11/7/14
inspection.
12.) 2/11115: NOD
a. Section II(3): Stormwater features must be substantially constructed.
b. Section II(8): Certification is needed. "The permittee must certify in writing that the project's stormwater controls,
and impervious surfaces have been constructed within substantial intent of the approved plans and specifications..."
c. Section III(5): Transfer needed.
i. Common Area Deeds needed
ii. Documentation of 50% sold needed
iii. Transfer form needed
13.) 3/6/15: Response to NOD received
a. Certification & Substantial Construction:
i. Submitted by John Riggle, Project Manager with Trader Construction. He is the contractor responsible for
the work. His qualifications are unclear (not PE or PLS on letter).
ii. Some swales not built, determined not to be needed.
iii. Says that any deficiencies noted during the project were corrected.
iv. LawyersPoints: Lawyer discusses his meeting with the State a iew years ago (2019?). They discussed
the issues with the swales at that time. Lawyer says law requires "substantial compliance" and not
"compliance".
14.) 6/1/15: Continuing NOD
a. Same deficiencies as 2/11/15
b. Determination: The permit says that the "permittee" has to certify the system. In this case there is disagreement
between the permittee/developer and the proposed permittee/HOA as to whether or not the project is constructed
within "substantial compliance" of the permit requirements. A certification from an appropriate design professional
such as a PE or a PLS is therefore warranted.
i. Certification Can Be Obtained: If the project can be certified, then the permit will be considered in
compliance, and it can be transferred.
ii. Certification Can Not Be Obtained: If an appropriate design professional cannot certify that the system has
been installed within substantial compliance with the permit, then the permit is not in compliance and cannot
be transferred. If this is the case, then the permittee will have to modify or revise the permit to match the
field conditions.
1. If there are issues such as if a curb outlet swale is missing or is built shorter than it was permitted
to be built, then the permittee will have to provide justification for each change.
2. The permittee could choose to propose other changes to the permit as well, but it is not required.
For instance the HOA has brought up two safety issues. There is water ponding in the street, and
there is an amenity pond that reportedly does not have an overflow point. Another issue that could
be addressed is that some of the deed restrictions for impervious area per lot are recorded at
values below what the State Stormwater permit allows. The permittee could modify the deed
restrictions to increase the impervious area per lot for the lots affected.
c. Transfer: Common area deeds, documentation of 50% sold, and transfer form are still needed.
15.) 6/19/15: Tracy Davis (DEMLR Director) & RA North (permittee/developer) Phone Call:
a. Summary: Upheld 6/1/15 determination. Also noted that items not required to be addressed by the permit will have
to be addressed by the HOA.
2

b. Email Text: I just got off the phone with Glenn Dunn, attorney for RA North. We discussed the current situation and
we agreed that there are two options: 1) RA North obtain the services of a PE/PLS to review the SW plan and permit
vs. the site conditions and certify that the site is in substantial compliance with the permit or 2) if such PE/PLS is not
comfortable certifying substantial compliance, then a meeting will be scheduled at the site with DEMLR, RA North
rep, PE/PLS, and HOA rep to discuss work to be done onsite to make it certifiable — and once the work is completed
and the certification issued, the permit will be deemed in compliance and transferred to the HOA. The other areas
outside of the permit will have to be addressed by the HOA.
16.) 7/2/15: Glenn Dunn (RA North's attorney) requested an onsite meeting which has been scheduled for 7/29/15 at 12:30pm at
the clubhouse.
17.) 7/10/15: Govemor's Office, RA North, Braxton Davis (DCM) & DEMLR/WiRO (G. Scott & K. Johnson) Phone Call: Reiterated
the 6/19/15 discussion and the 6/1/15 letter. There were follow up calls/emails which resulted in clarification of previously -
mailed documents and verification of the 7/29/15 meeting. Email text to RA North from K Johnson:
Mr. Allen,
As we discussed on the phone this afternoon, here is a list of the items we will need to transfer the permit. This list is
also in the 6/1 /15 letter. We received a package on 6/15/15, and so I have updated the 6/1/15 list as appropriate:
1.) Certification [permit Section II(8)]: Please submit a certification from an appropriate professional such as a PE or
a PLS certifying that the project has been constructed in substantial compliance with the permit requirements.
2.) Plan Revision: If the PE/PLS determines that changes have been made in the field that differ from the permitted
plans, or if additional changes are necessary to bring the project into compliance please have him/her document
those changes in the form of a Plan Revision. This is a simple, free process. All you will need to do is to submit the
1-page Plan Revision Application form which is available online, http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/Ir/state-stormwater-
forms—docs and two sets of plans documenting the changes. We will approve and keep a set, and one will be sent to
you (or to the HOA when it transfers).
3.) Administrative Items:
a. Common Area Deed: Submitted 6/15/15
b. Documentation of at least 50% of the lots sold: SL 2011-256 requires that 50% of the lots be sold to
owners other than the declarant of the planned community. We received a list on 6/15/15 showing the deed
closing dates of the lots in the subdivision, but the list does not include the lot owner's name and so I do not
know who they were deeded to. Please provide clarification that 50% of the lots are not currently owned by
your company.
c. Name/Ownership Change Form: Submitted 6/15/15
If you have further questions please let me know.
Thanks,
Kelly
18.) 7/27/15: Change in HOA Contact. Riley Home is stepping down at the end of July, and Brian Campbell (910.862.0782,
[e-mail]) is taking over.
19.) 7/28/15: K Johnson spoke with Melissa Williams, a representative of RA North, and she indicated that the permittee plans to
submit the certification and plan revision requested in the June 1, 2015 letter. Since the intention of the meeting was to
determine the actions that needed to be completed to make the site able to be certified, the 7/29/15 meeting has been
cancelled.

Johnson, Kelly
From: Keith Maready <[e-mail]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2015 3:47 PM
To: Johnson, Kelly
Cc: Riley Horne; Robert Moore; Terry Lee; Brian Campbell
Subject: Re: from Brian D. Campbell - Cannonsgate HOA Storm Water Meeting Info - 7-28-15
Kelly
I did get the email. I too am curious to view info from permittee with regard to their belief to be
substantially compliant with the issued permit.
Thanks for the communication. My cell is 252-916-6986.
Look forward to hearing from you.
Thanks
Keith
Sent from my iPad
Keith Maready
On Jui 28, 2015, at 2:39 PM, "Johnson, Kelly" <[e-mail]> wrote:
<image002.gif>
Mr. Maready,
I do not have a phone number for you, but I wanted to verify that you received the email I sent this
afternoon about tomorrow's meeting being cancelled. Will you please email me back to let me
know? Evidently the permittee believes that it can be certified, and so though they had previously
requested the meeting they have now requested it to be cancelled.
Thanks,
Kelly
From: Brian Campbell fmailto:briancCalcamobelloil.net]
Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2015 11:40 AM
To: Johnson, Kelly
Cc: Riley Horne; Robert Moore; Keith Maready; Terry Lee
Subject: RE: from Brian D. Campbell - Cannonsgate HOA Storm Water Meeting Info - 7-28-15
Hey Ms. Johnson:
Thank you for the reply to my email and I have CC'd the HOA Board in this email. I
will be out of town in Atlanta for meetings this week but Mr. Keith Maready that
serves on our HOA Board will be in attendance at this meeting tomorrow at the
Cannonsgate Clubhouse at 12:30pm. Thank you for all your help with this and call or
email with any questions.
Have a Great Day ...........

Brian D. Campbell
Campbell Oil Company
P. O. Box 637
418 Peanut Road
Elizabethtown, NC 28337
Phone: [phone] (Direct Line)
Fax: [phone]
Cell: 910-874-2005
Email: [e-mail]
<i m age003. p ng><i m age004. j pg><i m age005.j pg>
"A Third Generation, Family Owned and Operated Business since 1948"
From: Johnson, Kelly[mailto:kelly.p.johnsoppncdenr.gov]
Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2015 7:59 AM
To: Brian Campbell
Subject: RE: from Brian D. Campbell - Cannonsgate HOA Storm Water Permit - 7-27-15
Mr. Campbell,
I was out of the office yesterday unexpectedly, which is why I did not return your call. I need to talk with
my supervisor to verify a few things when she gets in this morning, and then I will send out an email
about tomorrow's meeting which is at 12:30 at the clubhouse. We can also talk this afternoon if
necessary.
Thanks,
Kelly

Johnson, Kell
From: Johnson, Kelly
Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2015 2:11 PM
To: 'Dunn, Glenn;'Melissa Williams;'[e-mail];
'[e-mail]'; 'Brian Campbell; Robert Moore; Keith Maready; Terry Lee
Cc: Sams, Dan; 'Georgette Scott'; Davis, Tracy; 'Bradley Bennett'
Subject: Cannonsgate State Stormwater Meeting - 7/29/15 Cancelled
All,
I just spoke with Melissa Williams, a representative of RA North, and she indicated that the permittee plans to submit
the certification and plan revision requested in the June 1, 2015 letter. Since the intention of the meeting was to
determine the actions that needed to be completed to make the site able to be certified, the meeting has been
cancelled.
Thanks,
Kelly
From: Johnson, Kelly
Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2015 9:53 AM
To: 'Dunn, Glenn% 'Melissa Williams'; '[e-mail]';'[e-mail]'; 'Brian
Campbell'
Cc: Sams, Dan; 'Georgette Scott'
Subject: RE: Cannonsgate
All,
I understand that. Mr. North is in the process of contacting a PE or PLS to obtain the certification, Plan Revision, and
administrative items pursuant to the previous correspondence. But, that documentation has not yet been received. We
will meet you all tomorrow at 12:30 at the clubhouse.
Thanks,
Kelly
From: Johnson, Kelly
Sent: Thursday, July 02, 2015 9:21 AM
To: 'Dunn, Glenn'; Melissa Williams; '[e-mail]'; '[e-mail]'
Cc: Sams, Dan; 'Georgette Scott'
Subject: RE: Cannonsgate
All,
Mr. Dunn has requested a meeting to discuss sormwater at Cannonsgate. Dan, Georgette, and I are available or
Wednesday, July 291" at 12:30. Unless one of you has a scheduling conflict, we will meet you near the clubhouse.
Thanks,
Kelly
From: Dunn, Glenn mailto:hgdunnCabpoynerspruiil.�nm]
Sent: Wednesday, July 01., 2015 11:07 AM
To: Johnson, Kelly

r._
Cc: Melissa Williams
Subject: Cannonsgate
Kelly,l am responding for R.A. North to DENR's Request for Additional Information dated June 23 ,2015. We request that
a meeting be set up at Cannonsgate to review the stormwater plan and how it has been implemented . The objective is
to determine " on the ground" what measures were not built as shown in the plan and whether any of those measures
are necessary for substantial compliance with the plan . R.A. North will have Trader Construction representatives there
to explain why in their opinion substantial compliance has been achieved . We will ask Prestige Land Surveying to be at
the meeting, and of course the HOA's representative and DENR are essential. Our hope is to get agreement that any
measures that weren't implemented are not necessary for substantial compliance, or if we can agree on an additional
measure or measures that are reasonable in cost and may have some meaningful function R.A. North will consider
doing it or them as long as DENR and the HOA agree that doing so will end this matter and the permit will be transferred
. If you would get me dates for a meeting that work for DENR ,we will contact Prestige and Trader Construction . Then I
think it best that you contact the HOA to be sure they can have a representative attend .I hope this will lead to some
resolution . I realize it may take a while to set up the meeting and request that , if necessary, the deadline for response
be extended an needed to allow for this meeting. I will be out of my office for much of July but do not think it necessary
that I be at the meeting. But I would appreciate your letting me know in the next few days whether DENR is agreeable
with this approach . Please contact me if you have any questions or want to discuss this meeting with me .
H. Glenn 1. Duirin I Parbier
PO)7TIer Spruill "`
ATTORNrYS M- LAV,
301 Fayetteville Street, Suite 1900, Raleigh, NC 27601
PO Box 1801, Raleigh NC 27602-1801
L:'- 919 783 2842 r: 919 783 1075
©� 8
;1C! ..:' nfidt ?'1e31 ?3?Ofrn ai.!(?i"
. _
. nt .W . fC, Z A
, `ii.F, ., :" . Y
F; r:'! hb ted from
' o or r.<,
�':,..
a: 64-00 and ±:
tt,'<> Your

Johnson, Kelly
From: Johnson, Kelly
Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2015 7:59 AM
To: 'Brian Campbell'
Subject: RE: from Brian D. Campbell - Cannonsgate HOA Storm Water Permit - 7-27-15
Mr. Campbell,
I was out of the office yesterday unexpectedly, which is why I did not return your call. I need to talk with my supervisor
to verify a few things when she gets in this morning, and then I will send out an email about tomorrow's meeting which
is at 12:30 at the clubhouse. We can also talk this afternoon if necessary.
Thanks,
Kelly
From: Brian Campbell[mailto: brianc(dcampbelloil. net]
Sent: Monday, July 27, 2015 9:15 AM
To: Johnson, Kelly
Subject: from Brian D. Campbell - Cannonsgate HOA Storm Water Permit - 7-27-15
Ms. Johnson:
My name is Brian D. Campbell and I serve on the Cannonsgate HOA Board of Directors along with
Mr. Riley Horne who has been our lead person on the Storm Water Issue related to RA North, the
developer of Cannonsgate. Mr. Kiley will be stepping down from the Cannonsgate Board effective
7-31-15 and I would like to talk with you about the status of the storm water permit and I think Mr.
Riley said that there may be a meeting relating to this sometime this week. Could you call me
when you get a chance to discuss this on my direct line at work @ 910-862-0782? After we talk I am
planning to have a conference call with the entire Cannonsgate HOA Board to determine who will
be representing the Cannonsgate HOA in this matter going forward.
Thank you for your time with this.
Have a Great Day...........
Brian D. Campbell
Campbell Oil Company
P. O. Box 637
418 Peanut Road
Elizabethtown, NC 28337
Phone: [phone] (Direct Line)
Fax: [phone]
Cell: 910-874-2005
Email: brianc0campbelloll.net
71"
nm bgA1 A►NUTEA+IAN
t>Ia� t OF i-A:1I . 'j� ��ARRAr p• x s r e w r
"A Third Generation, Family Owned and Operated Business since 1948"

Johnson, Kelly
From: Johnson, Kelly
Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2015 9:53 AM
To: 'Dunn, Glenn; 'Melissa Williams; 'prestigesurveying [e-mail];
'[e-mail] ; 'Brian Campbell'
Cc: Sams, Dan; 'Georgette Scott'
Subject: RE: Cannonsgate
All,
I understand that Mr. North is in the process of contacting a PE or PLS to obtain the certification, Pian Revision, and
administrative items pursuant to the previous correspondence. But, that documentation has not yet been received. We
will meet you all tomorrow at 12:30 at the clubhouse.
Thanks,
Kelly
From: Johnson, Kelly
Sent: Thursday, July 02, 2015 9:21 AM
To: 'Dunn, Glenn'; Melissa Williams;'[e-mail]'; '[e-mail]'
Cc: Sams, Dan; 'Georgette Scott'
Subject: RE: Cannonsgate
All,
Mr. Dunn has requested a meeting to discuss stormwater at Cannonsgate. Dan, Georgette, and I are available on
Wednesday, July 29th at 12:30. Unless one of you has a scheduling conflict, we will meet you near the clubhouse.
Thanks,
Kelly
From: Dunn, Glenn[mailto:hgdunnC&goynerspruill.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 01, 2015 11:07 AM
To: Johnson, Kelly
Cc: Melissa Williams
Subject: Cannonsgate
Kelly,l am responding for R.A. North to DENR's Request for Additional Information dated June 23 ,2015. We request that
a meeting be set up at Cannonsgate to review the stormwater plan and how it has been implemented. The objective is
to determine " on the ground" what measures were not built as shown in the plan and whether any of those measures
are necessary for substantial compliance with the plan . R.A. North will have Trader Construction representatives there
to explain why in their opinion substantial compliance has been achieved . We will ask Prestige Land Surveying to be at
the meeting, and of course the HOA's representative and DENR are essential. Our hope is to get agreement that any
measures that weren't implemented are not necessary for substantial compliance , or if we can agree on an additional
measure or measures that are reasonable in cost and may have some meaningful function R.A. North will consider
doing it or them as long as DENR and the HOA agree that doing so will end this matter and the permit will be transferred
. If you would get me dates for a meeting that work for DENR ,we will contact Prestige and Trader Construction. Then I
think it best that you contact the HOA to be sure they can have a representative attend .I hope this will lead to some
resolution . I realize it may take a while to set up the meeting and request that , if necessary, the deadline for response
be extended an needed to allow for this meeting. I will be out of my office for much of July but do not think it necessary

that I be at the meeting. But I would appreciate your letting me know in the next few days whether DENR is agreeable
with this approach . Please contact me if you have any questions or want to discuss this meeting with me .
H. Glenn T. Dunn i . Partner
Poyner Spruill LLF
A7TCIRNFYS AT LAW
301 Fayetteville Street, Suite 1900, Raleigh, NC 27601
PO Box 1801, Raleigh NC 27602-1801
L.1 919 783 2842 * F: 919 783 1075
dunn@ poynersp,r uL
comvl%.urlicnien ina; contziin atto,rney prmicz;:-�-' � '. f i F. -
I - ' , k % in-.fj-t' pa(i.O.n
ir:zenoed cAY for ti'ie use. of'L�,-,e iiarncd i'eci�p:i3nt. llf.k!ou are- not iifia irtcnded re-----ipierd. y-o;.! are prol,L"-ed fo'-O
Jl-serrAnWirig, C.,str",-Aing crec,pying. -I�iis,-,,mrilin' ,.'..ioti. Ifyov have recel,.'co this in ple--ate
i .T,. rr i E, i a i (-! ly no t;(,- 7 u. s b y r F-
? tUrr, riessec-a or oy leleplho:le zt 0-1!?.783 ind cie!k�, C-,' (-,-�nrrun;-
TOr'.1 yc:�-.!;'
SYS'NY. VOLI.

Johnson, Kelly
From: Johnson, Kelly
Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2015 1:50 PM
To: 'Melissa Williams'
Cc: Randy Allen
Subject: RE: Follow up for Cannonsgate Stormwater Permit
Attachments: Cannonsgate Email.pdf; Cannonsgate Transfer Form.pdf
Melissa,
Yes, Mr. Allen and I spoke Friday afternocn. I have attached a copy of the email that I sent to him which summarizes the
items that are needed for the transfer. Also, I still have the transfer form. The $40 fee was returned because there is no
fee for a first transfer.
If you have further questions please let me know.
Thanks,
Kelly
From: Melissa Williams fmailto:mwilliams(&ramanagementinc.com]
Sent: Monday, July 13, 2015 4:04 PM
To: Johnson, Kelly
Cc: Randy Allen
Subject: Follow up for Cannonsgate Stormwater Permit
Good afternoon Kelly,
I spoke with Randy Allen earlier this afternoon and he asked that I follow up with you. He informed me that the two of
you spoke and you would send him an email with exactly what needs to be sent to you/DENR to request the transfer of
the permit to the homeowners association?
We asked Glenn Dunn to send the application with all the supporting documents including the fee however this check was
returned to us. Please let me know if it is necessary to send another application. Also please let me know the check
amount that should be sent. Can you also give the specifics on the plans with an engineer or surveyor stamp certifying
these. As soon as we hear back from you we will gather these documents and submit them to you.
Thank you,
Melissa Williams

Johnson, Kell
From: Johnson, Kelly
Sent: Friday, July 10, 2015 3:25 PM
To: '[e-mail]'
Cc: Davis, Tracy; 'Bradley Bennett'; Sams, Dan; 'Georgette Scott; Dunn, Glenn
([e-mail])
Subject: RE: SW8 050516, Cannonsgate Stormwater - Follow Up from the 7/10/15 Phone Call from
Randy Allen
Resending. Undeliverable email address.
From: Johnson, Kelly
Sent: Friday, July 10, 2015 3:21 PM
To: '[e-mail]'
Cc: Davis, Tracy; 'Bradley Bennett'; Sams, Dan; 'Georgette Scott'; Dunn, Glenn ([e-mail])
Subject: SW8 050516, Cannonsgate Stormwater - Follow Up from the 7/10/15 Phone Call from Randy Allen
Mr. Allen,
As we discussed on the phone this afternoon, here is a list of the items we will need to transfer the permit. This list is
also in the 6/1/15 letter. We received a package on 6/15/15, and so I have updated the 6/1/15 list as appropriate:
1.) Certification [permit Section II(8)]: Please submit a certification from an appropriate professional such as a PE or
a PLS certifying that the project has been constructed in substantial compliance with the permit requirements.
2.) Plan Revision: If the PE/PLS determines that changes have been made in the field that differ from the permitted
f
plans, or if additional changes are necessary to bring the project into compliance please have him/her document
those changes in the form of a Plan Revision. This is a simple, free process. All you will need to do is to submit
the 1-page Plan Revision Application form which is available online, http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/Ir/state-
stormwater-forms docs and two sets of plans documenting the changes. We will approve and keep a set, and
one will be sent to you (or to the HOA when it transfers).
3.) Administrative Items:
a. Common Area Deed: Submitted 6/15/15
b. Documentation of at least 50% of the lots sold: SL 2011-256 requires that 50% of the lots be sold to
owners other than the declarant of the planned community. We received a list on 6/15/15 showing the
deed closing dates of the lots in the subdivision, but the list does not include the lot owner's name and
so I do not know who they were deeded to. Please provide clarification that 50% of the lots are not
currently owned by your company.
c. Name/Ownership Change Form: Submitted 6/15/15
If you have further questions please let me know.
Thanks,
Kelly
From: Johnson, Kelly
Sent: Thursday, July 02, 2015 9:21 AM
To: 'Dunn, Glenn; Melissa Williams;'[e-mail]';'[e-mail]'
Cc: Sams, Dan; 'Georgette Scott'
Subject: RE: Cannonsgate
All,

. A -
Mr. Dunn has requested a meeting to discuss stormwater at Cannonsgate. Dan, Georgette, and I are available on
Wednesday, July 291" at 12:30. Unless one of you has a scheduling conflict, we will meet you near the clubhouse.
Thanks,
Kelly
From: Dunn, Glenn[mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 01, 2015 11:07 AM
To: Johnson, Kelly
Cc: Melissa Williams
Subject: Cannonsgate
Kelly,l am responding for R.A. North to DENR's Request for Additional Information dated June 23 ,2015. We request that
a meeting be set up at Cannonsgate to review the stormwater plan and how it has been implemented . The objective is
to determine " on the ground" what measures were not built as shown in the plan and whether any of those measures
are necessary for substantial compliance with the plan . R.A. North will have Trader Construction representatives there
to explain why in their opinion substantial compliance has been achieved . We will ask Prestige Land Surveying to be at
the meeting, and of course the HOA's representative and DENR are essential. Our hope is to get agreement that any
measures that weren't implemented are not necessary for substantial compliance, or if we can agree on an additional
measure or measures that are reasonable in cost and may have some meaningful function R.A. North will consider
doing it or them as long as DENR and the HOA agree that doing so will end this matter and the permit will be transferred
. If you would get me dates for a meeting that work for DENR ,we will contact Prestige and Trader Construction . Then I
think it best that you contact the HOA to be sure they can have a representative attend .I hope this will lead to some
resolution . I realize it may take a while to set up the meeting and request that , if necessary, the deadline for response
be extended an needed to allow for this meeting. I will be out of my office for much of July but do not think it necessary
that I be at the meeting. But I would appreciate your letting me know in the next few days whether DENR is agreeable
with this approach . Please contact me if you have any questions or want to discuss this meeting with me .
H. We n T. Dwr`ir: I Parvier
Poyner Spruill "`
301 Fayetteville Street, Suite 1900, Raleigh, NC 27601
PO Box 1801, Raleigh NC 27602-1801
919 783 2842 ! F- 919 783 1075
odnn cq)c ners ruiii.corn I www.poytierspruill.Com
MC®
7`rn � �Ix .. 3+�r'11ir.:' cari'.rislliiir' ]'t:_its ('r ,udIng at a hme.r s' may co: ±sir�ftp yy '!Z�;Iened and confioient l Informer: icv
rl- i n r• �J_ i+ Iles, e.d r€.c:;!n nt. "I"you are niot the intended r'eciDie i# o;j 1 i r
!r��.... ..!��� :Jrii J Ts.+r' ..Ifs f.l�'�e � e -f;'[ a 'rP 3' }• � � }` F '
Y ., Y awe �;.o: i.),7ar� ���o�Il
w ;-p` in; mur ica?ion. 6f you have .c. e'ved this c 9 ,inn, 31•,^ ti;'!i ir, er;'L?'', p!.e 7C
!I' b refur"? 171E'San Via_ _ rY Ie � �'ii?rG a; 919.*$?,.�jC[r I andc�e it-tF, this [ t3! i!i '�flicr3tititi fFUi" \:?Ur

Johnson, Kelly OS OS [ Co
From: Davis, Braxton C
Sent: Friday, July 10, 2015 9:38 AM
To: Scott, Georgette; Davis, Tracy; Johnson, Kelly
Cc: Bennett, Bradley; Sams, Dan; Cole, Brad; Reeder, Tom; Vinson, Toby
Subject: RE: Cannonsgate
Thanks they have 3 call -in lines available, one for me and two additional, so hopefully that covers everyone.
Braxton Davis
Director, NC Division of Coastal Management
400 Commerce Avenue
Morehead City, NC 28557
[phone] ext. 202
Please visit www.nccoastaimanaciement.net to subscribe to
Coastal Management's quarterly newsletter, the CAMAgram.
E-mail correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
From: Scott, Georgette
Sent: Friday, July 10, 2015 9:14 AM
To: Davis, Tracy; Johnson, Kelly
Cc: Bennett, Bradley; Sams, Dan; Cole, Brad; Reeder, Tom; Davis, Braxton C; Vinson, Toby
Subject: RE: Cannonsgate
Kelly and I are available for the conference call and will call in at 1 Oam.
Georgette
From: Davis, Tracy
Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2015 4:57 PM
To: Johnson, Kelly; Scott, Georgette
Cc: Bennett, Bradley; Sams, Dan; Cole, Brad; Reeder, Tom; Davis, Braxton C; Vinson, Toby
Subject: FW: Cannonsgate
Importance: High
Kelly/Georgette,
Can one or both of you attend this conference call tomorrow (Friday) morning at 10:00 am as you are involved with this
Cannonsgate project and can convey the latest situation and what is needed? I will forward to all on this email the last
update I received from Dan Sams on this project to get everyone up to date on this situation prior to the call.
Thanks, Tracy
From: Davis, Braxton C
Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2015 4:30 PM
To: Reeder, Tom
Cc: Davis, Tracy; Vinson, Toby; Bennett, Bradley
Subject: RP, Cannonsgate

Thanks all - the conf call -in # is 704-849-1488 at 10am with Randy Allen and Mark Estep.
Braxton Davis
Director, Division of Coastal Management
NC Department of Environment and Natural Resources
400 Commerce Avenue
Morehead City, NC 28557
[phone] x202
From: Reeder, Tom
Sent: Thursday, July 9, 2015 4:16 PM
To: Davis, Braxton C
Cc: Davis, Tracy; Vinson, Toby; Bennett, Bradley
Subject: RE: Cannonsgate
Braxton — If I am remembering correctly this is a stormwater issue dealing with the transfer of the stormwater permits
from the developer to the HOA. I have copied Tracy, Toby and Bradley. I believe that Bradley, or perhaps some of the
stormwater staff in the WiRO have already been involved with this. Thanks for checking.
Tracy — Could you have the appropriate parties participate in this conf call? That will expedite things and also free up
Braxton.
Thanks everybody.
Tom Reeder
Assistant Secretary for Environment
NC Department of Environment and Natural Resources
919-707-8619
[e-mail]
From: Davis, Braxton C
Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2015 4:02 PM
To: Reeder, Tom
Subject: Cannonsgate
Tom, are you aware of any (current) issues related to the Cannonsgate development in Newport? I was
referred by the Governors office (John Baldwin) to call Mr. Mark Estep, and he is setting up a conference call
for me tomorrow morning to speak with him and another one of the original developers. As I understand,
there seems to be some issue between the HOA and DENR on the transfer of the permits from the developers
to the HOA (or something along those lines). I told him it may not involve the CAMA permits, but I'd be happy
to speak with them and try to point them in the right direction. Just wanted to make sure I'm not wading into
an ongoing issue that the Department is already working on.
Thanks,
Braxton

*********************************************
Braxton Davis
Director, Division of Coastal Management
NC Department of Environment and Natural Resources
400 Commerce Avenue
Morehead City, NC 28557
[phone] x202

Johnson, Kell
From: Johnson, Kelly
Sent: Friday, July 10, 2015 3:25 PM
To: [e-mail]'
Cc: Davis, Tracy; 'Bradley Bennett'; Sams, Dan; 'Georgette Scott; Dunn, Glenn
([e-mail])
Subject: RE: SW8 050516, Cannonsgate Stormwater - Follow Up from the 7/10/15 Phone Call from
Randy Allen
Resending. Undeliverable email address.
From: Johnson, Kelly
Sent: Friday, July 10, 2015 3:21 PM
To: '[e-mail]'
Cc: Davis, Tracy; 'Bradley Bennet; Sams, Dan; 'Georgette Scott'; Dunn, Glenn ([e-mail])
Subject: SW8 050516, Cannonsgate Stormwater - Follow Up from the 7/10/15 Phone Call from Randy Allen
Mr. Allen,
As we discussed on the phone this afternoon, here is a list of the items we will need to transfer the permit. This list is
also in the 6/1/15 letter. We received a package on 6/15/15, and so I have updated the 6/1/15 list as appropriate:
1.) Certification [permit Section II(8)1: Please submit a certification from an appropriate professional such as a PE or
a PLS certifying that the project has been constructed in substantial compliance with the permit requirements.
2.) Plan Revision: If the PE/PLS determines that changes have been made in the field that differ from the permitted
plans, or if additional changes are necessary to bring the project into compliance please have him/her document
those changes in the form of a Plan Revision. This is a simple, free process. All you will need to do is to submit
the 1-page Plan Revision Application form which is available online, htta://portal.ncdenr.ore/web/Ir/state-
stormwater-forms docs and two sets of plans documenting the changes. We will approve and keep a set, and
one will be sent to you (or to the HOA when it transfers).
3.) Administrative Items:
a. Common Area Deed: Submitted 6/15/15
b. Documentation of at least 50% of the lots sold: SL 2011-256 requires that 50% of the lots be sold to
owners other than the declarant of the planned community. We received a list on 6/15/15 showing the
deed closing dates of the lots in the subdivision, but the list does not include the lot owner's name and
so I do not know who they were deeded to. Please provide clarification that 50% of the lots are not
currently owned by your company.
c. Name/Ownership Change Form: Submitted 6/15/15
If you have further questions please let me know.
Thanks,
Kelly
From: Johnson, Kelly
Sent: Thursday, July 02, 2015 9:21 AM
To: 'Dunn, Glenn'; Melissa Williams;'[e-mail]';'[e-mail]'
Cc: Sams, Dan; 'Georgette Scott'
Subject: RE: Cannonsgate
All,

Mr. Dunn has requested a meeting to discuss stormwater at Cannonsgate. Dan, Georgette, and I are available or
Wednesday, July 291" at 12:30. Unless one of you has a scheduling corfiict, we will meet you near the clubhouse.
Thanks,
Kelly
From: Dunn, Glenn [mailto:h unn%Dpoynerspruill.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 01, 2015 11:07 AM
To: Johnson, Kelly
Cc: Melissa Williams
Subject! Cannonsgate
Kelly,l am responding for R.A. North to DENR's.Request for Additional Information dated June 23 ,2015. We request that
a meeting be set up at Cannonsgate to review the stormwater plan and how it has been implemented. The objective is
to determine " on the ground" what measures were not built as shown in the plan and whether any of those measures
are necessary for substantial compliance with the plan . R.A. North will have Trader Construction representatives there
to explain why in their opinion substantial compliance has been achieved . We will ask Prestige Land Surveying to be at
the meeting, and of course the HOA's representative and DENR are essential. Our hope is to get agreement that any
measures that weren't implemented are not necessary for substantial compliance , or if we can agree on an additional
measure or measures that are reasonable in cost and may have some meaningful function R.A. North will consider
doing it or them as long as DENR and the HOA agree that doing so will end this matter and the permit will be transferred
. If you would get me dates for a meeting that work for DENR,we will contact Prestige and Trader Construction . Then I
think it best that you contact the HOA to be sure they can have a representative attend .I hope this will lead to some
resolution . 1 realize it may take a while to set up the meeting and request that , if necessary, the deadline for response
be extended an needed to allow for this meeting. I will be out of my office for much of July but do not think it necessary
that I be at the meeting. But I would appreciate your letting me know in the next few days whether DENR is agreeable
with this approach . Please contact me if you have any questions or want to discuss this meeting with me .
PoYner SPrui 1.`E`
Al7OR NE", AT LAW
301 Fayetteville Street, Suite 1900, Raleigh, NC 27601
PO Box 1801, Raleigh NC 27602-1801
D - 919 783 2842 c . 919 783 1075
gdunnPpoynerspruill.Gom � www. cti,nerspruili.corn
©C8
may contain a` t rmey pri',';i ilea and coralfidential infor'IT.1no'n
v
LiSe Ca'. the n.:, t 1. i'i trll!? are not the intended d rr•.ipicr!;, you are prohibited from
ng or Tt 0y'i C.' 1''i1T;4k?li ation. If y(N.- `;a!'e re.:e3`,ed this ^...nrnn! _ 'C4t;b9, in u'rY[�r', pIpP;5P'
), i`elurrl:'t" i,y' iel r I'( Re c�l?,;J I '. rJi.t' �Cti� and i?h;i }f t li i iE}rr±r-lJrliC<'c�tiUP.' r rri Yr
tic'.. . .. .

Johnson, Kell
From:
Johnson, Kelly
Sent:
Friday, July 10, 2015 3:21 PM
To:
'[e-mail]'
Cc:
Davis, Tracy; 'Bradley Bennett; Sams, Dan; 'Georgette Scott; Dunn, Glenn
([e-mail])
Subject:
SW8 050516, Cannonsgate Stormwater - Follow Up from the 7/10/15 Phone Call from Randy
Allen
Mr. Allen,
As we discussed on the phone this afternoon, here is a list of the items we will need to transfer the permit. This list is
also in the 6/1/15 letter. We received a package on 6/15/15, and so I have updated the 6/1/15 list as appropriate:
1.) Certification [permit Section II(8)]: Please submit a certification from an appropriate professional such as a PE or
a PLS certifying that the project has been constructed in substantial compliance with the permit requirements.
2.) Plan Revision: If the PE/PLS determines that changes have been made in the field that differ from the permitted
plans, or if additional changes are necessary to bring the project into compliance please have him/her document
those changes in the form of a Plan Revision. This is a simple, free process. All you will need to do is to submit
the 1-page Plan Revision Application form which is available online, http://portal.ncdenr.ore/web/Ir/state-
stormwater-forms docs and two sets of plans documenting the changes. We will approve and keep a set, and
one will be sent to you (or to the HOA when it transfers).
3.) Administrative Items:
a. Common Area Deed: Submitted 6/15/15
b. Documentation of at least 50% of the lots sold: SL 2011-256 requires that 50% of the lots be sold to
owners other than the declarant of the planned community. We received a list on 6/15/15 showing the
deed closing dates of the lots in the subdivision, but the list does not include the lot owner's name and
so I do not know who they were deeded to. Please provide clarification that 50% of the lots are not
currently owned by your company.
c. Name/Ownership Change Form: Submitted 6/15/15
If you have further questions please let me know.
Thanks,
Kelly
From: Johnson, Kelly
Sent: Thursday, July 02, 2015 9:21 AM
To: 'Dunn, Glenn'; Melissa Williams;'[e-mail]';'[e-mail]'
Cc: Sams, Dan; 'Georgette Scot
Subject: RE: Cannonsgate
All,
Mr. Dunn has requested a meeting to discuss stormwater at Cannonsgate. Dan, Georgette, and I are available or
Wednesday, July 29th at 12:30. Unless one of you has a scheduling conflict, we will meet you near the clubhouse.
Thanks,
Kelly

From: Dunn, Glenn[mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 01, 2015 11:07 AM
To: Johnson, Kelly
Cc: Melissa Williams
Subject: Cannonsgate
Kelly,l am responding for R.A. North to DENR's Request for Additional Information dated June 23 ,2015. We request that
a meeting be set up at Cannonsgate to review the stormwater plan and how it has been implemented . The objective is
to determine " on the ground" what measures were not built as shown in the plan and whether any of those measures
are necessary for substantial compliance with the plan . R.A. North will have Trader Construction representatives there
to explain why in their opinion substantial compliance has been achieved . We will ask Prestige Land Surveying to be at
the meeting, and of course the HOA's representative and DENR are essential. Our hope is to get agreement that any
measures that weren't implemented are not necessary for substantial compliance, or if we can agree on an additional
measure or measures that are reasonable in cost and may have some meaningful function R.A. North will consider
doing it or them as long as DENR and the HOA agree that doing so will end this matter and the permit will be transferred
If you would get me dates for a meeting that work for DENR ,we will contact Prestige and Trader Construction . Then I
think it best that you contact the HOA to be sure they can have a representative attend .I hope this will lead to some
resolution . I realize it may take a while to set up the meeting and request that , if necessary, the deadline for response
be extended an needed to allow for this meeting. I will be out of my office for much of July but do not think it necessary
that I be at the meeting. But I would appreciate your letting me know in the next few days whether DENR is agreeable
with this approach . Please contact me if you have any questions or want to discuss this meeting with me -
Hr ClWin,rwT. ''Juk[i1
Poyner '_--q r 111.
IF
k
301 Fayetteville Street, Suite 1900, Raleigh, NC 27601
PO Box 1801, Raleigh NC 27602-1801
C;r 919 783 2842 ; 919 783 1075
rr'jf'.if}(Fz'�TC'.j"}PrS[1-LliI CC['51I�A.`__-._.r.��-1��-•-•�-�--�--
I attor p:
e— a
-.Inc>•. ..7 �.' .,.�� i, Th: USf' C- ...:1 ! i� rc r..
ii,�� . :r': Pic ii): i.'. .r jC aIG iio
.'c! ` ?•y `- _ t �I _ L '(Y CC, •11:rY W'R-ac ion. If you have: read -ver.` i a �.
n erroir. P;eas_,
I v retun,. r;�f v4 i)y te-lc'phCpn `?'1r.7�: r[{j[i and F: :V' n � Im
j t: �: �t :. i-. J� �i tl al:. 4.�}i� II �if;l:.3...�.}i e _ r; jlnLlr
. Th,a.r`k -
2

Johnson, Kelly
From: Johnson, Kelly
Sent: Friday, July 10, 2015 2:50 PM
To: 'Dunn, Glenn'
Cc: Melissa Williams; 'Georgette Scott'
Subject: RE: Cannonsgate
Attachments: Email —Sets Up July 29 2015 Meeting.pdf
Mr. Dunn,
i am confused by this. I thought we were meeting on 7/29/15 per your request dated 7/1/15 as discussed in the
attached email?
Kelly
From: Dunn, Glenn[mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Friday, July 10, 2015 1:37 PM
To: Johnson, Kelly
Cc: Melissa Williams
Subject: Cannonsgate
Kelly, I will be on vacation the next two weeks. I have not heard any more about a meeting at Cannonsgate, but am not
planning to go to the meeting and perhaps you have communicated with Melissa . At any rate, I think you already know
to move ahead without me. I do want to be sure that the response deadline of July 23 in the notice will be extended or
that we have responded for now. Please let Melissa know. And thanks.
H. Glenn T. Dunn ! Partnet
Foyn r SI-41rW
301 Fayetteville Street, Suite 1900, Raleigh, NC 27601
PO Box 1801, Raleigh NC 27602-1801
919 783 2842 i i 919 783 1075
rrr:e,�+. x•xi
Ns eiectronIr. [,urn-iuriIca t'on n.c!ijdin9 j+'a.,I..n',ents3 t nay L:on,",a;n art,0riney privi!e g `d an a : -ifi+lc'1 ;al n fo mnatior,
:. r:ntie deonfo the use v Ithe nar!ed s is \- re. "o te r ed wr.pe!e,yJucr)-i✓tr
:
Cf csNi �![1 sli3 :CJ. ill iti'!i ut: l"l4 or i opt yirn'Na comm If ra it ac +ed !.jc r
a �. s. ati! r ,+ou have siti ,h+s c.C.Tiir�l a.i r err, irae
niil!!'>tLis �� + i r _ T' �:; F. 3 ..7. : n�' +.A
b etlUr.-i ni..J-,. gi77 3r .j} el . ph I nl W-'�.64,00 and d,:4e !ii r, ao ?irnu`.!k atio.. from your
sysle� !;?. Thank, you.

Johnson, Kelly
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:
Mr. Dunr,,
I am confused by this.
attached email?
Kelly
Johnson, Kelly
Friday, July 10, 2015 2:50 PM
'Dunn, Glenn'
Melissa Williams; 'Georgette Scott'
RE: Cannonsgate
Email —Sets Up July 29 2015 Meeting.pdf
I thought we were meeting on 7/29/15 per your request dated 7/1/15 as discussed in the
From: Dunn, Glenn [mailto:hgdunn apoynerspruiil.com]
Sent: Friday, July 10, 2015 1:37 PM
To: Johnson, Kelly
Cc: Melissa Williams
Subject: Cannonsgate
Kelly, I will be on vacation the next two weeks. I have not heard any more about a meeting at Cannonsgate, but am not
planning to go to the meeting and perhaps you have communicated with Melissa . At any rate, I think you already know
to move ahead without me. I do want to be sure that the response deadline of July 23 in the notice will be extended or
that we have responded for now. Please let Melissa know. And thanks.
H. Glenn T. D—unn ( Partner
f 1l'
PolyrIf
run 11,
301 Fayetteville Street, Suite 1900, Raleigh, NC 27601
PO Box 1801, Raleigh NC 27602-1801
919 783 2842 i : 919 783 1075
.. i.: •,'-•.i•SI:3 .r.
! 1?J x���� t+r.•+p�i� %,mil E� Sri [ i? t ' � '� + 7 rat S� i r t r j?rf;":'f'r i•-t� P ra•7 f%^� F -1 -3 . -il /1
4 r; i_ n..:s O [ii l( ludin � a t : h'.n'ier si_) r-na't i �E" 21.1 a i t I ile_ j d and Ali f'tlai c ri c l._r
in.te.nded € my for ti-ie use o!• the nanned :c?'.', f+'ent. If 'e`oz are.; not the intended ra6p''er+t, you are fhibited from
giSSt T.Ei lc!iln�"; disirit !utinkg Or `a�i�ir ving th:z cornmuni a:io .. if ?��stJ ' awe t?CLii?� "� th s- cn nimJr i;ti.t f gfl in f:i' 'f_ iplea.se
�:d s y ;;s k. r.' ,nessagE r:r { iele z j r:F� ��i914?.7�33.ra? '�� '°rd ��� e? i� r!,►iceicn fron7 your
liv - « :z c not' +y° r; y ue , Corn:.1 i
�3tE'ril. ha. !F_ you.

Johnson, Kelly 0SOS[k4
From: Johnson, Kelly
Sent: Thursday, July 02, 2015 9:21 AM
To: 'Dunn, Glenn; Melissa Williams;'[e-mail];
'riley@rileyhorneconstruction. com'
Cc: Sams, Dan; 'Georgette Scott'
Subject: RE. Cannonsgate
All,
Mr. Dunn has requested a meeting to discuss stormwater at Cannonsgate. Dan, Georgette, and I are available on
Wednesday, July 29th at 12:30. Unless one of you has a scheduling conflict, we will meet you near the clubhouse.
Thanks,
Kelly
From: Dunn, Glenn[mailto:[e-mail]
Sent: Wednesday, July 01, 2015 11:07 AM
To: Johnson, Kelly
Cc: Melissa Williams
Subject: Cannonsgate
Kelly,l am responding for R.A. North to DENR's Request for Additional Information dated June 23 ,2015. We request that
a meeting be set up at Cannonsgate to review the stormwater plan and how It has been implemented . The objective is
to determine " on the ground" what measures were not built as shown in the plan and whether any of those measures
are necessary for substantial compliance with the plan . R.A. North will have Trader Construction representatives there
to explain why in their opinion substantial compliance has been achieved . We will ask Prestige Land Surveying to be at
the meeting, and of course the HOA's representative and DENR are essential. Our hope is to get agreement that any
measures that weren't implemented are not necessary for substantial compliance, or if we can agree on an additional
measure or measures that are reasonable in cost and may have some meaningful function R.A. North will consider
doing it or them as long as DENR and the HOA agree that doing so will end this matter and,the permit will be transferred
. If you would get me dates for a meeting that work for DENR,we will contact Prestige and Trader Construction. Then I
think it best that you contact the HOA to be sure they can have a representative attend .l hope this will lead to some
resolution . I realize it may take a while to set up the meeting and request that , if necessary, the deadline for response
be extended an needed to allow for this meeting. I will be out of my office for much of July but do not think it necessary
that I be at the meeting. But I would appreciate your letting me know in the next few days whether DENR is agreeable
with this approach . Please contact me if you have any questions or want to discuss this meeting with me.
H. Gien "W . Dunn (Pari rover
Poyner Sp�� tt - �t
301 Fayetteville Street, Suite 1900, Raleigh, NC 27601
PO Box 1801, Raleigh NC 27602-1801
919 783 2842 1 F: 919 783 1075

Johnson, Kelly
From: Johnson, Kelly
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2015 10:18 AM
To: Melissa Williams([e-mail]); Dunn, Glenn
([e-mail]);'[e-mail]'
([e-mail]); [e-mail]
Cc: 'Georgette Scott'
Subject: SW8 050516, Cannonsgate State Stormwater Permit
Attachments: Cannonsgate Letter —June 23 2015.pdf
All,
Please see attached. We received the request to transfer the permit from RA North to the HOA. Tracy Davis, Director of
DEMLR, and Glenn Dunn, attorney for RA North discussed the issue on Friday. RA North will obtain the services of a
PE/PLS to determine if the project can be certified, and if so, the permit will be transferred. If a PE/PLS cannot certify
the system then we will hold a meeting to discuss the next steps. The attached letter acknowledges receipt of the
transfer form and formally asks for the certification.
Thanks,
Kelly
V-6LUJ 0h V1.SDVl.
Kelly Johnson
Environmental Engineer
NC Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources
Stormwater Permitting
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington, NC 28405-3845
Office: 910.796.7331
Fax: [phone]

Johnson. Kel
From: Davis, Tracy
Sent: Friday, June 19, 2015 9:59 AM
To: Sams, Dan
Cc: Scott, Georgette; Bennett, Bradley; Johnson, Kelly; Vinson, Toby; Cole, Brad
Subject: RE: Canon's Gate, Glenn Dunn call for R.A. North
Thanks for the information you sent (excellent documentation, Kelly!). It was very helpful.
I just got off the phone with Glenn Dunn, attorney for RA North. We discussed the current situation and we agreed that
there are two options: 1) RA North obtain the services of a PE/PLS to review the SW plan and permit vs. the site
conditions and certify that the site is in substantial compliance with the permit or 2) if such PE/PLS is not comfortable
certifying substantial compliance, then a meeting will be scheduled at the site with DEMLR, RA North rep, PE/PLS, and
HOA rep to discuss work to be done onsite to make it certifiable — and once the work is completed and the certification
issued, the permit will be deemed in compliance and transferred to the HOA. The other areas outside of the permit will
have to be addressed by the HOA.
Mr. Dunn will discuss this with his client and will be back in touch next week on next steps.
Thanks, Tracy
From: Sams, Dan
Sent: Friday, June 19, 2015 9:18 AM
To: Davis, Tracy
Cc: Scott, Georgette; Bennett, Bradley; Johnson, Kelly
Subject: FW: Canon's Gate, Glenn Dunn call for R.A. North
Tracy:
Here is the information regarding Mr. R.A. North. Basically, the low density project has not followed the approved plan
(omission of some of the drainage swales, standing water). Mr. North would like to transfer the permit to the HOA, the
HOA doesn't want it until it is in compliance or an agreement is reached. Kelly's Record of Recent Events walks through
this fairly clearly.
If you have questions, give me or Georgette a call.
Thanks....
dan
From: Scott, Georgette
Sent: Friday, June 19, 2015 8:59 AM
To: Sams, Dan
Subject: Canon's Gate
Georgette Scott
Stormwater Program Supervisor
State Stormwater Program
NC Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources

127 Cardinal Drive ExL
Wilmington, NC 28405
Phone [phone]
Fax [phone]
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
Tracy,
I'm not sure of the specifics on this one either.
Bradley Bennett
Stormwater Permitting Program Phone: [phone]
NC Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources Fax: [phone]
1612 Mail Service Center I Email: bradley.ben nett(c)ncdenr,gov
Raleigh, NC 27699-1612 Web: http://portal.ncden,.Org/web/Ir/stormwater
Email correspondence to and from this address may be subject to public records laws
From: Sams, Dan
Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2015 2:11 PM
To: Davis, Tracy; Bennett, Bradley; Johnson, Kelly
Cc: Vinson, Toby
Subject: RE: Call from Glen Dunn regarding RA North SW Permit Transfer
Tracy:
Kelly and Georgette are both out today; Kelly until Monday. I will have to get a briefing myself
before I can tell you anything useful.
I'll try to get back to you later.
Thanks....
From: Davis, Tracy
Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2015 2:07 PM
To: Sams, Dan; Bennett, Bradley; Johnson, Kelly
Cc: Vinson, Toby
Subject: Call from Glen Dunn regarding RA North SW Permit Transfer
I received a voicemail from Glen Dunn representing RA North regarding the transfer of a SW
permit. Apparently, Mr. North was issued a NOD for non compliance and Mr. Dunn wants to discuss
the situation with me (he noted that he has already discussed his concerns with Kelly).
Can either of you give me a brief update on this situation before I call Mr. Dunn back later
today/tomorrow?
Many thanks, Tracy

Tracy E. Davis, PE, CPM
Director - Division of Energy, Mineral, and Land Resources
NC Dept. of Environment and Natural Resources
tracy.davisC ncdenr.gov
Telephone number: [phone]
E-Mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the NC Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
Tracy,
I'm not sure of the specifics on this one either.
Bradley Bennett
Stormwater Permitting Program Phone: [phone]
NC Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources Fax: [phone]
1612 Mail Service Center Email: [e-mail]
Raleigh, NC 27699-1612 Web: htt://Portal.ncdenr,org/web/Ir/stormwater
Email correspondence to and from this address may be subject to public records laws
From: Sams, Dan
Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2015 2:11 PM
To: Davis, Tracy; Bennett, Bradley; Johnson, Kelly
Cc: Vinson, Toby
Subject: RE: Call from Glen Dunn regarding RA North SW Permit Transfer
Tracy:
Kelly and Georgette are both out today; Kelly until Monday. I will have to get a briefing myself
before I can tell you anything useful.
I'll try to get back to you later.
Thanks....
dan
From: Davis, Tracy
Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2015 2:07 PM
To: Sams, Dan; Bennett, Bradley; Johnson, Kelly
Cc: Vinson, Toby
Subject: Call from Glen Dunn regarding RA North SW Permit Transfer
I received a voicemail from Glen Dunn representing RA North regarding the transfer of a SW
permit. Apparently, Mr. North was issued a NOD for non compliance and Mr. Dunn wants to discuss
the situation with me (he noted that he has already discussed his concerns with Kelly).
Can either of you give me a brief update on this situation before I call Mr. Dunn back later
today/tomorrow?
Many thanks, Tracy

Tracy E. Davis, PE, CPM
Director - Division of Energy, Mineral, and Land Resources
NC Dept. of Environment and Natural Resources
[e-mail]
Telephone number: [phone]
E-Mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the NC Public Records Law and may he disclosed to third parties.
4

Johnson, Kelly
From: Johnson, Kelly
Sent: Tuesday, June 02, 2015 1:12 PM
To: 'Dunn, Glenn'
Subject: RE: SW8 050516, Cannonsgate State Stormwater Permit
Glenn,
I don't know that it is a matter of not taking someone's word or not. It is just that there is a clear difference of opinion
between the parties. If it turns out that something on the plan isn't necessary, then we will deal with that when the
time comes. But, anything that may be eventually removed will have to be appropriately documented on the plans.
Kelly
From: Dunn, Glenn fmaiIto: hgdunn poynerspruill com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 02, 2015 12:09 PM
To: Johnson, Kelly
Subject: RE: SW8 050516, Cannonsgate State Stormwater Permit
Kelly ,I will pass this on. I suppose the message here is that you won't take the word of anyone other than a PLS or PE
regarding substantial compliance . But I assume you agree that " substantial" compliance means that some aspects of an
approved plan do not have to be implemented if there is good reason .
From: Johnson, Kelly fmailto:[e-mail]
Sent: June 02, 201510:11 AM
To: Melissa Williams([e-mail]); Dunn, Glenn;'[e-mail]'
([e-mail]); [e-mail]
Subject: SW8 050516, Cannonsgate State Stormwater Permit
All,
Please see the attached letter.
Thanks,
Kelly
1-,' 6 . i oh vt,so ,
Kelly Johnson
Environmental Engineer
NC Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources
Stormwater Permitting
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington, NC 28405-3845
Office: 910.796.7331
Fax: [phone]
t:ina'; CC _ pnde1;G l_ a"Vi loom this 5E nd, t . `i.e :^!.0 ..'L. . F:G. 1';rds Law wn-J 7i iY be f irk ; z1.'d Fd ?fr.

Johnson, Kelly
From: Johnson, Kelly
Sent: Tuesday, June 02, 2015 10:11 AM
To: Melissa Williams([e-mail]); Dunn, Glenn
([e-mail]);'[e-mail]'
([e-mail]); [e-mail]
Subject: SW8 050516, Cannonsgate State Stormwater Permit
Attachments: Cannonsgate.pdf
All,
Please see the attached letter.
Thanks,
Kelly
f-"' UwDelVI.SDV1.
Kelly Johnson
Environmental Engineer
NC Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources
Stormwater Permitting
227 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington, NC 28405-3845
Office: 910.796.7331
Fax: [phone]

TRADER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
Design/Bulld • Heavy Civil • Site Development • Engineering • Surveying • Wells • Demolition • Materials Testing
March 6, 2015
Mr. Randy Allen, President
R.A. North Development, Inc.
110 Matthews Station Street, Suite 2D
Matthews, NC 28105
Subject: Stormwater Controls and Impervious Surface Statement
Cannonsgate at Bogue Sound
Permit No. SW8 050516
Carteret County, NC
Mr. Allen:
During every phase of development, Trader Construction Company performed all
construction activities in compliance with the above referenced stormwater permit. It is
my opinion, all stormwater controls and impervious surfaces were constructed within
substantial intent of the approved plans and specifications.
To the beat of my knowledge and recollection, it was determined some swales were not
needed as their installation served no function. It is my opinion, the stormwater
measures implemented met the substantial intent of the stormwater permit.
Throughout this project any deficiencies noted by R.A. North Development, Inc.'s
representatives or by NC Division of Water Quality (DWQ) inspectors required only
minor rework and were corrected.
Respectfully submitted,
DeN .l�eect
J n Riggle - Manager
ECEIVE
R 0-9 2015
PO Drawer 1578, New Bem, NC 28583, Tele: [phone]. Fax: [phone], www.trade=mstrudion.00m

Johnson, Kelly
From: Dunn, Glenn <[e-mail]>
Sent: Monday, March 09, 2015 10:41 AM
To: Johnson, Kelly
Cc: Melissa Williams
Subject: FW: Cannonsgate
Attachments: TCC-Cannonsgate_Stormwater Controls & Impervious Surface Statement 5-6-15.pdf
Kelly, I have received this compliance statement from Trader Construction, the contractor that was responsible for the
storm water management work. Obviously It acknowledges that some of the swales were not built and recounts that
they were determined not to be needed. This is consistent with the statutory requirement that the storm water
management system be in substantial compliance with the storm water permit as required by the statute. This opinion
is also consistent with statements made by DENR officials when 1 visited the site with them about 3 years ago. They
stated that there was no need for the swales but they were concerned they couldn't state the system is consistent with
the plan as long as the swales are shown on the plan . But I want to point out that the statute requires substantial
compliance, not precise compliance, which indicates the General Assembly's intent to allow the latitude to certify
compliance in circumstances such as this. I thought it best to send this statement to you and get a response re: its
adequacy. Then it appears we will need to have the permittee send in the transfer request form which includes the
certification of compliance, to which we propose to attach this document. We have the other information that must be
included with the transfer request form but I want to get your response to Trader Construction's statement before
putting together a complete package of documents.
I want to add that we have not pressed Trader Construction on this matter, this statement is theirs entirely and I talked
with them to be sure they acknowledge that some swales were not constructed while stating their opinion . I
understand that the Homeowners; or at least Riley Horne; have told you they want to install the swales. But you have
responded that they can't do so unless and until they are the permittee . It seems to me that we need to move ahead
with this transfer and then the Homeowners will be in a position to install the swales if they want to do so.
I will be out of town later this week and all of next week, so if possible I would appreciate a response in the next day or
two .Thanks and don't hesitate to call me if you want to discuss this email.
***********
This electronic communication (including attachments) may contain attorney privileged and confidential information
intended only for the use of the named recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, you are prohibited from
disseminating, distributing or copying this communication. If you have received this communication in error, please
immediately notify us by return message or by telephone at 919.783.6400 and delete this communication from your
system. Thank you.
***********
1

Johnson, Kelly 05us t (o
From: Davis, Tracy
Sent: Friday, June 19, 2015 9:59 AM
To: Sams, Dan
Cc: Scott, Georgette; Bennett, Bradley, Johnson, Kelly; Vinson, Toby; Cole, Brad
Subject: RE: Canon's Gate, Glenn Dunn call for R.A. North
Thanks for the information you sent (excellent documentation, Kelly!). It was very helpful.
I just got off the phone with Glenn Dunn, attorney for RA North. We discussed the current situation and we agreed that
there are two options: 1) RA North obtain the services of a PE/PLS to review the SW plan and permit vs. the site
conditions and certify that the site is in substantial compliance with the permit or 2) if such PE/PLS is not comfortable
certifying substantial compliance, then a meeting will be scheduled at the site with DEMLR, RA North rep, PE/PLS, and
HOA rep to discuss work to be done onsite to make it certifiable — and once the work is completed and the certification
issued, the permit will be deemed in compliance and transferred to the HOA. The other areas outside of the permit will
have to be addressed by the HOA.
Mr. Dunn will discuss this with his client and will be back in touch next week on next steps.
Thanks, Tracy
From: Sams, Dan
Sent: Friday, June 19, 2015 9:18 AM
To: Davis, Tracy
Cc: Scott, Georgette; Bennett, Bradley; Johnson, Kelly
Subject: FW: Canon's Gate, Glenn Dunn call for R.A. North
Tracy:
Here is the information regarding Mr. R.A. North. Basically, the low density project has not followed the approved plan
(omission of some of the drainage swales, standing water). Mr. North would like to transfer the permit to the HOA, the
HOA doesn't want it until it is in compliance or an agreement is reached. Kelly's Record of Recent Events walks through
this fairly clearly.
If you have questions, give me or Georgette a call.
Thanks....
n, M
From: Scott, Georgette
Sent: Friday, June 19, 2015 8:59 AM
To: Sams, Dan
Subject: Canon's Gate
Georgette Scott
Stormwater Program Supervisor
State Stormwater Program
NC Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources

127 Cardinal Drive Ext.
Wilmington, NC 28405
Phone [phone]
Fax [phone]
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
Tracy,
I'm not sure of the specifics on this one either.
Bradley Bennett
Stormwater Permitting Program Phone: [phone]
NC Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources I Fax: [phone]
1612 Mail Service Center Email: bradley.bennett0inedenr.gov
Raleigh, NC 27699-1612 Web: hM://portal.nedenr.org/webAr/sormwater
Email correspondence to and from this address may be subject to public records laws
From: Sams, Dan
Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2015 2:11 PM
To: Davis, Tracy; Bennett, Bradley; Johnson, Kelly
Cc: Vinson, Toby
Subject: E: Call from Gten Dunn regarding RA North SW Permit Transfer
Tracy:
Kelly and Georgette are both out today; Kelly until Monday. I will have to get a briefing myself
before I can tell you anything useful.
I'll try to get back to you later.
Thanks....
no M
From: Davis, Tracy
Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2015 2:07 PM
To: Sams, Dan; Bennett, Bradley; Johnson, Kelly
Cc: Vinson, Toby
Subject: Call from Glen Dunn regarding RA North SW Permit Transfer
I received a voicemail from Glen Dunn representing RA North regarding the transfer of a SW
permit. Apparently, Mr. North was issued a NOD for non compliance and Mr. Dunn wants to discuss
the situation with me (he noted that he has already discussed his concerns with Kelly).
Can either of you give me a brief update on this situation before I call Mr. Dunn back later
today/tomorrow?
Many thanks, Tracy

Tracy E. Davis, PE, CPM
Director - Division of Energy, Mineral, and Land Resources
NC Dept. of Environment and Natural Resources
[e-mail]
Telephone number: [phone]
E-Mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the NC Public Records Law and may he disclosed to third parties.
Tracy,
I'm not sure of the specifics on this one either.
Bradley Bennett
Stormwater Permitting Program Phone: [phone]
NC Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources I Fax: [phone]
1612 Mail Service Center Email: bradley.bennett(a�ncdenr.gov
Raleigh, NC 27699-1612 Web: htto://portal.ncdenr.orq/webAr/stormwater
Email correspondence to and from this address may be subject to public records laws
From: Sams, Dan
Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2015 2:11 PM
To: Davis, Tracy; Bennett, Bradley; Johnson, Kelly
Cc: Vinson, Toby
Subject: RE: Call from Glen Dunn regarding RA North SW Permit Transfer
Tracy:
Kelly and Georgette are both out today; Kelly until Monday. I will have to get a briefing myself
before I can tell you anything useful.
I'll try to get back to you later.
Thanks....
dan
From: Davis, Tracy
Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2015 2:07 PM
To: Sams, Dan; Bennett, Bradley; Johnson, Kelly
Cc: Vinson, Toby
Subject: Call from Glen Dunn regarding RA North SW Permit Transfer
I received a voicemail from Glen Dunn. representing RA North regarding the transfer of a SW
permit. Apparently, Mr. North was issued a NOD for non compliance and Mr. Dunn wants to discuss
the situation with me (he noted that he has already discussed his concerns with Kelly).
Can either of you give me a brief update on this situation before I call Mr. Dunn back later
today/tomorrow?
Many thanks, Tracy

Tracy E. Davis, PE, CPM
Director - Division of Energy, Mineral, and Land Resources
NC Dept. of Environment and Natural Resources
[e-mail]
Telephone number: [phone]
E-Mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the NC Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.

Completeness Review Checklist
Project Name: tw „� � ��, Received Date:
Project Location: Accepted Date: !�
Rule(s) 02008 Coastal
1995 Coastal
®Phase II (WiRO.) 13 Universal
LJ1988 Coastal
Type of Permit: New or
Mod or PR
Existing Permit # (Mod or PR): Qe�, ( in
MPE
Cert on File?
Density: HD or LD I Type: Commercial or Residential NCG:
%: M(% OK?) Stream Glass: r7,SA Map 710ffsil
to SW8
ISubdlvlded?: Subdivision or Single Lot NORW Map d Exempt j
Paperwork Emailed Engineer on:
Supplements) (1 original per BMP) BMP Type(s): '�:G
0&M with correct/original signatures (1 original per BMP except LS/VFS and swales)
®Application with correct/original signatures ®Deed
Corp or LLC: Sig. Auth. per SoS or letter ®Email Address: Design Engineer
$505 (within 6mo) I Email Address: Owner
Soils Report with SHVVT co c Hoote 20 RPMen"'We
Calculations (signed/sealed) �'O '4-
0 No obvious errors
Density includes common areas, etc
Deed Restrictions, if subdivided: -,5 4N, -IV
+.Signed & Notarized trv,—'O P
. _ . . ._ _ ..- .. - - - - 1 Y:ex-tv-- V.`
Plans
Jj2 Sets Details (roads, cul-de-sacs, curbs, sidewalks, BiVPs, Buildings, etc)
Grading � ]Wetlands: Delineated or No Wetlands
Vicinity Map El Layout (proposed BUA dimensions)
Legend IIDA Maps F­IProject Boundaries
Wiltration
Wet [pond
of -sRe
Soils Report
I Soils Report
MPE Cert for Master Lot #:
SHWT:
H IISHWT:
®Deed Rest for Master Lot # Matches Master
Bottom:
PP:
Li
BUA Permitted (Master): sf
Visited:
BUA Proposed (Offsite): sf
Additional Information:
Permitted Proposed: prrnpnsed: Proposed-
BUA (sf)
DA (sf)
PP (el)
SHWT (el)
Depth (ft)
SA (sf)

�uq
ac-)\1
t�j 1,
ck
\C\.
VLN A�o

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA
SESSION 2011
SESSION LAW 2011-256
HOUSE. BILL 750
AN ACT TO (1) REQUIRE THE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL
RESOURCES TO TRANSFER A PERMIT FOR A STORMWATER MANAGEMENT
SYSTEM FROM A DECLARANT OF A CONDOMINIUM OR PLANNED
COMMUNITY TO AN OWNERS ASSOCIATION UPON REQUEST OF THE
PERMITTEE AND SUBMISSION OF DOCUMENTATION THAT DECLARANT
CONTROL HAS TERMINATED, (2) PROVIDE THAT THE RULES OF A SANITARY
DISTRICT MAY NOT BE MORE RESTRICTIVE THAN OR CONFLICT WITH THE
REQUIREMENTS OR ORDINANCES OF A COUNTY WITH JURISDICTION OVER
THE AREA; AND (3) PROHIBIT ANY PERSON FROM CONTRACTING OR
SUBCONTRACTING TO RENT OR LEASE TO ANOTHER A PORTABLE TOILET
OR MANAGE OR DISPOSE OF WASTE FROM A PORTABLE TOILET UNLESS
THAT PERSON IS PERMITTED TO OPERATE A SEPTAGE MANAGEMENT FIRM.
The General Assembly of North Carolina enacts:
SECTION 1. G.S. 143-214.7 is amended by adding a new subsection to read:
" c�2� The Department shall transfer a permit issued under this section for a storm
"§ 130A-55. Corporate powers.
A sanitary district board shall be a body politic and corporate and may sue and be sued in
matters relating to the sanitary district. Notwithstanding any limitation in the petition under
G.S. 130A-48, but subject to the provisions of G.S. 130A-55(17)e, each sanitary district may
exercise all of the powers granted to sanitary districts by this Article. In addition, the sanitary
district board shall have the following powers:
(7) To adopt rules necessary for the proper functioning of the district. However,
these rules shall not conflict with rules adopted by the Commission for
Public Health, Environmental Management Commission, or the local board
of health having jurisdiction over the area. Further, such rules shall be no
111,10 1V 1lI

11
SECTION 3.(a) In addition to the other portable sanitation permitting provisions
of 15A NCAC 13B .0832(b), from the effective date of this act the Department of Environment
and Natural Resources shall prohibit any person from contracting or subcontracting to rent or
lease to another a portable toilet or manage or dispose of waste from a portable toilet,
regardless of ownership of the portable toilet, unless that person is permitted to operate a
septage management firm.
SECTION 3.(b) No later than January 1, 2014, the Commission for Public Health
shall adopt rules consistent with the provisions of Section 3(a) of this act. Notwithstanding
G.S. 150B-19(4), the rules adopted by the Commission pursuant to this section shall be
substantively identical to the provisions of Section 3(a) of this act.
SECTION 4. This act is effective when it becomes law.
2011. In the General Assembly read three times and ratified this the 16th day of June,
s/ Walter H. Dalton
President of the Senate
s/ Thom Tillis
Speaker of the House of Representatives
s/ Beverly E. Perdue
Governor
Approved 1:48 p.m. this 23`d day of June, 2011
Page 2 Session Law 2011-256 SL201 i-0256

Johnson, Kelly
From:
Dunn, Glenn <[e-mail]>
Sent:
Monday, March 23, 2015 1:39 PM
To:
Johnson, Kelly
Cc:
Melissa Williams
Subiect:
FW: Cannonsgate
Ms. Johnson . I am confirming our phone conversation of today in which you said the response below is adequate to
meet the deadline for response to the February 11, 2015 NOD and that you will respond as soon as you are able to go
over it with your supervisor. I will appreciate your efforts and wait to hear from you. If you wish to discuss this by phone
, don't hesitate to let me know. I realize that the question of " substantial compliance" in allowing for less that absolute
compliance also calls for discretion on DENR's part. But I want to emphasize that this set of facts along with Trader
Construction's letter indicate that there is no need for the swales in question .
-----Original Message -----
From: Dunn, Glenn
Sent: March 11, 2015 9:23 AM
To: 'Johnson, Kelly'
Subject: RE: Cannonsgate
Thank you .I will be on vacation until 3/23 and will be able to discuss it with you then if you have reviewed and
responded . I think the new response deadline 15 3/23 5-- we have time tc see where we stand then.
-----Original Message -----
From: Johnson, Kelly [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: March 10, 2015 5:39 PM
To: Dunn, Glenn
Cc: Melissa Williams
Subject: RE: Cannonsgate
Thanks Mr. Dunn. I am out if the office, but I will review this when I return.
Thanks,
Kelly
From: Dunn, Glenn [[e-mail]]
Sent: Monday, March 09, 2015 10:41 AM
To: Johnson, Kelly
Cc: Melissa Williams
Subject: FW: Cannonsgate
Kelly, I have received this compliance statement from Trader Construction, the contractor that was responsible for the
storm water management work. Obviously It acknowledges that some of the swales were not built and recounts that
they were determined not to be needed. This is consistent with the statutory requirement that the storm water
management system be in substantial compliance with the storm water permit as required by the statute. This opinion
is also consistent with statements made by DENR officials when I visited the site with them about 3 years ago . They
stated that there was no need for the swales but they were concerned they couldn't state the system is consistent with
the plan as long as the swales are shown on the plan . But I want to point out that the statute requires substantial
compliance, not precise compliance, which indicates the General Assembly's intent to allow the latitude to certify

compliance in circumstances such as this. I thought it best to send this statement to you and get a response re: its
adequacy. Then it appears we will need to have the permittee send in the transfer request form which includes the
certification of compliance, to which we propose to attach this document. We have the other information that must be
included with the transfer request form but I want to get your response to Trader Construction's statement before
putting together a complete package of documents.
I want to add that we have not pressed Trader. Construction on this matter, this statement is theirs entirely and I talked
with them to be sure they acknowledge that some swales were not constructed while stating their opinion . 1
understand that the Homeowners, or at least Riley Horne, have told you they want to install the swales . But you have
responded that they can't do so unless and until they are the permittee . It seems to me that we need to move ahead
with this transfer and then the Homeowners will be in a position to install the swales if they want to do so.
I will be out of town later this week and all of next week, so if possible I would appreciate a response in the next day or
two .Thanks and don't hesitate to call me if you want to discuss this email.
This electronic communication (including attachments) may contain attorney privileged and confidential information
intended only for the use of the named recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, you are prohibited from
disseminating, distributing or copying this communication. If you have received this communication in error, please
immediately notify us by return message or by telephone at 919.783.6400 and delete this communication from your
system. Thank you.
***********
***********
This electronic communication (including attachments) may contain attorney privileged and confidential information
intended only for the use of the named recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, you are prohibited from
disseminating, distributing or copying this communication. If you have received this communication in error, please
immediately notify us by return message or by telephone at 919.783.6400 and delete this communication from your
system. Thank you.
***********
***********
This electronic communication (including attachments) may contain attorney privileged and confidential information
intended only for the use of the named recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, you are prohibited from
disseminating, distributing or copying this communication. If you have received this communication in error, please
immediately notify us by return message or by telephone at 919.783.6400 and delete this communication from your
system. Thank you.
***********
2

Johnson, Kelly
050S tl0
From:
Johnson, Kelly
Sent:
Thursday, March 05, 2015 3:42 PM
To:
'Dunn, Glenn'
Cc:
Melissa Williams
Subject:
RE: Cannonsgate storm water permit
OK thanks. The due date has been extended until 3/25/15.
Kelly
From: Dunn, Glenn fmailto:hcdunn(@poynerspruill.coml
Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2015 2:33 PM
To: Johnson, Kelly
Cc: Melissa Williams
Subject: FW: Cannonsgate storm water permit
I am requesting an extension of two weeks to respond to the NOD sent to Mr. Randy North for the Cannonsgate storm
water matter dated February 11, 2015. R.A.North intends to certify that the project complies with its storm water
permit and will provide the other information required for a transfer of the permit according to N.C.G.S. 143-214.7 (c2) .
H. Glenn T. Dunn I Partner
Poyner Spruill"
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
301 Fayetteville Street, Suite 1900, Raleigh, NC 27601
PO Box 1801, Raleigh NC 27602-1801
D: 919 783 2842 1 F: 919 783 1075
[e-mail] I www.poynersprui I..com
***********
This electronic communication (including attachments) may contain attorney privileged and confidential information
intended only for the use of the named recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, you are prohibited from
disseminating, distributing or copying this communication. If you have received this communication in error, please
immediately notify us by return message or by telephone at 919.783.6400 and delete this communication from your
system. Thank you.

Johnson, Kelly
From: Johnson, Kelly
Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2015 1:30 PM
To:'[e-mail]'; Lambe, Brian
Cc: Scott, Georgette; Sams, Dan; '[e-mail]'
Subject: RE: cannonsgate
Mr. Horne,
Brian inspected the site in September, and after some back and forth with you and with the developer I mailed an NOD
on 2/11/15 which is due on 3/11/5. 1 have discussed it with Mr. Glenn Dunn, the developer's attorney, and he is
working with the developer to see if the site can be certified in preparation for resolving the NOD and ultimately
transferring the permit to the HOA. He has indicated to me that he may need an extension on the 3/11/15 due date so
that the developer's representatives can make that determination. But, I will let you know once I get the response to
the NOD. I think it is premature to say that he isn't going to do anything, or that nobody is going to make him.
Thanks,
Kelly
From: riles(&rileyhorneconstruction.com rmailto:rilgy(drileyhorneconstruction.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2015 12:31 PM
To: Lambe, Brian
Cc: Johnson, Kelly
Subject: RE: cannonsgate
Brian,
It appears that the developer is not going to do anything and nobody is going to make him. Can you do
a complete compliance inspection so the HOA will know where it stands. Can this inspection be completed
by 3-15-2015. Thank you
Riley Horne
R.H. Construction, Inc.
General Contractor
Real Estate Broker
Work --- 919-553-8100
[e-mail]
Cell 919-422-1800
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: cannonsgate
From: "Lambe, Brian" <brian.lambe0ncdenr.gov>
Date: Tue, September 23, 2014 12:10 pm
To:"rileyOrilevhorneconstruction.com"
<riles(&rileyhorneconstruction.com>
I received a memo that you have requested an inspection of cannonsgate in
reference to a permit transfer. I spoke to Steve from Prestige Land Survey to get
a gate code and he said to call him if I had a problem getting in. In addition to
the stormwater permit, there is an active erosion control permit (CARTE-2005-
327). Any construction sites will be reviewed during the inspection.
1

Please respond to this email if you would like to meet with me, but Kelly's email
was very detailed, so your representation may not be necessary.
Brian Lambe
Environmental Specialist
Land Quality Section
NC Division of Energy, Mineral, and Land Resources
[phone]
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North
Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
2

Johnson, Kelly
From: Johnson, Kelly
Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2015 9:03 AM
To: '[e-mail] ; '[e-mail]';
'[e-mail]';'[e-mail]'
Cc: Lambe, Brian; Scott, Georgette
Subject: RE: SW8 050516, Cannonsgate Stormwater Permit
Attachments: Cannonsgate.pdf
All,
Please see the attached letter. We still have not received the certification that the project has been built appropriately.
The certification is a permit requirement. Though the HOA has assumed responsibility for many aspects of the
development, the permit does not transfer automatically. RA Management, Inc. is still the permittee until the permit is
transferred to the HOA.
Thanks,
Kelly
From: Johnson, Kelly
Sent: Friday, November 07, 2014 10:36 AM
To: '[e-mail]'; '[e-mail]';'[e-mail];
'[e-mail]'
Cc: Lambe, Brian; Scott, Georgette
Subject: SW8 050516, Cannonsgate Stormwater Permit
All,
The Division has received separate questions from many of you about this project and so I will address them
all simultaneously via email in order to clear up any confusion that may exist stemming from the 9/30/14 letter
(attached), and to also start the conversation that will hopefully lead to permit compliance and transfer to the
HOA. The following parties are copied:
Melissa Williams, RA Management, Inc.
Glenn Dunn, Poyner & Spruill
Keith, Prestige Land Surveying
Riley Horn, R. H. Construction, Inc. & HOA
R.A. North Development, Inc. is the current permittee per the most recent permit which was issued on 9/22/11
and is attached for your reference. This permit does not automatically transfer to the HOA with the sale of
land. It has to be formally transferred through the Division [per Permit Section 111(5)]. The Division received
the attached transfer form from R.A. North Development, Inc. on 7/26/11 but the form was not signed by the
HOA and so it was not executed. It is in the interest of both the HOA and the developer to transfer this permit
to the HOA. From the developer's perspective, if you do not transfer it you will be responsible for it forever.
From the HOA's perspective, if you do not eventually accept a permit transfer you can be charged with
operating without a permit. I would like to facilitate this transfer in any way that I can.
in order to transfer the permit to the HOA, the permit either has to be in compliance or we have to have to
come to some sort of agreement between the two parties that will get the site into compliance. It is my
understanding that some of the stormwater measures may not be installed per the approved plan. Section II(8)
of the permit requires a certification that the project has been constructed in substantial compliance with the
permit, and that certification has not been received.

As the permittee, R. A. North Development, Inc. is responsible for submitting the certification per the permit.
As requested in the 9/30/14 letter, please submit this certification. If the site can be certified, then this project
will be in compliance. But, it is my understanding that there are missing swales (and potentially other items)
that may keep it from being certified. I met with the HOA and Prestige Land Surveying about the situation on
9/12/14, and I have provided their pictures which highlight their concerns. I also created a diagram to show the
location of the swales of interest. I understand that water pools in one area of the development. Pooling water
alone is not a violation of the permit if the permit is constructed per approved plans. The issue is that there is
an allegation that the permit is not constructed per the plans. If the site cannot be certified that it has been
constructed per the approved plans, please contact me to discuss obtaining either a Plan Revision or a Permit
Modification to change the permitted plan to a configuration which can be certified.
There is a related but separate issue at hand as well. There is an amenity pond on the plan that is not required
by the State Stormwater permit, and the HOA is concerned that this pond does not have an appropriate place
to overflow. This is a flooding issue, and is therefore beyond the scope of the State Stormwater permit. The
Division does not have authority to regulate flooding. But, if the State Stormwater permit is hindering a solution
to this potential safety issue and we can help you resolve it via a Plan Revision please let me know and we can
discuss that further.
After these issues are resolved, we can transfer the permit to the HOA. Administratively, we will three
documents per SL 2011-256 which is attached:
1.) Common area deeds showing that the HOA is the owner.
2.) Documentation showing that at least 50% of the development has been sold.
3.) Name/Ownership Change Form, available on our website http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/Ir/state-
stormwater-forms docs under "miscellaneous forms". Please note that there are two forms. The one
designated for HOAs is pursuant to SL2011-256 which says that if the site is compliant and the
appropriate documentation is submitted then the permit can be transferred to the HOA without their
signature. This form has a signature block only for the outgoing (current) permittee and can be used if
the site is in compliance. (Please note that this law has been passed since the previous transfer form
was submitted by the developer.) The other form has signature blocks for both the outgoing (current)
and incoming (proposed) permittee. We will use that form if we come to some agreement between the
developer and the permittee to get the site into compliance as discussed above so that both sides can
sign.
If you have further questions, please let me know how I can help you.
Thanks,
Kelly
K.eLLUJ0hI&Sow
Kelly Johnson
Environmental Engineer
NC Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources
Stormwater Permitting
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington, NC 28405-3845
Office: 910.796.7331
Fax: [phone]

Johnson, Kelly
From: [e-mail]
Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2015 9:22 AM
To: Johnson, Kelly
Cc: [e-mail]; [e-mail]
Subject: RE: SW8 050516, Cannonsgate Stormwater Permit
Mrs Johnson,
Good morning. It has been over three months since we started inquiring about the storm water
situation in Cannonsgate. Just thought I would reach out to you again. Is there anything that can be done
by your office to help Cannonsgate HOA get the correction completed? We still have a large amount of
standing water in the road after each rain on one street. Since no one can get the develop to fix this can
we install an 8" pipe under the road to relieve the water? Is the Developer still being issued storm water
permits on his other properties in N.C.? Do you have any recommendations for us?
Thank You For Your Help,
Riley Horne
R.H. Construction, Inc.
Work --- 919-553-8100
rilev rilevhorneconstruction.com
Cannonsgate HOA. Vice President
Cannonsgate BSA Treasurer
Cell 919-422-1800
-------- Original Message -------
Subject: RE: SW8 050516, Cannonsgate Stormwater Permit
From: "Johnson, Kelly" <kelly.pJohnsonCa ncdenr.gov>
Date: Mon, December 22, 2014 9:25 am
To:"riley(&rileyhorneconstruction.com"
<riley(arileyhorneconstruction.com>
Mr. Horne,
I have not heard from anyone about Cannonsgate since my 11/7/14 email.
Happy Holidays,
Kelly
From: riley rileyhorneconstruction.com [mailto:riley rileyhorneconstruction com]
Sent: Sunday, December 21, 2014 9:47 PM
To: Johnson, Kelly
Subject: RE: SW8 050516, Cannonsgate Stormwater Permit
Good Morning Mrs. Johnson,
We haven't seen any work in Cannonsgate on these storm water problems. Could you please
tell me if anybody has contacted you on any of these issues.
Thanks for your time.
Riley Horne
R.H. Construction, Inc.
Work --- 91a-553-81 nn
J iVV
riley(drileyhorneconstruction.com

Cannonsgate HOA. Vice President
Cannonsgate BSA Treasurer
Cell 919-422-1800
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: SW8 050516, Cannonsgate Stormwater Permit
From: "Johnson, Kelly" <keiiy.p.johnson0 ncdenr.gov>
Date: Fri, November 07, 2014 8:36 am
To: "mwilliams(a)ramanagementinc.com" <mwilliams()ramanagementinc.com>,
"hadunn(apovnerspruill.com" <hgdunn ftoynerspruill.com>,
"[e-mail]"<[e-mail]>,
"[e-mail]" <riley aOrileyhorneconstruction.com>
Cc: "Lambe, Brian" <brian.lambeoncdenr.gov>, "Scott, Georgette"
<georgette.scott(@ncden r.gov>
AII,
The Division has received separate questions from many of you about this project and
so I will address them all simultaneously via email in order to clear up any confusion
that may exist stemming from the 9/30/14 letter (attached), and to also start the
conversation that will hopefully lead to permit compliance and transfer to the HOA.
The following parties are copied:
Melissa Williams, RA Management, Inc.
Glenn Dunn, Poyner & Spruill
Keith, Prestige Land Surveying
Miley Horn, R. H. construction, Inc. & HOA
R.A. North Development, Inc. is the current permittee per the most recent permit
which was issued on 9/22/11 and is attached for your reference. This permit does not
automatically transfer to the HOA with the sale of land. It has to be formally
transferred through the Division [per Permit Section III(5)]. The Division received the
attached transfer form from R.A. North Development, Inc. on 7/26/11 but the form was
not signed by the HOA and so it was not executed. It is in the interest of both the
HOA and the developer to transfer this permit to the HOA. From the developer's
perspective, if you do not transfer it you will be responsible for it forever. From the
HOA's perspective, if you do not eventually accept a permit transfer you can be
charged with operating without a permit. I would like to facilitate this transfer in any
way that I can.
In order to transfer the permit to the HOA, the permit either has to be in compliance or
we have to have to come to some sort of agreement between the two parties that will
get the site into compliance. It is my understanding that some of the stormwater
measures may not be installed per the approved plan. Section II(8) of.the permit
requires a certification that the project has been constructed in substantial compliance
with the permit, and that certification has not been received.
As the permittee, R. A. North Development, Inc. is responsible for submitting the
certification per the permit. As requested in the 9/30/14 letter, please submit this
certification. If the site can be certified, then this project will be in compliance. But, it
is my understanding that there are missing swales (and potentially other items) that
may keep it from being certified. I met with the HOA and Prestige Land Surveying

about the situation on 9/12/14, and I have provided their pictures which highlight their
concerns. I also created a diagram to show the location of the swales of interest. I
understand that water pools in one area of the development. Pooling water alone is
not a violation of the permit if the permit is constructed per approved plans. The issue
is that there is an allegation that the permit is not constructed per the plans. If the site
cannot be certified that it has been constructed per the approved plans, please
contact me to discuss obtainina either a Plan Revision or a Permit Modification to
change the permitted plan to a configuration which can be certified.
There is a related but separate issue at hand as well. There is an amenity pond on
the plan that is not required by the State Stormwater permit, and the HOA is
concerned that this pond does not have an appropriate place to overflow. This is a
flooding issue, and is therefore beyond the scope of the State Stormwater permit. The
Division does not have authority to regulate flooding. But, if the State Stormwater
permit is hindering a solution to this potential safety issue and we can help you
resolve it via a Plan Revision please let me know and we can discuss that further.
After these issues are resolved, we can transfer the permit to the HOA.
Administratively, we will three documents per SL 2011-256 which is attached:
Common area deeds showing that the HOA is the owner.
Documentation showing that at least 50% of the development has been sold.
Name/Ownership Change Form, available on our website htto://Dortal.ncdenr.ora/web/lr/state-
stormwater-forms docs under "miscellaneous forms". Please note that there are two forms. The one
designated for HOAs is pursuant to SL201 ^ -256 which says that if the site is compliant and the
appropriate documentation is submitted then the permit can be transferred to the HOA without their
signature. This form has a signature block only for the outgoing (current) permittee and can be used if
the site is in compliance. (Please note that this law has been passed since the previous transfer form
was submitted by the developer.) The other form has signature blocks for both the outgoing (current)
and incoming (proposed) permittee. We will use that form if we come to some agreement between the
developer and the permittee to get the site into compliance as discussed above so that both sides can
sign.
If you have further questions, please let me know how I can help you.
Thanks,
Kelly
K,eU,�-JDhv►sovu
Kelly Johnson
Environmental Engineer
NC Division of Energy, Mineral and Band Resources
Stormwater Permitting
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington, NC 28405-3845
Office: 910.796.7331
Fax: [phone]

From: Johnson, Kelly
Sent: Tuesday, December 01, 2015 9:59 AM
To: 'Caleb Wright'
Subject: RE: Drainage Easements
Thanks Caleb. Will you please submit copies of any necessary documents with your submittal package? It is difficult to
keep up with partial submittals over email from so many different projects.
Thanks,
Kelly
From: Caleb Wright [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2015 2:07 PM
To: Johnson, Kelly <[e-mail]>
Subject: Fwd: Drainage Easements
Kelly,
Please find the attached files from the county office indicating that the easements are shown on the plats.
Thank you for the notes from the meeting yesterday.
R/S
Caleb Wright, PE
(C) 252.229.0485
(F) 704.972.0300
cwriaht(&ISEC.enaineerin
www. ISEC.engineering
NC Firm No. P-1346
EMAIL DISCLAIMER
This message is intended for the recipients named in the e-mail. It may contain confidential or privileged
information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by replying to this
message and then delete it from your system. You should not read, copy, use, store or circulate this e-
mail whatsoever.
Disclaimer:
Internet communications are not secure. While every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that this
communication has not been tampered with, ISEC cannot be held accountable for any alterations made to the
contents of this message. If you wish to receive a hard copy of this message for comparison or should you
require any form of confirmation of the contents of this message, please contact the sender. E-mail messages
are not sealed reports and are thus draft recommendations for comment or responses to questions regarding a
sealed report. Do not rely on e-mail message for construction, see the corresponding engineering .report.
Begin forwarded message:
From: Gregg Hartman<Greaa.Hartmana-carteretcountvnc.aov-
Subject: RE: Drainage Easements cm (y

Date: November 24, 2015 at 8:16:49 AM EST
To: Caleb Wright <cwright(a)-isec.engineerinp
Caleb,
Please see the attached .pdf of Phase 1 & Phase 2 of Cannonsgate S/D. Drainage easements are shown
on the plats.
-Gregg
From: Caleb Wright[mailto:cwrightCcisec.engineering]
Sent: Monday, November 23, 2015 4:44 PM
To: Gregg Hartman <Gregg.Hartman@carteretcoi!ntync.gov>
Subject: Drainage Easements
Disclaimer: The content of this message and all attachments are subject to NC Public Record Law.
According to the law all information except the property of a private individual is considered public record
and subject to disclosure upon request to third parties without prior notification. If you are not the intended
recipient of this message contact the sender immediately and delete the message from your files. Thank
you for your cooperation.

Johnson, Kelly
From: Johnson, Kelly
Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2015 8:53 AM
To: 'Caleb Wright'
Cc: Georgette Scott
Subject: Cannonsgate Meeting Yesterday
Attachments: 15A NCAC 02H.1000 effective 1995 U 01.pdf
Caleb,
Thanks for meeting yesterday. Here are the notes I will leave on file:
1. General Approach: Please consider each swale individually in relation to the rule requirements, and document a
decision for each one. Options for swales:
a. Keep swales: Swales that are installed per the plan will be left in place.
b. Install swales: Install missing swales as they are shown on the permitted plans.
c. Modify swales: If, when considering full build -out, you determine that the flow rate/velocity of the
water warrants redesign of a swale then it can be modified.
i. Curb Outlet Swales:
1. 15A NCAC 2H .1008(g) sets specific requirements to "convey the stormwater to grassed
swales or vegetated areas prior to the runoff discharging to vegetative filters or
wetlands." Curb outlet swales shown on the plan cannot be removed, but their design
can be modified if it still meets the legal requirements.
2. 15A NCAC 2H .1008(h) allows for alternative designs that "provide equal or better
stormwater control, equal or better protection of waters of the state, and result in no
increase potential for nuisance conditions." This is another option for modifying curb
outlet swale design.
ii. Non -Curb Outlet Swales: These swales may also be able to be modified under the alternative
design rule.
d. Remove swales: If, when considering full build -out, you determine that the flow rate/velocity of the
water does not necessitate a non -curb outlet swale then it can be removed.
2. Complete System: We discussed that there are some swales that are not currently in place and they are
supposed to be on lot lines between homes. While we understand your concern that if you install the swales
now the upcoming adjacent construction may destroy them, we cannot transfer the permit to the HOA without
a complete system in place which can serve the community appropriately at full -build out. If the HOA, the
homeowners impacted, and the developer can reach an agreement to allow the swales to be installed after each
home is constructed then we can discuss that further. It would have to be a legal agreement tied to each
impacted lot, and it would also have to specify who is responsible for the installation, that the swale had to be
installed before the CO is issued for the homes on each side, and there would have to be a specific design for
each swale to be installed so that they one day know what to build.
3. Regulation: This project was designed under the 1995 version of 15A NCAC 2H .1005, which is attached.
4. Impervious Area: There may have been bike lanes and other impervious installed that was not originally
planned for. The project needs to meets is low density requirements (both inside the ORW 575 line and outside
of that line).
5. Pipes: Pipes are limited to draining only water underneath impervious surfaces (such as from one side of a road
to the other) in low density projects. Please keep this in mind in your design.
6. CAMA: We talked to Debbie Wilson, DCM Supervisor in our office, and she said that Ronda Bennett in the
Morehead City office, 252.808.2808x206, will have the latest CAMA permit plans.
Thanks,
Kelly
1

ILe��Ljjohwsow
Kelly Johnson
Environmental Engineer
NC Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources
Storm water Permitting
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington, NC 28405-3845
Office: 910.796.7331
Fax: [phone]

Johnson, Kelly ,Iwa ()C, 1' co
From: Johnson, Kelly
Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2015 9:30 AM
To: 'Melissa Williams'
Cc: 'Randy Allen; Scott, Georgette; Sams, Dan; '[e-mail] ; 'Caleb Wright'
Subject: RE: Cannonsgate Permit Transfer and Eng. certification
Melissa,
I never heard back from you last month, and I need to set a deadline for submittal. Please submit the required
information one month from today, 12/17/15.
Thanks,
Kelly
From: Johnson, Kelly
Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2015 10:42 AM
To:'Melissa Williams' <[e-mail]>
Cc: 'Randy Allen' <ralien @ramanagementinc.com>; Scott, Georgette <[e-mail]>; Sams, Dan
<[e-mail]>; '[e-mail]' <[e-mail]>; 'Caleb Wright'
<[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: Cannonsgate Permit Transfer and Eng. certification
Melissa,
i talked to the engineer, Caleb Wright, on Friday. i need to set a due date for this. What date is reasonable?
Thanks,
KJ
From: Melissa Williams [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Friday, October 02, 2015 2:33 PM
To: Johnson, Kelly <[e-mail]>
Subject: Re: Cannonsgate Permit Transfer and Eng. certification
Ms. Johnson,
1 was hoping to have you a better answer by today but honestly I don't. Last we spoke I explained we were
having complications with the engineer we were working with. Unfortunately we were not able to come to an
agreement and are no longer working with him. I made everything clear to him what was needed and we
signed an agreement. After his inspection he asked.for a significant amount of more money and I still didn't,feel
he was clear on what the scope of work needed to be. In any case we are now working with Caleb Wright, I
believe you are already aware of this. He left you a voice mail and would like to clarify a couple items with
you. I will have his scope including timeline once he speaks with you.
Again my apologies we haven't been able to complete this sooner. I will send you an update beginning of next
week. #you could please return Mr. Wrights call at your earliest convenience.
1 hanks,

Melissa Williams
Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LT . DROID
"Johnson, Kelly" <kelly.p.iohnson(a—),ncdenr.p-ov> wrote:
Melissa,
What is the status of the Cannonsgate submittal?
Thanks,
Kelly
-----Original Message -----
From: Johnson, Kelly
Sent: Thursday, September 10, 2015 11:30 AM
To: Melissa Williams'<mwilliamsCaramanagementine.com>
Cc: 'Randy Allen' <rallenCa?ramanagementinc.com>; Scott, Georgette <Reeorgette.scottCa?ncdenr.eov>; Sams, Dan
<dan.samsAyncdenr.gov>; Keith Maready (keithmaready(c�gmail.com) <keithmaready( gmail.com>
Subject: RE: Cannonsgate Permit Transfer and Eng. certification
Melissa,
As we discussed the revised due date will be two weeks from today, 9/24/15 to accommodate the engineer's unexpected delayed
schedule as well as the revised scope of work. (I have cc'd the HOA on this email as well).
Thanks,
Kelly
-----Original Message -----
From: Johnson, Kelly
Sent: Wednesday, August 19, 2015 3:26 PM
To: Melissa Williams<mwilliams(&xamanai!ementinc.com>
Cc: Randy Allen <rallen(uxamanagementinc.com>; Scott, Georgette <georgette.scottiuncdenr.sov>; Sams, Dan
<dan. sams(a),ncdenr. gov>
Subject: RE: Cannonsgate Permit Transfer and Eng. certification
Melissa,
I need to set a date so that we can track this NOD in our computer system. The June 1, 2015 permit set July 1, 2015 as the response
date, and we should probably have set a new date already. But, we lost sight of rescheduling given the cancelled onsite meeting and
the call from Governor's Office. We will set the new response deadline for September 2, 2015 which is two weeks from today and is
also within your estimated timeframe below.
Thanks,
Kelly
-----Original Message -----
From: Melissa Williams fmailto:mwilliams(aramanagementinc.coml
Sent: Wednesday, August 19, 2015 3:08 PM
To: Johnson, Kelly
Cc: Randy Allen; Scott, Georgette; Sams, Dan
Subject: RE: Cannonsgate Permit Transfer and Eng. certification
Kelly,
I wouldn't give them a date. I hope to have something to you by the end of the month. Maybe just give them an est. timeframe of end
of Aug./Beg. Of Sept.

As soon as I get further word from the engineer I will provide you more specifics
Melissa Williams
RA. Management, Inc.
3129 Springbank Lane I Charlotte, NC 28226 mwilliamsnxamanagementinc.com O. 704-847-60061 M. 704-609-0528 1 F. 704-841-
3525 The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or
privileged material. If you are not the intended recipient of this message you are hereby notified that any use, review, retransmission,
dissemination, distribution, reproduction or any action taken in reliance upon this message is prohibited. If you received this in error,
please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual
sender and may not necessarily reflect the views of the company.
-----Original Message -----
From: Johnson, Kelly [mailto:kellv.p.iohnsonL.ncdenr.gov]
Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2015 1:14 PM
To: Melissa Williams<mwilliams(iv'ramanaeernentinc.com>
Cc: Randy Allen <rallen ,ramanasementinc.com>; Scott, Georgette <georgette.scott dncdenr.gov>; Sams, Dan
<dan.sams cincdenr. ov>
Subject: RE: Cannonsgate Permit Transfer and Eng. certification
Melissa,
I am getting questions from the HOA about timeframes to have this resolved. What date should I tell them?
Thanks,
Kelly
-----Original Message -----
From: Melissa Williams [mailto:mwilliams(a?ramanagementinc.cornl
Sent: Friday, August 14, 2.015 836 AM
To: Johnson, Kelly
Cc: Randy Allen
Subject: Cannonsgate Permit Transfer and Eng. certification
Good morning Ms. Johnson,
Hope you are well. I apologize we have not been in communication for the last couple weeks. I wanted to let you know we are still
working on the documentation necessary to transfer the permii to the homeowners association. Summer months and holidays always
seem to bring vacation time and time away from the office.
We anticipate having this complete in the next couple weeks.
Thank you again for your assistance and the clarification you have provided so we can get this done
Be in touch soon.
Melissa Williams

Johnson, Kelly
From: Johnson, Kelly
Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2015 8:13 AM
To: 'Keith Maready'
Subject: RE: Cannonsgate Permit Transfer and Eng. certification
Keith,
The permittee is working with an engineer to have the stormwater permit certified. I have talked with the engineer
several times about it, and so I know that they are making progress with contracts etc. The changes that may be made
to the system depend on what the engineer finds. As we discussed previously, however, the issue withstanding water
in the road is not necessarily a stormwater permit violation because this is an environmental permit. We just have to
wait to see what he finds.
Thanks,
Kelly
-----Original Message -----
From: Keith Maready [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2015 1:30 PM
To: Johnson, Kelly <[e-mail]>
Subject: Re: Cannonsgate Permit Transfer and Eng. certification
Kelly
What can we do from our stand point? We are most interested in resolving this and hopefully addressing some of our
standing water concerns.
Thanks
Sent from my iPad
Keith Maready
On Sep 30, 2015, at 12:41 PM, "Johnson, Kelly" <[e-mail]> wrote:
> Melissa,
> What is the status of the Cannonsgate submittal?
> Thanks,
> Kelly
> -----Original Message -----
> From: Johnson, Kelly
> Sent: Thursday, September 10, 201511:30 AM
> To:'Melissa Williams' <mwiIlia [e-mail]>
> Cc: 'Randy Allen' <[e-mail]>; Scott, Georgette <[e-mail]>; Sams, Dan
<[e-mail]>; Keith Maready ([e-mail]) <[e-mail]>
> Subject: RE: Cannonsgate Permit Transfer and Eng. certification

> Melissa,
> As we discussed the revised due date will be two weeks from today, 9/24/15 to accommodate the engineer's
unexpected delayed schedule as well as the revised scope of work. (I have cc'd the HOA on this email as well).
> Thanks,
> Kelly
> -----Original Message -----
> From: Johnson, Kelly
> Sent: Wednesday, August 19, 2015 3:26 PM
> To: Melissa Williams <[e-mail]>
> Cc: Randy Allen <[e-mail]>; Scott, Georgette <[e-mail]>; Sams, Dan
<[e-mail]>
> Subject: RE: Cannonsgate Permit Transfer and Eng. certification
> Melissa,
> I need to set a date so that we can track this NOD in our computer system.. The June 1, 2015 permit set July 1, 2015 as
the response date, and we should probably have set a new date already. But, we lost sight of rescheduling given the
cancelled onsite meeting and the call from Governor's Office. We will set the new response deadline for September 2,
2015 which is two weeks from today and is also within your estimated timeframe below.
> Thanks,
> Kelly
> -----Original Message-----
• From: Melissa Williams [mailto:[e-mail]]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 19, 2015 3:08 PM
> To: Johnson, Kelly
> Cc: Randy Allen; Scott, Georgette; Sams, Dan
> Subject: RE: Cannonsgate Permit Transfer and Eng. certification
> Kelly,
> I wouldn't give them a date. I hope to have something to you by the end of the month. Maybe just give them an est.
timeframe of end of Aug./Beg. Of Sept.
> As soon as I get further word from the engineer I will provide you more specifics.
> Melissa Williams
> R.A. Management, Inc.
> 3129 Springbank Lane I Charlotte, NC 28226 [e-mail] 0.704-847-6006 1 M. 704-609-0528
F. 704-841-3525 The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may
contain confidential and/or privileged material. If you are not the intended recipient of this message you are hereby
notified that any use, review, retransmission, dissemination, distribution, reproduction or any action taken in reliance
upon this message is prohibited. if you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any

computer. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender and may not necessarily reflect the
views of the company.
> -----Original Message -----
> From: Johnson, Kelly [mailto:[e-mail]]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2015 1:14 PM
> To: Melissa Willia ns <[e-mail]>
> Cc: Randy Allen <[e-mail]>; Scott, Georgette <[e-mail]>; Sams, Dan
<[e-mail]>
> Subject: RE: Cannonsgate Permit Transfer and Eng. certification
> Melissa,
> I am getting questions from the HOA about timeframes to have this resolved. What date should I tell them?
> Thanks,
> Kelly
> -----Original Message -----
> From: Melissa Williams [mailto:[e-mail]]
> Sent: Friday, August 14, 2015 8:36 AM
> To: Johnson, Kelly
> Cc: Randy Allen
> Subject: Cannonsgate Permit Transfer and Eng. certification
> Good morning Ms. Johnson,
> Hope you are well. I apologize we have not been in communication for the last couple weeks. I wanted to let you
know we are still working on the documentation necessary to transfer the permit to the homeowners association.
Summer months and holidays always seem to bring vacation time and time away from the office.
> We anticipate having this complete in the next couple weeks.
> Thank you again for your assistance and the clarification you have provided so we can get this done.
> Be in touch soon.
> Melissa Williams
3

Johnson, Kell
From: Johnson, Kelly
Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2015 10:42 AM
To: 'Melissa Williams'
Cc: 'Randy Allen; Scott, Georgette; Sams, Dan; '[e-mail];'Caleb Wright'
Subject: RE: Cannonsgate Permit Transfer and Eng. certification
Melissa,
I talked to the engineer, Caleb Wright, on Friday. I need to set a due date for this. What date is reasonable?
Thanks,
KJ
From: Melissa WilliamsImailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Friday, October 02, 2015 2:33 PM
To: Johnson, Kelly <[e-mail]>
Subject: Re: Cannonsgate Permit Transfer and Eng. certification
Ms. Johnson,
I was hoping to have you a better answer by today but honestly I don't. Last we spoke I explained we were
having complications with the engineer we were working with. Unfortunately we were not able to come to an
agreement and are no longer working with him. I made everything clear to him what was needed and we
signed an agreement. After his inspection he asked, for a significant amount of more money and I still didn't feel
he was clear on what the scope of wor k needed to be. In any case we are now working with Caleb Wright, I
believe you are already aware of`this. He left you a voice mail and would like to clarifi, a couple items with
You. I will have his scope including timeline once he speaks with you.
Again my apologies we haven't been able to complete this sooner. I will send you an update beginning of next
week. If you could please return Mr. Wrights call at your earliest convenience.
Thanks,
Melissa Williams
Sent from my Verion Wireless 4G LTE DROID
"Johnson, Kelly" <[e-mail]> wrote:
Melissa,
What is the status of the Cannonsgate submittal?
Thanks,
Kelly
-----Original Message -----
From: Johnson, Kelly
Sent: Thursday, September 10, 2015 1130 AM

To: 'Melissa Williams'<inwilliams[a?ramanagementinc.com>
Cc: 'Randy Allen' <rallenC�aamax�aementinc.com>; Scott, Georgette <georgette.scottC�ncdenr.gov>; Sams, Dan
<dan.sams iuncdenr.gov>; Keith Maready (keitlunaready(x' mail.com) <keithmaready(a< com>
Subject: RE: Cannonsgate Permit Transfer and Eng. certification
Melissa,
As we discussed the revised due date will be two weeks from today, 9/24/15 to accommodate the engineer's unexpected delayed
schedule as well as the revised scope of work. (I have cc'd the HOA on this email as well).
Thanks,
Kelly
-----Original Message -----
From: Johnson, Kelly
Sent: Wednesday, August 19, 2015 3:26 PM
To: Melissa Williams<mwilliams(a)ramanageinentinc.com>
Cc: Randy Allen <rallen&amanagementinc.com>; Scott, Georgette <georgette.scottAncdenr.aov>; Sams, Dan
<dan.sams a�;ncdenr.Roy>
Subject: RE: Cannonsgate Permit Transfer and Eng. certification
Melissa,
I need to set a date so that we can track this NOD in our computer system. The June 1, 2015 permit set July 1, 2015 as the response
date, and we should probably have set a new date already. But, we lost sight of rescheduling given the cancelled onsite meeting and
the call from Governor's Office. We will set the new response deadline for September 2, 2015 which is two weeks from today and is
also within your estimated timeframe below.
Thanks,
Kelly
-----Original Message -----
From: Melissa Williams[mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 19, 2015 3:08 PM
To: Johnson, Kelly
Cc: Randy Allen; Scott, Georgette; Sams, Dan
Subject: RE: Cannonsgate Permit Transfer and Eng. certification
Kelly,
I wouldn't give them a date. I hope to have something to you by the end of the month. Maybe just give them an est. timeframe of end
of Aug./Beg. Of Sept.
As soon as I get further word from the engineer I will provide you more specifics.
Melissa Williams
R.A. Management, Inc.
3129 Springbank Lane I Charlotte, NC 28226 mwilliams(aramanagementine.com O. 704-847-6006 1 M. 704-609-0528 1 F. 704-841-
3525 The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or
privileged material. If you are not the intended recipient of this message you are hereby notified that any use, review, retransmission,
dissemination, distribution, reproduction or any action taken in reliance upon this message is prohibited. If you received this in error,
please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual
sender and may not necessarily reflect the views of the company.
-----Original Message -----
From: Johnson, Kelly [maiito:keiiy.p.johnson a)ncdenr.gov]
Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2015 1:14 PM

To: Melissa Williams <mwilliams(dxamanagementinc com>
Cc: Randy Allen <rallen &, amanagementinc.com>; Scott, Georgette <jzeoraette.scott(uncdenr.aov>; Sams, Dan
<dan. Sams Ancdenr. g ov>
Subject: RE: Cannonsgate Permit Transfer and Eng. certification
Melissa,
I am getting questions from the HOA about timeframes to have this resolved. What date should I tell them?
Thanks,
Kelly
-----Original Message -----
From: Melissa Williams[mailto:mwilliams(curamanagementinc coml
Sent: Friday, August 14, 2015 8:36 AM
To: Johnson, Kelly
Cc: Randy Allen
Subject: Cannonsgate Permit Transfer and Eng. certification
Good morning Ms. Johnson,
Hope you are well. I apologize we have not been in communication for the last couple weeks. I wanted to let you know we are still
working on the documentation necessary to transfer the permit to the homeowners association. Summer months and holidays always
seem to bring vacation time and time away from the office.
We anticipate having this complete in the next couple weeks.
Thank you again for your assistance and the clarification you have provided so we can get this done.
Bc in touch soon.
Melissa Williams

Johnson, Kell
From: Johnson, Kelly
Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2015 12:41 PM
To: 'Melissa Williams'
Cc: 'Randy Allen; Scott, Georgette; Sams, Dan; Keith Maready ([e-mail]);
'Caleb Wright'
Subject: RE: Cannonsgate Permit Transfer and Eng. certification
Melissa,
What is the status of the Cannonsgate submittal?
Thanks,
Kelly
-----Original Message -----
From: Johnson, Kelly
Sent: Thursday, September 10, 2015 11:30 AM
To:'Melissa Williams' <[e-mail]>
Cc: 'Randy Allen' <[e-mail]>; Scott, Georgette <[e-mail]>; Sams, Dan
<[e-mail]>; Keith Maready ([e-mail]) <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: Cannonsgate Permit Transfer and Eng. certification
Melissa,
As we discussed the revised due date will be two weeks from today, 9/24/15 to accommodate the engineer's
unexpected delayed schedule as well as the revised scope of work. (I have cc'd the HOA on this email as well).
Thanks,
Kelly
-----Original Message -----
From: Johnson, Kelly
Sent: Wednesday, August 19, 2015 3:26 PM
To: Melissa Williams <[e-mail]>
Cc: Randy Allen <[e-mail]>; Scott, Georgette <[e-mail]>; Sams, Dan
<[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: Cannonsgate Permit Transfer and Eng. certification
Melissa,
I need to set a date so that we can track this NOD in our computer system. The June 1, 2015 permit set July 1, 2015 as
the response date, and we should probably have set a new date already. But, we lost sight of rescheduling given the
cancelled onsite meeting and the call from Governor's Office. We will set the new response deadline for September 2,
2015 which is two weeks from today and is also within your estimated timeframe below.
Thanks,
Kelly
-----Original Message-----
1

From: Melissa Williams [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 19, 2015 3:08 PM
To: Johnson, Kelly
Cc: Randy Allen; Scott, Georgette; Sams, Dan
Subject: RE: Cannonsgate Permit Transfer and Eng. certification
Kelly,
I wouldn't give them a date. I hope to have something to you by the end of the month. Maybe just give them an est.
timeframe of end of Aug./Beg. Of Sept.
As soon as I get further word from the engineer I will provide you more specifics.
Melissa Williams
R.A. Management, Inc.
3129 Springbank Lane I Charlotte, NC 28226 [e-mail] O. 704-847-6006 1 M. 704-609-0528 1
F. 704-841-3525 The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may
contain confidential and/or privileged material. If you are not the intended recipient of this message you are hereby
notified that any use, review, retransmission, dissemination, distribution, reproduction or any action taken in reliance
upon this message is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any
computer. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender and may not necessarily reflect the
views of the company.
-----Original Message -----
From: Johnson, Kelly [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2015 1:14 PM
To: Melissa Williams <[e-mail]>
Cc: Randy Allen <[e-mail]>; Scott, Georgette <[e-mail]>; Sams, Dan
<[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: Cannonsgate Permit Transfer and Eng. certification
Melissa,
I am getting questions from the HOA about timeframes to have this resolved. What date should I tell them?
Thanks,
Kelly
-----Original Message -----
From: Melissa Williams [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Friday, August 14, 2015 8:36 AM
To: Johnson, Kelly
Cc: Randy Allen
Subject: Cannonsgate Permit Transfer and Eng. certification
Good morning Ms. Johnson,

Hope you are well. I apologize we have not been in communication for the last couple weeks. I wanted to let you know
we are still working on the documentation necessary to transfer the permit to the homeowners association. Summer
months and holidays always seem to bring vacation time and time away from the office.
We anticipate having this complete in the next couple weeks.
Thank you again for your assistance and the clarification you have provided so we can get this done.
Be in touch soon.
Melissa Williams

Johnson, Kelly
From: Lewis,Linda
Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2015 6:34 PM
To: Caleb Wright ([e-mail])
Cc: Johnson, Kelly
Subject: Canonsgate SW8 050516
Attachments: 2011 09 permit 050516.docx; 2015 02 CEI_BIMS 050516 final.pdf; 2015 02 CEI_NOD
050516.docx; 2015 06 addinfo 050516.docx; 2015 06 CEI—BIMS 050516.pdf, 2015 06
CEI NOD 050516.docx
Contacts: Caleb Wright
Caleb:
Attached is a copy of the current permit, and copies of various letters, emails and inspection reports you may find
helpful in preparing your scope of work to be able to certify the project in anticipation of transferring the permit to the
HOA. Since this is a low density permit, there is no blank certification attached to the permit. In order to transfer a
permit, SL 2011-256 requires, among other things, that the project be in substantial compliance with the permit.
As discussed, certification for this low density subdivision with a curb outlet swale system pertains to the following:
1. That the per lot built -upon area is not exceeded;
2. That the overall project built -upon are is not exceeded. For example, if the approved plan shows no sidewalk
within the rights -of -way, but the inspection reveals that sidewalks were constructed, then that is a compliance
issue.
3. That the curb outlet swales are installed at the grades depicted on the approved plans, and in the locations
shown on the approved plans, and are located in recorded drainage easements, and are not eroding, and are
nicely vegetated and the side slopes are 5:1(H:V) or flatter;
4. That the deed restrictions are properly and accurately recorded and a copy has been submitted to the Division;
5. That piping is minimized as shown on the approved plan. Under low density, the only runoff conveyances
allowed are grassed swales. Minimal piping to get under roads or at intersections to get the runoff into the
permitted curb outlet swale is allowed.
I've copied Kelly Johnson on this email —she authored much of the later correspondence and conducted the compliance
inspections. She will have much more knowledge of the details of the deficiencies than I do.
I saw Brian Lambe's September 2014 compliance inspection letter and as explained, we are in the process of cross -
training the Sediment inspectors to be stormwater inspectors and vice versa. Terminology is different between the
programs. Brian's request to "certify the measures" is a bit misleading for low density, where there is more than just a
BMP to be checked and verified.
Linda
Linda Lewis, E.I.
Environmental Engineer III
Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources
Wilmington Regional Office
127 Cardinal Drive Ext.
Wilmington, NC 28405
Main Office — 910-796-7215
Direct Line — 910-796-7343

Johnson, Kelly
From: Johnson, Kelly
Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2015 12:34 PM
To: 'Keith Maready'
Subject: RE: Cannonsgate
It was due a few days ago. I have been wrapped up in other things, and I haven't called her. But, the engineer has
contacted us to get copies of documents so I know they are still working on it.
(IT
-----Original Message -----
From: Keith Maready [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2015 11:54 AM
To: Johnson, Kelly <[e-mail]>
Subject: Cannonsgate
Morning Kelly
We are beyond the time extension date --I think??? Have you heard anything from the R A North folks?
Thanks
Keith

6V37 oSc�S � CO
Johnson, Kelly
From:
Johnson, Kelly
Sent:
Thursday, September 10, 2015 11:30 AM
To:
'Melissa Williams'
Cc:
'Randy Allen'; Scott, Georgette; Sams, Dan; Keith Maready ([e-mail])
Subject:
RE: Cannonsgate Permit Transfer and Eng. certification
Melissa,
As we discussed the revised due date will be two weeks from today, 9/24/15 to accommodate the engineer's
unexpected delayed schedule as well as the revised scope of work. (I have cc'd the HOA on this email as well).
Thanks,
Kelly
-----Original Message -----
From: Johnson, Kelly
Sent: Wednesday, August 19, 2015 3:26 PM
To: Melissa Williams <[e-mail]>
Cc: Randy Allen <[e-mail]>; Scott, Georgette <[e-mail]>; Sams, Dan
<[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: Cannonsgate Permit Transfer and Eng. certification
Melissa,
I need to set a date so that we can track this NOD in our computer system. The June 1, 2015 permit set July 1, 2015 as
the response date, and we should probably have set a new date already. But, we lost sight of rescheduling given the
cancelled onsite meeting and the call from Governor's Office. We will set the new response deadline for September 2,
2015 which is two weeks from today and is also within your estimated timeframe below.
Thanks,
Kelly
-----Original Message -----
From: Melissa Williams [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 19, 2015 3:08 PM
To: Johnson, Kelly
Cc: Randy Allen; Scott, Georgette; Sams, Dan
Subject: RE: Cannonsgate Permit Transfer and Eng. certification
Kelly,
1 wouldn't give them a date. i hope to have something to you by the end of the month. Maybe just give them an est.
timeframe of end of Aug./Beg. Of Sept.
As soon as I get further word from the engineer I will provide you more specifics.
Melissa Williams

R.A. Management, Inc.
3129 Springbank Lane I Charlotte, NC 28226 [e-mail] 0.704-847-6006 1 M. 704-609-0528 1
F. 704-841-3525 The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may
contain confidential and/or privileged material. If you are not the intended recipient of this message you are hereby
notified that any use, review, retransmission, dissemination, distribution, reproduction or any action taken in reliance
upon this message is prohibited. if you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete: the material from any
computer. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender and may not necessarily reflect the
views of the company.
-----Original Message -----
From: Johnson, Kelly [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2015 1:14 PM
To: Melissa Williams <[e-mail]>
Cc: Randy Allen <[e-mail]>; Scott, Georgette <[e-mail]>; Sams, Dan
<[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: Cannonsgate Permit Transfer and Eng. certification
Melissa,
am getting questions from the HOA about timeframes to have this resolved. What date should I tell them?
Thanks,
Kelly
-----Original Message -----
From: Melissa Williams [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Friday, August 14, 2015 8:36 AM
To: Johnson, Kelly
Cc: Randy Allen
Subject: Cannonsgate Permit Transfer and Eng. certification
Good morning Ms. Johnson,
Hope you are well. I apologize we have not been in communication for the last couple weeks. I wanted to let you know
we are still working on the documentation necessary to transfer the permit to the homeowners association. Summer
months and holidays always seem to bring vacation time and time away from the office.
We anticipate having this complete in the next couple weeks.
Thank you again for your assistance and the clarification you have provided so we can get this done.
Be in touch soon.
Melissa Williams

R. A. NORTH DEVELOPMENT, INC.
Ep.
June 10, 2015 J U N 15 2015
Ms. Tracy Davis BY:
-
NC Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington, NC 28405
RE: Request for Transferring Stormwater Management Permit No. SW 8050516 for
Cannonsgate at Bogue Sound
Dear Ms. Davis:
I am writing in response to your Notice of Deficiency dated June 1, 2015 regarding transfer of
the above -referenced stormwater permit to the Cannonsgate of Bogue Sound Homeowners
Association. I am disappointed that DENR will not accept the letter from John Riggle of Trade
Construction Company stating that the stormwater measures have been constructed in substantial
compliance with the stormwater permit.
There are always necessary field changes based on actual field conditions. This is inevitable,
particularly in the case of a very large development such as Cannonsgate, which has
approximately 500 building lots and associated infrastructure. Grading and infrastructure
construction was finished more than seven years ago, and all the infrastructure and common
areas were transferred and accepted by the HOA for continuing maintenance and repair. Since
that time all lots have been sold and grading has taken place on some of them. R.A. North has
not had control over these private activities or any changes that have affected drainage. These are
reasons that N.C.G.S. 143-214.7(c2) requires "substantial" compliance rather than strict
compliance in order to transfer the permit. I do not think, based on consultation with Trader
Construction, that our implementation of the stormwater plan is the cause of the problems the
HO complains about. Simply put, the HOA needs to assume its responsibilities and DENR

June"10, 2015
Page 2
needs to facilitate this by transferring the permit rather than pressuring R. A. North to take care
of the HOA's responsibilities. The HOA may not ever take this responsibility willingly.
Regarding the NOD, it appears to me to acknowledge that various drainage problems are not
R.A. North's responsibility, and it only alleges generally that the development is not in
compliance with the stormwater plan without specifically identifying why the non-compliance is
substantial. In view of Mr. Riggle's letter, DENR should specify the non-compliance and why it
is substantial. Mr. Riggle is experienced in these matters and I see no reason nor legal
requirement that compliance must be certified by a PE or PLS, and it is not required by the
permit. It appears to me that DENR is trying to avoid conflict with the HOA by refusing to
transfer the permit. This is not the fair way to handle this matter.
The HOA owns the common areas and has assumed the responsibility for their maintenance as
shown by the accompanying documentation. As your letter acknowledges, the HOA complains
of drainage problems that are not R.A. North's responsibility, which makes me wonder why you
even include these matters in an NOD written to R.A. North. This just verifies that the HOA is
trying to use DENR to help get someone else to solve its maintenance issues at the site that the
HOA should deal with itself.
In conclusion, R.A. North contends it is in substantial compliance with the stormwater permit
and I am certifying this based on Mr. Riggle's letter. Enclosed are the items listed below, so I
think all the items required for the transfer have now been submitted. I ask that DENR effectuate
the transfer. If you continue to think the development is not in substantial compliance, please
respond with a description of such non-compliance and why you think it is substantial. If
necessary, I will have our consultant meet with you and the HOA at the development to
determine whether there is actually a need for further work and, if so, who is responsible.

June 10, 2015
Page 3
Please understand that R.A. North is not trying to avoid its obligations, but it should not be held
responsible indefinitely for matters unrelated to the adequacy of the stormwater measures at the
development.
Enclosed documents are as follows:
• Check to NC Department of Environment and Natural Resources for the $40.00
application fee. I understand this fee may not be required if this is the -first transfer. If that
is the case, please return the check.
• State Stormwater Permit Transfer Request Form executed by Randy Allen as president of
R.A. North Development, Inc. pursuant to N.C.G.S. 143-214.7(c2). Please note Mr. Allen
is certifying substantial compliance for the permittee based on the enclosed letter from
John Riggle of Trader Construction Company.
• Letter from John Riggle of Trader Construction Company certifying that the stormwater
measures at Cannonsgate were constructed in substantial compliance with the permit.
• Copy of current Stormwater Management Permit No. SW 8050516 and transmittal letter
dated September 22, 201 L
• Deed recorded in Book 1285, Page 345 of the Carteret County Registry transferring from
R.A. North Development, Inc. to Cannonsgate at Bogue Sound Homeowners Association
all the common area in the development except "Boat Slip Area and Boat Slips."
• Business Corporation Annual Report showing Randolph M. Allen as President, Treasurer
and Secretary of R.A. North Development, Inc. and thus authorized to sign this
application.
• A copy of Article VIII, Section 4 Compliance with Stormwater Management Acts from
the Declaration of Protective Covenants, Restrictions, Easements, Charges, and Liens for
Cannonsgate at Bogue Sound recorded in Book 1121, Page 146 of the Carteret County
Registry. This is to show that the restrictions required by the stormwater permit have
been recorded as required.
• List of all lots in Cannonsgate that have been transferred verified by Randolph M. Allen
and showing that well over 50% of the 525 lots have been transferred.

June`10, 2015
Page 4
Yours trul
d�
Randy Allen, President
R.A. North Development, Inc.

RA
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory
Governor
June 23, 2015
Mr. Randy Allen, President
R.A. North Development, Inc.
3129 Springbank Lane
Charlotte, NC 28226
Subject: Request for Additional Information
Stormwater Project No. SW8 050516
Cannonsgate
Carteret County
Dear Mr. North:
Donald van der Vaart
Secretary
The Wilmington Regional Office received Stormwater Management Permit Name/Ownership Change Application for
Cannonsgate on June 15, 2015. A preliminary review of that information has determined that the application is not
complete. The following information is needed to continue the stormwater review:
1. PE/PLS Certification [Sections II(3) and II(8) of the permit]: Per the enclosed email from Tracy Davis dated June
19, 2015 please submit a certification showing that the project has been constructed within substantial
compliance with the permit conditions. If the project cannot be certified, then please contact me to schedule a
meeting to discuss the next steps.
2. Other:
a. Check for Forty Dollars ($40): Check number 0000010435 is being retumed because there is no fee for
the first permit transfer.
b. Administrative Items: The Name/Ownership Change form, the common area deed, and documentation
that 50% of the lots have been sold has been submitted.
Please note that this request for additional information is in response to a preliminary review. The requested information
should be received in this Office prior to July 23, 2015, or the application will be retumed as incomplete. The return of a
project will necessitate resubmittal of all required items, including the application fee.
If you need additional time to submit the information, please email or fax your request for a time extension to the Division at
the address and fax number at the bottom of this letter. Please note that a second significant request for additional
information may result in the return of the project. If the project is retumed, you will need to reschedule the project through
the Express coordinator for the next available review date, and resubmit all of the required items, including the application
fee..
The construction of any impervious surfaces, other than a construction entrance under an approved Sedimentation Erosion
Control Plan, is a violation of NCGS 143-215.1 and is subject to enforcement action pursuant to NCGS 143-215.6A.
Division of Energy, Mineral, and Land Resources
Land Quality Section — Wilmington Regional Office
127 Cardinal Drive Extension, Wilmington, North Carolina 28405 • [phone] / Fax: [phone]

SW8 050516
`June 23, 2015
If you have any questions concerning this matter please feel free to call me at [phone] or email me at
[e-mail]
Sinc `rely, ,.
i
Ily Jo ns
nvironmental Engineer
GDS/kpj: G:1WQ1SharedlStormWate6Permits & Projects12005 \050516 LDT015 06 addinfo 050516
enc : Email from Tracy Davis, Director of Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources, June 19, 2015
cc: Melissa Williams, RA Management, Inc., ([e-mail])
Glenn Dunn, Poyner & Spruill, ([e-mail])'
Prestige Land Surveying,([e-mail])
Riley Horn, R.H. Construction & HOA,(riley@(leyhomeconstruction.com)
Wilmington Regional Office
Page 2 of 2

Johnson, Kell
From: Davis, Tracy
Sent: Friday, June 19, 2015 9:59 AM
To: Sams, Dan
Cc: Scott, Georgette; Bennett, Bradley; Johnson, Kelly; Vinson, Toby; Cole, Brad
Subject: RE: Canon's Gate, Glenn Dunn call for R.A. North
Thanks for the information you sent (excellent documentation, Kelly!). It was very helpful.
I just got off the phone with Glenn Dunn, attorney for RA North. We discussed the current situation and we agreed that
there are two options: 1) RA North obtain the services of a PE/PLS to review the SW plan and permit vs. the site
conditions and certify that the site is in substantial compliance with the permit or 2) if such PE/PLS is not comfortable
certifying substantial compliance, then a meeting will be scheduled at the site with DEMLR, RA North rep, PE/PLS, and
HOA rep to discuss work to be done onsite to make it certifiable — and once the work is completed and the certification
issued, the permit will be deemed in compliance and transferred to the HOA. The other areas outside of the permit will
have to be addressed by the HOA.
Mr. Dunn will discuss this with his client and will be back in touch next week on next steps.
Thanks, Tracy
From: Sams, Dan
Sent: Friday, June 19, 2015 9:18 AM
To: Davis, Tracy
Cc: Scott, Georgette; Bennett, Bradley; Johnson, Kelly
Subject: FW: Canon's Gate, Glenn Dunn call for R.A. North
Tracy:
Here is the information regarding Mr. R.A. North. Basically, the low density project has not followed the approved plan
(omission of some of the drainage swales, standing water). Mr. North would like to transfer the permit to the HOA, the
HOA doesn't want it until it is in compliance or an agreement is reached. Kelly's Record of Recent Events walks through
this fairly clearly.
If you have questions, give me or Georgette a call.
Thanks....
dan
From: Scott, Georgette
Sent: Friday, June 19, 2015 8:59 AM
To: Sams, Dan
Subject: Canon's Gate
Georgette Scott
Stormwater Program Supervisor
State Stormwater Program
NC Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources

VENDOR n13 CHECK: 0000010435
DATE: 6/10/2015
REMIT TO: N.C.
Dent. of Environment & COMMENT: RAND DWO rermit
- irrocessin Fee to
Transfer 17WA
N F I- AMOUNT
INVOW�
DWO Permit RAJ
1.)A 11-1
6/10/2015
VOUCHER
0000001463
COMMENT
RAND DWO Permit -Processing Fee b
AMOUNT
40.00
DISCOUNI
0.00
40.00
40.001
0.00
40.00
R.A. North Development 1, LLC
- ------------ -----------
FD)__0U_-Jffa@W
No. 0000GA-04-35
R.A. N.a.rthDovelopmont I; LLBftnkist
312.9 ftrin,goank Lane,
Charlotte, WC 28226
USA
PAY. Forty and xx ! 100 Dollars
TO THE N.C. Dept. of Environment &
ORDER Natural Resources
OF I
USA
DATE AMOUNT
6/10/2015 ****************40.00
CHECK AMXNM OVER $26,000-00 RECUIRE IM SIGA7LM
WNW_ W.-I
n000000 L043 Sill I:OS 3 10046 SI: LOOO 13 2496 786110

TRADER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
DesigNBulid • Heavy Civil - Site Dembprrrerd • Engineering • Surveying • wells • Demalitlon • Materials Testing
March 6, 2015
Mr. Randy Allen, President
R.A. North Development, Inc.
110 Matthews Station Street, Suite 2D
Matthews, NC 28105
Subject Stormwater Controls and Impervious Surface Statement
Cannonsgate at Bogue Sound
Permit No. SW8 050516
Carteret County, NC
Mr. Allen:
During every phase of development, Trader Construction Company performed all
construction activities in compliance with the above referenced stormwater permit. It is
my opinion, all stormwater Controls and impervious surer were constructed within
substantial intent of the approved plans and specifications.
To the best of my knowledge and recollection, it was determined some swales were not
needed as their installation served no function. It is my opinion, the stormwater
measures implemented met the substantial intent of the stormwater permit.
Throughout this project any deficiencies noted by R.A. North Development, Inc.'s
representatives or by NC Division of Water Quality (DWQ) inspectors required only
minor rework and were corrected.
Respectfully submitted,
J hn Riggle - ect Manager
PO Drawer 1578, New Bem, NC 28563, Tale: [phone], Fax: [phone], www.traderconstruction.com

Johnson, Kelly
From: Johnson, Kelly
Sent: Monday, December 22, 2014 9:26 AM
To:'[e-mail]'
Subject: RE: SW8 050516, Cannonsgate Stormwater Permit
Mr. Horne,
I have not heard from anyone about Cannonsgate since my 11/7/14 email.
Happy Holidays,
Kelly
From: [e-mail][mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Sunday, December 21, 2014 9:47 PM
To: Johnson, Kelly
Subject: RE: SW8 050516, Cannonsgate Stormwater Permit
Good Morning Mrs. Johnson,
We haven't seen any work in Cannonsgate on these storm water problems. Could you please tell me if
anybody has contacted you on any of these issues.
Thanks for your time.
Rilev Horne
R.H. Construction, Inc.
Work --- 919-553-8100
riles@)rilevhorneconstruction.com
Cannonsgate HOA. Vice President
Cannonsgate BSA Treasurer
Cell 919-422-1800
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: SW8 050516, Cannonsgate Stormwater Permit
From: "Johnson, Kelly" <kelly.pJohnsonCa ncdenr gov>
Date: Fri, November 07, 2014 8:36 am
To:"mwilliams@)ramanagementinc.com" <mwilliams@)ramanagementinc com>,
"hgdunn(ftoynerspruill.com" <hadunn0poynerspruill.com>,
"prestigesurveying(&embargmail com" <prestigesurveyinataembargmail com>,
"riley@)rileyhorneconstruction.com"<riley(&rileyhorneconstruction.com>
Cc: "Lambe, Brian" <brian.lambeC&ncdenr.gov>, "Scott, Georgette"
<georgette.scott a0ncdenr.gov>
All,
The Division has received separate questions from many of you about this project and so I will
address them all simultaneously via email in order to clear up any confusion that may exist
stemming from the 9/30/14 letter (attached), and to also start the conversation that will
hopefully lead to permit compliance and transfer to the HOA. The following parties are
copied:
Melissa Williams, RP. Management, Inc.

2.'
3.'
Glenn Dunn, Poyner & Spruill
Keith, Prestige Land Surveying
Riley Horn, R. H. Construction, Inc. & HOA
R.A. North Development, Inc. is the current permittee per the most recent permit which was
issued on 9/22111 and is attached for your reference. This permit does not automatically
transfer to the HOA with the sale of land. It has to be formally transferred through the Division
[per Permit Section 111(5)]. The Division received the attached transfer form from R.A. North
Development, Inc. on 7/26/11 but the form was not signed by the HOA and so it was not
executed. It is in the interest of both the HOA and the developer to transfer this permit to the
HOA. From the developer's perspective, if you do not transfer it you will be responsible for it
forever. From the HOA's perspective, if you do not eventually accept a permit transfer you
can be charged with operating without a permit. I would like to facilitate this transfer in any
way that I can.
In order to transfer the permit to the HOA, the permit either has to be in compliance or we
have to have to come to some sort of agreement between the two parties that will get the site
into compliance. It is my understanding that some of the stormwater measures may not be
installed per the approved plan. Section 11(8) of the permit requires a certification that the
project has been constructed in substantial compliance with the permit, and that certification
has not been received.
As the permittee, R. A. North Development, Inc. is responsible for submitting the certification
per the permit. As requested in the 9/30/14 letter, please submit this certification. If the site
can be certified, then this project will be in compliance. But, it is my understanding that there
are missing swales (and potentially other items) that may keep it from being certified. I met
with the HOA and Prestige Land Surveying about the situation on 9/12/14, and I have
provided their pictures which highlight their concerns. I also created a diagram to show the
location of the swales of interest. I understand that water pools in one area of the
development. Pooling water alone is not a violation of the permit if the permit is constructed
per approved plans. The issue is that there is an allegation that the permit is not constructed
per the plans. If the site cannot be certified that it has been constructed per the approved
plans, please contact me to discuss obtaining either a Plan Revision or a Permit Modification
to change the permitted plan to a configuration which can be certified.
There is a related but separate issue at hand as well. There is an amenity pond on the plan
that is not required by the State Stormwater permit, and the HOA is concerned that this pond
does not have an appropriate place to overflow. This is a flooding issue, and is therefore
beyond the scope of the State Stormwater permit. The Division does not have authority to
regulate flooding. But, if the State Stormwater permit is hindering a solution to this potential
safety issue and we can help you resolve it via a Plan Revision please let me know and we
can discuss that further.
After these issues are resolved, we can transfer the permit to the HOA. Administratively, we
will three documents per SL 2011-256 which is attached:
Common area deeds showing that the HOA is the owner.
Documentation showing that at least 50% of the development has been sold.
Name/Ownership Change Form, available on our website http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/ir/state-stormwater-
forms does under "miscellaneous iorrns". Please note that there are two forms. i he one desionated for HOAs
is pursuant to SL2011-256 which says that if the site is compliant and the appropriate documentation is

submitted then the permit can be transferred to the HOA without their signature. This form has a signature block
only for the outgoing (current) permittee and can be used if the site is in compliance. (Please note that this law
has been passed since the previous transfer form was submitted by the developer.) The other form has
signature blocks for both the outgoing (current) and incoming (proposed) permittee. We will use that form if we
come to some agreement between the developer and the permittee to get the site into compliance as discussed
above so that both sides can sign.
If you have further questions, please let me know how I can help yoLj.
Thanks,
Kelly
1-,-' 6LUj oh V1.50V1.
Kelly Johnson
Environmental Engineer
NC Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources
Stormwater Permitting
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington, NC 28405-3845
Office: 910.796.7331
Fax: [phone]

Johnson, Kelly
From: Lambe, Brian
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2014 11:54 AM
To: Melissa Williams
Cc: Scott, Georgette; Johnson, Kelly
Subject: RE: Response to 9/30/14 Notice of Inspection - Non Compliant Cannonsgate
Attachments: SSW-HOA-NAME-OWNER-CHANGE-20120924-DWQ-SPU.pdf
Dear Ms. Williams:
Thank you for the response to the recent inspection. Regardless of the ownership of the project, the permit remains in
R A North's name. This can only be changed by completing the attached form. Please note on page one the required
checklist for transfer of the permit. The site must be in compliance with the stormwater permit during transfer. A
compliance inspection can be scheduled with a representative from your office as needed.
I look forward to working with you on this project to find the best solution possible for all parties involved. Please do
not hesitate to contact me or Kelly Johnson with any questions you may have. Kelly will be the engineer reviewing the
transfer.
Brian Lambe
Environmental Specialist
Land Quality Section
NC Division of Energy, Mineral, and Land Resources
[phone]
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be
disclosed to third parties.
From: Melissa Williams[mailto:mwilliamsC&ramanagementinc.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2014 5:08 PM
To: Lambe, Brian
Cc: Randy Allen
Subject: Response to 9/30/14 Notice of Inspection - Non Compliant Cannonsgate
Good afternoon Mr. Lambe,
Please see attached response with other supporting documents that were requested. This has also been certified mail
and should be delivered to your office via USPS by this Thursday 10/30/14.
hrleiissa VVil$iams
R `� AA a'laaem.e-)t, Iikc,
3129 Springbank Lane I Chaff iotte, NC 28226
[e-mail]
0. 704-847-6006 1 w. 704-609-0528 1 F. 704-841-3 ,2:,
':,.i Dr n;L! -m trensmitWd is into: i6t] onK, for tnc r-�r .c:n c:r en?!ty t0 N:7ii�;,it it is as:itresu:>_ �'i?�! m•<t (:4:.'lt�iln G"%�'i'�dantii;.l �mdjor privii�;;ch� mat r4=.:!. if you +_re n A the
-r:Jud rt. ipieT. o: th!5 me e,;; : ;• >u ar•_ no',dicd That any;a (:, v_• iew, r trenw!r is:i:;n; di_,sonv,tatio:e, ciistributiun, remad.<;u'-_ion oi _�..n, action taken in rt iian-:c
i :::s mess,.:., is p• c;•'.Oit= d. If..ou rem ived "his in error, pv�,aE^e cont; ;c_ the sender and deL•tr, the mat.-; iai from any cam miter. Any vieeas a+xpressed in t!tis
- are t0se of to:= 1:-1%idaal sendFt and may not necv_ssarily ?fiect the , JtwiE€ ofthe company.

Johnson, Kelly
From: Scott, Georgette
Sent: Monday, September 15, 2014 10:52 AM
To: Johnson, Kelly
Subject: FW: SW8 050516 BUA reallocation request
It appears that Christine and David were working on this transfer. I think somewhere along the way the permittee
backed out of the transfer. Here is some info on the lot reallocation.
Georgette
From: Kathy Vinson [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Friday, September 23, 2011 9:34 AM
To: Scott, Georgette
Subject: RE: SW8 050516 BUA reallocation request
Thank you so much. I appreciate your help.
7t .i' Zsz:7,I.ICP
P
252 i -975
kbvxlmn@ ec
From: Scott, Georgette [mailto:cieorgette.scott dncdenr.gov]
Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2011 12:45 PM
To: Kathy Vinson
Cc: Glenn Dunn; Nelson, Christine; Cox, David
Subject: RE: SW8 050516 BUA reallocation request
Ms. Vinson,
I have just been discussing this project with my engineer. It appears that the BUA reallocation should not be a problem.
Before a transfer can occur any issues/changes with the permit must be completed. Therefore the modification will be
completed first and in short order. Once that is completed, approved and signed we will complete the transfer.
I understand that the permittee would like to transfer the permit under the new transfer act. If that is the case we have
a few questions and information that we will require per the new act before we can transfer. We have been instructed
by the Attorney General that if the permittee wishes to transfer the permit under the new transfer Act that an
inspection must be conducted after the date of the passage of the Act and at the time a transfer is requested under the
Act. We will be sending the questions to you shortly so that we can complete this as soon as possible.
Christine Nelson should be contacting you shortly to discuss the additional information she needs for the transfer.
Georgette Scott
Stormwater Program Supervisor
State Stormwater Program
NC Division of Water Quality
127 Cardinal Drive Ext.
Wilmington, NC 2840.5
Phone [phone]
Fax [phone]
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.

From: Kathy Vinson [mailto:kbvinsonaec.rr.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2011 10:53 AM
To: Scott, Georgette
Cc: Glenn Dunn
Subject: SW8 050516 BUA reallocation request
Dear Ms. Scott,
State Stormwater permit SW8 050516 was issued to RA North Development, Inc. (Randy Allen, President) in June 2005
for development of Cannonsgate at Bogue Sound, a low -density stormwater subdivision in Carteret County. Plan
revisions were approved by DWQ in January 2006 and August 2007 to add facilities and reallocate built -upon -area (BUA)
within the subdivision.
On behalf of Randy Allen we submitted a modification request to DWQ in July to reallocate 3585 square feet of BUA
currently set aside for future development to Lot #437. Prior to submitting the request we worked with DWQ staff to
obtain their guidance on the required procedures, and traveled to the Wilmington Regional Office to review and copy
files associated with the permit and related modifications. It was necessary for us to review the files to determine if
sufficient BUA was available for future development within the 575' CAMA coastal shoreline AEC, in accordance with
CAMA and water quality regulations. Based on your files, we found that sufficient unallocated BUA remained available
to allocate the additional area to Lot #437.
The modification request was delivered to the regional office by UPS on July 13, 2011, and I understand from DENR staff
that the modification package was logged in as complete on that day. To assist in staff review, we included a "BUA
Tracking & Requested Allocation" table that traces the changes in BUA allocations that have been executed in two
previous permit revisions, as well as the currently requested revision. I was told by DENR staff that the standard time for
reviewing such requests is 45 — 60 days, depending upon staff workload; vacation schedules, etc. In mid -August! was
told that action should occur within three weeks (the week of Labor Day). However, as of today, we have heard nothing
on the status of our request.
My clients are David and Gloria Keesee, who are the owners of Lot #437. They are paying all costs associated with the
current application and BUA reallocation process. These expenses are in addition to more than $25,000 spent by the
Keesees since the fall of 2009 with surveyors, engineers, soil scientists and other professionals pursuing various options
to develop their property in accordance with local, state, and federal requirements. These expenses are on top of the
full market price they paid for the lot in 2006.
DWQ staff has stated clearly to us that as owner of the permit, Mr. Allen controls the reallocation. Mr. Allen was
gracious to agree to the reallocation to assist the Keesees in building their home on the lot. He has indicated repeatedly
that he wants the Keesees to have the additional BUA.
Through his attorney Glenn Dunn, Mr. Allen has also submitted a request to transfer the permit from Randy Allen and
RA North Development, Inc. to Cannonsgate at Bogue Sound Homeowners Association, Inc (HOA). The ownership
transfer request was submitted on July 22 following my submission requesting the BUA reallocation to Lot #437. In his
request, Mr. Dunn stated that Mr. Allen had agreed to the BUA transfer some time ago and wants to complete the
reallocation before the permit is transferred to the homeowners. association.
Mr. Dunn and I are working together on these requests and are anxious to resolve both the BUA and ownership
transfers. Representatives of the HOA are calling Mr. Dunn and are getting agitated that Mr. Allen has not yet
transferred permit ownership. Mr. Allen is concerned that while DWQ staff has inspected the property and found it to
be compliant with the stormwater plan, as time goes on the project may become damaged or otherwise out of
compliance. I am concerned that the BUA reallocation occur while the permit is still in Mr. Allen's name to avoid
repeating this process with the HOA and subsequently incurring more expense for the Keesees.

Mr. Dunn and I were careful to provide all of the necessary information in an organized manner and it seems to us that
the two transfers will take very little time.
On behalf of all involved, I am requesting that you expedite both requests under review by your staff. I am available to
come to Wilmington to meet with your staff to review the BUA reallocation submittal and answer any questions that
may have arisen.
Thank you for your help. Please call if you need more information or to schedule a meeting.
a -,.;.z:N C 28557,
r
kbvinscn@ ec xncm
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 10.0.1410 / Virus Database: 1520/3912 - Release Date: 09/22/11

Scott, Georgette
From: Johnson, Kelly
Sent: Monday, September 15, 2014 9:20 AM
To: Lambe, Brian; Scott, Georgette
Cc: Sams, Dan
Subject: SW8 050516, Cannonsgate Inspection Needed
Attachments: Cannonsgate.pdf
olow Up Flag: Follow up -fit
Flag Status: Flagged 5�
Georgette, �J
Keith with Prestige Land Surveying and a ember f the HOA (I didn't get his name) did a file review on this on Friday. I
haven't worked on this one, so I don't have c background. I just set up the file review. SteWI spected it and found
it to be compliant in 2011. They have requested an inspection. They are ramping up to transfer. This one has two
potential safety issues that need to be addressed that we may need to consider under "alternative measures". I asked
them to get some proposals together and then we can discuss them.
1. They have water pooling on a road that reportedly isn't graded properly, and they will look into putting in a
pipe/LS/FS to get the water off of the road. This is LD so they will need special permission for the pipe (and it is
also ORW 575). This is also a CO swale, and they may need to shorten the 100ft swale to install whatever they
propose.
2. They have an amenity pond that doesn't have anywhere to overflow, and they want to add a swale
(pipe/LS/FS?) along one side of lot 519. They will have to get an easement from the lots owner, but they think
that they will be able to get it because otherwise that lot will have water issues. I don't think that lot 519 is built
yet (not positive though). This is also ORW 575.
Brian,
Here is some general info. I will bring you the file.
1.) 25% LD with Curb Outlet system. There are several ponds, but they are amenity ponds only and are not covered
by the permit.
2.) Documentation:
a. Designer's Certification: Needed
b. 0&M: On file with the 2011 permit
c. Deed Restrictions: Recorded (need to verify that they are correct)
d. Common Area Deed(s): Needed
3.) History:
a. 2005: Permit issued.
b. 2006: Plan Revision issued to re -allocate impervious area from "future" to allow some common areas to
be built.
c. 2007: Plan Revision issued to re -allocate impervious area from "future" to allow some common areas to
be built. The original, signed letter has been lost. In 2010 Linda saw that the letter was lost and did
some homework to verify that it had, in fact, been issued. She sent a letter documenting that.
d. 2010: Letter about the 2007 PR sent.
e. 2011: Permit modified to re -allocate "future" area to lot 437. (It looks like that lot must have bought
some impervious from the developer?)
f. 2012: Letter issued that development on lot 437 is covered by SW8 050516.
4.) Two Specific Issues: See my scanned notes (which are sort of hard to read... sorry O). The plans aren't very
detailed with topography/spot elevations unfortunately. If you could take pictures of these two areas while you
are there that would be appreciated so that we can figure out what to do when make their proposals. ! to!d
them that we generally ask for the Designer's Certification since it isn't on file and also note potential problems

(such as the two below) in the inspection letter. If they aren't able to get the Cert, and what has been permitted
can't be built because of unforeseen field issues then we can work with them to make appropriate changes.
a. Water Pooling: Swales #29 and #28 look like they should receive the road's water, but the road is
reportedly not graded properly.
b. Pond near Lot 519: They said that this pond just overflows onto the side near lot 519 and pools. They
said that there aren't outlet boxes or overflows on the ponds. (That isn't part of our permit because
they are only amenity ponds, but It Is interesting.) If it is a safety issue and -we are able to help them
resolve it while still appropriately implementing the stormwater program then hopefully we can do so.
Thanks,
KJ
k.6LU-JokV-Sem,
Kelly Johnson
Environmental Engineer
NC Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources
Stormwater Permitting
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington, NC 28405-3845
Office: 910.796.7331
Fax: [phone]

a. Water Pooling: Swales #29 and #28 look like they should receive the road's water, but the road is
reportedly not graded properly.
b. Pond near Lot 519: They said that this pond just overflows onto the side near lot 519 and pools. They
said that there aren't outlet boxes or overflows on the ponds. (That isn't part of our permit because
they are only amenity ponds, but it is interesting.) If it is a safety issue and we are able to help them
resolve it while still appropriately implementing the stormwater program then hopefully we can do so.
Thanks,
KJ
V-el.I.�JDkVLSDV,
Kelly Johnson
Environmental Engineer
NC Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources
Stormwater Permitting
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington, NC 28405-3845
Office: 910.796.7331
Fax: [phone]

Johnson, Kelly
From: Johnson, Kelly
Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 201410:13 AM
To: 'Prestige Land"Surveying'
Cc: Nelson, Christine
Subject: RE: Cannonsgate at Bogue Sound
Attachments: 2012 02 14_Project Return.pdf; 2011 11 30_Response from attorney.pdf; 2012 01 11
_Email.pdf; 2011 11 28_Questions to Permittee.pdf
Keith,
Cannonsgate, SW8 050516, was issued most recently to R.A. North Development, Inc. on September 22, 2011. It looks
like they tried to transfer it to the HOA, but there were some compliance issues and the transfer could not be done until
those were resolved. I have attached a few of the items we have on file that give you an idea of the history. If you
would like to schedule a time to come down and do a file review to see the whole thing, please let us know.
Thanks
Kelly
From: Prestige Land Surveying fmailto:prestigesurveyinciaembargmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2014 4:26 PM
To: Johnson, Kelly
Subject: Cannonsgate at Bogue Sound
Good afternoon Ms. Kelly,
I am working with Riley Horne, a board member of the Cannonsgate HOA. He has asked me to find out if the
Stormwater Permit No. SW8 050516 has been transferred to the HOA. If it has can you tell us who signed the
transfer form so we can try and find out where the plans are.
Thanks for all you do,
Keith
Prestige Land Surveying, P.A.
501 W. B. McLean Blvd.
Cape Carteret, NC 28584
252-393-2129
252-393-3075(fax)
Corporation License Number C-0960