SW7070305_HISTORICAL FILE_20070627

STORMWATER DIVISION CODING SHEET
POST -CONSTRUCTION PERMITS
PERMIT NO.
DOC TYPE
❑ CURRENT PERMIT
❑ APPROVED PLANS
(?HISTORICAL FILE
<<❑
COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION
DOC DATE
YYYYMMDD

STORM WATER DETENTION CALCULATIONS
FOR
CEDAR SHORES SUBDIVISION
SECTION TWO
JUN 2 7 '2007
WASHINGTON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA DWQ-WAFO
I ST INCH DETENTION STORAGE
.&01 `'
�py .,�QIN
D.
CALCULATION5 PREPARED BY:
Ii NCIN1. EKING & 5U It FYING. 1'. A.
MAIN 5TREFT
WINTERVILLE, NC ••

Site Conditions Predevelopment
Total watershed area
Impervious Area
C- 0.95
Open Space - Good Condition
C= 0.35
5C5 Soil Group
Tarboro Sand
Overland
Hydraulic Length
98G feet
Vertical Rehef
7.2 feet
24-hr, 2 yr rainfall
Time of Concentration
Overland flow
L e niftf
19.70 acres
CN= 98 0.00 acres
CN= 39 19.70 acres
A Sons Group
Channehzed
0 feet
O feet
3.84 inches
Overland
10.5
X
2
21 .0 minutes
!�
Channehzed
0.0
X
1
0.0 minutes
128
Time of Concentration
21.0 minutes
Composite C based on
published values (exhibit 1-Malcom)
0.35
8
B
g
h
Rainfall Intensity =
! =
2
132
18
3.39 inches per fir
(h+T)
10
203
22
25
246
23
100
302
25
Peak Discharge
Q = CIA
23.35 cfs
Site Conditions Post Development
Total watershed area
19.70 acres
Impervious Area
C=
0.95
CN-
98
7.20 acres
Managed Pervious
C=
0.22
CN=
39
12.50 acres
Unmanaged Pervious
C=
0.20
CN=
39
0.00 acres
SCS Soil Group
A Soils Group
Overland
Channelzed
Hydraulic Length
O
feet
927
feet
Vertical Relief
O
feet
4.64
feet
24-hr, 2 yr rainfall
Design Hydrograph Formulation
Composite CN
1000
S=--10
CN
Runoff
Q. (P-0.2S)'
P+o.8s
Time of Concentration
channel flow (not overland)
L3OIftS
H
128
Composite C =
Remfall Intensity =
3.84 inches
0.71 inches
Overland
Channehzed
0.0
I I
X 2
X
0.0 minutes
1.G minutes
Time of Concentration
.6 minutes
0,49
%
B
9 h
!-
2
) 32 18
4.46 inches per hr
10
203 22
25
246 23
100
302 25
Peak Discharge Q e CIA
Time to peak T - Vol
° 1.39Qr
42.52 cfs
14.3 minutes

,. Zp
Storage Required
Allowable release at impoundment =
Peak rate of inflow at impoundment =
Storage Required (from Kv Calculations below)
Kv Calculations
Dramage Area = 19.70 Acres
I = 37 % (From NP Calcs)
Detention Runoff Storage Volume Requirements
23.4 cfs
42.8 cfs
27,097 cf
Kv = 0.05+.00%1)
1 = 37 %
Rv =
0.36
inches/mches
Volume that must be controlled
=
(Design ramfalp(Rv)(Dramage Area)
Volume =
0.62
ac-ft = 27,097 of
Must store
27.097 of of water to be drawn down over 2-5 days above the permanent pool elevation
STAGE - STORAGE DATA
surface Cliff.
accum.
Elevation
area elev
storage
storage Elevation Stage
7.70
2,736
0 7.70 0
0.30
1 ,069
5.00
4,390
1,069 8.00 0.30
1.00
8,644
9.00
12,897
9,712 9.00 1.30
1.00
19,062
10.00
25,227
25,774 10.00 2.30
Storage
Stage
LN(storage)
LN(Stage)
Computed
Stage
0
O
#NUM!
#NUM!
0.00
I ,069
0.30
6.97
-1 .20
0.30
9,712
1.30
3.15
0.26
1.17
28,774
2.30
10.27
0.63
2.30
Z,/
,S I
K, _ - 7,486
Zz°
Z 1KS]
Predicted Water Surface Elevation for Temporary Water Quality Pool= 9.92 feet met

Ecosystem .
PROGRAM � //
July 18, 2007 RECEI ✓ E®
Jeffrey and Annmarie Pierce JUL 19 2007
3220 Holly Ave.
Colonial Heights, VA 23834 " ° Q-WAPn
Project: Pierce Fill Project County: Dare
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is willing to
accept payment for impacts associated with the above referenced project. Please note that this decision does not assure that
the payment will be approved by the permit issuing agencies as mitigation for project impacts. It is the responsibility of the
applicant to contact these agencies to determine if payment to the NCEEP will be approved.
---- This acceptance-is-valid-forsix-months-from-the-date'of-this`letterand-is-nontransferable=Ifwe have -not -received -a copv-of---'--
- - - the issued 404 Permit/401 Certification/CAMA-permit within this time frame, this acceptance will expire. It isthe- --
applicant's responsibility to send copies of the permits to NCEEP. Once NCEEP receives a copy of the permit(s) an invoice
will be issued based on the required mitigation in that permit and payment must be made prior to conducting the authorized
work. The amount of the In Lieu Fee to be paid to NCEEP by an applicant is calculated based upon the Fee Schedule and
policies listed at www.nceep.net,
Based on the information supplied by you the impacts that may require compensatory mitigation are summarized in the
following table.
Pasquotank
03010205
Stream (feet)
Wetlands (acres)
Buffer I
(Sq.Ft.)
Buffer Il
(Sq.Ft.)
Cold
Cool
Warm
Ri arian
Non -Riparian
Coastal Marsh
Impacts
0
0
0
0.098
0
0
0
0
Credits
0
0
0
0.196
0
0
0
0
Upon receipt of payment, EEP will take responsibility for providing the compensatory mitigation. If the regulatory agencies
require mitigation credits greater than indicated above, and the applicant wants NCEEP to be responsible for the additional
mitigation, the applicant will need to submit a mitigation request to NCEEP for approval prior to permit issuance. The
mitigation will be performed in accordance with the Memorandum of Understanding between the N. C. Department of
Environment and Natural Resources and the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers dated November 4, 1998,
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Kelly Williams at [phone].
Sincerely,
Wiilmore, P_E V
Director
cc: Cyndi Karoly, NCDWQ Wetlands/401 Unit
Tom Steffens, USACE-Washington
Kyle Barnes, NCDWQ- Washington
Dennis Hawthorne, agent
File
Rutoria9... EKAa"... Protects' Oats State
ITJ >,
Ad.
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program, 1652 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1652 / 919-715-0476 / www.nceep.net

5TORMWATER NARRATIVE
For:
Cedar Shores 5ubd1v151on
Section 2
5kinner5ville Township
Washington County, North Carolina
Developed By:
Blue Sun Development, L.L.C.
Plan Prepared By:
;��.y • .,!NEED ^off
D.
H. C. Harr15, Jr.
Encglneering � Surveying, P.A.
2 1 6 Main Street, Winterville, North Carolina 28590
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
e-mail: mdtol50nPhcharri5.net
JUN 2 7 2007
DWQ-WARD

DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
Location of Project:
This site is located in the Skinnersville Township, Washington County, North Carolina,
northeast of the intersection of Pea Ridge Road (5R 1 302) and Breezy Banks Road (SR
13 15). The entrance road to this site is being constructed out of the existing Lot 14 of
Cedar Shores Subdivision Section One. This 100' wide lot is being dedicated as public
right of way and will be utilized to build a divided roadside Swale section as the entrance
to Section Two. The north boundary of this project bounds Section One of Cedar Shores
Subdivision which is being developed as residential smgle family housing. The western
boundary line 15 Breezy Banks Road, the southern adJoiner is currently in use for
agricultural production as a sod farm and the eastern adjoiner is the currently an
abandoned NCDOT borrow pit. The property is located at approximate latitude of North
353571 2 and an approximate longitude of West 7&47593.
Predominant Soil Types:
According to the NRC5 Web Soil Survey, the predominate soil type 15 Tarboro Sand
with 0-3 percent slopes. According to the NC Soil Survey information, the Tarboro
series is a somewhat excessively drained soil that is formed in coarse textured sediment.
Type of Development:
This project will install the roads, drainage features, water main and services for 29
residential single family homes ranging in style from single family home to patio home style
construction. Each individual dwelling Will be served by private septic sewage disposal.
The patio homes will utilize a community type septic disposal area located in a common area
directly behind structures. There is also a planned club house and pool area planned that
will be built on the area noted as Club House Common Area.
Earth Disturbing Activities:
Presently the entire tract is being used as a commercial sod farm. The earth disturbing
activities will be the stripping of topsoil and rough grading of the roads and dramage
features. The total area of disturbance equals I 1 .00 acres.
Existing Drainage Patterns:
The site currently drains in the general direction of the eastern adjoining property which is
currently the site of an abandoned NCDOT borrow pit.
Proposed Drainage Patterns:
The roadside Swale sections have been designed to convey stormwater runoff along the
proposed road system into the same general direction as the existing topography

currently allows. The 5ite will di5charge 5tormwater into a perimeter 5wale that will allow
infiltration of runoff into the sandy 50115 on Site. The infiltration Swale has been Sized to
accept the runoff from the entire drainage basin 51nce it 15 located at the main drainage
point of the Site.

e tS• U 6'
RECE \19ir,H.
' 1
Jti,,'�'r 2007
®WQ-WARC
CLIENT:
PROJECT:
TERRACON JOB NO
DATE: 6/5/2007
TERRACON CONSULTANTS, INC.
111-C W. FIRE TOWER RD.
WINTERVILLE, N.C. 28590
TELEPHONE [phone]
Blue Sun Development Group
Cedar Shores Phase II Infiltration Investigation,
Washington County, North Carolina
72071165
PERSONNEL: Carl Bonner
As requested by Mr. Michael Tolson, representing HC Harris, Jr., Engineering and
Surveying, PA., a representative of Terracon was on site to evaluate the existing soil
conditions at the Cedar Shores Phase II project. The project site is currently a cleared,
undeveloped tract of land. The proposed roads were staked at the time of our site visit.
The purpose of the soils exploration was to determine the classification of the upper
soils, the permeability of these soils and the approximate elevation of the water table.
Five hand auger borings were advanced across the site at locations selected by Mr.
Tolson as shown on the attached drawing. The soils encountered in our borings were
visually classified and the borings were temporarily left open in order to obtain a depth to
the water table.
The lithology of the five borings was relatively consistent at each hand auger location.
An approximate 6 inch layer of topsoil and organics was underlain by brown, yellow
brown and gray silty fine to medium sand. The borings were advanced until the samples
were saturated.
The following table summarizes the location of the borings and the depth to the water
table at the time of our exploration. See the attached site plan for the location of the soil
borings.
BORING LOCATION
DEPTH TO
GROUNDWATER
HA-1
8.0 Feet
HA-2
5.0 Feet
HA-3
5.5 Feet
HA-4
7.0 Feet
HA-5
6.0 Feet
A composite soil sample was obtained from the hand auger borings from a depth of
approximately 4 to 6 feet In each boring. This composite soil sample was remolded at its
natural moisture content and at the approximate natural density and a laboratory

Page 2 June 5, 2007
Cedar Shores, Washington County, North Carolina Terracon Job Number: 72071165
permeability test was performed in general accordance with ASTM D 5084. Please note
that the permeability shown on the attached test report is listed in cm/sec.
In addition, we also performed a grain size analysis, the results of which are also
attached with this report.
Mr. Michael Tolson was informed of our test results after the conclusion of the
permeability testing on June 5, 2007.
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED
TERRACON

5
. .s... 7-..M...
120
44 /� ' r r—I—� _L—r _ T
A• ' - I / TOTAL MSFURVED AREA 10A0AC
fT i A
' - c?� / --- __ ____ �T-,F�-- �r � / � 11 • KGIWBV15.1P.
/ li - I _ xewavm
MFL i'EARENOECSTMV NE7LAA'DS /`^^'+s"�•TM'y
LOGATEO oN THIS SITE
CEDAR
_•c �` ®`m`mt m+ cc_ CAR
SHORES
WILI
+ I RF'Yt FIiAV/
SE-2
m2v B

1
Particle Size Distribution Report
GRAIN SIZE - mm
% COBBLES I % GRAVEL I % SAND I M. Ru 7 I ui rr ev
SIEVE
SIZE
PERCENT
FINER
SPEC!
PERCENT
PASS?
(X=NO)
114
100.0
1110
100.0
1120
99.7
1140
94.6
1160
63.5
11100
20.3
11200
10.3
pm 5pccilicalian pruvided)
Sample No.: 71165-1
Location: On -site
Source of Sample:
Material Description
GRAY BROWN AND YELLOW DROWN SILTY FINE TO
MEDIUM SAND
Atterbere Limits
PL= NP LL= NL PI= NP
Coefficients
D85= 0.349 D60= 0.240 D50= 0.214
D30= 0.172 D15= 0.104 D10=
Cu= Cc=
Classification
USCS= SP-SM AASHTO= A-3
Remarks
COMPOSITE SAMPLE
Date: 6-1-2007
Elev./Depth: 3-6 fi
Terraeon Consultants, Inc.11 Client: Blue Sun Development Group
Project: Cedar Shores Subdivision, Section 2
Infiltration Investigation, Washington County, NC
Winterville, North Carolina Project No: 72071165 Figure 71165-1

PERMEABILITY TEST REPORT
TEST DATA: SAMPLE DATA:
Specimen Height (cm): 10.15 Sample Identification: #1
Specimen Diameter (cm): 7.11
Dry Unit Weight (pcf): 105.5
Moisture Before Test (%): 14.7
Moisture After Test (%): 20.0
Run Number: 1 •
Cell Pressure (psi): 45.0
'rest Pressure(psi) : 43.0
Back Pressure(psi) : 40.0
Diff. Head (psi):' 3.0
Flow Rate (cc/sec): 5.37. 10--1 4.88
Perm. (cm/sec): 1 5.89. 10--4 5.40
0
I
u
2
u
n
4
W
M
n
J
0
6
3
0
J
W 8
10
I . 10--3
8 • 10--4
8 . 10--4
4 . 10--4
10--4
Visual Description: Gray Brown and Yellow
Brown Silty Fine to Medium Sand
Remarks: ASTM 05084
2
45.0 Maximum Dry Density (pcf):
43.0 Optimum Moisture Content (%):
40.0
3.0 Percent Compaction: a
Ia--1 Permeameter type: Flexible Wall
10--4 Sample type: Remolded
TIME - t (sec)
0 25 50 75
inn
10 20 30 40
AVERAGE HYDRAULIC GRADIENT - dH/L (cm/cm)
Project: Cedar Shores Infiltration Testing
Location: Washington County, NC
Date: 5-31-2007
PERMEABILITY TEST REPORT
TERRACON CONSULTANTS, INC-
Project No.: 72071165
File No.:
Lob No.:
Tested by: LC
Checked by: CFO
Test: CH - Constant head

July 1 1, 2007
North Carolina DIV151011 of Water Quality
Washington Regional Office
943 Wa5hmcjton Square Mall
Wa5hmgton, North Carolina 27889
Re: 5tormwater Review - 5W7070305
Cedar Shores Subdivision Phase 2
Attn: Mr. 5amir Dumpor, P.E.
Mr. Dumpor:
i;�C� gEl)
JUL 1 3 2007
DWQ-WARD
On behalf of Blue Sun Development, LLC, H.C. Hari-15, Jr. Engineering and 5urveymg 15 pleased to offer
the following responses to the comments presented in your letter dated July 6, 2007.
Comment # I
Clarify Total Area of tract. Plans (cover sheet) show 13.07 acres, Application and lot area table
shows 19.7 and Low density Supplement shows 20.97. Please clarify and make the necessary
reV151on5.
Response #1
Based on our conversations, the cover sheet 517ow5 the area in the overall tract for Phase 2 of the
subdivision. A5 you are aware, the entrance to the eubdivision will be constructed on one of the
existing lots in Phase l which 15 the reason that an area discrepancy exists between the cover sheet
and the application and lot area table. The Cow Density 5upplement has been corrected to show that
only l /.49 acres are considered to be included a5 low density lots in this project.
Comment #2
Clarify if this project 15 Phase 2 or Section 2.
Response #2
Thank you for pointing out this discrepancy and please refer to this project as Phase 2.
Comment #3
Provide an Infiltration Basin Benchmark for Sediment removal.
Response #3
Please find the requested Benchmark has been shown on sheet 0-6.
Comment #4
Revise the Typical Swale Detail (sheet 5E-2) and the Typical Infiltration Ba5m Detail (sheet D-6) to
show slopes a5 4: 1 or flatter, rather than 4: 1 Max.
2 1 6 Main Street — Winterville, NC 28590
Phone: [phone] Pax: (252) 321 -6208 [e-mail]

Response #4
Please find that the requested changes have been made to the two details In question.
Comment #5
Revise sheet 5E-2 to show all lot numbers, areas and Drainage Easements.
Response #5
Please find that sheet 5E 2 now shows the lot numbers with areas and that the drainage easements
have been labeled aroUnd the storm structure.
Comment #6
Provide the Stream Cla551fication on page 2 of the 5tormwater Management Application Form.
Response #6
Please find that the revised page 2 of the 5tormwater Management Application has been revised to
Include the 5trea177 Cla3s1fr6abon and a copy of the North Carolina Waterbodies Listed by County has
been hrghfighted to show the reference from which this Information was obtained.
Comment #7
Please provide two copies of Signed and sealed revised sheets and calculatbon5.
Response #7
Please find that two copies of all revised sheets and calculabons have been submitted In this package.
Thank you for the opportunity to address these comments and for the opportunity to provide you with
additional information for your use in the continued review of this project. I look forward to hearmg
from you regarding the future review and subsequent approval of this project and many other projects
in the future.
Resp ctfully,
Michael D. To150n, P.E.
H.C. Harn5, Jr. Engineering B 5urveying, P.A.
Enc105ure5: A5 Stated
Cc: Jeremy Peanq Meth - Blue 5un Development, LLC
Project file - 05-1 15
2 1 6 Main Street — Winterville, NC 28590
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone] [e-mail]

North Carolina Waterbodies Listed by County
Note: Waterbodies are listed in more than one county, if they cross county lines.
Report Date: 07/07/07
Records Found: 45
Search Parameters:
County:
Washington
Class:
SpDes:
Name:
%
Index#:
%
Name of Stream Description Curr. Class Date Basin Stream Index #
Washington County
ROANOKE RIVER From 18 mile marker at C;Sw
Janesville to
Albemarle Sound
(Batchelor Bay)
Welch Creek
From source to Roanoke
C;SW
River
Conaby Creek
From source to Roanoke
C;Sw
River
ALBEMARLE SOUND
West of a line
B;Sw
(Batchelor Bay)
extendingg from a point
of land 0.3 mile north
of mouth of Morgan
Swamp in a southerly
direction to a point
of land on the
eastside of the mouth
of Roanoke River
ALBEMARLE SOUND West of a line B;Sw
(Batchelor Bay) extendingg from a point
of land 0.3 mile north
of mouth of Morgan
Swamp in a southerly
direction to a point
of land on the
eastside of the mouth
of Roanoke River
ALBEMARLE SOUND West of a line B;Sw
(Batchelor Bay) extendingg from a point
of land 0.3 mile north
of mouth of Morgan
Swamp in a southerly
direction to a point
of land on the
eastside of the mouth
of Roanoke River
Pungo River Canal From source to Pungo
River
Canal A
From source
to
Pungo
River Canal
Canal A
From source
to
Pungo
River Canal
Canal B
From source
to
Pungo
River Canal
09/01/57 Roanoke 23-(53)
07/13/60 Roanoke 23-55
09/01/57 Roanoke 23-56
09/01/74 Chowan 24
09/01/74 Pasquotan 24
k
09/01/74 Roanoke 24
C; Sw, NSW
01/01/90
Tar-Pamli
29-34-2
co
C;Sw,NSW
01/01/90
Pasquotan
29-34-2-1
k
C;Sw,NSW
01/01/90
Tar-Pamli
29-34-2-1
co
C;Sw,NSW
01/01/90
Pasquotan
29-34-2-2
k
Page I of 3

Name of Stream
Description
Curr. Class
Date
Basin
Stream Index #
Canal B
From source to Pungo
C;Sw,NSW
O1/01/90
Tar-Pamli
29-34-2-2
River Canal
a0
Canal C
From source to Pungo
C;Sw,NSW
O1/01/90
Pasquotan
29-34-2-3
River Canal
k
Canal C
From source to Pungo
C;Sw,NSW
O1/01/90
Tar-Pamli
29-34-2-3
River Canal
co
Canal D
From source to Pungo
C;Sw,NSW
O1/01/90
Tar-Pamli
29-34-2-5
River Canal
co
Pungo Lake
Entire Lake
C;Sw,NSW
O1/01/90
Tar-Pamli
29-34-3-1
cc
White Cypress
From source to Pungo
C;Sw,NSW
O1/01/90
Tar-Pamli
29-34-3-1-1
Tributary
Lake
to
Third Tributary
From source to Pungo
C;Sw,NSW
O1/01/90
Tar-Pamli
29-34-3-1-2
Lake
to
ALBE14ARLE SOUND
All waters south and
SB )
07/01/73
Pasquotan
30
east of a line running
k
in a southerly
direction from
Horniblow Point (North
end of
Norfolk -Southern
Railroad Bridge) to a
point of land on the
east side of Roanoke
River (a line running
along the railroad to
the Chowan-Washington
County Line, thence
west along the
Chowan-Washington
County Line to the
Bertie-Washington
County Line, thence
along the
Bertie-Washington
County Line to a point
0.1 mile above the
mouth of Roanoke
River, thence south
east 0.1 mile to the
east side of Roanoke
River
Pleasant Grove
From source to
C;Sw
09/01/74
Pasquotan
30-10
Creek
Albemarle Sound
k
Chapel Swamp
From source to
C;Sw
09/01/74
Pasquotan
30-11
Albemarle Sound
k
Newberry Ditch
From source to
C;Sw
09/01/74
Pasquotan
30-12
Albemarle Sound
k
Sleights Creek
From source to
C;Sw
09/01/74
Pasquotan
30-13
Albemarle Sound
k
Bull Bay
Entire Bay
SB
07/01/73
Pasquotan
30-14
k
Bull Creek
From source to Bull Bay
C;Sw
09/01/74
Pasquotan
30-14-1
k
Deep Creek
From source to Bull Bay
C;Sw
07/01/73
Pasquotan
30-14-2
k
Page 2 of 3

Name of Stream
Description
Curr. Class
Bunton Creek
From source
to Bull Bay
C;Sw
Scuppernong River
From source
to mouth
C;Sw
of Riders Creek
(First
Creek)
Moccasin Canal
From sources
to
C;Sw
and connecting
Scuppernong
River
canals
Western Canal
From sources
to
C;Sw
and connecting
Scuppernong
River
canals
Ten Foot Canal
From source
to Western
C;Sw
Canal
Nine Foot Canal
From source
to Ten
C;Sw
Foot Canal
Mountain Canal
From sources
to
C;Sw
and connecting
Scuppernong
River
canals
Thirty Foot Canal From source to
Scuppernong River
Old Canal From source to
Scuppernong River
Phelps Lake Entire Lake
Kendrick Creek From source to U.S.
(Mackeys Creek) Hwy. 64 at Roper
Kendrick Creek From U.S. Hwy. 64 at
(Mackeys Creek) Roper to Albemarle
Sound
Beaver Dam Branch From source to
Kendrick Creek
Beaver Dam Branch From source to
Kendrick Creek
Skinners Canal From source to Beaver
Dam Branch
Main Canal From source to
Kendrick Creek
Canal B From source to Main
Canal
Canal A From source to Main
Canal
Lewis Canal From source to Main
Canal
Bakers Swamp From source to
Kendrick Creek
C;Sw
C;Sw
B; Sw, ORW
C;Sw
SC
C;Sw
C;Sw
Date Basin Stream Index #
07/01/73 Pasquotan 30-14-3
k
04/06/61 Pasquotan 30-14-4-(1)
k
09/01/74 Pasquotan 30-14-4-2
k
09/01/74 Pasquotan 30-14-4-3
k
09/01/74 Pasquotan 30-14-4-3-1
k
09/01/74 Pasquotan 30-14-4-3-1-1
k
09/01/74 Pasquotan 30-14-4-9
k
09/01/74 Pasquotan 30-14-4-5
k
09/01/74 Pasquotan 30-14-4-6
k
08/01/00 Pasquotan 30-14-4-6-1
k
03/01/77 Pasquotan 30-9-(1)
k
07/01/73 Pasquotan 30-9-(2)
k
09/01/74 Pasquotan 30-9-3
k
09/01/74 Roanoke 30-9-3
C;Sw
09/01/74
Pasquotan
30-9-3-1
k
C;Sw
09/01/74
Pasquotan
30-9-4
k
C;Sw
09/01/74
Pasquotan
30-9-4-1
k
C;Sw
09/01/74
Pasquotan
30-9-4-2
k
C;Sw
09/01/74
Pasquotan
30-9-4-3
k
C;Sw
09/01/74
Pasquotan
30-9-5
k
Page 3 of 3

Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
rNorth Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
1
'C Coleen H. Sullins, Director
Division of Water Quality
July 6, 2007
Blue Sun Development, LLC
Atm.: Jeremy Peang-Meth
626 West Main Street
m, NC 27889
Subject: Stormwater Review SW7070305
Cedar Shores Subdivision, Phase 2
Washington County
Dear Mr. Peang-Meth:
This office received a Coastal Stormwater Permit Modification Application and plans for the subject
project on June 27, 2007. A preliminary review of the project indicates that before a State Stormwater permit can
be issued the following additional information is needed.
I. Clarify Total Area of tract. Plans (cover sheet) show 19.07 acres, Application and lot area table shows 19.7
and Low density Supplement shows 20.97. Please clarify and make the necessary revisions.
2. Clarify if this projects is Phase 2 or Section 2.
3. Provide an Infiltration Basin Benchmark for sediment removal.
4. Revise the Typical Swale Detail (sheet SE-2) and the Typical Infiltration Basin Detail (sheet D-6) to show
slopes as 4:1 or flatter, rather than 4:1 Max.
5. Revise sheet SE-2 to show all lot numbers, areas and Drainage Easements.
6. Provide the Steam Classification on page 2 of the Stormwater Management Application Form.
7. Please provide two copies of signed and sealed revised sheets and calculations.
The above requested information must be received in this office prior to July 13, 2007 or your application
will be returned as incomplete. The return of this project will necessitate resubmittal of all required items including
the application fee. If you need additional time to submit the required information, please mail or fax your
request for time extension to this office at the Letterhead address.
You should also be aware that the Stormwater Rules require that the permit be issued prior to any
development activity. Construction without a permit is a violation of 15A NCAC 21-1.1000 and North Carolina
General Statute 143-215.1 and may result in civil penalties of up to $10,000 per day.
Please reference the Stormwater Project Number above on all correspondence. If you have questions, please
feel free to contact me at [phone].
Sincerely,
f
Samir Dumper, PE
Environmental Engineer
Washington Regional Office
cc: Michael D. Tolson, PE, H.C. Harris, Jr. Engineering & Surveying P.A.
asfiington RegionaFOffice�j
0.rCarolina
mrally
North Carolina Division of Water Quality Washington Regional Office Phone [phone] FAX [phone]
Intemet h2o.encstate.mus 943 Washington Square Mall, Washington, NC 27889
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer— 50%Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
Customer Service
1-877-623-6748

l
Soil survey' i -�
Washington County, North Carolina
The Oat or Cap horizon has hue of 5YR or 10YR,
Tarboro soils have sandy horizons tt
value of 2 or 3, and chroma of 0 to 3. In cultivated or
80 inches thick. Reaction ranges from
if very poorly
pastured areas, it has weak to moderate fine and
y
slightly acid in unlimed areas.
ers are 16 to 51
medium granular structure. Structure in the Oa2 horizon!
tir
`
The A horizon has hue of 7.5YR or 1
at are high in silt
occurs only in drained areas that are cultivated. The
y)
?
to 5, and chroma of 2 or 4.
Slope ranges from
structure is massive but parts to fine and medium
The C horizon has hue of 7.5YR or
angular blocky.
,k
to 7, and chroma of 3 to 8. It is loamy
;k, approximately
The Oa2 horizon and underlying organic tiers have hue
m State Road 1183,
of 2.5YR or 5YR, value of 2 or 3, and chroma of 2 or 4.
TOmOtley Series
The lower tiers of organic matter are pastelike, have a
greasy feel, and are massive under natural, wet
j: *'
The Tomotley series consists of poo
broken face and
conditions. If the soil is drained and cultivated, its
(
that formed in loamy fluvial and marine
nt fiber unrubbed
structure changes upon aeration. Excessive drying
ranges from 0 to 2 percent.
aedium granular
causes shrinkage and the formation of hard angular
Typical pedon of Tomotley fine sand
ne and large roots
blocky peds. These peds dry irreversibly. Fiber content is
south of U.S. Highway 64 on State Ro;
acid; abrupt smooth
highest in the lower tier. It ranges from 10 to 50 percent
feet west of State Road 1132:
unrubbed and less than 10 percent rubbed.
wn 5YR 2/2,
(
The IIC1g horizon has hue of 5GY, 5G, or 5Y, value of
;;,,
Al-0 to 6 inches; dark gray (10YR•4/
ess than 1 percent
3 to 5, and chroma of 1 or 2. It is silt loam or silty clay
E,
„
loam; weak medium granular strut
Ove parting to weak
loam and contains 10 to 20 percent organic matter
common very fine to medium root
ble; slightly sticky
throughout.
fine flakes of mica; very strongly e
fium, and large
The IIICg horizons have hue of 10YR or 5Y, value of 6
boundary.
N fine pieces of
or 8, and chroma of 1 or 2 and range to greenish gray or
A2-6 to 11 inches; light gray (10YR 7
mooth boundary.
dark greenish gray. They are sand or loamy sand.
loam; weak medium granular strut
own (5YR 3/2,
common Al bodies; common fine
about 5 percent
TarbOrO series
and pores; few fine flakes of mica
d; massive; friable;
acid; clear wavy boundary.
:mon medium and
The Tarboro series consists of somewhat excessively
Bt g—1 1 to 16 inches; light gray (10Yf
)d; few medium
drained soils that formed in sandy fluvial sediments.
with pockets of sandy clay loam; 1
id; gradual wavy
Slope ranges from 0 to 3 percent.
distinct yellowish brown (10YR 5/
Typical pedon of Tarboro sand, 0 to 3 percent slopes,
yellow (10YR 6/8) mottles; moder
)rown (5YR 3/3,
approximately 0.5 mile east of intersection of State Road
?
subangular blocky structure; friabl
about 15 percent
1315 and N.C. Highway 32, and 250 feet south of
medium roots and pores; few fine
_a; friable; slightly
Albemarle Sound in the woods:
%
very strongly acid; gradual wavy t
adium and large
ry medium pieces of
All-0 to 3 inches; dark grayish brown (10YR 4/2)
rp:
B21tg-16 to 25 inches; gray (10YR 6
pockets and lenses of sandy l loan
navy boundary.
sand; weak fine granular structure; very.friable;
��
distinct yellowish brown (10YR 5/
h gray (5GY 4/1)
many fine and medium roots; many clean sand
yellow (10YR 6/8) mottles; model
�. sticky; common
grains; strongly acid; clear smooth boundary.
subangular blocky structure; friabl
gray very fine sand
Al 2-3 to 12 inches; brown (10YR 4/3) sand; weak fine
slightly plastic; few medium roots
tooth boundary.
OYR 7/1) sand;
granular structure; very friable; common fine to
coarse roots; few organic stains on sand grains; few
i
medium pores; few thin distinct p
m •flakes of mica;
very fine opaque grains; strongly acid; clear wavy
m
Y
faces of peds; very strongly acid;
boundary.
undary.
;h gray (5GY 4/1)
boundary.
C1-12 to 31 inches; brownish yellow (10YR 6/6) sand;B22tg-25
��'
to 37 inches; gray (10YR E
medium flakes of
single grained; loose; few fine to coarse roots; few
1
pockets and lenses of sandy clay
clay; common medium and coars
fine flakes of mica; few very fine opaque grains;
strongly acid; gradual wavy boundary.
brown (7.5YR 5/8) and reddish y,
'anges from 16 to
C2-31 to 52 inches; yellowish brown (10YR 5/6) sand;
mottles; moderate medium and c
Trial
extremely acid (in
single grained; loose; few medium and large roots;.
,u
and angular blocky structure;
�t where the surface
few fine flakes of mica; few very fine opaque grains;
slightly plastic; few medium roots
)rizons range from
strongly acid; clear wavy boundary.
medium pores; few thin distinct p
ips, and fragments
03-52 to 60 inches; yellow (10YR 7/8) sand; single
faces of peds; very strongly acid;
ie upper organic
)as and 10 to 35
grained; loose; few fine flakes of mica; few very
opaque grains; medium acid; clear smooth
1,
boundary.
B23tg-37 to 48 inches; gray (10YR f
loam
to 2 percent)
boundary.);
gray (5Y6/2) clay with pock
loam; common mediu
>h occur in the
C4-60 to 99 inches; pale brown (10YR 6/3) sand;
1.
sandy clay
w to common in the
single grained; loose;.few fine flakes of mica; few
distinct strong brown (7.5YR 5/8;
very fine opaque grains; strongly acid.
,r
se:
(7.5YR 6/8) mottles; moderate rr

In
Washington County, North Carolina
Oat or Cap horizon has hue of 5YR or 10YR,
of 2 or 3, and chrome of 0 to 3. In cultivated or
ed areas, it has weak to moderate fine and R.
'm granular structure. Structure in the Oa2 horizo
; only in drained areas that are cultivated. The
,ire is massive but parts to fine and medium
it blocky. r,
Oa2 horizon and underlying organic tiers have hue
(R or 5YR, value of 2 or 3, and chrome of 2 or 4.
wer tiers of organic matter are pastelike, have a
feel, and are massive under natural, wet
ons. If the soil is drained and cultivated, its
ire changes upon aeration. Excessive drying
> shrinkage and the formation of hard angular
peds. These peds dry irreversibly. Fiber content is
t in the lower tier. It ranges from 10 to 50 percent
led and less than 10 percent rubbed.
IIC1g horizon has hue of 5GY, 5G, or 5Y, value of
and chroma of 1 or 2. It is silt loam or silty clay
.nd contains 10 to 20 percent organic matter
iout.
IIICg horizons have hue of 10YR or 5Y, value of 6
nd chroma of 1 or 2 and range to greenish gray or
,eenish gray. They are sand or loamy sand.
)ro series .
Tarboro series consists of somewhat excessively
f soils that formed in sandy fluvial sediments.
-anges from O to 3 percent.
:al pedon of Tarboro sand, 0 to 3 percent slopes,
imately 0.5 mile east of intersection of State Road
nd N.C. Highway 32, and 250 feet south of
arle Sound in the woods:
) to 3 inches; dark grayish brown (10YR 4/2)
nd; weak fine granular structure; very friable;
any fine and medium roots; many, clean sand
sins; strongly acid; clear smooth boundary.
) to 12 inches; brown (10YR 4/3) sand; weak fine
anular structure; very friable; common fine to
arse roots; few organic stains on sand grains; few
ry fine opaque grains; strongly acid; clear wavy
undary.
! to 31 inches; brownish yellow (10YR 6/6) sand;
gle grained; loose; few fine to coarse roots; few
a flakes of mica; few very fine opaque grains;
ongly acid; gradual wavy boundary.
to 52 inches; yellowish brown (10YR 5/6) sand;
gle grained; loose; few medium and large roots;
v fine flakes of mica; few very fine opaque grains;
ongly acid; clear wavy boundary.
to 60 inches; yellow (10YR 7/8) sand; single
lined; loose; few fine flakes of mica; few very fine
aque grains; medium acid; clear smooth
mdary.
to 99 inches; pale brown (10YR 6/3) sand;
gle grained; loose; few fine flakes of mica; few
y fine opaque grains; strongly acid.
Tarboro soils have sandy horizons that are more than
60 inches thick. Reaction ranges from strongly acid to
slightly acid in unlimed areas.
The A horizon has hue of 7.5YR or 10YR, value of 3
to 5, and chrome of 2 or 4.
7 5YR or The aa 3 ue o 8 f It is I amylsand or sand.
4
sand.
to 7, and chrome
Tomotley series
The Tomotley series consists of poorly drained soils
that formed in loamy fluvial and marine sediments. Slope
ranges from 0 to 2 percent.
Typical pedon of Tomotley fine sandy loam, 0.3 mile Tomot
o
south of U.S. Highway 64 on State Road 1132 and 50 Zhick. Re
feet west f State Road 1132: acid in tt
A1-0 to 6 inches; dark gray (10YR 4/1) fine sandy about 5C
loam; weak medium granular structure; very friable; medium
common very fine to medium roots and pores; few The A
fine flakes of mica; very strongly acid; clear smooth of
boundary. 10YR 7/1) fine sandychroma
A2 to 11 inches; light gray
loam; weak medium granular structure; very friable; yellow,
common Al bodies; common fine and
medium
roots 7 and The E
and pores; few fine flakes of mica; verystrongly loam. T
acid; clear wavy boundary. 10YR 7/1) sandy loam 5 to 7,
Big-11 to 16 inches; light gray ( few medium clay for
with pockets of sandy clay loam;
distinct yellowish brown (10YR 5/8) and brownish horizor
yellow (10YR 6/8) mottles; moderate fine loam.'
subangular blocky structure; friable; common fine to olive, y
The
medium roots and pores;few
wavy bolundaryf mica; pale o'
very strongly acid; gradual
621tg-1610 25 inches; gray 110YR 6/1) clay loam with sandy
pockets and lenses of sandy loam; few medium
distinct yellowish brown (10YR 5/8) and brownish
yellow (10YR 6/13) mottles; moderate medium
subangular blocky structure; friable; slightly sticky,
slightly plastic; few medium roots; common fine and
medium pores, few thin distinct patchy clay dual wavy
on
faces of peds; very strongly acid; gradual
boundary. B22tg-25 to 37 inches; gray ra 10YR 6/1) clay loam with
es of
loam and
clay;,pocketsoomm nemedium and coarse distinct strong
clay;
brown (7.5YR 5/8) and reddish yellow (7.5YR 6/8)
mottles; moderate medium and coarse subangular
and angular blocky structure; friable; slightly sticky,
slightly plastic; few medium roots; common fine and
medium pores; few thin
distinct
d patchy
clay
aal waillmys on
faces of peds; very strongly acid;
boundary.
B23tg-37 to 48 inches; gray (tOYR 6/1) and light olive
gray (5Y6/2) clay loam with pockets and lenses of
sandy clay loam; common medium and coarse
distinct strong brown 8) and
(7.5YR 6/8) mottles; 7/
moderate mereddish medium andcoarrsew
suban
slightl'
COMM
peds;
B3g-48 t
pock(
distin
medic
stron
Cg-64 V
loam
distir
mas!
Wah(
The
draine
sedirr
TYF
apprc
north
W eye
A1—
f10
B21

In accordance with Title 15 NCAC 2H.1000, the Coastal Stormwater Management Regulations, deed
restrictions and protective covenants are required for Low Density Residential Subdivisions where lots
will be subdivided and sold. Deed restrictions and protective covenants are necessary to ensure that the
development maintains a "built -upon" area consistent with the applicable regulation governing the density
level.
I, Jeremy Peanq - Meth acknowledge and affirm by my signature below, that I will cause the following
deed restrictions and protective covenants to be recorded for Cedar Shores Subdivision Section Two
prior to the sale of any lot:
1. The following covenants are intended to ensure ongoing compliance with State Stormwater
Management Permit Number as issued by the Division of Water Quality under
NCAC 2H.1000.
2. The State of North Carolina is made a beneficiary of these covenants to the extent necessary to
maintain compliance with the stormwater management permit.
3. These covenants are to run with the land and be binding on all persons and parties claiming
under them.
4. The covenants pertaining to stormwater may not be altered or rescinded without the express
written consent of the State of North Carolina, Division of Water Quality.
5. Alteration of the drainage as shown on the approved plan may not take place without the
concurrence of the Division of Water Quality.
6. The maximum allowable built -upon area per lot is See Chart square feet. This allotted amount
includes any built -upon area constructed within the lot property boundaries, and that portion of the
right-of-way between the front lot line and the edge of the pavement. Built upon area includes, but
is not limited to, structures, asphalt, concrete, gravel, brick, stone, slate, and coquina, but does
not include raised, open wood decking, or the water surface of swimming pools.
7. In the case of a lot within CAMA's regulated AEC, where the Division of Coastal Management
calculates a different maximum allowable built -upon area for that lot than is shown herein, the
governing maximum built -upon area for that lot shall be the most restrictive of the two.
8. Filling in or piping of any vegetative conveyances (ditches, swales, etc.) associated with the
development except for average driveway crossings, is strictly prohibited by any persons.
9. Each lot will maintain a 30' wide vegetated buffer between all impervious areas and surface
waters.
10. All roof drains shall terminate at least 30' from the mean high water mark of surface waters.
Signature:` Date: � , S, q- • oY,
I, Michael D. Tolson, a Notary Public in the State of North Carolina, County of Edgecombe, do
hereby certify that Jeremy Peanq-Meth personally appeared before me this the
21 7,
day of lo* , 2007, and acknowledge the due execution of the foregoing
instrument. Witness my hand and official seal,
My Commission expires November 24, 2008
i _�.t . �.
JUN 2 7 2007
POpp
�� D To`ZVI
s 2 .
. %X0 .
•,•c�pDB E ,c
DWQ-WARD

Permit No. S W 10103 os
(to be provided by DWQ)
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PERMIT APPLICATION FORM
LOW DENSITY SUPPLEMENT
This form may be photocopied for use as an original
A low density project is one that meets the appropriate criteria for built upon area and transports stormwater
runoff primarily through vegetated conveyances. Low density projects should not have a discrete stormwater
collection system as defined by 15A NCAC 2H .1002(18). Low density requirements and density factors can be
found in 15A NCAC 21-1 .1005 through .1007.
1. PROJECT INFORMATION
µPr -t (A l 0-1
.PHA5 �F
Project Name : CEDAR SNORES SJBDIVIS 10tq --5f e'�4 2
Contact Person: {MtChNEL p -roI_Sot,/ E15 Phone Number: (7-5z)-5ZI-5&6-1
Number of Lots:_ 19 Allowable Built Upon Area Per Lot*: SEE C.HAI?'(
*If lot sizes are not uniform, attach a table indicating the number of lots, lot sizes and allowable built upon area
for each lot. The attachment must include the project name, phase, page numbers and provide area subtotals
and totals.
11. BU1LT UPON AREA
See the Stormwater Management Permit Application for specific language that must be recorded in the deed
restrictions for all subdivisions.
For uniform lot sizes, complete the following calculation in the space provided below where:
• SA Site Area - the total project area above Mean High Water. Wetlands may be excluded when the
development results in high density pockets.
• DF Density Factor - the appropriate percent built upon area divided by 100.
• RA Road Area - the total impervious surface occupied by roadways.
• OA Other Area - the total area of impervious surfaces such as clubhouses, tennis courts, sidewalks, etc.
• No. Lots - the total number of lots in the subdivision.
• BUA/Lot - the computed allowable built upon area for each lot including driveways and impervious
surfaces located between the front lot line and the edge of pavement.
Form SWU-104 Rev3.99 Page 1 of 2

N
(SA x DF) - RA - OA = BUA
No. Lots Lot
SA = .11.49 Ae-
DF = 30/1 W _ , B.3b
�A ::b%ZfY (Lu PEP rN WILH DEI`is rrq tbRTior-4
OA ' OTHEZ A2EA To BE AULOCk16D: o
Ill. REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
SINCE LOTS AND PROP05SD
5TRoc'rov65 O&R,4I 5EE CHART Fog
DES(&EP ByA �I.oT.
61.401 X 6.5) ' o - C' _ G.1 b .4c LO'7
Initial in the space provided to indicate that the following requirements have been met and supporting
documentation is provided as necessary. If the applicant has designated an agent on the Stormwater
Management Permit Application Form, the agent may initial below.
Applicants Initials
r] �F Vrl(i a. A 30 foot vegetative buffer is provided adjacent to surface waters. Projects in the Neuse
River basin may require additional buffers.
V�tC7( b. Deed restriction language as required on form SWU-101 shall be recorded as a restrictive
covenant. A copy of the recorded document shall be provided to DWQ within 30 days of
platting and prior to sale of any lots.
Vt c. Built upon area calculations are provided for the overall project and all lots.
d. Project conforms to low density requirements within the ORW AEC (if applicable).
[ 15A NCAC 2H .I007(2)(b)]
Form SWU-104 Rev 3.99 Page 2 of 2

Lot Number Area
Area
30%
19
27,806 sf
0.64 ac
8,342
sf
30.00%
20
25,632 sf
0.59 ac
7,690
sf
30,00%
21
31,803 sf
0.73 ac
9,541
sf
30.00%
22
30,009 sf
0.69 ac
9,003
sf
30,00%
23
30,624 sf
0.70 ac
9,187
sf
30.00%
24
29,756 sf
0.68 ac
8,927
sf
30.00%
25
27,046 sf
0.62 ac
8,114
sf
30,00%
26
25,734 sf
0.59 ac
7,720
sf
30.00%
27
20,107 sf
0.46 ac
6,032
sf
30.00%
28
19,996 sf
0.46 ac
5,999
sf
30.00%
29
26,719 sf
0.61 ac
8,016
sf
30.00%
30
26,557 sf
0.61 ac
7,967
sf
30.00%
31
23,490 sf
0.54 ac
7,047
sf
30.00%
32
20,042 sf
0.46 ac
6,013
sf
30.00%
33
23527 sf
0.54 ac
7,058
sf
30.00%
34
27,290 sf
0.63 ac
8,187
sf
30.00%
35
36,188 sf
0.83 ac
10,856
sf
30.00%
36
24,711 sf
0.57 ac
7,413
sf
30.00%
37
23,313 sf
0.54 ac
6,994
sf
30.00%
4,000 sf per lot
38
7,858 sf
0.18,ac
4,000
sf
50.91%
39,
6,438 sf
0.15 ac
4,000
sf
62.13%
40
6,438 sf
0.15'ac
4,000
sf
62.13%
41
6,545 sf
0.15'ac
4,000
sf
61.12%
42'
6,525 Isf
0.15,ac
4,000
sf
61.30%
431
7,483 sf
0.17 ac
4,000
sf
53,45%
44
6,459 ,sf
0.15,ac
4,000
sf
61.93%
45
6,534 'sf
0.15 ac
4,000
sf
61.22%
46!
7,308 sf'
0.17 ac
4,000
sf
54.73%
47
7,379 sf
0.17'ac
4,000
sf
54.21%
% Impervious Varies
Lot 38-47 common area / septic
32,025
sf
0.74 ac
0 sf
0.00%
Club House
55,352
sf
1.27 ac
38,746.40 sf
70.00%
Trailer Storage Common Area
39,742
sf
0.91 ac
27,819.40 sf
70.00%
Rioht of Wav Area
161.798
sf
3.71 ac
57,100.00 sf
35.29%
Total Area [ 858,234.11 sf 19.70 ac 313,770.80 sf
Total Proposed Impervious Area 313,770.80 sf 36.56%

©P yk't 4,
NCDENR�; r
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Request for Express Permit Review
FILL-IN all information below and CHECK required Permit(s). Fax or email this completed form along with a narrative
and vicinity map of the project location to the appropriate One -Stop Coordinator:
• Fayetteville or Raleigh Region -David Lee 919-791-4203; david.lee(d_)ncmail.net REC b. vEu
• Mooresville & Asheville Region -Patrick Grogan 704-663-3772 or patrick.grogan(a),ncmail.netri, i
• Washington Region -Lyn Hardison 252-946-9215 or Iyn.hardisonna,ncmail.not JUN 2 7 200
• Wilmington Region -Cameron Weaver 910-350-2004 or cameron.weaver(a)ncmail.net
Project application received after 12 noon will be stamped in the following work day. DWQ-L'V R0
APPLICANT Name Jeremv Peang-Meth
Company Blue Sun Development Group Address 626 W. Main Street City/State Washington, NC Zip 27889
Phone [phone] Fax [phone] Email iom(a)bluesundevelopment.com
PROJECT SYSTEM(S) TRIBUTARY TO Big Swamp SURFACE WATER CLASSIFICATION SWB
PROJECT Name Cedar Shores Subdivision Section Two County Washington
Company H.C. Harris Jr. Engineering & Surveying, P.A.
Address 216 Main Street City/State Winterville, North Carolina Zip 28590
Phone [phone] Fax [phone] Email mdtolsonna hchards.net
State or National Environmental Policy Act (SEPA, NEPA) - EA or EIS Required ❑Yes N No
❑ STREAM ORIGIN Determination: of Stream calls; Stream Name
® STORMWATER ®Low Density ❑ High Density -Detention Pond
❑ Low Density -Curb & Gutter ® High Density -Infiltration
WETLANDS MUST BE ADDRESSED BELOW
❑ High Density -Other
❑ Off Site
❑ COASTAL ❑ Excavation & Fill ❑ Bridges & Culverts ❑ Structures Information
MANAGEMENT ❑ Upland Development ❑ Manna Development ❑ Urban Waterfront
❑ LAND QUALITY ❑ Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan with i acres to be disturbed.(CK # (for DENR use))
❑ WETLANDS (401): Check all that apply
Wetlands on Site ❑ Yes ® No
Wetlands Delineation has been completed: ❑ Yes ® No
US ACOE Approval of Delineation completed: ❑ Yes ® No
404 Application in Process w/ US ACOE: ❑ Yes ® No
Perennial, Blue line stream, etc on site ❑ yes ® No
Isolated wetland on Property ❑ Yes ® No
/ Buffer Impacts: ® No ❑ YES: acre(s)
/ Minor Variance: ® No ❑ YES
Major General Variance ® No ❑ YES
401 Application required: ❑Yes ® No If YES, ❑ Regular
/ Permit Received from US ACOE ❑ Yes ® No
The legislation allows additional fees, not to exceed 50% of the original Express Review permit application fee, to be
charged for subsequent reviews due to the insufficiency of the permit applications.
For DENR use only
Fee Split for multiple permits: (Check # ( d q a- ) I Total Fee Amount $4000
SUBMITTAL
DATES
Fee
SUBMITTAL DATES I
Fee
CAMA
Variance ❑ Maj; ❑ Min
SW HD; ❑ LD
(o - �'I -
401:
LoS
Stream Deter,_

Roper, NC, USA - Google Maps
http://www.google.com/maps?q=Roper,+NC,+USA&ie=UTF8&11=35...
Address Roper, NC
AAaps
of I
7/32007 10:37 AM

Roper, NC, USA - Google Maps
http://www.google.com/maps?q=Roper,+NC,+USA&ie=UTF8&11=35...
C;0081e- Address Roper, NC
Maps l
IofI
7/3/2007 10:37 AM

..- i I! 87 i I • I .i.n!.[ 1-."3P �ul�,. ,`.'.gi,ai rt,�.�1�,„��.c,a�r� p.n
w
I
OM ;jagO5' 289rbL'r^.
6
s
i A ": 0 I r':'. co

2 1 6 Main Street - Winterwlle, NC 28590 I Date: 7/3/2007 Job No: 05-1 15
(o) 252.32 1.5607 (f) 252.321 .6208
[e-mail] Attention: 5amir Dumpor
NCDENP
943 Washington 5cluare Mall
Washington, NC 27559
We are 5endmg you:
Attached
Drawmg5
Plans
Letter
Other
tom: Cedar Shores- Ph I B 2
❑ Under separate cover via _
❑ Prmt5 ❑ Samples
the following:
❑ 5peciication5
..
2
7/3/2007
Overall 5ite Plan
R CEOVE �
DWQ-WARC
1 ran5mitted a5 checked below:
For approval
El
Approved a5 noted
ElRe5ubnut copies for approval
For your use
El
Approved a5 5ubmitted
[]5ubm,t copie5 for ch5tribution
1-1
A5 requested
El
Returned for corrections
Return corrected prmt5
For review
Other
Remarks:
Samir-
Please let u5 know if you need anything else.
Thanks!
Copy to: file
Ctarue MacDonald
If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. F. 12005 PROJECTS105115-Peangmeth - Cedar Shores0oeuments105115-xmit-Samir.xls

A 7'F' Michael F. Easlry, Govemor 11 t I A I
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
rNorth Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
T
Alan W. Klimek. P.E. Director
i Division of Water Qualin
i�
May 8, 2007
Blue Sun Development, LLC
Attu: Mr. Jeremy Peane Meth
626 West Main St
Washington, NC 27889
Subject: Request for Stormwater Application
Stormwater Review SV 7070305
Cedar Shores, Phase 2
Washington County
Dear Mr. Peang-Meth:
!O 74wr�Y
4)14(o7
This office received a copy of your sedimentation/erosion control plan for the subject
project on March 6, 2007. North Carolina Administrative Code 15 NCAC 2H.1000 requires that
any project that must receive either a Sedimentation and Erosion Control Plan approval and/or a
CAMA Major permit apply for and receive a Stormwater Management Permit by the Division of
Water Quality.
To obtain a Stormwater Permit you must submit a completed application, application fee
of $420.00, two sets of plans and specifications showing the proposed project and all
stormwater treatment units along with engineering calculations and a narrative description. This
application package should be received by this office prior to June 8, 2007. If an application
package is not received by this date we will consider the project incomplete. We also have an
Express Permitting program. If you are interested in this program you may contact Ms. Lyn
Hardison, One Stop Permit Coordinator, at 252-948-3842.
Any development of the site prior to receipt of the required permit will constitute a
violation of 15A NCAC 21-1.1000 and North Carolina General Statute 143-2 15.1 and may result
in appropriate enforcement action including civil penalty assessment of up to $10,000 per day.
If you have questions, please feel free to contact me at [phone].
Sincerely,----1
William J. Moore, Environmental Engineer
Washington Regional Office
cc: H.C. Harris Engineering R. Surveyinc
Washington County PlanninJinspezrions
Washington Regional Office
:\o LnCarol:
,7aturalt
North Carolina Division of Water Quality• Washington Reeional Office Phone [phone] FAX [phone] Customer service
Inteme:: h2o.encstate.naus 94, V1 ashington Square Mall. Washington, NC 27899 1-87;-623-6748

7T, 4G yo4e 6(✓Q
SW7 0 7 0 3 0 5 F�,v,- 6.NOU� G q S
VJ _ FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY/OWNERSHIP FORM 3/007
SEDIMENTATION POLLUTION CONTROL ACT
No person may initiate any land -disturbing activity on one or more acres as covered by the Act before this form and
an acceptable erosion and sedimentation control plan have been completed and approved by the Land Quality
Section, N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources. (Please type or print and, iftf%qu—F�on�
applicable or the e-mail and/or fax information unavailable, place N/A in the blank.)
la4d4—c f�✓ — Pk�-�— 1 ;s 7o7a/2.5� MAR 0 6 2007
Part A. t'S.'v /e/:r L.D rtf. 'rxii/�07 1AI
1. Project Name: Cedar Shores Subdivision Phase Two uVdQ'WAf�0
2. Location of land -disturbing activity: County: Washington City or Township: Skinnersville Township fl
Highway/Street: Cedar Shores Drive Latitude: Longitude:
3. Approximate date land -disturbing activity will commence: March 19 2007 /. )
4. Purpose of development (residential, commercial, industrial, institutional, etc.): Residential „0
5. Total acreage disturbed or uncovered (including off -site borrow and waste areas): 11 acres jj��
6. Amount of fee enclosed: $550
7. Has an erosion and sediment control plan been filed? Yes No_Enclosed X
8. Person to contact should erosion and sediment control issues arise during land -disturbing activity:
Name: Jeremy Peang-Meth E-mail Address: bluesundevelopment(aDcox.net
Telephone: Cell# 252-945-9975 Fax #: [phone]
9. Landowner(s) of Record (attach accompanied page to list additional owners):
Blue Sun Development LLC
Name
626 West Main Street
Current Mailing Address
252-945-9975 252-882-1640
Telephone Fax Number
626 West Main Street
Current Street Address
Washington North Carolina 27889 Washington North Carolina 27889
City State Zip City State Zip
10. Deed Book No. Page No. Provide a copy of the most current deed.
Part B.
1. Person(s) or firm(s) who are financially responsible for the land -disturbing activity
(Provide a comprehensive list of all responsible parties on an attached sheet):
Blue Sun Development, LLC
Name
626 West Main Street
Current Mailing Address
Washington North Carolina 27889
City State Zip
Telephone: [phone]
bluesund evelooment(c)cox. net
E-mail Address
626 West Main Street
Current Street Address
Washington North Carolina 27889
City State Zip
Fax Number: 252-882-1640
RQW5 PROJECTS105115-Peargmeth-Cedar Shores\[) r mends\permits\FRO blue-sundm

2. (a) If the Financially Responsible Party is not a resident of North Carolina, give name and street address of the
designated North Carolina Agent:
Name
Mailing Address
State
E-mail Address
Current Street Address
Zip City State Zip
Fax Number
(b) If the Financially Responsible Party is a Partnership or other person engaging in business under an assumed
name, attach a copy of the Certificate of Assumed Name. If the Financially Responsible Party is a
Corporation, give name and street address of the Registered Agent:
Name of Registered Agent
Current Mailing Address
City State Zip
E-mail Address
Current Street Address
City State Zip
Fax Number
The above information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief and was provided by me
under oath (This form must be signed by the Financially Responsible Person if an individual or his attorney -
in -fact, or if not an individual, by an officer, director, partner, or registered agent with the authority to
execute instruments for the Financially Responsible Person). I agree to provide corrected information
should there by any change in the information provided herein.
Jeremy Peang-Meth Member Manager — Blue Sun Development LLC
Type or print name Title or Authority
2 I 19 0�
Date
I, Michael D. Tolson , a Notary Public of the County of Edgecombe
State of North Carolina, hereby certify that Jeremy Peang-Meth appeared personally before me this day
and being duly sworn acknowledged that the above form was executed by him.
Witness my hand and notarial seal, this 19th day of February 11 , 2007
P p
Q % Notar
Q
S 9t 1
eat 0289 1
• My commission expires 11-24-2008
P •. Ca1NE� • ��
OJECTS\05I ngmotn - Cedar Shoros\Documents\permits\FRO-blue-sun. died

Cedar Shores 5UbdIV1510n — Section Two
Washington County, North Carolina
EROSION CONTROL NARRATIVE
For:
Cedar Shores 5ubdlVl5lon. Section Two
WA5HINGTON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
Developed B)L
Blue Sun Development. LLC
PIan5 Prepared By:
IDA
H. C. Harris. Jr.
Engineering * Surveying, P.A.
2 1 G Main Street, Wntervllle, North Carolina 28590
Phone: [phone]GO7 Pax: (252) 32 1-G208
e-mail: [e-mail]
P:\2005 PROJECT5Q5I 15-Peangmeth - Cedar Shorc5\Document5\perm,t5Q5-1 15-EC-narrative.DOC
EC I

D'j
f• a�S£ta.i i

Cedar Shores 5ubdiv1510n — 5ection Two
Washington County, North Carolina
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
Location of Project:
This site is located in the Skinnersville Township, Washington County, North Carolina,
northeast of the intersection of Pea Ridge Road (SR 1302) and Breezy Banks Road (SR
13 15). The entrance road to this site Is being constructed out of the existing Lot 14 of
Cedar Shores Subdivision Section One. This 100' wide lot is being dedicated 05 public
right of way and will be utlhzed to build a divided roadside Swale Section as the entrance
to Section Two. The north boundary of this project bounds Section One of Cedar Shores
Subdivision which 15 being developed as residential single family hou5mq. The western
boundary line 15 Breezy Banks Road, the southern adjoiner 15 currently in use for
agricultural production as a sod farm and the eastern adjoiner 15 the currently an
abandoned NCDOT borrow pit. The property 15 located at approximate latitude of North
35.957 1 2 and an approximate longitude of West 76.47593.
Predominant Soil Types:
According to the NRCS Web Soil Survey, the predominate soil type is Tarboro Sand
with 0-3 percent slopes. According to the NC Soil Survey information, the Tarboro
series IS a somewhat CXCC551VCly drained 5011 that IS formed in coarse textured sediment.
Type of Development:
This project will m5tall the roads, drainage features, water main and services for 29
residential Single family homes ranging In style from single family home to patio home style
construction. Each individual dwelhng will be served by private septic sewage disposal.
The patio homes Will utilize a community type septic disposal area located In a common area
directly behind structures. There Is also a planned club house and pool area planned that
will be built on the area noted as Club House Common Area.
Earth Disturbing Activities:
Presently the entire tract is being used as a commercial sod farm. The earth disturbing
activities will be the stripping of topsoil and rough grading of the roads and drainage
features. The total area of disturbance equals I 1 .00 acres.
Existing Drainage Patterns:
The site currently drams in the general direction of the eastern adjoinmq property which 15
currently the site of an abandoned NCDOT borrow pit.
EA2005 PROJECTS\051 154 cangmeth - Cedar Shore5\Documents\oermit5\05-1 15-EC-narrative.DOC
EC 2

Cedar Shores 5Ubd1V151on — section Two
Washington County, North Carolina
Proposed Drainage Patterns:
The roadside Swale sections have been designed to convey stormwater runoff along the
proposed road system into the same general direction as the existing topography
currently allows. The site will discharge stormwater into a perimeter, Swale that will allow
for infiltration of runoff into the sandy soils on site.
A. EROSION AND SEDIMENTAION CONTROL MEASURES:
I . A copy of the latest approved soil erosion and sedimentation control plan
must be maintained at the project site at all times of work activity. The
minimum grades of the proposed roadways, ditches, and swales shall help to
minimize erosion. Timely installation of seeding and mulching shall also assist
in minimizing erosion. However; if it becomes evident that additional
measures such as silt fences, silt basins, and silt check dams are needed;
sufficient types and sizes shall be installed immediately. The best control
measure is the establishment of permanent ground cover, and pursuant to
Land Quality regulations and North Carolina General Statues, a permanent
ground cover, sufficient to retain erosion, must be provided within 15
working days or 30 calendar days, whichever is shorter, after the completion
of any phase of grading.
2. A construction entrance shall be installed as shown to prevent construction
vehicles from tracking soil onto Cedar Shores Drive.
3. Temporary silt basins and silt check dams shall assist in controlling sediment
until the permanent ground cover is established.
4. Temporary silt fence will be installed along the common property line with the
adjoining property to reduce the risk of any offsite sedimentation.
B. TIME SEQUENCE OF OPERATIONS:
Construction sequence shall be as noted on the storm drainage and erosion control
plan, Sheet 5E-2.
F:\2005 PROJECTS\051 15-Peangmeth - Cedar Shore5\Document5\nermit5\05-1 15-EC-narrative.DOC
EC 3

,f..
.; -_, .

TerraServer Image Courtesy of the USGS
Page 1 of 1
Send To Printer Back To TerraSewer Change to 11x17 Print Size Show Grid Lines Change to Landscape
MUSGS 6 km E of Skinnersville. North Carolina, United States 01 Jul 1974
.r?r 96
. �CR
A
0' 1200M 01 '2ooyd
Image courtesy of the U.S. Geological Survey
© 2004 Microsoft Corporation. Terms of Use Privacy Statement
http://www.terraserver.microsoft.com/Prinifinage.aspx?T=2&S=l I &Z=18&X=917&Y=99... 2/26/2007

H.C. Harris, Jr.
Harris,
��
Engineering Surveying
21,in51-1
T26 Main
WinterviM1, NC 285"
(o) 252.321.550T in 252A2la20e
Pipe Roughness Coefficient n - 0.012
g - 195
h - 22
Inlet time- 15 min
FES
,08 Cedar Shores Sudivision Phase 2
Time
Prop.
Cap
Prop
Prop
Design
Design
Drainage
Total
Inlet Pipe Of
Runoff
Req'E
Pipe
*of of Prop
Cap>
Pipe Val
Segment
Up
Down
From To Areas Area
Area
Time Time Cone Intennifty
Coeff Dischar a
Slope
Oth Size
Pipes PI Size R
'd Ca Y
Wull Len
Tlme
Invert
Invert
Hood Depth Min. Depth
l
I t) ( 1
(acres)
1- l (min) 1' ) Ih I
1 f I
Iftlft)
(in) fall
Ic/sl
ptI au l Ift)
(min)
ft
it
IN ft R
test fes2 1 3A87
3487
15 1500 5.27
055 100%
0.0050
1955 18 X
2 16A3
PASS
4.55 53.61
0.23
9.73
941
NIA kMWNN 281
FES #3-FES#4
Time
Prop.
Cap Prop
Prop
Design
Design
Drainage
Total
Inlet Pipe IX
Runoff
Ree'E
Pipe
Nof of Prop Cap>
Pipe Val
Segrrem
Up
Down
From To Areas
Area
Area
Time Time Con, Intensi
Coeff
Discharge SIo
Dim
Size
Pipes PI Size Re 'tl Ca i
Wull Len
Time
Invert
Invert
Hood
Depth Min. Depth
ft it
(1 f 1
1 I
I 1
1 1 1 1 I I f Ih I
(n) (ftI ftl
(in)
tin)
(d.)
In aeq IRI
(min)
ft
it
R
fes3 lest 3
4706
41W
15 15.M 527
0,55
13.64'IJ 0DOW
21.92
18 X
2 16.13 PASS
455 50.51
0,19
852
8.27
NIA
NXptt#p 281
#5-FES#6 .
Time
Prop.
Cap Prop
Prop
Design
Design
Drainage
Total
Inlet Pipe Of
Runoff
Req'E
Pipe
aof of Prop Cap>
Pipe Vet
Segment
Up
Dawn
From To Areas
Area
Area
Time Time Cone Intens
Coeff
DischargeSlope
Dth
Size
Pipes Pi Size Re 'd Ca 2
V/ulI
Len h
Time
Invert
Invert
Hood
Depth Min. Depth
( I )
(acres)
(acres)
( I (min) (min) (in 1h)
(c/) 011 ftl
(in)
(in)
(of$)
IR l sec)
IRI
(min)
R
It
It
fl ft
fes5 fes8 5
IA83
1483
15 1500 527
0.55
4.30 •, 0.Ww
14.22
18 X
1 8.07 PASS
455
5239
0.19
low
10,04
WA
NNbkNN 281
r cros��sw..a�nn.w.amnmmaem��samm a...mn

HC Harris Engineering and Surveying
216 Main Street
Winterville, NC 28590
252.321.5607
--_1! ` Od ♦ 0.41-d
La
g?Jwa soe
100
\QQ`o 70 #
o I
sec 60ty 1.
mg,
{� tfll if
TV
v
Z-1591 e
a`
v 10 -
10 20
Given Information
Q10 10.05 cfs
De = 24 " from storm drain talcs
Class'B' stone, unit weight = 110 pcf
I
24" for Dq to approximate twin 18" rcp's
provided exceeds design parameters
90 r.iiili hi'.
JOB Cedar Shores Subdivision, Phase Two -EDP at FES 2 and FES 2A
SHEET NO. 1 OF 1
CALCULATED BY mdt DATE 2/12/2007
CHECKEDBY mdt DATE 2/12/2007
SCALE n/a
4
rt rr �r err
Calculated Information!
Width at entrance = 3Do = 6 It use! 6.0 ft
Width at exit (U. + U.4xLa) = 5.6 ft use, 6.0 ft
Length of Apron (from chart) L = 9 ft
Thickness = 22 "thick Class'B' stone
Tonnage = 5.45 tons use 6 tons
LeOer SMves W cumBnbltalu W511Seaplss@ds

HC Harris Engineering and Surveying JOB Cedar Shores Subdivision, Phase Two - EDP at FES 4 and FES 4A
216 Main Street SHEET 1 1
Wlnterville, NC 26590 CALCULATED
DATE 8Y mdt DATE 2/12/2007
252.321.5607 CHECKED BY mdt DATE 2/12/2007
SCALE n/a
1
r ; 300
p Outlet T
w Do + p,4Ly 120
! diameter (�)
La Ilp Vr
r
�dp 5DoI Iit
100
T i1I!' 4 r II i.
I; gpI L t I jill 1 i Ittl { I
ii�rit
i'�'t { ij�Ilrll �' iE iij', I I •�'=
.
a
all
pp
11Iirli!!!!�!
�IIiII
fl
r811444
��
pFA
C IIII�j�I�•
nnuluune
.r1,11lIIII1Wtl+��
•sii"►.i�i
n
m
n
R
li9ili
��
41113
eiiiii
I
•eem1111A�11$Illp
IgarMl
1 ,
Formation
r
•
24 from storm drain calcs
Class 13' • -
unit weight1 pcf
Notes
Using 24" for iDo to approximate twin 18" rcp's
Apron provided exceeds design parameters
it
T 1j111111
I j
,1{j iE fle�1!
I
d�
•� �
I
Bal��!ieI
IVA
V
'
PAP
®1iI
1
1 11 11
11
IIJ
Y a •-
•
. 1

HC Harris Engineering and Surveying .• Cedar ShoresSubdivision, . e-
Main Street
SHEET NO.
1
OF 1
CALCULATED216
BY mdt.
/1
SCALE n/a
1 ,
1
����°is
�1
�
•.
a�,l
a
,�
:
�,p
�i
lr�1i
i!�
ei�����I�illiiiill
rl�+1{
r
PIt111111111,01111
l
{
ifi
1
Illt�ll1ijf{yfjp$j;'
II!
;Pp®
,
19
�ABi
�
1
nn
1 nn��lame
1{01�°
n
�
afi
11
�I•
l
a•
►
p/
rn
i
►
p
6liiilill
�!6°
r
Qa
1�
I>�llili;diRG��
!�
ii
11�l�
,
1{�I
,.pai®li°db'
i�i�
�Iirll
ill
iin
!f !'
Iliil;ii�V'
I!I'e
,il�j
A°
°D
�
!r
�t',ait+mw.i-f,
I[1's?"!tiICIIH�aII�'!
I
a
4r•`nl�����'
1J1r1
'�Ieppqpqp
;p.
11!ngqqu
Iln��ll!a'I°IWIII
11pp1��
'µt,J�,I11,',r�,�f{If�fpryai�I}t{Iiuee''
1
�,,g�
•��I�
/�/�
f�'
: .
1
.
III11111116U1
'
��
®•
'.
mvalaAlliAlRRjm1ow
ME
�I
Given Information Calculated Information
Qtp = 4.30 cfs Width at entrance = 3D. = 3.75 ft use 4.0 ft
Do = 15 .. from storm drain caics Width at exit (uo + u.4xLj = 3.65 ft use 4.0 ft
Class'B' stoneunit weight = 110 pcf Length of Apron (from chart) L = 6 ft
Thickness = 22 " thick Class'B'stone
Tonnage = 2.42 tons use 3 tons
Notes
Apron provided, exceeds design parameters
15-PoWgp l5. CW SM1wesW[Um lsca=05115e Jas.fltls

.W corsraa ( ^
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Coastal Management
s?/t r-707
7070r2
6d.-LD
Michael F. Easley, Governor Charles S. Jones, Director William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary ; SSu-Q
MEMORANDUM LID
TO: Pill Moore
Division of Water Quality
FROM: Doug Haggett
Major Permits Processing Coordinator
Coastal Management Division
400 Commerce Avenue
Morehead City NC 28557
DATE: 17 August 2006
jeeq Sw n 4N 07
Respond to Doug Huggett
Morehead City Office
AUG 1 i 2006
SUBJECT: CAMA Application Review �VpV� ��yyy, �A,pR(�
®t7tl�'tltlb'ir�S(O
APPLICANT: Environmental Professionals, Inc., Agent for Blue Sun Development Group, LLC
PROJECT LOCATION: Washington County, off US SR 1') 15 on reserved common lot at Cedar
Shores Subdivision on the Albemarle Sound, near Roper, NC.
PROPOSED PROJECT: Applicant proposes to construct a pier, platform, finger piers and mooring
piles.
Please indicate below your position or viewpoint on the proposed project and return this form by 7
September 2006. Please contact R. Kelly Spivey at 252-948-3853, if you have any questions regarding
the proposed project. When appropriate, in depth comments with supporting data are requested.
REPLY This office has no objection to the project as proposed.
Signed
This office has no continent on the proposed project.
This office approves of the proposed project only if the recommended changes
are incorporated. See attached.
This office objects to the proposed project for reasons described in the attached
continents.
Date
943 Washington Square Mall, Washington, North Carolina 27889
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] Internet:w .nccoastalmanagementne0
NoilhCarolina
.1valwalllf
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer-50% Recycled 110% Past Consumer Paper

DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
FIELD INVESTIGATION REPORT
1. APPLICANT'S NAME: Blue Sun Development, LLC. Mr. Jeremy Peangmeth
2. LOCATION OF PROJECT SITE: Washington County off US SR 1315 on reserved common lot at Cedar
Shores Subdivision on the Albemarle Sound near Roper, North Carolina
Photo Index — 1995, 133-1411, I-I-5 2000, 133-1560, R-3
State Plane Coordinates - X: 21745,650 Y: 813,400
Leonard's Point Quadrangle - Upper Left Corner
3. INVESTIGATION TYPE: CAMA
4. INVESTIGATIVE PROCEDURE: Dates of Site Visit— 6 June 2006,27 July 2006
Was Applicant Present —No
5. PROCESSING PROCEDURE: Application Received — 10 August 2006
Office — Washington
6. SITE DESCRIPTION:
(A) Local Land Use Plan — 1994 Bertie County Land Use Plan
Land Classification From LUP — Conservation (water), Rural (land)
(B) AEC(s) Involved: Estuarine Water and Public Trust Area
(C) Water Dependent: Yes
(D) Intended Use: private (community)
(E) Wastewater Treatment: Existing —none
Planned — none
(F) Type of Structures: Existing — none
Planned - pier, platform, finger piers, 12 mooring pilings
(G) Estimated Annual Rate of Erosion: N/A
(H) Source — N/A
7. HABITAT DESCRIPTION: JAREA]
na Fn(:Fn FILLED OTHER
(A) Vegetated Wetlands
(404)
±1456 it=
(B) Non -Vegetated Wetlands
(structures and
River Bottom
boatsli s)
(C) Other (Uplands)
covered
(D) Total Area Disturbed: t1456ft2
(E) Primary Nursery Area: No
(F) Water Classification: SB Open: No
8. PROJECT SUMMARY: The applicant proposes to construct a pier, platform, finger piers and
mooring piles.

Blue Sun Development Group, LLC, Mr. Jeremy Peangmeth
Cedar Shores
Washington County
Project setting
The project site is located off US SR 1315 (Breezy Banks Road) on the reserved common lot
at Cedar Shores Subdivision on the Albemarle Sound near Roper in Washington County, North
Carolina. The lot is approximately 0.41 acres in size. Blue Sun Development Group, III currently
owns the lot. This lot is to be used as a common lot for residents of the Cedar Shores Subdivision.
The Cedar Shores Subdivision has been platted but currently there are no residential
structures in the development. Man-made features within the development include an asphalt road
(Cedar Shores Dr.) and a metal barn. The entire 1023 linear feet of shoreline has been previously
stabilized with a wooden bulkhead. The reserved common lot has±70' of shoreline and is located
between lot no. 4 and lot no. 5 near the center of the subdivision. Landward of the bulkhead the
elevation gradually slopes upward to an approximate elevation of t 15' above the normal water
level. Lawn grass is the predominant vegetation to the top of the slope, which is approximately 60'
landward of the bulkhead. The remainder of the lot is vegetated with cedars, pines, scattered
hardwoods and other herbaceous growth. The undeveloped lots on either side of the common lot are
of similar vegetation and elevation.
The adjacent property on the downstream (east) side of the development is an established
single-family residence. A bulkhead and ±50' pier with platform and boathouse exist on this lot. The
lot on the upstream (west) side of the development is also developed as single-family residence
which is bulkheaded and has a t 115' pier with a boatlift.
The Albemarle Sound is classified as SB by the Environmental Management Commission at
the project site. The Albemarle Sound is Coastal waters and is not open to shell fishing.
Project description
The applicant proposes to construct a f6' by t200' pier with a f6' by f26' T-Head platform
on the terminal end. Pour f2.5' by ±10' finger piers will be located near the T-liead platform to
create ten fixed boat slips. Twelve mooring pilings will be installed in association with the boat slips.
Anticipated impacts
The project will result in localized turbidity as a result of the installation of the pier and
platform pilings. Additionally, the pier, finger piers and platform will shade approximately 1,456 ftz
of Sound bottom.
Kelly Spivey — 17 August 2006

Peang-meth — Cedar Shores subdivision boating facility
CAMA MAJOR NARRATIVE
APPLICANT —
Mr. Jeremy Peaugmeth
626 West Main Street
Washington, NC 27889
SITE LOCATION - 2/3 mile east of the southern end of the Hwy 32 bridge. The site
covers 12.46 acres and is located off NCSR 1302, Pea Ridge Rd.
The Applicant holds title to the existing subdivision. Site is subdivided into 18 building
lots, improved with an asphalt road in the center of the property and has an existing
bulkhead along the 1023.64 LF of shoreline. Existing structures include the bulkhead,
asphalt road, a barn to be razed, and a park bench. All upland areas have been stabilized
and revegetated. No land disturbance will occur in upland areas, or in the AEC to
complete this activity.
In order to:
• promote and provide community recreational opportunities.
o provide small boat access to adjacent waters
the applicant proposes the following within the AEC:
• construct a 200 ft. X 6 ft. wooden pier with a 26 ft. X 6ft. T-head platform. Pier
will be perpendicular to shoreline on northern boundary of subject site.
• construct 4, 2.5 ft. X 10 ft. finger piers to allow for individual boat access
• Set 12, 20-foot mooring piles 6 feet into the bottom substrate, allowing
approximately 10 to 12 feet above water, available to the 10 boat slips along the pier.
Construction calculations
Pier
200 LF pier - perpendicular to shoreline on northern boundary of subject site. 6
foot wide by 200 foot long. Four, 10 by 2.5 foot finger piers (connected to the main
pier), to provide individual access to slips. Set 12, 20-foot mooring piles into the bottom
substrate to provide additional mooring points available to the 10 boat slips along the
pier.
T-Head Platform
156 sq. ft. (elevated, slatted wooden) platform on the end of pier.
* 6 feet wide by 26 feet long
**all proposed structures will be a minimum of 3 feet above NWL

AUTHORIZATION TO ACT AS REPRESENTATIVE FORM
Landowner of record authorizes Environmental Professionals, Inc. to:
I. enter the property to gather environmental and site information, including delineation of
environmental regulatory jurisdictions;
2. enter the site with the regulatory agencies (i.e. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers,
North Carolina Division of Coastal Management, North Carolina Division of Water
Quality, etc.) as needed to review regulatory alignment(s) and to identify additional
regulatoryjurisdictions; and
3. submit plats and other information to acquire regulatory agency confirmations and/or
approvals (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, North Carolina Division of Coastal
Management, North Carolina Division of Water Quality, etc.).
(Please note: If the Client is not the Landowner of Record, the Client and
Landowner MUST sign below.)
low,�.". o(e-
L d wner Date
Client
Date

Form DCM-MP-1 w'1o(o0ga"�, REVISED 7.21.06
c. Street address or secondary road number
Cedar Shores Drive off SR 1315 (Breezy Banks Rd.)
1. APPLICANT
a. Landowner: Blue Sun Development Group, LLC
Name Mr. Jeremy Peangmeth — Representative
Address 626 West Main St.
City Washington State N.C.
Zip 27889 Day Phone
Fax
b. Authorized Agent:
Name Environmental Professionals, Inc.
Address PO Box 3368
City Kill Devil Hills State NC
Zip 27948 Day Phone[phone]
Fax [phone]
c. Project name (if any) Cedar Shores
NOTE: Permit will be issued in name of londowner(s), and/or
project name.
2. LOCATION OF PROPOSED
PROJECT
a. County Washington
b. City, town, community or landmark
NE of the town of Roper, approximately 2/3 mile
east of southern end of Rt 32 bridge (Leonards Point).
Area is known as Pea Ridge
d. Is proposed work within city limits or planning
jurisdiction? —Yes X No
e. Name of body of water nearest project (e.g. river,
creek, sound, bay) Albemarle Sound
3. DESCRIPTION.AND PLANNED USE
OF PROPOSED PROJECT
a. List all development activities you propose (e.g.
building a home, motel, marina, bulkhead, pier, and
excavation and/or tilling activities.
Constriction of a 10-slip boating facility to
accommodate small boats ( 18-25 foot power boats) .
No dredging required
b. Is the proposed activity maintenance of an existing
project, new work, or both? New
c. Will the project be for public, private or commercial
use? Private
d. Give a brief description of purpose, use, methods of
construction and daily operations of proposed project.
If more space is needed, please attach additional
pages.
Construction of a 10-boat boating facility comprised
of a 200 X 6 foot pier, a 26 X 6 foot T-Bead platform,
four 10-foot long finger piers, and 12 mooring, piles.
Pier will connect to existing bulkhead at shoreline.
Constructed to accommodate small boats (18-25 foot
power boats) No dred ing_e required
4. LAND AND WATER
CHARACTERISTICS
a. Size of entire tract 12.46 acres
b. Size of individual lot(s) 0.58 to 0.86 acres
c. Approximateelevationoftractabove M[IWorNWL
5 to 15 feet
d. Soil type(s) and texture(s) of tract
Revised 03/95

Form DCM-MP-I
REVISED 7.21.06
Tarboro sand (TaB) - excessively drained sand.
e. Vegetation on tract Forested upland - Pinus teada
Liquidambar styraciRua.
f. Man-made features now on tract asphalt roadway,
bulkhead park bench.
g. What is the CAMA Land Use Plan land classification
of the site? (Consult the local laid use plan)
X Conservation _ Transitional
_ Developed Community
Rural Other
h. How is the tract zoned by local government?
Residential
i. Is the proposed project consistent with the applicable
zoning? X Yes _ No
(Attach zoning conipliance certificate, ijapplicable)
See Attacked certificate
J_
Has a professional
done for the tract?
If yes, by whom? _
archaeological assessment been
Yes X No
k. Is the project located in a National Registered.
Historic District or does it involve a National Register
listed or eligible property?
Yes X No
Are there wetlands on the site? —Yes X No
Coastal (marsh) _ Other
If yes, has a delineation been conducted?
(Attach documentation, if available)
m. Describe existing wastewater treatment facilities.
None existing
n. Describe location and type of discharges to waters of
the state. (For example, surface runoff, sanitary
wastewater, industrial/commercial effluent, "wash
down" and residential discharges.) Surface runoff
o. Describe existing drinking water supply source.
Washington County Water Department
5. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
In addition to the completed application form, the
following items must be submitted:
0 A copy of the deed (with state application only) or
other instrument under which the applicant claims title
to the affected properties. If the applicant is not
claiming to be the owner of said property, then forward
a copy of the deed or other instrument under which the
owner claims title, plus written permission from the
owner to carry out the project.
* * Please see attached
0 An accurate, dated work plat (including plan view
and cross -sectional drawings) drawn to scale in black
ink on an 8 1/2" by 11" white paper. (Refer to Coastal
Resources Commission Rule 7J.0203 for a detailed
description.)
** Please see attached
Please note that original drawings are preferred and
only high quality copies will be accepted. Blue -line
prints or other larger plats are acceptable only if an
adequate number of quality copies are provided by
applicant. (Contact the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
regarding that agency's use of larger drawings.) A site
or location map is a part of plat requirements and it
must be sufficiently detailed to guide agency personnel
unfamiliar with the area to the site. Include highway or
secondary, road (SR) numbers, landmarks, and the like.
OA Stormwater Certification, if one is necessary.
9A fist of the names and complete addresses of the
adjacent waterfront (riparian) landowners and
signed return receipts as proof that such owners
have received a copy of the application and plats by
certified mail. Such landowners must be advised that
they have 30 days in which to submit comments on the
proposed project to the Division . of Coastal
Management. Upon signing this form, the applicant
further certifies that such notice has been provided.
Revised 03/95

Form DCM-MP-1
REVISED 7.21.06
** Please see attached
Name Robert and Brenda Holliday
Address 595 Breezy Banks Rd. Roper, NC 27970
Phone
Name
Address
Phone
Robert and Cynthia Partridge
210 Blair Shores Rd. Roper, NC 27970
Name Mr. Denis Randall (Lot 4
Atmosphere 13
43 West 24"' St. 6`h floor
New York. New York 1001
Phone
* LOT 5 OWNED BY APPLICANT
• A list of previous state or federal permits issued for
work on the project tract. Includepermit numbers,
permittee, and issuing dates.
Property was improved prior to purchase. Permits for
site work done previously were obtained by Harvey A
Johnson, et. al.; previous owners of the property. Copies
and details were not available for inclusion here.
• A check for $400 made payable to the Department of
Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
(DEHNR) to cover the costs of processing the
application. **Please see enclosed/attached check
• A signed AEC hazard notice for projects in
oceanfront and inlet areas. N/A
• A statement of compliance with the N.C.
Environmental Policy Act (N.C.G.S. 113A - 1 to 10)
If the project involves the expenditure of public funds
or use of public lands, attach a statement documenting
compliance with the North Carolina Environmental
Policy Act. N/A
6. CERTIFICATION AND PERMISSION
TO ENTER ON LAND
I understand that any permit issued in response to this
application will allow only the development described in
the application. The project will be subject to conditions
and restrictions contained in the permit.
I certify that to the best of my knowledge, the proposed
activity complies with the State of North Carolina's
approved Coastal Management Program and will be
conducted in a manner consistent with such program.
I certify that I am authorized to grant, and do in fact, grant
permission to representatives of state and federal review
agencies to enter on the aforementioned lands in
connection with evaluating information related to this
permit application and follow-up monitoring of the
project.
I further certify that the information provided in this
application is truthful to the best of my knowledge.
This is the 21 day of July , 2006.
Print Name Louise I. Hans n agent)
Signature'•.,�;�
Landowner or AuthorizedAgent
** Please see Letter of Authorization attached
Please indicate attachments pertaining to your proposed
project.
DCM MP-2
Excavation and Fill Information
DCM MP-3
Upland Development
X DCM MP-4
Structures Information
_ DCM MP-5
Bridges and Culverts
DCM MP-6
Marina Development
NOTE. Please sign and date each attachment in the
space provided at the bottom of each form.
Revised 03/95

FormDCM-MP4 R¢Vlse'? 8-08 oc
(Construction within Public Trust Areas)
Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major Permit, e.
Form DCM-MP-1. Be sure to complete all other sections of the
Joint Application which relate to this proposed project.
Dock(s) and/or Pier(s)
(1)Commercial Private _X_ Community
(2)
Number 1
(3)
Length, 200 ft.
(4)
Width 6 ft.
(5)
Finger Yes X No,
Piers -
(i) Number 4
(ii) Length 10 ft
(iii) Width 2.5 ft
average
(6)
Platform(s) X Yes No
(i) Number
1 T-
Head
(ii) Length 26
(iii) Width 6
(7) Number of slips proposed 10
(8) Proximity of structure to adjacent riparian property
lines
Structure (mooring piles) is approx. 12 feet from Lot 4 and Lot
5. (140 ft. to Lot 84 boundary and 165 ft. west of the ROW for
NCSR 1147). * riparian lots 5 through 9, and 1 through 3 are
OWNED BY APPLICANT
(9) Width of water body 4 miles
(10) Water depth at waterward end of pier at MLW or
NWL 2.8 ft
b. Boathouse (including covered lifts) N/A
(1) Commercial Private
(2) Length
(3) Width
C. Groin (e.g. wood, sheetpile, etc.) N/A
(1) Number N/A
(2) Length
d. Breakwater (e.g. wood, sheetpile, etc.) N/A
(1) Length
(2). Average distance from MI-IW, NWL, or
wetlands
(3) Maximum distance beyond MHW, NWL or
wetlands
Mooring buoys N/A
(1) Commercial Private_ Community _
(2) Number N/A.
(3) Description of buoy (Color, inscription, size, anchor,
etc.
N/A
(4) Width of water body N/A
(5) Distance buoy(s) to be placed beyond shoreline
N/A
f Mooring structure (boadift, mooring pilings, etc.)
(1) Commercial X Community X Private
(2) Number 12
(3) Length 20 ft
(4) Width 12 inches
g. Other (Give complete description)
Louise I. Hanson (agent)
Applic t of Project Name
Signature —
p `F-OG
Date
Revised 03/95

����-
��Y:
,,� � ,,
J '"

m JSW" J 76'TIW O 76•b'6P' Continue on Page 25 76'7D'W' /
76.=' 76L666- 78.4 67' 70=-
]
N,T
.. I 9 r�ovn3 i
�,,�•4-".ray'�n`a'YrY-+v�R
A7
I ,
W.V,
'
1 �
f , '/ 11 If ,w li7 1 ly V P \� . 1 `-• I p,
47ho y'- D ti- i r f
Ir
T
I
�_ '•' "�l / I I �TI'ti^eY. I I' Mxa N - jI
b / �� I _. � nmin � I •yr er cm^v m Y h. .S � f'•
J N k4r a IF „� J
3 [
1C x
��-,i R � - / '7 I i'�1 I', 'ii=.. `6 '�.7e•`" + ^/v\� 1 .a „af'.
B 1p,iq
y r

LEONARDS POINT, N. C.
N 3552.5'—W 7622.5 / 7.5
5713a'
N
to
8x
MN
GN
133 yjM145 0•51'
15 MIL$
A GRID AND 1974 MAGNETIC NORTH
ECLINATION AT CENTER OF SHEET
. 1954
PHOTOREVI5ED 1974
nnra dr°° ry nw-SERIES V842
x,7
h,_• � Iv
yyy emu-- �\. �. w• w. •r-
p a- _
rtlH yU-r
it— a
Yl
..� `"- tir_ _-►-' _ -n tin- _
_M_-YF
TJ!• N — - F .ram N_
4.7
_ ✓' \ e
1302
�+
� 4-_ A _✓W 4 _ yY- = .i- aa- •• y �.► .u. <n_ -An_ _. <n_ «. "~' - �..r - .r. _+. a- ""� "-
• ._a.a -d-- _ y,.- r. tia S eb `tin_ _ '41_.r•• .Yn 'w - - �ti. -.w - .Y--4- <n +s dr-
�+IIn -YM-M4•_-�_ _ al, , � M4' .�a• _-��4F � J!. Y _y WJ--�y.��M i.-iY
,•. _T+Yn s-"�-s� - as .5s. _ _ w_'F.vF _ w-_+Y- r - '�- .n• w=
.�. w _ _ 'F .. -.. YT ..u. _' �_ � �„ •"'- .ram
Y f�-y'_i'+Il.
X '•Ys .d. 4"W_ -•1. "W' y0. yY' A .C- - - 4 .�i A"J' y"
ZL
a•. i� Y 1303 _tin- !, T F R�� _.fl-� _ .M'M _ C_#.fin
w tl
4
Ridge
m- - • as +�` - .e-tin -
a.
4
a n
�G�'�'. CIO\ '°" •
,Y - _ 1

SOU TH
r�
EXISTING GRADE
PIER CROSS SECTION
CEDAR SHORES
CAMA MAJOR APPLICATION
SCALE: 1 inch = 20 ft
DRAWN: KT DATE 6/16/06
NO MOORING OF VESSELS
OR INSTALLATION OF CLEATS
OR OTHER MOORING POINTS
ALLOWED ALONG THIS PORTION
0.9
ENVIRONMENTAL PROFESSIONALS, INC.
Planning :or a Better Environment
1404 N. Virginia Dare Trail
KILL DEVIL HILLS?NC8 27948 NORTH
[phone]
[phone] (FAX)
PIER LENGTH: 200 ft
PLATFORM: 26 ft X 6 ft
TOTAL PROPOSED SLIPS: 10
OF PIER NO MOORING OF VESSELS
P� - OR INSTALLATION OF CLEATS
� 0S\ ENDp FINGER PIER/ OR OTHER MOORING POINTS
0� 4p �S\O - SIDES) HANDRA2 ALLOWED ALONG THIS POP ON OF PIER
0 (ON BOTH SIDES) \ �OORING PILING AREA N�6',kA,
S'
—rA
NWL
-SUBSTRATE

I�z�ZO
O��F W A1'FRPG Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
rNorth Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
� —i
Q — •( Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
., '" Division of Water Quality
November 14, 2006
Blue Sun Development Group, LLC
Attn: Mr. Jeremy Peangmeth
626 West Main St.
Washington, NC 27889
Subject: Request for Stormwater Application
Stormwater Review SW7060827
CAMA Major Permit Application
Cedar Shores Subdivision
Washington County
Dear Mr. Peangmeth:
This office received a copy of your CAMA Major application for the subject project on
August 17, 2006. North Carolina Administrative Code 15 NCAC 2H.1000 requires that any
project that must receive either a Sedimentation and Erosion Control Plan approval and/or a
CAMA Major permit apply for and receive a Stormwater Management Permit by the Division of
Water Quality.
To obtain a Stormwater Permit you must submit a completed application, application fee
of $420.00, two sets of plans and specifications showing the proposed project and all
stormwater treatment units along with engineering calculations and a narrative description. This
application package should be received by this office prior to December 14, 2006. If an
application package is not received by this date we will consider the project incomplete. We also
have an Express Permitting program. If you are interested in this program you may contact Ms. Lyn
Hardison, One Stop Permit Coordinator, at 252-948-3842.
Any development of the site prior to receipt of the required permit will constitute a
violation of 15A NCAC 2H.1000 and North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and may result
in appropriate enforcement action including civil penalty assessment of up to $10,000 per day.
If you have questions, please feel free to contact me at [phone].
S� i�nceerrely,,,
William J. Moore
Environmental Engineer
Washington Regional Office
cc: Environmental Professionals, Inc
Doug Huggett, DCM, Morehead City, NC
Washington County Planning/Inspections
Washington Regional Office N'oc�p`K I
�vatural,
North Carolina Division of Water Quality Washington Regional Office Phone [phone] FAX [phone] Customer Service
Internet h2o.enratate.naus 943 Washington Square Mall, Washington, NC 27889 1-877-623-6748
,�

ENVIRONMENTAL
PROFESSIONALS
—1N1:—
PLANNING FOR
A BETTER
ENVIRONMENT
December 14, 2006
Mr. William J. Moore
DWQ Washington Reg. Office
943 Washington Square Mall
Washington, NC 27889
Dear Mr. Moore,
� 9�C ,
C
DEC 18 2006
re : DWQ Stormwater review
SW7060827 Cedar Shores
ecv�ivel. 4. i
7�
Environmental Professionals, Inc., has received your correspondence dated November 14, 2006
outlining the SWIM comments concerning the CAMA Major permit application for the above -referenced
project. This letter is to verify that we have received your letter and that we plan to continue to pursue
the permitting of this project. We are in the process of addressing your comments. Information
regarding the Stormwater Management permit application will be forthcoming. Thank you for your
consideration and cooperation in this matter.
Sincerely,
Environmental Professionals, Inc.
l / � , X 101
Louise I. Hanson
IL-r X 10 4'
P.O. BOX 3368 • KILL DEVIL HILLS, NORTH CAROLINA 27948-3368 • 252-441-023.9
FAX: [phone] • EMAIL: [e-mail]

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment a
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality ^��-
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor NCDENR
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
July 26, 1999
Mr. Harvery Johnson
731 Arnolds Beach Road
Roper, NC 27970
Subject: Stormwater Permit SW7990619
Shoreline Stabilization
Washington County
Dear Mr. Johnson:
This office received a copy of your erosion control plan and supporting
information on June 2, 1999. Staff review of the plans and specifications has
determined that the project, as proposed, consists of activities that will not
pose surface water quality threats from stormwater runoff. The Director has
determined that projects that are reviewed and approved by the Division as, not
posing water quality threats from stormwater runoff should not be subject to the
stormwater management permitting requirements of 15A NCAC 2H.1000. For this
reason, we are informing you by way of this letter that your project will not
require a stormwater management permit.
Please keep in mind that this determination does not affect your legal
requirements to obtain other permits which may be required by the Division of
Water Quality, the Division of Land Resources, Coastal Area Management Act or any
other Federal, State or Local Government. In addition, any future modifications
to the project will require additional review from this office to assure that
stormwater impacts are not an issue.
If you have any questions or need additional information concerning this
matter, please contact Mr. Bill Moore at [phone], extension 264.
Sincerely,
mar im Mulligan
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
Washington Regional Office
cc: LWashington Regional office
Central Files
943 Washington Square Mall, Washington, North Carolina 27889 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

u
�Q906 �q
Co -
Air//d .f c0 i nI E �/v � � % e -! E (� �c✓�,c<� ,D� n/ /'� �c �r p�/L-
S/�E.LeS //{�rd
L�
6 14
0 pNE
n«c,2Ef �EE
`1j be .2 �' 3 6 C L�%�- � � /cA- � R-�(/. t C' A4 �
Ay ov.v�
Awe,
7
Gay
,
7�( fl�n/ar/�seRcf /�
/�OP �2 , /V e, Z -7 lr •7 0
7— a- `7Oi3- z/S"
MAY or
LAND QUAIITy SECTION
WASHINGTpN REGIG Al CFF1CF-
•.�'.:�i?:::.sir);::��.�:�::�::`�`�.::>�:`���::.`:'r:.::�;�.�(:�:��::i:.:::..:i_::,i:::..i:�:�_�:.:r.�::{�: ����::.:�::`>��::?}:i:(:;:.. ;�: �::�:: �:::.<:::�,�.:(:�..:�.:ra'.'.'.�::;;�::}:';,:::�...ir:.:.(:_;:'.::<��. is>��tii:�:';::':�`:••. �:::

3Guio .
C1,2r
ri
C O U N T Y H Y D "c C 0 U tN T Y

N
qa b iio � >.J, � • o o n, � � � �
o.♦� ♦ i �,.# .0 ;y \ IC. Ape
to
04
V
! � `in_ � "� ? sI,/P' �• /^J/42 E 4/0. 42e N �� '� \ �, P \ r
4 10
06L,
y$ 0 e b c� 2 D pose' ac:d (A
w b y 4 .iL _.• o I w
4i•D°
' 4 4� � i. 9e. ep• >p\ ti la b0pp� b O \� j -r. ti�j
46
' k b..ON .o. b44; a \. •�
4`r La`
Pr 'saa s! 3q
N, I, 1l
• :at'ZBa N I I o 0 ��
.Pr //a 4ya; a
01
QN
C q
lvl wr ,/6Bta N o� 4 ♦ O : m
° 1 Ca.
Q
MBOo/ON ..��� i!3lliy •�O.�Iid .S3b/ �a`/
1 0 ,iO'LLa A 0 ; 0 0
i!
,rr YLd� � i L � f� �•
\ pp sMN
n ,rr'rerin
a
q
�Lz
I� a crow RrofogA FG Q�N
�0Q
��
'� `+M 4 u 0 � 0 I � 1 •� � � f
� � � w ` �w1 `I M bY7o/ON �• i - ��f v�}>i� a
BOTN
o/OS
km
Al
7. OR p1J. BI '
q NDO^OB/1-T \ 4 NO/o 0e'4N'W • O --yvv .
tQ
}
\