Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSW5220301_Supplement-EZ Form_20220907SUPPLEMENT-EZ COVER PAGE FORMS LOADED PROJECT INFORMATION 1 ;Project Name Deliverance Church 2 Project Area so 6.47 3 Coastal Wetland Area ac 0 4 Surface Water Area ac 0.14 5 Is this project Hi ti or Low Density? Low 6 Does this project use an off -site SCM? No COMPLIANCE WITH 02H.1003(4) 7 Width of vegetated setbacks provided feet 100 8 Will the vegetated setback remain vegetated? Yes 9 If BUA is ro osed in the setback, does it meet NCAC 02H.1003.4 c-d ? NIA 10 Is streambank stabilization proposed on this project? No NUMBER • ND TYPE OF SCMs: 11 Infiltration System Bioretention Cell 12 13 'Wet Pond 14 Stormwater Wetland 15 Permeable Pavement 16 Sand Filter 17 Rainwater Harvesting RWH _ 18 1 Green Roof 19 Level Spreader -Filter Strip LS-FS 20 Disconnected Im ervious Surface (DIS) 21 Treatment Swale 22 Dry Pond 23 StormFilter 24 Silva Cell 25 Bayfilter 26 1 Filterra FORMS LOADED DESIGNER CERTIFICATION 27 Name and Title: Organization: Street address: City, State, Zip: Phone number(s): Email: H. Mack Summev, Jr. P.E. Summev Enaineerina Associates. PLLC 150 S. Fayetteville St. Asheboro. NC 27205 336-328-0902 mack@summeyengineering.com 28 29 30 31 32 J Cenifiraiion Sia!®rnerL I certify, under penalty of law that this Supplement-EZ form and all supporting information were prepared under my direction or supervision; that the information provided in the form Is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete; and that the engineering plans, specifications, operation and maintenance agreements and other supporting information are consistent with the information provided here. Im= �.�o��ss��;C�,. I SEAL w 2fi447 Al �«��+ie�i anti+ti►�► Si o asigner DRAINAGE AREAS 1 Is this a high density project? No 2 If so, number of drainage areas/SCMs 0 3 Does this project have low density areas? Yes 4 If so, number of low density drainage areas 1 5 Is all/part of this project subject to previous rule versions? No FORMS LOADED (DRAINAGE AREA INFORMATION Entire Site LD 1 4 Type of SCM N/A N/A 5 Total drainage area (sq ft) 281913 281913 6 Onsite drainage area (sq ft 281913 281913 7 Offsite drainage area (sq ft 19631 sf 19631 sf 8 Total BUA in project (sq ft 9 New BUA on subdivided lots (subject to permitting) (sq ft 19631 sf 19631 sf 10 New BUA not on subdivided lots (subject to ermittin s 11 Offsite BUA (sq ft 12 Breakdown of new BUA not on subdivided lots: Parking (sq ft 9673 sf 9673 sf Sidewalk (sq ft 1884 sf 1884 sf Roof (sq ft 8074 sf 8074 sf Roadway s ft - Future (sq ft Other, please specify in the comment box below (sa ft) 13 New infiltrating permeable pavement on subdivided lots (sq ft 14 New infiltrating permeable pavement not on subdivided lots (sq ft) 452 sf 452 sf 15 Existing BUA that will remain (not subject to permittinq) (sq ft) 16 Existinq BUA that is alreadv permitted (so ft) 17 Existinq BUA that will be removed (so ft) 18 Percent BUA 7% 7% 19 Design storm (inches) 20 Design volume of SCM (cu ft) 21 1 Calculation method for design volume ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Please use this space to provide any additional information about the 22 drainage area(s): See Stormwater Management Report for additional information. LOW DENSITY POWN R UIREMENTS FOR LOW VENSITY PROJECTS FROM 02 .1003 1 Is project below density thresholds set forth in the applicable stormwater rule? Yes 2 Does project maximize dispersed flow and minimize channelization of flow? Yes 3 Has the use of piping been minimized per.1003(2)(c)? Yes 4 Side slopes of the vegetated conveyances (H:V) 3 sf 5 Maximum velocity in the vegetated conveyances during the 10- ear storm? 1.49 6 Are curb outlet swales proposed? No 7 Maximum longitudinal slope of curb outlet swale(s) (°/u) 8 Bottom width of curb outlet swale(s) (feet) 9 Maximum side slope of curb outlet swale(s) (H:V) 10 Minimum length of curb outlet swale(s) (feet) 11 Are treatment swales used instead of curb outlet swales? 12 Is stormwater released at the edge of the setback as dispersed flow? Yes 13 Have stormwater outlets been designed to prevent downslope erosion? Yes 14 !Are variations to rule .1003 proposed? No ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 15 IPlease use this space to provide any additional information about this low density project: Maximium voloci!g in the permanent ditches are 1.49 fps