BPDP for PN_Musselshell

Mitigation Project Information Upload
ID#* 20210020
Version* 6
Select Reviewer: *
Katie Merritt
Initial Review Completed Date 01/18/2023
Mitigation Project Submittal - 1/16/2023
..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Is this a Prospectus, Technical Proposal or a New Site? * 0 Yes O No
Type of Mitigation Project:*
Stream Wetlands Buffer Nutrient Offset
(Select all that apply)
Project Contact Information
Contact Name: *
Email Address: *
Barrett Jenkins [e-mail]
Project Information
ID#:*
20210020
Existing ID#
Project Type:
DMS • Mitigation Bank
Version:* 6
Project Name: Kingfield Musselshell Creek Nutrient Offset
Bank
County:
Jones
Document Information
Mitigation Document Type: *
Mitigation Plans
File Upload:
Signature
............................................
Print Name: *
Signature:*
Musselshell Draft II BPDP 1.16.2022.pdf
Existing Version
30.12MB
Please upload only one PDF of the complete file that needs to be submitted...
Barrett Jenkins
eatteerogficemi

a DAVEY# company
January 16, 2023
To: Katie Merritt,
Nutrient Offset &Buffer Banking Coordinator
NCDWR 401& Buffer Permitting Branch
RE: Musselshell Nutrient Offset Bank BPDP DWR#2021-0020v6 Comment Responses and Submittal of
Second Draft
In response to comments received from you by Restoration Systems (RS)on December 16, 2021
regarding the Draft Bank Parcel Development Plan (BPDP) for the Musselshell Nutrient Offset Bank
Parcel, RS is submitting this response to comments including the second draft of the BPDP, attached
after comment responses.
All comments were extracted from the received PDF and copied below. Responses in Blue Italics.
We appreciate your attention and look forward to hearing back from you on this draft and finalizing the
BPDP.
Sincerely,
Barrett Jenkins
1101 Haynes St, Suite 211, Raleigh NC 27604

a DAVEY# company
RS RESPONSE TO DWR COMMENTS RE: MUSSELSHELL BPDP
Page 2
1. Use Project ID #2021-0020v6: Updated throughout document
Page 5
2. After making these editorial changes please update all references in the BPDP to UBI when
referencing the banking instrument: Updated there and throughout the document
3. Stikethrough Text - deleted
4. Insert "proposed" - inserted
5. Insert "Umbrella" - inserted
6. Insert "UBI"- 7serted
7. Insert "in accordance with the buffer mitigation rule 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (n) - inserted
Page 6
These photos predate the Site Viability assessment site visit. Photos submitted with BPDPs
cannot predate the Site Viability assessment date and need to be taken closer to the date the
BPDP is submitted. It is good to submit photos that are taken no longer than months before the
BPDP is submitted: Updated
9. RS updated the initial planting and subsequent monitoring period in Table 2 to reflect Q1 2024
planting.
Page 7
10. This table does not match the viability letter. Not all ditches were >3', and some of the "Yes" to
being subject are not correct. Correct this table accordingly. There was a feature "H" in the
viability as well. — Changed B ditch depth to < instead of >, removed word "Stream" from F field
classification column, changed F and E subject to buffer rules from "yes" to "no'; added H as
requested and 1 as it is in the viability letter as well.
Page 9
11. Stirkethrough Text — struck through "a"
Add additional detail regarding the DMS site: the DWR ID #, status of submittal of a mitigation
plan, etc. Also need to indicate that this Project is contingent on the DMS project being fully
implemented according to its approved Plan. — updated to include DWR #, recorded survey
reference and implementation status re planting complete in early 2022. Also added language
that our site is contingent upon successful completion of the DMS site.
13. Insert Text "a portion of this" - inserted
14. Insert Text "an approved" - inserted
Page 10
15. Add details here on any culvert removal any bank stabilization needed or erosion issues that will
be remediated. The site viability letter indicated that UT1 had erosion and bank stabilization
issues. Address all these things in this section. There was a culvert noted in the letter that was
not in good condition and needed to be addressed during this Plan. Explain why RS did not
1101 Haynes St, Suite 211, Raleigh NC 27604

a WAIEYI company
address the failing culvert. See text added. Grading and planting where bank stability is
jeopardized will be implemented as needed on site at the time of planting. Erosional rills, sink
holes, and gullies are constantly moving and being graded by the farmer to maintain bank
stability, therefore specific areas are not mapped here but rather will be assessed at the time of
implementation. DWR can assess sufficiency atAsBuilt walkthrough. The updated photo log
documents sink hole locations as of January 2023 as well as areas the farmer has repaired in his
normal course of forminq.
16. Is the provider not able to address non -diffused flow any other way? No plugging, filling or
grading the section of ditch within the easement area? Why or why not? Keep in mind that the
use of this memo is not a requirement if the provider is able to create diffuse flow by other
efforts. Landowner is concerned that drainage associated with these ditches not be impeded.
RS is willing to a incorporate the credit reduction and will additionally try to vegetate the ditch
channels where possible.
17. Added additional diffuse flow for ditch along northern edge of CE boundary on east sied of
Musselshell Creek, see Figure 7.
18. Reference Figure 6 updated
Page 11
The expectation is that IRS will make sure the stems are well mixed in the bags BEFORE they are
planted by the crews. The way this is worded doesn't meet that expectation. Reword the
sentence to acknowledge this expectation. Commit to ensuring that stem species will be well
mixed before planting to ensure diversity of bare roots across the planted area. That is the plan,
language added to clarify.
20. If 14 species of trees are shown in the table, DWR expects 14 species to be planted. If
anticipating to plant less than 14 species, you need to at least indicate the minimum # of species
IRS will plant. Rs indicated only a minimum of 4 species. If that is true, DWR cannot confirm he
of Total Planted Tree column would comply with the performance standard "no one tree
species will be greater than 50%". Additionally, with the minimum proposal of 4, IRS is at risk for
not meeting the performance standard for stem diversity if less than 4 species end up inplots or
fail to thrive/survive. The standard in rule is 4, but hopefully IRS is intending to plant more based
on the comment above. However, at this time, the column on % of total planted trees", which is
required to include in this plan, is not accurate unless IRS truly plants 14 species (all adding up to
be 100%). Adjust the table accordingly and only show the number of species IRS truly intends to
plant. If not 14 species, then a minimum of X and of those X species show the % intending to
plant. We intend to plant what is in the table, we do not order the trees until the middle of the
year before we plant so there are sometimes variances based on availability. For clarity 1 have
reduced the species we plan to plant to 12 and listed 4 substitutes that we will not plant above
10%. It would be helpful to us if this plan including substitutes is approved with the BPDP and we
do not have to get approval from DWR as long as we stay in the parameters outlined in the
BPDP.
DWR can no longer accept this note below the planting table. It has created a big issue when
DWR has been lenient on the details of the planting proposal in BPDPs. IRS will be required to
1101 Haynes St, Suite 211, Raleigh NC 27604

a DAVEY# company
follow the planting list in Table 7. If any changes are needed to the planting list before planting,
IRS will need to submit a request to DWR for approval of that modified planting list. DWR will
accept a FEW substitutions if IRS wants to include those few potential substitutions in a Table 7b,
but you must include the % those subs are intended to be utilized in the case you need those
substitutions. Removed and substitute species at max densities added to bottom of Table 7
Page 12
22. IRS should take measures to ensure that plots are divers (have 4 species represented as much as
possible) and where a species does not represent more than 50% of the plot. All plots need to
be representative of the planted diversity and density surrounding the plot and will be
evaluated by DWR during the onsite AsBuilt Walkthru to ensure these criteria are met.
Language added. This can be difficult due to the size of the site relative to the monitoring plots
but comment understood.
All DWR comments provided on planting plan & monitoring are being provided under the
following Rule reference 15A NCAC 02b .0295 (n)(2-4).
23. The 2% is taken from the Total Planted Area, not the "Total restoration credit generating area".
The total planted area is shown in Figure 6 and represented in Table 9 as 2,216,895 ft2, please
correct statement accordingly. Updated. The Total Restoration Area is now defined in Figure 7
as including all planted areas within 200 feet from the TOB, including non-credit areas i.e.,
diffuse flow, etc. There area few areas incorporated into the conservation easement (largely to
straighten lines) that are outside of the 200 credit generating area that will also be planted. This
areas are shown in Figure 7 and largest west of highway 41. We do not include this areas in
calculating the required monitoring plots and we do not put monitoring plots within these areas
as they are not generating mitigation credit. See different acreages defined in Section 7.0 and
Figure 7
24. No specific parameters are noted here for the data intended to be collected. It is expected that
in order to meet the performance standards, and to be able to determine if the Health of stems
is sufficient (0295)(2)(E), the data that needs to be committed to being collected area: species,
height, planting date (or volunteer). Vigor should also be included.
Page 13
25. Add language form the UMBI that commits the Provider to notifying DWR within 30 calendar
days from the completion of the activities. Within 30 calendar days after completing the
establishment of the buffer mitigation and nutrient offset credit areas, the Sponsor will submit
written notification to DWR documenting that all nutrient offset activities have been completed.
Failure to submit written notification within 30 days may result in a modified credit release
schedule or a delay in the issuance of credit releases. Notification shall include all the items as
specified in the UBI. Updated
Page 14
26. Fill in XX acres here Jpdated
Page 17
1101 Haynes St, Suite 211, Raleigh NC 27604

a DAVEY# company
27. 1 do not know what group this is. Correct All Figures to say "401 & Buffer Permitting Branch"
28. Remove "Phase A" on all figures
Page 22
29. Easement boundary is not straight, but rather curvy and inconsistent. IRS should be proposing
straighter easement lines (as noted to be an issue on other sites proposed by IRS). The ability to
go out to 200' from TOB should provide all providers the ability to make straighter easement
lines, thus reducing the risk of encroachments during monitoring. This is not required for IRS to
change, but IRS should consider the risk associated with curvy easements and make changes to
the easement boundary to reduce those risks. Comment and flexibility appreciated. RS has
straightened the lines.
30. Change "Reforestation Area" to "Area to be Planted" or "Planted Area" Updated
Page 23
1. Call out this stream feature. I believe it should be UT2. Updated
2. The information in this box is not accurate. According to the plotes, there are 42, not 29. The
total area to be calculated with this 2% is shown in Table 9 as 2,216,895 ft2, explain the
discrepancies.
Where is this orange area on the project. None present, removed from legend.
Page 25
1. Photos provided in this section are not current enough to be used in the plan to represent
"existing conditions". You may include these photos as long as there are more current photos
provided that represent the site conditions closer to the time the Plan was submitted to DWR.
No photos should predate the DWR Site Viability Letter. Updated
1101 Haynes St, Suite 211, Raleigh NC 27604

BANK PARCEL DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE
MUSSELSHELL NUTRIENT OFFSET BANK PARCEL
NEUSE RIVER BASIN
DWR ID#: 2021-0020v6
Pr
Bank Parcel Sponsor
Restoration Systems, LLC
POC: Barrett Jenkins ([e-mail])
Ph: 919-755-9490
1101 Haynes Street, Suite 211
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604

BANK PARCEL DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE
MUSSELSHELL NUTRIENT OFFSET BANK PARCEL
January 16, 2023
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0
Introduction.....................................................................................................................................1
2.0
Mitigation Project Summary............................................................................................................1
2.1 Project Goals.........................................................................................................................1
2.2 Existing Parcel Conditions.....................................................................................................2
2.3 Watershed Characterization.................................................................................................3
2.4 Soils.......................................................................................................................................3
2.5 Geology.................................................................................................................................4
2.6 Existing Vegetative Communities.........................................................................................4
2.7 Threatened and Endangered Species...................................................................................4
2.9 Cultural Resources and Significant Natural Heritage Areas.................................................5
2.9 FEMA Floodplain Compliance...............................................................................................5
2.10 Parcel Location, Parcel Constraints, and Access..................................................................5
2.11 Other Environmental Conditions..........................................................................................5
3.0
Site Protection Instrument..............................................................................................................5
4.0
Mitigation Work Plan.......................................................................................................................6
4.1 Parcel Preparation................................................................................................................6
4.2 Diffused Flow........................................................................................................................7
4.3 Riparian Area Restoration Activities.....................................................................................7
5.0
Monitoring and Maintenance Plan..................................................................................................8
5.1 Monitoring Protocol.............................................................................................................8
5.2 Parcel Maintenance..............................................................................................................9
5.3 Parcel Protection & Easement Boundaries..........................................................................9
6.0
Financial Assurances and Long -Term Management......................................................................10
6.1 Financial Assurances...........................................................................................................10
6.2 Long Term Management Plan............................................................................................10
7.0
Project Credit Potential..................................................................................................................10
8.0
Credit Release................................................................................................................................11
9.0
References.....................................................................................................................................11
Musselshell, Bank Parcel Development Plan (DWR ID#: 2021-0020v6) Table of Contents pg. i
Neuse River Basin 8-Digit HUC: 03020204

TABLES
Table 1: Ecological and Water Quality Goals................................................................................................ 1
Table 2: Project Attributes & Timeline.........................................................................................................2
Table3: Project Features..............................................................................................................................3
Table 4: Project Soil Types and Descriptions................................................................................................4
Table 5: Bank Parcel Fee Simple Ownership.................................................................................................6
Table 6: Diffuse Flow Summary....................................................................................................................7
Table 7: Proposed Hardwood Bare Root Planting Plan by Species*.............................................................7
Table8: Proposed Seed Mix..........................................................................................................................8
Table 9: Musselshell 2021-0020v6, Project Credit Table............................................................................12
APPENDICES
Appendix A — Figures, Historic Aerial Imagery (EDR), Existing Condition Photos
Figure 1—
Parcel Location and Service Area
Figure 2 —Site
Map and Existing Conditions
Figure 3 —
USGS Map
Figure 4 —
NRCS Map
Figure 5 —
Restoration Plan
Figure 6 —
Credit Map
Figure 7 —
Monitoring Map
Historic Aerial Imagery— EDR
Parcel Photos
— Existing Conditions
Appendix B — DWR Correspondence
Appendix C — USDA, NRCS Web Soil Survey Report
Appendix D — NHP & USFWS Reports
Appendix E — EDR Report
Appendix F — SHPO Correspondence
Appendix G —Template Conservation Easement
Musselshell, Bank Parcel Development Plan (DWR ID#: 2021-0020v6) Table of Contents pg. ii
Neuse River Basin 8-Digit HUC: 03020204

Bank Parcel Development Package
Musselshell Nutrient Offset Bank Parcel
Jones County, NC — Neuse River Basin
1.0 Introduction
Musselshell Nutrient Offset Bank Parcel ("Parcel" or "Site") is proposed under the terms and conditions
of the proposed Restoration Systems Neuse 04 Nutrient Offset Umbrella Banking Instrument (UBI), which
will be made and entered into by Restoration Systems, LLC (RS), acting as Bank Sponsor (Sponsor), and
the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (NCDEQ), Division of Water Resources (DWR).
The Parcel shall be planned and designed according to the MBI, 15A NCAC 02B .0703, and the Consolidated
Buffer Mitigation Rule 15A NCAC 02B .0295.
Located in Jones County, North Carolina, the project encompasses 54.95 acres of land utilized for row crop
production. The project will restore the riparian area in accordance with the buffer mitigation rule 15A
NCAC 02B .0295 (n) along one (1) ditch, one (1) unnamed tributaries and one (1) named stream with
hydrologic connection to the Trent River and subsequently the Neuse River. The primary purpose of the
Parcel is to provide nutrient offset credits for stormwater and wastewater requirements within the United
States Geological Survey (USGS) Cataloging Unit 03020204. The Parcel is located on several tracts of land
3 miles north of the Trent River.
The Parcel is located approximately 3.4 miles north of the town of Trenton in Jones County, NC along
either side of NC Highway 41. (Appendix A, Figure 1). The Pollock, Lee, Norris, and McCoy families are the
current fee simple owners of the tracts of land associated with the Bank Parcel, which has been historically
and is currently used as agricultural fields with minimal existing forest/non-agricultural area. The Parcel is
within the Neuse River Basin 14-digit USGS Cataloging Unit 03020204010071 of the Middle Trent River
(North Carolina Division of Water Quality [NCDWQ] Sub -basin Number 03-04-11) (Appendix A, Figure 1).
DWR representatives conducted on -site stream determinations and provided a Stream Determination
letter for the Parcel January 20, 2021, and a Site Viability for Buffer & Nutrient Offset letter was provided
by the Division on May 11, 2022. Both letters are provided in Appendix B.
2.0 Mitigation Project Summary
2.1 Project Goals
The primary goals of the proposed nutrient offset project are to provide ecological and water quality
enhancements to the Neuse River Basin by restoring the riparian area to create a functional, forested,
riparian corridor. Specific improvements to water quality and ecological processes are outlined below in
Table 1.
Table 1: Ecological and Water Quality Goals
Goal
Objective
Nutrient input will be decreased by filtering runoff from the agricultural fields
Decrease nutrient levels
through restored native buffer zones. The off -site nutrient input will also be
absorbed on -site by filtering flood flows through restored floodplain areas,
where flood flows can disperse through native vegetation.
Musselshell, Bank Parcel Development Plan (DWR ID#: 2021-0020v6) Pg. 1
Neuse River Basin 8-Digit HUC: 03020204

Table 1: Ecological and Water Quality Goals (Continued)
Goal
Objective
Decrease sediment input
Sediment from off -site sources will be captured by deposition on restored
floodplain areas where native vegetation will slow overland flow velocities.
Decrease water temperature
Planted riparian trees will shade the streams as they mature, reducing thermal
and increase dissolved
pollution.
oxygen concentrations
Create appropriate
Buffer areas will be restored by planting native vegetation.
terrestrial habitat
Permanently protect the
project Parcel from harmful
A conservation easement will be recorded on the Parcel.
uses
2.2 Existing Parcel Conditions
The proposed nutrient offset project includes approximately 54.95 acres of open agricultural fields along
a ditch and named and unnamed tributary to the Trent River. The agricultural fields are currently being
used for row crop production, including cotton, soybeans, and corn. In addition, the farmer regularly
applies fertilizers and herbicides to the fields (Appendix A, Figure 3). Land use and general site conditions
have not changed since the site photos in Appendix A were taken.
Site features predominantly originate on -site, and all drain to Trent River approximately 3 miles
downstream. A review of historic aerials shows the property has been historically and consistently utilized
for row crop production (Appendix A).
Table 2: Project Attributes & Timeline
Project Name
Musselshell Nutrient Offset Mitigation Site
Hydrologic Unit Code
03020204
River Basin
Neuse
Geographic Location (Lat, Long)
35.08650466°,-77.400175761°
Site Protection Instrument (DB, PG)
To be recorded
Total Credits
50.3282 acres (114,378.092 nitrogen offset credits)
Types of Credits
Nitrogen Offset Credits
BPDP Date
January 2023
Initial Planting Date
February 2024
Baseline Report Date
March 2024
MY1 Report Date
December 2024
MY2 Report Date
December 2025
MY3 Report Date
December 2026
MY4 Report Date
December 2027
MY5 Report Date
December 2028
Musselshell Bank Parcel Development Plan (DWR ID#: 2021-0020v6)
Neuse River Basin 8-Digit HUC: 03020204
Pg. 2

DWR performed an on -site visit of the Parcel to determine applicability to the Neuse Buffer Rules (15A
NCAC 02B .0714) and viability to provide nutrient offset credits. A copy of both the "On -Site Origin
Determination for Applicability to the Neuse Buffer Rules" and "Site Viability for Buffer Mitigation and
Nutrient Offset" are provided in Appendix B. In addition, a summary of their determinations, specific to
Parcel Features, is shown in Table 3 and correlated with stream segments as labeled in Figure 2, Appendix
A. There have been no changes to land use in the project area since DWR's site visit, and project photos
contained in Appendix A were taken.
Table 3: Project Features
DWR Feature ID
In Field Classification
Subject to Buffer Rules
Nutrient Offset Viability
Musselshell
Creek
Stream
Yes
Yes
UT1
Stream
Yes
Yes
UT2
Stream
Yes
Yes (non -forested ag field only)
A
Ditch >3ft depth
No
Yes
B
Ditch <3ft depth
No
Yes
C
Ditch >3ft depth
No
Yes
D
Ditch >3ft depth
No
Yes
E
Ditch >3ft depth
No
Yes
F
Ditch >3ft depth
No
Yes (non -forested ag field only)
G
Ditch >3ft depth
No
Yes (left bank only)
H
Ditch <3ft depth
No
Yes
I
Ditch/Swale
No
No
2.3 Watershed Characterization
The Parcel is located within USGS HUC 03020204 and DWR Subbasin 03-04-11. Features include and drain
to Musselshell Creek, which is classified as C and NSW by DWR. Class C waters are designated for
recreational use, agriculture, fishing and fish consumption, and the maintenance of biological integrity for
wildlife. The NSW designation applies to surface waters that are experiencing excessive growths of
microscopic or macroscopic vegetation.
The Parcel topography, as indicated on the 2019 Trenton, NC USGS 7.5-minute topographic quadrangle,
shows gently sloped areas throughout the Parcel (Figure 4). Land uses draining to the project reaches are
primarily agriculture with some forested use.
2.4 Soils
The Parcel is mapped by the Jones County Soil Survey. Project soils are described below in Table 4. An
image of the paper copy of the 1981 Soil Survey of Jones is provided in Figure 5. A custom soil report is
provided in Appendix C.
Musselshell Bank Parcel Development Plan (DWR ID#: 2021-0020v6) Pg. 3
Neuse River Basin 8-Digit HUC: 03020204

Table 4: Project Soil Types and Descriptions
Map Unit
Percent of
Hydric
Symbol
Map Unit Name
Bank Parcel
Soil Rating
Goldsboro loamy sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes, Atlantic
Go
Flatwoods
12.2
No
Lynchburg fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, Atlantic
L y
Coast Flatwoods
4.6
No
Mk
Muckalee loam
72.2
Yes
NoB
Norfolk loamy sand, 1 to 4 percent slopes
5.6
No
Rains fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, Atlantic
Ra
Coast Flatwoods
1.1
Yes
St
Stallings loamy fine sand
4.4
No
Source: https://websoilsurvey.sc.egov.usda.gov/App/HomePage.htm
2.5 Geology
The Parcel is in the Inner Coastal Plain physiographic province. The landscape is characterized by flatlands
to gently rolling hills and valleys. The Coastal Plain primarily consists of marine sedimentary rocks
comprised of sand, clay, and limestone formed through the deposition of estuarine and marine sediments
within the last 140 million years. According to the Geologic Map of North Carolina (1985), the underlying
geology of the Parcel is mapped as the Spring Garden Member— Castle Hayne Formations. The Formation
is described as molluscan -mold limestone, indurated, and very sandy. Furthermore, it is described as
grading downward into a calcareous sand and laterally into Comfort Member.
2.5 Existing Vegetative Communities
Existing vegetation within the Parcel consists of active row crop fields, as shown in the attached site
photos (Appendix A).
2.7 Threatened and Endangered Species
The NC Natural Heritage Program (NHP) database was searched for federally listed threatened and
endangered plant and animal species in within one mile of the Parcel. One species, the Red Cockaded
Woodpecker (Picoides borealis) was listed as being last observed in 1993. The project footprint however
had no occurrences and the habitat is not suitable. The US Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) was similarly
queried for occurrences and listed six species that could occur in the area. The Northern Long-eared Bat
(Myotis septenrionalis), Red -cockaded Woodpecker (Picoides borealis), American Alligator (Alligator
mississippiensis), Neuse River Waterdog (Necturus lewisi), Carolina Madtom (Noturus furiosus), and
Monarch Butterfly (Danaus plexippus), are listed or proposed for listing as federally endangered or
threatened species that could occur in the area. RS performed pedestrian surveys of the Parcel in June
2022 and determined no suitable habitat for the species within the proposed Parcel. The USFWS Self -
Certification Letter and NHP Report are included in Appendix D.
Musselshell Bank Parcel Development Plan (DWR ID#: 2021-0020v6) Pg. 4
Neuse River Basin 8-Digit HUC: 03020204

The presence of conditions or characteristics that can hinder restoration activities on the Parcel was
evaluated. The evaluation focused primarily on the presence of hazardous materials, utilities, and
restrictive easements, rare/threatened/endangered species or critical habitats, the potential for
hydrologic trespass, and existing utility easements. Existing information regarding Parcel constraints was
acquired and reviewed, including an Environmental Records Report developed by Environmental Data
Resources Inc., which located no evidence of environmental risk associated with the Parcel (Appendix E).
In addition, any Parcel conditions that can restrict the restoration and implementation were documented
during the field investigation. As a result of our review and field surveys, no known Parcel constraints
exist that may hinder proposed restoration activities. Potential constraints reviewed include the
following;
2.8 Cultural Resources and Significant Natural Heritage Areas
There are no existing structures in the project area or on the larger tract of land. SHPO was contacted with
a request for review and comment on July 11, 2022. All communication with SHPO is included in Appendix
F.
2.9 FEMA Floodplain Compliance
No grading activities are proposed in the floodplain, so a floodplain development permit will not be
required. Additionally, no hydraulic modeling is proposed for this project.
2.10 Parcel Location, Parcel Constraints, and Access
The Parcel is in rural Jones County, near the town of Trenton. The Parcel is accessible for construction,
monitoring, and long-term stewardship from NC Highway 41 and Kingsfield Road (Appendix A, Figure 3).
An access road and associated access easement will be detailed in the final conservation easement survey
and recorded at the Jones County Register of Deeds. DOT right of ways, powerlines, and associated
easements will be excluded from the conservation easement.
A portion of this project surrounds an approved full delivery buffer restoration project implemented by
Eco Terra, LLC under NC Division of Mitigation (NCDMS) ID number 100176, NC DEQ Contract number
0103-01, and DWR #2021-0020v2, which includes approximately 8.7 acres under permanent conservation
easement held by North Carolina as shown in Figures 3-7. The site is known as the Kingfield Buffer
Mitigation Site and was planted in the first quarter of 2022 and the conservation easements are recorded
in the Jones County Register of Deeds at deed book 422 pages 661 to 688 over three tracts of land and
the survey is recorded at Jones County Register of Deeds Plat Book c-124 Paged 1-4. This BPDP is
contingent on the full implementation of the DMS Final Mitigation Plan for the Kingfield Site.
2.11 Other Environmental Conditions
An Environmental Data Resources, Inc (EDR) Radius Map Report with Geocheck was provided for the
Parcel on March 28, 2022. Neither the target property nor the adjacent properties were listed in any of
the Federal, State, or Tribal environmental databases searched by EDR. The executive summary of the
EDR report is included in Appendix E.
3.0 Site Protection Instrument
The land required for planting, management, and stewardship of the mitigation project includes portions
of the larger tracts of land listed in Table 5. The Parcel will remain in private ownership, protected in its
entirety by an approved DWR conservation easement, and managed/held by an approved DWR long-term
steward under the terms detailed in the conservation easement. A template conservation easement that
will be used to develop the conservation easement for this Parcel is provided in Appendix G.
Musselshell Bank Parcel Development Plan (DWR ID#: 2021-0020v6) Pg. 5
Neuse River Basin 8-Digit HUC: 03020204

Table 5: Bank Parcel Fee Simple Ownership
Owner Name
D.B/Pg.
INC PIN#
Acreage
James Clifton Pollock
342/692
459061312100
51.24
Dennis James Lee
422/355
459070998400
37.34
Betty Boyette Norris
10E/52
459070253400
24
Charles C Mitchell
362/500
449979764100
37.28
Elvin J. Lee, Jr
206/143
449999687100
43.03
Elvin J. Lee, Jr
406/318
449988583900
36.10
Elvin Lee Jr and Ida Lee
400/112
540907281400
79
4.0 Mitigation Work Plan
The project will restore agriculturally impacted land in the Parcel footprint to a forested riparian corridor,
protected in perpetuity, improving the ecological function of the area. In addition, the project design will
ensure that no adverse impacts to wetlands or existing riparian buffers occur. Figure 6 illustrates the
conceptual design for the Parcel.
4.1 Parcel Preparation
The land use within 200 feet from the top of bank of project features is either forested and will not be
impacted, or is agricultural land maintained for crops. Areas slated for restoration may require soil testing
and will be ripped to break up compact soil. No permits are necessary, including 404 (US Army Corps of
Engineers), 401 (NC Division of Water Resources), and Land Quality Erosion and Sediment Control (NC
Division of Energy, Mineral, and Land Resources). Site preparation will include select herbicide treatments
and/or limited mechanical clearing to remove undesirable vegetation and may include soil amendments.
Where needed, invasive species will be selectively removed and/or spot treated by a licensed pesticide
applicator.
Minor bank stabilization efforts including planting and grading will be implemented where bank stability
is compromised along UT1 where erosional rills, sink holes and gullies are observed prior to planting based
on field assessments at the time of land preparation. Specific areas of concern can be seen in Image 2
and are isolated to the portion of UT1 upstream of NC highway 41. These areas are constantly evolving
and actively managed by the farmer as needed. Image land 2 in the photo log found at Appendix A show
sink holes at various stages of erosion that will be addressed. Implementation of sufficient stabilization
efforts will be assessed by DWR at the AsBuilt Walkthrough. After planting, sluffing of incised bank
channels is anticipated as the channelized stream is no longer maintained and returns to a more natural
pattern. Stabilization efforts prior to planting will focus on grading and/or tamping of sink holes and
gullies and planting to assist in slowing erosion.
The existing crossing on UT1 just upstream of the Kingsfield Buffer Site easement will be excluded from
this proposed conservation easement as shown in all figures. The crossing is essential to maintaining
access for the landowner from one side of the stream to the other. The crossing will be assessed at the
time of project implementation and may be repaired or cleaned out if practical and necessary to ensure
continued flow along UT1. Any maintenance or repair to the crossing will be documented in the AsBuilt
Walkthrough memorandum. The landowner provides periodic maintenance to the crossing as it is used
Musselshell Bank Parcel Development Plan (DWR ID#: 2021-0020v6) Pg. 6
Neuse River Basin 8-Digit HUC: 03020204

frequently and stabilization of riparian buffer areas upstream of the crossing through the establishment
of herbaceous and forest cover should reduce the threat of potential clogging resulting from excessive
sedimentation and erosion of the upstream channel.
4.2 Diffused Flow
The landowner wishes to maintain the use of lateral ditches B, C, D, and E outside of the conservation
easement and is concerned that plugging these ditches within the conservation easement. Per DWR
Buffer Interpretation/Clarification Memo #2008-019 — Diffuse Flow, stormwater carried by lateral ditches
that enter buffered streams will receive a 4,350 sq. ft. credit deduction. The credit deduction will be
calculated at start of the credit generating area from any features subject to the Diffuse Flow Memo
(Appendix A, Figure 7).
Table 6: Diffuse Flow Summary
Feature
Classification
Diffuse Flow Subjectivity
B
Ditch
Yes; credit deduction applied (Figure 7, Appendix A).
C
Ditch
Yes; credit deduction applied (Figure 7, Appendix A).
D
Ditch
Yes; credit deduction applied (Figure 7, Appendix A).
E
Ditch
Yes; credit deduction applied (Figure 7, Appendix A).
Musselshell
Creek Ditch*
Ditch
Yes; credit deduction applied (Figure 7, Appendix A).
*This ditch was not delineated in viability letter but exists on east bank of upstream boundary of
conservation easement on Musselshell Creek, along the northern boundary, see Figure 7.
4.3 Riparian Area Restoration Activities
Riparian area restoration will involve planting appropriate native tree species along the riparian corridor,
see Figure 6. Vegetation management and herbicide applications may be needed over the first few years
of tree establishment in the riparian restoration areas to prevent encroachment of undesirable species
that may out -compete the planted native vegetation. Tree species planted across the Parcel are planned
to include the species and percentages listed in Table 7. Bareroot stems will be well mixed prior to
planting to ensure diversity of bare roots across planted areas and monitoring plots. Species availability
at the time of planting may result in the substitution of regionally appropriate native species listed at
substitutes at the bottom of Table 7, with each substitute species not to exceed 10% of total planted
stems. Final species composition and density will be detailed in the As -built Report. DWR will be notified
for approval prior to planting if the species density and diversity outlined below are not available for
planting.
Table 7: Proposed Hardwood Bare Root Planting Plan by Species*
Common Name
Scientific Name
% of Total Planted Trees
Canopy Type
River birch
Betula nigra
10%
Canopy
Tulip poplar
Liriodendron tulipifera
5%
Canopy
Red mulberry
Morus rubra
10%
Midstory
Sycamore
Platanus occidentalis
10%
Canopy
Swamp chestnut oak
Quercus michauxii
10%
Canopy
Water oak
Quercus nigra
10%
Canopy
Willow oak
Quercus phellos
10%
Canopy
Musselshell Bank Parcel Development Plan (DWR ID#: 2021-0020v6) Pg. 7
Neuse River Basin 8-Digit HUC: 03020204

American elm
Ulmus americana
10%
Canopy
Red bud
Cercis canadensis
5%
Midstory
Persimmon
Diospyros virginiana
10%
Canopy
Green ash
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
5%
Canopy
Wax myrtle
Myrica cerifera
5%
Shrub
Proposed Substitutes
Black gum
Nyssa sylvatica
<10%
Midstory
White oak
Quercus alba
<10%
Canopy
Hackberry
Celtis occidentalis
<10%
Midstory
Red Oak
Carya illinoinensis
<10%
Canopy
Trees will be planted at a density sufficient to meet the performance standards outlined in Rule 15A NCAC
02B .0295 of 260 planted trees per acre at the end of five years of monitoring. In addition, no one tree
species will be greater than 50% of the established stems. An appropriate seed mix of annual and
perennial species listed below in Table 8 will also be applied to provide temporary and permanent ground
cover for soil stabilization and reduction of sediment loss during rain events in areas without existing
herbaceous cover. Seed species availability may result in the substitution of regionally appropriate native
species. Planting is tentatively scheduled for February 2023 at a density of 680 stems per acre on 8ft x 8ft
spacing.
Table 8: Proposed Seed Mix
Common Name
Scientific Name
Annual/Perennial
Plains Coreopsis
Coreopsis tinctoria
Annual
Deertongue, Tioga
Panicum clandestinum
Perennial
Blackeyed Susan
Rudbeckia hirta
Perennial
Purpletop
Tridens flavus
Perennial
Lanceleaf Coreopsis
Coreopsis lanceloata
Perennial
Clasping Coneflower
Rudbeckia amplexicaulis
Annual
Oxeye Sunflower
Heliopsis helianthoides
Perennial
Common Yarrow
Achillea millefolium
Perennial
Perennial Gaillardia (Blanketflower)
Gaillardia aristata
Perennial
Purple Coneflower
Echinacea purpurea
Perennial
5.0 Monitoring and Maintenance Plan
5.1 Monitoring Protocol
Permanent vegetation monitoring plots will be installed and evaluated within the riparian buffer
restoration and nutrient offset areas to measure the survival of the planted trees. The plots will be
randomly placed throughout the planted total restoration areas. A total of 42 plots (2% of the total
restoration area as shown in Figure 7 and defined to include areas within the 200 foot buffer excluding
non-credit areas such as diffused flow deductions, but excluding areas within the conservation easement
outside of the 200 foot buffer.) will be established within the total restoration areas (Figure 7). The size
Musselshell Bank Parcel Development Plan (DWR ID#: 2021-0020v6) Pg. 8
Neuse River Basin 8-Digit HUC: 03020204

of individual quadrants will be 100 square meters. IRS will mix bare root stems before planting to ensure
monitoring plots are representative of the larger Parcel's diversity goals, including that no one species
represents more than 50% of planted stems and there are a minimum of 4 species per monitoring plot.
Vegetation assessments will be conducted and follow the Carolina Vegetation Survey (CVS) Level 2
Protocol for Recording Vegetation (2008). A reference photo will be taken from the southwestern corner
of each of the 42 plots. Photos will be taken from all photo points each monitoring year and provided in
the annual reports. All planted stems will be marked with flagging tape and recorded.
Planting is scheduled for February 2024. The first annual monitoring activities will commence at the end
of the first growing season, at least five months after planting has been completed and no earlier than the
fall season. Species composition and survival rates will be evaluated on an annual basis by plot based on
data collected on species, height, planting or volunteer date, and vigor. The total number of volunteer
woody stems will also be documented and reported. The measure of vegetative success for the Parcel will
be the survival of at least four native hardwood tree species, where no one species is greater than 50% of
the established planted stems, and an established density of at least 260 planted trees per acre at the end
of monitoring year five. Appropriate and desirable native volunteer species may be included in the Parcel's
density to meet the performance standards with DWR approval.
Restoration Systems shall submit the annual monitoring report to DWR by December 31 of each year for
five consecutive years and will follow the terms and conditions of the Restoration Systems Neuse 04 UBI.
5.2 Parcel Maintenance
If the Parcel or a specific component of the Parcel fails to achieve the success criteria outlined in Section
5.1, adaptive measures will be developed and/or appropriate remedial actions will be implemented. Site
maintenance will be performed to correct any identified problems on the Parcel that have a high likelihood
of affecting the project's success. Such items include but are not limited to fire, flooding, drought, or
insects that cause excess tree mortality. Any actions implemented will be designed to achieve the success
criteria and will include a work schedule and updated monitoring criteria. Any parcel maintenance
performed will be included in the monitoring report for that year. A rigorous herbicide schedule may need
to be implemented in the first few years of tree establishment in the restoration areas to prevent the
establishment of invasive species that may out -compete the planted native vegetation. The only
herbicides used on the Parcel will be aquatic approved herbicides that will be applied in accordance with
North Carolina Department of Agriculture rules and regulations.
The easement boundary will be checked annually as part of monitoring activities. Easement boundary
conditions and any maintenance performed will be reported in the annual monitoring reports to DWR. If
mowing is deemed necessary by the Sponsor during the monitoring period, the Sponsor must receive
approval from DWR prior to conducting any mowing activities within Neuse Buffer Zones 1 and 2 to ensure
that no buffer violations have occurred.
5.3 Parcel Protection & Easement Boundaries
Easement boundaries will be identified in the field to ensure clear distinction between the Parcel and
adjacent properties. Boundaries may be identified by fence, marker, post, tree -blazing, or other means as
allowed by site conditions and/or conservation easement and will be clearly marked prior to the Task 2
site visit by DWR. Boundary markers that have been disturbed, damaged, or destroyed will be repaired
and/or replaced on an as needed basis. Contact information for the conservation easement holder will be
Musselshell Bank Parcel Development Plan (DWR ID#: 2021-0020v6) Pg. 9
Neuse River Basin 8-Digit HUC: 03020204

included on easement markers. A complete and detailed survey of the easement boundaries will be
included in the As -Built Report.
In accordance with the UBI, within 30 calendar days after completing the establishment of the nutrient
offset areas, the Sponsor will submit written notification to DWR documenting that all nutrient offset
activities have been completed. Failure to submit written notification within 30 days may result in a
modified credit release schedule or a delay in the issuance of credit releases. Notification shall include all
the items as specified in the UBI.
6.0 Financial Assurances and Long -Term Management
6.1 Financial Assurances
Following approval of the Musselshell Nutrient Offset Bank Parcel Development Package, the Sponsor
shall provide a Performance Bond from a surety that is rated no less than an "A -"as rated by A. M. Best.
The performance bond amount shall be 100% of the estimated cost for implementation of the project as
described in the Bank Parcel Development Package, but not less than $150,000. In lieu of posting the
performance bond, the Sponsor may elect to construct the project prior to the first credit release. In that
case, no performance bond will be necessary.
After completion of the restoration/construction, a separate performance/maintenance bond will be
secured for 100% of the estimated cost to implement the monitoring and maintenance plan but not less
than $100,000. The performance/maintenance bond shall apply at the inception of the monitoring period
for a term of one year and be extended annually for a minimum of five years. Upon DWR approval, this
may be lowered each year based on the adjusted cost to complete the monitoring.
Performance bonds for monitoring shall be renewed at least annually to cover the next year's monitoring
period, with confirmation of renewal provided to DWR with each annual monitoring report when
applicable. DWR reserves the right to alter the credit release schedule if monitoring reports are submitted
without proof of bond renewals when applicable.
6.2 Long Term Management Plan
The Parcel will remain in private ownership, protected in its entirety by an approved DWR long-term
steward, and will be managed under the terms detailed in an approved DWR conservation easement. The
long-term manager will be responsible for periodic inspection of the Parcel to ensure that the restrictions
documented in the recorded easement are upheld in perpetuity. The conservation easement will be
transferred to the long term steward prior to the year 4 monitoring period.
7.0 Project Credit Potential
Of the 54.95 acres protected under the conservation easement, 52.78 will be planted, 50.77 will be
planted within the 200ft buffer corridor, and 50.32 are anticipated to provide Nitrogen Offset Credits
equivalent to 114,397.092 lbs. of nitrogen offset credit (Figure 6, Figure 7, and Table 9). Riparian area
restoration, with a minimum of 50-feet from the top of bank (TOB), out 200-feet from the TOB, will general
Nitrogen Offset Credit. The nutrient offset credit summary below was derived based on Restoration
Systems' conceptual design and may be adjusted in the AsBuilt Report. The management objectives,
mitigation type, and proposed credits are presented in detail in the Project Credit Table provided in Table
Musselshell Bank Parcel Development Plan (DWR ID#: 2021-0020v6)
Neuse River Basin 8-Digit HUC: 03020204
Pg. 10

9. These Nutrient Offset Credits will be neither convertible or transferable to any other credit type,
including Riparian Buffer Mitigation.
8.0 Credit Release
Upon submittal of the appropriate documentation by the Sponsor and subsequent approval by DWR, the
mitigation credits associated with the Musselshell Nutrient Offset Bank Parcel will be released as
described in the credit release schedule found in the UBI.
9.0 References
Schafale, M. P. and Weakley, 2012. A Classification of the Natural Communities of North Carolina, Fourth
Approximation.
North Carolina Geological Survey, 1985, Geologic map of North Carolina: North Carolina Geological Survey,
General Geologic Map, scale 1:500000. https://deq.nc.gov/about/divisions/energy-mineral-land-
resources/north-carolina-geological-survey/ncgs-maps/1985-geologic-map-of-nc
Musselshell Bank Parcel Development Plan (DWR ID#: 2021-0020v6) Pg. 11
Neuse River Basin 8-Digit HUC: 03020204

(1)
NIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
NIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
NIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
NIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
MIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
HIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
),
/■�¥$

APPENDIX A — FIGURES, HISTORIC AERIAL IMAGERY (EDR), EXISTING CONDITION PHOTOS
Figure 1—
Vicinity Map
Figure 2 —
Service Area
Figure 3 —
Site Overview
Figure 4 —
USGS
Figure 5 —
NRCS
Figure 6 —
Restoration Plan
Figure 7 —
Credit and Monitoring
Historic Aerial Imagery— EDR
Parcel Photos
— Existing Conditions
Musselshell, Bank Parcel Development Plan (DWR ID# 2021-0020v6) Appendices
Neuse River Basin 8-Digit HUC: 03020204

o
W
0 7
WC O
m�K
Z.�
7 ._ U
otfE�°
ym
�a
J W J
J N W
W LL LL U
U)O m
Wza
V/WY
:: jW<
U
Z
_T
C
v
d
Q
z
U
=
Q
N
N
Z
Q
O
O
N
>
O
N
O
N
oO
ZN
W
0
LL
r
z-
00Q
,
o0
ZU
Z }}
a
¢>¢Z
KO
�U)
a0
U U
r }}
wz
Zs
UO
_mo
o2
7
za
�
>
Z
Z�
n
O
m
••
z
�t
A
s
m
v c
U)
O
N
N O
O E
O
O M M
0 0 0
W
p
W
U
M
-0
7 N
62
U
-
a;
y
M
P
OE
N
fn N
N
Y
Z
U mmZ
M
�
� o�eb
Nal11n
0
N =
$
3
U-
�
oW
ow
z
zcz
w2
w
¢>
K0
UU
`
6W
N T
> >
o �i
U) U)
Z j
OO
M heoai a
d
Z
T }
/ K
Oz
J 0
zz
az
>>
Ou
I
3:�
Oz
co m
OU

U
0. 0 7
w c o
o L)
U '>
zoo
a
`r m�
m. u
o2f E 19
m
oa
J W J
J N W
= LUU
v)
w Z 0-
V1 WI 1e
:: v)FQ
� m m
o
a z
U
Z
(j
o
6
-
F
W
f)f< O
Qaw
U��
> w
z
v)
S
Q
o
o
N
z
Q
a
A
o
o
Lo
N
v
..
in
o
O
O
N
Z o
-
o
D-
W
Q'
LL
\ V
-
� T
p
O
z0
m u)
ap
Y�
Z t
c�
m �
02
� .
3J
O
¢Z�
1?
_
a
z 05
o -0
O
o
� OO
0o
A
-
m o-
-
w�
(7
U �
O
`O
a�
m
fl
Y
¢ CO
p
-
J
e
F
p W
LLj
-
W �
W m
W W
N T
Q�
WZ
u
U
ro
o
C OJ
O �
- M
�p M
U M
J �
z>
mop-
Y3
Z
N
N
�o
am
2
-
v
0] M
N
0
of
N
0
Z
�O z
A
ol
J
N
pp
Q
u
zz
=
=
Z
=
p
� p
-
�
v
1
a
O
N
0
N
o
o
o
M
O
O S
f
N
m
f
m
m 0
ro
3 n
Z
F
m
U
N
s
m
0 K
U m
Z
Z Z
O)

»
z
(
_o
/E
g\6
0
N
\
)
( .
ƒ
: ±/:
]e:
_j
:
d
\)
\
= M
a ,2*
z§\
a£§
¢z�
\
=/
ko
±
2
§
m);
E
cl
\
:-
=8E
/a
-o
�)
-
2/ »!;1.
~
/
� \
i
\
�
0
o
\01

p U
N J w J U ¢ z = N o >
UJ v) W Z o o O
O, o n tt: = w� >: Q 0. 0 N m o W
p oo m. c J0¢ az Q o LY
o � � d1 E 19 LLI (j O w c�
U> m c�wY U Zo 0
v) v) QLL
vCY ¢
m o p m m v) o Y m o
l l
U u) `
u m c V
0-6
U
z3U� >.O -�
LF
`o m
w tin
LLo
02
I \
oe
cl
�0
-O �� I
�E
om a" C9u
'o
~ o
1
F � I
l E
I °
m v
� w in
6 A E
> N
/ 0 m
f w
�{ U o Ig
''`� Z A N N ✓�
o o �
m m
0 0 o O
Al L o a
m 0
t
.Q ¢ z T 0 d
�000� 1 I
m �
I I

w U w = m o m
UJ e w Z ~ o o o
o° �- =w� a �m m o W
woo m ° �OQ 0v) H z o Q'
o D.N� d E 19 wza ° UJ w Q Lo
L) m cn w Y U v) = .. 0 o (�
v)CYQ zv) Q .. LL
OL) Y m o
o I o-
a / I
� met
U
z2c)
cOE m �
tin
m
T
u
W E ♦ Lr � �4�
o _ f
o w �
-- �
02
0
N
f -
F
/ co
I I / 10
E�
W�
I , o
E
>N
r
W
_
U o fg
• o U v m
m m o
0 0 o O
o u Y U com
m (n
m
~ d �
m 0 �' �' (n
m = = Y
a a 10
z T>>u)
o a
�000� 1 I

_co
o §))
�±k
§
/E
]e:
a£§
§
�/L
� 0
)}ƒoo
¢z�
°)J
§/_
3
}
f
&�
/}
6
f e
§
e
)
,
)
*
/
( .
k
/
-
/
2
E
:-
6.0
/,§
R
^
�u)
\\
/)
;
.-
.±
=:7:
...
z Om
/( ))
\\\\\
°
5
:
.
.
J
r
.
�
} \
\
�;
.
\
�
R
!0
_
\ \\
cl
�E
2�
+�.
( \
~
Z \ )
z: «
`.
m
Lu
\ \
2 § : ƒ
aww s a
<
w
Lwu
— u:
. ..
®
; co2 ; \ 2 )
� _ :
-
\ \ j E
\ \ \ \ \
}
»`~
2^
\ \ \ \
co\_
-
y
-
{
/ 00011 i) i

W
U J W J
N Z
a
Q }
=
N
O
>
07 `,C C
J W
WLLU T
Q m LL'
Z W
O
N
O
O
O
N
W
W CO 7._�
Q o y m
N0K C
J F a p
QZ t7
F Q
z
Q
O
Q'
o v LA K of E2
Z� y m
wz U
W Z N
in �
w=
Q
ON
z 0
V
W O
N QR �a
V%
:: 7FQ �
N
UZ o
..
+'
LL
-O
O N
m
O
@
m
_
'O
U o
a
. �...
�F
�=
m Eo
o� _
W
modoo
LL o—
o om�
�000
_
U
z3UM
TO
LF
�oE m-1
`oo
\
U - _
I CI Z 13
/ 10I
/
o� d `o
- \/ o
/ E Y
mE
p / / W O
a0tom Um'
L F p
j c Ii C, _ ! p
N
O o \ \ p U O D
�w C3, Z rn E
O U F p E
\ \\ CO 0 A
Z W
a. o E
/�• U m
ao 0�-0
/ - t (n z m
"
El/ • jo F .. om
o �yOF
F b E
U) O O
m o-
/• ¢ -
z z
13
/ I r
E ¢
o
M o,
N o � E o
d/ W
//• aF : w 1. o O Z
o o ai m N o U o fg w
o m p
o
oto LL COo N
B N Q Y%O O O N -O d O O N m E
C O A O Q w m o O N 0
LL - _- — Q 41 C O y o
N o O -6 u_ . O mo di 48 O =N mO
-o W mN N WN 0rw ZUO
0
- m p
0
U -
z
II
r
OZ > 8¢
O
E m¢ N
d
C� y >�-
z o o— O O 11 B o
> o¢ OF E N¢ y
N
m
O (O E N p N a' O O
II ~
¢
C
.. •
Z N x o Eo p¢ O p
O ¢ N V pN
m 011
J
o u CO~ p y o O
0
O)� m0 U o 0
� � F
O W
_ I
N

W
J W J
J N W
U
Z
a
Q
m
}
=
N
O
O
O
>
07
W c 0
O y
`,C C
M -LU
m c
WLLU
N0�
T
0
Z
QZ
LL'
W
t7
Q
N
z
Q
O
O
N
o
W
p
o U inK
m
J F a
WZ
U)WZ
o
U
F R
13
C
ON
O
V
N Z W
p R
O y
va
:: 7FQ
a)=
o
N
O
Q
..
Z
..
LL
-O
UZ
N 0
N
Y
N
NO
N
NO
—
LO
o
O
o
in
0-
_
I
,
I
/ /
t5C
Fo
L.
` /n,reMvsy�
m
L N y O
E N
Z_
-of
oa oa
F
X
0 0I
w E
n al
o m
p
- rn o o
.�o��mm >
x3
y
coz:am
w -I N U -O O S" N
F-- .Qm .- mom
F a• N CD
0 m U0
y
n
o
O, y > F - o6 F
Z ^O E II y
� .�.
0 D O o
O A E ofo O N d' O O
~ d F y x ~
Q j o w
m" o
II o o
z m x E o Q o v
ON
w
F , = z u�
OZ
Q Q N V
Z
a
EE
y
w
U
o
z
0
U > N
Z a
rn
N
LL
m
F
- 40
O
D
o O
N
N
LL
C O
oUU a
Q
F
0
A
O
m E
O
m o
n
o o
Y
m
E
w
O
F
U
m
0 m
a>
o w
0
OZ
o
0
o o
IL o
m
- o o
m m
o O
U
m
_
w
o
Yn � w
•'• •�•
000
Z I
I to
J

W
07 IC C
w c 0 M
D w m•-
2
z>ro
NO
J W J
J N W
WLLU
NOS
JFd
Wz
W Z
U
Z
T
o
U
N=
o
a
Q
O m
z
QZ
�_�
13
Uz
a O
-
}
LL'
W
0
Q
N
O
N
=
C Y
Q
LO
0
N
O
N
z
Q
0
O
O
O
..
NO
in
>
O
N
o
ON
Z O
'�
a`
W
Q'
V
LL
W
m
_
Q
E
y °?
m v
W �
o
y E
m
6
m
U
o
w
0
U o
Z
C m
U o N
Z N
N
w
O F
O N
N
T
D
O
O N
N LL
O
U d O
O N -6 F
N m
O O
E
C
U N O y
N m O Y A
0
�.
0 N
a'
0 -o o f m y
:? U
OZ
O m
0
o
o
-
to
c°i
o
LL U
cl
.0 Q Z (n a O
ON N cr
W
0 J
•
J Vl
I
I �
�
>
p O E
0
-�
/ �oE
o °
�mw.
mow=
m' o $
1
/
o m `o
U °
m
1
3U z
d o
\
❑
/
-_--_
_
----------
6.0
'Q_
---
�o
2U)
—
U �
ern
� 1
\
1
\
/
1
\
/
\
E Ed
I
/ /
❑.
/
m o- o
O
E Y
/, ,
E O w
Q�o0
m E
�o
•�, / ,
0
N II
-
O O
/
v
w
o
N N
02
4 y N
O y
O
U
E N
O O
n E
o �±°
o
N
0
z
F of
��
"o
m
0 �E
o m:=
n
al
U oy
0
m
(n �' p '� ZT
o N
�
A of
m
>
.6 Y�
(n Z :6 A
W CI N U "6
~O
O S V
m
N
y
0 m O
Z E aria �_
0
`�N
v
Q
�� -
Y
y t
0
U` y -�
> m Q,
.d.ro
E N Q
= 5
b
O o
O A E o
F
ON Qi
00
CD w
t.0
N'
C7�Q
��N
O o
ON
w
Z O�
OZ
V
Z

Musselshell
Not Reported
Trenton, NC 28585
Inquiry Number: 6916785.5
March 29, 2022
6 Armstrong Road, 4th floor
Shelton, CT 06484
CEDR � Toll Free: 800.352.0050
www.edrnet.com

EDR Aerial Photo Decade Package 03/29/22
Site Name: Client Name:
Musselshell
Not Reported
Trenton, NC 28585
EDR Inquiry # 6916785.5
Restoration Systems, LLC
1101 Haynes Street
Raleigh, NC 27604
Contact: JD Hamby
CEDW
Environmental Data Resources, Inc. (EDR) Aerial Photo Decade Package is a screening tool designed to assist
environmental professionals in evaluating potential liability on a target property resulting from past activities. EDR's
professional researchers provide digitally reproduced historical aerial photographs, and when available, provide one photo
per decade.
Search Results:
Year
Scale
Details
Source
2016
1 "=875'
Flight Year: 2016
USDA/NAIP
2012
1 "=875'
Flight Year: 2012
USDA/NAIP
2009
1 "=875'
Flight Year: 2009
USDA/NAIP
2006
1 "=875'
Flight Year: 2006
USDA/NAIP
1999
1 "=875'
Acquisition Date: January 01, 1999
USGS/DOQQ
1993
1 "=875'
Acquisition Date: March 08, 1993
USGS/DOQQ
1982
1 "=875'
Flight Date: March 29, 1982
NHAP
1974
1 "=875'
Flight Date: April 01, 1974
USGS
1964
1 "=875'
Flight Date: April 01, 1964
USGS
1961
1 "=875'
Flight Date: September 22, 1961
USGS
1950
1 "=875'
Flight Date: November 21, 1950
USGS
When delivered electronically by EDR, the aerial photo images included with this report are for ONE TIME USE
ONLY. Further reproduction of these aerial photo images is prohibited without permission from EDR. For more
information contact your EDR Account Executive.
Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice
This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot
be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY
EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY
DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE
OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE,
WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING,
WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL
DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any
analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to
provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I
Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property.
Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice.
Copyright 2022 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of
Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission.
EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are
the property of their respective owners.
6916785 - 5 page 2

r �
r
P.

y 4vf
rfr
�r
A
1 :f
1
r
ENQUIRY k 6916785.5
N
YEAR: 2012 ■ ■ ,
EDR

tNIQU4RY #: 6916785.5
YEAR: 2009 N
eE DR
- 875,

� •�W�

■
PS
V
INQUIRY k 6916785.5 N
YEAR: 1999
875, (rEDR

M:
a

~ t 40
k
f
i
r
As,
WA

a
1

r

fi\IOURY #: 6916785.5
YEAR: 1950
eE DR

Musselshell Bank Parcel — Neuse 04; Jones County Photo Date: 01/09/2023
Image 1: Looking west from NC highway 41 upstream UT1
Image 2: Looking east, downstream UT1.

Feature A
- -
Feature B -�
,7
UT2
Feature C
Feature D
UT1�---�
4
LookingImage 3: downstream
Mussel shellCreek ��
DMS Kingsfield Site
Existing culvert outside CE, near
confluence of Feature A
and G with UT1
UT1. --
Feature B

Musselshell Bank Parcel — Neuse 04; Jones County Photo Date: 01/09/2023
Image 5: Looking downstream UT1 to confluence with Musselshell Creek and downstream
extent of project
Image 6: Looking south, downstream on Musselshell Creek, DMS Full Delivery Project to right at Musselshell
confluence with UT1

APPENDIX B - DWR COMMUNICATION
Musselshell, Bank Parcel Development Plan (DWR ID# 2021-0020v6) Appendices
Neuse River Basin 8-Digit HUC: 03020204

ROY COOPER
Governor
DIONNE DELLFGATTI
Secretary
S. DANIEL SMITH
Director
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
April 30, 2021
Elvin James Lee Jr. 20210020 v1
1359 Kingfield Road
Jones County
Trenton, NC 28585
[phone]
Subject: On -Site Determination for Applicability to Neuse Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 02B .0714)
Subject Property/ Project Name: Kingsfield Buffer Mitigation Site
Address/Location: 1359 Kingfield Road, Trenton, NC 28585 Jones County
Stream(s) Evaluated: (2) — Musselshell Creek, Unnamed Tributary to Musselshell Creek (UT1)
Determination Date: February 22, 2021 Staff: Allen Stewart
Determination Type:
Buffer:
Stream:
X - Neuse (15A NCAC 02B .0714)
X - Intermittent/Perennial Determination
Tar -Pamlico (15A NCAC 026 .0734
Catawba (15A NCAC 02B .0614)
Jordan (15A NCAC 02B .0267) (governmental and/or
interjurisdictional projects)
Randleman (15A NCAC 02B .0724)
Goose Creek (15A NCAC 02B .0605-.0608)
Stream
E/I/P*
Not
Subject
Subject
Start@
Stop@
Soil
Survey
USGS
Topo
Musselshell Creek
P
X
35.113643,-77.325478
35.108759,-77.329753
X
X
UT1
P
X
35.111283,-77.331121
35.108759,-77.329753
X
X
*Ephemeral / Intermittent / Perennial
Mr. Lee,
The Division of Water Resources has determined that the stream listed above and included on the attached map has been located on the most
recent published (1981) NRCS Soil Survey of Jones County, North Carolina and/or the most recent copy of the 2019 Trenton USGS Topographic
map at a 1:24,000 scale and evaluated for applicability to the Neuse Riparian Buffer Rule. For each stream that is checked "Not Subject' it has
been determined to not be at least intermittent or not present on the property. Streams that are checked "Subject' have been mapped on
(1981) NRCS Soil Survey and/or USGS Topographic map 1:24,000, located on the property and possess characteristics that qualify them to be at
least intermittent streams. There may be other streams or features located on the property that do not appear on the maps referenced above
but may be considered jurisdictional according to the US Army Corps of Engineers and subject to the Clean Water Act.
This on -site determination shall expire five (5) years from the date of this letter. Landowners or affected parties that dispute a
determination made by the DWR may request a determination by the Director. An appeal request must be made within sixty (60) calendar
days of date of this letter to the Director in writing.
If sending via US Postal Service:
c/o Paul Wojoski
DWR —401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
If sending via delivery service (UPS, FedEx, etc.):
c% Paul Wojoski
DWR — 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
512 N. Salisbury Street
Raleigh, NC 27604
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources
4NorrrN GARCH NA Washington Regional Office 1 943 Washington Square Mall I Washington, North Carolina 27889
NOM;� /'� 252,946.6481

This determination is final and binding as detailed above unless an appeal is requested within sixty (60) days.
This determination only addresses the applicability to the buffer rules and does not approve any activity within the buffers or
waters. The project may require a Section 404/401 Permit for the proposed activity. Any inquiries regarding applicability to the
Clean Water Act should be directed to the US Army Corps of Engineers Raleigh Regulatory Field Office at (919)-554-4884 Ext. 22.
If you have questions regarding this determination, please feel free to contact Allen Stewart at [phone].
Sincerely,
Row TA#."
Robert Tankard, Assistant Regional Supervisor
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Division of Water Resources, NCDEQ
cc: WaRO DWR File Copy/LASERFICHE
Raymond Holz, Restoration Systems LLC, [e-mail]
Katie Merritt, NCDWR 401 & Buffer Permitting Branch, [e-mail]
Samantha Dailey, US Army Corps of Engineers Raleigh Regulatory Field Office, [e-mail]
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources
SJCRTH CARCUN Washington Regional Office 1 943 Washington Square Mail I Washington, North Carolina 27889
neox.m+amme�mm�mmra{au.i� �� 252.946.6483

North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources
SJCRTH CARCUNA Washington Regional Office 1 943 Washington Square Mail I Washington, North Carolina 27889
neox.e.amme�mm.mmra{au.i� �� 252.946b483

DocuSign Envelope ID: 57193C99-CCBO-4EC4-A4A1-811 BB174F72D
ROY COOPER
Governor
ELIZABETH S. BISER
Secretary
RICHAM E. ROGERS, JR.
Director
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
May 11, 2022
Barrett Jenkins
Restoration Systems, LLC
(via electronic mail: [e-mail] )
Re: Site Viability for Buffer Mitigation & Nutrient Offset — Musselshell Site
Near 35.116225,-77.338622 off 1359 Kingsfield Rd, Trenton, NC
Neuse 03020204
Jones County
Dear Mr. Jenkins,
On February 11, 2022, Katie Merritt, with the Division of Water Resources (DWR), received a
request from you on behalf of Restoration Systems, LLC (RS) for a site visit near the above -
referenced site in the Neuse River Basin within the 8-digit Hydrologic Unit Code 03020204. The site
visit was to determine the potential for riparian buffer mitigation and nutrient offset within a
proposed conservation easement boundary, which is more accurately depicted in the attached map
labeled "Figure 1" prepared by RS. Portions of this site are adjacent to a riparian restoration project
approved by DWR for the Division of Mitigation Services (DMS ID: 100176, DWR ID: 2021-
0020v2) known as the Kingfield Buffer Mitigation Site. A map representing the Kingfield Buffer
Mitigation Site boundary is attached to this letter and labeled "Figure 3: Existing Conditions,
Kingfield Buffer Mitigation Site". The proposed easement boundary in Figure 1, includes all
riparian areas intended to be proposed as part of the mitigation site. On March 8, 2022, Ms. Merritt
performed a site assessment of the subject site. Staff with RS were also present.
Ms. Merritt's evaluation of the features onsite and their associated mitigation determination for the
riparian areas are provided in the table below. This evaluation was made from Top of Bank (TOB)
and landward 200' from each feature for buffer mitigation pursuant to 15A NCAC 02B .0295
(effective November 1, 2015) and for nutrient offset credits pursuant to 15A NCAC 02B .0703.
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources
D E Q 512 North Salisbury Street 11611 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1611
NORTH C of Envi A a 919.707.9000
Deparlmem of Envlronmenml Duali�

DocuSign Envelope ID: 57193C99-CCBO-4EC4-A4A1-811 BB174F72D
Musselshell Site
RS
May 11, 2022
Feature
Classification
1Sublect
Riparian Land uses
Buffer
'Nutrient
4,SMitigation Type Determination Win
to
riparian areas
onsite
adiacent to Feature
Credit
Offset Viable
At 2,273.02
Buffer
0( 200'
Viable
Rule
lbs/acre
Musselshell
Stream
Yes
Non -forested agricultural
Yes
Yes
Non -forested fields - Restoration Site
Creek
fields and pasture. An
per 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (n)
offline pond is present on
left bank but is not within
the proposed project
Riparian restoration determined in
boundary.
riparian areas immediately adjacent to
riparian areas associated with the
An existing conservation
Kingfield Buffer Mitigation site is
easement is likely present
contingent on the full implementation of
within the innermost
the DMS Final Mitigation Plan.
riparian areas along
portions of this feature.
UTl
Stream
Yes
Non -forested agricultural
Yes
Yes
Non -forested fields - Restoration Site
fields and pasture.
per 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (n)
Erosional rills and unstable
banks were observed. An
Minor bank stabilization efforts and
unstable culverted crossing
grading needed where bank stability is
is present within the stream
compromised and where erosional rills,
sink holes and gullies are observed.
An existing conservation
easement is likely present
Repair to an existing crossing may be
within the innermost
warranted to reduce the risk of the
riparian areas along
culvert collapsing and thus disconnecting
portions of this feature.
the upstream and downstream portions of
the stream and affecting hydrology &
aquatic life passage
Riparian restoration determined in
riparian areas immediately adjacent to
riparian areas associated with the
Kingfield Buffer Mitigation site is
contingent on the full implementation of
the DMS Final Mitigation Plan.
UT2
Stream
Yes
Non -forested agricultural
Yes
Yes (non-
Non -forested areas - Restoration Site per
Starts at
fields and managed lawn
forested ag
15A NCAC 02B .0295 (n)
35.113055,
fields only)
-77.337866
A
Ditch
No
Non -forested agricultural
No
Yes
Non -forested fields - Restoration Site
>3' depth
fields.
per 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (n)
B
Ditch
No
Non -forested agricultural
*see
Yes
Non -forested fields - Restoration Site
<3' depth
fields.
note
per 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(8)
Conservation easement is
*Buffer Mitigation Note — Assessment
depicted on both sides but
concludes the ditch meets 15A NCAC
only partially along the
02B .0295 (o)(8) (A, B, C, D & E). More
feature.
information is required to be provided in
a mitigation plan for complete
assessment. See rule.
C
Ditch
No
Non -forested agricultural
No
Yes
Non -forested fields - Restoration Site
>3' depth
fields.
per 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (n)
Page 2 of 4

DocuSign Envelope ID: 57193C99-CCBO-4EC4-A4A1-811 BB174F72D
Musselshell Site
RS
May 11, 2022
Feature
Classification
'Subiect
Riparian Land uses
Buffer
'Nutrient
4,SMitigation Tyne Determination Win
onsite
to
riparian areas
adiacent to Feature
Credit
Offset Viable
At 2,273.02
Buffer
0( 200'
Viable
Rule
lbs/acre
D
Ditch
No
Non -forested agricultural
No
Yes
Non -forested fields - Restoration Site
>3' depth
fields.
per 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (n)
E
Ditch
No
Non -forested agricultural
No
Yes
Non -forested fields - Restoration Site
>3' depth
fields.
per 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (n)
F
Ditch
No
Combination of non-
No
Yes (non-
Non -forested fields - Restoration Site
>3' depth
forested agricultural fields
forested ag
per 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (n)
and managed lawn;
fields only)
partially included within a
No credits within the D.O.T right of way.
D.O.T Right Of Way;
located outside of
Conservation easement
boundary but was assessed
in the field
G
Ditch
No
Non -forested agricultural
No
Yes (left bank
Non -forested fields - Restoration Site
Starts at
>3' depth
fields along left bank with
only)
per 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (n)
35.110202,
timbered forest along right
-77.334250
bank
H
Ditch
No
Non -forested agricultural
*see
Yes
Non -forested fields - Restoration Site
Starts at
<3' depth
fields.
note
per 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(8)
35.112230,
-77.33678
*Buffer Mitigation Note — Assessment
concludes the ditch meets 15A NCAC
02B .0295 (o)(8) (A, B, C, D & E). More
information is required to be provided in
a mitigation plan for complete
assessment. See rule.
I
Ditch/Swale
No
N/A
No
No
N/A
'Subjectivity calls for the features were determined by DWR in correspondences dated January 20, 2022 (DWR# 2021-00200) and
April 1, 2022 (DWR# 2021-0020v4) using the 1:24,000 scale quadrangle topographic map prepared by USGS and the most recent
printed version of the soil survey map prepared by the NRCS .
2The area of preservation credit within a buffer mitigation site shall comprise of no more than 25 percent (25%) of the total area of buffer
mitigation per 15A NCAC 0295 (o)(5) and 15A NCAC 0295 (o)(4). Site cannot be a Preservation Only site to comply with this rule.
'NC Division of Water Resources - Methodology and Calculations for determining Nutrient Reductions associated with Riparian Buffer
Establishment
'Determinations made for this Site are determined based on the proposal provided in maps and figures submitted with the request.
s All features proposed for buffer mitigation or nutrient offset, must have a planted conservation easement established that includes the
tops of channel banks when being measured perpendicular and landward from the banks, even if no credit is viable within that riparian
area.
'The area of the mitigation site on ephemeral channels shall comprise no more than 25 percent (25%) of the total area of buffer
mitigation per 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(7).
7The area described as an Enhancement Site was assessed and determined to comply with all of 15A NCAC 02B .0295(o)(6). Cattle
exclusion fencing is required to be installed around the mitigation area to get buffer credit under this part of the rule.
Determinations provided in the table above were made using a proposed easement boundary showing
proposed mitigation areas and features shown in Figure 1. The map representing the proposal for the
site is attached to this letter and initialed by Ms. Merritt on May 11, 2022. Substantial changes to the
proposed easement boundary as well as any site constraints identified in this letter, could affect the
Page 3 of 4

DocuSign Envelope ID: 57193C99-CCBO-4EC4-A4A1-811 BB174F72D
Musselshell Site
RS
May 11, 2022
Site's potential to generate buffer mitigation and nutrient offset credits. The mitigation
determination of some riparian areas in the table above is contingent on the full implementation of
the approved mitigation plan for the Kingfield Buffer Mitigation site by DMS.
This letter does not constitute an approval of this Site to generate buffer and nutrient offset credits.
Pursuant to 15A NCAC 02B .0295, a mitigation proposal and a mitigation plan shall be submitted to
DWR for written approval prior to conducting any mitigation activities in riparian areas and/or
surface waters for buffer mitigation credit. Pursuant to 15A NCAC 02B .0703, a proposal regarding a
proposed nutrient load -reducing measure for nutrient offset credit shall be submitted to DWR for
approval prior to any mitigation activities in riparian areas and/or surface waters.
All vegetative plantings, performance criteria and other mitigation requirements for riparian
restoration, enhancement and preservation must follow the requirements in 15A NCAC 02B .0295 to
be eligible for buffer and/or nutrient offset mitigation credits. For any areas depicted as not being
viable for nutrient offset credit above, one could propose a different measure, along with supporting
calculations and sufficient detail to support estimates of load reduction, for review by the DWR to
determine viability for nutrient offset in accordance with 15A NCAC 02B .0703.
This viability assessment will expire on May 11, 2024 or upon approval of a mitigation plan by
the DWR, whichever comes first. This letter should be provided in any nutrient offset, buffer,
stream or wetland mitigation plan for this Site.
Please contact Katie Merritt at [phone] if you have any questions regarding this
correspondence.
Sincerely,
ERDOCUS . gned by:
Ij W10
949D91BA53EF4E0...
Paul Wojoski, Supervisor
401 and Buffer Permitting Branch
PW/kym
Attachments: Figure 1, Figure 3: Existing Conditions, Kingfield Buffer Mitigation Site
cc: File Copy (Katie Merritt)
Page 4 of 4

DocuSign Envelope ID: 57193C99-CCBO-4EC4-A4A1-811 BB174F72D
A AT'
IR
l(y� �.y. -. y ��. � r _ .fit •,
04
! a
,(40.
_Abe'
J �. F
�mr s T i1t . GFrE�D RID
_-7:0 - br
� -yr►
7 `
Legend 1 •'�
MusselshelE_Proposed _CE_Merged
® NGDMS CE (8.776-ac)
Streams and Ditches
Ln_Typ
Ditch
I/P Stream at f
RESTORATION SYSTEMS, oATE. a-zozl Figure 1
I IC1 HAYNES ST. SURE 211 SCALE 1-535R Neuse river Basin
RALEIGN. NC 2T60
PHONE. [phone] W SITE. Muuebr,el All Musselshell Nutrient Mitf ation Site
FAX a96.9Y92.
u --- Iele9ery source. O5G6 -2029 C—aMi19 Syetem: NAO ,953 SP NC FIPS 3299_F[.
� a M u..'p�w.••+r Fee[ o 9oo 1,6pp � ., NC'rPV H�arel

DocuSign Envelope ID: 57193C99-CCBO-4EC4-A4A1-811 BB174F72D
Legend
Conservation Easement
CJ I/P Streams
NCDOT 2' Contours
-A AN
a
UT1
p�o�Qc�
I��o�Qc
:r
Musselshell
Creek
yyr
�p
Figure 3: Existing Conditions
Kingfield Buffer Mitigation Site N
Neuse 03020204 w�E
Jones County, North Carolina s
0 (:0 rr August 2021 0 125 250 500
Arte NC Onemap 2018 Aerial Feet

APPENDIX C —
USDA, NRCS Web Soil Survey Report
Musselshell, Bank Parcel Development Plan (DWR ID# 2021-0020v6) Appendices
Neuse River Basin 8-Digit HUC: 03020204

USDA United States
Department of
Agriculture
N RCS
Natural
Resources
Conservation
Service
A product of the National
Cooperative Soil Survey,
a joint effort of the United
States Department of
Agriculture and other
Federal agencies, State
agencies including the
Agricultural Experiment
Stations, and local
participants
Custom Soil Resource
Report for
Jones County,
North Carolina
July 13, 2022

Preface
Soil surveys contain information that affects land use planning in survey areas.
They highlight soil limitations that affect various land uses and provide information
about the properties of the soils in the survey areas. Soil surveys are designed for
many different users, including farmers, ranchers, foresters, agronomists, urban
planners, community officials, engineers, developers, builders, and home buyers.
Also, conservationists, teachers, students, and specialists in recreation, waste
disposal, and pollution control can use the surveys to help them understand,
protect, or enhance the environment.
Various land use regulations of Federal, State, and local governments may impose
special restrictions on land use or land treatment. Soil surveys identify soil
properties that are used in making various land use or land treatment decisions.
The information is intended to help the land users identify and reduce the effects of
soil limitations on various land uses. The landowner or user is responsible for
identifying and complying with existing laws and regulations.
Although soil survey information can be used for general farm, local, and wider area
planning, onsite investigation is needed to supplement this information in some
cases. Examples include soil quality assessments (http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/
portal/nres/main/soils/health/) and certain conservation and engineering
applications. For more detailed information, contact your local USDA Service Center
(https:Hoffices.sc.egov.usda.gov/locator/app?agency=nres) or your NRCS State Soil
Scientist (http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/soils/contactus/?
cid=nres142p2_053951).
Great differences in soil properties can occur within short distances. Some soils are
seasonally wet or subject to flooding. Some are too unstable to be used as a
foundation for buildings or roads. Clayey or wet soils are poorly suited to use as
septic tank absorption fields. A high water table makes a soil poorly suited to
basements or underground installations.
The National Cooperative Soil Survey is a joint effort of the United States
Department of Agriculture and other Federal agencies, State agencies including the
Agricultural Experiment Stations, and local agencies. The Natural Resources
Conservation Service (NRCS) has leadership for the Federal part of the National
Cooperative Soil Survey.
Information about soils is updated periodically. Updated information is available
through the NRCS Web Soil Survey, the site for official soil survey information.
The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its
programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability,
and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion,
sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or a
part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not
all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require

alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print,
audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at [phone] (voice
and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of
Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410 or
call [phone] (voice) or [phone] (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity
provider and employer.

Contents
Preface....................................................................................................................
2
How Soil Surveys Are Made..................................................................................5
SoilMap..................................................................................................................
8
SoilMap................................................................................................................9
Legend................................................................................................................10
MapUnit Legend................................................................................................
11
MapUnit Descriptions.........................................................................................11
Jones County, North Carolina.........................................................................13
Go —Goldsboro loamy sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes, Atlantic Flatwoods.....
13
Ly—Lynchburg fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, Atlantic Coast
Flatwoods..............................................................................................14
Mk—Muckalee loam....................................................................................15
NoB—Norfolk loamy sand, 1 to 4 percent slopes........................................16
Pn—Pantego loam......................................................................................
17
Ra—Rains fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, Atlantic Coast
Flatwoods..............................................................................................19
St —Stallings loamy fine sand......................................................................21
References............................................................................................................
24

How Soil Surveys Are Made
Soil surveys are made to provide information about the soils and miscellaneous
areas in a specific area. They include a description of the soils and miscellaneous
areas and their location on the landscape and tables that show soil properties and
limitations affecting various uses. Soil scientists observed the steepness, length,
and shape of the slopes; the general pattern of drainage; the kinds of crops and
native plants; and the kinds of bedrock. They observed and described many soil
profiles. A soil profile is the sequence of natural layers, or horizons, in a soil. The
profile extends from the surface down into the unconsolidated material in which the
soil formed or from the surface down to bedrock. The unconsolidated material is
devoid of roots and other living organisms and has not been changed by other
biological activity.
Currently, soils are mapped according to the boundaries of major land resource
areas (MLRAs). MLRAs are geographically associated land resource units that
share common characteristics related to physiography, geology, climate, water
resources, soils, biological resources, and land uses (USDA, 2006). Soil survey
areas typically consist of parts of one or more MLRA.
The soils and miscellaneous areas in a survey area occur in an orderly pattern that
is related to the geology, landforms, relief, climate, and natural vegetation of the
area. Each kind of soil and miscellaneous area is associated with a particular kind
of landform or with a segment of the landform. By observing the soils and
miscellaneous areas in the survey area and relating their position to specific
segments of the landform, a soil scientist develops a concept, or model, of how they
were formed. Thus, during mapping, this model enables the soil scientist to predict
with a considerable degree of accuracy the kind of soil or miscellaneous area at a
specific location on the landscape.
Commonly, individual soils on the landscape merge into one another as their
characteristics gradually change. To construct an accurate soil map, however, soil
scientists must determine the boundaries between the soils. They can observe only
a limited number of soil profiles. Nevertheless, these observations, supplemented
by an understanding of the soil -vegetation -landscape relationship, are sufficient to
verify predictions of the kinds of soil in an area and to determine the boundaries.
Soil scientists recorded the characteristics of the soil profiles that they studied. They
noted soil color, texture, size and shape of soil aggregates, kind and amount of rock
fragments, distribution of plant roots, reaction, and other features that enable them
to identify soils. After describing the soils in the survey area and determining their
properties, the soil scientists assigned the soils to taxonomic classes (units).
Taxonomic classes are concepts. Each taxonomic class has a set of soil
characteristics with precisely defined limits. The classes are used as a basis for
comparison to classify soils systematically. Soil taxonomy, the system of taxonomic
classification used in the United States, is based mainly on the kind and character
of soil properties and the arrangement of horizons within the profile. After the soil

Custom Soil Resource Report
scientists classified and named the soils in the survey area, they compared the
individual soils with similar soils in the same taxonomic class in other areas so that
they could confirm data and assemble additional data based on experience and
research.
The objective of soil mapping is not to delineate pure map unit components; the
objective is to separate the landscape into landforms or landform segments that
have similar use and management requirements. Each map unit is defined by a
unique combination of soil components and/or miscellaneous areas in predictable
proportions. Some components may be highly contrasting to the other components
of the map unit. The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way
diminishes the usefulness or accuracy of the data. The delineation of such
landforms and landform segments on the map provides sufficient information for the
development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, onsite
investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous areas.
Soil scientists make many field observations in the process of producing a soil map.
The frequency of observation is dependent upon several factors, including scale of
mapping, intensity of mapping, design of map units, complexity of the landscape,
and experience of the soil scientist. Observations are made to test and refine the
soil -landscape model and predictions and to verify the classification of the soils at
specific locations. Once the soil -landscape model is refined, a significantly smaller
number of measurements of individual soil properties are made and recorded.
These measurements may include field measurements, such as those for color,
depth to bedrock, and texture, and laboratory measurements, such as those for
content of sand, silt, clay, salt, and other components. Properties of each soil
typically vary from one point to another across the landscape.
Observations for map unit components are aggregated to develop ranges of
characteristics for the components. The aggregated values are presented. Direct
measurements do not exist for every property presented for every map unit
component. Values for some properties are estimated from combinations of other
properties.
While a soil survey is in progress, samples of some of the soils in the area generally
are collected for laboratory analyses and for engineering tests. Soil scientists
interpret the data from these analyses and tests as well as the field -observed
characteristics and the soil properties to determine the expected behavior of the
soils under different uses. Interpretations for all of the soils are field tested through
observation of the soils in different uses and under different levels of management.
Some interpretations are modified to fit local conditions, and some new
interpretations are developed to meet local needs. Data are assembled from other
sources, such as research information, production records, and field experience of
specialists. For example, data on crop yields under defined levels of management
are assembled from farm records and from field or plot experiments on the same
kinds of soil.
Predictions about soil behavior are based not only on soil properties but also on
such variables as climate and biological activity. Soil conditions are predictable over
long periods of time, but they are not predictable from year to year. For example,
soil scientists can predict with a fairly high degree of accuracy that a given soil will
have a high water table within certain depths in most years, but they cannot predict
that a high water table will always be at a specific level in the soil on a specific date.
After soil scientists located and identified the significant natural bodies of soil in the
survey area, they drew the boundaries of these bodies on aerial photographs and

Custom Soil Resource Report
identified each as a specific map unit. Aerial photographs show trees, buildings,
fields, roads, and rivers, all of which help in locating boundaries accurately.

Soil Map
The soil map section includes the soil map for the defined area of interest, a list of
soil map units on the map and extent of each map unit, and cartographic symbols
displayed on the map. Also presented are various metadata about data used to
produce the map, and a description of each soil map unit.

Custom Soil Resource Report
M Soil Map
o
286400 28660D 286800 2870M 2872M 2874M 2876M 287M0 288000
35° 7' 17" N 35° 717 N
Ogg
r
oyQj( ` e
. ter••
•
• IYYh •
F
a
a g
Q u'a�S
u'S �
r
1
g
g
r['µ
Soil MaN may not he III at this scale.
35° 6' 6" N - - 35° 6' 6" N
286400 286630 286800 287000 287200 2874W 287600 287800
a Map Scale: 1:10,600 if printed on A portrait (8.5" x 11") sheet.
N Meters
0 150 300 600 900
Feet
0 500 1000 2000 3000
Map projection: Web Mercator Comereoordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM 7_a3e 18N WGS84
9

O
a)m
U)
N
a)'0 N
7 y
i U) U)O
m
Ul
>O
Z
N
N '6
(6 p N
N
N O N
(n
I
0 0
U 0 '6
U
O L
'6
N
O
U) O
O
-6
U U)
N
U) E
(U)
O E
CL
Z
(6
E
N
c U N N
Q (6
�O
O
O N
N a) 7
N N U) a
U
(n
m
CCL
E
U
U) 0 O
N U)
O
N
U
N
N C C
L
co
OO O CL a) O
N
U)
E m 3
U)
6
N CJ
N>-0
Z
O O
UU))
QC
3
_
O
O
O_
U) U)
y '6 O
Q
U N
2i
'O
L O >
N 'C- � U)
E
U W
(6 (Op 0 0
N
N
N O
G
O
U N O N
L
U)
C U) N
Z C
N
N
p N Q
O
0
=
y E U)
N
N
U (6
(6 .0 m 0 0
N
O
>;
N
O
fl-'O Ul (U
E
LL
>+
N
N
>
N
(D p O N
— O>
O
O
7 U
O N
>, O� U
N U O
N
"�-'
E O
C
N
O
N
0
L
>,
Q U)
E a)
Z
�
O L
N
N 2
'� N
7 U) U O jp
O�
w 'O
O
U O
O_
N
N
N
_
'O
(6 0 N
Q
U
>+
- m O
U) E U
J>
U) a) O
U)
_
C N
� �
N
-0
U)
N 7
s � �
E
� �
z E
0
m
Utl)
m
N
�
�-0 'E
U)
Q
O
E C H y
>+ .O-
aa) o
L N N jp
W
O) (6
io
N
O O
E
O .O O 7
>'
p 'O
C y
O_ N >+
N U (6 (6 7
,U) -O
N Q
y
._
T
O 76 (p 0_
O
U)
C (6 N U)
a) N E rn
0 0
>
3 (n
a)
"" 3 C N N
�
U .O
Q N
'C
o
L O N E
Q m
U)
O
C
E N .c
N '6 y
a) E
0— (6
O C
E U
O a
O p U 0 ""
'6
O>
aa)
O O
a)
(6
O '6
O O
U)
E55
N
C (6
Q O
N 7
U)
O � '6
U) U C
Q N
7 >+
U) O
E O
O)
O 'Q N C
N
O 'N C U
(u
N N
O O
(6 O n� U
Mn 46
0 7
O N
M
O
L
O
W E— U U)
a E
U) > U
9
Q 'O Q om
L
H O
U) U)
O
N
L O
)
H U. U)
Q
y
d y
R O
(i U
R
L
L
Q
Q
>.
00
2 y a
0
-yo 0
L
d
Q
6 J N
° m E
U)CL
a) .0. O
m o M
O
� a
0 O
U) (n
Z
>
N L_ y
O (n (n
�
O
°
a)
R m
U
3 a Q
0
R
N
R
0
O
C
p
O
Z
a
WR
4
R5
R
fVn
�
F
m
W
J
y
a
a
pCL
y
o
o
)
o
o
N
Q
�
aa°Q
o
Q
Q
Q
R
>�
O
N
O
w o
))U
o
U
Q_
a)
o
O-
ay
3
o
= o
oE
O
>000
Y o
Ua)Q
QR
(n
SLL
(n (n o m
m
o
E
n a)
a
O m
M U)
R a)
U)0
U)
O
U)
w
a
�
R ❑
R +Vy�
■
y0 ❑ u i/
®
�ap�
<> { �
y�p�
"V
`}
!
o o
}�
�O
V)
Q
y
0
r

Custom Soil Resource Report
Map Unit Legend
Map Unit Symbol
Map Unit Name
Acres in AOI
Percent of AOI
Go
Goldsboro loamy sand, 0 to 2
percent slopes, Atlantic
Flatwoods
6.4
12.2%
Ly
Lynchburg fine sandy loam, 0 to
2 percent slopes, Atlantic
Coast Flatwoods
2.4
4.6%
Mk
Muckalee loam
37.8
72.2%
NoB
Norfolk loamy sand, 1 to 4
percent slopes
2.9
5.6%
Pn
Pantego loam
0.0
0.0%
Ra
Rains fine sandy loam, 0 to 2
percent slopes, Atlantic Coast
Flatwoods
0.6
1.1 %
St
Stallings loamy fine sand
2.3
4.4%
Totals for Area of Interest
62.3
100.0%
Map Unit Descriptions
The map units delineated on the detailed soil maps in a soil survey represent the
soils or miscellaneous areas in the survey area. The map unit descriptions, along
with the maps, can be used to determine the composition and properties of a unit.
A map unit delineation on a soil map represents an area dominated by one or more
major kinds of soil or miscellaneous areas. A map unit is identified and named
according to the taxonomic classification of the dominant soils. Within a taxonomic
class there are precisely defined limits for the properties of the soils. On the
landscape, however, the soils are natural phenomena, and they have the
characteristic variability of all natural phenomena. Thus, the range of some
observed properties may extend beyond the limits defined for a taxonomic class.
Areas of soils of a single taxonomic class rarely, if ever, can be mapped without
including areas of other taxonomic classes. Consequently, every map unit is made
up of the soils or miscellaneous areas for which it is named and some minor
components that belong to taxonomic classes other than those of the major soils.
Most minor soils have properties similar to those of the dominant soil or soils in the
map unit, and thus they do not affect use and management. These are called
noncontrasting, or similar, components. They may or may not be mentioned in a
particular map unit description. Other minor components, however, have properties
and behavioral characteristics divergent enough to affect use or to require different
management. These are called contrasting, or dissimilar, components. They
generally are in small areas and could not be mapped separately because of the
scale used. Some small areas of strongly contrasting soils or miscellaneous areas
are identified by a special symbol on the maps. If included in the database for a
given area, the contrasting minor components are identified in the map unit
11

Custom Soil Resource Report
descriptions along with some characteristics of each. A few areas of minor
components may not have been observed, and consequently they are not
mentioned in the descriptions, especially where the pattern was so complex that it
was impractical to make enough observations to identify all the soils and
miscellaneous areas on the landscape.
The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way diminishes the
usefulness or accuracy of the data. The objective of mapping is not to delineate
pure taxonomic classes but rather to separate the landscape into landforms or
landform segments that have similar use and management requirements. The
delineation of such segments on the map provides sufficient information for the
development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, however,
onsite investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous
areas.
An identifying symbol precedes the map unit name in the map unit descriptions.
Each description includes general facts about the unit and gives important soil
properties and qualities.
Soils that have profiles that are almost alike make up a soil series. Except for
differences in texture of the surface layer, all the soils of a series have major
horizons that are similar in composition, thickness, and arrangement.
Soils of one series can differ in texture of the surface layer, slope, stoniness,
salinity, degree of erosion, and other characteristics that affect their use. On the
basis of such differences, a soil series is divided into soil phases. Most of the areas
shown on the detailed soil maps are phases of soil series. The name of a soil phase
commonly indicates a feature that affects use or management. For example, Alpha
silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is a phase of the Alpha series.
Some map units are made up of two or more major soils or miscellaneous areas.
These map units are complexes, associations, or undifferentiated groups.
A complex consists of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas in such an intricate
pattern or in such small areas that they cannot be shown separately on the maps.
The pattern and proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat similar
in all areas. Alpha -Beta complex, 0 to 6 percent slopes, is an example.
An association is made up of two or more geographically associated soils or
miscellaneous areas that are shown as one unit on the maps. Because of present
or anticipated uses of the map units in the survey area, it was not considered
practical or necessary to map the soils or miscellaneous areas separately. The
pattern and relative proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat
similar. Alpha -Beta association, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example.
An undifferentiated group is made up of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas
that could be mapped individually but are mapped as one unit because similar
interpretations can be made for use and management. The pattern and proportion
of the soils or miscellaneous areas in a mapped area are not uniform. An area can
be made up of only one of the major soils or miscellaneous areas, or it can be made
up of all of them. Alpha and Beta soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example.
Some surveys include miscellaneous areas. Such areas have little or no soil
material and support little or no vegetation. Rock outcrop is an example.
12

Custom Soil Resource Report
Jones County, North Carolina
Go —Goldsboro loamy sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes, Atlantic Flatwoods
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 2v75k
Elevation: 40 to 150 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 40 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost -free period: 200 to 280 days
Farmland classification: All areas are prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Goldsboro and similar soils: 85 percent
Minor components: 15 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Goldsboro
Setting
Landform: Flats on marine terraces, broad interstream divides on marine terraces
Landform position (three-dimensional): Talf
Down -slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Loamy marine deposits
Typical profile
Ap - 0 to 8 inches: loamy sand
E - 8 to 14 inches: loamy sand
Bt - 14 to 38 inches: sandy clay loam
Btg - 38 to 56 inches: sandy clay loam
BCg - 56 to 72 inches: sandy clay loam
Cg - 72 to 80 inches: loamy sand
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Moderately well drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high
(0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 24 to 36 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Moderate (about 7.8 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 2w
Hydrologic Soil Group: B
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Norfolk
Percent of map unit. 8 percent
Landform: Broad interstream divides on marine terraces, flats on marine terraces
13

Custom Soil Resource Report
Landform position (three-dimensional): Talf
Down -slope shape: Convex, linear
Across -slope shape: Convex, linear
Hydric soil rating: No
Lynchburg
Percent of map unit. 7 percent
Landform: Flats on marine terraces, broad interstream divides on marine terraces
Landform position (three-dimensional): Talf
Down -slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Linear
Hydric soil rating: No
Ly—Lynchburg fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, Atlantic Coast
Flatwoods
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol. 2vx8k
Elevation: 0 to 100 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 40 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 64 to 70 degrees F
Frost -free period: 200 to 310 days
Farmland classification: Prime farmland if drained
Map Unit Composition
Lynchburg and similar soils: 82 percent
Minor components: 18 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Lynchburg
Setting
Landform: Marine terraces
Landform position (three-dimensional): Tread
Down -slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Loamy marine deposits
Typical profile
Ap - 0 to 6 inches: fine sandy loam
E - 6 to 13 inches: fine sandy loam
Bt - 13 to 21 inches: sandy clay loam
Btg - 21 to 45 inches: sandy clay loam
BCg - 45 to 63 inches: sandy clay loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Somewhat poorly drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high
(0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
14

Custom Soil Resource Report
Depth to water table: About 6 to 18 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Low (about 5.1 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 2w
Hydrologic Soil Group: B/D
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Goldsboro
Percent of map unit. 8 percent
Landform: Flats on marine terraces, broad interstream divides on marine terraces
Landform position (three-dimensional): Talf
Down -slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Linear
Hydric soil rating: No
Rains, drained
Percent of map unit. 5 percent
Landform: Carolina bays on marine terraces, flats on marine terraces, broad
interstream divides on marine terraces
Landform position (three-dimensional): Dip, talf
Down -slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Linear
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Rains, undrained
Percent of map unit. 5 percent
Landform: Carolina bays on marine terraces, flats on marine terraces, broad
interstream divides on marine terraces
Landform position (three-dimensional): Dip, talf
Down -slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Linear
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Mk—Muckalee loam
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol. 3wp8
Elevation: 20 to 160 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 40 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost -free period: 200 to 280 days
Farmland classification: Not prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Muckalee, undrained, and similar soils: 80 percent
15

Custom Soil Resource Report
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Muckalee, Undrained
Setting
Landform: Flood plains
Down -slope shape: Concave
Across -slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Sandy and loamy alluvium
Typical profile
A - 0 to 24 inches: loam
Cg - 24 to 80 inches: sandy loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Poorly drained
Runoff class: Negligible
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high
(0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 0 to 12 inches
Frequency of flooding: FrequentNone
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Moderate (about 6.5 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 5w
Hydrologic Soil Group: B/D
Hydric soil rating: Yes
NoB—Norfolk loamy sand, 1 to 4 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 3wpc
Elevation: 20 to 160 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 40 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost -free period: 200 to 280 days
Farmland classification: All areas are prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Norfolk and similar soils: 85 percent
Minor components: 4 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Norfolk
Setting
Landform: Broad interstream divides on marine terraces, ridges on marine
terraces
Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit, shoulder
it.

Custom Soil Resource Report
Landform position (three-dimensional): Crest
Down -slope shape: Convex
Across -slope shape: Convex
Parent material: Loamy marine deposits
Typical profile
Ap - 0 to 14 inches: loamy fine sand
Bt - 14 to 56 inches: sandy clay loam
BC - 56 to 80 inches: sandy clay loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 2 to 6 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Well drained
Runoff class: Low
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high
(0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 40 to 72 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Moderate (about 7.7 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 2e
Hydrologic Soil Group: A
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Woodington, undrained
Percent of map unit. 3 percent
Landform: Flats on marine terraces, depressions on marine terraces, broad
interstream divides on marine terraces
Down -slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Concave
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Muckalee, undrained
Percent of map unit. 1 percent
Landform: Flood plains
Down -slope shape: Concave
Across -slope shape: Linear
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Pn—Pantego loam
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 3wpg
Elevation: 20 to 160 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 40 to 55 inches
17

Custom Soil Resource Report
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost -free period: 200 to 280 days
Farmland classification: Prime farmland if drained
Map Unit Composition
Pantego, drained, and similar soils: 80 percent
Pantego, undrained, and similar soils: 10 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Pantego, Drained
Setting
Landform: Flats on marine terraces, broad interstream divides on marine terraces
Down -slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Concave
Parent material: Loamy marine deposits
Typical profile
A - 0 to 18 inches: loam
Bt - 18 to 27 inches: sandy clay loam
Btg - 27 to 80 inches: sandy clay loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 1 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Very poorly drained
Runoff class: Very low
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high
(0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 0 to 12 inches
Frequency of flooding: Rare
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: High (about 10.2 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3w
Hydrologic Soil Group: B/D
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Description of Pantego, Undrained
Setting
Landform: Flats on marine terraces, broad interstream divides on marine terraces
Down -slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Concave
Parent material: Loamy marine deposits
Typical profile
A - 0 to 18 inches: loam
Bt - 18 to 27 inches: sandy clay loam
Btg - 27 to 80 inches: sandy clay loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 1 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Very poorly drained
Runoff class: Very low
18

Custom Soil Resource Report
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high
(0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 0 to 12 inches
Frequency of flooding: Rare
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: High (about 10.2 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 6w
Hydrologic Soil Group: B/D
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Ra—Rains fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, Atlantic Coast
Flatwoods
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 2tn9g
Elevation: 20 to 160 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 40 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost -free period: 200 to 280 days
Farmland classification: Prime farmland if drained
Map Unit Composition
Rains, undrained, and similar soils: 70 percent
Rains, drained, and similar soils: 16 percent
Minor components: 14 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Rains, Undrained
Setting
Landform: Carolina bays on marine terraces, broad interstream divides on marine
terraces, flats on marine terraces
Landform position (three-dimensional): Dip, talf
Down -slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Loamy marine deposits
Typical profile
Ap - 0 to 7 inches: fine sandy loam
Eg - 7 to 16 inches: fine sandy loam
Btg - 16 to 41 inches: sandy clay loam
BCg - 41 to 66 inches: sandy clay loam
Cg - 66 to 80 inches: sandy clay loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Poorly drained
19

Custom Soil Resource Report
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high
(0.20 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 0 to 12 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: High (about 9.6 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4w
Hydrologic Soil Group: B/D
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Description of Rains, Drained
Setting
Landform: Carolina bays on marine terraces, broad interstream divides on marine
terraces, flats on marine terraces
Landform position (three-dimensional): Dip, talf
Down -slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Loamy marine deposits
Typical profile
Ap - 0 to 7 inches: fine sandy loam
Eg - 7 to 16 inches: fine sandy loam
Btg - 16 to 41 inches: sandy clay loam
BCg - 41 to 66 inches: sandy clay loam
Cg - 66 to 80 inches: sandy clay loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Poorly drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high
(0.20 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 24 to 36 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: High (about 9.6 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3w
Hydrologic Soil Group: B/D
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Minor Components
Lynchburg
Percent of map unit. 8 percent
Landform: Broad interstream divides on marine terraces, flats on marine terraces
Landform position (three-dimensional): Talf
Down -slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Linear
Hydric soil rating: No
20

Custom Soil Resource Report
Pantego, ponded
Percent of map unit. 6 percent
Landform: Flats, broad interstream divides
Landform position (three-dimensional): Talf
Down -slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Concave
Hydric soil rating: Yes
St —Stallings loamy fine sand
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol. 3wpj
Elevation: 20 to 330 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 38 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost -free period: 200 to 280 days
Farmland classification: Farmland of statewide importance
Map Unit Composition
Stallings, drained, and similar soils: 80 percent
Stallings, undrained, and similar soils: 10 percent
Minor components: 7 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Stallings, Drained
Setting
Landform: Flats on marine terraces, broad interstream divides on marine terraces
Down -slope shape: Concave
Across -slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Loamy and sandy marine deposits
Typical profile
A - 0 to 8 inches: loamy sand
E - 8 to 12 inches: loamy sand
Btg - 12 to 42 inches: sandy loam
BCg - 42 to 80 inches: loamy sand
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Somewhat poorly drained
Runoff class: Very low
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): High (1.98 to 5.95
in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 12 to 30 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Moderate (about 7.0 inches)
21

Custom Soil Resource Report
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 2w
Hydrologic Soil Group: A/D
Hydric soil rating: No
Description of Stallings, Undrained
Setting
Landform: Flats on marine terraces, broad interstream divides on marine terraces
Down -slope shape: Concave
Across -slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Loamy and sandy marine deposits
Typical profile
A - 0 to 8 inches: loamy sand
E - 8 to 12 inches: loamy sand
B - 12 to 42 inches: sandy loam
BC - 42 to 80 inches: loamy sand
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Somewhat poorly drained
Runoff class: Very low
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): High (1.98 to 5.95
in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 12 to 30 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Moderate (about 7.0 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3w
Hydrologic Soil Group: A/D
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Woodington, undrained
Percent of map unit. 5 percent
Landform: Flats on marine terraces, depressions on marine terraces, broad
interstream divides on marine terraces
Down -slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Concave
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Rains, undrained
Percent of map unit. 2 percent
Landform: Flats on marine terraces, carolina bays on marine terraces, broad
interstream divides on marine terraces
Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit
Down -slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Linear
Hydric soil rating: Yes
22

Custom Soil Resource Report
23

References
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO).
2004. Standard specifications for transportation materials and methods of sampling
and testing. 24th edition.
American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). 2005. Standard classification of
soils for engineering purposes. ASTM Standard D2487-00.
Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Golet, and E.T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of
wetlands and deep -water habitats of the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service FWS/OBS-79/31.
Federal Register. July 13, 1994. Changes in hydric soils of the United States.
Federal Register. September 18, 2002. Hydric soils of the United States.
Hurt, G.W., and L.M. Vasilas, editors. Version 6.0, 2006. Field indicators of hydric
soils in the United States.
National Research Council. 1995. Wetlands: Characteristics and boundaries.
Soil Survey Division Staff. 1993. Soil survey manual. Soil Conservation Service.
U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 18. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/
n res/d eta i I/n ati o n a I/s o i Is/?cid = n res 142 p2_0 54262
Soil Survey Staff. 1999. Soil taxonomy: A basic system of soil classification for
making and interpreting soil surveys. 2nd edition. Natural Resources Conservation
Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 436. http://
www. nres. usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/national/soils/?cid=nres142p2_053577
Soil Survey Staff. 2010. Keys to soil taxonomy. 11th edition. U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. http://
www. nres. usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/national/soils/?cid=nres142p2_053580
Tiner, R.W., Jr. 1985. Wetlands of Delaware. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and
Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control, Wetlands
Section.
United States Army Corps of Engineers, Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps of
Engineers wetlands delineation manual. Waterways Experiment Station Technical
Report Y-87-1.
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National forestry manual. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/soils/
home/?cid=nres142p2_053374
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National range and pasture handbook. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/
detail/national/landuse/rangepastu re/?cid=stelprdb1043084
24

Custom Soil Resource Report
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National soil survey handbook, title 430-VI. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/
n res/d eta i I/so i Is/scie ntists/?cid=n res 142 p2_054242
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
2006. Land resource regions and major land resource areas of the United States,
the Caribbean, and the Pacific Basin. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook
296. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/national/soils/?
cid = n res 142 p2_05 3624
United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. 1961. Land
capability classification. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 210. http:H
www.nrcs.usda.gov/lnternet/FSE—DOCUMENTS/nrcsl 42p2_052290. pdf
25

APPENDIX D —
NHP Report
FWS Report
Musselshell, Bank Parcel Development Plan (DWR ID# 2021-0020v6) Appendices
Neuse River Basin 8-Digit HUC: 03020204

Roy Cooper, Governor
■ ■■■
r ■■ ■ INC DEPARTMENT OF
■■,■i NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
■ ■■
June 23, 2022
Alexander Baldwin
Restoration Systems, LLC
1101 Haynes Street, Suite 211
Raleigh, NC 27604
RE: Musselshell Nutrient Bank
Dear Alexander Baldwin:
❑. Reid Wilson, Secretary
Misty Buchanan
Deputy Director, Natural Heritage Program
101 \��r.TDTMEi�1i1
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide
information about natural heritage resources for the project referenced above.
Based on the project area mapped with your request, a query of the NCNHP database indicates that
there are no records for rare species, important natural communities, natural areas, and/or
conservation/managed areas within the proposed project boundary. Please note that although there
may be no documentation of natural heritage elements within the project boundary, it does not
imply or confirm their absence; the area may not have been surveyed. The results of this query
should not be substituted for field surveys where suitable habitat exists. In the event that rare
species are found within the project area, please contact the NCNHP so that we may update our
records.
The attached `Potential Occurrences' table summarizes rare species and natural communities that
have been documented within a one -mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these
records suggests that these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area
if suitable habitat exists. Tables of natural areas and conservation/managed areas within a one -mile
radius of the project area, if any, are also included in this report.
If a Federally -listed species is found within the project area or is indicated within a one -mile radius of
the project area, the NCNHP recommends contacting the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) for
guidance. Contact information for USFWS offices in North Carolina is found here:
httr)s://www.fws.gov/offices/Directory/ListOffices.cfm?statecode=37.
Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation
planning, project review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria
for regulatory decisions. Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published
without prior written notification to the NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information
source in these publications. Maps of NCNHP data may not be redistributed without permission.
The NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional correspondence if a
Dedicated Nature Preserve, Registered Heritage Area, Land and Water Fund easement, or Federally -
listed species are documented near the project area.
If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance,
please contact Rodney A. Butler at rod ney.butler�ncdcr.gov or 919-707-8603.
Sincerely,
NC Natural Heritage Program
DEPAR7HEN7 OF NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
121 W. JONES STREET. RALEIGH. NC 27603 • 1691 MAIL SERVICE CENTER. RALEIGH. NC 27609
OFC 919.707.9120 • FAX [phone]

■
CO
2
\
CO
\/
\t\QO
// c /
CO
®®%/
\\±$
z=g
CO
< _
_x
CO
\
/
E
»
\
CO
/
-
�
Y
&
ƒ
/ /
3 3
CO
4
\
�
/
\
\
CO
\
}
O
CO
\
%
\
\
E
\
0
\
\
\
\
\
/
}
/
§
\
c

n
■i
y�
c�
C
V
O
LO
M
�G
P8 pl ald6u N Pay a
GP� O
'V m p
Pa uoJUa�l Pb �!a!d8��� �/aaa�!!ays�s
� sh
e
' 3 lb 4e'48,14 )N
v
4
oh
rdd
a
LTa
0
3
°nzsm°p
w C:
Q o
� m �
V �p
N N
O �
Q
O
aj
0 O In
N � V
O C
N O
M z co a
M
O
M
N
a

United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
In Reply Refer To:
Project Code: 2022-0057039
Project Name: Musselshell Nutrient Bank
June 23, 2022
Subject: List of threatened and endangered species that may occur in your proposed project
location or may be affected by your proposed project
To Whom It May Concern:
The enclosed species list identifies threatened, endangered, proposed and candidate species, as
well as proposed and final designated critical habitat, that may occur within the boundary of your
proposed project and/or may be affected by your proposed project. The species list fulfills the
requirements of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) under section 7(c) of the
Endangered Species Act (Act) of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). If your project area
contains suitable habitat for any of the federally -listed species on this species list, the proposed
action has the potential to adversely affect those species. If suitable habitat is present, surveys
should be conducted to determine the species' presence or absence within the project area. The
use of this species list and/or North Carolina Natural Heritage program data should not be
substituted for actual field surveys.
New information based on updated surveys, changes in the abundance and distribution of
species, changed habitat conditions, or other factors could change this list. Please feel free to
contact us if you need more current information or assistance regarding the potential impacts to
federally proposed, listed, and candidate species and federally designated and proposed critical
habitat. Please note that under 50 CFR 402.12(e) of the regulations implementing section 7 of the
Act, the accuracy of this species list should be verified after 90 days. This verification can be
completed formally or informally as desired. The Service recommends that verification be
completed by visiting the ECOS-IPaC website at regular intervals during project planning and
implementation for updates to species lists and information. An updated list may be requested
through the ECOS-IPaC system by completing the same process used to receive the enclosed list.
The purpose of the Act is to provide a means whereby threatened and endangered species and the
ecosystems upon which they depend may be conserved. Under sections 7(a)(1) and 7(a)(2) of the
Act and its implementing regulations (50 CFR 402 et seq.), Federal agencies are required to
utilize their authorities to carry out programs for the conservation of threatened and endangered

06/23/2022
species and to determine whether projects may affect threatened and endangered species and/or
designated critical habitat.
A Biological Assessment is required for construction projects (or other undertakings having
similar physical impacts) that are major Federal actions significantly affecting the quality of the
human environment as defined in the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 4332(2)
(c)). For projects other than major construction activities, the Service suggests that a biological
evaluation similar to a Biological Assessment be prepared to determine whether the project may
affect listed or proposed species and/or designated or proposed critical habitat. Recommended
contents of a Biological Assessment are described at 50 CFR 402.12.
If a Federal agency determines, based on the Biological Assessment or biological evaluation, that
listed species and/or designated critical habitat may be affected by the proposed project, the
agency is required to consult with the Service pursuant to 50 CFR 402. In addition, the Service
recommends that candidate species, proposed species and proposed critical habitat be addressed
within the consultation. More information on the regulations and procedures for section 7
consultation, including the role of permit or license applicants, can be found in the "Endangered
Species Consultation Handbook" at:
http://www.fws.gov/endangered/esa-library/pdf/TOC-GLOS.PDF
Migratory Birds: In addition to responsibilities to protect threatened and endangered species
under the Endangered Species Act (ESA), there are additional responsibilities under the
Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (BGEPA) to
protect native birds from project -related impacts. Any activity, intentional or unintentional,
resulting in take of migratory birds, including eagles, is prohibited unless otherwise permitted by
the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (50 C.F.R. Sec. 10.12 and 16 U.S.C. Sec. 668(a)). For more
information regarding these Acts see https://www.fws.gov/birds/policies-and-regulations.php.
The MBTA has no provision for allowing take of migratory birds that may be unintentionally
killed or injured by otherwise lawful activities. It is the responsibility of the project proponent to
comply with these Acts by identifying potential impacts to migratory birds and eagles within
applicable NEPA documents (when there is a federal nexus) or a Bird/Eagle Conservation Plan
(when there is no federal nexus). Proponents should implement conservation measures to avoid
or minimize the production of project -related stressors or minimize the exposure of birds and
their resources to the project -related stressors. For more information on avian stressors and
recommended conservation measures see https://www.fws.gov/birds/bird-enthusiasts/threats-to-
birds.php.
In addition to MBTA and BGEPA, Executive Order 13186: Responsibilities of Federal Agencies
to Protect Migratory Birds, obligates all Federal agencies that engage in or authorize activities
that might affect migratory birds, to minimize those effects and encourage conservation measures
that will improve bird populations. Executive Order 13186 provides for the protection of both
migratory birds and migratory bird habitat. For information regarding the implementation of
Executive Order 13186, please visit https://www.fws.gov/birds/policies-and-regulations/
executive-orders/e0-13186. php.

06/23/2022
3
We appreciate your concern for threatened and endangered species. The Service encourages
Federal agencies to include conservation of threatened and endangered species into their project
planning to further the purposes of the Act. Please include the Consultation Code in the header of
this letter with any request for consultation or correspondence about your project that you submit
to our office.
Attachment(s):
• Official Species List
• Migratory Birds

06/23/2022
Official Species List
This list is provided pursuant to Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, and fulfills the
requirement for Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary of the Interior information whether
any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of a proposed
action".
This species list is provided by:
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
[phone]

06/23/2022
Project Summary
Project Code: 2022-0057039
Event Code: None
Project Name: Musselshell Nutrient Bank
Project Type: Mitigation Development/Review - Mitigation or Conservation Bank
Project Description: Restore stream, ditch, and pond riparian buffers by planting hardwood
trees within a 200-foot width along both sides of features.
Project Location:
Approximate location of the project can be viewed in Google Maps: https://
www. google.com/maps/(@35.1140128,-77.33530316579437,14z
Counties: Jones County, North Carolina

06/23/2022 3
Endangered Species Act Species
There is a total of 6 threatened, endangered, or candidate species on this species list.
Species on this list should be considered in an effects analysis for your project and could include
species that exist in another geographic area. For example, certain fish may appear on the species
list because a project could affect downstream species.
IPaC does not display listed species or critical habitats under the sole jurisdiction of NOAA
Fisheriesi, as USFWS does not have the authority to speak on behalf of NOAA and the
Department of Commerce.
See the "Critical habitats" section below for those critical habitats that lie wholly or partially
within your project area under this office's jurisdiction. Please contact the designated FWS office
if you have questions.
1. NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an
office of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of
Commerce.
Mammals
NAME STATUS
Northern Long-eared Bat Myotis septentrionalis Threatened
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9045
NAME
STATUS
Red -cockaded Woodpecker Picoides borealis
Endangered
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/7614
Reptiles
NAME
STATUS
American Alligator Alligator mississippiensis
Similarity of
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Appearance
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/776
(Threatened)
Amphibians
NAME
STATUS
Neuse River Waterdog Necturus lewisi
Threatened
There is final critical habitat for this species. The location of the critical habitat is not available.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6772

06/23/2022
4
Fishes
NAME
STATUS
Carolina Madtom Noturus furiosus Endangered
There is final critical habitat for this species. The location of the critical habitat is not available.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/528
Insects
NAME
Monarch Butterfly Danaus plexippus
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9743
STATUS
Candidate
Critical habitats
THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS WITHIN YOUR PROJECT AREA UNDER THIS OFFICE'S
JURISDICTION.

06/23/2022
Migratory Birds
Certain birds are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act! and the Bald and Golden Eagle
Protection Actz.
Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result in impacts to
migratory birds, eagles, and their habitats should follow appropriate regulations and consider
implementing appropriate conservation measures, as described below.
1. The Migratory Birds Treat. Act of 1918.
2. The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act of 1940.
3. 50 C.F.R. Sec. 10.12 and 16 U.S.C. Sec. 668(a)
The birds listed below are birds of particular concern either because they occur on the
USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) list or warrant special attention in your
project location. To learn more about the levels of concern for birds on your list and how this
list is generated, see the FAQ below. This is not a list of every bird you may find in this location,
nor a guarantee that every bird on this list will be found in your project area. To see exact
locations of where birders and the general public have sighted birds in and around your project
area, visit the E-bird data mapping tool (Tip: enter your location, desired date range and a species
on your list). For projects that occur off the Atlantic Coast, additional maps and models detailing
the relative occurrence and abundance of bird species on your list are available. Links to
additional information about Atlantic Coast birds, and other important information about your
migratory bird list, including how to properly interpret and use your migratory bird report, can be
found below.
For guidance on when to schedule activities or implement avoidance and minimization measures
to reduce impacts to migratory birds on your list, click on the PROBABILITY OF PRESENCE
SUMMARY at the top of your list to see when these birds are most likely to be present and
breeding in your project area.
NAME BREEDING SEASON
American Kestrel Falco sparverius paulus Breeds Apr 1 to Aug
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular Bird Conservation 31
Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA
https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9587
Prairie Warbler Dendroica discolor Breeds May 1 to Jul
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental 31
USA and Alaska.
Prothonotary Warbler Protonotaria citrea Breeds Apr 1 to Jul
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental 31
USA and Alaska.

06/23/2022
NAME BREEDING SEASON
Red-headed Woodpecker Melanerpes erythrocephalus Breeds May 10 to
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental Sep 10
USA and Alaska.
Wood Thrush Hylocichla mustelina Breeds May 10 to
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental Aug 31
USA and Alaska.
Probability Of Presence Summary
The graphs below provide our best understanding of when birds of concern are most likely to be
present in your project area. This information can be used to tailor and schedule your project
activities to avoid or minimize impacts to birds. Please make sure you read and understand the
FAQ "Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report" before using or attempting
to interpret this report.
Probability of Presence (■)
Each green bar represents the bird's relative probability of presence in the 10km grid cell(s) your
project overlaps during a particular week of the year. (A year is represented as 12 4-week
months.) A taller bar indicates a higher probability of species presence. The survey effort (see
below) can be used to establish a level of confidence in the presence score. One can have higher
confidence in the presence score if the corresponding survey effort is also high.
How is the probability of presence score calculated? The calculation is done in three steps:
The probability of presence for each week is calculated as the number of survey events in
the week where the species was detected divided by the total number of survey events for
that week. For example, if in week 12 there were 20 survey events and the Spotted Towhee
was found in 5 of them, the probability of presence of the Spotted Towhee in week 12 is
0.25.
2. To properly present the pattern of presence across the year, the relative probability of
presence is calculated. This is the probability of presence divided by the maximum
probability of presence across all weeks. For example, imagine the probability of presence
in week 20 for the Spotted Towhee is 0.05, and that the probability of presence at week 12
(0.25) is the maximum of any week of the year. The relative probability of presence on
week 12 is 0.25/0.25 = 1; at week 20 it is 0.05/0.25 = 0.2.
3. The relative probability of presence calculated in the previous step undergoes a statistical
conversion so that all possible values fall between 0 and 10, inclusive. This is the
probability of presence score.
Breeding Season( )
Yellow bars denote a very liberal estimate of the time -frame inside which the bird breeds across
its entire range. If there are no yellow bars shown for a bird, it does not breed in your project
area.
Survey Effort (1)

06/23/2022
3
Vertical black lines superimposed on probability of presence bars indicate the number of surveys
performed for that species in the 10km grid cell(s) your project area overlaps. The number of
surveys is expressed as a range, for example, 33 to 64 surveys.
No Data (—)
A week is marked as having no data if there were no survey events for that week.
Survey Timeframe
Surveys from only the last 10 years are used in order to ensure delivery of currently relevant
information. The exception to this is areas off the Atlantic coast, where bird returns are based on
all years of available data, since data in these areas is currently much more sparse.
■ probability of presence breeding season I survey effort — no data
SPECIES JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
American Kestrel — — — — — --'--- _�II IIII IIII IIII III — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
BCC - BCR
Prairie Warbler
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
Prothonotary
Warbler
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — III IIII IIII IIII II--
Red-headed
Woodpecker
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
Wood Thrush
BCC Rangewide ---- ---- — — — — ----'III IIII IIII IIII ----
(CON)
Additional information can be found using the following links:
• Birds of Conservation Concern https://www.fws.gov/program/migratory-birds/species
• Measures for avoiding and minimizing impacts to birds https://www.fws.gov/library
collections/avoidinp--and-minimizinp--incidental-take-mip-ratorv-birds
• Nationwide conservation measures for birds https://www.fws.gov/sites/default/files/
documents/nationwide-standard-conservation-measures.Ddf
Migratory Birds FAQ
Tell me more about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts
to migratory birds.

06/23/2022 4
Nationwide Conservation Measures describes measures that can help avoid and minimize
impacts to all birds at any location year round. Implementation of these measures is particularly
important when birds are most likely to occur in the project area. When birds may be breeding in
the area, identifying the locations of any active nests and avoiding their destruction is a very
helpful impact minimization measure. To see when birds are most likely to occur and be breeding
in your project area, view the Probability of Presence Summary. Additional measures or permits
may be advisable depending on the type of activity you are conducting and the type of
infrastructure or bird species present on your project site.
What does IPaC use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified
location?
The Migratory Bird Resource List is comprised of USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern
(BCQ and other species that may warrant special attention in your project location.
The migratory bird list generated for your project is derived from data provided by the Avian
Knowledge Network (AKN). The AKN data is based on a growing collection of survey, banding.
and citizen science datasets and is queried and filtered to return a list of those birds reported as
occurring in the 10km grid cell(s) which your project intersects, and that have been identified as
warranting special attention because they are a BCC species in that area, an eagle (Eagle Act
requirements may apply), or a species that has a particular vulnerability to offshore activities or
development.
Again, the Migratory Bird Resource list includes only a subset of birds that may occur in your
project area. It is not representative of all birds that may occur in your project area. To get a list
of all birds potentially present in your project area, please visit the AKN Phenology Tool.
What does IPaC use to generate the probability of presence graphs for the migratory birds
potentially occurring in my specified location?
The probability of presence graphs associated with your migratory bird list are based on data
provided by the Avian Knowledge Network (AKN). This data is derived from a growing
collection of survey, banding, and citizen science datasets .
Probability of presence data is continuously being updated as new and better information
becomes available. To learn more about how the probability of presence graphs are produced and
how to interpret them, go the Probability of Presence Summary and then click on the "Tell me
about these graphs" link.
How do I know if a bird is breeding, wintering, migrating or present year-round in my
project area?
To see what part of a particular bird's range your project area falls within (i.e. breeding,
wintering, migrating or year-round), you may refer to the following resources: The Cornell Lab
of Ornithology All About Birds Bird Guide, or (if you are unsuccessful in locating the bird of
interest there), the Cornell Lab of Ornithology Neotropical Birds guide. If a bird on your
migratory bird species list has a breeding season associated with it, if that bird does occur in your
project area, there may be nests present at some point within the timeframe specified. If "Breeds
elsewhere" is indicated, then the bird likely does not breed in your project area.
What are the levels of concern for migratory birds?

06/23/2022 5
Migratory birds delivered through IPaC fall into the following distinct categories of concern:
1. 'BCC Rangewide" birds are Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) that are of concern
throughout their range anywhere within the USA (including Hawaii, the Pacific Islands,
Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands);
2. 'BCC - BCR" birds are BCCs that are of concern only in particular Bird Conservation
Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA; and
3. "Non -BCC - Vulnerable" birds are not BCC species in your project area, but appear on
your list either because of the Eagle Act requirements (for eagles) or (for non -eagles)
potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types of development or activities
(e.g. offshore energy development or longline fishing).
Although it is important to try to avoid and minimize impacts to all birds, efforts should be made,
in particular, to avoid and minimize impacts to the birds on this list, especially eagles and BCC
species of rangewide concern. For more information on conservation measures you can
implement to help avoid and minimize migratory bird impacts and requirements for eagles,
please see the FAQs for these topics.
Details about birds that are potentially affected by offshore projects
For additional details about the relative occurrence and abundance of both individual bird species
and groups of bird species within your project area off the Atlantic Coast, please visit the
Northeast Ocean Data Portal. The Portal also offers data and information about other taxa besides
birds that may be helpful to you in your project review. Alternately, you may download the bird
model results files underlying the portal maps through the NOAA NCCOS Integrative Statistical
Modeling and Predictive Mapping of Marine Bird Distributions and Abundance on the Atlantic
Outer Continental Shelf project webpage.
Bird tracking data can also provide additional details about occurrence and habitat use
throughout the year, including migration. Models relying on survey data may not include this
information. For additional information on marine bird tracking data, see the Diving Bird Study
and the nanotag studies or contact Caleb Spiegel or Pam Lorin.
What if I have eagles on my list?
If your project has the potential to disturb or kill eagles, you may need to obtain a permit to avoid
violating the Eagle Act should such impacts occur.
Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report
The migratory bird list generated is not a list of all birds in your project area, only a subset of
birds of priority concern. To learn more about how your list is generated, and see options for
identifying what other birds may be in your project area, please see the FAQ "What does IPaC
use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified location". Please be
aware this report provides the "probability of presence" of birds within the 10 km grid cell(s) that
overlap your project; not your exact project footprint. On the graphs provided, please also look
carefully at the survey effort (indicated by the black vertical bar) and for the existence of the "no
data" indicator (a red horizontal bar). A high survey effort is the key component. If the survey
effort is high, then the probability of presence score can be viewed as more dependable. In
contrast, a low survey effort bar or no data bar means a lack of data and, therefore, a lack of

06/23/2022
H.
certainty about presence of the species. This list is not perfect; it is simply a starting point for
identifying what birds of concern have the potential to be in your project area, when they might
be there, and if they might be breeding (which means nests might be present). The list helps you
know what to look for to confirm presence, and helps guide you in knowing when to implement
conservation measures to avoid or minimize potential impacts from your project activities,
should presence be confirmed. To learn more about conservation measures, visit the FAQ "Tell
me about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory
birds" at the bottom of your migratory bird trust resources page.

06/23/2022
IPaC User Contact Information
Agency: Restoration Systems, LLC
Name: Alexander Baldwin
Address: 1101 Haynes Street
Address Line 2: Suite 211
City:
Raleigh
State:
NC
Zip:
27604
Email
[e-mail]
Phone:
9192742419

APPENDIX E - EDR REPORT
Musselshell, Bank Parcel Development Plan (DWR ID# 2021-0020v6) Appendices
Neuse River Basin 8-Digit HUC: 03020204

Musselshell
Not Reported
Trenton, NC 28585
Inquiry Number: 6916785.2s
March 28, 2022
6 Armstrong Road, 4th floor
Shelton, CT 06484
CEDW Toll Free: 800.352.0050
www.edrnet.com
FORM-LBD-RG

TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION
PAGE
Executive Summary-------------------------------------------------------
ES1
Overview Map
2
Detail Map
3
Map Findings Summary----------------------------------------------------
4
Map Findings
8
Orphan Summary---------------------------------------------------------
15
Government Records Searched/Data Currency Tracking
GR-1
GEOCHECK ADDENDUM
Physical Setting Source Addendum------------------------------------------
A-1
Physical Setting Source Summary-------------------------------------------.
A-2
Physical Setting SSURGO Soil Map-------------------------------------------
A-5
Physical Setting Source Map
A-14
Physical Setting Source Map Findings----------------------------------------
A-16
Physical Setting Source Records Searched------------------------------------.
PSGRA
Thank you for your business.
Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050
with any questions or comments.
Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice
This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data
Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from
other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL
DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION,
MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL
ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE,
ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL,
CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY
LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings,
environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor
should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I
Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any
property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice.
Copyright 2020 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole
or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission.
EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other
trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners.
TC6916785.2s Page 1

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
A search of available environmental records was conducted by Environmental Data Resources, Inc (EDR).
The report was designed to assist parties seeking to meet the search requirements of EPA's Standards
and Practices for All Appropriate Inquiries (40 CFR Part 312), the ASTM Standard Practice for
Environmental Site Assessments (E1527-21), the ASTM Standard Practice for Environmental Site
Assessments for Forestland or Rural Property (E 2247-16), the ASTM Standard Practice for Limited
Environmental Due Diligence: Transaction Screen Process (E 1528-14) or custom requirements developed
for the evaluation of environmental risk associated with a parcel of real estate.
TARGET PROPERTY INFORMATION
ADDRESS
NOT REPORTED
TRENTON, NC 28585
COORDINATES
Latitude (North):
Longitude (West):
Universal Tranverse Mercator
UTM X (Meters):
UTM Y (Meters):
Elevation:
35.1147510 - 35- 6' 53.10"
77.3345450 - 77- 20' 4.36"
Zone 18
287241.7
3888064.8
41 ft. above sea level
USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP ASSOCIATED WITH TARGET PROPERTY
Target Property Map: 13720824 TRENTON, NC
Version Date: 2019
North Map: 13720724 COVE CITY, NC
Version Date: 2019
AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY IN THIS REPORT
Portions of Photo from: 20140706
Source: USDA
TC6916785.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1

F- MAPPED SITES SUMMARY
Target Property Address:
NOT REPORTED
TRENTON, NC 28585
Click on Map ID to see full detail.
MAP RELATIVE DIST (ft. & mi.)
ID SITE NAME ADDRESS DATABASE ACRONYMS ELEVATION DIRECTION
Al ANDRE DIXON 125 GIBBS LANE SHWS, IMD Higher 490, 0.093, SW
A2 ANDREA DIXON TRUCKIN 125 GIBBS LN RCRA NonGen / NLR, FINDS, ECHO Higher 490, 0.093, SW
6916785.2s Page 2

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TARGET PROPERTY SEARCH RESULTS
The target property was not listed in any of the databases searched by EDR.
DATABASES WITH NO MAPPED SITES
No mapped sites were found in EDR's search of available ("reasonably ascertainable ") government
records either on the target property or within the search radius around the target property for the
following databases:
STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Lists of Federal NPL (Superfund) sites
NPL___________________________ National Priority List
Proposed NPL________________ Proposed National Priority List Sites
NPL LIENS -------------------- Federal Superfund Liens
Lists of Federal Delisted NPL sites
Delisted NPL__________________ National Priority List Deletions
Lists of Federal sites subject to CERCLA removals and CERCLA orders
FEDERAL FACILITY__________ Federal Facility Site Information listing
SEMS_________________________ Superfund Enterprise Management System
Lists of Federal CERCLA sites with NFRAP
SEMS-ARCHIVE-------------- Superfund Enterprise Management System Archive
Lists of Federal RCRA facilities undergoing Corrective Action
CORRACTS__________________ Corrective Action Report
Lists of Federal RCRA TSD facilities
RCRA-TSDF------------------ RCRA- Treatment, Storage and Disposal
Lists of Federal RCRA generators
RCRA-LQG------------------- RCRA- Large Quantity Generators
RCRA-SQG------------------- RCRA- Small Quantity Generators
RCRA-VSQG----------------- RCRA- Very Small Quantity Generators (Formerly Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity
Generators)
Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registries
LUCIS_________________________ Land Use Control Information System
TC6916785.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
US ENG CONTROLS_________ Engineering Controls Sites List
US INST CONTROLS --------- Institutional Controls Sites List
Federal ERNS list
ERNS_________________________ Emergency Response Notification System
Lists of state- and tribal (Supen°und) equivalent sites
NC HSDS_____________________ Hazardous Substance Disposal Site
Lists of state and tribal landfills and solid waste disposal facilities
SWF/LF_______________________ List of Solid Waste Facilities
DEBRIS_______________________ Solid Waste Active Disaster Debris Sites Listing
OLI____________________________ Old Landfill Inventory
LCID__________________________ Land -Clearing and Inert Debris (LCID) Landfill Notifications
Lists of state and tribal leaking storage tanks
LAST__________________________ Leaking Aboveground Storage Tanks
LUST -------------------------- Regional UST Database
INDIAN LUST_________________ Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUST TRUST_________________ State Trust Fund Database
Lists of state and tribal registered storage tanks
FEMA UST____________________ Underground Storage Tank Listing
UST___________________________ Petroleum Underground Storage Tank Database
AST___________________________ AST Database
INDIAN UST__________________ Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
State and tribal institutional control / engineering control registries
INST CONTROL______________ No Further Action Sites With Land Use Restrictions Monitoring
Lists of state and tribal voluntary cleanup sites
INDIAN VCP__________________ Voluntary Cleanup Priority Listing
VCP___________________________ Responsible Party Voluntary Action Sites
Lists of state and tribal brownfield sites
BROWNFIELDS______________ Brownfields Projects Inventory
ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Local Brownfield lists
US BROWNFIELDS----------- A Listing of Brownfields Sites
Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites
SWRCY_______________________ Recycling Center Listing
TC6916785.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
HIST LF_______________________ Solid Waste Facility Listing
INDIAN ODI___________________ Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian Lands
ODI___________________________ Open Dump Inventory
DEBRIS REGION 9___________ Torres Martinez Reservation Illegal Dump Site Locations
IHS OPEN DUMPS___________ Open Dumps on Indian Land
Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites
US HIST CDL_________________ Delisted National Clandestine Laboratory Register
US CDL_______________________ National Clandestine Laboratory Register
PFAS-------------------------- PFAS Contamination Site Listing
Local Land Records
LIENS 2_______________________ CERCLA Lien Information
Records of Emergency Release Reports
HMIRS________________________
Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System
SPILLS________________________
Spills Incident Listing
SPILLS 90____________________
SPILLS 90 data from FirstSearch
SPILLS 80____________________
SPILLS 80 data from FirstSearch
Other Ascertainable Records
FUDS_________________________
Formerly Used Defense Sites
DOD__________________________
Department of Defense Sites
SCRD DRYCLEANERS_______
State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Listing
US FIN ASSUR_______________
Financial Assurance Information
EPA WATCH LIST____________
EPA WATCH LIST
2020 COR ACTION___________
2020 Corrective Action Program List
TSCA_________________________
Toxic Substances Control Act
TRIS__________________________
Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System
SSTS--------------------------
Section 7 Tracking Systems
ROD__________________________
Records Of Decision
RMP__________________________
Risk Management Plans
RAATS________________________
RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System
PRP___________________________
Potentially Responsible Parties
PADS_________________________
PCB Activity Database System
ICIS___________________________
Integrated Compliance Information System
FTTS__________________________
FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide
Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act)
MLTS_________________________
Material Licensing Tracking System
COAL ASH DOE______________
Steam -Electric Plant Operation Data
COAL ASH EPA______________
Coal Combustion Residues Surface Impoundments List
PCB TRANSFORMER________
PCB Transformer Registration Database
RADINFO ---------------------
Radiation Information Database
HIST FTTS____________________
FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Administrative Case Listing
DOT OPS_____________________
Incident and Accident Data
CONSENT____________________
Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees
INDIAN RESERV_____________
Indian Reservations
FUSRAP______________________
Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program
UMTRA_______________________
Uranium Mill Tailings Sites
LEAD SMELTERS____________
Lead Smelter Sites
US AIRS______________________
Aerometric Information Retrieval System Facility Subsystem
TC6916785.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
US MINES____________________
Mines Master Index File
ABANDONED MINES ---------
Abandoned Mines
FINDS -------------------------
Facility Index System/Facility Registry System
DOCKET HWC----------------
Hazardous Waste Compliance Docket Listing
ECHO -------------------------
Enforcement & Compliance History Information
UXO ---------------------------
Unexploded Ordnance Sites
FUELS PROGRAM___________
EPA Fuels Program Registered Listing
AIRS__________________________
Air Quality Permit Listing
ASBESTOS___________________
ASBESTOS
COAL ASH____________________
Coal Ash Disposal Sites
DRYCLEANERS______________
Drycleaning Sites
Financial Assurance -----------
Financial Assurance Information Listing
NPDES------------------------
NPDES Facility Location Listing
UIC----------------------------
Underground Injection Wells Listing
AOP---------------------------
Animal Operation Permits Listing
PCSRP------------------------
Petroleum -Contaminated Soil Remediation Permits
CCB___________________________
Coal Ash Structural Fills (CCB) Listing
SEPT HAULERS______________
Permitted Septage Haulers Listing
MINES MRDS-----------------
Mineral Resources Data System
EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS
EDR Exclusive Records
EDR MGP_____________________ EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plants
EDR Hist Auto ----------------- EDR Exclusive Historical Auto Stations
EDR Hist Cleaner_____________ EDR Exclusive Historical Cleaners
EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES
Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives
RGA HWS____________________ Recovered Government Archive State Hazardous Waste Facilities List
RGA LF_______________________ Recovered Government Archive Solid Waste Facilities List
RGA LUST____________________ Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank
SURROUNDING SITES: SEARCH RESULTS
Surrounding sites were identified in the following databases
Elevations have been determined from the USGS Digital Elevation Model and should be evaluated on
a relative (not an absolute) basis. Relative elevation information between sites of close proximity
should be field verified. Sites with an elevation equal to or higher than the target property have been
differentiated below from sites with an elevation lower than the target property.
Page numbers and map identification numbers refer to the EDR Radius Map report where detailed
data on individual sites can be reviewed.
Sites listed in bold italics are in multiple databases.
Unmappable (orphan) sites are not considered in the foregoing analysis.
TC6916785.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Lists of state- and tribal hazardous waste facilities
SHWS: The State Hazardous Waste Sites records are the states' equivalent to CERCLIS. These sites
may or may not already be listed on the federal CERCLIS list. Priority sites planned for cleanup using state
funds (state equivalent of Superfund) are identified along with sites where cleanup will be paid for by
potentially responsible parties. The data come from the Department of Environment & Natural Resources'
Inactive Hazardous Sites Program.
A review of the SHWS list, as provided by EDR, and dated 11/30/2021 has revealed that there is 1 SHWS
site within approximately 1 mile of the target property.
Equal/Higher Elevation
ANDRE DIXON
Facility Id: NONCD0001270
ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Records of Emergency Release Reports
IMD: Incident Management Database.
Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page
125 GIBBS LANE SW 0 - 1/8 (0.093 mi.) Al 8
A review of the IMD list, as provided by EDR, and dated 10/29/2021 has revealed that there is 1 IMD
site within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property.
Equal/Higher Elevation
ANDRE DIXON
Facility Id: 87801
Other Ascertainable Records
Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page
125 GIBBS LANE SW 0 - 1/8 (0.093 mi.) Al 8
RCRA NonGen / NLR: RCRAInfo is EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting
the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA)
of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or
dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Non -Generators do
not presently generate hazardous waste.
A review of the RCRA NonGen / NLR list, as provided by EDR, and dated 02/28/2022 has revealed that
there is 1 RCRA NonGen / NLR site within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property.
Equal/Higher Elevation
ANDREA DIXON TRUCKIN
EPA ID:: NCS000002056
Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page
125 GIBBS LN SW 0 - 1/8 (0.093 mi.) A2 9
TC6916785.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 7

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
There were no unmapped sites in this report.
TC6916785.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 8

OVERVIEW MAP - 6916785.2S
Target Property
A
Sites at elevations higher than
or equal to the target property
♦
Sites at elevations lower than
the target property
1
Manufactured Gas Plants
National Priority List Sites
Dept. Defense Sites
0 1/4 1/2 1 Mlles
Indian Reservations BIA Hazardous Substance
Special Flood Hazard Area (1%) Disposal Sites
0.2% Annual Chance Flood Hazard
0 National Wetland Inventory
0 State Wetlands
This report includes Interactive Map Layers to
display and/or hide map information. The
legend includes only those icons for the
default map view.
SITE NAME: Musselshell CLIENT: Restoration Systems, LLC
ADDRESS: Not Reported CONTACT: JD Hamby
Trenton NC 28585 INQUIRY #: 6916785.2s
LAT/LONG: 35.114751 / 77.334545 DATE: March 28, 2022 4:18 pm
Copyright �o 2022 EDR, Inc. (,) 2015 TonnTom Rai. 2015.

DETAIL MAP - 6916785.2S
Target Property
A
Sites at elevations higher than
or equal to the target property
♦
Sites at elevations lower than
the target property
1
Manufactured Gas Plants
i
Sensitive Receptors
National Priority List Sites
Dept. Defense Sites
0 1 /9 1 /4 1 /2 Mlles
Indian Reservations BIA Hazardous Substance
Special Flood Hazard Area (1%) Disposal Sites
0.2% Annual Chance Flood Hazard
0 National Wetland Inventory
0 State Wetlands
This report includes Interactive Map Layers to
display and/or hide map information. The
legend includes only those icons for the
default map view.
SITE NAME: Musselshell CLIENT: Restoration Systems, LLC
ADDRESS: Not Reported CONTACT: JD Hamby
Trenton NC 28585 INQUIRY #: 6916785.2s
LAT/LONG: 35.114751 / 77.334545 DATE: March 28, 2022 4:20 pm
Copyright �o 2022 EDR, Inc. (,) 2015 TonnTom Rai. 2015.

MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY
Search
Distance Target Total
Database (Miles) Property < 1/8 1/8-1/4 1/4-1/2 1/2-1 > 1 Plotted
STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Lists of Federal NPL (Superfund) sites
NPL 1.000
0
0
0
0
NR 0
Proposed NPL 1.000
0
0
0
0
NR 0
NPL LIENS 1.000
0
0
0
0
NR 0
Lists of Federal Delisted NPL sites
Delisted NPL 1.000
0
0
0
0
NR 0
Lists of Federal sites subject to
CERCLA removals and CERCLA orders
FEDERAL FACILITY 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR 0
SEMS 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR 0
Lists of Federal CERCLA sites with NFRAP
SEMS-ARCHIVE 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR 0
Lists of Federal RCRA facilities
undergoing Corrective Action
CORRACTS 1.000
0
0
0
0
NR 0
Lists of Federal RCRA TSD facilities
RCRA-TSDF 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR 0
Lists of Federal RCRA generators
RCRA-LQG 0.250
0
0
NR
NR
NR 0
RCRA-SQG 0.250
0
0
NR
NR
NR 0
RCRA-VSQG 0.250
0
0
NR
NR
NR 0
Federal institutional controls /
engineering controls registries
LUCIS 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR 0
US ENG CONTROLS 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR 0
US INST CONTROLS 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR 0
Federal ERNS list
ERNS 0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR 0
Lists of state- and tribal
(Superfund) equivalent sites
NC HSDS 1.000
0
0
0
0
NR 0
Lists of state- and tribal
hazardous waste facilities
SHWS 1.000
1
0
0
0
NR 1
Lists of state and tribal landfills
and solid waste disposal facilities
SWF/LF 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR 0
TC6916785.2s Page 4

MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY
Search
Distance Target
Total
Database (Miles) Property
< 1/8
1/8-1/4
1/4-1/2
1/2-1
> 1
Plotted
DEBRIS 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
OLI 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
LCID 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
Lists of state and tribal leaking storage tanks
LAST 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
LUST 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
INDIAN LUST 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
LUST TRUST 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
Lists of state and tribal registered storage tanks
FEMA UST 0.250
0
0
NR
NR
NR
0
UST 0.250
0
0
NR
NR
NR
0
AST 0.250
0
0
NR
NR
NR
0
INDIAN UST 0.250
0
0
NR
NR
NR
0
State and tribal institutional
control / engineering control registries
INST CONTROL 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
Lists of state and tribal voluntary cleanup sites
INDIAN VCP 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
VCP 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
Lists of state and tribal brownfield sites
BROWNFIELDS 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Local Brownfield lists
US BROWNFIELDS
0.500
Local Lists of Landfill / Solid
Waste Disposal Sites
SWRCY
0.500
HIST LF
0.500
INDIAN ODI
0.500
ODI
0.500
DEBRIS REGION 9
0.500
IHS OPEN DUMPS
0.500
Local Lists of Hazardous waste /
Contaminated Sites
US HIST CDL
0.001
US CDL
0.001
PFAS
TP
Local Land Records
LIENS 2
0.001
Records of Emergency Release Reports
HMIRS
0.001
0
0
0
NR
NR 0
0
0
0
NR
NR 0
0
0
0
NR
NR 0
0
0
0
NR
NR 0
0
0
0
NR
NR 0
0
0
0
NR
NR 0
0
0
0
NR
NR 0
0
NR
NR
NR
NR 0
0
NR
NR
NR
NR 0
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR 0
0
NR
NR
NR
NR 0
0
NR
NR
NR
NR 0
TC6916785.2s Page 5

MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY
Search
Distance Target
Total
Database
(Miles) Property
< 1/8
1/8 - 1/4
1/4-1/2
1/2 - 1
> 1
Plotted
SPILLS
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
IMD
0.500
1
0
0
NR
NR
1
SPILLS 90
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
SPILLS 80
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
Other Ascertainable Records
RCRA NonGen / NLR
0.250
1
0
NR
NR
NR
1
FUDS
1.000
0
0
0
0
NR
0
DOD
1.000
0
0
0
0
NR
0
SCRD DRYCLEANERS
0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
US FIN ASSUR
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
EPA WATCH LIST
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
2020 COR ACTION
0.250
0
0
NR
NR
NR
0
TSCA
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
TRIS
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
SSTS
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
ROD
1.000
0
0
0
0
NR
0
RMP
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
RAATS
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
PRP
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
PADS
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
ICIS
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
FTTS
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
MLTS
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
COAL ASH DOE
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
COAL ASH EPA
0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
PCB TRANSFORMER
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
RADINFO
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
HIST FTTS
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
DOT OPS
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
CONSENT
1.000
0
0
0
0
NR
0
INDIAN RESERV
1.000
0
0
0
0
NR
0
FUSRAP
1.000
0
0
0
0
NR
0
UMTRA
0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
LEAD SMELTERS
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
US AIRS
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
US MINES
0.250
0
0
NR
NR
NR
0
ABANDONED MINES
0.250
0
0
NR
NR
NR
0
FINDS
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
DOCKET HWC
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
ECHO
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
UXO
1.000
0
0
0
0
NR
0
FUELS PROGRAM
0.250
0
0
NR
NR
NR
0
AIRS
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
ASBESTOS
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
COAL ASH
0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
DRYCLEANERS
0.250
0
0
NR
NR
NR
0
Financial Assurance
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
NPDES
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
UIC
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
AOP
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
TC6916785.2s Page 6

MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY
Search
Distance Target
Database
(Miles) Property
PCSRP
0.500
CCB
0.500
SEPT HAULERS
0.001
MINES MRDS
0.001
EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS
EDR Exclusive Records
EDR MGP 1.000
EDR Hist Auto 0.125
EDR Hist Cleaner 0.125
EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES
Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives
RGA HWS 0.001
RGA LF 0.001
RGA LUST 0.001
- Totals -- 0
NOTES:
TP = Target Property
NR = Not Requested at this Search Distance
Sites may be listed in more than one database
Total
< 1/8
1/8-1/4
1/4-1/2
1/2-1
> 1
Plotted
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
0 0
0
0
NR 0
0 NR
NR
NR
NR 0
0 NR
NR
NR
NR 0
0 NR
NR
NR
NR 0
0 NR
NR
NR
NR 0
0 NR
NR
NR
NR 0
3 0
0
0
0 3
TC6916785.2s Page 7

Map ID
MAP FINDINGS
Direction
Distance
EDR ID Number
Elevation
Site
Database(s) EPA ID Number
Al
ANDRE DIXON
SHWS S107998607
SW
125 GIBBS LANE
IMD N/A
< 1/8
TRENTON, NC
0.093 mi.
490 ft.
Site 1 of 2 in cluster A
Relative:
SHWS:
Higher
Name:
ANDRE DIXON
Actual:
Address:
125 GIBBS LANE
48 ft.
City,State,Zip:
TRENTON, NC
EPAID:
NONCD0001270
Lat/Longitude:
35.10955 /-77.34089
Geolocation Method:
On Screen Placement On Georeferenced Map
Click here to access the North Carolina DEQ records for this facility
IMD:
Facility ID:
87801
Name:
ANDRE DIXON
Address:
125 GIBBS LANE
City,State,Zip:
TRENTON, NC
Date Occurred:
7/6/2006
Submit Date:
7/18/2006
Incident Desc:
DWQ visited the farm 7-12-06 and noted oil in puddles and stained
soil. A soil sample was taken to confirm contamination.
Operator:
UST ID:
Not reported
Incident ID:
Not reported
Initials of UST Regional Contact:
Not reported
Regional Office:
Not reported
Responsible Party/Company Name:
Not reported
Ownership:
0
Responsible Party Contact Name:
Not reported
Operation:
0
Responsible Party Mailing Address:
Not reported
Responsible Party City,State,Zip:
Not reported
Ownership:
Not reported
Operation Type:
Not reported
Responsible Party County:
Not reported
Source of Contamination:
OTHER INORGANICS
Source:
11
Type:
11
Location:
Not reported
Petroleum Type:
Not reported
Date Incident Reported:
Not reported
Whether Tank is Commercial or Non
Commercial: Not reported
Site Priority:
Not reported
Whether Tank is Regulated:
Not reported
Priority Update:
Not reported
Notice of Regulatory Requirement:
Not reported
Wells Affected:
N
Notice of Violation:
Not reported
Phase 1 or Phase 2:
Not reported
Num Affected:
Not reported
Site Priority:
Not reported
Type:
OTHER INORGANICS
Location:
Not reported
Current Risk Condition:
Not reported
Sampled By:
Not reported
TC6916785.2s Page 8

Map ID
Direction
Distance
Elevation
Site
ANDRE DIXON (Continued)
MAP FINDINGS
Samples Include:
Not reported
Initial reported risk of incident (never changes):
Not reported
7.5 Min Quad:
Not reported
5 Min Quad:
Not reported
Intermediate Condition Present:
Not reported
Latitude:
35.10801
Longitude:
-77.33997
Use of Land, Industrial:
Not reported
Corrective Action Plan Selected - up to 5:
Not reported
RBCA:
Not reported
Date Close Review Requested From RP or Owner:
Not reported
Date Case Closed:
Not reported
Extent of Contamination:
Not reported
Number of Supply Wells Located on Property:
Not reported
MTBE in Well Y/N/U Yes, No or Unknown:
Not reported
Facility Phone Number:
Not reported
MTBE in Groundwater Y/N/U Yes, No or Unknown:
Not reported
Date Land Use Restriction Filed:
Not reported
Date Cleanup Initiated:
Not reported
Record Status:
Not reported
RBCA GW Codes:
Not reported
RBCA GW:
Not reported
Pollutant Type Present:
Not reported
Reference Number for Media Disk for Archived Record: Not reported
RP Owner?:
Not reported
RP Operator?:
Not reported
RP Landowner?:
Not reported
A2
ANDREA DIXON TRUCKING
SW
125 GIBBS LN
< 1/8
TRENTON, NC 28585
0.093 mi.
490 ft.
Site 2 of 2 in cluster A
Relative:
RCRA NonGen / NLR:
Higher
Date Form Received by Agency:
Actual:
Handler Name: ANDREA DIXON TRUCKING
48 ft.
Handler Address:
Handler City,State,Zip:
EPA ID:
Contact Name:
Contact Address:
Contact City,State,Zip:
Contact Telephone:
Contact Fax:
Contact Email:
Contact Title:
EPA Region:
Land Type:
Federal Waste Generator Description:
Non-Notifier:
Biennial Report Cycle:
Accessibility:
Active Site Indicator:
State District Owner:
State District:
Mailing Address:
Mailing City,State,Zip:
EDR ID Number
Database(s) EPA ID Number
S107998607
RCRA NonGen /NLR 1016453852
FINDS NCS000002056
ECHO
PAQ 195 PA VA
125 GIBBS LN
TRENTON, NC 28585
NCS000002056
ANDREA DIXON
GIBBS LN
TRENTON, NC 28585
252-448-0021
Not reported
[e-mail]
CONTACT
04
Not reported
Not a generator, verified
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
GIBBS LN
TRENTON, NC 28585
TC6916785.2s Page 9

Map ID
MAP FINDINGS
Direction
Distance
EDR ID Number
Elevation
Site
Database(s) EPA ID Number
ANDREA DIXON TRUCKING (Continued)
1016453852
Owner Name:
Not reported
Owner Type:
Not reported
Operator Name:
Not reported
Operator Type:
Not reported
Short -Term Generator Activity:
No
Importer Activity:
No
Mixed Waste Generator:
No
Transporter Activity:
No
Transfer Facility Activity:
No
Recycler Activity with Storage:
No
Small Quantity On -Site Burner Exemption:
No
Smelting Melting and Refining Furnace Exemption:
No
Underground Injection Control:
No
Off -Site Waste Receipt:
No
Universal Waste Indicator:
No
Universal Waste Destination Facility:
No
Federal Universal Waste:
No
Active Site Fed -Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility:
Not reported
Active Site Converter Treatment storage and Disposal Facility:
Not reported
Active Site State -Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility:
Not reported
Active Site State -Reg Handler:
---
Federal Facility Indicator:
Not reported
Hazardous Secondary Material Indicator:
NN
Sub -Part K Indicator:
Not reported
Commercial TSD Indicator:
No
Treatment Storage and Disposal Type:
Not reported
2018 GPRA Permit Baseline:
Not on the Baseline
2018 GPRA Renewals Baseline:
Not on the Baseline
Permit Renewals Workload Universe:
Not reported
Permit Workload Universe:
Not reported
Permit Progress Universe:
Not reported
Post -Closure Workload Universe:
Not reported
Closure Workload Universe:
Not reported
202 GPRA Corrective Action Baseline:
No
Corrective Action Workload Universe:
No
Subject to Corrective Action Universe:
No
Non-TSDFs Where RCRA CA has Been Imposed Universe:
No
TSDFs Potentially Subject to CA Under 3004 (u)/(v) Universe:
No
TSDFs Only Subject to CA under Discretionary Auth Universe:
No
Corrective Action Priority Ranking:
No NCAPS ranking
Environmental Control Indicator:
No
Institutional Control Indicator:
No
Human Exposure Controls Indicator:
N/A
Groundwater Controls Indicator:
N/A
Operating TSDF Universe:
Not reported
Full Enforcement Universe:
Not reported
Significant Non -Complier Universe:
No
Unaddressed Significant Non -Complier Universe:
No
Addressed Significant Non -Complier Universe:
No
Significant Non -Complier With a Compliance Schedule Universe:
No
Financial Assurance Required:
Not reported
Handler Date of Last Change:
20131219
Recognized Trader -Importer:
No
Recognized Trader -Exporter:
No
Importer of Spent Lead Acid Batteries:
No
Exporter of Spent Lead Acid Batteries:
No
Recycler Activity Without Storage:
Not reported
TC6916785.2s Page 10

Map ID
MAP FINDINGS
Direction
Distance
EDR ID Number
Elevation Site
Database(s) EPA ID Number
ANDREA DIXON TRUCKING (Continued)
1016453852
Manifest Broker:
Not reported
Sub -Part P Indicator:
No
Historic Generators:
Receive Date:
20131217
Handler Name: ANDREA DIXON TRUCKING
Federal Waste Generator Description:
Not a generator, verified
State District Owner:
Not reported
Large Quantity Handler of Universal Waste:
No
Recognized Trader Importer:
No
Recognized Trader Exporter:
No
Spent Lead Acid Battery Importer:
No
Spent Lead Acid Battery Exporter:
No
Current Record:
Yes
Non Storage Recycler Activity:
Not reported
Electronic Manifest Broker:
Not reported
List of NAICS Codes and Descriptions:
NAICS Codes:
No NAICS Codes Found
Facility Has Received Notices of Violation:
Found Violation:
No
Agency Which Determined Violation:
Not reported
Violation Short Description:
Not reported
Date Violation was Determined:
Not reported
Actual Return to Compliance Date:
Not reported
Return to Compliance Qualifier:
Not reported
Violation Responsible Agency:
Not reported
Scheduled Compliance Date:
Not reported
Enforcement Identifier:
Not reported
Date of Enforcement Action:
Not reported
Enforcement Responsible Agency:
Not reported
Enforcement Docket Number:
Not reported
Enforcement Attorney:
Not reported
Corrective Action Component:
Not reported
Appeal Initiated Date:
Not reported
Appeal Resolution Date:
Not reported
Disposition Status Date:
Not reported
Disposition Status:
Not reported
Disposition Status Description:
Not reported
Consent/Final Order Sequence Number:Not reported
Consent/Final Order Respondent Name:
Not reported
Consent/Final Order Lead Agency:
Not reported
Enforcement Type: Not reported
Enforcement Responsible Person:
Not reported
Enforcement Responsible Sub -Organization:
Not reported
SEP Sequence Number: Not reported
SEP Expenditure Amount:
Not reported
SEP Scheduled Completion Date:
Not reported
SEP Actual Date:
Not reported
SEP Defaulted Date:
Not reported
SEP Type:
Not reported
SEP Type Description:
Not reported
Proposed Amount:
Not reported
Final Monetary Amount:
Not reported
TC6916785.2s Page 11

Map ID MAP FINDINGS
Direction
Distance EDR ID Number
Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number
ANDREA DIXON TRUCKING (Continued) 1016453852
Paid Amount: Not reported
Final Count: Not reported
Final Amount: Not reported
Found Violation:
No
Agency Which Determined Violation:
Not reported
Violation Short Description:
Not reported
Date Violation was Determined:
Not reported
Actual Return to Compliance Date:
Not reported
Return to Compliance Qualifier:
Not reported
Violation Responsible Agency:
Not reported
Scheduled Compliance Date:
Not reported
Enforcement Identifier:
Not reported
Date of Enforcement Action:
Not reported
Enforcement Responsible Agency:
Not reported
Enforcement Docket Number:
Not reported
Enforcement Attorney:
Not reported
Corrective Action Component:
Not reported
Appeal Initiated Date:
Not reported
Appeal Resolution Date:
Not reported
Disposition Status Date:
Not reported
Disposition Status:
Not reported
Disposition Status Description:
Not reported
Consent/Final Order Sequence Number:Not reported
Consent/Final Order Respondent Name:
Not reported
Consent/Final Order Lead Agency:
Not reported
Enforcement Type: Not reported
Enforcement Responsible Person:
Not reported
Enforcement Responsible Sub -Organization:
Not reported
SEP Sequence Number: Not reported
SEP Expenditure Amount:
Not reported
SEP Scheduled Completion Date:
Not reported
SEP Actual Date:
Not reported
SEP Defaulted Date:
Not reported
SEP Type:
Not reported
SEP Type Description:
Not reported
Proposed Amount:
Not reported
Final Monetary Amount:
Not reported
Paid Amount:
Not reported
Final Count:
Not reported
Final Amount:
Not reported
Found Violation:
No
Agency Which Determined Violation:
Not reported
Violation Short Description:
Not reported
Date Violation was Determined:
Not reported
Actual Return to Compliance Date:
Not reported
Return to Compliance Qualifier:
Not reported
Violation Responsible Agency:
Not reported
Scheduled Compliance Date:
Not reported
Enforcement Identifier:
Not reported
Date of Enforcement Action:
Not reported
Enforcement Responsible Agency:
Not reported
Enforcement Docket Number:
Not reported
Enforcement Attorney:
Not reported
Corrective Action Component:
Not reported
Appeal Initiated Date:
Not reported
TC6916785.2s Page 12

Map ID
Direction
Distance
Elevation
MAP FINDINGS
Site
ANDREA DIXON TRUCKING (Continued)
Appeal Resolution Date:
Disposition Status Date:
Disposition Status:
Disposition Status Description:
Consent/Final Order Sequence Number:Not reported
Consent/Final Order Respondent Name:
Consent/Final Order Lead Agency:
Enforcement Type: Not reported
Enforcement Responsible Person:
Enforcement Responsible Sub -Organization:
SEP Sequence Number: Not reported
SEP Expenditure Amount:
SEP Scheduled Completion Date:
SEP Actual Date:
SEP Defaulted Date:
SEP Type:
SEP Type Description:
Proposed Amount:
Final Monetary Amount:
Paid Amount:
Final Count:
Final Amount:
Evaluation Action Summary:
Evaluation Date:
Evaluation Responsible Agency:
Found Violation:
Evaluation Type Description:
Evaluation Responsible Person Identifier:
Evaluation Responsible Sub -Organization
Actual Return to Compliance Date:
Scheduled Compliance Date:
Date of Request:
Date Response Received:
Request Agency:
Former Citation:
Evaluation Date:
Evaluation Responsible Agency:
Found Violation:
Evaluation Type Description:
Evaluation Responsible Person Identifier:
Evaluation Responsible Sub -Organization
Actual Return to Compliance Date:
Scheduled Compliance Date:
Date of Request:
Date Response Received:
Request Agency:
Former Citation:
Evaluation Date:
Evaluation Responsible Agency:
Found Violation:
Evaluation Type Description:
Evaluation Responsible Person Identifier:
Evaluation Responsible Sub -Organization
Actual Return to Compliance Date:
EDR ID Number
Database(s) EPA ID Number
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
20131211
State
No
FOCUSED COMPLIANCE INSPECTION
NC060
07
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
20190128
State
No
FOCUSED COMPLIANCE INSPECTION
NC036
11
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
20140618
State
No
FOCUSED COMPLIANCE INSPECTION
NC060
07
Not reported
1016453852
TC6916785.2s Page 13

Map ID
Direction
Distance
Elevation
MAP FINDINGS
Site
ANDREA DIXON TRUCKING (Continued)
Scheduled Compliance Date:
Not reported
Date of Request:
Not reported
Date Response Received:
Not reported
Request Agency:
Not reported
Former Citation:
Not reported
FINDS:
Registry ID: 110056513848
Is] l( fora' -
Environmental Interest/Information System
EDR ID Number
Database(s) EPA ID Number
RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource
Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of
events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport,
and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA
program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and
corrective action activities required under RCRA.
Click this hgpprLak while viewing on your computer to access
additional FINDS: detail in the EDR Site Report.
ECHO:
Envid:
1016453852
Registry ID:
110056513848
DFR URL:
http://echo.epa.gov/detailed-facility-report?fid=l10056513848
Name:
ANDREA DIXON TRUCKING
Address:
125 GIBBS LN
City,State,Zip:
TRENTON, NC 28585
1016453852
TC6916785.2s Page 14

Site Address
ORPHAN SUMMARY
N
E
Z
a)
U)
0
CC
0
O
NO SITES FOUND
TC6916785.2s Page 15

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
To maintain currency of the following federal and state databases, EDR contacts the appropriate governmental agency
on a monthly or quarterly basis, as required.
Number of Days to Update: Provides confirmation that EDR is reporting records that have been updated within 90 days
from the date the government agency made the information available to the public.
STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Lists of Federal NPL (Superfund) sites
NPL: National Priority List
National Priorities List (Superfund). The NPL is a subset of CERCLIS and identifies over 1,200 sites for priority
cleanup under the Superfund Program. NPL sites may encompass relatively large areas. As such, EDR provides polygon
coverage for over 1,000 NPL site boundaries produced by EPA's Environmental Photographic Interpretation Center
(EPIC) and regional EPA offices.
Date of Government Version: 01/25/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/03/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/22/2022
Number of Days to Update: 19
NPL Site Boundaries
Source: EPA
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 03/02/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/11/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
Sources:
EPA's Environmental Photographic Interpretation Center (EPIC)
Telephone:[phone]
EPA Region 1
Telephone [phone]
EPA Region 3
Telephone [phone]
EPA Region 4
Telephone [phone]
EPA Region 5
Telephone [phone]
EPA Region 10
Telephone [phone]
EPA Region 6
Telephone: [phone]
EPA Region 7
Telephone: [phone]
EPA Region 8
Telephone: [phone]
EPA Region 9
Telephone: [phone]
Proposed NPL: Proposed National Priority List Sites
A site that has been proposed for listing on the National Priorities List through the issuance of a proposed rule
in the Federal Register. EPA then accepts public comments on the site, responds to the comments, and places on
the NPL those sites that continue to meet the requirements for listing.
Date of Government Version: 01/25/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/03/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/22/2022
Number of Days to Update: 19
Source: EPA
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 03/02/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/11/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
NPL LIENS: Federal Superfund Liens
Federal Superfund Liens. Under the authority granted the USEPA by CERCLA of 1980, the USEPA has the authority
to file liens against real property in order to recover remedial action expenditures or when the property owner
received notification of potential liability. USEPA compiles a listing of filed notices of Superfund Liens.
TC6916785.2s Page GR-1

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 10/15/1991
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/02/1994
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/30/1994
Number of Days to Update: 56
Lists of Federal Delisted NPL sites
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 08/15/2011
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/28/2011
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
Delisted NPL: National Priority List Deletions
The National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP) establishes the criteria that the
EPA uses to delete sites from the NPL. In accordance with 40 CFR 300.425.(e), sites may be deleted from the
NPL where no further response is appropriate.
Date of Government Version: 01/25/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/03/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/22/2022
Number of Days to Update: 19
Source: EPA
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 03/02/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/11/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
Lists of Federal sites subject to CERCLA removals and CERCLA orders
FEDERAL FACILITY: Federal Facility Site Information listing
A listing of National Priority List (NPL) and Base Realignment and Closure (BRAG) sites found in the Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Information System (CERCLIS) Database where EPA Federal Facilities
Restoration and Reuse Office is involved in cleanup activities.
Date of Government Version: 05/25/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/24/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/20/2021
Number of Days to Update: 88
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/29/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/11/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
SEMS: Superfund Enterprise Management System
SEMS (Superfund Enterprise Management System) tracks hazardous waste sites, potentially hazardous waste sites,
and remedial activities performed in support of EPA's Superfund Program across the United States. The list was
formerly know as CERCLIS, renamed to SEMS by the EPA in 2015. The list contains data on potentially hazardous
waste sites that have been reported to the USEPA by states, municipalities, private companies and private persons,
pursuant to Section 103 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA).
This dataset also contains sites which are either proposed to or on the National Priorities List (NPL) and the
sites which are in the screening and assessment phase for possible inclusion on the NPL.
Date of Government Version: 01/25/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/03/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/22/2022
Number of Days to Update: 19
Lists of Federal CERCLA sites with NFRAP
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 03/02/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/25/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
SEMS-ARCHIVE: Superfund Enterprise Management System Archive
TC6916785.2s Page GR-2

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
SEMS-ARCHIVE (Superfund Enterprise Management System Archive) tracks sites that have no further interest under
the Federal Superfund Program based on available information. The list was formerly known as the CERCLIS-NFRAP,
renamed to SEMS ARCHIVE by the EPA in 2015. EPA may perform a minimal level of assessment work at a site while
it is archived if site conditions change and/or new information becomes available. Archived sites have been removed
and archived from the inventory of SEMS sites. Archived status indicates that, to the best of EPA's knowledge,
assessment at a site has been completed and that EPA has determined no further steps will be taken to list the
site on the National Priorities List (NPL), unless information indicates this decision was not appropriate or
other considerations require a recommendation for listing at a later time. The decision does not necessarily mean
that there is no hazard associated with a given site; it only means that. based upon available information, the
location is not judged to be potential NPL site.
Date of Government Version: 01/25/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/03/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/22/2022
Number of Days to Update: 19
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 03/02/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/25/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
Lists of Federal RCRA facilities undergoing Corrective Action
CORRACTS: Corrective Action Report
CORRACTS identifies hazardous waste handlers with RCRA corrective action activity.
Date of Government Version: 02/28/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/02/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/17/2022
Number of Days to Update: 15
Lists of Federal RCRA TSD facilities
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 03/02/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/04/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
RCRA-TSDF: RCRA - Treatment, Storage and Disposal
RCRAInfo is EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database
includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste
as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Transporters are individuals or entities that
move hazardous waste from the generator offsite to a facility that can recycle, treat, store, or dispose of the
waste. TSDFs treat, store, or dispose of the waste.
Date of Government Version: 02/28/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/02/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/17/2022
Number of Days to Update: 15
Lists of Federal RCRA generators
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 03/02/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/04/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
RCRA-LQG: RCRA - Large Quantity Generators
RCRAInfo is EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database
includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste
as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Large quantity generators (LQGs) generate
over 1,000 kilograms (kg) of hazardous waste, or over 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month.
Date of Government Version: 02/28/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/02/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/17/2022
Number of Days to Update: 15
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 03/02/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/04/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
TC6916785.2s Page GR-3

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
RCRA-SQG: RCRA - Small Quantity Generators
RCRAInfo is EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database
includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste
as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Small quantity generators (SQGs) generate
between 100 kg and 1,000 kg of hazardous waste per month.
Date of Government Version: 02/28/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/02/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/17/2022
Number of Days to Update: 15
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 03/02/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/04/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
RCRA-VSQG: RCRA - Very Small Quantity Generators (Formerly Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generators)
RCRAInfo is EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database
includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste
as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Very small quantity generators (VSQGs) generate
less than 100 kg of hazardous waste, or less than 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month.
Date of Government Version: 02/28/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/02/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/17/2022
Number of Days to Update: 15
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 03/02/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/04/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registries
LUCIS: Land Use Control Information System
LUCIS contains records of land use control information pertaining to the former Navy Base Realignment and Closure
properties.
Date of Government Version: 11/15/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/16/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/08/2022
Number of Days to Update: 84
Source: Department of the Navy
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 02/07/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/23/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
US ENG CONTROLS: Engineering Controls Sites List
A listing of sites with engineering controls in place. Engineering controls include various forms of caps, building
foundations, liners, and treatment methods to create pathway elimination for regulated substances to enter environmental
media or effect human health.
Date of Government Version: 11/19/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/19/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/14/2022
Number of Days to Update: 87
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 02/23/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/06/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
US INST CONTROLS: Institutional Controls Sites List
A listing of sites with institutional controls in place. Institutional controls include administrative measures,
such as groundwater use restrictions, construction restrictions, property use restrictions, and post remediation
care requirements intended to prevent exposure to contaminants remaining on site. Deed restrictions are generally
required as part of the institutional controls.
Date of Government Version: 11/19/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/19/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/14/2022
Number of Days to Update: 87
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 02/23/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/06/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TC6916785.2s Page GR-4

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Federal ERNS list
ERNS: Emergency Response Notification System
Emergency Response Notification System. ERNS records and stores information on reported releases of oil and hazardous
substances.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2021 Source: National Response Center, United States Coast Guard
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/01/2022 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/10/2022 Last EDR Contact: 03/22/2022
Number of Days to Update: 9 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/04/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
Lists of state- and tribal (Superfund) equivalent sites
HSDS: Hazardous Substance Disposal Site
Locations of uncontrolled and unregulated hazardous waste sites. The file includes sites on the National Priority
List as well as those on the state priority list.
Date of Government Version: 08/09/2011 Source: North Carolina Center for Geographic Information and Analysis
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/08/2011 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/05/2011 Last EDR Contact: 01/18/2022
Number of Days to Update: 27 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
Lists of state- and tribal hazardous waste facilities
SHWS: Inactive Hazardous Sites Inventory
State Hazardous Waste Sites. State hazardous waste site records are the states' equivalent to CERCLIS. These sites
may or may not already be listed on the federal CERCLIS list. Priority sites planned for cleanup using state funds
(state equivalent of Superfund) are identified along with sites where cleanup will be paid for by potentially
responsible parties. Available information varies by state.
Date of Government Version: 11/30/2021 Source: Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/08/2021 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/24/2022 Last EDR Contact: 03/09/2022
Number of Days to Update: 78 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/20/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
Lists of state and tribal landfills and solid waste disposal facilities
SWF/LF: List of Solid Waste Facilities
Solid Waste Facilities/Landfill Sites. SWF/LF type records typically contain an inventory of solid waste disposal
facilities or landfills in a particular state. Depending on the state, these may be active or inactive facilities
or open dumps that failed to meet RCRA Subtitle D Section 4004 criteria for solid waste landfills or disposal
sites.
Date of Government Version: 11/12/2021 Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/16/2021 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/11/2022 Last EDR Contact: 03/24/2022
Number of Days to Update: 85 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/04/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
DEBRIS: Solid Waste Active Disaster Debris Sites Listing
NCDEQ Division of Waste Management Solid Waste Section Temporary Disaster Debris Staging Site (TDDSS) Locations
which are available to be activated in a disaster or emergency.. Disaster Debris Sites can only be used for temporary
disaster debris storage if the site's responsible party activates the site for use by notifying the NCDEQ DWM
Solid Waste Section staff during an emergency
Date of Government Version: 12/08/2021 Source: Department of Environmental Quality
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/09/2021 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/25/2022 Last EDR Contact: 03/15/2022
Number of Days to Update: 78 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/27/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TC6916785.2s Page GR-5

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
OLI: Old Landfill Inventory
Old landfill inventory location information.
sites).
Date of Government Version: 09/11/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/09/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/30/2020
Number of Days to Update: 82
(Does not include no further action sites and other agency lead
Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/07/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/18/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
LCID: Land -Clearing and Inert Debris (LCID) Landfill Notifications
A list all of the Land -Clearing and Inert Debris (LCID) Landfill Notification facilities (under 2 acres in
size) in North Carolina.
Date of Government Version: 05/11/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/02/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/28/2021
Number of Days to Update: 88
Lists of state and tribal leaking storage tanks
Source: Department of Environmental Quality
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/07/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/18/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
LUST: Regional UST Database
This database contains information obtained from the Regional Offices. It provides a more detailed explanation
of current and historic activity for individual sites, as well as what was previously found in the Incident Management
Database. Sites in this database with Incident Numbers are considered LUSTS.
Date of Government Version: 10/29/2021 Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/03/2021 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/26/2022 Last EDR Contact: 02/02/2022
Number of Days to Update: 84 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/16/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
LAST: Leaking Aboveground Storage Tanks
A listing of leaking aboveground storage tank site locations.
Date of Government Version: 10/08/2021 Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/27/2021 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/27/2021 Last EDR Contact: 02/02/2022
Number of Days to Update: 0 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/16/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
INDIAN LUST R1: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
A listing of leaking underground storage tank locations on Indian Land.
Date of Government Version: 04/28/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/11/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/07/2021
Number of Days to Update: 88
Source: EPA Region 1
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/18/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN LUST R4: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUSTS on Indian land in Florida, Mississippi and North Carolina.
Date of Government Version: 05/28/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/22/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/20/2021
Number of Days to Update: 90
Source: EPA Region 4
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/18/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TC6916785.2s Page GR-6

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
INDIAN LUST R7: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUSTS on Indian land in Iowa, Kansas, and Nebraska
Date of Government Version: 10/12/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/15/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/08/2022
Number of Days to Update: 85
Source: EPA Region 7
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/18/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN LUST R8: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUSTS on Indian land in Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah and Wyoming.
Date of Government Version: 10/12/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/15/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/08/2022
Number of Days to Update: 85
Source: EPA Region 8
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/18/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN LUST R9: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUSTS on Indian land in Arizona, California, New Mexico and Nevada
Date of Government Version: 10/12/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/15/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/08/2022
Number of Days to Update: 85
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/18/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN LUST R10: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUSTS on Indian land in Alaska, Idaho, Oregon and Washington.
Date of Government Version: 10/12/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/15/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/08/2022
Number of Days to Update: 85
Source: EPA Region 10
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/18/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN LUST R5: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
Leaking underground storage tanks located on Indian Land in Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin.
Date of Government Version: 10/12/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/15/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/08/2022
Number of Days to Update: 85
Source: EPA, Region 5
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/18/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN LUST R6: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUSTS on Indian land in New Mexico and Oklahoma.
Date of Government Version: 10/12/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/15/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/08/2022
Number of Days to Update: 85
Source: EPA Region 6
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/18/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
LUST TRUST: State Trust Fund Database
This database contains information about claims against the State Trust Funds for reimbursements for expenses
incurred while remediating Leaking USTs.
Date of Government Version: 01/03/2022 Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/05/2022 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/21/2022 Last EDR Contact: 01/05/2022
Number of Days to Update: 75 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/18/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
TC6916785.2s Page GR-7

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Lists of state and tribal registered storage tanks
FEMA UST: Underground Storage Tank Listing
A listing of all FEMA owned underground storage tanks.
Date of Government Version: 10/14/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/05/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/01/2022
Number of Days to Update: 88
Source: FEMA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 02/07/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/18/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
UST: Petroleum Underground Storage Tank Database
Registered Underground Storage Tanks. UST's are regulated under Subtitle I of the Resource Conservation and Recovery
Act (RCRA) and must be registered with the state department responsible for administering the UST program. Available
information varies by state program.
Date of Government Version: 10/29/2021 Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/03/2021 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/26/2022 Last EDR Contact: 02/02/2022
Number of Days to Update: 84 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/16/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
AST: AST Database
Facilities with aboveground storage tanks that have a capacity greater than 21,000 gallons.
Date of Government Version: 11/15/2021 Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/10/2021 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/25/2022 Last EDR Contact: 03/14/2022
Number of Days to Update: 77 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/27/2022
Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually
INDIAN UST R4: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 4 (Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee
and Tribal Nations)
Date of Government Version: 05/28/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/22/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/20/2021
Number of Days to Update: 90
Source: EPA Region 4
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/18/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN UST R1: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 1 (Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, Vermont and ten Tribal
Nations).
Date of Government Version: 10/14/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/15/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/08/2022
Number of Days to Update: 85
Source: EPA, Region 1
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/18/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN UST R6: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 6 (Louisiana, Arkansas, Oklahoma, New Mexico, Texas and 65 Tribes).
Date of Government Version: 10/12/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/15/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/08/2022
Number of Days to Update: 85
Source: EPA Region 6
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/18/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TC6916785.2s Page GR-8

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
INDIAN UST R5: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 5 (Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin and Tribal Nations).
Date of Government Version: 04/06/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/11/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/07/2021
Number of Days to Update: 88
Source: EPA Region 5
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 02/09/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN UST R8: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 8 (Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah, Wyoming and 27 Tribal Nations).
Date of Government Version: 10/12/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/15/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/08/2022
Number of Days to Update: 85
Source: EPA Region 8
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/18/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN UST R9: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 9 (Arizona, California, Hawaii, Nevada, the Pacific Islands, and Tribal Nations).
Date of Government Version: 10/12/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/15/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/08/2022
Number of Days to Update: 85
Source: EPA Region 9
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/18/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN UST R7: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 7 (Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska, and 9 Tribal Nations).
Date of Government Version: 10/12/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/15/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/08/2022
Number of Days to Update: 85
Source: EPA Region 7
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/18/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN UST R10: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 10 (Alaska, Idaho, Oregon, Washington, and Tribal Nations).
Date of Government Version: 10/12/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/15/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/08/2022
Number of Days to Update: 85
Source: EPA Region 10
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/18/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
State and tribal institutional control / engineering control registries
INST CONTROL: No Further Action Sites With Land Use Restrictions Monitoring
A land use restricted site is a property where there are limits or requirements on future use of the property
due to varying levels of cleanup possible, practical, or necessary at the site.
Date of Government Version: 11/30/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/08/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/24/2022
Number of Days to Update: 78
Source: Department of Environmental Quality
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 03/09/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/20/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
TC6916785.2s Page GR-9

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Lists of state and tribal voluntary cleanup sites
INDIAN VCP R1: Voluntary Cleanup Priority Listing
A listing of voluntary cleanup priority sites located on Indian Land located in Region 1.
Date of Government Version: 07/27/2015
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/29/2015
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/18/2016
Number of Days to Update: 142
Source: EPA, Region 1
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 03/16/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/04/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
VCP: Responsible Party Voluntary Action Sites
Responsible Party Voluntary Action site locations.
Date of Government Version: 11/30/2021 Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/08/2021 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/24/2022 Last EDR Contact: 03/09/2022
Number of Days to Update: 78 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/20/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
INDIAN VCP R7: Voluntary Cleanup Priority Lisitng
A listing of voluntary cleanup priority sites located on Indian Land located in Region 7.
Date of Government Version: 03/20/2008
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/22/2008
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/19/2008
Number of Days to Update: 27
Lists of state and tribal brownfield sites
Source: EPA, Region 7
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/08/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/20/2009
Data Release Frequency: Varies
BROWNFIELDS: Brownfields Projects Inventory
A brownfield site is an abandoned, idled, or underused property where the threat of environmental contamination
has hindered its redevelopment. All of the sites in the inventory are working toward a brownfield agreement for
cleanup and liabitliy control.
Date of Government Version: 12/01/2021 Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/21/2021 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/11/2022 Last EDR Contact: 12/21/2021
Number of Days to Update: 80 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/11/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Local Brownfield lists
US BROWNFIELDS: A Listing of Brownfields Sites
Brownfields are real property, the expansion, redevelopment, or reuse of which may be complicated by the presence
or potential presence of a hazardous substance, pollutant, or contaminant. Cleaning up and reinvesting in these
properties takes development pressures off of undeveloped, open land, and both improves and protects the environment.
Assessment, Cleanup and Redevelopment Exchange System (ACRES) stores information reported by EPA Brownfields
grant recipients on brownfields properties assessed or cleaned up with grant funding as well as information on
Targeted Brownfields Assessments performed by EPA Regions. A listing of ACRES Brownfield sites is obtained from
Cleanups in My Community. Cleanups in My Community provides information on Brownfields properties for which information
is reported back to EPA, as well as areas served by Brownfields grant programs.
Date of Government Version: 02/23/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/10/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/10/2022
Number of Days to Update: 0
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 03/15/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/27/2022
Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually
TC6916785.2s Page GR-10

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites
SWRCY: Recycling Center Listing
A listing of recycling center locations.
Date of Government Version: 08/28/2021 Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/31/2021 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/22/2021 Last EDR Contact: 01/24/2022
Number of Days to Update: 83 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/09/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
HIST LF: Solid Waste Facility Listing
A listing of solid waste facilities.
Date of Government Version: 11/06/2006 Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/13/2007 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/02/2007 Last EDR Contact: 01/19/2009
Number of Days to Update: 17 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
INDIAN ODI: Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian Lands
Location of open dumps on Indian land.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/1998
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/03/2007
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/24/2008
Number of Days to Update: 52
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/24/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/09/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
ODI: Open Dump Inventory
An open dump is defined as a disposal facility that does not comply with one or more of the Part 257 or Part 258
Subtitle D Criteria.
Date of Government Version: 06/30/1985 Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/09/2004 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/17/2004 Last EDR Contact: 06/09/2004
Number of Days to Update: 39 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
DEBRIS REGION 9: Torres Martinez Reservation Illegal Dump Site Locations
A listing of illegal dump sites location on the Torres Martinez Indian Reservation located in eastern Riverside
County and northern Imperial County, California.
Date of Government Version: 01/12/2009 Source: EPA, Region 9
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/07/2009 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/21/2009 Last EDR Contact: 01/13/2022
Number of Days to Update: 137 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
IHS OPEN DUMPS: Open Dumps on Indian Land
A listing of all open dumps located on Indian Land in the United States.
Date of Government Version: 04/01/2014 Source: Department of Health & Human Serivices, Indian Health Service
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/06/2014 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/29/2015 Last EDR Contact: 01/28/2022
Number of Days to Update: 176 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/09/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites
TC6916785.2s Page GR-11

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
US HIST CDL: National Clandestine Laboratory Register
A listing of clandestine drug lab locations that have been removed from the DEAs National Clandestine Laboratory
Register.
Date of Government Version: 11/16/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/18/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/08/2022
Number of Days to Update: 82
Source: Drug Enforcement Administration
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 02/23/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/06/2022
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
US CDL: Clandestine Drug Labs
A listing of clandestine drug lab locations. The U.S. Department of Justice ("the Department") provides this
web site as a public service. It contains addresses of some locations where law enforcement agencies reported
they found chemicals or other items that indicated the presence of either clandestine drug laboratories or dumpsites.
In most cases, the source of the entries is not the Department, and the Department has not verified the entry
and does not guarantee its accuracy. Members of the public must verify the accuracy of all entries by, for example,
contacting local law enforcement and local health departments.
Date of Government Version: 11/16/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/18/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/08/2022
Number of Days to Update: 82
PFAS: PFAS Contamination Site Listing
List of PFAS facilities
Date of Government Version: 11/01/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/07/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/23/2022
Number of Days to Update: 78
Local Land Records
Source: Drug Enforcement Administration
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 02/23/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/06/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
Source: Department of Environmental Quality
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/31/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/16/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
LIENS 2: CERCLA Lien Information
A Federal CERCLA ('Superfund') lien can exist by operation of law at any site or property at which EPA has spent
Superfund monies. These monies are spent to investigate and address releases and threatened releases of contamination.
CERCLIS provides information as to the identity of these sites and properties.
Date of Government Version: 01/25/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/03/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/22/2022
Number of Days to Update: 19
Records of Emergency Release Reports
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 03/02/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/11/2022
Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually
HMIRS: Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System
Hazardous Materials Incident Report System. HMIRS contains hazardous material spill incidents reported to DOT.
Date of Government Version: 12/15/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/16/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/10/2022
Number of Days to Update: 84
Source: U.S. Department of Transportation
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 03/21/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/04/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
SPILLS: Spills Incident Listing
A listing spills, hazardous material releases, sanitary sewer overflows, wastewater treatment plant bypasses and
upsets, citizen complaints, and any other environmental emergency calls reported to the agency.
TC6916785.2s Page GR-12

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 12/16/2021 Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/28/2021 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/17/2022 Last EDR Contact: 03/18/2022
Number of Days to Update: 79 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/20/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
IMD: Incident Management Database
Groundwater and/or soil contamination incidents
Date of Government Version: 10/29/2021 Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/03/2021 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/26/2022 Last EDR Contact: 02/02/2022
Number of Days to Update: 84 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/16/2022
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
SPILLS 90: SPILLS90 data from FirstSearch
Spills 90 includes those spill and release records available exclusively from FirstSearch databases. Typically,
they may include chemical, oil and/or hazardous substance spills recorded after 1990. Duplicate records that are
already included in EDR incident and release records are not included in Spills 90.
Date of Government Version: 09/27/2012
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/03/2013
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/06/2013
Number of Days to Update: 62
Source: FirstSearch
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 01/03/2013
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
SPILLS 80: SPILLS80 data from FirstSearch
Spills 80 includes those spill and release records available from FirstSearch databases prior to 1990. Typically,
they may include chemical, oil and/or hazardous substance spills recorded before 1990. Duplicate records that
are already included in EDR incident and release records are not included in Spills 80.
Date of Government Version: 06/14/2001
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/03/2013
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/06/2013
Number of Days to Update: 62
Other Ascertainable Records
Source: FirstSearch
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 01/03/2013
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
RCRA NonGen / NLR: RCRA - Non Generators / No Longer Regulated
RCRAInfo is EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database
includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste
as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Non -Generators do not presently generate hazardous
waste.
Date of Government Version: 02/28/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/02/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/17/2022
Number of Days to Update: 15
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 03/02/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/04/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
FUDS: Formerly Used Defense Sites
The listing includes locations of Formerly Used Defense Sites properties where the US Army Corps of Engineers
is actively working or will take necessary cleanup actions.
Date of Government Version: 10/26/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/16/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/08/2022
Number of Days to Update: 84
Source: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 02/15/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/30/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TC6916785.2s Page GR-13

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
DOD: Department of Defense Sites
This data set consists of federally owned or administered lands, administered by the Department of Defense, that
have any area equal to or greater than 640 acres of the United States, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands.
Date of Government Version: 06/07/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/13/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/09/2022
Number of Days to Update: 239
Source: USGS
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 03/02/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/25/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
FEDLAND: Federal and Indian Lands
Federally and Indian administrated lands of the United States. Lands included are administrated by: Army Corps
of Engineers, Bureau of Reclamation, National Wild and Scenic River, National Wildlife Refuge, Public Domain Land,
Wilderness, Wilderness Study Area, Wildlife Management Area, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Bureau of Land Management,
Department of Justice, Forest Service, Fish and Wildlife Service, National Park Service.
Date of Government Version: 04/02/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/11/2018
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/06/2019
Number of Days to Update: 574
Source: U.S. Geological Survey
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/07/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/18/2022
Data Release Frequency: N/A
SCRD DRYCLEANERS: State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Listing
The State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners was established in 1998, with support from the U.S. EPA Office
of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation. It is comprised of representatives of states with established
drycleaner remediation programs. Currently the member states are Alabama, Connecticut, Florida, Illinois, Kansas,
Minnesota, Missouri, North Carolina, Oregon, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, and Wisconsin.
Date of Government Version: 01/01/2017
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/03/2017
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/07/2017
Number of Days to Update: 63
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 02/08/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/23/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
US FIN ASSUR: Financial Assurance Information
All owners and operators of facilities that treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste are required to provide
proof that they will have sufficient funds to pay for the clean up, closure, and post -closure care of their facilities.
Date of Government Version: 12/13/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/17/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/17/2022
Number of Days to Update: 90
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 03/21/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/04/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
EPA WATCH LIST: EPA WATCH LIST
EPA maintains a "Watch List' to facilitate dialogue between EPA, state and local environmental agencies on enforcement
matters relating to facilities with alleged violations identified as either significant or high priority. Being
on the Watch List does not mean that the facility has actually violated the law only that an investigation by
EPA or a state or local environmental agency has led those organizations to allege that an unproven violation
has in fact occurred. Being on the Watch List does not represent a higher level of concern regarding the alleged
violations that were detected, but instead indicates cases requiring additional dialogue between EPA, state and
local agencies - primarily because of the length of time the alleged violation has gone unaddressed or unresolved.
Date of Government Version: 08/30/2013
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/21/2014
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/17/2014
Number of Days to Update: 88
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 02/01/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/16/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
TC6916785.2s Page GR-14

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
2020 COR ACTION: 2020 Corrective Action Program List
The EPA has set ambitious goals for the RCRA Corrective Action program by creating the 2020 Corrective Action
Universe. This RCRA cleanup baseline includes facilities expected to need corrective action. The 2020 universe
contains a wide variety of sites. Some properties are heavily contaminated while others were contaminated but
have since been cleaned up. Still others have not been fully investigated yet, and may require little or no remediation.
Inclusion in the 2020 Universe does not necessarily imply failure on the part of a facility to meet its RCRA obligations.
Date of Government Version: 09/30/2017
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/08/2018
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/20/2018
Number of Days to Update: 73
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 02/03/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/16/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TSCA: Toxic Substances Control Act
Toxic Substances Control Act. TSCA identifies manufacturers and importers of chemical substances included on the
TSCA Chemical Substance Inventory list. It includes data on the production volume of these substances by plant
site.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/17/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/10/2020
Number of Days to Update: 85
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 03/18/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/27/2022
Data Release Frequency: Every 4 Years
TRIS: Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System
Toxic Release Inventory System. TRIS identifies facilities which release toxic chemicals to the air, water and
land in reportable quantities under SARA Title III Section 313.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/14/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/04/2020
Number of Days to Update: 82
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 02/18/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/30/2022
Data Release Frequency: Annually
SSTS: Section 7 Tracking Systems
Section 7 of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act, as amended (92 Stat. 829) requires all
registered pesticide -producing establishments to submit a report to the Environmental Protection Agency by March
1 st each year. Each establishment must report the types and amounts of pesticides, active ingredients and devices
being produced, and those having been produced and sold or distributed in the past year.
Date of Government Version: 10/18/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/20/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/10/2022
Number of Days to Update: 82
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/19/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022
Data Release Frequency: Annually
ROD: Records Of Decision
Record of Decision. ROD documents mandate a permanent remedy at an NPL (Superfund) site containing technical
and health information to aid in the cleanup.
Date of Government Version: 01/25/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/03/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/22/2022
Number of Days to Update: 19
RMP: Risk Management Plans
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 03/02/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/13/2022
Data Release Frequency: Annually
TC6916785.2s Page GR-15

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
When Congress passed the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, it required EPA to publish regulations and guidance
for chemical accident prevention at facilities using extremely hazardous substances. The Risk Management Program
Rule (RMP Rule) was written to implement Section 112(r) of these amendments. The rule, which built upon existing
industry codes and standards, requires companies of all sizes that use certain flammable and toxic substances
to develop a Risk Management Program, which includes a(n): Hazard assessment that details the potential effects
of an accidental release, an accident history of the last five years, and an evaluation of worst -case and alternative
accidental releases; Prevention program that includes safety precautions and maintenance, monitoring, and employee
training measures; and Emergency response program that spells out emergency health care, employee training measures
and procedures for informing the public and response agencies (e.g the fire department) should an accident occur.
Date of Government Version: 10/20/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/05/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/12/2021
Number of Days to Update: 7
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/18/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
RAATS: RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System
RCRA Administration Action Tracking System. RAATS contains records based on enforcement actions issued under RCRA
pertaining to major violators and includes administrative and civil actions brought by the EPA. For administration
actions after September 30, 1995, data entry in the RAATS database was discontinued. EPA will retain a copy of
the database for historical records. It was necessary to terminate RAATS because a decrease in agency resources
made it impossible to continue to update the information contained in the database.
Date of Government Version: 04/17/1995
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/03/1995
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/07/1995
Number of Days to Update: 35
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/02/2008
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/01/2008
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
PRP: Potentially Responsible Parties
A listing of verified Potentially Responsible Parties
Date of Government Version: 01/25/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/03/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/25/2022
Number of Days to Update: 22
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 03/02/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/16/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
PADS: PCB Activity Database System
PCB Activity Database. PADS Identifies generators, transporters, commercial storers and/or brokers and disposers
of PCB's who are required to notify the EPA of such activities.
Date of Government Version: 01/20/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/20/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/25/2022
Number of Days to Update: 64
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/07/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/18/2022
Data Release Frequency: Annually
ICIS: Integrated Compliance Information System
The Integrated Compliance Information System (ICIS) supports the information needs of the national enforcement
and compliance program as well as the unique needs of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)
program.
Date of Government Version: 11/18/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/23/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/10/2017
Number of Days to Update: 79
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/29/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/18/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
TC6916785.2s Page GR-16

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
FTTS: FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act)
FTTS tracks administrative cases and pesticide enforcement actions and compliance activities related to FIFRA,
TSCA and EPCRA (Emergency Planning and Community Right -to -Know Act). To maintain currency, EDR contacts the
Agency on a quarterly basis.
Date of Government Version: 04/09/2009 Source: EPA/Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/16/2009 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/11/2009 Last EDR Contact: 08/18/2017
Number of Days to Update: 25 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/04/2017
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
FTTS INSP: FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act)
A listing of FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) inspections and enforcements.
Date of Government Version: 04/09/2009
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/16/2009
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/11/2009
Number of Days to Update: 25
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 08/18/2017
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/04/2017
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
MLTS: Material Licensing Tracking System
MLTS is maintained by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and contains a list of approximately 8,100 sites which
possess or use radioactive materials and which are subject to NRC licensing requirements. To maintain currency,
EDR contacts the Agency on a quarterly basis.
Date of Government Version: 07/29/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/24/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/19/2021
Number of Days to Update: 87
Source: Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/18/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
COAL ASH DOE: Steam -Electric Plant Operation Data
A listing of power plants that store ash in surface ponds.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/30/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/22/2022
Number of Days to Update: 84
Source: Department of Energy
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 02/28/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/13/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
COAL ASH EPA: Coal Combustion Residues Surface Impoundments List
A listing of coal combustion residues surface impoundments with high hazard potential ratings.
Date of Government Version: 01/12/2017
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/05/2019
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/11/2019
Number of Days to Update: 251
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 02/28/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/13/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
PCB TRANSFORMER: PCB Transformer Registration Database
The database of PCB transformer registrations that includes all PCB registration submittals.
Date of Government Version: 09/13/2019
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/06/2019
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/10/2020
Number of Days to Update: 96
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 02/04/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/16/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
RADINFO: Radiation Information Database
The Radiation Information Database (RADINFO) contains information about facilities that are regulated by U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulations for radiation and radioactivity.
TC6916785.2s Page GR-17

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 07/01/2019
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2019
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/23/2019
Number of Days to Update: 84
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/27/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/11/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
HIST FTTS: FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Administrative Case Listing
A complete administrative case listing from the FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) for all ten EPA regions. The
information was obtained from the National Compliance Database (NCDB). NCDB supports the implementation of FIFRA
(Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act) and TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act). Some EPA regions
are now closing out records. Because of that, and the fact that some EPA regions are not providing EPA Headquarters
with updated records, it was decided to create a HIST FTTS database. It included records that may not be included
in the newer FTTS database updates. This database is no longer updated.
Date of Government Version: 10/19/2006
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/01/2007
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/10/2007
Number of Days to Update: 40
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2007
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/17/2008
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
HIST FTTS INSP: FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Inspection & Enforcement Case Listing
A complete inspection and enforcement case listing from the FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) for all ten EPA
regions. The information was obtained from the National Compliance Database (NCDB). NCDB supports the implementation
of FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act) and TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act). Some
EPA regions are now closing out records. Because of that, and the fact that some EPA regions are not providing
EPA Headquarters with updated records, it was decided to create a HIST FTTS database. It included records that
may not be included in the newer FTTS database updates. This database is no longer updated.
Date of Government Version: 10/19/2006
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/01/2007
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/10/2007
Number of Days to Update: 40
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2008
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/17/2008
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
DOT OPS: Incident and Accident Data
Department of Transporation, Office of Pipeline Safety Incident and Accident data.
Date of Government Version: 01/02/2020 Source: Department of Transporation, Office of Pipeline Safety
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/28/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/17/2020 Last EDR Contact: 01/24/2022
Number of Days to Update: 80 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/08/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
CONSENT: Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees
Major legal settlements that establish responsibility and standards for cleanup at NPL (Superfund) sites. Released
periodically by United States District Courts after settlement by parties to litigation matters.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2021 Source: Department of Justice, Consent Decree Library
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/14/2022 Telephone: Varies
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/25/2022 Last EDR Contact: 01/03/2022
Number of Days to Update: 70 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/18/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
BRS: Biennial Reporting System
The Biennial Reporting System is a national system administered by the EPA that collects data on the generation
and management of hazardous waste. BRS captures detailed data from two groups: Large Quantity Generators (LQG)
and Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facilities.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2019
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/02/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/25/2022
Number of Days to Update: 23
Source: EPA/NTIS
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 03/02/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/04/2022
Data Release Frequency: Biennially
TC6916785.2s Page GR-18

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
INDIAN RESERV: Indian Reservations
This map layer portrays Indian administered lands of the United States that have any area equal to or greater
than 640 acres.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2014
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/14/2015
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/10/2017
Number of Days to Update: 546
Source: USGS
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/04/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/18/2022
Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually
FUSRAP: Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program
DOE established the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP) in 1974 to remediate sites where
radioactive contamination remained from Manhattan Project and early U.S. Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) operations.
Date of Government Version: 07/26/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/27/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/22/2021
Number of Days to Update: 87
Source: Department of Energy
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/31/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/16/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
UMTRA: Uranium Mill Tailings Sites
Uranium ore was mined by private companies for federal government use in national defense programs. When the mills
shut down, large piles of the sand -like material (mill tailings) remain after uranium has been extracted from
the ore. Levels of human exposure to radioactive materials from the piles are low; however, in some cases tailings
were used as construction materials before the potential health hazards of the tailings were recognized.
Date of Government Version: 08/30/2019
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/15/2019
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/28/2020
Number of Days to Update: 74
LEAD SMELTER 1: Lead Smelter Sites
A listing of former lead smelter site locations.
Date of Government Version: 01/25/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/03/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/22/2022
Number of Days to Update: 19
Source: Department of Energy
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 02/17/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/30/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 05/03/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/11/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
LEAD SMELTER 2: Lead Smelter Sites
A list of several hundred sites in the U.S. where secondary lead smelting was done from 1931and 1964. These sites
may pose a threat to public health through ingestion or inhalation of contaminated soil or dust
Date of Government Version: 04/05/2001
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/27/2010
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/02/2010
Number of Days to Update: 36
Source: American Journal of Public Health
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/02/2009
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
US AIRS (AFS): Aerometric Information Retrieval System Facility Subsystem (AFS)
The database is a sub -system of Aerometric Information Retrieval System (AIRS). AFS contains compliance data
on air pollution point sources regulated by the U.S. EPA and/or state and local air regulatory agencies. This
information comes from source reports by various stationary sources of air pollution, such as electric power plants,
steel mills, factories, and universities, and provides information about the air pollutants they produce. Action,
air program, air program pollutant, and general level plant data. It is used to track emissions and compliance
data from industrial plants.
TC6916785.2s Page GR-19

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 10/12/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/26/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/03/2017
Number of Days to Update: 100
US AIRS MINOR: Air Facility System Data
A listing of minor source facilities.
Date of Government Version: 10/12/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/26/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/03/2017
Number of Days to Update: 100
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 09/26/2017
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/08/2018
Data Release Frequency: Annually
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 09/26/2017
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/08/2018
Data Release Frequency: Annually
US MINES: Mines Master Index File
Contains all mine identification numbers issued for mines active or opened since 1971. The data also includes
violation information.
Date of Government Version: 11/02/2021 Source: Department of Labor, Mine Safety and Health Administration
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/22/2021 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/14/2022 Last EDR Contact: 02/23/2022
Number of Days to Update: 84 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/06/2022
Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually
MINES VIOLATIONS: MSHA Violation Assessment Data
Mines violation and assessment information. Department of Labor, Mine Safety & Health Administration.
Date of Government Version: 03/21/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/22/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/25/2022
Number of Days to Update: 3
Source: DOL, Mine Safety & Health Admi
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 03/14/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/13/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
US MINES 2: Ferrous and Nonferrous Metal Mines Database Listing
This map layer includes ferrous (ferrous metal mines are facilities that extract ferrous metals, such as iron
ore or molybdenum) and nonferrous (Nonferrous metal mines are facilities that extract nonferrous metals, such
as gold, silver, copper, zinc, and lead) metal mines in the United States.
Date of Government Version: 05/06/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/27/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/13/2020
Number of Days to Update: 78
Source: USGS
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 02/24/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/06/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
US MINES 3: Active Mines & Mineral Plants Database Listing
Active Mines and Mineral Processing Plant operations for commodities monitored by the Minerals Information Team
of the USGS.
Date of Government Version: 04/14/2011
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/08/2011
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/13/2011
Number of Days to Update: 97
Source: USGS
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 02/24/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/06/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
ABANDONED MINES: Abandoned Mines
An inventory of land and water impacted by past mining (primarily coal mining) is maintained by OSMRE to provide
information needed to implement the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 (SMCRA). The inventory
contains information on the location, type, and extent of AML impacts, as well as, information on the cost associated
with the reclamation of those problems. The inventory is based upon field surveys by State, Tribal, and OSMRE
program officials. It is dynamic to the extent that it is modified as new problems are identified and existing
problems are reclaimed.
TC6916785.2s Page GR-20

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 12/14/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/15/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/10/2022
Number of Days to Update: 85
Source: Department of Interior
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 03/04/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/20/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
FINDS: Facility Index System/Facility Registry System
Facility Index System. FINDS contains both facility information and 'pointers' to other sources that contain more
detail. EDR includes the following FINDS databases in this report: PCS (Permit Compliance System), AIRS (Aerometric
Information Retrieval System), DOCKET (Enforcement Docket used to manage and track information on civil judicial
enforcement cases for all environmental statutes), FURS (Federal Underground Injection Control), C-DOCKET (Criminal
Docket System used to track criminal enforcement actions for all environmental statutes), FFIS (Federal Facilities
Information System), STATE (State Environmental Laws and Statutes), and PADS (PCB Activity Data System).
Date of Government Version: 11/04/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/22/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/25/2022
Number of Days to Update: 95
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 02/28/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/13/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
DOCKET HWC: Hazardous Waste Compliance Docket Listing
A complete list of the Federal Agency Hazardous Waste Compliance Docket Facilities.
Date of Government Version: 05/06/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/21/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/11/2021
Number of Days to Update: 82
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 02/22/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/06/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
ECHO: Enforcement & Compliance History Information
ECHO provides integrated compliance and enforcement information for about 800,000 regulated facilities nationwide.
Date of Government Version: 01/01/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/04/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/10/2022
Number of Days to Update: 6
UXO: Unexploded Ordnance Sites
A listing of unexploded ordnance site locations
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/11/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/14/2022
Number of Days to Update: 34
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/04/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/18/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
Source: Department of Defense
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/11/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/25/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
FUELS PROGRAM: EPA Fuels Program Registered Listing
This listing includes facilities that are registered under the Part 80 (Code of Federal Regulations) EPA Fuels
Programs. All companies now are required to submit new and updated registrations.
Date of Government Version: 11/15/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/15/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/01/2022
Number of Days to Update: 78
AIRS: Air Quality Permit Listing
A listing of facilities with air quality permits.
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 02/17/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/30/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
TC6916785.2s Page GR-21

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 12/06/2021 Source: Department of Environmental Quality
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/08/2021 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/24/2022 Last EDR Contact: 01/09/2022
Number of Days to Update: 78 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/20/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
ASBESTOS: ASBESTOS
Asbestos notification sites
Date of Government Version: 07/31/2021 Source: Department of Health & Human Services
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/09/2021 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/02/2021 Last EDR Contact: 01/18/2022
Number of Days to Update: 85 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
COAL ASH: Coal Ash Disposal Sites
A listing of coal combustion products distribution permits issued by the Division for the treatment, storage,
transportation, use and disposal of coal combustion products.
Date of Government Version: 11/12/2021 Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/16/2021 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/11/2022 Last EDR Contact: 03/24/2022
Number of Days to Update: 85 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/04/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
DRYCLEANERS: Drycleaning Sites
Potential and known drycleaning sites, active and abandoned, that the Drycleaning Solvent Cleanup Program has
knowledge of and entered into this database.
Date of Government Version: 12/06/2021 Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/13/2021 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/25/2022 Last EDR Contact: 03/18/2022
Number of Days to Update: 74 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/27/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
Financial Assurance 1: Financial Assurance Information Listing
A listing of financial assurance information for underground storage tank facilities. Financial assurance is intended
to ensure that resources are available to pay for the cost of closure, post -closure care, and corrective measures
if the owner or operator of a regulated facility is unable or unwilling to pay.
Date of Government Version: 10/29/2021 Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/03/2021 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/26/2022 Last EDR Contact: 02/02/2022
Number of Days to Update: 84 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/16/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
Financial Assurance 2: Financial Assurance Information Listing
Information for solid waste facilities. Financial assurance is intended to ensure that resources are available
to pay for the cost of closure, post -closure care, and corrective measures if the owner or operator of a regulated
facility is unable or unwilling to pay.
Date of Government Version: 10/02/2012 Source: Department of Environmental & Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/03/2012 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/26/2012 Last EDR Contact: 03/18/2022
Number of Days to Update: 23 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/04/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
Financial Assurance 3: Financial Assurance Information
Hazardous waste financial assurance information.
TC6916785.2s Page GR-22

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 12/03/2021 Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/07/2021 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/23/2022 Last EDR Contact: 03/07/2022
Number of Days to Update: 78 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/20/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
NPDES: NPDES Facility Location Listing
General information regarding NPDES(National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System) permits.
Date of Government Version: 09/01/2021 Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/27/2021 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/20/2022 Last EDR Contact: 01/26/2022
Number of Days to Update: 85 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/09/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
UIC: Underground Injection Wells Listing
A listing of uncerground injection wells locations.
Date of Government Version: 10/26/2020 Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/30/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/07/2020 Last EDR Contact: 03/01/2022
Number of Days to Update: 7 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/13/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
AOP: Animal Operation Permits Listing
This listing includes animal operations that are required to be permitted by the state.
Date of Government Version: 04/01/2020 Source: Department of Environmental Quality
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/26/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/27/2020 Last EDR Contact: 03/11/2022
Number of Days to Update: 1 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/20/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
PCSRP: Petroleum -Contaminated Soil Remediation Permits
To treat petroleum -contaminated soil in order to protect North Carolinaa??s environment and the health of the
citizens of North Carolina.
Date of Government Version: 09/15/2021 Source: Department of Environmental Quality
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/05/2021 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/23/2021 Last EDR Contact: 01/05/2022
Number of Days to Update: 79 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/18/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
CCB: Coal Ash Structural Fills (CCB) Listing
These are not permitted Coal Ash landfills A list all of the now closed Coal Ash Structural Fills (CCB) in North
Carolina, in point data form. The purpose is to provide the public and other government entities a visual overview
of coal ash structural fills throughout the state and increase public awareness of their current locations.
Date of Government Version: 05/10/2021 Source: Department of Environmental Quality
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/02/2021 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/27/2021 Last EDR Contact: 01/07/2022
Number of Days to Update: 87 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/18/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
SEPT HAULERS: Permitted Septage Haulers Listing
This list of all active and permitted Septage Land Application Site (SLAS) and Septage Detention and Treatment
Facility (SDTF) sites in North Carolina. The purpose of this map is to provide the public and government entities
a visual overview of the businesses that manage septage and septage facilities throughout the state.
TC6916785.2s Page GR-23

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 03/25/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/06/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/24/2021
Number of Days to Update: 79
MINES MRDS: Mineral Resources Data System
Mineral Resources Data System
Date of Government Version: 04/06/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/21/2019
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/24/2019
Number of Days to Update: 3
PCS ENF: Enforcement data
No description is available for this data
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2014
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/05/2015
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/06/2015
Number of Days to Update: 29
Source: Department of Environmental Quality
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/18/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/18/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
Source: USGS
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 02/24/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/06/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/29/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/18/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
PCS: Permit Compliance System
PCS is a computerized management information system that contains data on National Pollutant Discharge Elimination
System (NPDES) permit holding facilities. PCS tracks the permit, compliance, and enforcement status of NPDES
facilities.
Date of Government Version: 07/14/2011
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/05/2011
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/29/2011
Number of Days to Update: 55
Source: EPA, Office of Water
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/29/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/18/2022
Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually
PCS INACTIVE: Listing of Inactive PCS Permits
An inactive permit is a facility that has shut down or is no longer discharging.
Date of Government Version: 11/05/2014
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/06/2015
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/06/2015
Number of Days to Update: 120
EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS
EDR Exclusive Records
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/29/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/18/2022
Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually
EDR MGP: EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plants
The EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plant Database includes records of coal gas plants (manufactured gas plants)
compiled by EDR's researchers. Manufactured gas sites were used in the United States from the 1800's to 1950's
to produce a gas that could be distributed and used as fuel. These plants used whale oil, rosin, coal, or a mixture
of coal, oil, and water that also produced a significant amount of waste. Many of the byproducts of the gas production,
such as coal tar (oily waste containing volatile and non-volatile chemicals), sludges, oils and other compounds
are potentially hazardous to human health and the environment. The byproduct from this process was frequently
disposed of directly at the plant site and can remain or spread slowly, serving as a continuous source of soil
and groundwater contamination.
Date of Government Version: N/A Source: EDR, Inc.
Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A Telephone: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports: N/A Last EDR Contact: N/A
Number of Days to Update: N/A Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
TC6916785.2s Page GR-24

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
EDR Hist Auto: EDR Exclusive Historical Auto Stations
EDR has searched selected national collections of business directories and has collected listings of potential
gas station/filling station/service station sites that were available to EDR researchers. EDR's review was limited
to those categories of sources that might, in EDR's opinion, include gas station/filling station/service station
establishments. The categories reviewed included, but were not limited to gas, gas station, gasoline station,
filling station, auto, automobile repair, auto service station, service station, etc. This database falls within
a category of information EDR classifies as "High Risk Historical Records", or HRHR. EDR's HRHR effort presents
unique and sometimes proprietary data about past sites and operations that typically create environmental concerns,
but may not show up in current government records searches.
Date of Government Version: N/A
Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports: N/A
Number of Days to Update: N/A
Source: EDR, Inc.
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: N/A
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: Varies
EDR Hist Cleaner: EDR Exclusive Historical Cleaners
EDR has searched selected national collections of business directories and has collected listings of potential
dry cleaner sites that were available to EDR researchers. EDR's review was limited to those categories of sources
that might, in EDR's opinion, include dry cleaning establishments. The categories reviewed included, but were
not limited to dry cleaners, cleaners, laundry, laundromat, cleaning/laundry, wash & dry etc. This database falls
within a category of information EDR classifies as "High Risk Historical Records", or HRHR. EDR's HRHR effort
presents unique and sometimes proprietary data about past sites and operations that typically create environmental
concerns, but may not show up in current government records searches.
Date of Government Version: N/A Source: EDR, Inc.
Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A Telephone: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports: N/A Last EDR Contact: N/A
Number of Days to Update: N/A Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: Varies
EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES
Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives
RGA HWS: Recovered Government Archive State Hazardous Waste Facilities List
The EDR Recovered Government Archive State Hazardous Waste database provides a list of SHWS incidents derived
from historical databases and includes many records that no longer appear in current government lists. Compiled
from Records formerly available from the Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources in North Carolina.
Date of Government Version: N/A Source: Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2013 Telephone: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/24/2013 Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2012
Number of Days to Update: 176 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: Varies
RGA LF: Recovered Government Archive Solid Waste Facilities List
The EDR Recovered Government Archive Landfill database provides a list of landfills derived from historical databases
and includes many records that no longer appear in current government lists. Compiled from Records formerly available
from the Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources in North Carolina.
Date of Government Version: N/A Source: Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2013 Telephone: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/13/2014 Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2012
Number of Days to Update: 196 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: Varies
RGA LUST: Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank
The EDR Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank database provides a list of LUST incidents
derived from historical databases and includes many records that no longer appear in current government lists.
Compiled from Records formerly available from the Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources in North
Carolina.
TC6916785.2s Page GR-25

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: N/A Source: Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2013 Telephone: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/20/2013 Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2012
Number of Days to Update: 172 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: Varies
OTHER DATABASE(S)
Depending on the geographic area covered by this report, the data provided in these specialty databases may or may not be
complete. For example, the existence of wetlands information data in a specific report does not mean that all wetlands in the
area covered by the report are included. Moreover, the absence of any reported wetlands information does not necessarily
mean that wetlands do not exist in the area covered by the report.
CT MANIFEST: Hazardous Waste Manifest Data
Facility and manifest data. Manifest is a document that lists and tracks hazardous waste from the generator through
transporters to a tsd facility.
Date of Government Version: 11/11/2021 Source: Department of Energy & Environmental Protection
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/12/2021 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/01/2022 Last EDR Contact: 02/11/2022
Number of Days to Update: 81 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/23/2022
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
NJ MANIFEST: Manifest Information
Hazardous waste manifest information.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2018 Source: Department of Environmental Protection
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/10/2019 Telephone: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/16/2019 Last EDR Contact: 01/07/2022
Number of Days to Update: 36 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/18/2022
Data Release Frequency: Annually
NY MANIFEST: Facility and Manifest Data
Manifest is a document that lists and tracks hazardous waste from the generator through transporters to a TSD
facility.
Date of Government Version: 01/01/2019 Source: Department of Environmental Conservation
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/29/2021 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/19/2022 Last EDR Contact: 01/28/2022
Number of Days to Update: 82 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/09/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
PA MANIFEST: Manifest Information
Hazardous waste manifest information.
Date of Government Version: 06/30/2018 Source: Department of Environmental Protection
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/19/2019 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/10/2019 Last EDR Contact: 01/10/2022
Number of Days to Update: 53 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/25/2022
Data Release Frequency: Annually
RI MANIFEST: Manifest information
Hazardous waste manifest information
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2020 Source: Department of Environmental Management
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/30/2021 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/18/2022 Last EDR Contact: 02/14/2022
Number of Days to Update: 80 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/30/2022
Data Release Frequency: Annually
TC6916785.2s Page GR-26

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
WI MANIFEST: Manifest Information
Hazardous waste manifest information.
Date of Government Version: 05/31/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/19/2019
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/03/2019
Number of Days to Update: 76
Source: Department of Natural Resources
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 03/02/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/20/2022
Data Release Frequency: Annually
Oil/Gas Pipelines
Source: Endeavor Business Media
Petroleum Bundle (Crude Oil, Refined Products, Petrochemicals, Gas Liquids (LPG/NGL), and Specialty
Gases (Miscellaneous)) N = Natural Gas Bundle (Natural Gas, Gas Liquids (LPG/NGL), and Specialty Gases
(Miscellaneous)). This map includes information copyrighted by Endeavor Business Media. This information
is provided on a best effort basis and Endeavor Business Media does not guarantee its accuracy nor warrant its
fitness for any particular purpose. Such information has been reprinted with the permission of Endeavor Business
Media.
Electric Power Transmission Line Data
Source: Endeavor Business Media
This map includes information copyrighted by Endeavor Business Media. This information is provided on a best
effort basis and Endeavor Business Media does not guarantee its accuracy nor warrant its fitness for any
particular purpose. Such information has been reprinted with the permission of Endeavor Business Media.
Sensitive Receptors: There are individuals deemed sensitive receptors due to their fragile immune systems and special sensitivity
to environmental discharges. These sensitive receptors typically include the elderly, the sick, and children. While the location of all
sensitive receptors cannot be determined, EDR indicates those buildings and facilities - schools, daycares, hospitals, medical centers,
and nursing homes - where individuals who are sensitive receptors are likely to be located.
AHA Hospitals:
Source: American Hospital Association, Inc.
Telephone:[phone]
The database includes a listing of hospitals based on the American Hospital Association's annual survey of hospitals.
Medical Centers: Provider of Services Listing
Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
Telephone:[phone]
A listing of hospitals with Medicare provider number, produced by Centers of Medicare & Medicaid Services,
a federal agency within the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
Nursing Homes
Source: National Institutes of Health
Telephone:[phone]
Information on Medicare and Medicaid certified nursing homes in the United States.
Public Schools
Source: National Center for Education Statistics
Telephone:[phone]
The National Center for Education Statistics' primary database on elementary
and secondary public education in the United States. It is a comprehensive, annual, national statistical
database of all public elementary and secondary schools and school districts, which contains data that are
comparable across all states.
Private Schools
Source: National Center for Education Statistics
Telephone:[phone]
The National Center for Education Statistics' primary database on private school locations in the United States.
Daycare Centers: Child Care Facility List
Source: Department of Health & Human Services
Telephone:[phone]
Flood Zone Data: This data was obtained from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). It depicts 100-year and
500-year flood zones as defined by FEMA. It includes the National Flood Hazard Layer (NFHL) which incorporates Flood
Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) data and Q3 data from FEMA in areas not covered by NFHL.
Source: FEMA
Telephone:[phone]
Date of Government Version: 2003, 2015
TC6916785.2s Page GR-27

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
NWI: National Wetlands Inventory. This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR
in 2002, 2005 and 2010 from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
State Wetlands Data: Wetland Inventory
Source: US Fish & Wildlife Service
Telephone:[phone]
Current USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Map
Source: U.S. Geological Survey
STREET AND ADDRESS INFORMATION
A© 2015 TomTom North America, Inc. All rights reserved. This material is proprietary and the subject of copyright protection
and other intellectual property rights owned by or licensed to Tele Atlas North America, Inc. The use of this material is subject
to the terms of a license agreement. You will be held liable for any unauthorized copying or disclosure of this material.
TC6916785.2s Page GR-28

GEOCHECK®- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE ADDENDUM
TARGET PROPERTY ADDRESS
MUSSELSHELL
NOT REPORTED
TRENTON, NC 28585
Irill :zC]=11 11112:z•»a:4WK90191NQI,Fit r*1
Latitude (North):
Longitude (West):
Universal Tranverse Mercator:
UTM X (Meters):
UTM Y (Meters):
Elevation:
USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP
Target Property Map:
Version Date:
North Map:
Version Date:
35.114751 - 35- 6' 53.10"
77.334545 - 77- 20' 4.36"
Zone 18
287241.7
3888064.8
41 ft. above sea level
13720824 TRENTON, NC
2019
13720724 COVE CITY, NC
2019
EDR's GeoCheck Physical Setting Source Addendum is provided to assist the environmental professional in
forming an opinion about the impact of potential contaminant migration.
Assessment of the impact of contaminant migration generally has two principle investigative components:
1. Groundwater flow direction, and
2. Groundwater flow velocity.
Groundwater flow direction may be impacted by surface topography, hydrology, hydrogeology, characteristics
of the soil, and nearby wells. Groundwater flow velocity is generally impacted by the nature of the
geologic strata.
TC6916785.2s Page A-1

GEOCHECe - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
GROUNDWATER FLOW DIRECTION INFORMATION
Groundwater flow direction for a particular site is best determined by a qualified environmental professional
using site -specific well data. If such data is not reasonably ascertainable, it may be necessary to rely on other
sources of information, such as surface topographic information, hydrologic information, hydrogeologic data
collected on nearby properties, and regional groundwater flow information (from deep aquifers).
TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION
Surface topography may be indicative of the direction of surficial groundwater flow. This information can be used to
assist the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or,
should contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted.
TARGET PROPERTY TOPOGRAPHY
General Topographic Gradient: General SE
SURROUNDING TOPOGRAPHY: ELEVATION PROFILES
c
0
(V V V V V V QAi
W. - . - . - . - . - . - . - . - . - . - . - . . - . - . - . - . - . - . - - -
North I South
TIP
0
OAO OW W AO V T V T A N _ A N A W N N A N
W. - . - . - . - .. - . - . - . - - - - - - - . .'L - . - . - . - . - .
West
TIP
Target Property Elevation: 41 ft.
East
1/2 1 Miles
Source: Topography has been determined from the USGS 7.5' Digital Elevation Model and should be evaluated
on a relative (not an absolute) basis. Relative elevation information between sites of close proximity
should be field verified.
TC6916785.2s Page A-2

GEOCHECe - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
HYDROLOGIC INFORMATION
Surface water can act as a hydrologic barrier to groundwater flow. Such hydrologic information can be used to assist
the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, should
contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted.
Refer to the Physical Setting Source Map following this summary for hydrologic information (major waterways
and bodies of water).
FEMA FLOOD ZONE
Flood Plain Panel at Target Property
3720458000J
Additional Panels in search area:
3720550000J
3720449900J
3720540800J
NATIONAL WETLAND INVENTORY
NWI Quad at Target Property
TRENTON
HYDROGEOLOGIC INFORMATION
FEMA Source Type
FEMA FIRM Flood data
FEMA Source Type
FEMA FIRM Flood data
FEMA FIRM Flood data
FEMA FIRM Flood data
NWI Electronic
Data Coverage
YES - refer to the Overview Map and Detail Map
Hydrogeologic information obtained by installation of wells on a specific site can often be an indicator
of groundwater flow direction in the immediate area. Such hydrogeologic information can be used to assist the
environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, should
contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted.
AQUIFLOW®
Search Radius: 1.000 Mile.
EDR has developed the AQUIFLOW Information System to provide data on the general direction of groundwater
flow at specific points. EDR has reviewed reports submitted by environmental professionals to regulatory
authorities at select sites and has extracted the date of the report, groundwater flow direction as determined
hydrogeologically, and the depth to water table.
LOCATION GENERAL DIRECTION
MAP ID FROM TP GROUNDWATER FLOW
Not Reported
TC6916785.2s Page A-3

GEOCHECe - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
GROUNDWATER FLOW VELOCITY INFORMATION
Groundwater flow velocity information for a particular site is best determined by a qualified environmental professional
using site specific geologic and soil strata data. If such data are not reasonably ascertainable, it may be necessary
to rely on other sources of information, including geologic age identification, rock stratigraphic unit and soil
characteristics data collected on nearby properties and regional soil information. In general, contaminant plumes
move more quickly through sandy -gravelly types of soils than silty -clayey types of soils.
GEOLOGIC INFORMATION IN GENERAL AREA OF TARGET PROPERTY
Geologic information can be used by the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the relative speed
at which contaminant migration may be occurring.
ROCK STRATIGRAPHIC UNIT
GEOLOGIC AGE IDENTIFICATION
Era: Cenozoic Category: Stratifed Sequence
System: Tertiary
Series: Eocene
Code: Te (decoded above as Era, System & Series)
Geologic Age and Rock Stratigraphic Unit Source: P.G. Schruben, R.E. Arndt and W.J. Bawiec, Geology
of the Conterminous U.S. at 1:2,500,000 Scale - a digital representation of the 1974 P.B. King and H.M. Beikman
Map, USGS Digital Data Series DDS - 11 (1994).
TC6916785.2s Page A-4

SSURGO SOIL MAP - 6916785.2s
N
* Target Property
N SSURGO Soil
N Water
7
4
6
3
0 1116 118 I:; Hiles
SITE NAME: Musselshell CLIENT: Restoration Systems, LLC
ADDRESS: Not Reported CONTACT: JD Hamby
Trenton NC 28585 INQUIRY #: 6916785.2s
LAT/LONG: 35.114751 / 77.334545 DATE: March 28, 2022 4:21 pm
Gopyright,o 2022 EDR, Ina v 2015 TonnTom Rai. 2015.

GEOCHECe - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
DOMINANT SOIL COMPOSITION IN GENERAL AREA OF TARGET PROPERTY
The U.S. Department of Agriculture's (USDA) Soil Conservation Service (SCS) leads the National Cooperative Soil
Survey (NCSS) and is responsible for collecting, storing, maintaining and distributing soil survey information
for privately owned lands in the United States. A soil map in a soil survey is a representation of soil patterns
in a landscape. The following information is based on Soil Conservation Service SSURGO data.
Soil Map ID: 1
Soil Component Name: Goldsboro
Soil Surface Texture: loamy fine sand
Hydrologic Group: Class B - Moderate infiltration rates. Deep and moderately deep,
moderately well and well drained soils with moderately coarse
textures.
Soil Drainage Class: Moderately well drained
Hydric Status: Partially hydric
Corrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: Moderate
Depth to Bedrock Min: > 0 inches
Depth to Watertable Min: > 76 inches
Soil Layer Information
Boundary
Classification
Saturated
hydraulic
conductivity
Soil Reaction
Layer
Upper
Lower
Soil Texture Class
AASHTO Group
Unified Soil
micro m/sec
(pH)
1
0 inches
9 inches
loamy fine sand
Granular
FINE-GRAINED
Max: 14
Max: 5.5
materials (35
SOILS, Silts and
Min: 4
Min: 3.5
pct. or less
Clays (liquid
passing No.
limit less than
200), Silty, or
50%), Lean Clay
Clayey Gravel
and Sand.
2
9 inches
12 inches
fine sandy loam
Granular
FINE-GRAINED
Max: 14
Max: 5.5
materials (35
SOILS, Silts and
Min: 4
Min: 3.5
pct. or less
Clays (liquid
passing No.
limit less than
200), Silty, or
50%), Lean Clay
Clayey Gravel
and Sand.
3
12 inches
72 inches
sandy clay loam
Granular
FINE-GRAINED
Max: 14
Max: 5.5
materials (35
SOILS, Silts and
Min: 4
Min: 3.5
pct. or less
Clays (liquid
passing No.
limit less than
200), Silty, or
50%), Lean Clay
Clayey Gravel
and Sand.
TC6916785.2s Page A-6

GEOCHECe - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
Soil Layer Information
Boundary
Classification
Saturated
hydraulic
conductivity
Soil Reaction
Layer
Upper
Lower
Soil Texture Class
AASHTO Group
Unified Soil
micro m/sec
(pH)
4
72 inches
79 inches
clay loam
Granular
FINE-GRAINED
Max: 14
Max: 5.5
materials (35
SOILS, Silts and
Min: 4
Min: 3.5
pct. or less
Clays (liquid
passing No.
limit less than
200), Silty, or
50%), Lean Clay
Clayey Gravel
and Sand.
Soil Map ID: 2
Soil Component Name: Muckalee
Soil Surface Texture: loam
Hydrologic Group: Class D - Very slow infiltration rates. Soils are clayey, have a high
water table, or are shallow to an impervious layer.
Soil Drainage Class: Poorly drained
Hydric Status: All hydric
Corrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: High
Depth to Bedrock Min: > 0 inches
Depth to Watertable Min: > 15 inches
Soil Layer Information
Boundary
Classification
Saturated
hydraulic
conductivity
Soil Reaction
Layer
Upper
Lower
Soil Texture Class
AASHTO Group
Unified Soil
micro m/sec
(pH)
1
0 inches
24 inches
loam
Silt -Clay
COARSE -GRAINED
Max: 14
Max: 8.4
Materials (more
SOILS, Sands,
Min: 4
Min: 5.6
than 35 pct.
Sands with fines,
passing No.
Clayey sand.
200), Silty
COARSE -GRAINED
Soils.
SOILS, Sands,
Sands with fines,
Silty Sand.
2
24 inches
64 inches
sandy loam
Silt -Clay
COARSE -GRAINED
Max: 14
Max: 8.4
Materials (more
SOILS, Sands,
Min: 4
Min: 5.6
than 35 pct.
Sands with fines,
passing No.
Clayey sand.
200), Silty
COARSE -GRAINED
Soils.
SOILS, Sands,
Sands with fines,
Silty Sand.
TC6916785.2s Page A-7

GEOCHECe - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
Soil Map ID: 3
Soil Component Name: Rains
Soil Surface Texture: fine sandy loam
Hydrologic Group: Class B/D - Drained/undrained hydrology class of soils that can be
drained and are classified.
Soil Drainage Class: Poorly drained
Hydric Status: All hydric
Corrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: High
Depth to Bedrock Min: > 0 inches
Depth to Watertable Min: > 0 inches
Soil Layer Information
Boundary
Classification
Saturated
hydraulic
conductivity
Soil Reaction
Layer
Upper
Lower
Soil Texture Class
AASHTO Group
Unified Soil
micro m/sec
(pH)
1
0 inches
7 inches
fine sandy loam
Granular
COARSE -GRAINED
Max: 14
Max: 5.5
materials (35
SOILS, Sands,
Min: 4
Min: 3.6
pct. or less
Sands with fines,
passing No.
Clayey sand.
200), Silty, or
Clayey Gravel
and Sand.
2
7 inches
11 inches
fine sandy loam
Granular
COARSE -GRAINED
Max: 14
Max: 5.5
materials (35
SOILS, Sands,
Min: 4
Min: 3.6
pct. or less
Sands with fines,
passing No.
Clayey sand.
200), Silty, or
Clayey Gravel
and Sand.
3
11 inches
20 inches
sandy loam
Granular
COARSE -GRAINED
Max: 14
Max: 5.5
materials (35
SOILS, Sands,
Min: 4
Min: 3.6
pct. or less
Sands with fines,
passing No.
Clayey sand.
200), Silty, or
Clayey Gravel
and Sand.
4
20 inches
61 inches
sandy clay loam
Granular
COARSE -GRAINED
Max: 14
Max: 5.5
materials (35
SOILS, Sands,
Min: 4
Min: 3.6
pct. or less
Sands with fines,
passing No.
Clayey sand.
200), Silty, or
Clayey Gravel
and Sand.
TC6916785.2s Page A-8

GEOCHECe - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
Soil Layer Information
Boundary
Classification
Saturated
hydraulic
conductivity
Soil Reaction
Layer
Upper
Lower
Soil Texture Class
AASHTO Group
Unified Soil
micro m/sec
(pH)
5
61 inches
85 inches
sandy clay loam
Granular
COARSE -GRAINED
Max: 14
Max: 5.5
materials (35
SOILS, Sands,
Min: 4
Min: 3.6
pct. or less
Sands with fines,
passing No.
Clayey sand.
200), Silty, or
Clayey Gravel
and Sand.
Soil Map ID: 4
Soil Component Name: Stallings
Soil Surface Texture: loamy sand
Hydrologic Group: Class C - Slow infiltration rates. Soils with layers impeding downward
movement of water, or soils with moderately fine or fine textures.
Soil Drainage Class: Somewhat poorly drained
Hydric Status: Partially hydric
Corrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: High
Depth to Bedrock Min: > 0 inches
Depth to Watertable Min: > 53 inches
Soil Layer Information
Boundary
Classification
Saturated
hydraulic
conductivity
Soil Reaction
Layer
Upper
Lower
Soil Texture Class
AASHTO Group
Unified Soil
micro m/sec
(pH)
1
0 inches
7 inches
loamy sand
Granular
COARSE -GRAINED
Max: 141
Max: 5.5
materials (35
SOILS, Sands,
Min: 14
Min: 3.5
pct. or less
Sands with fines,
passing No.
Clayey sand.
200), Silty, or
COARSE -GRAINED
Clayey Gravel
SOILS, Sands,
and Sand.
Sands with fines,
Silty Sand.
2
7 inches
11 inches
loamy sand
Granular
COARSE -GRAINED
Max: 141
Max: 5.5
materials (35
SOILS, Sands,
Min: 14
Min: 3.5
pct. or less
Sands with fines,
passing No.
Clayey sand.
200), Silty, or
COARSE -GRAINED
Clayey Gravel
SOILS, Sands,
and Sand.
Sands with fines,
Silty Sand.
TC6916785.2s Page A-9

GEOCHECe - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
Soil Layer Information
Boundary
Classification
Saturated
hydraulic
conductivity
Soil Reaction
Layer
Upper
Lower
Soil Texture Class
AASHTO Group
Unified Soil
micro m/sec
(pH)
3
11 inches
42 inches
sandy loam
Granular
COARSE -GRAINED
Max: 141
Max: 5.5
materials (35
SOILS, Sands,
Min: 14
Min: 3.5
pct. or less
Sands with fines,
passing No.
Clayey sand.
200), Silty, or
COARSE -GRAINED
Clayey Gravel
SOILS, Sands,
and Sand.
Sands with fines,
Silty Sand.
4
42 inches
79 inches
loamy sand
Granular
COARSE -GRAINED
Max: 141
Max: 5.5
materials (35
SOILS, Sands,
Min: 14
Min: 3.5
pct. or less
Sands with fines,
passing No.
Clayey sand.
200), Silty, or
COARSE -GRAINED
Clayey Gravel
SOILS, Sands,
and Sand.
Sands with fines,
Silty Sand.
Soil Map ID: 5
Soil Component Name:
Norfolk
Soil Surface Texture:
loamy fine sand
Hydrologic Group:
Class B - Moderate infiltration rates. Deep and moderately deep,
moderately well and well drained soils with moderately coarse
textures.
Soil Drainage Class:
Well drained
Hydric Status: Partially hydric
Corrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel:
Moderate
Depth to Bedrock Min:
> 0 inches
Depth to Watertable Min:
> 122 inches
TC6916785.2s Page A-10

GEOCHECe - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
Soil Layer Information
Boundary
Classification
Saturated
hydraulic
conductivity
Soil Reaction
Layer
Upper
Lower
Soil Texture Class
AASHTO Group
Unified Soil
micro m/sec
(pH)
1
0 inches
14 inches
loamy fine sand
Granular
FINE-GRAINED
Max: 14
Max: 5.5
materials (35
SOILS, Silts and
Min: 4
Min: 3.5
pct. or less
Clays (liquid
passing No.
limit less than
200), Silty, or
50%), silt.
Clayey Gravel
and Sand.
2
14 inches
55 inches
sandy clay loam
Granular
FINE-GRAINED
Max: 14
Max: 5.5
materials (35
SOILS, Silts and
Min: 4
Min: 3.5
pct. or less
Clays (liquid
passing No.
limit less than
200), Silty, or
50%), silt.
Clayey Gravel
and Sand.
3
55 inches
79 inches
sandy clay loam
Granular
FINE-GRAINED
Max: 14
Max: 5.5
materials (35
SOILS, Silts and
Min: 4
Min: 3.5
pct. or less
Clays (liquid
passing No.
limit less than
200), Silty, or
50%), silt.
Clayey Gravel
and Sand.
Soil Map ID: 6
Soil Component Name:
Pantego
Soil Surface Texture:
loam
Hydrologic Group:
Class B/D - Drained/undrained hydrology class of soils that can be
drained and are classified.
Soil Drainage Class:
Very poorly drained
Hydric Status: All hydric
Corrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel:
High
Depth to Bedrock Min:
> 0 inches
Depth to Watertable Min:
> 15 inches
TC6916785.2s Page A-11

GEOCHECe - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
Soil Layer Information
Boundary
Classification
Saturated
hydraulic
conductivity
Soil Reaction
Layer
Upper
Lower
Soil Texture Class
AASHTO Group
Unified Soil
micro m/sec
(pH)
1
0 inches
18 inches
loam
Silt -Clay
FINE-GRAINED
Max: 14
Max: 5.5
Materials (more
SOILS, Silts and
Min: 4
Min: 3.5
than 35 pct.
Clays (liquid
passing No.
limit less than
200), Silty
50%), Lean Clay
Soils.
2
18 inches
27 inches
sandy clay loam
Silt -Clay
FINE-GRAINED
Max: 14
Max: 5.5
Materials (more
SOILS, Silts and
Min: 4
Min: 3.5
than 35 pct.
Clays (liquid
passing No.
limit less than
200), Silty
50%), Lean Clay
Soils.
3
27 inches
64 inches
sandy clay loam
Silt -Clay
FINE-GRAINED
Max: 14
Max: 5.5
Materials (more
SOILS, Silts and
Min: 4
Min: 3.5
than 35 pct.
Clays (liquid
passing No.
limit less than
200), Silty
50%), Lean Clay
Soils.
Soil Map ID: 7
Soil Component Name: Lynchburg
Soil Surface Texture: fine sandy loam
Hydrologic Group: Class C - Slow infiltration rates. Soils with layers impeding downward
movement of water, or soils with moderately fine or fine textures.
Soil Drainage Class: Somewhat poorly drained
Hydric Status: Partially hydric
Corrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: High
Depth to Bedrock Min: > 0 inches
Depth to Watertable Min: > 15 inches
TC6916785.2s Page A-12

GEOCHECe - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
Soil Layer Information
Boundary
Classification
Saturated
hydraulic
conductivity
Soil Reaction
Layer
Upper
Lower
Soil Texture Class
AASHTO Group
Unified Soil
micro m/sec
(pH)
1
0 inches
9 inches
fine sandy loam
Silt -Clay
FINE-GRAINED
Max: 14
Max: 5.5
Materials (more
SOILS, Silts and
Min: 1.4
Min: 3.6
than 35 pct.
Clays (liquid
passing No.
limit less than
200), Silty
50%), Lean Clay
Soils.
2
9 inches
14 inches
sandy loam
Silt -Clay
FINE-GRAINED
Max: 14
Max: 5.5
Materials (more
SOILS, Silts and
Min: 1.4
Min: 3.6
than 35 pct.
Clays (liquid
passing No.
limit less than
200), Silty
50%), Lean Clay
Soils.
3
14 inches
64 inches
sandy clay loam
Silt -Clay
FINE-GRAINED
Max: 14
Max: 5.5
Materials (more
SOILS, Silts and
Min: 1.4
Min: 3.6
than 35 pct.
Clays (liquid
passing No.
limit less than
200), Silty
50%), Lean Clay
Soils.
4
64 inches
79 inches
clay
Silt -Clay
FINE-GRAINED
Max: 14
Max: 5.5
Materials (more
SOILS, Silts and
Min: 1.4
Min: 3.6
than 35 pct.
Clays (liquid
passing No.
limit less than
200), Silty
50%), Lean Clay
Soils.
LOCAL / REGIONAL WATER AGENCY RECORDS
EDR Local/Regional Water Agency records provide water well information to assist the environmental
professional in assessing sources that may impact ground water flow direction, and in forming an
opinion about the impact of contaminant migration on nearby drinking water wells.
WELL SEARCH DISTANCE INFORMATION
DATABASE SEARCH DISTANCE (miles)
Federal USGS 1.000
Federal FRDS PWS Nearest PWS within 1 mile
State Database 1.000
y=I Q =I :7A I&WICIaTA =IIaI.1101Nky,FAN Ile] .I
MAP ID WELL ID
No Wells Found
LOCATION
FROM TP
TC6916785.2s Page A-13

GEOCHECe - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
FEDERAL FRDS PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM INFORMATION
LOCATION
MAP ID WELL ID FROM TP
No PWS System Found
Note: PWS System location is not always the same as well location.
STATE DATABASE WELL INFORMATION
LOCATION
MAP ID WELL ID FROM TP
No Wells Found
OTHER STATE DATABASE INFORMATION
TC6916785.2s Page A-14

PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP - 6916785.2s
County Boundary
I I I
1 Miles
N
Major Roads
N
Contour Lines
Groundwater Flow Direction
Wildlife Areas
OO
Earthquake epicenter, Richter 5 or greater
CW
Indeterminate Groundwater Flow at Location
Natural Areas
®
Water Wells
c v
Groundwater Flow Varies at Location o
Rare & Endangered Species
©
Public Water Supply Wells
®
Cluster of Multiple Icons
SITE NAME: Musselshell CLIENT: Restoration Systems, LLC
ADDRESS: Not Reported CONTACT: JD Hamby
Trenton NC 28585 INQUIRY #: 6916785.2s
LAT/LONG: 35.114751 / 77.334545 DATE: March 28, 2022 4:21 pm
Copyright �o 2022 EDR, Inc.(,) 2015 Tom Tom Ref. 2015.

GEOCHECK®- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS
Map ID
Direction
Distance Database EDR ID Number
NC_NHEO NC50007251
Elclass: A Precision1: G
Eostat: E Gisid: 2521617
Edr id: NC50007251
TC6916785.2s Page A-16

GEOCHECK®- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS
RADON
AREA RADON INFORMATION
Federal EPA Radon Zone for JONES County: 3
Note: Zone 1 indoor average level > 4 pCi/L.
Zone 2 indoor average level — 2 pCi/L and — 4 pCi/L.
Zone 3 indoor average level < 2 pCi/L.
Not Reported
TC6916785.2s Page A-17

PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED
TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION
USGS 7.5' Digital Elevation Model (DEM)
Source: United States Geologic Survey
EDR acquired the USGS 7.5' Digital Elevation Model in 2002 and updated it in 2006. The 7.5 minute DEM corresponds
to the USGS 1:24,000- and 1:25,000-scale topographic quadrangle maps. The DEM provides elevation data
with consistent elevation units and projection.
Current USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Map
Source: U.S. Geological Survey
HYDROLOGIC INFORMATION
Flood Zone Data: This data was obtained from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). It depicts 100-year and
500-year flood zones as defined by FEMA. It includes the National Flood Hazard Layer (NFHL) which incorporates Flood
Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) data and Q3 data from FEMA in areas not covered by NFHL.
Source: FEMA
Telephone:[phone]
Date of Government Version: 2003, 2015
NWI: National Wetlands Inventory. This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR
in 2002, 2005 and 2010 from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
State Wetlands Data: Wetland Inventory
Source: US Fish & Wildlife Service
Telephone:[phone]
HYDROGEOLOGIC INFORMATION
AQUIFLOWR Information System
Source: EDR proprietary database of groundwater flow information
EDR has developed the AQUIFLOW Information System (AIS) to provide data on the general direction of groundwater
flow at specific points. EDR has reviewed reports submitted to regulatory authorities at select sites and has
extracted the date of the report, hydrogeologically determined groundwater flow direction and depth to water table
information.
GEOLOGIC INFORMATION
Geologic Age and Rock Stratigraphic Unit
Source: P.G. Schruben, R.E. Arndt and W.J. Bawiec, Geology of the Conterminous U.S. at 1:2,500,000 Scale - A digital
representation of the 1974 P.B. King and H.M. Beikman Map, USGS Digital Data Series DDS - 11 (1994).
STATSGO: State Soil Geographic Database
Source: Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS)
The U.S. Department of Agriculture's (USDA) Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) leads the national
Conservation Soil Survey (NCSS) and is responsible for collecting, storing, maintaining and distributing soil
survey information for privately owned lands in the United States. A soil map in a soil survey is a representation
of soil patterns in a landscape. Soil maps for STATSGO are compiled by generalizing more detailed (SSURGO)
soil survey maps.
SSURGO: Soil Survey Geographic Database
Source: Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS)
Telephone: [phone]
SSURGO is the most detailed level of mapping done by the Natural Resources Conservation Service, mapping
scales generally range from 1:12,000 to 1:63,360. Field mapping methods using national standards are used to
construct the soil maps in the Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database. SSURGO digitizing duplicates the
original soil survey maps. This level of mapping is designed for use by landowners, townships and county
natural resource planning and management.
TC6916785.2s Page PSGR-1

PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED
LOCAL / REGIONAL WATER AGENCY RECORDS
FEDERAL WATER WELLS
PWS: Public Water Systems
Source: EPA/Office of Drinking Water
Telephone: [phone]
Public Water System data from the Federal Reporting Data System. A PWS is any water system which provides water to at
least 25 people for at least 60 days annually. PWSs provide water from wells, rivers and other sources.
PWS ENF: Public Water Systems Violation and Enforcement Data
Source: EPA/Office of Drinking Water
Telephone: [phone]
Violation and Enforcement data for Public Water Systems from the Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS) after
August 1995. Prior to August 1995, the data came from the Federal Reporting Data System (FRDS).
USGS Water WeIIs: USGS National Water Inventory System (NWIS)
This database contains descriptive information on sites where the USGS collects or has collected data on surface
water and/or groundwater. The groundwater data includes information on wells, springs, and other sources of groundwater.
STATE RECORDS
North Carolina Public Water Supply Wells
Source: Department of Environmental Health
Telephone: [phone]
OTHER STATE DATABASE INFORMATION
North Carolina Wildlife Resources/Game Lands
Source: Center for Geographic Information and Analysis
Telephone: [phone]
All publicly owned game lands managed by the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission and as listed in Hunting
and Fishing Maps.
NC Natural Heritage Sites: Natural Heritage Element Occurrence Sites
Source: Natural Heritage Occurrence Sites Center for Geographic Information and Analysis
Telephone: [phone]
A point coverage identifying locations of rare and endangered species, occurrences of exemplary or unique natural
ecosystems (terrestrial or aquatic), and special animal habitats (e.g., colonial waterbird nesting sites).
NC Natural Areas: Significant Natural Heritage Areas
Source: Center for Geographic Information and Analysis
Telephone: [phone]
A polygon converage identifying sites (terrestrial or aquatic) that have particular biodiversity significance.
A site's significance may be due to the presenceof rare species, rare or high quality natural communities, or
other important ecological features.
RADON
State Database: NC Radon
Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Telephone:[phone]
Radon Statistical and Non Statiscal Data
Area Radon Information
Source: USGS
Telephone: [phone]
The National Radon Database has been developed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
(USEPA) and is a compilation of the EPA/State Residential Radon Survey and the National Residential Radon Survey.
The study covers the years 1986 - 1992. Where necessary data has been supplemented by information collected at
private sources such as universities and research institutions.
TC6916785.2s Page PSGR-2

PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED
EPA Radon Zones
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Sections 307 & 309 of IRAA directed EPA to list and identify areas of U.S. with the potential for elevated indoor
radon levels.
OTHER
Airport Landing Facilities: Private and public use landing facilities
Source: Federal Aviation Administration, 800-457-6656
Epicenters: World earthquake epicenters, Richter 5 or greater
Source: Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Earthquake Fault Lines: The fault lines displayed on EDR's Topographic map are digitized quaternary faultlines, prepared
in 1975 by the United State Geological Survey
STREET AND ADDRESS INFORMATION
A© 2015 TomTom North America, Inc. All rights reserved. This material is proprietary and the subject of copyright protection
and other intellectual property rights owned by or licensed to Tele Atlas North America, Inc. The use of this material is subject
to the terms of a license agreement. You will be held liable for any unauthorized copying or disclosure of this material.
TC6916785.2s Page PSGR-3

APPENDIX F - SHPO CORRESPONDENCE
Musselshell, Bank Parcel Development Plan (DWR ID# 2021-0020v6) Appendices
Neuse River Basin 8-Digit HUC: 03020204

North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
Ramona M. Bartos, Administrator
Governor Roy Cooper
Secretary D. Reid Wilson
July 28, 2022
Office of Archives and History
Deputy Secretary, DRrilr J. Waters, Ph.D.
John Hamby jhambygrestorationsystems.com
Restoration Systems, LLC
1101 Haynes Street Suite 211
Raleigh, NC 27604
Re: Musselshell mitigation project, 169 Elvin Lee Lane, Trenton, Jones County, ER 22-1708
Dear Mr. Hamby:
Thank you for your email of June 23, 2022, regarding the above -referenced undertaking. We have reviewed
the submittal and offer the following comments.
We have conducted a review of the project and are aware of no historic resources which would be affected
by the project. Therefore, we have no comment on the project as proposed.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36
CFR Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment,
contact Renee Gledhill -Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919-814-6579
or environmental.reviewkncdcr.gov. In all future communication concerning this project, please cite the
above referenced tracking number.
Sincerely,
Ramona Bartos, Deputy
State Historic Preservation Officer
Location: 109 East Jones Street, Raleigh NC 27601 Mailing Address: 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-4617 Telephone/Fax: [phone]-6898

April 41h, 2022
Renee Gledhill -Earley,
Environmental Review Coordinator
North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office
109 East Jones Street
Raleigh, NC 27699-4617
Sent electronically to [e-mail]
Re: Musselshell Mitigation Project, Jones County, NC
Dear Renee,
The purpose of this letter is to request written concurrence from the State Historic Preservation Office
(SHPO) for the Musselshell Mitigation Project in Jones County, a Nutrient Off -set Mitigation Bank servicing
the Neuse River Basin. Please review and comment on any possible issues that might emerge with respect
to SHPO from a potential stream restoration project depicted on the attached mapping.
Project Name: Musselshell Mitigation Project
Project Location: 169 Elvin Lee Ln Trenton, NC 2585
Project Contact: JD Hamby, Restoration Systems LLC, 1101 Haynes St. Suite 211,
Raleigh, NC 27604
Project Description: The project has been identified for the purpose of providing in -kind mitigation for
unavoidable nutrient loading impacts. Permits from the NC DWR will be obtained to restore riparian
buffer areas that drain into waters of the US. Soil and erosion control permits will also be obtained. The
project encompasses —87 acres of agricultural fields, currently used for row crops. All —87 acres of riparian
buffer area will be replanted in native hardwoods.
The term "cultural resources" refers to prehistoric or historic archaeological sites, structures, or artifact
deposits over 50 years old. "Significant" cultural resources are those that are eligible or potentially
eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places. Evaluations of site significance are made
with reference to the eligibility criteria of the National Register (36 CFR 60) and in consultation with the
North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO).
Field visits were conducted in the spring of 2022 to conduct evaluations for presence of structures or
features that may be eligible for the National Register of Historic Places. No significant structures or
ruins were identified within the parcel boundaries. In addition to field reviews for historically relevant
structures, a records search was conducted at the SHPO office to determine if documented occurrences

of historic structures or artifacts occur within, or adjacent to the Site. The SHPO records identify two
features within a 1.0-mile radius of the Site.
• JN0259 I King-Boyette House
• JN0251 I Friendship Original FWB Church
Typical SHPO coordination will occur prior to construction activities to determine if any significant
cultural resources are present; however, no constraints are expected at this time. We thank you in
advance for your timely response and cooperation. Please feel free to contact me with any questions
that you may have concerning the extent of site disturbance associated with this project.
Yours truly,
RESTORATION SYSTEMS, LLC
?"'P 11-�—f ' JD Hamby
Project Manager
[e-mail]
919-755-9490
Attachments — USGS Map, Existing Conditions

VV. 1i
.i, wit, �4 _ •�
_�• �- �f ,yam• �- '�- S
- fit• -L- "''
41
A 4 — — -- --
/ Island ((
/ /Branch
0 A(
.art �4�a����� �� � �•'•�•••
1
d1 h K
WA'
Q rlC
Mussel hs elm ;r�- (\✓ Qr
Legend
Musselshell Conservation Easement
RESTORATION SYSTEMS, LLC DATE: 3 - 2022 Figure 2 "
1101 HAYNES ST, SUITE 211 SCALE:1 in=2,000ft USGS 24K Topoquad (Trenton, NC)
RALEIGH, NC 27604
PHONE: [phone] SITE: Musselshell Musselshell Nutrient Mitigation Site
FAX : [phone]
This map and au data sontamed w�min are soppoed as Is with no warranty. I-stnrafion Systems, LLC expr.sslo.Mes Imagery Source: USGS - 2019 Coordinate System: NAD_1983_SP_NC_FIPS_3200_Ft.
responsibility for damages or liability from anY claims that may arise out of the use or mis,seof this map. It Is the sole
responsibility "the user to determine if the data on this map Is cempatmle with the users needs. This map was nee Feet
prented as survey data, n r shows It be used as ooh. ¢ Is me users responsibility to obtain proper somev data,
repared by a lmensedsi, —yor, where required by law. 0 1,000 2,000 4,000 6,000

Leta1,
ti
4
. 4
r
r a
' x
1
"'s
F<O
f "
vz
,.
Legend.-�-
741
Project Parcels'-
CMusselshell Conservation Easement
NHD 24K
Agricultural Ditches
RESTORATION SYSTEMS, LLC DATE: 3 - 2022 Figure 3 "
1101 HAYNES ST, SUITE 211 SCALE in=700ft Existing Conditions
RALEIGH, NC 27604
PHONE: [phone] SITE: Musselshell Musselshell Nutrient Mitigation Site
FAX : [phone]
This map axd au data ... tamed withix are sxppiied as is with -war—ty. Resmraaox Systems, LLC expr.ssl1ds,iss Imagery Source: NAIP - 2019 Coordinate System: NAD_1983_SP_NC_FIPS_3200_Ft.
responsibility for damages or liability from any claims that may arise out ofI use or misuse11 this map. It Is the sole
responsmoiry of ms xssr to dstsrmixs it ms data ox mis map is sompatmis w¢h ms xssrs xssds. rnis map was "t Feet
prsatsd as sxmsv data, nor shows it bs used such. ¢ is me users responsmoiry to obtain proper survey data,
rsparsd by a iissxssd sxrvspr, whsrs rsgxirsd by iaw. 0 700 1,400

APPENDIX G - TEMPLATE CONSERVATION EASEMENT
Musselshell, Bank Parcel Development Plan (DWR ID# 2021-0020v6) Appendices
Neuse River Basin 8-Digit HUC: 03020204

Recommended model for nutrient offset and buffer mitigation easements -Please remove all reference
to the Army Corps of Engineers (COE) & replace with "Division of Water Resources". The COE has
no involvement with nutrient offset and buffer mitigation banks unless the site easement also includes
a stream and/or wetland mitigation bank.
MODEL CONSERVATION EASEMENT
January 18, 2001
Rev'd October 16, 2002
Rev'd August, 2003
Model Conservation Easement for use in preserving mitigation property. Language in
italics is instructional, and should be deleted when site -specific Conservation Easement
is prepared.
PERMANENT CONSERVATION EASEMENT Grantee and Grantor must be
different parties - read UMBI for
any specific details
THIS CONSERVATION EASEMENT ("Conservation Easement") made this.
day of , 200 by and between ,
("Grantor") and (Grantee).
The designation Grantor and Grantee as used herein shall include said parties,
their heirs, successors and assigns, and shall include singular, plural, masculine, feminine
or neuter as required by context.
RECITALS
WHEREAS, Grantor owns in fee simple certain real property situated, lying and
being in County, North Carolina, more particularly
described in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein ("Property");
WHEREAS, Grantee is [either a public body of this state, an agency of the United
States, or a nonprofit corporation or trust whose purpose is the conservation of property],
and is qualified to be the Grantee of a conservation easement pursuant to N.C. Gen. Stat.
§ 121-35;
WHEREAS, Grantor and Grantee recognize the conservation, scenic, natural, or
aesthetic value of the property in its natural state, which includes the following natural
communities: [describe by wetland and/or stream type, as well as any associated buffers
or upland communities]. The purpose of this Conservation Easement is to maintain
wetland and/or riparian resources and other natural values of the Property, and prevent
the use or development of the Property for any purpose or in any manner that would
conflict with the maintenance of the Property in its natural condition.
[For use when the mitigation is offered for impacts of a single individual or
general permit use/ WHEREAS, the preservation of the Property is a condition of
Department of the Army permit Action ID issued by the Wilmington
District Corps of Engineers, required to mitigate for unavoidable stream and/or wetland
impacts authorized by that permit. Grantor and Grantee agree that third -party rights of
enforcement shall be held by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District

a paragraph similar to this one describing the easement is for a mitigation bank
(include the Site BPDP name & include that it was approved by DWR; also include
the UMBI/MBI Name, who signed it and when it was signed
(Corps, to include any successor agencies), and that these rights are in addition to, and do
not limit, the rights of enforcement under said permit.
[Alternate paragraph for use when the conservation easement supports a
mitigation bank] WHEREAS, the preservation of the Property is required by a Mitigation
Banking Instrument for the [Name of Bank], Department of the Army Action ID [Action
ID number for the mitigation bank]. The Mitigation Bank is intended to be used to
compensate for unavoidable stream and/or wetland impacts authorized by permits issued
by the Department of the Army. Grantor and Grantee agree that third -party rights of
enforcement shall be held by the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District
(Corps, to include any successor agencies), and that these rights are in addition to, and do
not limit, the rights of the parties to the Mitigation Banking Instrument.
NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the covenants and
representations contained herein and for other good and valuable consideration, the
receipt and legal sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, Grantor hereby
unconditionally and irrevocably grants and conveys unto Grantee, its heirs, successors
and assigns, forever and in perpetuity a Conservation Easement of the nature and
character and to the extent hereinafter set forth, over the Property described on Exhibit A,
together with the right to preserve and protect the conservation values thereof, as follows:
ARTICLE I.
DURATION OF EASEMENT
This Conservation Easement shall be perpetual. This conservation Easement is an
easement in gross, runs with the land and is enforceable by Grantee against Grantor,
Grantor's personal representatives, heirs, successors and assigns, lessees, agents and
licensees.
ARTICLE II.
PROHIBITED AND RESTRICTED ACTIVITIES
Any activity on, or use of, the Property inconsistent with the purpose of this
Conservation Easement is prohibited. The Property shall be preserved in its natural
condition and restricted from any development that would impair or interfere with the
conservation values of the Property.
Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the following activities and uses
are expressly prohibited, restricted or reserved as indicated hereunder:
A. Disturbance of Natural Features. Any change disturbance, alteration or
impairment of the natural features of the Property or any introduction of non-native
plants and/or animal species is prohibited.
B. Construction. There shall be no constructing or placing of any building,
mobile home, asphalt or concrete pavement, billboard or other advertising display,

antenna, utility pole, tower, conduit, line, pier, landing, dock or any other temporary or
permanent structure or facility on or above the Property.
C. Industrial, Commercial and Residential Use. Industrial, residential and/or
commercial activities, including any right of passage for such purposes are prohibited.
D. Agricultural, Grazing and Horticultural Use. Agricultural, grazing, animal
husbandry, and horticultural use of the Property are prohibited.
E. Vegetation. There shall be no removal, burning, destruction, harming, cutting
or mowing of trees, shrubs, or other vegetation on the Property.
F. Roads and Trails. There shall be no construction of roads, trails or walkways
on the property; nor enlargement or modification to existing roads, trails or walkways.
G. Signage. No signs shall be permitted on or over the Property, except the
posting of no trespassing signs, signs identifying the conservation values of the Property,
signs giving directions or proscribing rules and regulations for the use of the Property
and/or signs identifying the Grantor as owner of the property.
H. Dumping or Storage. Dumping or storage of soil, trash, ashes, garbage, waste,
abandoned vehicles, appliances, machinery or hazardous substances, or toxic or
hazardous waste, or any placement of underground or aboveground storage tanks or other
materials on the Property is prohibited.
1. Excavation, Dredging or Mineral Use. There shall be no grading, filling,
excavation, dredging, mining or drilling; no removal of topsoil, sand, gravel, rock, peat,
minerals or other materials, and no change in the topography of the land in any manner
on the Property, except to restore natural topography or drainage patterns.
J. Water Quality and Drainage Pattern. There shall be no diking, draining,
dredging, channeling, filling, leveling, pumping, impounding or related activities, or
altering or tampering with water control structures or devices, or disruption or alteration
of the restored, enhanced, or created drainage patterns. In addition, diverting or causing
or permitting the diversion of surface or underground water into, within or out of the
easement area by any means, removal of wetlands, polluting or discharging into waters,
springs, seeps, or wetlands, or use of pesticide or biocides is prohibited.
K. Development Rights. No development rights that have been encumbered or
extinguished by this Conservation Easement shall be transferred pursuant to a
transferable development rights scheme or cluster development arrangement or
otherwise.
L. Vehicles. The operation of mechanized vehicles, including, but not limited to,
motorcycles, dirt bikes, all -terrain vehicles, cars and trucks is prohibited. [The Corps
You may add this statement to (L): is prohibited "above, on or over the Conservation
Easement Property other than for temporary or occasional access for purposes of
maintaining the easement area.

M. Other Prohibitions. Any other use of, or activity on, the Property which is or
may become inconsistent with the purposes of this grant, the preservation of the Property
substantially in its natural condition, or the protection of its environmental systems, is
prohibited.
ARTICLE III
GRANTOR'S RESEVERED RIGHTS
The Grantor expressly reserves for himself, his personal representatives, heirs,
successors or assigns, the right to continue the use of the property for all purposes not
inconsistent with this Conservation Easement, including, but not limited to, the right to
quiet enjoyment of the Property, the rights of ingress and egress, the right to hunt, fish,
and hike on the Property, the right to sell, transfer, gift or otherwise convey the Property,
in whole or in part, provided such sale, transfer or gift conveyance is subject to the terms
of, and shall specifically reference, this Conservation Easement.
a paragraph
[For use when mitigation work (approved or required restoration, creation, or
similar to this
enhancement}is to be done on the prop erty]Notwithstanding the foregoing Restrictions,
one revised to
Grantor reserves for Grantor, its successors and assigns, the right to construct wetland
fit a Nutrient
and stream mitigation on the Property, in accordance with the [describe mitigation plan
Offset and/or
by title, date and permit action id if a single mitigation site; if a mitigation bank, include
Buffer
the language "detailed mitigation plan approved in accordance with the Mitigation
mitigation
Banking Instrument for the Mitigation Bank.] lbank
ARTICLE IV.
GRANTEE'S RIGHTS
The Grantee or its authorized representatives, successors and assigns, and the
Corps, shall have the right to enter the Property at all reasonable times for the purpose of
inspecting said property to determine if the Grantor, or his personal representatives, heirs,
successors, or assigns, is complying with the terms, conditions, restrictions, and purposes
of this Conservation Easement. The Grantee shall also have the right to enter and go
upon the Property for purposes of making scientific or educational observations and
studies, and taking samples. The easement rights granted herein do not include public
access rights.
ARTICLE V
ENFORCEMENT AND REMEDIES
A. To accomplish the purposes of this Easement, Grantee is allowed to prevent
any activity on or use of the Property that is inconsistent with the purposes of this
Easement and to require the restoration of such areas or features of the Property that may
be damaged by such activity or use. Upon any breach of the terms of this Conservation

Easement by Grantor that comes to the attention of the Grantee, the Grantee shall notify
the Grantor in writing of such breach. The Grantor shall have 30 days after receipt of
such notice to correct the conditions constituting such breach. If the breach remains
uncured after 30 days, the Grantee may enforce this Conservation Easement by
appropriate legal proceedings including damages, injunctive and other relief.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Grantee reserves the immediate right, without notice,
to obtain a temporary restraining order, injunctive or other appropriate relief if the breach
of the term of this Conservation Easement is or would irreversibly or otherwise
materially impair the benefits to be derived from this Conservation Easement. The
Grantor and Grantee acknowledge that under such circumstances damage to the Grantee
would be irreparable and remedies at law will be inadequate. The rights and remedies of
the Grantee provided hereunder shall be in addition to, and not in lieu of, all other rights
and remedies available to Grantee in connection with this Conservation Easement. The
costs of a breach, correction or restoration, including the Grantee's expenses, court costs,
and attorneys' fees, shall be paid by Grantor, provided Grantor is determined to be
responsible for the breach. The Corps shall have the same right to enforce the terms and
conditions of this casement as the Grantee.
B. No failure on the part of the Grantee to enforce any covenant or provision
hereof shall discharge or invalidate such covenant or any other covenant, condition, or
provision hereof or affect the right to Grantee to enforce the same in the event of a
subsequent breach or default.
C. Nothing contained in this Conservation Easement shall be construed to entitle
Grantee to bring any action against Grantor for any injury or change in the Property
resulting from causes beyond the Grantor's control, including, without limitation, fire,
flood, storm, war, acts of God or third parties, except Grantor's lessees or invitees; or
from any prudent action taken in good faith by Grantor under emergency conditions to
prevent, abate, or mitigate significant injury to life, damage to property or harm to the
Property resulting from such causes.
ARTICLE VI
MISCELLANEOUS
A. Warranty. Grantor warrants, covenants and represents that it owns the
Property in fee simple, and that Grantor either owns all interests in the Property which
may be impaired by the granting of this Conservation Easement or that there are no
outstanding mortgages, tax liens, encumbrances, or other interests in the Property which
have not been expressly subordinated to this Conservation Easement. Grantor further
warrants that Grantee shall have the use of and enjoy all the benefits derived from and
arising out of this Conservation Easement, and that Grantor will warrant and defend title
to the Property against the claims of all persons.
Allow for
DWR to have
right to
access and
enforce

B. Subsequent Transfers. The Grantor agrees to incorporate the terms of this
Conservation Easement In any deed or other legal Instrument that transfers any Interest In
all or a portion of the Property. The Grantor agrees to provide written notice of such
transfer at least thirty (30) days prior to the date of the transfer. The Grantor and Grantee
agree that the terms of this Conservation Easement shall survive any merger of the fee
and easement interests in the Property or any portion thereof and shall not be amendecj�
modified or terminated without the prior written consent and approval of the Corps.
C. Assignment. The parties recognize and agree that the benefits of this
Conservation Easement are in gross and assignable provided, however that the Grantee
hereby covenants and agrees that in the event it transfers or assigns this Conservation
DWR, not the
Corps unless
their is also
stream/
wetland
mitigation
Easement, the organization receiving the interest will be a qualified holder under N.C.
Gen. Stat. § 121-34 et seq. and § 170(h) of the Internal Revenue Code, and the Grantee
further covenants and agrees that the terms of the transfer or assignment will be such that
the transferee or assignee will be required to continue in perpetuity the conservation
purposes described in this document.
This Item D is
D. Entire Agreement and Severabilit� This instrument sets forth the entire not 100%
agreement of the parties with respect to the Conservation Easement and supersedes all accurate and
prior discussions, negotiations, understandings or agreements relating to the Conservat should be
Easement. If any provision is found to be void or unenforceable by a court of compete reworded. There
jurisdiction, the remainder shall continue in full force and effect. is also a
banking
E. Obligations of Ownership. Grantor is responsible for any real estate taxes, instrument and
assessments, fees, or charges levied upon the Property. Grantor shall keep the Property a Bank Parcel
free of any liens or other encumbrances for obligations incurred by Grantor. Grantee st Development
not be responsible for any costs or liability of any kind related to the ownership, Package that
operation, insurance, upkeep, or maintenance of the Property, except as expressly operate as
provided herein. Nothing herein shall relieve the Grantor of the obligation to comply
federal, state or local laws, regulations and permits that may apply to the exercise of th "agreements
Reserved Rights. This easement
may not be the
F. Extinguishment. In the event that changed conditions render impossible the "entire
continued use of the Property for the conservation purposes, this Conservation Easeme agreement" of
may only be extinguished, in whole or in part, by judicial proceeding. the parties but
Bank's attorney
G. Eminent Domain. Whenever all or part of the Property is taken in the exerci will need to
of eminent domain so as to substantially abrogate the Restrictions imposed by this determine
Conservation Easement, Grantor and Grantee shall join in appropriate actions at the tin language to use
of such taking to recover the full value of the taking, and all incidental and direct
damages due to the taking.
H. Proceeds. This Conservation Easement constitutes a real property interest
immediately vested in Grantee. In the event that all or a portion of this Property is sold,
exchanged, or involuntarily converted following an extinguishment or the exercise of
eminent domain, Grantee shall be entitled to the fair market value of this Conservation

Easement. The parties stipulate that the fair market value of this Conservation Easement
shall be determined by multiplying the fair market value of the Property unencumbered
by this Conservation Easement (minus any increase in value after the date of this grant
attributable to improvements) by the ratio of the value of this easement at the time of this
grant to the value of the Property (without deduction for the value of this Conservation
Easement) at the time of this grant. The values at the time of this grant shall be the values
used, or which would have been used, to calculate a deduction for federal income tax
purposes, pursuant to Section 170(h) of the Internal Revenue Code (whether eligible or
ineligible for such a deduction). Grantee shall use its share of the proceeds in a manner
consistent with the purposes of this Conservation Easement.
I. Notification. Any notice, request for approval, or other communication
required under this Conservation Easement shall be sent by registered or certified mail,
postage prepaid, to the following addresses (or such address as may be hereafter specified
by notice pursuant to this paragraph):
To Grantor:
[Name, address and fax number]
To Grantee:
[Name, address and fax number]
To Division of Water Resources:
Division of Water Resources
Attn: Nutrient Offset Banking Coordinator
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
J. Failure of Grantee. If at any time Grantee is unable or fails to enforce this
Conservation Easement, or if Grantee ceases to be a qualified grantee, and if within a
reasonable period of time after the occurrence of one of these events Grantee fails to
make an assignment pursuant to this Conservation Easement, then the Grantee's interest
shall become vested in another qualified grantee in accordance with an appropriate
proceeding in a court of competent jurisdiction.
K. Amendment. This Conservation Easement may be amended, but only in a
writing signed by all parties hereto, and provided such amendment does not affect the
qualification of this Conservation Easement or the status of the Grantee under any
applicable laws, and is consistent with the conservation purposes of this grant.
L. [For use if there is a document describing the current condition of the
property. The language provided is applicable if there is a mitigation plan that
accurately describes the current condition and uses of the property. If there is not such a
plan, another document we agree is accurate and can be identified and is in our files can
be referenced.]Present Condition of the Property. The wetlands, scenic, resource,
environmental, and other natural characteristics of the Property, and its current use and
state of improvement, are described in Section , Appendix B of the Mitigation Plan,

dated , prepared by Grantor and acknowledged by the Grantor and
Grantee to be complete and accurate as of the date hereof. Both Grantor and Cn-antee
have copies of this report. It will be used by the parties to assure that any future changes
in the use of the Property will be consistent with the terms of this Conservation
Easement. However, this report is not intended to preclude the use of other evidence to
establish the present condition of the Property if there is a controversy over its use.
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the said rights and easements perpetually unto Grantee for
the aforesaid purposes.
IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, the Grantor has hereunto set his hand and seal, the day
and year first above written.
[Signatures of the Grantor and Grantee in appropriate form]