SW1210501_Stormwater Report_20210713

DESIGN REPORT
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT IMPROVEMENTS
SEAL °
050548
%y0� FNGfNEE� Z
P. M
PHASE 1
TOWN OF WAYN ESVI LLE
Haywood County, North Carolina
Thomas P. Mannino, PE
NC Professional Engineer No. 050548
McGill Associates, P.A.
55 Broad Street
Asheville, NC 28801
License Number C-0459
June 2021

STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT IMPROVEMENTS PHASE 1
TOWN OF WAYNESVILLE
HAYWOOD COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
Table of Contents
1.1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ..........................................
1.2 SITE DESCRIPTION....................................................
1.3 ADJACENT PROPERTY .............................................
1.4 SOILS..............................................................................
1.5 STORMWATER CONTROL MEASURES ................
APPENDIX A Rainfall Data
APPENDIX B
Soils Reports
APPENDIX C
Calculations: Permanent Ditch
APPENDIX D
Drainage Areas Maps
APPENDIX E
Deed
APPENDIX F
Design Sheets
............................................ 1
............................................ 1
............................................ 1
............................................ 1
............................................ 2

1.1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The Town of Waynesville owns and operates a 6.0 million gallon per day (MGD)
capacity wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) in Haywood County, North Carolina under
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit No. NCO025321. The
facility discharges treated wastewater effluent into Richland Creek.
The project's main purpose is the replacement or rehabilitation of every unit process at
the WWTP, and will not increase the capacity of the WWTP. A new access road will be
added to the site to provide access to the new headworks building and the secondary
clarifiers. A truck turn -around will also be added to the site to ease maintenance and
access at the site.
Financially Responsible Party:
Town of Waynesville
16 South Main Street
Waynesville, NC 28786
Contact:
Rob Hites, Town Manager
[e-mail]
828.452.2491
1.2 SITE DESCRIPTION
The project site can be described as impervious areas with occasional voids of grass and
surrounded by grass. Many of the treatment units at the site are open basins with the
water surface designated as pervious area. The facility and site discharge into Richland
Creek.
1.3 ADJACENT PROPERTY
The surrounding properties can best be described as pasture and agricultural lands with
minimal structures. There is a suburban community to the east of the wastewater
treatment plant but does not directly touch the WWTP property.
1.4 SOILS
The extents of the project site contain soils with the following map unit names: BrC,
Braddock -Urban land complex, 2 to 15 percent slopes, hydrologic soil group B; CxA,
Cull owhee-Nikwasi complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded, hydrologic soil
group A/D; and RoA, Rosman fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, occasionally
19.00330 June 2021

flooded, hydrologic soil group A.
1.5 STORMWATER CONTROL MEASURES
Due to the minimal increase of impervious area to the site, the project can be classified as
low -density per 15A NCAC 02H .1003. As a low -density project, dispersed now is
primarily used to convey stormwater. One vegetated conveyance swale will be
implemented to divert water flow away from the a proposed clarifier.
2
19.00330 June 2021

APPENDIX A
Rainfall Data

5/10/2021
Precipitation Frequency Data Server
NOAA Atlas 14, Volume 2, Version 3 "b
' Location name: Waynesville, North Carolina, USA*
Latitude: 35.54140, Longitude:-82.9510
Elevation: 2520.75 ft**
' source: ESRI Maps Q0
** source: USGS '
POINT PRECIPITATION FREQUENCY ESTIMATES
G.M. Bonnin, D. Martin, B. Lin, T. Parcybok, M.Yekta, and D. Riley
NOAA, National Weather Service, Silver Spring, Maryland
PF tabular I PF graphical I Maps & aerials
PF tabular
PDS-based point precipitation frequency estimates with 90% confidence intervals (in inches)1
Average recurrence interval (years)
Duration
1
����������
2
5
10
25
50
100
200
500
1000
0.336
0.397
0.479
0.542
0.623
0.684
0.746
0.807
0.885
0.946
5-min
(0.303-0.373)
(0.359-0.442)
(0.431-0.532)
(0.488-0.602)
(0.557-0.690)
(0.608-0.759)
(0.659-0.829)
(0.707-0.899)
(0.767-0.992)
(0.812-1.07)
0.537
0.636
0.767
0.866
0.993
1.09
1.19
1.28
1.40
1.49
10-min
(0.484-0.596)
(0.575-0.707)
(0.691-0.852)
(0.780-0.962)
(0.887-1.10)
(0.968-1.21)
( 1.05-1.32) 11
( 1.12-1.43)
( 1.21-1.57)
( 1.28-1.68)
0.671
0.799
0.970
1.10
1.26
1.38
1.50
1.61
1.76
F 1.87
15-min
(0.605-0.745)
(0.722-0.889)
(0.874-1.08)
(0.987-1.22)
(1.13-1.39)
1 (1.23-1.53)
1 (1.32-1.67) 11
(1.41-1.80)
1 (1.53-1.97)
(1.61-2.11)
0.920
1.10
1.38
1.59
1.86
2.08
2.29
2.51
2.80
3.03
30-min
(0.829-1.02)
(0.998-1.23)
1 (1.24-1.53)
1 (1.43-1.76) 11
(1.67-2.07)
(1.85-2.31)
(2.03-2.55)
(2.20-2.80)
(2.43-3.14)
(2.60-3.41)
1.15
1.39
1.77
2.07
2.48
2.82
3.16
3.52
4.02
4.42
60-min
(1 .03-1.27)
(1.25-1.54)
(1.59-1.96)
(1.86-2.30)
(2.22-2.75)
(2.50-3.12)
(2.79-3.51)
(3.09-3.93)
(3.49-4.51)
(3.80-4.98)
2-hr
1.33
(1.21-1.48)
1.61
(1.46-1.78)
2.04
(1.84-2.25)
2.38
(2.15-2.63)
2.86
(2.57-3.16)
3.25
(2.90-3.59)
3.66
(3.23-4.05)
4.09
(3.58-4.53)
4.67
(4.04-5.21)
5.13
( 4.40-5.76)
1.41
7 1.69
2.12
2.48
7 3.00
3.43
3.88
4.36
5.04
5.58
3-hr
(1.28-1.57)
(1.53-1.87)
(1.92-2.34)
(2.24-2.74)
(2.69-3.30)
(3.05-3.78)
(3.43-4.29)
(3.81-4.83)
(4.34-5.62)
( 4.74-6.26)
1.71
7 2.01
2.48
2.89
7 3-A7
3.96
4.49
7 5.04
5.83
F 6.45
6-hr
(1.56-1.87)
(1.84-2.20)
1 (2.26-2.72)
1 (2.63-3.16) 11
(3.14-3.79)
1 (3.56-4.33)
1 (3.99-4.91) 11
(4.44-5.53)
1 (5.05-6.43)
(5.52-7.15)
12-hr
1.9412.30
2.29 2871
2. 9 3330
3. 0 3980
3.76 4 47
4. 0 5101
4. 315.55
5.06 6111
5.61 6685
5.98 7139
2.44
7 2.92
3.57
4.10
7 4.82
5.39
5.96
7 6.54
7.28
7.83
24-hr
(2.29-2.61)
(2.73-3.13)
(3.34-3.83)
(3.83-4.38)
(4.49-5.13)
(5.01-5.73)
(5.53-6.33)
(6.05-6.93)
(6.72-7.71)
( 7.20-8.28)
2-day
2.90
(2.72-3.09) 11
3.45
(3.24-3.68)
4.18
1 (3.93-4.46)
4.77
1 (4.48-5.08) 11
5.57
(5.21-5.91)
6.20
1 (5.79-6.58)
6.83
1 (6.37-7.24) 11
7.46
(6.93-7.90)
8.27
1 (7.65-8.75)
8.86
(8.19-9.35)
3.10
7 3.69
4.44
5.04
5.84
6.47
7.09
7.70
8.48
F 9.04
3-day
(2 .93-3.30) 11
(3.48-3.92)
1 (4.18-4.72)
(4.74-5.35)
(5.49-6.19)
(6.07-6.85)
(6.63-7.50)
(7.19-8.15)
1 (7.89-8.96)
(8.40-9.53)
3.31
3.93
4.70
5.30
6.11
6.74
7.35
7.94
8.69
9.21
4-day
(3.13-3.51)
(3.72-4.17)
(4.44-4.98)
(5.01-5.62)
(5.76-6.47)
(6.34-7.12)
(6.90-7.77)
(7.45-8.39)
1 (8.13-9.18)
(8.61-9.71)
7-day
3.72 4316
4. 0 4593
5. 5 5588
5. 3 6763
6. 3-27465
7. 3 8044
8. 2 9624
8. 9-r10.0
9.76-11.0
10.4-121.8
10-day
4.51
(4.27-4 79)
5.33
(5.04-5.66)
6.31
(5.96-6.69)
7.08
(6.68-7.50)
8.13
(7.65-8.60)
8.94
(8.40-9.46)
9.74
(9.14-10.3) 11
10.5
(9.85-11.2)
11.6
(10.8-12.2)
12.3
( 11.4-13.0)
6.22
7.30
8.47
9.37
10.6
11.4
12.3
13.1
14.1
14.8
20-day
(5.91-6.55)
(6.94-7.70)
(8.05-8.93)
(8.90-9.87)
(10.0-11.1)
(10.8-12.0)
(11.6-12.9) 11
(12.3-13.8)
1 (13.2-14.9)
(13.9-15.6)
7.68
8.99
10.3
11.2
12.4
13.3
14.2
14.9
15.8
16.5
30-day
(7 .35-8.04)
(8.60-9.42)
(9.82-10.7)
(10.7-11.8)
(11.9-13.0)
(12.7-13.9)
(13.5-14.8) 11
(14.2-15.6)
1 (15.0-16.6)
(15.6-17.3)
9.80
11.4
12.8
13.9
15.1
16.0
16.8
17.5
18.2
18.7
45-day
(9.40-10.2)
(11.0-11.9)
(12.3-13.4)
(13.3-14.5)
(14.5-15.8)
(15.3-16.7)
(16.1-17.5) 11
(16.7-18.2)
1 (17.4-19.0)
(17.8-19.5)
60-day
11.4- 2.3
13 23 4.3
1418- 6.0
15.9-17.2
1712- 8.6
1810-19.5
18.8- 0A
19-5-21.1
20.2121.9
20.71 2.4
Precipitation frequency (PF) estimates in this table are based on frequency analysis of partial duration series (PDS).
Numbers in parenthesis are PF estimates at lower and upper bounds of the 90% confidence interval. The probability that precipitation frequency estimates (for a
given duration and average recurrence interval) will be greater than the upper bound (or less than the lower bound) is 5%. Estimates at upper bounds are not
checked against probable maximum precipitation (PMP) estimates and may be higher than currently valid PMP values.
Please refer to NOAA Atlas 14 document for more information.
Back to Top
PF graphical
https://hdsc.nws.noaa.gov/hdsctpfds/pfds_printpage.html?lat=35.5414&Ion=-82.9510&data=depth&units=english&series=pds 1/4

5/10/2021
�Wlj
5
Precipitation Frequency Data Server
PDS-based depth -duration -frequency (DDF) curves
Latitude: 35.5414', Longitude:-82.9510'
I I I I 1 r— 1 1 T I I
•
E
E
t t
s t
t
N A
lb
A
A
rn
O
'i
N
t1�1
rx O
O
O
u'1 O
rl
r-I
f�'1
4Q
rl
N
�'Y
V ko
Duration
25
20
c
R
�--�----�-�---�-�-.yam.----��-�------�;.�
------------------
1 2 5 10 25 50 100 200 500 1000
Average (recurrence interval (years)
NOAAAtlas 14, Volume 2, Version 3 Created (GMT): Mon May 10 13:00:14 2021
Back to Top
Maps & aerials
Small scale terrain
Average recurrence
interval
{years}
— 1
2
— 5
— 1a
25
50
100
200
500
1000
Duration
5-min —
2-day
— 10-min —
3-day
15-min —
4-day
— 30-min —
7-day
— 60-min —
10-aay
— 2-hr —
20-day
— 3-hr —
34-day
— 6-hr —
45-day
— 12-nr —
60-day
- 24-hr
https://hdsc.nws.noaa.gov/hdsctpfds/pfds_printpage.html?lat=35.5414&Ion=-82.951 O&data=depth&units=english&series=pds 2/4

5/10/2021 Precipitation Frequency Data Server
T
Y'D
J UN TAlh'
r1TAN
hfOL'h'TAlh'
Clyde
.Lake-Johaiusk�f
-_ w L71
3km
•`�f - �RFS]il
2mi 5 Y r VOUN'Ti
Larqe scale terrain
Kingsport' Blrpistol
' Johnson Llty
�q wlnsto
xv
f
rnt Mitchell
LI,I F� • Ashedille N 0 R I
i
_ � I
l dttclnGOgd
Greenville —
100km
somi SOUTH C f
L
Large scale map
--- Kingsport BrJ tnl.
Johnson Cray
I
�xvji!
r -
Ash Re
} 177
!e l
"ICM!
0km
Large scale aerial
https://hdsc.nws.noaa.gov/hdsctpfds/pfds—printpage.html?lat=35.5414&Ion=-82.951 O&data=depth&units=english&series=pds 3/4

5/10/2021
Precipitation Frequency Data Server
Back to Top
US Department of Commerce
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
National Weather Service
National Water Center
1325 East West nignway
Silver Spring, MD 2naln
Questions?: [e-mail]
Disclaimer
https://hdsc.nws.noaa.gov/hdsctpfds/pfds_printpage.html?lat=35.5414&Ion=-82.9510&data=depth&units=english&series=pds 4/4

5/10/2021
Precipitation Frequency Data Server
NOAA Atlas 14, Volume 2, Version 3 "b
' Location name: Waynesville, North Carolina, USA*
Latitude: 35.54140, Longitude:-82.9510
Elevation: 2520.75 ft**
' source: ESRI Maps Q0
** source: USGS '
POINT PRECIPITATION FREQUENCY ESTIMATES
G.M. Bonnin, D. Martin, B. Lin, T. Parcybok, M.Yekta, and D. Riley
NOAA, National Weather Service, Silver Spring, Maryland
PF tabular I PF graphical I Maps & aerials
PF tabular
PDS-based point precipitation frequency estimates with 90% confidence intervals (in inches/hour)1
Average recurrence interval (years)
1
2
5
10
25
50
100
200
500
1000
5-min
4.03
(3.64-4.48)
4.76
(4.31-5.30)
5.75
1 (5.17-6.38)
6.50
1 (5.86-7.22) 11
7.48
(6.68-8.28)
8.21
1 (7.30-9.11)
8.95
(7.91-9.95)
9.68
(8.48-10.8)
10.6
(9.20-11.9)
11.4
(9.74-12.8)
3.22
3.82
4.60
5.20
5.96
6.54
7.11
7.67
8.39
8.94
10-min
2
( .90-3.58)
(3.45-4.24)
(4.15-5.11)
(4.68-5.77)
(5.32-6.60)
(5.81-7.25)
(6.28-7.90)
(6.73-8.56 )
( 7.28-9.41 )
( 7.67-10.1 )
2.68
3.20
3.88
4.38
5.03
5.52
5.99
6.46
7.04
7.48
15-min
(2.42-2.98)
(2.89-3.56)
(3.504.31)
(3.95-4.87)
(4.50-5.58)
(4.90-6.12)
(5.29-6.66)
(5.66-7.20)
(6.10-7.90)
(6.42-8.43)
1.84
2.21
2.76
3.18
3.73
4.16
4.59
5.02
5.61
6.06
30-min
(1.66-2.04)
(2.00-2.45)
(2.48-3.06)
(2.86-3.53)
(3.33-4.13)
(3.69-4.61)
(4.05-5.10)
(4.40-5.60)
(4.86-6.28)
(5.20-6.83)
1.15
1.39
1.77
2.07
2.48
2.82
3.16
3.52
4.02
4.42
60-min
(1 .03-1.27)
(1.25-1.54)
(1.59-1.96)
(1.86-2.30)
(2.22-2.75)
(2.50-3.12)
(2.79-3.51)
(3.09-3.93)
(3.49-4.51)
(3.80-4.98)
0.666
0.802
1.02
1.19
1.43
1.63
1.83
2.04
2.34
2.57
2-hr
(0.604-0.738)
(0.728-0.888)
(0.920-1.12)
1 (1.07-1.32) 11
(1.28-1.58)
1 (1.45-1.80)
1 (1.62-2.03)
(1.79-2.27)
(2.02-2.61)
(2.20-2.88)
0.470
0.561
0.706
0.827
0.999
1.14
1.29
1.45
1.68
1.86
3-hr
(0.427-0.521)
(0.510-0.621)
(0.640-0.781)
(0.747-0.911)
(0.895-1.10)
1 (1.02-1.26)
1 (1.14-1.43) 11
(1.27-1.61)
1 (1.44-1.87)
1 (1.58-2.09)
0.285
0.335
0.414
0.482
0.580
0.662
0.749
0.842
0.974
1.08
6-hr
(0.261-0.313)
(0.307-0.368)
(0.378-0.454)
(0.439-0.527)
(0.525-0.633)
(0.594-0.723)
(0.666-0.819)
(0.742-0.924)
(0.844-1.07)
1 (0.921-1.19)
12-hr
0.16110.191
0.190-0 225
0.232-0 274
0.266-0 315
0.3112-0.371
0.349-0 415
0.385-0 461
0.420-0 507
0.465-0 569
0.496-0 613
0.102
0.122
0.149
0.171
0.201
0.224
0.248
0.272
0.303
0.326
24-hr
(0.095-0.109)
(0.114-0.130)
(0.139-0.159)
(0.160-0.182)
(0.187-0.214)
(0.209-0.239)
(0.230-0.264)
(0.252-0.289)
(0.280-0.321)
(0.300-0.345)
0.060
0.072
0.087
0.099
0.116
0.129
0.142
0.155
0.172
0.185
2iiay
(0.057-0.064)
(0.067-0.077)
(0.082-0.093)
(0.093-0.106)
(0.109-0.123)
(0.121-0.137)
(0.133-0.151)
(0.144-0.165)
(0.159-0.182)
(0.170-0.195)
0.043
0.051
0.062
0.070
0.081
0.090
0.098
0. 007
0.118
0.126
3�iay
(0.041-0.046)
(0.048-0.055)
(0.058-0.066)
(0.066-0.074)
(0.076-0.086)
(0.084-0.095)
(0.092-0.104)
(0.100-0.113)
(0.110-0.124)
(0.117-0.132)
0.035
0.041
0.049
0.055
0.064
0.070
0.077
0.083
0.091
0.096
aiiay
(0.033-0.037)
(0.039-0.043)
(0.046-0.052)
(0.052-0.059)
(0.060-0.067)
(0.066-0.074)
(0.072-0.081)
(0.078-0.087)
(0.085-0.096)
(0.090-0.101)
7iiay
0.02 -0 025
0.026-0 029
0. 31--0 035
0. 35-0 039
0.041--0 046
0.045-0 050
0.049-0 055
0.053-0 060
0.058-0 066
0. 6 -0 070
0.019
0.022
0.026
0.030
0.034
0.037
0.041
0.044
0.048
0.051
10-day
(0.018-0.020)
(0.021-0.024)
(0.025-0.028)
(0.028-0.031)
(0.032-0.036)
(0.035-0.039)
(0.038-0.043)
(0.041-0.046)
(0.045-0.051)
(0.048-0.054)
0.013
0.015
0.018
0.020
0.022
0.024
0.026
0.027
0.029
0.031
20-day
(0.012-0.014)
(0.014-0.016)
(0.017-0.019)
(0.019-0.021)
(0.021-0.023)
(0.023-0.025)
(0.024-0.027)
(0.026-0.029)
(0.028-0.031)
(0.029-0.033)
0.011
0.012
0.014
0.016
0.017
0.019
0.020
0.021
0.022
0.023
30-day
(0.010-0.011)
(0.012-0.013)
(0.014-0.015)
(0.015-0.016)
(0.016-0.018)
(0.018-0.019)
(0.019-0.021)
(0.020-0.022)
(0.021-0.023)
(0.022-0.024)
0.009
0.011
0.012
0.013
0.014
0.015
0.016
0.016
0.017
0.017
45-day
(0.009-0.009)
(0.010-0.011)
(0.011-0.012)
(0.012-0.013)
(0.013-0.015)
(0.014-0.015)
(0.015-0.016)
(0.015-0.017)
(0.016-0.018)
(0.017-0.018)
60-day
0. 08-0 009
0. 09-0 010
0.01 0 011
0.01100.012
0.01 -0 013
0.013-0 014
0.01 0 014
0.014-0 015
0.014-0 015
0.014-0 016
Precipitation frequency (PF) estimates in this table are based on frequency analysis of partial duration series (PDS).
Numbers in parenthesis are PF estimates at lower and upper bounds of the 90% confidence interval. The probability that precipitation frequency estimates (for a
given duration and average recurrence interval) will be greater than the upper bound (or less than the lower bound) is 5%. Estimates at upper bounds are not
checked against probable maximum precipitation (PMP) estimates and may be higher than currently valid PMP values.
Please refer to NOAA Atlas 14 document for more information.
Back to Top
PF graphical
https://hdsc.nws.noaa.gov/hdsctpfds/pfds_printpage.html?lat=35.5414&Ion=-82.9510&data=intensity&units=english&series=pds 1/4

5/10/2021
116161[61061
° 0.100
CL
a 0.010
Precipitation Frequency Data Server
PDS-based intensity -duration -frequency (IDF) curves
Latitude: 35.5414`, Longitude:-82.9510D
-----------------------
0.001
•
E
E
t t
s t
t
N A
lb
AO
Lt7
rn
O
'i
N
t1�1
rx O
O
O
u'1 O
rl
r-I
f�'1
4Q
rl
N
�'Y
V ko
Duration
0.100
9-
a 0.010
0.001 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1 2 5 10 25 50 100 200 500 1000
Average recurrence interval (years)
NOAA Atlas 14, Volume 2, Version 3 Created (GMT): Mon May 10 13:01:07 2021
Back to Top
Maps & aerials
Small scale terrain
Average recurrence
interval
{years}
— 1
2
— 5
— 1a
25
50
100
200
500
1000
Duration
5-min —
2-day
— 10-min —
3-day
15-min —
4-day
— 30-min —
7-day
— 60- min —
10-aay
— 2-hr —
20-day
— 3-hr —
34-day
— 6-hr —
45-day
— 12-nr —
60-day
- 24-hr
https://hdsc.nws.noaa.gov/hdsctpfds/pfds_printpage.html?lat=35.5414&Ion=-82.951 O&data=intensity&units=english&series=pds 2/4

5/10/2021 Precipitation Frequency Data Server
T
Y'D
J UN TAlh'
r1TAN
hfOL'h'TAlh'
Clyde
.Lake-Johaiusk�f
-_ w L71
3km
•`�f - �RFS]il
2mi 5 Y r VOUN'Ti
Larqe scale terrain
Kingsport' Blrpistol
' Johnson Llty
�q wlnsto
xv
f
rnt Mitchell
LI,I F� • Ashedille N 0 R I
i
_ � I
l dttclnGOgd
Greenville —
100km
somi SOUTH C f
L
Large scale map
--- Kingsport BrJ tnl.
Johnson Cray
I
�xvji!
r -
Ash Re
} 177
!e l
"ICM!
0km
Large scale aerial
https://hdsc.nws.noaa.gov/hdsctpfds/pfds—printpage.html?lat=35.5414&Ion=-82.951 O&data=intensity&units=english&series=pds 3/4

5/10/2021
Precipitation Frequency Data Server
Back to Top
US Department of Commerce
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
National Weather Service
National Water Center
1325 East West nignway
Silver Spring, MD 2naln
Questions?: [e-mail]
Disclaimer
https://hdsc.nws.noaa.gov/hdsctpfds/pfds_printpage.html?lat=35.5414&Ion=-82.9510&data=intensity&units=english&series=pds 4/4

APPENDIX B
Soils Reports

USDA United States
Department of
Agriculture
N RCS
Natural
Resources
Conservation
Service
A product of the National
Cooperative Soil Survey,
a joint effort of the United
States Department of
Agriculture and other
Federal agencies, State
agencies including the
Agricultural Experiment
Stations, and local
participants
Custom Soil Resource
Report for
Haywood County
Area, North
Carolina
April 5, 2021

Preface
Soil surveys contain information that affects land use planning in survey areas.
They highlight soil limitations that affect various land uses and provide information
about the properties of the soils in the survey areas. Soil surveys are designed for
many different users, including farmers, ranchers, foresters, agronomists, urban
planners, community officials, engineers, developers, builders, and home buyers.
Also, conservationists, teachers, students, and specialists in recreation, waste
disposal, and pollution control can use the surveys to help them understand,
protect, or enhance the environment.
Various land use regulations of Federal, State, and local governments may impose
special restrictions on land use or land treatment. Soil surveys identify soil
properties that are used in making various land use or land treatment decisions.
The information is intended to help the land users identify and reduce the effects of
soil limitations on various land uses. The landowner or user is responsible for
identifying and complying with existing laws and regulations.
Although soil survey information can be used for general farm, local, and wider area
planning, onsite investigation is needed to supplement this information in some
cases. Examples include soil quality assessments (http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/
portal/nres/main/soils/health/) and certain conservation and engineering
applications. For more detailed information, contact your local USDA Service Center
(https:Hoffices.sc.egov.usda.gov/locator/app?agency=nres) or your NRCS State Soil
Scientist (http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/soils/contactus/?
cid=nres142p2_053951).
Great differences in soil properties can occur within short distances. Some soils are
seasonally wet or subject to flooding. Some are too unstable to be used as a
foundation for buildings or roads. Clayey or wet soils are poorly suited to use as
septic tank absorption fields. A high water table makes a soil poorly suited to
basements or underground installations.
The National Cooperative Soil Survey is a joint effort of the United States
Department of Agriculture and other Federal agencies, State agencies including the
Agricultural Experiment Stations, and local agencies. The Natural Resources
Conservation Service (NRCS) has leadership for the Federal part of the National
Cooperative Soil Survey.
Information about soils is updated periodically. Updated information is available
through the NRCS Web Soil Survey, the site for official soil survey information.
The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its
programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability,
and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion,
sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or a
part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not
all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require

alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print,
audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at [phone] (voice
and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of
Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410 or
call [phone] (voice) or [phone] (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity
provider and employer.

Contents
Preface....................................................................................................................
2
How Soil Surveys Are Made..................................................................................5
SoilMap..................................................................................................................
8
SoilMap................................................................................................................9
Legend................................................................................................................10
MapUnit Legend................................................................................................
11
MapUnit Descriptions.........................................................................................11
Haywood County Area, North Carolina...........................................................13
BkB2—Braddock clay loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes, eroded ........................
13
BrC—Braddock-Urban land complex, 2 to 15 percent slopes.....................14
CxA—Cullowhee-Nikwasi complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently
flooded..................................................................................................
16
DsB—Dillsboro loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes................................................18
FnE2—Fannin loam, 30 to 50 percent slopes, eroded................................19
HaD2—Hayesville clay loam, 15 to 30 percent slopes, eroded ..................
20
HeC—Hayesville-Urban land complex, 2 to 15 percent slopes...................21
RoA—Rosman fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, occasionally
flooded..................................................................................................
22
References............................................................................................................
25

How Soil Surveys Are Made
Soil surveys are made to provide information about the soils and miscellaneous
areas in a specific area. They include a description of the soils and miscellaneous
areas and their location on the landscape and tables that show soil properties and
limitations affecting various uses. Soil scientists observed the steepness, length,
and shape of the slopes; the general pattern of drainage; the kinds of crops and
native plants; and the kinds of bedrock. They observed and described many soil
profiles. A soil profile is the sequence of natural layers, or horizons, in a soil. The
profile extends from the surface down into the unconsolidated material in which the
soil formed or from the surface down to bedrock. The unconsolidated material is
devoid of roots and other living organisms and has not been changed by other
biological activity.
Currently, soils are mapped according to the boundaries of major land resource
areas (MLRAs). MLRAs are geographically associated land resource units that
share common characteristics related to physiography, geology, climate, water
resources, soils, biological resources, and land uses (USDA, 2006). Soil survey
areas typically consist of parts of one or more MLRA.
The soils and miscellaneous areas in a survey area occur in an orderly pattern that
is related to the geology, landforms, relief, climate, and natural vegetation of the
area. Each kind of soil and miscellaneous area is associated with a particular kind
of landform or with a segment of the landform. By observing the soils and
miscellaneous areas in the survey area and relating their position to specific
segments of the landform, a soil scientist develops a concept, or model, of how they
were formed. Thus, during mapping, this model enables the soil scientist to predict
with a considerable degree of accuracy the kind of soil or miscellaneous area at a
specific location on the landscape.
Commonly, individual soils on the landscape merge into one another as their
characteristics gradually change. To construct an accurate soil map, however, soil
scientists must determine the boundaries between the soils. They can observe only
a limited number of soil profiles. Nevertheless, these observations, supplemented
by an understanding of the soil -vegetation -landscape relationship, are sufficient to
verify predictions of the kinds of soil in an area and to determine the boundaries.
Soil scientists recorded the characteristics of the soil profiles that they studied. They
noted soil color, texture, size and shape of soil aggregates, kind and amount of rock
fragments, distribution of plant roots, reaction, and other features that enable them
to identify soils. After describing the soils in the survey area and determining their
properties, the soil scientists assigned the soils to taxonomic classes (units).
Taxonomic classes are concepts. Each taxonomic class has a set of soil
characteristics with precisely defined limits. The classes are used as a basis for
comparison to classify soils systematically. Soil taxonomy, the system of taxonomic
classification used in the United States, is based mainly on the kind and character
of soil properties and the arrangement of horizons within the profile. After the soil

Custom Soil Resource Report
scientists classified and named the soils in the survey area, they compared the
individual soils with similar soils in the same taxonomic class in other areas so that
they could confirm data and assemble additional data based on experience and
research.
The objective of soil mapping is not to delineate pure map unit components; the
objective is to separate the landscape into landforms or landform segments that
have similar use and management requirements. Each map unit is defined by a
unique combination of soil components and/or miscellaneous areas in predictable
proportions. Some components may be highly contrasting to the other components
of the map unit. The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way
diminishes the usefulness or accuracy of the data. The delineation of such
landforms and landform segments on the map provides sufficient information for the
development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, onsite
investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous areas.
Soil scientists make many field observations in the process of producing a soil map.
The frequency of observation is dependent upon several factors, including scale of
mapping, intensity of mapping, design of map units, complexity of the landscape,
and experience of the soil scientist. Observations are made to test and refine the
soil -landscape model and predictions and to verify the classification of the soils at
specific locations. Once the soil -landscape model is refined, a significantly smaller
number of measurements of individual soil properties are made and recorded.
These measurements may include field measurements, such as those for color,
depth to bedrock, and texture, and laboratory measurements, such as those for
content of sand, silt, clay, salt, and other components. Properties of each soil
typically vary from one point to another across the landscape.
Observations for map unit components are aggregated to develop ranges of
characteristics for the components. The aggregated values are presented. Direct
measurements do not exist for every property presented for every map unit
component. Values for some properties are estimated from combinations of other
properties.
While a soil survey is in progress, samples of some of the soils in the area generally
are collected for laboratory analyses and for engineering tests. Soil scientists
interpret the data from these analyses and tests as well as the field -observed
characteristics and the soil properties to determine the expected behavior of the
soils under different uses. Interpretations for all of the soils are field tested through
observation of the soils in different uses and under different levels of management.
Some interpretations are modified to fit local conditions, and some new
interpretations are developed to meet local needs. Data are assembled from other
sources, such as research information, production records, and field experience of
specialists. For example, data on crop yields under defined levels of management
are assembled from farm records and from field or plot experiments on the same
kinds of soil.
Predictions about soil behavior are based not only on soil properties but also on
such variables as climate and biological activity. Soil conditions are predictable over
long periods of time, but they are not predictable from year to year. For example,
soil scientists can predict with a fairly high degree of accuracy that a given soil will
have a high water table within certain depths in most years, but they cannot predict
that a high water table will always be at a specific level in the soil on a specific date.
After soil scientists located and identified the significant natural bodies of soil in the
survey area, they drew the boundaries of these bodies on aerial photographs and

Custom Soil Resource Report
identified each as a specific map unit. Aerial photographs show trees, buildings,
fields, roads, and rivers, all of which help in locating boundaries accurately.

Soil Map
The soil map section includes the soil map for the defined area of interest, a list of
soil map units on the map and extent of each map unit, and cartographic symbols
displayed on the map. Also presented are various metadata about data used to
produce the map, and a description of each soil map unit.

323000
35° 32' 37" N O
35° 32' 21" N
Custom Soil Resource Report
Soil Map
323060 323120 323180 323240
323000 323060 323120 323180 323240
m
Map Scale: 1:2,420 if printed on A portrait (8.5" x 11") sheet.
N Meters
° 0 35 70 140 210
Feet
0 100 200 400 E00
Map projection: Web Mercator Comer coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 17N WGS84
9
323300
3233M
35° 32' 37" N
o_
35° 32' 21" N
v
m

MAP LEGEND
Area of Interest (AOI)
0
Area of Interest (AOI)
Soils
0
Soil Map Unit Polygons
Soil Map Unit Lines
Soil Map Unit Points
Special
Point Features
Iwo
Blowout
Borrow Pit
Clay Spot
Closed Depression
Gravel Pit
Gravelly Spot
Landfill
A.
Lava Flow
.&
Marsh or swamp
Mine or Quarry
Miscellaneous Water
Perennial Water
Rock Outcrop
Saline Spot
Sandy Spot
Severely Eroded Spot
Sinkhole
Slide or Slip
oa
Sodic Spot
Custom Soil Resource Report
MAP INFORMATION
Spoil Area
The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at
1:12,000.
Stony Spot
Very Stony Spot
Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale.
Wet Spot
Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause
Other
misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil
�-
Special Line Features
line placement. The maps do not show the small areas of
contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed
Water Features
scale.
Streams and Canals
Transportation
Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map
--+-*
Rails
measurements.
. 0
Interstate Highways
Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service
US Routes
Web Soil Survey URL:
Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857)
Major Roads
Local Roads
Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator
projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts
Background
distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the
Aerial Photography
Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more
accurate calculations of distance or area are required.
This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as
of the version date(s) listed below.
Soil Survey Area: Haywood County Area, North Carolina
Survey Area Data: Version 21, Jun 3, 2020
Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales
1:50,000 or larger.
Date(s) aerial images were photographed: May 3, 2020—May 7,
2020
The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were
compiled and digitized probably differs from the background
imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor
shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident.
10

Custom Soil Resource Report
Map Unit Legend
Map Unit Symbol
Map Unit Name
Acres in AOI
Percent of AOI
BkB2
Braddock clay loam, 2 to 8
5.4
19.2%
percent slopes, eroded
BrC
Braddock -Urban land complex,
7.2
25.2%
2 to 15 percent slopes
CxA
Cullowhee-Nikwasi complex, 0
4.7
16.7%
to 2 percent slopes,
frequently flooded
DsB
Dillsboro loam, 2 to 8 percent
1.8
6.4%
slopes
FnE2
Fannin loam, 30 to 50 percent
4.2
14.7%
slopes, eroded
HaD2
Hayesville clay loam, 15 to 30
0.1
0.4%
percent slopes, eroded
HeC
Hayesville-Urban land complex,
0.0
0.1 %
2 to 15 percent slopes
RoA
Rosman fine sandy loam, 0 to 2
4.9
17.2%
percent slopes, occasionally
flooded
Totals for Area of Interest
28.3
100.0%
Map Unit Descriptions
The map units delineated on the detailed soil maps in a soil survey represent the
soils or miscellaneous areas in the survey area. The map unit descriptions, along
with the maps, can be used to determine the composition and properties of a unit.
A map unit delineation on a soil map represents an area dominated by one or more
major kinds of soil or miscellaneous areas. A map unit is identified and named
according to the taxonomic classification of the dominant soils. Within a taxonomic
class there are precisely defined limits for the properties of the soils. On the
landscape, however, the soils are natural phenomena, and they have the
characteristic variability of all natural phenomena. Thus, the range of some
observed properties may extend beyond the limits defined for a taxonomic class.
Areas of soils of a single taxonomic class rarely, if ever, can be mapped without
including areas of other taxonomic classes. Consequently, every map unit is made
up of the soils or miscellaneous areas for which it is named and some minor
components that belong to taxonomic classes other than those of the major soils.
Most minor soils have properties similar to those of the dominant soil or soils in the
map unit, and thus they do not affect use and management. These are called
noncontrasting, or similar, components. They may or may not be mentioned in a
particular map unit description. Other minor components, however, have properties
and behavioral characteristics divergent enough to affect use or to require different
management. These are called contrasting, or dissimilar, components. They
generally are in small areas and could not be mapped separately because of the
11

Custom Soil Resource Report
scale used. Some small areas of strongly contrasting soils or miscellaneous areas
are identified by a special symbol on the maps. If included in the database for a
given area, the contrasting minor components are identified in the map unit
descriptions along with some characteristics of each. A few areas of minor
components may not have been observed, and consequently they are not
mentioned in the descriptions, especially where the pattern was so complex that it
was impractical to make enough observations to identify all the soils and
miscellaneous areas on the landscape.
The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way diminishes the
usefulness or accuracy of the data. The objective of mapping is not to delineate
pure taxonomic classes but rather to separate the landscape into Iandforms or
Iandform segments that have similar use and management requirements. The
delineation of such segments on the map provides sufficient information for the
development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, however,
onsite investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous
areas.
An identifying symbol precedes the map unit name in the map unit descriptions.
Each description includes general facts about the unit and gives important soil
properties and qualities.
Soils that have profiles that are almost alike make up a soil series. Except for
differences in texture of the surface layer, all the soils of a series have major
horizons that are similar in composition, thickness, and arrangement.
Soils of one series can differ in texture of the surface layer, slope, stoniness,
salinity, degree of erosion, and other characteristics that affect their use. On the
basis of such differences, a soil series is divided into soil phases. Most of the areas
shown on the detailed soil maps are phases of soil series. The name of a soil phase
commonly indicates a feature that affects use or management. For example, Alpha
silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is a phase of the Alpha series.
Some map units are made up of two or more major soils or miscellaneous areas.
These map units are complexes, associations, or undifferentiated groups.
A complex consists of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas in such an intricate
pattern or in such small areas that they cannot be shown separately on the maps.
The pattern and proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat similar
in all areas. Alpha -Beta complex, 0 to 6 percent slopes, is an example.
An association is made up of two or more geographically associated soils or
miscellaneous areas that are shown as one unit on the maps. Because of present
or anticipated uses of the map units in the survey area, it was not considered
practical or necessary to map the soils or miscellaneous areas separately. The
pattern and relative proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat
similar. Alpha -Beta association, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example.
An undifferentiated group is made up of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas
that could be mapped individually but are mapped as one unit because similar
interpretations can be made for use and management. The pattern and proportion
of the soils or miscellaneous areas in a mapped area are not uniform. An area can
be made up of only one of the major soils or miscellaneous areas, or it can be made
up of all of them. Alpha and Beta soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example.
Some surveys include miscellaneous areas. Such areas have little or no soil
material and support little or no vegetation. Rock outcrop is an example.
12

Custom Soil Resource Report
Haywood County Area, North Carolina
BkB2—Braddock clay loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes, eroded
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: Ibxy
Elevation: 1,770 to 2,090 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 50 to 58 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 46 to 57 degrees F
Frost -free period: 116 to 170 days
Farmland classification: All areas are prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Braddock, moderately eroded, and similar soils: 80 percent
Minor components: 20 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Braddock, Moderately Eroded
Setting
Landform: Stream terraces
Landform position (three-dimensional): Mountainbase, tread
Down -slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Old alluvium
Typical profile
Ap - 0 to 11 inches: clay loam
Bt - 11 to 57 inches: clay
BC - 57 to 80 inches: loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 2 to 8 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Well drained
Runoff class: High
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately low to
moderately high (0.06 to 0.20 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water capacity: High (about 9.0 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 2e
Hydrologic Soil Group: C
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Urban land
Percent of map unit. 8 percent
Hydric soil rating: No
13

Custom Soil Resource Report
Udorthents
Percent of map unit: 6 percent
Landform: Stream terraces
Landform position (three-dimensional): Mountainbase, tread
Down -slope shape: Convex, linear
Across -slope shape: Convex, linear
Hydric soil rating: No
Thurmont
Percent of map unit: 4 percent
Landform: Drainageways on stream terraces
Landform position (three-dimensional): Mountainbase, base slope
Down -slope shape: Concave, linear
Across -slope shape: Linear
Hydric soil rating: No
Hemphill, undrained
Percent of map unit: 1 percent
Landform: Depressions on stream terraces
Landform position (three-dimensional): Mountainbase, base slope
Down -slope shape: Concave, linear
Across -slope shape: Concave, linear
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Dillard
Percent of map unit: 1 percent
Landform: Drainageways on stream terraces
Landform position (three-dimensional): Mountainbase, base slope
Down -slope shape: Concave, linear
Across -slope shape: Linear
Hydric soil rating: No
BrC—Braddock-Urban land complex, 2 to 15 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: IbyO
Elevation: 1,730 to 2,250 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 50 to 58 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 46 to 57 degrees F
Frost -free period: 116 to 170 days
Farmland classification: Not prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Braddock, moderately eroded, and similar soils: 50 percent
Urban land: 30 percent
Minor components: 20 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
14

Custom Soil Resource Report
Description of Braddock, Moderately Eroded
Setting
Landform: Stream terraces
Landform position (three-dimensional): Mountainbase, tread
Down -slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Old alluvium
Typical profile
Ap - 0 to 11 inches: clay loam
Bt - 11 to 57 inches: clay
BC - 57 to 80 inches: loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 2 to 15 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Well drained
Runoff class: Medium
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high
(0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water capacity: High (about 9.0 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3e
Hydrologic Soil Group: B
Hydric soil rating: No
Description of Urban Land
Setting
Parent material: Streets, parking lots, buildings, and other structures
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 8s
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Udorthents
Percent of map unit. 9 percent
Landform: Stream terraces
Landform position (three-dimensional): Mountainbase, tread
Down -slope shape: Linear, convex
Across -slope shape: Linear, convex
Hydric soil rating: No
Thurmont
Percent of map unit. 4 percent
Landform: Drainageways on stream terraces
Landform position (three-dimensional): Mountainbase, base slope
Down -slope shape: Concave, linear
15

Custom Soil Resource Report
Across -slope shape: Linear
Hydric soil rating: No
Dillard, rarely flooded
Percent of map unit: 3 percent
Landform: Drainageways on stream terraces
Landform position (three-dimensional): Mountainbase, base slope
Down -slope shape: Linear, concave
Across -slope shape: Linear
Hydric soil rating: No
Reddies, occasionally flooded
Percent of map unit: 2 percent
Landform: Flood plains
Landform position (three-dimensional): Mountainbase
Down -slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Linear
Hydric soil rating: No
Hemphill, undrained
Percent of map unit: 2 percent
Landform: Swales on stream terraces
Landform position (three-dimensional): Mountainbase, base slope
Down -slope shape: Linear, concave
Across -slope shape: Linear, concave
Hydric soil rating: Yes
CxA—Cullowhee-Nikwasi complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently
flooded
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: Ibyb
Elevation: 1,200 to 2,000 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 45 to 70 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 46 to 57 degrees F
Frost -free period: 116 to 170 days
Farmland classification: Not prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Cullowhee, frequently flooded, and similar soils: 40 percent
Nikwasi, frequently flooded, and similar soils: 30 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Cullowhee, Frequently Flooded
Setting
Landform: Flood plains
Down -slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Concave
it.

Custom Soil Resource Report
Parent material: Loamy alluvium over sandy and gravelly alluvium
Typical profile
A - 0 to 13 inches: fine sandy loam
C - 13 to 23 inches: loamy sand
Ab - 23 to 35 inches: loamy sand
C' - 35 to 80 inches: extremely gravelly sand
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: 20 to 40 inches to strongly contrasting textural
stratification
Drainage class: Somewhat poorly drained
Runoff class: Very low
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): High (1.98 to 5.95
in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 18 to 24 inches
Frequency of flooding: FrequentNone
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water capacity: Low (about 3.6 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4w
Hydrologic Soil Group: A/D
Hydric soil rating: No
Description of Nikwasi, Frequently Flooded
Setting
Landform: Depressions on flood plains
Down -slope shape: Linear, concave
Across -slope shape: Concave
Parent material: Loamy alluvium over sandy and gravelly alluvium
Typical profile
Ap - 0 to 8 inches: fine sandy loam
A - 8 to 26 inches: fine sandy loam
Cg - 26 to 80 inches: extremely gravelly coarse sand
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: 20 to 40 inches to strongly contrasting textural
stratification
Drainage class: Very poorly drained
Runoff class: Negligible
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): High (1.98 to 5.95
in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 0 to 12 inches
Frequency of flooding: FrequentNone
Frequency of ponding: Occasional
Available water capacity: Low (about 4.4 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 6w
Hydrologic Soil Group: A/D
Hydric soil rating: Yes
17

Custom Soil Resource Report
DsB—Dillsboro loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: Ibyf
Elevation: 1,200 to 2,000 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 45 to 70 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 46 to 57 degrees F
Frost -free period: 116 to 170 days
Farmland classification: All areas are prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Dillsboro and similar soils: 85 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Dillsboro
Setting
Landform: Fans, stream terraces
Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit
Landform position (three-dimensional): Tread
Down -slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Convex
Parent material: Old alluvium and/or old colluvium derived from igneous and
metamorphic rock
Typical profile
Ap - 0 to 10 inches: loam
Bt1 - 10 to 15 inches: clay
Bt2 - 15 to 43 inches: sandy clay loam
2BC - 43 to 87 inches: cobbly sandy clay loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 2 to 8 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Well drained
Runoff class: Medium
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high
(0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water capacity: Moderate (about 7.4 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 2e
Hydrologic Soil Group: B
Hydric soil rating: No
18

Custom Soil Resource Report
FnE2—Fannin loam, 30 to 50 percent slopes, eroded
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol. Ibyv
Elevation: 1,690 to 2,600 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 40 to 80 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 46 to 57 degrees F
Frost -free period: 124 to 176 days
Farmland classification: Not prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Fannin and similar soils: 80 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Fannin
Setting
Landform: Mountain slopes, ridges
Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit, backslope
Landform position (three-dimensional): Upper third of mountainflank, side slope
Down -slope shape: Convex
Across -slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Affected by soil creep in the upper solum over residuum
weathered from mica schist and/or micaceous gneiss and/or other micaceous
metamorphic rock
Typical profile
A - 0 to 7 inches: fine sandy loam
Bt - 7 to 26 inches: clay loam
BC - 26 to 33 inches: loam
C - 33 to 80 inches: sandy loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 30 to 50 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Well drained
Runoff class: High
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high
(0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water capacity: Moderate (about 7.1 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 6e
Hydrologic Soil Group: B
Hydric soil rating: No
19

Custom Soil Resource Report
HaD2—Hayesville clay loam, 15 to 30 percent slopes, eroded
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: Ibyy
Elevation: 1,790 to 2,280 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 50 to 58 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 46 to 57 degrees F
Frost -free period: 124 to 176 days
Farmland classification: Farmland of local importance
Map Unit Composition
Hayesville, moderately eroded, and similar soils: 80 percent
Minor components: 20 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Hayesville, Moderately Eroded
Setting
Landform: Hillslopes, ridges
Landform position (two-dimensional): Backslope, summit
Landform position (three-dimensional): Side slope, interfluve
Down -slope shape: Convex
Across -slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Residuum weathered from hornblende gneiss and/or amphibolite
Typical profile
Ap - 0 to 6 inches: clay loam
Bt - 6 to 33 inches: clay loam
BC - 33 to 45 inches: loam
C - 45 to 80 inches: fine sandy loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 15 to 30 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Well drained
Runoff class: High
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high
(0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water capacity: High (about 9.7 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4e
Hydrologic Soil Group: B
Hydric soil rating: No
20

Custom Soil Resource Report
Minor Components
Cowee, stony
Percent of map unit: 8 percent
Landform: Hillslopes, ridges
Landform position (two-dimensional): Backslope, summit
Landform position (three-dimensional): Side slope, interfluve
Down -slope shape: Convex
Across -slope shape: Linear
Hydric soil rating: No
Fannin
Percent of map unit: 7 percent
Landform: Hillslopes, ridges
Landform position (two-dimensional): Backslope, summit
Landform position (three-dimensional): Side slope, interfluve
Down -slope shape: Convex
Across -slope shape: Linear
Hydric soil rating: No
Urban land
Percent of map unit: 5 percent
Hydric soil rating: No
HeC—Hayesville-Urban land complex, 2 to 15 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: Ibyz
Elevation: 1,200 to 3,500 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 35 to 61 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 46 to 57 degrees F
Frost -free period: 130 to 180 days
Farmland classification: Not prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Hayesville and similar soils: 50 percent
Urban land: 35 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Hayesville
Setting
Landform: Mountain slopes, ridges
Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit, shoulder
Landform position (three-dimensional): Mountaintop, crest
Down -slope shape: Convex
Across -slope shape: Convex
Parent material: Residuum weathered from igneous and metamorphic rock
21

Custom Soil Resource Report
Typical profile
Ap - 0 to 6 inches: clay loam
Bt - 6 to 33 inches: clay loam
BC - 33 to 45 inches: loam
C - 45 to 80 inches: fine sandy loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 2 to 15 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Well drained
Runoff class: Medium
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high
(0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water capacity: High (about 9.7 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3e
Hydrologic Soil Group: B
Hydric soil rating: No
Description of Urban Land
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 8
Hydric soil rating: No
RoA—Rosman fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, occasionally
flooded
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: Ibzl
Elevation: 1,690 to 2,590 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 50 to 58 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 46 to 57 degrees F
Frost -free period. 116 to 170 days
Farmland classification: All areas are prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Rosman, occasionally flooded, and similar soils: 80 percent
Minor components: 20 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
22

Custom Soil Resource Report
Description of Rosman, Occasionally Flooded
Setting
Landform: Flood plains
Landform position (three-dimensional): Mountainbase
Down -slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Loamy alluvium
Typical profile
Ap - 0 to 10 inches: fine sandy loam
Bw - 10 to 59 inches: fine sandy loam
C - 59 to 80 inches: fine sandy loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 3 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Well drained
Runoff class: Very low
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): High (1.98 to 5.95
in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 42 to 60 inches
Frequency of flooding: Occasional
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water capacity: Moderate (about 8.5 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 2w
Hydrologic Soil Group: A
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Dillard, rarely flooded
Percent of map unit. 5 percent
Landform: Stream terraces on flood plains
Landform position (three-dimensional): Mountainbase, base slope
Down -slope shape: Linear, concave
Across -slope shape: Concave, linear
Hydric soil rating: No
Cullowhee, occasionally flooded
Percent of map unit. 5 percent
Landform: Swales on flood plains on valleys
Landform position (three-dimensional): Mountainbase
Down -slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Linear, concave
Hydric soil rating: No
Toxaway, undrained
Percent of map unit. 5 percent
Landform: Depressions on flood plains
Landform position (three-dimensional): Mountainbase
Down -slope shape: Linear, concave
Across -slope shape: Linear, concave
Hydric soil rating: Yes
23

Custom Soil Resource Report
Biltmore, occasionally flooded
Percent of map unit: 5 percent
Landform: Natural levees on flood plains
Landform position (three-dimensional): Mountainbase
Down -slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Convex
Hydric soil rating: No
24

References
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO).
2004. Standard specifications for transportation materials and methods of sampling
and testing. 24th edition.
American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). 2005. Standard classification of
soils for engineering purposes. ASTM Standard D2487-00.
Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Golet, and E.T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of
wetlands and deep -water habitats of the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service FWS/OBS-79/31.
Federal Register. July 13, 1994. Changes in hydric soils of the United States.
Federal Register. September 18, 2002. Hydric soils of the United States.
Hurt, G.W., and L.M. Vasilas, editors. Version 6.0, 2006. Field indicators of hydric
soils in the United States.
National Research Council. 1995. Wetlands: Characteristics and boundaries.
Soil Survey Division Staff. 1993. Soil survey manual. Soil Conservation Service.
U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 18. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/
n res/d eta i I/n ati o n a I/s o i Is/?cid = n res 142 p2_0 54262
Soil Survey Staff. 1999. Soil taxonomy: A basic system of soil classification for
making and interpreting soil surveys. 2nd edition. Natural Resources Conservation
Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 436. http://
www. nres. usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/national/soils/?cid=nres142p2_053577
Soil Survey Staff. 2010. Keys to soil taxonomy. 11th edition. U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. http://
www. nres. usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/national/soils/?cid=nres142p2_053580
Tiner, R.W., Jr. 1985. Wetlands of Delaware. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and
Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control, Wetlands
Section.
United States Army Corps of Engineers, Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps of
Engineers wetlands delineation manual. Waterways Experiment Station Technical
Report Y-87-1.
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National forestry manual. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/soils/
home/?cid=nres142p2_053374
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National range and pasture handbook. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/
detail/national/landuse/rangepastu re/?cid=stelprdb1043084
25

Custom Soil Resource Report
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National soil survey handbook, title 430-VI. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/
n res/d eta i I/so i Is/scie ntists/?cid=n res 142 p2_054242
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
2006. Land resource regions and major land resource areas of the United States,
the Caribbean, and the Pacific Basin. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook
296. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/national/soils/?
cid = n res 142 p2_05 3624
United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. 1961. Land
capability classification. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 210. http:H
www.nrcs.usda.gov/lnternet/FSE—DOCUMENTS/nrcsl 42p2_052290. pdf
W

323000
35° 32' 37" N O
35° 32' 21" N
Hydrologic Soil Group —Haywood County Area, North Carolina
323060 323120 323180 323240 323300
323000 323060 323120 323180 323240
m
Map Scale: 1:2,420 if printed on A portrait (8.5" x 11") sheet.
N Meters
° 0 35 70 140 210
Feet
0 100 200 400 E00
Map projection: Web Mercator Conermordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: lfrM Zone 17N WGS84
USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey
3233M
35° 32' 37" N
o_
35° 32' 21" N
v
m
4/5/2021
Pagel of 4

Hydrologic Soil Group —Haywood County Area, North Carolina
MAP LEGEND
Area of Interest (AOI)
0
Area of Interest (AOI)
Soils
Soil Rating
Polygons
0
A
0
A/D
0
B
0
B/D
0
C
0
C/D
0
D
0
Not rated or not available
Soil Rating
Lines
r 0
A
r 0
A/D
B
r
B/D
N 0
C
r 0
C/D
r 0
D
r 0
Not rated or not available
Soil Rating
Points
0
A
0
A/D
0
B
0
B/D
❑ C
0 C/D
0 D
❑ Not rated or not available
Water Features
Streams and Canals
Transportation
— Rails
­0 Interstate Highways
US Routes
Major Roads
Local Roads
Background
Aerial Photography
MAP INFORMATION
The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at
1:12,000.
Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale.
Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause
misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil
line placement. The maps do not show the small areas of
contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed
scale.
Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map
measurements.
Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey URL:
Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857)
Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator
projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts
distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the
Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more
accurate calculations of distance or area are required.
This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as
of the version date(s) listed below.
Soil Survey Area: Haywood County Area, North Carolina
Survey Area Data: Version 21, Jun 3, 2020
Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales
1:50,000 or larger.
Date(s) aerial images were photographed: May 3, 2020—May 7,
2020
The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were
compiled and digitized probably differs from the background
imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor
shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident.
USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 4/5/2021
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 2 of 4

Hydrologic Soil Group —Haywood County Area, North Carolina
Hydrologic Soil Group
Map unit symbol
Map unit name
Rating
Acres in AOI
Percent of AOI
BkB2
Braddock clay loam, 2 to
C
5.4
19.2%
8 percent slopes,
eroded
BrC
Braddock -Urban land
B
7.2
25.2%
complex, 2 to 15
percent slopes
CxA
Cullowhee-Nikwasi
A/D
4.7
16.7%
complex, 0 to 2
percent slopes,
frequently flooded
DsB
Dillsboro loam, 2 to 8
B
1.8
6.4%
percent slopes
FnE2
Fannin loam, 30 to 50
B
4.2
14.7%
percent slopes,
eroded
HaD2
Hayesville clay loam, 15
B
0.1
0.4%
to 30 percent slopes,
eroded
HeC
Hayesville-Urban land
B
0.0
0.1 %
complex, 2 to 15
percent slopes
RoA
Rosman fine sandy
A
4.9
17.2%
loam, 0 to 2 percent
slopes, occasionally
flooded
Totals for Area of Interest
28.3
100.0%
USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 4/5/2021
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 4

Hydrologic Soil Group —Haywood County Area, North Carolina
Description
Hydrologic soil groups are based on estimates of runoff potential. Soils are
assigned to one of four groups according to the rate of water infiltration when the
soils are not protected by vegetation, are thoroughly wet, and receive
precipitation from long -duration storms.
The soils in the United States are assigned to four groups (A, B, C, and D) and
three dual classes (A/D, B/D, and C/D). The groups are defined as follows:
Group A. Soils having a high infiltration rate (low runoff potential) when
thoroughly wet. These consist mainly of deep, well drained to excessively
drained sands or gravelly sands. These soils have a high rate of water
transmission.
Group B. Soils having a moderate infiltration rate when thoroughly wet. These
consist chiefly of moderately deep or deep, moderately well drained or well
drained soils that have moderately fine texture to moderately coarse texture.
These soils have a moderate rate of water transmission.
Group C. Soils having a slow infiltration rate when thoroughly wet. These consist
chiefly of soils having a layer that impedes the downward movement of water or
soils of moderately fine texture or fine texture. These soils have a slow rate of
water transmission.
Group D. Soils having a very slow infiltration rate (high runoff potential) when
thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of clays that have a high shrink -swell
potential, soils that have a high water table, soils that have a claypan or clay
layer at or near the surface, and soils that are shallow over nearly impervious
material. These soils have a very slow rate of water transmission.
If a soil is assigned to a dual hydrologic group (A/D, B/D, or C/D), the first letter is
for drained areas and the second is for undrained areas. Only the soils that in
their natural condition are in group D are assigned to dual classes.
Rating Options
Aggregation Method: Dominant Condition
Component Percent Cutoff.- None Specified
Tie -break Rule: Higher
USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 4/5/2021
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 4 of 4

APPENDIX C
Calculations:
Permanent Ditch

Ditch - Rational Method Hydrology
Ditch
Itotal area (acres)
Itotal area (sf)
I Impervious
I Lawns, Heavy Soil, average (2-7Y)
C
Q10
Q25
Q50
Q100
Permanent Ditchl
0.131
56811
31581
2523
0.617
0.52
0.60
0.66
0.72
19.0033
By: NLC
Date:5/10/2021
Description
rational runoff coefficients
Unimproved Areas
0.35
Asphalt
0.95
Concrete
0.95
Brick
0.85
Roofs, Inclined
1
Roofs, Flat
0.9
Lawns, Sandy Soil, Flat (<2Y)
0.1
Lawns, Sandy Soil, Average (2-7Y)
0.15
Lawns Sandy Soil, Steep (>7Y)
0.2
Lawns, Heavy Soil, Flat (<2Y)
0.15
Lawns, Heavy Soil, average (2-7Y)
0.2
Lawns, Heavy Soil, Steep (>7Y)
0.3
Bare Packed Soil
0.6
Wooded Areas
0.15
10 Year intensity (in/hr)
6.5
25 Year intensity (in/hr)
7.48
50 Year intensity (in/hr)
8.21
100 Year intensity (in/hr)
8.95
Taken From NOAA (10yr, 5 min duration)
Taken From NOAA (25 yr, 5 min duration)
Taken From NOAA (50yr, 5 min duration)
Taken From NOAA (100 yr, 5 min duration)
Table 3-2
Rational runoff coefficients (A5CE,1975; Viessman, et A, 199t; and Malcom 1999)
Descriptiar of Surface Ratioral Runoff coefficients, C
Unimproved Areas 0.35
Asphalt 0.95
Concrete 0.95
Bnck
0.85
Roofs, inclined
1.00
Roofs, flat
(1.90
lawns, sandy avi1, flat %)
010
lawns, sandy soil, average (2-7%)
0.15
lawns. sandy soil, steep (>7%)
020
Lawns. heavy soil, flat (c2%)
0.15
1 awns. heavy sail, average (2-S%)
0.20
Lawns. heavy soil steep (>7%)
0.30
Wooded areas
0.15

Channel Report
Hydraflow Express Extension for Autodesk0 AutoCADO Civil 3D0 by Autodesk, Inc.
Permanent Ditch
- 10-yr
Triangular
Side Slopes (z:1)
= 3.00, 3.00
Total Depth (ft)
= 0.26
Invert Elev (ft)
= 2510.00
Slope (%)
= 4.00
N-Value
= 0.025
Calculations
Compute by:
Known Q
Known Q (cfs)
= 0.52
Elev (ft)
2511.00
v
2510.75
2510.50
2510.25
2510.00
2509.75
i
5 1
Section
1.5
Reach (ft)
Highlighted
Depth (ft)
Q (cfs)
Area (sqft)
Velocity (ft/s)
Wetted Perim (ft)
Crit Depth, Yc (ft)
Top Width (ft)
EGL (ft)
2 2.5
Wednesday, Jun 23 2021
= 0.25
= 0.520
= 0.19
= 2.77
= 1.58
= 0.26
= 1.50
= 0.37
Depth (ft)
1.00
0.75
0.50
0.25
-0.25
3

6/23/2021
NORTH
AMERICAN
GREEN
CHANNEL ANALYSIS
> > > Permanent Ditch - Small
Name
Permanent Ditch - Small
Discharge
0.52
Channel Slope
0.04
Channel Bottom Width
0
Left Side Slope
3
Right Side Slope
3
Low Flow Liner
Retardence Class
C 6-12 in
Vegetation Type
Mix (Sod and Bunch)
Vegetation Density
Fair 50-64%
Soil Type
Clay Loam (CL)
C125
ECMDS 7.0
North American Green
5401 St. Wendel -Cynthiana Rd.
Poseyville, Indiana 47633
Tel. [phone]
> Fax [phone]
www.nagreen.com
ECMDS v7.0
Normal Permissible Calculated Safety Staple
Phase Reach Discharge Velocity Mannings N Remarks
Depth Shear Stress Shear Stress Factor Pattern
C125 Straight 0.52 cfs 2.42 ft/s 0.27 ft 0.031 2.3 Ibs/ft2 0.67 Ibs/ft2 3.45 STABLE D
Unvegetated
Underlying Straight 0.52 cfs 2.42 ft/s 0.27 ft 0.031 2.51 Ibs/ft2 0.32 Ibs/ft2 7.92 STABLE D
Substrate
Unreinforced Vegetation
Phase Reach Discharge Velocity
Normal Mannings N Permissible Calculated Safety Remarks Staple
Depth Shear Stress Shear Stress Factor Pattern
lnreinforced Straight 0.52 cfs 1.37 ft/s 0.36 ft 0.066 4 Ibs/ft2 0.89 Ibs/ft2 4.5 STABLE
Vegetation
Underlying Straight 0.52 cfs 1.37 ft/s 0.36 ft 0.066 4 Ibs/ft2 0.42 Ibs/ft2 9.5 STABLE
Substrate
https://ecmds.com/project/l 48575/channel-analysis/205839/show 1 /1

(Source: "Bank and chancel lining procedures". New York Depmtnsent of
Transportation, Division of Design and Construction, 197I-)
Guide to Color Key: JUser Input Data lCalculated Value lReference Data
Designed By: NI-C Date: 5/10/2021
Checked By: TM Date: 5/10/2021
Company: McGill Associates
Project Name: Waynesville WWTP - Phase 1
Project No.: 19.00330
Site Location (City/Town) Waynesville, NC
Culvert Id. Permanent Ditch
Estimation of Stone Size and Dimensions For Culvert Aprons
Step 1) Compute flow velocity N4 at culvert or paved channel outlet.
Step 2) For pipe culwi tS D. is diameter
For pipe arch, arch and box culverts, and paved channel outlets-
D, = A. where A = cross -sectional area of flaw at outlet_
For multiple culverts, use D. = 1.25 x De of single culvert.
Velocity (ft/s) 2.77
Opening type Channel Outlet
Single or multiple openings? Single
Outlet pipe diameter, Do (ft) 0.25
NOTE 1: If opening type is anything other than "Pipe Culvert", Do Po (Cross -
sectional area of flow at outlet).
NOTE 2: If multiple openings, Do 1.25 x Do of single culvert.
Step 3) For apron grades of l01/, car steeper, use recommendations
For next higher zone. (Zones t through 6).
Zone 1 Figure 8.06c
Will apron have >/=10 % grade? No
NOTE: For apron slopes equal to or greater than 10%, use next higher Zone in Figure 8.06d to determine
apron length.
Apron length (ft) 1 Figure 8.06d
Determination of Stone Sizes For Dumped Stone Channel Lininas and
Revetments
Step 1. Use figure 8.060 to deterrmne maxrmum stone suze (e, g_ for 12
Fps = 20" or 550 lbs.
Max. stone size (in.) 3 Figure 8.06e
Step 2. Use figure 8.06. f❑ to determine acceptable size range for stone
(for 12 FPS it is 125-500 lb.- for 75 % of stare, and the maxrmum
and minimum range it weight should be 25-500 Ibs_)_
YOIE: In deter,nuung channel velocities for stone hrsmgs and revetment.
use the fotlowmg coefficients of roughness:
Diameter Manning's Min. thickness
(inches) W. of lining (inches)
Fine 3 0 031 9 12
Light 6 0.035 12 18
Medium 13 0.040 IS 24
Heavy 23 0 044 30 36
(ChatweFs) (Dimpators)
Min. & max range of stones (Ibs) 25-150 Figure 8.05f
Weight range of 75% of stones (Ibs) 50-150 Figure 8.05f

APPENDIX D
Drainage Area Maps

S X
CONCRE7 fW.�S'�7'S8 i'
/r L
j �� " D f
h-° .�
�� } tZ tih �f 1
�
�\ �>
�
t-
! l
(°>
1 ( opt
n \ J �•
DATE
PROJECT#
WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT
SHEET
JUNE2021
19.00330
IMPROVEMENTS PHASE 1
s0 0 30 s0 �zo
55Broad
NC 28801
e,NC2
OFFICE MANAGER
M. CATHEY
DESIGNER
N. CROOM
CWSRF PROJECT NO. CS370930-01
TOWN OF WAYNESVILLE
PERMANENT DITCH
EX-2
MC
'
11828eville,
828.2520575
NC Firm License # C-0459
GRAPHIC SCALE DIVISION VALUE = 60 FEET
DRAINAGE AREA
PROJECT MANAGER
REVIEWER
mcgile ssociat-0459
MJ CHEN
T. MANNINO
HAYWOOD COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA

APPENDIX E

278
MY COMMISSION EXPIRES:
Sept. 6, 1963
(NOTARIAL SEAL)
Shirley B. Ezell
NOTARY PUBLIC
NORTH CAROLINA
HAYWOOD COUNTY
The foregoing certificate of Shirley B. Ezell, a Notary Public of Haywood
County, North Carolina, is adjudged to be correct and sufficient. Therefore, let
the instrument, with said certificate and this certificate, be registered.
WITNESS my hand, this 12 day of September, 1963.
J. B. Siler
CLM SUPERIOR COURT
Filed for registration 12 day of September, 1963 11:25 o'clock A.M. and registered
in office of the Register of Deeds for Haywood County, North Carolina.
This 13th day of September, 1963 in Book No. 199 on page 276.
REGIS ETA OF D
7
NORTH CAROLINA
HAYWOOD COUNTY
THIS DEED, made this 2nd day of August, 1963 by EDWARD JAYNES (Also Known
as J. Edward Jaynes) and wife, FREDA JAYNES of Haywood County and State of North
Carolina of the first part, to the TOWN OF WAYNESVILLE, A municipal corporation
organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the State of North
Carolina, a four -fifths undivided interest, and to the TOWN OF HAZELWOOD, a
municipal corporation organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of
the State of North Carolina a one -fifth undivided interest, of Haywood County and
State of North Carolina of the second part:
WITNESSETH, That said parties of the first part, in consideration of
twenty-five thousand ($25,000.00) DOLLARS and other good or valuable considerations
to them paid by the said parties of the second part, the receipt of which is
hereby acknowledged, have bargained and sold, and by these presents do grant,
bargain, sell and convey said respective interests named above to the parties of
the second part, their successors and assigns, a certain tra ct or parcel of land
in Clyde Township, Haywood County, State of North Caroli na, bounded as follows,
viz.:
That certain tract or parcel of land lying, being and situate in Clyde
Township, Haywood County, North Carolina, bounded, now or formerly, on the North
by Richland Creek, on the East by other lands of Edward Jaynes, on the South by
lands of Edward Jaynes and on the West by 2ands of Edward Jaynes, and beirg more
particularly described aecdrdting:.to a plat by W. K. Dickson, R.E., dated July,
1963, as follows:
BEGINNING at the center of a manhole in the 24-inch Sewer line, said
manhole being located South SS deg. 30 min. East 200.6 feet and North 16 deg. 41
min. West 338.7 feet from the Southwest corner of Lot No. 3 and the Southeast
corner of Lot No. 2, and runs thence North 9 deg. 0 min. West 640 feet (passing an

279
b-,
u-,
I
iron on the Creek bank at 608.1 feet) to the center line of Richland Creek; thence
with the center line of Richland Creek as it meanders in an Easterly direction
approximately 910 feet (according to a traverse line running from said iron stake
above mentioned as follows: North 67 deg. 08 min. East 141 feet; North 64 deg. 18
min. East 100 feet to a stake, said stake marking the Northeast corner of Lot No. 2
and the Northwest corner of Lot No. 3 in the C. R. Jaynes sub -division hereinafter
referred to; thence continuing said traverse line North 80 deg. 15 min. East 84.4
feet; South 39 deg. 02 min. East 99 feet; South 55 deg. 48 min. East 198 feet; and
South 61 deg. 19 min. East 274.5 febt to a corner iron); thence, leaving the center
line of said creek South 50 deg. 43 min. West 270 feet to an iron (passing an iron
on the Creek bank at 31 feetq This iron is located North 79 deg. 30 min. West 104.5
feet and North 61 deg. 19 min. West 72 feet from a Chestnut Stump, a corner of the
land of J. W. Green and the grantors as recorded in the Register of Deeds Office,
Haywood County, Deed Book 156, page 23, said iron being the termination of the
traverse line above described); thence, South 38 deg. 11 min. West 276.7 feet to
an iron; thence, South 11 deg. 44 min. West 321.8 feet to an iron (said iron being
located 40 feet North of the line between the grantors and N. W.Jaynes); thence,
parallel with said line North $$ deg.30 min. West 169.7 feet to an iron; thence,
North 16 deg. 41 min. West 296.6 feet to the point of BEGINNING, CONTAINING 10
acres, more or less.
This tract of land is a part of two tracts of land deeded to the grantor s
in Deeds registered in the Register of Deeds Office of Haywood County, North Carolin
as follows: Deed from C. R. Jaynes et ux. to Edward Jaynes et ux. dated March 20,
1952, and recorded in Book 152, page 264, and Deed from Clara Robinson et vir. to
Edward Jaynes et ux. dated October 23, 1963, recorded in Book 158 at page "6..
These two tracts are lots 2 and 3 respectively in the C. R. Jaynes sub -division
surveyed October 20, 19519 by R. H. Terrell, Surveyor.
THERE:_IS_ALSO CONVEYED by this instrument a right-of-way for a roadway
which shall run from the Southern margin of the property herein conveyed to the
present road which is 1/2 on Lot No. 3 and 1/2 on Lots 4 and 2, thence along the
present roadway as it exists over Lots Nos. 3, 4 and 2, thence continuing along said
roadway over Lot No. 1(the property of N. W. Jaynes) to the highway. It is expressly
agreed that the grantees shall have the right to widen, improve,'and otherwise
maintain the existing roadway above described.
The grantors hereby agree that as part of the consideration for the
purchase price of this property above set forth that they shall waive and do hereby
expressly waive any claims which they now have or may hereafter have for damage to
their remaining property by virtue of the installation or presence of the Sewage
Treatment Plant which the parties of the second part shall hereafter construct on
the land herein conveyed.
The grantees hereby agree that -if the grantees ever run a water main to
said Sewage Treatment Plant that the grantors, their heirs and assigns, may tap on

to said water main at the minimum outside rate.
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD said respective interests in and to the aforesaid
tract or parcel of land, and all privileges and appurtenances thereto belonging,to
the said parties of the second part, their successors and assigns, to their only
use and behoof forever.
And the said parties of the first part, for themselves and their heirs,
executors and administrators, covenant with said parties of the second part, their
successors and assigns, that they are seized of said premises in fee and have the
right to convey in fee simple; that the same are free and clear from all encumbrance ,
and that they do hereby forever warrant and will forever defend the said title to
the same against the claims of all persons whomsoever.'
IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, the said parties of the first part have hereunto
set their hands and seals, the day and year first above written.
Edward Jaynes ,SEAL)_
Freda Jaynes (SEAL)
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
HAYWOOD COUNTY
I, J. B. Siler, Clerk Superior Court, do hereby certify that EDIMM
JAYNES and FREDA JAYNES, his wife, personally appeared before me this day and
acknowledge the due execution of the foregoing and annexed Deed of Conveyance.
Let the instrument with certificate be recorded.
WITNESS my hand and seal, this 12 day of September, A.D. 1963.
J. B. Siler (SEAL)
CLERK SUPERIOR COURT
Filed for registration 12 day of September, 1963 4:31 o'clock P.M. and registered
in office of the Register of Deeds for Haywood County, North Carolina.
This 13th day of September, 1963 in Book No. 199 on page 278.
'411� e4-�
RW S F DEED
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF HAYWOOD
APPOINTMENT OF SUBSTITUTE TRUSTEE
WHEREAS, The undersigned corporation is the owner and holder of a certain
note secured by a Deed of Trust from J. H. Jones and wife, Katheleen Jones, to
Joseph H. Kelly, Trustee for Jim Walter Corporation, recorded in the office of the
Register of Deeds for Haywood County, North Carolina, in Book 130, page 25, said
Deed of Trust having been assigned to the undersigned corporation by instruments of
assignment recorded in the office of the Register of Deeds for said County in Book
191, page 13, and Book _r___, page'_, and
WHEREAS, the said Joseph H. Kelly, Trustee is a non-resident of the State
of North Carolina;
NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to authority contained in Section
45-10 of the
General Statutes of North Carolina, Fred M. Upchurch of Guilford County, North

APPENDIX F
Design Sheets