SW8000220_Historical File_20130513

ITI
��4AF
HONOR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Pat McCrory Charles Wakild, P. E.
Governor Director
May 13, 2013
Magnolia Greens Master Association, Inc.
C/o Dennis Michaliga, President
2502 South 17".' Street
Wilmington, NC 28401
Subject: Stormwater Permit No. SW8 000220
Name/Ownership Change and Permit Extension
The Lakes at Magnolia Greens
High Density Project
Brunswick County
Dear Mr. Michaliga:
John E. Skvarla, III
Secretary
On August 5, 2009, the Governor signed Session Law 2009-406. This law impacts any
development approval issued by the Division of Water Quality under Article 21 of Chapter 143 of
the General Statutes, which is current and valid at any point between January 1, 2008, and
December 31, 2010. The law extends the effective period of any stormwater permit that was set
to expire during this time frame up to three (3) years from its current expiration date. On August
2, 2010, the Governor signed Session Law 2010-177, which granted an extra year for an
extension of up to four (4) years.
On March 22, 2013, the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) received a permit Name/Ownership
Change Form from Landmark Developers, Inc. A file review and site inspection was performed
on April 29, 2013 by DWQ and as noted in the enclosed inspection report, the site is currently in
compliance with the terms and conditions of the current state stormwater permit. The Division is
hereby notifying you that permit SW8 000220 has been transferred on May 13, 2013, and shall
be effective until May 12, 2019, which includes the extensions. For your records, please find
enclosed a copy of the updated page 2 of the previously issued permit, a copy of the inspection
report, and a copy of the Name/Ownership Change form(s) submitted on March 22, 2013.
Please attach this cover letter and updated page 2 to your permit originally issued on Mav 26,
2000 and as modified thereafter.
This permit is subject to the conditions and limitations as specified in the previously issued
permit. Please pay special attention to the conditions listed in this permit regarding the
Operation and Maintenance of the BMP(s), recordation of deed restrictions, procedures for
changes of ownership, transferring the permit, and renewing the permit. Failure to establish an
adequate system for operation and maintenance of the stormwater management system, to
record deed restrictions, to transfer the permit, or to renew the permit, will result in future
compliance problems.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this permit are unacceptable, you have the
right to request an adjudicatory hearing by filing.a written petition with the Office of
Administrative Hearings (OAH). The written petition must conform to Chapter 150E of the North
Carolina General Statutes, and must be filed with the OAH within thirty (30) days of receipt of
this permit. You should contact the OAH with all questions regarding the filing fee (if a filing fee
is required) and/or the details of the filing process at 6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC
27699-6714, or via telephone at 919-431-3000, or visit their website at www.NCOAH.com.
Unless such demands are made this permit shall be final and binding.
1 i7 Cardin Regional Office N of x iCarolina
127 Cardinal Drive Extension, Wilmington, North Carolina 28405 /
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] DENR Assistance:1-877-623-6748 l �atu�+a`` �/
Internet www.ncwaterqualky.org f� i/
An Equal Opportunity 1 AfArrnative Action Employer

State Stormwater Management
Permit # SW8 000220
If you have any questions, need additional copies of the permit or approved plans, please
contact David Cox or Chris Baker with the Division of Water Quality in the Wilmington Regional
Office at [phone].
Sincerely,
r Charles Wakild, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
GDS/dwc: S:1WQS1Stormwater\Permits & Projects12000100022012013 05 permit 000220
cc: Chris Stephens
Phil Norris
Chris Baker
Wilmington Regional Office Stormwater File
Page 2of2

State Stormwater Management Systems
Permit No. SW8 000220 Modification
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
STATE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PERMIT
HIGH DENSITY DEVELOPMENT
In accordance with the provisions of Article 21 of Chapter 143, General Statutes of
North Carolina as amended, and other applicable Laws, Rules, and Regulations
PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED TO
Magnolia Greens Master Association, Inc.
The Lakes @ Magnolia Greens
Brunswick County
FOR THE
construction, operation and maintenance of a wet detention pond in compliance with the
provisions of 15A NCAC 2H .1000 (hereafter referred to as the "stormwater rules') and
the approved stormwater management plans and specifications and other supporting
data as attached and on file with and approved by the Division of Water Quality and
considered a part of this permit.
This permit shall be effective from the date of issuance until May 12, 2019 and shall be
subject to the following specified conditions and limitations:
1. DESIGN STANDARDS
1. This permit is effective only with respect to the nature and volume of stormwater
described in the application and other supporting data.
2. This stormwater system has been approved for the management of stormwater
runoff as described in Section 1.6 on page 3 of this permit. The subdivision is
permitted for 233 lots, each allowed a maximum amount of built -upon area. Lots
1A, 1 through 72 and 5-69 through 5-110 are limited to 5,000 square feet of built -
upon area. Lots 5-1 through 5-68, 6-1 through 6-26 and 73 through 96 are
limited to 4,000 square feet of built -upon area.
3. Approved plans and specifications for this project are incorporated by reference
and are enforceable parts of the permit.
4. All stormwater collection and treatment systems must be located in either
dedicated common areas or recorded easements. The final plats for the project
will be recorded showing all such required easements, in accordance with the
approved plans.
5. The detention pond is designed to store up to 8" of runoff without discharging.
Offsite subdivisions permitted under SW8 020522, SW8 970104, and SW8
990628 are included in the drainange area of this pond.

II. CURRENT PERMIT INFORMATION
1. Stormwater Management Permit Number: SW8 000220
2. Project Name: The Lakes at Magnolia Greens
3. Current Permitee's Company Name/Organization: Landmark Developers, Inc.
4. Signing Official's Name: W. Christopher Stephens Title: President
5. Mailing Address: 5022 Wrightsville Avenue, Suite 102
City: Wilmington State: NC
6. Phone: 9( 10 ) 392-7201
Fax: 9( 10 )
Zip: 28403
350-0610
III. PROPOSED PERMITTEE / OWNER / PROJECT / ADDRESS INFORMATION
The proposed permittee identified in the condominium or planned community's declaration is the
following (check one):
❑ Unit Owners Association
© Owners Association ' G- L U 171
❑ Other Management Entity
Proposed Permittee's:
1. Company Name/Organization: Magnolia Greens Master Association, Inc.
2. Contact Name & Title (Please provide name of company/organization's authorized representative or agent
and her/his official title such as President):
Dennis Michaliga, President
3. Mailing Address: 2502 South 17th Street
City: _ Wilmington State: NC Zip: 28401
4. Phone: (910 ) 395-15oo Fax: ( ) N/A
ECEIVE
IV. CURRENT PERMITTEE'S CERTIFICATION MAR 2 2 2013
I, W_ Christopher Stephens , the current permittee, am subting h��ct for
a transfer of stormwater permit # mg oo022o . I hereby attest that I have met the
requirements of N.C.G.S. 143-214.7(c2)/ Session Law 2011-256, and propose to transfer the permit
to a unit owners association, owners association, or other management entity identified in the
condominium or planned community's declaration. The common areas related to the operation and
maintenance of the stormwater management system have been conveyed to the unit owners
association or owners association in accordance with the declaration. I have provided a copy** of the
most recent permit, the designer's certification for Pach BMP, any recorded deed restrictions,
covenants, or easements, the DWQ approved plans and/or approved as -built plans, the approved
operation and maintenance agreement, past maintenance records, and the DWQ stormwater
inspection report evidencing compliance to the proposed permittee named in Section III of this form.
I further attest that this request for a permit transfer is accurate and complete to the best of my
knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this request are not comDleted or if all required
supporting information and attachments listed above are not included, this request package will be
Page 2 of 3

I
returned as incomplete. I assign all rights
named in Section II of this form. I undersj
DWQ unless and until the,fadilittis in c
Signature: V '-/
obligations as permittee to the proposed permittee
that this permit transfer cannot be approved by the
.nce with the permit.
Date:
a Notary Public for the State of
!j C , County of �r,,nswi�` , do hereby certify that
V�1 • CIr v%40 piner ohe.,,s personally appeared before me this the
1 A- day of March , 20 13 , and acknowledge the due execution of the
forgoing instrument. fitness y hand and official seal, pQeal)
H.
t ry Si ture •`�� a,
La
r1...( c,ornn�►, s sia►n
�G AV BI.�G v
** it is recommended that all documents that are required for the transfer of this permit be
sent by a traceable delivery method to the proposed permittee.
Additional copies of the original permit and the approved Operation and Maintenance agreement can
be obtained from the appropriate Regional Office of the Division of Water Quality.
This completed form, including all supporting documents and the processing fee (if required), should be sent to the
appropriate Regional Office of the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Division of Water
Quality, as shown on the attached map.
DWO Regional Office Contact Information:
Asheville Office ......
[phone]
Fayetteville Office ...
[phone]
Mooresville Office ...
[phone]
Raleigh Office ........
[phone]
Washington Office... [phone]
Wilmington Office ...
[phone]
Winston-Salem ......
[phone]
Central Office .........
[phone]
Page 3 of 3

Compliance Inspection Report
Permit: SW8000220 Effective:05/12105 Expiration: 05/12/19
Project: The Lakes at Magnolia Greens
Owner: Magnolia Greens Master Association Inc
County: Brunswick Adress: NC Hwy 17
Region: Wilmington
City/State/Zip: Belville NC 28451
Contact Person: George Steelberg Title: President Phone:
Directions to Project:
Located along the north right-of-way on Hwy 17 approx. 1000 ft. Northeast of the Hwy 17 and Lanvale Road interseciton.
Type of Project: State Stormwater - HD - Detention Pond
Drain Areas: 1 - (Jackeys Creek) (03-06-17) ( C;Sw)
On -Site Representative(s):
Related Permits:
SW8970104 Magnolia Greens Master Association Inc - Magnolia Greens Golfcourse Master I
SW8020522 Magnolia Greens Master Association Inc - Glendale at Magnolia Greens
SW8990628 Magnolia Greens Master Association Inc - Fairway Village At Magnolia Greens
Inspection Date: 04/2912013 Entry Time: 10:30AM Exit Time: 11:15AM
Primary Inspector: Christopher Baker
Secondary Inspector(s):
Phone:
Reason for Inspection: Routine Inspection Type: Transfer Renewal
Permit Inspection Type: State Stormwater
Facility Status: ® Compliant ❑ Not Curnpliant
Question Areas:
E State Stormwater
(See attachment summary)
page: 1

6
permit: SW8000220 Owner Project: Magnolia Greens Master Association Inc
Inspection Date: 04/29/2013 Inspection Type Transfer Renewal Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
This stormwater system is in compliance with the terms and conditions of the permit.
File Review
Is the permit active?
Signed copy of the Engineer's certification is in the file?
Signed copy of the Operation & Maintenance Agreement is in the file?
Copy of the recorded deed restrictions is in the file?
Comment:
Operation and Maintenance
Are the SW measures being maintained and operated as per the permit requirements?
Are the SW BMP inspection and maintenance records complete and available for review or provided to
DWQ upon request?
Comment:
Yes No NA NE
❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ❑
Yes No NA NE
❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ❑ E
page: 2

Norris & Tunstall
1127 Floral ParkwayConsulting Engineers, P.C.
1429 Ash -Little River Road
Suite 400 Ash, NC 28420
Wilmington, NC 28403 [phone]
[phone] [phone] Fax
[phone] Fax
John S. Tunstall, P.E. J. Phillip Norris, P.E.
March 19, 2013
Ms. Jo Casmer
NC DENR / Division of Water Quality \
Water Quality Section
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington, NC 28405-3845 l�
Re: State Stormwater Permit Transfer of Ownership
Magnolia Greens
Brunswick County, NC
N&T Project No. 12058
Dear Ms. Casmer:
Enclosed are the permit transfer request forms for the following permits:
SW8 970104 SW8 000131
SW8 981008 SW8 000220//
SW8 990628 / SW8 020522 %
SW8 990947A- SW8 020527
SW8 991136
Also enclosed are a copy of the master declaration of Protective Covenants for
Magnolia Greens, a copy of Articles of Incorporation of Magnolia Greens Master
Association, Inc., and the By Laws of Magnolia Greens Master Association, Inc.
Please review this information for approval and contact us with any questions or
comments you may have. Thank you for your assistance on this project.
Sincerely,
NORRIS & TUNSTALL
CONSULTING ENGINEERS, P.C.
R 4
J Phillip rris, P
12058 03-19-13-s-sw-transfer-Itr
Enclosures
cc: W. Christopher Stephens / Landmark Developers, Inc.
�G E.
MAR 2 2 2013
BY:
NCBELS License C-3641

Lewis,Linda
From: Lewis,Linda
Sent: Friday, September 28, 2012 12:37 PM
To: 'Chris Stephens'
Subject: The Lakes at Magnolia Greens SW8 000220
Chris
I was going through my stack of unresolved inspections and found this one. Although I received Davis' pond
evaluation, it was not sealed. It needs to be sealed.
Also, it did not address all of the inspection points in my February 10, 2012 inspection report. I still need
answers and written verification for the following:
1. An as -built survey of the pond's permanent pool (21.0) and temporary pool (23.5) surface areas. The
pond configuration is different than permitted, so the as -built sheet will become a part of the approved
plan set. Please make sure it is signed and sealed.
2. We discussed the repair/replacement of that rickety old flashboard riser outlet structure, but I have not
received any proposed details for a new structure.
3. Vegetation — have the bare spots identified in the inspection report been beefed up?
4. Has the outlet ditch been cleaned out, resloped and stabilized?
5. Has the gravel check dam been removed?
6. Davis' report did not address the drawdown pump and irrigation system. I had requested that you
provide calculations supporting the pump's ability to pump the full 8" volume to the irrigation system and
spray irrigate it all within 2-5 days.
As we discussed, although the pond is designed to store 8" of runoff (25 year storm back then), the street's
piped collection system was only designed to convey a 10 year storm. I have already indicated to Melissa
Juhan that as long as the runoff is staging within the drainage area and is not bypassing the pond, any flooding
is not a permit violation and is not a "nuisance condition" under the alternative system rules since flooding is
not regulated by the State nor is it covered by the rules. Furthermore, if the HOA wants to alleviate that
flooding, they can do so after they take the permit. I have provided several suggestions to the HOA which
include installing larger pipes, and adding a bypass line from the last catch basin to the larger pond on the
other side of the road to alleviate the load on the smaller pond.
The other issue raised by Greg Thompson, P.E., Southern Engineering, was about putting easements on the
golf course fairways so that when the HOA becomes the permittee, they will have access to the fairway
irrigation system, which is the permitted drawdown system for the approved pond. At one point I believe you
indicated that Landmark would record these easements before turning the system over to the HOA. Is that still
the plan? Do you have any idea when the turnover will take place?
Thanks for any updates regarding these unresolved inspection issues that you can provide. I'd like to hear
something back from you as soon as possible, but certainly by October 30, 2012.
Linda Lewis
NC Division of Water Quality
127 Cardinal Drive Ext.
Wilmington, NC 28405
910-796-7215
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may
be disclosed to third parties.

0 COAST LINEt-
E N G I N E E R I N Gn
2107 Laurel Oak Way
office: [phone]
Memorm&jm
To: Chris Stephens
From: Davis Fennell
CC:
Leland, NC 28451
fay-• [phone]
Subject: The Lakes at Magnolia Greens — Pond Evaluation
Date: 03/16/2012
Job No: 1230-100
As requested I have evaluated the storm pond within The Lakes at Magnolia Greens for compliance
with permitted design criteria. The basis of this evaluation was the updated normal water surface
provided by Michael Underwood and Associates. I assumed a minimum of at least 3:1 slopes above
water for volume calculations.
The permitted pond is actually made up of multiple, interconnected ponds treated as a single unit.
There are 5 ponds that receive drainage and are connected linearly to a single discharge. No data
was provided for the connecting pipes from the two uppermost ponds so they were ignored. For this
reason the following results are conservative.
The data for the three ponds was combined and analyzed as a single unit in the same fashion as
presented in prior permitting documents. I found the surface area provided is more than 98% of what
was -designed, or in substantial compliance with the permit. The associated volume is nearly 99% of
what was designed, and is 109% of what is required, also in substantial compliance with the permit.
A wet pond data sheet similar to what was originally submitted and approved is attached for your use.
I also evaluated the interconnections between the ponds using the data developed above. In this
case, each pond was modeled independently for drainage area, storage volume, and discharge.
Hydraflow Hydrographs software was utilized to predict the reaction of these ponds to 8 inches of
rainfall in 24 hours time. As the ponds are interconnected, and as these interconnections are the
focus of this evaluation, the following parameters were assumed for the calculations:
• The pond north of Pine Harvest Drive was modeled to discharge via a connector pipe to the
pond between Pine Harvest Drive and Cornerstone Drive.
• The pond south of Cornerstone Drive was modeled to discharge via connector pipes to the
pond between Pine Harvest Drive and Cornerstone Drive.
• The pond between Pine Harvest Drive and Cornerstone Drive was modeled with discharge via
connector pipes to the ponds north of Pine Harvest Drive and south of Cornerstone Drive.

• In all cases, it was assumed that the receiving ponds were full to the maximum stage from 8
inches of rainfall, calculated to be elevation 23.3 in the wet pond data sheet and represented
as tail water in the storm model. The tail water elevation actually rises from 21 to 23.3 during
the 24 hours of the storm event, so the results of the model are conservative.
The results of the storm model are attached for your use. The model shows that even if the capacity
of connector pipes is reduced by high water in the receiving pond(s), adequate storage volume is
provided and the connector pipes provide ample discharge to regulate the maximum water volume to
within 0.1 feet (1.2 inches), and still below the maximum elevation of 23.5. This model demonstrates
that the pipes installed to interconnect the ponds, as installed, are adequate to move water as
required between the ponds to maintain nearly identical water levels in each pond.
Please note that the large pond between Pine Harvest Drive and Cornerstone Drive appears to have
no discharge to the other ponds in this storm event. This is due only to the assumption that the other
ponds are already full to the elevation 23.3 -- the large pond has enough storage that the water level
would only rise to match this elevation, even from 8 inches of rain, so the model shows no flow. If the
actual elevation of adjoining ponds were to be modeled at the various elevations experienced in an
actual storm, the large middle pond would show discharge to the adjoining ponds. As only the worst
case scenario is evaluated here, that additional analysis was not performed.
In summary, the interconnected ponds that make up the permitted non -discharge pond have sufficient
surface area and storage volume to be in substantial compliance with the original design and the
permitted criteria. The pipes installed to interconnect the ponds are adequate in size and elevation to
allow the discreet ponds to operate as a single unit, rising and falling in near unison to provide a
constant water elevation.

l z
IR
N
0
�
N
Ln G)
L6
N v
N
d-
v OL
t aG
U
u
OL u OC u
v
v
u u
u
u
u
u
OL
Q Qaa¢
a
aQ¢a
a
¢aaa
a
¢¢Qa
u mNCOm
W
d'm1l-d-
1`
lf)UCf)
N
tn O'IrmCO
1�
M03—m
U
cc}d
CO
—N1�
N
6bC;
0—
-
4
C5L6
It N
—
m
NO
m Q
,z<
O
Q
�. a
O
�4
Q %n
4 0
C Q}
L E
zQQ
(�
Q Q
mo
QQ
v
q)
0
�6
i
L
—
II >, cfj cfj
Q¢
c
3 zO
w
liu-
Q
�-
Q
Q N
(B
C �
0 E
QG
Q
in
6
N N
lu
O o
a¢aa
em 1%, N N
mcocou
N m N
Q � 6U'
Q
O Oz_
Q O
CZ
^ a D
..
Q J
u Q
Qin
O
� L
L �
E
C�
1

O
t\
N
N
O
m
W
O o 0
u IL
l H
z N U-j
p W
z
Q Q
a
w
o
m N Q
J
Q
y Lf
a D
O �
N
u
Q
►`N
R.
N
0
O
O
IL
Q
lu
J
Q
w
2
M
0
LU
N
0 O
> �z
aC �
J
� Q
d U
oC O
O
8E O
co m
—
O W,
U
Nu't
u10O
O-�o<oN
Q
I— O
—
to
I— 3
Ln 00
m
w �--
m CD
0
IL II
U
N m
[�
m
o0Vm
cn�om
zo
oN
— >
II
0
omcn�
*Z
NN�
In
�e
mm
c0 N u
ap
z
U
w
-j088
Wi
—Nm
m
N N N
N
L N N
0 O
N =
W
W
W
W
Q
= In
U
0
Z
O
C3
p
Q
H
o�
2
w
D
tu

Hydraflow Table of Contents
POND ROUTING.gpw
Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for AutoCADO Civ113D® 2012 by Autodesk, Inc. v9 Monday, 00 19, 2012
Watershed Model Schematic................................................................................ I
HydrographReturn Period Recap....................................................................... 2
25 - Year
SummaryReport...................................................................................................................
3
HydrographReports...............................'.........................................................................
4
Hydrograph No. 1, SCS Runoff, NORTH PHD ...................................................................
4
Hydrograph No. 3, SCS Runoff, PHD - CSD......................................................................
5
Hydrograph No. 5, SCS Runoff, SOUTH CSD...................................................................
6
Hydrograph No. 7, Reservoir, S-CSD THRU POND..........................................................
7
Pond Report - SOUTH CSD......................................................................................... 8
Hydrograph No. 9, Reservoir, PHD-CSD POND..............................................................
10
PondReport - PHD - CSD...........................................................................................
11
Hydrograph No. 11, Reservoir, N. PHD POND................................................................
13
PondReport - NORTH PHD........................................................................................
14
OFReport............................................................................................................. is

Watershed Model SchematicHydraflowHydrographsExtension for AutoCADOCivil 3D®2012byAutodesKInc, v9
1
Legend
-H>f6-
Orlain
Description
1
SCS Runoff
NORTH PHD
I 3
SCS Runoff
PHD - CSD
I
5
SCS Runoff
SOUTH CSD
7
Reservoir
S-CSD THRU POND
9
Reservoir
PHD-CSD POND
11
Reservoir
N. PHD POND
Project POND ROUTING.gpw
Monday, 0019, 2012

2
Hydrograph Return Period a
reIlaydrographs Extension for AutoCAD9 Civil 3DO 2012 by Autodesk, Inc. v9
Hyd.
No.
Hydrograph
type
(origin)
Inflow
hyd(s)
Peak Outflow (cfs)
Hydrograph
Description
1-yr
2 yr
3-yr
5-yr
110-yr
2"r
50-yr
100-yr
1
SCS Runoff
---
-
----
-
-
56.73
---
—
NORTH PHD
3
SCS Runoff
---
-
--
-
-
-
128.74
—
---
I
PHD - CSD
5
SCS Runoff
i
--
-
---
--
-
-
101.94
—
—
SOUTH CSD
7
Reservoir
5
—
----
—
14.73
---
S-CSD THRU POND
9
Reservoir
3
—
—
—
—
0.000
- - -
--
PHD-CSD POND
11
Reservoir
1
---
-
-
- I
17.36
—
N. PHD POND
Proj. file: POND ROUTING.gpw
Monday, 0019, 2012

3
Hydrograph Summary Re po odraflow Hydrographs Extension forAutoCAD® Civil 3136 2012 by Autodesk, Inc. v9
Hyd.
No.
Hydrograph
type
(or)gin)
Peak
flow
(cis)
Time
interval
(min)
Time to
Peak
(min)
Hyd.
volume
(cuff)
Inflow
hyd(s)
Maximum
elevation
(ft)
Total
strge used
(cufo
Hydrograph
Description
1
SCS Runoff
56.73
2
760
III 458,381
---
-
--
NORTH PHD
I
3
SCS Runoff
I
128.74
2
754
I
957,607
i
—
I
—
I
PHD -CSD
5
SCS Runoff
101.94
2
722
270,348
----
SOUTH CSD
7
Reservoir
14.73
2
750
146,652
5
23.35
126,798
S-CSD THRU POND
9
Reservoir
0.000
2
n/a
0
;d.02
957,607
PHD-CSD POND
11
Reservoir
17.36
2
828
223.028
1
23.38
244,475
N. PHD POND
POND ROUTING.gpw
Return Period: 25 Year ! Monday, 0019, 2012

Hydrograph Report
Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension forAutoCADD Civil 3139 2012 by Autodesk, Inc. v9
Hyd. No. 1
NORTH PHD
Hydrograph type
= SCS Runoff
Peak discharge
Storm frequency
= 25 yrs
Time to peak
Time interval
= 2 min
Hyd. volume
Drainage area
= 45.100 ac
Curve number
Basin Slope
= 1.0 %
Hydraulic length
Tc method
= LAG
Time of conc. (Tc)
Total precip.
= 8.00 in
Distribution
Storm duration
= 24 hrs
Shape factor
Q (dsil
60.00
50.00
40.00
30.00
20.00
10.00
4
Monday, 00 19, 2012
= 56.73 cfs
= 760 min
= 458,381 cult
= 55
= 1175 ft
= 71.10 min
= Type II
= 484
Q (Cfs)
60.00
50.00
40.00
30.00
20.00
10.00
0.00 0.00
0 120 240 360 480 800 720 840 960 1080 1200 1320 1440 1560
---- Hyd No. 1 Time (min)

S
Hydrograph
Report
Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for AutoCADO Civil 3D® 2012 by Autodesk, Inc. v9
Monday, 00 19, 2012
Hyd. No. 3
PHD - CSD
Hydrograph type
= SCS Runoff
Peak discharge
= 128.74 cfs
Storm frequency
= 25 yrs
Time to peak
= 754 min
Time interval
= 2 min
Hyd. volume
= 957,607 cuft
Drainage area
= 95.350 ac
Curve number
= 55
Basin Slope
= 1.0 %
Hydraulic length
= 1040 ft
Tc method
= LAG
Time of conc. (Tc)
= 64.50 min
Total precip.
= 8.00 in
Distribution
= Type II
Storm duration
= 24 hrs
Shape factor
= 484
Q (cfs)
140.00
120.00
100.00
80.00
40.00
20.00
PHD - CSD
Hyd. No. 3 -- 25 Year
0.00 '
0 120 240 360 480 600
--•- Hyd No. 3
Q (cfs)
140.00
120.00
100.00
80.00
40.00
20.00
' i ' ' ' ' 0.00
720 840 960 1080 1200 1320 1440 1560
Time (min)

6
Hydrograph
Report
Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for AutoCAD® Civil 3D® 2012 by Autodesk, Inc. v9
Monday, 0019, 2012
Hyd. No. 5
SOUTH CSD
Hydrograph type
= SCS Runoff
Peak discharge
= 101.94 cfs
Storm frequency
= 25 yrs
Time to peak
= 722 min
Time interval
= 2 min
Hyd. volume
= 270,348 cuff
Drainage area
= 25.940 ac
Curve number
= 55
Basin Slope
= 1.0 %
Hydraulic length
= 1190 ft
Tc method
= KIRPICH
Time of conc. (Tc)
= 10.72 min
Total precip.
= 8.00 in
Distribution
= Type II
Storm duration
= 24 hrs
Shape factor
= 484
Q (cfs)
120.00
100.00
80.00
60.00
40.00
20.00
SOUTH CSD
Hyd. No. 5 — 25 Year
Q (Cfs)
120.00
100.00
40.00
20.00
0.00 1 1 1.. " 1 1 1 1- 0.00
0 120 240 360 460 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 1320 1440 1560
— Hyd No. 5 Time (min)

Hydrograph
Report
7
Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for AutoCAD® Civil 3D® 2012 by Autodesk, Inc. v9
Monday, 0019, 2012
Hyd. No. 7
S-CSD THRU POND
Hydrograph type
= Reservoir
Peak discharge
= 14.73 cfs
Storm frequency
= 25 yrs
Time to peak
= 750 min
Time interval
= 2 min
Hyd. volume
= 146,652 cuft
Inflow hyd. No.
= 5 -SOUTH CSD
Max. Elevation
= 23.35 ft
Reservoir name
= SOUTH CSD
Max. Storage
= 126,798 cuft
Storage Indication method used.
Q (cfs)
i 20.00 -
100.00
80.00
60.00
40.00
20.00
S-CSD THRU POND
Hyd. No. 7 — 25 Year
Q (cfs)
120.00
100.00
80.00
60.00
40.00
20.00
0.00 ' I 0.00
0 120 240 360 480 800 720 840 960 1080 1200 1320 1440 1560
Time (min)
— Hyd No. 7 — Hyd No. 5 Total storage used=126,798 cult

Pond Report $
Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for AutoCAD® Civil 3D® 2012 by Autodesk, Inc. v9
Monday, 00 19, 2012
Pond No. 5 - SOUTH CSD
Pond Data
Contours JAer-defined contour areas. Conic method used for volume calculation. Begining Elevation = 21.00 ft
Stage I Storage Table
stage (ft) Elevation (ft)
Contour area (sgft)
Inor. Storage (cult)
Total storage (tuft)
0.00 21.00
47,794
0
0
1.00 22.00
52,941
50,341
50,341
2.00 23.00
58,150
55,520
105,860
2.50 23.50
80,779
29,727
135,587
3.00 24.00
63,423
31,045
186,632
Culvert I Orifice Structures Weir Structures
[A] [B] [C] [Pd [A] [B] [C] [D]
Rise (in)
= 24.00
36.00
0.00
0.00
Crest Len (ft)
= 20.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Span (in)
= 24.00
36.00
0.00
0.00
Crest El. (ft)
= 23.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
No. Barrels
= 1
1
0
0
Weir Coeff.
= 2.60
3.33
3.33
3.33
Invert El. (ft)
= 20.21
22.06
0.00
0.00
Weir Type
= Broad
-
-
-
Length (ft)
= 100.00
100.00
0.00
0.00
Multi -Stage
= No
No
No
No
Slope (%)
= 0.00
0.00
0.00
n/a
N-Value
= .013
.013
.013
n/a
Orifice Coaff.
= 0.60
0.60
0.60
0.60
Exfll.(irt/hr)
= 0.000 (by Contour)
Multi -Stage
a n1c
No
No
No
TW Etay. ft
= 23.30
Notes CutverVOrittce outflows are enelyzed under Inlet (tc) end outlet (cc) Control. Weir deers dieckad for odes Condition (le) and submergence (s).
Stage I Storage I Discharge Table
Stage Storage Elevation Clv A CIV B Civ C PriRsr Wr A Wr B Wr C Wr D Exfll User Total
ft tuft ft cis cfs cfs cfs Cfs cis cis Clio cfe cfs cis
0.00
0
21.00
0.00
0.00 -
- 0.00 - -
0.10
5,034
21.10
0.00
0.00 -
- 0.00 - -
0.20
10,068
21.20
0.00
0.00 ---
- 0.00 - --
0.30
15,102
21.30
0.00
0.00 -
- 0.00 - -
0.40
20,136
21.40
0.00
0.00 -
-- 0.00 - -
0.50
25,170
21.60
0.00
0.00 -
--- 0.00
0.60
30,204
21.60
0.00
0.00 --
- 0.00 -
0.70
35,238
21.70
0.00
0.00 --
-- 0.00 - -
0.80
40,272
21.80
0.00
0.00 -
- 0.00 --
0.90
45,308
21.90
0.00
0.00 -
- 0.00 - --
1.00
50,341
22.00
0.00
0.00 --
-- 0.00 - -
1.10
55,893
22.10
0.00
0.00 --
- 0.00 -
1.20
61,444
22.20
0.00
0.00 ---
- 0.00 --
1.30
66,996
22.30
0.00
0.00 -
- 0.00 - --
1.40
72,548
22AO
0.00
0.00 -
- 0.00 -
1.50
78,10a
22.50
0.00
0.00 -
- 0.00 - -
1.60
83,652
22.60
0.00
0.00 -
-- 0.00 -- --
1.70
89,204
22.70
0.00
0.00 -
-- 0.00 - -
1.80
94,756
22.80
0.00
0.00 -
- 0.00 - -
1.90
100,308
22.90
0.00
0.00 -
- 0.00 --
2.00
105,860
23.00
0.00
0.00 -
- 0.00 - -
2.05
108,833
23.05
0.00
0.00 ---
- 0.00 - -
2.1.0
111,808
23.10
0.00
0.00 -
- 0.00 - -
2.15
114,778
23.15
0.00
0.00 -
- 0.00 -
2.20
117,751
23,20
0.00
0.00 -
- 0.00 -- --
2.25
120,724
23.25
0.00
0.00 -
- 0.00 - --
2.30
123,696
23.30
0.00
0.00 -
- 0.00 -
2.35
126,669
23.35
3.38 is
11.25 is -
- 0.00 - -
2.40
129,642
23.40
4.78 (c
12.04 is -
- 0.00 - -
2.45
132,614
23.45
5.86 Ic
12.88 is -
- 0.00 -- -
2.50
135,587
23.50
6.76 is
13.72 (c -
- 0.00 - -
2.55
138,692
23.55
7.56 is
14.57 is
- 0.58 - -
2.60
141,796
23.60
8.28 is
15.44 is -
- 1.64 - -
2.65
144,901
23.65
8.95 is
16.36 Ic -
- 3.02 - -
2.70
148,005
23.70
9.57 is
W.25 io -
- 4.66 - -
2.75
151,110
23.75
10.151c
18.161c -
- 6.50 - -
- - 0.000
- 0.000
- - -- 0.000
-- - 0.000
-- - 0.000
0.000
-- - - 0.000
- 0.000
0.000
- 0.000
-- 0.000
- - -- 0.000
- - 0.000
-- - - 0.000
- -- 0.000
- 0.000
- - -- 0.000
-- --- - 0.000
-- - - 0.000
- - - 0.000
- - - 0.000
- 0.000
0.000
0.000
- - 0.000
- -- 0.000
0.000
14.63
-- - 16.82
- - 18.74
20.48
- - - 22.71
25.37
28.32
- - 31.47
34.81
Continues on next page...

SOUTH CSD
Stage / Storage / Discharge Table
Stage
Storage
Elevation
ClvA
ft
cuft
ft
cfs
2.80
154.214
23.80
10.69 1s
2.85
157,319
23.85
11.22 is
2.90
160,423
23.90
11.721c
2.95
163,528
23.95
12.19 is
3.00
166,632
24.00
12.65 is
...ErW
Clv B Clv C
PrfRsr Wr A Wr B
Wr C Wr D Exfil User Total
cfs cis
cis cis cis
cis cfs efs efs cfs
19.11 is —
— 8.54 —
— — — -- 38.35
20.04 is —
— 10.77 —
— — — — 42.03
21.01 is —
-- 13.16 --
— -- -- 45.88
21.97 is —
— .15.70 --
— -- -- — 49.86
22.94 is —
— 18.38 --
-- — -- — 53.98

10
Hydrograph
Report
Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for AutoCAD® Civil 3138 2012 by Autodesk, Inc. v9
Monday, 0019, 2012
Hyd. No. 9
PHD-CSD POND
Hydrograph type
= Reservoir
Peak discharge
= 0.000 cfs
Storm frequency
= 25 yrs
Time to peak
= n1a
Time interval
= 2 min
Hyd. volume
= 0 cuft
Inflow hyd. No.
= 3 - PHD - CSD
Max. Elevation
= 23.02 ft
Reservoir name
= PHD - CSD
Max. Storage
= 957,607 cuff
Storage Indication method used.
Q (cfs)
140.00
120.00
iIIIIIIII7
80.00
60.00
40.00
20.00
PHD-CSD POND
Hyd. No. 9 -- 25 Year
Q (cfs)
140.00
120.00
100.00
80.00
40.00
20.00
0.00 0.00
0 120 240 360 480 600 720 •840 960 1080 1200 1320 1440 1560
Time (min)
— Hyd No. 9 — Hyd No. 3 FFFI l n Total storage used = 957,607 cult

Pond Report 11
Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension forAutoCAD® Civil 3D® 2012 by Autodesk, Inc. v9 Monday, 00 19,2012
Pond No. 3 - PHD - CSD
Pond Data
Contours -User-defined contour areas. Conic method used for volume calculation. Begining Elevation = 21,00 ft
Stage / Storage Table
Stage (ft) Elevation (ft) Contour area (sqft) Incr. Storage (cult) Total storage (cuff)
! 0.00
21.00
445,514
0
0
j 1.00
22.00
474,902
460,084
460,084
2.00
23.00
504,357
489,507
949,591
2.50
23.50
519,092
255,828
1,205,418
3.00
24.00
533,833
263,197
1.468,616
Culvert I Orifice Structures Weir Structures
[A]
[B]
[C]
IPrfRsri
[A]
[B]
[C]
IDl
Rise (in)
= 48.00
24.00
36.00
0.00
Crest Len (ft)
= 0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Span (In)
= 48.00
24.00
36.00
0.00
Crest El. (ft)
= 0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
No. Barrels
= 1
1
1
0
WeirCoeff.
= 3.33
3.33
3.33
3.33
Invert El. (ft)
= 17.39
20.21
22.06
0.00
Weir Type
= -
-
-
---
Length (ft)
= 100.00
100.00
100.00
0.00
Multi -Stage
No
No
No
No
Slope (%)
= 0.00
0.00
0.00
n/a
N Value
= .013
.013
.013
n/a
Orifice Coeff.
0.60
0.60
0.60
0.60
Exfil.(iNhr)
- 0.000 (by Contour)
Muitl dam
We
KID
Iva
KID
'J'W Elan. (ft)
- 23.30
Mote: CulveRlQAf ce "w a are analyzed under inlet pc) and oudot (ac) *antral. weir rivers ducked fororiflce conditions (ic) and sutxnsrpanoa (a).
Stage I Storage /
Discharge
Table
Stage
Storage
Elevation
Civ A
Civ B
Civ C PrMsr Wr A Wr B
Wr C Wr D Exfll User Total
ft
cuff
ft
cis
cis
efa afs cfs cfs
cis efs efs efa efe
0.00
0
21.00
0.00
0.00
0.00 - - -
-- - -- - 0.000
0.10
46,008
21.10
0.00
0.00
0.00 - -
- - - - 0.000
0.20
92,017
21.20
0.00
0.00
0.00 -- -
- -- - 0.000
0.30
138,025
21.30
0.00
0.00
0.00 --- -
--- --- -- - 0.000
0.40
184,034
21.40
0.00
0.00
0.00 - -- --
-- - -- 0.000
0.50
230,042
21.50
0.00
0.00
0.00 --
- - 0.000
0.60
276,050
21.60
0.00
0.00
0.00 -
- 0.000
0.70
322,059
21.70
0.00
0.00
0.00 - -
- -- - - 0.000
0.80
368,067
21.80
0.00
0.00
0.00 - -
- 0.000
0.90
414,075
21.90
0.00
0.00
0.00 - - -
- 0.000
1.00
460,084
22.00
0.00
0.00
0.00 - - -
- - 0.000
1.10
509,034
22.10
0.00
0:00
0.00 - - -
-- 0.000
1.20
567,986
22.20
0.00
0.00
0.00 - -
- - 0.000
1.30
606,936
22.30
0.00
0.00
0.00 - -- -
-- 0.000
1.40
655,887
22.40
0.00
0.00
0.00 - - -
-- - - -- 0.000
1.50
704,837
22.50
0.00
0.00
0.00 - - -
- - - - 0.000
1.60
763,788
22.60
0.00
0.00
0.00 - -
- 0.000
1.70
802,739
22.70
0.00
0.00
0.00 - - -
- - - - 0.000
1.80
851,689
22.80
0.00
0.00
0.00 - -
- -- - -- 0.000
1.90
900,640
22.90
0.00
0.00
0.00 -- -
- - - 0.000
2.00
949,591
23.00
0.00
0.00
0.00 - --- -
M_ - 0.000
2.06
975,173
23.05
0.00
0.00
0.00 --- - -
-- -- - - 0.000
2.10
1,000,756
23.10
0.00
0.00
0.00 - - -
- - - - 0.000
2.15
1,026,339
23.15
0.00
0.00
0.00 - -
- - - - 0.000
2.20
1,051,922
23.20
0.00
0.00
0.00 - - -
- - - - 0.000
2.25
1,077,505
23.25
0.00
0.00
0.00 - --
-- - - - 0.000
2.30
1,103.087
23.30
0.00
0.00
0.00 - -
- - - 0.000
2.36
1,128,670
23.36
13.53 is
3.3B is
11.25 is - - -
- - - 28.16
2.40
1,164,253
23.40
19.13 is
4.781c
12.04Ic - - -
- - -- 35.96
2.45
1,179.836
23.45
23.431c
5.861c
12.88 is - - -
- - - - 42.17
2.60
1,205,418
23.50
27.06 is
6.76 ie
13.72 ie - - -
- - - - 47.54
2.55
1,231,738
23.55
30.25 is
7.56 is
14.57 is - -- -
- - - 52.38
2.60
1,258,058
23.60
33.14 le
8.28 is
15.441c - - -
- - - 56.86
2.65
1,284,377
23.65
35.79 is
8.95-1c
16.36 is - - --
- - - - 61.10
2.70
1,310,697
23.70
38.26 is
9.67 is
17.25 )c - - -
- - - - 65.08
2.76
1,337,017
23.75
40.58 is
10.1510
18.1610 - - -
- - - - 68.89
Continues on nextpage...

PHD-CSD
Stage / Storage 1 Discharge Table
Stage
Storage
Elevation
Civ A
ft
cuft
ft
Cfs
2.80
1,363,336
23.80
42.78Ic
2.85
1,389,656
23.85
44.87Ic
2.90
1,415,975
23.90
46.86 !c
2.95
1,442,295
23.95
48.78 lc
3.00
1,468,615
24.W
50.62 is
...End
12
Clv B
Clv C PrfRsr Wr A
Wr B Wr C Wr D Exfil User Total
Cfs
cfs efs cis
Cfs Cfe cfs Cfs Cis efs
10.69 !c
19.11 !c -- —
— - -- — --- 72.59
11.22 is
20.04 is — —
— — — — 76.13
11.72 is
21.01 is -- --
- --- - - 79.58
12.19 is
21.97 Ic — --
— — --- --- — 82.94
12.65 is
22.94 !c - -
— -- — — 86.22

13
Hydrograph
Report
Hydraffow Hydrographs Extension forAutoCAD® Civil 31302012 by Autodesk, Inc. v9
Monday, 0019, 2012
Hyd. No. 11
N. PHD POND
Hydrograph type
= Reservoir
Peak discharge
= 17.36 cfs
Storm frequency
= 25 yrs
Time to peak
= 828 min
Time interval
= 2 min
Hyd. volume
= 223,028 cuft
Inflow hyd. No.
= 1 -NORTH PHD
Max. Elevation
= 23.38 ft
Reservoir name
= NORTH PHD
Max. Storage
= 244,475 cuft
Storage Indication method used.
61111101
40.00
30.00
20.00
10.00
0.00
0 120 240
-- Hyd No. 11
N. PHD POND
Hyd. No. 11 — 25 Year
360 480 600 720
Hyd No. 1
Q Oft)
ISOM
E flxlIf,
40.00
30.00
20.00
10.00
0.00
840 960 1080 1200 1320 1440 1560
Total storage used = 244,475 cult Time (min)

Pond Report 14
Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for AutoCADS Civil 3DO 2012 by Autodesk, Inc. v9 Monday, 0019, 2012
Pond No. 7 - NORTH PHD
Pond Data
Contours -User-defined contour areas. Conic method used for volume calculation. Regifti; Elevation = 21.00 ft
Stage / Storage Table
Stage (ft)
Elevation (ft)
Contour area (sgft)
Incr. Storage (cult)
Total storage (tuft)
0.uu
21.00
95,982
0
0
1.00
22.00
101,436
98,687
98,687
2.00
23.00
106,948
104,169
202,856
2.50
23.50
109,723
54,181
257,017
3.00
24.00
112,510
65,551
312.568
Culvert / Orifice Structures
Weir Structures
[A]
[BI
[C]
[PrfRsr]
[A]
[B]
[C]
[D]
Rise (in)
= 48.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Crest Len (ft)
- 0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Span (in)
= 48.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Coast El. (ft)
= 0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
No. Barrels
= 1
0
0
0
Weir Coeff.
= 3.33
3.33
3.33
3.33
Invert El. (ft)
17.39
0.00
0.00
0.00
Weir Type
= -
-
-
-
Length (ft)
100.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Multi -Stage
= No
No
No
No
Slope (%)
= 0.00
0.00
0.00
n/a
N Value
= .013
.013
.013
n/a
Orifice Coeff.
= 0.60
0.60
0.60
0.60
Exfll.(Inlhr)
= 0.000 (by Contour)
Multi -Stage
= n/a
No
No
No
TW Elev. (ft)
= 23.30
Note: CulvertfOrIDce wffi s are analyzed under inlet pc) and outlet (oc) control. weir dun ducMd for arlffce condrdons (Ic) and submargenoe (a).
Stage /
Storage /
Discharge
Table
Stage
Storage
Elevation
Clv A Clv B CIv C PrfRar Wr A Wr B
Wr C Wr D Exfll laser Total
ft
curt
ft
cfs cis cis eft Cfs eft
cfs efs cfs C% efs
0.00
0
21.00
0,00 -- - -- -
-- - - - 0.000
0.10
9,869
21.10
0.00 - - - -
- - -- -- 0.000
0.20
19,737
21.20
0.00 - -
- --- --- 0.000
0.30
2906
21.30
0.00 - - - -
- -- - 0.000
0.40
39,475
21.40
0.00 - - - -
- -- -- -- 0.000
0.50
49,343
21.50
0.00 -
- 0.000
0.60
59,212
21.60
0.00 - - - --
- - --- 0.000
0.70
69,081
21.70
0.00 - - - - --
- - - - 0.000
0.80
78,949
21.80
0.00 - - ---
- -- 0.000
0.90
88,818
21.90
0.00 - - --
- 0.000
1.00
98,687
22.00
0.00 - - -- - - -
- - - --- 0.000
1.10
109,104
22.10
0.00 - - -- - - -
- - -- -- 0.000
1.20
119,521
22.20
0.00 - -- - - -
- - - - 0.000
1.30
129,937
22.30
0.00 - -- - - -
- - - - 0.000
1.40
140,354
22.40
0.00 - - - -
- - - 0.000
1.50
150,771
22.60
0.00 -- - - - -
- -- - - 0.000
1.60
161,188
22.60
0.00 --- - - --
-- - - - 0.000
1.70
171,605
22.70
0.00 - - - _ -
_ _ _ _ 0.000
1.80
182,022
22.80
0.00 - -- - -- -
- - - - 0.000
1.90
192,439
22.90
0.00 --- - - - -
- - - -- 0.000
2.00
202,856
23.00
0.00 - - - - -
- -- --- - 0.000
2.05
208,272
23.06
0.00 - - - --- -
- - -- - 0.000
2.10
213,688
23.10
0.00 - - - - -
- - - -- 0.000
2.15
219,104
23.15
0.00 - - -- --
-- - --- -- 0.000
2.20
224,520
23.20
0.00 - -- -
- --- - -- 0.000
2.2E
229,937
23.25
0.00 - - - - -
- - - - - 0.000
2.30
235,353
23.30
0.00 - - -- -
- - - - -- 0.000
2.36
240,769
23.35
13.53 is - - - - -
- - - - 13.53
2.40
246,185
23.40
19.13 [o -
19.13
2.45
251,601
23.45
23.43 is ---- - -.. _
- - - - 23.43
2.50
257,017
23.50
27.06 is - - - -
- - - - 27.06
2.55
262,572
23.55
30.26Ic - - - - -
- - - - 30.25
2.60
268,127
23.60
33.14 is - - - -
- - - - 33.14
2.65
273,682
23.65
35.79 [c - - -- - -
- - - - 35.79
2.70
279,237
23.70
38.26 is - - - - -
- - - - 38.26
2.75
284,793
23.75
40.58 is -- - - - -
- - - - 40.58
Con0hues on next page...

w
NORTH PHD
Stage / Storage / Discharge Table
Stage
Storage
Elevation
Civ A Civ B Civ C PrFRsr Wr A
Wr B Wr C Wr D Exfil User Total
it
cult
ft
Cfs oft Cfs Cfs Cfs
Cfs Cfa CfS Cfs Cfs CfS
2.80
290,348
23.80
42.781c -- -- - -
--- --- --- --- --- 42.78
2.85
295,903
23.85
44.87 IC - --- --- -
-- - 44.87
2.90
301,458
23.90
46.86 is -- --- ---
--- - - - - 46.86
2.95
307,013
23.95
48.78 iC - --- --- -
- - 48.78
3.00
312,568
24.00
50.62 is — — — --
— -- - — - 50.62
...End

Hydraflow Rainfall Report
16
Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for AutoCAD® Civil 3DO 2012 by Autodesk, Inc. v9 Monday, 00 19, 2012
Return
Period
(Yrs)
Intensitv-Duratlon-Frequency Equation Coefficients (FHA)
IS
D
E
(NIA)
1
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
---
2
52.4381
10.7000
0.8910
-- -
3
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
5
50.7701
9.3000
0.8202
10
52.1525
8.8000
0.7917
- ------
25
48.0406
7.5000
0.7364
50
43.3749
6.3000
0.6891
--------
100
42.7260
5.8000
0.6641
File name: Tsays Valley.IDF
Intensity = B ! (Tc + D)AE
Return
Period
Intensity Values (In/hr)
(Yrs)
5 min
10
15
20
26
30
35
40
46
50
55
60
1
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
2
4.51
3.53
2.91
2.48
2.17
1.93
1.74
1.59
1.46
1.35
1.26
1.18
3
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
5
5.73
4.48
3.71
3.18
2.80
2.50
2.27
2.08
1.92
1.78
1.67
1.57
10
6.53
5.11
4.24
3.65
3.21
2.88
2.62
2.40
2.22
2.07
1.94
1.83
25
7.48
5.84
4.85
4.18
3.70
3.33
3.04 '
2.80
2.80
2.43
2.29
2.16
50
8.18
6.34
5.27
4.56
4.04
3.65
3.34
3.09
2.88
2.70
2.54
2A1
100
8.80
6.83
5.69
4.93
4.39
3.97
3.64
3.37
3.15
2.96
2.79
2.65
Tc = time in minutes. Values may exceed 60.
Pnw-ln No nemo• C-Welf mnvo Ama nnlio 9M ownnFKiR-nwn a wnu 9SVR ......
Storm
Rainfall Precipitation Table (in)
Distribution
1-yr
2-yr
3 yr
6 yr
10-yr
26-yr
50-yr
100-yr
SCS 24-hour
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
8.00
0.00
0.00
SCS o-Hr
` 0.00
10.00
10.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00 I
I Huff -1st
10.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
! 0.00
0.00 1
Huff-2nd
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Muff-3rd
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Huff-4th
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Huff-lndy
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Custom
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00

Lewis,Unda
From:
Lewis,Linda
Sent:
Wednesday, February 15, 2012 5:15 PM
To:
'Chris Stephens'
Cc:
Scott, Georgette
Subject:
RE: The Lakes... Magnolia Greens
Thanks for the flashboard riser plans, Chris. I was really hoping to get a copy of the approved one and a copy
of an approval letter from Rhonda. The detail is not something that I would have approved as there is nothing
to support the flashboard structure — it is set into "backfill" only. I am glad to hear that you and Carver are
looking at alternatives to make that outlet device more permanent while being able to keep the emergency
drain function in preparation for large rain events.
Just so you know, Melissa Juhan and her husband Chuck have asked Greg Thompson, P.E., Southern
Engineering, to look into the flooding issue. I spoke with Greg today and he had a few questions that, when
answered, might have a bearing on this project. I'll be speaking to my supervisor about his questions this
week.
He reminded me that the permit is an "alternative" design which doesn't allow for the creation of nuisance
conditions. He is pushing me to consider the occasional flooding at the intersection at Trail Pines Court and
Morning View Way as a "nuisance condition". He also asked me why this was not a permit violation.
Technically, this pond should be able to accommodate any rain event up to and including 8" under normal
antecedent wetness conditions without any part of it staging beyond the 23.5 temporary pool elevation.
The flooding may also be due to the size of and/or the condition of the equalization pipes. This non -discharge
system was presented to us for permitting with the understanding that the water levels would rise and fall as
one. If the equalization pipes are not sized to allow that, I believe Greg might have a point. Greg is pushing for
us to require the engineer to prove that the equalization pipes are adequately sized to keep the water level in
the three upper pond areas equal with the lower pond areas. He proposed that the engineer perform a
hydraulic grade line analysis to see where the highest stage is occurring. Greg also thought a possible
temporary fix could be to add another pump in those 3 upper pond areas to keep them from staging up too
high. This pump would pump into the lower pond areas and not into the irrigation system.
Greg also expressed some concern about the ability of the HOA to access the irrigation system lines in the
fairways to maintain them in the event that the golf course is abandoned or defunct. You know that the
permitted BMP "system" has to be in a recorded easement or common area. Greg wants us to consider the
golf course irrigation lines as part of the "system" because it is a vital part of the permitted drawdown
mechanism for the pond. The HOA needs to be able to access the irrigation system for maintenance should
that become necessary. Alternatively, if the golf course is abandoned or defunct, the HOA could just propose
to convert the pond to a normal discharging pond, which would require the addition of a vegetated shelf,
forebays, orifice, etc.
Greg was also concerned about the ability of the pump to draw down the pond's volume in 2-5 days. For
whatever reason, we don't have any pump design calculations or pump curves in our files to judge whether the
pump is adequate or not to provide the necessary drawdown time. Can you oblige me with a copy of those
calculations?
Thanks,
Linda Lewis
NC Division of Water Quality
127 Cardinal Drive Ext.
Wilmington, NC 28405
910-796-7215

E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may
be disclosed to third parties.
From: Chris Stephens [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2012 3:40 PM
To: Lewis,Linda
Subject: The Lakes... Magnolia Greens
Linda:
Great to talk with you yesterday regarding Magnolia Greens and the overall transition we are
beginning this year with permits and the official HOA stuff.
You had mentioned that the pond outlet repairs/maintenance was the most important matter of the
inspection items you listed in your 2/10/2012 letter. Also you were unable to locate the plan that went
with the weir or flashboard riser outlet system.
I have discussed with Carver Wilson, our field supervisor, to quickly look at the outlet and repair the
existing design so that it is functioning properly so that the pond retains the proper level. We may
further redesign this outlet pending the ongoing debate of the need to have an un-required pond
draining mechanism to react to threatening flood level rains. Apparently the Public Works department
at Leland removed the flash -boards pre -Irene last fall and they have not been replaced. Like you and
I discussed, a more permanent structure may be the answer. I have just leaned that the Golf Course
has suggested that since they can pump this lake down for a storm event by transferring the water to
other ponds on the course that are not storm treatment ponds thereby eliminating the need to lose the
water completely. We will try to make "the most" happy with this.
1 did find my copy of the plan revision sheet that details the flash -board riser... not much to it. The
cover letter states that this outlet structure was approved as a plan revision and that a permit revision
was not necessary. See attachments .... I can get you a full page copy of this if this scan is
inadequate.
We have advised the property manager, CEPCO, to ask the maintenance crews to identify any bare
spots of vegetation and re -grass those as necessary.
While we are there with the outlet repair we will review the pond depths at the cross over pipes under
Cornerstone drive. I actually looked at this yesterday myself but there was too much algae in that
particular area to see the real bottom.
The gravel check dam is the previous location of the outlet dam for the pond system. It was left in
place to keep the main lake from completely draining during the flash -board riser construction. It
remains at lower than the 23.5 outlet design. No problem to remove it... but it doesn't impede water
flow above the 23.5 mark .... my guess it's at 21 or 22.
I am working on the deed restrictions list of recorded book and page numbers for you .... a number of
amendments!
Thank you,
Chris

W. Chris Stephens
Landmark Companies
910-392-7201 office
910-350-0610 fax
910-540-9714 cell
PO Box 4127
Wilmington. NC 28406

i
e
2114,A6
z
Is
Apt
oil
,,Qaa22e��iit Q
E
%I
I
as
r,w
I 1
I I
I I
I •.,, I
IK,
I
I
I
I
I
I
� I
I
I
I
11
II I
I
I I
I I
I npy I
I I
I I
I
I I
I I

3V
1
LL
to J
0
V)
4
4
}
Vf
Q
w
Of
}L
1L1
Cl
V
iJv}
Q
(ti�lloi
1
Fs i
W
W
C')
V U
00
lz
{� - A N
to - u
wow

'ZI
!
AN
lei

North Carolina Secretary of State
Page 1 of 2
North Carolina
Elaine F !Marshall DEPARTMENT OF THE
Secretary SECRETARY OF STATE
PO Box 29622 Raleigh, NC 27626-0622 [phone]
Date: 2/10/2012
Click here to:
View Document Filings 1 Sign
Up for E-Notifications j
J Print apre-populated Annual
Report Form I File an Annual Report
Corporation Names
Name
Name Type
NC LANDMARK
DEVELOPERS, INC.
LEGAL
NC GPS, INC.
PREV LEGAL
Business Corporation Information
SOSID:
0297295
Status:
Current -Active
Effective Date:
12/6/1991
Annual Report Due
Date:
Citizenship:
DOMESTIC
State of Inc.:
NC
Duration:
PERPETUAL
Annual Report Status:
CURRENT
Registered Agent
Agent Name:
STEPHENS, B REX
Office Address:
Mailing Address: PO BOX 4127
WILMINGTON NC 28406
Principal Office
Office Address: 5022 WRIGHTSVILLE AVE
WILMINGTON NC 28403-7044
Mailing Address:
P O BOX 4127
WILMINGTON NC 28406
Officers
PRESIDENT
Name:
W CHRISTOPHER STEPHENS
Business Address:
P O BOX 4127
WILMINGTON NC 28406
Title: SECRETARY
Name: B REX STEPHENS
Business Address: P O BOX 4127
WILMINGTON NC 28406
Title: VICE PRESIDENT
Name: KEVIN MCCARTHY
Business Address: P O BOX 4127
WILMINGTON NC 28406
http://www.secretary.state.nc.us/corporations/Corp.aspx?Pitemld=4951848 2/10/2012

North Carolina Secretary of State Page 2 of 2
Class Shares No Par Value Par Value
COMMON 1000000 1
This website is provided to the public as a part of the Secretary of State Knowledge Base (SOSKB) system. Version:
2139
http://www.secretary.state.nc.us/corporations/Corp.aspx?PitemId=4951848 2/10/2012

CD-479 (42) Business Corporation North Carolina An
11-22-10
This report may be filed online at the Secretary of State website: www.1
SOSED: 0297295
Date Filed: 4125/20112:59:00 PM
Elaine F. Marshall
North Carolina Secretary of State
z CA201119200146
Name of Bus. Corporation: LANDMARK DEVELOPERS, INC.
Fiscal Year Ending: 12 31 10 3tate oif incorporation: NC
Month / Day ! Year
Secretary of State ID Number: 0297295
n I hereby certify that an annual report completed in its entirety has been submitted and the information requested below (required by
L I NCGS 55-16-22) has not changed and is therefore complete.
Nature of Business: REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT
Registered Agent: B REX STEPHENS
Registered Office Mailing Address: 5022. WRIGHTSVILLE AVENUE
County; NEW HANOVER City: WILMINGTON State: NC zip Code: 2 8 4 0 3
Registered Office street Address: PO BOX 4127
County: NEW HANOVER City: WILMINGTON State: NC zip Code; 28406
Signature of New Registered Agent:
(Signature constitutes consent to the appointment)
Principal Office Telephone Number. 910 - 3 9 2 W 7 2 01
Principal Office Mailing Address; PO BOX 4127
City- WILMINGTON state: NC zip Code: 2 8 4 0 6
Principal Office Street Address: 5022 WRIGHTSVILLE AVENUE
City: WILMINGTON State: NC zipCode:28403
Name, Tide, and Business Address of Principal Officers;
Name: W CHRISTOPHER STEPHENS Title: PRESIDENT
Address: PO BOX 4127
City: WILMINGTON State: NC Tip: 2 8 4 0 6
Name: B REX STEPHENS Title: SECRETARY
Address: PO BOX 4127
City: WILMINGTON State: NC zfp: 28406
Name: KEVIN L MCCARTHY Title: TREASURER
Address: PO BOX 4127
City: WILMINGTON State: NC zip: 28406
--• •ter ^• %---• - -ap-au uy all ousmeas Wrporations).
a4 M-41 Z. t9
Signature (Form must be s' ned by an officer of corporation)
B REX STEPHENS_
Type or Print Name
5F-CRl 1-Al2y
Title

Lewis,Linda
From: Lewis,Linda
Sent: Friday, February 10, 2012 11:27 AM
To: 'Melissa Juhan'
Cc: [e-mail]
Subject: The Lakes at Magnola Greens SW8 000220
Melissa:
You'll be glad to know that the compliance inspection of this project was conducted yesterday. You'll be even
more glad to know that the compliance situation is not nearly as dire as you thought it might be. I inspected 7
aspects of the project, as I gleaned from our conversations and meetings:
The emergency outlet is in a state of disrepair and appears to be allowing runoff to escape through the
riprap, around and under the existing flashboard riser structure. Additionally, the elevation of the top
board does not appear to be at the correct elevation of 23.5. 1 say this based on the fact that due to the
dry weather, the water level was down about a foot, so that means there should have been about 3.5'
of clearance between the water surface and the top board elevation. There was maybe 2 feet at the
most.
2. 1 think most of what you've been seeing as "erosion" on the slopes is actually just the exposed pond
slope below the normal water line. The dry weather has caused the water elevation to drop about a
foot, exposing the slopes below. This can lead to undercutting and erosion, which has occurred in 2
places. The slopes below the normal water level (21.0 fmsl) are not regulated by the permit. I found the
slopes above the normal water level to be close enough to 3:1 in most areas, and only two or three
isolated areas with steeper slopes. I also found the vegetation on the slopes for the most part, to be
more than adequate. There were some bare spots and sparse vegetation on the fairway side of the
pond between Pine Harvest Drive and Cornerstone Drive that could be beefed up somewhat.
3. The fairway area between Davis Court and Morning View Way was apparently extended across a
portion of the pond, filling it in. This created a smaller pond area which has been connected to the
larger ponds on either side of it via equalization pipes under the fairway. However, another area of the
pond next to Cornerstone Drive was expanded beyond the limits shown on the plans, so the two areas
probably cancel each other out. What was taken away in one area may have been provided for in
another.
4. The pond's depth may be in question. I observed lots of shallow vegetation on the bottom near the
banks, so it could be that the silt has accumulated to the point that it needs to be removed. Only a
canoe trip into the middle of the pond with a measuring device will provide confirmation of the actual
depths.
5. 1 was able to visually observe all equalization pipes. Because the water level was low and it was clear, I
could see the pipes. The tops were not covered over with sediment, but that doesn't mean sediment
hasn't accumulated in them. It is possible that even if the sediment is removed from the pipes, the
water levels during a rain event and for a few hours afterward might not be exactly the same, but I
believe that they do eventually equalize. It depends of course, on the size of the individual pond, and on
how much runoff each individual area receives. If a relatively smaller pond, like the pond off of Morning
View Way, receives a disproportionately large share of runoff, it is possible that the water level in the
smaller pond might jump up higher than the other adjacent larger ponds for a time. Unless the water
level gets so high that it starts bypassing the pond completely, I can't consider this a permit violation or
a compliance issue at this time. The term bypassing means that the runoff that should be entering the
pond goes somewhere else. It's not an ideal situation, but it's not a permit violation for it to stand in the
yards or in the streets within the drainage area for a while until the water level in the smaller pond

reaches equilibrium with the larger pond. There's really no other place for it to go, as this pond is the
only drainage outlet available. When the HOA becomes the permittee, they would be free to add more
equalization pipes between the ponds at different elevations, or upsize the existing ones. A more
expensive option would be to remove the road fill and bridge the span of open water or replace the
pipes with large box culverts. Both options would allow full and unrestricted free flow of water between
the ponds, and possibly eliminate or reduce the flooding.
6. The small pond off of Trail Pines Court, in the power line right-of-way, does not appear to be connected
to the permitted pond system in any way. I walked the perimeter of the pond and could not find any
evidence of a piped connection anywhere. My best guess is that if this pond were to overflow, there are
2 possible directions it could go. One would be into the nearest golf course pond between Fairways 11
and 14, or into the adjacent street (Trail Pines Court). If it were to get into the street, then the catch
basins and piping in Trail Pines Court would convey it to the permitted pond, which would be a permit
violation. However, the grade in that area suggests that the overflow will most likely go into the closest
golf course pond first. We may need to revisit the site during a flooding event to verify the direction of
overflow. It appears that it would have to overcome a lot of grade difference to get into the permitted
pond or into the street. Although I find the situation of an impoundment of water with no outlet to be a
potential flooding nuisance, it is not a permit violation until some proof is offered that it overflows into
the permitted pond or into the street. I cannot base permit violations on allegations.
7. The pond levels appeared to be pretty equal to me. Sometimes the eye can be fooled in this regard
because the top elevation of the pond slope in one pond on one side of the road may be higher than
the top elevation of the pond slope in the pond on the other side of the road, giving the illusion that the
water level is lower in the pond with the higher slope elevation. Of course, only an as -built survey can
confirm that, but to my experienced eye, I saw no problem with the current water levels. Please refer to
item #5 for a more detailed discussion of this issue.
I think that should address your seven major concerns. The inspection report will be mailed to Landmark today
and should be available to the public by the end of next week.
Linda Lewis
NC Division of Water Quality
127 Cardinal Drive Ext.
Wilmington, NC 28405
910-796-7215
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may
be disclosed to third parties.

��*
NCDE
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Charles Wakild, P. E. Dee Freeman
Governor Director Secretary
February 10, 2012
Chris Stephens, President
Landmark Developers, Inc.
PO Box 4127
Wilmington, NC 28406
Subject: NOTICE OF INSPECTION
The Lakes at Magnolia Greens
Stormwater Permit No. SW8 000220
CI'Ir15 Brunswick County
Dear Mrr., hens:
On February 9, 2012, Linda Lewis of the Wilmington Regional Office of the Division of Water
Quality (DWQ) inspected The Lakes at Magnolia Greens off of Highway 17, Belville/Leland, in
Brunswick County to determine compliance with Stormwater Management Permit Number SW8
000220 issued on May 12, 2005. DWQ file review and site inspection revealed that the site is
not in compliance with the terms and conditions of this permit. Please find a copy of the
completed form entitled "Compliance Inspection Report" attached to this letter, which
summarizes the findings of the recent inspection.
As indicated in the attached inspection report, the following deficiencies must be resolved:
1. Provide a copy of the recorded deed restrictions specific to this area of Magnolia
Greens.
2. Due to changes in the pond's surface area, provide an as -built survey of the pond and
revised calculations to demonstrate that the minimum required surface area and volume
have been provided.
3. Check the pond's depth for sediment accumulation and remove any accumulated silt
such that the four (4) foot design depth is provided and such that the equalization pipes
can function more effectively to maintain equal water levels between the connected
ponds.
4. Repair the flashboard riser outlet structure to keep runoff in the pond. The top board
must be set at the temporary pool elevation of 23.5.
5. The August 2007 plan revision is not in our files. Please provide a copy of the proposed
plans that were submitted for approval. This is not a compliance issue, but rather an
issue of lost records on our part.
6. Overall, the vegetation was very good. A few bare spots and sparsely vegetated areas of
the pond slopes need attention.
7. Restore the outlet ditch leading from the outlet structure. It is partially blocked off due to
sediment accumulation, and the slopes are in extremely poor condition.
8. A gravel check dam has been added across the narrow arm of the pond just before the
outlet structure. What is the purpose of this check dam?
Wilmington Regional Office
127 Cardinal Drive Extension, Wilmington, North Carolina 28405 One
Phone: [phone] FAX [phone] DENR Assistance:1-877-623-6748 NO Carolina
Internet: www.nciMerqualky.org dura!!r�
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Acton Employer

Mr. Stephens
February 10, 2012
SW8 000220
Please inform this Office in writing before March 10, 2012, of the specific actions that will be
undertaken and the time frame that will be required to correct the deficiencies. Failure to provide
the requested information, or to respond to this letter by the due date, may initiate enforcement
action including the assessment of civil penalties of up to $25,000 per day. If a written plan of
action is not submitted to this office by March 10, 2012, then DWQ staff will re -inspect the site
and issue a Notice of Violation if the listed deficiencies have not been addressed.
Please be reminded that if you are planning to turn over the pond to the HOA, it is your
responsibility to submit a completed and signed Name/Ownership Change form to the Division
prior to the turnover. After these deficient items are addressed, the Division will conduct a follow-
up inspection to determine the status of compliance. The project must be in compliance before
the permit is transferred to the HOA. If you have any questions, please contact me at the
Wilmington Regional Office, telephone number [phone], via email at
linda.lewisCcD-ncdenr.gov.
ti i4z;�4u
ncerely,
Linda Lewis
Environmental Engineer III
Enc: Compliance Inspection Report
GDS/arl: S:1WQS1Stormwater\Permits & Projects120001000220 HD12012 02 CEI_deficient 000220
cc: Karen Higgins, WBS-CPU
Davis Fennell, P.E., Coastline Engineering
WiRO Stormwater File
DWQ Central Files
Page 2 of 2

Compliance Inspection Report
Permit: SW8000220 Effective: 05/12/05 Expiration: 05/12/15 Owner: Landmark Developers Inc
Project: Magnolia Greens Patio Homes II
County: Brunswick NC Hwy L7
Region: Wilmington
Belville NC 28451
Contact Person: Bert Exum
Title: President
Phone: [phone]
Directions to Project:
Located along the north right-of-way on Hwy 17 approx. 1000 ft. Northeast of the Hwy 17 and Lanvale Road interseciton.
Type of Project: State Stormwater - HD - Detention Pond
Drain Areas: 1 - (lackeys Creek) (03-06-17 ) ( C;Sw)
On -Site Representative(s):
Related Permits:
SW8970104 Landmark Developers Inc - Magnolia Greens Golfcourse Master Plan
SW8020522 Landmark Developers Inc - Glendale at Magnolia Greens
SW8990628 Landmark Developers Inc - Fairway Village At Magnolia Greens
Inspection Date: 02/09/2012 Entry Time: 12:45 PM
Primary Inspector: Alida R Lewis
Secondary Inspector(s):
Reason for Inspection: Complaint
Permit Inspection Type: State Stormwater
Facility Status: Q Compliant ■ Not Compliant
Question Areas:
0 State Stormwater
(See attachment summary)
Exit Time: 02:15 PM
Phone: [phone]
Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Page: 1

Permit: SW8000220 Owner - Project: Landmark Developers Inc
Inspection Date: 02/09/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Complaint
Inspection Summary:
The following deficiencies were noted:
1. A copy of the recorded deed restrictions for this section of Magnolia Greens has not been submitted.
2. The pond surface area has changed due to a reduction in area in one part and an increase in surface area in another
part.
3. The pond's depth needs to be checked to make sure accumulated ailt has not reduced the pond's depth below 4 feet.
4. The condition of the outlet structure and the elevation of the flashboard riser appears to allow runoff to escape the pond
prior to reaching its storage elevation of 23.5.
5. The plan revision that was submitted in August 2007 is not in the file.
6. Vegetation on the slopes is good in most places, but there are some bare spots and some sparsely vegetated places
that need attention.
7. The outlet ditch leading from the pond is in extremely poor condition.
8. A gravel check dam has been added across the arm of the pond that leads to the outlet structure.
9. The equalization pipes may need to be cleaned out and the accumulated silt removed to facilitate equal water levels.
To bring this system into compliance, please address the following:
1. Submit a copy of the recorded deed restrictions.
2. Submit an as -built survey of the pond and revised calculations demonstrating that the minimum required surface area
and volume have been provided.
3. Check the pond for any sediment accumulation and remove as required to maintain a 4 foot depth.
4. Repair the outlet structure to design condition and keep the top board in the riser at the correct elevation. It is
suggested that a more functional, stable and accessible outlet structure be provided.
5. Submit a copy of the approved August 2007 plans and a copy of the plan revision approval letter.
6. Provide permanent vegetation on the bare spots and sparsely vegetated areas.
7. Restore the outlet ditch - remove sediment, provide 3:1 side slopes, and vegetate the slopes.
8. Provide the purpose of the gravel check dam.
9. Clean out the sediment from the equalization pipes.
Page: 2

Permit: SW8000220 Owner - Project: Landmark Developers Inc
Inspection Date: 02/09/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
File Review
Is the permit active?
Signed copy of the Engineer's certification is In the file?
Signed copy of the Operation & Maintenance Agreement is in the file?
Copy of the recorded deed restrictions is in the file?
Comment: 1. A copy of the recorded deed restrictions for this area of Magmolia
Greens has not been submitted.
SW Measures
Are the SW measures constructed as per the approved plans?
Are the inlets located per the approved plans?
Are the outlet structures located per the approved plans?
Reason for Visit: Complaint
Comment: 2. The surface area of the pond appears to differ from the approved plan.
In one area, adjacent Morning View Way, a portion of the pond has been filled to
accommodate the golf course fairway and a cart path, resulting in the loss of surface
area and volume. Further southeast, adjacent Cornerstone Drive, it appears that pond
area has been added behind the fairway.
Operation and Maintenance
Are the SW measures being maintained and operated as per the permit requirements?
Yes No NA HE
Yes No NA NE
0000
Yes No NA NE
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Are the SW BMP inspection and maintenance records complete and available for review or provided to DWQ ❑ ❑ ❑ ■
upon request?
Comment: 3. The pond's depth may be in question. A lot of shallow vegetation could
be seen.
4. The outlet stucture is not faring well. This structure is allowing the runoff in the pond
to drain through, around and under the flashboard riser. The structure must hold back
the runoff in the pond up to elevation 23.5. The top board did not appear to be set at
the proper elevation. The water level was down 1 foot, so at the time of this inspection
there should have been at least 3.5 feet from the water surface to the top board
elevation. There was only 1.5-2 feet.
5. A plan revision was delivered to DWQ on August 3, 2007 with details of the modified
outlet structure. However, neither these plans nor an approval letter can be located. I
need to get a copy of that 2007 approved plan and a copy of the approval letter.
6. The vegetation on the slopes is very good in most places. There are a few areas
where the grass is sparse and bare spots are evident.
Other WQ Issues
Yes No NA NE
Page: 3

Permit: SW8000220 Owner - Project: Landmark Developers Inc
Inspection Date: 02/09/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Is the site compliant with other water quality issues as noted during the inspection?
Reason for Visit: Complaint
Comment: 7. The outlet ditch after the flashboard riser is in extremely poor condition.
The slopes are nearly vertical and extremely eroded, there's no vegetation on the
slopes and there's a lot of silt accumulated in the ditch, which has partially blocked it off.
8. A gravel check dam has been added across the narrrow channel that leads to the
outlet structure.
9. The tops of most of the equalization pipes were visually located. These pipes may
need to be cleaned out of any accumulated sediment to facilitate "equalization" of the
water levels in the various connected ponds.
❑ ■ O ❑
Page: 4

Compliance Inspection Report
Permit: SW8000220 Effective: 05/12/05 Expiration: 05/12/15 Owner: Landmark Developers Inc
Project: Magnolia Greens Patio Homes II
County: Brunswick NC Hwy L7
Region: Wilmington
Belville NC 28451
Contact Person: Bert Exum Title: President Phone: [phone]
Directions to Project:
Located along the north right-of-way on Hwy 17 approx. 1000 ft. Northeast of the Hwy 17 and Lanvale Road interseciton.
Type of Project: State Stormwater - HD - Detention Pond
Drain Areas: 1 - (Jackeys Creek) (03-06-17 ) ( C;Sw)
On -Site Representative(s):
Related Permits:
SW8970104 Landmark Developers Inc - Magnolia Greens Golfcourse Master Plan
SW8020522 Landmark Developers Inc - Glendale at Magnolia Greens
SW8990628 Landmark Developers Inc - Fairway Village At Magnolia Greens
Inspection Date: 02/09/2012 Entry Time: 12:45 PM Exit Time: 02:15 PM
Primary Inspector: Alicia R Lewis Phone: [phone]
Secondary Inspector(s):
Reason for Inspection: Complaint Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Permit Inspection Type: State Stormwater
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant IN Not Compliant
Question Areas:
0 State Stormwater
(See attachment summary)
Page: 1

Permit: SW8000220 Owner - Project: Landmark Developers Inc
Inspection Date: 02/0912012 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Complaint
Inspection Summary:
The following deficiencies were noted:
1. A copy of the recorded deed restrictions for this section of Magnolia Greens has not been submitted.
2. The pond surface area has changed due to a reduction in area in one part and an increase in surface area in another
part.
3. The pond's depth needs to be checked to make sure accumulated ailt has not reduced the pond's depth below 4 feet.
4. The condition of the outlet structure and the elevation of the flashboard riser appears to allow runoff to escape the pond
prior to reaching its storage elevation of 23.5.
5. The plan revision that was submitted in August 2007 is not in the file.
6. Vegetation on the slopes is good in most places, but there are some bare spots and some sparsely vegetated places
that need attention.
7. The outlet ditch leading from the pond is in extremely poor condition.
8. A gravel check dam has been added across the arm of the pond that leads to the outlet structure.
9. The equalization pipes may need to be cleaned out and the accumulated silt removed to facilitate equal water levels.
To bring this system into compliance, please address the following:
1. Submit a copy of the recorded deed restrictions.
2. Submit an as -built survey of the pond and revised calculations demonstrating that the minimum required surface area
and volume have been provided.
3. Check the pond for any sediment accumulation and remove as required to maintain a 4 foot depth.
4. Repair the outlet structure to design condition and keep the top board in the riser at the correct elevation. It is
suggested that a more functional, stable and accessible outlet structure be provided.
5. Submit a copy of the approved August 2007 plans and a copy of the plan revision approval letter.
6. Provide permanent vegetation on the bare spots and sparsely vegetated areas.
7. Restore the outlet ditch - remove sediment, provide 3A side slopes, and vegetate the slopes.
8. Provide the purpose of the gravel check dam.
9. Clean out the sediment from the equalization pipes.
Page: 2

Permit: SW8000220 Owner - Project: Landmark Developers Inc
Inspection Date: 02/09/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
File Review
Is the permit active?
Signed copy of the Engineer's certification is in the file?
Signed copy of the Operation & Maintenance Agreement is in the file?
Copy of the recorded deed restrictions is in the file?
Comment: 1. A copy of the recorded deed restrictions for this area of Magmolia
Greens has not been submitted.
SW Measures
Are the SW measures constructed as per the approved plans?
Are the inlets located per the approved plans?
Are the outlet structures located per the approved plans?
Reason for Visit: Complaint
Comment: 2. The surface area of the pond appears to differ from the approved plan.
In one area, adjacent Morning View Way, a portion of the pond has been filled to
accommodate the golf course fairway and a cart path, resulting in the loss of surface
area and volume. Further southeast, adjacent Cornerstone Drive, it appears that pond
area has been added behind the fairway.
Operation and Maintenance
Are the SW measures being maintained and operated as per the permit requirements?
Vac Mn Ale MF
Yes No NA NE
D■DD
■D00
Yae Mn MA MF
D■DD
Are the SW BMP inspection and maintenance records complete and available for review or provided to DWQ ❑ ❑ D ■
upon request?
Comment: 3. The pond's depth may be in question. A lot of shallow vegetation could
be seen.
4. The outlet stucture is not faring well. This structure is allowing the runoff in the pond
to drain through, around and under the flashboard riser. The structure must hold back
the runoff in the pond up to elevation 23.5. The top board did not appear to be set at
the proper elevation. The water level was down 1 foot, so at the time of this inspection
there should have been at least 3.5 feet from the water surface to the top board
elevation. There was only 1.5-2 feet.
5. A plan revision was delivered to DWQ on August 3, 2007 with details of the modified
outlet structure. However, neither these plans nor an approval letter can be located. I
need to get a copy of that 2007 approved plan and a copy of the approval letter.
6. The vegetation on the slopes is very good in most places. There are a few areas
where the grass is sparse and bare spots are evident.
Other WQ Issues
Yes No NA NE
Page: 3

Permit: SW8000220 Owner - Project: Landmark Developers Inc
Inspection Date: 02109/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Is the site compliant with other water quality issues as noted during the inspection?
Reason for Visit: Complaint
Comment: 7. The outlet ditch after the flashboard riser is in extremely poor condition.
The slopes are nearly vertical and extremely eroded, there's no vegetation on the
slopes and there's a lot of silt accumulated in the ditch, which has partially blocked it off.
8. A gravel check dam has been added across the narrrow channel that leads to the
outlet structure.
9. The tops of most of the equalization pipes were visually located. These pipes may
need to be cleaned out of any accumulated sediment to facilitate "equalization" of the
water levels in the various connected ponds.
Page: 4

Lewis,Linda
From: Michael Manna [[e-mail]]
Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2012 10:19 PM
To: Lewis,Linda
Subject: Magnolia Greens Storm Water Ponds
Linda, I was very glad to meet you today. It was an amazing coincidence that put you out there at the
same time and place as our Magnolia Greens HOA Storm Water Pond Sub -Committee.
We had a long day taking elevation measurements of specific features (water level, connecting pipes,
storm water grates, etc) from the "weir" all the way down along Winding Trail, Parkmore, Pine
Harvest, Morning View Way and Willow Pond. We concentrated on those areas that during past
heavy rain events have experienced "ponding". It will take a few days, but when complete we hope
we will have an accurate picture of the area topography which will allow us to make some sense of
what and how this happens.
The long term goals of our committee are:
■ Set a level of expectation for homeowners as to what to expect from the storm water
system (ponds, streets, property) during extensive rain events
■ Get the HOA ready to accept the permits when turned over by Landmark
■ Determine the future cash reserves that will be necessary for any long term storm water
pond remediation
As I indicated to you we have met with the new owners of the Magnolia Greens Golf Course to
discuss the permitted ponds that are now on their property. We believe that the necessary
easements are in place that would allow the HOA access to those ponds should future remediation
be necessary. We have also discussed with the golf course that they need to be a partner with the
HOA in keeping the "Lakes" at a maximum elevation of 21 feet above sea level before a "significant"
rain event, by pumping it down as necessary to get to that level or lower. They assured us that during
the summer they really depend upon that system of ponds to irrigate the golf course. It is their "life
line". Their pumping system, when in operation, can remove 900 GPM from that pond. During the
summer they are pumping between 500,000 to 1,000,000 gallons a day up to the pond behind the
clubhouse for irrigation. I feel we are on the "same page" with them.
I have also met with Landmark, Chris Stephens, and he is in the process of preparing a package of all
the permits and drawings to hand over to the HOA. I believe that he wants to help us understand the
operation of the entire storm water pond system as well as prepare us to take over the permits and
any associated reporting when turnover occurs. I am aware that in 2011 Landmark did some
significant remediation to the ponds behind holes #5 and #6 off Willow Pond Land as well as the pond
behind hole #21 off West Cove Loop. My only area of concern is the design and operation of the
"weir" and it's removable boards. At present the Town of Leland feels it is their responsibility to
remove the "boards" as necessary before a significant rain event.
We have met with the Town of Leland and have a good relationship with Steve Spruill, the Public
Work Director. As you may know, in Magnolia Greens all of the streets belong to the Town rather
than the HOA so they also are our partner.

Again, it was good to meet you today. I can assure you that the Magnolia Greens HOA wants to be a
partner with NC DWQ when the permit turnover occurs. My e-mail address is [e-mail]. If
during your review, you found something that would help us in our efforts, I would love to know about
it.
Regards,
Mike Marna
Magnolia Greens HOA — Member at Large
Storm Water Pond Sub -Committee Chaiman
1159 Willow Pond Lane
Magnolia Greens Golf Plantation
Leland, NC 28451
Home: [phone]
Mike's iPhone: [phone]

CAPE FEAR
Engineering, Inc.
August 3, 2007
Rhonda Hall
NC OfNR-DWQ
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington, NC 26405-3845
Re:
Rhonda:
Notice of Violation
The Lakes at Magnolia Greens
5W8 000220
RECEIVED
JAN 2 5 2012
BY:
2=717,77;AIngV1n a
We are in receipt of Ed Beck's letter dated June 25, 2007 regarding the above described Notice of
Violation and offer the following response:
r
I . A written plan of action is included with the narrative response attached to this letter.
2. In speaking with Rhonda Hall about the modified spillway, it was concluded that a permit
modification is not necessary, only a plan revision. The detail sheet previously approved for this
project has been revised to show the modified spillway, and is attached to this response as a
plan revision.
3. The designer certification for this project is attached to this response.
4. Operation and maintenance issues are addressed in the narrative plan of action.
5. The permittee has assured me that the deed restrictions for this project have been legally
recorded and submitted as required. Additional copies of the recorded deed restrictions are
available if needed.
I trust this information is sufficient to satisfy the requirements of the Notice of Violation, and upon
completion of required maintenance to the ponds, settle the violation completely. 5hould you have any
questions, c mments, or require additional information regarding this matter, please contact this office.
Respectf
9'
K. Davis F nell, PE
cc : File (230-45)
Chris Stephens
151 f°bofs R md, Suite 100 - Bai 1;g MC 20451 - TEL• [phone] - FAX. [phone]
wwwcapmwrwlghAmf ng.com

Narrative Plan of Action
For
Phase VI / The Lakes
at
Magnolia Greens Plantation
SW8 000220
Prepared for:
Landmark Developers
5022 Wrightsville Ave. Suite 102
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403
[phone]
Date: August 3, 2007
Prepared by:
ape k'ear Engineering, Inc.
151 Poole Road, Suite 100
Belville, North Carolina 28451
(910) 383-i044

The storm ponds for The Lakes were constructed and stabilized seven years ago in 2000 for golf
course use, and were later permitted for utilization in stormwater treatment. They have
performed quite well and maintenance has been fairly uneventful with the most significant issues
being construction debris, algae control during dry spells and minor erosion. Since the
construction of the ponds, and with increased home construction, additional specialty
subcontractors have been employed to manage the ponds through the property manager for the
association.
Specifically, a water quality subcontractor, Estate Management Company, is employed to
monitor the actual water conditions of the ponds and provide maintenance and preventive
measures to include vegetation, algae control, debris, and fish stocking. A landscape
maintenance subcontractor, who performs additional maintenance operations within the
community, has been contracted to mow the banks and to provide general repairs and debris
removal. The community association operates under a property management company, CEPCO,
whose offices are located within the community. Finally, an association grounds committee,
made up of residents, reviews and monitors all common grounds activities and maintenance,
reviews subcontractor performance, addresses landscape issues, modifications and
enhancements.
i
The conditions that exist, as referred to the June 5, 2007 inspection, are a direct result of two
unique and coincidental weather extremes. The storms and record rainfall events of July,
August, and September 2006 caused major flooding to the Leland area roads and subdivisions.
In total, nearly 27 inches of rain fell in about 36 days — far exceeding design standards and
expected storm frequency. Streets became flooded, the ponds and lakes swelled to bank tops and
outfall tributaries were significantly backed up. Fortunately, the flooding subsided over several
hours except where blockages occurred. Many residents, not completely understanding the
magnitude of rainfall over the design pleaded with the developer and the Town of Leland to
review any possible relief in those situations. After several meetings with the Public Works
department and Town Manager for the Town of Leland and at Public meetings, it was decided
that expansion of the outfall ditch and a conversion of the outlet to the pond to a weir structure.
The weir allows the pond to be lowered prior to a known tropical storm or hurricane event
thereby creating storage buffer. The weir was installed at the ponds designed storage elevation
and the outfall ditch was widened.
The major storm of 2006 was hurricane Ernesto that dumped a record rainfall on the immediate
area along with very high winds on August 31, 2006.. With much of the land still saturated from
the previous flooding rains, Ernesto pushed pond levels to nearly the top of banks. With the
soils being of a very course sand type the saturation was apparently intense. As water levels
receded, the sands eroded from underneath the established sod, leaving sinkholes and rills in the
bank. This is further evidenced by the horizontal breaks in the grass. This is the more common
damage except for a few areas of the pond that face the southeast and were apparently whipped
by wave action from the very high winds of the Ernesto storm.
As the significant wet weather ended in late 2006 as the pond bank was dormant, the drought of
2007 materialized and it wasn't until June of 2007 that ever. 5" of rain had been recorded in
eastern Brunswick I.-bi niy. By that time, a multitude of efforts ivere in motion analyzing the

conditions, understanding the circumstances, scheduling repairs and coordinating the phases of
needed repairs. The developer along with the property manager, association committee members
and residents walked the pond to assemble repair "punch -lists". Algae, erosion, plant/tree
outcrops, silt occur►iuiatioi;, pipe outlet stabilization and aeration needs were noted and
inventoried. The pond, even at March, was quite low and by May was nearly 3 feet low with
algae becoming uncontrollable by the pond contractors. It was decided to begin with the silt
removal which had accumulated at various pipe inlets to the pond. Long -reach excavators were
employed to remove these sandy -silt areas while the ponds were excessively low. Additional
measures were taken to stabilize the areas around pipe inlets with geo-textile fabric and rip -rap
aggregate material. The silt and pipe inlet protection work, not limited by the drought or pond
level conditions, began immediately as was completed in about a week's time. The algae was
manually removed by the pond contractor with large rakes after tvnical chemical treatments
failed to provide a timely reduction of the algae.
The repair of erosion areas was further reviewed by several landscape contractors who looked at
the various kinds of conditions. The prevalent concern was the drought and the effectiveness of
repairs without adequate irrigation. Upon further review it was found that while there is an
abundance of irrigation systems contiguous to the pond, not many of them were adjusted or
designed to adequately water the bank areas. The committee and residents moved to request
irrigation cooperation from those contiguous residents. Residents were asked to provide hose
type of irrigation, if necessary, for a repair area that might exist behind there home. There
appears to be a general cooperation but everyone agreed that it would be better if the repairs
could commence with the eventual return of normal rainfall. Many of the irrigation systems
were adjusted and residents began a greater effort of watering the banks. Since May, and before
repairs, the general grass conditions have improved measurably with a little more rainfall and
additional irrigation efforts. It was concluded that without rain the erosion was not getting worse
and wetter conditions would improve the success of sod repairs. Since that time, it appears that
the drought is finally ending and those involved feel that conditions are now adequate to initiate
those erosion repairs. Pond levels are near the typical normal level again. The landscape
contractors should begin within the next week with the erosion repairs as irrigation is
coordinated for each repair area.
i—

Lewis,Linda
From: Lewis, Linda
Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2011 1:14 PM
To: 'Melissa Juhan'
Subject: The Lakes at Magnolia Greens SW8 000220
Melissa:
I've always believed in miracles and today one has occurred. After almost 2 months, I have found the missing
SW8 000220 file!!! Please let me know when you would like to come in and review it.
If memory serves me, I believe we were trying to find out what we permitted as the outlet structure. As it turns
out, the pond is "non -discharging" meaning that it was approved to store up to 8" of rain without discharging.
The 2005 approved plans show a permanent pool at elevation 21.0 and a gravel emergency spillway set into
the bank of the pond at elevation 23.5, which is the temporary pool elevation.
A Notice of Violation was issued in 2007 and says, in part, that the approved spillway structure was replaced
by a new weir and a new dam without benefit of an approved permit modification. That is the current status of
this project — we are still waiting for the permittee to submit an application to modify the permitted outlet
structure. There is currently no approval for any type of flashboard riser for this pond.
The NOV also indicates that neither the recorded deed restrictions nor the required Designer's Certification
were submitted. I will be following up on this as soon as possible. Thanks for your patience.
Linda Lewis
NC Division of Water Quality
127 Cardinal Drive Ext.
Wilmington, NC 28405
910-796-7215
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may
be disclosed to third part

N P41 21/ tJ 'i O- n) 2r,0/
3I13/2009 -
etr
David; I pulled this file from storage as a gentlemen by the name of Tige Brubacker
requested a file review. He came in today to review it and requested to speak with me. In
looking at the file with him, it looks like the ball was dropped back in 2007 with the NOV
that Rhonda sent out.
I gave Mr. Brubacker your name/phone — you will most likely hear from him. I told him
that you would probably want to go inspect the location again as it sounds as though there
is a lot of activity going on our there.
PIM
Tige Brubaker; 216-470-6970
�t&..-A
j1 _ � �• �- �,_ r�,.�t, �'�! ��-� -i /dU0 � /Ili
t

RE: File Review Request
Sw0ject: RE: File Review Request
From: Tige Brubaker <[e-mail]>
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 200914:00:06 -0500
To: Jo Casmer <[e-mail]>
MY Phone is 216-470-6970.
----- Orig
inal ..message -----
From: Jo Casmer [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent-: Tuesday, February 24., 2009 1:58 PM
To: Tige Brubaker
Subject: Re: File Review Request
In further examination, I have discovered that "The Lakes at Magnolia
Greens Phase IV" was a duplicate project of Magnolia Greens Patio
Homes. There is no permit for the Phase IV project - it was issued
under the Patio Homes project. It is an older file and is stored
offsite in our storage facility. I am adding the file number to our
running list we keep. As soon as someone goes over to storage, the file
will be brought back. Once I have it in hand, I will call you and
schedule a day/time for you to come look at it.
Please provide a contact number for me - you will hear from me as soon
as I have the file.
Tige Brubaker wrote:
Yes, Can I see the permit, design and calcs. for the pond and the outfall
structure.
Thanks
Tige
-----Original Message -----
From: Jo Casmer (mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2009 12:22 PM
To: Tige Brubaker
Subject: File Review Request
Linda Lewis forwarded your request to me to review a file called "The
Lakes at Magnolia Green Phase VI."
I have searched our system and we have no project by that name. As
close as I can come is The Lakes at Magnolia Greens Phase IV. I have
searched our system a variety of ways and I have nothing for any version
of "Magnolia" that has a Phase VI.
I will wait to hear back from you.
Jo Casmer
Administrative Assistant IV
NC Dept. of Environment & Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington, NC 28405
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Email correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North
Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
1 of 2 3/2/2009 2:19 PM

RE: File Review Request
Jo Casmer
Administrative Assistant IV
NC Dept. of Environment & Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington, NC 28405
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Email correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina
Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
2 of 2 3r M009 2:19 PM

< �0 IN TF9Q
�O G
r
J
Mr. Mike Toht
1714 Dawnridge Court
Leland, NC 28451
1,6�'-',C
July 3, 2007
Subject: Stormwater Permit No. SW8 000220
The Lakes at Magnolia Greens
High Density Subdivision Project
Brunswick County
Dear Mr. Toht:
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Coleen H. Sullins Director
Division of Water Quality
The Wilmington Regional Office received a letter from you dated May 29, 2007 requesting that
our office investigate a number of possible permit violations. Wilmington Regional Office staff
performed a site visit of this facility on June 5, 2007. The possible violations along with our
finding are as follows:
Possible Violation:
The original permitted weir was removed without a permit modification.
Findings:
The site visit revealed that the emergency spillway, which I believe is what you refer to as
the weir, associated with this facility has been modified. Our office has requested that the
permittee submit an application for this modification (scc attached Notice of Violation
dated July 3, 2007).
Possible Violation:
A newly designed weir and new dam were constructed without a permit.
Findings:
The site visit revealed that the emergency spillway, which I believe is what you refer to as
the weir, associated with this facility has been modified. Our office has requested that the
permittee submit an application for this modification (see attached Notice of Violation
dated July 3, 2007).
III. Possible Violation:
Many of the basin side slopes are steeper than 3:1 as specified in the approved permit to
build "The Lakes"
Findings:
Based on a review of the file associated with this facility, it appears that this office has not
received a certification from an appropriate designer for this project. This office has
None Carolina
)VIaMmily
North Carolina Division of Water Quality 127 Cardinal Drive Extension Wilmington, NC 28405 Phone [phone] Customer Service
Wilmington Regional Office Internet: www.ncwaterouality.ora Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer— 50% Recycled110% Post Consumer Paper

The Lakes at Magnolia Greens
Stormwater Permit No. SW8 000220
Page 2 of 4
requested that the permittee provide a certification, from an appropriate
designer for the system installed, certifying that the permitted facility has
been installed in accordance with the permit, approved plans and
specifications, and other supporting documentation (see attached Notice of
Violation dated July 3, 2007)
The site visit revealed that the basin side slopes between the temporary
pool elevation, 23.5 FMSL (Feet Mean Sea Level ) and the maximum
permanent pool elevation, 21 FMSL appeared to be approximately 3:1
(horizontal to vertical). North Carolina Administrative Code 15A NCAC 02H
.1008 (e)(7) requires that the basin side slopes for the storage volume
above the permanent pool shall be stabilized with vegetation down to the
permanent pool level and that the side slopes shall be no steeper than 3:1
(horizontal to vertical).
IV. Possible Violation:
The operation and maintenance plan specified in the permit has not been
followed by the permittee and significant maintenance has not occurred.
Findings:
The site visit revealed that the side slopes in several areas throughout the
pond, had eroded areas with very little vegetation. The sediment in the
pond did not appear to have reached the required sediment removal
elevation of 18.0 FMSL. This office has requested that the permittee
provide the necessary operation and maintenance to assure that the
permitted stormwater system functions at optimum efficiency. The
permittee shall also ensure that the operation and maintenance agreement
associated with this facility is followed in its entirety and that maintenance
occurs at the scheduled intervals including, but not limited to:
a. Semiannual scheduled inspections (every 6 months).
b. Sediment removal.
c. Mowing and re -vegetation of side slopes.
d. Immediate repair of eroded areas.
e. Maintenance of side slopes in accordance with approved plans and
specifications.
f. Debris removal and unclogging of structures, orifice, catch basins
and piping.
g. Access to all components of the system must be available at all
times.
V. Possible Violation:
No system seems to be in place to ensure that no water is removed from
the system facility when the permanent pool elevation of 21.0 FMSL is
reached.

The Lakes at Magnolia Greens
Stormwater Permit No. SW8 000220
Page 3 of 4
Findings:
A review of the approved plans, specifications, calculations and other
supporting documentation indicates'that the key control strategy for this
stormwater management system is to provide, as a minimum, enough
volume in the pond to hold a 25-year rainfall event (8" design storm) without
discharging. This minimum required volume is to be provided between an
established maximum water elevation (maximum permanent pool elevation
— 21 FMSL) and the elevation of the pond outlet (temporary pool elevation —
23.5 FMSL).
Based on this control strategy, the permanent pool elevation of 21 FMSL
listed in the permit is the maximum elevation at which the water level can be
maintained without compromising the pond's ability to provide enough
volume, between the maintained water level elevation and the temporary
pool elevation, to hold a 25-year rainfall event. Maintaining a water level
below the maximum permanent pool elevation of 21 FMSL would provide
additional storage volume in the pond beyond the 25-year rain event. This
condition would not be considered to be a violation of the conditions of the
permit.
This particular stormwater system is designed such that the volume
between elevations 21 FMSL (maximum permitted permanent pool
elevation) and 23.5 FMSL (permitted temporary pool elevation) holds the
25-year rainfall event (8 inch design storm). There should be no outlet
below elevation 23.5 FMSL. The permitee proposes to assure that this
volume is reserved for future storms by maintaining the elevation of the
water in the pond at 21 FMSL or less. The permittee currently maintains an
elevation of 21 FMSL or less by withdrawing water from this pond and using
it to irrigate the golf course associated with this facility.
The permittee must maintain a permanent pool elevation of no more than 21
FMSL. Maintaining a permanent pool elevation of no more that 21 FMSL
will ensure that the key control strategy of providing enough storage volume
to hold the 25-year rainfall event (8" design storm) with no discharge is
being complied with.
VI. Possible Violation:
Public Health Concerns about stagnant water and excessive pond scum
covering significant pond surfaces.
Findings:
The Division of Water Quality currently allows decorative fountains to be
used in state stormwater ponds. Certain benefits can de derived from

The Lakes at Magnolia Greens
Stormwater Permit No. SW8 000220
Page 4 of 4
correctly sized and placed fountains, namely, increased dissolved oxygen
levels, increased flocculation of certain pollutants, denitrification, and the
discouragement of mosquito breeding. For your convenience, I have
attached a copy of the Fountains in Stormwater Extended Wet Detention
Pond Guidance dated September 24, 2003. In addition; it is my
understanding that certain species of plants and fish will assist in the
discouragement of mosquito breeding. As a reference, you might want to
consider North Carolina State University's Stormwater Website
(httr)://www.bae.ncsu.edu/stormwater/). This website indicates some
measures that can be used to assist in the discouragement of mosquito
breeding.
While the current State Stormwater Regulations allow for the use of
measures, such as fountains, plants, fish, etc. to aid in the discouragement
of mosquito breeding, these regulations do not give jurisdictional authority to
require that these measures be installed.
If you have any questions, or need additional information concerning this matter,
please contact Rhonda Hall or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
Edward Beck
Regional Supervisor
Surface Water Protection Section
ENBlrbh: S\WQS\STORMWATER\LETTERS\2007\000220.ju107
cc: Dennis Deasy
Rhonda Hall
Wilmington Regional Office

■ Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete
item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired.
■ Print your name and address on the reverse
so that w Gan return the card to you.
■ Attach thi card to the back of the mailpieoe,
or on the f nt if space permits.
1. Article Addressed to:
Al id &Ri'sroP.4et' S
A. Signature
X O%,, ���,� A Agent
❑ Addressee
B. Received by (Prints C. Date of Delivery
7 '6 -66
D. Is delivery address different from item 1? ❑ Yes
If YES, enter delivery address below: ❑ No
L a 17 d1na1 r,�' Lope,-s
`�L�✓c
502- Z Ville AW '
3. Se Ice Type
Certified Mail ❑ Express Mail
Registered ❑ Return Receipt for Merchandise
4)i'L Mi n❑Insured
r'
Mail ❑ C.O.D.
4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) ❑ Yes
2. (rhansfer cle Rol; - 7006 2760 0003 3529 1809
(Transfromservice fabe�
PS Form 3811, February 2004 Domestic Return Receipt 102595-02-M-1540 ;
a

WA rFi9QG Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
r North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
0 'C Coleen H. Sullins Director
Division of Water Quality
June 25, 2007
CERTIFIED MAIL #7006 2760 0003 3529 1809
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. W. Christopher Stephens, President
Landmark Developers, Inc.
5022 Wrightsville Avenue, Suite 102
Wilmington, NC 28403
Subject: NOTICE OF VIOLATION
The Lakes @ Magnolia Greens
Stormwater Permit No. SW8 000220
Brunswick County
Dear Mr. Stephens:
On June 5, 2007, Wilmington Regional Office personnel performed a Compliance Inspection of
the subject project, located approximately 1000 feet Northeast of the Highway 17 and Lanvale
Road intersection in Leland, Brunswick County, North Carolina. The inspection was performed
to determine the status of compliance with Stormwater Permit Number SW8 000220, issued to
you on May 12, 2005.
Based on the June 5, 2007 compliance inspection and a review of your files, the project has
been found in violation of Stormwater Permit Number SW8 000220, issued pursuant to the
requirements of 15A NCAC 2H.1000. The violations found are:
1. Failure to submit and receive approval for revised plans, specifications, and
calculations prior to construction, for any modification to the approved plans. It
appears that the emergency spillway associated with this facility has been
modified.
2. Failure to submit a certification from an appropriate designer for the system
installed. Upon completion of construction, prior to issuance of a Certificate of
Occupancy, and prior to operation of this permitted facility, a certification must be
received from an appropriate designer for the system installed in accordance with
this permit, the approved plans and specifications and other supporting
documentation. Any deviations from the approved plans and specifications must
be noted on the Certification.
3. Failure to perform the required operation and maintenance necessary to assure
the permitted stormwater system functions at optimum efficiency. Based on an
inspection performed on June 5, 2007, it appears that the approved operation
and maintenance agreement is not being followed in its entirety. In several areas
throughout the pond, the side slopes had eroded areas with very little vegetation.
4. Failure to submit a copy of the recorded deed restrictions for this property.
1N Caro ' a
%wrak �
Noi ui'Carolila Division of Water Quality 127 Cardinal Drive Extension Wilmington, NC 28405 Phone [phone] Customer Service
Wilmington Regional Office Internet: www.ncwaterqualitv.ore Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer— 50% Recycledl10% Post Consumer Paper

July 3, 2007
The Lakes @ Magnolia Greens
Stormwater Permit No. SW8 000220
To correct these violations you must:
1. Provide a written "Plan of Action" which outlines the actions you will take to
correct the violation(s) and a time frame for completion of those actions, on
or before August 3, 2007.
2. Provide one complete application package for the modification. A complete
application package includes all of the items listed below.:
a. One original of the Stormwater Management Permit Application Form
b. One original of the applicable Supplement Form(s) for each BMP
C. Permit application processing fee of $420 (payable to NCDENR)
d. Detail narrative description of stormwater treatment/management
e. Two copies of plans and specifications
■ Development/Project name
■ Engineer and firm
■ Legend
■ North arrow
• Scale
• Revision number & date
• Mean high water line
■ Dimensioned property/project boundary
Location map with named streets or NCSR numbers
• Original contours, proposed contours, spot elevations, finished floor
elevations
■ Details of roads, drainage features, collection systems, and
stormwater control measures
■ Wetlands delineated, or a note on plans that none exist
■ Existing drainage (including off -site), drainage easements, pipe sizes,
runoff calculations
■ Drainage areas delineated
■ Vegetated buffers (where required)
a copy of the recorded deed restrictions for this property, including all
lots associated with this subdivision that have been subdivide or sold.
3. Provide a certification, from an appropriate designer for the system
installed, certifying that the permitted facility has been installed in
accordance with the permit, approved plans and specifications, and other
supporting documentation.
4. Provide the necessary operation and maintenance to assure that the
permitted stormwater system functions at optimum efficiency. Ensure that
the operation and maintenance agreement associated with this facility is
followed in its entirety and that maintenance occurs at the scheduled
intervals including, but not limited to:
Page 2 of 5

July 3, 2007
The Lakes @ Magnolia Greens
Stormwater Permit No. SW8 000220
a. Semiannual scheduled inspections (every 6 months).
b. Sediment removal.
c. Mowing and re -vegetation of side slopes.
d. Immediate repair of eroded areas.
e. Maintenance of side slopes in accordance with approved plans and
specifications.
f. Debris removal and unclogging of structures, orifice, catch basins
and piping.
g. Access to all components of the system must be available at all
times.
5. Submit a copy the recorded deed restrictions for this property.
Failure to provide the 'Plan of Action" by August 3, 2007, or to correct the violations by
the date designated in the "Plan of Action", are considered violations of 15A NCAC
2H.1000, and may result in the initiation of enforcement action which may include
recommendations for the assessment of civil penalties, pursuant to NCGS 143-215.6A.
By copy of this letter to the Onslow County Building Inspector, this Office is requesting
that the Building Inspector consider withholding building permits and Certificates of
Occupancy for this project until this matter is satisfactorily resolved.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please call Rhonda Hall at (910) 796-
7335.
Sinc ly,
Ed Beck
Regional Supervisor
Surface Water Protection Section
ENB1rbh: S:IWQSISTORMWATINOTICE1000220MOD.ju107
cc: Comer Lyons, Cape Fear Engineering Inc.
Brunswick County Building Inspections
Michael Toht
Rhonda Hall
Wilmington Regional Office
Central Files
Page 3 of 5

PERMIT VIOLATIONS NOTIFICATION
THE LAKES — STORM WATER MANAGEMENT PERMIT
Permit No SW8000220 Wet Detention Pond Stormwater Facility
Mr. Ed Beck
North Carolina Division of Water Resources 7MAY
CF,7VE�I I,Wilmington Regional Office 2 9 2007
May 29, 2007
Dear Mr. Beck,
A review of the above permit (which allowed for the building of "The Lakes"
section of Magnolia Greens) by a number of residents evidences a number of
possible permit violations that we would like investigated. The possible violations
are as follows:
THE ORIGINAL PERMITTED WEIR WAS REMOVED WITHOUT A
PERMIT MODIFICATION. The permit says that alteration of the drainages as
shown on the approved plans should not take place without concurrence of the
Division of Water Quality. The removal of the weir caused significant water
runoff and allowed for no water retention.
A NEWLY DESIGNED WEIR AND NEW DAM WERE CONSTRUCTED
WITHOUT A PERMIT. Again, alteration of the drainages as shown on the
approved plans should not take place without concurrence of the Division of Water
Quality. The permittee has refused, at a Home Owners Association committee
meeting, to apply for a permit to comply with State permit requirements.
MANY OF THE BASIN SIDE SLOPES ARE STEEPER THAN 3:1 AS
SPECIFIED IN THE APPROVED PERMIT TO BUILD "THE LAKES".
Basin side slopes above the permanent pool are specified to be no steeper than
3:1(33.3% slope) in the permit. A majority of the system's slopes are in excess of
3:1, some are in excess of a 45% slope. The permittee certified in the permit to the
Division of Water Quality that the slopes were no steeper than 3:1 but they are not
in compliance. Corrective actions are needed to be taken by the permittee to
remediate the excessive water runoff and erosion caused by the non -compliant
slopes.
THE OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PLAN SPECIFIED IN THE
PERMIT HAS NOT BEEN FOLLOWED BY THE PERMITTEE AND
SIGNIFICANT MAINTENANCE HAS NOT OCCURRED. Significant
erosion, sediment, and lack of slope maintenance are evident. Resident requests
for erosion remediation have been ignored in the past by the permittee. Sediment
removal has not occurred. The permittee has said erosion and sediment removal

would be done. There have been several delays. No results are evident at this
writing.
NO SYSTEM SEEMS TO BE IN PLACE TO INSURE THAT NO WATER
IS REMOVED FROM THE SYSTEM FACILITY WHEN THE
PERMANENT POOL ELEVATION OF FMSL 21.0 IS REACHED. The
permanent pool level of 21 FMSL is the level below which water, by permit,
cannot be drawn from the ponds for any purpose including watering the golf
course. The permittee insists that the permit allows water drawdown to zero level
destroying the pond ecosystem. The permittee is taking water to irrigate the golf
course at this time. There appears to be no measuring system in place such as a
staff gauge to ensure water levels are not drawn down lower than permit allowable
levels endangering the pond ecosystem.
PUBLIC HEALTH CONCERNS ABOUT STAGNANT WATER AND
EXCESSIVE POND SCUM COVERING SIGNIFICANT POND
SURFACES. There are algal blooms and noxious plants evident potentially
leading to breeding grounds for mosquitoes and other disease carrying insects.
Please have the Regional Office staff person responsible for investigating this
permit violation notice inform The Lakes residents of progress toward resolution of
these violations and any fines that may be levied
The Lakes residents' group contact person:
Dennis Deasy 1915 Bridlewood Court Leland NC 28451 910-3 71-1117
Sincerely,
Michael Toht
1714 Dawnridge Court
Leland, NC 28451
910=5324905