Cape Fear Steam Station (17)

TV 100
�'•,rA k
!'
NCDENR
Nofth Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Qualify
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H Sullins Dee Freeman
Governor Director
Secretary
September, 14, 2011
Certified Mail # 7008 1830'0004 8312 1279
Return Receipt Requested
Mr. Randy Cox
Plant Manager
Cape Fear Steam Electric Power Plant
500 CP&L Rd
Moncure, NC 27559
Subject: NPDES Compliance Sampling Inspection
NPDES Wastewater Discharge
Permit No. NC0003433
(Includes NPDES Stormwater)
NCS000550- Application Review for NPDES
Individual Stormwater Permit
Cape Fear,Steam Electric Power Plant
Chatham County
Dear Mr. Cox:
On August 16, 2011, Autumn Romanski with, the North Carolina Division of Water Quality,
-accompanied by Louis Salguero and Cornell Gayle with the US Environmental Protection
Agency conducted a'Sampling Compliance Inspection of the Cape Fear Steam Electric Power
Plant. This' inspection was conducted to verify that the facility is operating in compliance with
the conditions and limitations specified,in NPDES Wastewater Permit No. NCO038377.
On September 8, 2011,Autumn Romanski returned with Bethany Georgoulias and Brian
`Lowther of the, DWQ Stormwater Permifting Unit to complete the NPDES 'Stormwater
Inspection (this permit includes stormwater) and to confirm stormwater outfalls for the new
NPDES Individual Ston-nwater Permit NCS000550.
,A summa y,of the findings and comments noted during this inspection is provided in Section D
on Page 2 of the attached copy of the complete inspection report titled "Water Compliance
Inspection ,Report". Please=provide a ,status report, in writing- to this office, within 30 days of
your receipt of this letter regarding your plans or measures to be taken to address the items listed
under Section D of this report particularly those items `listed under Item 12. Operations &
Maintenance rerardinQ safety recommendations
Page 2-1

If you 'have, any,questions concerning this report, please contact me at 919-791=4247 in the
Raleigh Regional Office.
Sincerely,
JI
Autumn Romanski
Senior Environmental Specialist
5
Attachments
Cc: (w/attachments) Raleigh Regional Office — File
DWQ/Raleigh — Central Files and Stormwater Permitting Unit
Mr. Louis Salguero Mr. Cornell Gayle, P.E.
EPA Science and Ecosystem Support EPA Science and Ecosystem Support
980 College Station 980 College Station
Athens; GA 30605 - Athens, GA 36605
Page 2-2
T�
If you 'have, any,questions concerning this report, please contact me at 919-791=4247 in the
Raleigh Regional Office.
Sincerely,
JI
Autumn Romanski
Senior Environmental Specialist
5
Attachments
Cc: (w/attachments) Raleigh Regional Office — File
DWQ/Raleigh — Central Files and Stormwater Permitting Unit
Mr. Louis Salguero Mr. Cornell Gayle, P.E.
EPA Science and Ecosystem Support EPA Science and Ecosystem Support
980 College Station 980 College Station
Athens; GA 30605 - Athens, GA 36605
Page 2-2

Section D Summary of Findings /Comments
1. Permit:
Your permit became effective September 1, 2006 and expired July 31, 2011. The facility
is not currently under a Special Order by Consent.
The permittee submitted a wastewater permit renewal application on May, 4, 2011, as,
required, and a new wastewater permit Was issued on July 22, 2011. However, the new
wastewater permit does not come into effect until September, 1', 2011. The NPDES
wastewater and stormwater discharges on site were covered by the NPDES wastewater
permit issued September 1, 2006 as of the date(s) of the inspection(s). The stormwater
permit renewal is still under review and will be issued in the near future as an Individual
Stormwater Permit NCS000550. The permittee is reminded to read, understand and
comply with all of the terms and' conditions contained in the permit. If you have questions,
concerning your'responsibilities, call the Raleigh Regional Offce°to speak to a Divi'sio_ n of
Water Quality Surface Water.staff member.
Upon review of the current NPDES wastewater permit it was determined that a separate
NPDES Individual Stormwater Permit should be issued and clariications of stormwater
discharge outfalls should be conducted on site The site visit was comnleted nn R,,ntvmhvr
new stormwater-permit will be issued
The facility was compliant with the wastewater requirements of the NPDES wastewater
permit. —
2. Compliance Schedules:
The permit does not have any outstanding compliance schedules for this facility.
3: Facility'Site Review:
The overall condition of the plant site was satisfactory. The appearance of the facility was
in acceptable condition indicating that the current housekeeping practices are good.
4 Self -Monitoring Program:
You are reminded that your•monitonng samples must be collected, preserved, and analyzed
by appropriate procedures and methods. You' should maintain records of the sampler
temperature, and a certified laboratory must calibrate the sample thermometers annually.
Your operator is ,rem`inded that he/she must keep a logbook of all operation/maintenance
activities undertaken at the facility. The `logbook should include all daily process control
activities including any field measurements conducted for process control A visitation log
for the facility must also be maintained.
Page 2-3

The facility is currently in compliance "with these requirements however, vve offer the
folloiviu comments and recommendations
Sample collection 'techniques observed the day of' -the inspection were hindered by the
difficulties reaching the sample stream at both, outall(s) 00,1 and outfall 005. It is the,
responsibility of Progress Energy to provide safe access -for DWQ inspectors to complete
inspection activities (visual, observations and sampling) ,at NPDES, permitted outfalls. The
Progress Energy Operator in Responsible Charge, the DWQ inspector, and the EPA
inspectors had diff cufty conducting sampling at outfalls 001 and 005. The 001 outfall is
an effluent pipe located at a steep bank with no guard rails that plunges into the cooling
water discharge canal. This outfall is unsafe for sampling and the safety risk associated
with the person(s) required to sample at this location should be evaluated, by Progress
Energy. The proper safety railing or other actions needed should be taken immediate)y to
mitigate this risk Also, collecting the sample properly at Outfall 005 requires standing in
a portion of the waste stream in order to reach the flowing wastewater And -in order to
position the collection bottle in the waste stream towards, the current flow. Again, Progress
Energy should evaluate the safety risk involved and' develop appropriate safetyprocedures
and' provide protective foot ware and proper gloves as deemed necessary to mitigate this
risk.
Preservation of the samples collected was also hindered by wastewater characteristics
some of which were documented by results provided by Progress Energy in 2009 NPDES
Inspection. Hardness of .140 mg/L, and Calcium of 50.6 mg/L at outfall 005.
Tritest Inc. "(North Carolina Certified Laboratory #67) supplies pre -acidified -collection
containers for -the collection of Oil and Grease at outfalls) 001 and 005: ,Both the Division
of Water Quality Laboratory and the Raleigh, Regional Office believe "the wastewater at
outfall 001 and outfall 005 contained constituents that interfered with some of the lab
analyses. Acidification was noLaccomplished with 6 Normality H2SO4 and dilution of the
sample was, needed and therefore some of the data results were qualified.
In a second round of DWQ sampling on September -8, 2011, it was confirmed that a
stronger acid for sample preservation. Approximately 1 milliliter of concentrated (36
Normality H2SO4) in 1 liter,of sample was needed in,order to properly preserve the oil and
grease sample. The second round of sampling included Total Hardness (Ca, Mg),
Chlorides, and Alkalinity, as we expect these to contribute buffering capacity and interfere
with acidification of the sample. A follow-up visit with, Tritest Inc. will be conducted as,
this finding also raises questions as„to how Tritest Inc. is accomplishing acidification of'Oil
and Grease samples using the standard procedure that calls, for 6 Normality H2SO4.
The collector for grab samples (ORC) should be reminded to collect the sample directly,
into the sample bottle, taking ,care not to overfill pre -preserved sample containers, which
could, result loss of preservative during sampling. The collector should grasp the bottle
securely at the base with one hand and plunge the mouth down into the water, avoiding
surface scum, and then position the bottle in -the waste stream towards the current flow and
away from the hand of the collector. The sampling depth should be about 0.15 meters
below the water surface.
Page,2-4

Composite sampling was conducted at outfall '007 by ,DWQ and by Progress Energy. The
Progress Energy sample was collected over a 24 hour period collecting 120:millrlt'ters
every 20 minutes for 72 aliquots of 120 milliliters each., DWQ also collected sample over
a 24 hour period, collecting 100 milliliters every 20 minutes for 73 aliquots of 100
milliliters each. In order to conduct compliance sampling with the EPA inspectors ,on-site
composite samples from, both composite samplers were collected at 12:,10 PM and that
time is noted on the DWQ' sample documentation. Please note the time the last aliquot was
dispensed for DWQ was 10:30 AM and the sample time should have reflected 10:30 AM.
Progress Energy noted the time of, last aliquot, 06:30 AM -as the sample ;time as, required by
the composite sampling procedure It should be noted, as ,described above, that the facility
uses fixed time fixed volume method. The facility has attested to the flow variance
requirements for use of this method and has received DWQ director approval. This
documentation is attached.
It should be noted that the ISCO sampler Unit being used by Progress Energy did not have
enou,gh_space around the sample container for ice to cool the sample to less than or equal
to 6 Degrees Celsius as recommended for effluent sampling. The tubing for the ISCO
sampler should be cleaned more frequently to avoid problems with the collection and
contamination of'the sample.
5) Records/Reports:
a) A review of the daily monitoring, data submitted during the previous I2 -month period
and a review' of the permit conditions indicates the facility was in compliance with the
permit requirements and/or limitations.
The facility, was issued no penalty assessments'and no notices of violation for the 12'
month period
b) The facility must designate a certified Operator -in -Responsible -Charge (ORC) having
a certification level equal to ,or greater than the facility classification. A Back-up ORC
must also be designated with a minimum certification level at least one level -less than
the facility classification.
The facility is currently in compliance with these requirements This facility is
classified as a Physical Chemical 1 (PC -1) and the Oi7erator in ResnonsihIp i"hnrow
(Cert- No 1 a 66) rneageparn He notas a Fc' -1 (Cert No 27398) and a Wastewater H
The Division of Water Quality records indicate the Back up ORC's are Norman
Barlow (PC -1 Cert No. 989381 and lames Reed (PC -1 Cert No 28680) Please
submit updated designation' information (IF ORC's chap e over, or addihonal'ORC"s
are designated as operators) please send information'to the attention ofStetie Reid
with the Division's Technical Assistance and Certification Unit using the form located
here
http://h2o enr state nc us/tacu/WPCSDForm doc
The facility is currently in compliance with these requirements
Page 2-5

5., Laboratory:
For all analytical data submitted for compliance monitoring purposes, a certified laboratory
must be utilized for all laboratory analysis. Additionally, if field parameter testing is
conducted, an operator certified to perform the specified field parameter analysis, is ,also
required'. The operator needs to be sure -to calibrate dit,m- eters/instrumentation before each
use and retain all calibration records.
cerrinea commercial laboratory #67 The factlity holds a current 2011 NC Dh
Laboratory, 'ield Parameter Certificatibn #5101 for pH and `temperature measurements
The facility has a pH meter and a thermometer that measures temperature.
•isv siavu [AJ /[V
°initiat buffer solution'pH 7 is used to set the isopotential point This was discussed with
the EPA inspectors the day of the inspection
place in initial buffer solution and set the isopotential point"
The electronic thermometer' located at outfall=007 was last' calibrated against a certified
,thermometer on 12/10/2010
C
6. Flow Measurement:
If the permit requires a flow measurement- device, for determining, the effluent flow, the
flow measurement device must be calibrated annually.
This facility is required to monitor and report of uent flow and the facility is in compliance
'with this requirement They report effluent of by
1) Mammng's"equation was used to calculate, cross-sectional average velocity flow in open,
channels
2) A 2010 Pump ,Curves Flow Table was established by -engineers and is in use currently
based on actual pumping, capacity which reportedly differs from design pump capacity.
This table 'and the flow calculations, were reviewed by the EPA, as part of this
inspection.
7. Effluent/Receiving Waters:
The effluent discharge should be clear with a, continuous, flow with no vi's'ible changes to
the receiving waters.
Page 2-6

The effluent chscharge was clear and flow was continuous The receiving waters looked
clear with no visible changes from the effluent discharge
S. Pretreatment:
This facility currently has no pretreatment permit and does not accept or discharge
domestic or industrial waste to a sanitad? sewer system Pre-treatment permits are
required, if applicable by Your NPDES Discharge Permit
9. Solids Hand lin g/Disposa1:
The facility must dispose of,solids by an acceptable method such as a'landfill or utilize 'the
services of an approved solids hauling and disposal contractor, which requires the facility
to be included under the contractor's non -discharge permit (i.e. land application). The
facility' is reminded to maintain adequate records (i.e. shipment dates, quantities, etc.) of
any solids hauling and/or disposal activities.
The facility is in compliance with these requirements and reports no transporting of ash
or -wastewater sludge solids to offsite locations In the past they did report some reuse
of ash in cement block The facility should address Coal Combustion Products
management as directed by the NC Division of Solid Waste and,or as directed by other
state or federal regulations as that apply to solids at this facility. The capacity and
ultimate disposal of solids from the active 1985 ash pond is currently being reviewed
and Progress Enerav has reported that preparations are being made to permanently
shut down this plant as early as 2014 in a press release from Progress Enerav in
Raleigh,C. dated (April 1 2011) Progress Energy stated "the Cape Fear Plant near
Moncure will be retired by the end of 2014
10. Sanitary Wastewater Treatment Plant
The only wastewater treatment unit observed during this inspection was the sanitary
wastewater treatment Dlant The plant is an old extended aeration package plant the
plant is currently operating as a septic tank with aeration It did not appear that the
plant operates efficiently or that it accom fishes proper biological treatment The
effluent is chlorinated and ,a maximum flow of approximately 0.002 MGD is sent to,the
1985 Ash Pond f65 acres ) for secondary treatment Information on the 1985 Ash Pond
can be -found in the 2009 NPDES Inspection Report Colifbrin Fecal MF monitoring is
required at NPDES interna] outfall 005 Cthis is the eluent waste stream exiting the
1985 Ash on ) and the fecal results at NPDES outfall 005 were in the range of 143
CFU/100 ml to 230 CFU/100 ml at the internal NPDES outfall 005 Some fecal is likely
realized from wildlife but it does not appear that the sanitary waste flow, Cwhich is
decreasing as the plant begins the rocess of preparing fora permanent shut downy is
cause or concern at this time Therefore i see no reason to comment further on the
inadequacies of the sanitary pac'kade plant
Page 2-7

1'l. Compliance Sampling:
Compliance sampling was conducted durinz the inspection tivith the ollowing results
NPDES Internal Outfall 001 -includes ash sluice, low volume wastewater, stormwater and
coal pile runoff
DWQ RESULTS
'PROGRESS ENERGY RESULTS
TSS = Unidentified at (PQL 6.2 mg/L)
TSS= -<2:5' mg/L
O & G = Unidentified at (PQL 10 mg/L)
O & G = <5.0_mg/L
NH3 as N= Unidentified,at ('PQL 0.02 mg/L)—'
NH3 as N= < 0:02 mg/L
Arsenic = 5,.8 ug/L
Arsenic = <3.00 ug/L
Selenium=Unidentified at (PQL 5 0 ug/L)
Selenium=6.95
NPDES Internal Outfall 005 includes ash, sluice, sanitary wastewater, low volume
wastewater, stonmwater and Metal cleaning wastes from East Ash Pond
NPD>ES Final Outfall 007 discharging to an unnamed tributary of the Cape 'Fear River
classified as (WS -V) Water Supply includes combined- wastewaters and Stormwater, from
Outfalls 001, 003, and 005.
Page'2-8
PROGRESS ENERGY RESULTS
[DEWQ�-RESULTS
form, MF Fecal = 230 CFU/100ml (B4)
Coliform, MF Fecal = 1,43 CFU/.100m1
TSS ='Un dentified,at,(PQL 6.2 mg/L)
TS,3.7 mg/L
*O & G =Unidentified at, (PQL, 110 mg/L) (16),
O &G— <5.0 mg/L
NH3 as N= Unidentified, at, (PQL 0.02 mg/L)
NH3, as N= < 0.02 mg/L
Arsenic— 40 ug/L
Arsenic = 27.2 ug/L -
Selenium=,120 ug/L
Selenium=101' us/L�
NPD>ES Final Outfall 007 discharging to an unnamed tributary of the Cape 'Fear River
classified as (WS -V) Water Supply includes combined- wastewaters and Stormwater, from
Outfalls 001, 003, and 005.
Page'2-8

The sampling results above were in compliance with the limits as set in•the permit
The facility is required to perform Chronic Toxicity quarterly cind has passed all Chronic
Toxicity tests within the last 12 months
The highest temperature reported at outfall 007 in hot summer months was 31 DEG C It
was explained that the cooling towers on-site are operated as once throuigh cooling as
discharge canal.
12. NPDES Combined Wastewater/Stormwater -Permit NC0003433 and Individual
Stormwater, Permif NCS000550 Renewal
A separate inspection was conducted on a follow-up visit September 8, 2011 to determine
compliance with the, stormwater requirements of the NPDES Permit NC0003433 and to
confirms tormwater outfalls associated with the renewal/new issuance of an Individual
Stormwater Permit NCS000550. The stormwater inspection results are attached. '
The facility was compliant with the permit conditions as set forth in the NC0003433
combined wastewater/Stormwater permit
he
DWO agreed that the stormwater outfalls #SWI #SW8, _#SW2 (New Location) SW#3 in the
NCS000550 Stormwater application are discharge locations that discharge stormwater to
waters of the state and are associated with industrial activities that require coverage
However SW#4 and. SW#6 have been removed in the NCS000550 Stormwater application.
DWO reviewed this decision and agreed that outfall SW#4 appeared to be associated with
the railroad and railroad right -of way and not associated with the power plants industrial
activities DWO confirmed that SW46 discharges to the wastewater discharge canal and
then to the final NPDES wastewater outfall 007 'that is already monitored through the
NC0003433 wastewater permit
13 Operations & Maintenance:
The following items were noted during the inspection please forward a response on items
(a -d).
a) The D'a inspector, and the EPA inspectors had duf iculU conducting sampling at
unsafe for samnlina and the ,safety risk associated with the persons) required
Page 2-9

to sain ple at this location shbuld-be evaluated by Progress Bner�v _The proper
fsgfety� railing or other vctions needed should tie taken immediately lo:
mitigate this risk. - -
b) Collecting ,the sample. properly at Outfall 005 requites'sfanding in a portion of the
waste,stream' in orderw reach the- flowing wastewater, and in order to position the
collection bottle in the waste-streard towards: the _current, flow' + Proggress'Energy'
should' -evaluate the- sgfety risk involved `at - this outfall and develop
app rim at`e-sgfetprocedures, and, provide protettive foot Ware and broiler
gloves as deemed necessary to mitigate this risk -
c) The sample collector for arab .samples CORC) should be remindedto collect the
sample directly, into- the sample 'bottle taking care not` to overfill' ire
preserved sample containers : There were -plausible questions` raised by the
EPA'inspectors rea"d�. rdina ,checking p'H on-site to con' rip fiver acidi cation
ofsamples. Pro er acidification spe'dficall�Oil and Grease samples was further-
�guestioned at the- Tritest Inc Lab, -in Raleigh and DM ik still investigating this
'matter further- 'It is highlu recommended that -Progress Energy check the pH of;'
' ,samples prior. to transport to the Tritest Lab Please,tise a method least likely to
contribute to sample contamination 'such'as pouring- a small amount Qf the
sa"rri a oiz alaper and dv`oid i2acing er or ro 'pinto the sami2le i _
d) The ISCO sa`mp'ler Unit beind" used by Progress Energy did noEhave enough °spac_ e`
around the sample container for ice to cool the sample to less than or equal to 6
Dearees Celsius as recommended for el' uent.sa plinq. This is a requirerrient,and
must be remedied °"witti `a .larger ISCO unit or other method - of jobtairiing. '
cooling ,for -the sample'beina collected over the 24 period. eriod The tubing,far:
the ISCO samp'!er shouldbe cleaned rhore ftguent[v.
13. Coiiibliarice Status: - 'Ell-
® Compliant', ; .0 'Non, -compliant ❑' 'Neither
Name and Sign`ature�of Inspector:
u n Ronianski - - 4 D to
Sqfce Water, Protection Section
Raleigh 'Regional Office
Page, 2-10

Permit: NCS000550 Effect
SOC: Effect
County: Chatham
Region: Raleigh
Contact Person: Caren B Anders
Directions to Facility:
System Classifications:
Primary ORC:
Secondary ORC(s)c
On -Site Representative(s):
Related Permits:
a -
Compliance Inspection Report
e: Expiration: Owner: Carohna' Power and Light Company DBA
Progress Energy Inc
e: Expiration: Facility: Cape Fear°Steam Electric Power Plant
500 CP L Rd
Title: Vice President
Certification:
Moncure NC 27559
Phone: [phone]
Inspection Date:, 08/08/2011 Entry Time: 01 30 PM Exit -Time: 03 30 PM
Phone:
Primary Inspector: Autumn H Romanski�tPhone: 919-791-4247
Secondary Inspector(s):
Reason°for Inspection: Complaint Inspection Type: Compliance'Evaluation
Perm it,lnspection Type: Stormwater Discharge, Individual
Facility Status: ■ Compliant ❑ Not'Compliant
Question Areas:
■ Storm Water
(See attachment Summary)
Page 1

Penult: NCS000550Owner - Fac'flity: Carolina Power and Light;Company DBA Progress
Energy I-
nc_,
F . _
Inspection Date:r08/08!2011 , Inspection Type:, Comphance,Evaluahon Reason for Visit: Complaint+ `
Inspection Summary'
r `The facility was in conpliahce`with,the,,NC0003433 stormwater permit requirements the day of the inspection Permit-,
Coverage is currently under the NC003433 Combined Wait
ewater/Stormwater Permit, until such'time as,the�NCS00055G
- perrrtit is i' sued. " -
_ : This Inspection conciiintrated on"verifiyinIg the ;outfalls that should be Included In the•NCS,000550 (the new NPDES,: , ,•
Individual Stormwater Perrnit,j: All'Outfalls wereobseived in 2009 and;photos of some of'those?outfallsvere ieveiwed
and, discussed while -others were observed ori site the day of this Inspection _
The"re was no,'in event;tlie day of theyinspection and no active stormwaterwdischarges observed
The,following was discussed 1)It was explained and observed,,in�the past inspections that SW#1 and'SW#8 are•overFloWs,
for`25"year storage ponds, and are very unlikely to discharge except in extreme weather conditions or extreme,flooding of -
the Cape Fear River 2) The new SW#2'6utfall was observed and DWQ recommended that thelacility-monitor and
sar ple, as deemed, appropriate, •to determine If samples are representative of the�stor-rnw ier from.industrial,activity It
appeared that grotindwater,rnfluence�was possible at this location and it was explained that hewvy'rain''evehts can back
the stream Into the stormwater discharge -outlet. It was discussed that,good judgment should lie made,at the time,of
`sampling this�outfall;to_ensure a representative sample -3) SW#3 outfaltwas observed,and r'epresentafive sampling"can
be conducted'here, ;but it was reported that sampling usually requires at least -3 inches of rain., Currently,, -a bucket is�used-,`
to catch.the sample; DWQ further recommended that the addition of,,a mesh screen may preventtr'ash/debris from = -
collecting in the bucket with,the sample;
Page 2

Permit NCS000550 Owner - Facility Carolina Power and Light Company DBA,Progress
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
,# Does the, Plan, include a list of significant,spills occurring during the past;3 years?
000 '❑'
# Has the facility, evaluated feasible alternatives,to current practices?
Energy Inc
# Does the facility provide all necessary'secondary,containment?
E' ❑ ❑, ❑
`# Does the Plan include a BMP summary?
0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Inspectlon Date. 08/08/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance, Evaluation
Reason for Visit: Complaint
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
Yes
No
NA
NE
Does the,site have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan?
# Is the Plan reviewed and updated annually?
❑
❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a General Location (USGS) map?
0000
Comment The facility explained they are In compliance wlth� secondary containment,
0000
,as contalnment,ls checked monthly, with a corporate audit annually in compliance with,
`the
#Does the Plan include a "Narrative Description of Practices"?
■
❑
❑
❑
#°Does the Plan include,a detailed site map including outfall locations and,drainage areas?
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
,# Does the, Plan, include a list of significant,spills occurring during the past;3 years?
000 '❑'
# Has the facility, evaluated feasible alternatives,to current practices?
0 ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the facility provide all necessary'secondary,containment?
E' ❑ ❑, ❑
`# Does the Plan include a BMP summary?
0 ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a Spill Prevention and Response Plan (SPRP)?
0 ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping Plan?
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the facility provide and document Employee Training?
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a list of Responsible Party(s)?
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
# Is the Plan reviewed and updated annually?
0 ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a Stormwater Facility Inspection Program?
0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Has the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan been implemented?
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment The facility explained they are In compliance wlth� secondary containment,
0000
,as contalnment,ls checked monthly, with a corporate audit annually in compliance with,
`the
requirements of SPCC.
The facility further explained their training program to Question, Verify, and Validate
The stormwater plan was last upodated in November 2010, and will be updated ,again
Yes
this year to reflect the needs of teh new, NCS' 000550 Individual Stormwater permit
NA NE
Qualitative Monitoring
Yes
No
NA NE
Has the facility conducted its Qualitative Monitoring semi-annually?
❑
❑ ,❑
Comment Monitoring was completed ;in May 2010, October 2010, and again May
2011 as required by the permit
Analytical Monitoring
Yes
No
NA NE
Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring?
0000
# Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring from Vehicle Maintenance areas?
0000
Comment
Permit and Outfalls
Yes
No
NA NE
# Is�a copy of the Permit and the Certificate of Coverage available at the site?
0000
Page 3

r x-
s
Permit: NCS000550 Owner-Tacdity: Carolina, Power and Light Company DBA,Progress
Energy Inc
Inspection Date: 08/08/2011 Inspection Type- Compliance Evaluation Reason,for Visit: Complaint
#'Were all outfalls observed,during, the inspection? ❑ =00
# If the facility has representative outfall status, is it properly documented by the Division? ❑ ❑ '■ ❑
#,Has the facdity,evaluated all dlicit,(non stormwater) discharges? 000
Comment See'Summary
C
Page 4