SW3140601_HISTORICAL FILE_20140724

STORMWATER DIVISION CODING SHEET
POST -CONSTRUCTION PERMITS
PERMIT NO.
SW ,�l _L
DOC TYPE
❑ CURRENT PERMIT
❑ APPROVED PLANS
HISTORICAL FILE
❑ COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION
DOC DATE
YYYYMMDD

Geotechnical Engineering Evaluation
Epcon Communities - Marvin Site
2012 Providence Road
Marvin, North Carolina
Project Number 130629.000
Prepared For:
Mr. Todd Pomorski
Epcon Communities
500 Stonehenge Parkway
Dublin, Ohio 43017
Prepared by:
CESI
P.O. Box 268
Concord, North Carolina 28026-0268
North Carolina License Number C-0263
July 2, 2013
45 Spring Street, SW P.O. Box 268 Concord, NC 28026-0268 704-786-5404
NC License No C-0263 www.cesilds.com NC License No C-0263

CE���i'
,_,,J " Land Development Services
July 2, 2013
Mr. Todd Pomorski
Epcon Communities
500 Stonehenge Parkway
Dublin, Ohio 43017
Reference: Epcon Communities - Marvin Site
2012 Providence Road
Marvin, North Carolina
CESI Project Number 130629.000
Mr. Pomorski:
CESI has performed a geotechnical engineering evaluation for the Epcon Communities - Marvin Site,
2012 Providence Road in Marvin, North Carolina. We completed this geotechnical engineering
evaluation in general accordance with our proposal number P130675 dated June 17, 2013.
This report explains our understanding of the project, documents our findings, and presents our
conclusions and engineering recommendations. After you have reviewed our report, we recommend
either a meeting or a telephone conference to discuss our recommendations.
We appreciate the opportunity to be of service to you and we look forward to helping you through
project completion. If you have any questions, please call.
Respectfully submitted,
CESI
Edward S. Cummings, III P.E.
Geotechnical Engineer
N.C. Registration Number24963
4w/-qzl(�Zy—
James G. Eaves, III P.E.
Division Manager
N.C. Registration Number 27837
45 Spring Street, SW P.O. Box 268 Concord, NC 28026-0268 704-786-5404
NC License No C-0263 www.cesilds.com NC License No C-0263

GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING EVALUATION
Epcon Communities - Marvin Site
2012 Providence Road
Marvin, North Carolina
CESI Project Number 130629.000
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0
INTRODUCTION....................................................................................................................................................................................1
1.1 GENERAL................................................................................................................................................................................1
1.2 REPORT SUMMARY.................................................................................................................................................................1
2.0
PROJECT INFORMATION....................................................................................................................................................................2
2.1 EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS.....................................................................................................................................................2
2.2 PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION....................................................................................................................................................2
3.0
PUBLISHED INFORMATION................................................................................................................................................................2
3.1 SITE GEOLOGY.......................................................................................................................................................................2
ResidualMaterials............................................................... .............. --- ............................................................................. 2
Bedrock.................................................................................................................................................................................2
4.0
EXPLORATION METHODS..................................................................................................................................................................3
4.1 FIELD EXPLORAnON................................................................................................................................................................3
5.0
SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS..............................................................................................................................................................3
5.1 GENERAL SUBSURFACE PROFILE............................................................................................................................................3
5.2 GROUNDWATER......................................................................................................................................................................4
6.0
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS....................................................................................................................................5
6.1 EARTHWORK CONSIDERATIONS...............................................................................................................................................5
6.2 FILL MATERIAL AND PLACEMENT........................... ......................... .......................................................................................... 5
EarthFill Materials.................................................................................................................................................................5
CompactionRecommendations...........................................................................................................................................5
6.3 SHALLOW FOUNDATIONS..........................................................................................................................................................6
Design................................................................................................................................................................................... 6
Construclion.......................................... .......................................................................... :...... --........................................... 6
SeismicInformation...............................................................................................................................................................7
6.4 SLAB -ON -GRADE RECOMMENDATIONS...................................................................................................................................7
6.5 TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT SLOPE RECOMMENDATIONS......................................................................................................7
6.6 EXCAVATION ........................................... ...................... .......................................................................... ................................. 7
GeneralMass Rods Excavation............................................................................................................................................7
TrenchExcavation— .............................................................................................................................................................. 7
6.7 PAVEMENT DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION CONSIDERATIONS......................................................................................................7
7.0
FOLLOW UP SERVICES......................................................................................................................................................................8
8.0
LIMITATIONS OF REPORT..................................................................................................................................................................9
9.0
ACKNOWLEDGMENT..........................................................................................................................................................................9
APPENDIX
Boring Location Plan
Key to Symbols and Descriptions
Logs of Test Borings
Procedures
Vapor Barrier Information
45 Spring Street, SW P.O. Box 268 Concord, NC 28026-0268 704-786-5404
NC License No C-0263 www.cesilds.com NC License No C-0263

GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING EVALUATION
Epcon Communities — Marvin Site
2012 Providence Road
Marvin, North Carolina
CESI Project Number 130629.000
1.0
1.1 General
oy
.s
OT
OF �pG�,G
��'••. Jul ��:?�r2oq
4r �F0QG
c'p/� oy9cFs.
CESI has completed a subsurface exploration and engineering evaluation for the proposed Epcon
Communities - Marvin Site, 2012 Providence Road in Marvin, North Carolina. The purpose of the
subsurface exploration was to obtain data for the geotechnical engineering evaluation and to
determine the occurrence of rock, groundwater and unsuitable soils at the site.
This report describes our understanding of the project, the field testing performed and the general
subsurface conditions revealed at the soil test boring locations. Presented herein are our
geotechnical engineering design and construction recommendations for earthwork, building
foundations, floor slabs -on -grade and pavements.
1.2 Report Summary
We understand the proposed development will include the construction of sixty two home sites,
roads and associated underground utilities.
Test borings B-2 through B-15 were performed within the site on June 21, 2013. Test boring B-1
was not performed due to the close proximity to the current land owner's home. A topsoil stratum
was present at the surface of test borings B-2, B-3, B-5, B-7 through B-10 and B-12. Average
topsoil thickness was 6.4 inches. This soil strata was moist. The topsoil will need to be stripped
and stockpiled for use in non structural areas.
A zone of disturbed soil from past agricultural operations called a plow zone was present at the
surface of test boring B-4, B-6, B-11, B-13, B-14 and B-15. The plow zone is moist and varies in
depth between 6 and 16 inches with an average thickness of 11.3 inches. The plow zone soils
are considered non-structural and will need to be stripped and stockpiled for use in non structural
areas.
Weathered in place or residual soils were present below the topsoil and plow zone at the test
borings. These residual soils are silts (ML) with various amounts of sand (SM). Soil consistency
was firm to very hard.
Weathered rock was observed in test borings B-7, B-9, B-10, B-12 and B-13 at the depths
sampled. Auger refusal was encountered at test boring B-10 at 10.5 feet below ground surface.
Even though auger refusal was not encountered in the other test borings, it may be encountered
at unexplored areas of the site at various elevations. Groundwater at the time of drilling was not
encountered in the test borings at the depths sampled.
After the recommended site and subgrade preparation has been performed, the anticipated
structural loads may be supported on stiff residual soil or newly placed structural fill soil. It is
important to understand that these Union County soils are moisture sensitive an will need to be
adequately drained and protected during construction.
EPCON Marvin Site, Marvin, North Carolina July 2, 2013
CESI Project Number 130629.000 Page 1

2.0 PROJECT INFORMATION
2.1 Existing Site Conditions
The subject site consists of approximately 20.35 acres located on the west side of Providence
Road in Marvin, North Carolina. A cross country power line borders the site on the north. A
house with a garage is present at the northeast corner of the site. An abandoned nursery building
is present behind the house. A small barn is located to the southwest from the house. A small
lake is present in the west center of the site. Abandoned fields used to grow vegetables are
present. Trees are present around the perimeter of the site except along Providence Road West.
The site is generally topographically higher around the residence and slopes downhill toward the
southwest.
2.2 Proposed Construction
Based on the information provided to date, the proposed development will include the construction
of single story single family buildings with adjacent streets. The single family buildings will consist
of wood framed exterior and interior load bearing walls. It is anticipated that design column and
continuous footing loads will not exceed 2,500 psf. At this time, projected cut and fill depths have
not been determined.
3.0
3.1 Site Geology
Residual Materials
The residual soil overburden of this area was formed by in -place weathering of the parent
metamorphic rock. A typical upland soil profile consists of topsoil underlain by silt strata that
transitions with increasing depth into coarser grained soils. Separating the completely weathered
soil overburden from the unaltered parent rock is a transition zone of very high consistency
materials locally referred to as weathered rock. Weathered rock retains much of the appearance
and striations of the parent bedrock formations, and may consist of alternating layers of high
consistency soil and rock. Weathered rock exhibits Standard Penetration Resistances in excess
of 100 blows per foot (bpf).
The weathering processes that formed the overburden soils and weathered rock were extremely
variable, depending on such factors as rock mineralogy, past groundwater conditions, and the
tectonic history (joints, faults, igneous intrusions, etc.) of the specific area. Differential weathering
of the rock mass has resulted in erratically varying subsurface conditions, evidenced by abrupt
changes in soil type and consistency in relatively short horizontal and vertical distances.
Furthermore, depths to rock can be irregular and isolated boulders, discontinuous rock layers, or
rock pinnacles can be present within the overburden and transition zones.
Bedrock
The project site is in the Charlotte Belt of the Piedmont Physiographic Province.
According to the Geologic Map of North Carolina by Rhodes and Conrad (1985), the
bedrock at the site is felsic metavolcanic rock.
EPCON Marvin Site, Marvin, North Carolina July 2, 2013
CESI Project Number 1300629.000 Page 2

4.0
4.1 Field Exploration
The procedures used by CESI for field sampling and testing are in general accordance with ASTM
procedures and established geotechnical engineering practice. Brief descriptions of field
procedures, as well as the data obtained, are presented in the Appendix.
Our geotechnical engineer located fourteen soil test borings, B-2 through B-15 within the
proposed development limits. The locations of the test borings are presented on the 'Boring
Location Plan" included in the Appendix. These locations are approximate and are based on
visual landmarks of the site.
Test borings B-2 through B-15 were advanced with an ATV mounted CME 550X drill rig to a depth
of 10 to 15 feet below the ground surface using continuous -flight, hollow -stem augers. Standard
penetration tests were performed at 2.5-foot increments in the upper 10 feet and at 5-foot intervals
thereafter to the termination depths in general accordance with ASTM D 1586. Standard
penetration test data was used to estimate the in -situ soil strength and compressibility. Soil
samples were obtained at each test interval. Test boring B-1 was not performed due to the close
proximity to the current land owner's home.
The recovered soil samples were visually classified by our geotechnical engineer in the field. A
Log of Test Boring was prepared for each boring and is included in the Appendix, together with
brief descriptions of the field testing procedures. The Logs were prepared using the observations
made in the field by the driller. Unified Soil Classification System (USCS) classifications
presented on the Logs were based on visual -manual evaluations by our engineer. The dashed
lines designating the interfaces between various strata are approximate. The actual transition
between strata may be gradual in both the vertical and horizontal directions.
5.0
5.1 General Subsurface Profile
A topsoil stratum has formed at the surface of test borings B-2, B-3, B-5, B-7 through B-10 and B-
12. Average topsoil thickness was 6.4 inches. These soils are not suitable for use in structural
areas and should be stripped and stockpiled for landscaping use.
A zone of disturbed surface soil from past agricultural operations called a plow zone was present
at the surface of test borings B-4, B-6, B-11, B-13 through B-15. Average plow zone depth was
11.3 inches. Texturally, these soils are moist fine sandy silt (ML) with rootlets. These soils are
not suitable for use in structural areas and should be stripped and placed outside the areas of
structural influence.
Weathered in place or residual soils were present below the topsoil and plow zone. Texturally,
these residual soils are silt (ML) with various amounts of sand (SM). Silt (ML) soil consistency as
measured by the Standard Penetration Resistance (N) values between 7 and 81 was firm to very
hard.
The NRCS (National Resources Conservation Service) formerly called the USDA Soil
Conservation Service has mapped this site with the Tatum Soil Series. The Tatum Soil Series
can have elastic silt (MH), silt with high plasticity, between 6 and 45 inches below existing ground
surface. Even though elastic silt (MH) was not encountered, it may be present at other
unexplored areas of the site.
EPCON Marvin Site, Marvin, North Carolina July 2, 2013
CESI Project Number 1300629.000 Page 3

Weathered rock was encountered in the test borings B-7, B-9, B-10, B-12 and B-13. Auger
refusal was encountered at test boring B-10. Even though auger refusal was not encountered at
other test borings, it may be present deeper in the soil profile or in unexplored portions of the site.
Table 1: Summary of Test Boring Data
Test Boring
Topsoil Depth
Plow Zone Depth
Weathered Rock
Number
(Inches below Existing
(Inches below Existing
(Feet below Existing
Ground Surface)
Ground Surface)
Ground Surface)
B-1
Not drilled
-
-
B-2
6.0
-
Not encountered in
depths sampled
B-3
4.0
-
Not encountered in
depths sampled
134
-
16.0
Not encountered in
depths sampled
B-5
6.0
-
Not encountered in
depths sampled
13-6
-
6.0
Not encountered in
depths sampled
B-7
9.0
-
13.5
B-8
6.0
-
Not encountered in
depths sampled
B-9
6.0
-
6.0
B-10
2.0
-
3.5
B-11
-
10.0
Not encountered in
depths sampled .
B-12
12.0
-
6.0
B-13
-
12.0
6.0-13.5
B-14
-
14.0
Not encountered in
depths sampled
B-15
-
10.0
Not encountered in
depths sampled
5.2 Groundwater
Groundwater, at time of drilling, was not encountered in the depths sampled. The elevation of the
groundwater may vary depending upon seasonal factors such as precipitation.
Borehole cave-in depths are shown on the test boring logs. Caved depths may indicate
groundwater is present, at or just below the depth and caused the soils to collapse into the hole. It
also may be the result of soil cuttings left in the hole when the hollow stem flight augers were
removed at the end of drilling.
EPCON Marvin Site, Marvin, North Carolina July 2, 2013
CESI Project Number 1300629,000 Page 4

6.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
6.1 Earthwork Considerations
Existing plans of the construction area should be reviewed and the site should be inspected to
locate existing underground utilities. Conflicting utilities such as electric and gas lines should be
removed, relocated or protected. Construction must be scheduled carefully to maximize the
benefits of seasonal weather conditions and minimize downtime for soil modification or
remediation. Grading and building operations should not occur during or immediately following
periods of heavy precipitation. We anticipate excavations for mass grading, foundations and utility
trenches can be accomplished with conventional construction equipment.
Topsoil, plow zone, fine roots, organics, and other unsuitable materials should be stripped to at
least 5 feet plus the plan fill depth beyond the outline of the proposed structures and pavement
areas.
An area of concern is the firm moist surface soils encountered at Test Boring B-9. Water has
migrated through the surface topsoil and softened the subsurface residual soils. CESI
recommends these soft soils be undercut and repaired with structural fill soils.
Based on our field experience, we anticipate groundwater control problems may be encountered
in the form of a perched groundwater condition in the topsoil, plow zone and underlying residual
soils. As a result, CESI recommends grading should be performed during drier summer and early
fall months to minimize delays and additional costs due to weather.
The soil surfaces within the stripped construction area should be proofrolled with a 25-ton, four -
wheeled, rubber -tired roller, a loaded dumptruck, or similar approved equipment. Proofrolling
operations should be carefully monitored by CESI. Areas that wave, rut, or deflect excessively
and continue to do so after several passes of the proofroller will be evaluated by our Geotechnical
Engineer. If encountered, septic tanks, septic fields and old house and barn foundations should
be removed and replaced will structural fill material.
6.2 Fill Material and Placement
Recommended criteria for soil fill characteristics and compaction procedures are listed below.
The project design documents should include the following recommendations to address proper
placement and compaction of project fill materials. Earthwork operations should not begin until
representative samples are collected and tested (allow 3 to 4 days for sampling and testing).
Earth Fill Materials
❑ General guidelines for project fill should control properties such as Plasticity Index (PI),
gradation, and organic content. The use of the following USCS soil types, as defined by
ASTM D 2487, should be satisfactory for use as project fill: GW, GP, GM, GC, SW, SP,
SM, SC, CL, ML, MH (provided the PI is 25 percent or less for MH soils), or
combinations thereof.
❑ Organic content should be no greater than 5 percent by weight, and no large roots
should be allowed. Additionally, maximum particle sizes should be limited to 4 inches or
less.
EPCON Marvin Site, Marvin, North Carolina July 2, 2013
CESI Project Number 1300629.000 Page 5

Compaction Recommendations
❑ One* standard Proctor compaction test and one Atterberg limits test for each soil type
used as project fill. Gradation tests may be necessary and should be performed at the
Project Geotechnical Engineer's discretion.
❑ Maximum loose lift thickness — 8 inches.
❑ Compaction requirements — 95 percent of the maximum dry density as determined by
the standard Proctor compaction test, 100 percent in the top 2 feet within building,
parking and drive areas.
❑ Soil moisture content at time of compaction — within plus 3 percent to minus 3 percent of
the optimum moisture content.
❑ One density test every 2,500 square feet for each lift or two tests per lift, whichever is
greater (for preliminary planning only; the test frequency should be determined by our
geotechnical engineering staff).
❑ Trench fill areas — one density test every 75 linear feet at vertical intervals of 2 feet or
less.
6.3 Shallow Foundations
Design
The building foundations should be sized for a maximum net allowable bearing pressure of 2,500
pounds per square foot. The exploration findings indicate the building may be supported by
shallow spread footings bearing on residual soil (equal to or greater than N=8) or newly placed
structural fill soil. All footings should bear at a minimum depth of 12 inches below exterior grades
for frost protection. Properly reinforced building footings with adequate slab and wall control joints
are recommended to handle slight differential settlements, if they occur.
Construction
Foundation bearing surfaces should be inspected by our Engineering Technician under our
Geotechnical Engineer's review prior to concrete placement to confirm that suitable soils are
present at the bearing elevation. We recommend that bearing surfaces be evaluated by hand
auger borings with Dynamic Cone Penetrometer (DCP) testing equipment prior to concrete
placement to determine whether the foundation bearing soils encountered during construction are
similar to those found during our exploration.
DCP testing is a verification tool to be used for an economical bearing grade evaluation during
construction. It will help detect isolated areas of soft residual soils or loosely compacted soils.
Unsuitable soil detected during this evaluation should be repaired as directed by the geotechnical
engineer. Footing bearing grades identified as having soft soils should be undercut and replaced
with properly compacted structural fill soils or crushed aggregate. The depth and width of
undercutting should be recommended by our Project Geotechnical Engineer.
Bearing surfaces for shallow spread foundations should not be disturbed or left exposed during
inclement weather. Saturation of the on -site soils will cause a loss of strength and increased
compressibility. Excavations for footings in stiff residual soils or newly placed structural fill should
be completed with a smooth bucket backhoe following excavation to reduce disturbance of the
subgrade soils. Confined excavations should conform to applicable OSHA regulations and North
Carolina State Building Codes. Upon their exposure, bearing grades should have excess and
loosened material removed. The final grades should be firm and stable, and free of loose soil,
rock, mud, water, or frost. If construction occurs during inclement weather and concreting of the
EPCON Marvin Site, Marvin, North Carolina July 2, 2013
CESI Project Number 1300629.000 Page 6

foundation is not possible at the time it is excavated, a layer of lean concrete should be placed on
the over excavated bearing surface subsequent to testing for protection. Also, concrete should
not be placed on frozen subgrades.
Seismic Information
Per Table 1613.5.2 of the 2009 International Building Code (IBC) as adopted by North Carolina, a
Site Class "D" should be assigned to the eastern half of the site in the vicinity of test borings B-2
through B-8. Site Class "C" should be assigned to the western half of the site in the vicinity of test
borings B-9 through B-15. Site specific subsurface data were determined to the boring
termination depth of about 15 feet below existing grade. Appropriate properties were estimated
for the materials deeper in the subsurface profile. The Seismic Site Class is derived from the
standard penetration test data recorded during drilling.
6.4 Slab -On -Grade Recommendations
The building floor slabs may be supported at grade provided the subgrades are prepared properly.
The concrete slab will be of monolithic design with a turn down edge. The slabs should be
constructed over at least 4 inches of compacted coarse granular material or aggregate base
course. A vapor retarder should be included if moisture -sensitive floor coverings will be used.
6.5 Temporary and Permanent Slope Recommendations
Generally, permanent cut slopes should be no steeper than 2(H):1(V). Fill slopes should have a
maximum inclination of 3(H):1(V) unless the slope is engineered and construction is closely
monitored and tested. For maintenance purposes, permanent slopes may need to be flatter to
allow access to mowing equipment. Crest areas and pavements should be sloped to prevent
surface runoff from flowing over the slope faces.
6.6 Excavation
Due to the presence of partially weathered rock at shallow depths on the site, localized excavation
problems due to rock may occur. For contractual purposes CESI recommends that Rock be
defined as the following:
General Mass Rock Excavation:
Any material which cannot be excavated with a single -tooth ripper drawn by a crawler tractor
having a draw bar pull rated at not less than 56,000 pounds (Caterpillar D8K or equivalent) or
excavated by a trackhoe having a bucket curling force rated at not less than 33,000 pounds
(Caterpillar 225B or equivalent).
Trench Rock Excavation:
Any material which cannot be excavated with a backhoe having a bucket curling force rated at not
less than 33,000 pounds (Caterpillar 225E or equivalent).
If these rock excavation conditions are encountered, CESI should be notified for verification and
quantification. Excavation of encountered trench rock will then require fracturing using jack
hammering or blasting.
EPCON Marvin Site, Marvin, North Carolina July 2, 2013
CESI Project Number 1300629.000 Page 7

6.7 Pavement Desion and Construction Considerations
Residual soils encountered at our test boring locations within the proposed drive areas are
suitable for support of flexible pavements. Subject upon final site grades and soil subgrade
proofroll observations, the proposed parking and drive areas maybe supported on stiff residual
soil and new structural fill soil.
Prevention of infiltration of water into the subgrade is essential to the successful performance of
any pavement. To prevent the subgrade from becoming saturated and reducing its support
capabilities, we recommend that the soil subgrade be graded to provide positive drainage away
from the pavement areas.
Presented in the table below is our pavement thickness recommendation for a flexible pavement
section for the proposed streets. The recommended pavement thickness below consists of
minimum compacted thicknesses rather than nominal thicknesses. The aggregate base course
and asphalt surface course should meet the requirements of and be placed in general accordance
with the applicable sections of the latest edition of North Carolina Department of Transportation
(NCDOT) "Standard Specifications for Roads and Structures".
Flexible Pavement Section
Recommended
Thickness
Recommended
Pavement Section
1.5 inches
Asphalt Surface Course — Type S 9.5mmB (NCDOT Section 610)
1.5 inches
Asphalt Intermediate Course —Type S 9.5mmB (NCDOT Section 610)
8 inches
Aggregate Base Course (ABC) — (NCDOT Section 520)
11.0 inches
Total Recommended Section
The flexible pavement section exceeds the requirements of the Village of Marvin Subdivision
Ordinance, but is necessary due to the nature of the on site soils. This pavement section is
recommended under the assumption that the residual and new structural fill subgrade soils are
thoroughly proofrolled and stable immediately prior to construction of the aggregate base course.
Schedule CESI to witness the proofroll. All paving materials should meet the requirements of and
be placed in general accordance with the applicable sections of the latest edition of North Carolina
Department of Transportation (NCDOT) "Standard Specifications for Roads and Structures".
Pavement construction should be monitored by our Project Materials Engineering Technician
working under the direct supervision of CESI's Project Construction Materials Testing or
Geotechnical Engineer.
Immediately prior to the installation of the asphalt surface course, the aggregate base course
subgrade should be proofrolled under CESI's supervision. The Materials Engineering
Technician's duties should include in -place density testing of the soil backfill, in -place density
testing of the base course, testing of the asphalt; and, if required, obtaining asphalt cores to
determine in -place pavement thicknesses. Field observations, monitoring, and quality assurance
testing during earthwork and pavement construction are an extension of the pavement design.
EPCON Marvin Site, Marvin, North Carolina July 2, 2013
CESI Project Number 1300629.000 Page 8

7.0 FOLLOW-UP SERVICES
Field observations, monitoring, and quality assurance testing during earthwork, foundation
installation and pavement construction are an extension of the geotechnical design. As a result
we recommend the following:
• Proofroll observations of areas to receive fill soils;
• Density testing during fill soil placement;
• Density testing during utility trench backflll placement;
• Footing bearing evaluations;
• Proofroll observations within the pavement areas prior to aggregate and asphalt
placement.
8.0 LIMITATIONS OF REPORT
This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of Epcon Communities for specific application to
the proposed project described in this report using generally accepted standards of geotechnical
engineering practice in the State of North Carolina. No other warranty is expressed or implied. This
company is not responsible for the conclusions, opinions, or recommendations of others based on
this data. Nor do we accept any responsibility for job -site safety, which is the sole responsibility of the
contractor.
Our conclusions and recommendations are based on the design information furnished to us, the
assumptions outlined above, and our past experience. They do not reflect variations in the
subsurface conditions, which are likely to exist between our test borings in unexplored areas of
the site. If such variations become apparent during construction, it will be necessary for us to re-
evaluate our conclusions and recommendations based upon on -site observation of the conditions.
9.0 ACKNOWLEDGMENT
CESI appreciates the opportunity to participate in this phase of the Epcon Communities - Marvin
Site located on Providence Road in Marvin, North Carolina. Please contact us if you have any
questions regarding this report or if we may be of further service.
EPCON Marvin Site, Marvin, North Carolina July 2, 2013
CESI Project Number 1300629.000 Page 9

C E'.S4)-
1 �y
►�H� �rrS `� �a
k 5't`t,.
4 ".• B H C �� Y s�
CyY/f
Y
V f
y .�� � ..l tlyC t _ ��ai43 � •�
EPCON COMMUNITIES - MARVIN SITE
BORING LOCATION PLAN
2012 Providence Road
Marvin, North Carolina
opyyyp.

SOIL CLASSIFICATION CHART
MAJOR DIVISIONS
SYMBOLS
TYPICAL
DESCRIPTIONS
GRAPH
I LETTER
GRAVEL
AND
CLEAN
GRAVELS
•
GW
WELL -GRADED GRAVELS, GRAVEL -
SAND MIXTURES, LITTLE OR NO
FINES
°Q° n 1.3
o ODo D
C oO
GP
POORLY -GRADED GRAVELS,
GRAVEL -SAND MIXTURES, LITTLE
OR NO FINES
GRAVELLY
SOILS
(LITTLE OR NO FINES)
COARSE
GRAINED
SOILS
MORE THAN 50%
OF COARSE
GRAVELS WITH
FINES
°
o
D
C
GM
SILTY GRAVELS, GRAVEL -SAND -
SILT MIXTURES
FRACTION
RETAINED ON NO.
4 SIEVE
(APPRECIABLE
-AMOUNT OF FINES)
GC
CLAYEY GRAVELS, GRAVEL -SAND-
CLAY MIXTURES
MORE THAN 50%
OF MATERIAL IS
SAND
AND
CLEAN SANDS
SW
WELL -GRADED SANDS, GRAVELLY
SANDS, LITTLE OR NO FINES
SP
POORLY -GRADED SANDS.
GRAVELLY SAND, LITTLE OR NO
LARGER THAN
NO. 200 SIEVE
SIZE
SANDY
SOILS
(LITTLE OR NO FINES
FINES
SANDS WITH
FINES
SM
SILTY SANDS, SAND - SILT
MIXTURES
MORE THAN 50%
OF COARSE
FRACTION
PASSING ON NO.
4 SIEVE
(APPRECIABLE
AMOUNT OF FINES)
SC
CLAYEY SANDS, SAND - CLAY
MIXTURES
INORGANIC SILTS AND VERY FINE
ML
SANDS, ROCK FLOUR, SILTY OR
CLAYEY FINE SANDS OR CLAYEY
SILTS WITH SLIGHT PLASTICITY
FINE
GRAINED
SOILS
SILTS
LIQUID LIMIT
CDs LESS THAN 50
16
C+L
INORGANIC CLAYS OF LOW TO
MEDIUM PLASTICITY, GRAVELLY
CLAYS, SANDY CLAYS, SILTY
CLAYS, LEAN CLAYS
— — —
OL
ORGANIC SILTS AND ORGANIC
SILTY CLAYS OF LOW PLASTICITY
MORE THAN 50%
OF MATERIAL IS
SMALLER THAN
NO. 200 SIEVE
MH
INORGANIC SILTS, MICACEOUS OR
DIATOMACEOUS FINE SAND OR
SILTY SOILS
SIZE
SILTS
LIQUID LIMIT
AND
CLAYS GREATER THAN 50
CH
INORGANIC CLAYS OF HIGH
PLASTICITY
OH
ORGANIC CLAYS OF MEDIUM TO
HIGH PLASTICITY, ORGANIC SILTS
HIGHLY ORGANIC sons
.., ...,
— — —
PT
PEAT, HUMUS, SWAMP SOILS WITH
HIGH ORGANIC CONTENTS
NOTE: DUAL SYMBOLS ARE USED TO INDICATE BORDERLINE SOIL CLASSIFICATIONS
CORRELATION OF
STANDARD PENETRATION RESISTANCE
WITH
RELATIVE DENSITY AND CONSISTENCY
Sand and Gravel
Standard Penetration Resistance
Approximate
Blows per Foot
Relative Density
0-4
Very Loose
5-10
Loose
11-20
Firm
21-30
Very Firm
31-50
Dense
Over 50
Very Dense
Silt and Clay
Standard Penetration Resistance Approximate
Blows per Foot Consistency
0-1
Very Soft
2-4
Soft
5-8
Firm
9-15
Stiff
16-30
Very Stiff
31-50
Hard
Over 50
Very Hard
Key to Symbols and Descriptions

a
0
u
z
a
w
z
z
z
z
w
z
a
0
m
u
z
0
m
r
0
0
0
�
1/��'r ,EM,
v
Log of Test Boring No. B-2 Page 1 of 1
Project : EPCON Communities Marvin Site
Date Drilled : 06/21/2013
0
Location : 2012 Providence Road, Marvin, NC
Project No. 130629.000
Drilling Method : Hollow Stem Augers Rig Type : CME 55OX
Surface Elevation : Not Determined ft. Cave-in Depth Al 10.6 ft.
:
Boring Diameter 6" Hammer, Automatic
Initial GWL: Not Encountered ft. Delayed GWL : ft.
Northing: ft. Easting: ft.
SAMPLE TYPE ® DISTURBED ® SPT SAMPLE ■ SHELBY TUBE 0 NO RECOVERY n CORE
SAMPLES
E
L
E
V
�
P
T
H
MATERIAL CLASSIFICATION
AND REMARKS
L
I
T
G
W
PL(%) NMC(%) LL(%)
0 e �
FINES(°/)
• SPT N-Value (bpf)
Y♦
TF
P
ft)
(ft)
H
L
E
70 20 004050 7090
0
Topsoil
RESIDUUM: Very stiff mottled yellow and red
fine sandy SILT (ML)
5-8-10
------------------------
Very stiff to stiff mottled red and yellow SILT
(ML)
s-8-9
5
5-5-8
------------------------
Stiff to firm mottled light red and yellow SILT
(ML)
4-4-s
11
10
ffi
3-4-4
15
Boring terminated at 15 feet
20
oAbbreviations
LWL
-Groundwater Level PL -Plastic Limit NMC -Natural Moisture Content
Lithologic Symbol LL - Liquid Limit SPT - Standard Penetration Test

Log of Test Boring No. B-3 Page 1 of 1
10
J !SD
Project : EPCON Communities Marvin Site
Date Drilled : 06/21/2013
Location : 2012 Providence Road, Marvin, NC
Project No. 130629.000
Drilling Method : Hollow Stem Augers Rig Type : CME 550X
Surface Elevation : Not Determined ft. Cave-in Depth A 11.0 ft.
Boring Diameter: 6" Hammer: Automatic
Initial GWL: Not Encountered ft, Delayed GWL: ft.
Northing: ft. Easling: ft.
SAMPLE TYPE' ® DISTURBED ® SPT SAMPLE ■ SHELBY TUBE 0 NO RECOVERY Q CORE
SAMPLES
E
L
E
V
E
P
T
H
MATERIAL CLASSIFICATION
AND REMARKS
L
I
T
G
W
PL(%) NMC(%) LL(%)
v I
• FINES(%)
• SPT N-Value (bpf)
TE
(ft)
(h)
H
L
70 20 70 4050 70 90
0
Topsoil
RESIDUUM: Very stiff mottled red and yellow
fine sandy SILT (ML)
5-6-8
------------------------:
Very stiff mottled yellow and red SILT (ML)
s-10-10
s
------------------------
Very stiff moist mottled light red and gray SILT
(ML)
a-7-s
------------------------
Stiff mottled yellow and gray SILT (ML)
a-s-7
—to-
-----------------------------
Firm mottled reddish yellow and light brown
SILT (ML)
3-4-4
1s
Boring terminated at 15 feet
20
Key to Abbreviations
GWL - Groundwater Level PL - Plastic Limit NMC - Natural Moisture Content
LITH - Lithologic Symbol LL - Liquid Limit SPT - Standard Penetration Test

"^
I
CEr
Log of Test Boring No. B-4 Page 1 of 1
Project EPCON Communities Marvin Site
Date Drilled : 06/21/2013
ULocation
: 2012 Providence Road, Marvin, NC
PfOfBCt NO. 130629.000
Drilling Method : Hollow Stem Augers Rig Type: CME 55OX
Surface Elevation : Not Determined ft. Cave-in Depth Al 10.3 ft.
Boring Diameter: 6" Hammer: Automatic
Initial GWL: Not Encountered ft. Delayed GWL: ft.
Northing: ft. Easting: ft.
SAMPLE TYPE ® DISTURBED ® SPT SAMPLE ■ SHELBY TUBE ® NO RECOVERY 0 CORE
SAMPLES
E
L
E
V
E
P
T
H
MATERIAL CLASSIFICATION
AND REMARKS
L
I
T
G
W
PLN NMC(%) LL(%)
V e
♦ FINES(%)
• SPT N-Value (bpf)(ft)
TYPOE
(ft)
H
L
10 20 30 4050 70 90
0
Plow Zone: Moist gray SILT (ML)
RESIDUUM: Mottled red and yellow fine sandy
SILT (ML)
---------------------------
Very stiff moist mottled red, yellow and black
SILT (ML)
6-7-9
71
5
------------------------
Stiff yellow, gray and black SILT (ML)
3-4-7
3-7-6
10
�
-------------------------
Firm yellow, gray and black SILT (ML)
2-3-3
15
Boring terminated at 15 feet
zo
Key to Abbreviations
GWL - Groundwater Level PL - Plastic Limit NMC - Natural Moisture Content
LITH - Lithologic Symbol LL - Liquid Limit SPT - Standard Penetration Test

h
� I E, I,
Log of Test Boring No. B-5 Page 1 of 1
Project : EPCON Communities Marvin Site
Date Drilled : 06fzy2013
JJ
Location : 2012 Providence Road, Marvin NC
Project No. 130629.000
Drilling Method : Hollow Stem Augers Rig Type : CME 550X
Surface Elevation : Not Determined ft. Cave-in Depth :0 11.1 ft.
Boring Diameter: 6" Hammer: Automatic
Initial GWL : Not Encountered ft. Delayed GWL: ft.
Northing: ft. Easting: IL
SAMPLE TYPE ® DISTURBED ® SPT SAMPLE ■ SHELBY TUBE ® NO RECOVERY n CORE
SAMPLES
E
L
E
V
(ft)
DE
P
T
H
(ft)
MATERIAL CLASSIFICATION
AND REMARKS
L
I
T
H
G
W
L
PL(%) NMC(%) LL(%)
FINES(%)
• SPT N-Value (bpf)
10 20 30 40 50 7090
S
.
TE
0
Moist topsoil
—
RESIDUUM: Stiff mottled yellow, gray and red
SILT (ML) with 1/8" rock fragments
3-6-7
------------------------
Very stiff mottled light brown and white SILT
(ML)
6-9-11
s
------------------------
Very stiff mottled yellow and gray SILT (ML)
5-8-9
6-8-9
10
ffi
5-8-11
15
Boring terminated at 15 feet
zo
Key to Abbreviations
GWL - Groundwater Level PL - Plastic Limit NMC - Natural Moisture Content
LITH - Lilhologic Symbol LL - Liquid Limit SPT - Standard Penetration Test

i
i ^.
�CE iv
Log of Test Boring No. B-6 Page 1 of 1
Project : EPCON Communities Marvin Site
Date Drilled : 06/21/2013
ULocation
: 2012 Providence Road, Marvin, NC
Project No. 130629.000
Drilling Method : Hollow Stem Augers Rig Type : CME 550X
Surface Elevation : Not Determined ft. Cave-in Depth :4 9.8 ft.
Boring Diameter 6" Hammer: Automatic
:
Initial GWL: Not Encountered ft. Delayed GWL: ft.
Northing: p, Easting: ff.
SAMPLE TYPE ® DISTURBED ® SPT SAMPLE ■ SHELBY TUBE NO RECOVERY CORE
SAMPLES
E
L
E
V
(ft)
D
E
P
T
H
(ft)
MATERIAL CLASSIFICATION
AND REMARKS
L
I
T
H
G
W
L
PL(%) NMC(%) LL(%)
���
♦ FINES(%)
• SPT N-Value (bpf)
70 20 30 4050 7090
T
Y
P
E
BLOWS
PER
6 IN.
0
Plow Zone: Moist dark gray SILT (ML) with
rootlets
RESIDUUM: Stiff mottled gray and yellow SILT
3-5-7
O
(ML) with SAND (SM)
--------------------------
Very stiff mottled gray and yellow SILT (ML)
with SAND (SM)
11-13-15
0
5
Hard mottled gray and yellow SILT (ML) with
SAND (SM)-13-z1
0
10
ffi
8-12-19
O
------------------------
Very stiff gray SILT (ML) with SAND (SM)
6-9-13
O
15
Boring terminated at 15 feet
Properties of Combined sample:
Atterberg Limits: LL = 28, PL = 25
Percent Finer than #200 Sieve = 78%
zo
Key to Abbreviations
GWL - Groundwater Level PL - Plastic Limit NMC - Natural Moisture Content
LITH - Lithologic Symbol LL - Liquid Limit SPT - Standard Penetration Test

^ E'^
Log of Test Boring No. B-7 Page 1 of 1
J � Ip
Project : EPCON Communities Marvin Site
Date Drilled : 06/21/2013
JLocation
: 2012 Providence Road, Marvin, NC
Project No. 130629.000
Drilling Method : Hollow Stem Augers Rig Type : CME 55OX
Surface Elevation : Not Determined ft. Cave-in Depth :-4 9.2 ft.
Boring Diameter. 6" Hammer: Automatic
Initial GWL : Not Encountered ft. Delayed GWL : ft.
Northing: ft. Easting: ft.
SAMPLE TYPE ® DISTURBED ® SPT SAMPLE ■ SHELBY TUBE ® NO RECOVERY CORE
SAMPLES
E
L
E
V
(ft)
E
P
T
H
(ft)
MATERIAL CLASSIFICATION
AND REMARKS
L
I
T
H
G
W
L
PL(%) NMC(%) LL(%)
v E)�—
♦ FINES(°/ )
0 SPT N-Value (bpf)
10 20 30 4050 7090
S
TP6 .
0
Moist topsoil
—
RESIDUUM: Stiff moist gray and reddish
yellow SILT (ML) with 1/8" to 1/4" quartz
2-4-5
fragments
------------------------
Very stiff gray and reddish yellow SILT (ML)
3-10-15
5
------------------------
Hard yellow and brown fine sandy SILT (ML)
with 1/8" rock fragments
13-21-28
------------------------
Hard yellow and gray SILT (ML)
ffi
14-16-15
10
Sofz.s°
WEATHERED ROCK sampled as yellow SILT
(ML) with 1/8" to 1/4" rock fragments
is
z0
Key to Abbreviations
GWL - Groundwater Level PL - Plastic Limit NMC - Natural Moisture Content
LITH - Lithologic Symbol LL - Liquid Limit SPT - Standard Penetration Test

a
m
z
a
0
m
r
0
0
0
0
1 !-�*�r
?CJ
Log of Test Boring No. B-8 Page 1 of i
• 1'
Project : EPCON Communities Marvin Site
Date Drilled : 06/21/2013
JLocation
: 2012 Providence Road Marvin NC
Project No. 130629.000
Drilling Method : Hollow Stem Augers Rig Type : CME 550X
Surface Elevation : Not Determined ft. Cave-in Depth :9 10.2 ft.
Boring Diameter: 6" Hammer: Automatic
Initial GWL : Not Encountered ft. Delayed GWL : ft.
Northing: (L Easting: ft.
SAMPLE TYPE ® DISTURBED ® SPT SAMPLE ■ SHELBY TUBE ® NO RECOVERY CORE
SAMPLES
E
L
E
V
�
P
T
H
MATERIAL CLASSIFICATION
AND REMARKS
L
I
T
G
W
PL(%) NMC(%) LL(%
Is
• FINES(%)
• SPT N-Value (bpf)
TFB0
Y
P
(ft)
(ft)
H
L
E
10 20 30 4050 ]090
0
Plow Zone: Moist gray SILT (ML) with rootlets
RESIDUUM: Very stiff yellowish brown and
gray SILT (ML) with SAND (SM)
5-8-15
------------------------
Hard to very stiff mottled gray and yellowish
brown SILT (ML) with SAND (SM)
11-16-21
O
s
8-13-16
O
41
0-16-17
O
10
�
-
-----------------------------
Very stiff yellowish brown and gray SILT (ML)
with SAND (SM)
9-10-16
O
15
Boring terminated at 15 feet
Properties of Combined sample:
Atterberg Limits: LL = 28, PL = 25
Percent Finer than #200 Sieve = 78%
20
Key to Abbreviations
GWL - Groundwater Level PL - Plastic Limit NMC - Natural Moisture Content
LITH - Lithologic Symbol LL - Liquid Limit SPT - Standard Penetration Test

1�T. r
a. .IL
Log of Test Boring No. B-9 Page 1 of 1
PfOfBCt : EPCON Communities Marvin Site
Date Drilled : 06f21/2013
JJ
Location : 2012 Providence Road, Marvin, NC
Project No. 130629.000
Drilling Method : Hollow Stem Augers Rig Type: CME 55OX
Surface Elevation : Not Determined ft. Cave-in Depth :9 4.8 ft.
Boring Diameter: 6" Hammer: Automatic
Initial GWL : Not Encountered ft. Delayed GWL : ft.
Northing: ft. Fasting: ft.
SAMPLE TYPE ® DISTURBED ® SPT SAMPLE SHELBY TUBE NO RECOVERY CORE
SAMPLES
E
E
V
D
P
T
H
MATERIAL CLASSIFICATION
AND REMARKS
L
I
T
G
W
PL(%) NMC(%) LL(%)
v 6 O
FINES(°/)
• SPT N-Value (bpf)
T
Y
P
BLOWS
PER
6 IN.
(ft)
(ft)
H
L
E
10 20 30 4050 7090
0
Moist topsoil
RESIDUUM: Firm moist yellow and brown
SILT (ML)
2-2-5
5
------------------------
Hard mottled gray and yellow fine sandy SILT
(ML)
ffi
5-8-23
10-16-
50/5.5"
WEATHERED ROCK sampled as gray and
reddish yellow fine sandy SILT (ML)
------------------------
WEATHERED ROCK sampled as gray SILT
x35-50i4.5^
(ML)
10
Boring terminated at 9.4 feet
s
zo
Key to Abbreviations
GWL - Groundwater Level PL - Plastic Limit NMC - Natural Moisture Content
LITH - Lithologic Symbol LL - Liquid Limit SPT - Standard Penetration Test

�^�11� ^
CEO
Log of Test Boring No. B-10 Page 1 of 1
Project : EPCON Communities Marvin Site
Date Drilled : 06f21/2013
Location : 2012 Providence Road, Marvin, NC
Project No. 130629.000
Drilling Method : Hollow Stem Augers Rig Type : CME 550X
Surface Elevation : Not Determined ft. Cave-in Depth :4 7.9 ft.
Boring Diameter: 6" Hammer: Automatic
Initial GWL : Not Encountered ft. Delayed GWL: ft.
Northing: ft. Easting: ft.
SAMPLE TYPE ® DISTURBED ® SPT SAMPLE ■ SHELBY TUBE ® NO RECOVERY CORE
SAMPLES
E
L
E
V
E
P
T
H
MATERIAL CLASSIFICATION
AND REMARKS
L
I
T
G
W
PL(%) NMC(%) LL(°/ )
♦ FINES(%)
• SPT N-Value (bpf)
TE
(ft)
(ft)
H
L
10 20 30 4050 7090
0
Topsoil
RESIDUUM: Hard mottled white and yellow
SILT (ML)
13-16-30
31-5015.75"
WEATHERED ROCK sampled as light yellow
SILT (ML)
5
WEATHERED ROCK sampled as light
50i5.5"
yellowish SILT (ML) with 1/4" to 3/4" rock
fragments
ffi
50/4"
to
2510"
Auger Refusal at 10.5 feet
t5
20
Key to Abbreviations
GWL - Groundwater Level PL - Plastic Limit NMC - Natural Moisture Content
LITH - Lithologic Symbol LL - Liquid Limit SPT - Standard Penetration Test

�.
JI I
Log of Test Boring No. B-11 Page 1 of 1
Project : EPCON Communities Marvin Site
Date Drilled : 06/21/2013
Location : 2012 Providence Road, Marvin, NC
Project No. 130629.000
Drilling Method : Hollow Stem Augers Rig Type: CME 550X
Surface Elevation : Not Determined ft. Cave-in Depth :ill 5.8 ft.
:
Boring Diameter 6" Hammer: Automatic
Initial GWL: Not Encountered ft. Delayed GWL: ft.
Northing: ft. Easting: ft.
SAMPLE TYPE ® DISTURBED ® SPT SAMPLE ■ SHELBY TUBE ® NO RECOVERY O CORE
SAMPLES
E
L
E
V
D
E
P
T
H
MATERIAL CLASSIFICATION
AND REMARKS
L
I
T
H
G
W
L
PL(%) NMC(%) LL(%)
(i) 6 O
FINES(%)
• SPT N-Value (bpf)(k)
10 20 70 4050 70 90
S♦
TYB
0
Plow Zone: Gray SILT (ML) with rootlets
RESIDUUM: WEATHERED ROCK sampled as
mottled yellow and light gray fine sandy SILT
18-35-
(ML)
50/5.5"
12-12-15
Very stiff mottled reddish yellow and light gray
SILT (ML)
s
10-10-13
------------------------
Very stiff mottled reddish brown and light gray
SILT (ML)
8-12-18
10
Boring terminated at 10 feet
15
zo
Key to Abbreviations
GWL - Groundwater Level PL - Plastic Limit NMC - Natural Moisture Content
LITH - Lithologic Symbol LL - Liquid Limit SPT - Standard Penetration Test

A ; ^
lu
JlJ
Log of Test Boring No. B-12 Page 1 of 1
Project : EPCON Communities Marvin Site
Date Drilled : 06/21/2013
Project No. 130629.000
Location : 2012 Providence Road, Marvin, NC
Drilling Method: Hollow Stem Augers Rig Type: CME 55OX
Boring Diameter6" Hammer: Automatic
:
Surface Elevation : Not Determined ft. Cave-in Depth:* 5.0 ft.
Initial GWL : Not Encountered ft. Delayed GWL: ft.
Northing: (t. Fasting: ft.
SAMPLE TYPE ® DISTURBED ® SPT SAMPLE ■ SHELBY TUBE a NO RECOVERY [I CORE
E
L
E
V
(ft)
E
P
T
H
(ft)
MATERIAL CLASSIFICATION
AND REMARKS
L
I
T
H
G
W
L
SAMPLES
PL(%) NMC(%) LQ )
♦ FINES(%)
• SPT N-Value (bpf)
10 20 30 4050 7090
T
Y
P
E
BLOWS
PER
6 IN.
0
5
to
1s
zo
Topsoil
�
16-19-27
13-17-39
33-50/1"
5014"
RESIDUUM: Hard to very hard mottled light
gray and reddish yellow SILT (ML)
WEATHERED ROCK sampled as gray fine
sandy SILT (ML)
Boring terminated at 8.8 feet
Key to Abbreviations
GWL - Groundwater Level PL - Plastic Limit NMC - Natural Moisture Content
LITH - Lithologic Symbol LL - Liquid Limit SPT - Standard Penetration Test

Log of Test Boring No. B-13 Page 1 of 1
J , J IO
Project : EPCON Communities Marvin Site
Date Drilled : 06/2112013
Location : 2012 Providence Road, Marvin, NC
Project No. 130629.000
Drilling Method : Hollow Stem Augers Rig Type : CME SSOX
Surface Elevation : Not Determined ft. Cave-in Depth :ffi 9.6 Ft.
Boring Diameter : 6" Hammer: Automatic
Initial GWL: Not Encountered ft. Delayed GWL: ft.
Northing: ft. Fasting: ft.
SAMPLE TYPE ® DISTURBED ® SPT SAMPLE ■ SHELBY TUBE ® NO RECOVERY CORE
SAMPLES
E
L
E
V
(h)
E
P
T
H
(ft)
MATERIAL CLASSIFICATION
AND REMARKS
L
I
T
H
G
W
L
PL(%) NMC(%) LL(%)
iv 6 O
FINES(°/)
• SPT N-Value (bpf)
10 20 30 40 so 7000
S
.
TE
0
Plow Zone: Moist gray SILT (ML) with rock
—
fragments
RESIDUUM: Very stiff gray and red SILT (ML)
6-11-14
------------------------
Very stiff brown and gray SILT (ML)
5-11-1 a
5
4-82-
sofss°
WEATHERED ROCK sampled as gray and
yellow SILT (ML)
------------------------
WEATHERED ROCK sampled as gray and
27-5014.5"
reddish yellow fine sandy SILT (ML) with 1/4"
1a
10
rock fragments
2s-36-45
Very hard gray and reddish yellow SILT (ML)
15
Boring terminated at 15 feet
zo
Key to Abbreviations
GWL - Groundwater Level PL - Plastic Limit NMC - Natural Moisture Content
LITH - Lithologic Symbol LL - Liquid Limit SPT - Standard Penetration Test

r lei Ali
Log of Test Boring No. B-14 Page 1 of 1
J ✓• IJ
Project : EPCON Communities Marvin Site
Date Drilled : 06i21/2013
Location : 2012 Providence Road, Marvin, NC
Project NO. 130629.000
Drilling Method : Hollow Stem Augers Rig Type : CME 55OX
Surface Elevation : Not Determined ft. Cave-in Depth :19 5.8 ft.
:
Boring Diameter 6" Hammer: Automatic
Initial GWL : Not Encountered ft. Delayed GWL: ft.
Northing: ft. Easting: ft.
SAMPLE TYPE ® DISTURBED ® SPT SAMPLE ■ SHELBY TUBE NO RECOVERY CORE
SAMPLES
E
L
V
(ft)
E
P
T
H
(ft)
MATERIAL CLASSIFICATION
AND REMARKS
L
I
T
H
G
W
L
PL(%) NMC(%) LL(%)
6E
A, FINES(%)
• SPT N-Value (bpf)
10 20 304050 7090
SG
TYB
0
Plow Zone: Moist gray SILT (ML) with rock
—
fragments and rootlets
RESIDUUM: Stiff gray SILT (ML) with 1/8" rock
2-4-7
fragments
------------------------
Hard light gray SILT (ML)
1z-za-zs
s
- - - - - - - - - -
n
- - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Very hard light gray fine sandy SILT (ML)
18-31-30
--------------------------
Hard mottled yellowish brown and light gray
fine sandy SILT (ML)
7-15-27
10
Boring terminated at 10 feet
15
zo
Key to Abbreviations
GWL - Groundwater Level PL - Plastic Limit NMC - Natural Moisture Content
LITH - Lithologic Symbol LL - Liquid Limit SPT - Standard Penetration Test

E
Log of Test Boring No. B-15 Page i of i
Project : EPCON Communities Marvin Site
Date Drilled : 06izv2013
I'
1 1
0
Location : 2012 Providence Road, Marvin, NC
Project NO. 130629.000
Drilling Method : Hollow Stem Augers Rig Type : CME 55OX
Surface Elevation : Not Determined ft. Cave-in Depth :9 5.4 ft.
Boring Diameter 6" Hammer: Automatic
:
Initial GWL : Not Encountered ft. Delayed GWL : It.
Northing: ft. Easting: ft.
SAMPLE TYPE ® DISTURBED ® SPT SAMPLE SHELBY TUBE NO RECOVERY CORE
SAMPLES
E
L
E
V
E
P
T
H
MATERIAL CLASSIFICATION
AND REMARKS
L
I
T
G
W
PL(%) NMC(%) LL(%)
O 6 O
♦ FINES(%)
• SPT N-Value (bpf)
S
.
TE
(ft)
(ft)
H
L
10 20 30 4050 7090
0
Plo_w_Zon_e: Dark gray SILT with
_(_ML)__rootlets
ow Zone: Gray SILT (ML) with small rock
fPlragments and rootlets
30-15-19
RESIDUUM: Hard to very hard mottled light
gray and reddish yellow fine sandy SILT (ML)
1-22-40
5
�
Very hard mottled light gray and reddish brown
fine sandy SILT (ML) with 1/8" rock fragments
30-37-27
--------------------------
Hard moist white and yellow fine sandy SILT
(ML) with 1/8" to 1/4" rock fragments
24-16-16
111(
10
Boring terminated at 10 feet
15
zo
Key to Abbreviations
GWL - Groundwater Level PL - Plastic Limit NMC - Natural Moisture Content
LITH - Lithologic Symbol LL - Liquid Limit SPT - Standard Penetration Test

FIELD PROCEDURE
SOIL TEST BORINGS
ASTM D-1586
The borings were made by advancing 5 inch diameter hollow stem augers. At regular intervals, soil
samples were obtained through the hollow stem augers with a standard 1.4-inch I.D., 2.0-inch O.D.,
split -tube sampler.
The sampler was initially seated 6 inches to penetrate any loose cuttings; then driven an additional foot
with blows of a 140-pound hammer falling 30 inches. The number of hammer blows required to drive
the sampler the final foot was recorded and is designated as the standard penetration resistance.
Penetration resistance, when properly evaluated, is an index to the soil's strength and density.
The samples were classified in the field by the driller as they were obtained. Representative portions of
each soil sample were then sealed in labeled glass jars and transported to our laboratory. The samples
were examined by a graduate geotechnical engineer or engineering geologist to check visually the field
classification. All boring data, including sampling intervals, penetration resistances, soil classifications,
and groundwater level are shown on the attached Test Boring Records.

An ACI warning:
Vapor Retarder Location
ACI committee 302, "Guide for Concrete Floor and Slab Construction: (ACI 302, 1 R-96) states in
section 4.1.5 that "if a vapor barrier or retarder is required due to local conditions, these products
should be placed under a minimum of 4 in. (100 mm) of trimable, compactible, granular fill (not
sand)." The Moisture Task Group of ACI Committees 302 & 360 has found examples where this
approach has directly contributed to floor covering problems and failures.
As a result of reviewing the details of problem installations, it became clear that the fill course
above the vapor retarder had taken on water from rain, wet -curing, wet -grinding or cutting, and
cleaning. Unable to drain, the wet or saturated fill provides and additional source of water that
contributes to moisture -vapor emission rates from the slab well in excess of the 3 to 5 lb/ 1000sf
/24 hr. recommendation of the floor covering manufacturers.
As a result of these experiences, and the difficulties involved with adequately protecting the fill
course from water during the construction process, caution is advised as to the use of the granular
fill layer when moisture -sensitive finishes are to be applied to the slab surface.
The task group believes that when the use of a vapor retarder or barrier is required, the decision
whether to locate the material in direct contact with the slab or beneath a layer of granular fill
should be made on a case -by -case basis.
Each proposed installation should be independently evaluated as to the moisture sensitivity of
subsequent floor finishes, anticipated project conditions, and the potential effects of slab curling
and cracking.
The following chart can be used to assist in the evaluation process. The anticipated benefits and
risks associated with the specified location of the vapor retarder should be reviewed with all
appropriate parties prior construction.

Flow Chart for Location of Vapor Retarder/Barrier
Does the project have a vapor -sensitive
covering or a humidity -controlled area?
Yes
Vapor retarder/barrier is required
No
Fig. 1
Slabs with vapor Slabs in humidity -controlled areas
sensitive coverings
' Will the slabs be placed with
Fig. 2 waterproof roof membrane in place?*
No
Fig. 2
Yes
Fig. 3
S"ab S b / Slab
o Dr o
Dry, granular material Dry, granular material ' rDry, granular material
Figure 1 Figure 2 Figure 3
*If granular material is subject to future moisture infiltration, use Fig. 2

• .. - '.s;DEMLRUSEONLY".­
w r>.
Date Received
Fee Paid
Permit Number
_ g , zoo q
s =°
Applicable Rules: ❑ Coastal SW -1995
❑ Coastal SW - 2008 la -Ph II - Post Construction
(select all that apply) ❑ Non -Coastal SW- HQW/ORW Waters ❑ Universal Stormwater Management Plan
❑ Other WQ M t Plan:
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources p
Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources,p�0
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PERMIT APPLICATIONtpRM 9�OpyOe
This form may be photocopied far use as an original
I. GENERAL INFORMATION ,
1. Project Name (subdivision, facility, or establishment name - should be consistent with projname w�latvs� 9
specifications, letters, operation and maintenance agreements, etc.):
2. Location of Project (street address):
2012 Providence Road South
City:Marvin County:Union Zip:28173
3. Directions to project (from nearest major intersection):
North 0.25 miles of Providence Road South and Bonds Grove Church Road.
4. Latitude:34* 58' 43" N Longitude:800 46' 23" W of the main entrance to the project.
3 - of7&6 'FD•7731
II. PERMIT INFORMATION:
1. a. Specify whether project is (check one): ®New ❑Modification ❑ Renewal w/ Modificationt
tRenewals with modifications also requires SWU-102 - Renewal Application Farm
b.If this application is being submitted as the result of a modification to an existing permit, list the existing
permit number , its issue date (if known) , and the status of
construction: ❑Not Started ❑Partially Completed* ❑ Completed* *provide a designer's certification
2. Specify the type of project (check one):
❑Low Density ®High Density ❑Drains to an Offsite Stormwater System ❑Other
3. If this application is being submitted as the result of a previously returned application or a letter from
DEMLR requesting a state stormwater management permit application, list the stormwater project number,
if assigned, and the previous name of the project, if different than currently
Proposed,
4. a. Additional Project Requirements (check applicable blanks; information on required state permits can be
obtained by contacting the Customer Service Center at 1-877-623-6748):
❑CAMA Major
❑NPDES Industrial Stormwater
®Sedimentation/Erosion Control: 18.96 ac of Disturbed Area
❑404/401 Permit: Proposed Impacts
b.If any of these permits have already been acquired please provide the Project Name, Project/Permit Number,
issue date and the type of each permit:
5. Is the project located within 5 miles of a public airport? ®No ❑Ye:
If yes, see S.L. 2012-200, Part VI: httu://uortal.ncdenr.org/webAr/rules-and-regulations
Form SWU-101 Version Oct. 31, 2013 Page 1 of 6

III. CONTACT INFORMATION
1. a. Print Applicant / Signing Official's name and title (specifically the developer, property owner, lessee,
designated government official, individual, etc. who owns the projectl:
Applicant/ Organization: Epcon Marvin LLC
Signing Official & Title:Rich Heareth/Carolinas VP Operations
b. Contact information for person listed in item la above:
Street Address:8600 Sam Furr Road Suite 180
City:Huntersville State:NC Zip:28078
Mailing Address (if applicable):8600 Sam Furr Road Suite 180
City:Huntersville State:NC Zip:28078
Phone: f855 ) 762-1010
Email:rheareth®epconcommunities
Fax: (704 ) 919-5848
c. Please check the appropriate box. The applicant listed above is:
® The property owner (Skip to Contact Information, item 3a)
❑ Lessee' (Attach a copy of the lease agreement and complete Contact Information, item 2a and 2b below)
❑ Purchaser" (Attach a copy of the pending sales agreement and complete Contact Information, item 2a and
2b below)
❑ Developer" (Complete Contact Information, item 2a and 2b below.)
2. a. Print Property Owner's name and title below, if you are the lessee, purchaser or developer. (This is the
person who owns the property that the project is located on):
Property Owner/1
Signing Official &
b. Contact information for person listed in item 2a above:
Street Address:
City: State: Zip:
Mailing Address (if applicable):
City: State:
Phone: ( 1 _ Fax: ( 1
3. a. (Optional) Print the name and title of another contact such as the project's construction supervisor or other
person who can answer questions about the project:
Other Contact Person/Organization:
Signing Official &
b. Contact information for person listed in item 3a above:
Mailing Address:
City: State: Zip:
Phone: ( I Fax: { )
Email:
4. Local jurisdiction for building permits: Village of Marvin
Point of Contact:Lisa Thompson Phone #: [phone]
Form SWU-101 Version Oct. 31, 2013 Page 2 of 6

IV. PROJECT INFORMATION
1. hr the space provided below, briefer summarize how the stormwater runoff will he treated.
Stormwater runoff will be treated in a wetvond consisting of two basins connected by an equalizer ping_
2. a. If claiming vested rights, identify the supporting documents provided and the date they were approved:
Approval of a Site Specific Development Plan or PUD Approval Date: October 17, 2013
Valid Building Permit Issued Date:
❑ Other: Date:
b.If claiming vested rights, identify, the regulation(s) the project has been designed in accordance with:
M Coastal SW -1.995 2 Ph I1- Post Construction
3. Stormwater runoff from this project drains to the Catawba River basin,
4. Total Property Area: 20.05 acres
5. Total Coastal Wetlands Area: 0 acres
6, Total Surface Water Area:'1.03 acres
7. Total Property Area (4) - Total Coastal Wetlands Area (5) - Total Surface Water Area (6) = Total Project
Area*:19.02 acres
Total project area shall be calculated to exclude the followinX: the normal ppool of imyqounded structures, the area
betroeen the banks of streams and rivers, the area below the Normal High [later (NHKq line or Mean High Water
(MHW) line, and coastal wetlands landward frorn the NHW (m• MHW) line. The resultant pproject area is used to
calculate overall percent built upon area (BUA). Non -coastal wetlands landward of the NHIl (or MNW) line may
be included in the total project area.
8. Project percent of impervious area: (Total Impervious Area / Total Project Area) X 100 = 39,70 %
9. How many drainage areas does the project have?1 (For high density, count I for each proposed engineered
stormwater BMP. For lord density and other projects, use 1 for the whole property area)
10. Complete the following information for each drainage area identified in Project Information item 9. If there
are more than four drainage areas in the project, attach an additional sheet with the information for each area
provided in the same format as below.
Basin Information
Drainage Area 1
Drainage Area
Drainage Area. -".Drama
e Area
Receiving Stream Name
- Twelve Mile
Creek
Stream Class *
C
Stream Index Number *
11-138'
`Dotal Draina e Area so
1,098,148
On -site Drainage Area so
621,601
Off -site Drainage Area (so
476,546
Proposed Impervious Area** sn
328,780 '
% Im ervious Area** total
29.94
Impervious— Surface Area
Drainage Area 1
Drainage Area
Drainage Area _
Drainage Area
On -site Buildings/Lots (so
241,417
On -site Streets (so
69,448
On -site Parkin (sf)
900
On -site Sidewalks (so
17,015
Other on -site sf)
Future (sf)
Off -site (sf)
Existing BUA*** (so
0
Total (sf):
328,780
Stream Class and Index Number can be determined at hit
vnrhrLnrdear.or 4/eoeb oil( c.,u/class[ irntions
Impervious area is defined as the built upon area including, but not limited to, buildings, roads, parking areas,
sidewalks, gravel areas, etc.
Form SWU-101 Version Oct. 31. 2013 Page 3 of 6

***Report only that amount of existing BUA that will remain after development. Do not report any existing BUA that
is to be removed and which will be replaced by new BUA.
11. How was the off -site impervious area listed above determined? Provide documentation. N/A
Proiects in Union County: Contact DEMLR Central Office staff to check if the project is located within a Threatened &
Endangered Species watershed that may be subject to more stringent stormwater requirements as per 15A NCAC 02B .0600.
V. SUPPLEMENT AND O&M FORMS
The applicable state stormwater management permit supplement and operation and maintenance (O&M) forms
must be submitted for each BMP specified for this project. The latest versions of the forms can be downloaded
fromht!p://12ortal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/ws/su/bml2-manual.
VI. . SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS
Only complete application packages will be accepted and reviewed by the Division of Energy, Mineral and
Land Resources (DEMLR). A complete package includes all of the items listed below. A detailed application
instruction sheet and BMP checklists are available from
http //I?ortal.ncdeny.org/ web/ wq /ws/su /statesw /forms does. The complete application package should be
submitted to the appropriate DEMLR Office. (The appropriate office may be found by locating project on the
interactive online map atham: / /12ortal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/ws/su/maps.)
Please indicate that the following required information have been provided by initialing in the space provided
for each item. All original documents MUST be signed and initialed in blue ink. Download the latest versions
for each submitted application package from hHplLportal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/ws/su/statesw/forms_docs.
Initials
1. Original and one copy of the Stormwater Management Permit Application Form,
2. Original and one copy of the signed and notarized Deed Restrictions & Protective Covenants
Form. (if required as per Part VII below)
3. Original of the applicable Supplement Form(s) (sealed, signed and dated) and O&M
agreement(s) for each BMP.
4. Permit application processing fee of $505 payable to NCDENR. (For an Express review, refer to
hU://www.envhelp.org/pages/­onestol2express.htn-d for information on the Express program
and the associated fees. Contact the appropriate regional office Express Permit Coordinator for
additional information and to schedule the required application meeting.)
5. A detailed narrative (one to two pages) describing the stormwater treatment/managementfor
the project. This is required in addition to the brief summary provided in the Project
Information, item 1.
6. A USGS map identifying the site location. If the receiving stream is reported as class SA or the
receiving stream drains to class SA waters within t/s mile of the site boundary, include the 1h
mile radius on the map.
7. Sealed, signed and dated calculations (one copy).
8. Two sets of plans folded to 8.5" x 14" (sealed, signed, & dated), including:
a. Development/Project name.
b. Engineer and firm.
c. Location map with named streets and NCSR numbers.
d. Legend.
e. North arrow.
f. Scale.
g. Revision number and dates.
h. Identify all surface waters on the plans by delineating the normal pool elevation of
impounded structures, the banks of streams and rivers, the MHW or NHW line of tidal
waters, and any coastal wetlands landward of the MHW or NHW lines.
• Delineate the vegetated buffer landward from the normal pool elevation of impounded
structures, the banks of streams or rivers, and the MHW (or NHW) of tidal waters.
i. Dimensioned property/project boundary with bearings & distances.
j. Site Layout with all BUA identified and dimensioned.
k. Existing contours, proposed contours, spot elevations, finished floor elevations.
1. Details of roads, drainage features, collection systems, and stormwater control measures.
m. Wetlands delineated, or a note on the plans that none exist. (Must be delineated by a
qualified person. Provide documentation of qualifications and identify the person who
made the determination on the plans.
Form SWU-101 Version Oct. 31, 2013 Page 4 of 6

n. Existing drainage (including off -site), drainage easements, pipe sizes, runoff calculations.
o. Drainage areas delineated (included in the main set of plans, not as a separate document).
p. Vegetated buffers (where required).
9. Copy of any applicable soils report with the associated SHWT elevations (Please identify _
elevations in addition to depths) as well as a map of the boring locations with the existing
elevations and boring logs. Include an 8.5"xll" copy of the NRCS County Soils map with the
project area clearly delineated. For projects with infiltration BMPs, the report should also
include the soil type, expected infiltration rate, and the method of determining the infiltration rate.
(Infiltration Devices submitted to WiRO: Schedule a site visit for DEMLR to venfij the SHIM prior
to submittal, [phone].)
10. A copy of the most current property deed. Deed book: 6178 Page No: 693 _
11. For corporations and limited liability corporations (LLC): Provide documentation from the NC _
Secretary of State or other official documentation, which supports the titles and positions held
by the persons listed in Contact Information, item la, 2a, and/or 3a per 15A NCAC 2H.1003(e).
The corporation or LLC must be listed as an active corporation in good standing with the NC
Secretary of State, otherwise the application will be returned.
http://www.secretary.state.nc.us/Corl2orations/CSearch.asl2x
VII. DEED RESTRICTIONS AND PROTECTIVE COVENANTS
For all subdivisions, outparcels, and future development, the appropriate property restrictions and protective
covenants are required to be recorded prior to the sale of any lot. If lot sizes vary significantly or the proposed
BUA allocations vary, a table listing each lot number, lot size, and the allowable built -upon area must be provided
as an attachment to the completed and notarized deed restriction form. The appropriate deed restrictions and
protective covenants forms can be downloaded from httl2://portal.ncdenr.org/iveb/Ir/state-stormwater-
forms docs. Download the latest versions for each submittal.
In the instances where the applicant is different than the property owner, it is the responsibility of the property
owner to sign the deed restrictions and protective covenants form while the applicant is responsible for ensuring
that the deed restrictions are recorded.
By the notarized signature(s) below, the permit holder(&) certify that the recorded property restrictions and
protective covenants for this project, if required, shall include all the items required in the permit and listed
on the forms available on the website, that the covenants will be binding on all parties and persons claiming
under them, that they will run with the land, that the required covenants cannot be changed or deleted
without concurrence from the NC DEMLR, and that they will be recorded prior to the sale of any lot.
VIII. CONSULTANT INFORMATION AND AUTHORIZATION
Applicant: Complete this section if you wish to designate authority to another individual and/or firm (such as a
consulting engineer and/or firm) so that they may provide information on your behalf for this project (such as
addressing requests for additional information).
Consulting Engineer:Wesley A Smith
Consulting Firm: EMH&T
Mailing Address:301 McCullough Drive Suite 109
City:Charlotte State:NC Zip:28262
Phone: (704 ) 548-0333 Fax: (704 ) 548-0334
Email:[e-mail]
IX. PROPERTY OWNER AUTHORIZATION (if Contact Information, item 2 has been filled out, complete this
section)
1, (print or type name of person listed in Contact Information, item 2a) certify that I
own the property identified in this permit application, and thus give permission to (print or type name of person
listed in Contact Information, item la) with (print or hype name of organization listed in
Contact Information, item la) to develop the project as currently proposed. A copy of
the lease agreement or pending property sales contract has been provided with the submittal, which indicates the
party responsible for the operation and maintenance of the stormwater system.
Form SWU-101 Version Oct. 31, 2013 Page 5 of 6

As the legal property owner I acknowledge, understand, and agree by my signature below, that if my designated
agent (entity listed in Contact Information, item 1) dissolves their company and/or cancels or defaults on their
lease agreement, or pending sale, responsibility for compliance with the DEMLR Stormwater permit reverts back
to me, the property owner. As the property owner, it is my responsibility to notify DEMLR immediately and
submit a completed Name/Ownership Change Form within 30 days; otherwise I will be operating a stormwater
treatment facility without a valid permit. I understand that the operation of a stormwater treatment facility
without a valid permit is a violation of NC General Statue 143-215.1 and may result in appropriate enforcement
action including the assessment of civil penalties of up to $25,000 per day, pursuant to NCGS 143-215.6.
Signature: Date:
a Notary Public for the State of
do hereby certify that
before me this _ day of
County of
personally appeared
. and acknowledge the due execution of the application for
a stormwater permit. Witness my hand and official seal,
SEAL
My commission
X. APPLICANT'S CERTIFICATION [�
1, (print or h/pe name of person listed in Contact Information, item la) Itl G� fi E'r
certify that the information included on this permit application form is, to the best of my knowledge, correct and
that the project will be constructed in conformance with the approved plans, that the required deed restrictions
and protective enants will be recorded, and that the proposed project complies with the requirements of the
applicable steater rules under 15A NCAC 2H .1000 and any other applicable state stormwater requirements.
Signature: ��� Date: Z9(
a Notary Public for the State of,flos! - CAeol'.n a- County of
IJ-41 :Le�— , do hereby certify that .i C._. l7Q personally appeared
before me this -LA- day of 13Lu 2 4014 and acknowledge the due execution of the application for
a stormwater permit. Witness my hand and official seal, uw—?. i7.Q. 2
. WAI
My commission expires MY i:OIItR11881(t1 E)V=07/2 MS
Form SWU-101 Version Oct. 31, 2013
Page 6 of 6

i
Evans, Mechwart, Hambleton & Tilton, Inc.
Engineers, Surveyors, Planners, Scientists
Letter of Transmittal
To: Mike Randall
Stormwater Permitting Program
NC Division of Energy, Mineral and Land
Resources (DEMLR)
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
We are sending you herewith via:
The following items:
6
�s,
i9�'QG�Iw
O�h ✓ '.gl�v�L09
' G12�2 ^F� G9cs
L OI 2 F
A
From: Wesley Smith, PEj
Date: June 13, 2014
Job no.: 2013-1720
Subject: Courtyards at Marvin
❑ Courier U.S. Mail ® Fed. Ex.
® copies ® originals ❑ (other]
Copies
Date
Number of
sheets
Description
2
06-11-14
55
Site Improvement Plans
1
06-11 -14
Ill
Stormwater Calculations (Includes Narrative)
1
05-30-14
43
Project Calculations
1
05-30-14
1
USGS Map
2
06-06-14
6
Stormwater Management Permit Application Form (1 Original, 1
Copy)
2
06-06-14
2
Deed Restrictions & Protective Covenants Form (1 Original, 1 Copy)
1
06-11-14
1
BMP Supplement Form
1
06-1 1 -14
4
BMP O&M Agreement Form
1
06-11-14
--
Permit Application Processing Fee (Check #1003 for $505.00)
1
07-02-13
33
Soils Report/Geotechnical Report
1
05-30-14
1
NRCS County Soils Map
1
--
12
Property Deed(s)
1
05-30-14
13
Documentation to support Titles and Positions of contact person
A legacy of experience. A reputation for excellence.
301 McCullough Drive, Suite 109. Charlotte, NC 28262 • Phone [phone] • Fax [phone]
Columbus • Atlanta - Charlotte • Cincinnati - Indianapolis
emht.com

y
Evans, Mechwart, Hambleton & Tilton, Inc.
Engineers, Surveyors, Planners, Scientists
These are transmitted as checked below:
❑ for approval ❑ for your file
❑ for execution / signatures
Remarks:
❑ as requested ❑X for review & comment
❑ [other]
Signed: ,2V - X l Al �
Wesley A. Smith, PE
A legacy of experience. A reputation for excellence.
301 McCullough Drive, Suite 109, Charlotte, NC 28262 • Phone [phone] • Fax [phone]
Columbus • Anamo. Chandra • cm<mnar . Indianapolis
ernht.corn

North Carolina Secretary of State
Page 1 of 1
Acco
North Carolina
Elaine F. Marshall DEPARTMENTOF THE
Secretary SECRETARY eF STATE
Date: 6/3/2014
PO Ben 20622 Raleigh, NC 27626-0622 [phone]
Click here to:
View Document Filings I File an Annual Report
' Print a Pre -populated Annual Report Fillable PDF Form I Amend A Previous Annual Report
Corporation Names
Name
Name Type
NC EPCON MARVIN, LLC
LEGAL
Limited Liability Company Information
SOSID:
1356088
Status:
Current -Active
Effective Date:
1/11/2014
Citizenship:
DOMESTIC
Duration:
PERPETUAL
Annual Report Status:
CURRENT
Registered Agent
Agent Name:
CORPORATION SERVICE COMPANY
Office Address:
327 HILLSBOROUGH STREET
RALEIGH NC 27603
Mailing Address:
327 HILLSBOROUGH STREET
RALEIGH NC 27603
Principal Office
Office Address:
500 STONEHENGE PARKWAY
DUBLIN OH 43017
Mailing Address:
500 STONEHENGE PARKWAY
DUBLIN OH 43017
Officers/Company Officials
This website is provided to the public as a part of the Secretary of State Knowledge Base (SOSKB) system. Version:
3240
http://www.secretary.state. nc.us/corporations/Corp.aspx?Pitemld=10421430
6/3/2014

e
C20t400600413 _
SOSID: 1356088
Date Filed: 1/11/2014 I1:28:01) A�1
Elaine F. Marshall
North Carolina Secretary of State
State of North Carolina
Department of the Secretary of State C2014 006 00413
Limited Liability Company.
ARTICLES OFORGANIZATION'=
Pursuant to §57D-2-20 of the General Statutes of North Carolina, the undersigned does hereby submit these
Articles of Organization for the purpose of forming a limited liability company.
1. The name of the limited liability company is: LpCON Mof v i N I LLC
(Se Item I of the Instructions for appropriate entity designation)
2. , The name and address of each person executing these articles of organization is as follows: (State
whether each person is executingthese articles of organization in the capacity of a member, organizer
or both. Note: This document must be signed by all persons listed.)
tr4slvpi es A • -6-UU le , CV-6�knize-r, 1300 sl e'S4 Pt wY uubli", OH y501?
3. The name of the initial registered agent is: or • orl n-vice_ ow an
4. The street address and county of the initial regisptered agent office of the limited liability company is:
Number and Street Saul NAms\por050Syree-�
City a Zi State: NC Zip Code: arl (003 County: Take
5. The mailin address, ddress, if different from the street address, of the initial registered agent office is:
Number and Street
CityState: NC Zip Code:. County:
14
Principal office information: (Select either a or b.)
a. ®The limited liability company has a principal office.
The principal office telephone number: (n y' ri (n I - 10 10
The street address and county of the principal office of the limited liability company is:
Number and Street
- v
City VN)WiN State: oii Zip Code: `1301rT County: Eno r-1W
CORPORATIONS DIVISION P.O. Box 29622
(Revised January 2014) i
RALEIGR NC 27626-0672
(Form L-01)

MMMW C201400600413
The mailing address, if different from the street address, of the principal office of the company is:
Number and Street
City State: Zip Code: County:
b. ❑The limited liability company does not have a principal office.
7. Any other provisions which the limited liability company elects to include (e.g, the purpose of the entity)
are attached.
8. (Optional): Please provide a business e-mail addres Privacy Redrtc lion
The Secretary of State's Office will e-mail the business automatically A the address provided above at no
cost when a document is filed. The e-mail provided will not be viewable on the website. For more
information on why this service is offered, please see the instructions for this document.
9. These articles will be effective upon filing, unless a future date is specified:
Rp
This is the 3 day of SftN� 20 14
E coN ComrnUA i 'e 5 Coro i 4S LCC
Signature
6Arf5 4& A. 3uen<le, ak to i ze. p,
}pe or Print Name and Tim
The below space to be used if more than one organizer or member is listed in Item 92 above.
Signature
Type and Print Name and Title
Signature
Type and Print Name and Title
Signature
Type and Print Name and Title
Signature
Type and Print Name and Title
NOTES:
1. Filing fee is $125. This document must be filed with the Secretary of State.
CORPORATIONS DIVISION P.O. Box 29622 RALEIGH, NC 27626-0622
(Revised January 2014) 2 (Form L-01)

6178
0693
FILED
UNION COUNTY, NC
CRYSTAL CRUMP
REGISTER OF DEEDS
FILED Feb 14, 2014
AT 04:41 pm
BOOK 06178
START PAGE 0693
END PAGE 0698
INSTRUMENT# 03554
EXCISE TAX $2,200.00
AH
NORTH CAROLINA GENERAL WARRANTY DEED
Excise Tax: $2,200.00
Parcel Identifier No. 06196007
Verified by County on the day of 20
Mail/Box to: GRANTEE:
This instrument was prepared by: Rogers, Townsend & Thomas (Nina Shor) (Barrister Title) (SB)
Brief description for the Index: Union County Registry
THIS DEED made this 8th day of February, 2014 by and between
GRANTOR I GRANTEE
Nora G. Haywood
Mailing Address:
2012 Providence Road South
Marvin, NC 28173
Epcon Marvin LLC
Property Address:
Parcel ID 06186007
2012 Providence Road South
Marvin, NC, 28173
Mailing Address:
500 Stonehenge Parkway
Dublin, Ohio 43017
Enter in appropriate block for each party: name, address, and, if appropriate, character of entity, e.g. corporation or partnership.
The designation Grantor and Grantee as used herein shall include said parties, their heirs, successors, and assigns, and shall include
singular, plural, masculine, feminine or neuter as required by context.
NC Bar Association Form No. 3 © 1976, Revised © 1977, 2002
Printed by Agreement with the NC Bar Association — 1981 - Chicago Title Insurance Company

6178
0694
W ITIESSETH, that the Grantor, for a valuable consideration paid by the Grantee, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, has and
by these presents does grant, bargain, se I and convey unto the Grantee in fee simple, all that certain lot or parcel of land situated in the
City of Marvin, Union County, North Carolina and more particularly described as follows:
BEING all of the property more particularly described on Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof.
The property hereinabove described was acquired by Grantor by instruments recorded in Deed Book I 1 I at page 394 and
Deed Book 164 at Page 46 of the Union County Public Registry.
A map showing the above described property is recorded in Map Book _, Page
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the aforesaid lot or parcel of land and all privileges and appurtenances thereto belonging to the
Grantee in fee simple.
And the Grantor covenants with the Grantee, that Grantor is seized of the premises in fee simple, has the right to convey the
same in fee simple, that title is marketable and free and clear of all encumbrances, and that Grantor will warrant and defend
the title against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever except for the exceptions hereinafter stated.
Title to the property hereinabove described is subject to the following exceptions:
1. Any and all easements, rights of way and restrictions of record.
2. Any and all zoning and planning ordinances.
3. Any discrepancies as an accurate survey of the premises might reveal.
4. Any and all Ad valorem taxes for the current year and subsequent years.
5. Any and all other matters of record.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Grantor has duly executed the foregoing this 8th day of February, 2014.
Noom G.
Haywood
Nora G. Haywood by Susan H. Hinson,
attorney in fact pursuant to that certain
power of attorney recorded in Deed
Book 481 Page 849 in the Union County Registry
NC Bar Association Form No. 3 © 1976, Revised © 1977, 2002
Printed by Agreement with the NC Bar Association - 1981 - Chicago Title Insurance Company

6178
0695
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF UNION:
1, Tony C. Johnson, a Notary Public for Mecklenburg County and State of North Carolina, certify that Nora G. Haywood,
either known to me or proven by satisfactory evidence (said evidence being identification) personally came before me this
day and acknowledged the voluntary execution of the foregoing instrument for the purposes stated therein.
WITNESS my hand and official seal this 8th day of February, 2014.
Notary Publi
Printed Name: y C. Johnson
My Commission Expires: February 25, 2018
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF UNION:
"'Q&RG CC�a.••
1, Tony C. Johnson, a Notary Public for Mecklenburg County and State of North Carolina, do hereby certify that Susan H.
Hinson, attorney in fact pursuant to that certain power of attorney recorded in Deed Book 481 Page 849 in the Union County
Registry for Nora G. Haywood either being personally known tome or proven by satisfactory evidence (said evidence being
driver license), personally appeared before me this day, and acknowledged the voluntary due execution of the foregoing
instrument by he/she/them for the purposes stated therein.
Witness my hand and official stamp/seal this 8th day of February, 2014.
Notary Publi
Printed Name. Johnson
My Commission Expires: February 25, 2018
NC Bar Association Form No. 3 © 1976, Revised © 1977, 2002
Printed by Agreement with the NC Bar Association — 1981 — Chicago Title Insurance Company
A:- C. J%N •,s
C
QLRQ CC'Ja•••

6178
0696
Exhibit A
Legal Description for North Carolina General Warranty Deed from
Nora G. Haywood to Epcon Marvin, LLC
DEED BOOK 1 I I PAGE 394:
BEGINNING AT A POINT IN THE CENTER OF HIGHWAY 916 (PROVIDENCE ROAD) J. L. MILLS
PROPERTY CORNER, INDICATED BY AN IRON STAKE ON THE WEST SIDE OF THE HIGHWAY AND
RUNS THENCE WITH SAID MILLS LINE N. 85 DEG. 30 MIN. W. 1339 FEET TO AN IRON STAKE, A
NEW CORNER ON SAID LINE; THENCE A NEW LINE N. 73 DEG. E. 1239 FEET TO A POINT IN THE
CENTER OF SAID HIGHWAY #16, INDICATED BY AN IRON STAKE ON THE WEST SIDE OF THE
HIGHWAY; THENCE WITH THE CENTER LINE OF SAID HIGHWAY #16, S. 18 DEG. 15 MIN. E.485.5
FEET TO THE BEGINNING, AND CONTAINING 6.90 ACRES, AS SURVEYED BY RALPH W. ELLIOTT,
SURVEYOR, JANUARY 3RD, 1949.
DEED BOOK 164 PAGE 46:
BEGINNING AT A POINT IN THE PROVIDENCE ROAD (HIGHWAY NO. 16) A.M. HAYWOOD'S
CORNER, INDICATED BY AN IRON STAKE ON HIS LINE W. SIDE OF HIGHWAY 25 FT. DISTANT,
AND RUNS THENCE WITH SAID HIGHWAY S. 17-30 E. 250 FT. TO A POINT IN SAID HIGHWAY, A
NEW CORNER INDICATED BY AN IRON STAKE IN RANGE OF THE FOLLOWING LINE 25 FT.
DISTANT, THENCE 2 NE W LINES, 1 ST S. 83-15 W. 425 FT. TO AN IRON STAKE, 2ND 8.17-30 E. 239 FT
TO AN IRON STAKE, A NEW CORNER ON THE OLD LINE, THENCE WITH OLD LINE N. 87-30 W. 2310
FT. TO A PILE OF STONES ON THE I.M. COOK LINE, THENCE WITH SAID LINE N. 5-30 E. 620 FT. TO
A STONE OR IRON STAKE, JIMMY GREEN'S CORNER, THENCE WITH HIS LINE S. 85-30 E. (PASSING
HIS CORNER AND WITH A.M. HAYWOODS LINE) 2524 FT. TO THE BEGINNING AND CONTAINING
32 ACRES.
LESS THAN AND EXCEPT THE, PROPERTY RECORDED IN THE UNION COUNTY REGISTRY IN
BOOK 1208, PAGE 0156 AND MORE PARTICULARLY DECRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
LYING AND BEING IN SANDY RIDGE TOWNSHIP, UNION COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA AND BEING
MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
TO FIND THE BEGINNING POINT BEGIN AT A FOUND IRON IN THE NORTHEASTERLY CORNER OF
THAT CERTAIN PROPERTY OF UNIVERSITY OF RICHMOND AND WORCESTER ACADEMY
PURSUANT TO THOSE CERTAIN DEEDS RECORDED IN BOOK 1056 AT PAGES 826 AND 828, IN THE
UNION COUNTY PUBLIC REGISTRY, SAID FOUND IRON FURTHER BEING IN THE
NORTHWESTERLY CORNER OF THAT CERTAIN PROPERTY OF RUBY MCGUIRE PURSUANT TO A
DEED RECORDED IN BOOK 157 AT PAGE 288 IN SAID REGISTRY AND BEING S 05-54-28 E 2682.80
FEET FROM A PK NAIL FOUND IN THE CENTER LINE. OF THE INTERSECTION OF PROVIDENCE
ROAD AND IN THE NORTHEASTERLY CORNER OF THAT CERTAIN PROPERTY OF NORA
HAYWOOD; THENCE FROM SAID FOUND IRON WITH THE NORTHERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID
UNIVERSITY OF RICHMOND AND WORCESTER ACADEMY PROPERTY (NOW OR FORMERLY) THE
FOLLOWING THREE (3) COURSES AND DISTANCES: (1) S 88-15-16 W 199.21 FEET TO A FOUND
IRON, (2) N 0 1 -35-27 W 25.88 FEET TO A FOUND IRON, AND (3) N 88-58-15 W 495.81 FEET TO A SET
IRON, THE BEGINNING POINT; THENCE FROM SAID BEGINNING POINT WITH THE SOUTHERLY
BOUNDARY OF SAID NORA HAYWOOD PROPERTY AND THE NORTHERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID
UNIVERSITY OF RICHMOND PROPERTY (NOW OR FORMERLY) N 88-58-15 W 1308.38 FEET TO A
FOUND IRON IN THE NORTHWESTERLY CORNER OF SAID UNIVERSITY OF RICHMOND
NC Bar Association Form No. 3 © 1976, Revised © 1977, 2002
Printed by Agreement with the NC Bar Association — 1981 — Chicago Title Insurance Company

6178
0697
PROPERTY; THENCE CONTINUING WITH THE SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID NORA
HAYWOOD PROPERTY N 88-58-15 W 123.64 FEET TO A SET IRON IN THE SOUTHWESTERLY
CORNER OF SAID NORA HAYWOOD PROPERTY AND IN THE EASTERLY BOUNDARY OF THAT
CERTAIN PROPERTY OF G. E. ROGERS PURSUANT TO A DEED RECORDED IN BOOK 228 AT PAGE
588IN SAID REGISTRY; THENCE WITH THE EASTERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID ROGERS PROPERTY
(NOW OR FORMERLY) AND THE WESTERTLY BOUNDARY OF SAID NORA HAYWOOD PROPERTY
N 03-08-38 E 622.80 FEET TO A FOUND STONE IN THE NORTHWESTERLY CORNER OF SAID NORA
HAYWOOD PROPERTY AND IN A CORNER OF SAID ROGERS PROPERTY AND A CORNER OF THAT
CERTAIN PROPERTY OF I. M. COOK PURSUANT TO A DEED RECORDED IN BOOK 152 AT PAGE 344
IN SAID REGISTRY; THENCE WITH THE BOUNDARY OF THE COOK PROPERTY (NOW OR
FORMERLY) AND WITH THE NORTHERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID NORA HAYWOOD PROPERTY S
87-38-11 E 130.10 FEET TO A FOUND IRON IN A CORNER OF SAID COOK PROPERTY AND IN THE
SOUTHWESTERLY CORNER OF THAT CERTAIN PROPERTY OF CHARTOWN PURSUANT TO A
DEED RECORDED IN BOOK 878 AT PAGE 306 IN SAID REGISTRY; THENCE WITH THE NORTHERLY
BOUNDARY OF SAID NORA HAYWOOD PROPERTY AND THE SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID
CHARTOWN PROPERTY (NOW OR FORMERLY) S 87-31-55 E 1044.54 FEET TO A FOUND IRON;
THENCE CONTINUING WITH THE SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID CHARTOWN PROPERTY AND
THE NORTHERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID NORA HAYWOOD PROPERTY N 73.06-55 E 98.54 FEET TO
A SET IRON; TI-IENCE WITH A NEW LINE WITI-IIN THE PROPERTY OF NORA HAYWOOD THE
FOLLOWING TEN (10) COURSES AND DISTANCES AS FOLLOWS: (1) S 06-45-58 E 79.60 FEET TO A
POINT, (2) S 21-08-11 W 132.57 FEET TO A POINT, (3) S 11-50-41 E 76.91 FEET TO A POINT, (4) S 25-52-
26 E 125,67 FEET TO A POINT, (5) S 58-10-40 E 68.20 FEET TO A POINT, (6) S 05-02-24 E 68.18 FEET TO
A POINT, (7) S 53-00-43 E 62.97 FEET TO A POINT (8) S 16-38-10 E 15.41 FEET TO A POINT (9) S 40.22-
05 W 44.33 FEET TO A POINT AND (10) S 09-45-42 E 45.17 FEET TO A SET IRON IN THE SOUTHERLY
BOUNDARY OF SAID PROPERTY OF NORA HAYWOOD AND IN THE NORTHERLY BOUNDARY OF
THAT CERTAIN PROPERTY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF RICHMOND AND WORCESTER ACADEMY,
THE BEGINNING POINT, SAID PROPERTY CONTAINING 18.45 ACRES, MORE OR LESS, AND BEING
MORE PARTICULARLY SHOWN ON THAT CERTAIN BOUNDARY SURVEY OF NORA HAYWOOD &
UNIVERSITY OF RICHMOND WORCHESTER ACADEMY PROPERTY DATED JANUARY 25, 1999
AND LAST REVISED ON FEBRUARY 11, 1999 BY F. DONALD LAWRENCE & ASSOCIATES, P.A.,
REFERENCE TO WHICH SURVEY IS HEREBY MADE.
TOGETHER WITH ALL OF THAT CERTAIN APPROXIMATELY 0.65 ACRE TRACT OF LAND LYING
ADJACENT TO THE SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED 18.45 ACRE TRACT OF
LAND WHICH IS SHOWN AS'0.65 AC. UNCLAIMED" ON THAT CERTAIN BOUNDARY SURVEY OF
THE NORA HAYWOOD & UNIVERSITY OF RICHMOND WORCESTER ACADEMY PROPERTY
PREPARED BY F. DONALD LAWRENCE & ASSOCIATES, P.A. DATED JANUARY 25, 1999 AND LAST
REVISED ONFEBRUARY 11,1999, REFERENCE TO WHICH SURVEY IS HEREBY MADE AND WHICH
PROPERTY IS MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT A SET IRON IN THE SOUTHWESTERLY CORNER OF THE ABOVE -DESCRIBED 18.45
ACRE TRACT OF LAND; THENCE WITH THE SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED
18.45 ACRE TRACT OF LANDS S 88-58-15 E 123.64 FEET TO A FOUND IRON IN THE
NORTHEASTERLY CORNER OF THAT CERTAIN PROPERTY OF UNIVERSITY OF RICHMOND AND
WORCESTER ACADEMY PURSUANT TO THOSE CERTAIN DEEDS RECORDED IN BOOK 1056 AT
PAGES 826 AND 828IN THE UNION COUNTY PUBLIC REGISTRY; THENCE WITH THE WESTERLY
BOUNDARY OF SAID UNIVERSITY OF RICHMOND AND WORCESTER ACADEMY PROPERTY (NOW
NC Bar Association Form No. 3 © 1976, Revised © 1977, 2002
Printed by Agreement with the NC Bar Association — 1981 — Chicago Title Insurance Company

CMD
OR FORMERLY) S 02-36-29 W 251.73 FEET TO A FOUND IRON N A BOUNDARY OF THAT CERTAIN
PROPERTY OF G. E. ROGERS PURSUANT TO A DEED RECORDED N BOOK 228 AT PAGE 588 N
SAID REGISTRY; THENCE WITH THE BOUNDARY OF SAID G. E. ROGERS PROPERTY (NOW OR
FORMERLY) THE FOLLOWING TWO (2) COURSES AND DISTANCES: (1) N 66-25-19 W 134.37 FEET
TO A FOUND IRON, AND (2) N 03-08-38 E 200.24 FEET TO A SET IRON N THE SOUTHWESTERLY
CORNER OF THE ABOVE -DESCRIBED 18.45 ACRE TRACT, THE BEGINNING POINT.
Said Property also known as: AS -SURVEYED LEGAL DESCRIPTION
LYING AND BEING SITUATED N THE VILLAGE OF MARVN, SANDY RIDGE TOWNSHIP, UNION
COUNTY, NORTH CAROLNA AND BEING MORE. PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT NCGS MONUMENT "HM54", HAVNG NORTH CAROLNA STATE PLANE GRID
COORDINATES OF NORTHING 442722.288 FEET, EASTNG 1473838.444 FEET BASED ON NAD
83/2011; THENCE N 25-38-56 W 9642.57 FEET (GROUND), (9641.24 FEET GRID, COMBINED FACTOR
OF 0.999862053), TO A FOUND 2" IRON PIPE N THE LINE OF SUDDIE M. GUY (NOW OR FORMERLY)
AS DESCRIBED N AN INSTRUMENT RECORDED N DEED BOOK 4767 PAGE 567 OF THE UNION
COUNTY PUBLIC REGISTRY (THE "REGISTRY"); HAVNG GRID COORDINATES OF NORTHING
451413.51, EASTNG 1469665.18; SAID 2" IRON PIPE ALSO BEING N 18-15-49 W 290.89 FEET FROM A
FOUND 44 REBAR AND BEING THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE WITH AND ALONG SAID
SUDDIE M. GUY PROPERTY (NOW OR FORMERLY) THE FOLLOWING TWO (2) COURSES AND
DISTANCES: 1) S 80-21-35 W 399.02 FEET TO A FOUND #4 REBAR; 2) S 18-0743 E 222.80 FEET TO A
#5 REBAR SET; THENCE S 89-13-43 W (PASSING THROUGH A FOUND %z" IRON PIPE AT 331.43 FEET)
A TOTAL DISTANCE OF 827.27 FEET TO A FOUND #4 REBAR N THE LINE OF LOT 76 WILLOW OAK
SUBDIVISION - PHASE II AS DESCRIBED N AN INSTRUMENT RECORDED N PLAT CABINET H
PAGE 11 OF THE REGISTRY; THENCE WITH AND ALONG THE LINE OF LOTS 76 THROUGH 83 OF
SAID WILLOW OAK SUBDIVISION - PHASE II THE FOLLOWING TEN (10) COURSES AND
DISTANCES: I) N 11-34-16 W 45.18' TO A FOUND #4 REBAR; 2) N 38-35-56 E 44.33 FEET TO A SET #5
REBAR; 3) N 18-20-10 W 15.45 FEET TO A FOUND #4 REBAR; 4) N 54-44-18 W 62.96 FEET TO A
FOUND #4 REBAR; 5) N 06-54-41 W 68.15 FEET TO A FOUND #4 REBAR; 6) N 60-00-09 W 68.14 FEET
TO A SET #5 REBAR; 7)N 27-39-35 W 125.74 FEET TO A SET 45 REBAR; 8) N 13-41-39 W (PASSING
"THROUGH A FOUND 94 REBAR AT 13.24 FEET) A TOTAL DISTANCE OF 76.80 FEET TO A FOUND #4
REBAR; 9) N 19-21-51 E (PASSING THROUGH A FOUND #4 REBAR AT 109.95 FEET) A TOTAL
DISTANCE OF 132.65 FEET TO A SET #5 REBAR; 10) N 08-33-56 W 79.69 FEET TO A FOUND #4
REBAR; SAID REBAR BEING THE COMMON CORNER OF LOT 83 AND LOT 84 OF AFORESAID
WILLOW OAK SUBDIVISION - PHASE II AND COMMON AREA (NOW OR FORMERLY) AS
DESCRIBED N AN INSTRUMENT RECORDED N PLAT CABINET F PAGE 604 OF THE REGISTRY;
THENCE WITH AND ALONG SAID COMMON AREA (NOW OR FORMERLY) AND CONTINUNG
WITH AND ALONG PROVIDENCE ROAD VENTURES PROPERTY (NOW OR FORMERLY) N 71-19-43
E (PASSING A FOUND #4 REBAR AT 269.69 FEET AND 1107.79 FEET) A TOTAL DISTANCE OF
1140.46 TO A COMPUTED POINT N THE CENTERLINE OF PROVIDENCE ROAD SOUTH - NC
HIGHWAY 16 HAVNG A MAINTENANCE RIGHT-OF-WAY FROM BACK OF DITCH TO BACK OF
DITCH; THENCE CONTINUING WITFI AND ALONG THE CENTERLINE OF PROVIDENCE ROAD S 19-
32-10 E 734.94 FEET TO A COMPUTED POINT; TIIENCE LEAVING SAID CENTERLINE OF
PROVIDENCE ROAD SOUTH - NC HIGHWAY 16 S 80-21-35 W 25.98 FEET TO THE PONT AND PLACE
OF BEGINNING, THE SAME CONTAINING 20.50 ACRES AS SHOWN ON ALTA SURVEY PREPARED
BY EVANS, MECHWART, HAMBLETON, & TILTON, INC. DATED JULY 13, 2013.
NC Bar Association Form No. 3 © 1976, Revised © 1977, 2002
Printed by Agreement with the NC Bar Association — 1981 — Chicago Title Insurance Company

6178
0699
FILED
UNION COUNTY, NC
CRYSTAL CRUMP
REGISTER OF DEEDS
FILED Feb 14, 2014
AT 04:41 pm
BOOK
06178
START PAGE
0699
END PAGE
0704
INSTRUMENT #
03555
EXCISE TAX
(None)
AH
DEED OF CONVEYANCE OF A LIFE ESTATE
Drawn by: Mail to:
Tony C. Johnson, Esq. Nora G. Haywood
PO Box 23297 2012 Providence Road South
Mint Hill, NC 28227 Marvin, NC 28173
(No Title Examination)
Excise Tax: $-0-
Tax Parcel Number. Portion of 06-186-007
Brief description for the Index: 1.73 acres, metes and bounds
THIS DEED made this W4 day of February, 2014 by and between
GRANTOR: Epcon Marvin LLC, a North Carolina limited liability company,
as remaindernan
whose address is: 500 Stonehenge Parkway, Dublin, Ohio 43017
(herein referred to collectively as Grantor)
GRANTEE: Nora G. Haywood (unmarried) and Phillip Haywood (unmarried),
as individual life tenants
whose address is: 2012 Providence Road South, Marvin, NC 28173
(herein referred to collectively as Grantee)
The designation Grantor and Grantee as used herein shall include said parties, their heirs,
successors, and assigns, and shall include singular, plural, masculine, feminine or neuter as
required by context.
WITNESSETH:
That the Grantor, for a valuable consideration paid by the Grantee, the receipt of which is
hereby acknowledged, has bargained and sold, and by these presents does grant, bargain, sell
and convey unto each individual Grantee, retaining however the remainder interest, a
separate and individual life estate to automatically terminate (i) upon the death of the
Grantee last to die; or (ii) upon the failure of the Grantee to continuously occupy the
property herein described as a primary residence for a period of longer than one hundred
eighty (180) consecutive calendar days, in and to all of that certain lot or parcel of land
situated in the City of Marvin, County of Union, State of North Carolina, and being more
particularly described as follows:

6178
0700
SEE EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO AND INCORPORATED HEREIN BY
REFERENCE
Property Address: 2012 Providence Road South, Marvin, NC 28173
It is the intent and purpose of this conveyance to vest separate and individual life estates in
Nora G. Haywood and Phillip Haywood, and to retain the remainder interest in Epcon Marvin
LLC. The grant and acceptance of the fife estates are made on the express condition that all of
the individual Grantee's right, title and interest as life tenant in and to the property herein
described will automatically terminate (i) upon the death of the Grantee last to die or (ii) upon
the failure of the Grantee to continuously occupy the property herein described as a primary
residence for a period of longer than one hundred eighty (180) consecutive calendar days.
Nora G. Haywood, as individual life tenant, and Phillip Haywood, as individual life tenant, join in
the execution of this instrument to evidence their acceptance of the terms contained herein.
The Grantee covenants with the Grantor to execute such recordable instrument as may be
appropriate to relinquish and forever quitclaim the interest conveyed herein upon any failure of
Grantee to continuously occupy the property herein described as a primary residence for a
period of longer than one hundred eighty (180) consecutive calendar days.
The property hereinabove . described was acquired by Grantor by instrument recorded
contemporaneously herewith in the Union County Public Registry.
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the aforesaid lot or parcel of land and all privileges and
appurtenances thereto belonging to the Grantees as life tenants.
And the Grantor covenants with the Grantee, that Grantor has done nothing to impair such title
as Grantor received, and that Grantor will warrant and defend the title against the lawful claims
of all persons claiming by, under or through Grantor, except for the exceptions hereinafter
stated.
Title to the property hereinabove described is subject to the following exceptions:
Any and all such valid and enforceable easements, conditions, reservations and
restrictions as may appear of the public record.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Grantor has duly executed the foregoing as of the day and year
first above written.
Epcon Marvin, LLC,
a North Carolina limited liability company
By: Epcon Communities Carolinas, LLC.
a North Carolina limited liability company,
its sol"emberlmanager
Bye/el
Phi p G. Fankhauser, Member/Manager
By: f�G
Edward A. Become, Member/Manacgerer
V

6178
0701
STATE OF ON 0
COUNTY OF kli�t
I, CA\C(s1-o�l er- q • e rklt . a Notary Public of the County of
T\ and State aforesaid, certify that Philip G. Fankhauser personally came
before me this day and acknowledged that he is a memberimanager of Epcon Communities,
LLC, the sole memberimanager of Epcon Marvin LLC, and that by authority duly given and
as the act of such entity, he signed the foregoing instrument in its name on its behalf as its act
and deed.
WITNESS my hand and Notarial stamp or seal, this ( ( 4� day of February, 2014.
Notary Public: L L 4 a; L
Print or type name: aris l *R-l- - • 7��r tcle
(Affix Seal) My commission expires: No Erta4kioN W
AbA t TsyAIL0
Nlfoorci harndEb
STATE OF 06
COUNTY OF RhuO i
1 A. k3✓crK�( a Notary Public of the County of
t'4'-ANCI i W and State aforesaid, certify that Edward A. Bacome personally came before
me this day and acknowledged that he is a memberimanager of Epcon Communities, LLC,
the sole memberimanager of Epcon Marvin LLC, and that by authority duly given and as the
act of such entity, he signed the foregoing instrument in its name on its behalf as its act and
deed.
WITNESS my hand and Notarial stamp or seal, this j t 4 day of February, 2014.
Notary Public:��&-', - -Z�
Print or type name: fi' } k A 1?S ✓t'-K-1 r
(Affix Seal) My commission expires: No Cxerq{h'ory / &bF
CNIs A@elb,At TAtlav
NDTARYUM-13M CF&M
IWMWMl=o0$ftft

6178
0702
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Grantee has duly executed the foregoing as of the day and year
first above written.
v[y� �• , fdfirYV ti-
Nora G. Haywood by Susan H. Hinson,
Attorney in fact pursuant to that certain
power of attorney recorded in Deed Book 481,
Page 849 in the Union County Registry
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF UNION
I, Tony C. Johnson, a Notary Public of the County of Mecklenburg and State of North
Carolina aforesaid, certify that Nora G. Haywood and Phillip Haywood personally appeared
before me this day and acknowledged the due execution of the foregoing instrument for the
purposes therein expressed.
WITNESS my hand and Notarial stamp or seal, this 8th day of February, 2014.
Notary Public:
Print or type name: Tor C. nson
(Affix Seal) �11'"' My Commission Expires: February 25, 2018
Qua G.i0Q--o.
0W
U

6178
0703
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF UNION
I, Tony C. Johnson, a Notary Public for Mecklenburg County and State of North
Carolina, do hereby certify that Susan H. Hinson, attorney in fact pursuant to that certain power
of attorney recorded in Deed Book 481 Page 849 in the Union County Registry for Nora G.
Haywood, personally appeared before me this day, and acknowledged the voluntary due
execution of the foregoing instrument by he/she/them for the purposes stated therein.
Witness my hand and Notarial stamp or seal, this 8th day of February, 2014.
Notary Public:
Print or type name: To ohnson
(Affim Seal) ��,.•�oe�'1 yNy�.�', My Commission Expires: February 25, 2018

6178
0704
EXHIBIT "A"
LIFE ESTATE LEGAL DESCRIPTION
LYING AND BEING SITUATED IN THE VILLAGE OF MARVIN, SANDY RIDGE TOWNSHIP,
UNION COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA AND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS
FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT NCGS MONUMENT "HM54", HAVING NORTH CAROLINA STATE PLANE
GRID COORDINATES OF NORTHING 442722.2B8 FEET, EASTING 1473838.444 FEET
BASED ON NAD 8312011; THENCE N 25-38-56 W 9642.57 FEET (GROUND), (9641.24 FEET
GRID, COMBINED FACTOR OF 0.999862053), TO A FOUND 2" IRON PIPE IN THE LINE OF
SUDDIE M. GUY (NOW OR FORMERLY) AS DESCRIBED IN AN INSTRUMENT RECORDED
IN DEED BOOK 4767 PAGE 567 OF THE UNION COUNTY PUBLIC REGISTRY (THE
'REGISTRY"); HAVING GRID COORDINATES OF NORTHING 451413.51, EASTING
1469665.18; SAID 2" IRON PIPE ALSO BEING N 18-1549 W 290.89 FEET FROM A FOUND
#4 REBAR; THENCE N 80-21-35 E 25.98 FEET TO A COMPUTED POINT WITHIN THE
RIGHT-OF-WAY OF NC HIGHWAY 16; THENCE CONTINUING WITHIN SAID RIGHT-OF-
WAY N 19-32-10 W 734.94 FEET TO A COMPUTED POINT; THENCE S 71-19-43 W 30.00
FEET TO A COMPUTED POINT' SAID POINT BEING THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE
S 19-32-10 E 175.02 FEET TO A COMPUTED POINT; THENCE S 71-19-43 W 425.00 FEET
TO A COMPUTED POINT; THENCE N 19-32-10 W 175.02 FEET TO A COMPUTED POINT,
SAID POINT BEING ALSO LOCATED ON THE COMMON LINE OF NOW OR FORMERLY
PROVIDENCE ROAD VENTURES, LLC (DEED BOOK 5525 PAGE 203); THENCE WITH SAID
COMMON LINE OF PROVIDENCE ROAD VENTURES, LLC N 71-19-43 E (PASSING A
FOUND #4 REBAR AT 422.33 FEET) A TOTAL DISTANCE OF 425.00 FEET TO THE POINT
AND PLACE OF BEGINNING, THE SAME CONTAINING 1.73 ACRES AS SHOWN ON ALTA
SURVEY PREPARED BY EVANS, MECHWART, HAMBLETON, & TILTON, INC. DATED JULY
13, 2013.

MSKMaps: Print
Page 1 of I
m I 100, 4000, fip, Image courtesy of the U.S. Geological Survey
Vds � 100 606
2010 Microsoft Corporation. Terms of Use Privacy Statement
http://msnnaps.com/Printlmage.aspx?T=2&S=12&Z=17&X=650&Y=4836& W=3&D=O... 12/ 13/2013

NOTE: FOR PLANNING PURPOSES ONLY. AR LIMA ONAL WATERS IC THE U.S. WERE DETERMINED JURISDICTIONAL
HAVE NA WETLAND SERVICES, INC. ON 1
NOT END JURISDICTIONAL FEATURES HAVE
NOT/aE[N DELINEATED AND HAVE NOT BEEN VERIFIED BY THE USAGE. L
Wetland AA � �
1
`\ I Non -Jurisdictional Pond
A
I\ I 1 I'
'-�' i •� J ( ��' i t Intermittent RP W Stream A
Legend / %1
Perennial RPW Stream B
Project Limits
Li�/1J wetland '1 / �'•l ` j / % ! f `\
Jurisdictional Streams % �� } j1 I 1 / / '•1
Pond
Roads
Buildings •'I '. \ ,•-"" _ - - f
t
200 100 0 200 Feet
r REFERENCE: BACKGROUND GIS ENERA ED BY W , INC.,UNION DATED
JUN GIS DEAN RTIAENT, DATED 2012.
\ STREAM AND WETIANp LAYERS GENERATED BY CWS, IDATED DUNE 3017 IMEEMMMM
\'
PIGURENO. pproximate Jurisdictional Boundar SCALE: 1!! .200! DATE: 06-6-2013
Field N L
CWS PROJECT NO: DRAWN BY:
Providence Road South Site �J F,72013-3158 TJB
Marvin, North Carolina APPLICANT NO: GHECKEU BY:
CWS Project No.,2013-3158 WWW.CWS-INC.NET GCA

asF<EEg a e9s �v^1^1 Qa �gps� £=`_" dd d aim;- RK " 3.
aSn�3 Mm 824i ,y y mmm3 ��y 33 ' ��s
L g�ry_ 4 9 3
3i �� 4 3 aX' gg a R oog s $
SE
-B -cgin es o h o sa o a o � 2 k z
_ s
_g 8
000 O 00 00
rt s s x
5'
s
O O
0 o
s
$ $
R
� �
a
x �
B
R
s"
a
a
ox x
R R
3

kill
a
5
n a
5 z
�
b S
,
s s
§§§yam
35
d 3 a-
3
o S
oa ao
3S
a,
Hp 1.
�-
@g
TH
Y19
$@@H
p
_
�qq
5ggpp
�C
7 $
s'
x &
3 ad $s e
3 4! £ "in j
g�y3,Ess�
Z-S alB� lab a v Mill
ills
11$ Hill it 1 8

DEMLR USE ONLY
Date Received
Fee Paid
Permit Number
G--/?— Zo/
FoS. =
Applicable Rules: ❑ Coastal SW -1995 ❑ Coastal SW - 2008 1EITh II - Post Construction
(select all that apply) ❑ Non -Coastal SW- HQW/ORW Waters ❑ Universal Stormwater Management Plan
❑ Other WQ M mt Plan:
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PERMIT APPLICA
This form may be photocopied for use as an original
I. GENERAL INFORMATION p2
1. Project Name (subdivision, facility, or establishment name - should be ce't�t0�.1 tent
specifications, letters, operation and maintenance agreemeri etc.): pyQ�L
^-- -. ---- w- too,,
2. Location of Project (street address): '�y�� 1a.
City:Marvin
3. Directions to project (from nearest major intersection):
Zip:28173
1 8 2014
4. Latitude:34* 58' 43" N Longitude:80' 46' 23" W of the main entrance to the project.
II. PERMIT INFORMATION:
1. a. Specify whether project is (check one): ®New ❑Modification ❑ Renewal w/ Modificationt
tReneroals with modifications also requires SWU-102 - Renewal Application Form
b.If this application is being submitted as the result of a modification to an existing permit, list the existing
permit number , its issue date (if known) , and the status of
construction: ❑Not Started ❑Partially Completed* ❑ Completed* *provide a designer's certification
2. Specify the type of project (check one):
❑Low Density ®High Density ❑Drains to an Offsite Stormwater System ❑Other
3. If this application is being submitted as the result of a previously returned application or a letter from
DEMLR requesting a state stormwater management permit application, list the stormwater project number,
if assigned, and the previous name of the project, if different than currently
proposed,
4. a. Additional Project Requirements (check applicable blanks; information on required state permits can be
obtained by contacting the Customer Service Center at 1-877-623-6748):
❑CAMA Major
❑NPDES Industrial Stormwater
®Sedimentation/Erosion Control: 18.96 ac of Disturbed Area
❑404/401 Permit: Proposed Impacts
b.If any of these permits have already been acquired please provide the Project Name, Project/Permit Number,
issue date and the type of each permit:
5. Is the project located within 5 miles of a public airport? ®No ❑Yes
If yes, see S.L. 2012-200, Part VI: http://12ortal.ncdenr.org/web/Ir/rules-and-regulations
Form SWU-101 Version Oct. 31, 2013 Page 1 of 6

Ill�iti7.�IFt►;rir�t itiCOT:4TIVI[UW1
1. a. Print Applicant / Signing Official's name and title (specifically the developer, property owner, lessee,
designated government official, individual, etc. who owns the vroiect):
Applicant/Organization:Eocon Marvin LLC
Signing Official & Title:Rich Heareth/Carolinas VP Operations
b. Contact information for person listed in item la above:
Street Address:8600 Sam Furr Road Suite 180
City:Huntersville State:NC Zip:28078
Mailing Address (if applicable):8600 Sam Furr Road Suite 180
City:Huntersville State:NC Zip:28078
Phone: (855 ) 762-1010 Fax: (704 ) 919-5848
Email: rheareth@epconcommu ni ties
c. Please check the appropriate box. The applicant listed above is:
® The property owner (Skip to Contact Information, item 3a)
❑ Lessee* (Attach a copy of the lease agreement and complete Contact Information, item 2a and 2b below)
❑ Purchaser* (Attach a copy of the pending sales agreement and complete Contact Information, item 2a and
2b below)
❑ Developer* (Complete Contact Information, item 2a and 2b below.)
2. a. Print Property Owner's name and title below, if you are the lessee, purchaser or developer. (This is the
person who owns the property that the project is located on):
Property Owner/Organization:
Signing Official & Title:
b. Contact information for person listed in item 2a above:
Street Address:
Mailing Address (if applicable):
City: State: Zip:
Phone:
Fax:
3. a. (Optional) Print the name and title of another contact such as the project's construction supervisor or other
person who can answer questions about the project:
Other Contact Person/Organization:
Signing Official & Title:
b. Contact information for person listed in item 3a above:
Mailing Address:
City: State: Zip:
Phone: ( 1 Fax: ( )
4. Local jurisdiction for building permits: Village of Marvin
Point of Contact:Lisa Thompson Phone #: (704 ) 843-1680
Form SWU-101 Version Oct. 31, 2013 Page 2 of 6

IV. PROJECT INFORMATION
1. In the space provided below, briefly summarize how the stormwater runoff will be treated.
Stormwater runoff will be treated in a wetoond consisting of two basins connected by an equalizer pipe.
2. a. If claiming vested rights, identify the supporting documents provided and the date they were approved:
® Approval of a Site Specific Development Plan or PUD Approval Date: October 17, 2013
❑ Valid Building Permit Issued Date:
❑ Other: Date:
b.If claiming vested rights, identify the regulation(s) the project has been designed in accordance with:
❑ Coastal SW -1995 ® Ph II - Post Construction
3. Stormwater runoff from this project drains to the Catawba River basin.
4. Total Property Area: 20.05 acres 5. Total Coastal Wetlands Area: 0 acres
6. Total Surface Water Area: 1.03 acres
7. Total Property Area (4) - Total Coastal Wetlands Area (5) - Total Surface Water Area (6) = Total Project
Area+:19.02 acres
Total project urea shall be calculated to exclude thefollowing: the normal yool of innyou�nded structures, the area
between the banks of streams and rivers, the area below the Normal Hi h Water iNHW) line or Mean High Water
(MHW) line, and coastal wetlands landward from the NHW (or MHX line. The resultant project area is used to
calculate overall percent built upon area (BUA). Non -coastal wetlands landward of the NH W (or MHW) line may
be included in the total project area.
8. Project percent of impervious area: (Total Impervious Area / Total Project Area) X 100 = 39.70 %
9. How many drainage areas does the project have?1 (For high density, count I for each proposed engineered
stormwater BMP. For low density and other projects, use 1 for the whole property area)
10. Complete the following information for each drainage area identified in Project Information item 9. If there
are more than four drainage areas in the project, attach an additional sheet with the information for each area
provided in the same format as below.
Basin Information
Drainage Area 1
Drainage Area _
Drainage Area _
Drainage Area _
Receiving Stream Name
Twelve Mile
Creek
Stream Class
C
Stream Index Number *
11-138
Total Drainage Area (so
1,098,148
On -site Drainage Area (so
621,601
Off -site Drainage Area (so
476,546
Proposed Impervious Area" (so
328,878
% Impervious Area** total
29.94
Impervious' Surface Area
Draina a Area 1
Draina e Area _
Draina a Area
Draina a Area _
On -site Buildings/Lots (so
241,417
On -site Streets (so
69,448
On -site Parking (so
900
On -site Sidewalks (so
17,015
Other on -site (so
-
Future (so
Off -site (so
Existing BUA*** (so
0
Total (so:
328,780
* Stream Class and Index Number can be determined at: htty://portal.ncdertr.orghoeb/wq[ps/csu/classifications
* liftpervious area is deferred as the built upon area including, but not limited to, buildings, roads, parking areas,
sidewalks, gravel areas, etc.
Form SWU-101 Version Oct. 31, 2013 Page 3 of 6

'Report only that amount of existing BUA that will remain after development. Do not report any existing BUA that
is to be removed and which will be replaced by new BUA.
11. How was the off -site impervious area listed above determined? Provide documentation. N/A
Projects in Union County: Contact DEMLR Central Office staff to check if the project is located within a Threatened &
Endangered Species watershed that may be subject to more .stringent stormwater requirements as per 15A NCAC 02B .0600.
V. SUPPLEMENT AND O&M FORMS
The applicable state stormwater management permit supplement and operation and maintenance (O&M) forms
must be submitted for each BMP specified for this project. The latest versions of the forms can be downloaded
from htto://12ortal.ncdenr.org/web/wg/ws/su/bmp-manual.
VI. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS
Only complete application packages will be accepted and reviewed by the Division of Energy, Mineral and
Land Resources (DEMLR). A complete package includes all of the items listed below. A detailed application
instruction sheet and BMP checklists are available from
http://12ortal.ncdenr.oriz/web/wq/ws/su/statesw/forms_docs. The complete application package should be
submitted to the appropriate DEMLR Office. (The appropriate office maybe found by locating project on the
interactive online map at h!W://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/ws/su/maps.)
Please indicate that the following required information have been provided bV initialing in the space provided
for each item. All original documents MUST be signed and initialed in blue ink. Download the latest versions
for each submitted application package from http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/ws/su/statesw/forms does.
Initials
1. Original and one copy of the Stormwater Management Permit Application Form.
2. Original and one copy of the signed and notarized Deed Restrictions & Protective Covenants
Form. (if required as per Part Vll below)
3. Original of the applicable Supplement Form(s) (sealed, signed and dated) and O&M
agreement(s) for each BMP.
4. Permit application processing fee of $505 payable to NCDENR. (For an Express review, refer to
http://www.envhelp.org/pages/onestopexoress.html for information on the Express program
and the associated fees. Contact the appropriate regional office Express Permit Coordinator for
additional information and to schedule the required application meeting.)
5. A detailed narrative (one to two pages) describing the stormwater treatment/managementfor
the project. This is required in addition to the brief summary provided in the Project
Information, item 1.
6. A USGS map identifying the site location. If the receiving stream is reported as class SA or the
receiving stream drains to class SA waters within 1/2 mile of the site boundary, include the 1/2
mile radius on the map.
7. Sealed, signed and dated calculations (one copy).
8. Two sets of plans folded to 8.5" x 14" (sealed, signed, & dated), including:
a. Development/Project name.
b. Engineer and firm.
c. Location map with named streets and NCSR numbers.
d. Legend.
e. North arrow.
f. Scale.
g. Revision number and dates.
h. Identify all surface waters on the plans by delineating the normal pool elevation of
impounded structures, the banks of streams and rivers, the MHW or NHW line of tidal
waters, and any coastal wetlands landward of the MHW or NHW lines.
• Delineate the vegetated buffer landward from the normal pool elevation of impounded
structures, the banks of streams or rivers, and the MHW (or NHW) of tidal waters.
i. Dimensioned property/project boundary with bearings & distances.
j. Site Layout with all BUA identified and dimensioned.
k. Existing contours, proposed contours, spot elevations, finished floor elevations.
1. Details of roads, drainage features, collection systems, and stormwater control measures.
m. Wetlands delineated, or a note on the plans that none exist. (Must be delineated by a
qualified person. Provide documentation of qualifications and identify the person who
made the determination on the plans.
Form SWU-101 Version Oct. 31, 2013 Page 4 of 6

n. Existing drainage (including off -site), drainage easements, pipe sizes, runoff calculations.
o. Drainage areas delineated (included in the main set of plans, not as a separate document).
p. Vegetated buffers (where required).
9. Copy of any applicable soils report with the associated SHWT elevations (Please identify _
elevations in addition to depths) as well as a map of the boring locations with the existing
elevations and boring logs. Include an 8.5"x1l" copy of the NRCS County Soils map with the
project area clearly delineated. For projects with infiltration BMPs, the report should also
include the soil type, expected infiltration rate, and the method of determining the infiltration rate.
(Infiltration Devices submitted to WiRO: Schedule a site visit for DEMLR to verifij the SHWF prior
to submittal, [phone].)
10. A copy of the most current property deed. Deed book: 6178 Page No: 693 _
11. For corporations and limited liability corporations (LLC): Provide documentation from the NC _
Secretary of State or other official documentation, which supports the titles and positions held
by the persons listed in Contact Information, item la, 2a, and/or 3a per 15A NCAC 21-1.1003(e).
The corporation or LLC must be listed as an active corporation in good standing with the NC
Secretary of State, otherwise the application will be returned.
hqp://www.secretary.state.nc.us/Corl2orations/CSearch.asl2x
VII. DEED RESTRICTIONS AND PROTECTIVE COVENANTS
For all subdivisions, outparcels, and future development, the appropriate property restrictions and protective
covenants are required to be recorded prior to the sale of any lot. If lot sizes vary significantly or the proposed
BUA allocations vary, a table listing each lot number, lot size, and the allowable built -upon area must be provided
as an attachment to the completed and notarized deed restriction form. The appropriate deed restrictions and
protective covenants forms can be downloaded from ham:///12ortal ncdenr.org web/Ir/state-stormwater-
forms dots. Download the latest versions for each submittal.
In the instances where the applicant is different than the property owner, it is the responsibility of the property
owner to sign the deed restrictions and protective covenants form while the applicant is responsible for ensuring
that the deed restrictions are recorded.
By the notarized signature(s) below, the permit holder(s) certify that the recorded property restrictions and
protective covenants for this project, if required, shall include all the items required in the permit and listed
on the forms available on the website, that the covenants will be binding on all parties and persons claiming
under them, that they will run with the land, that the required covenants cannot be changed or deleted
without concurrence from the NC DEMLR, and that they will be recorded prior to the sale of any lot.
VIII. CONSULTANT INFORMATION AND AUTHORIZATION
Applicant: Complete this section if you wish to designate authority to another individual and/or firm (such as a
consulting engineer and/or firm) so that they may provide information on your behalf for this project (such as
addressing requests for additional information).
Consulting Engineer.Wesley A Smith
Consulting Firm: EMH&T
Mailing Address:301 McCullough Drive Suite 109
City:Charlotte State:NC Zip:28262
Phone: (704 ) 548-0333 Fax: (704 ) 548-0334
Email:[e-mail]
IX. PROPERTY OWNER AUTHORIZATION (if Contact Information, item 2 has been filled out, complete this
section)
1, (print or type name of person listed in Contact Information, item 2a) , certify that I
own the property identified in this permit application, and thus give permission to (print or type name of person
listed in Contact Information, item 1a) with (print or hjpe name of organization listed in
Contact Information, item la) to develop the project as currently proposed. A copy of
the lease agreement or pending property sales contract has been provided with the submittal, which indicates the
party responsible for the operation and maintenance of the stormwater system.
Form SWU-101 Version Oct. 31, 2013 Page 5 of 6

As the legal property owner I acknowledge, understand, and agree by my signature below, that if my designated
agent (entity listed in Contact Information, item 1) dissolves their company and/or cancels or defaults on their
lease agreement, or pending sale, responsibility for compliance with the DEMLR Stormwater permit reverts back
to me, the property owner. As the property owner, it is my responsibility to notify DEMLR immediately and
submit a completed Name/Ownership Change Form within 30 days; otherwise I will be operating a stormwater
treatment facility without a valid permit. I understand that the operation of a stormwater treatment facility
without a valid permit is a violation of NC General Statue 143-215.1 and may result in appropriate enforcement
action including the assessment of civil penalties of up to $25,000 per day, pursuant to NCGS 143-215.6.
a Notary Public for the State of . County of
do hereby certify that personally appeared
before me this _ day of . and acknowledge the due execution of the application for
a stormwater permit. Witness my hand and official seal,
SEAL
My commission
X. APPLICANT'S CERTIFICATION , 1 ' L
1, (print or hype name of person listed in Contact Infonnation, item la) ttt GPI f�T7•i
certify that the information included on this permit application form is, to the best of my knowledge, correct and
that the project will be constructed in conformance with the approved plans, that the required deed restrictions
and protective enanIs will be recorded, and that the proposed project complies with the requirements of the
applicable st'�ter rules under 15A NCAC 2II .1000 and any other applicable state stormwater requirements.
Signature: �_t Date: 6 iri Z91
a Notary Public for the State of 41vL %— eikeol',n a-, County of
do hereby certify that —�i Cl—N.�pQ¢t► L 7Q personally appeared
before me this _U_ day of � 4L 201-4 and acknowledge the due execution of the application for
a stormwater permit. Witness my hand and official seal, w
=v 9:
r,!�TA!ZV
PUt3L.!C
SEAL
My commission
NN CMITWWan E tr*w r 7=6
Form SWU-101 Version Oct. 31, 2013 Page 6 of 6

/lam-i�u2� -ta
rrm , 'K,-- 1C A-,J dh-!(
Application Completeness Review
First Submittal ❑ Re -submittal
Development/Project Name: Coa
Receiving stream name
River Basin: C*-l-. �, a
Received: WIYLIY Date Re
For post -construction requirements, a program will be deemed compliant for the areas where it is
implementing any of the following programs: WS-I, WS-Il, WS-III, WS-IV, HOW, ORW, Neuse River Basin
NSW, Tar -Pamlico River Basin NSW, and the Randleman Lake Water Supply Watershed Nutrient
IE
High Density Projects that require a 401/404 within an NSW require 85% TSS, 30% TN and 30% TP removal.
T&E Species (Goose Creek, Waxhaw Creek or Six Mile Creek Water Sheds): IT Ik
Latitude and Longitude: 3tf -6-1? Jf j / - 80 Fue 23 k) Jurisdllction A BR ij o` a 04,07-jc
Project Address: Z012- PRoyipEuc[ ROAD soa,Tk 1M1+r9rzyt
Engineer name and firm: W ES LF-Y_A. SM rTHyrF JrmN + T_ '30i +NG e„ //co- r( Da+J c sw,a. IV q
Phone,'7 s�f -sag _ o33s Email: W s.,+;rranc Frok -. cor, nt,4/o+te, 2 FZ,4 Z
Is the project confirmed to be in the State MSI Stormwater Permit jurisdiction? EVYes or ❑ No
❑ ow Density (no curb and gutter) ❑Low Density with curb and gutter outlets t,�tigh Density
wY 401/404 impacts to surface waters, wetlands, and buffers (add language to cover le er an or a in
> q/BUA 39 . iD 6)0
V Check for $505.00 included
o' Original signature (not photoco o pplication
t� Legal signature (Corporatio P/highe , Partnership -General Partner/higher, LLC-member/manager.
Check spelling, capitalization, punctuation: http://www.secretary.state.ne.us/corporations/thepage.aspx
2
Other J'
;tter) 2agL
CP
\ n
If an agent signs the application, a signed letter of authorization from the applicant must be provided which g
includes the name, title, mailing address and phone number of the person signing the letter. j
Ef Copy of property deed showing ownership or control ,
10% g�or subdivided projects, a signed and notarized deed restriction statement
%14L,j Aiealed, signed & dated calculations
Correct supplement and O&M provided for each BMP on site (check all that were provided & number of each)
❑ Bioretention ❑ Rooftop Runoff Management �k
❑ Dry Detention Basin ❑ Sand Filter \\ d` ,
❑ Filter Strip ❑ Stormwater Wetland
❑ Grass Swale 17'Wet Detention Basin
❑ Infiltration Basin ❑ Low Density
❑ Infiltration Trench ❑ Curb Outlet
❑ Level Spreader ❑ Off -Site
❑ Permeable Pavement ❑ NCDOT Linear Road
/ ❑ Restored Riparian Buffer
:Y/Two sets of sealed, signed & dated layout & finish grading plans with appropriate details 0 1
Narrative Description of stormwater management provided
ea oils report, geotech information provided I
Wetlands delineated or a note on the plans or in the accompanying documents that none exist on site nd/or IS5
//adjacent property ADO
o �D etails for the roads, parking area, cul-de-sac radii, sidewalk widths, curb and gutter; 9P
d/Dimensions &slopes provided
dd Drainage areas delineated ❑ Pervious and impervious reported for each ❑ Areas of high density \� pP
BMP operation and maintenance agwernents provided
❑ Application complete GYApplication Incomplete Returned: (Date) �pq,
"'CS I
April 26, 2013 Revision, Bill Diuguid

. . w
EPCON COMMUNITIES
8600 SAM.FURR RD. -
HUNTERSVILLE, NC 28078
1003
DATE ;:Y�,y,o�10 7 � 56-72„-2412
DATE � ,_ °
TO THE F SOj . onTO THE
ORDER OF
` OLLARS e
O CFB' ANK
Worthington Office
lie 00100:30',1:2412721481: 1005407018ii' 7

DIVISION OF (A14D RES I AND QDq� SEgogl,RCES
oe JUL 2 4 2914

June 7, 2013
Mr. Wesley Smith
EMH&T
301 McCullough Dr., Suite 109
Charlotte, NC 28262
Subject:
Dear Mr. Smith:
550 E WESTINGHOUSE BLVD.
CHARLOTTE, NC 28273
704-527-1177IV)
704-527.1133 (tax)
Preliminary Wetlands Investigation Letter
Providence Road South
Marvin, NC
CWS Project No. 2013-3158
02
� O
O
T
1 00
;;P%
On June 6, 2013, Carolina Weiland Services, Inc. (CWS) Professional Wetland Scientist Thomas N
Blackwell, PWS and Kelly Thamesfield-reviewed the Providence Road South site (Parcel ID No.y�
06186007) for the presence of jurisdictional waters of the U.S., including wetlands. The Providence
Road South site is located in Marvin, North Carolina. 'rhe attached Union County GIS Map (Figure I) �s
shows the approximate location of the property. This investigation was conducted according to
methodologies described in the 1987 Corps of Engineers Delineation Manual, as well as, recent
guidance from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). Jurisdictional stream channels were
classified according to recent USACE and North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDNVQ)
guidance. Approximate breakpoints (location at which a channel changes classification) within each
on -site stream channel were flagged in the field and were recorded with a sub -meter capable GPS unit.
The project area consists of a fenced pasture with wooded field margins and drainageways. Typical on -
site vegetation includes red maple (Acer nlbrum), eastern red -cedar (Junipems virginiana), green ash
(Fraxinus pennsylvanica), willow oak (Quercus phellos), loblolly pine (Minus taeda), fescue (Festuca
sp.), and poison ivy (Toxicodrendron radicans).
Stream and Wetland Investigation Results
Based on the results of this field investigation, there are several jurisdictional waters of the U.S. located
within the property. The approximate location and extent of jurisdictional waters of the U.S. are shown
on Figure I (attached). The results of the on -site field 'investigation conducted by CWS indicate that
there is one Perennial Relatively Permanent Waters (RPWs), one Intermittent Seasonal Relatively
Permanent Waters (Seasonal RP Ws), and one jurisdictional wetland area located within the project area
(Figure 1, attached). There is also one non jurisdictional pond located on the site. On -Site
jurisdictional waters include unnamed tributaries to Twelve Mile Creek.
Seasonal RPW's
Seasonal RPW's are those streams that exhibit continuous flow seasonally. This flow regime is the
result of a lowering of the water table during dry periods that stops groundwater discharge to the stream
channel. Seasonal streams do not typically support aquatic life requiring year-round flow to support
reproductive and maturation stages. There is one Seasonal RPW located on the site. This stream
originates in the southern portion of the site and flows southwest for approximately 28 linear.feet before
flowing oft -site (Figure 1, attached). This stream exhibited moderate bed and banks, weak sinuosity,
and soil -based evidence of a seasonal high water table.
NORTH CAROLINA . SOUTH CAROLINA
NMI W.CWSJNC.NET

Providence Road South June 7, 2013
Preliminary Wetland Investi¢ntion Letter CWS Proles o 201 :31511
Perennial RPWA
Perennial Relatively Permanent Waters (RPWs) are streams that typically have year-round flow. These
streams typically have greater biological resources than Seasonal RPWs and Non-RPWs and are
capable of supporting those biological resources that require perennial flow. There is one Perennial
RPWs located along the western boundary of the site, flowing south for approximately 700 linear feet
(Figure 1, attached). This stream exhibited strong bed and banks, moderate flow, moderate in -channel
structure, and a moderate presence of amphibians.
edands
The USACE'and the Environmental Projection Agency (EPA) define wetlands as: "Those areas that
are inundated or saturated by surface or ground water at a frequency and duration sufficient to support,
and that under normal circumstances do support, a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life in
saturated soil conditions."' The USACE uses three parameters to identify jurisdictional wetlands.
These parameters are as follows: 1) Hydrophytic Vegetation, 2) Wetland Hydrology, and 3) Hydric
Soils. Except in certain atypical situations, all three parameters must be present in order for an area to
be determined to be ajurisdictional wetland. There is onejurisdictional wetland area located within the
project limits. This wetland is located in the northwestern comer of the site (Figure 1, attached).
Dominant vegetation within this wetland includes willow oak (Quercus phellos), loblolly pine (Pinus
raecla), sweetguin (Liyuidambar styraclflua), and soil rush (Juncus e(%iistls).
Thank you for the opportunity to provide these services on this important project. Please do not
hesitate to contact me at 704-527-1177, or through email at tom@cws-ine:net should you have any
questions or comments regarding this preliminary investigation.
Sincerely, ::;.:...
?ffommns J. Blackwell, PWS Kelly Thanes
Senior Scientist Staff Scientist 11
Attachments: Figure 1. Approximate Jurisdictional Boundary Field Map
t nnvironmehrei Ldbomtory. 1987, "Cords df 0ngineers Wetlands Delineation Manual", Technical Report Y•87.1, US Army
a8ginaer Mterways 6perlmont Station; Vidksburg, Mississippi,

�1,'mbY t�`1��� Z. i".. ��.m' i '' ; ! n 'L`. �'�'R� �. � l� i v • ' r+- \ V '_". 4 •. :t-=�--^• -
'..\��{t'>L,43rF
�x • it�S�ypn�.SI2
t'9"`1p r p
•- � °'�3 4 `-`=J rc7���� �-` 'rr,�s� y� { _Fb1+ '1 w aY�� � oo
A-roL
�i L _ Gfy `, `1��p Y� �+�`Y "4.^ �'1` )t•: C`�f,�k �±�{�k Fb.r { a r. "�•`rdG „ ' �,.ti /�tl��;.%'�'+� 4a:\.y �rx
IX
`�" *vQtr�'�a ;\ 7 +�' _r. "_#t��y�[ty' f �`i vt .� `r l "•,, '�1 �' - .1'4-r"+ 4`�:y�
.� '� ,�_` � r Aj J 1 + ,i'�P� ! 1 `'/'"17 �,`4:. •+ MU Tf � �p�t�
(��y��1r s' � ''��-F r `"�. r�r '1 ✓ � t: �' 4 {'+ 'd��y`\)��� +� C ♦ !
F ('Y;y.., 1 J �`ptr p T{�" w♦ a.'.�r, .f
M)2, : 'yr4Ae'�•�,,4s. f. (ql /{��` ,•!/ • r}Fk+r=y '
y Z. S _c 4`s .
deg SN ; ,%, 'j; c r. v � It Ir I
WW
1 ` 4• ^ y, ' l � � C_
;1��'� 4�,�f��xxSl�� Y r�y�t�.'�\h.`�� `��. �t,,j� 5���.+s� }{,�?;�;�,"i.4� ��fi>�,xp���� 'y�1��� r.', �r^4x "mac \�� `•,�
1 h�fo • t s '� 1 ti -• r��i L'i`F�' ��='j P �,a�� i T5i� 5 � j�, � F�� � t <. �b��n* a�H � � Ilea{""�� '2' �, ,e�'1y`-..i+r '. y
1^ N V�"' �i+ c �.�.� t �nl �f_,� H iC` Z�� a• Y`•4 .M' � ,� �+d i�j\" i , �\ i.� C��� ; . "� } I +:,
\�` y, ��1+ St \�'. y i�` e *Ji?��+ ) �.{�.'�r]`1 •�,�i n,('{ a 1`t L �i •+k �,�:X-?t' -a. 'F �y"y�Ty§ r X a 1 ' '' '..!
1�.�'S '}�.'c Y3 y��Y` =-,.i � ?�rt'ti °` Na �.r 'x�d`F i�5'�yy.�°�t�' c a2'•ls�i^� t"'?i'�"'it i � j�� �r' i .r `',
c i.. ' �s`:� \< ��Y'�`a`.'YL' ��.. <s��` �t'`! , r!,"r"'���'. � v�.�l � . b� i M , � J � � �� } . 1'•ti