Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSW5220101_Supplement-EZ Form_20220728SUPPLEMENT-EZ COVER PAGE FORMS LOADED PROJECT INFORMATION 1 Project Name 2 Project Area (ac) 3 Coastal Wetland Area (ac) Hardee's - Main Street 2.07 5 Ils this project High or Low Density? Both High and Low Density 6 1 Does this protect use an off -site SCM? No COMPLIANCE WITH 02H .1003(4) 7 Width of vegetated setbacks provided (feet) N/A 8 Will the vegetated setback remain vegetated? N/A 9 If BUA is proposed in the setback, does it meet NCAC 02H.1003(4)(c-d)? N/A 10 Is streambank stabilization proposed on this project? No NUMBER AND TYPE OF SCMs: 11 Infiltration System 12 Bioretention Cell 13 Wet Pond 14 Stormwater Wetland 1 15 Permeable Pavement 16 Sand Filter 17 Rainwater Harvesting (RWH) 18 JGreen Roof 19 Level Spreader -Filter Strip (LS-FS) 20 Disconnected Impervious Surface (DIS) 21 Treatment Swale 22 Dry Pond 23 StormFilter 24 Silva Cell 25 Bayfilter Filterra 26 FORMS LOADED DESIGNER CERTIFICATION 27 1 Name and Title: 28 Organization: Davidl- Smith, PE McAdams 1 30 (City. State. Zip: I Durham. NC. 27713 1 1 32 JEmail: I dsmith@mcadamsco.com I Certification Statement: I certify, under penalty of law that this Supplement-EZ form and all supporting information were prepared under my direction or supervision; that the information provided in the form is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete; and that the engineering plans, specifications, operation and maintenance agreements and other supporting information are consistent with the information provided here. 1�W111�f#II N C A Rp� r SEAL yr = 20744 = �?ocSt 07/15/22 Signature of Designer Date DRAINAGE AREAS 1 Is this a high density project? Yes 2 If so, number of drainage areas/SCMs 1 3 Does this project have low density areas? Yes 4 If so, number of low density drainage areas 2 5 Is all/part of this project subject to previous rule versions? No FORMS LOADED DRAINAGE AREA INFORMATION Entire Site 1 LD 1 LD 2 4 Type of SCM Sub 1 to SCM A Sub 1 Bypass Sub 2 5 Total drainage area (sq ft 90115.00 75,649 9,786 4,680 6 Onsite drainage area (sq ft) 90115.00 75,649 9,786 4,680 7 Offsite drainage area (sq ft 0 0 0 0 8 Total BUA in project (sq ft) 61490 sf 60187 sf 1303 sf 9 New BUA on subdivided lots (subject to permitting) 1 (sq ft 61490 sf 60187 sf 1303 sf 10 New BUA not on subdivided lots (subject to permitting) (sf) 11 Offsite BUA s ft 12 Breakdown of new BUA not on subdivided lots: - Parkinq (sq ft 32324 sf 31021 sf 1303 sf - Sidewalk (sq ft) 2285 sf 2285 sf - Roof (sq ft) 3099 sf 3099 sf - Roadway (sq ft) - Future (sq ft 23782 sf 23782 sf - Other, please specify in the comment box below (sq ft) 13 New infiltrating permeable pavement on Isubdivided lots (sq ft 14 New infiltrating permeable pavement not on subdivided lots (sq ft) 15permitting) Existing BUA that will remain (not subject to s ft 16 Existing BUA that is already permitted (sq ft) 17 Existing BUA that will be removed (sq ft 18 1 Percent BUA 68% 80% 13% 0% 19 1 Desi n storm inches 1.0 in 1.0 in 20 1 Design volume of SCM (cu ft) 5831 cf 5831 cf 21 1 Calculation method for design volume ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 22 Please use this space to provide any additional information about the drainage area(s): 1 = Subbasin 1 to SCM A STORMWATER WETLAND 1 Drainage area number 1 2 Minimum required treatment volume cu ft 4829 cf GENERAL MDC FROM 02H .1050 3 Is the SCM sized to treat the SW from all surfaces at build -out? Yes 4 Is the SCM located away from contaminated soils? Yes 5 What are the side slopes of the SCM (H:V)? 3:1 6 Does the SCM have retaining walls, gabion walls or other engineered side slopes? No 7 Are the inlets, outlets, and receiving stream protected from erosion (10- year storm)? Yes 8 Is there an overflow or bypass for inflow volume in excess of the design volume? Yes 9 What is the method for dewatering the SCM for maintenance? Drawdown Orifice 10 If applicable, will the SCM be cleaned out after construction? Yes 11 Does the maintenance access comply with General MDC (8)? Yes 12 Does the drainage easement comply with General MDC (9)? Yes 13 If the SCM is on a single family lot, does (will?) the plat comply with General MDC (10)? N/A 14 Is there an O&M Agreement that complies with General MDC (11)? Yes 151 Is there an O&M Plan that complies with General MDC (12)? Yes 16 Does the SCM follow the device specific MDC? Yes 17 Was the SCM designed by an NC licensedprofessional? Yes STORMWATER WETLAND MDC FROM 02H .1054 18 Design volume of SCM (cu ft) 5831 19 Are the inlet(s) and outlet located in a manner that avoids short- circuiting? Yes 20 Are berms or baffles provided to improve the flow path? No 21 Does the orifice drawdown from below the top surface of the permanent pool? Yes 22 Does the wetland minimize impacts to the receiving channel from the 1- yr, 24-hr storm? Yes 23 Is a trash rack or other device provided to protect the outlet system? Yes Elevations 24 1 Elevation, peak attenuation above temporary pool (if applicable) (fmsl) 1 273.57 1 251 Elevation, temporary pool (top of the temporary inundation zone) (fmsl) 1 273.25 1 1 261 Elevation, permanent pool (top of the shallow water zone) (fmsl) 1 272.00 1 I 28I Elevation, bottom of forebay deep pool at deepest point (at forebay 268.67 I entrance) (fmsl) 29 Elevation, bottom of forebay deep pool at shallowest point (at forebay 26' 00 1 30 1 Elevation, bottom of non-forebay deep pool at deepest point (fmsl) 1 269.00 1 31 Area, total surface area of the SW wetland at temporary pool elev. (sq ft) 5,740.00 32 Area, temporary inundation zone at temporary pool elev. (sq ft) 2,311.00 33 Area, shallow water zone at temporary pool elev. (sq ft) 2,507.00 34 Area, forebay at temporary pool elev. (sq ft) 631.00 35 Area, non-forebay deep pool at temporary pool elev .(sq ft) 291.00 36 Percent area provided, temporary inundation zone (should be 30-45%) 40 % provided, shallow water zone (should be 35-45%) 44 % provided, deep pool (forebay) (should be 10-15%) �Percent 11 % provided, deep pool (non-forebay) (should be 5-15%) 5% Depths and Outlet 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 Peak attenuation depth above temporary inundation zone (inches) 4 in Temporary inundation zone depth (temporary pool to permanent pool) 15 in (inches) Shallow water zone depth (permanent pool to bottom of wetland) 9 in (inches) Depth, forebay at entrance (permanent pool to bottom of forebay 40 in entrance) (inches) Depth, forebay at exit (permanent pool to bottom of forebay exit) 36 in (inches) Depth, non-forebay deep pools (permanent pool to deep pool bottom) 36 in (inches) If there is an orifice, diameter (inches) 1 in If there is a weir, weir height (inches) If there is a weir, weir length (inches) Drawdown time for the temporary pool (days) 3.10 Wetland 3 2:33 PM 7/15/2022 STORMWATER WETLAND Soil and Plants 50 Soil amendment depth (inches) 6 in 51 Has a soil amendment specification been provided? Yes 52 Has a landscaping plan that meets SW Wetland MDC (12) been Yes provided? 53 Number of plants per 200 square feet (#) in the shallow water zone: 54 Does the temporary inundation zone planting comply with SW Wetland Yes MDC (14)? 55 Are the dam structure and temporary fill slopes planted in non- Yes clumping turfgrass? 56 1 Will cattails be planted in the wetland? No ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 57 Please use this space to provide any additional information about the stormwater wetland(s): 24) Peak Attenuation for the 1 yr, 24-hr storm 42) Shallow Water zone depth = average/design depth for this zone = 6" Total Depth = 9" 53) 50 plants per 200 square feet Wetland 4 2:33 PM 7/15/2022 LOW DENSITY DESIGN REQUIREMENTS FOR LOW DENSITY PROJECTS FROM 02H .1003 1 Is project below density thresholds set forth in the applicable stormwater rule? Yes 2 Does project maximize dispersed flow and minimize channelization of flow? Yes 3 Has the use of piping been minimized per .1003(2)(c)? Yes 4 Side slopes of the vegetated conveyances (H:V) 4 sf 5 Maximum velocity in the vegetated conveyances during the 10-year storm? 2 6 Are curb outlet swales proposed? No 7 Maximum longitudinal slope of curb outlet swale(s) (%) 8 Bottom width of curb outlet swale(s) (feet) 9 Maximum side slope of curb outlet swale(s) (H:V) 10 Minimum length of curb outlet swale(s) (feet) 11 Are treatment swales used instead of curb outlet swales? Yes 12 Is stormwater released at the edge of the setback as dispersed flow? N/A 13 Have stormwater outlets been designed to prevent downslope erosion? Yes 14 Are variations to rule .1003 proposed? No ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 15 iPlease use this space to provide any additional information about this low density project: Half of onsite area (backside of SCM) leaves site via overland flow (grass). The other half including the impervious area (0.03 ac) flows off site via a roadsidevegetated ditch. The drainage area and C shown represent the total drainage to the roadside grass ditch which is predominently off site areas. Swale # Drainage Are Area (ac1 EtUA (ac) Pervious are a re(ac C Q (cfs) Slope N Vail°w (fps) V,�°,i (fps) Flow depth (ft) 0.51 0.31 0.20 0.70 2.70 3.00 2.00 1.62 0.75 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 LOW DENSITY DESIGN REQUIREMENTS FOR LOW DENSITY PROJECTS FROM 02H .1003 1 Is project below density thresholds set forth in the applicable stormwater rule? Yes 2 Does project maximize dispersed flow and minimize channelization of flow? Yes 3 Has the use of piping been minimized per .1003(2)(c)? Yes 4 Side slopes of the vegetated conveyances (H:V) 5 Maximum velocity in the vegetated conveyances during the 10-year storm? 6 Are curb outlet swales proposed? No 7 Maximum longitudinal slope of curb outlet swale(s) (%) 8 Bottom width of curb outlet swale(s) (feet) 9 Maximum side slope of curb outlet swale(s) (H:V) 10 Minimum length of curb outlet swale(s) (feet) 11 Are treatment swales used instead of curb outlet swales? 12 Is stormwater released at the edge of the setback as dispersed flow? N/A 13 Have stormwater outlets been designed to prevent downslope erosion? Yes 14 Are variations to rule .1003 proposed? No ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 15 Please use this space to provide any additional information about this low density project: Drainage area discharges from the site in unconcentrated overland flow on grass Swale # Drainage Are Area (ac1 EtUA (ac) Pervious are a re(ac C Q (cfs) Slope N Vail°w (fps) V,a°,i (fps) Flow depth (ft) 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30