SW8090903_Historical File_20131119

NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Energy, Mineral, and Land Resources
Tracy E. Davis, PE, CPM
Director
November 19, 2013
Mr. Raiford G. Trask, Jr
BC & RT, LLC
1202 Eastwood Rd
Wilmington, NC 28403
Manager and Trustee
Subject: Approved Plan Revision
South Bridge Subdivision
Stormwater Permit No. SW8 090903
Onslow County
Dear Mr. Trask:
Pat McCrory, Governor
John E. Skvada, III, Secretary
On November 4, 2013, the Wilmington Regional Office received a request to revise the approved plans for
Stomtwater Management Permit Number SW8 090903 The revisions include reallocating impervious area as
described in Table 1. It has been determined that a formal permit modification is not required for the proposed
changes. We are forwarding you an approved copy of the revised plans for your files. Please add the attached plans
to the previously approved plan set.
Table 1: Reallocation of Impervious Area for Drainage Area 14 (DA14)
2/24/12 11/19/13
Permit Plan Revision
Onsite Buildings/Lots*
On -Site Streets
On -Site Parking
On -Site Sidewalks
Other Onsite
Future
Off -Site
Existing BUA
118,310
138,528
50,100
50,100
116,226
146,236
27,095
34,874
12,240
12,240
145,889
87,882
0
0
0
0
ft2
ft2
ft2
ft2
ft2
ft2
ft2
ft2
Total 469,860 469,860 ft2
* DA14 serves Phase I Multi -Family apartment buildings. Re-
allocation of impervious area to "onsite buildings/lots" does not
require a change to deed restrictions.
Please be aware that all terms and conditions of the permit issued on February 24, 2012, remain in full force and
effect. Please also understand that the approval of this revision to the approved plans for the subject State
Storrwater Permit is done on a case -by -case basis. Any other changes to this project must be approved .
through this Office prior to construction. The issuance of this plan revision does not preclude the permittee from
complying with all other applicable statutes, rules, regulations or ordinances which may have jurisdiction over the
proposed activity, and obtaining a permit or approval prior to construction.
Wilmington Regional Office
127 Cardinal Drive Extension, Wilmington, North Carolina 28405 Phone: [phone] / Fax: [phone]

Trask
November 19, 2013
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to call Georgette Scott or me at (910) 796-
7215.
Sincerely,
Xell9son
Environmental Engineer
),ICGDS\kpj: S:1WQS1Stormwater\Permits & Projects120091090903 HD1201311 permit pr 090903
C.
Jody Bland, PE
inspector, Onslow County Building Inspections
Wilmington Regional Office
Page 2 of 2

Date Received Pee Paid Permit Number
1\lu 112. 1 4t n
Applicable Rules: Q Coastal SW -199P ❑ Coastal SW - 2008 ❑ Ph H - Post Construction
(select all that apply) ❑ Non -Coastal SW- HQW/ORW Waivers ❑ Universal Stormwater Management Plan
❑ Other WQ Mgmt Plan: - -
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PERMIT70TM.
This, form may be photocopied for use as an original
I. GENERAL INFORMATION
VT
rum
12E\l ks1oN
1. Project Name (subdivision, facility, or establishment name - should be consistent withkoi.!J�vmn-re
specifications, letters, operation and maintenance agreements, etc.): �-
South 8ridse Subdivision
J
2. Location of Project (street address):
NC 172
City:Sneads Ferry County:Onslow I Zip:28460
3. Directions to project (from nearest major intersection):
Take US 17 (Market St.l towards Tacicsonville for approx 29 miles Turn right at NC 172 Go approx 5.4
miles. The site is on the left, beside Yon's Tire & Garage
4. Latitude:34° 33' 43" N Longitude:7r 24' 14" W of the main entrancgto jthe o' t.
II. PERMIT INFORMATION: (� j 0� d h 1114 (ii1 r f \i l I1 j UOh i1S
1, a. Specify whether r p � project is (check one): ❑;slew ❑Modification ❑ Renewal w/ Modificationt
tRenaWs mfh mod cations also requires SWLI 102 - Renewal Application Form
b.If this application is being submitted as the result of a modification to an existing permit, list the existing
permit num 8.0 0903111od• , its issue date (if known 02 24-12 . and the status of
construction: Not Started ®Partially Completed* Completed* *provide a designer's certification
2. Specify the type of project (check one):
❑Low Density 200 Density ❑Drains to an Offsite Stormwater System ❑Other
3. If this application is being submitted as the result of a previously returned application or a letter from DWQ
requesting a state stormwater management permit application, list the storrnwater project number, if
mod, and the previous name of the project, if different than currently
proposed,
4. a. Additional Project Requirements (check applicable blanks; information on required state permits can be
obtained by contacting the Customer Service Cent3er at 1-877=623-6748):
❑LAMA Major ®Sedimentation/Brosion Control: 1.76+ - ac of Disturbed Area
❑NPDES Industrial Stormwater ❑404/40i Permit: Proposed Impacts
b.If any of these permits have already been acquired please provide the Project Name, Project/Permit Number,
issue date and the type of each permii~In the urocess of. being reviewed
5. Is the project located within 5 miles of a public airport? ®No ❑Yes
If yes, see S.L. 2012-200, Part VI: hU;IL/portal ncdenr org/web/ s/sulstates-w/Arles laws
�CElV�E; I.;
Form SlhU-101 ?Version 06A,4aOl2 Page 1 of 6 N Q V U 4 2013
BY:

DWQ USE ONLY
Date Received
Fee Paid
Permit Number
b
Applicable Rules: ❑ Coastal SW -1995 ❑ Coastal SW - 2008 ❑ Ph 11- Post Construction
(select all that apply) ❑ Non -Coastal SW- HQW/ORW Waters ❑ Universal Stormwater Management Plan
❑ Other WQ Mgmt Plan:
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
1\ Division of Water Quality
NaT�l3oq�
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PERMIT APPLICATION FORM
This form may be photocopied for use as an original
I. GENERAL
1. Project Name (subdivision, facility, r establishment name - should be consistent with project name on plans,
specifications, letters, operation and aintenance agreements, etc.):
2. Location of Project (street address):
City:Sneads Ferry
3. Directions to project (from nearest major inter;
4. Latitude:340 33' 43" N
Zip:28460
of the main entrance to the project.
II. PERMIT INFORMATION:
1. a. Specify whether project is (check one): ❑New ®Modifica i n ❑ Renewal w/ Modificationt
tRenewals with modifications also requi�115 SWU-102 - Renewal Application Form
b. If this application is being submitted as the result of a modification to an existing permit, list the existing
permit numberSW8 090903 Mod. , its issue date (if known) 02-24-12' . and the status of
construction: ❑Not Started ®Partially Completed* ❑ Completed* *pr vide a designer's certification
2. Specify the type of project (check one): -Pr'e k'o'W
❑Low Density ®High Density ❑Drains to an Offsite Stormwater System ❑Other
3. If this application is being submitted as the result of a previously returned applicati n or a letter from DWQ
requesting a state stormwater management permit application, list the stormwater p oject number, if
assigned, and the previous name of the project, if different currently
proposed,
4. a. Additional Project Requirements (check applicable blanks; information on required state petits can be
obtained by contacting the Customer Service Centex at 1-877-623-6748): \\
❑CAMA Major
❑NPDES Industrial Stormwater
❑Sedimentation/Erosion Control: 1.76+ - ac of
❑404/401 Permit: Proposed Impacts
b. If any of these permits have already been acquired please provide the Project Name,
issue date and the type of each permitIn the process of being reviewed.
5. Is the project located within 5 miles of a public airport?
If yes, see S.L. 2012-200, Part VI: htt :
Area
Number,
Form SWU-101 Version.06Aug2012 Page 1 of 6

III. CONTACT INFORMATION
1. a. Print Applicant / Signing Official's name and title (specifically the developer, property owner, lessee,
designated government official, individual, etc. who owns the RWect):
Applicant/Organization:BC & RT, LLC and Raiford G Trask Jr.,Trustee
Signing Official & Title -Raiford G. Trask Tr Manager and Raiford G Trask r Trustee --
b. Contact information for person listed in item 1a above:
Street Address:1202.Eastwood Road
City*MWmkgton State:NC Zip:28403
Mailing Address (if applicable):Same as above
CitY- State: Zip:
Phone: (910 ) 313-0795 Fax: (910 ) 313-0797
]Bmaff:madivm@"milW.com
c. Please check the appropriate box. The applicant listed above is:
® The property owner (Skip to Contact Information, item 3a)
❑ Lessee* (Attach a copy of the lease agreement and complete Contact Information,, item 2a and 2b below)
❑ Purchaser* (Attach a copy of the pending sales agreement and complete Contact Information, item 2a and
2b below)
® Developer* (Complete Contact information, item 2a and 2b below.)
2. a. Print Property Owner's name and title below, if you are the lessee, purchaser or developer. (This is the
person who owns the property that the project is located on):
Property Owner/Organization:BC & RT LLC and Raifbrd G Trask Jr Trustee _
Signing Official & Title:Raiford G. Trask, fr. Manaeer and Raiford G Trask fr., Trustee
b. Contact information for person listed in item 2a above:
Street Address:1202 Easbmd Road
City:Wilmington State:NC Zip:28403
Mailing Address (if applicable) -Same as above
City:
Phone: ,(910 __) 313-0795
Emaikmadison®autumnhalLcom
State: Zip:
Pax: MO ) 313-0797
3. a. (Optional) Print the name and title of another contact such as the project's construction supervisor or other
person who can answer questions about the project:
Other Contact Person/CJrganization:Norris & Tunstall Consulting Bnv+�Pprs P C
Signing Official & Title1ohn S. Tunstall. P.E.
b. Contact information for person listed in item 3a above:
Mailing Address:1127 Floral Parkway, Suite 400
Cityff—ftinaton State:NC Zip:28403
Phone: L910 ) 343-9653 _ - - Fax: f910 ) U9 -9604
Email:[e-mail] cc-:: anorris®nbengineers com
4. Local jurisdiction for building permits: Onslow County _
Point of Contact:Angih1anning Phone #: M0 ) 455-3661
RECEIVE.
Form SWU-101 Version 06Aug2012 Page 2 of 6 NOV 0 4 2013
BY:

In. CONTACT INFORMATION
1. a. Print Applicant / Signing Official's name and title (specifically the developer, property owner, lessee,
designated government official, individual, etc. who owns the project):
Applicant/Organization:SBMF phase 3. LLC
Signing Official & Title:Raiford G. Trask, Jr., Manager
b. Contact inforx-kation for person listed in item 1a above:
Street Address: 02
City:Wilmineton
Mailing Address (if
City:
Phone: (910 )
State:NC Zip:28403
State: Zip:
Fax: (910 ) 313-0797
c. Please check the appropriate ox. The applicant listed above is:
❑ The property owner (Skip t Contact Information, item 3a)
❑ Lessee* (Attach a copy of the ease agreement and complete Contact Information, item 2a and 2b below)
❑ Purchaser* (Attach a copy of pending sales agreement and complete Contact Information, item 2a and
2b below)
® Developer* (Complete Contact rmation, item 2a and 2b below.)
2. a. Print Property Owner's name and title b ow, if you are the lessee, purchaser or developer. (This is the
person who owns the property that the pr 'ect is located on):
Property Owner/
Signing Official &
b. Contact information for person listed in item 2a
Street Address:1202 Eastwood Road
City:Wihnington
Mailing Address (if applicable):Same as above
City:
Phone: [phone]
Email:madison®autumnhall.com
State:NC Zip:28403
3. a. (Optional) Print the name and title of another contact such as the
person who can answer questions about the project:
Other Contact Person/
Signing Official & Title
b. Contact information for person listed in item 3a above:
Mailing Address:1127 Floral Parkway, Suite 400
Zip:
s construction supervisor or other
City:MWILn n State:NC Zi 8403
Phone: (910 ) 343-9653 Fax: [phone]
[e-mail] cc: anorris@nten ' eers.com
4. Local jurisdiction for building permits: Onslow C_ ounty
Point of Contact:Angie Manning Phone #: S 10 455-3661
.--
OCT 16 2013
Form SW-101 Version 06Aug2012 Page 2 of 6 nM.

IV. PROJECT INFORMATION
1. In the space provided below, briefly summarize how the stormwater runoff will be treated.
Additional new impervious (which is being removed from future allocation) will be treated in the
South Bridge Regional Pond #14.
2. a. If claiming vested rights, identify the supporting documents provided and the date they were approved:
❑ Approval of a Site Specific Development Plan or PUD Approval Date:
❑ Valid Building Permit Issued Date:
❑ Other: Date:
b. If claiming vested rights, identify the regulation(s) the project has been designed in accordance with:
❑ Coastal SW -1995 ® Ph II - Post Construction
3. Stormwater runoff from this project drains to the White Oak River basin.
4. Total Property Area: 98.98 acres 5. Total Coastal Wetlands Area: 4.63 acres
6. Total Surface Water Area: 0 acres
7. Total Property Area (4) - Total Coastal Wetlands Area (5) - Total Surface Water Area (6) = Total Project
Area+:94.35 acres
+ Total project area shall be calculated to exclude the following: the normal pool of impounded structures, the area
between the banks of streams and rivers, the area below the Normal Hi h Water (Nlline or Mean High Water
W) (MHline, and coastal wetlands landward from the NHW (orW line. The resultant project area is used to
calculate overall percent built upon area (BUA). Non -coastal wetlands landward of the NHW (or MHV19 line may
be included in the total project area.
8. Project percent of impervious area: (Total Impervious Area / Total Project Area) X 100 = 43.26 %
9. How many drainage areas does the project have?10 (For high density, count 1 for each proposed engineered
stormwater BMP. For low density and other projects, use 1 for the whole property area)
10. Complete the following information for each drainage area identified in Project Information item 9. If there
are more than four drainage areas in the project, attach an additional sheet with the information for each area
provided in the same format as below.
Basin Information
PLalnm Area
DramaRe Area
DrainaRe Area
Drainage AFea
Receiving Stream Name
See Attached
Stream Class *
Spreadsheet
Stream Index Number *
for All
Total Drainage Area (sf)
On -site Drainage Area (sf)
Off -site Drainage Area (sf)
Proposed Impervious Area* s
% Impervious Area** total
Im ervio&* Surface Area
Drainage Area _
Drama a Area
Drainage Area
Drainage Area
On -site Buildings/Lots (sf)
On -site Streets (s
On -site Parking (sf)
On -site Sidewalks (sf)
Other on -site (sf)
Future (sf)
Off -site (sf)
Existing BUA*** (sf)
Total (sf):
Stream class and Index Number can be determined at: ht!p,*ortal.ncdenr.orz4yeb cuss.
Impervious area is defined as the built upon area including, but not limited to, build , r p�r�ir� as,
sidewalks, gravel areas, etc. 6u13 s
'Report only that amount of existing BIIA that will remain after development. Do no ort any existing BUA that
is to be removed and which will be replaced by new B i.IA. BY.
Form SWU-101 Version 06Aug2012 Page 3 of 6

n
�g
O
O
0 0
0 0
0 0
e
N
N
O O
pNOOO
O.00pO��
p8
N �
Q
h
0 0
0 0
0 0
g
� c+f
8
S
Mann
oo
00
O
p
O O
O
O O
O d
O O
p
0
0 c
O
v
1210.0q
888
8 ,
U
lb
so
v �
5
M
�VQ1
$g
8
W
N
5
A
8
S
5
v$
C1
88
vi
m
8
5
V3
=�Q7670�
p
fo�pp
p
0pp
p
0
uj
u
FE
E
08
x
a
a
�g$
�
o
r' us
Fc
co
o
Q
O C
a
ti
F�S000
�j00�
p
N
^00000o
� O
N
o 0
S O
8
C�U�0060001M
oil
OOO"
u
O
r:!
RIEC-
OCT 17 2013
BY:

m
�U�N
00
OaQ
m
cq�Op�o
o�
�
W
T
00
00V
`C
p
Q
Y
r
E
W
r
N
N
O
V
3
S
C.
O
O
7
N
p
w
W
co
o�
m
a
O
O
�
H
ul
O
m
E
to
Z
«
w
M
fq
�Qs
$
�
C
W
zqQ!
X
a
m
7
v1me90
C
—
C
•��
O
Q
m
O
Z6
1pEg7
_E
•p
•7—�iA
Q
a
Ln
O
O
m
0
c
000000
ao
N
N
C
tF
S
S
S
w-
�
0
0
0
0
0
0
Q
-,
N
co
Qo
coo
cq
S
O
ci
0
o
0
0
0
0
C
O
G
T
T
�So
S
N
V
Q
m
o,
w
mm
ZY
,p
J
m
C
w
y
w
w
w
Q
4
m
w
omID
'viAa�
U-
c
F
Z
OO
.a
�0
O
LD
V
;ID"CID;,
h
O
apD
C.
LU
Q
Vi
r
O
O
,S
00
coo
Q
M
T
�
C
>
(a
EO
OD
O
W
co
0:
N
"
V
So
m;_
C(vSQ
�po
O
oW
L
LU
N
N
O
��
s
Gom
�
Y
tG
_
O
O
O
p
o
m
m
>
=
C,
o
S
n
r
Q�
.be
('JHN
N
mS�NNOUN9�
Q
tlJ
�
w
«
V0
W
m
CD
_
E
c
m
c
c
Z
�.g-QN
>
0
m
m
a
VJ—U)U)
E
t
082
a
v
r
��°o�nvcovCg
��oo
Co
((66
rs
pwpa
<
O
r
90
O
Q
�
S
S
QyCOOOOr00�
0
O
Q
ti
ego
0
0
0
0
0
0C
m
0
0
o
Iq
m
u0
M
C
m
co
C
N
L
G
m
O
O
8
Q
'
o
m�
w
o
o
o
o
o
o
w
ro
O
o CN
0
S
S
S
Cd
M
n
C
w
«
m
La_tna�
..
Q
y
7-
cH
2
C
L
t
.000
00
W
C30
E IVE
BY:

11. How was the off -site impervious area listed above determined? Provide documentation. N/A
Projects in Union County: Contact DWQ Central Office staff to check if the project is located within a Threatened &
Endangered Species watershed that may be subject to more stringent stormwater requirements as per 1 SA NCAC 02B .0600.
V. SUPPLEMENT AND O&M FORMS
The applicable state stormwater management permit supplement and operation and maintenance (O&M) forms
must be submitted for each BUT specified for this project. The latest versions of the forms can be downloaded
fromhtty://lportal.ncdenr.orR/web/wq/ws/su/bmv-manuaL
VI. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS
Only complete application packages will be accepted and reviewed by the Division of Water Quality (DWQ).
A complete package includes all of the items listed below. A detailed application instruction sheet and BMP
checklists are available from hn://Rortal.ncdenr.org/web/-ffA/ws/su/statesw/forms does. The complete
application package should be submitted to the appropriate DWQ Office. (The appropriate office may be
found by locating project on the interactive online map at hgp_//Rortal.ncdenr.org web/wq/ws/su/maps.)
Please indicate that the following required information have been provided by initialing in the space provided
for each item. All original documents MUST be signed and initialed in blue ink. Download the latest versions
for each submitted application package from http/portaLncdenr.org/web/wq/ws/su/statesw/forms dots.
1. Original and one copy of the Stormwater Management Permit Application Form. CIB
2. Original and one copy of the signed and notarized Deed Restrictions & Protective Covenants_
Form. (if required as per Part V11 below)
3. Original of the applicable Supplement Form(s) (sealed, signed and dated) and O&M Wk—�
agreement(s) for each BMP.
4. Permit application processing fee of $505 payable to NCDENR. (For an Express review, refer to
hft://www.gnyhelp.oriz/Rago/­onesWMress.html for information on the Express program
and the associated fees. Contact the appropriate regional office Express Permit Coordinator for
additional information and to schedule the required application meeting.)
5. A detailed narrative (one to two pages) describing the stormwater treatment/managementfor_
the project. This is required in addition to the brief summary provided in the Project
Information, item 1.
6. A USGS map identifying the site location. Tf the receiving stream is reported as class SA or the
receiving stream drains to class SA waters within Y2 mile of the site boundary, include the Y2
mile radius on the map.
7. Sealed, signed and dated calculations (one copy).
8. Two sets of plans folded to 8.5" x 14" (sealed, signed, & dated), including:
a. Development/Project name.
b. Engineer and firm.
c. Location map with named streets and NCSR numbers.
d. Legend.
e. North arrow.
f. Scale.
g. Revision number and dates.
h. Identify all surface waters on the plans by delineating the normal pool elevation of
impounded structures, the banks of streams and rivers, the MHW or NHW line of tidal
wafters, and any coastal wetlands landward of the MHW or NHW lines.
• Delineate the vegetated buffer landward from the normal pool elevation of impounded
structures, the banks of streams or rivers, and the MHW (or NHW) of tidal waters.
i. Dimensioned property/project boundary with bearings & distances.
j. Site Layout with all BUA identified and dimensioned.
k. Existing contours, proposed contours, spot elevations, finished floor elevations.
1. Details of roads, drainage features, collection systems, and stormwater control measures %..p E IV G
m. Wetlands delineated, or a note on the plans that none exist. (Must be delineated by a
qualified person. Provide documentation of qualifications and identify the person who OCT 16 2013
made the determination on the plans.
n. Existing drainage (including off -site), drainage easements, pipe sizes, runoff calcula i'
o. Drainage areas delineated (included in the main set of plans, not as a separate docum
p. Vegetated buffers (where required).
Form SWU-101 Version 06Aug2012 Page 4 of 6

9. Copy of any applicable soils report with the associated SHWT elevations (Please identify
elevations in addition to depths) as well as a map of the boring locations with the existing
elevations and boring logs. Include an 8.5"x11" copy of the NRCS County Soils map with the
project area clearly delineated. For projects with infiltration BMPs, the report should also
include the soil type, expected infiltration rate, and the method of determining the infiltration rate.
(Infiltration Devices submitted to WiRO: Schedule a site visit for DWQ to verify the SHVV F prior
to submittal, (910) 796-73378.)
10. A copy of the most current property deed. Deed book: Page No:
11. For corporations and limited liability corporations (LLC): Providedocumentation from the NC
Secretary of State or other official documentation, which supports the titles and positions held
by the persons listed in Contact Information, item la, 2a, and/or 3a per 15A NCAC 2H.1003(e).
The corporation or LLC must be listed as an active corporation in good standing with the NC
Secretary of State, otherwise the application will be returned.
hW://www.secretary.state.nc.usiCorRomUonsICSearch.aW
VIL DEED RESTRICTIONS AND PROTECTIVE COVENANTS
For all subdivisions, outparcels, and future development, the appropriate property restrictions and protective
covenants are required to be recorded prior to the sale of any lot. If lot sizes vary si antly or the proposed
BUA allocations vary, a table listing each lot number, lot size, and the allowable built upon area must be provided
as an attachment to the completed and notarized deed restriction form. The appropriate deed restrictions and
protective covenants forms can be downloaded from
hft:/Iggftl.ncdenr.org/web/­Eg/­ws/­su/statesw/­Lorms docs. Download the latest versions for each submittal.
In the instances where the applicant is different than the property owner, it is the responsibility of the property
owner to sign the deed restrictions and protective covenants form while the applicant is responsible for ensuring
that the deed restrictions are recorded.
By the notarized signature(s) below, the permit holder(s) certify that the recorded property restrictions and
protective covenants for this project, if required, shall include all the items required in the permit and listed
on the forms available on the website, that the covenants will be binding on all parties and persons claiming
under them, that they will run with the land, that the required covenants cannot be changed or deleted
without concurrence from the NC DWQ, and that they will be recorded prior to the sale of any lot.
VIIL CONSULTANT INFORMATION AND AUTHORIZATION
Applicant: Complete this section if you wish to designate authority to another individual and/or firm (such as a
consulting engineer and/or firm) so that they may provide information on your behalf for this project (such as
addressing requests for additional information).
Consulting Engineer:Tohn S. TunstalL PA
Consulting Firm: Norris & Tunstall Consultii g Engineers. P.C. ^�
Mailing Address:1127 Floral Parkway, Suite 400
City:iKihd ton State:NC Zip:28403
Phone: (910 ) M3-9653 Fax: (910
Emaik tunstail�ntenaineers com cc; anorris®ntenaineers com
IX. PROPERTY OWNER AUTHORIZATION (if Contact Information, item 2 has been filled out, complete this
section)
I, (print or type name of person listed in Contact .Information, item 2a) Raiford G Trask, fr., Manager and Raiford G TrM&
Tn,.Trustee certify that I own the property identified in this permit
application, and thus give permission to (print or type name of person listed in Contact Information, item 1a) FAiLord G•
Trask In MOuger and Raiford G. Trask, Tr., Trustee with (print or type name of organization listed in
Contact Information., item la) BC & RT, LLC and Rgfiy4 G. Tr_ 14, Trustee to develop the
project as currently proposed. A copy of the lease agreement or pending property sales contract has been
provided with the submittal, which indicates the party responsible for the operation and maintenance of the
stormwater system.
Form SWU-101 lersion WAug2012
CE.IVED
Page 5 of S NOV 0 4 2013
�Y:

9. Copy of any applicable soils report with the associated SHWT elevations (Please identify NIA,
elevations in addition to depths) as well as a map of the boring locations with the existing
elevations and boring logs. Include an 8.5"x11" copy of the NRCS County Soils map with the
project area clearly delineated. For projects with infiltration BMPs, the report should also
include the soil type, expected infiltration rate, and the method of determining the infiltration rate.
(Infiltration Devices submitted to WiRO: Schedule a site visit for DWQ to verify the SHWT prior
to submittal, [phone].)
10. A copy of the most current property deed. Deed book: Page No:
11. For corporations and limited liability corporations (LLC): Provide documentation from the NC
Secretary of State or other official documentation, which supports the titles and positions held
by the persons listed in Contact Information, item 1a, 2a, and/or 3a per 15A NCAC 2H.1003(e).
The corporation or LLC must be listed as an active corporation in good standing with the NC
Secretary of State, otherwise thapplication will be returned.
htti)://www.secretarv.state.nc /Cornnratinn;IC..(;Parrh_acnY
VII. DEED RESTRICTIONS AND PROTECTIVE COVENANTS
For all subdivisions, outparcels, and fu development, the appropriate property restrictions and protective
covenants are required to be recorded prio the sale of any lot. If lot sizes vary significantly or the proposed
BUA allocations vary, a table listing each lot umber, lot size, and the allowable built -upon area must be provided
as an attachment to the completed and notarizM deed restriction form. The appropriate deed restrictions and
protective covenants forms can be downl( leditom
Download the latest versions for each submittal.
In the instances where the applicant is different than a property owner, it is the responsibility of the property
owner to sign the deed restrictions and protective cov is form while the applicant is responsible for ensuring
that the deed restrictions are recorded.
By the notarized signature(s) below, the permit holders)ncl that the recorded property restrictions and
protective covenants for this project, if required, shall ia all the items required in the permit and listed
on the forms available on the website, that the covenants wilNbe binding on all parties and persons claiming
under them, that they will run with the land, that the requiredvovenants cannot be changed or deleted
without concurrence from the NC DWQ and that they will be r orded prior to the sale of any lot.
VIII. CONSULTANT INFORMATION AND AUTHORIZATION
Applicant: Complete this section if you wish to designate authority to ther individual and/or firm (such as a
consulting engineer and/or firm) so that they may provide information o our behalf for this project (such as
addressing requests for additional information).
Consulting
Consulting
Mailing Ad
City:Wilmington State:NC
Phone: (910 ) 343-9653 Fax: (910 ) 34
IX. PROPERTY OWNER AUTHORIZATION (if Contact Information, item 2 has been filled out,�omplete this
section)
I, (print or type name of person listed in Contact Information, item 2a) Rai ord G. Trask r. Member Man er of
BC &
RT, LLC certify that I own the property identified ' this permit
application, and thus give permission to (print or type name of person listed in Contact Information, item 1 Rai d G.
Trask, fir., Manager with (print or type name of organization fisted in
Contact Information, item 1a) SBMF Phase 3, LLC ^ to develop the project as currently proposed. copy of
the lease agreement or pending property sales contract has been provided with the submittal, which indicates the
party responsible for the operation and maintenance of the stormwater system.
ECEIVEML
OCT 16 2013
Form SWU-101 Version 06Aug2012 Page 5 of 6 Pv

C
As the legal property owner I acknowledge, understand, and agree by my signature below, that if my designated
agent (entity listed in Contact Information, item 1) dissolves their company and/or cancels or defaults on their
lease agreement, or pending sale, responsibility for compliance with the DWQ Stormwater permit reverts back to
me, the property owner. As the property owner, it is my responsibility to notify DWQ immediately and submit a
completed Name/ Ownership Change Form within 30 days; otherwise I will be operating a stormwater treatment
facility without a valid permit. I understand that the operation of a stormwater treatment facility without a valid
permit is a violation of NC General Statue 143-215.1 and may result in appropriate enforcement action including
the assessment of civil penalties of up to_W,000 per day, pursuant to NCGS 143-215.6.
Signature:
Date: 1 0 ! -7! 1 3
I, l SDV I 131/1 l l l /1 /1 y a Notar blic for the State of _! " 0 f+h (Aq F 44 , County of
J�( �w K U Y101J eilr , do hereby certify that R G eG rd `DrA S V- J r personally appeared
before me this-7-day of d iA0L1 , 013 , and acknowledge the due ex lion of the application for
a stormwater permit. Witness my hand and official seal, JV t
�y
NOTARY 0t
I% PUBLIC �V6
01
�nRmm��a
SEAL
My commission expires kV a UAS+ ZZ ZO 17
X. APPLICANT'S CERTIFICATION BC * RZ) U.G
I, (print or type name of person listed in Contact Information, item 1 a) Raiford G. Trask, Tr., Manager of
certify that the information included on this permit application form is, to the best of my knowledge, correct and
that the project will be constructed in conformance with the approved plans, that the required deed restrictions
and protective covenants will be recorded, and that the proposed project complies with the requirements of the
applicable stormwater p-tinder 15A NCAC 2H .1000 and any other applicable state stormwater requirements.
Signature: + Date: 1 0 I1 1( 3
nI, ! Udts� �j1�ll<< hG Drl a Notary Public for the State of iy Od11 &VDI I (1 a , County of
I v f/� �fAX�OVP,ir , do hereby certify that QA,"4J 1' personally appeared
before me this day of d Oro ►o r `Do 13 , and acknowledge the due execution of the application for
a stormwater permit. Witness my hand and official sear
s4 01% Nc�
�pNARY Z�
�s PUBOO �C's
Z,``.a
�'5-%, 4,V0VER�G
Form SWU-101 Version 06Aug2012
SEAL
My commission expires—ffiL§IA�2Z, ZU ('7
ECEIVEMh
OCT 16 2013
Page 6 of 6

L
Johnson, Kelly
From: Johnson, Kelly
Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2013 9:00 AM
To: 'Jody Bland; 'Tammy Spivey; 'Amy Norris'
Cc: 'John Tunstall'
Subject: RE: Southbridge, SW8 090903
1 signed it yesterday. As long as Georgette approves it to go out (and I don't know why she wouldn't), you will get it in
the mail this week.
KJ
From: Jody Bland [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2013 8:51 AM
To: Johnson, Kelly; Tammy Spivey'; 'Amy Norris'
Cc: 'John Tunstall'
Subject: RE: Southbridge, SW8 090903
Hi Kelly,
I was asked to inquire on the status of this revision for the above subject permit. Could you give me an update?
Jody Bland, E.I.
Norris & Tunstall Consulting Engineers, P.C.
Brunswick Office - 9io-287-5900
Wilmington Office - 9io-343-9653
Mobile - 910-5u-8148
It is the professional opinion of Norris & Tunstall Consulting Engineers, P.C. and Norris, Kuske & Tunstall Consulting
Engineers, Inc. that this electronic information provides design information current as of the date of its release. It shall be
the responsibility of the party receiving the data to examine it to see that it contains the necessary files and information
requested. In transferring the files in electronic media format, Norris & Tunstall Consulting Engineers, P.C. and Norris,
Kuske & Tunstall Consulting Engineers, Inc. makes no representations as to the usability or readability of documents
resulting from the use of software application packages, operating systems, or computer hardware differing from those
used by Norris & Tunstall Consulting Engineers, P.C. and Norris, Kuske & Tunstall Consulting Engineers, Inc. in the
preparation of such data.
Confidentiality Notice
This message is intended exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed. This communication may contain
information that is proprietary, privileged, confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure. If you are not the
named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or disseminate this message or any part of it.
If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately either by phone [phone]) or reply
to this e-mail and delete all copies of this message.
From: Johnson, Kelly fmailto:kelly_p.tohnson(dncdenr.gov]
Sent: Monday, October 28, 2013 10:20 AM
To: Jody Bland; 'Madison Bullington'; Tammy Spivey; 'Amy Norris'
Cc: 'John Tunstall'
Subject: RE: Southbridge, SW8 090903
Jody,

(�Dr 40,C&-t.un ACCtPFed ' 7 q /13
Johnson, Kelly
From: Amy Norris [[e-mail]]
Sent: Monday, November 04, 2013 9:00 AM
To: Johnson, Kelly
Cc: 'Tammy Spivey; 'Madison Bullington'; 'Jody Bland; 'John Tunstall'
Subject: Southbridge Multifamily Phase 3 (N&T #13074)
Attachments: 1307411-04-13-State SW App. - Revised (Pg. 1, 2, 5 & 6) for Kelly Johnson @ DENR.pdf
Kelly,
Attached are the REVISED State Stormwater Application Pages 1, 2, 5 and 6 for the Plan Revision for State Stormwater
Permit No. SW8 090903 for the above subject project. Please replace Pages 1 and 2 with the documents we previously
submitted to you and then per our conversation last week you will cross out and handwrite the correct signee information
for Pages 5 and 6. Just as documentation for the both of us, you are accepting the submitted State Stormwater
Modification Application to be used as the Revision request since we already had it filled out and had the required
signatures.
Jody checked the numbers that you sent us this morning on the DRAFT Permit and they are correct.
Please let us know if you need any additional information.
Thank you,
Amy
Amy S. Norris I Office Manager / Administrative Assistant
Norris & Tunstall Consulting Engineers, P.C.
1127 Floral Parkway, Suite 400, Wilmington, NC 28403
910-343-9653 (Ext 212) 1 910-343-9604 (F)
[e-mail]
It is the professional opinion of Norris & Tunstall Consulting Engineers, P.C. and Norris, Kuske & Tunstall Consulting Engineers, Inc.
that this electronic information provides design information current as of the date of its release. It shall be the responsibility of the party
receiving the data to examine it to see that it contains the necessary files and information requested. In transferring the files in
electronic media format, Norris & Tunstall Consulting Engineers, P.C. and Norris, Kuske & Tunstall Consulting Engineers, Inc. makes
no representations as to the usability or readability of documents resulting from the use of software application packages, operating
systems, or computer hardware differing from those used by Norris & Tunstall Consulting Engineers, P.C. and Norris, Kuske & Tunstall
Consulting Engineers, Inc. in the preparation of such data.
From: Johnson, Kelly [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Monday, November 04, 2013 8:23 AM
To: Amy Norris
Subject: RE: Southbridge Multifamily Phase 3 (N&T #13074)
Amy,
Here is what I had drafted last week when I went through this.
L
From: Amy Norris[mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Friday, November 01, 2013 9:37 AM
To: Johnson; Kelly
Subject: RE: Southbridge Multifamily Phase 3 (N&T #13074)
Kelly,

We heard back from our client yesterday. They would like to go ahead and process the REVISION to the original State
SW Permit (SW8 090903). Jody Bland (N&T) is working on making sure none of the numbers we submitted to you need
to be tweaked. I will get with you on Monday to finalize this with you (changing any needed application pages). I will be
glad to send you a corrected Page 2 of the application with the correct entity names for the revision.
Thanks,
Amy
Amy S. Norris I Office Manager / Administrative Assistant
Norris & Tunstall Consulting Engineers, P.C.
1127 Floral Parkway, Suite 400, Wilmington, NC 28403
910-343-9653 (Ext. 212) 1 910-343-9604 (F)
anorrisO.ntengineers.com
It is the professional opinion of Norris & Tunstall Consulting Engineers, P.C. and Norris, Kuske & Tunstall Consulting Engineers, Inc.
that this electronic information provides design information current as of the date of its release. It shall be the responsibility of the party
receiving the data to examine it to see that it contains the necessary files and information requested. In transferring the files in
electronic media format, Norris & Tunstall Consulting Engineers, P.C. and Norris, Kuske & Tunstall Consulting Engineers, Inc. makes
no representations as to the usability or readability of documents resulting from the use of software application packages, operating
systems, or computer hardware differing from those used by Norris & Tunstall Consulting Engineers, P.C. and Norris, Kuske & Tunstall
Consulting Engineers, Inc. in the preparation of such data.
From: Johnson, Kelly fmailto:kelly.p.johnson(&ncdenr.ci
Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2013 11:11 AM
To: Amy Norris
Subject: RE: Southbridge Multifamily Phase 3 (N&T #13074)
Amy,
If there are typos on the application I can fix it and initial it and reference this email from your office on file. Just to
confirm, you would like to remove references to "SBMP Phase 3, LLC" on pages 2, 5 and 6 of the application and replace
those with "BC & RT- LLC", correct?
But, I think that the other question is whether this is a Plan Revision or a Permit Modification. The original application
from 10/16/13 showed that there would be a change in the DA size for DA #14, but Jody said that that was a typo and
that the DA wasn't actually changing. He sent me a revised version on 10/17/13. This shows that the allocation will be
changing, and it looks like the impervious for the buildings will change between the current 2/24/12 permit and the
proposed application. Will that affect the BUA/lot values such that deed restrictions will need to be changed? If so then
this is a modification ($505). If you are just re -allocating impervious area between uses without changing the deed
restriction requirements, without any BMP changes, and without a drainage area size change then this is just a Plan
Revision ($0). If this is a Plan Revision, we can process that using the "full" application that you have already submitted
rather than getting you to get the other Plan Revision Form signed. But, I want to go ahead and resolve this piece
because we can return the check before we cash it a lot more easily than we can refund the money after it is cashed.
Thanks,
Kelly
From: Amy Norris fmailto:anorrisCd)ntengineers.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2013 10:39 AM
To: Johnson, Kelly
Subject: Southbridge Multifamily Phase 3 (N&T #13074)
Kelly,

Johnson, Kelly
From:
Amy Norris [[e-mail]]
Sent:
Thursday, October 31, 2013 8:56 AM
To:
Johnson, Kelly
Cc:
'Jody Bland'
Subject:
FW: Southbridge Multifamily Phase 3 (N&T #13074)
Kelly,
See Jody's responses in RED to your e-mail to me of 10-29-13 on modifying the permit vs. revising the permit. I should
know after lunch how our client wants to handle (pushing this on through DENR review or doing the permit transfer at the
same time, which will require additional forms).
Thanks for all your help,
Amy
Amy S. Norris I Office Manager / Administrative Assistant
Norris & Tunstall Consulting Engineers, P.C.
1127 Floral Parkway, Suite 400, Wilmington, NC 28403
910-343-9653 (Ext. 212) 1 910-343-9604 (F)
[e-mail]
It is the professional opinion of Norris & Tunstall Consulting Engineers, P.C. and Norris, Kuske & Tunstall Consulting Engineers, Inc.
that this electronic information provides design information current as of the date of its release. It shall be the responsibility of the party
receiving the data to examine it to see that it contains the necessary files and information requested. In transferring the files in
electronic media format, Norris & Tunstall Consulting Engineers, P.C. and Norris, Kuske & Tunstall Consulting Engineers, Inc. makes
no representations as to the usability or readability of documents resulting from the use of software application packages, operating
systems, or computer hardware differing from those used by Norris & Tunstall Consulting Engineers, P.C. and Norris, Kuske & Tunstall
Consulting Engineers, Inc. in the preparation of such data.
From: Jody Bland [maiito:[e-mail]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2013 4:25 PM
To: 'Amy Norris'
Subject: RE: Southbridge Multifamily Phase 3 (N&T #13074)
See responses in RED
Thanks,
Jody Bland, E.I.
Norris & Tunstall Consulting Engineers, P.C.
Brunswick Office - 910-287-5900
Wilmington Office - 9io-343-9653
Mobile - 9io-5i2-8i48
It is the professional opinion of Norris & Tunstall Consulting Engineers, P.C. and Norris, Kuske & Tunstall Consulting
Engineers, Inc. that this electronic information provides design information current as of the date of its release. It shall be
the responsibility of the party receiving the data to examine it to see that it contains the necessary files and information
requested. In transferring the files in electronic media format, Norris & Tunstall Consulting Engineers, P.C. and Norris,
Kuske & Tunstall Consulting Engineers, Inc. makes no representations as to the usability or readability of documents
resulting from the use of software application packages, operating systems, or computer hardware differing from those
used by Norris & Tunstall Consulting Engineers, P.C. and Norris, Kuske & Tunstall Consulting Engineers, Inc. in the
preparation of such data.
Confidentiality Notice

This message is intended exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed. This communication may contain
information that is proprietary, privileged, confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure. If you are not the
named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or disseminate this message or any part of it.
If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately either by phone [phone]) or reply
to this e-mail and delete all copies of this message.
From: Amy Norris [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2013 3:58 PM
To: 'Jody Bland'
Subject: FW: Southbridge Multifamily Phase 3 (N&T #13074)
From: Johnson, Kelly fmaiito:kelly.pjohnson(ancdenr.gov]
Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2013 11:11 AM
To: Amy Norris
Subject: RE: Southbridge Multifamily Phase 3 (N&T #13074)
Amy,
If there are typos on the application I can fix it and initial it and reference this email from your office on file. Just to
confirm, you would like to remove references to "SBMP Phase 3, LLC" on pages 2, 5 and 6 of the application and replace
those with "BC & RT, LLC", correct?
But, I think that the other question is whether this is a Plan Revision or a Permit Modification. The original application
from 10/16/13 showed that there would be a change in the DA size for DA #14, but Jody said that that was a typo and
that the DA wasn't actually changing. He sent me a revised version on 10/17/13. Correct. Updated Spreadsheet
provided that corrected DA discrepancy. This shows that the allocation will be changing, and it looks like the
impervious for the buildings will change between the current 2/24/12 permit and the proposed application. Should be
no change in total allocation between current permit and our submittal. We are only requesting that impervious be
moved out of the future category & utilized for proposed development. Thus changes in DA14 allocations as
follows....decrease in future, building, walks, parking, etc increase Will that affect the BUA/lot values such that deed
restrictions will need to be changed? All residential complete no proposed change to deed restrictions.... All
undeveloped tracts only have a simple bulk allocation If so then this is a modification ($505). If you are just re-
allocating impervious area between uses without changing the deed restriction requirements, without any BMP
changes, and without a drainage area size change then this is just a Plan Revision ($0). Based on the info above I believe
we fall into this category... reallocating impervious between uses If this is a Plan Revision, we can process that using
the "full" application that you have already submitted rather than getting you to get the other Plan Revision Form
signed. But, I want to go ahead and resolve this piece because we can return the check before we cash it a lot more
easily than we can refund the money after it is cashed.
Thanks,
Kelly
From: Amy Norris fmailto:anorris(dntenaineers.coml
Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2013 10:39 AM
To: Johnson, Kelly
Subject: Southbridge Multifamily Phase 3 (N&T #13074)
Kelly,
Thank you for talking tome on the phone this morning. I have talked to John Tunstall, P.E. and understand that we will
only be doing the modification to SW8 090903 Mod. at this time for the above subject project. Splitting the permit up will
come at a later date.

My question to you is ... the NC DENR State Stormwater application Page 2 of 6 will need to be corrected for the Applicant
entity name, which is not a problem (I can scan & e-mail to you for replacement in out package you have). Pages 5 of 6 &
6 of 6 reference the now "incorrect' entity name. Do you need new pages with the entity name corrected or can you cross
out the incorrect entity and write in the correct entity for us when I give it to you? If I need to correct the pages and get
new signatures I will.
Amy
Amy S. Norris I Office Manager / Administrative Assistant
Norris & Tunstall Consulting Engineers, P.C.
1127 Floral Parkway, Suite 400, Wilmington, NC 28403
910-343-9653 (Ext. 212) 1 910-343-9604 (F)
anorrisO-)nten4ineers.com
It is the professional opinion of Norris & Tunstall Consulting Engineers, P.C. and Norris, Kuske & Tunstall Consulting Engineers, Inc.
that this electronic information provides design information current as of the date of its release. It shall be the responsibility of the party
receiving the data to examine it to see that it contains the necessary files and information requested. In transferring the files in
electronic media format, Norris & Tunstall Consulting Engineers, P.C. and Norris, Kuske & Tunstall Consulting Engineers, Inc. makes
no representations as to the usability or readability of documents resulting from the use of software application packages, operating
systems, or computer hardware differing from those used by Norris & Tunstall Consulting Engineers, P.C. and Norris, Kuske & Tunstall
Consulting Engineers, Inc. in the preparation of such data.
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2014.0.4158 / Virus Database: 3615/6777 - Release Date: 10/24/13
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2013.0.3426 / Virus Database: 3222/6794 - Release Date: 10/30/13
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2014.0.4158 / Virus Database: 3615/6793 - Release Date: 10/30/13

If you are going to keep the permittee the way it is for now and not transfer it yet, then the question as to modification
or plan revision is as follows:
1.) Modification ($505, regular program): This is for any change to the permit text. This could be switching
BUA/lot, changing BMP design, or any other action that changes the text.
2.) Plan Revision ($0, regular program): This is any change that does not change the permit text. This could be re-
allocating between sidewalks and roads (or any other two uses not subject to the deed restrictions listed in the
permit), switching the pipe layout for pipes draining to a HD pond, or any other change that doesn't affect the
permit text.
I hope that helps,
Kelly
From: Jody Bland[maiIto: jblanclOntengineers.coml
Sent- Monday, October 28, 2013 9:53 AM
To: 'Madison Bullington'; Tammy Spivey'; 'Amy Norris'
Cc: Johnson, Kelly; 'John Tunstall'
Subject: RE: Southbridge, SW8 090903
Hi Kelly,
I'm back in the office for a bit this morning. In reading the email below it states the current property owner is
Southbridge Multifamily LLC. Upon future permit split SBMF 3 will be the permittee for this portion (DA14). There is an
existing shared use agreement for SBMF3 & Southbridge Multifamily LLC.
I think the cleanest course of action is to permit the 2 new buildings in Southbridge Multifamily LLC (under the current
permit) so they can begin moving forward with construction. Then we will submit a package to NCDENR as previously
discussed to spilt the permit accordingly.
If we are simply revising the allocation #s under the current permittee then this becomes a revision & not a modification
correct? Therefore no permit fee etc.? Please advise
Thanks,
Jody Bland, E.I.
Norris & Tunstall Consulting Engineers, P.C.
Brunswick Office - 910-287-5900
Wilmington Office - 9io-343-9653
Mobile - 9io-512-8i48
It is the professional opinion of Norris & Tunstall Consulting Engineers, P.C. and Norris, Kuske & Tunstall Consulting
Engineers, Inc. that this electronic information provides design information current as of the date of its release. It shall be
the responsibility of the party receiving the data to examine it to see that it contains the necessary files and information
requested. In transferring the files in electronic media format, Norris & Tunstall Consulting Engineers, P.C. and Norris,
Kuske & Tunstall Consulting Engineers, Inc. makes no representations as to the usability or readability of documents
resulting from the use of software application packages, operating systems, or computer hardware differing from those
used by Norris & Tunstall Consulting Engineers, P.C. and Norris, Kuske & Tunstall Consulting Engineers, Inc. in the
preparation of such data.
Confidentiality Notice
This message is intended exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed. This communication may contain
information that is proprietary, privileged, confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure. If you are not the
named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or disseminate this message or any part of it.

If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately either by phone [phone]) or reply
to this e-mail and delete all copies of this message.
From: Madison Bullington[mailto:madison(dtrasklandco.coml
Sent: Monday, October 21, 2013 1:27 PM
To: Tammy Spivey; Amy Norris
Cc: Johnson, Kelly; John i unstall; Jody Bland
Subject: RE: Southbridge, SW8 090903
Amy,
Yes, Raiford Jr is the sole member/manager of both entities.
MADISON BULLiNCTON
Operations Manager/Broker Trask Land
p 910.799.8755
F 910.799.87$5 AM#
0
E [e-mail]
1202 Eastwood (toad I Wilmington, NC 28403
www.TraskLandCo.com
www.facebook.com/tlandco
Per NC Real Estate Law, please review "Working with Real Estate Agents".
CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT
This email transmission contains information from Trask Land Company, Inc., which is privileged and confidential. It is intended only for the use of
the addressee(s) shown above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of
such information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify us by reply e-mail or telephone. Thank
you.
From: Tammy Spivey
Sent: Monday, October 21, 2013 12:16 PM
To: Amy Norris; Madison Bullington
Cc: Johnson, Kelly; John Tunstall; Jody Bland
Subject: Re: Southbridge, SW8 090903
Madison - see Amy's message & my message below and provide needed info.
Jody - "Southbridge Multifamily LLC" currently owns the parcel that the apartment Stormwater facilities (2 forebays &
pond) are on. Once the original permit is split, this is the LI.0 that we'd like to transfer ownership to. Since we knew
SBM7 3 would also drain to these same facilities, there's an existing "shared use agreement" that specifies financial
responsibility percentages. I'm not in the office today, but Madison shouid be able o answer your questions regarding
corporate structures of Southbridge Multifamily & SBMF 3. 1 believe Raiford Jr is the owner/manager of both, but
Madison can confirm.
Thanks,
Tammy
On Oct 21, 2013, at 9:29 AM, "Amy Norris" <[e-mail]> wrote:
Tammy,
In reference to Kelly's e-mail comment #3 (Thurs., Oct. 17' 2013 at 10:42 AM) on Southbridge
Multifamily Phase 3 that was recently submitted (N&T #13074), she is right that the Articles of
Organization only state that the SBMF Phase 3, LLC is a Manager -Managed LLC. I know this LLC was

just formed so you should have a "Schedule" in your Operating Agreement that list the Managers) of
SBMF Phase 3, LLC. Please provide so we can sent to Kelly Johnson.
Thanks,
Amy
Amy S. Norris I Office Manager / Administrative Assistant
Norris & Tunstall Consulting Engineers, P.C.
1127 Floral Parkway, Suite 400, Wilmington, NC 28403
910-343-9653 (Ext. 212) 1 910-343-9604 (F)
anorris(&ntenaineers.com
It is the professional opinion of Norris & Tunstall Consulting Engineers, P.C. and Norris, Kuske & Tunstall Consulting
Engineers, Inc. that this electronic information provides design information current as of the date of its release. It
shall be the responsibility of the party receiving the data to examine it to see that it contains the necessary files and
information requested. In transferring the files in electronic media format, Norris & Tunstall Consulting Engineers,
P.C. and Norris, Kuske & Tunstall Consulting Engineers, Inc. makes no representations as to the usability or
readability of documents resulting from the use of software application packages, operating systems, or computer
hardware differing from those used by Norris & Tunstall Consulting Engineers, P.C. and Norris, Kuske & Tunstall
Consulting Engineers, Inc. in the preparation of such data.
From: Jody Bland[mailto;jbland(dntengineers.coml
Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2013 3:03 PM
To: Tammy Spivey'
Cc: 'Amy Norris'; 'Johnson, Kelly'; 'John Tunstall'
Subject: RE: Southbridge, SW8 090903
Hi Tammy,
Please see the correspondence regarding our permit modification submittal for South Bridge Multi -
Family PH3. Specifically item #3..... Originally Mrs. Johnson had asked us to transfer this permit into but I
raised some questions/ concerns in doing so. Maybe you can give is some insight on the "corporate"
structure at South Bridge Multi -Family since if I recall correctly SB Multi -Family PH1 was under a
different LLC than what PH3 is proposed under. If said transfer, as discussed below, were to be
processed would it cause issue with the existing SB Multi -Family. Is there a parent company that all the
LLCs will be operating under? Please see the correspondence below and advise accordingly... Ultimately
NCDENR needs to be able to identify who is financially responsible regardless of company/ LLC
structure.
Thanks,
Jody Bland, E.I.
Norris & Tunstall Consulting Engineers, P.C.
Brunswick Office - 910-287-5900
Wilmington Office - 910-343-9653
Mobile - 9io-5i2-8i48
It is the professional opinion of Norris & Tunstall Consulting Engineers, P.C. and Norris, Kuske & Tunstall
Consulting Engineers, Inc, that this electronic infonnation provides design information current as of the
date of its release. It shall be the responsibility of the party receiving the data to examine it to see that it
contains the necessary files and information requested. In transferring the files in electronic media
format, Norris & Tunstall Consulting Engineers, P.C. and Norris, Kuske & Tunstall Consulting Engineers,
Inc. makes no representations as to the usability or readability of documents resulting from the use of
software application packages, operating systems, or computer hardware differing from those used by

Norris & Tunstall Consulting Engineers, P.C. and Norris, Kuske & Tunstall Consulting Engineers, Inc. in
the preparation of such data.
Confidentiality Notice
This message is intended exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed. This
communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged, confidential or otherwise legally
exempt from disclosure. If you are not the named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain,
copy or disseminate this message or any part of it.
If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately either by phone (910-
287-5900) or reply to this e-mail and delete all copies of this message.
From: Johnson, Kelly[mailto:kelly.p.johnson(dncdenr.govl
Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2013 1:41 PM
To: Jody Bland; 'John Tunstall'
Cc: 'Amy Norris'
Subject: RE: Southbridge, SW8 090903
Jody,
Continuing our previous discussion...
1.) Splitting. OK, no split yet.
2.) BMP Changes, Follow Up Question: I replaced the table with the corrected version. I see that
you are just re -allocating impervious area with no other BMP design or permit text changes
(other than a potential transfer as in #3 below). If that is all that you are doing this could be
fairly simple. Does this re -allocation affect deed restrictions? (I assume that it does not since
there is no other discussion of deed restriction changes in the package?)
a. if there are no changes to deed restrictions: This is a Plan Revision ($0) rather than a
mod ($505) because you aren't changing the permit text. (The difference between the
two is that a modification changes the permit text and a PR does not. Usually PRs are
re -allocations between roads, sidewalks or other common area that isn't assigned to a
deed restriction. Those types of changes aren't in the permit text, they are just on the
plan so it is a plan revision. If this turns out to be a PR rather than a mod we can still
process it with the application you submitted rather than having to also get the PR
application form because the one you submitted has the information we will need on it.
And, we will return the check.)
b. If the deed restrictions will change: This is a modification, and we will need the revised
deed restrictions form.
3.) Applicant/ Transfer: Large developments commonly have individual LLCs setup for each aspect
of their business such as the development phase, the construction phase, and often sub-
categories of these phases but at the end of the day there is either a single person in charge of a
bunch of LLCs or there is a parent company that is over a bunch of smaller LLCs with a single
person in charge of the whale thing. If there is a situation like that here there are probably a lot
of different ways you could do this, it just depends on what your goals and limitations are for
your project. If you need to transfer from "John Doe #1, LLC" to "John Doe #2, LLC" where John
Doe is in charge of bo'.h, we still need a transfer form because these are two different legal
entities. It seems odd that John Doe would sign as both the incom9ng and outgoing party, buts9
is done for the same reason he set thcrr; up separately in the first place; they are separate
entities. If you need to transfer from "John Doe #1, LLC" to "John Doe, LLC" where one is a
parent company of the other and John Doe is in charge of both, the same process applies. We
still need the transfer form. If you have several LLCs that are each responsible for certain things
(certain buildings for instance), and there are a bunch of LLCs that are responsible for "things"
inside a current permit then perhaps there is a parent company that can become the
permittee? There may be some sort of separate operating agreement between the parent

Johnson, Kelly
From:
Johnson, Kelly
Sent:
Thursday, October 17, 2013 1:41 PM
To:
'Jody Bland; 'John Tunstall'
Cc:
'Amy Norris'
Subject:
RE: Southbridge, SW8 090903
Jody,
Continuing our previous discussion...
1.) Splitting: OK, no split yet.
2.) BMP Changes, Follow Up Question: I replaced the table with the corrected version. I see that you are just re-
allocating impervious area with no other BMP design or permit text changes (other than a potential transfer as
in #3 below). If that is all that you are doing this could be fairly simple. Does this re -allocation affect deed
restrictions? (I assume that it does not since there is no other discussion of deed restriction changes in the
package?)
a. If there are no changes to deed restrictions: This is a Plan Revision ($0) rather than a mod ($505)
because you aren't changing the permit text. (The difference between the two is that a modification
changes the permit text and a PR does not. Usually PRs are re -allocations between roads, sidewalks or
other common area that isn't assigned to a deed restriction. Those types of changes aren't in the permit
text, they are just on the plan so it is a plan revision. If this turns out to be a PR rather than a mod we
can still process it with the application you submitted rather than having to also get the PR application
form because the one you submitted has the information we will need on it. And, we will return the
check.)
b. If the deed restrictions will change: This is a modification, and we will need the revised deed restrictions
form.
3.) Applicant/ Transfer: Large developments commonly have individual LLCs set up for each aspect of their business
such as the development phase, the construction phase, and often sub -categories of these phases but at the
end of the day there is either a single person in charge of a bunch of LLCs or there is a parent company that is
over a bunch of smaller LLCs with a single person in charge of the whole thing. If there is a situation like that
here there are probably a lot of different ways you could do this, it just depends on what your goals and
limitations are for your project. If you need to transfer from "John Doe #1, LLC" to "John Doe #2, LLC" where
John Doe is in charge of both, we still need a transfer form because these are two different legal entities. It
seems odd that John Doe would sign as both the incoming and outgoing party, but it is done for the same
reason he set them up separately in the first place; they are separate entities. If you need to transfer from
"John Doe #1, LLC" to "John Doe, LLC" where one is a parent company of the other and John Doe is in charge of
both, the same process applies. We still need the transfer form. If you have several LLCs that are each
responsible for certain things (certain buildings for instance), and there are a bunch of LLCs that are responsible
for "things" inside a current permit then perhaps there is a parent company that can become the permittee?
There may be some sort of separate operating agreement between the parent company and the sub -companies
that further directs financial and other needs between the companies. But, the permit agreement in that case
would ultimately be between the State and the "parent company". It is really up to you. I am open to whatever
you decide as long as there is a way to trace responsibilities and signature authorities. My recommendation
would be to think about who the current permittee is now and who you want the permittee to be when you
split them eventually. If you don't need to change the permittee, then you can leave it in the current
permittee's name. If you want to go ahead and change it now you can. Just put some thought into how you
want the transfer process to proceed (as in my 10/10/13 email under "paperwork".) I am not sure what your
specific goals or limitations are to provide more specific detail. But, if this does not make sense please let me
know.
Thanks,
Kelly
1

From: Jody Bland [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2013 11:33 AM
To: Johnson, Kelly; 'John Tunstall'
Cc: 'Amy Norris'
Subject: RE: Southbridge, SW8 090903
Hi Kelly,
Please see my responses below.
Amy,
Please see Mrs. Johnson's comment #3.
Thanks,
Joi-ty Blend, E.I.
Norris & Tunstall Consulting Engineers, P.C.
Brunswick Office - 9io-z87-5900
Wilmington Office - gio-343-9653
Mobile - 910-512-8148
It is the professional opinion of Norris & Tunstall Consulting Engineers, P.C. and Norris, Kuske & Tunstall Consulting
Engineers, Inc. that this electronic information provides design information current as of the date of its release. It shall be
the responsibility of the party receiving the data to examine it to see that it contains the necessary files and information
requested. In transferring the files in electronic media format, Norris & Tunstall Consulting Engineers, P.C. and Norris,
Kuske & Tunstall Consulting Engineers, Inc. makes no representations as to the usability or readability of documents
resulting from the use of software application packages, operating systems, or computer hardware differing from those
used by Norris & Tunstall Consulting Engineers, P.C. and Norris, Kuske & Tunstall Consulting Engineers, Inc. in the
preparation of such data.
Confidentiality Notice
This message is intended exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed. This communication may contain
information that is proprietary, privileged, confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure. If you are not the
named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or disseminate this message or any part of it.
If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately either by phone [phone]) or reply
to this e-mail and delete all copies of this message.
From: Johnson, Kelly fmailto:kelly.p.johnson(&ncdenr a
Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2013 10:42 AM
To: Jody Bland
Subject: FW: Southbridge, SW8 090903
Jody,
We received the application for this permit. I have three questions:
1.) Permit Not Splitting?: I also want to confirm that you aren't planning on splitting the permit into three yet as we
have previously discussed? Not at this time no permit split.... We are still working through the "logistics" of said
split
2.) BMP Changes: This is to modify the BMP for DA #14 (the DA increases and the BUA is re -allocated). I just want
to confirm that this will be the only BMP change? The narrative says that it is constructed/certified so I believe
that the design will stay the same. Can you submit the previous pond supplement with the new DA amount on
it? We have to have that for the file. Actually, there is no change to total DA only BUA allocation. We are only
moving BUA out of future category to applicable BUA categories for Multi -Family PH3 development.

I found a mistake in my DA/ BUA spread sheet, attached is a corrected sheet that shows no change to DA only
BUA edits. The DA is to remain the same as shown on the previously approved permit modification &
corresponding plan set NT#10058 sheet C1.5 dated 2-2-12.
3.) Applicant:
a. Transfer: The current applicant is BC & RT, LLC and the proposed applicant is SBMF Phase 3, LLC. So,
we will need the transfer form. We went round & round here at the office as to how to submit. The
SBMF Phase 3, LLC is only responsible for the development of these 2 buildings & subsequent parking.
Phase 1 buildings are to remain as originally permitted in their LLC. Essentially they are splitting it up in
smaller companies for tax purposes. Invariably Mr. Trask is still the financially responsible party. Please
give us some guidance as to how to permit because I think if we change it out of BC & RT, LLC it could
possibly cause issue with PHI & 2. (Maybe an offsite form? But we are not splitting parcel. IDK?) Please
advise
b. Signature Authority: Please make sure that the signature for each has signature authority and that the
paperwork showing the authority is submitted. For instance, the SBMP Phase 3, LLC Articles of
Incorporation are included showing that it is manager -managed but they don't list the managers (so we
need a separate form showing that Raiford G. Trask, Jr. is the manager because he signed the
application.) Amy can you look into this comment?
From: Johnson, Kelly
Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2013 2:07 PM
To: 'Jody Bland'; 'John Tunstall'; Tammy Spivey'
Cc: 'Amy Norris'; 'Nancy Singleton'
Subject: RE: Southbridge, SW8 090903
Jody,
I think it can be done, and I don't think it will be that hard if we get a process in place early to keep the details straight.
Here are a couple of items to consider:
1.) Compliance: From the file, it looks like you all have worked with Steve Pusey to get things finalized from a
compliance perspective. I haven't gone through that carefully, but assuming that the site is in compliance any
upcoming transfers to the HOAs should be pretty easy.
2.) Paperwork: My recommendation would be to think of this as a two step process. You will need to have the
current permittee submit for a modification to split the permit into three pieces as the first action. Then, as a
second action have the current permittee transfer the permits to the HOAs. Both actions can be submitted in a
single submittal, but I would encourage you to think about this as a two-step process in order to keep track of
"who signs what". I would also recommend that you submit for both the mod and the transfer in a single
submittal because the reviewer will know the details of the situation, and this is usually the fastest route to a
permit (as opposed to getting a modification issued and then coming back in for a transfer after the mod is
issued). The current permittee needs to submit:
a. Three applications: The current permittee would sign each document as the applicant. If he/she wants
the permit number to stay with one of the three pieces in particular, please tell us that up front. It
doesn't matter to us which one keeps the old number. All three permits will stay under current rule
(assuming that all you do is a split and there are no other big changes), but sometimes people have a
preference as to who keeps the old number when they split permits. The other two pieces will get new
numbers.
b. Supporting Documents: Then, you would also submit any of the supporting forms that change signed by
the permit applicant/current permittee (supplements, 0&M, deed restrictions, or any other forms that
would have "new" info as a result of the permit split). If a form isn't changing, then we shouldn't need
a new form to be submitted.
c. Transfer Forms: The outgoing person is the current permittee and the incoming person is the new HOA.
Please also submit the data requested by the transfer form such as the deed to show that the new
owner owns the land.
d. Plans: We need two sets of plans for each of the three permits (6 sets total). We will keep one for each
of our files and mail one to each of the new permittees.
3

NORRIS & TUNSTALL
CONSULTING ENGINEERS P.C.
13.27 Floral Parkway
Suite 400
Wilmington, NC 28403
[phone]
[phone] Fax
John S. Tunstall, P.E.
October 16, 2013
Ms. Jo Casmer
NC DENR
Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources
Surface Water Protection
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington, NC 28405-3845
Re: State Stormwater Permit Modification Submittal
Modification to SW8 090903 Mod.
Southbridge Multifamily Phase 3
Sneads Ferry, NC
N&T Project No. 13074
Dear Ms. Casmer:
1429 Ash -Little River Road
Ash, NC 28420
[phone]
[phone] Fax
J. Phillip Norris, P.E.
ECEIVEn
OCT 16 2013
�{
BY:
Enclosed are two (2) sets of plans for the above referenced project, one (1) set of
calculations, one (1) copy of the Stormwater Narrative, one (1) USGS map, one (1)
copy of the deed, one (1) copy of the Articles of Organization, the original Division of
Water Quality Stormwater Management Permit application and a $505.00 check for the
permit review fee.
Please review this information for approval and contact us with any questions or
comments you may have. Thank you for your assistance on this project.
Sincerely,
NORRIS $ TUNSTALL
CONSULTING ENGINEERS, P.C.
Jo n S. Tunstall, P. E.
JST/asn
13074 10-16-13-s-sw-mod.-Itr
Enclosures
f-
NCBELS License C-3641

North Carolina Secretary of State
Account Login Register
DEPARTMENTOFTUE
laim F. Marshall
IO Of, 2 2 Raleo, Nc 27.t> 0%)MT 20M
Date: 10/16/2013
Click here to:
View Document Filings I File an Annual Report
PPrint a Pre -populated Annual Report Fillable PDF Form I Amend A Previous Annual Report I
Corporation Names
Name Name Type
NC SBMF PHASE 3, LLC LEGAL
Limited Liability Company Information
SOSID:
1341952
Status:
Current -Active
Effective Date:
10/8/2013
Citizenship:
DOMESTIC
Duration:
PERPETUAL
Annual Report Status:
CURRENT
Registered Agent
Agent Name: TRASK, RAIFORD G, J
Office Address: 1202 EASTWOOD RD
WILMINGTON NC 28403
Mailing Address: 1202 EASTWOOD RD
WILMINGTON NC 28403
Principal Office
Office Address:
Mailing Address:
Officers
1202 EASTWOOD RD
WILMINGTON NC 28403
1202 EASTWOOD RD
WILMINGTON NC 28403
Page 1 of 1
lml I
This website is provided to the public as a part of the Secretary of State Knowledge Base (SOSKB) system. Version:
1790
ECEIVE
OCT t 61013
Rv:
http://www.secretary.state.nc.us/corporations/Corp.aspx?Pitemld=10358387 10/1 h/2013

C201327700461
SOSID: 1341952
Date Filed: 10/8/2013 4:28:00 PM
Elaine F. Marshall
State of North Carolina North Carolina Secretary of State
Department of the Secretary of State C2013 277 00461
Limited Liability Company
ARTICLES OF ORGANIZATION
Pursuant to §57C-2-20 of the General Statutes of North Carolina, the undersigned does hereby submit
these Articles of Organization for the purpose of forming a limited liability company.
1. The name of the limited liability company is: 513M P h AS-e 31 u'C
2. If the limited liability company is to dissolve by a specific date, the latest date on which the
limited liability company is to dissolve: (If no date for dissolution is specified, there shall be no
limit on the duration of the limited liability company.)
The name and address of each person executing these articles of organization is as follows:
(State whether each person is executing these articles of organization in the capacity of a member,
organizer or both. Note: This document must be sieved by all nercnna lieteri-1
4. The name of the initial registered agent is: 9A1 T 0VZA G •—rm! LV
5. The street address and county of the initial registered office of the limited liability company is:
Plumber and Street � 2-02—laaSiWO061 "
City'W 1'1'111'�Gj State: NC Zip Code: 2S4 0 3 County: alJ OV
6. The mailing address, if different from the street address, of the initial registered office is:
7. Principal office information: (Select either a orb.)
a.* 9t6e limited liability company has a'principal office.
The principal office telephone number: -_ (-1 10 1-1' 1-- el G7
The street address andcountyof the principal office of the limited liability company is:
Number and Street 1 Z d 2 F(/51W D p
City, State, Zip Code V ( �rV\-Abyj P N G V q 03 County � K(,jCLDV ejr
The mailing address, if different from the street address, of the principal office of the company is:
b. ❑ The limited liability company does not have a principal office.

C201327700461
Check one of the following:
(i) Member -managed LLC: all members by virtue of their status as members shall be
m
1an
agers of this limited liability company. `� (ii) Manager -managed LLC: except as provided by N.C.G.S. Section 57C-3-2 0(a), the
members of this limited liability company shall not be managers by virtue of their status as
members.
9. Any other provisions which the limited liability company elects to include (e.g., the purpose of
the entity) are attached.
Privacy Redaction
10. (Optional): Please provide a business e-mail address:
The Secretary of State's Office will e-mail the business automatically at the address provided
above at no cost when a document is filed. The e-mail provided will not be viewable on the
website. For more information on why this service is offered, please see the instructions for this
document.
11. These articles will be effective upon filing, unless a future date is specified:
0
This is the day of is ( h Cie- 3
S�L�Ph�se.3
� w
Signa
0vz 9 iAllin�j-i-
(a�, Orr�
Type or Print Name and Title
The below space to be used if more than one organizer or member is listed in Item #3 above.
Signature' Signature
ype an rent ame i::,i iad Title Type an rant Name an it e
Signature Signature
ype an Print Name an Tittle- Type an rin± 111 ame : 113d Tit e
NOTES:
1. Filing fee is $125. This document must be filed with the Secretary of State.
CORPORATIONS DIVISION P.O. Box 29622 RALEIGH, NC 27626-0622
(Revised March 2013)
(Forth L-Ol )

STORMWATER SYSTEM & EROSION CONTROL NARRATIVE
Southbridge Multifamily Phase 3
Sneads Ferry, North Carolina
For
SBMF Phase 3, LLC
1202 Eastwood Road
Wilmington, NC 28403
[phone]
IECOVE
OCT 16 2013
sv:
October 2013
Prepared by:
NORRIS & TUNSTALL CONSULTING ENGINEERS, P.C.
1127 Floral Parkway, Suite 400
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403
[phone]
[phone] (Fax)
License # C-3641
N&T Project No. 13074

NARRATIVE
DESCRIPTION:
The project site is a 185 acre tract located off of NC 172 in Sneads Ferry, NC.
The soils of the site consist of silty sands. The site is moderately wooded with grades
ranging from 1 % to 20%. The proposed modification is to the current State Stormwater
Permit No. SW8 090903 Modification. The current permit contains a total of ten (10)
BMP's; of which seven (7) are sand filters and three (3) are wet detention ponds. These
BMP's treat various types of development within this project, which includes single
family residential, commercial, and multi -family. Approximately 1.76 additional acres
will be disturbed / graded for the construction of Southbridge Multifamily Phase 3.
The Phase I and Phase III Residential construction is complete. All sand filters
for drainage areas 1-613 are complete. Pond 7-12 is complete and certifications have
been previously provided to NC DENR.
Pond #14 (multi -family pond) construction is complete and certification has been
provided to NC DENR. Construction of Phase I and Phase II (Building 6) is now complete.
Plans have been included for Southbridge Multifamily Phase 3 that propose the
construction of two (2) new apartment buildings with paved parking and access. This
proposed modification of 58,007 Sf will reduce the previously permitted future allocation.
The remaining portion of the multi -family site will remain undeveloped. Based on the
current design, a future allocation of 87,882 SF of impervious surface has been provided
for future development of the remaining site area.
REVISED PLAN SHEETS AND REVISED CALCULATIONS:
Updated plan sheets have been provided to be inserted into the current file. The
existing plan sheets and calculations for the ponds are still valid and current and should
remain in your current file set.
EROSION CONTROL MEASURES:
The attached plans and specifications outline the requirements for erosion
control measures. Silt fencing will be provided along each side of the entrance drive
where stormwater would be expected to sheet flow from disturbed areas directly to
adjacent property. Gravel check dams will not be provided unless the Contractor has to
temporarily discharge into an open ditch instead of the proposed storm drain outfall.
The detention pond will be used as a silt basin during construction and restored to its
design contours prior to completion. A gravel construction entrance will be constructed
at the proposed new road entrance in the Northwest corner of Peggy's Trace Road.
Maintenance will be provided by the grading contractor and developer.

STORMWATER MANAGEMENT MEASURES:
The project site is located in Onslow County. Land disturbing on the site will
exceed one acre, which requires the site to comply with State Regulations. The
stormwater runoff from the proposed modification will be directed to the wet detention
pond. The stormwater detention+, pond was designed to accommodate DA 14 at 55.19%
impervious area lot coverage.
CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE:
The Contractor will install the gravel construction entrance and silt fence prior to
beginning any clearing and grading operations. Additional silt fence will be installed
when and if conditions warrant during construction. The detention pond/silt basin will be
constructed immediately after that portion of the site is cleared, and outlet structure with
protection will be installed. Disturbed areas will be landscaped or seeded upon
completion.

EROSION CONTROL NOTES AND MAINTENANCE PLAN
All erosion and sediment control measures will be checked for stability and
operation following every runoff -producing rainfall, but in no case, less than once
every week and within, 24 hours of every half -inch rainfall.
2. All points of egress will have construction entrances that will be periodically top -
dressed with an additional 2 inches of #4 stone to maintain proper depth. They
will be maintained in a condition to prevent mud or sediment from leaving the
site. Immediately remove objectionable material spilled washed or tracked onto
the construction entrance or roadways.
3. Sediment will be removed from hardware cloth and gravel inlet protection, block
and gravel inlet protection, rock doughnut inlet protection and rock pipe inlet
protection when the designed storage capacity has been half filled with sediment.
Rock will be cleaned or replaced when the sediment pool no longer drains as
designed. Debris will be removed from the rock and hardware cloth to allow
proper drainage. Silt sacks will be emptied once a week and after every rain
event. Sediment will be removed from around beaver dams, dandy sacks and
socks once a week and after every rain event.
4. Diversion ditches will be cleaned out immediately to remove sediment or
obstructions from the flow area. The diversion ridges will also be repaired.
Swales must be temporarily stabilized within 21 calendar days of cease of any
phase of activity associated with a swale.
5. Sediment will be removed from behind the sediment fence when it becomes half
filled. The sediment fence will be repaired as necessary to maintain a barrier.
Stakes must be steel. Stake spacing will be 6 feet max. with the use of extra
strength fabric, without wire backing. Stake spacing will be 8 feet max. when
standard strength fabric and wire backing are used. If rock filters are designed at
low points in the sediment fence, the rock will be repaired or replaced if it
becomes half -full of sediment, no longer drains as designed or is damaged.
6. Sediment will be removed from sediment traps when the designed storage
capacity has been half filled with sediment. The rock will be cleaned or replaced
when the sediment pool no longer drains or when the rock is dislodged. Baffles
will be repaired or replaced if they collapse, tear, decompose or become
ineffective. They will be replaced promptly. Sediment will be removed when
deposits reach half the height of the 1st baffle. Floating skimmers will be
inspected and kept clean weekly.
7. Sediment will be removed from the sediment basin when the design storage
capacity has been half filled with sediment. Rock will be cleaned or replaced
when the sediment pool no longer drains or if the rock is dislodged. Baffles will
be repaired or replaced if they collapse, tear, decompose or become ineffective.
They will be replaced promptly. Sediment will be removed from baffles when

deposits reach half the height of the 1St baffle. Floating skimmers will be
inspected weekly and will be kept clean.
Land Quality Requires:
8. All seeded areas will be fertilized, reseeded as necessary and mulched
according to specifications in the vegetative plan to maintain a vigorous, dense
vegetative cover. All slopes will be stabilized within 21 calendar days. All other
areas will be stabilized within 15 working days.
Water Quality Requires:
9. All seeded areas will be fertilized, reseeded as necessary and mulched
according to specifications in the vegetative plan to maintain a vigorous, dense
vegetative cover. All perimeter dikes, swales, ditches, perimeter slopes, all
slopes steeper than 3' horizontal to 1' vertical (3:1) and all high quality water
(HQW) zones shall be provided temporary or permanent stabilization with ground
cover as soon as practicable but in any event within seven (7) calendar days
from the last land -disturbing activity. All other disturbed areas shall be provided
temporary or permanent stabilization with ground cover as soon as practicable
but in any event within fourteen (14) calendar days from the last land -disturbing
activity.
10. Flocculants will be used to address turbidity issues. The pumps, tanks, hoses
and inject systems will be checked for problems or turbid discharges daily.
11. Refer to new NPDES rules regarding basin outlet structures and skimmers shall
withdraw water from the surface.

SECTION 02920
SOIL EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL
1. GENERAL
1.1 Contractor shall take every reasonable precaution throughout construction to
prevent the erosion of soil and the sedimentation of streams, lakes, reservoirs,
other water impoundments, ground surfaces, or other property as required by State
and Local regulations.
1.2 The Contractor shall install all required silt fences, and construction entrances at
the initiation of work, and have these measures reviewed and approved by the local
permit authority prior to clearing and grading operations.
1.3 The Contractor shall, within 21 days of suspension or completion of land disturbing
activities, provide permanent protective covering for disturbed areas. Temporary
and permanent erosion control measures shall be coordinated to assure
economical, effective, and continuous erosion and siltation control throughout the
construction and post -construction period. Use the specified seed for both
temporary and permanent seeding.
2. PRODUCTS
2.1 Asphalt for anchoring mulch shall be Type SS-1 Emulsion.
2.2 Fertilizer shall be 10-10-10 grade or equivalent.
2.3 Lime shall be dolomitic agricultural ground limestone containing not less than 10
percent magnesium oxide.
2.4 Mulch shall be small grain straw, hay, wood chips, asphalt emulsion, jute or other
suitable material free of undesirable weed seed.
2.5 Phosphate shall be 20 percent superphosphate or equivalent.
2.6 Seed shall be 20% carpet grass, 24% Bermuda, 20% turf Fescue, 10% Creeping
Red Fescue, and 24% Annual Rye grain. Bermuda seed shall be hulled for warm
weather planting and unhulled for cool weather planting. Purity of seed shall be a
minimum of 98 percent and germination shall be a minimum of 85 percent.
2.7 Silt fence shall consist of NCDOT Class A fabric supported by metal posts spaced
not more than 6 feet on center. The bottom of the fabric shall be buried a minimum
of 6 inches.
2.8 Gravel for check dams shall be #57 washed stone.
2.9 Aggregate for construction entrance shall be #4 washed stone.

2.10 Stone rip rap for check dams and erosion control shall be NCDOT Class A or B as
shown.
3. EXECUTION
3.1 General: Take every practicable measure during construction or suspension to
work to minimize erosion and siltation. Measures should include good construction
practices, temporary physical barriers to sediment travel, settling basins for new
ditches, and establishment of vegetative cover.
3.2 Construction Practices
3.2.1 Avoid dumping soil or sediment into any wetland or watercourse.
3.2.2 Maintain an undisturbed vegetative buffer where possible between a natural
watercourse and trenching and grading operations.
3.2.3 Avoid equipment crossings of streams, creeks, and ditches where practicable.
3.2.4 Grade all cut, fill and ditch slopes to minimum slope of 3:1, unless otherwise shown
or directed.
3.3 Temporary Physical Barriers are required where sedimentation on offsite property
or excessive erosion is a problem.
3.3.1 Mulch shall be used for temporary stabilization of areas subject to excessive
erosion and for protection of seedbeds after planting where required.
1. Apply grain straw and hay at a rate of 75 to 100 pounds per 1,000 square feet
and wood chips at a rate of 500 pounds per 1,000 square feet. Jute and mesh
should be installed as per manufacturer's instructions.
2. Asphalt emulsion for slope stabilization should be applied at a rate of 1,000
gallons per acre. Asphalt emulsion used for anchoring straw should be applied
at a rate of 150 gallons per ton of straw.
3.3.2 Silt Fences shall be used at the base of slopes to restrict movement of sediment
from the site. Clean silt fence of accumulated sediment after each rainfall event
or when it exceeds a depth of 0.5 feet above natural grade.
3.3.3 Stone Check Dams, placed at the discharges of creeks, ditches, and swales, shall
consist of Class A or Class B erosion control stone at minimum two feet high and
three feet thick across the watercourse, with a one foot thick layer of gravel on
upstream side. Remove sediment if accumulated to a depth of 1.0 feet at upstream
face.
3.4 Vegetative Cover: Establish and maintain permanent vegetative cover on all
unpaved areas disturbed by the work.

3.4.1 Preparation of Seedbed: Areas to be seeded shall be scarified to a depth of 4
inches and until a firm, well pulverized, uniform seedbed is prepared. Lime,
phosphorous and fertilizer shall be applied during the scarification process in
accordance with the following rates:
Lime: 45 pounds per 1000 square feet
Phosphorous: 20 pounds per 1,000 square feet
Fertilizer: 17 pounds per 1000 square feet
3.4.2 Seeding: Disturbed areas shall be seeded with 2 to 3 pounds per 1000 square feet
of the specified seed mixture. Seed shall be worked into the bed to a depth of 1/4
inch. Regrade and seed eroded areas immediately
3.4.3 Mulch all areas immediately after seeding. Mulch shall be applied and anchored as
specified hereinbefore. Reapply as necessary to retain cover until grass is
established.
3.5 Construction Entrance: Provide an aggregate drive, 20 feet wide by 50 feet long by
6 inches thick at each entrance to the site used by construction vehicles, until such
time as the permanent roadway is constructed. Remove soil if accumulated to a
depth greater than 0.5 inches.
3.6 Maintenance: The Owner and Contractor shall be responsible for maintaining all
temporary and permanent erosion control measures. Temporary structures shall
be maintained until such time as vegetation is firmly established in the area
protected by the structure. Permanent streambank protection and grassed areas
shall be maintained until completion of the project. Areas that fail to show a
suitable stand of grass or which are damaged by erosion shall be immediately
repaired.
END OF SECTION

STORMWATER SYSTEM & EROSION CONTROL CALCULATIONS
SOUTHBRIDGE MULTIFAMILY PHASE 3
Sneads Ferry, North Carolina
For
SBMF Phase 3, LLC
1202 Eastwood Road
Wilmington, NC 28403
[phone]
rypj�GINEF'Q'�'�
ECEIVE
OCT 16 2013
October 2013
SY:
Prepared by:
NORRIS & TUNSTALL CONSULTING ENGINEERS, P.C.
1127 Floral Parkway, Suite 400
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403
[phone]
[phone] (Fax)
License # C-3641
N&T Project No. 13074

Cld
N,
co 00,
cn C14 cli
m N
CM
-1,
r, Lo
cql V)
N
M
X:

I3
06
z
C!
O
O
L)
Cn
O
O
N
O
D)
Cn
O
M
O
O
O
cn
Cn
O
O
n
n
C
0
N
n
n
0
o
�
CD
)A
r
V,
u)
LC)
C)V)
M
to
N
V•
CA
CA
00
fV
r
r
CV
N
O
r
r
r
r
N
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
CV
r
r
v
7
It
N
^
10
oV•
M
n
C%
o
O
O
0
Lo
O
O
n
n
a
�N
q
o
co
Ln
U)
o
Co
r
n
rn
Lq
Co
Co
cq
N
r
O
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
O
r
o
0
r
r
r
r
E
O
n
n
O
O
O
O
N
O
co
O
0
Ln
O
O
0
O
0
0
0
0
O
C
O
O
0
0
O
IT
Cn
CM
M
n
O
O
O
O
O
O
to
O
O
M
M
M
M
GO
Go
Go
CO
Go
N
n
Go
co
m
co
co
co
Co
w
CO
M
C W
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
r0
(7
N
M
E
n
n
O
O
O
O
N
O
Go
O
v
0
O
0
o
O
O
O
O
O
O
0
0
Q,
0
O
CA
Lq
V?
V'
Ln
M
Up
M
N
M
Ci
n
O
O
O
O
)n
O
in
O
O
U�
r
$
n
M
r,
M
m
Co
r-
Go
co
Go
Go
O
�
M
M
Go
co
n
GO
Go
co
Go
co
m
M
M
M
M
CM
m
M
M
M
M
M
m
m
Cl)
Cl)
M
Cl)
M
M
w
C iL
�
Q
J ++
)C)
m
1n
O
O
0
n
w
D)
0
M
v
0
O
N
M
O
N
0
'
ao
CA
O
r
r
r
r
v
n
2
M
M
M
M
M
M
m
co
Go
M
M
co
co
co
COM
Cl)C
m
V))
Cn7
Cm
M
M
cn
M
C
O
n
Cl)
)n
U')
O
O
O
0
It
O
O
N
o
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
m C
O
mr
n
n
n
O
n
GO
r
r
O
N
LO
O
N
V•
N
co
r
N
N
C 0
CM
M
6
M
M
M
M
4
st
6
�
�
�
4
4
6
6
)A
6
M
Lo.
Lo.Lo-
M
m
m
M
co
M
M
M
M
M
GM
m
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
C
n
M
to
O
O
O
O
O
v
N
N
N
O
O
0
O
o
O
O
O
O
0
n
n
O
n
co
r
4:O
N
IC1
GD
O
N
M
O
N
N
>C'
GM')
mcn
M
VO
M
M
cn
n
m
M
cn
Pm)
m
Cm
(n
CM
GOM
m
COI
cM
4/ Q.
M
v
V•
n
v
(A
O
V•
U')
0
o
CD
n
v
O
co
cD
to
n
GO
0
C
C Q
a
CD
O
O
M
N
r
N
CD
V'
M
M
N
N
N
r
)n
CD
cD
"It
0
p
:3.2
C�
C3
O
O
o
O
O
O
O
O
r
O
O
O
o
C7
o
O
O
o
O
0
4)
a
t
m
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
O
o
0
0
0
0
O
o
C
o
0
0
0
0
0
O
o
0
0
0
o
O
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
o
Z
C
.J
CCl
W
N
N
0
V'
O
M
O
0
M
n
M
N
h
CO
v
LD
N
n
M
V•
CD
O
Cl)
to
N
M
M
M
n
O
co
co
0
r
r
r
cy
Qo
J
r r r r r r r
co
0
co
co
Co
O
It
V'
co
)n
to
V•
sY
V•
oo
)n
)n
N
N
O
O
C
M
m
M
co
M
M
N
N
r
r
r
N
N
N
N
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
J fQ
H
n
n
CD
N
Cn
It
N
W
v
v
v
in
co
n
O
It
Go
CD
O
CA
m
d j
N
4
O
co
n
Cn
r
r
CD
Cn
CO
O
CO
)Q
N
o
(N
n
O
r
O
O
Q
4
M
r
CV
N
M
N
N
r
r
N
r
r
r
r
O
O
O
N
r
r
C)
_
O
co
V'
V'
N
M
r
r
a
L
Q.
0. 3
Go
O
(A
n
M
V•
n
M
V•
M
CD
C0D
aD
N
a
Cp
G)
�=
OV'
N
GO
V'
N
V'
N
N
r
C1j
"a
v
)N
ID
r
r
r
r
r
3
O
n
O
N
CD
CD
M
N
o
O
cD
ao
n
O
tD
V•
Cn
O
0
(,)
Q
w
O
N
M
Co
cc)
O
N
N
O
V;
V'
CD
(A
O)
ti
N
Cn
-t
m
CD
CD
LL
N
N
N
N
P,
0
m
w
V'
N
r
0
0
V'
M
r
O
O
O
r
O
O
d
C)
Cl)
cn
CD
M
V)
M
Cl)
M
Cl)
Cl)
M
Cl)
0
C)
Cl)
M
M
M
M
m
M
,
N
N
N
O
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
n
n
n
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
ui
t.�
r;
r;
I:
I:
I:
co
co
cri
r�
r.:
I:
r;
r;
I:
ti
n
0
C
O
O
CD
O
O
n
V•
n
M
O
O
O
N
N
M
O
M
O
N
O
O
'p
t1
N
N
N
N
n
n
CD
(D
Ln
in
N
C)
co
co
Ln
CO
Lo
CD
vi
M
O
r
r
r
N
a
ov
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
)n
)n
LQ
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
o
E
E
E
ai
cci
)ri
N
to
to
to
Lo
Lo
w)
f-
N
II-
Lo
Lo
Lo
)ri
Ln
Ln
Lo
�
d
— r-
O
n
O
n
Go
)n
n
ao
CA
n
CA
ao
ao
GD
GD
�
n
V
CD
Cn
M
CR
O
V•
cD
N
Cn
�
Ea0
`cF
C0 41
Q Q
V
V
O
O
C)O
G
O
O
C
C)O
aD
ao
G
CD
O
u)
O
)n
O
GO
C)O
a
N
C)O
CD
n
C
n
O
n
O
n
C
M
O
�
o
CD
M
N
M
Go
0
n
V•
r
N
Cl)
N
V•
N
O
V•
O
O
Co
N
f=i
E
C
D)
co
O
D)
n
V•
n
CM
N
LO
N
D)
V•
N
N
O
f)
M
CD
N
v
r
r
r
O
O
C
r
r
r
O
O
G
O
6
O
O
C
N
�
N
7
O m
n
n
M
CCpp
M
M
Co
m
N
M
co
N
N
CD
v
O
N
ao
O
E E
v
N
N
O
OR
et
r
cl
r
M
M
N
r
M
ch
N
N
N
r
O
r
m
N
o
O
O
0
O
O
O
O
O
o
O
O
O
O
o
O
O
O
fn
�
m
C
Go
m
M
m
n
Q
y
m
o
0
r
r
r
)n
U
Go
0
II
cur
n
m
0
(A
N
M
v
Cn
V-
aD
CA
O
N
V
V
CD
(p
c
N
Z
—
r
r
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
M
t+1
M
M
Cl)
N
M
M
C
N
0 J
0
m
c
LL
d1
n
m
D1
O
N
M
V•
)n
CD
n
M
M
o
N
M
V•
Cn
CD
n
co
G)
�-
C Z
r
r
r
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
M
c9
Cl)
M
Cl)
M
M
M
MO
d
Z
5

Date ' Design NORRIS & TUNSTALL Wilmington, NC Sheet
4 i3 J CONSULTING ENGINEERS P.C. Brunswick County, NC
Sheet
Check Job For Job No.
J ST' Swt�} t� � I(1ti+a � %ry►... F��—Tl-.►--- �s� � C�t�,a � �r � 3 0-1�{'
6041:510A C OrA OL aAeL"W1.P yr FWU SPA tU VTr
.... ......... .
......... ...... .
T6V. f)1sr &A.S4 = c-s-D = o. 65' Ax-
N _ __: _ . t . -1 �- ......
2.41 Ac—
V 81 76
..IJC7.�►a«G�. ,._.5. " .....i6.=._...D_..t_(2:4+)(7) %•.sct`.
r o✓�1� 5. �....../ .5-r .3Z-S--..._............ ...... ...........
5�.•�r�....... (o.�.B32 Sf } 29 3G �F ...� ... .
. ..............

Page 1^of 31
` e9�y`s Gov
This arllllen th■I lherr■ Wjw ■d we
s14arolherfirwip"
the Ontlon•Cosatr8s II to
■I ��eallm■n
J��jry���ppppppypll,,nn��
I
Ph,eer rodrrr■B■q N M r.
� � alYspJJ�/IUI J)n1�ppJQjJrppp
n ■ 1
1I enitt Qo■Nontber
��Np7 �gWIIIpWp11Jl4�j'taRj
roalrlherlhisuXducom
RecOID; a0705Q970
$
Fae Amtd 8j260g12()Do ry2e4fe
?CR8 olae 4
gt -00 Page : t:4 5 PM
nelow County 'No .00
71se■aeeaoas
p■
cot.
�b^Cle�Ool,lard Re
`�1pa7149716
This deed presented to
Dat ��T e�o
(Excise Tax) t� V9. ors Recording time, Book and Page
Tax Parcel No. 7 q� f 3� is -
Prepared By and James A. MacDonald, Attorney
Return To: Allen, MacDonald & Davis, PLLC
1508 Military Cutoff Road, Suite 102 i` ` ' - : �' i TO
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403 ALLEIe' �''"' ' "'''rF'''lS. r3I ! C
t5_ri Lilt.": D.4D
After recording mail to: RTSFR & D, LLC `5'•
1202 Eastwood Road
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
WARRANTY DEED
COUNTY OF ONSLOW
THIS D$ED, made this /7d day of November, 2008, by and between RAIFORD G.
TRASK, JR., TRUSTEE under the Raiford G. Trask, Jr. Revocable Trust, and any
amendments thereto, dated May 23, 2006, hereinafter called the Grantor, and RTSFR & D, LLC,
a North Carolina limited liability company, hereinafter called the Grantee. The designations
Grantor and Grantee, as used herein, shall include said parties, their heirs, successors and assigns,
and shall include singular, plural, masculine, feminine or neuter, as required by context.
WITNESSETH:
THAT said Grantor, for a valuable consideration paid by the Grantee, the receipt of which
is hereby acknowledged, has granted, bargained, sold and conveyed, and, by these presents, does
hereby grant, bargain, sell and convey, unto the said Grantee, its heirs, successors and assigns, in fee
simple, all that certain lot or parcel of land situated in Onslow County, North Carolina, and more
particularly described as follows:
BEING ALL OF THAT PROPERTY SHOWN ON EXHIBIT "A" WHICH IS
HERETO ATTACHED AND INCORPORATED BY RE' iRi;C&
Together with all and singular the tenements, hereditaments and appurtenances thereunto
belonging, or in anywise appertaining.
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the aforesaid lot or parcel of land, and all privileges and
appurtenances thereto belonging, to the Grantee in fee simple.
And the Grantor covenants with the Grantee that Grantor is seized of the premises in fee
simple, and has the right to convey the same in fee simple; that title is marketable and free and clear
of all encumbrances, except as follows: 2008 ad valorem taxes, usual rights -of -way for utilities,
restrictive covenants of record, if any, and applicable zoning regulations and ordinances, if any; and
that Grantor will WARRANT and DEFEND the title against the lawful claims of all persons
whomsoever, except for exceptions hereinvated.
ECEIVE
OCT 16 2013 st
BY.
Book 3160. Pane 714. File NuMbex

(Page 2 of 3)
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Grantor has executed this instrument to be signed, the day
and year first above written.
RAIFORD G. TRASK, JR., TRUSTEE
under the Raiford G. Trask, Jr. Revocable
Trust, and any amendments thereto, dated
May 23, 2006
RAIFORD G. TRAW411., Trustee
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF NEW HANOVER
1, Notary Public of the County and State aforesaid, certify that
RAIFORD . TRASK, ., Trustee under the Raiford G. Trask, Jr. Revocable Trust, and any
amendments thereto, dated May 23, 2006, personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged the
execution of the foregoing instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal this 174 day of November, 2008.
My Commission Expires; y- j 4r j-
Book 3160. Pam 714. File Kumher

(Page 3 of 3)
EXHIBIT A
COMMENCE AT A POINT IN THE WESTERN RIGHT OF WAY OF NC HWY 172 (100' RPM
SAID POINT BEING LOCATED SOUTH 15 DEGREES 40 MINUTES 40 SECONDS WEST
696.87 FEET FROM THE INTERSECTION OF THE CENTERLINE OF SAID NC 172 WITH
THE CENTERLINE OF SR 1557 (60' R/W). FROM SAID COMMENCE POINT, THE
FOLLOWING COURSES AND DISTANCES:
NORTH 25 DEGREES 55 MINUTES 27 SECONDS WEST 148.99 FEET TO A POINT, THENCE
NORTH 18 DEGREES 05 MINUTES 17 SECONDS WEST 136.56 FEET TO A POINT, THENCE
NORTH 57 DEGREES 33 MINUTES 31 SECONDS WEST 199.21 FEET TO A POINT, THENCE
NORTH 35 DEGREES 46 MINUTES 07 SECONDS WEST 127.88 FEET TO A POINT, THENCE
NORTH 59 DEGREES 50 MINUTES 22 SECONDS WEST 248.22 FEET TO A POINT, THENCE
NORTH 20 DEGREES 15 MINUTES 52 SECONDS WEST 112.43 FEET TO A POINT, THENCE
NORTH 41 DEGERES 24 MINUTES 12 SECONDS WEST 81.53 FEET TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING.
FROM SAID POINT OF BEGINNING, THENCE:
SOUTH 30 DEGREES 37 MINUTES 58 SECONDS WEST 1071.56 FEET TO A POINT, THENCE
NORTH 69 DEGREES 07 MINUTES 08 SECONDS WEST 233.61 FEET TO A POINT, THENCE
SOUTH 35 DEGREES 45 MINUTES 33 SECONDS WEST 90.40 FEET TO A POINT, THENCE
NORTH 04 DEGREES 27 MINUTES 29 SECONDS WEST 358.39 FEET TO A POINT, THENCE
NORTH 27 DEGREES 36 MINUTES 46 SECONDS WEST I26.64 FEET TO A POINT, THENCE
NORTH 28 DEGREES 37 MINUTES 35 SECONDS EAST 141.22 FEET TO A POINT, THENCE
NORTH 22 DEGREES 46 MINUTES 52 SECONDS WEST 100.04 FEET TO A POINT, THENCE
NORTH 43 DEGREES 40 MINUTES 46 SECONDS WEST 249.46 FEET TO A POINT, THENCE
NORTH 09 DEGREES 14 MINUTES 25 SECONDS WEST 601.28 FEET TO A POINT, THENCE
NORTH 57 DEGREES 39 MINUTES 52 SECONDS WEST 458.07 FEET TO A POINT, TIiENCE
NORTH 22 DEGREES 11 MINUTES 44 SECONDS WEST 738.33 FEET TO A POINT, THENCE
SOUTH 81 DEGREES 48 MINUTES 47 SECONDS EAST 468.30 FEET TO A POINT, THENCE
SOUTH 22 DEGREES 07 MINUTES 54 SECONDS EAST 293.66 FEET TO A POINT, THENCE
SOUTH 22 DEGREES 11 MINUTES 14 SECONDS EAST 229.04 FEET TO A POINT.
THENCE, THE FOLLOWING COURSES & DISTANCES:
SOUTH 44 DEGREES 13 MINUTES 40 SECONDS EAST 255.25 FEET TO A POINT, THENCE
SOUTH 52 DEGREES 19 MINUTES 50 SECONDS EAST 287.84 FEET TO A POINT, THENCE
SOUTH 67 DEGREES 25 MINUTES 05 SECONDS EAST 196.77 FEET TO A POINT, THENCE
SOUTH 03 DEGREES 58 MINUTES 17 SECONDS EAST 109.10 FEET TO A POINT, THENCE
SOUTH 43 DEGREES 48 MINUTES 04 SECONDS EAST 212.41 FEET TO A POINT, THENCE
SOUTH 73 DEGREES 29 MINUTES 52 SECONDS EAST 289.35 FEET TO A POINT, THENCE
SOUTH 41 DEGPM 24 MI11,11UTFS 12 SECONDS EP.ST 195A9 F=-- TO TIM POINT T OF
BEGINNING, CONTAINING 31.00 ACRES MORE OR LESS.
TOGETHER WITH A 60-FOOT RIGHT-OF-WAY EXTENDING ACROSS THE GRANTOR'S
LINE FROM THE WESTERN LINE OF NC HWY.172 (100-FOOT RIGHT-OF-WAY) AND SAID
RIGHT-OF-WAY RUNNING IN A NORTHWESTWARDLY DIRECTION UNTIL IT
INTERSECTS WITH THE SOUTHEASTERN LINE OF THE ABOVE TRACT CONVEYED
HEREIN TO THE GRANTEE. THIS EASEMENT WILL BE LOCATED AT A LOCATION THAT
IS PfiJTUALLY ACCEPTABLE TO BOTH PARTIES.
Book 3160. Pane 714. rile Humber

�m
0�
r
L4
=a
a
ti
knw0du ?e►W ? rM W05
ALI
UJ 'r
.�
UJ ❑
m
~
0
-•
m
Al
a
+-0
CL
as
-- �.'�• �
N
0
-: 0
can
a
}gaol # - *t4
r
�
0
E
C
d
MC
E
a
C
E
E
a
a
E
w
540
3
a
`"
o
3
0
M
p
E
CGo
G
N
o
3
pp
O
"
.�
s-
0 2
0
3
0
o
Z a
-0
o
4-
3
w a
n
�
�E 4?
IYO
x
0
ei
to
0 O
i
+0
w?
:P.•0
N+�
to.
i CI
0
w
SuQ
V
m
w
0
u v
eC
io
W
0 M
th
f0
vs
pp co
�p
11❑❑❑❑

M PP (0'- o)
1\-ali� 4u
❑❑❑❑r
_ N4
� ftO
A
0� 01 a 3 '' na pr��
w
�Oi A Oi 'a Z
a of �. O O D• v+
0+ .0 0- � W to �
Pr
d fp
'O (DD 0 00 O� 0' a- ,O Z r•r
A p- cc -w0 _T
O C j c M'+
GD 7 w
A O tocr
V
X�� W w h N
• W f-0�D f-D u 1
V
lu w C C
r
Ca
C O A T7'n
m
1 H i
d
A
O ?
h
A fir:
m•�,� 1'r
;--
0+
r+
lu
N fi �rn ��`n� Z
..i
z
cr
CL
M
`` f 1 M Y•�
a co
"'°afi j�Vr 4
A Ile
�T 1 to we .172 e " a

lARipiexeness review %ARMIUM
Project Name:
Project Location:
/Vt-f % VPM &LM
Received Date: )(o Oct I
Accepted Date: NW �3
Rule(s)
008 Coastal
❑1995 Coastal ®Phase II (WIRO)
Universal 1-11988 Coastal
Type of Permit: New or
o PR
Existing Permit # (Mod PR)- CCkOq®-3
=PE
Cert on File?
Density;--HD._..:..or =--:..LD- :='ype:.:--Comme.rciaJ.--.—or.-_.__Residential �_—..,__
%: (% 00) Stream Class: EISA Map
Subdivided?: SuIldivIslibn or Single Lot 1MORW Map
_
ECG: _:._..-__-__:..-_::: _.. _.. -....
( it 1N8
MExempt
Paperwork Emailed Engineer on: "JQ115 "'%1I1IJ 1bJ30112 N(3i/IS
Supplement(s) (1 original per BMP) BMP Type(s): r16a ,& 9QMZ S 6XILA DA -014
2with correct/original signatures (I original per BMP except LS/VFS and swales) 15 CtUVNZtrXJ �Lr lv�
�. Applicat onkr with correct/original signatures ®wedgy,
E]Corp or LLC: Sig. Auth. per SoS or letter f`�`�j []J�atail Ad arner
Engineer
5 (within 6mo '+1�� mail Ad�'I4
.�
Soils Report with SHWT 1\O-kWMX1cA%W-N o to to Reviewer: t, `"
McAculations (signed/sealed)
®No obvious errors
Density includes common areas, etc
Deed Restrictions, .if subdivided:
& Notarized
W&—
c�^� Ilr`u1�2
n5u W- CW }+1@
r �,l L• • 11C�A.til�
4 2.4 / 1 Z
d�RoS`f (IQC•?iv� •Z
Pb,,ns V,
�2 Sets Details (roads, cud a , curbs, sidewal", B°VIPs, Buildings, etc)
L_JGra g Wetlands: I R �ted or No We,�'ands
Vic' ity Lay posed BUAdim•.nsic��)
® E
®Lege 0!" aps Project Boundaries
Infiltration
Soils Report
SHWT:
Bottom:
Visited: I
Additional Information:
Permitted
BUA (s1l)
DA (sf)
PP (el)
SHWT (el)
Depth (ft)
SA (sf)
Wet Pond
Soils ReF.c ,-':
SHW
PI-.
I_
Offsite
MPE Cert for Master
®Deed Rest for Master
BUA Permitted (Master):
BUA Prhosed (Offsite):
Lot #:
®Lot # Matches Master
sf
sf

Cxn,c�\ L_ 0 tk'9 w Z
Johnson, Kelly
From: Johnson, Kelly
Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2013 2:07 PM
To: 'Jody Bland; 'John Tunstall'; 'Tammy Spivey'
Cc: 'Amv Norris'; 'Nancy Singleton'
Subject: RE: Southbridge, SW8 090903
Jody,
I think it can be done, and I don't think it will be that hard if we get a process in place early to keep the details straight.
Here are a couple of items to consider:
1.) Compliance: From the file, it looks like you all have worked with Steve Pusey to get things finalized from a
compliance perspective. I haven't gone through that carefully, but assuming that the site is in compliance any
upcoming transfers to the HOAs should be pretty easy.
2.) Paperwork: My recommendation would be to think of this as a two step process. You will need to have the
current permittee submit for a modification to split the permit into three pieces as the first action. Then, as a
second action have the current permittee transfer the permits to the HOAs. Both actions can be submitted in a
single submittal, but I would encourage you to think about this as a two-step process in order to keep track of
"who signs what". I would also recommend that you submit for both the mod and the transfer in a single
submittal because the reviewer will know the details of the situation, and this is usually the fastest route to a
permit (as opposed to getting a modification issued and then coming back in for a transfer after the mod is
issued). The current permittee needs to submit:
a. Three applications: The current permittee would sign each document as the applicant. If he/she wants
the permit number to stay with one of the three pieces in particular, please tell us that up front. It
doesn't matter to us which one keeps the old number. All three permits will stay under current rule
(assuming that all you do is a split and there are no other big changes), but sometimes people have a
preference as to who keeps the old number when they split permits. The other two pieces will get new
numbers.
b. Supporting Documents: Then, you would also submit any of the supporting forms that change signed by
the permit applicant/current permittee (supplements, O&M, deed restrictions, or any other forms that
would have "new" info as a result of the permit split). If a form isn't changing, then we shouldn't need
a new form to be submitted.
c. Transfer Forms: The outgoing person is the current permittee and the incoming person is the new HOA.
Please also submit the data requested by the transfer form such as the deed to show that the new
owner owns the land.
d. Plans: We need two sets of plans for each of the three permits (6 sets total). We will keep one for each
of our files and mail one to each of the new permittees.
e. Three $505 fees for the three modifications. There are three transfers, too, but since each of them are a
first transfer to each of the three respective permits, the $40 fee doesn't apply. (Additional transfers
after the first one are $40.)
f. Other: I would recommend taking some extra time to think through the "who signs what" and "what is
changing" issues. That is easy to get mixed up, and it commonly does. For instance, sometimes people
will intend to follow this process but they will have each HOA sign the application form. That doesn't
quite work because the current permittee is the one who is doing the modification. Then, it becomes a
huge issue because there are so many people involved and everyone is confused about why forms have
to be resigned by different people. Or, sometimes the lot numbers will change in one of the "pieces"
and that doesn't get carried over to the deed restrictions. Or, any number of small details can be
omitted inadvertently. Like I said, this isn't "hard", it is just a lot to keep track of.
3.) Permitted Land: All of the land previously permitted will have to continue to be permitted. For instance, that
area that is sort of a triangle and not colored in the middle of the pink, blue, and green will have to be covered if
it was already covered before. Also, if the "pink" area is covered by the current permit then that will have to be
addressed, too. (Maybe that is why we were talking about a master permit before? I don't remember.)
1

4.) BMP Boundaries: We need to make sure that the BMP drainage area lines fall neatly within each HOA's new
boundary lines. From a quick look, it looks like they do. If they do not, then we will have one HOA's piece
partially offsite-ing to another HOA's piece. So, if the DA lines cross the future permit boundary lines then we
need to talk some more and I can send you an example of what we will need to do. You can still do the split, it
will just be more paperwork and the permit will be longer.
5.) Overall Low Density: I don't think that this is the case for this project, but there is place in the permit text that
references low density requirements (Section 116g). That may be in there in error. If it is overall low, then let's
talk about that, too.
Hopefully that clears things up. If not, please let me know,
Kelly
From: Jody Bland [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2013 8:49 AM
To: 'John Tunstall'; Tammy Spivey; Johnson, Kelly
Cc: 'Amy Norris'; 'Nancy Singleton'
Subject: FW: Southbridge, SW8 090903
Hi Kelly,
It's good to hear that you are back. I hope all is well on the family front. Congrats on the new addition I
To catch you up .... Regarding the attached map
1. 'The pink area was originally South Bridge Residential Ph2. N&T initially started design on this Phase but never
completed design or permitting. I am not sure as to its status.
2. The remaining areas Red (SB PHI Residential), Blue (SB Commercial), & Green (SB Multifamily) are currently
permitted under SW8 090903.
Each of these distinct areas have their own individual POA/ HOA set up to maintain BMPs etc within their "boundary"
Our client wishes to proceed forward with splitting the original permit into 3 permits with each covering their respective
areas (Red, Blue, & Green). They will be set up independently and individually be responsible for maintenance of their
respective BMPs. Construction in the Red (SB PHI Residential) area is complete and i believe that they either have
completed or are in the process of turning over common areas & BMPs to HOA (the permit split may be the last piece of
the puzzle for the attorneys). Nevertheless our client have asked us for a fee to provide services for permit split and we
just wanted to verify with NCDENR that 1. It's acceptable & 2. Any issues you can foresee with moving forward with this
process.
I know all BMPs are built & have been certified with NCDENR except for Pond 13 which resides in the Blue (SB
Commercial) area. This area is currently undeveloped and the status of any future development in this area is unknown
at this time.
Let me know if you need any more clarification. Thanks
Thanks,
Jody Bland, E.I.
Norris & Tunstall Consulting Engineers, P.C.
Brunswick Office - gio-287-59oo
Wilmington Office - gio-343-9653
Mobile - 910-512-8148
It is the professional opinion of Norris & Tunstall Consulting Engineers, P.C. and Norris, Kuske & Tunstall Consulting
Engineers, Inc. that this electronic information provides design information current as of the date of its release. It shall be
the responsibility of the party receiving the data to examine it to see that it contains the necessary files and information
requested. In transferring the files in electronic media format, Norris & Tunstall Consulting Engineers, P.C. and Norris,
2

Kuske & Tunstall Consulting Engineers, Inc. makes no representations as to the usability or readability of documents
resulting from the use of software application packages, operating systems, or computer hardware differing from those
used by Norris & Tunstall Consulting Engineers, P-C. and Norris, Kuske & Tunstall Consulting Engineers, Inc. in the
preparation of such data.
Confidentiality Notice
This message is intended exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed. This communication may contain
information that is proprietary, privileged, confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure. If you are not the
named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or disseminate this message or any part of it.
If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately either by phone [phone]) or reply
to this e-mail and delete all copies of this message.
From: Johnson, Kelly[mailto:kelly.p.johnson(dncdenr.gov]
Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2013 8:54 AM
To: Jody Bland; 'John Tunstall'
Cc: 'Amy Norris'
Subject: RE: Southbridge, SW8 090903
Jody,
I have been out on maternity leave since mid -July, and just returned yesterday. I don't remember the details of this off
the top of my head, but is this a question involving transfers with the split or just the permit splitting? There is always a
way to split permits, though it can be complicated if they drain to one another. But, ownership is usually the more
complicated piece of the puzzle. I have attached the map that I drew originally, and then you marked up two years
ago. Are you trying to remove the pink area from a permit that currently covers the whole plan shown? I am sure that
there is a way to do it, but we would have to work through who the various owners/permittees/offsite permittees
would be. i am not sure that I understand your question. Do you have something more specific in mind?
I will try to work through this with you, but please be patient with me as I have a lot to catch up on right now.
Thanks,
Kelly
From: Jody Bland[maiIto: jblandcd)ntengineers.com]
Sent: Monday, September 30, 2013 12:11 PM
To: Johnson, Kelly; 'John Tunstall'
Cc: 'Amy Norris'
Subject: FW: Southbridge, SW8 090903
Hi Kelly,
I hope this email finds you well. Looks like the following may be coming back to life...... Would our client still be allowed
to split their permit into 3? As we were originally pursuing in 2011?
Currently, South Bridge Ph2 is out of the picture for N&T. We would be dealing with PH1 Residential, SB Commercial, &
SB Multifamily. They have completed build out of SB PH1 residential & turned their portion over to POA. SB multifamily
is progressing with plans for the remaining portion of the multifamily site. I believe the commercial tract is still
somewhat dormant at this time.
In speaking with the owners their wish is still to split the permit into 3 separate permits with 3 POA/ HOA thus reducing
their administrative requirements in the future. Please advise
Thanks,

Jody Bland, E.I.
Norris & Tunstall Consulting Engineers, P.C.
Brunswick Office - 910-287-5900
Wilmington Office - 9io-343-9653
Mobile - 910-512-8148
It is the professional opinion of Norris & Tunstall Consulting Engineers, P.C. and Norris, Kuske & Tunstall Consulting
Engineers, Inc. that this electronic information provides design information current as of the date of its release. It shall be
the responsibility of the party receiving the data to examine it to see that it contains the necessary files and information
requested. In transferring the files in electronic media format, Norris & Tunstall Consulting Engineers, P.C. and Norris,
Kuske & Tunstall Consulting Engineers, Inc. makes no representations as to the usability or readability of documents
resulting from the use of software application packages, operating systems, or computer hardware differing from those
used by Norris & Tunstall Consulting Engineers, P.C. and Norris, Kuske & Tunstall Consulting Engineers, Inc. in the
preparation of such data.
Confidentiality Notice
This message is intended exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed. This communication may contain
information that is proprietary, privileged, confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure. If you are not the
named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or disseminate this message or any part of it.
If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately either by phone [phone]) or reply
to this e-mail and delete all copies of this message.
From: Jody Bland fmailto:jbland(dntengineers.com1
Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 4:21 PM
To: 'John Tunstall'; Tammy Spivey'; 'Amy Norris'
Subject: Southbridge, SW8 090903
John/Tammy,
This is what we were pursuing back in August 2011. We had originally spoke about a master permit structure but
decided against it because of the concerns listed below. I guess things have changed & they no longer wish to pursue the
individual permit route? See below....
Thanks,
Jody Bland, E.I.
Norris & Tunstall Consulting Engineers, P.C.
Brunswick Office - 910-287-5900
Wilmington Office - 9i®-343-9653
Mobile - 910-512-8148
It is the professional opinion of Norris & Tunstall Consulting Engineers, P.C. and Norris, Kuske & Tunstall Consulting
Engineers, Inc. that this electronic information provides design information current as of the date of its release. It shall be
the responsibility of the party receiving the data to examine it to see that it contains the necessary files and information
requested. In transferring the files in electronic media format, Norris & Tunstall Consulting Engineers, P.C. and Norris,
Kuske & Tunstall Consulting Engineers, Inc. makes no representations as to the usability or readability of documents
resulting from the use of software application packages, operating systems, or computer hardware differing from those
used by Norris & Tunstall Consulting Engineers, P.C. and Norris, Kuske & Tunstall Consulting Engineers, Inc. in the
preparation of such data.
Confidentiality Notice
This message is intended exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed. This communication may contain
information that is proprietary, privileged, confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure. If you are not the
named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or disseminate this message or any part of it.

If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately either by phone [phone]) or reply
to this e-mail and delete all copies of this message.
From: Jody Bland[mailto:jblandantenaineers.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2011 5:14 PM
To: 'John Tunstall'; '[e-mail]'; 'Amy Norris'
Subject: RE: Southbridge, SW8 090903
Good Afternoon Kelly,
I marked up your map I hope this helps. Please see attached.
We are requesting a total of four permits.
The original permit # SW8 090903 is being broken into 3 permits. We simply took the CADD file from the original
approved permit and re -sheeted it to reflect the 3 new project #s
N&T # 11002 — Southbridge Residential PH1 = Sand Filters 1 — 66
N&T # 11003 — Southbridge Commercial = Pond 7-12 & Pond 13
N&T # 10058 — Southbridge Multi -Family = Pond 14
Our permit boundary has remained the same for Pond 14. We have added a small additional amount of drainage
area to Pond 14. It is approxiamately 1 acre and naturally drains back towards the Pond 14 forebay. This maybe
the area you are referring to regarding a possible need for an offsite permit(?).
"'New Permit — N&T # 10064 — Southbridge Residential PH2
We are currently designing SB Res. PH2. Our client has sold or has all lots in PH under contract. They have
asked us to obtain more residential lots ASAP..Our soultion was to permit the first 2 drainage areas of SB Res.PH2 while
we continued working on the designs for the remainder of the tract. Our next submittial will be a modification to the
proposed new pemit. Therefore our pemit acreage identifies the large tract with two small drainage areas and only a 6 or
7 % impervious coverage at this time. Also, please note that this layout has changed from the layout you show in your
illustration that maybe why you are having a hard time identifying the SB PH2A location.
Finally is there a need for a master permit if each individual permit has its own individual owner & HOA/ POA etc? ; know
this option was discussed during our meeting but invariably the owner decided against this and decided to persue the
individual permit option which was discussed as well. The current owner does not wish to be involved in the idividual
permitted areas once they are sold. It was explained to us that if a master permit was put in place then a master HOA
would be requires as veeii. l :,u, our client is then required to manage and take an administrative role over these other
individun! HO?.s.:';iY,. soave a ern-rns regarding this structure; since as it was described to us; if an individual developer
whom iz j:,+oa: V:P kim,10rella of the master permit is found to be in non-conformence with their permit then the subsequent
h.0 �i. 4: puteatial fine is issued to the master permittee whom is required to then adminster it to the proper HOA. Our
cliep�k ffse-b that This method is a litigation issue waiting to happen and wishes not to be involved in a permit structure of
this type. We feel that NCDENR will have more "teeth" if they deal directly with the individuals that are responsible for the
permitted areas directly.
It was our understanding that we could apply for individual permits and this is what we have submitted to you.
John please add any information that I may have omitted.
"PLEASE BE AWARE THAT MY EMAIL ADDRESS HAS CHANGED TO IBLANDONTENGINEERS COM. SHORTLY WE
WILL DISCONTINUE USE OF OUR NKTENG EMAIL ADDRESSES. PLEASE UPDATE YOUR CONTACT LISTING.
Thanks,
Jody Bland
Norris & Tunstall Consulting Engineers, P.C.

Wilmington Office - gio-343-9653
Bsuns,Aick Office - gio-287-5900
Mobile. - 91u-3i2-8i48
It is the professional opinion of Norris & Tunstall Consulting Engineers, P.C. and Norris, Kuske & Tunstall Consulting
Engineers, Inc. that this electronic information provides design information current as of the date of its release. It shall be
the responsibility of the party receiving the data to examine it to see that it contains the necessary files and information
requested. In transferring the tiles in electronic media format, Norris & Tunstall Consulting Engineers, P.C. and .Norris,
Kuske & Tunstall Consulting Engineers, Inc. makes no representations as to the usability or readability of documents
resulting from the use of software application packages, operating systems, or computer hardware differing from those
used by Norris & Tunstall Consulting Engineers, P.C, and Norris, Kuske & Tunstall Consulting Engineers, Inc. in the
preparation of such data.
Confidentiality Notice
This message is intended exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed. This communication may contain
information that is proprietary, privileged, confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure. If you are not the
named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or disseminate this message or any part of it.
If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately either by phone [phone]) or reply
to this e-mail and delete all copies of this message.
From: John Tunstall fmailto:Runstall(&ntenaineers.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2011 3:00 PM
To: 'Jody Bland'
Subject: FW: Southbridge, SW8 090903
From: Johnson, Kelly[mailto:kelly.p.johnson(a)ncdenr.gov]
Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2011 2:47 PM
To: 'Amy'; jtunstall(dritengineers.com
Subject: Southbridge, SW8 090903
Amy & John,
I received your four applications, and I have attached a diagram of how I have interpreted what you are proposing. (It is
the same diagram as pdf and Powerpoint). I have outlined the area already covered by SW8 090903 (roughly) and have
overlaid the four projects you have submitted. Are you intending that this will become five permits as I have laid out?
Also, what permit will the apartments offsite to, SW8 090903 or one of the other new permits that will be created? The
offsite supplement was not included.
Once I get a feel for the big picture I will go back through the packages for the standard initial review.
Thanks,
Kelly
*** My email has changed to [e-mail]
fKeL LI i0hvusovu
Kelly Johnson
Environmental Engineer
Division of Water Quality
Stormwater Permitting

127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington, NC 28405-3845
Office: 910.796.7331
Fax: [phone]
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be
disclosed to third parties.
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 10.0.1392 / Virus Database: 1520/3854 - Release Date: 08/24/11
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 10.0.1392 / Virus Database: 1520/3854 - Release Date: 08/24/11
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg_com
Version: 2013.0.3408 / Virus Database: 3222/6730 Release Date: 10/07/13

LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY
ANNUAL REPORT
fa,w Nl
NAME OF LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY: BC&RT, LLC
REPORT FOR THE YEAR: 2013
SECRETARY OF STATE L.L.C. ID NUMBER: 0643994
NATURE OF BUSINESS: Land and Timber
REGISTERED AGENT: Trask, Raiford G. Jr.
REGISTERED OFFICE MAILING ADDRESS: 1202 Eastwood Road
Wilmington, NC 28403
E-Filed Annual Report
5522692
Do not data enter manually.
STATE OF INCORPORATION: NC
REGISTERED OFFICE STREET ADDRESS: 1202 Eastwood Road
Wilmington, NC 28403 New Hanover County
PRINCIPAL OFFICE TELEPHONE NUMBER: [phone]
PRINCIPAL OFFICE MAILING ADDRESS: 1202 Eastwood Road
Wilmington, NC 28403
PRINCIPAL OFFICE STREET ADDRESS: 1202 Eastwood Road
Wilmington, NC 28403
MANAGERS/MEMBERS/ORGANIZERS:
Name: Raiford G Trask Jr Name: Bruce C Carlson
Title: Manager Title: Member
Address: Address:
1202 Eastwood Road 150 Old Ferry Rd Hwy 172 N
Wilmington, NC 28403 Sneads Ferry, NC 28460
CERTIFICATION OF ANNUAL REPORT MUST BE COMPLETED BY ALL LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANIES
Raiford G Trask Jr
FORM MUST BE SIGNED BY A MANAGER/MEMBER
Raiford G Trask Jr
TYPE OR PRINT NAME
4/9/2013
DATE
Manager
TYPE OR PRINT TITLE
ANNUAL REPORT FEE: F Paid MAIL TO: Secretary of State • Corporations Division • Post Office Box 29525 • Raleigh, NC 27626•-0525

MCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Pat McCrory Charles Wakild, P. E.
Governor Director
February 4, 2013
Raiford G. Trask, Jr., Manager and Trustee
BC & RT, LLC
1202 Eastwood Road
Wilmington, NC 28403
Subject: Follow-up Inspection - NOD-2012-PC-0102
South Bridge Subdivision — Phase 1 & 2
State Stormwater Permit No. SW8 090903
Onslow County
Dear Mr. Trask:
John E. Skvarla, III
Secretary
On February 1, 2013, Steve Pusey of the Wilmington Regional Office of the Division of Water
Quality (DWQ) performed a follow-up Compliance Inspection at South Bridge Subdivision in
Onslow County, NC. The inspection was performed to determine the status of compliance with
Stormwater Permit Number SW8 090903, issued to you on September 3, 2010. DWO file
review and site inspection revealed that the site is compliant with the terms and conditions of
this permit. Please find a copy of the completed form entitled "Compliance Inspection Report"
attached to this letter.
Please be advised that you are required to comply with the terms, conditions and limitations of
your Stormwater Management Permit under Title 15A North Carolina Administrative Code 2H
.1003 and North Carolina General Statute 143-214.7, including operation and maintenance of
your permitted stormwater system.
If the project has changed its name, ownership or mailing address, a completed and signed
Name/Ownership Change form must be submitted to DWQ at least 30 calendar days prior to
making the changes. Please include the name, mailing address and phone number of the
person or entity that is now responsible for this permit on the Name/Ownership Change form.
If you have any questions, please contact Steve Pusey at the Wilmington Regional Office,
telephone number (910)-796-7215.
Si brely,
C,Z&OreCha es Wa1�Ci ,`P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
Enc: Compliance Inspection Report
GDS/sgp: S:1WQS1Stormwater\Permits & Projects120091090903 HD12013 02 CEi_compliant 090903
cc: John S. Tunstall, PE — Norris & Tunstall Engineers
Onslow County Inspections
Karen Higgins, WBS-CPU
Georgette Scott
WiRO Stormwater File
Wilmington Regional Office
127 Cardinal Drive Extension, Wilmington, North Carolina 28405
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] DENR Assistance:1-877-623-6748
Internet www.ncwaterquality.org

Compliance Inspection Report
Permit: SW8090903 Effective: 02/24/12 Expiration: 12/31/21 Owner: Bc & Rt LLC and Raiford G Trask Jr Trustee
Project: South Bridge Subdivision
County: Onslmv NC 172
Region: Wilmington
Sneads Ferry NC 28460
Contact Person: Raiford G Trask Title: Trustee Phone: [phone]
Directions to Project:
Take Market St. towards Jacksonville for 29 miles turn right at NC 172 go approx. 5.4 miles site on left beside Yopp's Tire & Garage.
Type of Project: State Stormwater - HD - Detention Pond State Stormwater - HD - Sand filters
Drain Areas: 1 - (Everett Creek) (03-05-02 ) ( SA, HOW)
13 - (Everett Creek) (03-05-02 ) ( SA;HQW)
14 - (Everett Creek) (03-05-02 ) ( SA; HOW)
2 - (Everett Creek) (03-05-02 ) ( SA;HQW)
3 - (Everett Creek) (03-05-02 ) ( SA;HQW)
4 - (Everett Creek) (03-05-02 ) (SA;HQW)
5 - (Everett Creek) (03-05-02 ) ( SA; HOW)
6A - (Everett Creek) (03-05-02 ) ( SA;HQW)
6B - (Everett Creak) (03-05-02 ) ( SA; HOW)
712 - (Everett Creek) (03-05-02) ( SA;HQW)
On -Site Representative(s):
Related Permits:
Inspection Date: 02/01/2013 EntryTime: 10:00 AM
Primary Inspector: Steven G Pusey
Secondary Inspector(s):
Reason for Inspection: Follow-up
Permit Inspection Type: State Stormwater
Facility Status: ■ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant
Question Areas:
■ State Stormwater
(See attachment summary)
Exit Time: 11:00 AM
Phone:
Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Page: 1

Permit: SW8090903 Owner - Project: Bc & Rt LLC and Raiford G Trask Jr Trustee
Inspection Date: 02/01/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Follow-up
Inspection Summary:
There was one area of erosion behind Lot 9 that has been fixed. However, it appears that erosion could happen again in
the future. DWQ Land Quality Division will followup with the home builder and developer to provide further guidance.
File Review
Yes
No
NA
NE
Is the permit active?
❑
❑
❑
Signed copy of the Engineer's certification is in the file?
®
❑
❑
❑
Signed copy of the Operation & Maintenance Agreement is in the file?
®❑
❑
Copy of the recorded deed restrictions is in the file?
�l
❑
❑
❑
Comment:
SW Measures
Yes
No
NA
NE
Are the SW measures constructed as per the approved plans?
im
❑
❑
❑
Are the inlets located per the approved plans?
an
❑
❑
❑
Are the outlet structures located per the approved plans?
IA
❑
❑
❑
Comment:
Operation and Maintenance
Yes
No
NA
NE
Are the SW measures being maintained and operated as per the permit requirements?
■
❑
❑
❑
Are the SW BMP inspection and maintenance records complete and available for review or provided to DWQ ❑
❑
❑
■
upon request?
Comment: There was one area of erosion behind Lot 9 that has been fixed. However,
it appears that erosion could happen again in the future. DWQ Land Quality Division
will followup with the home builder and developer to provide further guidance.
Page: 2

Pusey, Steven
From: Tammy Spivey [[e-mail]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2013 3:31 PM
To: Pusey, Steven
Cc: Hammers, Karl; Scott, Georgette
Subject: RE: South Bridge Subdivision State SW Cert. for Sand Filter #3 (N&T #07063)
Thanks, Steve. I plan to go out there tomorrow or Friday and will check on the area behind Lot 9 outside of the fence to
ensure that all is still holding up OK.
Of the 59 total lots in Peggy's Cove 1, 51 are owner occupied and 8 are builder owned. I believe 3 of the 8 builder
owned lots are complete, 4 are still under construction and 1 lot is vacant. We will ensure proper conveyance of
common areas to the property owners association and provide you with that documentation as part of the request to
transfer the permit.
Tammy M. Spivey
Development Manager
`"rat An
Office: 910.799.8755
1202 Eastwood Road
Wilmington, NC 28403
www.TraskLandCo.com
CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT
This email transmission contains information from Trask Land Company, Inc., which is privileged and confidential. It is intended only for the use of
the addressee(s) shown above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of
such information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify us by reply e-mail or telephone. Thank
you.
From: Pusey, Steven(mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2013 12:02 PM
To: Tammy Spivey
Cc: Hammers, Karl; Smott; Georgette
Subject: RE: South Bridge Subdivision State SW Cert. for Sand Filter #3 (N&T #07063)
Tammy,
If the erosion is fixed, then I believe we can call this compliant for State Stormwater. Then, you can proceed with the
transfer process. Remember, before transferring the permit, you must provide legal documentation showing that the
common areas have been conveyed to the HOA, and that the declarant has conveyed at least 50% of the lots to owners
other than the declarant.
I am going to go out there soon, along with our Land Quality representative, to take a look at the site. Land Quality is
responsible for any erosion issues with lots that are under construction. They haven't closed their project out yet.

I am not aware of any handouts DENR has for homeowners other than the permit itself. This paperwork is taken care of
in the transfer process.
Steve
From: Tammy Spivey [mailto:tammy0autumnhall.coml
Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2013 4:20 PM
To: Pusey, Steven
Subject: RE: South Bridge Subdivision State SW Cert. for Sand Filter #3 (N&T #07063)
Hi Steve,
Since the issue is on a homeowner -owned lot, wouldn't the homeowner be responsible for ensuring adequate
vegetation to prevent erosion issues? It sounds like this is the true crux of the issue. I've attached Rainstorm
Solutions' letter. Based on the letter, ° Bill says ... as best I can tell, and what I would suggest you do is to
allow the recent repairs an opportunity to take hold. The rip rap should hold and prevent additional erosion on
the downside of the fence. (Outside the property owners' yard) Hopefully the turf that was added will help as
well once it starts to root."
We've been working diligently for the past two years (plus) to wrap this project up and get it to a point where all
were comfortable for turnover to the property owners association. I feel like we are there. Any handouts
DENR has for homeowners explaining their continual responsibilities relating to erosion control/stormwater
would be greatly appreciated by us and our Property Management Company.
Please let me know where we need to go from here.
Thanks,
Tammy
From: Pusey, Steven[mailto:steven.pusey(@ncdenr.aovl
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 20i3 3:24 PM
To: Tammy Spivey
Subject: RE: South Bridge Subdivision State SW Cert. for Sand Filter #3 (N&T #07063)
Hi Tammy,
Holidays went as well as could be expected. I can't believe it's already Jan. 17! Anyway, it looks like there's only one
remaining problem to take care of, the erosion behind Lot 9. If the runoff from the roof is causing the problem, then I
agree with the Rainstorm Solutions. The best solution could be to add gutters to the house and pipe the runoff
underground via trunk lines under the fence to the swale that leads to the yard inlet (located just behind the
intersections of Lots 8 & 9). Maybe they could do the same for Lot 10 as well, if they have this problem. This would
require a plan revision and calculations to show that it would work without causing erosion at the outlet. The trunk lines
from the houses would probably feed to a common header which discharges into the swale.
Let me know ASAP what you all decide.
Thanks,
Steve
From: Tammy Spivey [mailto:tammy@)autumnhall.coml
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2013 4:41 PM
To: Pusey, Steven
Subject: RE: South Bridge Subdivision State SW Cert. for Sand Filter #3 (N&T #07063)

Hi Steve,
I hope your holidays were great. I see that John Tunstall sent you the final sand filter certification. We still have not
received an official report from Rainstorm Solutions, but I just didn't want to wait any longer since all else has been
resolved to my knowledge. His email is below. Please let me know your thoughts.
Thanks,
Tammy
NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN NNNNNNN/VNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN
NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN
NN
From: Rainstorm Solutions[mailto:rainstormsolutions(&Qmail com
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2013 4:55 PM
To: Chris Manning
Cc: Tammy Spivey (tammy0autumnhall.com)
Subject: Re: Peggy's Cove
Chris,
Sorry for the delay, yes with the holidays and such I had forgotten to get this to you
I went to Peggy's Cove last month to look at the situation you described and told me about.
Chris, as best I can tell, and what I would suggest to be done next ...Is let what repairs and preventive actions that
were recently installed take hold and see how it works. The rip rap should take hold and prevent additional
erosion on the downside of the fence. (outside the property owners yard) Hopefully the turf that was added will
help as well.
What I did see that would cause me some concern as a storm water/runoff/erosion problem is the area directly
beneath the drip line of the house's roof line. (On the side of the house where the HVAC is) This is the area that
has caused the problem to date and the amount of runoff going towards the fence and eroding the ground, both
inside the fence and beyond the fence. The yard is still going to erode, and as I mentioned to you the HVAC pad
is being compromised by the washout beneath it. This problem will only continue. We tend to see it in areas of
sharp grade changes and no gutters, just as here.
The water flow is so great for just turf, If they are lucky enough to get turf established they might be able to
sustain it, but still may see under washing around the pad itself. Getting some type of shrub established and
ground cover in place might hold up better in the long run to keep the soil in place.
If the problem persist and the above measures are not an option or for some reason don't work, I would suggest
adding gutters to the house and piping that water under ground via trunk lines beyond the fence. That in turn
would alleviate all the problems.
I hope this helps and let me know if I can be of any further assistance..
Thank you for the opportunity to help.
Best regards,
Bill

Pusey, Steven
From: David Honeycutt [[e-mail]]
Sent: Saturday, December 22, 2012 11:36 AM
To: Tammy Spivey
Cc: John Tunstall; Pusey, Steven; Amy Norris; Raiford G. Trask, III; D Mysiuk
Subject: Re: Scanned image from MX-5001 N
Thank u
Sent from my Phone
On Dec 21, 2012, at 4:39 PM, "Tammy Spivey" <tammy(olautumnhall.com> wrote:
> Thanks, John.
> On Dec 21, 2012, at 4:35 PM, "John Tunstall" <itunstallOnteneineers.com> wrote:
>> Steve
>> Please find engineers certification for Southbridge Sand Filters
>> 2,4,5,6A,6B and Pond 7-12. Per our previous conversations, the Sand
>> Filter Back slopes that are steeper than 3:1 are acceptable if they are stable with
vegetation.
>> Also, per our conversation, It is acceptable for the rear Roofs of
>> Houses on lots 1, 2, 38 and 39 to sheet flow over grass to wetlands.
>> Due to topography The rear of these lots do drain to designed
>> treatment system. Please let me know if you have any questions.
>> Thanks
>> John
>> -----Original Message -----
>> From: itunstall(@nteneineers.com[mailto:itunstall(@nteneineers.com]
>> Sent: Friday, December 21, 2012 4:40 PM
>> To: itunstallidnteneineers.com
>> Subject: Scanned image from MX-5001N
>> Reply to: itunstall(@ntensineers.com <itunstall(&ntensineers.com> Device Name:
>> Not Set Device Model: MX-5001N
>> Location: Not Set
>> File Format: PDF MMR(G4)
>> Resolution: 300dpi x 300dpi
>> Attached file is scanned image in PDF format.
>> Use Acrobat(R)Reader(R) or Adobe(R)Reader(R) of Adobe Systems
>> Incorporated to view the document.
>> Adobe(R)Reader(R) can be downloaded from the following URL:
>> Adobe, the Adobe logo, Acrobat, the Adobe PDF logo, and Reader are
>> registered trademarks or trademarks of Adobe Systems Incorporated in
>> the United States and other countries.
>> http://www.adobe.com/
>> -----
No virus found in this message.
>> Checked by AVG - www.ave.com
1

>> Version: 2012.0.2221 / Virus Database: 2637/5476 - Release Date:
>> 12/21/12 <]tunstalltOnteneineers.com 20121221 163943 vdf>

WDENK
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Charles Wakild, P. E.
Governor Director
December 4, 2012
Raiford G. Trask, Jr., Manager and Trustee
BC & RT, LLC
1202 Eastwood Road
Wilmington, NC 28403
Subject: Follow-up Inspection - NOD-2012-PC-0102
South Bridge Subdivision — Phase 1 & 2
State Stormwater Permit No. SW8 090903
Onslow County
Dear Mr. Trask:
Dee Freeman
Secretary
On November 19, 2012, Steve Pusey of the Wilmington Regional Office of the Division of Water Quality
(DWQ) performed a follow-up Compliance Inspection at South Bridge Subdivision in Onslow County, NC.
The inspection was performed to determine the status of compliance with Stormwater Permit Number
SW8 090903, issued to you on September 3, 2010.
We acknowledge that the recorded deed restrictions have been received. However, a new maintenance
issue has been identified in the recent inspection, as outlined below. Our latest inspection and file review
of this Stormwater Permit Number SW8 090903 indicates that the following deficiencies must still be
resolved:
1. Engineer certifications for the sand filters and ponds in Phases 1 & 2 need to be submitted.
2. The swale behind Lots 9 -10 is blocked by a yard fence and there is an erosion problem that
needs to be fixed due to underground seepage washing out the bank.
Please provide a "Plan of Action" by December 18, 2012 to DWQ that states how and when these
deficiencies will be corrected. If we do not receive your plan of action by this date, you will be in violation
of 15A NCAC 2H.1000, which could result in the initiation of enforcement action which may include
recommendations for the assessment of civil penalties, pursuant to NCGS 143-215.6A.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please call Steve Pusey at [phone].
Sincerely,
For Charles Wakild, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
Enc: Compliance Inspection Report
GDS/sgp: S:1WQS1StormwaterlPermits & Projects120091090903 HD12012 11 CEI—deficient 090903
cc: John S. Tunstall, PE — Norris & Tunstall Engineers
Onslow County Inspections
Karen Higgins, WBS-CPU
Georgette Scott
WiRO Stormwater File
Wilmington Regional Office
127 Cardinal Drive Extension, Wilmington, North Carolina 28405
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] DENR Assistance:1-877-623-6748
Internet: www.ncwaterquality.org
An Equal Opportunity l Affirmative Action Employer

Trask Land
.WIP
November 21, 2012
Ms. Georgette Scott
NCDENR/Division of Water Quality
Wilmington Regional Office
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington, NC 28405
RE: Follow-up Inspection — NOD-2012-PC-0102
Southbridge Subdivision — Phase i & 2
State Stormwater Permit No. SW8 090903
Onslow County
Dear Ms. Scott,
RECD NOV 2 6 2012
E IVE"'
NOV 2 6 2012
BY. - —
In response to your Follow-up Inspection Letter dated October 24, 2012, we offer the following
responses:
1. Engineer Certifications for the sand filters and ponds in Phases 1 & 2 have not been received.
Response: Morris & Tunstall is working with Steve Pusey on this. We anticipate issuance of
certifications within the next two weeks.
2. A copy of the recorded deed restrictions for Phases 1 & 2 has not been received.
Response: The recorded deed restrictions were emailed to Steve Pusey on October 30, 2012.
Please feel free to contact us with any additional questions or comments.
Sincerely,
Tammy M. Spivey
Development Manager
Trask Land Company
Cc: John Tunstall, Norris & Tunstall
Steve Pusey, NCDENR
1202 F�astwond Read • Wilmington, North Carolina 28403
910-799-8755 (voice) • 910-799-9785 (fax)

Compliance Inspection Report
Permit: SW8090903 Effective: 02/24/12 Expiration: 12/31/21 Owner: Bc & Rt LLC and Raiford G Trask Jr Trustee
Project: South Bridge Subdivision
County: Onslow NC 172
Region: Wilmington
Sneads Ferry NC 28460
Contact Person: Raiford G Trask Title: Trustee Phone: [phone]
Directions to Project:
Take Market St. towards Jacksonville for 29 miles turn right at NC 172 go approx. 5.4 miles site on left beside Yopp's Tire & Garage.
Type of Project: State Stormwater - HD - Detention Pond
Drain Areas: 1 - (Everett Creek) (03-05-02 ) ( SA;HQW)
13 - (Everett Creek) (03-05-02 ) (SA;HQW)
14 - (Everett Creek) (03-05-02 ) ( SA;HQW)
2 - (Everett Creek) (03-05-02 ) ( SA;HQW)
3 - (Everett Creek) (03-05-02 ) ( SA;HQW)
4 - (Everett Creek) (03-05-02 ) ( SA;HQW)
5 - (Everett Creek) (03-05-02 ) ( SA;HQW)
6A - (Everett Creek) (03-05-02 ) ( SA;HQW)
6B - (Everett Creek) (03-05-02 ) ( SA;HQW)
712 - (Everett Creek) (03-05-02) ( SA;HQW)
On -Site Representative(s):
Related Permits:
Inspection Date: 1111912012 Entry Time: 01:00 PM
Primary Inspector: Steven G Pusey
Secondary Inspector(s):
Reason for Inspection: Follow-up
Permit Inspection Type: State Stormwater
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ■ Not Compliant
Question Areas:
0 State Stormwater
(See attachment summary)
State Stormwater - HD - Sand filters
Exit Time: 03:00 PM
Phone:
Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Page: 1

Permit: SW8090903 Owner - Project: Bc & Rt LLC and Raiford G Trask Jr Trustee
Inspection Date: 11/19/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Follow-up
Inspection Summary:
The following actions need to be taken to bring this project into compliance.
1. Engineer certifications need to be submitted for BMPs.
2. Swale behind Lots 9 - 10 is blocked by a yard fence and there is an erosion problem that needs to be fixed due to
underground seepage washing out the bank.
File Review
Is the permit active?
Signed copy of the Engineer's certification is in the file?
Signed copy of the Operation & Maintenance Agreement is in the file?
Copy of the recorded deed restrictions is in the file?
Comment: Engineer certifications need to be submitted for BMPs.
SW Measures
Are the SW measures constructed as per the approved plans?
Are the inlets located per the approved plans?
Are the outlet structures located per the approved plans?
Comment:
Operation and Maintenance
Are the SW measures being maintained and operated as per the permit requirements?
Yes No NA NE
Yes No NA NE
0000
®❑❑n
iJ❑❑❑
Yes No NA NE
❑■❑Q
Are the SW BMP inspection and maintenance records complete and available for review or provided to DWQ ❑ ❑ ❑ ■
upon request?
Comment: Swale behind Lots 9 - 10 is blocked by a yard fence and there is an erosion
problem that needs to be fixed due to underground seepage washing out the bank.
Page: 2

..f
�r
1

Pusey, Steven
From: Tammy Spivey [[e-mail]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2012 1:12 PM
To: Pusey, Steven
Subject: RE: Southbridge
Attachments: PC Recorded Annexation Amendment.pdf
Attached. Please let me know if you need anything additional.
Thanks,
Tammy
From: Pusey, Steven f ailto:steven.pusey(dncdenr.aov]
Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2012 1:08 PM
To: Tammy Spivey
Subject: RE: Southbridge
Tammy,
This permit was modified on Feb. 24, 2012 and it looks like some of the lot BUA allocations were changed, and lots were
added in Section 3. Can you have these deed restrictions amended and recorded in accordance with the revised lot
configuration? Or, has it already been recorded? Please advise.
Thanks,
Steve
From: Tammy Spivey [mailto:tammy0autumnhall.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2012 12:16 PM
To: Pusey, Steven
Subject: RE: Southbridge
Will do — should have pictures later today.
Recorded covenants/deed restrictions are attached.
I'm trying to get an update from John Tunstall on when we can expect certifications. Will update you on this asap.
Thanks,
Tammy
From: Pusey, Steven[mailto:steven.pusey(dncdenr.gov]
Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2012 11:27 AM
To: Tammy Spivey
Subject: RE: Southbridge
Ok, thanks. If you could send a photo of the repaired area, I think that would be sufficient for compliance on site.
The other items we need are engineer certifications, and recorded deed restrictions as mentioned in the recent
inspection letter.

Thanks,
Steve Pusey
DWQ
From: Tammy Spivey Finailto:tammy@autumnhall com]
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2012 5:19 PM
To: Pusey, Steven
Subject: RE: Southbridge
Hi Steve,
Premier Management notified us this afternoon that the erosion repair was completed today.
Thanks,
Tammy
From: Pusey, Steven Finailto•steven pusey(dricdenr gov]
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2012 3:52 PM
To: Tammy Spivey
Cc: dmysiuk0capefearpaving.com; David Honeycutt; Chris Manning; Madison Bullington
Subject: RE: Southbridge
OK.
Thanks,
Steve Pusey
DWQ
From: Tammy Spivey fmailto:tammy0autumnhall.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2012 2:15 PM
To: Pusey, Steven
Cc: dmysiuk0capefearpaving.com; David Honeycutt; Chris Manning; Madison Bullington
Subject: RE: Southbridge
Hi Steve,
Premier Management (the HOA management company) has had the community landscape contractor take a look at this
area. They plan to fix the erosion issue the end of this week/first of next week and will place sod where immediate
vegetation/stabilization is needed. This area will be ready for re -inspection on Thursday or Friday of next week.
Thanks,
Tammy M. Spivey
Development Manager
Trask
Office: 910.799.8755
1202 Eastwood Road
Wilmington, NC 28403
www.TraskLandCo.com

CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT
This email transmission contains information from Trask Land Company, Inc., which is privileged and confidential. It is intended only for the use of
the addressee(s) shown above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of
such information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify us by reply e-mail or telephone. Thank
you.
From: Pusey, Steven[mailto:steven.pusey(cbncdenr.gov]
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2012 8:20 AM
To: dmysiuk@)capefearpaving.com; David Honeycutt
Cc: Tammy Spivey
Subject: Southbridge
Dan,
I will be sending out the official inspection report this week. There is one area of erosion behind Lot 9 (above retaining
wall) that will need to be repaired and grass sod installed to prevent erosion in future. I may be able to stop by there
today to look at this area if it has already been fixed. Please advise the status.
Thanks,
Steve
crtmel- c 0. _PmA,_V
Environmental Engineer
NCDENR - Div. of Water Quality
Surface Water Protection
Ph [phone] / Fax [phone]
Before printing this email, please consider your budget and the environment.
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.

( r
i F�I
i
MC®E�NR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Charles Wakild, P. E. Dee Freeman
Governor Director Secretary
October 24, 2012
Raiford G. Trask, Jr., Manager and Trustee
BC & RT, LLC
1202 Eastwood Road
Wilmington, NC 28403
Subject: Follow-up Inspection - NOD-2012-PC-0102
South Bridge Subdivision — Phase 1 & 2
State Stormwater Permit No. SW8 090903
Onslow County
Dear Mr. Trask:
On October 5, 2012, Steve Pusey of the Wilmington Regional Office of the Division of Water
Quality (DWQ) performed a follow-up Compliance Inspection at South Bridge Subdivision in
Onslow County, NC. A copy of the previous compliance inspection report was sent to you on
June 14, 2012. The inspection was performed to determine the status of compliance with
Stormwater Permit Number SW8 090903, issued to you on September 3, 2010.
The maintenance items outlined in the October 5, 2012 inspection have been corrected.
However, our file review of this Stormwater Permit Number SW8 090903 indicates that the
following deficiencies must still be resolved:
1. Engineer certifications for the sand filters and ponds in Phases 1 & 2 have not been
received.
2. A copy of the recorded deed restrictions for Phases 1 & 2 has not been received.
Please provide a "Plan of Action" by November 23, 2012 to DWQ that states how and when
these deficiencies will be corrected. If we do not receive your plan of action by this date, you will
be in violation of 15A NCAC 2H.1000, which could result in the initiation of enforcement action
which may include recommendations for the assessment of civil penalties, pursuant to NCGS
143-215.6A.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please call Steve Pusey at [phone].
Sin7erely, or Charle Wakild, P . E. hector
Division of Water Quality
Enc: Compliance Inspection Report
GDS/sgp: 3AVVQS1StormwaterlPermits & Projects120091090903 HD12012 10 CEi_deficient 090903
cc: John S. Tunstall, PE — Norris & Tunstall Engineers
Onslow County Inspections
Karen Higgins, WBS-CPU
Georgette Scott
WiRO Stormwater File
Wilmington Regional Office
127 Cardinal Drive Extension, Wilmington, North Carolina 28405
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] DENR Assistance: 1-877-623-6748
Internet: www.ncwaterquality.org

Compliance Inspection Report
Permit: SW8090903 Effective: 02/24/12 Expiration: 12/31/21 Owner: Bc & Rt LLC and Raiford G Trask Jr Trustee
Project: South Bridge Subdivision
County: Onslow NC 172
Region: Wilmington
Sneads Ferry NC 28460
Contact Person: Raiford G Trask Title: Trustee Phone: [phone]
Directions to Project:
Take Market St. towards Jacksonville for 29 miles turn right at NC 172 go approx. 5.4 miles site on left beside Yopp's Tire & Garage.
Type of Project: State Stormwater - HD - Detention Pond State Stormwater - HD - Sand filters
Drain Areas: 1 - (Everett Creek) (03-05-02 ) ( SA; HOW)
13 - (Everett Creek) (03-05-02 ) ( SA;HQW)
14 - (Everett Creek) (03-05-02 ) ( SA;HQW)
2 - (Everett Creek) (03-05-02 ) ( SA; HOW)
3 - (Everett Creek) (03-05-02 ) ( SA; HOW)
4 - (Everett Creek) (03-05-02 ) ( SA; HOW)
5 - (Everett Creek) (03-05-02 ) ( SA; HOW)
6A - (Everett Creek) (03-05-02 ) ( SA; HOW)
6B - (Everett Creek) (03-05-02 ) ( SA; HOW)
712 - (Everett Creek) (03-05-02) ( SA;HQW)
On -Site Representative(s):
Related Permits:
Inspection Date: 10/05/2012 Entry Time: 09:30 AM
Primary Inspector: Steven G Pusey
Secondary Inspector(s):
Reason for Inspection: Follow-up
Permit Inspection Type: State Stormwater
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ® Not Compliant
Question Areas:
M State Stormwater
(See attachment summary)
Exit Time: 11:30 AM
Phone:
Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Page: 1

Permit: SW8090903 Owner Project: Bc & Rt LLC and Raiford G Trask Jr Trustee
inspection Date: 10/05/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Inspection Summary:
Phase 1 & 2 of this site meet the minimum requirements for compliance with the permit.
See details section for further information.
Reason for Visit: Follow-up
Page: 2

Permit: SW8090903 Owner - Project: Bc & Rt LLC and Raiford G Trask Jr Trustee
Inspection Date: 10/05/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Follow-up
File Review Yes No NA NE
Is the permit active?
Signed copy of the Engineer's certification is in the file?
Signed copy of the Operation & Maintenance Agreement is in the file?
Copy of the recorded deed restrictions is in the file?
Comment: 1. Engineer certification for sand filters and ponds in Phases 1 & 2 have
not been received.
2. A copy of the recorded deed restrictions for Phases 1 & 2 have not been received.
SW Measures
Are the SW measures constructed as per the approved plans?
Are the inlets located per the approved plans?
Are the outlet structures located per the approved plans?
Comment:
Operation and Maintenance
Are the SW measures being maintained and operated as per the permit requirements?
Yes No NA NE
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
■❑0D
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Yes No NA NE
■❑❑❑
Are the SW BMP inspection and maintenance records complete and available for review or provided to DWQ ❑ ❑ ❑ ■
upon request?
Comment: 1. Sand filter #5 (Peggy's Trace): Vegetation has been established.
2. Sand filter #3 (Peggy's Trace): Forebay and sand/gravel area have been cleaned
and restored. All slopes no greater than 2:1 slope and grassed.
3. Sand filter #6A (Katrina Street): Lot 44 and area behind was stabilized in July'12.
4. Sand filter #613 (Katrina Street): Areas have been stabilized and silt fence repaired in
July'12.
5. Endcaps on each sock -pipe level spreader secured.
6. Main pond #7-12: All slopes stabilized with vegetation.
7. Sand filter #2 (Peggy's Trace): Inlet protection added at inlet to sand filter #2, behind
Lot 15.
Other WQ Issues
Is the site compliant with other water quality issues as noted during the inspection?
Yes No NA NE
© C10 0
Page: 3

10
Permit: SW8090903 Owner - Project: Bc & Rt LLC and Raiford G Trask Jr Trustee
inspection Date: 10/05/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Follow-up
Comment: 1. There was some sedimentation near the wetlands behind Lots 1-3 that
appears to have been caused by erosion in residents back yards, and there was some
bank erosion apparently caused by the installation of fences in back yards on Lots
9-10. These issues should be addressed to prevent bigger problems in the future.
Page: 4

Trask Land
.f�
July 13, 2012
Ms. Georgette Scott
NCDENR/Division of Water Quality
Wilmington Regional Office
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington, NC 28405
RE: Notice of Deficiency, NOD-2012-PC-0102
Southbridge Subdivision — Phases 1 & 2
State Stormwater Permit No. SW8 090903
Onslow County
Dear Ms. Scott,
REOD jtjL 182012
In response to your Notice of Deficiency Letter dated June 14, 2012 and our follow-up site inspection on
July 12, 2012 with Mr. Steve Pusey of your office, we offer the following responses:
1. Sand Filter #5 (Peggy's Trace) —There is a lack of vegetation on the berm and back slope of sand
filter #5, mostly caused by the Ecoexpress compost blanket. This area should be evaluated and
repaired as necessary.
Response: Berm and back slope of sand filter #5 are in compliance per site inspection with
Steve Puse:y on July 12. Per July 12 site inspection, seed and stravil vvill Dr.• piaced at the left rear
corner of Lot 9 where bare soil was noted.
2. Sand Filter #3 (Peggy's Trace) — Forebay and sand/gravel area needs to be cleaned out and
restored to design conditions after the jack and bore operation is completed. Also, the pit area
where the jack and bore operation is being conducted must be restored with slopes no greater
than 2:1 and grassed.
Response: Jack and bore is complete. Pipe connection from jack and bore manhole to lift
station manhole is now in process and is anticipated to be complete by July 16. additional
riprap will be added at end of sock pipe, and clean up, re -grading, seeding and straw placement
of the disturbed area is anticipated to be complete by July 23.
3. Sand Filter #6A (Katrina Street) — Lot 44 and area behind Lot 44 needs to be stabilized. Erosion
from the lot is causing sedimentation build-up in the area leading to this sand filter. The
problem appears to be primarily caused by lack of vegetation on Lot 44.
Response: In compliance per site inspection with Steve Pusey on July 12.
ECEIvE
JUL 13 2w
BY:
1202 Eastwood Road • Wilmington, North Carolina 22 103
910-799-8755 (voice) 0 910-799-8795 (fax)

Trask Lan
4. Sand Filter #613 — (Katrina Street) — Area just above new retaining wall needs to be stabilized.
Again, it appears that the lack of vegetation is caused by the Ecoexpress compost blanket. In
addition, the banks on i the downstream side of the sand filter need more stabilization and the
lower silt fence next to the wetlands needs repair. Remove excess sediment from wetlands as
needed.
Response: In compliance per site inspection with Steve Pusey on July 12
5. Secure end caps on each sock pipe level spreader with riprap as needed.
Response: End caps are secured.
6. Main Pond #7-12 —Slopes inside this main stormwater pond need to be stabilized with
vegetation in certain areas in order to minimize erosion and ensure integrity of the graded
vegetated shelf.
Response: Slopes of pond 7-12 are in compliance per site inspectio:; with Steve Pusey on July
12. Per July 12 inspection, silt fence will be added to direct runoff to riprap at outlet of
underground perforated pipe located at the south corner of the pond top berm. In addition,
eroded area will be filled in.
7. Per July 12 site inspection, we will add #57 stone and inlet protection fence around inlet to sand
filter #2, behind Lot 15."
Please feel free to contact us with any additional questions or comments.
Sincerely,
61mrKtim I
TammyM. Spivey
p Y
Development Manager
Trask Land Company
Cc: John Tunstall, Norris & Tunstall Engineering
David Honeycutt, Cape Fear Paving
Steve Pusey, NCDENR
1202 Eastwood Road - Wilmington, North Carolina 28403
9; 0-799-8755 (voice) - 910-799-8785 (fax)

Pusey, Steven
From:
Pusey, Steven
Sent:
Friday, July 13, 2012 10:25 AM
To:
'Tammy Spivey'
Cc:
Dan Mysiuk; David Honeycutt
Subject:
RE: Southbridge NOD response - July 12 site inspection
Tammy,
Thanks for the email. Here are my comments below:
1. Sand filter #5: OK
2. Sand filter #3: Add the following: "Additional riprap will be added at end of sock pipe."
3. Sand filter #6A: OK
4. Sand filter #68: OK
5. End caps: OK
6. Change to "Per July 12 inspection, silt fence will be added to direct runoff to riprap at outlet of underground
perforated pipe located at the south corner of the pond top berm. In addition, eroded area will be filled in."
7. Change to "Add #57 stone and inlet protection fence around inlet to sand filter #2, behind Lot 15."
Please revise and send letter ASAP. We're getting there.
Much thanks,
Steve
From: Tammy Spivey f ailto:tammv(dautumnhall.com]
Sent: Friday, July 13, 2012 9:18 AM
To: Pusey, Steven
Cc: Dan Mysiuk; David Honeycutt
Subject: Southbridge NOD response - July 12 site inspection
Steve,
Here's what I plan to put in our official response letter that I want to finish this morning & deliver to your office this
afternoon. Please review & let me know if I've covered everything appropriately based on our site inspection yesterday.
Thanks,
Tammy
Sand Filter #5 (Peggy's Trace) —There is a lack of vegetation on the berm and back slope of sand filter #5, mostly
caused by the Ecoexpress compost blanket. This area should be evaluated and repaired as necessary.

Response: Berm and back slope of sand filter #5 are in compliance per site inspection with Steve Pusey on July
12. Per July 12 site inspection, seed and straw will be placed at the left rear corner of Lot 9 where bare soil was
noted.
Sand Filter #3 (Peggy's Trace) — Forebay and sand/gravel area needs to be cleaned out and restored to design
conditions after the jack and bore operation is completed. Also, the pit area where the jack and bore operation
is being conducted must be restored with slopes no greater than 2:1 and grassed.
Response: Jack and bore is complete. Pipe connection from jack and bore manhole to lift station manhole is
now in process and is anticipated to be complete by July 16. Clean up, re -grading, seeding and straw placement
of this area is anticipated to be complete by July 23.
3. Sand Filter NA (Katrina Street) — Lot 44 and area behind Lot 44 needs to be stabilized. Erosion from the lot is
causing sedimentation build-up in the area leading to this sand filter. The problem appears to be primarily
caused by lack of vegetation on Lot 44.
Response: In compliance per site inspection with Steve Pusey on July 12.
4. Sand Filter #613 — (Katrina Street) — Area just above new retaining wall needs to be stabilized. Again, it appears
that the lack of vegetation is caused by the Ecoexpress compost blanket. In addition, the banks on the
downstream side of the sand filter need more stabilization and the lower silt fence next to the wetlands needs
repair. Remove excess sediment from wetlands as needed.
Response: In compliance per site inspection with Steve Pusey on July 12
5. Secure end caps on each sock pipe level spreader with riprap as needed.
Response: End caps are secured.
6. Main Pond #7-12 —Slopes inside this main stormwater pond need to be stabilized with vegetation in certain
areas in order to minimize erosion and ensure integrity of the graded vegetated shelf.
Response: Slopes of pond 7-12 are in compliance per site inspection with Steve Pusey on July 12. Per July 12
site inspection, silt fence will be added to direct stormwater to rip rap at end of sock pipe.
7. Per July 12 site inspection, additional rip rap will be added at the sand filter #2 inlet (behind lot 15).

■ Complete items 1, 2, . nd 3. Also complete
item 4 If Restricted D ivery is desired.
■ Print your name and a dress on the reverse
so that we can return he card to you.
■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece,
or on the front if space permits.
1. Article Addressed to:
8� `y- GAG 0/
l
2. Article Number
(Transfer from service iabeq
PS Form 3811, February 2004
VWWW
A.
❑ Agent
❑ Addressee
B�+eceived (P N me),j C. Date of Delivery
D. Is delivery address different from item 1? ❑ Yes
If YES, enter delivery address below: ❑ No
3. Service Type
ertifled Mail ❑ Express Mail
❑ egistered ❑ Return Receipt for Merchandise
❑ Insured Mail ❑ C.O.D.
4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) ❑ Yes
7010 0290 0003 0834 7231
Domestic Return Receipt .. 102595-02-M-154[

7 ;KW
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Charles Wakild, P. E. Dee Freeman
Governor Director Secretary
June 14, 2012
CERTIFIED MAIL #7010 0290 0003 0834 7231
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Raiford G. Trask, Jr., Manager and Trustee
BC & RT, LLC
1202 Eastwood Road
Wilmington, NC 28403
Subject: NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY, NOD-2012-PC-0102
South Bridge Subdivision — Phase 1 & 2
State Stormwater Permit No. SW8 090903
Onslow County
Dear Mr. Trask:
On June 7, 2012, Steve Pusey of the Wilmington Regional Office of the Division of Water
Quality (DWQ) performed a follow-up Compliance Inspection at South Bridge Subdivision in
Onslow County, NC. A copy of the previous compliance inspection report was sent to you on
January 17, 2012. The inspection was performed to determine the status of compliance with
Stormwater Permit Number SW8 090903, issued to you on September 3, 2010.
The project has been found to be deficient of Stormwater Permit Number SW8 090903, issued
pursuant to the requirements of the stormwater rules, 15A NCAC 2H.1000. As indicated in the
attached inspection report, the following deficiencies must be resolved:
`c 1. Sand filter #5 (Peggy's Trace) — There is a lack of vegetation on the berm and back
slope of sand filter #5, mostly caused by the Ecoexpress compost blanket. This area
should be evaluated and repaired as necessary. �� tor- It. + 4111
Q ,�( 2. Sand filter #3 (Peggy's Trace) — Forebay and sand / graverarea needs to be cleaned out
and restored to design conditions after the jack and bore operation is completed. Also,
.. r, the pit area where the jack and bore operation is being conducted must be restored with
slopes no greater than 2:1 and grassed. �� �• ,.,� l ;;r S,,G¢ ,F
3. Sand filter #6A (Katrina Street) — Lot 44 and area behind Lot 44 needs to be stabilized.
Erosion from the lot is causing sedimentation build-up in the area leading to this sand
filter. The problem appears to be primarily caused by lack of vegetation on Lot 44.
4. Sand filter #613 (Katrina Street) — Area just above new retaining wall needs to be
stabilized. Again, it appears that the lack of vegetation is caused by the Ecoexpress
compost blanket. In addition, the banks on the downstream side of the sand filter need
more stabilization and the lower silt fence next to the wetlands needs repair. Remove
excess sediment from wetlands as needed.
5. Secure endcaps on each sock -pipe level spreader with riprap as needed.
6. Main pond #7-12 — Slopes inside this main stormwater pond need to be stabilized with
vegetation in certain areas in order to minimize erosion and ensure integrity of the
graded vegetated shelf.
Wilmington Regional Office
127 Cardinal Drive Extension, Wilmington, North Carolina 28405
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] DENR Assistance: 1-877-623-6748
Internet www.ncwaterquality.org
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer

Please provide a "Plan of Action" by July 13, 2012 to DWQ that states how and when these
deficiencies will be corrected. If we do not receive your plan of action by this date, you will be in
violation of 15A NCAC 2H.1000, which could result in the initiation of enforcement action which
may include recommendations for the assessment of civil penalties, pursuant to NCGS 143-
215.6A.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please call Steve Pusey at (910)-796-7215.
Sincefely,
`For Coleen ins Director
Division of Water Quality
Enc: Compliance Inspection Report
GDS/sgp: S:\WQS\Stormwater\Permits & Projects\2009\090903 HD\2012 06 CEI_deficient 090903
cc: John S. Tunstall, PE — Norris & Tunstall Engineers
Onslow County Inspections
Karen Higgins, WBS-CPU
Georgette Scott
WiRO Stormwater File
DWQ Central Files
Page 2 of 2

Compliance Inspection Report
Permit: SW8090903 Effective: 02/24/12 Expiration: 12/31/21 Owner: Bc & Rt LLC and Raiford G Trask Jr Trustee
Project: South Bridge Subdivision
County: Onslow NC 172
Region: Wilmington
Sneads Ferry NC 28460
Contact Person: Raiford G Trask Title: Trustee Phone: [phone]
Directions to Project:
Take Market St. towards Jacksonville for 29 miles turn right at NC 172 go approx. 5.4 miles site on left beside Yopp's Tire & Garage.
Type of Project: State Stormwater - HD - Detention Pond State Stormwater - HD - Sand filters
Drain Areas: 1 - (Everett Creek) (03-05-02 ) ( SA;HQW)
13 - (Everett Creek) (03-05-02 ) ( SA;HQW)
14 - (Everett Creek) (03-05-02 ) ( SA;HQW)
2 - (Everett Creek) (03-05-02 ) ( SA;HQW)
3 - (Everett Creek) (03-05-02 ) ( SA;HQW)
4 - (Everett Creek) (03-05-02 ) ( SA;HQW)
5 - (Everett Creek) (03-05-02 ) ( SA;HQW)
6A - (Everett Creek) (03-05-02 ) (SA;HQW)
6B - (Everett Creek) (03-05-02 ) ( SA;HQW)
712 - (Everett Creek) (03-05-02 } ( SA;HQW)
On -Site Representative(s):
Related Permits:
Inspection Date: 06/07/2012 Entry Time: 02:00 PM
Primary Inspector: Steven G Pusey
Secondary Inspector(s):
Reason for Inspection: Follow-up
Permit Inspection Type: State Stormwater
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ■ Not Compliant
Question Areas:
® State Stormwater
(See attachment summary)
Exit Time: 05:00 PM
Phone:
Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Page: 1

Permit: SW8090903 Owner - Project: Bc & Rt LLC and Raiford G Trask A Trustee
Inspection Date: 06/07/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Follow-up
Inspection Summary:
See inspection cover letter.
Page: 2

Permit: SW8090903
Inspection Date: 06/07/2012
File Review
!s the permit active?
Owner - Project: Bc & Rt LLC and Raiford G Trask Jr Trustee
Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Reason for Visit: Follow-up
Yes No NA NE
Signed copy of the Engineers certification is in the file?
Signed copy of the Operation & Maintenance Agreement is in the file?
Copy of the recorded deed restrictions is in the file?
Comment: 1. Engineer certification for sand filters and ponds in Phases 1 and 2 have
not been received.
2. A copy of the recorded deed restrictions for Phases 1 and 2 have not been received.
SW Measures
Are the SW measures constructed as per the approved plans?
Are the inlets located per the approved plans?
Are the outlet structures located per the approved plans?
Comment:
Operation and Maintenance
Are the SW measures being maintained and operated as per the permit requirements?
Yes No NA NE
Cl ❑ ❑
C ❑ ❑ ❑
❑❑❑
Vac Nn WA KIP
❑ ® ❑ ❑
Are the SW BMP inspection and maintenance records complete and available for review or provided to DWQ ❑ ❑ ❑ P1
upon request?
Comment: 1. Sand filter #5 (Peggy's Trace) - Lack of vegetation on the berm and
back slope of sand filter #5.
2. Sand filter #3 (Peggy's Trace) — Forebay and sand / gravel area need to be cleaned
out and restored to design conditions after the jack and bore operation is completed.
Also, pit area where jack and bore operation is being conducted must be restored with
slopes no greater than 2:1 and grassed.
3. Sand filter NA (Katrina Street) — Lot 44 and area behind needs to be stabilized.
4. Sand filter #61B (Katrina Street) — Area just above new retaining wall needs to be
stabilized. In addition, the banks on the downstream side of the sand filter need more
stabilization and the lower silt fence next to the wetlands needs repair. Remove excess
sediment from wetlands.
5. Secure endcaps on each sock -pipe level spreader with riprap as needed.
6. Main pond #7-12 — Slopes inside this main stormwater pond need to be stabilized
with vegetation in certain areas.
Page: 3

Pusey, Steven
From: Pusey, Steven
Sent: Monday, June 11, 2012 8:40 AM
To: 'David Honeycutt'; D Mysiuk; Tammy Spivey; John Tunstall
Cc: Hammers, Karl
Subject: RE: Southbridge - Phase 1 & 2
Attachments: 2012-06-07 17.04.20.jpg
One other area I forgot to mention is Lot 44 on Katrina Street. Erosion from this Lot is causing sedimentation build-up in
the area leading to sand filter # 6A. This lot and the area behind the lot needs to be stabilized. The problem is mainly
caused by lack of vegetation on Lot 44. See picture attached.
Steve
From: David Honeycutt [ iailtn.dhonevcuttOcapefearoaving.com]
Sent: Monday, June 11, 2012 5:25 AM
To: Pusey, Steven; D Mysiuk; Tammy Spivey; John Tunstall
Subject: RE: Southbridge - Phase 1 & 2
Steve,
Good morning and thank you sir. We will take care of item 2 after jack and bore which should be this week and will take
care of item 4 today. I know that Tammy has been in touch with ECO
Thanks
David
From: Pusey, Steven [mailto•steven uusevCcbncdenr gov]
Sent: Friday, June 08, 201211:59 AM
To: D Mysiuk
Cc: David Honeycutt
Subject: Southbridge - Phase 1 & 2
Dan,
I enjoyed meeting with you at the site yesterday. After reviewing the previous inspection, plans, and notes, many issues
have been resolved. Here is a list of the remaining issues to clear up:
1. There is a lack of vegetation on the berm and back slope of sand filter #5, mostly caused by the Ecoexpress
compost blanket. Need to get something growing on this area to prevent erosion in future.
2. Sand filter #3 forebay and sand / gravel area will need to be cleaned out and restored to design condition after
jack and 'bore operation is completed. Also, the pit area where the jack and bore operation is being conducted
will need to be restored with slopes no greater than 2:1 and grassed.
3. Area just above new retaining wall near sand filter #613 still needs to have more stabilization. There is a lack of
vegetation primarily due to Ecoexpress compost blanket. Also, banks on downstream side of sand filter need
more stabilization, and silt fence next to wetlands has a blowout that needs repair.
4. Endcaps on each sock- pipe level spreader need to be secured with riprap.
5. Slopes inside the main stormwater pond #7-12 need to be stabilized as necessary with vegetation in certain
areas in order to minimize erosion and ensure integrity of the graded vegetated shelf.
This is all I have for now. I will get the inspection report mailed out as soon as possible.
Thanks,

Southbridge Subdivision —Jacksonville, NC
Area behind Lot 44, Katrina Street
This area has constant sedimentation caused by erosion from Lot 44 on Katrina Street, which needs to
be stabilized.

Land Quality Section: 127 Cardinal Drive Extension, Wilmington, NC 28405 [phone]
Onslow Southbridge Subdivision Lot Development White Oak
County: 1. Project: _....... River basin: ... .. ......_
Southbridge Lot Development, LL.0 2012-074
Person financially responsible: _.._....._ _ _.. ........ ...._.... Project
Address: I .. Attn: Raiford Trask 1111202 Eastwood Rd WIiln.ington, NC 28403
1. Project location: NC 172 _ .:....
Pictures: Yes: W No: r Prints: I Slides: r Video: r Digita1:
2. Weather and soil conditions:. partly cloudy, workable Initial inspection: Yes: P No: r
3. Is site currently under notice of violation? Yes: I No: P
4. Is the site in compliance with S.P.C.A. and rules? Yes: r No: r'
5. Violations:
I a. No approved plan, G.S. 113A-57 (4) and 15A N.C.A.C4B.0107(c)
b. Failure to follow approved plan, G.S. 113A-57 (5)
c. Failure to submit revised plan, G.S. I I3A-54.1(b) and
15A N.C.A.C. 4B.0118(a)
d. Failure to provide adequate groundcover, G.S. 113A-57(3) and
15A N.C.A.C. 4B.0007(b) or 15A N.C.A.C. 4B.0124(e)
r e. Insufficient measures to retain sediment on site, G.S. I I3A-57(3)
FF f. Failure to take all reasonable measures, 15A N.C.A.C.4130105
If no, check violations below:
r g. Inadequate buffer zone, G.S.113A-57(1)
r h. Graded slopes and fills too steep,
G.S. 113A-57(2) or 15A N.C.A.C. 4B.0124(d)
i. Unprotected exposed slopes, G.S. 113A-57(2)
r j. Failure to maintain erosion control measures,
15A N.C.A.C. 413.0113
r k. Failure to self -inspect G.S. 113A-54.1(e) and
15A N.C.A.C. 413.0131
r 1. Other (describe)
6. Has sedimentation damage occurred since last inspection? Yes: r If yes, where? (check all that apply) No: r
Lake/natural watercourse on the tract: I- Lake/natural watercourse off the tract: r, Other property: r
Sediment has entered delineated wetlands on the downhill side of the project:
Description: .. ..
Degree of damage: slight: r moderate: r severe: I
No one on site
7. Contact made with (name): ...._ ..... ......... _............ .. _ - . _ ......... Title: .. -
3/12/12
Inspection report given: r or sent: w to person financially responsible. Date 'ven/sent:. ___..._.... _.___._... _.. _........ _._ _ .. _... _ .. ._
Failure 8. Potential NPDES Permit Violation? Yes: r- No: r Describe:. ..- - -- .. -- to .mai- ntam erosion control mea_ .....s.ur..es _
9. Corrective actions needed:
1. Install and maintain the silt fence where shown on the approved plan.
2. Install adequate erosion and sediment control measures on the downhill side of the site to prevent sediment from leaving the
site.
3. Remove the sediment from the wetland using non -mechanical methods.
4. Provide adequate groundcover on all exposed soil that will not, be disturbed for 21 days.
If the corrective actions e not complete by it inspection Niof Viion
10. Comments: ar_..... ._ .. the ... ...t....me ..... of the . . ...........nex................ ....... a . .ot.....ce .. .....olat........_ . . may be
requested.
Please contact me at 910-796-7372 if ou have any questions regarding this report
Karl Hammers
Report by: .. Others present: .
Date of inspection: r 3/8/12 Time arriving1l:27 on site: :2 Time leavin site: 12:19
Linda Willis, DWQ
cc:
I'G H lte vised 4 /19 201 1 Page 1 of I

(mPO-L4(L-W r7
~--- Modification to ONSLO-2009-002 NKT #11071
FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY/OWNERSHIP FORM
SEDIMENTATION POLLUTION CONTROL ACT
No person may initiate any land -disturbing activity on one or more acres as covered by the Act before this form and an
acceptable erosion and sedimentation control plan have been completed and approved by the Land Quality Section, N.C.
Department of Environment and Natural Resources. (Please type or print and, if the question is not applicable or the e-mail
and/or fax information unavailable, place N/A in the blank).
Part A.
1. Project Name Southbridge Subdivision (PH III) — Additional Single Family Lots on Peggy's Trace
2. Location of [arid -disturbing activity: County Onslow City or Township Sneads Ferry
I & T( .77, y029 r
Highway/Street NC 172. Latitude 340 33 40" N Longitude -770 24 28.5" W
3. Approximate date land -disturbing activity will commence: As Soon as Permits Are Received
4. Purpose of development (residential, commercial, industrial, institutional, etc.): Residerfial
New. 1.75 AC (Previously
Approved: 9.07 on 01-03-11, 1.18
on 03-26-10, 3.64 on 02-11-10, 20
5. Total acreage disturbed or uncovered (including off -site borrow and waste areas): on 07-02-09 & 12 on 07 24-08)
6. Amount of fee enclosed: $ 130.00
The application fee of $65.00 per acre (rounded up to the
next acre) is assessed without a ceilina amount (Examine: a 9-acre application fee is $585).
7. Has an erosion and sediment control plan been filed? Yes X No
Enclosed X
8. Person to contact should erosion and sediment control issues arise during land -disturbing activity:
Name John S. Tunstall, P.E. E-mail Address [e-mail]
Telephone [phone]
Cell # 910-471-6757 Fax # [phone]
9. Landowner(s) of Record (attach accompanied page to list additional owners):
Raiford G. Trask, Jr., Trustee
Name
1202 Eastwood Road
Current Mailing Address
Wilmington NC 28403
City State Zip
Page No.
Part B.
910-313-0795
Telephone
910-313-0797
Fax Number
1202 Eastwood Road
Current Street Address
Wilmington NC 28403
City State Zip
Provide a copy of the most current deed.
Person(s) or firm(s) who are financially responsible for the land -disturbing activity (Provide a comprehensive list of all
responsible parties on an attached sheet):
Southbridge Lot Development, LLC
Name
1202 Eastwood Road
Current Mailing Address
Wilmington NC 28403
City State Zip
[e-mail]
autumnhall.com
E-mail Address
1202 Eastwood Road
Current Street Address
Wilmington NC 28403
City State Zip
Telephone [phone] Fax Number 910-799-8785

Akio
f
Al
4
q, . 4;
Rw
icig
Fm
WuvPKCt
CY
ii, `
Lp
p
C."th
•T
p TO:
50
7
'A
qbiFd ILD
La
i
Q.
r
4
—_4
6
2
0 01
N y Feary Point
Jamft Point
Appro?dmate Scale of Milos
U.
sc
Creels Fit
A
(OoiL
s &AII
Dr Poverty f
Dint
:21
Vi 11ans Bluff
s Ida99
0- Q n_
Wheeler 6
Landing.
M,60
an
Minnie
S ir
17
Bell Ln Fellow
0
13
3, T z
I .
-
9-
PeruSneads
Sn
M
Ida F
-bra
.5tad a
L 3.
POInt
Ferry,
> C Un
Club
nfl
RI -II Ct
d
el
dairaW R
RF
Russ IBMIn go
wilLn
Sneads Fe rry,
VFD p
Hill Ln Ct
res
U) 0 L. Ine
m Iii r
Eagle 4
Ch
, age
Y
&
U a
Co
ICSIGLn ay Ap
C
Clipper Ln
C
Z
Co
%9+Mmmock-
C',
Sh I
or
ad Chadj
vick
AC
Togmail