The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About090129_follow-up_20230128Division of Water Resources ❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation ❑ Other Agency Facility Number: 090129 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS090129 ❑ Denied Access Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive Or Closed Date: Reason for Visit: Follow-up County: Bladen Region: Date of Visit: 01/28/2023 Entry Time: 09:00 am Exit Time: 12:00 pm Incident #: Farm Name: Farm 7692 Owner Email: Fayetteville Owner: Murphy -Brown LLC Phone: 910-296-1800 Mailing Address: PO Box 487 Warsaw NC 283980487 Physical Address: Sr 1002 11486 Old Fayetteville Rd E Fayetteville NC 28301 Facility Status: ❑ Compliant El Not Compliant Integrator: Murphy -Brown LLC Location of Farm: Latitude: 34° 50' 12" SR # 1002 west of Ammon Longitude: 78° 36' 37" Question Areas: ▪ Dischrge & Stream Impacts ▪ Records and Documents ▪ Waste Col, Stor, & Treat ▪ Other Issues Waste Application Certified Operator: Secondary OIC(s): William Victor Sutton Operator Certification Number: 26076 On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone 24 hour contact name Mike Cudd On -site representative Mike Cudd Primary Inspector: Inspector Signature: Secondary Inspector(s): Steve Guyton Phone: 910-433-3300 Date: Inspection Summary: On the way to the farm I stopped by Turn Bull Creek road crossing at Lula Long Road, Hwy 242 and Braxton Edge road. No visible sign of hog waste seen in the creek. The water at all the locations. The water was flowing swiftly. When i arrived at Old Fayettville road crossing the large pump was still running pumping waste and water back to the lagoon. I noticed that Little Turn Bull Creek was not flowing on the down stream side of Fayettville road. I went into the woods about 86 +or - yards down stream and documented a beaver dam with pictures about 2 feet tall that was about 115 + or - yards wide measured on collector. The beaver dam was containing most of the waste, a small amount in one area was getting past dam. Waste was still visible at Old Fayettville road crossing. I documented with pictures an out side crew was in the process of repairing the recycle line , It was determined to inside seal of a recuceing cuppling failed and caused the line to fail and discharge waste. Before I left the pipe was repaired and preasure tested then covered up. Several trash pumps where moved up and down the unnamed tributary to recover waste during the night and were still being used. Page 1 of 6 Permit: AWS090129 Inspection Date: 01/28/23 Owner: Murphy -Brown LLC Facility Number: 090129 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Follow-up Water coming into little Turn Bull from up stream of the discharge was pulled by the pumps into the unnamed tributary, this helped with recovery pictures were taken of this recovery. Land management crew will continue removing wasteand water through out this day and during Saturday night No dead fish seen. Lagoon level was now at 33 inches. Will return tomorrow. Page 2 of 6 Permit: AWS090129 Owner: Murphy -Brown LLC Inspection Date: 01/28/23 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Facility Number: 090129 Reason for Visit: Follow-up Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current promotions Swine ❑ Swine - Farrow to Wean Waste Structures Type 4,000 Identifier Effective Date Total Design Capacity: Total SSLW: Built Date 4,000 1,732,000 Closed Designated Observed Date Freeboard Freeboard Lagoon 3727 03/04/2005 10/01/2019 19.50 Lagoon 7629 06/07/2006 31/01/1998 19.50 33.00 Page 3 of 6 Permit: AWS090129 Inspection Date: 01/28/23 Owner: Murphy -Brown LLC Facility Number: 090129 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Follow-up Discharges & Stream Impacts 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? Discharge originated at: Structure Application Field Other a. Was conveyance man-made? b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) 2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? 3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a discharge? Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment 4. Is storage capacity less than adequate? If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard? 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ larc trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)? 6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or closure plan? 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? 8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicablE to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks) 9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or improvement? Waste Application 10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or improvement? 11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. Excessive Ponding? Hydraulic Overload? Frozen Ground? Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? PAN? Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.? Total Phosphorus? Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil? Outside of acceptable crop window? Evidence of wind drift? Application outside of application area? Crop Type 1 Yes No NA NE • ❑ ❑ ❑ • ❑ ❑ ❑ • ❑ ❑ ❑ between 25,000 to 30,000 • • ❑ ❑ ❑ • ❑ ❑ El El El Yes No NA NE ❑ • ❑ ❑ El ❑ • ❑ ❑ ❑ • ❑ ❑ ❑ • ❑ ❑ • ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes No NA NE ❑ ❑ ❑ • ❑ ❑ ❑ • El El El El Page 4 of 6 Permit: AWS090129 Inspection Date: 01/28/23 Owner: Murphy -Brown LLC Facility Number: 090129 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Follow-up Waste Application Crop Type 2 Crop Type 3 Crop Type 4 Crop Type 5 Crop Type 6 Soil Type 1 Soil Type 2 Soil Type 3 Soil Type 4 Soil Type 5 Soil Type 6 14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan(CAWMP)? 15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? 16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? 17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? 18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? Records and Documents 19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available? 20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check the appropriate box below. WUP? Checklists? Design? Maps? Lease Agreements? Other? If Other, please specify 21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. Waste Application? Weekly Freeboard? Waste Analysis? Soil analysis? Waste Transfers? Weather code? Rainfall? Stocking? Crop yields? Yes No NA NE ❑ ❑ ❑ • ❑ ❑ ❑ • ❑ 0011 Yes No NA NE ❑ ❑ ❑ • ❑ ❑ ❑ • El ❑ ❑ ❑ • Page 5 of 6 Permit: AWS090129 Inspection Date: 01/28/23 Owner: Murphy -Brown LLC Facility Number: 090129 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Follow-up Records and Documents 120 Minute inspections? Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections Sludge Survey 22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? 23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipmen (NPDES only)? 24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? 25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the appropriate box(es) below: Failure to complete annual sludge survey Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: 26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification? Other Issues 28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates? 29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately. 30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application) 31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. Application Field Lagoon / Storage Pond Other If Other, please specify 32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAW M P? 33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? 34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? Yes No NA NE ❑ • ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ • Yes No NA NE ❑ ❑ ❑ • ❑ • ❑ ❑ ❑ • ❑ ❑ • ❑ ❑ ❑ • Spray field ❑ • ❑ ❑ ❑ • ❑ ❑ • ❑ ❑ ❑ Page 6 of 6