Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSW4230101_Supplement-EZ Form_20230526SUPPLEMENT-EZ COVER PAGE FORMS LOADED PROJECT INFORMATION Project Name E M Holt ES On -site Queuing Improvements 1 2 Project Area (ac) 30.2 3 Coastal Wetland Area (ac) 0 4 Surface Water Area (ac) 0 5 Is this pr9ject High or Low Density? Low 6 1 Does this project use an off -site SCM? No COMPLIANCE WITH 02H .1003 4 7 Width of vegetated setbacks provided (feet) 30 8 Will the vegetated setback remain vegetated? Yes 9 If BUA is proposed in the setback, does it meet NCAC 02H.1003 4 (c-d)? N/A 10 Is streambank stabilization proposed on thisproject? No NUMBER AND TYPE OF SCMS: 11 Infiltration System 12 Bioretention Cell _ 13 Wet Pond 14 Stormwater Wetland 15 Permeable Pavement 16 Sand Filter 17 Rainwater Harvesting (RWH) 18 Green Roof 19 Level Spreader -Filter Strip LS-FS 20 Disconnected Impervious Surface DIS 21 Treatment Swale 22 Dry Pond _ 23 StormFilter 24 Silva Cell 25 Bayfilter 26 Filterra FORMS LOADED Name and Title: Garrett Frank, PE, PLA Organization: Timmons Group Street address: 5410 Trinity Road, Suite 102 City, State, Zip: Phone numbers : Email: Raleigh, NC, 27607 919-866-4503 ] Garrett.Frank@timmons.com Certification Statement: I certify, under penalty of law that this Supplement-FZ form and all supporting information were prepared under my direction or supervision; that the information provided in the form is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, We, accurate, and complete; and that the engineering plans, specifications, operation and maintenance agreements and other supporting information are consistent with the information provided here. Designer ,j11411111111110,"' Aaaaa C A ry��rx • . .ss'Q �i ,i ►��, '�,,•' t'• �QF � �/ SEAL 9�=� 055780 ., ;A� E.N............. Of Sr Z6 z _ Date DRAINAGE AREAS 1 Is this a high density project? No 2 If so, number of drainage areas/SCMs 0 3 Does this project have low density areas? Yes 4 If so, number of low density drainage areas 1 5 Is all/part of this project subject to previous rule versions? No FORMS LOADED (DRAINAGE AREA INFORMATION Entire Site LD 1 4 Type of SCM Vegetated Swale Vegetated Swale 5 Total drainage area (sq ft) 1,315,512 1,315,512 6 Onsite drainage area sq ft 1,315.512 1.315,512 7 Offsite drainage area (sq ft) 0 0 8 9 Total BUA in project (sq ft) New BUA on subdivided lots (subject to permitting) (sq ft) 251486 sf 251486 sf N/A N/A 10 New BUA not on subdivided lots (subject to permittinsf)79583 _ _ sf 79583 sf 11 Offsite BUA (sq ft) Breakdown of new BUA not on subdivided lots: - Parkin sq ft Sidewalk (sq ft) N/A N/A 12 32946 sf 32946 sf 3444 sf 3444 sf - Roof ft sf sf Roadway (sq ft) 43193 sf 43193 sf Future ft N/A N/A Other, please specify in the comment box below (sq ft N/A N/A 13 New infiltrating permeable pavement on subdivided lots (sq ft) N/A N/A 14 New infiltrating permeable pavement not on subdivided lots sq ft) N/A N/A 15 Existing BUA that will remain (not subject to ermittin2) (sq ft 171903 sf 171903 sf 16 Existing BUA that is already permitted (sq ft) sf sf 17 Existing BUA that will be removed (sq ft) 13293 sf 13293 sf 18 Percent BUA 19% 19% 19 Desi n storm inches 1.0 in 1.0 in 20 1 Design volume of SCM (cu f1) N/A N/A 21 1 Calculation method for design volume NIA N/A ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Please use this space to provide any additional information about the 22 drainage areas : LOW DENSITY g2lGN REQUIREMENTS FOR LOW DENSITY PROJECTS FROM 02H 1003 1 Is project below density thresholds set forth in the applicable stormwater rule? Yes _ Yes 2 Does project maximize dispersed flow and minimize channelization of flow? 3 Has the use ofpipinq been minimized per .1003(2)(c)? Yes 4 Side slopes of the vegetated conveyances H:V 3:1 5 Maximum velocity in the vegetated conveyances duri2Q the 10- ear storm? 3.37 6 I.Are curb outlet swales.pro osed? Yes 7 Maximum longitudinal slope of curb outlet swale(s) (%) 4.1 8 Bottom width of curb outlet swale s (feet) 2 it 9 Maximum side slope of curb outlet swale s) (H:V) 3:1 10 Minimum length of curb outlet Swale(s)( feet 122.0 ft 11 Are treatment swales used instead of curb outlet swales? No 12 Is stormwater released at the edge of the setback as dispersed flow? Yes 13 Have stormwater outlets been designed to prevent downslope erosion? Yes 14 Are variatl s to rule .1003 ro osed? No ,ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 15 Please use this s ace to rovide an additional information about this low densit ro'ect: The curb outlet swales are: PDD2, PDD3 & PDD8 SwaleBUA # Drainage) �a (ae) Pervious rea ac) C Q (efs) Slope N V.11- (fps) V.-i (fps) Flow depth (ft) 1 0.31 0.10 0.21 0.54 1.18 3.22 4.50 2.73 0.35 2 1.64 0.63 1.01 0.58 6.73 3.20 4.50 3.37 0.40 3 0.18 0.12 0.06 0.76 0.98 3.10 4.50 1.90 0.20 4 0.65 0.30 0.35 0.63 2.88 3.71 4.50 2.96 1 0.35 5 0.49 0.09 0.40 0.46 1.59 3.15 4.50 2.74 0.35 6 3.71 1.25 2.45 0.55 14.50 1.00 4.50 3.19 1.10 7 0.23 0.04 0.19 0.45 0.74 4.70 4.50 2.93 0.30 8 0.64 0.31 0.33 0.64 2.80 4.10 4.50 3.71 0.30 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 - - 18 19 -- 20 _ 21 22 23 _ 24 25 26 27 28 29 30