20211422 Ver 1_Buffer Plan for PN_20221021

ID#* 20211422 Version* 1
Select Reviewer:
Katie Merritt
Initial Review Completed Date 10/24/2022
Mitigation Project Submittal - 10/21/2022
Is this a Prospectus, Technical Proposal or a New Site?* O Yes O No
Type of Mitigation Project:*
Stream Wetlands Buffer Nutrient Offset
(Select all that apply)
Project Contact Information
Contact Name:* Email Address-*
Ben N Furr [e-mail]
Project Information
.....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
ID#:* 20211422 Version:* 1
Existing ID# Existing Version
Project Type: DMS • Mitigation Bank
Project Name: Dutch Farms Stream, Buffer Mitigation Site
County: Guilford
Document Information
Mitigation Document Type:*
Mitigation Plans
File Upload: Dutch Farms Riparian Buffer and Nutrient Offset
11.92MB
Mitigation Plan_DWR 2021-1422.pdf
Please upload only one PDF of the complete file that needs to be submitted...
Signature
Print Name: * Ben Furr
Signature:

Dutch Farms Riparian Buffer and Nutrient Offset Mitigation Site
Response to Agency Comments from Draft Riparian Buffer and Nutrient Offset Mitigation Plan
General Comments: DWR comments made to the MBI were accepted and incorporated with the exception of the comment
about 14-Digit HUC, since DWR 14-Digit HUC mapping is not currently available.
- Responses to DWR comments on the Mitigation Plan are summarized below. Page number references are specific to the
pdf document that DWR provided comments through. Specific responses are detailed within the Mitigation Plan's verbiage
DWR (Katie
Response
Merritt)
Pg. 3 - 1
Plan sheets PL2 and PL2A were added as Appendix AA.
Pg. 3 -2
The Buffer MBI was removed from the Buffer Plan.
Pg. 4 - 1
Text was edited as requested.
Pg. 4 - 2
DM was replaced with Sposor throughout the Plan.
Pg. 4 - 3
Text was edited as requested.
Reference to the MBI was removed from the Plan. Appendix AA was changed to contain Planting Plan
Pg. 4 - 4
Sheets.
Pg. 4 - 5No comment.
Pg. 4 - 6DWR number was added.
Additional stream credits are not being requested for non-standard buffer widths. This statement was
Pg. 4 - 7
added to Section 1.0.
Pg. 4 - 8
Text was edited as requested.
Pg. 5 - 1
Text was edited as requested.
Pg. 5 - 2
Text was edited as requested.
Pg. 5 - 3
Text was edited as requested.
Pg. 5 - 4
This text was removed from the document.
Crossings will be approximately 25 feet wide. Crossings will be gated and culverted to minimize cattle
Pg. 5 - 5
access to the stream and riparian zones.This text was added to Section 1.2.
Pg. 5 - 6Text was edited as requested.
Pg. 5 - 7Text was edited as requested.
Pg. 5 - 8Text was edited as requested.
Pg. 5 - 9 and 10Text was edited as requested.
Yes, portions of the riparian zone along UT 1, UT 4, and UT 8 will be less than 50'. Figures and credit tables
Pg. 5 - 11
were revised to distinguish these areas.
Noted. Text was revised to call out total area of preservation credit proposed on-site (0.34 acres), which is
Pg. 5 - 12
far below the total allowable amount.
Pg. 6 - 1Noted.
The photos presented in Section 2.3.1 were collected on 9/16/2020. The site has been maintained in the
Pg. 9 - 1
conditions depicted in these photos for several years and the photos provide an accurate representatiion of
site conditions at the time of Buffer Plan submittal in January 2022.
Plan sheets PL2 and PL2A were added as Appendix AA. Text was also revised in Section 3.1 to reference
Pg. 12 - 1
Appendix AA instead of Stream and Wetland Mitigation Plan.
Pg. 13 - 130' and 50' offset lines from TOB were added to Figure 4
Pg. 13 - 2-5Text was edited as requested.
Text was edited to reference rule 0295(n)(2) specifically. Text was also edited to allow for a mix of tree and
Pg. 14 - 1
shrub species to count toward performance standards.
The streamside zone extends out to 10 feet from top of bank. Tag alder will not be planted outside of this
Pg. 14-2
zone.
At this point, we are not certain which species will be available when the site is planted. Table 3 was
Pg. 15 - 1
updated to show "Preferred" species that we anticipate to be available and also "Acceptable Substitutions".
Pg. 15 - 2
Canopy/Sub-canopy and shrub status was added for each species in Table 3.
Text was added to clearly state that boundaries will be properly marked prior to the As-Built onsite visit by
Pg. 16 - 1
DWR.

DWR (Katie
Response
Merritt)
Section 3.7 was added to discuss the 30-day notice of site completion. Reference was made to Section VI.B
Pg. 16 - 2
of the MBI for additional details concerning specific items to be included in the notification.
Pg. 16 - 3
Text was revised to include monitoring of Buffer and Nutrient Offset credit areas.
Pg. 16 - 4-5
Text was edited as requested.
Pg. 16 - 6Section 4.1 was updated to allow trees and shrubs to count toward meeting performance standards.
The proposed vegetation plots (10) exceed the 2% requirement for nutrient offset and riparian buffer
Pg. 16 - 7
credit areas. Text was revised in Section 4.1 to clarify.
Pg. 16 - 8-9
Text was edited as requested.
Pg. 16 - 10
Text was edited to indicate height will only be recorded for planted stems.
Pg. 16 - 11-13
Text was edited as requested.
Pg. 16 - 14
Noted.
Text was added at the end of Section 4.1 requiring monitoring reports to be submitted to DWR by
Pg. 16 - 15
December 31 of each year.
Pg. 17 - 1-3Text was edited as requested.
Text was added to clarify that the easement will be assigned to the steward prior to the first credit release
Pg. 17 - 4
as indicated in the MBI.
Pg. 17 - 5
Text was edited as requested.
Pg. 17 - 6-7
Text was edited as requested.
Pg. 17 - 8Section 6, corresponding figures, and the project credit table were edited to include nutrient offset credits.
Pg. 18 - 1Text was edited as requested.
Pg. 18 - 2Text was edited to reflect changes made in regards to nutrient offset credits.
Pg. 18 - 3Restoration and enhancement credits were seperated out to show totals for each.
Pg. 18 - 4Text was edited as requested.
Delivery factors were added; however, the 14-digit HUC was not changed because the DWR 14-digit HUC
Pg. 18 - 5
layer was not available at time of submittal.
Pg. 18 - 6
Amount of Generated Credits were added to Section 6.0.
Pg. 18 - 7
Text was edited as requested.
Pg. 18 - 8
Text was edited as requested.
Pg. 18 - 9
Project Credit Table was moved to Section 6.0 and Titled Table 4.
Edited legend to clarify that the service area is for Riparian Buffer and Nutrient Offset credits and is in the
Figure 1
Haw River Subwatershed.
Edited Figure to show nutrient offset credit area, 50' buffer, 30' buffer, and revised text in legend as
Figure 4
requested.
Figure 9
Edited text in legend as requested.
Changed to Table 4 and moved to Section 6.0. Also edited Title text and added nutrient credits. Did not
Credit Table
change 14-digit HUC.

BUFFER MITIGATION & NUTRIENT OFFSET PLAN

DUTCH FARMS SITE
Guilford County, North Carolina
DWR Project Number: 2021-1422 v1

Haw River Subwatershed of Jordan Lake
8-Digit HUC 03030002 / 14-Digit HUC 03030002040010

Mitigation Bank Sponsor:

Davey Mitigation, A Division of Davey Resource Group, Inc.
(attn. T.J. Mascia, Director)

Prepared by:

Davey Resource Group, Inc.
Raleigh, NC

October 2022

Buffer Mitigation and Nutrient Offset Plan
Dutch Farms Mitigation Site
Guilford County, North Carolina
Contents
1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................ 1
1.1 Parcel Location ................................................................................................................................... 1
1.2 Parcel Overview .................................................................................................................................. 1
1.2.1 Parcel Ownership ........................................................................................................................ 2
2.0 PROJECT AREA .............................................................................................................................. 3
2.1 Physiography and Geology ................................................................................................................. 3
2.2 Soils .................................................................................................................................................... 3
2.3 Existing Riparian Condition................................................................................................................ 3
2.3.1 Existing Condition Photos ........................................................................................................... 6
2.4 Wetlands ............................................................................................................................................. 7
2.5 Threatened and Endangered Species ................................................................................................... 8
2.6 Cultural Resources .............................................................................................................................. 8
2.7 Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Floodplain/Floodway Mapping ......................... 8
3.0 RIPARIAN RESTORATION, ENHANCEMENT, AND PRESERVATION PLAN ...................... 9
3.1 Parcel Preparation ............................................................................................................................... 9
3.2 Riparian Restoration Activities ......................................................................................................... 10
3.3 Riparian Enhancement Activities ...................................................................................................... 10
3.4 Riparian Preservation Activities ....................................................................................................... 10
3.5 Planting Plan ..................................................................................................................................... 11
3.6 Easement Boundaries and Fencing ................................................................................................... 13
4.0 MONITORING AND MAINTENANCE PLAN............................................................................ 13
4.1 Monitoring Protocol and Success Criteria ........................................................................................ 13
4.2 Adaptive Management Plan and Parcel Maintenance ....................................................................... 14
4.3 Long Term Management Plan ........................................................................................................... 14
5.0 FINANCIAL ASSURANCE .......................................................................................................... 14
6.0 MITIGATION POTENTIAL .......................................................................................................... 15
7.0 REFERENCES ............................................................................................................................... 17

Page ii

Buffer Mitigation and Nutrient Offset Plan
Dutch Farms Mitigation Site
Guilford County, North Carolina
Figures
Figure 1. Service Area
Figure 2. Project Vicinity
Figure 3. Existing Conditions
Figure 4. Conceptual Design Plan
Figure 5. USGS Drainage Area Map
Figure 6. NRCS Soils Map
Figure 7. National Wetlands Inventory
Figure 8. National Flood Hazard Layer
Figure 9. Planting and Monitoring Plan
Tables
Table 1. Parcel and Landowner Information ................................................................................................ 3
Table 2. Existing and Relic Wetland Summary ............................................................................................ 8
Table 3. Planting Plan ................................................................................................................................. 12
Table 4. Project Credits ............................................................................................................................... 16
Appendices
Appendix AA – Planting Plan
Appendix AB – Site Viability for Buffer Mitigation and Nutrient Offset Letter
Appendix AC – Conservation Easement Template and Supplementary Information

Page iii

Buffer Mitigation and Nutrient Offset Plan
Dutch Farms Mitigation Site
Guilford County, North Carolina
1.0 INTRODUCTION
Davey Mitigation (Sponsor), A Division of Davey Resource Group, Inc. (DRG), is pleased to provide this
Buffer Mitigation and Nutrient Offset Plan (Plan) for the Dutch Farms Riparian Buffer and Nutrient
Offset Mitigation Bank (Project). This Project is designed to provide riparian buffer and nutrient offset
credits for unavoidable impacts due to development within the Haw River Subwatershed of the Jordan
Lake Watershed (Figure 1). This Plan is in accordance with the Consolidated Buffer Mitigation Rule 15A
NCAC 02B.0295, 15A NCAC 02B.0703 and the Proposed Dutch Farms Mitigation Banking Instrument
for Riparian Buffer Mitigation and Nutrient Offset Credits (MBI), made and entered into by the Sponsor
and the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality-Division of Water Resources (DWR).
The Plan has also been designed in concurrence with the DM Cape Fear 02 Umbrella Bank – Dutch
Farms Mitigation Site (SAW-2021-01071, DWR #2021-1422 v1). The Dutch Farms Mitigation Site (Site)
is proposed to provide 5,402.1 Stream Mitigation Units (SMUs) and 2.23 Wetland Mitigation Units
(WMUs) within the conservation easement through a separate mitigation banking instrument with the
IRT. Additional stream credits are not being requested for non-standard buffer widths.
1.1 Parcel Location
The Parcel is located in Guilford County approximately 2 miles northeast of Climax, North Carolina east
of Fields Farm Rd. (Figure 2). The Parcel is located within Haw River Subwatershed within the Jordan
Lake Watershed, USGS 14-digit HUC 03030002040010, a Targeted Local Watershed, and DWR
Subbasin Number 03-06-03.
To access the Parcel, take Exit 190 off of US-421 N onto NC-62 S. Follow NC-62 S for 3.4 miles and
turn right onto Fields Farm Road. The parcel is on the right side of the road. The coordinates of the site
are 35.931951°N, -79.693365°W.
1.2 Parcel Overview
This Parcel is being proposed to restore and preserve stream and wetland complexes with adjacent
riparian areas, to compensate for unavoidable riparian buffer impacts and nutrient load reduction
requirements. The conservation easement will total approximately 16.57 acres and will include nine
unnamed tributaries (UT 1 – UT 9) that drain directly into Big Alamance Creek. Tributaries on-site are
primarily sand bed streams with significant inputs of fine sediments due to actively eroding banks, hoof
shear and sheet flow from unstabilized soils in adjacent cattle pastures.
Existing wetlands (W1, W4. W6A, and W7) and drained hydric soils (W2, W3, W5, W6B, and W8) are
present in the floodplain and headwaters of Site tributaries. The parcel has been in agriculture since at
least 1955 and is currently being managed for livestock (Figure 3). The majority of the easement is in
active cattle pasture, with the exception of wooded areas at the upstream extents of UT 1, UT 5, and UT
6. Cattle are excluded from the easement area adjacent to UT 4 and W4; however, this area is maintained
as pasture (i.e. regular mowing). Anthropogenic disturbances associated with agricultural practices have
resulted in a severely altered vegetative community, interception of surface water, lateral drawdown of
groundwater, and the reduction/removal of overbank flooding in relic and existing wetland areas. Despite
these disturbances, W1, W4, W6A, and W7 still exhibit indicators for hydric soils, hydrophytic
vegetation, and wetland hydrology. W2, W3, W5, W6, and W8 are located immediately adjacent to
incised tributaries, lack primary indicators of wetland hydrology, and are considered drained (i.e. relic)
wetlands (Figure 3). A preliminary jurisdictional determination (PJD) request was submitted to the United
States Army Corps of Engineers in October 2021. Stream identifications and viability determinations for

Page 1

Buffer Mitigation and Nutrient Offset Plan
Dutch Farms Mitigation Site
Guilford County, North Carolina
riparian buffer and nutrient offset were verified by the Division of Water Resources (DWR) in letters
dated June 1 and August 27, 2021, respectively. Agency correspondence is provided in Appendix AB.
Significant fecal and nutrient loads are entering Site tributaries as a result of direct cattle access to streams
and overland sheetflow from adjacent pastures. Evidence of this includes visual observation of cattle in
the stream channel during site visits and fecal matter along stream banks and within the stream channel.
The proposed conservation easement will be one contiguous area; however, maintenance breaks will be
allowed within the easement at crossing locations depicted on Figure 4. Crossings were discussed with
the landowner and strategically located to minimize impacts to aquatic features and surrounding riparian
habitat. Crossings depicted on Figure 4 will be gated and culverted to minimize cattle access to the
streams and riparian zones. Crossings will be approximately 25 feet wide and are necessary to provide the
landowner access between farming paddocks outside of the conservation easement.
The goal of the Project is to restore, enhance, and preserve ecological function to existing streams,
wetlands, and riparian areas by establishing appropriate plant communities while minimizing temporal
and land disturbing impacts. Restoration activities will include Priority I stream restoration of Site
tributaries to reconnect streams to the historic floodplain and adjacent wetlands. Riparian areas will be
replanted with native vegetation which will aid in filtering sediments and nutrients on-site. Under this
Plan specifically, proposed activities involve restoration, enhancement, and preservation of riparian areas
adjacent to mitigated streams and wetlands. Restoration, enhancement, and preservation of the Jordan
Lake riparian buffer (as defined in 15A NCAC 02B .0267) and adjacent riparian areas are anticipated to
result in a reduction of water quality stressors currently affecting the Project area.
The Project will generate Riparian Buffer and/or Nutrient Offset credit within two dedicated zones from
top of bank: the top of bank to 100 foot-wide zone of buffer; and the 101-200 foot-wide zone of buffer.
Both zones are measured perpendicular from top of bank. Total drainage area of the project is 167 acres
(0.26 square miles) (Figure 5).
Of the total 16.57-acre permanent conservation easement, the Project presents the opportunity to restore
11.71 acres of riparian areas, enhance 0.66 acres of riparian areas, and preserve 0.34 acres of riparian
areas with a minimum width of 30 feet and a maximum width of 200 feet adjacent to mitigated streams
onsite. The Project is intended to be utilized to generate both Riparian Buffer Credit and Nutrient Offset
Credit for the Haw River Subwatershed. According to 15A NCAC 02B.0295(o)(4) and (5), "the area of
preservation credit within a buffer mitigation site shall comprise of no more than 25% of the total area of
buffer mitigation". Total area of riparian buffer mitigation on-site accounts for 12.18 acres and the total
area of preservation credit proposed on-site accounts for 0.34 acres (2.8%). Table 4 in Section 6.0
provides an overall summary of the total buffer mitigation credits.
1.2.1 Parcel Ownership
Land required for construction, management, and stewardship of this Project includes three parcels in
Guilford County with the following ownership listed in Table 1. The Sponsor will obtain conservation
easements from the current landowners. The Wilmington District Conservation Easement model template
was utilized to draft the site protection instrument. Once recorded, the secured easements will allow the
Sponsor to proceed with Project development and protect mitigation assets in perpetuity. A copy of the
conservation easement template used for this project is included in Appendix AC.

Page 2

Buffer Mitigation and Nutrient Offset Plan
Dutch Farms Mitigation Site
Guilford County, North Carolina
Table 1. Parcel and Landowner Information
Landowners Parcel Identification Agreement Type County
Number
Randy Steve Fields and 7799452144 Easement Guilford
Cynthia Fields
Beverly Fields 7799349572 Easement Guilford
Larry Dean Fields and 7799543254 Easement Guilford
Patricia A. Hauser, as
Trustees of the Hauser-
Fields Living Trust
2.0 PROJECT AREA
2.1 Physiography and Geology
The Project is located in the Piedmont Level III Eco-region, Southern Outer Piedmont Level IV Eco-
region (Griffith, 2002) and Charlotte and Milton Belts (i.e. Carolina Slate Belt)/Metamorphosed Granitic
Rock (CZg) geologic formation (NCGS, 1985). The Carolina Slate Belt consists mostly of rocks
originally deposited by volcanic eruption and sedimentation. The name Carolina Slate is derived from the
low-grade metamorphism that gives the rocks their slaty cleavage (Rogers, 2010). The physiography of
the ecoregion is mostly characterized by hills, ridges, and irregular plains.
2.2 Soils
Soil series depicted in the Guilford County Soil Survey are shown on Figure 6. The majority of lands
within floodplains on-site and associated riparian wetlands are mapped as Congaree soils. Congaree soils
are well drained but are known to contain minor components of Chewacla and Wehadkee soils. Soil
profiles were collected in representative wetland/relic wetland areas and sealed by Nicholas Howell (NC
License #1294), a licensed soil scientist with DRG. Mr. Howell confirmed that the soil profiles he
collected were consistent with the Wehadkee soil series. Soil profile logs are provided in Appendix F of
the Dutch Farms Stream and Wetland Mitigation Plan.
Wehadkee soils are poorly drained with moderate permeability and moderate water capacity. Wehadkee
soils are often found in association with Chewacla soils. Chewacla soil is formed on slightly higher ridges
on floodplains while Wehadkee is formed in the lower swales of floodplains.
2.3 Existing Riparian Condition
Agriculture has been the primary land use at the Site since at least 1937, based on historic aerial
photographs. The majority of buffers along Site streams and wetlands are currently utilized as active
cattle pasture or hay production. Woody vegetation is limited to scattered trees located along the stream
banks. Vegetation along streams consists of species such as red maple, sweetgum, tag alder, American
elm, green ash, and privet (Ligustrum sinense). Herbaceous vegetation is dominated by common rush,
sedges, and fescue. The only mature, forested areas within riparian buffers on-site occur at the upstream
extents of UT 5, UT 6 and UT 9. The Site Viability Letter from DWR in Appendix AB provides details
on land-uses within the riparian areas on-site.
Streams within the Parcel limits (UT 1 – UT 9) are described below. The Stream Origin Determination
Letter is provided in Appendix AB.
UT 1 - UT 1 is the Site’s dominant hydrologic feature. UT 1 flows through a well-defined floodplain.
UT 1 begins on-site as a first order, perennial stream, flowing from west to east approximately 1,921 feet

Page 3

Buffer Mitigation and Nutrient Offset Plan
Dutch Farms Mitigation Site
Guilford County, North Carolina
prior to exiting the Site. UT 1’s drainage area is approximately 167 acres (0.26 square miles) at the
downstream extent of the Site (Figure 5).
For purposes of describing existing conditions, UT 1 has been divided into two reaches. UT 1 is stable as
it flows through W1, however the riparian buffer is substantially altered, and cattle have unrestricted
access to the channel. This section of UT 1 is referred to as Reach 1. Reach 2 begins just downstream of
W1, where a headcut forms and UT 1 becomes incised with eroding banks throughout the remainder of
the Site.
The large majority of UT 1 contains channel banks experiencing active erosion. UT 1 has been
manipulated through channelization and straightening throughout the Site. Anthropogenic manipulations
result in a system that lacks natural channel geometry (i.e. little to no meandering), is easily accessible for
cattle and void of a natural buffer.
UT 2 and UT 3 - UT 2 and UT 3 are short reaches within the Site that flow through well-defined
floodplains. Both streams enter the Site as first order, perennial streams (USGS Climax Quadrangle),
flowing from south to north. UT 2’s drainage area is approximately 50 acres (0.08 square miles) at its
convergence with UT 1. UT 3’s drainage area is approximately 22 acres (0.035 square miles) at its
convergence with UT 1 (Figure 5).
UT 2 and UT 3 are primarily a gravel bed streams that have unrestricted cattle access within the Site.
Both streams are incised in the landscape with bank height ratios of 2.0 or greater. UT 2 and UT 3 are
experiencing substantial bank erosion due to lack of deeply rooted vegetation and cattle access.
UT 4 - UT 4 flows through a well-defined floodplain and originates on-site as a first order, intermittent
stream, flowing from southeast to northwest. UT 4 begins as an intermittent stream on-site (Reach 1) and
transitions to a perennial stream downstream of a large headcut (Reach 2). UT 4’s drainage area is
approximately 20 acres (0.03 square miles) at its convergence with UT 1 (Figure 5).
UT 4 - Reach 1 is slightly incised and lacks a natural, wooded buffer. Stream banks along Reach 1 are
stable due to dense herbaceous vegetation. Cattle do not currently access Reach 1; however, the area
adjacent to UT 4 and W4 is maintained as pasture (i.e. regular mowing). UT 4 – Reach 2 is primarily a
sand bed stream that has unrestricted cattle access within the Site. UT4 – Reach 2 classifies as an E type
channel but is incised in the landscape as indicated by a bank height ratio of 2.17. The majority of UT 4’s
channel banks through this reach exhibit moderate to substantial bank erosion due to lack of deeply rooted
vegetation and cattle access.
UT 5 - UT 5 flows through a well-defined floodplain. Elevations range between approximately 730 ft
MSL at the point at which UT 5 enters the Site and approximately 710 ft MSL at the convergence with
UT 6. UT 5 originates on-site as a first order, perennial stream, flowing from north to south. UT 5 is a
spring-fed system with a drainage area of approximately 5 acres (0.001 square miles) at its convergence
with UT 6 (Figure 5).
UT 5 was divided into two reaches based on stream condition (Figure 3). Reach 1 consists of the
upstream most portion of UT 5 as it flows through a wooded area. Reach 1 is a stable, sand bed stream
with a mature, wooded buffer. The property owner currently grazes a horse in the area adjacent to Reach
1 but there is no evidence of livestock access in the channel. Reach 2 consists of the portion of UT 5 that
flows through active cattle pasture prior to converging with UT 6. Reach 2 is primarily a sand bed stream
that has unrestricted cattle access and severely eroding banks. Reach 2 classifies as a B type channel and

Page 4

Buffer Mitigation and Nutrient Offset Plan
Dutch Farms Mitigation Site
Guilford County, North Carolina
is incised in the landscape as indicated by a bank height ratio of 3.05. Hoof shear has created over
widened banks throughout Reach 2 of UT 5.
UT 6 - UT 6 flows through a well-defined floodplain. Elevations range between approximately 730 ft
MSL at the point at which UT 6 enters the Site and approximately 692 ft MSL at the convergence with
UT 1. UT 6 is contained entirely on Site as a first order, perennial stream, flowing from west to east. UT
6 is a spring-fed system with a drainage area of approximately 22 acres (0.034 square miles) at its
convergence with UT 7.
UT 6 is primarily a sand bed stream that has unrestricted cattle access within the Site. UT 6 displays two
separate stream types depending upon which landscape position the stream is assessed. Therefore,
geomorphic data was collected in both landscapes and separated into reaches (Figure 3). The upstream
reach (Reach 1) has a one tree buffer and is significantly incised through a steeper valley. Vertical stream
banks are actively eroding through most of this reach. Reach 1 classifies as a G type channel with a bank
height ratio of 5.07
UT 6 - Reach 2 appears to have been straightened and channelized within the downstream portions of the
valley (i.e. the lower slope portion of the valley). The straightened section of UT 6 now converges with
UT 7, outside of its natural valley. UT 6 classifies as an E type channel in Reach 2 with a bank height
ratio of 1.7. While this section classifies as a typically stable stream type, the channel has been
straightened, lacks a wooded riparian buffer, and is impacted by unrestricted cattle access. Streambanks
are covered with herbaceous vegetation through Reach 2 but are undercutting below the rooting depth. In
addition, rock and fill material used to stabilize a ford crossing at the beginning of Reach 2 is creating a
backwater effect for approximately 50’ upstream.
UT 7 - UT 7 originates on-site as a first order, intermittent stream and flows through W7 prior to
converging with UT 6. Elevations range between approximately 710 ft MSL at the point at which UT 7
originates and approximately 694 ft MSL at the convergence with UT 6. UT 7 has a drainage area of
approximately 8 acres (0.005 square miles) at its convergence with UT 6. UT 7 was divided into two
reaches based on stream condition (Figure 3). Reach 1 consists of the upstream most portion of UT 7 as it
flows through W7. UT 7 has been straightened through Reach 1 and an at-grade equipment crossing has
impacted approximately 50 feet of bed and banks through this Reach. Reach 2 begins at a headcut just
upstream of the confluence with UT 6. UT 7 becomes incised and exhibits eroding banks from the
headcut to its confluence with UT 6. UT 7 classifies a G type channel and is incised in the landscaped as
indicated by a bank height ratio of 2.8. Reach 1 and Reach 2 of UT 7 lack a wooded riparian buffer.
UT 8 - UT 8 flows through a well-defined floodplain. Elevations range between approximately 732 ft
MSL at the point at which UT 8 enters the Site and approximately 694 ft MSL at the convergence with
UT 1. UT 8 originates out of a headwater wetland immediately upstream of the Site and enters the Site as
a first order, perennial stream, flowing from southeast to northwest. UT 8’s drainage area is
approximately 18 acres (0.03 square miles) at it’s convergence with UT 1 (Figure 5).
UT 8 is primarily a sand bed stream that has unrestricted cattle access and lacks a wooded riparian buffer.
UT 8 classifies as an E type channel but is incised in the landscape as indicated by a bank height ratio of
1.86. Additionally, UT 8 has abandoned typical stream form in multiple areas due to cattle impacts that
have created variable bank configurations. A ford crossing on UT 8 is creating backwater effects for
approximately 40 feet upstream of the crossing.
UT 9 - UT 9 originates within the Site as a first order, perennial stream flowing out of a hillside near the
headwaters of UT 6. UT 9 is spring fed and has consistent bed and banks. UT 9’s drainage area is

Page 5

Buffer Mitigation and Nutrient Offset Plan
Dutch Farms Mitigation Site
Guilford County, North Carolina
approximately 3 acres at its convergence with UT 6 (Figure 5). Approximately 50 feet of UT 9 is lightly
incised as it converges with UT 6. UT 9 has a mature, narrow wooded buffer on both sides, but cattle
have unrestricted access to the stream.
2.3.1 Existing Condition Photos

Looking down valley at UT 4 – Reach 1 Looking down valley at UT 8
Looking up valley at confluence of UT 1, UT 6, UT 7, Looking up valley at confluence of UT 1 and UT 4
and UT 8

Page 6

Buffer Mitigation and Nutrient Offset Plan
Dutch Farms Mitigation Site
Guilford County, North Carolina
Looking down valley at Site Looking down valley at confluence of UT 1 and UT 4
Cattle accessing UT 8Looking up valley at confluence of UT 6 and UT 7
2.4 Wetlands
The Site contains existing and relic wetland areas. Several site wetlands have experienced loss and/or
degradation of characteristic function due to prior site manipulation. Alteration of natural hydrology,
vegetative structure and land use of wetlands at the Site has resulted in diminished nutrient
uptake/transformation and sediment retention. Table 2 provides a summary of existing and relic wetland
areas at the Site. Relic wetlands areas are proposed to be restored as part of Site mitigation activities. A
Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD) request was submitted to the USACE on October 21,
2021. The PJD request is included in Appendix E of the Dutch Farms Stream and Wetland Mitigation
Plan.

Page 7

Buffer Mitigation and Nutrient Offset Plan
Dutch Farms Mitigation Site
Guilford County, North Carolina
Table 2. Existing and Relic Wetland Summary
ID Type Hydrology Existing Acres
W 1 Riparian Wetland Existing Wetland 0.07
W 2 Relic Riparian Wetland Drained Hydric Soils 0.64
W 3 Relic Riparian Wetland Drained Hydric Soils 0.01
W 4 Riparian Wetland Existing Wetlands 0.46
W 5 Relic Riparian Wetland Drained Hydric Soils 0.25
W 6A Riparian Wetland Existing Wetlands 0.12
W 6B Relic Riparian Wetland Drained Hydric Soils 0.31
W 7Riparian WetlandExisting Wetland0.22
W 8 Relic Riparian Wetland Drained Hydric Soils 0.58
TOTAL 2.66
2.5 Threatened and Endangered Species
The United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) lists five species as threatened, endangered, or at
risk in Guilford County: Cape Fear Shiner (Notropis mekistocholas), Roanoke logperch (Percina rex),
Atlantic pigtoe (Fusconaia masoni), Schweinitz’s sunflower (Helianthus schweinitzii), and small whorled
pogonia (Isotria medeoloides). Records at the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NHP) do not
indicate an occurrence of a federally threatened or endangered species at the Site. Based on preliminary
site assessments, habitat for Schweinitz’s sunflower is provided in maintained areas throughout the Site;
however, occurrence of this species on-site is unlikely given the historical agricultural landuse. Records at
the NHP do not indicate that any federally protected species elemental occurrences are located within one
mile of Dutch Farms. USFWS responded to the Public Notice in a letter dated August 25, 2021,
indicating that the project is not likely to adversely affect federally listed species or their critical habitat.
Correspondence is provided in Appendix D of the Dutch Farms Stream and Wetland Mitigation Plan.
2.6 Cultural Resources
There are no properties listed on the National Register within a one-mile radius of Dutch Farms
(NCSHPO, 2021). The Lilian Coble House is located approximately 0.9 mile northwest of Dutch Farms
and has been surveyed only (Site ID GF1944). Survey of the home was likely done to identify and gather
data on the community’s historic resources. A survey does not guarantee that the site is eligible for listing
on the National Register and State law does not provide protection for properties that are determined
eligible but not listed in the National Register. SHPO responded to the Public Notice in a letter dated
September 17, 2021, indicating that they are aware of no historic resources which would be affected by
the project. Correspondence is provided in Appendix D of the Dutch Farms Stream and Wetland
Mitigation Plan.
2.7 Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Floodplain/Floodway Mapping
Review of the Floodplain Mapping Program website and the effective Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM)
Map Number 3710779900J Effective Date June 18, 2007 indicates streams on-site are not part of FEMA
study. Brent Gatlin of Guilford County specified in a meeting on February 24, 2021 that no floodplain
development permit is required for Dutch Farms because no streams on the property are part of a FEMA
designated 100 year floodplain.

Page 8

Buffer Mitigation and Nutrient Offset Plan
Dutch Farms Mitigation Site
Guilford County, North Carolina
3.0 RIPARIAN RESTORATION, ENHANCEMENT, AND
PRESERVATION PLAN
The goal of the Project is to restore ecological function to the streams, wetlands, and riparian areas by
establishing appropriate plant communities where absent, as well as to protect these streams, wetlands,
and riparian areas into perpetuity. Restored streams, wetlands, and buffers will provide water quality and
habitat functions within the Haw River Subwatershed of Jordan Lake, such as nutrient and sediment
removal, filtration of runoff from nearby agricultural fields, and improved aquatic and terrestrial habitat.
Lands adjacent to streams proposed for buffer restoration, enhancement, and preservation are currently
being used for livestock grazing or hay production.
Riparian restoration, enhancement, and preservation proposed under this Plan are shown in Figure 4, and
were determined viable mitigation approaches by DWR in their letter dated August 27, 2021 attached in
Appendix AB. All riparian restoration, enhancement, and preservation buffer mitigation activities along
channels will occur within two dedicated zones from the edge of the bank: the top of bank to 100 foot-
wide zone of buffer perpendicular from the top of bank; and the 101 to 200 foot-wide zone of buffer
perpendicular from the top of the bank.
Before beginning construction, the Sponsor will ensure that permitting scenarios are completed. The
Sponsor plans to obtain Clean Water Act (CWA) Section 404 permit approval and will submit
applications for a CWA Section 401, and a North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality Erosion
and Sediment Control permit.
3.1 Parcel Preparation
Preparation within the Parcel will involve treatment for invasive species (where present), ripping, and
seeding and planting. Any topsoil that is removed during construction will be stockpiled and placed back
over the Project during final soil preparation. Any areas that are compacted will be ripped or tilled before
the topsoil is placed back over the Project. Once the soil is prepared, it will be seeded and planted with
native riparian species. This process should provide favorable soil conditions for plant growth. A
combination of silt fencing, erosion control wattles, temporary seeding, and erosion control matting will
be used to reduce erosion and stabilize soil in riparian areas during any land disturbance activities. These
erosion control measures shall be inspected and properly maintained at the end of each working day to
ensure measures are functioning properly until permanent vegetation is established. Disturbed areas shall
be temporarily seeded within ten working days and upon completion of final grading, permanent
vegetation shall be established for all disturbed areas. Any topsoil that is removed during construction
will be stockpiled and reserved for final site soil preparation. Temporary and permanent riparian seeding
shall be done in accordance with the erosion control plan. A list of species used in the seed mix can be
found on Sheet PL2 (Appendix AA). Bare root plantings and live stakes shall be planted according to the
planting plan found on Sheet PL2A (Appendix AA). Invasive species may require different and multiple
treatment methods, depending on plant phenology and location of the species being treated. Treatment
methods may include mechanical (cutting with loppers, clippers, or chain saw) and chemical (foliar spray,
cut stump, and hack and squirt techniques). Fescue and other grasses in pasture areas will be treated prior
to construction. Plants containing mature viable seeds will be removed from the Project and properly
disposed. Management records will be kept on plant species treated, type of treatment employed, type of
herbicide used, application technique, and herbicide concentration and quantities used. These records will
be included in the annual monitoring reports.
Riparian restoration, enhancement, and preservation activities will commence in concurrence with the
stream and wetland mitigation activities and not before. Therefore, the mitigation area where riparian

Page 9

Buffer Mitigation and Nutrient Offset Plan
Dutch Farms Mitigation Site
Guilford County, North Carolina
restoration is being performed may be altered slightly depending on the approval of the Stream Mitigation
Plan. The riparian restoration areas will be surveyed, and information will be provided in the As-Built
report.
3.2 Riparian Restoration Activities
Buffer restoration is proposed along both right and left banks of restored and enhanced tributaries on-site
as depicted on Figure 4 and in accordance with the Consolidated Buffer Mitigation Rule 15A NCAC
02B.0295(n). Buffer restoration areas are convertible to nutrient offset credits along both right and left
banks of restored and enhanced tributaries on-site with the exception of UT 5 and the forested area at the
upstream extents of UT 6 and UT 9. Stream restoration will address existing impairments including
floodplain dislocation, bank erosion, nutrient input, and buffer degradation. The stream design approach
will include restoring existing degraded and incised tributaries on-site as primarily Priority I restored
streams so bankfull and larger flows can access the currently abandoned (from bankfull flows) floodplain
and associated riparian wetlands. The proposed mitigation strategy will promote settling, uptake, and
removal of pathogens, nutrients, sedimentation, and debris from watershed runoff/floodwaters. Restoring
a stable dimension, pattern, and profile will ensure the channels will transport and attenuate watershed
flows and sediment loads without aggrading or degrading. Priority I restoration should increase
floodplain interaction and groundwater storage within riparian wetlands, in-turn increasing the capacity of
the Site to uptake nutrients from upstream waters. Within the easement, riparian restoration areas will be
planted from top of bank to a minimum of 30 feet and a maximum of 200 feet from the stream with bare
root tree seedlings on an 8 by 8-foot spacing to achieve an initial density of at least 680 trees per acre.
Planting will consist of a composition of native bare-root tree species specified in Section 3.5. Restoring
native vegetation to the stream channel banks, wetlands, and adjacent riparian corridor (currently
dominated by herbaceous species) will diversify flora and create a protected habitat corridor that will
provide an abundance of available foraging and cover habitat for a multitude of amphibians, reptiles,
mammals and birds. Restoring buffers adjacent to streams and wetlands will also assist in attenuating
floodwaters, in turn reducing stressors from upstream impacts.
3.3 Riparian Enhancement Activities
Buffer enhancement is proposed along both right and left banks of UT 6 (forested area only) and UT 9 as
shown on Figure 4 and in accordance with the Consolidated Buffer Mitigation Rule 15A NCAC
02B.0295(o)(6). Enhancement activities will consist of supplemental planting following site construction
and installation of fencing to exclude cattle. Areas disturbed during construction will be seeded with a
native seed mix and bare root seedlings will be planted on 8 by 8-foot spacing to achieve an initial density
of at least 680 trees per acre. Excluding cattle from buffer enhancement areas will reduce nutrient inputs
to adjacent streams and aid in stabilizing stream banks. Buffer enhancement can only generate Riparian
Buffer mitigation credit and is not transferrable to nutrient offset credits.
3.4 Riparian Preservation Activities
Buffer preservation is proposed along the upstream extents of UT 5 as depicted on Figure 4. Preservation
activities along the left and right banks of UT 5 will be non-subject preservation on non-subject streams
in accordance with the Consolidated Buffer Mitigation Rule 15A NCAC 0295(0)(4). Documentation of
the site meeting requirements of 15A NCAC 02R .0403(c)(7)(8) and (11) is provided in Appendix AB.
Preservation activities will consist of permanently protecting the buffer from cutting, clearing, filling,
grading, and similar activities that would affect the functioning of the buffer through a conservation
easement that will have clearly visible easement markers and signs (see Section 3.6 for further
descriptions of the easement boundaries). No more than 25 percent of the total area of buffer mitigation
will be used for preservation credit pursuant to 15A NCAC 02B.0295(o)(5) and 15A NCAC 0295(0)(4)

Page 10

Buffer Mitigation and Nutrient Offset Plan
Dutch Farms Mitigation Site
Guilford County, North Carolina
and the rest of the area will be protected in the conservation easement and not applied for credit.
Furthermore, buffer preservation can only generate Riparian Buffer mitigation credit and is not
transferrable to nutrient offset credits.
3.5 Planting Plan
Revegetation of the Project where riparian restoration is being performed will meet the performance
standards outlined in the Rule 15A NCAC 02B.0295(n)(2). This includes treating invasive species growth
and planting at least 4 native hardwood tree and native shrub species at a density to ensure 260 stems per
acre at completion of monitoring. No one tree or shrub species will be greater than 50% of established
stems. Vegetation within riparian areas can vary depending on disturbance regime and adjacent
community types, so the protected buffer easement will be planted with appropriate native species
observed in the surrounding forest and species known to occur in similar environments. Target vegetation
communities for the Site will be Piedmont Alluvial Forest in the floodplain and lower slopes transitioning
to Dry Oak-Hickory Forests on upper slopes and ridgetops (Schafale, 2012). Stream banks of restored and
enhanced stream reaches will be planted with a streamside assemblage consisting of black willow, tag
alder, and other common streamside species. Table 3 below identifies the proposed species composition
for each planting zone. A plan view of the planting zones is depicted on Figure 9 and on plan sheets in
Appendix AA. Bare root seedlings in Zones 2 and 3 will be planted on approximately nine (9) foot by six
(6) foot spacing, corresponding to approximately 807 stems per acre. The stream bank (Zone 1) will be
planted with a combination of live stakes and bare root seedlings on approximately three (3) foot spacing.
It is expected that other characteristic species will recruit naturally into these areas subsequent to
completion of construction. The herbaceous layer will be restored by seeding disturbed areas with a
native seed mix.

Page 11

Buffer Mitigation and Nutrient Offset Plan
Dutch Farms Mitigation Site
Guilford County, North Carolina
Table 3. Planting Plan
Plant Spacing
Feet of Stream Bank
Zone 1: Streamside AssemblageForest Strata
11,325 ft3 ft
Indicator
Common NameScientific Name% Composition# Planted
Status
Preferred Species
Black willow Salix nigra OBL20755Canopy
Sycamore Platanus occidentalis FACW20755Canopy
Silky dogwood Cornus amomum FACW20755Sub-canopy/Shrub
Buttonbush Cephalanthus occidentalis OBL20755Sub-canopy/Shrub
Elderberry Sambucus canadensis N/A20755Sub-canopy/Shrub
Acceptable Substitutions
Cottonwood Populus deltoides FAC00Canopy
Tag alder Alnus serrulata OBL00Sub-canopy/Shrub
3,775
TOTAL
Plant Spacing
Area
Zone 2: Piedmont Alluvial ForestForest Strata
10.1 ac9 x 6 ft
Indicator
Common NameScientific Name% Composition# Planted
Status
Preferred Species
Tulip tree Liriodendron tulipifera FACU15Canopy
1223
River birch Betula nigra FACW10Canopy
816
Sycamore Platanus occidentalis FACW15Canopy
1223
Shagbark hickory Carya ovata FACU10Canopy
816
American elm Ulmus Americana FACW10Canopy
816
Cherrybark oak Quercus pagoda FACW15Canopy
1223
Water oak Quercus nigra FAC10Canopy
816
Persimmon Diospyros virginiana FAC5Sub-canopy
408
Spicebush Lindera benzoin FAC5Sub-canopy/shrub
408
Silky dogwood Cornus amomum FACW5Sub-canopy/shrub
408
Acceptable Substitutions
Hackberry Celtis laevigata FACW0Canopy
0
Willow oak Quercus phellos FAC0Canopy
0
Bitternut hickory Carya cordiformis FACU0Canopy
0
Ironwood Carpinus caroliniana FAC0Sub-canopy
0
American holly Ilex opaca FACU0Sub-canopy/shrub
0
TOTAL8,157
Plant Spacing
Area
Zone 3: Dry Oak-Hickory ForestForest Strata
4.3 ac9 x 6 ft
Indicator
Common NameScientific Name% Composition# Planted
Status
Preferred Species
White oak Quercus alba FACU15Canopy
521
Southern red oak Quercus falcata FACU10Canopy
348
Scarlet oak Quercus coccinea N/A15Canopy
521
Mountain oak Quercus montana UPL15Canopy
521
Pignut hickory Carya glabra FACU15Canopy
521
Mockernut hickory Carya tomentosa N/A15Canopy
521
Persimmon Diospyros virginiana FAC10Sub-canopy
348
Flowering dogwood Cornus florida FACU5Sub-canopy/Shrub
174
Acceptable Substitutions
Post oak Quercus stellata UPL0Canopy
0
Black oak Quercus velutina N/A0Canopy
0
Sourwood Oxydendrum arboreum UPL0Sub-canopy
0
Blackgum Nyssa sylvatica FAC0Sub-canopy
0
Red Bud Cercis canadensis FACU0Sub-canopy/Shrub
0
TOTAL3,475

Page 12

Buffer Mitigation and Nutrient Offset Plan
Dutch Farms Mitigation Site
Guilford County, North Carolina
3.6 Easement Boundaries and Fencing
Easement boundaries will be identified in the field to ensure clear distinction between the Parcel and
adjacent properties. Easement boundaries will be properly marked, and fencing will be completed prior to
the As -Built onsite visit by DWR, which is Task 2 in the MBI. Boundaries may be identified by
fence, marker, bollard, post, tree -blazing, or other means as allowed by site conditions and/or
conservation easement. Boundaries will be marked with signs identifying the property as a mitigation
site that will include the name of the long-term steward and a contact number. Boundary markers
disturbed, damaged, or destroyed will be repaired and/or replaced on an as needed basis. The
easement boundary will be checked annually as part of monitoring activities and the conditions as
well as any maintenance performed will be reported in the annual monitoring reports to DWR.
3.7 Notification of Completion
Within 30 calendar days after completing the establishment of the nutrient offset areas and buffer
mitigation areas, the Sponsor will submit written notification to DWR documenting that all nutrient
offset and buffer mitigation activities have been completed. Failure to submit written notification within
30 days may result in a modified credit release schedule or a delay in the issuance of credit releases.
The notification shall be prepared in accordance with Section VI.B of the MBI.
4.0 MONITORING AND MAINTENANCE PLAN
4.1 Monitoring Protocol and Success Criteria
Riparian vegetation monitoring will be based on the "CVS-EEP Protocol for Recording Vegetation Level
2 Plot Sampling Only Version 4.2." Annual vegetation monitoring will occur each year for a minimum of
five (5) consecutive years and will be conducted no earlier than late August of each year. First year
vegetation monitoring will occur at least 6 months from initial planting. The total planted area applicable
to nutrient offset and riparian buffer credit is 11.7 acres. A mix of 1I fixed and random lei square meter
vegetation plots will be monitored and will cover at least two percent of the planted area applicable to
nutrient offset and riparian buffer credit. Of those le plots, seven will be fixed plots, while three will be
randomly placed each monitoring year (Figure 9). The following qualitative and quantitative data will be
recorded for all planted and volunteer trees in the plots: common name, species, vigor, height (planted
only), planting date (or volunteer), and grid location. All stems in plots will be flagged with flagging tape.
Photographs will be taken at established monitoring stations each monitoring year. Visual inspection
reports and photographs will be provided in the annual reports to ensure that restoration areas are being
maintained and compliant. The measures of vegetative success for the Parcel will be the survival of at
least four native hardwood tree and/or shrub species, where no one species is greater than 50 percent of
stems, at a density of at least 260 planted trees and/or shrubs per acre at the end of Year 5. Desirable
native volunteer species may be included to meet the performance standards as determined by DWR.
Invasive and noxious species will be monitored and treated so that none become dominant or alter the
desired community structure of the Project.
A visual assessment of the conservation easement will also be performed each year to confirm:
1) Fencing is in good condition throughout the site;
2) no cattle access within the conservation easement area;
3) no encroachment has occurred;
Page 13

Buffer Mitigation and Nutrient Offset Plan
Dutch Farms Mitigation Site
Guilford County, North Carolina
4) diffuse flow is being maintained in the conservation easement area; and
5) there has not been any cutting, clearing, filling, grading, or similar activities that would
negatively affect buffer function.
Monitoring reports complying with this Plan will be submitted to DWR by December 31 of each year.
4.2 Adaptive Management Plan and Parcel Maintenance
Adaptive measures will be developed, or appropriate remedial actions taken in the event that the Project,
or a specific component of the Project, fails to achieve the defined success criteria. Remedial actions will
be designed to achieve the performance standards specified in this Plan, and will include identification of
the causes of failure, remedial design approach, work schedule, and monitoring criteria that will take into
account physical and climatic conditions.
Initial plant maintenance may include a one-time mowing, prior to initial planting to remove undesirable
species. If mowing is deemed necessary by the Sponsor during the monitoring period, the Sponsor must
receive approval by DWR prior to any mowing activities to ensure that no buffer violations have been
performed. Failure to receive approval to mow within the Jordan Lake buffer, as defined in 15A NCAC
02B.0267, by DWR could result in Jordan Lake buffer violations and violations of the conservation
easement. If necessary, the Sponsor will develop a species-specific control plan.
4.3 Long Term Management Plan
The Bank Sponsor will record a Conservation Easement with the Guilford County Register of Deeds'
Office for this site. The Conservation Easement will be assigned to Broad Water Innovations (BWI) prior
to the first credit release. All monitoring activities, including periodic inspections of the site to ensure that
restrictions required in the Conservation Easement are upheld, are the responsibility of the Sponsor until
the Bank Parcel is transferred to BWI. Endowment funds required to uphold the Dutch Farms Bank Parcel
conservation easement in perpetuity shall be negotiated prior to site transfer to BWI.
The Bank Sponsor will ensure that the Conservation Easement has allowed for the implementation of an
initial monitoring phase, which will be developed during the design phase and conducted by the Bank
Sponsor. The Conservation Easement will allow for yearly monitoring and, if necessary, maintenance of
the Parcel during the initial monitoring phase. These activities will be conducted in accordance with the
terms and conditions of the Proposed Dutch Farms Riparian Buffer and Nutrient Offset MBI made and
entered into by the Sponsor and DWR.
5.0 FINANCIAL ASSURANCE
The Sponsor will provide financial assurances in the form of Performance Bonds sufficient to assure one
hundred percent (100%) completion of all mitigation work, required reporting and monitoring, and any
remedial work required. The initial performance bond will be in the amount of at least $150,000 and shall
be able to cover 100% of the costs associated with construction of riparian restoration areas. The
monitoring bond shall be in the amount of at least $100,000 and shall be able to cover 100% of costs
associated with monitoring and maintenance of riparian restoration areas for five years.
Performance bonds for monitoring shall be renewed to cover each year's monitoring period, with
confirmation of renewal provided to DWR with each annual monitoring report when applicable. DWR
reserves the right to alter the credit release schedule if monitoring reports are submitted without proof of
bond renewals when applicable.

Page 14

Buffer Mitigation and Nutrient Offset Plan
Dutch Farms Mitigation Site
Guilford County, North Carolina
6.0 MITIGATION POTENTIAL
The project presents 16.57 acres of permanent conservation easement in Guilford County, North Carolina.
While this easement also encompasses areas for the Dutch Farms Stream and Wetland Mitigation Bank,
the purpose of the Project described in this Plan is to generate Riparian Buffer and Nutrient Offset credits
to mitigate authorized buffer impacts and offset nutrient loads respectively, in the Haw River
Subwatershed of Jordan Lake.
There are two dedicated Riparian Buffer and Nutrient credit generation zones within the overall buffer
area: the first will begin at the most landward limit of the top of bank or the rooted herbaceous vegetation
and extend outward to a distance of 100 feet (Zone A). The second zone begins at 101 feet and extends
landward to 200 feet from the top of bank (Zone B). Currently, Zone A is dedicated to Riparian Buffer
credit generation and Zone B is dedicated to Nutrient Offset credit generation. Restoration areas within
Zone A that have a minimum width of 50 feet from top of bank are eligible for conversion to Nutrient
Offset credits. In the event Riparian Buffer credits are converted to Nutrient Offset credits, there will be
no overlap in the Riparian Buffer and/or Nutrient Offset credit areas. Restoration areas with a minimum
width less than 50 feet from top of bank and Enhancement areas are not eligible for conversion to
Nutrient Offset credits. Restoration areas within Zone B that are dedicated to Nutrient Offset credit
generation are not eligible for conversion to Riparian Buffer credit. Areas proposed for wetland
mitigation have been excluded from areas being proposed for Riparian Buffer and Nutrient Offset credits.
According to the nutrient reduction goals for the Haw River arm of Jordan Lake, generated nitrogen credit
per acre in the Haw Sub-watershed is 2,249.360 pounds and the generated phosphorous credit per acre is
143.810 pounds. As proposed, the Bank will produce approximately 431.437 lbs of Generated Nitrogen
credit or 129.431 lbs of Delivered Nitrogen credit (with a 30% delivery factor). The Bank will also
produce approximately 27.586 lbs of Generated Phosphorous credit or 3.862 lbs of Delivered
Phosphorous credit (with a 14% delivery factor). An additional 452,554.000 ft2 of Nutrient Offset credits
could be generated from riparian restoration activities in accordance with 15A NCAC 02B.0703 that
would result in 7,010.722 lbs of Delivered Nitrogen credits and 209.170 lbs of Delivered Phosphorus
credits, if converted.
This Bank has the potential to generate approximately 501,949.000 riparian buffer restoration credits,
14,349.500 riparian buffer enhancement credits, and 2,965.000 riparian buffer preservation credits.
Riparian Buffer credits generated within forested areas and cattle exclusion areas are not convertible to
Nutrient Offset. Riparian Buffer mitigation credits generated will service authorized riparian buffer
impacts within the Haw River Subwatershed of Jordan Lake. Nutrient Offsets generated will service
nutrient load reduction requirements where payments are authorized in 15A NCAC 02B.0703 within the
Haw River Subwatershed. The Sponsor will maintain four credit ledgers. One ledger will account for
Riparian Buffer Restoration credits, one ledger will account for buffer Preservation and Enhancement
credits, one ledger will account for Nitrogen nutrient offset credits, and one will account for Phosphorus
nutrient offset credits. All credit assets shall be shown on these credit ledgers. Project credits were
determined utilizing the DWR “Project Credit Table Template (updated October 2020),” (Table 4).
Page 15

Table 4. Dutch Farms Riparian Buffer and Nutrient Offset Mitigation Site, DWR p 2021-1422 v1, Project Credits
Cape Fear - Jordan Haw 03030002040010
Project Area
N Credit Conversion
P Credit Conversion
Ratio (ft2/pound)
Ratio (ft2/pound)
64.5517
2163.569
Credit Type
Location
Subject? (enter
NO if
ephemeral or
ditch')
Feature Type
Mitigation Activity
Min -Max Buffer
Width (ft)
Feature Name
2
Total Area (ft)
Total (Creditable)
Area of Buffer
2
Mitigation (ft)
Initial Credit
Ratio (x:1)
% Full Credit
Final Credit
Ratio (x:1)
Convertible to
Riparian
Buffer?
Riparian Buffer
Credits
Convertible to
Nutrient Offset?
Delivered
Nutrient
Offset: N (Ibs)
Delivered
Nutrient
Offset: P (Ibs)
Buffer
Rural
Yes
I / P
Restoration
0-100
UT 1
181,284
181,284
1
100%
1.00000
Yes
181,284.000
Yes
2,808.354
83.789
Nutrient Offset
Rural
Yes
I / P
Restoration
101-200
UT 1
3,668
3,668
1
33Yr
3.03030
No
—
Yes
56.823
1.695
Buffer
Rural
Yes
I / P
Restoration
0-100
UT 1 (<50')
12,743
12,743
1
100%
1.00000
Yes
12,743.000
No
—
—
Buffer
Rural
No
I / P
Restoration
0-100
UT4, UT 5, UT 8 (<50')
36,652
36,652
1
100%
1.00000
Yes
36,652.000
No
—
—
Buffer
Rural
No
I/P
Restoration
0-100
UT4, UT 6, UT 7, UT 8
271,270
271,270
1
1009(
1.00000
Yes
271,270.000
Yes
4,202.368
125.381
Nutrient Offset
Rural
No
I/P
Restoration
101-200
UT4, UT8
4,687
4,687
1
33%
3.03030
No
—
Yes
72.608
2.166
Buffer
Rural
No
I / P
Enhancement
0-100
UT 6, UT9
28,699
28,699
2
100%
2.00000
Yes
14,349.500
No
—
—
Totals (ft2):
Total Buffer (ft2):
Total Nutrient Offset (ft2):
539,003
539,003
516,298.500
6._ 7,140.153
213.032
530,648
530,648
8,355
N/A
Enter Preservation Credits Below
Total Ephemeral Area (ft2) for Credit:
Total Eligible Ephemeral Area (ft2):
Total Eligible for Preservation (ft2):
Credit Type Location
Subject?
Feature Type Mitigation Activity
Rural
TOTAL AREA OF BUFFER MITIGATION TABM)
Mitigation Totals
Square Feet
Credits
Restoration:
501,949
501,949.000
Enhancement:
28,699
14,349.500
r Preservation:
14,825
2,965.000
Total Riparian Buffer:
545,473
519,263.500
TOTAL NUTRIENT OFFSET MITIGATION
Mitigation Totals Square Feet
Credits
I Nitrogen:
8,355
129.431
Nutrient Offset:'
Phosphorus:I
3.862
last updated 08/03/2020
Min -Max Buffer
Width (ft)
0-100
Feature Name
UT 5
Preservation Area Subtotals (ftr):
0
0
136,368
0.0%
176,883
2.1%
Total (Creditable)
Total Area (sf)
Area for Buffer
Mitigation (ft2)
14,825
14,825
14,825
14,825
Ephemeral Reaches as % TABM
Preservation as % TABM
Initial Credit
Ratio (x:1)
% Full Credit
Final Credit
Ratio (x:1)
Riparian
Buffer Credits
100%
5.00000
2,965.000
Page 16

Buffer Mitigation and Nutrient Offset Plan
Dutch Farms Mitigation Site
Guilford County, North Carolina
7.0 REFERENCES
Environmental Laboratory. (1987). "Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual,"
Technical Report Y-87-1, U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg,
MS
Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). 2007. FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Map:
Panel 3710779900J. https://msc.fema.gov/portal/search. (December 2021).
Griffith, G.E., et al. 2002. Ecoregions of North Carolina, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Corvallis,
OR (map scale 1:1,500,000).
Lee, M. T. et al. 2008. CVS-EEP Protocol for Recording Vegetation, All Levels of Plot
Sampling. Version 4.2. http://cvs.bio.unc.edu/methods.htm. (December 2021).
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources (NCDNR). 2005. "Cape
Fear River Basinwide Water Quality Plan." Division of Water Quality.
https://deq.nc.gov/media/3866/download. (January 2022).
NCDNR. 2016. "N.C. Wetland Assessment Method User Manual Version 5." N.C. Wetland
Functional Assessment Team https://deq.nc.gov/media/10187/download. (January 2022)
North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources. NCDNCR. 2018. North Carolina State
Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) GIS Web Service.
https://nc.maps.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=79ea671ebdcc45639f0860257d5f5ed7.
Updated May 28, 2021.
North Carolina Geological Survey (NCGS), 1985. Geologic Map of North Carolina.
North Carolina Office of Administrative Hearings (NCOAH). 2010. Rule 15A NCAC 02B.0703
-Nutrient Offset Credit Trading. http://reports.oah.state.nc.us/ncac/title%2015a%20-
%20environmental%20quality/chapter%2002%20-
%20environmental%20management/subchapter%20b/15a%20ncac%2002b%20.0703.pdf
(January 2022).
NCOAH. 2015. Rule 15A NCAC 02B.0267 - Jordan Water Supply Nutrient Strategy:
Protection of Existing Riparian Buffers. http://reports.oah.state.nc.us/ncac/title%2015a%20-
%20environmental%20quality/chapter%2002%20-
%20environmental%20management/subchapter%20b/15a%20ncac%2002b%20.0267.pdf
(January 2022).
NCOAH. 2015. Rule 15A NCAC 02B .0295- Mitigation Program Requirements for Protection
and Maintenance of Riparian Buffers. http://reports.oah.state.nc.us/ncac/title%2015a%20-
%20environmental%20quality/chapter%2002%20-
%20environmental%20management/subchapter%20b/15a%20ncac%2002b%20.0295.pdf
(January 2022).
Page 17

Buffer Mitigation and Nutrient Offset Plan
Dutch Farms Mitigation Site
Guilford County, North Carolina
NCOAH. 2014. Rule 15A NCAC 02R.0403 - Donation of Property.
http://reports.oah.state.nc.us/ncac/title%2015a%20-
%20environmental%20quality/chapter%2002%20-
%20environmental%20management/subchapter%20r/15a%20ncac%2002r%20.0403.pdf.
(November 2019).
Rogers, John J.W. 2010. The Carolina Slate Belt. http://rla.unc.edu/publications/pdf/resrep25/Ch2.pdf.
Accessed December 2021.
Schafale, Michael P. Guide to the Natural Communities of North Carolina, Fourth Approximation. 2012.
North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, Raleigh, NC.
Page 18

}}
}}
}}
}}
}}
}}
}}
}}
}}
}}
}}

}}
}}
}}
}}
}}
}}
}}
}}
}}
}}
}}
}}
}}

Dutch Farms Mitigation Plan
DM Cape Fear 02 Umbrella Bank (SAW-2021-01071)
Guilford County, North Carolina
Appendices
Appendix AA – Planting Plan

Dutch Farms Mitigation Plan
DM Cape Fear 02 Umbrella Bank (SAW-2021-01071)
Guilford County, North Carolina
Appendices
Appendix AB – Site Viability for Buffer Mitigation and
Nutrient Offset Letter

August 27, 2021
Ben Furr
Land Management Group
(via electronic mail: [e-mail] )
Re: Site Viability for Buffer Mitigation & Nutrient Offset – Dutch Farms Site
Near 35.9310326, -79.6936199 in Climax, NC
Haw River Sub-watershed
Guilford County
Dear Mr. Furr,
On June 7, 2021, Katie Merritt, with the Division of Water Resources (DWR), received a request
from you on behalf of Land Management Group (LMG) for a site visit near the above-referenced site
in the Haw River Sub-watershed of Jordan Lake. The site visit was to determine the potential for
riparian buffer mitigation and nutrient offset within a proposed conservation easement boundary,
which is more accurately depicted in the attached map labeled “Figure 3-Aerial Map” (Figure 3)
prepared by LMG. The proposed easement boundary in Figure 3, includes all riparian areas intended
to be proposed as part of the mitigation site. This site is also being proposed as a stream mitigation
site and therefore stream bank instability or presence of erosional rills within riparian areas were not
addressed. On July 28, 2021, Ms. Merritt performed a site assessment of the subject site. Staff with
LMG were also present.
Ms. Merritt’s evaluation of the features onsite and their associated mitigation determination for the
riparian areas are provided in the table below. This evaluation was made from Top of Bank (TOB)
and landward 200’ from each feature for buffer mitigation pursuant to 15A NCAC 02B .0295
(effective November 1, 2015) and for nutrient offset credits pursuant to 15A NCAC 02B .0703.
134,5
Classification
FeatureSubject Riparian Land uses Buffer Nutrient Mitigation Type Determination w/in
onsite
to adjacent to Feature Credit Offset riparian areas
Buffer (0-200’)ViableViableat
Rule2,249.36
lbs-N/acre
7
UT1StreamYesMostly non-forested pasture YesYes (non-Non-forested fields -Restoration Site
grazed by cattle. Areas forested per 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (n)
beyond easement boundary fields only)
between UT4 & UT8 are Forested pasture -Enhancement Siteper
mature forest grazed by 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(6)
cattle

Dutch Farm Site
EBX
August 27, 2021
134,5
Classification
FeatureSubject Riparian Land uses Buffer Nutrient Mitigation Type Determination w/in
onsite
to adjacent to Feature Credit Offset riparian areas
Buffer (0-200’)ViableViable at
Rule2,249.36
lbs-N/acre
2
UT2StreamYesNon-forested pasture YesYes (non-Non-forested fields -Restoration Site
grazed by cattle. Areas forested per 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (n)
beyond easement boundary fields only)
that are forested were not Forested Areas – Preservation Siteper
being grazed by cattle. See 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(5)
map.
2
UT3StreamNoNon-forested pasture YesYes (non-Non-forested fields -Restoration Site
grazed by cattle. Areas forested per 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(3)
beyond easement boundary fields only)
that are forested were not Forested Areas – Preservation Siteper
being grazed by cattle. See 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(4)
map.
2
UT4StreamNoMostly non-forested YesYes (non-Non-forested fields -Restoration Site
agricultural fields with forested per 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(3)
forested areas beyond fields only)
easement boundary. See Forested Areas – Preservation Siteper
map15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(4)
2
UT5StreamNoUpstream is forested with YesNo Non-forested Pasture -Restoration site
nograzing by cattle. Non-(landuse per 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(3)
forested areas were being was forest
Forested Areas -Preservation Siteper
grazed by cattle but were during
forested during the baseline baseline)15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(4)
of the nutrient strategy
(1997-2001)
7
UT6StreamNoMostly non-forested pasture YesYes (non-Non-forested Pasture -Restoration site
with some mature forest forested per 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(3)
grazed by cattle pasture
only)Forested pasture -Enhancement Siteper
15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(6)
UT7StreamNoNon-forested pasture YesYes Restoration Siteper 15A NCAC 02B
grazed by cattle. .0295 (o)(3)
7
UT8StreamNoMostly non-forested pasture YesYes (non-Non-forested fields -Restoration Site
grazed by cattle. Areas forested per 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(3)
beyond easement boundary fields only)
Forested pasture -Enhancement Siteper
are mature forest grazed by
cattle.15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(6)
Page 2 of 4

Dutch FarmsSite
LMG
August 27, 2021

134,5
Classification
FeatureSubject Riparian Land uses Buffer Nutrient Mitigation Type Determination w/in
onsite
to adjacent to Feature Credit Offset riparian areas
Buffer (0-200’)ViableViable at
Rule2,249.36
lbs-N/acre
7
UT9StreamNoMature forest grazed by YesNoEnhancement Siteper 15A NCAC 02B
cattle.0295 (o)(6)
1
Subjectivity calls for the features were determined by DWR in correspondence dated June 1, 2021(DWR# -no ID)using the 1:24,000
scale quadrangle topographic map prepared by USGS and the most recent printed version of the soil survey map prepared by the
NRCS .
2
The area of preservation credit within a buffer mitigation site shall comprise of no more than 25 percent (25%) of the total area of buffer
mitigation per 15A NCAC 0295 (o)(5) and 15A NCAC 0295 (o)(4). Site cannot be a Preservation Only site to comply with this rule.
3
NC Division of Water Resources -Methodology and Calculations for determining Nutrient Reductions associated with Riparian Buffer
Establishment.Credits are calculated differently in the Jordan Lake Watershed.Phosphorus may be calculated separately.
4
Determinationsmade for this Site are determined based on the proposal provided in maps and figures submitted with the request.
5
All features proposed for buffer mitigation or nutrient offset, must have a planted conservation easement established that includes the
tops of channel banks when being measured perpendicular and landward from the banks, even if no credit is viable within thatriparian
area.Easement breaks that disconnect the continuity of riparian restoration/enhancement/preservation result in no credit viable beyond
the break.
6
The area of the mitigation site on ephemeral channels shall comprise no more than 25 percent (25%) of the total area of buffer
mitigation per 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(7).
7
The area described as an Enhancement Site was assessed and determined to comply with all of 15A NCAC 02B .0295(o)(6). Cattle
exclusion fencing is required to be installed around the mitigation area to get buffer credit under this part of the rule.

Determinations provided in the table above were made using a proposed easement boundary showing
proposed mitigation areas shown in Figure 3. During the site visit, LMG mentioned the possibility of
extending the proposed easement boundary and therefore, DWR assessed areas outside of the
proposed boundary on some features. The map representing the proposal for the site is attached to
this letter and initialed by Ms. Merritt onAugust 27, 2021. Substantial changes to the proposed
easement boundary as well as any site constraints identified in this letter, could affect the Site’s
potential to generate buffer mitigation and nutrient offset credits.
This letter does not constitute an approval of this Site to generate buffer and nutrient offset credits.
Pursuant to 15A NCAC 02B .0295, a mitigation proposal and a mitigation plan shall be submitted to
DWR for written approval prior to conducting any mitigation activities in riparian areas and/or
surface waters for buffer mitigation credit. Pursuant to 15A NCAC 02B .0703, a proposal regarding a
proposed nutrient load-reducing measure for nutrient offset credit shall be submitted to DWR for
approval prior to any mitigation activities in riparian areas and/or surface waters.
All vegetative plantings, performance criteria and other mitigation requirements for riparian
restoration, enhancement and preservation must follow the requirements in 15A NCAC 02B .0295 to
be eligible for buffer and/or nutrient offset mitigation credits. For any areas depicted as not being
viable for nutrient offset credit above, one could propose a different measure, along with supporting
calculations and sufficient detail to support estimates of load reduction, for review by the DWR to
determine viability for nutrient offset in accordance with 15A NCAC 02B .0703.
Page 3 of 4

Dutch Farm Site
EBX
August 27, 2021
This viability assessment will expire on August 27, 2023 or upon approval of a mitigation plan
by the DWR, whichever comes first. This letter should be provided in any nutrient offset,
buffer, stream or wetland mitigation plan for this Site.
Please contact Katie Merritt at [phone] if you have any questions regarding this
correspondence.
Sincerely,
Paul Wojoski, Supervisor
401 and Buffer Permitting Branch
PW/kym
Attachments: Figure 3: Aerial Map
cc: File Copy (Katie Merritt)
Page 4 of 4

!

June 1, 2021

Land Management Group
Attn: Ben Furr
3101 Poplarwood Ct, Suite 120
Raleigh NC 27604

Delivered via email to: [e-mail]

{ǒĬƆĻĭƷʹ On-Site Determination for Applicability to the Jordan Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 02B .0267)

{ǒĬƆĻĭƷ tƩƚƦĻƩƷǤʹ Dutch Farms Mitigation Project

Dear Mr. Furr:

On April 29, 2021, I conducted an on-site determination with you to review features located on the subject
project for stream determinations with regards to the above noted state regulations.

The attached initialed and dated sketch accurately depicts all Division stream determinations and
stream origin determinations conducted during the site visit.

This on-site determination shall expire five (5) years from the date of this letter. The owner (or future
owners) should notify the Division (and other relevant agencies) of this decision in any future
correspondences concerning this property. Landowners or affected parties that dispute this
determination made by the Division may request a determination by the Director of Water Resources.
This determination is final and binding, unless an appeal request is made within sixty (60) calendar days
of the date of this letter to the Director in writing.

LŅ ƭĻƓķźƓŭ ǝźğ …͵{͵ tƚƭƷğƌ {ĻƩǝźĭĻʹ LŅ ƭĻƓķźƓŭ ǝźğ ķĻƌźǝĻƩǤ ƭĻƩǝźĭĻ Λ…t{Ͳ CĻķ9ǣͲ ĻƷĭ͵Μ
Paul Wojoski - DWR 401 & Buffer Paul Wojoski - DWR 401 & Buffer
Permitting Branch Supervisor Permitting Branch Supervisor
1617 Mail Service Center 512 N Salisbury St.
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Raleigh, NC 27604

This letter only addresses the features on the subject property and/or within the proposed project area
and does not approve any activity within buffers or within waters of the state. If you have any
additional questions or require additional information, please call me at 336-776-9693 or

!
Page Ћ of Ћ
!
[e-mail]. This determination is subject to review as provided in Articles 3 & 4 of G.S.
150B.

Sincerely,

Sue Homewood
Winston-Salem Regional Office

Enclosures: USGS Topo Map
Figure 3 Aerial map provided by LMG - initialed and dated

Cc: The Hauserfields Living Trust/Larry Fields, 6528 Monnett Rd, Climax, NC 27233
Randy Steve Fields, 6711 Fields Farm Rd, Climax, NC 27233
Beverly Fields, 6716 Fields Farm Rd, Climax, NC 27233
Katie Merritt, 401 & Buffer Permitting Branch (via email)
DWR, Winston-Salem Regional Office
!

Dutch Farms Mitigation Plan
DM Cape Fear 02 Umbrella Bank (SAW-2021-01071)
Guilford County, North Carolina
Appendices
Appendix AC – Conservation Easement Template and
Supplementary Information

RECORDING REQUESTED BY
AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO:
SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER’S
USE
PERMANENT CONSERVATION
EASEMENT
THIS CONSERVATION EASEMENT (“Conservation Easement”) made
this day _____ of _______________, 202_____ by _______________ and
between (“Grantor”) and _______________ (“Grantee”).

The designation Grantor and Grantee as used herein shall include said
parties, their heirs, successors and assigns, and shall include singular, plural,
masculine, feminine or neuter as required by context.

RECITALS

WHEREAS, Grantor owns in fee simple certain real property situated,
lying and being in _______________ County, North Carolina, more particularly
described in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein (the “Property”);

WHEREAS, Grantee is a charitable, not-for-profit or educational
corporation, association, or trust qualified under § 501 (c)(3) and § 170 (h) of
1

the Internal Revenue Code, and N.C. Gen. Stat. § 121-34 et seq., the
purposes or powers of which include one or more of the purposes (a) – (d)
listed below;

(a) retaining or protecting natural, scenic, or open-space aspects of
real property;
(b) ensuring the availability of real property for recreational,
educational, or open-space use;
(c) protecting natural resources;
(d) maintaining or enhancing air or water quality.

WHEREAS, Grantor and Grantee recognize the conservation, scenic,
natural, or aesthetic value of the property in its natural state, which includes
the following natural communities: \[add or delete as appropriate: coastal
wetlands, non-riparian wetlands, riparian wetlands, perennial and intermittent
streams and riparian buffers\]. The purpose of this Conservation Easement is to
maintain streams, wetlands and riparian resources and other natural values of
approximately acres, more or less, and being more particularly described in
Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated fully herein by reference (the
“Conservation Easement Area”), and prevent the use or development of the
Conservation Easement Area for any purpose or in any manner that would
conflict with the maintenance of its natural condition.
WHEREAS, the restoration, enhancement and preservation of the
Conservation Easement Area is a condition of the approval of the Mitigation
Banking Instrument (MBI) and Mitigation Plan for the _______________
Mitigation Bank, Department of the Army (DA) Action ID Number SAW-
_______________, entitled “Agreement to Establish the _______________
Mitigation Bank in the _______________ River Basin within the State of North
Carolina”, entered into by and between \[enter Sponsor name\] acting as the
Bank Sponsor and the Wilmington District Corps of Engineers (Corps), in
consultation with the North Carolina Interagency Review Team (IRT). The
_______________ Mitigation Site has been approved by the Corps for use as
a mitigation bank to compensate for unavoidable stream and wetland impacts
authorized by DA permits.
WHEREAS, Grantor and Grantee agree that third-party rights of
enforcement shall be held by the North Carolina Division of Water Resources
(NCDWR) and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District (“Third-
Parties,” to include any successor agencies), and may be exercised through
the appropriate enforcement agencies of the United Statesand the State of
North Carolina, and that these rights are in addition to, and do not limit, the
rights of enforcement under the NCDWR Project ID # _______________ and
Department ofthe Army instrument number SAW-_______________
(“Mitigation Banking Instrument”), or any permit or certification issued by the
Third-Parties.

2

NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the covenants and
representations contained herein and for other good and valuable
consideration, the receipt and legal sufficiency of which is hereby
acknowledged, Grantor hereby unconditionally and irrevocably grants and
conveys unto Grantee, its heirs, successors and assigns, forever and in
perpetuity a Conservation Easement of the nature and character and to the
extent hereinafter set forth, over the Conservation Easement Area described
on Exhibit B, together with the right to preserve and protect the conservation
values thereof, as follows:

ARTICLE I.
DURATION OF EASEMENT

This Conservation Easement shall be perpetual. This Conservation
Easement is an easement in gross, runs with the land and is enforceable by
Grantee against Grantor, Grantor’s personal representatives, heirs, successors
and assigns, lessees, agents and licensees.

ARTICLE II.
PROHIBITED AND RESTRICTED ACTIVITIES

Any activity on, or use of, the Conservation Easement Area inconsistent
with the purpose of this Conservation Easement is prohibited. The
Conservation Easement Area shall be preserved in its natural condition and
restricted from any development that would impair or interfere with the
conservation values of the Conservation Easement Area.

Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the following activities
and uses are expressly prohibited, restricted or reserved as indicated
hereunder:

A. Disturbance of Natural Features. Any change disturbance,
alteration or impairment of the natural features of the Conservation Easement
Area or any introduction of non-native plants and/or animal species is
prohibited.

B. Construction. There shall be no constructing or placing of any building, mobile
home, asphalt or concrete pavement, billboard or other advertising display, antenna, utility
pole, tower, conduit, line, pier, landing, dock or any other temporary or permanent structure
orfacility on or above the Conservation Easement Area.

C. Industrial, Commercial and Residential Use. Industrial, residential
and/or commercial activities, including any rights of passage for such purposes
are prohibited.

D. Agricultural, Grazing and Horticultural Use. Agricultural, grazing,
animal husbandry, and horticultural use of the Conservation Easement Area
3

are prohibited.

E.Vegetation.There shall be no removal, burning, destruction,
harming, cutting or mowing of trees, shrubs, or other vegetation in the
Conservation Easement Area except as provided in the Mitigation Plan.
Mowing of invasive and herbaceous vegetation for purposes of enhancing
planted or volunteer trees and shrubs approved in the Mitigation Plan is
allowable once a year for no more than five consecutive years from the date on
page 1 of this Conservation Easement, except where mowing will negatively
impact vegetation or disturb soils. Mowing activities shall only be performed by
\[enter Sponsor name\] and shall not violate any part of Item L of Article II.

F. Roads and Trails. There shall be no construction of roads, trails or
walkways on the Conservation Easement Area; nor enlargement or
modification to existing roads, trails or walkways.

G. Signage. No signs shall be permitted on or over the Conservation
Easement Area, except the posting of no trespassing signs, signs identifying
the conservation values of the Conservation Easement Area, signs giving
directions or proscribing rules and regulations for the use of the Conservation
Easement Area and/or signs identifying the Grantor as owner of the
Conservation Easement Area.

H. Dumping or Storage. Dumping or storage of soil, trash, ashes,
garbage, waste, abandoned vehicles, appliances, machinery or hazardous
substances, or toxic or hazardous waste, or any placement of underground or
aboveground storage tanks or other materials on the Conservation Easement
Area isprohibited.

I. Excavation, Dredging or Mineral Use.There shall be no grading,
filling, excavation, dredging, mining or drilling; no removal of topsoil, sand,
gravel, rock, peat, minerals or other materials, and no change in the topography
of the land in any manner on the Conservation Easement Area, except to
restore natural topography or drainage patterns. For purposes of restoring and
enhancing streams and wetlands within the Conservation Easement Area,
\[enter Sponsor name\] is allowed to perform grading, filling, and excavation
associated with stream and wetland restoration and enhancement activities as
described in the Mitigation Plan and authorized by Department of the Army
Nationwide Permit 27.

J. Water Quality and Drainage Pattern. There shall be no diking,
draining, dredging, channeling, filling, leveling, pumping, impounding or related
activities, or altering or tampering with water control structures or devices, or
disruption or alteration of the restored, enhanced, or created drainage patterns.
In addition, diverting or causing or permitting the diversion of surface or
underground water into, within or out of the easement area by any means,
removal of wetlands, polluting or discharging into waters, springs, seeps, or
4

wetlands, or use of pesticide or biocides is prohibited.

K. Development Rights. No development rights that have been
encumbered or extinguished by this Conservation Easement shall be
transferred pursuant to a transferable development rights scheme or cluster
development arrangement or otherwise.

\[Not required, but may be added if Grantor and Grantee agree:\]
L. Subdivision. The Grantor and Grantee agree that the Conservation
Easement Area currently consists of _______________ within
_______________ separate parcels. The Grantor may not further subdivide the
Conservation Easement Area, except with the prior written consent of the
Grantee. If Grantor elects to further subdivide any portion of the Conservation
Easement Area, Grantor must provide the Grantee the name, address, and
telephone number of new owner(s) of all property within the Conservation
Easement Area, if different from Grantor. No subdivision of the Conservation
Easement Area shall limit the right of ingress and egress over and across the
Property for the purposes set forth herein. Further, in the event of any
subdivision of the Property (whether inside or outside of the Conservation
Easement Area) provision shall be made to preserve not only Grantee’s
perpetual rights of access to the Conservation Easement Area, as defined
herein, but also Grantee’s right of perpetual access to any conservation
easements on properties adjacent to the Property which form a part of or are
included in the Mitigation Plan. Creation of a condominium or any de facto
division of the Conservation Easement Area is prohibited. Lot line adjustments
or lot consolidation without the prior written consent of the Grantee is
prohibited. The Grantor may convey undivided interests in the real property
underlying the Conservation Easement Area. The Grantor shall notify the
Grantee immediately of the name, address, and telephone number of any
grantee of an undivided interest in any property within the Conservation
Easement Area.

M. Vehicles. The operation of mechanized vehicles, including, but not
limited to, motorcycles, dirt bikes, all-terrain vehicles, cars and trucks is
prohibited other than for temporary or occasional access by the \[enter
Sponsor name\], the Grantee, its employees and agents, successors,
assigns, NCDWR, and the Corps for purposes of constructing, maintaining
and monitoring the restoration, enhancement and preservation of streams,
wetlands and riparian areas within the Conservation Easement Area. The
use of mechanized vehicles for monitoring purposes is limited to only
existing roads and trails as shown in the approved in the mitigation plan.

N. Other Prohibitions.Any other use of, or activity on, the
Conservation Easement Area which is or may become inconsistent with the
purposes of this grant, the preservation of the Conservation Easement Area
substantially in its natural condition, or the protection of its environmental
systems, is prohibited.
5

ARTICLE III.
GRANTOR’S RESEVERED RIGHTS

The Grantor expressly reserves for himself, his personal representatives,
heirs, successors or assigns, the right to continue the use of the Conservation
Easement Area for all purposes not inconsistent with this Conservation
Easement, including, but not limited to, the right to quiet enjoyment of the
Conservation Easement Area, the rights of ingress and egress, the right to
hunt, fish, and hike on the Conservation Easement Area, the right to sell,
transfer, gift or otherwise convey the Conservation Easement Area, in whole or
in part, provided such sale, transfer or gift conveyance is subject to the terms
of, and shall specifically reference, this Conservation Easement.

Notwithstanding the foregoing Restrictions, Grantor reserves for Grantor,
its successors and assigns, including \[enter Sponsor name\] acting as the Bank
Sponsor, the right to construct and perform activities related to the restoration,
enhancement, and preservation of streams, wetlands and riparian areas within
the Conservation Easement Area in accordance with the approved
_______________ Mitigation Plan, and the Mitigation Banking Instrument
described in the Recitals of this Conservation Easement.

Notwithstanding the foregoing Restrictions, Grantor reserves for Grantor,
its successors and assigns, the following rights in the areas labeled as “Internal
Crossing” on the plat \[insert plat name and recorded plat book page number\] in
the Conservation Easement Area: vehicular access, livestock access, irrigation
piping and piping of livestock waste. All Internal Crossings that allow livestock
access will be bounded by fencing and will be over a culvert.

ARTICLE IV.
GRANTEE’S RIGHTS

The Grantee or its authorized representatives, successors and assigns,
and the Corps, shall have the right to enter the Property and Conservation
Easement Area at all reasonable times for the purpose of inspecting the
Conservation Easement Area to determine if the Grantor, or his personal
representatives, heirs, successors, or assigns, is complying with the terms,
conditions, restrictions, and purposes of this Conservation Easement. The
Grantee, \[enter Sponsor name\], and its authorized representatives, successors
and assigns, and the Corps shall also have the right to enter and go upon the
Conservation Easement Area for purposes of making scientific or educational
observations and studies, and taking samples. The easement rights granted
herein do not include public access rights.

ARTICLE V.
ENFORCEMENT AND REMEDIES

6

A. To accomplish the purposes of this Easement, Grantee, the Corps,
and NCDWR are allowed to prevent any activity on or use of the Conservation
Easement Area that is inconsistent with the purposes of this Easement and to
require the restoration of such areas or features of the Conservation Easement
Area that may be damaged by such activity or use. Upon any breach of the
terms of this Conservation Easement by Grantor that comes to the attention of
the Grantee, the Grantee shall notify the Grantor in writing of such breach. The
Grantor shall have 30 days after receipt of such notice to correct the conditions
constituting such breach. If the breach remains uncured after 30 days, the
Grantee may enforce this Conservation Easement by appropriate legal
proceedings including damages, injunctive and other relief. Notwithstanding
the foregoing, the Grantee reserves the immediate right, without notice, to
obtain a temporary restraining order, injunctive or other appropriate relief if the
breach of the terms of this Conservation Easement is or would irreversibly or
otherwise materially impair the benefits to be derived from this Conservation
Easement. The Grantor and Grantee acknowledge that under such
circumstances damage to the Grantee would be irreparable and remedies at
law will be inadequate. The rights and remedies of the Grantee provided
hereunder shall be in addition to, and not in lieu of, all other rights and
remedies available to Grantee in connection with this Conservation Easement.
The costs of a breach, correction or restoration, including the Grantee’s
expenses, court costs, and attorneys’ fees, shall be paid by Grantor, provided
Grantor is determined to be responsible for the breach. The Corps and the
NCDWR shall have the same rights and privileges as the said Grantee to
enforce the terms and conditions of this Conservation easement.

B. No failure on the part of the Grantee to enforce any covenant or
provision hereof shall discharge or invalidate such covenant or any other
covenant, condition, or provision hereof or affect the right to Grantee to enforce
the same in the event of a subsequent breach or default.

C. Nothing contained in this Conservation Easement shall be
construed to entitle Grantee to bring any action against Grantor for any injury or
change in the Conservation Easement Area resulting from causes beyond the
Grantor’s control, including, without limitation, fire, flood, storm, war, acts of
God or third parties, except Grantor’s lessees or invitees; or from any prudent
action taken in good faith by Grantor under emergency conditions to prevent,
abate, or mitigate significant injury to life, damage to property or harm to the
Conservation Easement Area resulting from such causes.
ARTICLE VI.
MISCELLANEOUS

A. Warranty. Grantor warrants, covenants and represents that it owns
the Property in fee simple, and that Grantor either owns all interests in the
Property which may be impaired by the granting of this Conservation Easement
or that there are no outstanding mortgages, tax liens, encumbrances, or other
7

interests in the Property which have not been expressly subordinated to this
Conservation Easement. Grantor further warrants that Grantee shall have the
use of and enjoy all the benefits derived from and arising out of this
Conservation Easement, and that Grantor will warrant and defend title to the
Property against the claims of all persons.

B. Subsequent Transfers. The Grantor agrees to incorporate the terms
of this Conservation Easement in any deed or other legal instrument that
transfers any interest in all or a portion of the Conservation Easement Area.
The Grantor agrees to provide written notice of such transfer at least sixty (60)
days prior to the date of the transfer. The Grantor and Grantee agree that the
terms of this Conservation Easement shall survive any merger of the fee and
easement interests in the Conservation Easement Area or any portion thereof
and shall not be amended, modified or terminated without the prior written
consent and approval of the Corps.

C. Assignment. The parties recognize and agree that the benefits of
this Conservation Easement are in gross and assignable provided, however
that the Grantee hereby covenants and agrees, that in the event it transfers or
assigns this Conservation Easement, the organization receiving the interest will
be a qualified holder pursuant to 33 CFR 332.7 (a)(1), N.C. Gen. Stat. § 121-34
et seq. and § 501 (c)(3) and § 170 (h) of the Internal Revenue Code, and the
Grantee further covenants and agrees that the terms of the transfer or
assignment will be such that the transferee or assignee will be required to
continue in perpetuity the conservation purposes described in this document.

D. Entire Agreement and Severability. The Mitigation Banking
Instrument: MBI with corresponding Mitigation Plan, and this Conservation
Easement sets forth the entire agreement of the parties with respect to the
Conservation Easement and supersedes all prior discussions, negotiations,
understandings or agreements relating to the Conservation Easement. If any
provision is found to be void or unenforceable by a court of competent
jurisdiction, the remainder shall continue in full force and effect.

E.Obligations of Ownership. Grantor is responsible for any real estate
taxes, assessments, fees, or charges levied upon the Property. Grantor shall
keep the Property free of any liens or other encumbrances for obligations
incurred by Grantor, except those incurred after the date hereof, which are
expressly subject and subordinate to the Conservation Easement. Grantee shall
not be responsible for any costs or liability of any kind related to the ownership,
operation, insurance, upkeep, or maintenance of the Property, except as
expressly provided herein. Nothing herein shall relieve the Grantor of the
obligation to comply with federal, state or local laws, regulations and permits
that may apply to the exercise of the Reserved Rights.

F. Long-Term Management. Grantor is responsible for all long-term
management activities associated with fencing. These activities include the
8

maintenance and/or replacement of fence structures to ensure the aquatic
resource functions within the boundaries of the Protected Property are
sustained.

G. Extinguishment.In the event that changed conditions render
impossible the continued use of the Conservation Easement Area for the
conservation purposes, this Conservation Easement may only be extinguished,
in whole or in part, by judicial proceeding.

H. Eminent Domain. Whenever all or part of the Conservation
Easement Area is taken in the exercise of eminent domain so as to
substantially abrogate the Restrictions imposed by this Conservation
Easement, Grantor and Grantee shall join in appropriate actions at the time of
such taking to recover the full value of the taking, and all incidental and direct
damages due to the taking.

I. Proceeds. This Conservation Easement constitutes a real property
interest immediately vested in Grantee. In the event that all or a portion of the
Conservation Easement Area is sold, exchanged, or involuntarily converted
following an extinguishment or the exercise of eminent domain, Grantee shall
be entitled to the fair market value of this Conservation Easement as
determined at the time of the extinguishment or condemnation.

J. Notification. Any notice, request for approval, or other
communication required under this Conservation Easement shall be sent by
registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, to the following addresses (or such
address as may be hereafter specified by notice pursuant to this paragraph):

To Grantor:
\[Name, address and fax number\]

To Grantee:
\[Name, address and fax number\]
To Sponsor:

To the Corps:
US Army Corps of Engineers Wilmington District, Regulatory Division
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, NC 28403

K. Failure of Grantee.If at any time Grantee is unable or fails to
enforce this Conservation Easement, or if Grantee ceases to be a qualified
grantee, and if within a reasonable period of time after the occurrence of one of
these events Grantee fails to make an assignment pursuant to this
Conservation Easement, then the Grantee’s interest shall become vested in
another qualified grantee in accordance with an appropriate proceeding in a
9

court of competent jurisdiction.

L. Amendment. This Conservation Easement may be amended, but
only in a writing signed by all parties hereto, and provided such amendment
does not affect the qualification of this Conservation Easement or the status of
the Grantee under any applicable laws, and is consistent with the conservation
purposes of this grant.

M.Present Condition of the Conservation Easement Area. The
wetlands, scenic, resource, environmental, and other natural characteristics of
the Conservation Easement Area, and its current use and state of
improvement, are described in Section _____ of the Mitigation Plan, prepared
by Grantor and acknowledged by the Grantor and Grantee to be complete and
accurate as of the date hereof. Both Grantor and Grantee have copies of this
report. It will be used by the parties to assure that any future changes in the use
of the Conservation Easement Area will be consistent with the terms of this
Conservation Easement. However, this report is not intended to preclude the
use of other evidence to establish the present condition of the Conservation
Easement Area if there is a controversy over its use.

TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the said rights and easements perpetually
unto Grantee for the aforesaid purposes.

IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, the Grantor has hereunto set his hand and
seal, the day and year first above written.

\[Signatures of the Grantor and Grantee in appropriate form\]
10

Dutch Farms
6711 Fields Farm Rd
Climax, NC 27233
Inquiry Number: 6780554.2s
December 08, 2021
The EDR Radius Map™ Report with GeoCheck®
6 Armstrong Road, 4th floor
Shelton, CT 06484
Toll Free: 800.352.0050
www.edrnet.com
GPSN.MCE.NHB

TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTIONPAGE
Executive SummaryES1
Overview Map2
Detail Map3
Map Findings Summary4
Map Findings8
Orphan Summary9
Government Records Searched/Data Currency TrackingGR-1
GEOCHECK ADDENDUM
Physical Setting Source AddendumA-1
Physical Setting Source SummaryA-2
Physical Setting SSURGO Soil MapA-5
Physical Setting Source MapA-21
Physical Setting Source Map FindingsA-23
Physical Setting Source Records SearchedPSGR-1
Uibol!zpv!gps!zpvs!cvtjoftt/
Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050
with any questions or comments.
Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice
This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data
Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from
other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL
DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION,
MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL
ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE,
ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL,
CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY
LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings,
environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor
should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I
Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any
property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice.
Copyright 2020 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole
or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission.
EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other
trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners.
TC6780554.2s Page 1

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
A search of available environmental records was conducted by Environmental Data Resources, Inc (EDR).
The report was designed to assist parties seeking to meet the search requirements of EPA’s Standards
and Practices for All Appropriate Inquiries (40 CFR Part 312), the ASTM Standard Practice for
Environmental Site Assessments (E1527-21), the ASTM Standard Practice for Environmental Site
Assessments for Forestland or Rural Property (E 2247-16), the ASTM Standard Practice for Limited
Environmental Due Diligence: Transaction Screen Process (E 1528-14) or custom requirements developed
for the evaluation of environmental risk associated with a parcel of real estate.
TARGET PROPERTY INFORMATION
ADDRESS
6711 FIELDS FARM RD
CLIMAX, NC 27233
COORDINATES
Latitude (North): 35.9319300 - 35ˆ 55’ 54.94’’
Longitude (West): 79.6942390 - 79ˆ 41’ 39.26’’
Universal Tranverse Mercator: Zone 17
UTM X (Meters): 617792.2
UTM Y (Meters): 3976986.0
Elevation:724 ft. above sea level
USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP ASSOCIATED WITH TARGET PROPERTY
Target Property Map:13839764 CLIMAX, NC
Version Date:2019
AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY IN THIS REPORT
Portions of Photo from:20140705
Source:USDA
TC6780554.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1

MAPPED SITES SUMMARY
Target Property Address:
6711 FIELDS FARM RD
CLIMAX, NC 27233
Click on Map ID to see full detail.
MAPRELATIVEDIST (ft. & mi.)
IDDATABASE ACRONYMSELEVATIONDIRECTIONSITE NAMEADDRESS
NO MAPPED SITES FOUND
6780554.2s Page 2

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TARGET PROPERTY SEARCH RESULTS
The target property was not listed in any of the databases searched by EDR.
DATABASES WITH NO MAPPED SITES
No mapped sites were found in EDR’s search of available ("reasonably ascertainable ") government
records either on the target property or within the search radius around the target property for the
following databases:
STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Mjtut!pg!Gfefsbm!OQM!)Tvqfsgvoe*!tjuft
NPLNational Priority List
Proposed NPLProposed National Priority List Sites
NPL LIENSFederal Superfund Liens
Mjtut!pg!Gfefsbm!Efmjtufe!OQM!tjuft
Delisted NPLNational Priority List Deletions
Mjtut!pg!Gfefsbm!tjuft!tvckfdu!up!DFSDMB!sfnpwbmt!boe!DFSDMB!psefst
FEDERAL FACILITYFederal Facility Site Information listing
SEMSSuperfund Enterprise Management System
Mjtut!pg!Gfefsbm!DFSDMB!tjuft!xjui!OGSBQ
SEMS-ARCHIVESuperfund Enterprise Management System Archive
Mjtut!pg!Gfefsbm!SDSB!gbdjmjujft!voefshpjoh!Dpssfdujwf!Bdujpo
CORRACTSCorrective Action Report
Mjtut!pg!Gfefsbm!SDSB!UTE!gbdjmjujft
RCRA-TSDFRCRA - Treatment, Storage and Disposal
Mjtut!pg!Gfefsbm!SDSB!hfofsbupst
RCRA-LQGRCRA - Large Quantity Generators
RCRA-SQGRCRA - Small Quantity Generators
RCRA-VSQGRCRA - Very Small Quantity Generators (Formerly Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity
Generators)
Gfefsbm!jotujuvujpobm!dpouspmt!0!fohjoffsjoh!dpouspmt!sfhjtusjft
LUCISLand Use Control Information System
TC6780554.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
US ENG CONTROLSEngineering Controls Sites List
US INST CONTROLSInstitutional Controls Sites List
Gfefsbm!FSOT!mjtu
ERNSEmergency Response Notification System
Mjtut!pg!tubuf.!boe!usjcbm!)Tvqfsgvoe*!frvjwbmfou!tjuft
NC HSDSHazardous Substance Disposal Site
Mjtut!pg!tubuf.!boe!usjcbm!ib{bsepvt!xbtuf!gbdjmjujft
SHWSInactive Hazardous Sites Inventory
Mjtut!pg!tubuf!boe!usjcbm!mboegjmmt!boe!tpmje!xbtuf!ejtqptbm!gbdjmjujft
SWF/LFList of Solid Waste Facilities
DEBRISSolid Waste Active Disaster Debris Sites Listing
OLIOld Landfill Inventory
LCIDLand-Clearing and Inert Debris (LCID) Landfill Notifications
Mjtut!pg!tubuf!boe!usjcbm!mfbljoh!tupsbhf!ubolt
LASTLeaking Aboveground Storage Tanks
LUSTRegional UST Database
INDIAN LUSTLeaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUST TRUSTState Trust Fund Database
Mjtut!pg!tubuf!boe!usjcbm!sfhjtufsfe!tupsbhf!ubolt
FEMA USTUnderground Storage Tank Listing
USTPetroleum Underground Storage Tank Database
ASTAST Database
INDIAN USTUnderground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
Tubuf!boe!usjcbm!jotujuvujpobm!dpouspm!0!fohjoffsjoh!dpouspm!sfhjtusjft
INST CONTROLNo Further Action Sites With Land Use Restrictions Monitoring
Mjtut!pg!tubuf!boe!usjcbm!wpmvoubsz!dmfbovq!tjuft
INDIAN VCPVoluntary Cleanup Priority Listing
VCPResponsible Party Voluntary Action Sites
Mjtut!pg!tubuf!boe!usjcbm!cspxogjfme!tjuft
BROWNFIELDSBrownfields Projects Inventory
ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Mpdbm!Cspxogjfme!mjtut
US BROWNFIELDSA Listing of Brownfields Sites
TC6780554.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Mpdbm!Mjtut!pg!Mboegjmm!0!Tpmje!Xbtuf!Ejtqptbm!Tjuft
SWRCYRecycling Center Listing
HIST LFSolid Waste Facility Listing
INDIAN ODIReport on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian Lands
DEBRIS REGION 9Torres Martinez Reservation Illegal Dump Site Locations
ODIOpen Dump Inventory
IHS OPEN DUMPSOpen Dumps on Indian Land
Mpdbm!Mjtut!pg!Ib{bsepvt!xbtuf!0!Dpoubnjobufe!Tjuft
US HIST CDLDelisted National Clandestine Laboratory Register
US CDLNational Clandestine Laboratory Register
PFASPFAS Contamination Site Listing
Mpdbm!Mboe!Sfdpset
LIENS 2CERCLA Lien Information
Sfdpset!pg!Fnfshfodz!Sfmfbtf!Sfqpsut
HMIRSHazardous Materials Information Reporting System
SPILLSSpills Incident Listing
IMDIncident Management Database
SPILLS 90SPILLS 90 data from FirstSearch
SPILLS 80SPILLS 80 data from FirstSearch
Puifs!Btdfsubjobcmf!Sfdpset
RCRA NonGen / NLRRCRA - Non Generators / No Longer Regulated
FUDSFormerly Used Defense Sites
DODDepartment of Defense Sites
SCRD DRYCLEANERSState Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Listing
US FIN ASSURFinancial Assurance Information
EPA WATCH LISTEPA WATCH LIST
2020 COR ACTION2020 Corrective Action Program List
TSCAToxic Substances Control Act
TRISToxic Chemical Release Inventory System
SSTSSection 7 Tracking Systems
RODRecords Of Decision
RMPRisk Management Plans
RAATSRCRA Administrative Action Tracking System
PRPPotentially Responsible Parties
PADSPCB Activity Database System
ICISIntegrated Compliance Information System
FTTSFIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide
Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act)
MLTSMaterial Licensing Tracking System
COAL ASH DOESteam-Electric Plant Operation Data
COAL ASH EPACoal Combustion Residues Surface Impoundments List
PCB TRANSFORMERPCB Transformer Registration Database
RADINFORadiation Information Database
HIST FTTSFIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Administrative Case Listing
DOT OPSIncident and Accident Data
TC6780554.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
CONSENTSuperfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees
INDIAN RESERVIndian Reservations
FUSRAPFormerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program
UMTRAUranium Mill Tailings Sites
LEAD SMELTERSLead Smelter Sites
US AIRSAerometric Information Retrieval System Facility Subsystem
US MINESMines Master Index File
ABANDONED MINESAbandoned Mines
FINDSFacility Index System/Facility Registry System
DOCKET HWCHazardous Waste Compliance Docket Listing
UXOUnexploded Ordnance Sites
ECHOEnforcement & Compliance History Information
FUELS PROGRAMEPA Fuels Program Registered Listing
AIRSAir Quality Permit Listing
ASBESTOSASBESTOS
COAL ASHCoal Ash Disposal Sites
DRYCLEANERSDrycleaning Sites
Financial AssuranceFinancial Assurance Information Listing
NPDESNPDES Facility Location Listing
UICUnderground Injection Wells Listing
AOPAnimal Operation Permits Listing
MINES MRDSMineral Resources Data System
PCSRPPetroleum-Contaminated Soil Remediation Permits
SEPT HAULERSPermitted Septage Haulers Listing
CCBCoal Ash Structural Fills (CCB) Listing
EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS
FES!Fydmvtjwf!Sfdpset
EDR MGPEDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plants
EDR Hist AutoEDR Exclusive Historical Auto Stations
EDR Hist CleanerEDR Exclusive Historical Cleaners
EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES
Fydmvtjwf!Sfdpwfsfe!Hpwu/!Bsdijwft
RGA HWSRecovered Government Archive State Hazardous Waste Facilities List
RGA LFRecovered Government Archive Solid Waste Facilities List
RGA LUSTRecovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank
SURROUNDING SITES: SEARCH RESULTS
Surrounding sites were not identified.
Unmappable (orphan) sites are not considered in the foregoing analysis.
TC6780554.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Due to poor or inadequate address information, the following sites were not mapped. Count: 1 records.
Site Name Database(s)
____________ ____________
CITY OF GSBO DIESEL SPILL LAST
TC6780554.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 7

EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Innnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnncccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccc........................................

EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Innnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnncccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccc........................................

MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY
Search
DistanceTargetTotal
DatabaseProperty(Miles)< 1/81/8 - 1/41/4 - 1/21/2 - 1> 1Plotted
STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Mjtut!pg!Gfefsbm!OQM!)Tvqfsgvoe*!tjuft
NPL 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
Proposed NPL 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
NPL LIENS 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
Mjtut!pg!Gfefsbm!Efmjtufe!OQM!tjuft
Delisted NPL 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
Mjtut!pg!Gfefsbm!tjuft!tvckfdu!up
DFSDMB!sfnpwbmt!boe!DFSDMB!psefst
FEDERAL FACILITY 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
SEMS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
Mjtut!pg!Gfefsbm!DFSDMB!tjuft!xjui!OGSBQ
SEMS-ARCHIVE 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
Mjtut!pg!Gfefsbm!SDSB!gbdjmjujft
voefshpjoh!Dpssfdujwf!Bdujpo
CORRACTS 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
Mjtut!pg!Gfefsbm!SDSB!UTE!gbdjmjujft
RCRA-TSDF 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
Mjtut!pg!Gfefsbm!SDSB!hfofsbupst
RCRA-LQG 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
RCRA-SQG 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
RCRA-VSQG 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
Gfefsbm!jotujuvujpobm!dpouspmt!0
fohjoffsjoh!dpouspmt!sfhjtusjft
LUCIS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
US ENG CONTROLS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
US INST CONTROLS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
Gfefsbm!FSOT!mjtu
ERNS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
Mjtut!pg!tubuf.!boe!usjcbm
)Tvqfsgvoe*!frvjwbmfou!tjuft
NC HSDS 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
Mjtut!pg!tubuf.!boe!usjcbm
ib{bsepvt!xbtuf!gbdjmjujft
SHWS 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
Mjtut!pg!tubuf!boe!usjcbm!mboegjmmt
boe!tpmje!xbtuf!ejtqptbm!gbdjmjujft
SWF/LF 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
TC6780554.2s Page 4

MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY
Search
DistanceTargetTotal
DatabaseProperty(Miles)< 1/81/8 - 1/41/4 - 1/21/2 - 1> 1Plotted
DEBRIS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
OLI 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
LCID 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
Mjtut!pg!tubuf!boe!usjcbm!mfbljoh!tupsbhf!ubolt
LAST 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
LUST 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
INDIAN LUST 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
LUST TRUST 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
Mjtut!pg!tubuf!boe!usjcbm!sfhjtufsfe!tupsbhf!ubolt
FEMA UST 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
UST 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
AST 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
INDIAN UST 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
Tubuf!boe!usjcbm!jotujuvujpobm
dpouspm!0!fohjoffsjoh!dpouspm!sfhjtusjft
INST CONTROL 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
Mjtut!pg!tubuf!boe!usjcbm!wpmvoubsz!dmfbovq!tjuft
INDIAN VCP 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
VCP 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
Mjtut!pg!tubuf!boe!usjcbm!cspxogjfme!tjuft
BROWNFIELDS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Mpdbm!Cspxogjfme!mjtut
US BROWNFIELDS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
Mpdbm!Mjtut!pg!Mboegjmm!0!Tpmje
Xbtuf!Ejtqptbm!Tjuft
SWRCY 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
HIST LF 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
INDIAN ODI 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
DEBRIS REGION 9 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
ODI 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
IHS OPEN DUMPS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
Mpdbm!Mjtut!pg!Ib{bsepvt!xbtuf!0
Dpoubnjobufe!Tjuft
US HIST CDL TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
US CDL TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
PFAS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
Mpdbm!Mboe!Sfdpset
LIENS 2 TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
Sfdpset!pg!Fnfshfodz!Sfmfbtf!Sfqpsut
HMIRS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
TC6780554.2s Page 5

MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY
Search
DistanceTargetTotal
DatabaseProperty(Miles)< 1/81/8 - 1/41/4 - 1/21/2 - 1> 1Plotted
SPILLS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
IMD 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
SPILLS 90 TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
SPILLS 80 TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
Puifs!Btdfsubjobcmf!Sfdpset
RCRA NonGen / NLR 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
FUDS 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
DOD 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
SCRD DRYCLEANERS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
US FIN ASSUR TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
EPA WATCH LIST TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
2020 COR ACTION 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
TSCA TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
TRIS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
SSTS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
ROD 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
RMP TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
RAATS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
PRP TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
PADS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
ICIS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
FTTS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
MLTS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
COAL ASH DOE TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
COAL ASH EPA 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
PCB TRANSFORMER TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
RADINFO TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
HIST FTTS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
DOT OPS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
CONSENT 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
INDIAN RESERV 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
FUSRAP 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
UMTRA 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
LEAD SMELTERS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
US AIRS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
US MINES 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
ABANDONED MINES 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
FINDS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
DOCKET HWC TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
UXO 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
ECHO TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
FUELS PROGRAM 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
AIRS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
ASBESTOS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
COAL ASH 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
DRYCLEANERS 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
Financial Assurance TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
NPDES TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
UIC TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
AOP TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
TC6780554.2s Page 6

MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY
Search
DistanceTargetTotal
DatabaseProperty(Miles)< 1/81/8 - 1/41/4 - 1/21/2 - 1> 1Plotted
MINES MRDS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
PCSRP 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
SEPT HAULERS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
CCB 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS
FES!Fydmvtjwf!Sfdpset
EDR MGP 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
EDR Hist Auto 0.125 0 NR NR NR NR 0
EDR Hist Cleaner 0.125 0 NR NR NR NR 0
EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES
Fydmvtjwf!Sfdpwfsfe!Hpwu/!Bsdijwft
RGA HWS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
RGA LF TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
RGA LUST TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
- Totals -- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
NOTES:
TP = Target Property
NR = Not Requested at this Search Distance
Sites may be listed in more than one database
TC6780554.2s Page 7

Map IDMAP FINDINGS
Direction
DistanceEDR ID Number
ElevationSiteDatabase(s)EPA ID Number
NO SITES FOUND
TC6780554.2s Page 8

Database(s)LAST
Zip27233
TC6780554.2s Page 9
Site AddressCOMPANY MILL ROAD
ORPHAN SUMMARY
Site NameCITY OF GSBO DIESEL SPILL
EDR IDS127734044
Count: 1 records.CityCLIMAX

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
To maintain currency of the following federal and state databases, EDR contacts the appropriate governmental agency
on a monthly or quarterly basis, as required.
Number of Days to Update:Provides confirmation that EDR is reporting records that have been updated within 90 days
from the date the government agency made the information available to the public.
STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Mjtut!pg!Gfefsbm!OQM!)Tvqfsgvoe*!tjuft
NPL: National Priority List
National Priorities List (Superfund). The NPL is a subset of CERCLIS and identifies over 1,200 sites for priority
cleanup under the Superfund Program. NPL sites may encompass relatively large areas. As such, EDR provides polygon
coverage for over 1,000 NPL site boundaries produced by EPA’s Environmental Photographic Interpretation Center
(EPIC) and regional EPA offices.
Date of Government Version: 10/20/2021Source: EPA
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/05/2021Telephone: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/29/2021Last EDR Contact: 12/01/2021
Number of Days to Update: 24Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/10/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
NPL Site Boundaries
Sources:
EPA’s Environmental Photographic Interpretation Center (EPIC)
Telephone: [phone]
EPA Region 1EPA Region 6
Telephone [phone]Telephone: [phone]
EPA Region 3EPA Region 7
Telephone [phone]Telephone: [phone]
EPA Region 4EPA Region 8
Telephone [phone]Telephone: [phone]
EPA Region 5EPA Region 9
Telephone [phone]Telephone: [phone]
EPA Region 10
Telephone [phone]
Proposed NPL: Proposed National Priority List Sites
A site that has been proposed for listing on the NationalPriorities List through the issuance of a proposed rule
in the Federal Register.EPA then accepts public comments on the site, responds to the comments,and places on
the NPL those sites that continue to meet therequirements for listing.
Date of Government Version: 10/20/2021Source: EPA
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/05/2021Telephone: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/29/2021Last EDR Contact: 12/01/2021
Number of Days to Update: 24Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/10/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
NPL LIENS: Federal Superfund Liens
Federal Superfund Liens. Under the authority granted the USEPA by CERCLA of 1980, the USEPA has the authority
to file liens against real property in order to recover remedial action expenditures or when the property owner
received notification of potential liability. USEPA compiles a listing of filed notices of Superfund Liens.
TC6780554.2s Page GR-1

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 10/15/1991Source: EPA
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/02/1994Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/30/1994Last EDR Contact: 08/15/2011
Number of Days to Update: 56Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/28/2011
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
Mjtut!pg!Gfefsbm!Efmjtufe!OQM!tjuft
Delisted NPL: National Priority List Deletions
The National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP) establishes the criteria that the
EPA uses to delete sites from the NPL. In accordance with 40 CFR 300.425.(e), sites may be deleted from the
NPL where no further response is appropriate.
Date of Government Version: 10/20/2021Source: EPA
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/05/2021Telephone: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/29/2021Last EDR Contact: 12/01/2021
Number of Days to Update: 24Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/10/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
Mjtut!pg!Gfefsbm!tjuft!tvckfdu!up!DFSDMB!sfnpwbmt!boe!DFSDMB!psefst
FEDERAL FACILITY: Federal Facility Site Information listing
A listing of National Priority List (NPL) and Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) sites found in the Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Information System (CERCLIS) Database where EPA Federal Facilities
Restoration and Reuse Office is involved in cleanup activities.
Date of Government Version: 05/25/2021Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/24/2021Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/20/2021Last EDR Contact: 10/01/2021
Number of Days to Update: 88Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/10/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
SEMS: Superfund Enterprise Management System
SEMS (Superfund Enterprise Management System) tracks hazardous waste sites, potentially hazardous waste sites,
and remedial activities performed in support of EPA’s Superfund Program across the United States. The list was
formerly know as CERCLIS, renamed to SEMS by the EPA in 2015. The list contains data on potentially hazardous
waste sites that have been reported to the USEPA by states, municipalities, private companies and private persons,
pursuant to Section 103 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA).
This dataset also contains sites which are either proposed to or on the National Priorities List (NPL) and the
sites which are in the screening and assessment phase for possible inclusion on the NPL.
Date of Government Version: 10/20/2021Source: EPA
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/05/2021Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/29/2021Last EDR Contact: 12/01/2021
Number of Days to Update: 24Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/24/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
Mjtut!pg!Gfefsbm!DFSDMB!tjuft!xjui!OGSBQ
SEMS-ARCHIVE: Superfund Enterprise Management System Archive
TC6780554.2s Page GR-2

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
SEMS-ARCHIVE (Superfund Enterprise Management System Archive) tracks sites that have no further interest under
the Federal Superfund Program based on available information. The list was formerly known as the CERCLIS-NFRAP,
renamed to SEMS ARCHIVE by the EPA in 2015. EPA may perform a minimal level of assessment work at a site while
it is archived if site conditions change and/or new information becomes available. Archived sites have been removed
and archived from the inventory of SEMS sites. Archived status indicates that, to the best of EPA’s knowledge,
assessment at a site has been completed and that EPA has determined no further steps will be taken to list the
site on the National Priorities List (NPL), unless information indicates this decision was not appropriate or
other considerations require a recommendation for listing at a later time. The decision does not necessarily mean
that there is no hazard associated with a given site; it only means that. based upon available information, the
location is not judged to be potential NPL site.
Date of Government Version: 10/20/2021Source: EPA
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/05/2021Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/29/2021Last EDR Contact: 12/01/2021
Number of Days to Update: 24Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/24/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
Mjtut!pg!Gfefsbm!SDSB!gbdjmjujft!voefshpjoh!Dpssfdujwf!Bdujpo
CORRACTS: Corrective Action Report
CORRACTS identifies hazardous waste handlers with RCRA corrective action activity.
Date of Government Version: 09/13/2021Source: EPA
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/15/2021Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/12/2021Last EDR Contact: 09/15/2021
Number of Days to Update: 27Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/03/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
Mjtut!pg!Gfefsbm!SDSB!UTE!gbdjmjujft
RCRA-TSDF: RCRA - Treatment, Storage and Disposal
RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database
includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste
as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Transporters are individuals or entities that
move hazardous waste from the generator offsite to a facility that can recycle, treat, store, or dispose of the
waste. TSDFs treat, store, or dispose of the waste.
Date of Government Version: 09/13/2021Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/15/2021Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/12/2021Last EDR Contact: 09/15/2021
Number of Days to Update: 27Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/03/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
Mjtut!pg!Gfefsbm!SDSB!hfofsbupst
RCRA-LQG: RCRA - Large Quantity Generators
RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database
includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste
as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Large quantity generators (LQGs) generate
over 1,000 kilograms (kg) of hazardous waste, or over 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month.
Date of Government Version: 09/13/2021Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/15/2021Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/12/2021Last EDR Contact: 09/15/2021
Number of Days to Update: 27Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/03/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
TC6780554.2s Page GR-3

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
RCRA-SQG: RCRA - Small Quantity Generators
RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database
includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste
as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Small quantity generators (SQGs) generate
between 100 kg and 1,000 kg of hazardous waste per month.
Date of Government Version: 09/13/2021Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/15/2021Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/12/2021Last EDR Contact: 09/15/2021
Number of Days to Update: 27Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/03/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
RCRA-VSQG: RCRA - Very Small Quantity Generators (Formerly Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generators)
RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database
includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste
as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Very small quantity generators (VSQGs) generate
less than 100 kg of hazardous waste, or less than 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month.
Date of Government Version: 09/13/2021Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/15/2021Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/12/2021Last EDR Contact: 09/15/2021
Number of Days to Update: 27Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/03/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
Gfefsbm!jotujuvujpobm!dpouspmt!0!fohjoffsjoh!dpouspmt!sfhjtusjft
LUCIS: Land Use Control Information System
LUCIS contains records of land use control information pertaining to the former Navy Base Realignment and Closure
properties.
Date of Government Version: 07/12/2021Source: Department of the Navy
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/06/2021Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/22/2021Last EDR Contact: 11/08/2021
Number of Days to Update: 77Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/21/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
US ENG CONTROLS: Engineering Controls Sites List
A listing of sites with engineering controls in place. Engineering controls include various forms of caps, building
foundations, liners, and treatment methods to create pathway elimination for regulated substances to enter environmental
media or effect human health.
Date of Government Version: 08/23/2021Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/23/2021Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/12/2021Last EDR Contact: 11/18/2021
Number of Days to Update: 81Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/06/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
US INST CONTROLS: Institutional Controls Sites List
A listing of sites with institutional controls in place. Institutional controls include administrative measures,
such as groundwater use restrictions, construction restrictions, property use restrictions, and post remediation
care requirements intended to prevent exposure to contaminants remaining on site. Deed restrictions are generally
required as part of the institutional controls.
Date of Government Version: 08/23/2021Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/23/2021Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/12/2021Last EDR Contact: 11/19/2021
Number of Days to Update: 81Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/07/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TC6780554.2s Page GR-4

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Gfefsbm!FSOT!mjtu
ERNS: Emergency Response Notification System
Emergency Response Notification System. ERNS records and stores information on reported releases of oil and hazardous
substances.
Date of Government Version: 06/14/2021Source: National Response Center, United States Coast Guard
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/17/2021Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/17/2021Last EDR Contact: 09/21/2021
Number of Days to Update: 61Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/03/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
Mjtut!pg!tubuf.!boe!usjcbm!)Tvqfsgvoe*!frvjwbmfou!tjuft
HSDS: Hazardous Substance Disposal Site
Locations of uncontrolled and unregulated hazardous waste sites. The file includes sites on the National Priority
List as well as those on the state priority list.
Date of Government Version: 08/09/2011Source: North Carolina Center for Geographic Information and Analysis
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/08/2011Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/05/2011Last EDR Contact: 10/14/2021
Number of Days to Update: 27Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/31/2022
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
Mjtut!pg!tubuf.!boe!usjcbm!ib{bsepvt!xbtuf!gbdjmjujft
SHWS: Inactive Hazardous Sites Inventory
State Hazardous Waste Sites. State hazardous waste site records are the states’ equivalent to CERCLIS. These sites
may or may not already be listed on the federal CERCLIS list. Priority sites planned for cleanup using state funds
(state equivalent of Superfund) are identified along with sites where cleanup will be paid for by potentially
responsible parties. Available information varies by state.
Date of Government Version: 08/31/2021Source: Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/09/2021Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/30/2021Last EDR Contact: 09/09/2021
Number of Days to Update: 82Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/20/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
Mjtut!pg!tubuf!boe!usjcbm!mboegjmmt!boe!tpmje!xbtuf!ejtqptbm!gbdjmjujft
SWF/LF: List of Solid Waste Facilities
Solid Waste Facilities/Landfill Sites. SWF/LF type records typically contain an inventory of solid waste disposal
facilities or landfills in a particular state. Depending on the state, these may be active or inactive facilities
or open dumps that failed to meet RCRA Subtitle D Section 4004 criteria for solid waste landfills or disposal
sites.
Date of Government Version: 05/06/2021Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/22/2021Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/20/2021Last EDR Contact: 09/24/2021
Number of Days to Update: 90Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/03/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
DEBRIS: Solid Waste Active Disaster Debris Sites Listing
NCDEQ Division of Waste Management Solid Waste Section Temporary Disaster Debris Staging Site (TDDSS) Locations
which are available to be activated in a disaster or emergency.. Disaster Debris Sites can only be used for temporary
disaster debris storage if the site’s responsible party activates the site for use by notifying the NCDEQ DWM
Solid Waste Section staff during an emergency
Date of Government Version: 01/06/2021Source: Department of Environmental Quality
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/16/2021Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/02/2021Last EDR Contact: 09/14/2021
Number of Days to Update: 78Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/27/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TC6780554.2s Page GR-5

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
OLI: Old Landfill Inventory
Old landfill inventory location information. (Does not include no further action sites and other agency lead
sites).
Date of Government Version: 09/11/2020Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/09/2020Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/30/2020Last EDR Contact: 10/08/2021
Number of Days to Update: 82Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/17/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
LCID: Land-Clearing and Inert Debris (LCID) Landfill Notifications
A list all of the Land-Clearing and Inert Debris (LCID) Landfill Notification facilities (under 2 acres in
size) in North Carolina.
Date of Government Version: 05/11/2021Source: Department of Environmental Quality
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/02/2021Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/28/2021Last EDR Contact: 10/08/2021
Number of Days to Update: 88Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/17/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
Mjtut!pg!tubuf!boe!usjcbm!mfbljoh!tupsbhf!ubolt
LUST: Regional UST Database
This database contains information obtained from the Regional Offices. It provides a more detailed explanation
of current and historic activity for individual sites, as well as what was previously found in the Incident Management
Database. Sites in this database with Incident Numbers are considered LUSTs.
Date of Government Version: 07/30/2021Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/03/2021Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/27/2021Last EDR Contact: 11/03/2021
Number of Days to Update: 85Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/14/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
LAST: Leaking Aboveground Storage Tanks
A listing of leaking aboveground storage tank site locations.
Date of Government Version: 10/08/2021Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/27/2021Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/27/2021Last EDR Contact: 10/27/2021
Number of Days to Update: 0Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/14/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
INDIAN LUST R6: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUSTs on Indian land in New Mexico and Oklahoma.
Date of Government Version: 05/17/2021Source: EPA Region 6
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/11/2021Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/07/2021Last EDR Contact: 11/15/2021
Number of Days to Update: 88Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/31/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN LUST R4: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUSTs on Indian land in Florida, Mississippi and North Carolina.
Date of Government Version: 05/28/2021Source: EPA Region 4
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/22/2021Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/20/2021Last EDR Contact: 11/15/2021
Number of Days to Update: 90Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/31/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TC6780554.2s Page GR-6

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
INDIAN LUST R5: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
Leaking underground storage tanks located on Indian Land in Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin.
Date of Government Version: 04/06/2021Source: EPA, Region 5
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/11/2021Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/07/2021Last EDR Contact: 11/15/2021
Number of Days to Update: 88Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/31/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN LUST R10: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUSTs on Indian land in Alaska, Idaho, Oregon and Washington.
Date of Government Version: 04/27/2021Source: EPA Region 10
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/11/2021Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/07/2021Last EDR Contact: 11/15/2021
Number of Days to Update: 88Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/31/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN LUST R9: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUSTs on Indian land in Arizona, California, New Mexico and Nevada
Date of Government Version: 05/27/2021Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/11/2021Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/07/2021Last EDR Contact: 11/15/2021
Number of Days to Update: 88Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/31/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN LUST R8: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUSTs on Indian land in Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah and Wyoming.
Date of Government Version: 05/27/2021Source: EPA Region 8
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/11/2021Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/07/2021Last EDR Contact: 11/15/2021
Number of Days to Update: 88Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/31/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN LUST R7: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUSTs on Indian land in Iowa, Kansas, and Nebraska
Date of Government Version: 06/01/2021Source: EPA Region 7
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/11/2021Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/07/2021Last EDR Contact: 11/15/2021
Number of Days to Update: 88Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/31/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN LUST R1: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
A listing of leaking underground storage tank locations on Indian Land.
Date of Government Version: 04/28/2021Source: EPA Region 1
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/11/2021Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/07/2021Last EDR Contact: 11/15/2021
Number of Days to Update: 88Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/31/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
LUST TRUST: State Trust Fund Database
This database contains information about claims against the State Trust Funds for reimbursements for expenses
incurred while remediating Leaking USTs.
Date of Government Version: 07/02/2021Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/02/2021Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/27/2021Last EDR Contact: 10/05/2021
Number of Days to Update: 87Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/17/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
TC6780554.2s Page GR-7

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Mjtut!pg!tubuf!boe!usjcbm!sfhjtufsfe!tupsbhf!ubolt
FEMA UST: Underground Storage Tank Listing
A listing of all FEMA owned underground storage tanks.
Date of Government Version: 01/29/2021Source: FEMA
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/17/2021Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/22/2021Last EDR Contact: 11/01/2021
Number of Days to Update: 33Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/17/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
UST: Petroleum Underground Storage Tank Database
Registered Underground Storage Tanks. UST’s are regulated under Subtitle I of the Resource Conservation and Recovery
Act (RCRA) and must be registered with the state department responsible for administering the UST program. Available
information varies by state program.
Date of Government Version: 07/30/2021Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/03/2021Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/27/2021Last EDR Contact: 11/03/2021
Number of Days to Update: 85Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/14/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
AST: AST Database
Facilities with aboveground storage tanks that have a capacity greater than 21,000 gallons.
Date of Government Version: 05/18/2021Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/09/2021Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/30/2021Last EDR Contact: 09/09/2021
Number of Days to Update: 82Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/27/2021
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
INDIAN UST R1: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 1 (Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, Vermont and ten Tribal
Nations).
Date of Government Version: 04/28/2021Source: EPA, Region 1
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/11/2021Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/07/2021Last EDR Contact: 11/15/2021
Number of Days to Update: 88Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/31/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN UST R4: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 4 (Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee
and Tribal Nations)
Date of Government Version: 05/28/2021Source: EPA Region 4
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/22/2021Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/20/2021Last EDR Contact: 11/15/2021
Number of Days to Update: 90Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/31/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN UST R6: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 6 (Louisiana, Arkansas, Oklahoma, New Mexico, Texas and 65 Tribes).
Date of Government Version: 05/17/2021Source: EPA Region 6
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/11/2021Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/07/2021Last EDR Contact: 11/15/2021
Number of Days to Update: 88Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/31/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TC6780554.2s Page GR-8

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
INDIAN UST R10: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 10 (Alaska, Idaho, Oregon, Washington, and Tribal Nations).
Date of Government Version: 04/27/2021Source: EPA Region 10
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/11/2021Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/07/2021Last EDR Contact: 11/15/2021
Number of Days to Update: 88Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/31/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN UST R5: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 5 (Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin and Tribal Nations).
Date of Government Version: 04/06/2021Source: EPA Region 5
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/11/2021Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/07/2021Last EDR Contact: 11/15/2021
Number of Days to Update: 88Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/31/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN UST R7: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 7 (Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska, and 9 Tribal Nations).
Date of Government Version: 06/01/2021Source: EPA Region 7
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/11/2021Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/07/2021Last EDR Contact: 11/15/2021
Number of Days to Update: 88Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/31/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN UST R9: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 9 (Arizona, California, Hawaii, Nevada, the Pacific Islands, and Tribal Nations).
Date of Government Version: 05/27/2021Source: EPA Region 9
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/11/2021Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/07/2021Last EDR Contact: 11/15/2021
Number of Days to Update: 88Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/31/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN UST R8: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 8 (Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah, Wyoming and 27 Tribal Nations).
Date of Government Version: 05/27/2021Source: EPA Region 8
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/11/2021Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/07/2021Last EDR Contact: 11/15/2021
Number of Days to Update: 88Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/31/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
Tubuf!boe!usjcbm!jotujuvujpobm!dpouspm!0!fohjoffsjoh!dpouspm!sfhjtusjft
INST CONTROL: No Further Action Sites With Land Use Restrictions Monitoring
A land use restricted site is a property where there are limits or requirements on future use of the property
due to varying levels of cleanup possible, practical, or necessary at the site.
Date of Government Version: 09/04/2020Source: Department of Environmental Quality
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/09/2020Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/03/2020Last EDR Contact: 09/10/2021
Number of Days to Update: 85Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/20/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
TC6780554.2s Page GR-9

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Mjtut!pg!tubuf!boe!usjcbm!wpmvoubsz!dmfbovq!tjuft
VCP: Responsible Party Voluntary Action Sites
Responsible Party Voluntary Action site locations.
Date of Government Version: 08/31/2021Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/09/2021Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/01/2021Last EDR Contact: 09/09/2021
Number of Days to Update: 83Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/20/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
INDIAN VCP R1: Voluntary Cleanup Priority Listing
A listing of voluntary cleanup priority sites located on Indian Land located in Region 1.
Date of Government Version: 07/27/2015Source: EPA, Region 1
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/29/2015Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/18/2016Last EDR Contact: 09/15/2021
Number of Days to Update: 142Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/03/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN VCP R7: Voluntary Cleanup Priority Lisitng
A listing of voluntary cleanup priority sites located on Indian Land located in Region 7.
Date of Government Version: 03/20/2008Source: EPA, Region 7
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/22/2008Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/19/2008Last EDR Contact: 07/08/2021
Number of Days to Update: 27Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/20/2009
Data Release Frequency: Varies
Mjtut!pg!tubuf!boe!usjcbm!cspxogjfme!tjuft
BROWNFIELDS: Brownfields Projects Inventory
A brownfield site is an abandoned, idled, or underused property where the threat of environmental contamination
has hindered its redevelopment. All of the sites in the inventory are working toward a brownfield agreement for
cleanup and liabitliy control.
Date of Government Version: 06/01/2021Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/24/2021Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/17/2021Last EDR Contact: 09/28/2021
Number of Days to Update: 85Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/10/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Mpdbm!Cspxogjfme!mjtut
US BROWNFIELDS: A Listing of Brownfields Sites
Brownfields are real property, the expansion, redevelopment, or reuse of which may be complicated by the presence
or potential presence of a hazardous substance, pollutant, or contaminant. Cleaning up and reinvesting in these
properties takes development pressures off of undeveloped, open land, and both improves and protects the environment.
Assessment, Cleanup and Redevelopment Exchange System (ACRES) stores information reported by EPA Brownfields
grant recipients on brownfields properties assessed or cleaned up with grant funding as well as information on
Targeted Brownfields Assessments performed by EPA Regions. A listing of ACRES Brownfield sites is obtained from
Cleanups in My Community. Cleanups in My Community provides information on Brownfields properties for which information
is reported back to EPA, as well as areas served by Brownfields grant programs.
Date of Government Version: 06/10/2021Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/10/2021Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/17/2021Last EDR Contact: 09/14/2021
Number of Days to Update: 68Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/27/2021
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
TC6780554.2s Page GR-10

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Mpdbm!Mjtut!pg!Mboegjmm!0!Tpmje!Xbtuf!Ejtqptbm!Tjuft
SWRCY: Recycling Center Listing
A listing of recycling center locations.
Date of Government Version: 08/28/2021Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/31/2021Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/22/2021Last EDR Contact: 10/25/2021
Number of Days to Update: 83Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/07/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
HIST LF: Solid Waste Facility Listing
A listing of solid waste facilities.
Date of Government Version: 11/06/2006Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/13/2007Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/02/2007Last EDR Contact: 01/19/2009
Number of Days to Update: 17Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
INDIAN ODI: Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian Lands
Location of open dumps on Indian land.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/1998Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/03/2007Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/24/2008Last EDR Contact: 10/22/2021
Number of Days to Update: 52Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/07/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
ODI: Open Dump Inventory
An open dump is defined as a disposal facility that does not comply with one or more of the Part 257 or Part 258
Subtitle D Criteria.
Date of Government Version: 06/30/1985Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/09/2004Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/17/2004Last EDR Contact: 06/09/2004
Number of Days to Update: 39Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
DEBRIS REGION 9: Torres Martinez Reservation Illegal Dump Site Locations
A listing of illegal dump sites location on the Torres Martinez Indian Reservation located in eastern Riverside
County and northern Imperial County, California.
Date of Government Version: 01/12/2009Source: EPA, Region 9
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/07/2009Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/21/2009Last EDR Contact: 10/14/2021
Number of Days to Update: 137Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/31/2022
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
IHS OPEN DUMPS: Open Dumps on Indian Land
A listing of all open dumps located on Indian Land in the United States.
Date of Government Version: 04/01/2014Source: Department of Health & Human Serivces, Indian Health Service
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/06/2014Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/29/2015Last EDR Contact: 10/28/2021
Number of Days to Update: 176Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/07/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
Mpdbm!Mjtut!pg!Ib{bsepvt!xbtuf!0!Dpoubnjobufe!Tjuft
TC6780554.2s Page GR-11

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
US HIST CDL: National Clandestine Laboratory Register
A listing of clandestine drug lab locations that have been removed from the DEAs National Clandestine Laboratory
Register.
Date of Government Version: 05/18/2021Source: Drug Enforcement Administration
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/18/2021Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/03/2021Last EDR Contact: 11/16/2021
Number of Days to Update: 77Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/07/2022
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
US CDL: Clandestine Drug Labs
A listing of clandestine drug lab locations. The U.S. Department of Justice ("the Department") provides this
web site as a public service. It contains addresses of some locations where law enforcement agencies reported
they found chemicals or other items that indicated the presence of either clandestine drug laboratories or dumpsites.
In most cases, the source of the entries is not the Department, and the Department has not verified the entry
and does not guarantee its accuracy. Members of the public must verify the accuracy of all entries by, for example,
contacting local law enforcement and local health departments.
Date of Government Version: 05/18/2021Source: Drug Enforcement Administration
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/18/2021Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/03/2021Last EDR Contact: 11/16/2021
Number of Days to Update: 77Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/07/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
PFAS: PFAS Contamination Site Listing
List of PFAS facilities
Date of Government Version: 11/15/2020Source: Department of Environmental Quality
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/03/2021Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/28/2021Last EDR Contact: 11/11/2021
Number of Days to Update: 86Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/14/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
Mpdbm!Mboe!Sfdpset
LIENS 2: CERCLA Lien Information
A Federal CERCLA (’Superfund’) lien can exist by operation of law at any site or property at which EPA has spent
Superfund monies. These monies are spent to investigate and address releases and threatened releases of contamination.
CERCLIS provides information as to the identity of these sites and properties.
Date of Government Version: 10/20/2021Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/05/2021Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/29/2021Last EDR Contact: 12/01/2021
Number of Days to Update: 24Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/10/2022
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
Sfdpset!pg!Fnfshfodz!Sfmfbtf!Sfqpsut
HMIRS: Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System
Hazardous Materials Incident Report System. HMIRS contains hazardous material spill incidents reported to DOT.
Date of Government Version: 09/12/2021Source: U.S. Department of Transportation
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/13/2021Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/28/2021Last EDR Contact: 09/13/2021
Number of Days to Update: 15Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/03/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
SPILLS: Spills Incident Listing
A listing spills, hazardous material releases, sanitary sewer overflows, wastewater treatment plant bypasses and
upsets, citizen complaints, and any other environmental emergency calls reported to the agency.
TC6780554.2s Page GR-12

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 06/07/2021Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/08/2021Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/30/2021Last EDR Contact: 11/11/2021
Number of Days to Update: 83Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/20/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
IMD: Incident Management Database
Groundwater and/or soil contamination incidents
Date of Government Version: 07/30/2021Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/03/2021Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/06/2021Last EDR Contact: 11/03/2021
Number of Days to Update: 3Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/14/2022
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
SPILLS 90: SPILLS90 data from FirstSearch
Spills 90 includes those spill and release records available exclusively from FirstSearch databases. Typically,
they may include chemical, oil and/or hazardous substance spills recorded after 1990. Duplicate records that are
already included in EDR incident and release records are not included in Spills 90.
Date of Government Version: 09/27/2012Source: FirstSearch
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/03/2013Telephone: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/06/2013Last EDR Contact: 01/03/2013
Number of Days to Update: 62Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
SPILLS 80: SPILLS80 data from FirstSearch
Spills 80 includes those spill and release records available from FirstSearch databases prior to 1990. Typically,
they may include chemical, oil and/or hazardous substance spills recorded before 1990. Duplicate records that
are already included in EDR incident and release records are not included in Spills 80.
Date of Government Version: 06/14/2001Source: FirstSearch
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/03/2013Telephone: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/06/2013Last EDR Contact: 01/03/2013
Number of Days to Update: 62Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
Puifs!Btdfsubjobcmf!Sfdpset
RCRA NonGen / NLR: RCRA - Non Generators / No Longer Regulated
RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database
includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste
as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Non-Generators do not presently generate hazardous
waste.
Date of Government Version: 09/13/2021Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/15/2021Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/12/2021Last EDR Contact: 09/15/2021
Number of Days to Update: 27Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/03/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
FUDS: Formerly Used Defense Sites
The listing includes locations of Formerly Used Defense Sites properties where the US Army Corps of Engineers
is actively working or will take necessary cleanup actions.
Date of Government Version: 08/10/2021Source: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/17/2021Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/22/2021Last EDR Contact: 11/16/2021
Number of Days to Update: 66Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/28/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TC6780554.2s Page GR-13

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
DOD: Department of Defense Sites
This data set consists of federally owned or administered lands, administered by the Department of Defense, that
have any area equal to or greater than 640 acres of the United States, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2005Source: USGS
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/10/2006Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/11/2007Last EDR Contact: 10/15/2021
Number of Days to Update: 62Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/24/2022
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
FEDLAND: Federal and Indian Lands
Federally and Indian administrated lands of the United States. Lands included are administrated by: Army Corps
of Engineers, Bureau of Reclamation, National Wild and Scenic River, National Wildlife Refuge, Public Domain Land,
Wilderness, Wilderness Study Area, Wildlife Management Area, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Bureau of Land Management,
Department of Justice, Forest Service, Fish and Wildlife Service, National Park Service.
Date of Government Version: 04/02/2018Source: U.S. Geological Survey
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/11/2018Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/06/2019Last EDR Contact: 10/05/2021
Number of Days to Update: 574Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/17/2022
Data Release Frequency: N/A
SCRD DRYCLEANERS: State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Listing
The State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners was established in 1998, with support from the U.S. EPA Office
of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation. It is comprised of representatives of states with established
drycleaner remediation programs. Currently the member states are Alabama, Connecticut, Florida, Illinois, Kansas,
Minnesota, Missouri, North Carolina, Oregon, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, and Wisconsin.
Date of Government Version: 01/01/2017Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/03/2017Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/07/2017Last EDR Contact: 11/08/2021
Number of Days to Update: 63Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/21/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
US FIN ASSUR: Financial Assurance Information
All owners and operators of facilities that treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste are required to provide
proof that they will have sufficient funds to pay for the clean up, closure, and post-closure care of their facilities.
Date of Government Version: 09/13/2021Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/15/2021Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/28/2021Last EDR Contact: 09/15/2021
Number of Days to Update: 13Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/03/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
EPA WATCH LIST: EPA WATCH LIST
EPA maintains a "Watch List" to facilitate dialogue between EPA, state and local environmental agencies on enforcement
matters relating to facilities with alleged violations identified as either significant or high priority. Being
on the Watch List does not mean that the facility has actually violated the law only that an investigation by
EPA or a state or local environmental agency has led those organizations to allege that an unproven violation
has in fact occurred. Being on the Watch List does not represent a higher level of concern regarding the alleged
violations that were detected, but instead indicates cases requiring additional dialogue between EPA, state and
local agencies - primarily because of the length of time the alleged violation has gone unaddressed or unresolved.
Date of Government Version: 08/30/2013Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/21/2014Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/17/2014Last EDR Contact: 11/01/2021
Number of Days to Update: 88Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/14/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
TC6780554.2s Page GR-14

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
2020 COR ACTION: 2020 Corrective Action Program List
The EPA has set ambitious goals for the RCRA Corrective Action program by creating the 2020 Corrective Action
Universe. This RCRA cleanup baseline includes facilities expected to need corrective action. The 2020 universe
contains a wide variety of sites. Some properties are heavily contaminated while others were contaminated but
have since been cleaned up. Still others have not been fully investigated yet, and may require little or no remediation.
Inclusion in the 2020 Universe does not necessarily imply failure on the part of a facility to meet its RCRA obligations.
Date of Government Version: 09/30/2017Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/08/2018Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/20/2018Last EDR Contact: 11/05/2021
Number of Days to Update: 73Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/14/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TSCA: Toxic Substances Control Act
Toxic Substances Control Act. TSCA identifies manufacturers and importers of chemical substances included on the
TSCA Chemical Substance Inventory list. It includes data on the production volume of these substances by plant
site.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2016Source: EPA
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/17/2020Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/10/2020Last EDR Contact: 09/17/2021
Number of Days to Update: 85Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/27/2021
Data Release Frequency: Every 4 Years
TRIS: Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System
Toxic Release Inventory System. TRIS identifies facilities which release toxic chemicals to the air, water and
land in reportable quantities under SARA Title III Section 313.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2018Source: EPA
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/14/2020Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/04/2020Last EDR Contact: 11/16/2021
Number of Days to Update: 82Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/28/2022
Data Release Frequency: Annually
SSTS: Section 7 Tracking Systems
Section 7 of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act, as amended (92 Stat. 829) requires all
registered pesticide-producing establishments to submit a report to the Environmental Protection Agency by March
1st each year. Each establishment must report the types and amounts of pesticides, active ingredients and devices
being produced, and those having been produced and sold or distributed in the past year.
Date of Government Version: 07/19/2021Source: EPA
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/19/2021Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/12/2021Last EDR Contact: 10/20/2021
Number of Days to Update: 85Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/31/2022
Data Release Frequency: Annually
ROD: Records Of Decision
Record of Decision. ROD documents mandate a permanent remedy at an NPL (Superfund) site containing technical
and health information to aid in the cleanup.
Date of Government Version: 10/20/2021Source: EPA
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/05/2021Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/29/2021Last EDR Contact: 12/01/2021
Number of Days to Update: 24Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/14/2022
Data Release Frequency: Annually
RMP: Risk Management Plans
TC6780554.2s Page GR-15

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
When Congress passed the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, it required EPA to publish regulations and guidance
for chemical accident prevention at facilities using extremely hazardous substances. The Risk Management Program
Rule (RMP Rule) was written to implement Section 112(r) of these amendments. The rule, which built upon existing
industry codes and standards, requires companies of all sizes that use certain flammable and toxic substances
to develop a Risk Management Program, which includes a(n): Hazard assessment that details the potential effects
of an accidental release, an accident history of the last five years, and an evaluation of worst-case and alternative
accidental releases; Prevention program that includes safety precautions and maintenance, monitoring, and employee
training measures; and Emergency response program that spells out emergency health care, employee training measures
and procedures for informing the public and response agencies (e.g the fire department) should an accident occur.
Date of Government Version: 10/20/2021Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/05/2021Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/12/2021Last EDR Contact: 10/18/2021
Number of Days to Update: 7Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/31/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
RAATS: RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System
RCRA Administration Action Tracking System. RAATS contains records based on enforcement actions issued under RCRA
pertaining to major violators and includes administrative and civil actions brought by the EPA. For administration
actions after September 30, 1995, data entry in the RAATS database was discontinued. EPA will retain a copy of
the database for historical records. It was necessary to terminate RAATS because a decrease in agency resources
made it impossible to continue to update the information contained in the database.
Date of Government Version: 04/17/1995Source: EPA
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/03/1995Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/07/1995Last EDR Contact: 06/02/2008
Number of Days to Update: 35Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/01/2008
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
PRP: Potentially Responsible Parties
A listing of verified Potentially Responsible Parties
Date of Government Version: 12/30/2020Source: EPA
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/14/2021Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/05/2021Last EDR Contact: 12/01/2021
Number of Days to Update: 50Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/14/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
PADS: PCB Activity Database System
PCB Activity Database. PADS Identifies generators, transporters, commercial storers and/or brokers and disposers
of PCB’s who are required to notify the EPA of such activities.
Date of Government Version: 11/19/2020Source: EPA
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/08/2021Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/22/2021Last EDR Contact: 10/08/2021
Number of Days to Update: 73Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/17/2022
Data Release Frequency: Annually
ICIS: Integrated Compliance Information System
The Integrated Compliance Information System (ICIS) supports the information needs of the national enforcement
and compliance program as well as the unique needs of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)
program.
Date of Government Version: 11/18/2016Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/23/2016Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/10/2017Last EDR Contact: 09/30/2021
Number of Days to Update: 79Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/17/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
TC6780554.2s Page GR-16

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
FTTS: FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act)
FTTS tracks administrative cases and pesticide enforcement actions and compliance activities related to FIFRA,
TSCA and EPCRA (Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act). To maintain currency, EDR contacts the
Agency on a quarterly basis.
Date of Government Version: 04/09/2009Source: EPA/Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/16/2009Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/11/2009Last EDR Contact: 08/18/2017
Number of Days to Update: 25Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/04/2017
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
FTTS INSP: FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act)
A listing of FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) inspections and enforcements.
Date of Government Version: 04/09/2009Source: EPA
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/16/2009Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/11/2009Last EDR Contact: 08/18/2017
Number of Days to Update: 25Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/04/2017
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
MLTS: Material Licensing Tracking System
MLTS is maintained by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and contains a list of approximately 8,100 sites which
possess or use radioactive materials and which are subject to NRC licensing requirements. To maintain currency,
EDR contacts the Agency on a quarterly basis.
Date of Government Version: 07/29/2021Source: Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/24/2021Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/19/2021Last EDR Contact: 10/18/2021
Number of Days to Update: 87Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/31/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
COAL ASH DOE: Steam-Electric Plant Operation Data
A listing of power plants that store ash in surface ponds.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2019Source: Department of Energy
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/01/2020Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/09/2021Last EDR Contact: 11/30/2021
Number of Days to Update: 70Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/14/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
COAL ASH EPA: Coal Combustion Residues Surface Impoundments List
A listing of coal combustion residues surface impoundments with high hazard potential ratings.
Date of Government Version: 01/12/2017Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/05/2019Telephone: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/11/2019Last EDR Contact: 12/02/2021
Number of Days to Update: 251Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/14/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
PCB TRANSFORMER: PCB Transformer Registration Database
The database of PCB transformer registrations that includes all PCB registration submittals.
Date of Government Version: 09/13/2019Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/06/2019Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/10/2020Last EDR Contact: 11/05/2021
Number of Days to Update: 96Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/14/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
RADINFO: Radiation Information Database
The Radiation Information Database (RADINFO) contains information about facilities that are regulated by U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulations for radiation and radioactivity.
TC6780554.2s Page GR-17

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 07/01/2019Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2019Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/23/2019Last EDR Contact: 09/27/2021
Number of Days to Update: 84Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/10/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
HIST FTTS: FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Administrative Case Listing
A complete administrative case listing from the FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) for all ten EPA regions. The
information was obtained from the National Compliance Database (NCDB). NCDB supports the implementation of FIFRA
(Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act) and TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act). Some EPA regions
are now closing out records. Because of that, and the fact that some EPA regions are not providing EPA Headquarters
with updated records, it was decided to create a HIST FTTS database. It included records that may not be included
in the newer FTTS database updates. This database is no longer updated.
Date of Government Version: 10/19/2006Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/01/2007Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/10/2007Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2007
Number of Days to Update: 40Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/17/2008
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
HIST FTTS INSP: FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Inspection & Enforcement Case Listing
A complete inspection and enforcement case listing from the FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) for all ten EPA
regions. The information was obtained from the National Compliance Database (NCDB). NCDB supports the implementation
of FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act) and TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act). Some
EPA regions are now closing out records. Because of that, and the fact that some EPA regions are not providing
EPA Headquarters with updated records, it was decided to create a HIST FTTS database. It included records that
may not be included in the newer FTTS database updates. This database is no longer updated.
Date of Government Version: 10/19/2006Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/01/2007Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/10/2007Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2008
Number of Days to Update: 40Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/17/2008
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
DOT OPS: Incident and Accident Data
Department of Transporation, Office of Pipeline Safety Incident and Accident data.
Date of Government Version: 01/02/2020Source: Department of Transporation, Office of Pipeline Safety
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/28/2020Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/17/2020Last EDR Contact: 10/26/2021
Number of Days to Update: 80Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/07/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
CONSENT: Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees
Major legal settlements that establish responsibility and standards for cleanup at NPL (Superfund) sites. Released
periodically by United States District Courts after settlement by parties to litigation matters.
Date of Government Version: 06/30/2021Source: Department of Justice, Consent Decree Library
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/14/2021Telephone: Varies
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/16/2021Last EDR Contact: 09/30/2021
Number of Days to Update: 2Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/17/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
BRS: Biennial Reporting System
The Biennial Reporting System is a national system administered by the EPA that collects data on the generation
and management of hazardous waste. BRS captures detailed data from two groups: Large Quantity Generators (LQG)
and Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facilities.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2017Source: EPA/NTIS
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/22/2020Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/20/2020Last EDR Contact: 09/15/2021
Number of Days to Update: 151Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/03/2022
Data Release Frequency: Biennially
TC6780554.2s Page GR-18

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
INDIAN RESERV: Indian Reservations
This map layer portrays Indian administered lands of the United States that have any area equal to or greater
than 640 acres.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2014Source: USGS
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/14/2015Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/10/2017Last EDR Contact: 10/05/2021
Number of Days to Update: 546Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/17/2022
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
FUSRAP: Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program
DOE established the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP) in 1974 to remediate sites where
radioactive contamination remained from Manhattan Project and early U.S. Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) operations.
Date of Government Version: 07/26/2021Source: Department of Energy
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/27/2021Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/22/2021Last EDR Contact: 11/01/2021
Number of Days to Update: 87Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/14/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
UMTRA: Uranium Mill Tailings Sites
Uranium ore was mined by private companies for federal government use in national defense programs. When the mills
shut down, large piles of the sand-like material (mill tailings) remain after uranium has been extracted from
the ore. Levels of human exposure to radioactive materials from the piles are low; however, in some cases tailings
were used as construction materials before the potential health hazards of the tailings were recognized.
Date of Government Version: 08/30/2019Source: Department of Energy
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/15/2019Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/28/2020Last EDR Contact: 11/29/2021
Number of Days to Update: 74Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/28/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
LEAD SMELTER 1: Lead Smelter Sites
A listing of former lead smelter site locations.
Date of Government Version: 10/20/2021Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/05/2021Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/29/2021Last EDR Contact: 11/30/2021
Number of Days to Update: 24Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/10/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
LEAD SMELTER 2: Lead Smelter Sites
A list of several hundred sites in the U.S. where secondary lead smelting was done from 1931and 1964. These sites
may pose a threat to public health through ingestion or inhalation of contaminated soil or dust
Date of Government Version: 04/05/2001Source: American Journal of Public Health
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/27/2010Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/02/2010Last EDR Contact: 12/02/2009
Number of Days to Update: 36Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
US AIRS (AFS): Aerometric Information Retrieval System Facility Subsystem (AFS)
The database is a sub-system of Aerometric Information Retrieval System (AIRS). AFS contains compliance data
on air pollution point sources regulated by the U.S. EPA and/or state and local air regulatory agencies. This
information comes from source reports by various stationary sources of air pollution, such as electric power plants,
steel mills, factories, and universities, and provides information about the air pollutants they produce. Action,
air program, air program pollutant, and general level plant data. It is used to track emissions and compliance
data from industrial plants.
TC6780554.2s Page GR-19

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 10/12/2016Source: EPA
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/26/2016Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/03/2017Last EDR Contact: 09/26/2017
Number of Days to Update: 100Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/08/2018
Data Release Frequency: Annually
US AIRS MINOR: Air Facility System Data
A listing of minor source facilities.
Date of Government Version: 10/12/2016Source: EPA
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/26/2016Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/03/2017Last EDR Contact: 09/26/2017
Number of Days to Update: 100Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/08/2018
Data Release Frequency: Annually
MINES VIOLATIONS: MSHA Violation Assessment Data
Mines violation and assessment information. Department of Labor, Mine Safety & Health Administration.
Date of Government Version: 06/30/2021Source: DOL, Mine Safety & Health Admi
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2021Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/28/2021Last EDR Contact: 11/24/2021
Number of Days to Update: 89Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/14/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
US MINES: Mines Master Index File
Contains all mine identification numbers issued for mines active or opened since 1971. The data also includes
violation information.
Date of Government Version: 08/09/2021Source: Department of Labor, Mine Safety and Health Administration
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/24/2021Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/19/2021Last EDR Contact: 11/22/2021
Number of Days to Update: 87Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/07/2022
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
US MINES 2: Ferrous and Nonferrous Metal Mines Database Listing
This map layer includes ferrous (ferrous metal mines are facilities that extract ferrous metals, such as iron
ore or molybdenum) and nonferrous (Nonferrous metal mines are facilities that extract nonferrous metals, such
as gold, silver, copper, zinc, and lead) metal mines in the United States.
Date of Government Version: 05/06/2020Source: USGS
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/27/2020Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/13/2020Last EDR Contact: 11/22/2021
Number of Days to Update: 78Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/07/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
US MINES 3: Active Mines & Mineral Plants Database Listing
Active Mines and Mineral Processing Plant operations for commodities monitored by the Minerals Information Team
of the USGS.
Date of Government Version: 04/14/2011Source: USGS
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/08/2011Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/13/2011Last EDR Contact: 11/22/2021
Number of Days to Update: 97Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/07/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
ABANDONED MINES: Abandoned Mines
An inventory of land and water impacted by past mining (primarily coal mining) is maintained by OSMRE to provide
information needed to implement the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 (SMCRA). The inventory
contains information on the location, type, and extent of AML impacts, as well as, information on the cost associated
with the reclamation of those problems. The inventory is based upon field surveys by State, Tribal, and OSMRE
program officials. It is dynamic to the extent that it is modified as new problems are identified and existing
problems are reclaimed.
TC6780554.2s Page GR-20

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 06/15/2021Source: Department of Interior
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/16/2021Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/17/2021Last EDR Contact: 12/02/2021
Number of Days to Update: 62Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/21/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
FINDS: Facility Index System/Facility Registry System
Facility Index System. FINDS contains both facility information and ’pointers’ to other sources that contain more
detail. EDR includes the following FINDS databases in this report: PCS (Permit Compliance System), AIRS (Aerometric
Information Retrieval System), DOCKET (Enforcement Docket used to manage and track information on civil judicial
enforcement cases for all environmental statutes), FURS (Federal Underground Injection Control), C-DOCKET (Criminal
Docket System used to track criminal enforcement actions for all environmental statutes), FFIS (Federal Facilities
Information System), STATE (State Environmental Laws and Statutes), and PADS (PCB Activity Data System).
Date of Government Version: 05/05/2021Source: EPA
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/18/2021Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/17/2021Last EDR Contact: 11/22/2021
Number of Days to Update: 91Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/14/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
DOCKET HWC: Hazardous Waste Compliance Docket Listing
A complete list of the Federal Agency Hazardous Waste Compliance Docket Facilities.
Date of Government Version: 05/06/2021Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/21/2021Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/11/2021Last EDR Contact: 11/23/2021
Number of Days to Update: 82Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/07/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
UXO: Unexploded Ordnance Sites
A listing of unexploded ordnance site locations
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2018Source: Department of Defense
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/02/2020Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/17/2020Last EDR Contact: 10/07/2021
Number of Days to Update: 77Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/24/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
ECHO: Enforcement & Compliance History Information
ECHO provides integrated compliance and enforcement information for about 800,000 regulated facilities nationwide.
Date of Government Version: 06/26/2021Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2021Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/28/2021Last EDR Contact: 10/05/2021
Number of Days to Update: 89Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/17/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
FUELS PROGRAM: EPA Fuels Program Registered Listing
This listing includes facilities that are registered under the Part 80 (Code of Federal Regulations) EPA Fuels
Programs. All companies now are required to submit new and updated registrations.
Date of Government Version: 08/13/2021Source: EPA
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/13/2021Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/22/2021Last EDR Contact: 11/15/2021
Number of Days to Update: 70Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/28/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
AIRS: Air Quality Permit Listing
A listing of facilities with air quality permits.
TC6780554.2s Page GR-21

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 09/07/2021Source: Department of Environmental Quality
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/08/2021Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/30/2021Last EDR Contact: 09/08/2021
Number of Days to Update: 83Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/20/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
ASBESTOS: ASBESTOS
Asbestos notification sites
Date of Government Version: 07/31/2021Source: Department of Health & Human Services
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/09/2021Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/02/2021Last EDR Contact: 10/18/2021
Number of Days to Update: 85Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/31/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
COAL ASH: Coal Ash Disposal Sites
A listing of coal combustion products distribution permits issued by the Division for the treatment, storage,
transportation, use and disposal of coal combustion products.
Date of Government Version: 05/06/2021Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/22/2021Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/22/2021Last EDR Contact: 09/24/2021
Number of Days to Update: 92Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/03/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
DRYCLEANERS: Drycleaning Sites
Potential and known drycleaning sites, active and abandoned, that the Drycleaning Solvent Cleanup Program has
knowledge of and entered into this database.
Date of Government Version: 09/08/2021Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/14/2021Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/03/2021Last EDR Contact: 09/14/2021
Number of Days to Update: 80Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/27/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
Financial Assurance 1: Financial Assurance Information Listing
A listing of financial assurance information for underground storage tank facilities. Financial assurance is intended
to ensure that resources are available to pay for the cost of closure, post-closure care, and corrective measures
if the owner or operator of a regulated facility is unable or unwilling to pay.
Date of Government Version: 07/30/2021Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/03/2021Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/27/2021Last EDR Contact: 11/03/2021
Number of Days to Update: 85Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/14/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
Financial Assurance 2: Financial Assurance Information Listing
Information for solid waste facilities. Financial assurance is intended to ensure that resources are available
to pay for the cost of closure, post-closure care, and corrective measures if the owner or operator of a regulated
facility is unable or unwilling to pay.
Date of Government Version: 10/02/2012Source: Department of Environmental & Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/03/2012Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/26/2012Last EDR Contact: 09/15/2021
Number of Days to Update: 23Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/03/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
Financial Assurance 3: Financial Assurance Information
Hazardous waste financial assurance information.
TC6780554.2s Page GR-22

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 09/02/2021Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/02/2021Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/22/2021Last EDR Contact: 12/02/2021
Number of Days to Update: 81Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/21/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
NPDES: NPDES Facility Location Listing
General information regarding NPDES(National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System) permits.
Date of Government Version: 07/07/2021Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/26/2021Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/19/2021Last EDR Contact: 10/27/2021
Number of Days to Update: 85Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/07/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
UIC: Underground Injection Wells Listing
A listing of uncerground injection wells locations.
Date of Government Version: 10/26/2020Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/30/2020Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/07/2020Last EDR Contact: 12/02/2021
Number of Days to Update: 7Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/14/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
AOP: Animal Operation Permits Listing
This listing includes animal operations that are required to be permitted by the state.
Date of Government Version: 04/01/2020Source: Department of Environmental Quality
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/26/2020Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/27/2020Last EDR Contact: 09/10/2021
Number of Days to Update: 1Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/20/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
SEPT HAULERS: Permitted Septage Haulers Listing
This list of all active and permitted Septage Land Application Site (SLAS) and Septage Detention and Treatment
Facility (SDTF) sites in North Carolina. The purpose of this map is to provide the public and government entities
a visual overview of the businesses that manage septage and septage facilities throughout the state.
Date of Government Version: 03/25/2021Source: Department of Environmental Quality
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/06/2021Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/24/2021Last EDR Contact: 10/08/2021
Number of Days to Update: 79Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/17/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
PCS ENF: Enforcement data
No description is available for this data
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2014Source: EPA
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/05/2015Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/06/2015Last EDR Contact: 09/30/2021
Number of Days to Update: 29Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/17/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
PCSRP: Petroleum-Contaminated Soil Remediation Permits
To treat petroleum-contaminated soil in order to protect North Carolinaa??s environment and the health of the
citizens of North Carolina.
Date of Government Version: 05/25/2021Source: Department of Environmental Quality
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/02/2021Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/27/2021Last EDR Contact: 10/05/2021
Number of Days to Update: 87Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/17/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TC6780554.2s Page GR-23

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
CCB: Coal Ash Structural Fills (CCB) Listing
These are not permitted Coal Ash landfills A list all of the now closed Coal Ash Structural Fills (CCB) in North
Carolina, in point data form. The purpose is to provide the public and other government entities a visual overview
of coal ash structural fills throughout the state and increase public awareness of their current locations.
Date of Government Version: 05/10/2021Source: Department of Environmental Quality
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/02/2021Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/27/2021Last EDR Contact: 10/08/2021
Number of Days to Update: 87Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/17/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
PCS: Permit Compliance System
PCS is a computerized management information system that contains data on National Pollutant Discharge Elimination
System (NPDES) permit holding facilities. PCS tracks the permit, compliance, and enforcement status of NPDES
facilities.
Date of Government Version: 07/14/2011Source: EPA, Office of Water
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/05/2011Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/29/2011Last EDR Contact: 09/30/2021
Number of Days to Update: 55Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/17/2022
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
PCS INACTIVE: Listing of Inactive PCS Permits
An inactive permit is a facility that has shut down or is no longer discharging.
Date of Government Version: 11/05/2014Source: EPA
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/06/2015Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/06/2015Last EDR Contact: 09/30/2021
Number of Days to Update: 120Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/17/2022
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
MINES MRDS: Mineral Resources Data System
Mineral Resources Data System
Date of Government Version: 04/06/2018Source: USGS
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/21/2019Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/24/2019Last EDR Contact: 11/23/2021
Number of Days to Update: 3Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/07/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS
FES!Fydmvtjwf!Sfdpset
EDR MGP: EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plants
The EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plant Database includes records of coal gas plants (manufactured gas plants)
compiled by EDR’s researchers. Manufactured gas sites were used in the United States from the 1800’s to 1950’s
to produce a gas that could be distributed and used as fuel. These plants used whale oil, rosin, coal, or a mixture
of coal, oil, and water that also produced a significant amount of waste. Many of the byproducts of the gas production,
such as coal tar (oily waste containing volatile and non-volatile chemicals), sludges, oils and other compounds
are potentially hazardous to human health and the environment. The byproduct from this process was frequently
disposed of directly at the plant site and can remain or spread slowly, serving as a continuous source of soil
and groundwater contamination.
Date of Government Version: N/ASource: EDR, Inc.
Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/ATelephone: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports: N/ALast EDR Contact: N/A
Number of Days to Update: N/ANext Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
TC6780554.2s Page GR-24

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
EDR Hist Auto: EDR Exclusive Historical Auto Stations
EDR has searched selected national collections of business directories and has collected listings of potential
gas station/filling station/service station sites that were available to EDR researchers. EDR’s review was limited
to those categories of sources that might, in EDR’s opinion, include gas station/filling station/service station
establishments. The categories reviewed included, but were not limited to gas, gas station, gasoline station,
filling station, auto, automobile repair, auto service station, service station, etc. This database falls within
a category of information EDR classifies as "High Risk Historical Records", or HRHR. EDR’s HRHR effort presents
unique and sometimes proprietary data about past sites and operations that typically create environmental concerns,
but may not show up in current government records searches.
Date of Government Version: N/ASource: EDR, Inc.
Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/ATelephone: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports: N/ALast EDR Contact: N/A
Number of Days to Update: N/ANext Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: Varies
EDR Hist Cleaner: EDR Exclusive Historical Cleaners
EDR has searched selected national collections of business directories and has collected listings of potential
dry cleaner sites that were available to EDR researchers. EDR’s review was limited to those categories of sources
that might, in EDR’s opinion, include dry cleaning establishments. The categories reviewed included, but were
not limited to dry cleaners, cleaners, laundry, laundromat, cleaning/laundry, wash & dry etc. This database falls
within a category of information EDR classifies as "High Risk Historical Records", or HRHR. EDR’s HRHR effort
presents unique and sometimes proprietary data about past sites and operations that typically create environmental
concerns, but may not show up in current government records searches.
Date of Government Version: N/ASource: EDR, Inc.
Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/ATelephone: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports: N/ALast EDR Contact: N/A
Number of Days to Update: N/ANext Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: Varies
EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES
Fydmvtjwf!Sfdpwfsfe!Hpwu/!Bsdijwft
RGA HWS: Recovered Government Archive State Hazardous Waste Facilities List
The EDR Recovered Government Archive State Hazardous Waste database provides a list of SHWS incidents derived
from historical databases and includes many records that no longer appear in current government lists. Compiled
from Records formerly available from the Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources in North Carolina.
Date of Government Version: N/ASource: Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2013Telephone: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/24/2013Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2012
Number of Days to Update: 176Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: Varies
RGA LF: Recovered Government Archive Solid Waste Facilities List
The EDR Recovered Government Archive Landfill database provides a list of landfills derived from historical databases
and includes many records that no longer appear in current government lists. Compiled from Records formerly available
from the Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources in North Carolina.
Date of Government Version: N/ASource: Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2013Telephone: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/13/2014Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2012
Number of Days to Update: 196Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: Varies
RGA LUST: Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank
The EDR Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank database provides a list of LUST incidents
derived from historical databases and includes many records that no longer appear in current government lists.
Compiled from Records formerly available from the Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources in North
Carolina.
TC6780554.2s Page GR-25

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: N/ASource: Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2013Telephone: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/20/2013Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2012
Number of Days to Update: 172Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: Varies
OTHER DATABASE(S)
Depending on the geographic area covered by this report, the data provided in these specialty databases may or may not be
complete. For example, the existence of wetlands information data in a specific report does not mean that all wetlands in the
area covered by the report are included. Moreover, the absence of any reported wetlands information does not necessarily
mean that wetlands do not exist in the area covered by the report.
CT MANIFEST: Hazardous Waste Manifest Data
Facility and manifest data. Manifest is a document that lists and tracks hazardous waste from the generator through
transporters to a tsd facility.
Date of Government Version: 07/23/2021Source: Department of Energy & Environmental Protection
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/10/2021Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/08/2021Last EDR Contact: 11/12/2021
Number of Days to Update: 90Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/21/2022
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
NJ MANIFEST: Manifest Information
Hazardous waste manifest information.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2018Source: Department of Environmental Protection
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/10/2019Telephone: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/16/2019Last EDR Contact: 10/05/2021
Number of Days to Update: 36Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/17/2022
Data Release Frequency: Annually
NY MANIFEST: Facility and Manifest Data
Manifest is a document that lists and tracks hazardous waste from the generator through transporters to a TSD
facility.
Date of Government Version: 01/01/2019Source: Department of Environmental Conservation
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/29/2020Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/10/2020Last EDR Contact: 10/29/2021
Number of Days to Update: 72Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/07/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
PA MANIFEST: Manifest Information
Hazardous waste manifest information.
Date of Government Version: 06/30/2018Source: Department of Environmental Protection
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/19/2019Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/10/2019Last EDR Contact: 10/07/2021
Number of Days to Update: 53Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/24/2022
Data Release Frequency: Annually
RI MANIFEST: Manifest information
Hazardous waste manifest information
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2019Source: Department of Environmental Management
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/11/2021Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/24/2021Last EDR Contact: 11/29/2021
Number of Days to Update: 13Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/28/2022
Data Release Frequency: Annually
TC6780554.2s Page GR-26

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
WI MANIFEST: Manifest Information
Hazardous waste manifest information.
Date of Government Version: 05/31/2018Source: Department of Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/19/2019Telephone: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/03/2019Last EDR Contact: 12/06/2021
Number of Days to Update: 76Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/21/2022
Data Release Frequency: Annually
Oil/Gas Pipelines
Source: Endeavor Business Media
Petroleum Bundle (Crude Oil, Refined Products, Petrochemicals, Gas Liquids (LPG/NGL), and Specialty
Gases (Miscellaneous)) N = Natural Gas Bundle (Natural Gas, Gas Liquids (LPG/NGL), and Specialty Gases
(Miscellaneous)). This map includes information copyrighted by Endeavor Business Media. This information
is provided on a best effort basis and Endeavor Business Media does not guarantee its accuracy nor warrant its
fitness for any particular purpose. Such information has been reprinted with the permission of Endeavor Business
Media.
Electric Power Transmission Line Data
Source: Endeavor Business Media
This map includes information copyrighted by Endeavor Business Media. This information is provided on a best
effort basis and Endeavor Business Media does not guarantee its accuracy nor warrant its fitness for any
particular purpose. Such information has been reprinted with the permission of Endeavor Business Media.
Sensitive Receptors:There are individuals deemed sensitive receptors due to their fragile immune systems and special sensitivity
to environmental discharges. These sensitive receptors typically include the elderly, the sick, and children. While the location of all
sensitive receptors cannot be determined, EDR indicates those buildings and facilities - schools, daycares, hospitals, medical centers,
and nursing homes - where individuals who are sensitive receptors are likely to be located.
AHA Hospitals:
Source: American Hospital Association, Inc.
Telephone: [phone]
The database includes a listing of hospitals based on the American Hospital Association’s annual survey of hospitals.
Medical Centers: Provider of Services Listing
Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
Telephone: [phone]
A listing of hospitals with Medicare provider number, produced by Centers of Medicare & Medicaid Services,
a federal agency within the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
Nursing Homes
Source: National Institutes of Health
Telephone: [phone]
Information on Medicare and Medicaid certified nursing homes in the United States.
Public Schools
Source: National Center for Education Statistics
Telephone: [phone]
The National Center for Education Statistics’ primary database on elementary
and secondary public education in the United States. It is a comprehensive, annual, national statistical
database of all public elementary and secondary schools and school districts, which contains data that are
comparable across all states.
Private Schools
Source: National Center for Education Statistics
Telephone: [phone]
The National Center for Education Statistics’ primary database on private school locations in the United States.
Daycare Centers: Child Care Facility List
Source: Department of Health & Human Services
Telephone: [phone]
Flood Zone Data:This data was obtained from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). It depicts 100-year and
500-year flood zones as defined by FEMA. It includes the National Flood Hazard Layer (NFHL) which incorporates Flood
Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) data and Q3 data from FEMA in areas not covered by NFHL.
Source: FEMA
Telephone: [phone]
Date of Government Version: 2003, 2015
TC6780554.2s Page GR-27

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
NWI:National Wetlands Inventory. This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR
in 2002, 2005 and 2010 from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
State Wetlands Data: Wetland Inventory
Source: US Fish & Wildlife Service
Telephone: [phone]
Current USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Map
Source: U.S. Geological Survey
STREET AND ADDRESS INFORMATION
© 2015 TomTom North America, Inc. All rights reserved. This material is proprietary and the subject of copyright protection
and other intellectual property rights owned by or licensed to Tele Atlas North America, Inc. The use of this material is subject
to the terms of a license agreement. You will be held liable for any unauthorized copying or disclosure of this material.
TC6780554.2s Page GR-28

GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE ADDENDUM
TARGET PROPERTY ADDRESS
DUTCH FARMS
6711 FIELDS FARM RD
CLIMAX, NC 27233
TARGET PROPERTY COORDINATES
Latitude (North): 35.93193 - 35ˆ 55’ 54.95’’
Longitude (West): 79.694239 - 79ˆ 41’ 39.26’’
Universal Tranverse Mercator: Zone 17
UTM X (Meters): 617792.2
UTM Y (Meters): 3976986.0
Elevation:724 ft. above sea level
USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP
Target Property Map:13839764 CLIMAX, NC
Version Date:2019
EDR’s GeoCheck Physical Setting Source Addendum is provided to assist the environmental professional in
forming an opinion about the impact of potential contaminant migration.
Assessment of the impact of contaminant migration generally has two principle investigative components:
1. Groundwater flow direction, and
2. Groundwater flow velocity.
Groundwater flow direction may be impacted by surface topography, hydrology, hydrogeology, characteristics
of the soil, and nearby wells. Groundwater flow velocity is generally impacted by the nature of the
geologic strata.
TC6780554.2s Page A-1

GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
GROUNDWATER FLOW DIRECTION INFORMATION
Groundwater flow direction for a particular site is best determined by a qualified environmental professional
using site-specific well data. If such data is not reasonably ascertainable, it may be necessary to rely on other
sources of information, such as surface topographic information, hydrologic information, hydrogeologic data
collected on nearby properties, and regional groundwater flow information (from deep aquifers).
TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION
Surface topography may be indicative of the direction of surficial groundwater flow. This information can be used to
assist the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or,
should contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted.
TARGET PROPERTY TOPOGRAPHY
General Topographic Gradient:General NE
SURROUNDING TOPOGRAPHY: ELEVATION PROFILES
806
801
773
767
765
759
752
751
742
740
735
730
724724724
715
708
697
696
Elevation (ft)
NorthSouth
TP
773
754
747
743743
742
740
738
736
735
734
732
730
728
725
724
709
707
705
Elevation (ft)
WestEast
TP
01/21 Miles
Target Property Elevation: 724 ft.
Source: Topography has been determined from the USGS 7.5’ Digital Elevation Model and should be evaluated
on a relative (not an absolute) basis. Relative elevation information between sites of close proximity
should be field verified.
TC6780554.2s Page A-2

GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
HYDROLOGIC INFORMATION
Surface water can act as a hydrologic barrier to groundwater flow. Such hydrologic information can be used to assist
the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, should
contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted.
Refer to the Physical Setting Source Map following this summary for hydrologic information (major waterways
and bodies of water).
FEMA FLOOD ZONE
Flood Plain Panel at Target PropertyFEMA Source Type
3710779900J FEMA FIRM Flood data
Additional Panels in search area:FEMA Source Type
3710789000J FEMA FIRM Flood data
3710778900J FEMA FIRM Flood data
3710779800K FEMA FIRM Flood data
NATIONAL WETLAND INVENTORY
NWI Electronic
NWI Quad at Target PropertyData Coverage
CLIMAXYES - refer to the Overview Map and Detail Map
HYDROGEOLOGIC INFORMATION
Hydrogeologic information obtained by installation of wells on a specific site can often be an indicator
of groundwater flow direction in the immediate area. Such hydrogeologic information can be used to assist the
environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, should
contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted.
AQUIFLOW
Search Radius: 1.000 Mile.
EDR has developed the AQUIFLOW Information System to provide data on the general direction of groundwater
flow at specific points. EDR has reviewed reports submitted by environmental professionals to regulatory
authorities at select sites and has extracted the date of the report, groundwater flow direction as determined
hydrogeologically, and the depth to water table.
LOCATIONGENERAL DIRECTION
MAP IDFROM TPGROUNDWATER FLOW
Not Reported
TC6780554.2s Page A-3

GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
GROUNDWATER FLOW VELOCITY INFORMATION
Groundwater flow velocity information for a particular site is best determined by a qualified environmental professional
using site specific geologic and soil strata data. If such data are not reasonably ascertainable, it may be necessary
to rely on other sources of information, including geologic age identification, rock stratigraphic unit and soil
characteristics data collected on nearby properties and regional soil information. In general, contaminant plumes
move more quickly through sandy-gravelly types of soils than silty-clayey types of soils.
GEOLOGIC INFORMATION IN GENERAL AREA OF TARGET PROPERTY
Geologic information can be used by the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the relative speed
at which contaminant migration may be occurring.
ROCK STRATIGRAPHIC UNITGEOLOGIC AGE IDENTIFICATION
Era:PaleozoicCategory:Volcanic Rocks
System:Cambrian
Series:Cambrian volcanic rocks
Code:Cv!!!)efdpefe!bcpwf!bt!Fsb-!Tztufn!'!Tfsjft*
Geologic Age and Rock Stratigraphic Unit Source: P.G. Schruben, R.E. Arndt and W.J. Bawiec, Geology
of the Conterminous U.S. at 1:2,500,000 Scale - a digital representation of the 1974 P.B. King and H.M. Beikman
Map, USGS Digital Data Series DDS - 11 (1994).
TC6780554.2s Page A-4

3
13
6
5
13
3
3
3
6
9
4
112
3
8
2
4
10
14
7
11
10
10
7
0 1/16 1/8 1/4 Miles
EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Innnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnncccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccc........................................

GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
DOMINANT SOIL COMPOSITION IN GENERAL AREA OF TARGET PROPERTY
The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) Soil Conservation Service (SCS) leads the National Cooperative Soil
Survey (NCSS) and is responsible for collecting, storing, maintaining and distributing soil survey information
for privately owned lands in the United States. A soil map in a soil survey is a representation of soil patterns
in a landscape. The following information is based on Soil Conservation Service SSURGO data.
Soil Map ID: 1
Soil Component Name:Congaree
Soil Surface Texture:loam
Hydrologic Group:Class B - Moderate infiltration rates. Deep and moderately deep,
moderately well and well drained soils with moderately coarse
textures.
Soil Drainage Class:Moderately well drained
Hydric Status: Partially hydric
Corrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel:Moderate
Depth to Bedrock Min:> 0 inches
Depth to Watertable Min:> 99 inches
Soil Layer Information
Saturated
BoundaryClassification
hydraulic
conductivity
LayerUpperLowerSoil Texture ClassAASHTO GroupUnified SoilSoil Reaction
micro m/sec(pH)
1 0 inches 9 inchesloamNot reportedNot reportedMax: 14Max: 7.3
Min: 4Min: 4.5
2 9 inches70 inchesNot reportedNot reportedMax: 14Max: 7.3
Min: 4Min: 4.5
Soil Map ID: 2
Soil Component Name:Madison
Soil Surface Texture:sandy loam
Hydrologic Group:Class B - Moderate infiltration rates. Deep and moderately deep,
moderately well and well drained soils with moderately coarse
textures.
Soil Drainage Class:Well drained
TC6780554.2s Page A-6

GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
Hydric Status: Not hydric
Corrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel:High
Depth to Bedrock Min:> 0 inches
Depth to Watertable Min:> 0 inches
Soil Layer Information
Saturated
BoundaryClassification
hydraulic
conductivity
LayerUpperLowerSoil Texture ClassAASHTO GroupUnified SoilSoil Reaction
micro m/sec(pH)
1 0 inches 5 inchessandy loamSilt-ClayCOARSE-GRAINEDMax: 14Max: 6 Min:
Materials (moreSOILS, Sands,Min: 44.5
than 35 pct.Sands with fines,
passing No.Silty Sand.
200), Silty
Soils.
2 5 inches29 inchesSilt-ClayCOARSE-GRAINEDMax: 14Max: 6 Min:
Materials (moreSOILS, Sands,Min: 44.5
than 35 pct.Sands with fines,
passing No.Silty Sand.
200), Silty
Soils.
329 inches33 inchesSilt-ClayCOARSE-GRAINEDMax: 14Max: 6 Min:
Materials (moreSOILS, Sands,Min: 44.5
than 35 pct.Sands with fines,
passing No.Silty Sand.
200), Silty
Soils.
433 inches79 inchesSilt-ClayCOARSE-GRAINEDMax: 14Max: 6 Min:
Materials (moreSOILS, Sands,Min: 44.5
than 35 pct.Sands with fines,
passing No.Silty Sand.
200), Silty
Soils.
Soil Map ID: 3
Soil Component Name:Enon
Soil Surface Texture:fine sandy loam
Hydrologic Group:Class C - Slow infiltration rates. Soils with layers impeding downward
movement of water, or soils with moderately fine or fine textures.
Soil Drainage Class:Well drained
TC6780554.2s Page A-7

GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
Hydric Status: Not hydric
Corrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel:High
Depth to Bedrock Min:> 0 inches
Depth to Watertable Min:> 0 inches
Soil Layer Information
Saturated
BoundaryClassification
hydraulic
conductivity
LayerUpperLowerSoil Texture ClassAASHTO GroupUnified SoilSoil Reaction
micro m/sec(pH)
1 0 inches 7 inchesfine sandy loamSilt-ClayCOARSE-GRAINEDMax: 14Max: 7.8
Materials (moreSOILS, Sands,Min: 1.4Min: 6.1
than 35 pct.Sands with fines,
passing No.Silty Sand.
200), Silty
Soils.
2 7 inches11 inchesSilt-ClayCOARSE-GRAINEDMax: 14Max: 7.8
Materials (moreSOILS, Sands,Min: 1.4Min: 6.1
than 35 pct.Sands with fines,
passing No.Silty Sand.
200), Silty
Soils.
311 inches33 inchesSilt-ClayCOARSE-GRAINEDMax: 14Max: 7.8
Materials (moreSOILS, Sands,Min: 1.4Min: 6.1
than 35 pct.Sands with fines,
passing No.Silty Sand.
200), Silty
Soils.
433 inches74 inchesloamSilt-ClayCOARSE-GRAINEDMax: 14Max: 7.8
Materials (moreSOILS, Sands,Min: 1.4Min: 6.1
than 35 pct.Sands with fines,
passing No.Silty Sand.
200), Silty
Soils.
Soil Map ID: 4
Soil Component Name:Appling
Soil Surface Texture:sandy loam
Hydrologic Group:Class B - Moderate infiltration rates. Deep and moderately deep,
moderately well and well drained soils with moderately coarse
textures.
Soil Drainage Class:Well drained
TC6780554.2s Page A-8

GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
Hydric Status: Not hydric
Corrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel:Moderate
Depth to Bedrock Min:> 0 inches
Depth to Watertable Min:> 0 inches
Soil Layer Information
Saturated
BoundaryClassification
hydraulic
conductivity
LayerUpperLowerSoil Texture ClassAASHTO GroupUnified SoilSoil Reaction
micro m/sec(pH)
1 0 inches 5 inchessandy loamGranularCOARSE-GRAINEDMax: 14Max: 5.5
materials (35SOILS, Sands,Min: 4Min: 4.5
pct. or lessSands with fines,
passing No.Clayey sand.
200), Silty, orCOARSE-GRAINED
Clayey GravelSOILS, Sands,
and Sand.Sands with fines,
Silty Sand.
2 5 inches18 inchessandy clay loamGranularCOARSE-GRAINEDMax: 14Max: 5.5
materials (35SOILS, Sands,Min: 4Min: 4.5
pct. or lessSands with fines,
passing No.Clayey sand.
200), Silty, orCOARSE-GRAINED
Clayey GravelSOILS, Sands,
and Sand.Sands with fines,
Silty Sand.
318 inches35 inchesclayGranularCOARSE-GRAINEDMax: 14Max: 5.5
materials (35SOILS, Sands,Min: 4Min: 4.5
pct. or lessSands with fines,
passing No.Clayey sand.
200), Silty, orCOARSE-GRAINED
Clayey GravelSOILS, Sands,
and Sand.Sands with fines,
Silty Sand.
435 inches51 inchessandy clay loamGranularCOARSE-GRAINEDMax: 14Max: 5.5
materials (35SOILS, Sands,Min: 4Min: 4.5
pct. or lessSands with fines,
passing No.Clayey sand.
200), Silty, orCOARSE-GRAINED
Clayey GravelSOILS, Sands,
and Sand.Sands with fines,
Silty Sand.
551 inches62 inchessandy loamGranularCOARSE-GRAINEDMax: 14Max: 5.5
materials (35SOILS, Sands,Min: 4Min: 4.5
pct. or lessSands with fines,
passing No.Clayey sand.
200), Silty, orCOARSE-GRAINED
Clayey GravelSOILS, Sands,
and Sand.Sands with fines,
Silty Sand.
TC6780554.2s Page A-9

GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
Soil Map ID: 5
Soil Component Name:Enon
Soil Surface Texture:fine sandy loam
Hydrologic Group:Class C - Slow infiltration rates. Soils with layers impeding downward
movement of water, or soils with moderately fine or fine textures.
Soil Drainage Class:Well drained
Hydric Status: Not hydric
Corrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel:High
Depth to Bedrock Min:> 0 inches
Depth to Watertable Min:> 0 inches
Soil Layer Information
Saturated
BoundaryClassification
hydraulic
conductivity
LayerUpperLowerSoil Texture ClassAASHTO GroupUnified SoilSoil Reaction
micro m/sec
(pH)
1 0 inches 7 inchesfine sandy loamSilt-ClayCOARSE-GRAINEDMax: 14Max: 7.8
Materials (moreSOILS, Sands,Min: 1.4Min: 6.1
than 35 pct.Sands with fines,
passing No.Silty Sand.
200), Silty
Soils.
2 7 inches11 inchesSilt-ClayCOARSE-GRAINEDMax: 14Max: 7.8
Materials (moreSOILS, Sands,Min: 1.4Min: 6.1
than 35 pct.Sands with fines,
passing No.Silty Sand.
200), Silty
Soils.
311 inches33 inchesSilt-ClayCOARSE-GRAINEDMax: 14Max: 7.8
Materials (moreSOILS, Sands,Min: 1.4Min: 6.1
than 35 pct.Sands with fines,
passing No.Silty Sand.
200), Silty
Soils.
433 inches74 inchesloamSilt-ClayCOARSE-GRAINEDMax: 14Max: 7.8
Materials (moreSOILS, Sands,Min: 1.4Min: 6.1
than 35 pct.Sands with fines,
passing No.Silty Sand.
200), Silty
Soils.
TC6780554.2s Page A-10

GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
Soil Map ID: 6
Soil Component Name:Enon
Soil Surface Texture:fine sandy loam
Hydrologic Group:Class C - Slow infiltration rates. Soils with layers impeding downward
movement of water, or soils with moderately fine or fine textures.
Soil Drainage Class:Well drained
Hydric Status: Partially hydric
Corrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel:High
Depth to Bedrock Min:> 0 inches
Depth to Watertable Min:> 0 inches
Soil Layer Information
Saturated
BoundaryClassification
hydraulic
conductivity
LayerUpperLowerSoil Texture ClassAASHTO GroupUnified SoilSoil Reaction
micro m/sec
(pH)
1 0 inches 7 inchesfine sandy loamSilt-ClayCOARSE-GRAINEDMax: 14Max: 7.8
Materials (moreSOILS, Sands,Min: 1.4Min: 6.1
than 35 pct.Sands with fines,
passing No.Silty Sand.
200), Silty
Soils.
2 7 inches11 inchesSilt-ClayCOARSE-GRAINEDMax: 14Max: 7.8
Materials (moreSOILS, Sands,Min: 1.4Min: 6.1
than 35 pct.Sands with fines,
passing No.Silty Sand.
200), Silty
Soils.
311 inches33 inchesSilt-ClayCOARSE-GRAINEDMax: 14Max: 7.8
Materials (moreSOILS, Sands,Min: 1.4Min: 6.1
than 35 pct.Sands with fines,
passing No.Silty Sand.
200), Silty
Soils.
433 inches74 inchesloamSilt-ClayCOARSE-GRAINEDMax: 14Max: 7.8
Materials (moreSOILS, Sands,Min: 1.4Min: 6.1
than 35 pct.Sands with fines,
passing No.Silty Sand.
200), Silty
Soils.
TC6780554.2s Page A-11

GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
Soil Map ID: 7
Soil Component Name:Vance
Soil Surface Texture:sandy loam
Hydrologic Group:Class C - Slow infiltration rates. Soils with layers impeding downward
movement of water, or soils with moderately fine or fine textures.
Soil Drainage Class:Well drained
Hydric Status: Not hydric
Corrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel:High
Depth to Bedrock Min:> 0 inches
Depth to Watertable Min:> 0 inches
Soil Layer Information
Saturated
BoundaryClassification
hydraulic
conductivity
LayerUpperLowerSoil Texture ClassAASHTO GroupUnified SoilSoil Reaction
micro m/sec
(pH)
135 inches50 inchessandy loamSilt-ClayFINE-GRAINEDMax: 1.4Max: 5.5
Materials (moreSOILS, Silts andMin: 0.42Min: 4.5
than 35 pct.Clays (liquid
passing No.limit 50% or
200), Siltymore), Fat Clay.
Soils.
250 inches61 inchesclay loamSilt-ClayFINE-GRAINEDMax: 1.4Max: 5.5
Materials (moreSOILS, Silts andMin: 0.42Min: 4.5
than 35 pct.Clays (liquid
passing No.limit 50% or
200), Siltymore), Fat Clay.
Soils.
3 0 inches 5 inchessandy loamSilt-ClayFINE-GRAINEDMax: 1.4Max: 5.5
Materials (moreSOILS, Silts andMin: 0.42Min: 4.5
than 35 pct.Clays (liquid
passing No.limit 50% or
200), Siltymore), Fat Clay.
Soils.
4 5 inches35 inchesclaySilt-ClayFINE-GRAINEDMax: 1.4Max: 5.5
Materials (moreSOILS, Silts andMin: 0.42Min: 4.5
than 35 pct.Clays (liquid
passing No.limit 50% or
200), Siltymore), Fat Clay.
Soils.
TC6780554.2s Page A-12

GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
Soil Map ID: 8
Soil Component Name:Helena
Soil Surface Texture:gravelly sandy loam
Hydrologic Group:Class C - Slow infiltration rates. Soils with layers impeding downward
movement of water, or soils with moderately fine or fine textures.
Soil Drainage Class:Moderately well drained
Hydric Status: Partially hydric
Corrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel:High
Depth to Bedrock Min:> 0 inches
Depth to Watertable Min:> 38 inches
Soil Layer Information
Saturated
BoundaryClassification
hydraulic
conductivity
LayerUpperLowerSoil Texture ClassAASHTO GroupUnified SoilSoil Reaction
micro m/sec
(pH)
151 inches61 inchesgravelly sandySilt-ClayFINE-GRAINEDMax: 1.4Max: 5.5
loamMaterials (moreSOILS, Silts andMin: 0.42Min: 3.5
than 35 pct.Clays (liquid
passing No.limit 50% or
200), Siltymore), Fat Clay.
Soils.
238 inches51 inchesfine sandy loamSilt-ClayFINE-GRAINEDMax: 1.4Max: 5.5
Materials (moreSOILS, Silts andMin: 0.42Min: 3.5
than 35 pct.Clays (liquid
passing No.limit 50% or
200), Siltymore), Fat Clay.
Soils.
3 0 inches 3 inchessandy loamSilt-ClayFINE-GRAINEDMax: 1.4Max: 5.5
Materials (moreSOILS, Silts andMin: 0.42Min: 3.5
than 35 pct.Clays (liquid
passing No.limit 50% or
200), Siltymore), Fat Clay.
Soils.
4 3 inches38 inchesclaySilt-ClayFINE-GRAINEDMax: 1.4Max: 5.5
Materials (moreSOILS, Silts andMin: 0.42Min: 3.5
than 35 pct.Clays (liquid
passing No.limit 50% or
200), Siltymore), Fat Clay.
Soils.
TC6780554.2s Page A-13

GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
Soil Map ID: 9
Soil Component Name:Cecil
Soil Surface Texture:sandy loam
Hydrologic Group:Class B - Moderate infiltration rates. Deep and moderately deep,
moderately well and well drained soils with moderately coarse
textures.
Soil Drainage Class:Well drained
Hydric Status: Not hydric
Corrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel:High
Depth to Bedrock Min:> 0 inches
Depth to Watertable Min:> 0 inches
Soil Layer Information
Saturated
BoundaryClassification
hydraulic
conductivity
LayerUpperLowerSoil Texture ClassAASHTO GroupUnified SoilSoil Reaction
micro m/sec(pH)
1 0 inches 7 inchessandy loamSilt-ClayNot reportedMax: 14Max: 6 Min:
Materials (moreMin: 44.5
than 35 pct.
passing No.
200), Silty
Soils.
2 7 inches11 inchessandy clay loamSilt-ClayNot reportedMax: 14Max: 6 Min:
Materials (moreMin: 44.5
than 35 pct.
passing No.
200), Silty
Soils.
311 inches50 inchesclaySilt-ClayNot reportedMax: 14Max: 6 Min:
Materials (moreMin: 44.5
than 35 pct.
passing No.
200), Silty
Soils.
450 inches74 inchesloamSilt-ClayNot reportedMax: 14Max: 6 Min:
Materials (moreMin: 44.5
than 35 pct.
passing No.
200), Silty
Soils.
TC6780554.2s Page A-14

GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
Soil Map ID: 10
Soil Component Name:Vance
Soil Surface Texture:sandy loam
Hydrologic Group:Class C - Slow infiltration rates. Soils with layers impeding downward
movement of water, or soils with moderately fine or fine textures.
Soil Drainage Class:Well drained
Hydric Status: Not hydric
Corrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel:High
Depth to Bedrock Min:> 0 inches
Depth to Watertable Min:> 0 inches
Soil Layer Information
Saturated
BoundaryClassification
hydraulic
conductivity
LayerUpperLowerSoil Texture ClassAASHTO GroupUnified SoilSoil Reaction
micro m/sec
(pH)
135 inches50 inchessandy loamSilt-ClayFINE-GRAINEDMax: 1.4Max: 5.5
Materials (moreSOILS, Silts andMin: 0.42Min: 4.5
than 35 pct.Clays (liquid
passing No.limit 50% or
200), Siltymore), Fat Clay.
Soils.
250 inches78 inchesclay loamSilt-ClayFINE-GRAINEDMax: 1.4Max: 5.5
Materials (moreSOILS, Silts andMin: 0.42Min: 4.5
than 35 pct.Clays (liquid
passing No.limit 50% or
200), Siltymore), Fat Clay.
Soils.
3 0 inches 5 inchessandy loamSilt-ClayFINE-GRAINEDMax: 1.4Max: 5.5
Materials (moreSOILS, Silts andMin: 0.42Min: 4.5
than 35 pct.Clays (liquid
passing No.limit 50% or
200), Siltymore), Fat Clay.
Soils.
4 5 inches35 inchesclaySilt-ClayFINE-GRAINEDMax: 1.4Max: 5.5
Materials (moreSOILS, Silts andMin: 0.42Min: 4.5
than 35 pct.Clays (liquid
passing No.limit 50% or
200), Siltymore), Fat Clay.
Soils.
TC6780554.2s Page A-15

GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
Soil Map ID: 11
Soil Component Name:Madison
Soil Surface Texture:sandy loam
Hydrologic Group:Class B - Moderate infiltration rates. Deep and moderately deep,
moderately well and well drained soils with moderately coarse
textures.
Soil Drainage Class:Well drained
Hydric Status: Not hydric
Corrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel:High
Depth to Bedrock Min:> 0 inches
Depth to Watertable Min:> 0 inches
Soil Layer Information
Saturated
BoundaryClassification
hydraulic
conductivity
LayerUpperLowerSoil Texture ClassAASHTO GroupUnified SoilSoil Reaction
micro m/sec(pH)
1 0 inches 5 inchessandy loamSilt-ClayCOARSE-GRAINEDMax: 14Max: 6 Min:
Materials (moreSOILS, Sands,Min: 44.5
than 35 pct.Sands with fines,
passing No.Silty Sand.
200), Silty
Soils.
2 5 inches29 inchesSilt-ClayCOARSE-GRAINEDMax: 14Max: 6 Min:
Materials (moreSOILS, Sands,Min: 44.5
than 35 pct.Sands with fines,
passing No.Silty Sand.
200), Silty
Soils.
329 inches33 inchesSilt-ClayCOARSE-GRAINEDMax: 14Max: 6 Min:
Materials (moreSOILS, Sands,Min: 44.5
than 35 pct.Sands with fines,
passing No.Silty Sand.
200), Silty
Soils.
433 inches79 inchesSilt-ClayCOARSE-GRAINEDMax: 14Max: 6 Min:
Materials (moreSOILS, Sands,Min: 44.5
than 35 pct.Sands with fines,
passing No.Silty Sand.
200), Silty
Soils.
TC6780554.2s Page A-16

GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
Soil Map ID: 12
Soil Component Name:Appling
Soil Surface Texture:sandy loam
Hydrologic Group:Class B - Moderate infiltration rates. Deep and moderately deep,
moderately well and well drained soils with moderately coarse
textures.
Soil Drainage Class:Well drained
Hydric Status: Not hydric
Corrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel:Moderate
Depth to Bedrock Min:> 0 inches
Depth to Watertable Min:> 0 inches
Soil Layer Information
Saturated
BoundaryClassification
hydraulic
conductivity
LayerUpperLowerSoil Texture ClassAASHTO GroupUnified SoilSoil Reaction
micro m/sec(pH)
1 0 inches 5 inchessandy loamGranularCOARSE-GRAINEDMax: 14Max: 5.5
materials (35SOILS, Sands,Min: 4Min: 4.5
pct. or lessSands with fines,
passing No.Clayey sand.
200), Silty, orCOARSE-GRAINED
Clayey GravelSOILS, Sands,
and Sand.Sands with fines,
Silty Sand.
218 inches35 inchesclayGranularCOARSE-GRAINEDMax: 14Max: 5.5
materials (35SOILS, Sands,Min: 4Min: 4.5
pct. or lessSands with fines,
passing No.Clayey sand.
200), Silty, orCOARSE-GRAINED
Clayey GravelSOILS, Sands,
and Sand.Sands with fines,
Silty Sand.
335 inches51 inchessandy clay loamGranularCOARSE-GRAINEDMax: 14Max: 5.5
materials (35SOILS, Sands,Min: 4Min: 4.5
pct. or lessSands with fines,
passing No.Clayey sand.
200), Silty, orCOARSE-GRAINED
Clayey GravelSOILS, Sands,
and Sand.Sands with fines,
Silty Sand.
4 5 inches18 inchessandy clay loamGranularCOARSE-GRAINEDMax: 14Max: 5.5
materials (35SOILS, Sands,Min: 4Min: 4.5
pct. or lessSands with fines,
passing No.Clayey sand.
200), Silty, orCOARSE-GRAINED
Clayey GravelSOILS, Sands,
and Sand.Sands with fines,
Silty Sand.
TC6780554.2s Page A-17

GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
Soil Layer Information
Saturated
BoundaryClassification
hydraulic
conductivity
LayerUpperLowerSoil Texture ClassAASHTO GroupUnified SoilSoil Reaction
micro m/sec(pH)
551 inches62 inchessandy loamGranularCOARSE-GRAINEDMax: 14Max: 5.5
materials (35SOILS, Sands,Min: 4Min: 4.5
pct. or lessSands with fines,
passing No.Clayey sand.
200), Silty, orCOARSE-GRAINED
Clayey GravelSOILS, Sands,
and Sand.Sands with fines,
Silty Sand.
Soil Map ID: 13
Soil Component Name:Wilkes
Soil Surface Texture:loam
Hydrologic Group:Class C - Slow infiltration rates. Soils with layers impeding downward
movement of water, or soils with moderately fine or fine textures.
Soil Drainage Class:Well drained
Hydric Status: Not hydric
Corrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel:Moderate
Depth to Bedrock Min:> 0 inches
Depth to Watertable Min:> 0 inches
Soil Layer Information
Saturated
BoundaryClassification
hydraulic
conductivity
LayerUpperLowerSoil Texture ClassAASHTO GroupUnified SoilSoil Reaction
micro m/sec
(pH)
1 0 inches 7 inchesloamSilt-ClayNot reportedMax:Max: Min:
Materials (moreMin:
than 35 pct.
passing No.
200), Silty
Soils.
2 7 inches14 inchesclaySilt-ClayNot reportedMax:Max: Min:
Materials (moreMin:
than 35 pct.
passing No.
200), Silty
Soils.
TC6780554.2s Page A-18

GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
Soil Layer Information
Saturated
BoundaryClassification
hydraulic
conductivity
LayerUpperLowerSoil Texture ClassAASHTO GroupUnified SoilSoil Reaction
micro m/sec(pH)
314 inches44 inchesweatheredSilt-ClayNot reportedMax:Max: Min:
bedrockMaterials (moreMin:
than 35 pct.
passing No.
200), Silty
Soils.
444 inches48 inchesbedrockSilt-ClayNot reportedMax:Max: Min:
Materials (moreMin:
than 35 pct.
passing No.
200), Silty
Soils.
Soil Map ID: 14
Soil Component Name:Mecklenburg
Soil Surface Texture:sandy clay loam
Hydrologic Group:Class C - Slow infiltration rates. Soils with layers impeding downward
movement of water, or soils with moderately fine or fine textures.
Soil Drainage Class:Well drained
Hydric Status: Not hydric
Corrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel:High
Depth to Bedrock Min:> 0 inches
Depth to Watertable Min:> 0 inches
Soil Layer Information
Saturated
BoundaryClassification
hydraulic
conductivity
LayerUpperLowerSoil Texture ClassAASHTO GroupUnified SoilSoil Reaction
micro m/sec(pH)
1 0 inches 7 inchessandy clay loamSilt-ClayCOARSE-GRAINEDMax: 14Max: 7.3
Materials (moreSOILS, Sands,Min: 1.4Min: 5.6
than 35 pct.Sands with fines,
passing No.Silty Sand.
200), Clayey
Soils.
TC6780554.2s Page A-19

GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
Soil Layer Information
Saturated
BoundaryClassification
hydraulic
conductivity
LayerUpperLowerSoil Texture ClassAASHTO GroupUnified SoilSoil Reaction
micro m/sec(pH)
2 7 inches33 inchesSilt-ClayCOARSE-GRAINEDMax: 14Max: 7.3
Materials (moreSOILS, Sands,Min: 1.4Min: 5.6
than 35 pct.Sands with fines,
passing No.Silty Sand.
200), Clayey
Soils.
333 inches37 inchesSilt-ClayCOARSE-GRAINEDMax: 14Max: 7.3
Materials (moreSOILS, Sands,Min: 1.4Min: 5.6
than 35 pct.Sands with fines,
passing No.Silty Sand.
200), Clayey
Soils.
437 inches70 inchesloamSilt-ClayCOARSE-GRAINEDMax: 14Max: 7.3
Materials (moreSOILS, Sands,Min: 1.4Min: 5.6
than 35 pct.Sands with fines,
passing No.Silty Sand.
200), Clayey
Soils.
LOCAL / REGIONAL WATER AGENCY RECORDS
EDR Local/Regional Water Agency records provide water well information to assist the environmental
professional in assessing sources that may impact ground water flow direction, and in forming an
opinion about the impact of contaminant migration on nearby drinking water wells.
WELL SEARCH DISTANCE INFORMATION
DATABASESEARCH DISTANCE (miles)
Federal USGS1.000
Federal FRDS PWSNearest PWS within 1 mile
State Database1.000
FEDERAL USGS WELL INFORMATION
LOCATION
MAP IDWELL IDFROM TP
No Wells Found
FEDERAL FRDS PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM INFORMATION
LOCATION
MAP IDWELL IDFROM TP
TC6780554.2s Page A-20

GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
FEDERAL FRDS PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM INFORMATION
LOCATION
MAP IDWELL IDFROM TP
No PWS System Found
Note: PWS System location is not always the same as well location.
STATE DATABASE WELL INFORMATION
LOCATION
MAP IDWELL IDFROM TP
A1NC30000000040271/2 - 1 Mile South
A2NC30000000089921/2 - 1 Mile South
TC6780554.2s Page A-21

NC
EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Innnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnncccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccc........................................

GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS
Map ID
Direction
Distance
ElevationDatabaseEDR ID Number
A1
SouthNC WELLSNC3000000004027
1/2 - 1 Mile
Higher
PWD ID:NC0241489System Name:QUAKER LAKE CONFERENCE CENTER
PWS Type:Non Community TransientPrimary Source:Ground Water
Water Type:Ground WaterFacility Name:WELL #2
Facility Type:WellWell Depth:0
Owner:QUAKER LAKE CONFERENCE CENTER_241489
A2
SouthNC WELLSNC3000000008992
1/2 - 1 Mile
Higher
PWD ID:NC3041071System Name:QUAKER LAKE CONFERENCE CENTER #2
PWS Type:Non Community TransientPrimary Source:Ground Water
Water Type:Ground WaterFacility Name:WELL #2
Facility Type:WellWell Depth:0
Owner:NC YEARLY MEETING OF FRIENDS
TC6780554.2s Page A-23

GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS
RADON
AREA RADON INFORMATION
State Database: NC Radon
Radon Test Results
Num ResultsAvg pCi/LMin pCi/LMax pCi/L
__________________________________
10.700.70.7
10.300.30.3
Federal EPA Radon Zone for GUILFORD County: 3
Note: Zone 1 indoor average level > 4 pCi/L.
: Zone 2 indoor average level >= 2 pCi/L and <= 4 pCi/L.
: Zone 3 indoor average level < 2 pCi/L.
Federal Area Radon Information for GUILFORD COUNTY, NC
Number of sites tested: 30
AreaAverage Activity% <4 pCi/L% 4-20 pCi/L% >20 pCi/L
Living Area - 1st Floor0.503 pCi/L100%0%0%
Living Area - 2nd FloorNot ReportedNot ReportedNot ReportedNot Reported
Basement1.910 pCi/L90%10%0%
TC6780554.2s Page A-24

PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED
TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION
USGS 7.5’ Digital Elevation Model (DEM)
Source: United States Geologic Survey
EDR acquired the USGS 7.5’ Digital Elevation Model in 2002 and updated it in 2006. The 7.5 minute DEM corresponds
to the USGS 1:24,000- and 1:25,000-scale topographic quadrangle maps. The DEM provides elevation data
with consistent elevation units and projection.
Current USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Map
Source: U.S. Geological Survey
HYDROLOGIC INFORMATION
Flood Zone Data:This data was obtained from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). It depicts 100-year and
500-year flood zones as defined by FEMA. It includes the National Flood Hazard Layer (NFHL) which incorporates Flood
Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) data and Q3 data from FEMA in areas not covered by NFHL.
Source: FEMA
Telephone: [phone]
Date of Government Version: 2003, 2015
NWI:National Wetlands Inventory. This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR
in 2002, 2005 and 2010 from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
State Wetlands Data: Wetland Inventory
Source: US Fish & Wildlife Service
Telephone: [phone]
HYDROGEOLOGIC INFORMATION
R
AQUIFLOW Information System
Source: EDR proprietary database of groundwater flow information
EDR has developed the AQUIFLOW Information System (AIS) to provide data on the general direction of groundwater
flow at specific points. EDR has reviewed reports submitted to regulatory authorities at select sites and has
extracted the date of the report, hydrogeologically determined groundwater flow direction and depth to water table
information.
GEOLOGIC INFORMATION
Geologic Age and Rock Stratigraphic Unit
Source: P.G. Schruben, R.E. Arndt and W.J. Bawiec, Geology of the Conterminous U.S. at 1:2,500,000 Scale - A digital
representation of the 1974 P.B. King and H.M. Beikman Map, USGS Digital Data Series DDS - 11 (1994).
STATSGO:State Soil Geographic Database
Source: Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS)
The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) leads the national
Conservation Soil Survey (NCSS) and is responsible for collecting, storing, maintaining and distributing soil
survey information for privately owned lands in the United States. A soil map in a soil survey is a representation
of soil patterns in a landscape. Soil maps for STATSGO are compiled by generalizing more detailed (SSURGO)
soil survey maps.
SSURGO: Soil Survey Geographic Database
Source: Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS)
Telephone: [phone]
SSURGO is the most detailed level of mapping done by the Natural Resources Conservation Service, mapping
scales generally range from 1:12,000 to 1:63,360. Field mapping methods using national standards are used to
construct the soil maps in the Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database. SSURGO digitizing duplicates the
original soil survey maps. This level of mapping is designed for use by landowners, townships and county
natural resource planning and management.
TC6780554.2s Page PSGR-1

PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED
LOCAL / REGIONAL WATER AGENCY RECORDS
FEDERAL WATER WELLS
PWS:Public Water Systems
Source: EPA/Office of Drinking Water
Telephone: [phone]
Public Water System data from the Federal Reporting Data System. A PWS is any water system which provides water to at
least 25 people for at least 60 days annually. PWSs provide water from wells, rivers and other sources.
PWS ENF:Public Water Systems Violation and Enforcement Data
Source: EPA/Office of Drinking Water
Telephone: [phone]
Violation and Enforcement data for Public Water Systems from the Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS) after
August 1995. Prior to August 1995, the data came from the Federal Reporting Data System (FRDS).
USGS Water Wells: USGS National Water Inventory System (NWIS)
This database contains descriptive information on sites where the USGS collects or has collected data on surface
water and/or groundwater. The groundwater data includes information on wells, springs, and other sources of groundwater.
STATE RECORDS
North Carolina Public Water Supply Wells
Source: Department of Environmental Health
Telephone: [phone]
OTHER STATE DATABASE INFORMATION
North Carolina Wildlife Resources/Game Lands
Source: Center for Geographic Information and Analysis
Telephone: [phone]
All publicly owned game lands managed by the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission and as listed in Hunting
and Fishing Maps.
NC Natural Heritage Sites: Natural Heritage Element Occurrence Sites
Source: Natural Heritage Occurrence Sites Center for Geographic Information and Analysis
Telephone: [phone]
A point coverage identifying locations of rare and endangered species, occurrences of exemplary or unique natural
ecosystems (terrestrial or aquatic), and special animal habitats (e.g., colonial waterbird nesting sites).
NC Natural Areas: Significant Natural Heritage Areas
Source: Center for Geographic Information and Analysis
Telephone: [phone]
A polygon converage identifying sites (terrestrial or aquatic) that have particular biodiversity significance.
A site’s significance may be due to the presenceof rare species, rare or high quality natural communities, or
other important ecological features.
RADON
State Database: NC Radon
Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Radon Statistical and Non Statiscal Data
Area Radon Information
Source: USGS
Telephone: [phone]
The National Radon Database has been developed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
(USEPA) and is a compilation of the EPA/State Residential Radon Survey and the National Residential Radon Survey.
The study covers the years 1986 - 1992. Where necessary data has been supplemented by information collected at
private sources such as universities and research institutions.
TC6780554.2s Page PSGR-2

PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED
EPA Radon Zones
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Sections 307 & 309 of IRAA directed EPA to list and identify areas of U.S. with the potential for elevated indoor
radon levels.
OTHER
Airport Landing Facilities:Private and public use landing facilities
Source: Federal Aviation Administration, 800-457-6656
Epicenters:World earthquake epicenters, Richter 5 or greater
Source: Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Earthquake Fault Lines:The fault lines displayed on EDR’s Topographic map are digitized quaternary faultlines, prepared
in 1975 by the United State Geological Survey
STREET AND ADDRESS INFORMATION
© 2015 TomTom North America, Inc. All rights reserved. This material is proprietary and the subject of copyright protection
and other intellectual property rights owned by or licensed to Tele Atlas North America, Inc. The use of this material is subject
to the terms of a license agreement. You will be held liable for any unauthorized copying or disclosure of this material.
TC6780554.2s Page PSGR-3