SW8910307_Historical File_20220804

Smith, Ashley M
From: Heglar, David W <[e-mail]>
Sent: Thursday, August 4, 2022 12:40 PM
To: Hall, Christine; David Heglar
Cc: 'Jim Mesimer'; '[e-mail]'; 'David Heglar'; Smith, Ashley M
Subject: RE: [External] Stormwater Permit Information - SW8910307
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Completed
CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an attachment to
Re oort Spam
Thankyou for your response. Yes I would like the file scanned and can give a town credit card when you direct me who
to give it to.
Also —with that file size —will I need to stop by to pickup with a USB or do you have a file sharing process to allow it to
be downloaded?
R—
David
From: Hall, Christine <[e-mail]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 3, 2022 6:01 PM
To: Heglar, David W <[e-mail]>; David Heglar <[e-mail]>
Cc:'Jim Mesimer'<[e-mail]>;'[e-mail]'
<[e-mail]>; 'David Heglar' <d. h egla r@tow nofku re beach. org>; Smith, Ashley M
<[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: [External] Stormwater Permit Information - SW8910307
Mr. Heglar,
My sincerest apologies for the delay and the poor quality pdf. I have attached a corrected and complete pdf of the
approval letter. The site plan showing the layout, is available as part of the file. The reason for my delay is that I wanted
to look into the situation a bit further before responding. The complicating factor is that Session Law 2021-158 includes
the following section:
SECTION 4.(b) Low density storm water certifications and approvals issued prior to September 1, 1995, are
revoked as of January 1, 2022, and the built -upon area shall be considered as existing development for
purposes of G.S. 143-214.7(a1). Any future development on the project or site shall comply with the
requirements of G.S. 143-214.7 and any recorded deed restrictions.
We are still trying to understand the implications of this legislation and how to apply it to the various scenarios seen
with these approvals. Since this particular project is a low density certification, at least on the surface, it appears to
qualify to be revoked; however, further evaluation will be needed. I will ask Ashley (cc'ed) look into the situation some
more to identify any questions where further direction is needed.
In the meantime, based on the situation you described in your voicemail and based on this Session Law, the lots will still
need to comply with the recorded deed restrictions. If you are still in need of the file in the meantime, Ashley can also
assist in having the file scanned by Always Graphics. Based on the size of the file, it will cost $35. Once confirmed that

you are still interested in the file at this time, they will contact you for payment once the file is prepared and delivered
to them.
Thank you for your patience.
Christine Hall, PE
Wilmington Regional Stormwater Program Supervisor
Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources — State Stormwater Program
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
Office: 910 796 7215
Direct: 910 796 7339
Email: chdstine.hall(a)-ncdenr.gov
Address: 127 Cardinal Drive Ext.
Wilmington, NC 28405
Email correspondence to and from this address is subiect to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to .r)ird parties.
From: Heglar, David W <[e-mail]>
Sent: Monday, August 1, 2022 10:36 AM
To: Hall, Christine <Christine.Hal:@ncdenr.gov>; David Heglar <[e-mail]>
Cc:'Jim Mesimer' <i.mesimer townofkurebeach.ors>;'[e-mail]'
<[e-mail]>; 'David Heglar' <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: [External] Stormwater Permit Information - SW8910307
ICAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an attachment to
Report_5parn.
Ms. Hall —
Just following up on the process to follow to get this file scanned and picked up.
Is there a good time to have a call for you today or tomorrow?
Respectfully —
David W. Heglar, PE
Commissioner, Public Works
Town of Kure Beach, NC
From: Heglar, David W
Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2022 7:35 AM
To: Hall, Christine <[e-mail]>
Cc: Jim Mesimer<[e-mail]>; [e-mail]; David Heglar
<d.heglar @townofkurebeach. or >
Subject: RE: [External] Stormwater Permit Information - SW8910307
Ms. Hall —

Would like to get this file scanned and sent to the town. Do I need to call for making the payment. And also in the scan
you sent -the second page is all blacked out. I assume it is the map of the lots — however it did not come through in the
pdf on the file sent.
Also — do I need to call with a credit card and how do I get this completed.
Respectfully —
David W. Heglar, PE
Commissioner, Public Works
Town of Kure Beach, NC
From: Hall, Christine <Christine.Hall @ncdenr.eov>
Sent: Monday, July 25, 2022 1:09 PM
To: Heglar, David W <[e-mail]>
Cc: Jim Mesimer<[e-mail]>; [e-mail]; David Heglar
<[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: [External] Stormwater Permit Information SW8910307
Mr. Heglar,
We are in the process of scanning files, starting with expired or expiring permits. Unfortunately this is one that has not
yet been scanned. In the meantime, I have attached a pdf of the approval.
If they would like additional information, our paper files are considered public record and would include things like the
application documents, approved site plans, and other supporting documentation. If you need further information, we
can either arrange a time to make the file available for review here in the office or can arrange to have the file scanned
at your expense. The cost to scan depends on how big the file is ($35/inch of file thickness).
Please let me know if I can be of additional assistance or if anyone would like to take advantage of either of these
options to review the file.
Christine Hall, PE
Wilmington Regional Stormwater Program Supervisor
Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources — State Stormwater Program
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
Office: 910 796 7215
Direct: 910 796 7339
Email: christine.hall(M-ncdenr.gov
Address: 127 Cardinal Drive Ext.
Wilmington, NC 28405
Ema7 ccrrespondence to and f-op? Ulis address is 011.1bject tc the
NO-1h Carniina. pudic Records Ljj,.: ,vnd may ae disclosed to third parties.
From: Heglar, David W <[e-mail]>
Sent: Friday, July 2.2, 2022 1:45 PM
To: Hall, Christine <[e-mail]>
Cc: Jim Mesimer<[e-mail]>; [e-mail]: David Heglar
<[e-mail]>
Subject: [External] Stormwater Permit Information - SW8910307

CJ�tb" fir3 rtm1 e1 'dC�'1rd€�1k ' `tilii ` attachment liwm suspicious email as an attachment to
Ms. Hall —
I am the Commissioner of Public Works in Kure Beach. A citizen that lives in the Kure Beach has requested information
on the permit and limitations associated with it regarding his property. I found the below info on the permit - however
it is not online in your system when I research it. Is there a way to get an electronic copy of this permit through your
office. I have copied my Public Works director (responsible for Stormwater) and his Administrative assistant in this
request.
Below came from your
website: https•//ncdenr maps arcgis com/apps/webappviewer/index html7id=8d3lO8c9364b4ef3966c07ll8f2cf4f9
And here is where I went to more information that was not online:
https•//edocs deg nc.gov/WaterResources/Browse.aspx?id=494276&dbid=0&repo=WaterResources
Respectfully -
David W. Heglar, PE
Commissioner, Public Works
Town of Kure Beach
STATE Stcnrwvkr Pit rm it: Oman Dunes
Fared Sui dk-lj v
r
Permit Number
E. * ic = ie.
b^U My
Project game
r�
r-
St&te
l'
7
edLl:m`a'
Act -ye
Ei�i••i: f'tj.'�r3���.'�
r
iA2fLrr !runes cones_
US 1� 'Yi.
Krjre Bee&
.&a
David W. 'Heglar, PE ) Senior Project Engineer
Coming Incorporated I Wilmington, NC 28405 1 Email: [e-mail]
4

Tel: [phone] Mobile: [phone]
The information contained in this e-mail and any accompanying documents is Corning Incorporated property, is
confidential, and intended solely for the person and/or entity to whom it is addressed(i.e. those identified in the "To"
and "cc" box). Unauthorized review, use, disclosure, or copying of this communication, or any part thereof, is strictly
prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this email in error, please return the e-mail and attachments to
the sender, delete the e-mail and attachments and any copy from your system. Thank you for your cooperation.

Johnson, Kelly
From: Johnson, Kelly
Sent: Monday, September 9, 2019 11:43 AM
To: Brad Sedgwick
Subject: RE: [External] Questions - Ocean Dunes Forest (SW8 910307)
Attachments: 1991 03 permit 910307.pdf
Brad,
The permit is attached. There are two ways to go about this.
1. Option #1: You can see if the permittee will modify the permit to either give you more impervious (if it is
available), or modify the permit to allow the permittee to review/approve permeable pavement designs in the
neighborhood. This is generally the preferred option, but given that this permit was written 27 years ago to a
bank and it also low density (and likely maxed-out on impervious) that isn't likely to happen.
2. Option #2: Assuming that Option #1 isn't going to work out, you can apply for an individual permit for
permeable pavement for the lot. As I am sure you know, permeable pavement now gets 100% credit if it is
designed per the manual and the 2017 regulations. You would apply for the permit just like any other
application with the signed application form, supplement, 0&M, calculations, plans, $505, etc. You would
receive a new, individual permit that only covers this particular lot. It would be associated with the master
permit, but this doesn't put any liability for the rest of the subdivision on this lot owner. It is simply to
document that the impervious is within the master permit's allocation for the lot because the permeable
pavement has been designed appropriately.
If you have further questions, please let me know.
Thanks,
Kelly
From: Brad Sedgwick [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Monday, September 9, 201911:17 AM
To: Johnson, Kelly <[e-mail]>
Subject: Re: [External] Questions
Hi Kelly, I could not locate the state stormwater permit. Any help would be appreciated. The only
documentation I have is the attached plat.
Planning, Engineering, Project Management
Brad Sedgwick, PE
7332 Cotesworth Drive
Wilmington, NC 2W5
Phone:[phone]
Email: bradsedrp5id'u otnwl.com

From: Johnson, Kelly <kelly.p.![e-mail]>
Sent: Monday, September 9, 2019 10:59 AM
To: Brad Sedgwick ([e-mail]) <[e-mail]>
Subject: FW: [External] Questions
Brad,
The letter days that the 1,689sf impervious area limit is from Kure Beach Inspections. Is there an associated State
Stormwater permit also? If so, what is the permit number? Does that permit already allow the permittee to approve
permeable pavement in the subdivision?
Thanks,
Kelly
From: Weaver, Cameron
Sent: Thursday, September 5, 2019 3:59 PM
To: Johnson, Kelly <[e-mail]>
Subject: FW: [External] Questions
Hi Kelly,
Can you reach out to Brad and let him know best procedure?
Thanks!
Cameron
Cameron Weaver
Environmental Assistance Coordinator
NCDEQ-Wilmington Regional Office
127 Cardinal Drive Ext.
Wilmington NC 28405
910-796-7265
[e-mail]
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
From: Brad Sedgwick <[e-mail]>
Sent: Thursday, September 5, 2019 2:24 PM
To: Weaver, Cameron <[e-mail]>
Cc: Dr Doug Schreyack <[e-mail]>
Subject: [External] Questions
Cameron, attached is a report on using permeable concrete for a driveway in Kure Beach. This report was
done in compliance of E2 of the bmp manual.
I do not see any information as to how this is to be submitted. Fee? Application? Cover Letter?

Help
B-S Consulting, PA.
Planning, Engineering, Project Management
Brad Sedgwick, PE
7332 Cotesworth Dave
Wilmington, NC 28Q5
Phone:[phone]
Email: brzdset %ic � jy
1, . Ln-!— com

Lewis,Linda
From: Lewis,Linda
Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2015 12:26 PM
To: [e-mail]'
Cc:'[e-mail]'
Subject: RE: 118 Camp Wyatt Court Kure Beach NC
Mr. Sharp:
The total maximum allowed built -upon area, aka BUA or impervious area, on this lot is 1689 sf, which includes the
house, driveway, patios, sidewalks, etc. Based on the tax record for 118 Camp Wyatt Court, it appears that the home by
itself already covers approximately 1705 sf, so there does not appear to be an opportunity to put down more impervious
area without jeopardizing your compliance.
Depending on the underlying soil type, permeable pavement can be credited up to 75% of its area as "pervious". I
haven't seen any drawings for the extent of your proposed permeable pavement, so it is not possible for me to
comment on how much BUA will be credited or how much you have left on your lot. I can only look at the tax record
which does not appear to support your findings. If you have other more recent information regarding the total BUA that
exists on this lot, I will be more than happy to consider it.
I am sorry, but under the low density permit, there is no ability to allow one lot to exceed the permitted maximum
density level regardless of the proposed treatment devices. Developments in North Carolina are permitted as a single
unit under a common plan, of development. If one lot within the common plan goes over the maximum -permitted low
density BUA, then in essence, the overall density within the common plan of development would be higher than the
maximum limit. This would require that every existing lot install retrofitted measures to treat their runoff.
A couple of options:
1. As of July 2, 2015, a 4" deep surface of #57 stone underlain by geotextile fabric is considered as
"pervious". Although you state that you don't want your kids to walk on "rocks", you do not appear to have any
BUA left for a permeable pavement installation, so #57 stone may be a viable option;
2. Get with your neighbors and see if any of them has any leftover BUA that they are willing to "donate" or "trade"
to you. Be aware that the State cannot mandate that your neighbors help you out, and those neighbors may
charge you by the square foot. This option requires as -built surveys of all the lots to verify that the donor lot has
excess BUA to spare and that it will be sufficient to cover your need after construction. It also requires that the
recorded deed restrictions be amended to reflect the loss of BUA from the "donor" lot and the increase of BUA
on the "recipient" lot. Amendments to the restrictive covenants may require the approval of the HOA.
3. Purchase an empty lot within the same subdivision and take some of that lot's BUA allocation. As with Option
#2, Option #3 requires an amendment to the recorded deed restrictions to reflect the new BUA limits for both
lots. The 1689 sf currently allowed is not very much. Reducing the BUA on the purchased lot may make it
unsellable.
4. Use elevated wood decking for your driveway.
5. Remove existing BUA on the lot such that enough BUA is freed up to cover the permeable pavement needs.
6. Use 3-foot-wide "tire runners" for your driveway instead of a full width driveway with grass in-between the
runners.
That's about all the options I have for you at this time. Good luck.
Linda

From: [e-mail][mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Monday, October 05, 201510:56 AM
To: Lewis,Linda <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: 118 Camp Wyatt Court Kure Beach NC
Ms. Lewis,
I think I have totally confused myself as I can read this permit and plat, coupled with information received
from Kure Beach code enforcement a couple of ways. It would appear that the total allowable impervious
area is 1689 square feet. Does this include the home itself, I think it does? If the home is in fact included
in this and the drive with permeable paver is 1036 square feet, it appears that I would need to look at the
options available to mitigate roughly 465+/- square feet.
This assumes we can not reach an acceptable degree of impervious with the paver selection. Are you
aware of any options available that could be used to satisfactorily meet this requirement, ie; additional
drainage, larger holding capacity of a buried tank, or redirected water providing it stays on the subject
lot? I am wanting as much info through the planning stage, so that I can get to plan "B" in the event plan
"A" doesn't fly. Years ago we had a similar issue in South Carolina, we were able to get the impervious up
by installing a large sump in the sand. We used two 12" drain pipes 55' each, and filled them with #76
stone we then used channel drain to direct the surface water to them, is this something I could do here? I
would get the engineer involved with the load calculations, if this is something you would consider.
If there are materials you are aware of and have a comfort level with would you be kind enough to share
them with me? I really want this project done over the winter and I don't mind submitting the plans to
you at all, however if there are products you are comfortable with, it makes the process easier for all of
us. I am not brand specific biased, if there is a product that keeps the kids from walking across rocks or
wood drip edge, I am open to it.
Thank you,
John Sharp, Jr.
President
Quality Landscape, rnr_
803-416-6138 (m)
803-684-3921 (o)
855-684-3921 (ext 704)
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: RE: 118 Camp Wyatt Court Kure Beach NC
From: "L-ewis,Linda" <linda.lewis(@ncdenr.gov>
Date: Mon, October 05, 2015 8:44 am
To: "Williams, Diane" <d1aneJ.williams0ncdenr.gov>, "Scott, Georgette"
<georgette.scottCa ncdenr.gov>, "Johnson, Kelly"
<kelly.pJohnson(a ncdenr.gov>, "Weaver, Cameron"
<cameron.weaverOncdenr aov>
Cc: "Cox, Heidi <heldi.coxCa ncdenr.gov>, "iohn.sharp &gualitylsinc.com"
<john.sharp &qualityisinc.com>, "[e-mail]"
<codyandjacobsmom(dbellsouth.net>,"'publicworks(atownofkurebeach.org"'
<publicworks0townofkurebeach org>
Mr. Sharp:

Your address corresponds to Lot 8 in Phase 1 of Ocean Dunes Forest Subdivision which is covered by
stormwater permit number SW8 910307 (copy attached). I also attach a copy of the recorded plat for Phase I.
The permit and the recorded deed restrictions for this lot limit the total built -upon area (BUA) to a maximum of
1689 square feet. As of July 2, 2015, a 4" deep surface of #57 stone underlain by a geotextile fabric is
considered as a "pervious" surface.
In addition, permeable pavement can be used to reduce the overall net amount of built -upon area. You will
need to keep the net total BUA on your lot to 1689 ftz or less after the credits assigned to permeable pavement
have been applied. Please submit your application to use permeable pavement to either the Town of Kure
Beach or to the Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources in the Wilmington Regional Office.
If you have any questions, please contact me at the phone number below and/or email address above.
Linda Lewis, E.I.
Environmental Engineer III
Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources
Wilmington Regional Office
127 Cardinal Drive Ext.
Wilmington, NC 28405
Main Office — 910-796-7215
Direct Line — 910-796-7343
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be
disclosed to third parties.
From: Williams, Diane
Sent: Saturday, October 03, 2015 12:25 PM
To: Scott, Georgette <[e-mail]>; Johnson, Kelly <[e-mail]>;
Lewis,Linda <[e-mail]>; Weaver, Cameron <[e-mail]>
Cc: Cox, Heidi <[e-mail]>; [e-mail]: [e-mail]
Subject: RE: 118 Camp Wyatt Court Kure Beach NC
Hey Ladies and Cameron:
I believe your group (Storm Water Protection) would be the appropriate ones handle this citizen's concern? Or
perhaps a New Hanover County agency?...
Please let us know if we can provide more.
Thanks
Diane
Diane J. Williams, Regional Engineering Supervisor, Public Water Supply Section
Div of Water Resources, NC Dept of Environmental Quality
Fayetteville & Wilmington Regional Offices
WiRO OFFC: 910.796.7366 MAIN: 910.796.7215 FAX: [phone]
FRO OFFC: 910.433.3309 MAIN: 910.433.3300 FAX: 910,486.0707
Cell: 910.409.2619
To view projects' status, go to: http://www.pws3.denr.nc.gov/pages/PlanDataReview.aspx
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be
disclosed to third parties.

A Go Green! Print this email only when necessary. Thank you for helping NCDENR be environmentally
responsible.
From: [e-mail][mailto:[e-mail]
Sent: Friday, October 02, 2015 6:33 PM
To: Williams, Diane <[e-mail]>
Cc. TAMMI Sharp<codvandiacobsmom(@bellsouth.net>
Subject:118 Camp Wyatt Court Kure Beach NC
Ms. Williams,
I hope this note finds you well, and if I have sent this request to the wrong dept/person that you
might help direct me to whom I should be speaking?
I have recently purchased a home in Kure Beach, NC. 118 Camp Wyatt Court more specifically,
New Hanover County. In speaking with John Batson of Kure Beach code enforcement I need to
work with the Division to remedy an issue I have.
I have a gravel drive, as do many of the homes in the area. I am wanting more information as to
why this is, I am assuming this has something to do with impervious area? If this is the case, I
would absolutely be interested in working with the division to find a solution that is site specific to
my home, so that I might be able to install a drive. I would like to use a concrete previous paver,
which would allow infiltration. Additionally, I can place some additional drainage or catchment tied
to a pumping system to hold water for future use. (wash cars or watering of plants etc.). We are
certified Belgard contractors, as well as licensed landscape and irrigation contractors' in the State
of NC.
I do have contact with DWQ as I am an reuse spray operator as well, We operate the land
application of of medium sized compact plant in Chapel Hill, NC. and am familiar with the work
load you are under. I am very patient and know that you guys are worked pretty hard and have
limited resources. So, this doesn't have to happen over night, but would like to begin the
conversation.
The journey of a thousand miles begins with the first step, and this is it. I look forward to hearing
from you about the above mentioned information or perhaps direction to whom I should direct
this too.
Thank you very much,
John Sharp, Jr.
President
Quality Landscape, Inc.
803-416-6138 (m)
803-684-3921(o)
855-684-3921 (ext 704)

A
ae
z
_
0
0
I LO
M
0)
c1M
co
O
U
W
0
�
U
�
O
I
a
co
m
w
z
>
c0
LJJ
co
0
WU�UU
CL
:3wwo0oo
O
m
Q
V
C.)
c�a
00z
O�
O
00
O
0
�
(D
0
O
w
0
Y
0
aU'
U�LL
C)
7j-D
w
O
QQ�aQaa
r
c *5
v
Lei
to
0
N
O
r'�

Eewis,Unda
From: Lewis,Linda
Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 6:02 PM
To: 'Allen Thornton'
Subject: RE: Concrete Grid Pavers
Allen:
Is this in regards to Ocean Dunes Forest SW8 910307 in Kure Beach? I happened to see that name in the body of the
email string.
If it is, the stormwater application we received in 1991 said that the receiving water body was the Atlantic Ocean,
classified SB. We issued the permit, so I assume the reviewer agreed with that call.
For other stream classification requests, the procedure I outlined in my previous email applies.
Linda
-----Original Message -----
From: Allen Thornton[mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 4:05 PM
To: Lewis,Linda <[e-mail]>
Subject: Re: Concrete Grid Pavers
Hi Linda,
It's Allen from Walton Eng.
What would the stream class and Index # be for this project? It is situated between the Atlantic and the Cape Fear.
Thanks,
Allen
----- Original Message
From: "Lewis,Linda" <[e-mail]>
To: "Mark Walton" <[e-mail]>
Cc: <[e-mail]>; <[e-mail]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2015 9:15 AM
Subject: RE: Concrete Grid Pavers
> Mark:
> For any permeable pavement, whether its driven on or not, the design
> requirements of Chapter 18 of the BMP manual apply. Everything you
> need to design the pavement is in that chapter. Please note that in
> order to claim BUA credit, you must design the permeable pavement to

> store and infiltrate the design storm, and to handle the 10 year 24
hour storm. It's all spelled out in Chapter 18 of the BMP manual if
> you'll take the time to read it.
> Since the permit for Ocean Dunes Forest has not been modified to add
> permeable pavement, the lot owner will need to submit their
> application for permeable pavement to the State for review and
> permitting. If the lot is within the jurisdiction of the Town of Kure
> Beach or the Town of Carolina Beach, you should check with them, too.
> Our agreement with the Town is that we'll do the reviews if they don't
> want to or are not able to.
> The application for permeable pavement on this lot would necessarily
> include the following:
> 1. A completed and signed application form SWU-101; 2. A completed
> permeable pavement supplement; 3. The application fee of $505.00; 4. A
> completed and signed 0&M agreement for the permeable pavement (signed
> by the lot owner); 5. Two sets of lot layout plans showing ALL of the
> BUA (layout w/dimensions, grading and details); including the location
> of and grading for the permeable pavement, with any adjacent BUA that
> is being treated by the permeable pavement. Please note that the lot
> owner will only get BUA credit for the permeable pavement itself. The
> adjacent BUA that drains onto it will NOT be credited.
> 6. The plans need to include the permeable pavement section details
> and if, there is adjacent BUA that drains onto the permeable pavement,
> you'll need to delineate the drainage area.
> 7. A lot -specific soils report which identifies the soil type (HSG A/B
> or C/D), the expected infiltration rate, and the elevation of the
> SHWT. This soils investigation and report needs to be done by a
> licensed soil scientist.
> Linda
> -----Original Message -----
> From: Mark Walton [mailto:[e-mail]]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2015 4:25 PM
> To: Lewis,Linda
> Subject: Concrete Grid Pavers
> Linda,
> In designing a patio with CGPs, I would use Section 18 of the BMP
> Manual, right?
> It won't be for vehicular traffic.
>
> I am being asked about this for Lot 3 Phase II of Ocean Dunes Forest
> which has a deed restriction of 2,559 sf BUA.
> What, if any, paperwork or site investigation would be required on
> your end for this? Soil scientist, design, etc.

> Thanks,
> Mark
> R. Mark Walton
> Licensed Professionsal Engineer
> Walton Engineering
> PO Box 895
> Burgaw, NC 28425
> Tel: [phone]
> Fax: [phone]
> e-mail: [e-mail]
> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> https://www.avast.com/antivirus

Lewis,Linda
From: Lewis,Linda
Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2015 3:03 PM
To: 'Mark Walton'
Subject: RE: Ocean Forest Dunes
Based on the recorded plats, it appears that there are 31 lots in Phase 2 (MB 31 PG 219) and 19 lots in Phase 1(MB 31
PG 218). That totals up to 50 lots, which is what the Certification of Compliance covers. The original 1991 certification of
compliance limited each of the 50 lots to 1650 sf of BUA. Due to overbuilding on some of the lots, the project had to be
modified and was modified on July 17, 1992.
Please refer to the last page of the July 17, 1992 permit scan pdf I emailed to you on August 11, 2015. The revised BUA
allocations were recorded as an amendment on June 2, 1992 in DB 1604 at Page 1765. The last page of the permit scan I
sent you is the last page of that June 2, 1992 amendment which contains the BUA allocations for all 50 lots.
Based on my reading of that recorded document, all 50 lots that were previously subject to the DB 1514 PG 1146
declaration were made subject to the amended declaration which specified a maximum BUA of 1689 sf per lot,
and excepting the lots set forth below:
Lot 3 in Phase II
Lot 6 in Phase II
Lot 8 in Phase II
Lot 13 in Phase it
Lot 25 in Phase II
2559 sf maximum
2067 sf
2359 sf
3074 sf
3260 sf.
So, my conclusion would be that if you are working on Lot 3 in Phase II, it would appear that its BUA limit is 2,559 sf. Lot
3 in Phase 1 is limited to 1,689 sf. Hope that clears it up for you.
Linda
-----Original Message -----
From: Mark Walton fmailto:mark0waltoneneineerine.net]
Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 201512:44 PM
To: Lewis,Linda
Subject: Re: Ocean Forest Dunes
Linda,
The lot I am looking at is Lot 3 Phase il. 1 believe it is limited to
1689 sf. But there is a Lot 3 that is allocated 2559 sf. Can you confirm which limit applies to Lot 3 Phase 11?
Thanks,
Mark
On 30;1112015 2:45 PM, Lewis,Linda wrote:
> Mark:
> Attached. I think page 2 is missing, but it's just the signature page. The pertinent information you want is on Pages 1
and 3. in a nutshell, except for 4 of the lots, all of the lots are limited to a maximum BUA of 1689 sf.

Universal SW
Subject: Universal SW
From: Linda Lewis <[e-mail]>
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 11:13:45 -0500
To: "Robin Robertson (KBPW)" <[e-mail]>
Hey Robin:
Just checking in. Haven't heard from you in a while.
I just got off the phone with Greg Stier. He's raised a concern that I thought we
had already discussed, but need to make sure we both understand.
If a lot in Kure Beach is located in a subdivision or project that is already
covered by a State Stormwater Management Permit, a Universal SW permit cannot be
issued for that lot. The lot must adhere to its permitted built -upon area under the
SSWM permit. Since you are the first point of contact for these -lot owners, how
would you feel about doing a little triage? If you could find out from the
applicant the name of the subdivision the lot is located in, then you can call or
email me and I can look it up to see if it already has a stormwater permit. That
will save a lot of headaches down the line.
Also, you may want to consider compiling a list of all the known subdivision names
in Kure Beach for me. Then, I can look them up, and write down the permit numbers
and the BUA per lot for you. Maybe that will save you some time.
Let me know what you think.
Linda
1 of 1 2/20/2008 11:52 AM

Received: from SpoolDir by NROAR02 (Mercury 1.44); 15 Jul 99 10:54:34 -050
Return -path: <[e-mail]. state. nc.us>
Received: from h2o.enr.state.nc.us (149.168.123.60) by wiro.enr.state.nc.us (M
15 Jul 99 10:54:30 -0500
Received: from h2o.enr.state.nc.us ([149.168.131.24])
by h2o.enr.state.nc.us (Netscape Messaging Server 3.6)
with ESMTP id AAA2029; Thu, 15 Jul 1999 10:59:49 -0400
Message-ID:<[e-mail]. nc.us>
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 1999 10:54:29 -0400
From: "Jeanette Powell" <[e-mail]. nc.us>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (WinNT; 1)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME -Version: 1.0
To: Linda Lewis<[e-mail]. nc.us>
CC: Bradley Bennett <[e-mail]. nc.us>
Subject: Re: 910307
References:<[e-mail]>
Content -Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content -Transfer -Encoding: 7bit
X-PMFLAGS: 34078848 0 1 Y09291.CNM
If the restrictions were never recorded then they aren't legally
binding on the lot owner and any enforcement from us would have to be
against whoever received the certification. Doesn't sound like we'd
have much luck with that. You might want to check with counsel, but
don't see how we can legally require the owner to tear up his
driveway.
Linda Lewis wrote:
> Dear Jeanette:
> I have a situation that has come up this morning. One of our old
> Certifications, 910307, for Ocean Dunes Forest was certified as low
> density in July, 1992, with 1,689 square feet per lot.
> Apparently, one of the homeowners, who purchased and built in
> December 1998, has exceeded the 1689. The restrictions apparently
> were never recorded. The developer does not own anymore lots,
> therefore, there is no bargaining tool available.
Linda Lewis -- 1 -- Fri, 16 Jul 1999 14:46:31

> Do we want to pursue this? The local BI wants to make the homeowner
> tear up his driveway. The BI has been the one enforcing the BUA
> limit, but this one must have gotten by him.
> Thanks,
> Linda
Mai Ito: Jeanette [e-mail]
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Stormwater and General Permits Unit
[phone], ext. 537
Linda Lewis -- 2 -- Fri, 16 Jul 1999 14:46:31