20201937 Ver 2_Dead Tree Phase A BPDP for PN_20211019

Mitigation Project Information Upload
ID#* 20201937
Version* 2
Select Reviewer: *
Katie Merritt
Initial Review Completed Date 10/21/2021
Mitigation Project Submittal - 10/19/2021
..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Is this a Prospectus, Technical Proposal or a New Site? * 0 Yes O No
Type of Mitigation Project:*
Stream Wetlands Buffer Nutrient Offset
(Select all that apply)
Project Contact Information
Contact Name: *
Raymond Holz
Project Information
ID#:*
20201937
Existing ID#
Project Type:
Project Name:
County:
DMS Mitigation Bank
Dead Tree Phase A
Edgecombe
Document Information
Mitigation Document Type:*
Mitigation Plans
File Upload:
Signature
............................................
Print Name: *
Signature:*
Email Address: *
[e-mail]
Version:* 2
Existing Version
2020-1937v2 Dead Tree Phase A BPDP 2021-10-
28.67MB
19_.pdf
Please upload only one PDF of the complete file that needs to be submitted...
Raymond Holz

BANK PARCEL DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE
DEAD TREE PHASE A NUTRIENT OFFSET BANK PARCEL
TAR-PAMLICO RIVER BASIN
DWR ID#: 2020-1937v2
Bank Parcel Sponsor
Restoration Systems, LLC
POC: Barrett Jenkins ([e-mail])
Ph: 919-755-9490
1101 Haynes Street, Suite 211
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
RFSTOR,1T1O:
SYSTLMS ILL

Restoration Systems, LLC
1101 Haynes St. Suite 211
Raleigh, North Carolina
Ph: [phone]
Fx: [phone]
Dead Tree Phase A BPDP
DWR Project No. 2020-1937v2
Response to DWR Comments Dated October 13th, 2021
Comments Received (Black Text) & Responses (Blue Text)
RESTORATION
SYSTEMS ILL.0
Page 3
1. Comment: DWR removed all attachments and Appendices that did not have any edits or comments in order to keep
the file smaller for sending electronically.
Response: Noted, thanks.
2. Comment: DWR ID # is 2020-1937v2
Response: updated
Page 5
3. Comment: Add a Figure depicting the CE of Phase B since one of the features 1E doesn't have to get a credit deduction
for non -diffused flow because the rest of that ditch will be part of Phase B.
Response: Phase B CE was added to Figure 2-7 and appropriate language added with regard to Feature 1E to a new
diffuse flow section and to subject figures.
4. Comment: move to 7.1 Table, not an appendix; DWR forgot to add this comment on Phase B BPDP so please incorporate
same comment in that document as well.
Response: Moved to Table 9. Table of Contents restructure based on your comments from other BPDPs. Diffuse flow
and Seed mix table added as well.
Page 6
5. Comment: Inserted Text "and ephemeral channels"
Response: Updated
Page 10
6. Comment: Reference the Appendix E here and state that it is a "Template CE" that will be used to develop the CE for
the Parcel.
Response: Updated, now appendix G see comment 4 response above. Appendix references updated throughout the
BPDP.
7. Comment: DWR recommends RS commit to performing soil testing to determine how best to prepare the soil for
planting and success. Additionally, with this site being used for ag for such a long period of time, it is always
recommended that the Sponsor implement disking or ripping to break up compact soils.
Why has RS not suggested these activities for parcel preparation?
Response: You didn't require it in the approved Moccasin Creek BPDP, which we used as a template. Language added
regarding ripping which we do anyway, and soil testing which we might do.
8. Comment: Add a note that feature 1E, which is a ditch, will have it's upstream reach/segment included in a separate
easement affiliated with the Phase B riparian restoration project. this language is needed to justify why it doesn't get a
credit deduction per the diffused flow memo.
Response: Note added regarding Feature 1E in new diffused flow section (4.2) and table (table 6). See addition below:
4.2 Diffused Flow
Per DWR Buffer Interpretation/Clarification Memo #2008-019— Diffuse Flow, stormwater carried by lateral ditches that
enter buffered streams will receive a 4,350 sq. ft. credit deduction. The credit deduction will be calculated at start of the
credit generating area from any features subject to the Diffuse Flow Memo (Appendix A, Figures 5 and 6). Table 6 details
each site feature and its subjectivity of the Diffuse Flow Memo.
Page 1 of 5

Restoration Systems, LLC
1101 Haynes St. Suite 211
Raleigh, North Carolina
Ph: [phone]
Fx: [phone]
Table 1: Diffuse Flow Summary
RESTORATION
SYSTEMS LLC
Feature
Classification
Diffuse Flow Subjectivity
1A-D
Ditch
No; origin point located within the conservation easement.
1B
Ephemeral
No; origin point located within the conservation easement.
1Ca
Ditch
Yes; credit deduction applied (Figure 5, Appendix A).
1D
Ditch
No; origin point located within the conservation easement.
1E
Ditch
No; feature spans two watersheds and continues into the Dead Tree Phase B Parcel
(DWR 2020-1937v3) and subject to the Phase B conservation easement and restoration
plan. Phase A conservation easement extends to and covers the origin point of &
overland surface flow (TOB — 200') to Feature 1E.
1F
Ditch
Yes; credit deduction applied (Figure 5, Appendix A).
9. Comment: There may need to be a separate section (as was done for Phase B BPDP) titled Diffused Flow: Explain how
RS will restore diffused flow on the site. Specifically, 1Ca and 1D currently are considered as non -diffused flow since
the ditches continue beyond the CE and will need be addressed. Reference the diffused flow memo from the MBI if
other means of creating diffused flow cannot be obtained (i.e. plugging, filling planting with the footprint of the ditch)
Response: Section 4.2 added see above comment 8 response. The ditch at 1D does no continue beyond the CE. I think
the property boundary is shown on some figures, looks like a ditch, and may be misleading.
10. Comment: Commit to ensuring that stem species will be well mixed before planting to ensure diversity of bare roots
across the planted area.
Response: Updated. Added specific language "Species will be well mixed within the planting scheme to ensure diversity
of bare roots across planted areas and monitoring plots."
Page 11
11. Comment: There are no shrubs shown in the table, correct?
Response: Correct, shrubs are not a requirement. Several midstory species are selected to provide canopy diversity,
see updated Table 7 tree species list for reference.
12. Comment: Strikethrough Text "and shrubs collectively"
Response: Updated
13. Comment: I don't usually see Pecan trees in planting plans. Why is this specie chose
Response: I have seen mature ones on neighboring sites. It turns out they aren't available this year so are removed
from the planting plan. Also, trees have been ordered, see in Table 7 updated species list.
14. Comment: What is the anticipated spacing of stem?
Response: Added language after table 7 " at a density of 680 stems per acre on 8ft x 8ft spacing."
15. Comment: Include the type of Seed Mix RS intends to use; I need to confirm that there will be annual and perennial
seed.
Response: See table 8 in BPDP, shown below:
Table 2: Proposed Seed Mix
Common Name
Scientific Name
Annual/Perennial
Plains Coreopsis
Coreopsis tinctoria
Annual
Deertongue, Tioga
Panicum clandestinum
Perennial
Blackeyed Susan
Rudbeckia hirta
Perennial
Purpletop
Tridens flavus
Perennial
Lanceleaf Coreopsis
Coreopsis lanceloata
Perennial
Clasping Coneflower
Rudbeckia amplexicaulis
Annual
Oxeye Sunflower
Heliopsis helianthoides
Perennial
Common Yarrow
Achillea millefolium
Perennial
Perennial Gaillardia (Blanketflower)
Gaillardia aristata
Perennial
Purple Coneflower
Echinacea purpurea
Perennial
Page 2 of 5

Restoration Systems, LLC
1101 Haynes St. Suite 211
Raleigh, North Carolina
Ph: [phone]
Fx: [phone]
RESTORATION
SYSTEMS LLC
16. Comment: It is also highly recommended that RS agree to include pollinator species in their seed. DWR understands
this is not a requirement, and that RS does not have to do this. Therefore, adding it into your plan is only a suggestion
and completely voluntary.
Response: Noted. See seed mix table in comment 15 response above.
17. Comment: RS should take measures to ensure that plots are diverse (have 4 species represented in plots as much as
possible) and where a species does not represent more than 50% of the plot. All plots need to be representative of the
planted diversity and density surrounding the plot and will be evaluated by DWR during the onsite AsBuilt Walkthru to
ensure these criteria are met.
All DWR comments provided on planting plan & monitoring are being provided under the following Rule reference 15A
NCAC 02B .0295 (n)(2-4).
Response: Noted
Page 12
18. Comment: Add a section 5.3 titled Easement Boundaries and provide a description of how RS will mark these
boundaries. Additionally, add the following language to this new section: "all boundaries must be marked and clearly
identifiable prior to the NCDWR onsite AsBuilt Inspection to assess conditions for the Task 2 credit release." Add
language committing to putting contact information on easement placards as well.
Response: Section 5.3 added, see language below:
5.3 Parcel Protection & Easement Boundaries
Easement boundaries will be identified in the field to ensure clear distinction between the Parcel and adjacent properties.
Boundaries may be identified by fence, marker, post, tree -blazing, or other means as allowed by site conditions and/or
conservation easement and will be clearly marked prior to the Task 2 site visit by DWR. Boundary markers that have
been disturbed, damaged, or destroyed will be repaired and/or replaced on an as needed basis. Contact information for
the conservation easement holder will be included on easement markers. A complete and detailed survey of the
easement boundaries will be included in the As -Built Report.
Page 13
19. Comment: add language consistent with the MBI language that the long-term steward will be chosen prior to the year
4 monitoring period.
Response: Updated. Unclear if you mean easement transfer or just "choosing" long-term steward. We assume
easement transfer.
20. Comment: we are trying to move away from using "Mitigation" in this section if the site is also a nutrient offset site.
This is a new change.
Response: Updated
21. Comment: there should be deductions required on some features to compensate for non -diffused flow from ditches
feeding into CE. Make note of this here and what that deduction amount is. Make sure to reference the clarification
memo from your MBI references. I suggest referring to it as "non-credit area"
Response: Updated by adding the following language to 7.0 Project Credit Potential:
"Credit deductions were calculated to account for diffused flow (DWR Diffuse Flow Memorandum 2008-0819).
Accordingly, 8,700 sq. ft. of "non-credit area" was removed in accordance with DWR's Diffuse Flow Memorandum
(Appendix A, Figure 6 & Table 9)."
22. Comment: Replace Text "Project Credit"
Response: Updated.
23. Comment: Inserted Text "Nitrogen and Phosphorus"
Response: Updated
Page 3 of 5

Restoration Systems, LLC
1101 Haynes St. Suite 211
Raleigh, North Carolina
Ph: [phone]
Fx: [phone]
RESTORATION
SYSTEMS LLC
24. Comment: I don't really understand this statement and I've seen it in other BPDPs from RS. The nutrient offset
calculation was derived by DWR and is noted in your MBI. Not sure if this statement means something else, but the
way it's worded implies RS derived the calculation form some other means.
Response: I think the point of this sentence is to reference the total credits are based on a "conceptual design" and
may change at the as -built stage when the survey is finalized. See updated clarifying language.
25. Comment: DWR forgot to delete the reference to Appendix B in the Phase B BPDP. Please correct the error in that
document as well.
Response: Updated in Phase B BPDP
26. Comment: Replace Text "Project"
Response: Updated
27. Comment: Inserted Text "in detail"
Response: Updated
28. Comment: Replace Text "Table 7.1"
Response: Updated, now Table 9
29. Comment: Replace Text "Project"
Replace: Whole sentence deleted as summary table replaced with full table.
30. Comment: Acknowledge that there are some riparian areas that will be included in the CE but not receiving any credit
due the existing condition of the vegetation, and that these areas are defined as "Preservation/no credit areas" on the
corresponding Figure 6.
Response: Updated with the following language: "There are some riparian areas that will be included in the
conservation easement but not receiving any credit due to the existing condition of the vegetation that are defined as
preservation/no credit areas on Figure 6."
31. Comment: Need to indicate how many ledgers RS will have for this site and that they are N and P ledgers. DWR forgot
to add this comment on Phase B BPDP so please incorporate same comment in that document as well.
Response: Updated with the following language: "The Sponsor will maintain two separate ledgers for the Parcel, one
for nitrogen offsets and one for phosphorus offsets."
Page 15
32. Comment: It appears the electronic version of the maps cut off the entire "plan sheets". I have them in the hard copy
though. Make sure they are scanned appropriately for final submittal.
Response: will do
Page 16
33. Comment: Correct this label to show 1B as an ephemeral channel, not a ditch
Response: Figure set updated
Page 19
34. Comment: Add diffused flow deduction here
Response: Updated
35. Comment: There is a feature cut off of this map that RS will need to address on the final figure. Ditches 1D and 1Ca
come into this site from offsite and thus delivers non -diffused flows in the Ditch proposed for credit. Does RS have a
plan for ensuring diffused flows? What is the plan to address non -diffused flow here or does RS intend to apply the
memo from reference #4 in the MBI?
Response: 1D originates within the CE. I think the property boundary is drawn on some figures and looks like a ditch.
We have made the diffuse flow deduction on 1Ca. Notes for each are included on figure 6 and section 4.2 was added
to clarify diffuse flow approach. See response to comment 8 above.
36. Comment: Correct label to read ephemeral and not a ditch
Response: Updated
Page 4 of 5

Restoration Systems, LLC
1101 Haynes St. Suite 211
Raleigh, North Carolina
Ph: [phone]
Fx: [phone]
Page 20
37. Comment: Show deductions for non -diffused flow here
Response: Updated
38. Comment: Explain that this ditch is included in RS' Phase A and therefore non -diffused flow is not an issue.
Response: Updated. Also added CE for Phase B to figures.
RESTORATION
SYSTEMS ILL.0
39. Comment: Show deductions for non -diffused flow here (at end of ditch which is cut off on map)
Response: D1 originates within the conservation easement. The parcel line is shown on some figures and may look like
a ditch. See response to comment 35 above for further description of diffuse flow approach.
Page 25
40. Comment: Edit Figure name to be 7.1, clarify it's for Phase A, move to be located in section 7
Response: Added reference to section & and titled Table 9 as diffuse flow and seed table have also been added.
41. Comment: Remove all numbers from this column since none are creditable for buffer mitigation.
Response: Updated
42. Comment: Feature 1B was determined to be an ephemeral channel and not a ditch. Correct the table to show 1B as an
ephemeral channel
Response: Updated
43. Comment: Assuming the diffused Memo will be applied to this site, please add a line item here for capturing the total
area of non -diffused flow
Credit Type — Nutrient, Feature Type — Ditch, Mitigation Activity — Rest, Feature Name = Diffused flow deductions; Total
Area = ???; Then Check "NO" in both buffer and nutrient offset columns
Your total area of nutrient offset credits will change so update all totals in the BPDP to reflect the new amount.
Response: Updated
Page 5 of 5

BANK PARCEL DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE
DEAD TREE PHASE A NUTRIENT OFFSET BANK PARCEL
October 19, 2021
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 Introduction 1
2.0 Mitigation Project Summary 1
2.1 Project Goals 1
2.2 Existing Parcel Conditions 2
2.3 Watershed Characterization 3
2.4 Soils 3
2.5 Geology 4
2.6 Existing Vegetative Communities 4
2.7 Threatened and Endangered Species 4
2.8 Cultural Resources and Significant Natural Heritage Areas 4
2.9 FEMA Floodplain Compliance 4
2.10 Parcel Location, Parcel Constraints, and Access 4
2.11 Existing Utility Line 5
2.12 Other Environmental Conditions 5
3.0 Site Protection Instrument 5
4.0 Mitigation Work Plan 5
4.1 Parcel Preparation 5
4.2 Diffused Flow 6
4.3 Riparian Area Restoration Activities 6
5.0 Monitoring and Maintenance Plan 8
5.1 Monitoring Protocol 8
5.2 Parcel Maintenance 8
5.3 Parcel Protection & Easement Boundaries 9
6.0 Financial Assurances and Long -Term Management 9
6.1 Financial Assurances 9
6.2 Long Term Management Plan 9
7.0 Project Credit Potential 9
8.0 Credit Release 10
9.0 References 10
Dead Tree Phase A, Bank Parcel Development Plan (DWR ID#: 2020-1937v2) Table of Contents pg. i
Tar -Pamlico River Basin 8-Digit HUC: 03020101

TABLES
Table 1: Ecological and Water Quality Goals 1
Table 2: Project Attributes & Timeline 2
Table 3: Project Features 3
Table 4: Project Soil Types and Descriptions 3
Table 5: Bank Parcel Fee Simple Ownership 5
Table 6: Diffuse Flow Summary 6
Table 7: Proposed Hardwood Bare Root Planting Plan by Species 7
Table 8: Proposed Seed Mix 7
Table 9: Dead Tree Phase A, 2020-1937v2, Project Credit Table 11
APPENDICES
Appendix A — Figures, Historic Aerial Imagery (EDR), Existing Condition Photos
Figure 1— Parcel Location and Service Area
Figure 2 — Site Map and Existing Conditions
Figure 3 — USGS Map
Figure 4 — NRCS Map
Figure 5 — Restoration Plan
Figure 6 — Credit Map
Figure 7 — Monitoring Map
Historic Aerial Imagery — EDR
Parcel Photos — Existing Conditions
Appendix B — DWR Correspondence
Appendix C — USDA, NRCS Web Soil Survey Report & FEMA
Appendix D — NHP & USFWS Reports
Appendix E — EDR Report
Appendix F — SHPO Correspondence
Appendix G —Template Conservation Easement
Dead Tree Phase A, Bank Parcel Development Plan (DWR ID#: 2020-1937v2) Table of Contents pg. ii
Tar -Pamlico River Basin 8-Digit HUC: 03020101

Bank Parcel Development Package
Dead Tree Phase A Nutrient Offset Bank Parcel
Edgecombe County, NC — Tar -Pamlico River Basin
1.0 Introduction
Dead Tree Phase A Nutrient Offset Bank Parcel ("Parcel" or "Site") is proposed under the terms and
conditions of the Dead Tree Umbrella Nutrient Offset Banking Instrument, which will be made and entered
into by Restoration Systems, LLC (RS), acting as Bank Sponsor (Sponsor), and the North Carolina
Department of Environmental Quality (NCDEQ), Division of Water Resources (DWR). The Parcel shall be
planned and designed according to the MBI, 15A NCAC 02B .0703, and the Consolidated Buffer Mitigation
Rule 15A NCAC 02B .0295.
Located in Edgecombe County, North Carolina, the project encompasses 65.44 acres of land utilized for
row crop production. The project will restore the riparian area along two (2) unnamed tributaries and six
(6) surface water conveyances (ditches and ephemeral channels) with hydrologic connection to the White
Oak Swamp and subsequently the Tar River. The primary purpose of the Parcel is to provide nutrient offset
credits for stormwater and wastewater requirements within the United States Geological Survey (USGS)
Cataloging Unit 03020101. The Parcel is located on two contiguous tracts of land 1.2 miles northeast of
White Oak Swamp and immediately adjacent to the tracts of land which contain the Dead Tree Phase B
Bank Parcel.
The Parcel is located between Whitakers and Leggett, approximately 5.5 miles east of the town of
Whitakers in Edgecombe County, NC (Appendix A, Figure 1). The Barnes and Harris families are the current
fee simple owners of the two tracts of land associated with the Bank Parcel, which have been historically
and are currently used as agricultural fields with minimal existing forest/non-agricultural area. The Parcel
is within the Tar -Pamlico River Basin 14-digit USGS Cataloging Unit 03020101130100 of the Middle
Atlantic Coastal Plain (North Carolina Division of Water Quality [NCDWQ] Sub -basin Number 03-03-02)
(Appendix A, Figure 1).
DWR representatives conducted an on -site stream determination on December 20, 2020. A Stream
Determination letter for the Parcel was provided on April 6, 2021, and a Site Viability for Buffer & Nutrient
Offset letter was provided by the Division on May 11, 2021. Both letters are provided in Appendix B.
2.0 Mitigation Project Summary
2.1 Project Goals
The primary goals of the proposed nutrient offset project are to provide ecological and water quality
enhancements to the Tar -Pamlico River Basin by restoring the riparian area to create a functional,
forested, riparian corridor. Specific improvements to water quality and ecological processes are outlined
below in Table 1.
Table 1: Ecological and Water Quality Goals
Goal
Objective
Decrease nutrient levels
Nutrient input will be decreased by filtering runoff from the agricultural fields
through restored native buffer zones. The off -site nutrient input will also be
absorbed on -site by filtering flood flows through restored floodplain areas,
where flood flows can disperse through native vegetation.
Dead Tree Phase A, Bank Parcel Development Plan (DWR ID#: 2020-1937v2)
Tar -Pamlico River Basin 8-Digit HUC: 03020101
Pg. 1

Table 1: Ecological and Water Quality Goals (Continued)
Goal
Objective
Decrease sediment input
Sediment from off -site sources will be captured by deposition on restored
floodplain areas where native vegetation will slow overland flow velocities.
Decrease water temperature
and increase dissolved
oxygen concentrations
Planted riparian trees will shade the streams as they mature, reducing thermal
pollution.
Create appropriate
terrestrial habitat
Buffer areas will be restored by planting native vegetation.
Permanently protect the
project Parcel from harmful
uses
A conservation easement will be recorded on the Parcel.
2.2 Existing Parcel Conditions
The proposed nutrient offset project includes approximately 60.271 acres of open agricultural fields along
unnamed tributaries to White Oak Swamp. The agricultural fields are currently being used for row crop
production, including cotton, corn, and peanuts. In addition, the farmer regularly applies fertilizers and
herbicides to the fields (Appendix A, Figure 2). Land use and general site conditions have not changed
since the site photos in Appendix A were taken.
Site features predominantly originate on -site, and all drain to White Oak Swamp approximately 1.2 miles
downstream. A review of historic aerials shows the property has been historically and consistently utilized
for row crop production (Appendix A).
Table 2: Project Attributes & Timeline
Project Name
Dead Tree Phase A Nutrient Offset Mitigation Site
Hydrologic Unit Code
03020101
River Basin
Tar Pamlico
Geographic Location (Lat, Long)
36.093067°,-77.621206°
Site Protection Instrument (DB, PG)
To be recorded
Total Credits
60.071 acres (2,616,711 sq. ft.)
Types of Credits
Nitrogen, and Phosphorous Offset Credits
BPDP Date
December 2021
Initial Planting Date
February 2022
Baseline Report Date
March 2022
MY1 Report Date
December 2022
MY2 Report Date
December 2023
MY3 Report Date
December 2024
MY4 Report Date
December 2025
MY5 Report Date
December 2026
Dead Tree Phase A, Bank Parcel Development Plan (DWR ID#: 2020-1937v2)
Tar -Pamlico River Basin 8-Digit HUC: 03020101
Pg. 2

DWR performed an on -site visit of the Parcel to determine applicability to the Tar -Pamlico Buffer Rules
(15A NCAC 02B .0734) and viability to provide nutrient offset credits on December 30, 2020. A copy of
both the "On -Site Origin Determination for Applicability to the Tar -Pamlico Buffer Rules" and "Site Viability
for Buffer Mitigation and Nutrient Offset" are provided in Appendix B. In addition, a summary of their
determinations, specific to Parcel Features, is shown in Table 3 and correlated with stream segments as
labeled in Figure 2, Appendix A. There have been no changes to land use in the project area since DWR's
site visit, and project photos contained in Appendix A were taken.
Table 3: Project Features
DWR Feature ID
In Field Classification
Subject to Buffer Rules
Nutrient Offset Viability
1
Stream
Yes
Yes
1A-1
Stream
Yes
Yes
1A-E
Ephemeral
No
Yes
1A-D
Ditch >3ft depth
No
Yes
1B
Ephemeral
No
Yes
1Ca
Ditch >3ft depth
No
Yes
1D
Ditch >3ft depth
No
Yes
1E
Ditch >3ft depth
No
Yes
1F
Ditch >3ft depth
No
Yes
2.3 Watershed Characterization
The Parcel is located within USGS HUC 03020101 and DWR Subbasin 03-03-02. Features drain to Whtie
Oak Swamp, which is classified as C and NSW by DWR. Class C waters are designated for recreational use,
agriculture, fishing and fish consumption, and the maintenance of biological integrity for wildlife. The NSW
designation applies to surface waters that are experiencing excessive growths of microscopic or
macroscopic vegetation.
The Parcel topography, as indicated on the Draughn, NC USGS 7.5-minute topographic quadrangle, shows
gently sloped areas throughout the Parcel (Figure 3). Land uses draining to the project reaches are
primarily agriculture with some forested use.
2.4 Soils
The Parcel is mapped by the Edgecombe County Soil Survey. Project soils are described below in Table 4.
An image of the paper copy of the 1979 Soil Survey of Edgecombe County is provided in Figure 4. A custom
soil report is provided in Appendix C.
Table 4: Project Soil Types and Descriptions
Map Unit
Symbol
Map Unit Name
Percent of
Bank Parcel
Hydric
Soil Rating
AyA
Aycock very fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes
9%
No
AyB
Aycock very fine Sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes
26%
No
ExA
Exum very fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes
15%
No
Gr
Granthum very fine sandy loam
20%
Yes
Source: https//websoilsurvey.sc.egov.usda.gov/App/HomePage.htm
Dead Tree Phase A, Bank Parcel Development Plan (DWR ID#: 2020-1937v2) Pg. 3
Tar -Pamlico River Basin 8-Digit HUC: 03020101

2.5 Geology
The Parcel is in the Inner Coastal Plain physiographic province. The landscape is characterized by flatlands
to gently rolling hills and valleys. Parcel elevations range from 74 to 96 feet above sea level. The Coastal
Plain primarily consists of marine sedimentary rocks comprised of sand, clay, and limestone formed
through the deposition of estuarine and marine sediments within the last 140 million years. According to
the Geologic Map of North Carolina (1985), the underlying geology of the Parcel is mapped as the
Yorktown and Duplin Formations. The Yorktown Formation is described as fossiliferous clay with varying
amounts of fine-grained sand, bluish -gray shell material commonly concentrated in lenses, mainly in areas
north of the Neuse River. The Duplin Formation is shelly, medium to coarse -grained sand and sandy marl.
2.6 Existing Vegetative Communities
Existing vegetation within the Parcel consists of active row crop fields with narrow streamside thickets, as
shown in the attached site photos (Appendix A).
2.7 Threatened and Endangered Species
The NC Natural Heritage Program (NHP) database and the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) database
were searched for federally listed threatened and endangered plant and animal species in Edgecombe
County, NC. Six species, the Neuse River Waterdog, Carolina Madtom, Atlantic Pigtoe, Dwarf
Wedgemussel, Tar River Spinymussel, and Yellow Lance are listed or proposed for listing as federally
endangered or threatened species. RS performed pedestrian surveys of the Parcel in December 2020 and
determined no suitable habitat for the species with the proposed Parcel. The USFWS Self -Certification
Letter, USFWS concurrence, and NHP Report are included in Appendix D.
The presence of conditions or characteristics that can hinder restoration activities on the Parcel was
evaluated. The evaluation focused primarily on the presence of hazardous materials, utilities, and
restrictive easements, rare/threatened/endangered species or critical habitats, the potential for
hydrologic trespass, and existing utility easements. Existing information regarding Parcel constraints was
acquired and reviewed, including an Environmental Records Report developed by Environmental Data
Resources Inc., which located no evidence of environmental risk associated with the Parcel (Appendix E).
In addition, any Parcel conditions that can restrict the restoration and implementation were documented
during the field investigation. As a result of our review and field surveys, no known Parcel constraints
exist that may hinder proposed restoration activities. Potential constraints reviewed include the
following;
2.8 Cultural Resources and Significant Natural Heritage Areas
There are no existing structures in the project area or on the larger tract of land. SHPO was contacted with
a request for review and comment on February 25, 2021, and concluded in a response letter on April 1,
2021, that "the project as proposed will not have an effect on any historic structures." All communication
with SHPO is included in Appendix F.
2.9 FEMA Floodplain Compliance
No grading activities are proposed in the floodplain, so a floodplain development permit will not be
required. Additionally, no hydraulic modeling is proposed for this project.
2.10 Parcel Location, Parcel Constraints, and Access
The Parcel is in rural Edgecombe County, near the town of Whitakers. The Parcel is accessible for
construction, monitoring, and long-term stewardship from Red Hill Church Road (Appendix A, Figure 2).
An access road and associated access easement will be detailed in the final conservation easement survey
Dead Tree Phase A, Bank Parcel Development Plan (DWR ID#: 2020-1937v2) Pg. 4
Tar -Pamlico River Basin 8-Digit HUC: 03020101

and recorded at the Edgecombe County Register of Deeds. DOT right of ways, powerlines, and associated
easements will be excluded from the conservation easement.
2.11 Existing Utility Line
An existing utility line runs along the northern edge of Red Hill Church Road. The utility lines are excluded
from the Parcel's footprint. An additional five-foot offset will be applied between the utility right-of-way
and the start of the conservation easement boundary, Appendix A Figure 2.
2.12 Other Environmental Conditions
An Environmental Data Resources, Inc (EDR) Radius Map Report with Geocheck was provided for the
Parcel on February 26, 2021. Neither the target property nor the adjacent properties were listed in any of
the Federal, State, or Tribal environmental databases searched by EDR. The executive summary of the
EDR report is included in Appendix E.
3.0 Site Protection Instrument
The land required for planting, management, and stewardship of the mitigation project includes portions
of the larger tract of land listed in Table 5. The Parcel will remain in private ownership, protected in its
entirety by an approved DWR conservation easement, and managed/held by an approved DWR long-term
steward under the terms detailed in the approved conservation easement. A template conservation
easement that will be used to develop the conservation easement for this Parcel is provided in Appendix
G.
Table 5: Bank Parcel Fee Simple Ownership
Owner Name
D.B/Pg.
NC PIN#
Acreage
Carey Newsome Barnes
1677/0546
4805-77-7202
282.73
Nancy Harris Craven et al
119/0287
4805-86-7153
239.26
4.0 Mitigation Work Plan
The project will restore agriculturally impacted land in the Parcel footprint to a forested riparian corridor,
protected in perpetuity, improving the ecological function of the area. In addition, the project design will
ensure that no adverse impacts to wetlands or existing riparian buffers occur. Figure 5 illustrates the
conceptual design for the Parcel.
4.1 Parcel Preparation
The land use within 200 feet from the top of bank of project features is either forested and will not be
impacted, or is agricultural land maintained for crops. Areas slated for restoration may require soil testing
and will be ripped to break up compact soil. No permits are necessary, including 404 (US Army Corps of
Engineers), 401 (NC Division of Water Resources), and Land Quality Erosion and Sediment Control (NC
Division of Energy, Mineral, and Land Resources). Site preparation will include select herbicide treatments
and/or limited mechanical clearing to remove undesirable vegetation and may include soil amendments.
Where needed, invasive species will be selectively removed and/or spot treated by a licensed pesticide
applicator.
Dead Tree Phase A, Bank Parcel Development Plan (DWR ID#: 2020-1937v2) Pg. 5
Tar -Pamlico River Basin 8-Digit HUC: 03020101

4.2 Diffused Flow
Per DWR Buffer Interpretation/Clarification Memo #2008-019 — Diffuse Flow, stormwater carried by
lateral ditches that enter buffered streams will receive a 4,350 sq. ft. credit deduction. The credit
deduction will be calculated at start of the credit generating area from any features subject to the Diffuse
Flow Memo (Appendix A, Figures 5 and 6). Table 6 details each site feature and its subjectivity of the
Diffuse Flow Memo.
Table 6: Diffuse Flow Summary
Feature
Classification
Diffuse Flow Subjectivity
1A-D
Ditch
No; origin point located within the conservation easement.
1B
Ephemeral
No; origin point located within the conservation easement.
1Ca
Ditch
Yes; credit deduction applied (Figure 5, Appendix A).
1D
Ditch
No; origin point located within the conservation easement.
1E
Ditch
No; feature spans two watersheds and continues into the Dead Tree Phase B
Parcel (DWR 2020-1937v3) and subject to the Phase B conservation easement
and restoration plan. Phase A conservation easement extends to and covers
the origin point of & overland surface flow (TOB — 200') to Feature 1E.
1F
Ditch
Yes; credit deduction applied (Figure 5, Appendix A).
4.3 Riparian Area Restoration Activities
Riparian area restoration will involve planting appropriate native tree species along the riparian corridor.
Vegetation management and herbicide applications may be needed over the first few years of tree
establishment in the riparian restoration areas to prevent encroachment of undesirable species that may
out -compete the planted native vegetation. Tree species planted across the Parcel are anticipated to
include a mixture of the species listed in Table 7. Species will be well mixed within the planting scheme to
ensure diversity of bare roots across planted areas and monitoring plots. Species availability may result in
the substitution of regionally appropriate native species. A minimum of 4 species of trees will be planted.
Final species composition and density will be detailed in the As -built Report.
Space Purposefully Left Blank
Dead Tree Phase A, Bank Parcel Development Plan (DWR ID#: 2020-1937v2) Pg. 6
Tar -Pamlico River Basin 8-Digit HUC: 03020101

Table 7: Proposed Hardwood Bare Root Planting Plan by Species*
Common Name
Scientific Name
% of Total Planted Trees
Canopy Type
River birch
Betula nigra
9%
Canopy
Tulip poplar
Liriodendron tulipifera
9%
Canopy
Red mulberry
Morus rubra
9%
Midstory
Black gum
Nyssa sylvatica
5%
Midstory
Sycamore
Platanus occidentalis
5%
Canopy
Red Oak
Carya illinoinensis
3%
Canopy
Swamp chestnut oak
Quercus michauxii
9%
Canopy
Water oak
Quercus nigra
9%
Canopy
White oak
Quercus alba
9%
Canopy
American elm
Ulmus americana
9%
Canopy
Hackberry
Celtis occidentalis
5%
Midstory
Red bud
Cercis canadensis
5%
Midstory
Persimmon
Diospyros virginiana
9%
Canopy
Green ash
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
5%
Canopy
*Note: Species availability may result in the substitution of regionally appropriate native species including: Box elder
(Acer negundo), Hornbeam (Carpinus caroliniana), Sugarberry (Celtis occidentalis), Eastern cottonwood (Populus
deltoides), Overcup oak (Quercus lyrate), Willow Oak (Quercus phellos), Swamp White Oak (Quercus bicolor)
Shumard aok (Quercus shumardii), Winged elm (Ulmus alata), Silky dogwood (Cornus amomuml), Elderberry
(Sambucus nigra), Button bush (Cephalanthus occidentalis), and/or Arrowwood viburnum (Biburnum dentatum).
Trees will be planted at a density sufficient to meet the performance standards outlined in Rule 15A NCAC
02B .0295 of 260 planted trees per acre at the end of five years of monitoring. In addition, no one tree
species will be greater than 50% of the established stems. An appropriate seed mix of annual and
perennial species listed below in Table 8 will also be applied to provide temporary and permanent ground
cover for soil stabilization and reduction of sediment loss during rain events in areas without existing
herbaceous cover. Planting is tentatively scheduled for February 2022 at a density of 680 stems per acre
on 8ft x 8ft spacing.
Table 8: Proposed Seed Mix
Common Name
Scientific Name
Annual/Perennial
Plains Coreopsis
Coreopsis tinctoria
Annual
Deertongue, Tioga
Panicum clandestinum
Perennial
Blackeyed Susan
Rudbeckia hirta
Perennial
Purpletop
Tridens flavus
Perennial
Lanceleaf Coreopsis
Coreopsis lanceloata
Perennial
Clasping Coneflower
Rudbeckia amplexicaulis
Annual
Oxeye Sunflower
Heliopsis helianthoides
Perennial
Common Yarrow
Achillea millefolium
Perennial
Perennial Gaillardia (Blanketflower)
Gaillardia aristata
Perennial
Purple Coneflower
Echinacea purpurea
Perennial
Dead Tree Phase A, Bank Parcel Development Plan (DWR ID#: 2020-1937v2) Pg. 7
Tar -Pamlico River Basin 8-Digit HUC: 03020101

5.0 Monitoring and Maintenance Plan
5.1 Monitoring Protocol
Permanent vegetation monitoring plots will be installed and evaluated within the riparian buffer
restoration and nutrient offset areas to measure the survival of the planted trees. The plots will be
randomly placed throughout the planted riparian areas. A total of 49 plots (2% of the restoration credit
generating area) will be established within the riparian restoration areas (Figure 7). The size of individual
quadrants will be 100 square meters.
Vegetation assessments will be conducted and follow the Carolina Vegetation Survey (CVS) Level 2
Protocol for Recording Vegetation (2008). A reference photo will be taken from the southwestern corner
of each of the 49 plots. Photos will be taken from all photo points each monitoring year and provided in
the annual reports. All planted stems will be marked with flagging tape and recorded.
Planting is scheduled for February 2022. The first annual monitoring activities will commence at the end
of the first growing season, at least five months after planting has been completed and no earlier than the
fall season. Species composition, height, and survival rates will be evaluated on an annual basis by plot.
The total number of volunteer woody stems will also be documented and reported. The measure of
vegetative success for the Parcel will be the survival of at least four native hardwood tree species, where
no one species is greater than 50% of the established planted stems, and an established density of at least
260 planted trees per acre at the end of monitoring year five. Appropriate and desirable native volunteer
species may be included in the Parcel's density to meet the performance standards with DWR approval.
Restoration Systems shall submit the annual monitoring report to DWR by December 31 of each year for
five consecutive years and will follow the terms and conditions of the Dead Tree Phase A Mitigation
Banking Instrument (MBI).
5.2 Parcel Maintenance
If the Parcel or a specific component of the Parcel fails to achieve the success criteria outlined in Section
5.1, adaptive measures will be developed and/or appropriate remedial actions will be implemented. Site
maintenance will be performed to correct any identified problems on the Parcel that have a high likelihood
of affecting the project's success. Such items include but are not limited to fire, flooding, drought, or
insects that cause excess tree mortality. Any actions implemented will be designed to achieve the success
criteria and will include a work schedule and updated monitoring criteria. Any parcel maintenance
performed will be included in the monitoring report for that year. A rigorous herbicide schedule may need
to be implemented in the first few years of tree establishment in the restoration areas to prevent the
establishment of invasive species that may out -compete the planted native vegetation. The only
herbicides used on the Parcel will be aquatic approved herbicides that will be applied in accordance with
North Carolina Department of Agriculture rules and regulations.
The easement boundary will be checked annually as part of monitoring activities. Easement boundary
conditions and any maintenance performed will be reported in the annual monitoring reports to DWR. If
mowing is deemed necessary by the Sponsor during the monitoring period, the Sponsor must receive
approval from DWR prior to conducting any mowing activities within Tar -Pamlico Buffer Zones 1 and 2 to
ensure that no buffer violations have occurred.
Dead Tree Phase A, Bank Parcel Development Plan (DWR ID#: 2020-1937v2) Pg. 8
Tar -Pamlico River Basin 8-Digit HUC: 03020101

5.3 Parcel Protection & Easement Boundaries
Easement boundaries will be identified in the field to ensure clear distinction between the Parcel and
adjacent properties. Boundaries may be identified by fence, marker, post, tree -blazing, or other means as
allowed by site conditions and/or conservation easement and will be clearly marked prior to the Task 2
site visit by DWR. Boundary markers that have been disturbed, damaged, or destroyed will be repaired
and/or replaced on an as needed basis. Contact information for the conservation easement holder will be
included on easement markers. A complete and detailed survey of the easement boundaries will be
included in the As -Built Report.
6.0 Financial Assurances and Long -Term Management
6.1 Financial Assurances
Following approval of the Dead Tree Phase A Nutrient Offset Bank Parcel Development Package, the
Sponsor shall provide a Performance Bond from a surety that is rated no less than an "A -"as rated by A.
M. Best. The performance bond amount shall be 100% of the estimated cost for implementation of the
project as described in the Bank Parcel Development Package, but not less than $150,000. In lieu of
posting the performance bond, the Sponsor may elect to construct the project prior to the first credit
release. In that case, no performance bond will be necessary.
After completion of the restoration/construction, a separate performance/maintenance bond will be
secured for 100% of the estimated cost to implement the monitoring and maintenance plan but not less
than $100,000. The performance/maintenance bond shall apply at the inception of the monitoring period
for a term of one year and be extended annually for a minimum of five years. Upon DWR approval, this
may be lowered each year based on the adjusted cost to complete the monitoring.
Performance bonds for monitoring shall be renewed at least annually to cover the next year's monitoring
period, with confirmation of renewal provided to DWR with each annual monitoring report when
applicable. DWR reserves the right to alter the credit release schedule if monitoring reports are submitted
without proof of bond renewals when applicable.
6.2 Long Term Management Plan
The Parcel will remain in private ownership, protected in its entirety by an approved DWR long-term
steward, and will be managed under the terms detailed in an approved DWR conservation easement. The
long-term manager will be responsible for periodic inspection of the Parcel to ensure that the restrictions
documented in the recorded easement are upheld in perpetuity. The conservation easement will be
transferred to the long term steward prior to the year 4 monitoring period.
7.0 Project Credit Potential
Of the 65.44 acres protected under the conservation easement, 60.071 acres are anticipated to provide
Nitrogen and Phosphorus Nutrient Offset Credits (Figure 6) equivalent to 136,543.476 lbs. of nitrogen
offset credit and 8,794.455 lbs. of phosphorous offset credit. Riparian area restoration, with a minimum
of 50-feet from the top of bank (TOB), out 200-feet from the TOB, will general Nutrient Offset Credit. The
nutrient offset credit summary below was derived based on Restoration Systems' conceptual design and
may be adjusted in the AsBuilt Report. The management objectives, mitigation type, and proposed credits
are presented in detail in the Project Credit Table provided in Table 9. These Nutrient Offset Credits will
be neither convertible or transferable to any other credit type, including Riparian Buffer Mitigation. There
Dead Tree Phase A, Bank Parcel Development Plan (DWR ID#: 2020-1937v2) Pg. 9
Tar -Pamlico River Basin 8-Digit HUC: 03020101

are some riparian areas that will be included in the conservation easement but not receiving any credit
due to the existing condition of the vegetation that are defined as preservation/no credit areas on Figure
6. The Sponsor will maintain two separate ledgers for the Parcel, one for nitrogen offsets and one for
phosphorus offsets.
Credit deductions were calculated to account for diffused flow (DWR Diffuse Flow Memorandum 2008-
0819). Accordingly, 8,700 sq. ft. of "non-credit area" was removed in accordance with DWR's Diffuse Flow
Memorandum (Appendix A, Figure 6 & Table 9).
8.0 Credit Release
Upon submittal of the appropriate documentation by the Sponsor and subsequent approval by DWR, the
mitigation credits associated with the Dead Tree Phase A Nutrient Offset Bank Parcel will be released as
described in the credit release schedule found in the Dead Tree Umbrella Nutrient Offset Banking
Instrument.
9.0 References
Schafale, M. P. and Weakley, 2012. A Classification of the Natural Communities of North Carolina, Fourth
Approximation.
North Carolina Geological Survey, 1985, Geologic map of North Carolina: North Carolina Geological Survey,
General Geologic Map, scale 1:500000. https://deq.nc.gov/about/divisions/energy-mineral-land-
resources/north-carolina-geological-survey/ncgs-maps/1985-geologic-map-of-nc
Dead Tree Phase A, Bank Parcel Development Plan (DWR ID#: 2020-1937v2) Pg. 10
Tar -Pamlico River Basin 8-Digit HUC: 03020101

Zject Area
N Credit Conversion Ratio (ft2/pound)
P Credit Conversion Ratio (ft2/pound)
Delivered
Nutrient
Offset: P (Ibs)
2,322.554
2,227.219
a
a
Delivered
Nutrient
Offset:A(Ibs)
0E6.6.16'SZ
SLQ9£Y6Z
a
m
Convertible to
Nutrient Offset?
Y Y
Y
Y
Y Y
2
Riparian Buffer
Credits
j p 4"
u « 00
22
Z
Z
Z Z
Z
Ephemeral Reaches as %TABM
Preservation as %TABM
m`
TA 720
TA 720
Total (Creditable)
Area of Buffer
Mitigation (ft')
N/A
Total (Creditable)
Area for Buffer
Mitigation (ft')
Total Area (ft)
•
558,362
496,728
0
0
0
Total Area (sf)
0
Feature Name
0 o
43 43
0 o
.ai
.ai
Q Q
.y .i
Diffused Flow
Deduction
Features 1Ca, 1F
Totals (ft2):
Total Buffer (ft2):
Total Nutrient Offset (ft2):
Total Ephemeral Area (ft2) for Credit:
Total Eligible Ephemeral Area (ft2):
Total Eligible for Preservation (ft2):
Feature Name
m
O
m
v
Min -Max Buffer
Width (ft)
o
O
Min -Max Buffer
Width (ft)
0
4.
"
Mitigation Activity
Restoration
Restoration
Restoration
Restoration
Restoration
Restoration
Restoration
Mitigation Activity
1111
N
Feature Type
0
Ephemeral
Ephemeral
_ _
o
Enter Preservation Credits Below
Feature Type
REA OF BUFFER MITIGATION (TABM)
Credits
0.000
0.000
0.000
Total Riparian Buffer: I 0 I 0.000
TOTAL NUTRIENT OFFSET MITIGATION
Credits
136,543.476
00
Subject?
(enter NO if
ephemeral or
ditch')
Z Z
Z
Z
y y
Z
0
Square Feet
0
O O
Square Feet
2,625,411
Location
Mitigation Totals
Restoration:
Enhancement:
Preservation:
Location
Credit Type
Nutrient Offset
Nutrient Offset
Nutrient Offset
Nutrient Offset
Nutrient Offset
Nutrient Offset
Nutrient Offset
Credit Type
Mitigatia
Nutrient
Offset:

APPENDIX A — FIGURES, HISTORIC AERIAL IMAGERY (EDR), EXISTING CONDITION PHOTOS
Figure 1— Parcel Location and Service Area
Figure 2 — Site Map and Existing Conditions
Figure 3 — USGS Map
Figure 4 — NRCS Map
Figure 5 — Restoration Plan
Figure 6 — Credit Map
Figure 7 — Monitoring Map
Historic Aerial Imagery — EDR
Parcel Photos — Existing Conditions
Dead Tree Phase A, Bank Parcel Development Plan (DWR ID# 2020-1937v2) Appendices
Tar -Pamlico River Basin 8-Digit HUC: 03020101

(1)
0
111
111411.2
OQZ
.42111
0 it
pal
Edgecombe County
42
Ozw
wo
oz
0
m
92
0
0
U
0
w
Tm
L
ti

(1)
Edgecombe County
a 0 z
z0
W CO O
X z
nwO
U
Imagery: 2017 NC OneMap
0
p;
0
O
U
0
O
O
LO

(1)
Edgecombe County
a
0 a.
~a
0
0
0
0
0
U
0
O
O
LO

(1)
Edgecombe County
to
J
Oa
U2
re
Z
0
0
O
U
0
in
O
O
LO
icr

200 100 0 200 400 600 800 1,000
Feet
Feature 1A-1
Intermittent/Perennial
Feature 1A-D
Ditch
Feature 1
Intermittent/Perennial
Utility Line
30-Foot Right -Of -Way (ROW)
Propsoed Easement is 5-Feet
Byond ROW
s
No Diffuse Flow Credit Deduction Required;
Origin Point of Ditch is Included in the
Conservation Easement. Area Above Ditch to be Planted.
Feature 1 D
Ditch
Feature 1 - Start
Intermittent/Perennial
Legend
0 Project Parcels
QProposed Conservation Easement: +/- 65.44 Acres
Dead Tree Phase B Conservation Easement
Reforestation (Bare Root Planing): 61.37 Ac.
' Existing Forest / Vegetation or Non-Ag. Land Use: 1.89Ac.
In Diffuse Flow Area (DWR Memo #2008-019)
DWR Origin Points
Tar -Pam 01 / 02 8-Digit HUC Dividing Line (Based on QL2-LiDAR)
Utility Line
U Top of Bank, Parcel Features
Bank Parcel Features By Classification
Interm ittent/Perennial
- - - Ephemeral
Ditch
Diffuse Flow Credit Deduction Required;
Area to -be Planted & No Credit Given
No Diffuse Flow Credit Deduction Required;
Origin Point of Ditch is Included in the
Conservation Easement. No Connection Under
Red Hill Church Rd. Area Above Ditch to be Planted.
Feature 1E
Ditch
No Diffuse Flow Credit Deduction Required;
Edge of Easement is Start of Ditch Flow into Parcel,
Remainder of Ditch Subject to Phase B Easement
and Replanting.
IDiffuse Flow Credit Deduction Required;
Area to -be Planted & No Credit Given
Feature 1F ,
Ditch
' Soil Path Along Property Line
I to Remain. Easement Offset
30-Feet from Centerline.
�2S
RRSTORATTON
SYSTEMS LLC
Prepared for:
NC DEQ
Division of
Water Resources
401 & Isolated
WetlandslWaters
Program & 401
Stormwater
Project
DEAD TREE
PHASE A
NUTRIENT OFFSET
BANK PARCEL
Edgecombe County
Title:
RESTORATION
PLAN
Imagery: 2017 NC OneMap
Drawn by:
Date:
Scale:
RJH
OCT. 2021
1:4,500
Project No.:
2020-1937 V2
FIGURE
5

200 100 0 200 400 600 800 1,000 -
Feet
Feature 1A-1
- Intermittent/Perennial
I /
Feature 1A-D it
I l
l I
Feature 1A-E '
NOTE ABOUT WIDTHS & CREDITING:
' - Nutrient Offset Credit (NOC)
Nutrient Offset Credit is contiguous from TOB, is a minimum of
♦ 50 ft. from the TOB and a maximum of 200 ft. from the TOB.
No Diffuse Flow Credit Deduction Required;
Origin Point of Ditch is Included in the
1 Conservation Easement. Area Above Ditch to be Planted
.1
l♦ /
Legend
OProject Parcels
QProposed Conservation Easement :+/-65.44 Acres
0 Dead Tree Phase B Conservation Easement
® Existing Forest/ Vegetation or Non-Ag. Land Use: 1.89Ac.
Tar -Pam 01 / 02 &-Digit HUC Dividing Line (Based on QL2-LiDAR)
Utility Line
OTop of Bank, Parcel Features
TOB Offsets
- - TOB to 50 Feet
- TOB to 100 Feet
- TOB to 200 Feet
Bank Parcel Features By Classification
- - - Intermittent/Perennial
- - - Ephemeral
Ditch
Credit Determination
Restoration, NOC
- Preservation, No Credit
Diffuse Flow, No Credit (DWR Memo #2008-019)
Diffuse Flow Credit Deduction Requred
Area to -be Planted & No Credit Given
/ Feature 1Ca -
' r' r _ Ephemeral -`
r Featu re lB -
r
r 1 No Diffuse Flow Credit Deduction Required;
Edge of Easement is Start of Ditch Flow into Parcel,
:. 'I r r Remainder of Ditch Subjectto Phase B Easement
r L' r and Replanting.
,...g I r • ` r .
Feature 1E
Ditch
_ r
r
'v Featu re
Intermittent/Perennials
r
' s s Feature 1D _. Feature 1 - Start -
s Ditch Intermittent/Perennial _
ed ill Church d -- s /
{ - No Diffuse Flow Credit Deduction Required;
Origin Point of Ditch is Included in the
Conservation Easement. No Connection Under
Utility Line p " ' - - . 30-Foot Right -Of -Way (ROW) Red Hill Church Rd. Area Above Ditch to be Planted. '
i _ !
'N Propsoed Easement is 5-Feet ' _-
u
Byond ROW ,--
Diffuse Flow Credit Deduction Required;
Area to -be Planted & No Credit Given
Feature 1 F
Ditch
Prepared for:
NC DEQ
Division of
Water Resources
401 & Isolated
Wetland sNllate rs
Program & 401
Stormwater
Project
DEAD TREE
PHASE A
NUTRIENT OFFSET
BANK PARCEL
Edgecombe County
Title:
CREDIT
DETERMINATION
Imagery: 2017 NC OneMap
Drawn by:
RJH
Date:
OCT. 2021
Scale:
1:4, 500
Project No.:
2020-1937 V2
FIGURE
4N 6
u

200 100 0 200 400 600 800 1,000
Feet
Feature 1A-1
Intermittent/Perennial
Feature 1A-D
Ditch
Feature 1
Intermittent/Perennial
Utility Line
30-Foot Right -Of -Way (ROW)
Propsoed Easement is 5-Feet
Byond ROW
Feature 1B
Ditch
MONITORING NOTES:
Quantitative sampling will include fourty-nine (49) permanent
10 x10-meter vegetation plots, 2.01% of the Total Riparian
Restoration Area (TRRA).
1, 10 x10-meter vegetation plots = 1,076.39 sq. ft.
TRRA = 2,616,711.000 sq. ft.
2% of TRRA = 52,334.22 sq. ft. / 1,076.39 sq. ft. = 48.62
48.62 round -up = 49 vegetation plots accounting for 2.02% of the TRRA.
Feature 1Ca
Ephemeral
Feature 1 D
Ditch
Feature 1
Intermittent/Perennial
Legend
❑ CVS Monitoring Plots - 49 Total
0 Project Parcels
0 Proposed Conservation Easement: +/- 65.44 Acres
Dead Tree Phase B Conservation Easement
Existing Forest / Vegetation or Non-Ag. Land Use: 1.89Ac.
- Tar -Pam 01 / 02 8-Digit HUC Dividing Line (Based on QL2-LiDAR)
Utility Line
OTop of Bank, Parcel Features
TOB Offsets
— - — TOB to 50 Feet
— - - TOB to 100 Feet
— - - TOB to 200 Feet
Bank Parcel Features By Classification
Intermittent/Perennial
- — — Ephemeral
Ditch
Credit Determination
Restoration, NOC
Preservation, No Credit
Diffuse Flow, No Credit (DWR Memo #2008-019)
Feature 1E
Ditch
Feature 1F
Ditch
�2S
RESTORATTON
SYSTEMS LLC
Prepared for:
NC DEQ
Division of
Water Resources
401 & Isolated
Wetland slWate rs
Program & 401
Stormwater
Project
DEAD TREE
PHASE A
NUTRIENT OFFSET
BANK PARCEL
Edgecombe County
Title:
MONITORING
MAP
Imagery: 2017 NC OneMap
Drawn by:
Date:
Scale:
RJH
OCT. 2021
1:4,500
Project No.:
2020-1937 V2
FIGURE
7

Dead Tree, Phase A Bank Parcel — Tar -Pam 01; Edgecombe County
Image 1: Looking West, upper extent of Feature 1
Photo Date: 04/23/2021
Feature 1Ca
Image 2: Looking West, Feature 1E (foreground), Features 1Ca and 1D (mid -ground), Feature 1A
(background)

Dead Tree, Phase A Bank Parcel — Tar -Pam 01; Edgecombe County
Photo Date: 04/23/2021
Image 3: Looking West, Feature 1E (foreground), Features 1Ca and 1D (mid -ground), Feature 1A (background)

INQI.14RY #:6408542.3
YEAR: 2016 N
eE DR
- 875,

ti
lop
INQU4RY #: 6408542.3
YEAR: 2012
- 875'
15,
N
eEDR
4

- 875'
N
eED R

fNQ1.14RY #: 6408542.3
YEAR: 2006
N
=aio
FOR

f.
r
INQI.J4RY #: 6408542.3
YEAR: 1998
— c27F'
•
•••
• •Oh -
N
cE DR
1•14
-4
171-7/1/h.. •

- S27 eEDR
tJI

INOLPRY #:6408542.3 i
r
Nr
YEAR: 1982 Subject boundary not shown because it
exceeds image extent or image is not
= 1000' EDR _ georeferenced.

•
#NOURY #: 6408542.3
YEAR: 1977
- Q7W 6f3.YE DR
ii.Jaar-4°.
"Fr #

INQL141RY #:6408542.3
YEAR: 1974
= 875' CEDR

N
- 875'

.1"-•
't, •
f,
f NOLJ4RY #:6408542.3
YEAR: 1959 N
eE DR
' ' AA'ailet

INQUIRY #: 6408542.3
YEAR: 1950
eEDR
- 875'
ENIUMI1

APPENDIX B - DWR COMMUNICATION
Dead Tree Phase A, Bank Parcel Development Plan (DWR ID# 2020-1937v2) Appendices
Tar -Pamlico River Basin 8-Digit HUC: 03020101

DocuSign Envelope ID: A9447FB1-86AD-48D1-8CA5-7E8DA025DFEC
ROY COOPER
Governor
DIONNE DELLI-GATTI
secretary
S. DANIEL SMITH
Director
Barrett Jenkins
Restoration Systems, LLC
1101 Haynes Street, Suite 211
Raleigh, NC 27604
[e-mail]
Subject:
Project Name:
Address:
Location:
Inspection Dates:
Dear Mr. Jenkins:
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
April 6, 2021
Project 20201937
Edgecombe County
On -Site Determination for Applicability to the Tar -Pamlico Buffer Rules
15A NCAC 02B .0734
Dead Tree Nutrient Offset Site
Red Hill Church Road, Whitakers, Edgecombe County, NC
Lat., Long: 36.0890933967, -77.6164950718
12/30/20 and 1/5/21
On December 30, 2020 and January 5, 2021, Shelton Sullivan of the Division of Water
Resources (DWR) conducted an on -site review of features located on the subject property at
the request of Barrett Jenkins with Restoration Systems, LLC to determine the applicability
of features on the site to the Tar -Pamlico Riparian Area Protection Rules, Title 15A North
Carolina Administrative Code 02B .0734.
The enclosed map(s) depict the feature(s) evaluated and this information is also summarized
in the table below. Streams were evaluated for being ephemeral, at least intermittent, and
subjectivity to the Tar -Pamlico Riparian Area Protection Rules. Streams that are considered
"Subject" have been located on the most recently published NRCS Soil Survey of Edgecombe
County and/or the most recent copy of the USGS Topographic (at 1:24,000 scale) map(s),
have been located on the ground at the site, and possess characteristics that qualify them to
be at least intermittent streams. Features that are considered "Not Subject" have been
determined to not be at least intermittent, not present on the property, or not depicted on
the required maps.
This determination only addresses the applicability to the buffer rules within the
proposed easement and does not approve any activity within buffers or within waters
of the state. There may be other streams or features located on the property that
appear or do not appear on the maps referenced above. Any of the features on the site
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources
512 North Salisbury Street 1 1617 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
919.707.9000

DocuSign Envelope ID: A9447FB1-86AD-48D1-8CA5-7E8DA025DFEC
Project 20201937_Dead Tree
Edgecombe
Page 2 of 3
may be considered jurisdictional according to the US Army Corps of Engineers and
subject to the Clean Water Act.
The following table addresses the features observed and rated during the DWR site visit
Feature
ID
Feature Type: stream
(ephemeral, intermittent,
perennial), ditch, swale,
wetland, other
Subject to
Buffer
Rules
Start @
Stop @
Depicted on
Soil Survey
Depicted on
USGS Topo
lAD
Ditch
No
Not evaluated
1AE
Yes
No
1AE
Stream-E
No
1AE
lAI
Yes
No
lAI
Stream -at least I
Yes
lAI
Confluence with
Feature 1
Yes
No
1B
Stream-E
No
1B
Confluence with
Feature 1
Yes
No
1C
Ditch
No
Not evaluated
Confluence with
Feature 1
Yes
Yes
1D
Ditch
No
Not evaluated
Confluence with
Feature 1
Yes
No
lE
Ditch
No
Not evaluated
Confluence with
Feature 1
Yes
No
1F
Ditch
No
Not evaluated
1 Start
Yes
Yes
Feature
1
Stream — at least I
Yes
1 Start
Continues beyond
Easement boundary
Yes
Yes
2E
Stream - E
No
at farm
2Eroad
21 Below boundary easement
Yes
No
Feature
2
Stream — at least I
Yes
2 Start
At headcut
downstream
beyond
easement
boundary
Continues
downstream beyond
easement boundary
Yes
No
Feature
3
Stream — at least I
Yes
3 Start
At headcut
and blocks in
stream
Continues beyond
Easement boundary
Yes
No
4D
Ditch
No
Not evaluated
4 Start
No
Yes
Feature
4
Stream — at least I
Yes
4 Start
Continues beyond
Easement boundary
Yes
Yes
5D
Ditch
No
Not evaluated
Not evaluated
No
Yes
Feature
5
Stream — at least I
Yes
5 Start at
headcut
Continues beyond
Easement boundary
Yes
Yes
6D
Ditch
No
Not evaluated
Not evaluated
Yes
No
Feature
6
Stream at least I
Yes
6 Start at
creek bend
Continues beyond
Easement boundary
Yes
No
7B
Ditch
No
Not evaluated
7 Start
Yes
Yes
7C
Ditch
No
Not evaluated
Confluence with 7B
No
Yes
Feature
7
Stream — at least I
Yes
7 Start
(downstream
side of
crossing)
Continues beyond
easement boundary
Yes
Yes
8A
Ditch
No
Not evaluated
Confluence with 8B
at 8 Start
Yes
Yes
8B
Ditch
No
Not evaluated
Confluence with 8A
at 8 Start
Yes
No
Feature
8
Stream — at least I
Yes
8 Start
Confluence with
Feature 7
Yes
Yes
9B
Ditch
No
Not evaluated
9 Start
Yes
Yes
Feature
9
Stream —at least I
Yes
9 Start
Confluence with
Feature 7
Yes
Yes
1:1EC)-?,)
NDAT.-1 wain.
roar e.wir 4��
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality 1 Division of Water Resources
512 North Salisbury Street 1 1617 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
919.707.9000

DocuSign Envelope ID: A9447FB1-86AD-48D1-8CA5-7E8DA025DFEC
Project 20201937_Dead Tree
Edgecombe
Page 3 of 3
Feature
ID
Feature Type: stream
(ephemeral, intermittent,
perennial), ditch, Swale,
wetland, other
Subject to
Buffer
Rules
Start @
Stop @
Depicted on
Soil Survey
Depicted on
USGS Topo
10A
Ditch
No
Not evaluated
10 Start
No
Yes
Feature
10
Stream — at least I
Yes
10 Start
Continues to pond
beyond easement
boundary
No
Yes
Feature
11
Stream — at least I
Yes
11 Start
Continues beyond
Easement boundary
No
Yes
12
Ditch
No
Not evaluated
Continues to
Easement boundary
Yes
Yes
* E: Ephemeral, I: Intermittent, P: Perennial
This on -site determination shall expire five (5) years from the date of this letter.
Landowners or affected parties that dispute this determination made by the DWR
may request an appeal determination by the Director of Water Resources. An appeal
request must be made within sixty (60) calendar days of the date of this letter to the
Director in writing, as per 15A NCAC 02B .0734 (4).
If sending via U.S. Postal Service:
Paul Wojoski - DWR 401 & Buffer
Permitting Branch Supervisor
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
If sending via delivery service (UPS, FedEx, etc.)
Paul Wojoski - DWR 401 & Buffer
Permitting Branch Supervisor
512 N Salisbury St
Raleigh, NC 27604
This determination is final and binding as detailed above, unless an appeal is requested
within sixty (60) calendar days.
If you have any additional questions or require additional information, please contact
Shelton Sullivan at [e-mail] or 919-707-3636. This determination is
subject to review as provided in Articles 3 & 4 of G.S. 150B.
Sincerely,
,---DocuSigned by:
•e 110e�o
`-949D91BA53EF4E0...
Paul Wojoski
Supervisor, DWR 401 & Buffer Permitting
Attachments: Site Map with labels, Photos, NRCS Soil Survey, USGS Topographical Map
cc: Barrett Jenkins via email [e-mail]
Katie Merritt via email [e-mail]
401 & Buffer Permitting Branch files
Mail copies to:
Carey Newsome Barnes, 41 Longstreet Road, Weldon, NC 27890
Eureka Etheridge Farms LLC, 218 old Farm Rd., Roanoke Rapids, NC 27870
Nancy Craven, 124 Berry Hill Rd., Raleigh, NC 27615
Filename: 20201937 DeadTree StreamCalls 4-2-21.docx
DEQNET.-1 wain.
rnar e.wir 4��
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality 1 Division of Water Resources
512 North Salisbury Street 1 1617 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
919.707.9000

DocuSign Envelope ID: A9447FB1-86AD-48D1-8CA5-7E8DA025DFEC
Dead Tree Stream Calls, Shelton Sullivan DWR, 12/30/20 and 1/5/21, Google Aerials

0Z.T.11[.9G. I0 .L!!:ilE:• 11 A:�0 :iN:0 i11 00

0Z.T.11[.9G. I0 .L!!:ilE:• 11 A:�0 :iN:0 i11 00

DocuSign Envelope ID: A9447FB1-86AD-48D1-8CA5-7E8DA025DFEC

DocuSign Envelope ID: A9447FB1-86AD-48D1-8CA5-7E8DA025DFEC

DocuSign Envelope ID: A9447FB1-86AD-48D1-8CA5-7E8DA025DFEC

DocuSign Envelope ID: A9447FB1-86AD-48D1-8CA5-7E8DA025DFEC
Dead Tree Stream Call Pictures
Shelton Sullivan DWR
1 Start (flag labeled 1F)
1B Ephemeral
1AI Intermittent
2E Ephemeral

DocuSign Envelope ID: A9447FB1-86AD-48D1-8CA5-7E8DA025DFEC
3 Start
5 Start
4 Start
6 Start

DocuSign Envelope ID: A9447FB1-86AD-48D1-8CA5-7E8DA025DFEC
7 Start
9 Start
8 Start
10 Start

DocuSign Envelope ID: A9447FB1-86AD-48D1-8CA5-7E8DA025DFEC
11 Start
12 Ditch

N
o N
O LL
co
M
O
O
N
O
V
O

N
O N
O ILO
M
0
CO
r
N.
Qi
Qi
o
4—
O h
Q) D 0_
0 CO
5U2
zap(,
�,ID—
a) E o
1— oN
co cn U
0 w z

0
CO
N
0
N
0)
0
CO
O

Docu
SECURED
Certificate Of Completion
Envelope Id: A9447FB186AD48D18CA57E8DA025DFEC
Subject: Please DocuSign: 20201937_DeadTree_StreamCalls_4-6-21.pdf
Source Envelope:
Document Pages: 16 Signatures: 1
Certificate Pages: 1 Initials: 0
AutoNav: Enabled
Envelopeld Stamping: Enabled
Time Zone: (UTC-08:00) Pacific Time (US & Canada)
Status: Completed
Envelope Originator:
Shelton Sullivan
217 W. Jones Street
Raleigh, NC 27699
[e-mail]
IP Address: 149.168.204.10
Record Tracking
Status: Original
4/6/2021 8:51:00 AM
Security Appliance Status: Connected
Storage Appliance Status: Connected
Holder: Shelton Sullivan
[e-mail]
Pool: StateLocal
Pool: North Carolina Department of Environmental
Quality
Location: DocuSign
Location: DocuSign
Signer Events
Signature
Timestamp
Paul Wojoski „0—°oCoSigned by:
[e-mail]
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality �9491391Bn53EFdE0...
Security Level: Email, Account Authentication
(None)
Electronic Record and Signature Disclosure:
Not Offered via DocuSign
Signature Adoption: Pre -selected Style
Using IP Address: 107.197.154.200
Sent: 4/6/2021 8:52:38 AM
Viewed: 4/7/2021 6:48:21 AM
Signed: 4/7/2021 7:17:42 AM
Freeform Signing
In Person Signer Events
Signature
Timestamp
Editor Delivery Events
Status
Timestamp
Agent Delivery Events
Status
Timestamp
Intermediary Delivery Events
Status
Timestamp
Certified Delivery Events
Status
Timestamp
Carbon Copy Events
Status
Timestamp
Witness Events
Signature
Timestamp
Notary Events
Signature
Timestamp
Envelope Summary Events
Status
Timestamps
Envelope Sent
Certified Delivered
Signing Complete
Completed
Hashed/Encrypted
Security Checked
Security Checked
Security Checked
4/6/2021 8:52:38 AM
4/7/2021 6:48:21 AM
4/7/2021 7:17:42 AM
4/7/2021 7:17:42 AM
Payment Events
Status
Timestamps

ROY COOPER
Governor
DIONNE DELLI-GATTI
Secretory
S. DANIEL SMITH
Director
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
May 11, 2021
Barrett Jenkins
Restoration Systems, LLC
(via electronic mail: [e-mail] )
Re: Site Viability for Buffer Mitigation & Nutrient Offset — Dead Tree Phase A Site
Near 36.092169, -77.616978 off Red Hill Church Rd
Tar -Pamlico 03020101
Edgecombe County
Dear Mr. Jenkins,
On October 9, 2020, Katie Merritt, with the Division of Water Resources (DWR), received a request
from you on behalf of Restoration Systems, LLC (RS) for a site visit near the above -referenced site
in the Tar -Pamlico River Basin within the 8-digit Hydrologic Unit Code 03020101. The site visit was
to determine the potential for riparian buffer mitigation and nutrient offset within a proposed
Easement Boundary, which is more accurately shown in the attached map labeled "Dead Tree Phase
A Overview" (Figure 1) prepared by RS. On December 30, 2020, Ms. Merritt performed a site
assessment of the subject site. Staff with RS were also present.
Ms. Merritt's evaluation of the features onsite and their associated mitigation determination for the
riparian areas are provided in the table below. This evaluation was made from Top of Bank (TOB)
and landward 200' from each feature for buffer mitigation pursuant to 15A NCAC 02B .0295
(effective November 1, 2015) and for nutrient offset credits pursuant to 15A NCAC 02B .0703.
Feature
Classification
1Subject
Riparian Land uses
Buffer
'Nutrient
4'5Mitigation Type Determination w/in
onsite
to
Buffer
adjacent to Feature
Credit
Offset
riparian areas
(0-200')
Viable
Viable
Rule
1
Stream
Yes
Mostly non -forested
agricultural fields. Partially
forested areas and areas
with dense and diverse
early successional trees are
present along the right bank
downstream below
confluence of feature 1B.
See Map.
2Yes
Yes (non-
forested
fields only)
Non -forested fields - Restoration Site per
15A NCAC 02B .0295 (n)
Dense & Diverse Wooded Areas —
Preservation Site per 15A NCAC 02B
.0295 (o)(5)
Partially forested areas — Enhancement
Site per 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (n)
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources
512 North Salisbury Street 11617 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
919,707,9000

Dead Tree Phase A Site
Restoration Systems, LLC
May 11, 2021
Feature
Classification
1Subject
Riparian Land uses
Buffer
'Nutrient
4'5Mitigation Type Determination w/in
onsite
to
Buffer
adjacent to Feature
Credit
Offset
riparian areas
(0-200')
Viable
Viable
Rule
1A-1
Stream
Yes
Mostly non -forested
agricultural fields with
mature forest located along
right bank downstream.
2Yes
Yes (non-
forested
fields only)
Non -forested fields - Restoration Site per
15A NCAC 02B .0295 (n)
Forested Areas — Preservation Site per
15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(5)
1A-E
Ephemeral
No
Non -forested agricultural
fields
6Yes
Yes
Restoration Site per 15A NCAC 02B
.0295 (o)(7)
Must submit supporting documentation of
additional requirements under .0295
(o)(7) to be viable for buffer mitigation.
1A-D
Ditch
>3' depth
No
Non -forested agricultural
fields
No
Yes
Restoration Site per 15A NCAC 02B
.0295 (n)
1B
Starts @
36.093842,
-77.622377
Ephemeral
No
Non -forested agricultural
fields
*dense & diverse early
successional trees along the
confluence of feature 1 will
be assessed for feature 1.
6Yes
Yes
Restoration Site per 15A NCAC 02B
.0295 (o)(7)
Must submit supporting documentation of
additional requirements under .0295
(o)(7) to be viable for buffer mitigation.
1Ca
Starts @
36.094310,
-77.620028
Ditch
>3' depth
No
Non -forested agricultural
fields
No
Yes
Restoration Site per 15A NCAC 02B
.0295 (n)
1Cb
Upstream of
1Ca location
Ditch
>3' depth
No
Non -forested agricultural
fields
No
No
Drainage direction of overland flow does
not meet criteria as determined in the field
1D
Ditch
>3' depth
No
Non -forested agricultural
fields
No
Yes
Restoration Site per 15A NCAC 02B
.0295 (n)
1E
Ditch
>3' depth
Yes
Non -forested agricultural
fields
No
Yes
y�v"/iulal
Restoration Site per 15A NCAC 02B
.0295 (n)
1F
Ditch
>3' depth
No
Non -forested agricultural
fields
No
Yes
Restoration Site per 15A NCAC 02B
.0295 (n)
'Subjectivity calls for the features were determined by DWR in correspondence dated April 6, 2021 using the 1:24,000 scale quadrangle
topographic map prepared by USGS and the most recent printed version of the soil survey map prepared by the NRCS .
2The area of preservation credit within a buffer mitigation site shall comprise of no more than 25 percent (25%) of the total area of buffer
mitigation per 15A NCAC 0295 (o)(5) and 15A NCAC 0295 (o)(4). Site cannot be a Preservation Only site to comply with this rule.
3NC Division of Water Resources - Methodology and Calculations for determining Nutrient Reductions associated with Riparian Buffer
Establishment
4 Determinations made for this Site are determined based on the proposal provided in maps and figures submitted with the request.
5 All features proposed for buffer mitigation or nutrient offset, must have a planted conservation easement established that includes the
tops of channel banks when being measured perpendicular and landward from the banks, even if no credit is viable within that riparian
area.
6The area of the mitigation site on ephemeral channels shall comprise no more than 25 percent (25%) of the total area of buffer
mitigation per 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(7).
Page 2 of 3

Dead Tree Phase A Site
Restoration Systems, LLC
May 11, 2021
Determinations provided in the table above were made using a proposed easement boundary showing
proposed mitigation areas shown in Figure 1. A map representing the proposal for the site is attached
to this letter and is initialed by Ms. Merritt on May 11, 2021. Substantial changes to the proposed
easement boundary could affect the Site's potential to generate buffer and nutrient offset credits.
This letter does not constitute an approval of this Site to generate buffer and nutrient offset credits.
Pursuant to 15A NCAC 02B .0295, a mitigation proposal and a mitigation plan shall be submitted to
DWR for written approval prior to conducting any mitigation activities in riparian areas and/or
surface waters for buffer mitigation credit. Pursuant to 15A NCAC 02B .0703, a proposal regarding a
proposed nutrient load -reducing measure for nutrient offset credit shall be submitted to DWR for
approval prior to any mitigation activities in riparian areas and/or surface waters.
All vegetative plantings, performance criteria and other mitigation requirements for riparian
restoration, enhancement and preservation must follow the requirements in 15A NCAC 02B .0295 to
be eligible for buffer and/or nutrient offset mitigation credits. For any areas depicted as not being
viable for nutrient offset credit above, one could propose a different measure, along with supporting
calculations and sufficient detail to support estimates of load reduction, for review by the DWR to
determine viability for nutrient offset in accordance with 15A NCAC 02B .0703.
This viability assessment will expire on May 11, 2023 or upon approval of a mitigation plan by
the DWR, whichever comes first. This letter should be provided in any nutrient offset, buffer,
stream or wetland mitigation plan for this Site.
Please contact Katie Merritt at [phone] if you have any questions regarding this
correspondence.
Sincerely,
Paul Wojoski, Supervisor
401 and Buffer Permitting Branch
PW/kym
Attachments: —Dead Tree Phase A Overview" (Figure 1)"
cc: File Copy (Katie Merritt)
Page 3 of 3

cor
4 1
1I
•
r
C
0
m
U
7
.r
4�
a
S
E � v
sf
LL
J
-a rn H O r
•
c ;
30;
1
1
Phase A (Tar -Pam DI)
4
4
r
4
•

APPENDIX C —
USDA, NRCS Web Soil Survey Report
FEMA
Dead Tree Phase A, Bank Parcel Development Plan (DWR ID# 2020-1937v2) Appendices
Tar -Pamlico River Basin 8-Digit HUC: 03020101

USDA United States
Department of
Agriculture
NCS
Natural
Resources
Conservation
Service
A product of the National
Cooperative Soil Survey,
a joint effort of the United
States Department of
Agriculture and other
Federal agencies, State
agencies including the
Agricultural Experiment
Stations, and local
participants
Custom Soil Resource
Report for
Edgecom be
County, North
Carolina
Dead Tree Phase A Soil Report
June 21, 2021

Preface
Soil surveys contain information that affects land use planning in survey areas.
They highlight soil limitations that affect various land uses and provide information
about the properties of the soils in the survey areas. Soil surveys are designed for
many different users, including farmers, ranchers, foresters, agronomists, urban
planners, community officials, engineers, developers, builders, and home buyers.
Also, conservationists, teachers, students, and specialists in recreation, waste
disposal, and pollution control can use the surveys to help them understand,
protect, or enhance the environment.
Various land use regulations of Federal, State, and local governments may impose
special restrictions on land use or land treatment. Soil surveys identify soil
properties that are used in making various land use or land treatment decisions.
The information is intended to help the land users identify and reduce the effects of
soil limitations on various land uses. The landowner or user is responsible for
identifying and complying with existing laws and regulations.
Although soil survey information can be used for general farm, local, and wider area
planning, onsite investigation is needed to supplement this information in some
cases. Examples include soil quality assessments (http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/
portal/nrcs/main/soils/health/) and certain conservation and engineering
applications. For more detailed information, contact your local USDA Service Center
(https://offices.sc.egov.usda.gov/locator/app?agency=nres) or your NRCS State Soil
Scientist (http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/soils/contactus/?
cid=nres142p2_053951).
Great differences in soil properties can occur within short distances. Some soils are
seasonally wet or subject to flooding. Some are too unstable to be used as a
foundation for buildings or roads. Clayey or wet soils are poorly suited to use as
septic tank absorption fields. A high water table makes a soil poorly suited to
basements or underground installations.
The National Cooperative Soil Survey is a joint effort of the United States
Department of Agriculture and other Federal agencies, State agencies including the
Agricultural Experiment Stations, and local agencies. The Natural Resources
Conservation Service (NRCS) has leadership for the Federal part of the National
Cooperative Soil Survey.
Information about soils is updated periodically. Updated information is available
through the NRCS Web Soil Survey, the site for official soil survey information.
The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its
programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability,
and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion,
sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or a
part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not
all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require
2

alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print,
audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at [phone] (voice
and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of
Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410 or
call [phone] (voice) or [phone] (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity
provider and employer.
3

Contents
Preface 2
How Soil Surveys Are Made 5
Soil Map 8
Soil Map 9
Legend 10
Map Unit Legend 11
Map Unit Descriptions 11
Edgecombe County, North Carolina 13
AyA—Aycock very fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes 13
AyB—Aycock very fine sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes 13
ExA—Exum very fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes 15
Gr—Grantham very fine sandy loam 16
References 18
4

How Soil Surveys Are Made
Soil surveys are made to provide information about the soils and miscellaneous
areas in a specific area. They include a description of the soils and miscellaneous
areas and their location on the landscape and tables that show soil properties and
limitations affecting various uses. Soil scientists observed the steepness, length,
and shape of the slopes; the general pattern of drainage; the kinds of crops and
native plants; and the kinds of bedrock. They observed and described many soil
profiles. A soil profile is the sequence of natural layers, or horizons, in a soil. The
profile extends from the surface down into the unconsolidated material in which the
soil formed or from the surface down to bedrock. The unconsolidated material is
devoid of roots and other living organisms and has not been changed by other
biological activity.
Currently, soils are mapped according to the boundaries of major land resource
areas (MLRAs). MLRAs are geographically associated land resource units that
share common characteristics related to physiography, geology, climate, water
resources, soils, biological resources, and land uses (USDA, 2006). Soil survey
areas typically consist of parts of one or more MLRA.
The soils and miscellaneous areas in a survey area occur in an orderly pattern that
is related to the geology, landforms, relief, climate, and natural vegetation of the
area. Each kind of soil and miscellaneous area is associated with a particular kind
of landform or with a segment of the landform. By observing the soils and
miscellaneous areas in the survey area and relating their position to specific
segments of the landform, a soil scientist develops a concept, or model, of how they
were formed. Thus, during mapping, this model enables the soil scientist to predict
with a considerable degree of accuracy the kind of soil or miscellaneous area at a
specific location on the landscape.
Commonly, individual soils on the landscape merge into one another as their
characteristics gradually change. To construct an accurate soil map, however, soil
scientists must determine the boundaries between the soils. They can observe only
a limited number of soil profiles. Nevertheless, these observations, supplemented
by an understanding of the soil -vegetation -landscape relationship, are sufficient to
verify predictions of the kinds of soil in an area and to determine the boundaries.
Soil scientists recorded the characteristics of the soil profiles that they studied. They
noted soil color, texture, size and shape of soil aggregates, kind and amount of rock
fragments, distribution of plant roots, reaction, and other features that enable them
to identify soils. After describing the soils in the survey area and determining their
properties, the soil scientists assigned the soils to taxonomic classes (units).
Taxonomic classes are concepts. Each taxonomic class has a set of soil
characteristics with precisely defined limits. The classes are used as a basis for
comparison to classify soils systematically. Soil taxonomy, the system of taxonomic
classification used in the United States, is based mainly on the kind and character
of soil properties and the arrangement of horizons within the profile. After the soil
5

Custom Soil Resource Report
scientists classified and named the soils in the survey area, they compared the
individual soils with similar soils in the same taxonomic class in other areas so that
they could confirm data and assemble additional data based on experience and
research.
The objective of soil mapping is not to delineate pure map unit components; the
objective is to separate the landscape into landforms or landform segments that
have similar use and management requirements. Each map unit is defined by a
unique combination of soil components and/or miscellaneous areas in predictable
proportions. Some components may be highly contrasting to the other components
of the map unit. The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way
diminishes the usefulness or accuracy of the data. The delineation of such
landforms and landform segments on the map provides sufficient information for the
development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, onsite
investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous areas.
Soil scientists make many field observations in the process of producing a soil map.
The frequency of observation is dependent upon several factors, including scale of
mapping, intensity of mapping, design of map units, complexity of the landscape,
and experience of the soil scientist. Observations are made to test and refine the
soil -landscape model and predictions and to verify the classification of the soils at
specific locations. Once the soil -landscape model is refined, a significantly smaller
number of measurements of individual soil properties are made and recorded.
These measurements may include field measurements, such as those for color,
depth to bedrock, and texture, and laboratory measurements, such as those for
content of sand, silt, clay, salt, and other components. Properties of each soil
typically vary from one point to another across the landscape.
Observations for map unit components are aggregated to develop ranges of
characteristics for the components. The aggregated values are presented. Direct
measurements do not exist for every property presented for every map unit
component. Values for some properties are estimated from combinations of other
properties.
While a soil survey is in progress, samples of some of the soils in the area generally
are collected for laboratory analyses and for engineering tests. Soil scientists
interpret the data from these analyses and tests as well as the field -observed
characteristics and the soil properties to determine the expected behavior of the
soils under different uses. Interpretations for all of the soils are field tested through
observation of the soils in different uses and under different levels of management.
Some interpretations are modified to fit local conditions, and some new
interpretations are developed to meet local needs. Data are assembled from other
sources, such as research information, production records, and field experience of
specialists. For example, data on crop yields under defined levels of management
are assembled from farm records and from field or plot experiments on the same
kinds of soil.
Predictions about soil behavior are based not only on soil properties but also on
such variables as climate and biological activity. Soil conditions are predictable over
long periods of time, but they are not predictable from year to year. For example,
soil scientists can predict with a fairly high degree of accuracy that a given soil will
have a high water table within certain depths in most years, but they cannot predict
that a high water table will always be at a specific level in the soil on a specific date.
After soil scientists located and identified the significant natural bodies of soil in the
survey area, they drew the boundaries of these bodies on aerial photographs and
6

Custom Soil Resource Report
identified each as a specific map unit. Aerial photographs show trees, buildings,
fields, roads, and rivers, all of which help in locating boundaries accurately.
7

Soil Map
The soil map section includes the soil map for the defined area of interest, a list of
soil map units on the map and extent of each map unit, and cartographic symbols
displayed on the map. Also presented are various metadata about data used to
produce the map, and a description of each soil map unit.
8

M.22,92 °LC
M,SS,L£ °LC
006866E
060266E
006L66£
002L66£
00LL66£
009L66£
0017L66£
00£L66£
00ZL66£
En
006L66£
M„82,92 oLL
00£866£ 0OZS66£ 006966E 000266E 006L66£ 002L66£ 00LL66£ 009LE6£ 00fL66£ 0OVL66£ 0O£L66£ 00ZL66£
z
z
En
'o
Map Scale: 1:8,300 if printed on A landscape (11" x 8.5") sheet.
M„TS,L£ °LC

Custom Soil Resource Report
MAP INFORMATION
MAP LEGEND
to
a
\
/
to
\\
/)
Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale.
o
o_ 0
\/�\
o
§\/k
CL
WEt
E w
/0\/
w• Eo
ai
To
Soil Map Unit Polygons
Soil Map Unit Lines
Soil Map Unit Points
■
Special Line Features
1
Special Point Features
E
{
0
measurements.
) ce
\
( I ! 1 § j
ources
f \ :wc5w(2Ia'0ll2WwWa
\ $_�
)
/«f)- — R
/E _ 5 -\E
50670
/ ®cE
/ _ 0 0 -
\ /Ce 0 c ] //y
/ ƒ/±e z /\ / /\]7
/ § /\ = \-Qw
o §{#o
§ co{_cg _c §—Wg82
*o — \ E cow
/ /t/k\ \ 0 ]EE
/G/\) o
j./ �Lrot k— d
)\6 uQ<EW L> -
//§o# E 2
m 2
ƒ(/ /\}co\ _ /0 2 //
m Eco[o ,co \§-
2 12 \/ /\ /\ \5_ /
\f¥
\\\ //\\j /\ \j \) aN &Sf§
co
Interstate Highways
US Routes
Local Roads
m e / / CT)
5 \
\ , > |
5 a)) as
j) G 3 J
5 Z K 0 X'< 0 1# g 0> y$©
swa
Sodic Spot

Custom Soil Resource Report
Map Unit Legend
Map Unit Symbol
Map Unit Name
Acres in AOI
Percent of AOI
AyA
Aycock very fine sandy loam, 0
to 2 percent slopes
6.7
9.0%
AyB
Aycock very fine sandy loam, 2
to 6 percent slopes
19.5
26.3%
ExA
Exum very fine sandy loam, 0 to
2 percent slopes
33.6
45.3%
Gr
Grantham very fine sandy loam
14.5
19.5%
Totals for Area of Interest
74.3
100.0%
Map Unit Descriptions
The map units delineated on the detailed soil maps in a soil survey represent the
soils or miscellaneous areas in the survey area. The map unit descriptions, along
with the maps, can be used to determine the composition and properties of a unit.
A map unit delineation on a soil map represents an area dominated by one or more
major kinds of soil or miscellaneous areas. A map unit is identified and named
according to the taxonomic classification of the dominant soils. Within a taxonomic
class there are precisely defined limits for the properties of the soils. On the
landscape, however, the soils are natural phenomena, and they have the
characteristic variability of all natural phenomena. Thus, the range of some
observed properties may extend beyond the limits defined for a taxonomic class.
Areas of soils of a single taxonomic class rarely, if ever, can be mapped without
including areas of other taxonomic classes. Consequently, every map unit is made
up of the soils or miscellaneous areas for which it is named and some minor
components that belong to taxonomic classes other than those of the major soils.
Most minor soils have properties similar to those of the dominant soil or soils in the
map unit, and thus they do not affect use and management. These are called
noncontrasting, or similar, components. They may or may not be mentioned in a
particular map unit description. Other minor components, however, have properties
and behavioral characteristics divergent enough to affect use or to require different
management. These are called contrasting, or dissimilar, components. They
generally are in small areas and could not be mapped separately because of the
scale used. Some small areas of strongly contrasting soils or miscellaneous areas
are identified by a special symbol on the maps. If included in the database for a
given area, the contrasting minor components are identified in the map unit
descriptions along with some characteristics of each. A few areas of minor
components may not have been observed, and consequently they are not
mentioned in the descriptions, especially where the pattern was so complex that it
was impractical to make enough observations to identify all the soils and
miscellaneous areas on the landscape.
The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way diminishes the
usefulness or accuracy of the data. The objective of mapping is not to delineate
11

Custom Soil Resource Report
pure taxonomic classes but rather to separate the landscape into landforms or
landform segments that have similar use and management requirements. The
delineation of such segments on the map provides sufficient information for the
development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, however,
onsite investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous
areas.
An identifying symbol precedes the map unit name in the map unit descriptions.
Each description includes general facts about the unit and gives important soil
properties and qualities.
Soils that have profiles that are almost alike make up a soil series. Except for
differences in texture of the surface layer, all the soils of a series have major
horizons that are similar in composition, thickness, and arrangement.
Soils of one series can differ in texture of the surface layer, slope, stoniness,
salinity, degree of erosion, and other characteristics that affect their use. On the
basis of such differences, a soil series is divided into soil phases. Most of the areas
shown on the detailed soil maps are phases of soil series. The name of a soil phase
commonly indicates a feature that affects use or management. For example, Alpha
silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is a phase of the Alpha series.
Some map units are made up of two or more major soils or miscellaneous areas.
These map units are complexes, associations, or undifferentiated groups.
A complex consists of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas in such an intricate
pattern or in such small areas that they cannot be shown separately on the maps.
The pattern and proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat similar
in all areas. Alpha -Beta complex, 0 to 6 percent slopes, is an example.
An association is made up of two or more geographically associated soils or
miscellaneous areas that are shown as one unit on the maps. Because of present
or anticipated uses of the map units in the survey area, it was not considered
practical or necessary to map the soils or miscellaneous areas separately. The
pattern and relative proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat
similar. Alpha -Beta association, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example.
An undifferentiated group is made up of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas
that could be mapped individually but are mapped as one unit because similar
interpretations can be made for use and management. The pattern and proportion
of the soils or miscellaneous areas in a mapped area are not uniform. An area can
be made up of only one of the major soils or miscellaneous areas, or it can be made
up of all of them. Alpha and Beta soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example.
Some surveys include miscellaneous areas. Such areas have little or no soil
material and support little or no vegetation. Rock outcrop is an example.
12

Custom Soil Resource Report
Edgecombe County, North Carolina
AyA—Aycock very fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 132pg
Elevation: 80 to 330 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 38 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost -free period: 210 to 265 days
Farmland classification: All areas are prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Aycock and similar soils: 95 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Aycock
Setting
Landform: Broad interstream divides on marine terraces, flats on marine terraces
Down -slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Loamy and silty marine deposits
Typical profile
Ap - 0 to 7 inches: very fine sandy loam
E - 7 to 12 inches: very fine sandy loam
Bt - 12 to 90 inches: clay loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Well drained
Runoff class: Low
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high
(0.20 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 48 to 72 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water capacity: High (about 10.8 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 2e
Hydrologic Soil Group: B
Hydric soil rating: No
AyB—Aycock very fine sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 132ph
13

Custom Soil Resource Report
Elevation: 80 to 330 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 38 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost -free period: 210 to 265 days
Farmland classification: All areas are prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Aycock and similar soils: 90 percent
Minor components: 5 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Aycock
Setting
Landform: Broad interstream divides on marine terraces, ridges on marine
terraces
Landform position (two-dimensional): Shoulder, summit
Landform position (three-dimensional): Crest
Down -slope shape: Convex
Across -slope shape: Linear, convex
Parent material: Loamy and silty marine deposits
Typical profile
Ap - 0 to 7 inches: very fine sandy loam
E - 7 to 12 inches: very fine sandy loam
Bt - 12 to 90 inches: clay loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 2 to 6 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Well drained
Runoff class: Low
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high
(0.20 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 48 to 72 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water capacity: High (about 10.8 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3e
Hydrologic Soil Group: B
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Bibb, undrained
Percent of map unit: 3 percent
Landform: Flood plains
Landform position (two-dimensional): Toeslope
Down -slope shape: Concave
Across -slope shape: Linear
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Johnston, undrained
Percent of map unit: 2 percent
14

Custom Soil Resource Report
Landform: Flood plains
Down -slope shape: Concave
Across -slope shape: Linear
Hydric soil rating: Yes
ExA—Exum very fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 132pm
Elevation: 80 to 330 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 38 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost -free period: 210 to 265 days
Farmland classification: All areas are prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Exum and similar soils: 90 percent
Minor components: 5 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Exum
Setting
Landform: Flats on marine terraces, broad interstream divides on marine terraces
Down -slope shape: Concave
Across -slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Loamy and silty marine deposits
Typical profile
Ap - 0 to 8 inches: very fine sandy loam
E - 8 to 12 inches: silt loam
Bt - 12 to 70 inches: clay loam
C - 70 to 100 inches: loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Moderately well drained
Runoff class: Low
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high (0.20
to 0.57 in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 24 to 36 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water capacity: High (about 10.8 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 2w
Hydrologic Soil Group: C
Hydric soil rating: No
15

Custom Soil Resource Report
Minor Components
Grantham, undrained
Percent of map unit: 5 percent
Landform: Broad interstream divides on depressions, broad interstream divides on
flats
Down -slope shape: Concave
Across -slope shape: Linear, concave
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Gr—Grantham very fine sandy loam
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 132rx
Elevation: 80 to 330 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 38 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost -free period: 210 to 265 days
Farmland classification: Prime farmland if drained
Map Unit Composition
Grantham, drained, and similar soils: 85 percent
Grantham, undrained, and similar soils: 10 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Grantham, Drained
Setting
Landform: Broad interstream divides on depressions, broad interstream divides on
flats
Down -slope shape: Concave
Across -slope shape: Linear, concave
Parent material: Loamy and silty marine deposits
Typical profile
A - 0 to 6 inches: very fine sandy loam
Eg - 6 to 11 inches: very fine sandy loam
Btg - 11 to 77 inches: loam
Cg - 77 to 110 inches: loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Poorly drained
Runoff class: Low
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high (0.20
to 0.57 in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 0 to 12 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
16

Custom Soil Resource Report
Available water capacity: High (about 10.7 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3w
Hydrologic Soil Group: C/D
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Description of Grantham, Undrained
Setting
Landform: Broad interstream divides on depressions, broad interstream divides on
flats
Down -slope shape: Concave
Across -slope shape: Concave, linear
Parent material: Loamy and silty marine deposits
Typical profile
A - 0 to 6 inches: very fine sandy loam
Eg - 6 to 11 inches: very fine sandy loam
Btg - 11 to 77 inches: loam
Cg - 77 to 110 inches: loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Poorly drained
Runoff class: Low
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high (0.20
to 0.57 in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 0 to 12 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water capacity: High (about 10.7 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 6w
Hydrologic Soil Group: C/D
Hydric soil rating: Yes

References
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO).
2004. Standard specifications for transportation materials and methods of sampling
and testing. 24th edition.
American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). 2005. Standard classification of
soils for engineering purposes. ASTM Standard D2487-00.
Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Golet, and E.T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of
wetlands and deep -water habitats of the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service FWS/OBS-79/31.
Federal Register. July 13, 1994. Changes in hydric soils of the United States.
Federal Register. September 18, 2002. Hydric soils of the United States.
Hurt, G.W., and L.M. Vasilas, editors. Version 6.0, 2006. Field indicators of hydric
soils in the United States.
National Research Council. 1995. Wetlands: Characteristics and boundaries.
Soil Survey Division Staff. 1993. Soil survey manual. Soil Conservation Service.
U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 18. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/
nres/detail/national/soils/?cid =nres 142 p2_0 54262
Soil Survey Staff. 1999. Soil taxonomy: A basic system of soil classification for
making and interpreting soil surveys. 2nd edition. Natural Resources Conservation
Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 436. http://
www. nres. usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/national/soils/?cid=nres142p2_053577
Soil Survey Staff. 2010. Keys to soil taxonomy. 11th edition. U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. http://
www. nres. usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/national/soils/?cid=nres142p2_053580
Tiner, R.W., Jr. 1985. Wetlands of Delaware. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and
Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control, Wetlands
Section.
United States Army Corps of Engineers, Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps of
Engineers wetlands delineation manual. Waterways Experiment Station Technical
Report Y-87-1.
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National forestry manual. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/soils/
home/?cid=nres142p2_053374
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National range and pasture handbook. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/
detail/national/landuse/rangepastu re/?cid=stelprdb1043084
18

Custom Soil Resource Report
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National soil survey handbook, title 430-VI. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/
n res/deta i l/so i is/scie ntists/?cid=nres 142 p2_054242
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
2006. Land resource regions and major land resource areas of the United States,
the Caribbean, and the Pacific Basin. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook
296. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/national/soils/?
cid=nres142p2_053624
United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. 1961. Land
capability classification. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 210. http://
www. n res. usda.gov/I nternet/FSE_DOCU M ENTS/n res142p2_052290. pdf
19

°:
9¢ f.
%\
ei}
0 ..
0212E`
g./
PANEL 4804K
0.
! @-
) A•
°
Bk g
12| ■),/
i§; |#!§,
» �! .
1
&■§/.
$
§ : \
.
G■§ \
4APIO?DVATNV !$ 0AOI mBm0VA0q&

APPENDIX D —
NHP Report
FWS Report
Dead Tree Phase A, Bank Parcel Development Plan (DWR ID# 2020-1937v2) Appendices
Tar -Pamlico River Basin 8-Digit HUC: 03020101

ME
ENS NC DEPARTMENT OF
■•.{ ■a NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
■ ■Tx■
June 28, 2021
Alexander Baldwin
Restoration Systems, LLC
1101 Haynes Street, Suite 211
Raleigh, NC 27604
RE: Dead Tree
Dear Alexander Baldwin:
Roy Cooper, Governor
D. Reid Wilson, Secretary
Walter Clark
Director, Division of Land and Water Stewardship
NCNHDE-14953
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide
information about natural heritage resources for the project referenced above.
A query of the NCNHP database indicates that there are records for rare species, important natural
communities, natural areas, and/or conservation/managed areas within the proposed project
boundary. These results are presented in the attached `Documented Occurrences' tables and map.
The attached `Potential Occurrences' table summarizes rare species and natural communities that
have been documented within a one -mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these
records suggests that these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area
if suitable habitat exists. Tables of natural areas and conservation/managed areas within a one -mile
radius of the project area, if any, are also included in this report.
If a Federally -listed species is documented within the project area or indicated within a one -mile
radius of the project area, the NCNHP recommends contacting the US Fish and Wildlife Service
(USFWS) for guidance. Contact information for USFWS offices in North Carolina is found here:
https://www.fws.gov/offices/Directory/ListOffices.cfm?statecode=37.
Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation
planning, project review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria
for regulatory decisions. Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published
without prior written notification to the NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information
source in these publications. Maps of NCNHP data may not be redistributed without permission.
Also please note that the NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional
correspondence if a Dedicated Nature Preserve, Registered Heritage Area, Land and Water Fund
easement, or an occurrence of a Federally -listed species is documented near the project area.
If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance,
please contact Rodney A. Butler at rodney.butlerca ncdcr.gov or 919-707-8603.
Sincerely,
NC Natural Heritage Program
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
121 W. JOruES STREET, RALEIG! 1_ r'C 27603 • 16S1 MAIL SERVICE CENTER. RALEIGH. NC 276-39
OFC V19.747.9120 • FAK 919.7o7.9t21

0
a
ƒ
\
w
0
\
CD
\ \ / / / / / / /
s
/ c
\\
0 0 0 / (NI\
\
�
_
}
0
Endangered
Threatened
Threatened
> EEEEEEE E E
= _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ g
/
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
o x x x x x x x x x
< 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6
E\ 3 a. g a• a. g 3 3 <
2 2 2 < <
Occ
Observation
2
/
2014-02-19
0
\
a
Triangle Floater
Alasmidonta undulata
2005-04-06
Roanoke Slabshell
0 0
\ \
Atlantic Pigtoe
Notched Rainbow
0
a
Carolina Madtom
e
e EOƒƒw
s > > > 0
- G e
% s / % 6
\ % / \ % Y k s \
0 W 0 -2 y\ = g
\ ? > / \ / > 2 > 7 2
0 ` / 0
/ / % / I \ \ \ \ \ w «
t / j
\ \
0 m = .±
\ \ \ \ \ \ 3 / / °
\ 0
LE
% % % % W 2 2 2 \ m /\
% % %��� « E © \
_E/ _E/ > > CD CD _E 2 \ \ \ \ \ \ / / .
\ CO \ > \ > \ > \ , E E E 2 e 2
% o % o % o e ».z <
c 3 c 3 c 3 c 3 c Z e Z e Z e Z 7 c H
\
%
Collective
Elliptio roanokensis
Fusconaia masoni
Villosa constricts
Noturus furiosus
Brownwater
Bottomland
No Managed Areas Documented within the Project Area

co
a
N
co
N
0
0
z
U
z
U
0
0
LO
N
0
• V)
N n
a) 4
C
7 CO
O a
0
z
U
co z
0
c
0)• 0
0
O -0
co
C ▪ To
0
O
0
0
U
LO
0
O
CO
E
0
0
9
0
LO
0
O
CO
_cI •o
• U
0 a)
O 0
0
O 0
a)
0 0
O Le
U
( N
O co
U Ti)
O Le
O Le
cn
O
O
0
C O
1 0
O
• 0
• E
0 w
in +-
O
C
O
O O
O 0
0 +0
Q Le
X E
a
O O
O O
C
O
0 T
E 4
w �
CI
71)
0
ncnhde.natureserve.or
O

$
\
0
e
e
0
-Oro-
a)
E
}
0
/
?
\
ƒ
\
c
\ƒ
\ \ \
\
±
2
2
/
0
/
0
0
0
\
E
/
\
\
\
%
Z
\
s
\\
a e e e e e a a C e e v
CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO s s s s
e e.
0 0 / 0 0 \ Lc)
3 j
a)/ 2 %
s/ �/
Threatened
Endangered
Threatened
Threatened
> E E E E E E E E E E
/-E 2 2 2 2 2 2 4 2 2 2
= 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 0 5 5 5
e 1 e e e e e e a e e e
/ \ x x x x x I % x x x
4 m 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6
/
\ \ 3 0 ƒ o ƒ ƒ o \ \ \ 4 4
0
t
E
Z
0 3 0
\ 0
0
e
/
0
2 0 -
` \ \
Radius of tr
Z
Aft
Necturus lewisi
2001-06-12
40004 Procambarus medialis Pamlico Crayfish
Crustacean
&
0
\
a
Alasmidonta undulata Triangle Floater
0
\
a
2005-04-06
Roanoke Slabshell
Elliptio roanokensis
Atlantic Pigtoe
Fusconaia masoni
Notched Rainbow
Villosa constricts
\
a
Carolina Madtom
Noturus furiosus
0 0 0 0 0
\ 5 \ \ \
Brownwater
\
e
\ \ \ /
e a a - a
2
\ / \ / \ / \ / \ \
eeeee =
/ 7 / 7 / 7 / 7 / %
wmwCwmwmw Z
i
Bottomland
Community
»
3 d
cD -0\\/
0 ^ / CO 0
0\
/ = E \ ?/\?
_00w=a
/ / % / / D
\
0
Brownwater
\
0
Bottomland
Community
\
E
= E
% 0 %
Ze Z
Community

\\ 1 1 - a) CD a) - a) CD a)- a) - a)- `
2 E% E% E% E% c E% E% E 0 -
co
0_ C >a \ \ \ o 0 / \ \ \ % \ \
e$%/ s zszszszsea-a-o 5.2
3 ± > / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / z
& � \ :
\ a— ee6b-6b-6b-6se-60-6s% }\
2 2 § O Z a Z a Z a Z a s Z a Z a s 2 j j
\ 0 z
/ \ � \
2j
3 E• E E E E E E 3%
2 2 2 2 2
^ / / / 2 2 \ \
c ¢ ¢ ¢ y ¢ o « :
e® t .\\
k s \ \ \ \ \ E / \ ° z
= 3 / E E E E } E E / \ 0
2 e e e e e c e e
/ \ 1 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ W \ /
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
2 4 / e > > > > / \ \
a- / \ \ % % % . e % 0 77
e r Z e % % % % % % ° } E
\ 00 2 2 2 2 2 2 ° :\
= _ _ _ _ : _
/
0
e
co
\
\
.g my
J .2 / .2 / .2 / .2 / / .2 / .2 / e \
2 ®_ ®_ ®_ ®•7 = ®_ ® e 2 2
u c u c u c u e u c° c u=
/ >._>..y %.= y.= y.= g !
e \ % \ % \ e \ e s sexes «
2 \ 4 / / / / / 4- / 2 / / / / 4 /
\ \ \ \ / / / / / / / . / / / / \ \ \
\
E
Natural Areas Doc
Site Name
y y =
(\ <</ 2 2 2 2 2 2 % 2
\\ s s e t t t/% t\ ® \\
0 0> o y o> o> o> o> o
c 2 s s %
y m m r E e E% E% E 3% E% E /\
z e z e z e c z e z e w §
2 2 =_= = z= z= z = z= z\
WH ////////owDowo/% \/
se
n5
se
n5

NCNHDE-14953: Dead Tree
E
N ti
V O
O
Project Boundary
Buffered Project Boundary
NHP Natural Area (NHNA)
Managed Area (MAREA)
0
a)
0)
co
a

United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
In Reply Refer To:
Consultation Code: 04EN2000-2021-SLI-0678
Event Code: 04EN2000-2021-E-01462
Project Name: Dead Tree
February 15, 2021
Subject: List of threatened and endangered species that may occur in your proposed project
location or may be affected by your proposed project
To Whom It May Concern:
The species list generated pursuant to the information you provided identifies threatened,
endangered, proposed and candidate species, as well as proposed and final designated critical
habitat, that may occur within the boundary of your proposed project and/or may be affected by
your proposed project. The species list fulfills the requirements of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service (Service) under section 7(c) of the Endangered Species Act (Act) of 1973, as amended
(16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).
New information based on updated surveys, changes in the abundance and distribution of
species, changed habitat conditions, or other factors could change this list. Please feel free to
contact us if you need more current information or assistance regarding the potential impacts to
federally proposed, listed, and candidate species and federally designated and proposed critical
habitat. Please note that under 50 CFR 402.12(e) of the regulations implementing section 7 of the
Act, the accuracy of this species list should be verified after 90 days. This verification can be
completed formally or informally as desired. The Service recommends that verification be
completed by visiting the ECOS-IPaC website at regular intervals during project planning and
implementation for updates to species lists and information. An updated list may be requested
through the ECOS-IPaC system by completing the same process used to receive the enclosed list.
Section 7 of the Act requires that all federal agencies (or their designated non-federal
representative), in consultation with the Service, insure that any action federally authorized,
funded, or carried out by such agencies is not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of any
federally -listed endangered or threatened species. A biological assessment or evaluation may be
prepared to fulfill that requirement and in determining whether additional consultation with the
Service is necessary. In addition to the federally -protected species list, information on the
species' life histories and habitats and information on completing a biological assessment or

02/15/2021
Event Code: 04EN2000-2021-E-01462 2
evaluation and can be found on our web page at http://www.fws.gov/raleigh. Please check the
web site often for updated information or changes
If your project contains suitable habitat for any of the federally -listed species known to be
present within the county where your project occurs, the proposed action has the potential to
adversely affect those species. As such, we recommend that surveys be conducted to determine
the species' presence or absence within the project area. The use of North Carolina Natural
Heritage program data should not be substituted for actual field surveys.
If you determine that the proposed action may affect (i.e., likely to adversely affect or not likely
to adversely affect) a federally -protected species, you should notify this office with your
determination, the results of your surveys, survey methodologies, and an analysis of the effects
of the action on listed species, including consideration of direct, indirect, and cumulative effects,
before conducting any activities that might affect the species. If you determine that the proposed
action will have no effect (i.e., no beneficial or adverse, direct or indirect effect) on federally
listed species, then you are not required to contact our office for concurrence (unless an
Environmental Impact Statement is prepared). However, you should maintain a complete record
of the assessment, including steps leading to your determination of effect, the qualified personnel
conducting the assessment, habitat conditions, site photographs, and any other related articles.
Please be aware that bald and golden eagles are protected under the Bald and Golden Eagle
Protection Act (16 U.S.C. 668 et seq.), and projects affecting these species may require
development of an eagle conservation plan (http://www.fws.gov/windenergy/
eagle_guidance.html). Additionally, wind energy projects should follow the wind energy
guidelines (http://www.fws.gov/windenergy/) for minimizing impacts to migratory birds and
bats.
Guidance for minimizing impacts to migratory birds for projects including communications
towers (e.g., cellular, digital television, radio, and emergency broadcast) can be found at: http://
www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/CurrentBirdlssues/Hazards/towers/towers.htm; http://
www.towerkill.com; and http://www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/CurrentBirdlssues/Hazards/
towers/comtow.html.
Not all Threatened and Endangered Species that occur in North Carolina are subject to section 7
consultation with the U.S Fish and Wildlife Service. Atlantic and shortnose sturgeon, sea
turtles,when in the water, and certain marine mammals are under purview of the National Marine
Fisheries Service. If your project occurs in marine, estuarine, or coastal river systems you should
also contact the National Marine Fisheries Service, http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/
We appreciate your concern for threatened and endangered species. The Service encourages
Federal agencies to include conservation of threatened and endangered species into their project
planning to further the purposes of the Act. Please include the Consultation Tracking Number in
the header of this letter with any request for consultation or correspondence about your project
that you submit to our office. If you have any questions or comments, please contact John Ellis
of this office at [e-mail].

02/15/2021
Event Code: 04EN2000-2021-E-01462 3
Attachment(s):
• Official Species List

02/15/2021
Event Code: 04EN2000-2021-E-01462 1
Official Species List
This list is provided pursuant to Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, and fulfills the
requirement for Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary of the Interior information whether
any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of a proposed
action".
This species list is provided by:
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
[phone]

02/15/2021
Event Code: 04EN2000-2021-E-01462 2
Project Summary
Consultation Code: 04EN2000-2021-SLI-0678
Event Code: 04EN2000-2021-E-01462
Project Name: Dead Tree
Project Type: LAND - RESTORATION / ENHANCEMENT
Project Description: Nutrient Offset Project
Project Location:
Approximate location of the project can be viewed in Google Maps: https://
www.google.com/maps/@36.09883885000001,-77.60660904226731,14z
Counties: Edgecombe and Halifax counties, North Carolina

02/15/2021
Event Code: 04EN2000-2021-E-01462 3
Endangered Species Act Species
There is a total of 6 threatened, endangered, or candidate species on this species list.
Species on this list should be considered in an effects analysis for your project and could include
species that exist in another geographic area. For example, certain fish may appear on the species
list because a project could affect downstream species.
IPaC does not display listed species or critical habitats under the sole jurisdiction of NOAA
Fisheriesl, as USFWS does not have the authority to speak on behalf of NOAA and the
Department of Commerce.
See the "Critical habitats" section below for those critical habitats that lie wholly or partially
within your project area under this office's jurisdiction. Please contact the designated FWS office
if you have questions.
1. NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an
office of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of
Commerce.
Amphibians
NAME
Neuse River Waterdog Necturus lewisi
There is proposed critical habitat for this species. Your location overlaps the critical habitat.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6772
STATUS
Proposed
Threatened
Fishes
NAME STATUS
Carolina Madtom Noturus furiosus Proposed
There is proposed critical habitat for this species. Your location overlaps the critical habitat. Endangered
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/528

02/15/2021
Event Code: 04EN2000-2021-E-01462 4
Clams
NAME
STATUS
Atlantic Pigtoe Fusconaia masoni
There is proposed critical habitat for this species. The location of the critical habitat is not
available.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5164
Dwarf Wedgemussel Alasmidonta heterodon
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/784
Tar River Spinymussel Elliptio steinstansana
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1392
Yellow Lance Elliptio lanceolata
There is proposed critical habitat for this species. The location of the critical habitat is not
available.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/4511
Proposed
Threatened
Endangered
Endangered
Threatened
Critical habitats
There are 2 critical habitats wholly or partially within your project area under this office's
jurisdiction.
NAME STATUS
Carolina Madtom Noturus furiosus
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/528#crithab
Neuse River Waterdog Necturus lewisi
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6772#crithab
Proposed
Proposed

APPENDIX E - EDR REPORT
Dead Tree Phase A, Bank Parcel Development Plan (DWR ID# 2020-1937v2) Appendices
Tar -Pamlico River Basin 8-Digit HUC: 03020101

Dead Tree
Not Reported
Whitakers, NC 27891
Inquiry Number: 6383889.2s
February 26, 2021
The EDR Radius Map TM Report with GeoCheck®
CE DR°
6 Armstrong Road, 4th floor
Shelton, CT 06484
Toll Free: 800.352.0050
www.edrnet.com
FORM-LBD-CCA

TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION PAGE
Executive Summary _ ES1
Overview Map 2
Detail Map 3
Map Findings Summary 4
Map Findings 8
Orphan Summary_ 9
Government Records Searched/Data Currency Tracking GR-1
GEOCHECK ADDENDUM
Physical Setting Source Addendum_ A-1
Physical Setting Source Summary A-2
Physical Setting SSURGO Soil Map _ A-5
Physical Setting Source Map A-11
Physical Setting Source Map Findings A-13
Physical Setting Source Records Searched PSGR-1
Thank you for your business.
Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050
with any questions or comments.
Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice
This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data
Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from
other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL
DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION,
MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL
ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE,
ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL,
CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY
LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings,
environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor
should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I
Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any
property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice.
Copyright 2020 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole
or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission.
EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other
trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners.
TC6383889.2s Page 1

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
A search of available environmental records was conducted by Environmental Data Resources, Inc (EDR).
The report was designed to assist parties seeking to meet the search requirements of EPA's Standards
and Practices for All Appropriate Inquiries (40 CFR Part 312), the ASTM Standard Practice for
Environmental Site Assessments (E 1527-13), the ASTM Standard Practice for Environmental Site
Assessments for Forestland or Rural Property (E 2247-16), the ASTM Standard Practice for Limited
Environmental Due Diligence: Transaction Screen Process (E 1528-14) or custom requirements developed
for the evaluation of environmental risk associated with a parcel of real estate.
TARGET PROPERTY INFORMATION
ADDRESS
NOT REPORTED
WHITAKERS, NC 27891
COORDINATES
Latitude (North): 36.0923900 - 36° 5' 32.60"
Longitude (West): 77.6181660 - 77° 37' 5.39"
Universal Tranverse Mercator: Zone 18
UTM X (Meters): 264275.5
UTM Y (Meters): 3997169.2
Elevation: 120 ft. above sea level
USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP ASSOCIATED WITH TARGET PROPERTY
Target Property Map:
Version Date:
Southwest Map:
Version Date:
AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY IN THIS REPORT
Portions of Photo from:
Source:
5946137 DRAUGHN, NC
2013
5945861 WHITAKERS, NC
2013
20140521
USDA
TC6383889.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1

MAPPED SITES SUMMARY
Target Property Address:
NOT REPORTED
WHITAKERS, NC 27891
Click on Map ID to see full detail.
MAP RELATIVE DIST (ft. & mi.)
ID SITE NAME ADDRESS DATABASE ACRONYMS ELEVATION DIRECTION
NO MAPPED SITES FOUND
6383889.2s Page 2

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TARGET PROPERTY SEARCH RESULTS
The target property was not listed in any of the databases searched by EDR.
DATABASES WITH NO MAPPED SITES
No mapped sites were found in EDR's search of available ("reasonably ascertainable ") government
records either on the target property or within the search radius around the target property for the
following databases:
STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Federal NPL site list
NPL National Priority List
Proposed NPL Proposed National Priority List Sites
NPL LIENS Federal Superfund Liens
Federal Delisted NPL site list
Delisted NPL National Priority List Deletions
Federal CERCLIS list
FEDERAL FACILITY Federal Facility Site Information listing
SEMS Superfund Enterprise Management System
Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site list
SEMS-ARCHIVE Superfund Enterprise Management System Archive
Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list
CORRACTS Corrective Action Report
Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list
RCRA-TSDF RCRA - Treatment, Storage and Disposal
Federal RCRA generators list
RCRA-LQG RCRA - Large Quantity Generators
RCRA-SQG RCRA - Small Quantity Generators
RCRA-VSQG RCRA - Very Small Quantity Generators (Formerly Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity
Generators)
Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registries
LUCIS Land Use Control Information System
TC6383889.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
US ENG CONTROLS Engineering Controls Sites List
US INST CONTROLS Institutional Controls Sites List
Federal ERNS list
ERNS Emergency Response Notification System
State- and tribal - equivalent NPL
NC HSDS Hazardous Substance Disposal Site
State- and tribal - equivalent CERCLIS
SHWS . Inactive Hazardous Sites Inventory
State and tribal landfill and/or solid waste disposal site lists
SWF/LF List of Solid Waste Facilities
DEBRIS Solid Waste Active Disaster Debris Sites Listing
OLI Old Landfill Inventory
LCID Land -Clearing and Inert Debris (LCID) Landfill Notifications
State and tribal leaking storage tank lists
LAST Leaking Aboveground Storage Tanks
LUST Regional UST Database
INDIAN LUST Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUST TRUST State Trust Fund Database
State and tribal registered storage tank lists
FEMA UST Underground Storage Tank Listing
UST Petroleum Underground Storage Tank Database
AST AST Database
INDIAN UST Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
State and tribal institutional control / engineering control registries
INST CONTROL No Further Action Sites With Land Use Restrictions Monitoring
State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites
INDIAN VCP Voluntary Cleanup Priority Listing
VCP Responsible Party Voluntary Action Sites
State and tribal Brownfields sites
BROWNFIELDS Brownfields Projects Inventory
ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Local Brownfield lists
US BROWNFIELDS A Listing of Brownfields Sites
TC6383889.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY4

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites
HIST LF Solid Waste Facility Listing
SWRCY Recycling Center Listing
INDIAN ODI Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian Lands
DEBRIS REGION 9 Torres Martinez Reservation Illegal Dump Site Locations
ODI Open Dump Inventory
IHS OPEN DUMPS Open Dumps on Indian Land
Local Lists of Hazardous
US HIST CDL
US CDL
waste / Contaminated Sites
Local Land Records
Delisted National Clandestine Laboratory Register
National Clandestine Laboratory Register
LIENS 2 CERCLA Lien Information
Records of Emergency Release Reports
HMIRS
SPILLS
IMD
SPILLS 90
SPILLS 80
Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System
Spills Incident Listing
Incident Management Database
SPILLS 90 data from FirstSearch
SPILLS 80 data from FirstSearch
Other Ascertainable Records
RCRA NonGen / NLR RCRA - Non Generators / No Longer Regulated
FUDS
DOD
EPA WATCH LIST
2020 COR ACTION
TSCA_
TRIS
SSTS
ROD
RMP
RAATS
PRP
PADS
ICIS
FTTS
Formerly Used Defense Sites
Department of Defense Sites
SCRD DRYCLEANERS State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Listing
US FIN ASSUR Financial Assurance Information
EPA WATCH LIST
2020 Corrective Action Program List
Toxic Substances Control Act
Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System
Section 7 Tracking Systems
Records Of Decision
Risk Management Plans
RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System
Potentially Responsible Parties
PCB Activity Database System
Integrated Compliance Information System
FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide
Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act)
MLTS Material Licensing Tracking System
COAL ASH DOE Steam -Electric Plant Operation Data
COAL ASH EPA_ Coal Combustion Residues Surface Impoundments List
PCB Transformer Registration Database
Radiation Information Database
FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Administrative Case Listing
Incident and Accident Data
Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees
PCB TRANSFORMER
RADINFO
HIST FTTS
DOT OPS
CONSENT
TC6383889.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
INDIAN RESERV Indian Reservations
FUSRAP Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program
UMTRA Uranium Mill Tailings Sites
LEAD SMELTERS Lead Smelter Sites
US AIRS Aerometric Information Retrieval System Facility Subsystem
US MINES Mines Master Index File
ABANDONED MINES Abandoned Mines
FINDS Facility Index System/Facility Registry System
UXO Unexploded Ordnance Sites
ECHO Enforcement & Compliance History Information
DOCKET HWC Hazardous Waste Compliance Docket Listing
FUELS PROGRAM EPA Fuels Program Registered Listing
AIRS Air Quality Permit Listing
ASBESTOS ASBESTOS
COAL ASH Coal Ash Disposal Sites
DRYCLEANERS Drycleaning Sites
Financial Assurance Financial Assurance Information Listing
NPDES NPDES Facility Location Listing
UIC Underground Injection Wells Listing
AOP Animal Operation Permits Listing
PCSRP Petroleum -Contaminated Soil Remediation Permits
SEPT HAULERS Permitted Septage Haulers Listing
MINES MRDS Mineral Resources Data System
CCB Coal Ash Structural Fills (CCB) Listing
EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS
EDR Exclusive Records
EDR MGP EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plants
EDR Hist Auto EDR Exclusive Historical Auto Stations
EDR Hist Cleaner EDR Exclusive Historical Cleaners
EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES
Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives
RGA HWS Recovered Government Archive State Hazardous Waste Facilities List
RGA LF Recovered Government Archive Solid Waste Facilities List
RGA LUST Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank
SURROUNDING SITES: SEARCH RESULTS
Surrounding sites were not identified.
Unmappable (orphan) sites are not considered in the foregoing analysis.
TC6383889.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
There were no unmapped sites in this report.
TC6383889.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 7

OVERVIEW MAP - 6383889.2S
Target Property
Sites at elevations higher than
or equal to the target property
Sites at elevations lower than
the target property
Manufactured Gas Plants
National Priority List Sites
Dept. Defense Sites
N
VA
0
1/4
1/2
1 Mlles
Indian Reservations BIA
County Boundary
Special Flood Hazard Area (1%)
0.20 Annual Chance Flood Hazard
National Wetland Inventory
State Wetlands
Hazardous Substance
Disposal Sites
This report includes Interactive Map Layers to
display and/or hide map information. The
legend includes only those icons for the
default map view.
SITE NAME: Dead Tree
ADDRESS: Not Reported
Whitakers NC 27891
LAT/LONG: 36.09239 / 77.618166
CLIENT: Restoration Systems, LLC
CONTACT: JD Hamby
INQUIRY #: 6383889.2s
DATE: February 26, 2021 2:30 pm
Copyrigh
,© 2021 EDR, Inc. © 2015 TomTom Rel. 2015.

DETAIL MAP - 6383889.2S
Target Property
Sites at elevations higher than
or equal to the target property
Sites at elevations lower than
the target property
Manufactured Gas Plants
Sensitive Receptors
National Priority List Sites
Dept. Defense Sites
N
VA
0
1/8
1/4
1/2 Miles
Indian Reservations BIA
County Boundary
Special Flood Hazard Area (1%)
0.20 Annual Chance Flood Hazard
National Wetland Inventory
State Wetlands
Hazardous Substance
Disposal Sites
This report includes Interactive Map Layers to
display and/or hide map information. The
legend includes only those icons for the
default map view.
SITE NAME: Dead Tree
ADDRESS: Not Reported
Whitakers NC 27891
LAT/LONG: 36.09239 / 77.618166
CLIENT: Restoration Systems, LLC
CONTACT: JD Hamby
INQUIRY #: 6383889.2s
DATE: February 26, 2021 2:33 pm
Copyright ,© 2021 EDR, Inc. © 2015 TomTom Rel. 2015.

MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY
Database
Search
Distance Target Total
(Miles) Property < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted
STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Federal NPL site list
NPL 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
Proposed NPL 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
NPL LIENS 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
Federal Delisted NPL site list
Delisted NPL 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
Federal CERCLIS list
FEDERAL FACILITY 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
SEMS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site list
SEMS-ARCHIVE 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list
CORRACTS 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list
RCRA-TSDF 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
Federal RCRA generators list
RCRA-LQG 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
RCRA-SQG 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
RCRA-VSQG 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
Federal institutional controls /
engineering controls registries
LUCIS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
US ENG CONTROLS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
US INST CONTROLS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
Federal ERNS list
ERNS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
State- and tribal - equivalent NPL
NC HSDS 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
State- and tribal - equivalent CERCLIS
SHWS 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
State and tribal landfill and/or
solid waste disposal site lists
SWF/LF 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
DEBRIS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
OLI 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
LCID 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
TC6383889.2s Page 4

MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY
Database
Search
Distance Target Total
(Miles) Property < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted
State and tribal leaking storage tank lists
LAST 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
LUST 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
INDIAN LUST 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
LUST TRUST 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
State and tribal registered storage tank lists
FEMA UST 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
UST 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
AST 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
INDIAN UST 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
State and tribal institutional
control / engineering control registries
INST CONTROL 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites
INDIAN VCP 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
VCP 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
State and tribal Brownfields sites
BROWNFIELDS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Local Brownfield lists
US BROWNFIELDS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
Local Lists of Landfill / Solid
Waste Disposal Sites
HIST LF 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
SWRCY 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
INDIAN ODI 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
DEBRIS REGION 9 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
ODI 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
IHS OPEN DUMPS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
Local Lists of Hazardous waste /
Contaminated Sites
US HIST CDL
US CDL
Local Land Records
LIENS 2
0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
Records of Emergency Release Reports
HMIRS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
SPILLS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
IMD 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
TC6383889.2s Page 5

MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY
Database
Search
Distance Target Total
(Miles) Property < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted
SPILLS 90 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
SPILLS 80 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
Other Ascertainable Records
RCRA NonGen / NLR 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
FUDS 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
DOD 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
SCRD DRYCLEANERS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
US FIN ASSUR 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
EPA WATCH LIST 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
2020 COR ACTION 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
TSCA 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
TRIS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
SSTS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
ROD 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
RMP 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
RAATS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
PRP 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
PADS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
ICIS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
FTTS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
MLTS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
COAL ASH DOE 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
COAL ASH EPA 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
PCB TRANSFORMER 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
RADINFO 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
HIST FTTS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
DOT OPS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
CONSENT 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
INDIAN RESERV 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
FUSRAP 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
UMTRA 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
LEAD SMELTERS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
US AIRS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
US MINES 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
ABANDONED MINES 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
FINDS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
UXO 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
ECHO 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
DOCKET HWC 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
FUELS PROGRAM 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
AIRS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
ASBESTOS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
COAL ASH 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
DRYCLEANERS 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
Financial Assurance 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
NPDES 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
UIC 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
AOP 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
PCSRP 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
SEPT HAULERS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
TC6383889.2s Page 6

MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY
Search
Distance Target Total
Database (Miles) Property < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted
MINES MRDS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
CCB 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS
EDR Exclusive Records
EDR MGP 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
EDR Hist Auto 0.125 0 NR NR NR NR 0
EDR Hist Cleaner 0.125 0 NR NR NR NR 0
EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES
Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives
RGA HWS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
RGA LF 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
RGA LUST 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
- Totals -- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
NOTES:
TP = Target Property
NR = Not Requested at this Search Distance
Sites may be listed in more than one database
TC6383889.2s Page 7

Map ID
Direction
Distance
Elevation
MAP FINDINGS
EDR ID Number
Site Database(s) EPA ID Number
NO SITES FOUND
TC6383889.2s Page 8

Zip Database(s)
Site Address
ORPHAN SUMMARY
E
z
a)
w
Count: 0 records.
NO SITES FOUND
TC6383889.2s Page 9

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
To maintain currency of the following federal and state databases, EDR contacts the appropriate governmental agency
on a monthly or quarterly basis, as required.
Number of Days to Update: Provides confirmation that EDR is reporting records that have been updated within 90 days
from the date the government agency made the information available to the public.
STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Federal NPL site list
NPL: National Priority List
National Priorities List (Superfund). The NPL is a subset of CERCLIS and identifies over 1,200 sites for priority
cleanup under the Superfund Program. NPL sites may encompass relatively large areas. As such, EDR provides polygon
coverage for over 1,000 NPL site boundaries produced by EPA's Environmental Photographic Interpretation Center
(EPIC) and regional EPA offices.
Date of Government Version: 12/30/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/14/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/09/2021
Number of Days to Update: 26
Source: EPA
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 01/14/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/12/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
NPL Site Boundaries
Sources:
EPA's Environmental Photographic Interpretation Center (EPIC)
Telephone: [phone]
EPA Region 1
Telephone [phone]
EPA Region 3
Telephone [phone]
EPA Region 4
Telephone [phone]
EPA Region 5
Telephone [phone]
EPA Region 10
Telephone [phone]
EPA Region 6
Telephone: [phone]
EPA Region 7
Telephone: [phone]
EPA Region 8
Telephone: [phone]
EPA Region 9
Telephone: [phone]
Proposed NPL: Proposed National Priority List Sites
A site that has been proposed for listing on the National Priorities List through the issuance of a proposed rule
in the Federal Register. EPA then accepts public comments on the site, responds to the comments, and places on
the NPL those sites that continue to meet the requirements for listing.
Date of Government Version: 12/30/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/14/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/09/2021
Number of Days to Update: 26
Source: EPA
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 01/14/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/12/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
NPL LIENS: Federal Superfund Liens
Federal Superfund Liens. Under the authority granted the USEPA by CERCLA of 1980, the USEPA has the authority
to file liens against real property in order to recover remedial action expenditures or when the property owner
received notification of potential liability. USEPA compiles a listing of filed notices of Superfund Liens.
TC6383889.2s Page GR-1

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 10/15/1991
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/02/1994
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/30/1994
Number of Days to Update: 56
Federal Delisted NPL site list
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 08/15/2011
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/28/2011
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
Delisted NPL: National Priority List Deletions
The National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP) establishes the criteria that the
EPA uses to delete sites from the NPL. In accordance with 40 CFR 300.425.(e), sites may be deleted from the
NPL where no further response is appropriate.
Date of Government Version: 12/30/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/14/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/09/2021
Number of Days to Update: 26
Federal CERCLIS list
Source: EPA
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 01/14/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/12/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
FEDERAL FACILITY: Federal Facility Site Information listing
A listing of National Priority List (NPL) and Base Realignment and Closure (BRAG) sites found in the Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Information System (CERCLIS) Database where EPA Federal Facilities
Restoration and Reuse Office is involved in cleanup activities.
Date of Government Version: 04/03/2019
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/05/2019
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/14/2019
Number of Days to Update: 39
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/23/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/12/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
SEMS: Superfund Enterprise Management System
SEMS (Superfund Enterprise Management System) tracks hazardous waste sites, potentially hazardous waste sites,
and remedial activities performed in support of EPA's Superfund Program across the United States. The list was
formerly know as CERCLIS, renamed to SEMS by the EPA in 2015. The list contains data on potentially hazardous
waste sites that have been reported to the USEPA by states, municipalities, private companies and private persons,
pursuant to Section 103 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA).
This dataset also contains sites which are either proposed to or on the National Priorities List (NPL) and the
sites which are in the screening and assessment phase for possible inclusion on the NPL.
Date of Government Version: 12/30/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/14/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/18/2021
Number of Days to Update: 35
Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site list
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/14/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/26/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
SEMS-ARCHIVE: Superfund Enterprise Management System Archive
TC6383889.2s Page GR-2

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
SEMS-ARCHIVE (Superfund Enterprise Management System Archive) tracks sites that have no further interest under
the Federal Superfund Program based on available information. The list was formerly known as the CERCLIS-NFRAP,
renamed to SEMS ARCHIVE by the EPA in 2015. EPA may perform a minimal level of assessment work at a site while
it is archived if site conditions change and/or new information becomes available. Archived sites have been removed
and archived from the inventory of SEMS sites. Archived status indicates that, to the best of EPA's knowledge,
assessment at a site has been completed and that EPA has determined no further steps will be taken to list the
site on the National Priorities List (NPL), unless information indicates this decision was not appropriate or
other considerations require a recommendation for listing at a later time. The decision does not necessarily mean
that there is no hazard associated with a given site; it only means that. based upon available information, the
location is not judged to be potential NPL site.
Date of Government Version: 12/30/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/14/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/18/2021
Number of Days to Update: 35
Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/14/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/26/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
CORRACTS: Corrective Action Report
CORRACTS identifies hazardous waste handlers with RCRA corrective action activity.
Date of Government Version: 12/14/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/17/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/22/2020
Number of Days to Update: 5
Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/05/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
RCRA-TSDF: RCRA - Treatment, Storage and Disposal
RCRAInfo is EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database
includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste
as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Transporters are individuals or entities that
move hazardous waste from the generator offsite to a facility that can recycle, treat, store, or dispose of the
waste. TSDFs treat, store, or dispose of the waste.
Date of Government Version: 12/14/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/17/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/22/2020
Number of Days to Update: 5
Federal RCRA generators list
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/05/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
RCRA-LQG: RCRA - Large Quantity Generators
RCRAInfo is EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database
includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste
as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Large quantity generators (LQGs) generate
over 1,000 kilograms (kg) of hazardous waste, or over 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month.
Date of Government Version: 12/14/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/17/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/22/2020
Number of Days to Update: 5
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/05/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
TC6383889.2s Page GR-3

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
RCRA-SQG: RCRA - Small Quantity Generators
RCRAInfo is EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database
includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste
as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Small quantity generators (SQGs) generate
between 100 kg and 1,000 kg of hazardous waste per month.
Date of Government Version: 12/14/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/17/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/22/2020
Number of Days to Update: 5
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/05/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
RCRA-VSQG: RCRA - Very Small Quantity Generators (Formerly Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generators)
RCRAInfo is EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database
includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste
as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Very small quantity generators (VSQGs) generate
less than 100 kg of hazardous waste, or less than 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month.
Date of Government Version: 12/14/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/17/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/22/2020
Number of Days to Update: 5
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/05/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
Federal institutional controls /engineering controls registries
LUCIS: Land Use Control Information System
LUCIS contains records of land use control information pertaining to the former Navy Base Realignment and Closure
properties.
Date of Government Version: 11/11/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/17/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/09/2021
Number of Days to Update: 84
Source: Department of the Navy
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 02/08/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/24/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
US ENG CONTROLS: Engineering Controls Sites List
A listing of sites with engineering controls in place. Engineering controls include various forms of caps, building
foundations, liners, and treatment methods to create pathway elimination for regulated substances to enter environmental
media or effect human health.
Date of Government Version: 10/28/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/05/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/18/2020
Number of Days to Update: 13
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 02/23/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/06/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
US INST CONTROLS: Institutional Controls Sites List
A listing of sites with institutional controls in place. Institutional controls include administrative measures,
such as groundwater use restrictions, construction restrictions, property use restrictions, and post remediation
care requirements intended to prevent exposure to contaminants remaining on site. Deed restrictions are generally
required as part of the institutional controls.
Date of Government Version: 10/28/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/05/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/18/2020
Number of Days to Update: 13
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 02/23/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/06/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TC6383889.2s Page GR-4

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Federal ERNS list
ERNS: Emergency Response Notification System
Emergency Response Notification System. ERNS records and stores information on reported releases of oil and hazardous
substances.
Date of Government Version: 12/14/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/15/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/22/2020
Number of Days to Update: 7
State- and tribal - equivalent NPL
Source: National Response Center, United States Coast Guard
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/15/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/05/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
HSDS: Hazardous Substance Disposal Site
Locations of uncontrolled and unregulated hazardous waste sites. The file includes sites on the National Priority
List as well as those on the state priority list.
Date of Government Version: 08/09/2011
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/08/2011
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/05/2011
Number of Days to Update: 27
State- and tribal - equivalent CERCLIS
Source: North Carolina Center for Geographic Information and Analysis
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/19/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/03/2021
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
SHWS: Inactive Hazardous Sites Inventory
State Hazardous Waste Sites. State hazardous waste site records are the states' equivalent to CERCLIS. These sites
may or may not already be listed on the federal CERCLIS list. Priority sites planned for cleanup using state funds
(state equivalent of Superfund) are identified along with sites where cleanup will be paid for by potentially
responsible parties. Available information varies by state.
Date of Government Version: 11/02/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/08/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/23/2021
Number of Days to Update: 77
Source: Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/08/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/22/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
State and tribal landfill and/or solid waste disposal site lists
SWF/LF: List of Solid Waste Facilities
Solid Waste Facilities/Landfill Sites. SWF/LF type records typically contain an inventory of solid waste disposal
facilities or landfills in a particular state. Depending on the state, these may be active or inactive facilities
or open dumps that failed to meet RCRA Subtitle D Section 4004 criteria for solid waste landfills or disposal
sites.
Date of Government Version: 09/10/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/23/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/14/2020
Number of Days to Update: 82
Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/23/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/05/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
DEBRIS: Solid Waste Active Disaster Debris Sites Listing
NCDEQ Division of Waste Management Solid Waste Section Temporary Disaster Debris Staging Site (TDDSS) Locations
which are available to be activated in a disaster or emergency.. Disaster Debris Sites can only be used for temporary
disaster debris storage if the site's responsible party activates the site for use by notifying the NCDEQ DWM
Solid Waste Section staff during an emergency
Date of Government Version: 09/02/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/16/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/08/2020
Number of Days to Update: 83
Source: Department of Environmental Quality
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/14/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/29/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TC6383889.2s Page GR-5

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
OLI: Old Landfill Inventory
Old landfill inventory location information. (Does not include no further action sites and other agency lead
sites).
Date of Government Version: 09/11/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/09/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/30/2020
Number of Days to Update: 82
Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/08/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/19/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
LCID: Land -Clearing and Inert Debris (LCID) Landfill Notifications
A list all of the Land -Clearing and Inert Debris (LCID) Landfill Notification facilities (under 2 acres in
size) in North Carolina.
Date of Government Version: 04/30/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/09/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/23/2020
Number of Days to Update: 76
State and tribal leaking storage tank lists
Source: Department of Environmental Quality
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/08/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/19/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
LAST: Leaking Aboveground Storage Tanks
A listing of leaking aboveground storage tank site locations.
Date of Government Version: 10/30/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/03/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/22/2021
Number of Days to Update: 80
Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 02/03/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/17/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
LUST: Regional UST Database
This database contains information obtained from the Regional Offices. It provides a more detailed explanation
of current and historic activity for individual sites, as well as what was previously found in the Incident Management
Database. Sites in this database with Incident Numbers are considered LUSTS.
Date of Government Version: 10/30/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/03/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/18/2020
Number of Days to Update: 15
Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 02/03/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/17/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
INDIAN LUST R10: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUSTS on Indian land in Alaska, Idaho, Oregon and Washington.
Date of Government Version: 04/14/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/20/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/12/2020
Number of Days to Update: 84
Source: EPA Region 10
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/16/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/03/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN LUST R4: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUSTS on Indian land in Florida, Mississippi and North Carolina.
Date of Government Version: 04/14/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/26/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/12/2020
Number of Days to Update: 78
Source: EPA Region 4
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/16/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/03/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TC6383889.2s Page GR-6

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
INDIAN LUST R5: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
Leaking underground storage tanks located on Indian Land in Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin.
Date of Government Version: 04/14/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/20/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/12/2020
Number of Days to Update: 84
Source: EPA, Region 5
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/16/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/03/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN LUST R7: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUSTs on Indian land in Iowa, Kansas, and Nebraska
Date of Government Version: 04/15/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/20/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/12/2020
Number of Days to Update: 84
Source: EPA Region 7
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/16/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/03/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN LUST R1: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
A listing of leaking underground storage tank locations on Indian Land.
Date of Government Version: 04/29/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/20/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/12/2020
Number of Days to Update: 84
Source: EPA Region 1
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/16/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/03/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN LUST R6: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUSTs on Indian land in New Mexico and Oklahoma.
Date of Government Version: 04/08/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/20/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/12/2020
Number of Days to Update: 84
Source: EPA Region 6
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/16/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/03/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN LUST R8: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUSTS on Indian land in Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah and Wyoming.
Date of Government Version: 04/14/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/20/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/12/2020
Number of Days to Update: 84
Source: EPA Region 8
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/16/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/03/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN LUST R9: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUSTS on Indian land in Arizona, California, New Mexico and Nevada
Date of Government Version: 04/08/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/20/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/12/2020
Number of Days to Update: 84
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/16/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/03/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
LUST TRUST: State Trust Fund Database
This database contains information about claims against the State Trust Funds for reimbursements for expenses
incurred while remediating Leaking USTs.
Date of Government Version: 10/02/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/07/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/31/2020
Number of Days to Update: 85
Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/06/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/19/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
TC6383889.2s Page GR-7

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
State and tribal registered storage tank lists
FEMA UST: Underground Storage Tank Listing
A listing of all FEMA owned underground storage tanks.
Date of Government Version: 07/21/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/03/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/25/2020
Number of Days to Update: 83
Source: FEMA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/04/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/19/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
UST: Petroleum Underground Storage Tank Database
Registered Underground Storage Tanks. UST's are regulated under Subtitle I of the Resource Conservation and Recovery
Act (RCRA) and must be registered with the state department responsible for administering the UST program. Available
information varies by state program.
Date of Government Version: 10/30/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/04/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/31/2020
Number of Days to Update: 57
AST: AST Database
Facilities with aboveground storage tanks
Date of Government Version: 08/12/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/15/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/07/2020
Number of Days to Update: 83
Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 02/03/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/17/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
that have a capacity greater than 21,000 gallons.
Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/09/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/29/2021
Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually
INDIAN UST R10: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 10 (Alaska, Idaho, Oregon, Washington, and Tribal Nations).
Date of Government Version: 04/14/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/20/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/12/2020
Number of Days to Update: 84
Source: EPA Region 10
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/15/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/03/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN UST R6: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 6 (Louisiana, Arkansas, Oklahoma, New Mexico, Texas and 65 Tribes).
Date of Government Version: 04/08/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/20/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/12/2020
Number of Days to Update: 84
Source: EPA Region 6
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/16/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/03/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN UST R7: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 7 (Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska, and 9 Tribal Nations).
Date of Government Version: 04/03/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/20/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/12/2020
Number of Days to Update: 84
Source: EPA Region 7
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/16/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/03/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TC6383889.2s Page GR-8

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
INDIAN UST R1: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 1 (Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, Vermont and ten Tribal
Nations).
Date of Government Version: 04/29/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/20/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/12/2020
Number of Days to Update: 84
Source: EPA, Region 1
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/16/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/03/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN UST R8: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 8 (Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah, Wyoming and 27 Tribal Nations).
Date of Government Version: 04/14/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/20/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/13/2020
Number of Days to Update: 85
Source: EPA Region 8
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/16/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/03/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN UST R9: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 9 (Arizona, California, Hawaii, Nevada, the Pacific Islands, and Tribal Nations).
Date of Government Version: 04/08/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/20/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/12/2020
Number of Days to Update: 84
Source: EPA Region 9
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/16/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/03/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN UST R4: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 4 (Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee
and Tribal Nations)
Date of Government Version: 04/14/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/26/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/12/2020
Number of Days to Update: 78
Source: EPA Region 4
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/16/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/03/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN UST R5: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 5 (Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin and Tribal Nations).
Date of Government Version: 04/14/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/20/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/12/2020
Number of Days to Update: 84
Source: EPA Region 5
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/16/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/03/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
State and tribal institutional control / engineering control registries
INST CONTROL: No Further Action Sites With Land Use Restrictions Monitoring
A land use restricted site is a property where there are limits or requirements on future use of the property
due to varying levels of cleanup possible, practical, or necessary at the site.
Date of Government Version: 09/04/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/09/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/03/2020
Number of Days to Update: 85
Source: Department of Environmental Quality
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/11/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/22/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
TC6383889.2s Page GR-9

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites
INDIAN VCP R7: Voluntary Cleanup Priority Lisitng
A listing of voluntary cleanup priority sites located on Indian Land located in Region 7.
Date of Government Version: 03/20/2008
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/22/2008
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/19/2008
Number of Days to Update: 27
Source: EPA, Region 7
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 04/20/2009
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/20/2009
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN VCP R1: Voluntary Cleanup Priority Listing
A listing of voluntary cleanup priority sites located on Indian Land located in Region 1.
Date of Government Version: 07/27/2015
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/29/2015
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/18/2016
Number of Days to Update: 142
Source: EPA, Region 1
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/15/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/05/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
VCP: Responsible Party Voluntary Action Sites
Responsible Party Voluntary Action site locations.
Date of Government Version: 11/02/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/08/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/23/2021
Number of Days to Update: 77
State and tribal Brownfields sites
Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/08/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/22/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
BROWNFIELDS: Brownfields Projects Inventory
A brownfield site is an abandoned, idled, or underused property where the threat of environmental contamination
has hindered its redevelopment. All of the sites in the inventory are working toward a brownfield agreement for
cleanup and liabitliy control.
Date of Government Version: 12/01/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/08/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/09/2020
Number of Days to Update: 1
ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Local Brownfield lists
Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/08/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/12/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
US BROWNFIELDS: A Listing of Brownfields Sites
Brownfields are real property, the expansion, redevelopment, or reuse of which may be complicated by the presence
or potential presence of a hazardous substance, pollutant, or contaminant. Cleaning up and reinvesting in these
properties takes development pressures off of undeveloped, open land, and both improves and protects the environment.
Assessment, Cleanup and Redevelopment Exchange System (ACRES) stores information reported by EPA Brownfields
grant recipients on brownfields properties assessed or cleaned up with grant funding as well as information on
Targeted Brownfields Assessments performed by EPA Regions. A listing of ACRES Brownfield sites is obtained from
Cleanups in My Community. Cleanups in My Community provides information on Brownfields properties for which information
is reported back to EPA, as well as areas served by Brownfields grant programs.
Date of Government Version: 09/14/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/15/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/10/2020
Number of Days to Update: 86
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/11/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/29/2021
Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually
TC6383889.2s Page GR-10

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites
HIST LF: Solid Waste Facility Listing
A listing of solid waste facilities.
Date of Government Version: 11/06/2006
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/13/2007
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/02/2007
Number of Days to Update: 17
SWRCY: Recycling Center Listing
A listing of recycling center locations.
Date of Government Version: 09/16/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/17/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/09/2020
Number of Days to Update: 83
Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/19/2009
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/25/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/10/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN ODI: Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian Lands
Location of open dumps on Indian land.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/1998
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/03/2007
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/24/2008
Number of Days to Update: 52
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/25/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/10/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
DEBRIS REGION 9: Torres Martinez Reservation Illegal Dump Site Locations
A listing of illegal dump sites location on the Torres Martinez Indian Reservation located in eastern Riverside
County and northern Imperial County, California.
Date of Government Version: 01/12/2009
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/07/2009
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/21/2009
Number of Days to Update: 137
Source: EPA, Region 9
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/19/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/03/2021
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
ODI: Open Dump Inventory
An open dump is defined as a disposal facility that does not comply with one or more of the Part 257 or Part 258
Subtitle D Criteria.
Date of Government Version: 06/30/1985
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/09/2004
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/17/2004
Number of Days to Update: 39
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/09/2004
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
IHS OPEN DUMPS: Open Dumps on Indian Land
A listing of all open dumps located on Indian Land in the United States.
Date of Government Version: 04/01/2014
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/06/2014
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/29/2015
Number of Days to Update: 176
Source: Department of Health & Human Serivces, Indian Health Service
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/29/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/10/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites
TC6383889.2s Page GR-11

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
US HIST CDL: National Clandestine Laboratory Register
A listing of clandestine drug lab locations that have been removed from the DEAs National Clandestine Laboratory
Register.
Date of Government Version: 03/18/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/19/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/09/2020
Number of Days to Update: 82
Source: Drug Enforcement Administration
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 02/22/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/06/2021
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
US CDL: Clandestine Drug Labs
A listing of clandestine drug lab locations. The U.S. Department of Justice ("the Department") provides this
web site as a public service. It contains addresses of some locations where law enforcement agencies reported
they found chemicals or other items that indicated the presence of either clandestine drug laboratories or dumpsites.
In most cases, the source of the entries is not the Department, and the Department has not verified the entry
and does not guarantee its accuracy. Members of the public must verify the accuracy of all entries by, for example,
contacting local law enforcement and local health departments.
Date of Government Version: 03/18/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/19/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/09/2020
Number of Days to Update: 82
Local Land Records
Source: Drug Enforcement Administration
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 02/22/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/06/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
LIENS 2: CERCLA Lien Information
A Federal CERCLA ('Superfund') lien can exist by operation of law at any site or property at which EPA has spent
Superfund monies. These monies are spent to investigate and address releases and threatened releases of contamination.
CERCLIS provides information as to the identity of these sites and properties.
Date of Government Version: 12/30/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/14/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/18/2021
Number of Days to Update: 35
Records of Emergency Release Reports
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/14/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/12/2021
Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually
HMIRS: Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System
Hazardous Materials Incident Report System. HMIRS contains hazardous material spill incidents reported to DOT.
Date of Government Version: 09/20/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/22/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/14/2020
Number of Days to Update: 83
Source: U.S. Department of Transportation
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/05/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
SPILLS: Spills Incident Listing
A listing spills, hazardous material releases, sanitary sewer overflows, wastewater treatment plant bypasses and
upsets, citizen complaints, and any other environmental emergency calls reported to the agency.
Date of Government Version: 10/09/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/22/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/14/2021
Number of Days to Update: 84
Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/11/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/22/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
IMD: Incident Management Database
Groundwater and/or soil contamination incidents
TC6383889.2s Page GR-12

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 10/30/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/03/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/21/2021
Number of Days to Update: 79
Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 02/03/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/17/2021
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
SPILLS 90: SPILLS90 data from FirstSearch
Spills 90 includes those spill and release records available exclusively from FirstSearch databases. Typically,
they may include chemical, oil and/or hazardous substance spills recorded after 1990. Duplicate records that are
already included in EDR incident and release records are not included in Spills 90.
Date of Government Version: 09/27/2012
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/03/2013
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/06/2013
Number of Days to Update: 62
Source: FirstSearch
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 01/03/2013
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
SPILLS 80: SPILLS80 data from FirstSearch
Spills 80 includes those spill and release records available from FirstSearch databases prior to 1990. Typically,
they may include chemical, oil and/or hazardous substance spills recorded before 1990. Duplicate records that
are already included in EDR incident and release records are not included in Spills 80.
Date of Government Version: 06/14/2001
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/03/2013
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/06/2013
Number of Days to Update: 62
Other Ascertainable Records
Source: FirstSearch
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 01/03/2013
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
RCRA NonGen / NLR: RCRA - Non Generators / No Longer Regulated
RCRAInfo is EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database
includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste
as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Non -Generators do not presently generate hazardous
waste.
Date of Government Version: 12/14/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/17/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/22/2020
Number of Days to Update: 5
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/05/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
FUDS: Formerly Used Defense Sites
The listing includes locations of Formerly Used Defense Sites properties where the US Army Corps of Engineers
is actively working or will take necessary cleanup actions.
Date of Government Version: 09/29/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/17/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/25/2021
Number of Days to Update: 69
Source: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 02/17/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/31/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
DOD: Department of Defense Sites
This data set consists of federally owned or administered lands, administered by the Department of Defense, that
have any area equal to or greater than 640 acres of the United States, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2005
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/10/2006
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/11/2007
Number of Days to Update: 62
Source: USGS
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/15/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/26/2021
Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually
TC6383889.2s Page GR-13

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
FEDLAND: Federal and Indian Lands
Federally and Indian administrated lands of the United States. Lands included are administrated by: Army Corps
of Engineers, Bureau of Reclamation, National Wild and Scenic River, National Wildlife Refuge, Public Domain Land,
Wilderness, Wilderness Study Area, Wildlife Management Area, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Bureau of Land Management,
Department of Justice, Forest Service, Fish and Wildlife Service, National Park Service.
Date of Government Version: 04/02/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/11/2018
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/06/2019
Number of Days to Update: 574
Source: U.S. Geological Survey
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/07/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/19/2021
Data Release Frequency: N/A
SCRD DRYCLEANERS: State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Listing
The State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners was established in 1998, with support from the U.S. EPA Office
of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation. It is comprised of representatives of states with established
drycleaner remediation programs. Currently the member states are Alabama, Connecticut, Florida, Illinois, Kansas,
Minnesota, Missouri, North Carolina, Oregon, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, and Wisconsin.
Date of Government Version: 01/01/2017
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/03/2017
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/07/2017
Number of Days to Update: 63
US FIN ASSUR: Financial Assurance Information
All owners and operators of facilities that treat,
proof that they will have sufficient funds to pay
Date of Government Version: 09/21/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/22/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/14/2020
Number of Days to Update: 83
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 02/09/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/24/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
store, or dispose of hazardous waste are required to provide
for the clean up, closure, and post -closure care of their facilities.
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/05/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
EPA WATCH LIST: EPA WATCH LIST
EPA maintains a "Watch List' to facilitate dialogue between EPA, state and local environmental agencies on enforcement
matters relating to facilities with alleged violations identified as either significant or high priority. Being
on the Watch List does not mean that the facility has actually violated the law only that an investigation by
EPA or a state or local environmental agency has led those organizations to allege that an unproven violation
has in fact occurred. Being on the Watch List does not represent a higher level of concern regarding the alleged
violations that were detected, but instead indicates cases requiring additional dialogue between EPA, state and
local agencies - primarily because of the length of time the alleged violation has gone unaddressed or unresolved.
Date of Government Version: 08/30/2013
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/21/2014
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/17/2014
Number of Days to Update: 88
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 02/02/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/17/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
2020 COR ACTION: 2020 Corrective Action Program List
The EPA has set ambitious goals for the RCRA Corrective Action program by creating the 2020 Corrective Action
Universe. This RCRA cleanup baseline includes facilities expected to need corrective action. The 2020 universe
contains a wide variety of sites. Some properties are heavily contaminated while others were contaminated but
have since been cleaned up. Still others have not been fully investigated yet, and may require little or no remediation.
Inclusion in the 2020 Universe does not necessarily imply failure on the part of a facility to meet its RCRA obligations.
Date of Government Version: 09/30/2017
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/08/2018
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/20/2018
Number of Days to Update: 73
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 02/05/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/17/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TC6383889.2s Page GR-14

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
TSCA: Toxic Substances Control Act
Toxic Substances Control Act. TSCA identifies manufacturers and importers of chemical substances included on the
TSCA Chemical Substance Inventory list. It includes data on the production volume of these substances by plant
site.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/17/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/10/2020
Number of Days to Update: 85
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/18/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/29/2021
Data Release Frequency: Every 4 Years
TRIS: Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System
Toxic Release Inventory System. TRIS identifies facilities which release toxic chemicals to the air, water and
land in reportable quantities under SARA Title III Section 313.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/14/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/04/2020
Number of Days to Update: 82
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 02/02/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/31/2021
Data Release Frequency: Annually
SSTS: Section 7 Tracking Systems
Section 7 of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act, as amended (92 Stat. 829) requires all
registered pesticide -producing establishments to submit a report to the Environmental Protection Agency by March
1st each year. Each establishment must report the types and amounts of pesticides, active ingredients and devices
being produced, and those having been produced and sold or distributed in the past year.
Date of Government Version: 10/19/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/19/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/04/2021
Number of Days to Update: 77
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/21/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/03/2021
Data Release Frequency: Annually
ROD: Records Of Decision
Record of Decision. ROD documents mandate a permanent remedy at an NPL (Superfund) site containing technical
and health information to aid in the cleanup.
Date of Government Version: 12/30/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/14/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/18/2021
Number of Days to Update: 35
RMP: Risk Management Plans
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/14/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/15/2021
Data Release Frequency: Annually
TC6383889.2s Page GR-15

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
When Congress passed the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, it required EPA to publish regulations and guidance
for chemical accident prevention at facilities using extremely hazardous substances. The Risk Management Program
Rule (RMP Rule) was written to implement Section 112(r) of these amendments. The rule, which built upon existing
industry codes and standards, requires companies of all sizes that use certain flammable and toxic substances
to develop a Risk Management Program, which includes a(n): Hazard assessment that details the potential effects
of an accidental release, an accident history of the last five years, and an evaluation of worst -case and alternative
accidental releases; Prevention program that includes safety precautions and maintenance, monitoring, and employee
training measures; and Emergency response program that spells out emergency health care, employee training measures
and procedures for informing the public and response agencies (e.g the fire department) should an accident occur.
Date of Government Version: 11/02/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/12/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/25/2021
Number of Days to Update: 74
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/19/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/03/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
RAATS: RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System
RCRA Administration Action Tracking System. RAATS contains records based on enforcement actions issued under RCRA
pertaining to major violators and includes administrative and civil actions brought by the EPA. For administration
actions after September 30, 1995, data entry in the RAATS database was discontinued. EPA will retain a copy of
the database for historical records. It was necessary to terminate RAATS because a decrease in agency resources
made it impossible to continue to update the information contained in the database.
Date of Government Version: 04/17/1995
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/03/1995
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/07/1995
Number of Days to Update: 35
PRP: Potentially Responsible Parties
A listing of verified Potentially Responsible
Date of Government Version: 04/27/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/06/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/09/2020
Number of Days to Update: 34
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/02/2008
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/01/2008
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
Parties
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/14/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/17/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
PADS: PCB Activity Database System
PCB Activity Database. PADS Identifies generators, transporters, commercial storers and/or brokers and disposers
of PCB's who are required to notify the EPA of such activities.
Date of Government Version: 10/09/2019
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/11/2019
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/20/2019
Number of Days to Update: 70
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/08/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/19/2021
Data Release Frequency: Annually
ICIS: Integrated Compliance Information System
The Integrated Compliance Information System (ICIS) supports the information needs of the national enforcement
and compliance program as well as the unique needs of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)
program.
Date of Government Version: 11/18/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/23/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/10/2017
Number of Days to Update: 79
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/30/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/19/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
TC6383889.2s Page GR-16

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
FTTS: FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act)
FTTS tracks administrative cases and pesticide enforcement actions and compliance activities related to FIFRA,
TSCA and EPCRA (Emergency Planning and Community Right -to -Know Act). To maintain currency, EDR contacts the
Agency on a quarterly basis.
Date of Government Version: 04/09/2009
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/16/2009
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/11/2009
Number of Days to Update: 25
Source: EPA/Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 08/18/2017
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/04/2017
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
FTTS INSP: FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act)
A listing of FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) inspections and enforcements.
Date of Government Version: 04/09/2009
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/16/2009
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/11/2009
Number of Days to Update: 25
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 08/18/2017
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/04/2017
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
MLTS: Material Licensing Tracking System
MLTS is maintained by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and contains a list of approximately 8,100 sites which
possess or use radioactive materials and which are subject to NRC licensing requirements. To maintain currency,
EDR contacts the Agency on a quarterly basis.
Date of Government Version: 08/05/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/10/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/08/2020
Number of Days to Update: 59
Source: Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/19/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/03/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
COAL ASH DOE: Steam -Electric Plant Operation Data
A listing of power plants that store ash in surface ponds.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2019
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/01/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/09/2021
Number of Days to Update: 70
Source: Department of Energy
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/01/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/15/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
COAL ASH EPA: Coal Combustion Residues Surface Impoundments List
A listing of coal combustion residues surface impoundments with high hazard potential ratings.
Date of Government Version: 01/12/2017
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/05/2019
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/11/2019
Number of Days to Update: 251
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 11/30/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/15/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
PCB TRANSFORMER: PCB Transformer Registration Database
The database of PCB transformer registrations that includes all PCB registration submittals.
Date of Government Version: 09/13/2019 Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/06/2019 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/10/2020 Last EDR Contact: 02/05/2021
Number of Days to Update: 96 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/17/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
RADINFO: Radiation Information Database
The Radiation Information Database (RADINFO) contains information about facilities that are regulated by U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulations for radiation and radioactivity.
TC6383889.2s Page GR-17

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 07/01/2019
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2019
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/23/2019
Number of Days to Update: 84
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/08/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/12/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
HIST FTTS: FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Administrative Case Listing
A complete administrative case listing from the FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) for all ten EPA regions. The
information was obtained from the National Compliance Database (NCDB). NCDB supports the implementation of FIFRA
(Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act) and TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act). Some EPA regions
are now closing out records. Because of that, and the fact that some EPA regions are not providing EPA Headquarters
with updated records, it was decided to create a HIST FTTS database. It included records that may not be included
in the newer FTTS database updates. This database is no longer updated.
Date of Government Version: 10/19/2006
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/01/2007
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/10/2007
Number of Days to Update: 40
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2007
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/17/2008
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
HIST FTTS INSP: FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Inspection & Enforcement Case Listing
A complete inspection and enforcement case listing from the FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) for all ten EPA
regions. The information was obtained from the National Compliance Database (NCDB). NCDB supports the implementation
of FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act) and TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act). Some
EPA regions are now closing out records. Because of that, and the fact that some EPA regions are not providing
EPA Headquarters with updated records, it was decided to create a HIST FTTS database. It included records that
may not be included in the newer FTTS database updates. This database is no longer updated.
Date of Government Version: 10/19/2006
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/01/2007
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/10/2007
Number of Days to Update: 40
DOT OPS: Incident and Accident Data
Department of Transporation, Office of Pipeline
Date of Government Version: 01/02/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/28/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/17/2020
Number of Days to Update: 80
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2008
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/17/2008
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
Safety Incident and Accident data.
Source: Department of Transporation, Office of Pipeline Safety
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/27/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/10/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
CONSENT: Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees
Major legal settlements that establish responsibility and standards for cleanup at NPL (Superfund) sites. Released
periodically by United States District Courts after settlement by parties to litigation matters.
Date of Government Version: 09/30/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/08/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/04/2021
Number of Days to Update: 88
Source: Department of Justice, Consent Decree Library
Telephone: Varies
Last EDR Contact: 01/04/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/19/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
BRS: Biennial Reporting System
The Biennial Reporting System is a national system administered by the EPA that collects data on the generation
and management of hazardous waste. BRS captures detailed data from two groups: Large Quantity Generators (LQG)
and Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facilities.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2017
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/22/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/20/2020
Number of Days to Update: 151
Source: EPA/NTIS
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/23/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/05/2021
Data Release Frequency: Biennially
TC6383889.2s Page GR-18

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
INDIAN RESERV: Indian Reservations
This map layer portrays Indian administered lands of the United States that have any area equal to or greater
than 640 acres.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2014
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/14/2015
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/10/2017
Number of Days to Update: 546
Source: USGS
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/08/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/19/2021
Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually
FUSRAP: Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program
DOE established the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP) in 1974 to remediate sites where
radioactive contamination remained from Manhattan Project and early U.S. Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) operations.
Date of Government Version: 08/08/2017
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/11/2018
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/14/2018
Number of Days to Update: 3
Source: Department of Energy
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 02/02/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/17/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
UMTRA: Uranium Mill Tailings Sites
Uranium ore was mined by private companies for federal government use in national defense programs. When the mills
shut down, large piles of the sand -like material (mill tailings) remain after uranium has been extracted from
the ore. Levels of human exposure to radioactive materials from the piles are low; however, in some cases tailings
were used as construction materials before the potential health hazards of the tailings were recognized.
Date of Government Version: 08/30/2019
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/15/2019
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/28/2020
Number of Days to Update: 74
LEAD SMELTER 1: Lead Smelter Sites
A listing of former lead smelter site locations.
Date of Government Version: 12/30/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/14/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/09/2021
Number of Days to Update: 26
Source: Department of Energy
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 02/18/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/31/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/14/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/12/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
LEAD SMELTER 2: Lead Smelter Sites
A list of several hundred sites in the U.S. where secondary lead smelting was done from 1931and 1964. These sites
may pose a threat to public health through ingestion or inhalation of contaminated soil or dust
Date of Government Version: 04/05/2001
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/27/2010
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/02/2010
Number of Days to Update: 36
Source: American Journal of Public Health
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/02/2009
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
US AIRS (AFS): Aerometric Information Retrieval System Facility Subsystem (AFS)
The database is a sub -system of Aerometric Information Retrieval System (AIRS). AFS contains compliance data
on air pollution point sources regulated by the U.S. EPA and/or state and local air regulatory agencies. This
information comes from source reports by various stationary sources of air pollution, such as electric power plants,
steel mills, factories, and universities, and provides information about the air pollutants they produce. Action,
air program, air program pollutant, and general level plant data. It is used to track emissions and compliance
data from industrial plants.
TC6383889.2s Page GR-19

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 10/12/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/26/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/03/2017
Number of Days to Update: 100
US AIRS MINOR: Air Facility System Data
A listing of minor source facilities.
Date of Government Version: 10/12/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/26/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/03/2017
Number of Days to Update: 100
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 09/26/2017
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/08/2018
Data Release Frequency: Annually
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 09/26/2017
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/08/2018
Data Release Frequency: Annually
MINES VIOLATIONS: MSHA Violation Assessment Data
Mines violation and assessment information. Department of Labor, Mine Safety & Health Administration.
Date of Government Version: 11/24/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/30/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/25/2021
Number of Days to Update: 56
Source: DOL, Mine Safety & Health Admi
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 11/24/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/15/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
US MINES: Mines Master Index File
Contains all mine identification numbers issued for mines active or opened since 1971. The data also includes
violation information.
Date of Government Version: 11/03/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/23/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/25/2021
Number of Days to Update: 63
Source: Department of Labor, Mine Safety and Health Administration
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 02/24/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/06/2021
Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually
US MINES 2: Ferrous and Nonferrous Metal Mines Database Listing
This map layer includes ferrous (ferrous metal mines are facilities that extract ferrous metals, such as iron
ore or molybdenum) and nonferrous (Nonferrous metal mines are facilities that extract nonferrous metals, such
as gold, silver, copper, zinc, and lead) metal mines in the United States.
Date of Government Version: 05/06/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/27/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/13/2020
Number of Days to Update: 78
Source: USGS
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 11/25/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/08/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
US MINES 3: Active Mines & Mineral Plants Database Listing
Active Mines and Mineral Processing Plant operations for commodities monitored by the Minerals Information Team
of the USGS.
Date of Government Version: 04/14/2011
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/08/2011
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/13/2011
Number of Days to Update: 97
Source: USGS
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 11/25/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/08/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
ABANDONED MINES: Abandoned Mines
An inventory of land and water impacted by past mining (primarily coal mining) is maintained by OSMRE to provide
information needed to implement the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 (SMCRA). The inventory
contains information on the location, type, and extent of AML impacts, as well as, information on the cost associated
with the reclamation of those problems. The inventory is based upon field surveys by State, Tribal, and OSMRE
program officials. It is dynamic to the extent that it is modified as new problems are identified and existing
problems are reclaimed.
TC6383889.2s Page GR-20

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 09/16/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/17/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/10/2020
Number of Days to Update: 84
Source: Department of Interior
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/10/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/22/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
FINDS: Facility Index System/Facility Registry System
Facility Index System. FINDS contains both facility information and 'pointers' to other sources that contain more
detail. EDR includes the following FINDS databases in this report: PCS (Permit Compliance System), AIRS (Aerometric
Information Retrieval System), DOCKET (Enforcement Docket used to manage and track information on civil judicial
enforcement cases for all environmental statutes), FURS (Federal Underground Injection Control), C-DOCKET (Criminal
Docket System used to track criminal enforcement actions for all environmental statutes), FFIS (Federal Facilities
Information System), STATE (State Environmental Laws and Statutes), and PADS (PCB Activity Data System).
Date of Government Version: 11/04/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/01/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/25/2021
Number of Days to Update: 55
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/01/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/15/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
DOCKET HWC: Hazardous Waste Compliance Docket Listing
A complete list of the Federal Agency Hazardous Waste Compliance Docket Facilities.
Date of Government Version: 11/03/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/17/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/09/2021
Number of Days to Update: 84
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 11/17/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/08/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
ECHO: Enforcement & Compliance History Information
ECHO provides integrated compliance and enforcement information for about 800,000 regulated facilities nationwide.
Date of Government Version: 10/03/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/06/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/04/2021
Number of Days to Update: 90
UXO: Unexploded Ordnance Sites
A listing of unexploded ordnance site locations
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/02/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/17/2020
Number of Days to Update: 77
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/08/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/19/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
Source: Department of Defense
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/15/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/26/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
FUELS PROGRAM: EPA Fuels Program Registered Listing
This listing includes facilities that are registered under the Part 80 (Code of Federal Regulations) EPA Fuels
Programs. All companies now are required to submit new and updated registrations.
Date of Government Version: 11/13/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/13/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/25/2021
Number of Days to Update: 73
AIRS: Air Quality Permit Listing
A listing of facilities with air quality permits.
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 02/17/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/31/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
TC6383889.2s Page GR-21

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 12/07/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/08/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/23/2021
Number of Days to Update: 77
ASBESTOS: ASBESTOS
Asbestos notification sites
Date of Government Version: 10/30/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/23/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/08/2021
Number of Days to Update: 77
Source: Department of Environmental Quality
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/08/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/22/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
Source: Department of Health & Human Services
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/19/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/03/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
COAL ASH: Coal Ash Disposal Sites
A listing of coal combustion products distribution permits issued by the Division for the treatment, storage,
transportation, use and disposal of coal combustion products.
Date of Government Version: 09/10/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/23/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/14/2020
Number of Days to Update: 82
Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/23/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/05/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
DRYCLEANERS: Drycleaning Sites
Potential and known drycleaning sites, active and abandoned, that the Drycleaning Solvent Cleanup Program has
knowledge of and entered into this database.
Date of Government Version: 09/08/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/16/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/08/2020
Number of Days to Update: 83
Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/18/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/29/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
Financial Assurance 1: Financial Assurance Information Listing
A listing of financial assurance information for underground storage tank facilities. Financial assurance is intended
to ensure that resources are available to pay for the cost of closure, post -closure care, and corrective measures
if the owner or operator of a regulated facility is unable or unwilling to pay.
Date of Government Version: 10/30/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/04/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/31/2020
Number of Days to Update: 57
Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 02/03/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/17/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
Financial Assurance 2: Financial Assurance Information Listing
Information for solid waste facilities. Financial assurance is intended to ensure that resources are available
to pay for the cost of closure, post -closure care, and corrective measures if the owner or operator of a regulated
facility is unable or unwilling to pay.
Date of Government Version: 10/02/2012
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/03/2012
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/26/2012
Number of Days to Update: 23
Source: Department of Environmental & Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/16/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/05/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
Financial Assurance 3: Financial Assurance Information
Hazardous waste financial assurance information.
TC6383889.2s Page GR-22

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 12/02/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/03/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/18/2021
Number of Days to Update: 77
NPDES: NPDES Facility Location Listing
General information regarding NPDES(National
Date of Government Version: 10/01/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/27/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/15/2021
Number of Days to Update: 80
Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/02/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/22/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
Pollutant Discharge Elimination System) permits.
Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/27/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/10/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
UIC: Underground Injection Wells Listing
A listing of uncerground injection wells locations.
Date of Government Version: 10/26/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/30/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/07/2020
Number of Days to Update: 7
AOP: Animal Operation Permits Listing
This listing includes animal operations that are
Date of Government Version: 04/01/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/26/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/27/2020
Number of Days to Update: 1
Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 11/25/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/15/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
required to be permitted by the state.
Source: Department of Environmental Quality
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/11/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/22/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
CCB: Coal Ash Structural Fills (CCB) Listing
These are not permitted Coal Ash landfills A list all of the now closed Coal Ash Structural Fills (CCB) in North
Carolina, in point data form. The purpose is to provide the public and other government entities a visual overview
of coal ash structural fills throughout the state and increase public awareness of their current locations.
Date of Government Version: 02/27/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/07/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/23/2020
Number of Days to Update: 78
MINES MRDS: Mineral Resources Data System
Mineral Resources Data System
Date of Government Version: 04/06/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/21/2019
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/24/2019
Number of Days to Update: 3
Source: Department of Environmental Quality
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/08/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/19/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
Source: USGS
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 11/25/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/08/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
SEPT HAULERS: Permitted Septage Haulers Listing
This list of all active and permitted Septage Land Application Site (SLAS) and Septage Detention and Treatment
Facility (SDTF) sites in North Carolina. The purpose of this map is to provide the public and government entities
a visual overview of the businesses that manage septage and septage facilities throughout the state.
Date of Government Version: 05/13/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/07/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/23/2020
Number of Days to Update: 78
Source: Department of Environmental Quality
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/08/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/19/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TC6383889.2s Page GR-23

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
PCSRP: Petroleum -Contaminated Soil Remediation Permits
To treat petroleum -contaminated soil in order to protect North Carolinaa??s environment and the health of the
citizens of North Carolina.
Date of Government Version: 07/06/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/07/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/23/2020
Number of Days to Update: 78
Source: Department of Environmental Quality
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/30/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/18/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
PCS: Permit Compliance System
PCS is a computerized management information system that contains data on National Pollutant Discharge Elimination
System (NPDES) permit holding facilities. PCS tracks the permit, compliance, and enforcement status of NPDES
facilities.
Date of Government Version: 07/14/2011
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/05/2011
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/29/2011
Number of Days to Update: 55
Source: EPA, Office of Water
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/04/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/19/2021
Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually
PCS INACTIVE: Listing of Inactive PCS Permits
An inactive permit is a facility that has shut down or is no longer discharging.
Date of Government Version: 11/05/2014
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/06/2015
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/06/2015
Number of Days to Update: 120
PCS ENF: Enforcement data
No description is available for this data
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2014
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/05/2015
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/06/2015
Number of Days to Update: 29
EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS
EDR Exclusive Records
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/04/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/19/2021
Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/30/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/19/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
EDR MGP: EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plants
The EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plant Database includes records of coal gas plants (manufactured gas plants)
compiled by EDR's researchers. Manufactured gas sites were used in the United States from the 1800's to 1950's
to produce a gas that could be distributed and used as fuel. These plants used whale oil, rosin, coal, or a mixture
of coal, oil, and water that also produced a significant amount of waste. Many of the byproducts of the gas production,
such as coal tar (oily waste containing volatile and non-volatile chemicals), sludges, oils and other compounds
are potentially hazardous to human health and the environment. The byproduct from this process was frequently
disposed of directly at the plant site and can remain or spread slowly, serving as a continuous source of soil
and groundwater contamination.
Date of Government Version: N/A
Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports: N/A
Number of Days to Update: N/A
Source: EDR, Inc.
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: N/A
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
EDR Hist Auto: EDR Exclusive Historical Auto Stations
EDR has searched selected national collections of business directories and has collected listings of potential
gas station/filling station/service station sites that were available to EDR researchers. EDR's review was limited
to those categories of sources that might, in EDR's opinion, include gas station/filling station/service station
establishments. The categories reviewed included, but were not limited to gas, gas station, gasoline station,
filling station, auto, automobile repair, auto service station, service station, etc. This database falls within
a category of information EDR classifies as "High Risk Historical Records", or HRHR. EDR's HRHR effort presents
unique and sometimes proprietary data about past sites and operations that typically create environmental concerns,
but may not show up in current government records searches.
TC6383889.2s Page GR-24

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: N/A
Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports: N/A
Number of Days to Update: N/A
Source: EDR, Inc.
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: N/A
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: Varies
EDR Hist Cleaner: EDR Exclusive Historical Cleaners
EDR has searched selected national collections of business directories and has collected listings of potential
dry cleaner sites that were available to EDR researchers. EDR's review was limited to those categories of sources
that might, in EDR's opinion, include dry cleaning establishments. The categories reviewed included, but were
not limited to dry cleaners, cleaners, laundry, laundromat, cleaning/laundry, wash & dry etc. This database falls
within a category of information EDR classifies as "High Risk Historical Records", or HRHR. EDR's HRHR effort
presents unique and sometimes proprietary data about past sites and operations that typically create environmental
concerns, but may not show up in current government records searches.
Date of Government Version: N/A
Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports: N/A
Number of Days to Update: N/A
EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES
Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives
Source: EDR, Inc.
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: N/A
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: Varies
RGA HWS: Recovered Government Archive State Hazardous Waste Facilities List
The EDR Recovered Government Archive State Hazardous Waste database provides a list of SHWS incidents derived
from historical databases and includes many records that no longer appear in current government lists. Compiled
from Records formerly available from the Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources in North Carolina.
Date of Government Version: N/A
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2013
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/24/2013
Number of Days to Update: 176
Source: Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2012
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: Varies
RGA LF: Recovered Government Archive Solid Waste Facilities List
The EDR Recovered Government Archive Landfill database provides a list of landfills derived from historical databases
and includes many records that no longer appear in current government lists. Compiled from Records formerly available
from the Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources in North Carolina.
Date of Government Version: N/A
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2013
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/13/2014
Number of Days to Update: 196
Source: Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2012
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: Varies
RGA LUST: Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank
The EDR Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank database provides a list of LUST incidents
derived from historical databases and includes many records that no longer appear in current government lists.
Compiled from Records formerly available from the Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources in North
Carolina.
Date of Government Version: N/A
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2013
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/20/2013
Number of Days to Update: 172
Source: Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2012
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TC6383889.2s Page GR-25

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
OTHER DATABASE(S)
Depending on the geographic area covered by this report, the data provided in these specialty databases may or may not be
complete. For example, the existence of wetlands information data in a specific report does not mean that all wetlands in the
area covered by the report are included. Moreover, the absence of any reported wetlands information does not necessarily
mean that wetlands do not exist in the area covered by the report.
CT MANIFEST: Hazardous Waste Manifest Data
Facility and manifest data. Manifest is a document that lists and tracks hazardous waste from the generator through
transporters to a tsd facility.
Date of Government Version: 08/10/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/20/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/02/2020
Number of Days to Update: 13
NJ MANIFEST: Manifest Information
Hazardous waste manifest information.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/10/2019
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/16/2019
Number of Days to Update: 36
NY MANIFEST: Facility and Manifest Data
Manifest is a document that lists and tracks
facility.
Date of Government Version: 01/01/2019
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/29/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/10/2020
Number of Days to Update: 72
PA MANIFEST: Manifest Information
Hazardous waste manifest information.
Date of Government Version: 06/30/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/19/2019
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/10/2019
Number of Days to Update: 53
RI MANIFEST: Manifest information
Hazardous waste manifest information
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2019
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/11/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/24/2021
Number of Days to Update: 13
WI MANIFEST: Manifest Information
Hazardous waste manifest information.
Date of Government Version: 05/31/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/19/2019
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/03/2019
Number of Days to Update: 76
Source: Department of Energy & Environmental Protection
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 02/12/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/24/2021
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
Source: Department of Environmental Protection
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 01/08/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/19/2021
Data Release Frequency: Annually
hazardous waste from the generator through transporters to a TSD
Source: Department of Environmental Conservation
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/29/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/10/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
Source: Department of Environmental Protection
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/11/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/26/2021
Data Release Frequency: Annually
Source: Department of Environmental Management
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 02/09/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/31/2021
Data Release Frequency: Annually
Source: Department of Natural Resources
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 12/03/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/22/2021
Data Release Frequency: Annually
TC6383889.2s Page GR-26

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Oil/Gas Pipelines
Source: Endeavor Business Media
Petroleum Bundle (Crude Oil, Refined Products, Petrochemicals, Gas Liquids (LPG/NGL), and Specialty
Gases (Miscellaneous)) N = Natural Gas Bundle (Natural Gas, Gas Liquids (LPG/NGL), and Specialty Gases
(Miscellaneous)). This map includes information copyrighted by Endeavor Business Media. This information
is provided on a best effort basis and Endeavor Business Media does not guarantee its accuracy nor warrant its
fitness for any particular purpose. Such information has been reprinted with the permission of Endeavor Business
Media.
Electric Power Transmission Line Data
Source: Endeavor Business Media
This map includes information copyrighted by Endeavor Business Media. This information is provided on a best
effort basis and Endeavor Business Media does not guarantee its accuracy nor warrant its fitness for any
particular purpose. Such information has been reprinted with the permission of Endeavor Business Media.
Sensitive Receptors: There are individuals deemed sensitive receptors due to their fragile immune systems and special sensitivity
to environmental discharges. These sensitive receptors typically include the elderly, the sick, and children. While the location of all
sensitive receptors cannot be determined, EDR indicates those buildings and facilities - schools, daycares, hospitals, medical centers,
and nursing homes - where individuals who are sensitive receptors are likely to be located.
AHA Hospitals:
Source: American Hospital Association, Inc.
Telephone: [phone]
The database includes a listing of hospitals based on the American Hospital Association's annual survey of hospitals.
Medical Centers: Provider of Services Listing
Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
Telephone: [phone]
A listing of hospitals with Medicare provider number, produced by Centers of Medicare & Medicaid Services,
a federal agency within the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
Nursing Homes
Source: National Institutes of Health
Telephone: [phone]
Information on Medicare and Medicaid certified nursing homes in the United States.
Public Schools
Source: National Center for Education Statistics
Telephone: [phone]
The National Center for Education Statistics' primary database on elementary
and secondary public education in the United States. It is a comprehensive, annual, national statistical
database of all public elementary and secondary schools and school districts, which contains data that are
comparable across all states.
Private Schools
Source: National Center for Education Statistics
Telephone: [phone]
The National Center for Education Statistics' primary database on private school locations in the United States.
Daycare Centers: Child Care Facility List
Source: Department of Health & Human Services
Telephone: [phone]
Flood Zone Data: This data was obtained from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). It depicts 100-year and
500-year flood zones as defined by FEMA. It includes the National Flood Hazard Layer (NFHL) which incorporates Flood
Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) data and Q3 data from FEMA in areas not covered by NFHL.
Source: FEMA
Telephone: [phone]
Date of Government Version: 2003, 2015
NWI: National Wetlands Inventory. This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR
in 2002, 2005 and 2010 from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
State Wetlands Data: Wetland Inventory
Source: US Fish & Wildlife Service
Telephone: [phone]
TC6383889.2s Page GR-27

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Current USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Map
Source: U.S. Geological Survey
STREET AND ADDRESS INFORMATION
© 2015 TomTom North America, Inc. All rights reserved. This material is proprietary and the subject of copyright protection
and other intellectual property rights owned by or licensed to Tele Atlas North America, Inc. The use of this material is subject
to the terms of a license agreement. You will be held liable for any unauthorized copying or disclosure of this material.
TC6383889.2s Page GR-28

GEOCHECK
- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE ADDENDUM
TARGET PROPERTY ADDRESS
DEAD TREE
NOT REPORTED
WHITAKERS, NC 27891
TARGET PROPERTY COORDINATES
Latitude (North):
Longitude (West):
Universal Tranverse Mercator:
UTM X (Meters):
UTM Y (Meters):
Elevation:
USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP
Target Property Map:
Version Date:
Southwest Map:
Version Date:
36.09239 - 36° 5' 32.60"
77.618166 - 77° 37' 5.40"
Zone 18
264275.5
3997169.2
120 ft. above sea level
5946137 DRAUGHN, NC
2013
5945861 WHITAKERS, NC
2013
EDR's GeoCheck Physical Setting Source Addendum is provided to assist the environmental professional in
forming an opinion about the impact of potential contaminant migration.
Assessment of the impact of contaminant migration generally has two principle investigative components:
1. Groundwater flow direction, and
2. Groundwater flow velocity.
Groundwater flow direction may be impacted by surface topography, hydrology, hydrogeology, characteristics
of the soil, and nearby wells. Groundwater flow velocity is generally impacted by the nature of the
geologic strata.
TC6383889.2s Page A-1

GEOCHECK® - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
GROUNDWATER FLOW DIRECTION INFORMATION
Groundwater flow direction for a particular site is best determined by a qualified environmental professional
using site -specific well data. If such data is not reasonably ascertainable, it may be necessary to rely on other
sources of information, such as surface topographic information, hydrologic information, hydrogeologic data
collected on nearby properties, and regional groundwater flow information (from deep aquifers).
TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION
Surface topography may be indicative of the direction of surficial groundwater flow. This information can be used to
assist the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or,
should contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted.
TARGET PROPERTY TOPOGRAPHY
General Topographic Gradient: General WNW
SURROUNDING TOPOGRAPHY: ELEVATION PROFILES
0
W
0
W
N W W
A A
North
TP
South
as a
w O = + N + O co O N W W pp O O O i N -
West
TP
0
Target Property Elevation: 120 ft.
1/2
East
1 Miles
Source: Topography has been determined from the USGS 7.5' Digital Elevation Model and should be evaluated
on a relative (not an absolute) basis. Relative elevation information between sites of close proximity
should be field verified.
TC6383889.2s Page A-2

GEOCHECK® - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
HYDROLOGIC INFORMATION
Surface water can act as a hydrologic barrier to groundwater flow. Such hydrologic information can be used to assist
the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, should
contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted.
Refer to the Physical Setting Source Map following this summary for hydrologic information (major waterways
and bodies of water).
FEMA FLOOD ZONE
Flood Plain Panel at Target Property FEMA Source Type
3720480400K FEMA FIRM Flood data
Additional Panels in search area: FEMA Source Type
3720480600K FEMA FIRM Flood data
3720481600K FEMA FIRM Flood data
NATIONAL WETLAND INVENTORY
NWI Electronic
NWI Quad at Target Property Data Coverage
DRAUGHN YES - refer to the Overview Map and Detail Map
HYDROGEOLOGIC INFORMATION
Hydrogeologic information obtained by installation of wells on a specific site can often be an indicator
of groundwater flow direction in the immediate area. Such hydrogeologic information can be used to assist the
environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, should
contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted.
AQUIFLOW®
Search Radius: 1.000 Mile.
EDR has developed the AQUIFLOW Information System to provide data on the general direction of groundwater
flow at specific points. EDR has reviewed reports submitted by environmental professionals to regulatory
authorities at select sites and has extracted the date of the report, groundwater flow direction as determined
hydrogeologically, and the depth to water table.
MAP ID
Not Reported
LOCATION
FROM TP
GENERAL DIRECTION
GROUNDWATER FLOW
TC6383889.2s Page A-3

GEOCHECK® - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
GROUNDWATER FLOW VELOCITY INFORMATION
Groundwater flow velocity information for a particular site is best determined by a qualified environmental professional
using site specific geologic and soil strata data. If such data are not reasonably ascertainable, it may be necessary
to rely on other sources of information, including geologic age identification, rock stratigraphic unit and soil
characteristics data collected on nearby properties and regional soil information. In general, contaminant plumes
move more quickly through sandy -gravelly types of soils than silty -clayey types of soils.
GEOLOGIC INFORMATION IN GENERAL AREA OF TARGET PROPERTY
Geologic information can be used by the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the relative speed
at which contaminant migration may be occurring.
ROCK STRATIGRAPHIC UNIT GEOLOGIC AGE IDENTIFICATION
Era: Cenozoic Category: Stratified Sequence
System: Tertiary
Series: Miocene
Code: Tm (decoded above as Era, System & Series)
Geologic Age and Rock Stratigraphic Unit Source: P.G. Schruben, R.E. Arndt and W.J. Bawiec, Geology
of the Conterminous U.S. at 1:2,500,000 Scale - a digital representation of the 1974 P.B. King and H.M. Beikman
Map, USGS Digital Data Series DDS - 11 (1994).
TC6383889.2s Page A-4

SSURGO SOIL MAP - 6383889.2s
* Target Property
/\/ SSURGO Soil
/\/ Water
SITE NAME: Dead Tree
ADDRESS: Not Reported
Whitakers NC 27891
LAT/LONG: 36.09239 / 77.618166
CLIENT: Restoration Systems, LLC
CONTACT: JD Hamby
INQUIRY #: 6383889.2s
DATE: February 26, 2021 2:34 pm
Copyrigh
,© 2021 EDR, Inc. © 2015 TomTom Rel. 2015.

GEOCHECK® - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
DOMINANT SOIL COMPOSITION IN GENERAL AREA OF TARGET PROPERTY
The U.S. Department of Agriculture's (USDA) Soil Conservation Service (SCS) leads the National Cooperative Soil
Survey (NCSS) and is responsible for collecting, storing, maintaining and distributing soil survey information
for privately owned lands in the United States. A soil map in a soil survey is a representation of soil patterns
in a landscape. The following information is based on Soil Conservation Service SSURGO data.
Soil Map ID: 1
Soil Component Name: Grantham
Soil Surface Texture: very fine sandy loam
Hydrologic Group: Class D - Very slow infiltration rates. Soils are clayey, have a high
water table, or are shallow to an impervious layer.
Soil Drainage Class: Poorly drained
Hydric Status: All hydric
Corrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: High
Depth to Bedrock Min:
Depth to Watertable Min:
> 0 inches
> 15 inches
Soil Layer Information
Boundary
Classification
Saturated
hydraulic
conductiviy
micro m/sec
Soil Reaction
(pH)
Layer
Upper
Lower
Soil Texture Class
AASHTO Group
Unified Soil
1
0 inches
5 inches
very fine sandy
loam
Silt -Clay
Materials (more
than 35 pct.
passing No.
200), Silty
Soils.
FINE-GRAINED
SOILS, Silts and
Clays (liquid
limit less than
50%), Lean Clay
Max: 4
Min: 1.4
Max: 5.5
Min: 3.5
2
5 inches
11 inches
very fine sandy
loam
Silt -Clay
Materials (more
than 35 pct.
passing No.
200), Silty
Soils.
FINE-GRAINED
SOILS, Silts and
Clays (liquid
limit less than
50%), Lean Clay
Max: 4
Min: 1.4
Max: 5.5
Min: 3.5
3
11 inches
77 inches
loam
Silt -Clay
Materials (more
than 35 pct.
passing No.
200), Silty
Soils.
FINE-GRAINED
SOILS, Silts and
Clays (liquid
limit less than
50%), Lean Clay
Max: 4
Min: 1.4
Max: 5.5
Min: 3.5
4
77 inches
109
inches
stratified clay
loam to loam to
sand
Silt -Clay
Materials (more
than 35 pct.
passing No.
200), Silty
Soils.
FINE-GRAINED
SOILS, Silts and
Clays (liquid
limit less than
50%), Lean Clay
Max: 4
Min: 1.4
Max: 5.5
Min: 3.5
TC6383889.2s Page A-6

GEOCHECK® - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
Soil Map ID: 2
Soil Component Name: Exum
Soil Surface Texture: very fine sandy loam
Hydrologic Group: Class C - Slow infiltration rates. Soils with layers impeding downward
movement of water, or soils with moderately fine or fine textures.
Soil Drainage Class: Moderately well drained
Hydric Status: Partially hydric
Corrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: Moderate
Depth to Bedrock Min:
Depth to Watertable Min:
> 0 inches
> 76 inches
Soil Layer Information
Boundary
Classification
Saturated
hydraulic
conductivity
micro m/sec
Soil Reaction
(pH)
Layer
Upper
Lower
Soil Texture Class
AASHTO Group
Unified Soil
1
0 inches
7 inches
very fine sandy
loam
Silt -Clay
Materials (more
than 35 pct.
passing No.
200), Silty
Soils.
FINE-GRAINED
SOILS, Silts and
Clays (liquid
limit less than
50%), Lean Clay
Max: 4
Min: 1.4
Max: 5.5
Min: 3.5
2
7 inches
11 inches
silt loam
Silt -Clay
Materials (more
than 35 pct.
passing No.
200), Silty
Soils.
FINE-GRAINED
SOILS, Silts and
Clays (liquid
limit less than
50%), Lean Clay
Max: 4
Min: 1.4
Max: 5.5
Min: 3.5
3
11 inches
70 inches
clay loam
Silt -Clay
Materials (more
than 35 pct.
passing No.
200), Silty
Soils.
FINE-GRAINED
SOILS, Silts and
Clays (liquid
limit less than
50%), Lean Clay
Max: 4
Min: 1.4
Max: 5.5
Min: 3.5
4
70 inches
100
inches
loam
Silt -Clay
Materials (more
than 35 pct.
passing No.
200), Silty
Soils.
FINE-GRAINED
SOILS, Silts and
Clays (liquid
limit less than
50%), Lean Clay
Max: 4
Min: 1.4
Max: 5.5
Min: 3.5
TC6383889.2s Page A-7

GEOCHECK® - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
Soil Map ID: 3
Soil Component Name: Aycock
Soil Surface Texture: very fine sandy loam
Hydrologic Group: Class B - Moderate infiltration rates. Deep and moderately deep,
moderately well and well drained soils with moderately coarse
textures.
Soil Drainage Class: Well drained
Hydric Status: Partially hydric
Corrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: Moderate
Depth to Bedrock Min:
Depth to Watertable Min:
> 0 inches
> 153 inches
Soil Layer Information
Boundary
Classification
Saturated
hydraulic
conductiviy
micro m/sec
Soil Reaction
(pH)
Layer
Upper
Lower
Soil Texture Class
AASHTO Group
Unified Soil
1
0 inches
7 inches
very fine sandy
loam
Silt -Clay
Materials (more
than 35 pct.
passing No.
200), Silty
Soils.
FINE-GRAINED
SOILS, Silts and
Clays (liquid
limit less than
50%), silt.
Max: 42
Min: 14
Max: 6 Min:
4.5
2
11 inches
90 inches
clay loam
Silt -Clay
Materials (more
than 35 pct.
passing No.
200), Silty
Soils.
FINE-GRAINED
SOILS, Silts and
Clays (liquid
limit less than
50%), silt.
Max: 42
Min: 14
Max: 6 Min:
4.5
3
7 inches
11 inches
very fine sandy
loam
Silt -Clay
Materials (more
than 35 pct.
passing No.
200), Silty
Soils.
FINE-GRAINED
SOILS, Silts and
Clays (liquid
limit less than
50%), silt.
Max: 42
Min: 14
Max: 6 Min:
4.5
Soil Map ID: 4
Soil Component Name: Aycock
Soil Surface Texture: very fine sandy loam
Hydrologic Group: Class B - Moderate infiltration rates. Deep and moderately deep,
moderately well and well drained soils with moderately coarse
textures.
Soil Drainage Class: Well drained
TC6383889.2s Page A-8

GEOCHECK® - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
Hydric Status: Not hydric
Corrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: Moderate
Depth to Bedrock Min:
Depth to Watertable Min:
> 0 inches
> 153 inches
Soil Layer Information
Boundary
Classification
Saturated
hydraulic
conductivity
micro m/sec
Soil Reaction
(pH)
Layer
Upper
Lower
Soil Texture Class
AASHTO Group
Unified Soil
1
0 inches
7 inches
very fine sandy
loam
Silt -Clay
Materials (more
than 35 pct.
passing No.
200), Silty
Soils.
FINE-GRAINED
SOILS, Silts and
Clays (liquid
limit less than
50%), Lean Clay
Max: 14
Min: 1.4
Max: 5.5
Min: 4.5
2
7 inches
11 inches
very fine sandy
loam
Silt -Clay
Materials (more
than 35 pct.
passing No.
200), Silty
Soils.
FINE-GRAINED
SOILS, Silts and
Clays (liquid
limit less than
50%), Lean Clay
Max: 14
Min: 1.4
Max: 5.5
Min: 4.5
3
11 inches
90 inches
clay loam
Silt -Clay
Materials (more
than 35 pct.
passing No.
200), Silty
Soils.
FINE-GRAINED
SOILS, Silts and
Clays (liquid
limit less than
50%), Lean Clay
Max: 14
Min: 1.4
Max: 5.5
Min: 4.5
Soil Map ID: 5
Soil Component Name: Nahunta
Soil Surface Texture: very fine sandy loam
Hydrologic Group: Class C - Slow infiltration rates. Soils with layers impeding downward
movement of water, or soils with moderately fine or fine textures.
Soil Drainage Class: Somewhat poorly drained
Hydric Status: Partially hydric
Corrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: High
Depth to Bedrock Min: > 0 inches
Depth to Watertable Min: > 38 inches
TC6383889.2s Page A-9

GEOCHECK® - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
Soil Layer Information
Boundary
Classification
Saturated
hydraulic
conductiviy
micro m/sec
Soil Reaction
(pH)
Layer
Upper
Lower
Soil Texture Class
AASHTO Group
Unified Soil
1
7 inches
11 inches
very fine sandy
loam
Silt -Clay
Materials (more
than 35 pct.
passing No.
200), Silty
Soils.
FINE-GRAINED
SOILS, Silts and
Clays (liquid
limit less than
50%), silt.
Max: 42
Min: 14
Max: 6 Min:
4.5
2
11 inches
79 inches
clay loam
Silt -Clay
Materials (more
than 35 pct.
passing No.
200), Silty
Soils.
FINE-GRAINED
SOILS, Silts and
Clays (liquid
limit less than
50%), silt.
Max: 42
Min: 14
Max: 6 Min:
4.5
3
0 inches
7 inches
very fine sandy
loam
Silt -Clay
Materials (more
than 35 pct.
passing No.
200), Silty
Soils.
FINE-GRAINED
SOILS, Silts and
Clays (liquid
limit less than
50%), silt.
Max: 42
Min: 14
Max: 6 Min:
4.5
LOCAL / REGIONAL WATER AGENCY RECORDS
EDR Local/Regional Water Agency records provide water well information to assist the environmental
professional in assessing sources that may impact ground water flow direction, and in forming an
opinion about the impact of contaminant migration on nearby drinking water wells.
WELL SEARCH DISTANCE INFORMATION
DATABASE SEARCH DISTANCE (miles)
Federal USGS
Federal FRDS PWS
State Database
1.000
Nearest PWS within 1 mile
1.000
FEDERAL USGS WELL INFORMATION
MAP ID WELL ID
No Wells Found
FEDERAL FRDS PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM INFORMATION
MAP ID WELL ID
LOCATION
FROM TP
LOCATION
FROM TP
TC6383889.2s Page A-10

GEOCHECK® - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
FEDERAL FRDS PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM INFORMATION
MAP ID WELL ID
No PWS System Found
Note: PWS System location is not always the same as well location.
STATE DATABASE WELL INFORMATION
MAP ID WELL ID
No Wells Found
OTHER STATE DATABASE INFORMATION
LOCATION
FROM TP
LOCATION
FROM TP
TC6383889.2s Page A-11

PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP - 6383889.2s
®o®OZZ�
County Boundary
Major Roads
Contour Lines
Earthquake epicenter, Richter 5 or greater
Water Wells
Public Water Supply Wells
Cluster of Multiple Icons
0
1/4
1/2
1 Miles
f Groundwater Flow Direction
(—) Indeterminate Groundwater Flow at Location
(—) Groundwater Flow Varies at Location
Wildlife Areas
Natural Areas
Rare & Endangered Species
SITE NAME: Dead Tree
ADDRESS: Not Reported
Whitakers NC 27891
LAT/LONG: 36.09239 / 77.618166
CLIENT: Restoration Systems, LLC
CONTACT: JD Hamby
INQUIRY #: 6383889.2s
DATE: February 26, 2021 2:34 pm
Copyright /L) 2021 EDR, Inc. (L) 2015 TomTom Rel. 2015.

GEOCHECK®- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS
Map ID
Direction
Distance Database EDR ID Number
NC_NHEO NC50018104
Elclass: C Precisionl : S
Eostat: E Gisid: 272106
Edr id: NC50018104
NC_NHEO NC50019344
Elclass: C Precisionl : S
Eostat: E Gisid: 272106
Edr id: NC50019344
NC_NHEO NC50020148
Elclass: C Precisionl : S
Eostat: E Gisid: 172107
Edr id: NC50020148
NC_SNHA NC10001636
Acres: 4.37 Sitename: FISHING CREEK/ENFIELD BOTTOMLAND
Quality type: Not Reported Sig: B
Site id: 1636 Edr id: NC10001636
NC_SNHA NC10001637
Acres: 117.64 Sitename: FISHING CREEK/ENFIELD BOTTOMLAND
Quality type: Not Reported Sig: B
Site id: 1637 Edr id: NC10001637
NC_SNHA NC10001638
Acres: 1235.97 Sitename: FISHING CREEK/ENFIELD BOTTOMLAND
Quality type: Not Reported Sig: B
Site id: 1638 Edr id: NC10001638
NC_SNHA NC10001639
Acres: 100.77 Sitename: FISHING CREEK/ENFIELD BOTTOMLAND
Quality type: Not Reported Sig: B
Site id: 1639 Edr id: NC10001639
TC6383889.2s Page A-13

GEOCHECK®- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS
Map ID
Direction
Distance Database EDR ID Number
NC_SNHA NC10001640
Acres: 18.86 Sitename: FISHING CREEK/ENFIELD BOTTOMLAND
Quality type: Not Reported Sig: B
Site id: 1640 Edr id: NC10001640
NC_SNHA NC10003420
Acres: 815.33 Sitename: FISHING CREEK AQUATIC HABITAT
Quality type: Not Reported Sig: A
Site id: 3420 Edr id: NC10003420
TC6383889.2s Page A-14

GEOCHECK®- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS
RADON
AREA RADON INFORMATION
Federal EPA Radon Zone for EDGECOMBE County: 3
Note: Zone 1 indoor average level > 4 pCi/L.
: Zone 2 indoor average level >= 2 pCi/L and <= 4 pCi/L.
: Zone 3 indoor average level < 2 pCi/L.
Federal Area Radon Information for Zip Code: 27891
Number of sites tested: 2
Area Average Activity % <4 pCi/L % 4-20 pCi/L % >20 pCi/L
Living Area - 1st Floor 0.550 pCi/L 100% 0% 0%
Living Area - 2nd Floor Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported
Basement Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported
TC6383889.2s Page A-15

PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED
TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION
USGS 7.5' Digital Elevation Model (DEM)
Source: United States Geologic Survey
EDR acquired the USGS 7.5' Digital Elevation Model in 2002 and updated it in 2006. The 7.5 minute DEM corresponds
to the USGS 1:24,000- and 1:25,000-scale topographic quadrangle maps. The DEM provides elevation data
with consistent elevation units and projection.
Current USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Map
Source: U.S. Geological Survey
HYDROLOGIC INFORMATION
Flood Zone Data: This data was obtained from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). It depicts 100-year and
500-year flood zones as defined by FEMA. It includes the National Flood Hazard Layer (NFHL) which incorporates Flood
Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) data and Q3 data from FEMA in areas not covered by NFHL.
Source: FEMA
Telephone: [phone]
Date of Government Version: 2003, 2015
NWI: National Wetlands Inventory. This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR
in 2002, 2005 and 2010 from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
State Wetlands Data: Wetland Inventory
Source: US Fish & Wildlife Service
Telephone: [phone]
HYDROGEOLOGIC INFORMATION
AQUIFLOWR Information System
Source: EDR proprietary database of groundwater flow information
EDR has developed the AQUIFLOW Information System (AIS) to provide data on the general direction of groundwater
flow at specific points. EDR has reviewed reports submitted to regulatory authorities at select sites and has
extracted the date of the report, hydrogeologically determined groundwater flow direction and depth to water table
information.
GEOLOGIC INFORMATION
Geologic Age and Rock Stratigraphic Unit
Source: P.G. Schruben, R.E. Arndt and W.J. Bawiec, Geology of the Conterminous U.S. at 1:2,500,000 Scale - A digital
representation of the 1974 P.B. King and H.M. Beikman Map, USGS Digital Data Series DDS - 11 (1994).
STATSGO: State Soil Geographic Database
Source: Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS)
The U.S. Department of Agriculture's (USDA) Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) leads the national
Conservation Soil Survey (NCSS) and is responsible for collecting, storing, maintaining and distributing soil
survey information for privately owned lands in the United States. A soil map in a soil survey is a representation
of soil patterns in a landscape. Soil maps for STATSGO are compiled by generalizing more detailed (SSURGO)
soil survey maps.
SSURGO: Soil Survey Geographic Database
Source: Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS)
Telephone: [phone]
SSURGO is the most detailed level of mapping done by the Natural Resources Conservation Service, mapping
scales generally range from 1:12,000 to 1:63,360. Field mapping methods using national standards are used to
construct the soil maps in the Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database. SSURGO digitizing duplicates the
original soil survey maps. This level of mapping is designed for use by landowners, townships and county
natural resource planning and management.
TC6383889.2s Page PSGR-1

PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED
LOCAL / REGIONAL WATER AGENCY RECORDS
FEDERAL WATER WELLS
PWS: Public Water Systems
Source: EPA/Office of Drinking Water
Telephone: [phone]
Public Water System data from the Federal Reporting Data System. A PWS is any water system which provides water to at
least 25 people for at least 60 days annually. PWSs provide water from wells, rivers and other sources.
PWS ENF: Public Water Systems Violation and Enforcement Data
Source: EPA/Office of Drinking Water
Telephone: [phone]
Violation and Enforcement data for Public Water Systems from the Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS) after
August 1995. Prior to August 1995, the data came from the Federal Reporting Data System (FRDS).
USGS Water Wells: USGS National Water Inventory System (NWIS)
This database contains descriptive information on sites where the USGS collects or has collected data on surface
water and/or groundwater. The groundwater data includes information on wells, springs, and other sources of groundwater.
STATE RECORDS
North Carolina Public Water Supply Wells
Source: Department of Environmental Health
Telephone: [phone]
OTHER STATE DATABASE INFORMATION
North Carolina Wildlife Resources/Game Lands
Source: Center for Geographic Information and Analysis
Telephone: [phone]
All publicly owned game lands managed by the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission and as listed in Hunting
and Fishing Maps.
NC Natural Heritage Sites: Natural Heritage Element Occurrence Sites
Source: Natural Heritage Occurrence Sites Center for Geographic Information and Analysis
Telephone: [phone]
A point coverage identifying locations of rare and endangered species, occurrences of exemplary or unique natural
ecosystems (terrestrial or aquatic), and special animal habitats (e.g., colonial waterbird nesting sites).
NC Natural Areas: Significant Natural Heritage Areas
Source: Center for Geographic Information and Analysis
Telephone: [phone]
A polygon converage identifying sites (terrestrial or aquatic) that have particular biodiversity significance.
A site's significance may be due to the presenceof rare species, rare or high quality natural communities, or
other important ecological features.
RADON
State Database: NC Radon
Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Radon Statistical and Non Statiscal Data
Area Radon Information
Source: USGS
Telephone: [phone]
The National Radon Database has been developed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
(USEPA) and is a compilation of the EPA/State Residential Radon Survey and the National Residential Radon Survey.
The study covers the years 1986 - 1992. Where necessary data has been supplemented by information collected at
private sources such as universities and research institutions.
TC6383889.2s Page PSGR-2

PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED
EPA Radon Zones
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Sections 307 & 309 of IRAA directed EPA to list and identify areas of U.S. with the potential for elevated indoor
radon levels.
OTHER
Airport Landing Facilities: Private and public use landing facilities
Source: Federal Aviation Administration, 800-457-6656
Epicenters: World earthquake epicenters, Richter 5 or greater
Source: Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Earthquake Fault Lines: The fault lines displayed on EDR's Topographic map are digitized quaternary faultlines, prepared
in 1975 by the United State Geological Survey
STREET AND ADDRESS INFORMATION
© 2015 TomTom North America, Inc. All rights reserved. This material is proprietary and the subject of copyright protection
and other intellectual property rights owned by or licensed to Tele Atlas North America, Inc. The use of this material is subject
to the terms of a license agreement. You will be held liable for any unauthorized copying or disclosure of this material.
TC6383889.2s Page PSGR-3

APPENDIX F - SHPO CORRESPONDENCE
Dead Tree Phase A, Bank Parcel Development Plan (DWR ID# 2020-1937v2) Appendices
Tar -Pamlico River Basin 8-Digit HUC: 03020101

North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
Ramona M. Bartos, Administrator
Governor Roy Cooper Secretary D. Reid Wilson
April 1, 2021
John D. Hamby
Restoration Systems, LLC
1101 Haynes Street, Suite 211
Raleigh, NC 27604
[e-mail]
Re: Dead Tree Mitigation Project, Edgecombe County, ER 21-0678
Dear Mr. Hamby:
Thank you for your February 26, 2021, letter concerning the above -referenced project. We have reviewed
the materials provided and offer the following comments.
There are no recorded archaeological sites within the project boundaries. However, the project area has
never been systematically surveyed to determine the location or significance of archaeological resources.
As the proposed mitigation activities are unlikely to adversely affect any archaeological sites given the
limited nature of associated ground disturbance, we do not recommend any precautions be taken at this
time. However, should any remains be identified during buffer restoration, or should additional mitigation
activities be planned for the property, we request this information be forwarded to the Office of State
Archaeology for review and comment.
We have determined that the project as proposed will not have an effect on any historic structures.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36
CFR Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment,
contact Renee Gledhill -Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919-814-6579
or [e-mail]. In all future communication concerning this project, please cite the
above referenced tracking number.
Sincerely,
Lpf Ramona Bartos, Deputy
L State Historic Preservation Officer
Location: 109 East Jones Street, Raleigh NC 27601 Mailing Address: 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-4617 Telephone/Fax: [phone]-6898

APPENDIX G -TEMPLATE CONSERVATION EASEMENT
Dead Tree Phase A, Bank Parcel Development Plan (DWR ID# 2020-1937v2) Appendices
Tar -Pamlico River Basin 8-Digit HUC: 03020101

Recommended model for nutrient offset and buffer mitigation easements -Please remove all reference
to the Army Corps of Engineers (COE) & replace with "Division of Water Resources". The COE has
no involvement with nutrient offset and buffer mitigation banks unless the site easement also includes
a stream and/or wetland mitigation bank.
MODEL CONSERVATION EASEMENT
January 18, 2001
Rev 'd October 16, 2002
Rev'd August, 2003
Model Conservation Easement for use in preserving mitigation property. Language in
italics is instructional, and should be deleted when site -specific Conservation Easement
is prepared.
PERMANENT CONSERVATION EASEMENT
Grantee and Grantor must be
different parties - read UMBI for
any specific details
THIS CONSERVATION EASEMENT ("Conservation Easement") made this.
day of , 200 by and between
("Grantor") and (Grantee).
The designation Grantor and Grantee as used herein shall include said parties,
their heirs, successors and assigns, and shall include singular, plural, masculine, feminine
or neuter as required by context.
RECITALS
WHEREAS, Grantor owns in fee simple certain real property situated, lying and
being in County, North Carolina, more particularly
described in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein ("Property");
WHEREAS, Grantee is [either a public body of this state, an agency of the United
States, or a nonprofit corporation or trust whose purpose is the conservation of property],
and is qualified to be the Grantee of a conservation easement pursuant to N.C. Gen. Stat.
§ 121-35;
WHEREAS, Grantor and Grantee recognize the conservation, scenic, natural, or
aesthetic value of the property in its natural state, which includes the following natural
communities: [describe by wetland and/or stream type, as well as any associated buffers
or upland communities]. The purpose of this Conservation Easement is to maintain
wetland and/or riparian resources and other natural values of the Property, and prevent
the use or development of the Property for any purpose or in any manner that would
conflict with the maintenance of the Property in its natural condition.
[For use when the mitigation is offered for impacts of a single individual or
general permit use] WHEREAS, the preservation of the Property is a condition of
Department of the Army permit Action ID issued by the Wilmington
District Corps of Engineers, required to mitigate for unavoidable stream and/or wetland
impacts authorized by that permit. Grantor and Grantee agree that third -party rights of
enforcement shall be held by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District

a paragraph similar to this one describing the easement is for a mitigation bank
(include the Site BPDP name & include that it was approved by DWR; also include
the UMBI/MBI Name, who signed it and when it was signed
(Corps, to include any successor agencies), and that these rights are in addition to, and do
not limit, the rights of enforcement under said permit.
[Alternate paragraph for use when the conservation easement supports a
mitigation bank] WHEREAS, the preservation of the Property is required by a Mitigation
Banking Instrument for the [Name of Bank], Department of the Army Action ID [Action
ID number for the mitigation bank]. The Mitigation Bank is intended to be used to
compensate for unavoidable stream and/or wetland impacts authorized by permits issued
by the Department of the Army. Grantor and Grantee agree that third -party rights of
enforcement shall be held by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District
(Corps, to include any successor agencies), and that these rights are in addition to, and do
not limit, the rights of the parties to the Mitigation Banking Instrument.
NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the covenants and
representations contained herein and for other good and valuable consideration, the
receipt and legal sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, Grantor hereby
unconditionally and irrevocably grants and conveys unto Grantee, its heirs, successors
and assigns, forever and in perpetuity a Conservation Easement of the nature and
character and to the extent hereinafter set forth, over the Property described on Exhibit A,
together with the right to preserve and protect the conservation values thereof, as follows:
ARTICLE I.
DURATION OF EASEMENT
This Conservation Easement shall be perpetual. This conservation Easement is an
easement in gross, runs with the land and is enforceable by Grantee against Grantor,
Grantor's personal representatives, heirs, successors and assigns, lessees, agents and
licensees.
ARTICLE II.
PROHIBITED AND RESTRICTED ACTIVITIES
Any activity on, or use of, the Property inconsistent with the purpose of this
Conservation Easement is prohibited. The Property shall be preserved in its natural
condition and restricted from any development that would impair or interfere with the
conservation values of the Property.
Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the following activities and uses
are expressly prohibited, restricted or reserved as indicated hereunder:
A. Disturbance of Natural Features. Any change disturbance, alteration or
impairment of the natural features of the Property or any introduction of non-native
plants and/or animal species is prohibited.
B. Construction. There shall be no constructing or placing of any building,
mobile home, asphalt or concrete pavement, billboard or other advertising display,

antenna, utility pole, tower, conduit, line, pier, landing, dock or any other temporary or
permanent structure or facility on or above the Property.
C. Industrial, Commercial and Residential Use. Industrial, residential and/or
commercial activities, including any right of passage for such purposes are prohibited.
D. Agricultural, Grazing and Horticultural Use. Agricultural, grazing, animal
husbandry, and horticultural use of the Property are prohibited.
E. Vegetation. There shall be no removal, burning, destruction, harming, cutting
or mowing of trees, shrubs, or other vegetation on the Property.
F. Roads and Trails. There shall be no construction of roads, trails or walkways
on the property; nor enlargement or modification to existing roads, trails or walkways.
G. Signage. No signs shall be permitted on or over the Property, except the
posting of no trespassing signs, signs identifying the conservation values of the Property,
signs giving directions or proscribing rules and regulations for the use of the Property
and/or signs identifying the Grantor as owner of the property.
H. Dumping or Storage. Dumping or storage of soil, trash, ashes, garbage, waste,
abandoned vehicles, appliances, machinery or hazardous substances, or toxic or
hazardous waste, or any placement of underground or aboveground storage tanks or other
materials on the Property is prohibited.
I. Excavation, Dredging or Mineral Use. There shall be no grading, filling,
excavation, dredging, mining or drilling; no removal of topsoil, sand, gravel, rock, peat,
minerals or other materials, and no change in the topography of the land in any manner
on the Property, except to restore natural topography or drainage patterns.
J. Water Quality and Drainage Pattern. There shall be no diking, draining,
dredging, channeling, filling, leveling, pumping, impounding or related activities, or
altering or tampering with water control structures or devices, or disruption or alteration
of the restored, enhanced, or created drainage patterns. In addition, diverting or causing
or permitting the diversion of surface or underground water into, within or out of the
easement area by any means, removal of wetlands, polluting or discharging into waters,
springs, seeps, or wetlands, or use of pesticide or biocides is prohibited.
K. Development Rights. No development rights that have been encumbered or
extinguished by this Conservation Easement shall be transferred pursuant to a
transferable development rights scheme or cluster development arrangement or
otherwise.
L. Vehicles. The operation of mechanized vehicles, including, but not limited to,
motorcycles, dirt bikes, all -terrain vehicles, cars and trucks is prohibited. [The Corps
You may add this statement to (L): is prohibited "above, on or over the Conservation
Easement Property other than for temporary or occasional access for purposes of
maintaining the easement area.

M. Other Prohibitions. Any other use of, or activity on, the Property which is or
may become inconsistent with the purposes of this grant, the preservation of the Property
substantially in its natural condition, or the protection of its environmental systems, is
prohibited.
ARTICLE III
GRANTOR'S RESEVERED RIGHTS
The Grantor expressly reserves for himself, his personal representatives, heirs,
successors or assigns, the right to continue the use of the property for all purposes not
inconsistent with this Conservation Easement, including, but not limited to, the right to
quiet enjoyment of the Property, the rights of ingress and egress, the right to hunt, fish,
and hike on the Property, the right to sell, transfer, gift or otherwise convey the Property,
in whole or in part, provided such sale, transfer or gift conveyance is subject to the terms
of, and shall specifically reference, this Conservation Easement.
[For use when mitigation work (approved or required restoration, creation, or
enhancement)is to be done on the property/Notwithstanding the foregoing Restrictions,
Grantor reserves for Grantor, its successors and assigns, the right to construct wetland
and stream mitigation on the Property, in accordance with the [describe mitigation plan
by title, date and permit action id if a single mitigation site; if a mitigation bank, include
the language "detailed mitigation plan approved in accordance with the Mitigation
Banking Instrument for the Mitigation Bank.]
ARTICLE IV.
GRANTEE'S RIGHTS
The Grantee or its authorized representatives, successors and assigns, and the
Corps, shall have the right to enter the Property at all reasonable times for the purpose of
inspecting said property to determine if the Grantor, or his personal representatives, heirs,
successors, or assigns, is complying with the terms, conditions, restrictions, and purposes
of this Conservation Easement. The Grantee shall also have the right to enter and go
upon the Property for purposes of making scientific or educational observations and
studies, and taking samples. The easement rights granted herein do not include public
access rights.
ARTICLE V
ENFORCEMENT AND REMEDIES
A. To accomplish the purposes of this Easement, Grantee is allowed to prevent
any activity on or use of the Property that is inconsistent with the purposes of this
Easement and to require the restoration of such areas or features of the Property that may
be damaged by such activity or use. Upon any breach of the terms of this Conservation
a paragraph
similar to this
one revised to
fit a Nutrient
Offset and/or
Buffer
mitigation
bank

Easement by Grantor that comes to the attention of the Grantee, the Grantee shall notify
the Grantor in writing of such breach. The Grantor shall have 30 days after receipt of
such notice to correct the conditions constituting such breach. If the breach remains
uncured after 30 days, the Grantee may enforce this Conservation Easement by
appropriate legal proceedings including damages, injunctive and other relief.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Grantee reserves the immediate right, without notice,
to obtain a temporary restraining order, injunctive or other appropriate relief if the breach
of the term of this Conservation Easement is or would irreversibly or otherwise
materially impair the benefits to be derived from this Conservation Easement. The
Grantor and Grantee acknowledge that under such circumstances damage to the Grantee
would be irreparable and remedies at law will be inadequate. The rights and remedies of
the Grantee provided hereunder shall be in addition to, and not in lieu of, all other rights
and remedies available to Grantee in connection with this Conservation Easement. The
costs of a breach, correction or restoration, including the Grantee's expenses, court costs,
and attorneys' fees, shall be paid by Grantor, provided Grantor is determined to be
responsible for the breach. The Corps shall have the same right to enforce the terms and
conditions of this easement as the Grantee.
B. No failure on the part of the Grantee to enforce any covenant or provision
hereof shall discharge or invalidate such covenant or any other covenant, condition, or
provision hereof or affect the right to Grantee to enforce the same in the event of a
subsequent breach or default.
C. Nothing contained in this Conservation Easement shall be construed to entitle
Grantee to bring any action against Grantor for any injury or change in the Property
resulting from causes beyond the Grantor's control, including, without limitation, fire,
flood, storm, war, acts of God or third parties, except Grantor's lessees or invitees; or
from any prudent action taken in good faith by Grantor under emergency conditions to
prevent, abate, or mitigate significant injury to life, damage to property or harm to the
Property resulting from such causes.
ARTICLE VI
MISCELLANEOUS
A. Warranty. Grantor warrants, covenants and represents that it owns the
Property in fee simple, and that Grantor either owns all interests in the Property which
may be impaired by the granting of this Conservation Easement or that there are no
outstanding mortgages, tax liens, encumbrances, or other interests in the Property which
have not been expressly subordinated to this Conservation Easement. Grantor further
warrants that Grantee shall have the use of and enjoy all the benefits derived from and
arising out of this Conservation Easement, and that Grantor will warrant and defend title
to the Property against the claims of all persons.
Allow for
DWR to have
right to
access and
enforce

B. Subsequent Transfers. The Grantor agrees to incorporate the terms of this
Conservation Easement in any deed or other legal instrument that transfers any interest in
all or a portion of the Property. The Grantor agrees to provide written notice of such
transfer at least thirty (30) days prior to the date of the transfer. The Grantor and Grantee
agree that the terms of this Conservation Easement shall survive any merger of the fee
and easement interests in the Property or any portion thereof and shall not be amende
modified or terminated without the prior written consent and approval of the Corps.
C. Assignment. The parties recognize and agree that the benefits of this
Conservation Easement are in gross and assignable provided, however that the Grantee
hereby covenants and agrees, that in the event it transfers or assigns this Conservation
Easement, the organization receiving the interest will be a qualified holder under N.C.
Gen. Stat. § 121-34 et seq. and § 170(h) of the Internal Revenue Code, and the Grantee
further covenants and agrees that the terms of the transfer or assignment will be such that
the transferee or assignee will be required to continue in perpetuity the conservation
purposes described in this document.
DWR, not the
Corps unless
their is also
stream/
wetland
mitigation
D. Entire Agreement and Severability. This instrument sets forth the entire
agreement of the parties with respect to the Conservation Easement and supersedes all
prior discussions, negotiations, understandings or agreements relating to the Conservat:
Easement. If any provision is found to be void or unenforceable by a court of compete
jurisdiction, the remainder shall continue in full force and effect.
E. Obligations of Ownership. Grantor is responsible for any real estate taxes,
assessments, fees, or charges levied upon the Property. Grantor shall keep the Property
free of any liens or other encumbrances for obligations incurred by Grantor. Grantee sl
not be responsible for any costs or liability of any kind related to the ownership,
operation, insurance, upkeep, or maintenance of the Property, except as expressly
provided herein. Nothing herein shall relieve the Grantor of the obligation to comply AN
federal, state or local laws, regulations and permits that may apply to the exercise of th,
Reserved Rights.
F. Extinguishment. In the event that changed conditions render impossible the
continued use of the Property for the conservation purposes, this Conservation Easeme
may only be extinguished, in whole or in part, by judicial proceeding.
G. Eminent Domain. Whenever all or part of the Property is taken in the exerci
of eminent domain so as to substantially abrogate the Restrictions imposed by this
Conservation Easement, Grantor and Grantee shall join in appropriate actions at the tin
of such taking to recover the full value of the taking, and all incidental and direct
damages due to the taking.
This Item D is
not 100%
accurate and
should be
reworded. There
is also a
banking
instrument and
a Bank Parcel
Development
Package that
operate as
"agreements".
This easement
may not be the
"entire
agreement" of
the parties but
Bank's attorney
will need to
determine
language to use
H. Proceeds. This Conservation Easement constitutes a real property interest
immediately vested in Grantee. In the event that all or a portion of this Property is sold,
exchanged, or involuntarily converted following an extinguishment or the exercise of
eminent domain, Grantee shall be entitled to the fair market value of this Conservation

Easement. The parties stipulate that the fair market value of this Conservation Easement
shall be determined by multiplying the fair market value of the Property unencumbered
by this Conservation Easement (minus any increase in value after the date of this grant
attributable to improvements) by the ratio of the value of this easement at the time of this
grant to the value of the Property (without deduction for the value of this Conservation
Easement) at the time of this grant. The values at the time of this grant shall be the values
used, or which would have been used, to calculate a deduction for federal income tax
purposes, pursuant to Section 170(h) of the Internal Revenue Code (whether eligible or
ineligible for such a deduction). Grantee shall use its share of the proceeds in a manner
consistent with the purposes of this Conservation Easement.
I. Notification. Any notice, request for approval, or other communication
required under this Conservation Easement shall be sent by registered or certified mail,
postage prepaid, to the following addresses (or such address as may be hereafter specified
by notice pursuant to this paragraph):
To Grantor:
[Name, address and fax number]
To Grantee:
[Name, address and fax number]
To Division of Water Resources:
Division of Water Resources
Attn: Nutrient Offset Banking Coordinator
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
J. Failure of Grantee. If at any time Grantee is unable or fails to enforce this
Conservation Easement, or if Grantee ceases to be a qualified grantee, and if within a
reasonable period of time after the occurrence of one of these events Grantee fails to
make an assignment pursuant to this Conservation Easement, then the Grantee's interest
shall become vested in another qualified grantee in accordance with an appropriate
proceeding in a court of competent jurisdiction.
K. Amendment. This Conservation Easement may be amended, but only in a
writing signed by all parties hereto, and provided such amendment does not affect the
qualification of this Conservation Easement or the status of the Grantee under any
applicable laws, and is consistent with the conservation purposes of this grant.
L. [For use if there is a document describing the current condition of the
property. The language provided is applicable if there is a mitigation plan that
accurately describes the current condition and uses of the property. If there is not such a
plan, another document we agree is accurate and can be identified and is in our files can
be referenced.]Present Condition of the Property. The wetlands, scenic, resource,
environmental, and other natural characteristics of the Property, and its current use and
state of improvement, are described in Section , Appendix B of the Mitigation Plan,

dated , prepared by Grantor and acknowledged by the Grantor and
Grantee to be complete and accurate as of the date hereof. Both Grantor and Grantee
have copies of this report. It will be used by the parties to assure that any future changes
in the use of the Property will be consistent with the terms of this Conservation
Easement. However, this report is not intended to preclude the use of other evidence to
establish the present condition of the Property if there is a controversy over its use_
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the said rights and easements perpetually unto Grantee for
the aforesaid purposes.
IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, the Grantor has hereunto set his hand and seal, the day
and year first above written.
[Signatures of the Grantor and Grantee in appropriate form]