SW5210602_Wetland Determination/Report_20210616

Wetland and Stream Delineation Summary Report
Phobos Solar LLC
Nash County
477 acres
3602 Frazier Road
Middlesex, North Carolina 27557
Prepared for
Phobos Solar, LLC
3250 Ocean Park Boulevard, Suite 355
Santa Monica, California 90405
Prepared by
Land Management Group, Inc.
3805 Wrightsville Avenue; Suite 15
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403
April 19, 2018
01-17-107W

TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................................................................... 1
2.0
INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................. 1
2.1
Delineation Task Purpose ............................................................................................................ 1
2.2
Site Location ................................................................................................................................ 2
2.3
Site Description ............................................................................................................................ 2
2.4
Delineated Wetlands, Waters, and Streams ................................................................................ 2
3.0
SUPPORTING PJD DOCUMENTATION ................................................................................ 3
3.1
Topographic and LiDAR Maps ...................................................................................................... 3
3.2
NRCS Soil Series Map ................................................................................................................... 3
3.3
StudyArea Data Forms ................................................................................................................ 4
4.0
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION ........................................................... 4
4.1
USACE Site Approvals and Dates ................................................................................................. 4
4.2
Stream Buffer, Setbacks, and Water Quality Issues .................................................................... 5
5.0
MISCELLANEOUS MAPS ...................................................................................................... 5
5.1
FEMA Flood Zone Map ................................................................................................................ 5
5.2
NWI Map ...................................................................................................................................... 5
5.3
Roads, Culverts, Ponds, and Ditches ............................................................................................ 6
5.4
Site Photos and Explanations ....................................................................................................... 6
FIGURES:
Figure 1: Vicinity Map
Figure 2: 1998 Aerial Photograph
Figure 3: 2016 Aerial Photograph
Figure 4: Wetland Delineation Map — post USACE & DWR verification
Figure 5: Topographic Map
Figure 6: LiDAR Map
Figure 7: GIS Soils Map
Figure 8: 1989 Nash County Soils Map
Figure 9: FEMA Flood Zone Map
Figure 10: National Wetlands Inventory Map
APPENDIX A
USACE Data Package
APPENDIX B
NCDWR Buffer Determination Letter
APPENDIX C
Nash County Correspondence
APPENDIX D
Site Photographs

Wetland & Stream Delineation Summary Report
Phobos Solar LLC
3602 Frazier Road
Middlesex, Nash County, NC 27557
1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Cypress Creek Renewables (CCR) requested Land Management Group, Inc. (LMG) to delineate
wetlands and streams within the Phobos Solar, LLC site and obtain a Preliminary Jurisdictional
Determination (PJD) from the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). The 477-acre assessment area
is located at 3602 Frazier Road, to the north of Middlesex, North Carolina 27557 (Figures 1 and 2).
This delineation was performed following the 1987 USACE Wetland Delineation Manual and its
2010 Regional Supplement. Identification of streams was conducted using the NC Division of Water
Quality version 4.11 Method for Identification of Intermittent and Perennial Streams and Their
Origins.
LMG staff performed the delineation and submitted a PJD request package for the site to Ms.
Samantha Dailey of the USACE. Ms. Dailey met LMG staff on the site on March 20, 2018 and field
verified the delineation with no changes. Approximately 430 acres of the property were
determined to be uplands, comprising 90% of the tract. Approximately 41 acres of the site were
delineated as Section 404 wetlands, which comprised 9% of the site. Approximately 6 acres of
jurisdictional open water were also delineated, comprising 1% of the site. Approximately 8,780
linear feet of perennial streams, 3,492 linear feet of intermittent streams and 171 linear feet of
non -stream Waters of the U.S. were also identified on the site. Gary Kreiser of the NC Division of
Water Resources confirmed the limits of perennial and intermittent streams that are subjecttothe
Neuse River Buffer Rules within the site.
2.0 INTRODUCTION
2.1 Delineation Task Purpose
The purpose of the delineation task was to identify potential Section 404 wetlands and waters.
These jurisdictional wetlands and waters, along with potential setbacks and buffers, may restrict
solarfacility use within the tract. When identifying potential Section 404 wetlands, LMG followed
the USACE 1987 Wetland Delineation Manual and recent modifications described within the
regional supplement. Three natural parameters must be examined and documented before
wetland conditions are met. Wetland hydrology evidence must be present to the extent that
saturated soil conditions are or have been present under normal climatic circumstances. This can
be shown by direct evidence of surface water and/or repeated shallow groundwater saturation
through the identification of both hydric soil characteristics and wetland plant growth. The scoping
and identification of these three parameters namely the water table, hydric soils, and wetland
plant growth must be documented on the required USACE data forms. This delineation task also
seeks to gain USACE approval to determine land use restrictions concerning regulated wetlands
and waters.

Wetland & Stream Delineation Summary Report
Phobos Solar LLC
3602 Frazier Road
Middlesex, Nash County, NC 27557
2.2 Site Location
The 477-acre assessment area is located at 3602 Frazier Road, to the north of Middlesex, North
Carolina 27557 (Figures 1 and 2). The site is located within the Neuse River Basin.
2.3 Site Description
The northeastern property boundary is bounded by Frazier Road and the eastern property
boundary is partially bounded by Old Nash Road. The southern tip of the site is bisected byValley
Road and the northwestern portion of the property is bounded by Prophecy Road. An overhead
electrical easement traverses northeast to southwest in the northwestern portion of the site. An
unimproved soil road enters the northeastern portion of the site off Frazier Road and provides
access to a tenant home and residential home located on the site.
The majority of the project area is forested, but there are some agricultural fields in the
northeastern, northwestern, and southern sections of the site. Several unnamed tributaries of
Turkey Creek run south and southwest through the northern and middle sections of the tract.
These channels have an adjacent wetland fringe that supports mostly loblolly pine (Pinus toedo),
red maple (Acer rubrum), and ironwood (Corpinus caroliniona) in the canopy and understory.
Channel widths varied between Tto 8'. The main channels that run through the middle of the site
contained approximately one foot of water during the field visits and had little flow. One farm
pond that appears to be dug out of a stream channel is present in the northeastern part of the
site. Forested uplands throughoutthe site supported a fairly mature canopy of oaks and hickory.
Some loblolly pine trees (Pinus toedo) are mixed within the hardwoods in the southern part of the
site. Additionally, a small stand of planted loblolly pine trees is located within the northwestern
part of the site. The stand is densely vegetated and most trees have a 6" to 8" diameter at breast
height (DBH).
2.4 Delineated Wetlands, Waters, and Streams
LMG evaluated the 477-acre site on April 18 th, 19th anc12 oth of 2017. The Section 404 wetlands and
waters delineated on the site as approved by the USACE are shown in the attached "Wetland
Delineation Map — post USACE verification" (Figure 4). Approximately 430 acres of the property
were determined to be uplands, comprising 90% of the tract. Approximately 41 acres of the site
were delineated as Section 404 wetlands, which comprised 9% of the site. Approximately 6 acres
of jurisdictional open water were also delineated, comprising 1% of the site.
Approximately 8,780 linearfeet of perennial streams, 3,492 linearfeet of intermittent streams and
171 linear feet of non -stream Waters of the U.S. were also identified on the site (Figure 4). Gary
Kreiser of the NC Division of Water Resources confirmed the limits of perennial and intermittent
streams that are subject to the Neuse River Buffer Rules within the site (Appendix B).

Wetland & Stream Delineation Summary Report
Phobos Solar LLC
3602 Frazier Road
Middlesex, Nash County, NC 27557
3.0 SUPPORTING PJD DOCUMENTATION
3.1 Topographic and LiDAR Maps
The site is located on the U.S.G.S. Bunn East, 1978 Topographic Quadrangle map sheet (Figure 5).
The elevation of the site ranges from 285 feet above mean sea level (msl) in the eastern portion of
the property and slopes down to 230 feet above msl in the central portion of the property along
the tributary to Turkey Creek. The elevation in the northwestern portion of the property ranges
from 270 feet above mean sea level (msl) and slopes down to 235 feet above msl in the central
portion of the site along the tributary to Turkey Creek. The elevation in the southern portion of
the property ranges from 250 feet above mean sea level (msl) and slopes down to 220 feet above
msl in the central portion of the site along the tributary to Turkey Creek. The tenant farming
house and an unimproved soil road present in the northeastern and north -central portions of the
site are depicted in the 1978 topographic map sheet. Other anthropogenic features shown in the
topographic map sheet are the pond located in the northeastern portion of the property and a
house located in the southern portion of the site along Valley Road. The majority of the site is
shaded green indicating that it was wooded in 1978. There are agricultural fields located in the
northeastern, southern and northwestern portions of the property. A few residential structures
are present adjacent to the site. The land use surrounding this rural site is either wooded and
undeveloped land or agricultural fields. The groundwater in the vicinity of the property is
interpreted to flow in a southern direction towards Turkey Creek.
The attached LiDAR map (Figure 6) shows several areas of low elevation located along the western,
central, and southern parts of the site. These low areas correspond to the riparian drainageways
delineated on site (tributaries of Turkey Creek).
3.2 NRCS Soil Series Map
According to the Nash County NRCS Soil Survey (Figures 7 and 8), the site is composed of nine soil
series: the Faceville (FaB) loamy sand; the Georgeville (GeB) loam; the Georgeville (GgB) gravelly
loam; the Goldsboro (GoA) loamy sand; the Nason (NnB) loam; the Norfolk (NoB) loamy sand; the
Norfolk-Georgeville and Faceville (NrB) soils; the Rains (RaA) fine sandy loam; and Wehadkee (Wh)
loam.
The Faceville series is well drained and nearly level to gently sloping. It is on ridges and side slopes
mainly in the west central part of the county. Typically, the surface layer is yellowish brown loamy
sand underlain by a yellowish red sandy clay loam in the subsoil. The Georgeville series is well
drained and gently sloping. It is on convex ridgetops. The surface layer is typically red loam 6
inches thick and the subsoil is red silty clay loam. The Goldsboro series is moderately well drained
and nearly level. It is found on the broad, smooth divides of the coastal plain and in upland
depressions in more dissected landscapes. The surface layer is typically dark grayish brown fine
sandy loam 10 inches thick and the subsoil is sandy clay loam. The Nason series is well drained and
gently sloping. It is on broad ridgetops. The surface layer is brown loam 5 inches thick and the

Wetland & Stream Delineation Summary Report
Phobos Solar LLC
3602 Frazier Road
Middlesex, Nash County, NC 27557
subsoil it a strong brown clay loam and reddish yellow silty clay loam. The Norfolk series is well
drained and nearly level. It is found on broad interstrearn divides of coastal plain uplands.
Typically, the surface layer is grayish brown loamy sand and is underlain bya subsurface layerthat
is pale brown sandy loam. The Norfolk-Georgeville and Faceville map unit consists of soilsthat are
well drained and gently sloping to moderately sloping. These soils are found on ridges and side
slopes. The Rains series is poorly drained and nearly level. It is found on the lowest landscape
position of broad, smooth uplands of the coastal plain and in the depressions of dissected
landscapes. The surface layer is generallyvery clarkgrayfine sandy loam and the subsurface layer
is light brownish gray sandy loam. The Wehadkee series is poorly drained and nearly level. It is on
low floodplains along streams. The surface layer is typically grayish brown loam and the subsoil is
light gray and gray sandy clay loam with brown, yellow, and gray mottles. Wetlands within the
project area contain soils generally corresponding to the Wehadkee and Rains soil series
description.
3.3 Study Area Data Forms
The 404 wetland determination data forms are included within Appendix A. LIVIG completed a total
of eight forms for this site: four in uplands and four in wetlands. The data forms were paired, with
the upland and wetland data points taken in the same general area but on opposite sides of the
wetland line. Four pairs of data points were selected to represent each general wetland type and
to spatially represent the site. Three of the four wetland data forms recorded both primary and
secondary indicators of wetland hydrology. One wetland data form only listed primary indicators.
The water levels at the wetland data points ranged from 1 inch below the ground surface to 16
inches below the soil surface. The soil profiles for the wetland data points met the hydric soil
criteria for depleted below dark surface, depleted matrix, and/or umbric surface. Two of the four
upland data points did not meet any of the three wetland criteria. The other two upland data
points supported hydrophytic vegetation but lacked hydric soils and hydrology.
4.0 PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
4.1 USACE Site Approvals and Dates
• The onsite delineation was conducted on April 18 th, 19th , and 2 oth of 2017 by Paul Farley
and Nick Howell of LMG.
• The USACE Jurisdictional Determination (Preliminary) data package was submitted to Ms.
Samantha Dailey of the USACE on December 11, 2017 (Appendix A).
• Ms. Samantha Dailey of the USACE and Paul Farley of LIVIG met on site to review the
delineation on March 20, 2018. Ms. Dailey approved the delineation as flagged with no
changes (Figure 4). The Preliminary JD has not yet been issued by the USACE.
• Mr. Gary Kreiser of the NC Division of Water Resources and Paul Farley of LIVIG met on site
to review the stream determinations on March 20, 2018. Mr. Kreiser approved the streams
as identified in Figure 4. The Buffer Determination Letter was issued on April 5, 2018
(Appendix B).
4

Wetland & Stream Delineation Summary Report
Phobos Solar LLC
3602 Frazier Road
Middlesex, Nash County, NC 27557
4.2 Stream Buffer, Setbacks, and Water Quality Issues
The site is located outside of any town or city limits. LMG contacted Ms. Nancy Nixon, Planning
Director with Nash County, on July 11, 2017 and asked Ms. Nixon if the County has any
environmental setbacks/buffers off of wetlands or streams. Ms. Nixon replied that the County
does not have any required setbacks or buffers for streams orwetlands otherthan the 50' riparian
buffers from surface waters (Appendix Q. Note that the Nash County Unified Development
Ordinance (1999) states that a minimum 30' riparian buffer for new development activities is
required off of perennial waters (Appendix Q.
The site is located in the Neuse River Basin. The NC Division of Water Resources (NC DWR)
implements riparian buffer rules for the Neuse River Basin. Under these rules, a 50-ft buffer is
imposed from the top -of -bank of intermittent streams, perennial streams, lakes, ponds, estuaries
and modified natural streams that are depicted on USGS topographic maps or NRCS soils maps.
This 50-ft buffer is broken up into two zones; Zone 1 and Zone 2. Zone 1 consists of the first 30-ft
from top -of -bank. In Zone 1 trees can be selectively limbed by hand, but the topping of healthy
trees in Zone 1 is prohibited. Nuisance/invasive vegetation may be removed by hand. Zone 2 (the
outer 20-ft of the 50-ft stream riparian buffer) can be maintained as whatever vegetation is
desired, it just must be vegetated. If impacts to the buffer are needed, a riparian buffer permit
from the NC DWR may be required. Gary Kreiser of the NC DWR has verified that intermittent and
perennial streams on -site are subject to riparian buffer requirements under the Neuse River Buffer
Rules (Figure 4; Appendix B).
Note that state sedimentation and erosion control plans will need to be submitted to the regional
field office of NC Department of Environmental Quality (NC DEQ) before any land disturbance
activity is initiated. Sedimentation control to minimize turbidity of adjacent surface waters will be a
likely water quality concern.
5.0 MISCELLANEOUS MAPS
5.1 FEMA Flood Zone Map
The FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Map for this portion of Nash County is attached as Figure 9. The
FEMA National Flood Insurance Program map for this area shows that the site lies outside of any
mapped flood hazard areas.
5.2 NWI Map
The National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) Map is attached as Figure 10. The map shows one large
wetland drainagewaythat runs alongthe western and central parts of the site, which is classified
as PFo1A. This classification corresponds to Palustrine Forested, Broad -Leaved Deciduous,
Temporary Flooded. A small wetland pocket is located in the northeastern portion of the site and
is classified as PUBHh. This classification represents Palustrine Unconsolidated Bottom
Permanently Flooded, Diked/Impounded and corresponds to the pond on site. Another wetland
pocket is located adjacent to the pond and is classified as PFo1Ch. This classification stands for

Wetland & Stream Delineation Summary Report
Phobos Solar LLC
3602 Frazier Road
Middlesex, Nash County, NC 27557
Palustrine Forested, Broad -Leaved Deciduous, Seasonally Flooded, Diked/Impounded. The NWI
Map should be considered a general land use planning tool.
5.3 Roads, Culverts, Ponds, and Ditches
There are several access points off of Frazier Road, Valley Road, Old Nash Road, and Prophecy
Road that lead into the agricultural fields located on the site. Photo Stations 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, and 11
show some of the dirt roads that provide access (Figure 4). Most of these roads have culverts.
Photo Station 16 depicts a pipe that separates an intermittent stream and a pond.
There is one pond on the site, which is located within an intermittent stream in the northeastern
part of the site (PS 16 & 17). Six perennial streams are located throughout the site and are
tributaries of Turkey Creek. The perennial streams are approximately 8,780 linear feet, 5 — 8 feet
wide, and 2 feet deep. Approximately 3,492 LF of intermittent streams that are 2 - 3 feet wide and
2 feet deep exist throughout the site. Finally, approximately 171 LF of a jurisdictional ditch (WoUS)
is located in the northeastern part of the site. This ditch is 2 feet wide and 1 foot deep.
5.4 Site Photos and Explanations
Appendix D contains photographs that were taken during the wetland delineation in April of 2017.
The locations of the geo-referenced photos are shown on Figure 4.
Wetland Delineation By: Paul Farley
Nick Howell
Senior Environmental Scientist Licensed Soil Scientist
Digitally signed by Kimberlee
Kimberlee Williams
DN: cn=Kimberlee Williams, o=LMG,
ou, e,ail=k,illia,,@I,group.net,
C=US
Williams Date: 2018.04.19 10:48:28 -04'00'
Wetland Report By: Kim Williams
Section Manager

FIGURES

NONE 10""MR!
i�o�
[ JECT
CT
FTqR,�EA
+
contributors, �p.nSlr..Aa��ci coniribb-i-s
Creative Commons -Share Alike License (CC -BY -SA)
LAWETLANDS\20117 WETLANDS FILES\01-17-107W Phobos Solar, Ryan Conchilla\MAPS SCALE 1" = 1 mile
*Bou ndaries are approximate and are not meant to be absolute. (when printed at 11"x17")
Map Source: ArcGIS Open Street Map
Phobos Solar LLC LMG
Nash County, NC
Figure 1
.ww.lmgroup.net Vicinity Map
DATE: 04-13-18 3805 Wrightsville Avenue
I Wilmington, INC 28403
LMG # 01 -1 7-107W Phone: 9 ..452.0001 Fax: [phone]

LAWETLANDS\2017 WETLANDS FILES\01-17-107W Phobos Solar, Ryan Conchilla\MAPS
Toundaries are approximate and are not meant to be absolute.
SCALE 1 700'
(when printed at 11"x17")
Phobos Solar LLC LMG
Nash County, NC
4 Figure 2
.ww.lmgroup.net 1998 Infrared Photograph
DATE: 04-13-18 3805 Wrightsville Avenue
Wilmington, NC 29403
LMG # 01 -1 7-107W Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]

9%
III q8
A�
f
j
L,\WETLANDS\2017 WETLANDS FILES\01-17-107W-- Phobos Solar, Ryan Conchilla\MAPS
SCALE 1 700'
*Boundaries are approximate and are not meant to be absolute.
(when printed at 11"x17")
Map Source: 2013 NC OneMap Imagery
Phobos Solar LLC
LMG
Nash County, NC
I
1
Figure 3
.ww.lmgroup.net
2016 Aerial Photograph
DATE: 04-13-18
3805 Wrightsville Avenue
Wilmington, NC 28403
ILMG # 01 -1 7-107W
Phone:
910.452.0001 Fax: [phone]

NOTE: This is not a survey Al boundaries and distances are considered approximate.
This represents a preliminary sketch prepared from field notes. A survey of delineated
areas is recommended prior to specific site planning. This delineation was field verified
Samantha Dailey of the USACE and Gary Kreiser of INC DWR on 3/20/18.
6
+ 21
A
OHIEF=r 1 S
r
23
3
4
(25
26
41
0
LEGEND *REFERENCE FOR PRELIMINARY
FIGURES - SHEETS 1,2,3
r-1 Project area — 477 acres .......... Potential intermittent streams — 3492 linear feet
Potential uplands — 430 ac or 90% ............. Potential U.S. waters (Ri — 171 linear feet
I a r
Potential wetlands — 41 ac or 9% +
Existing culverts
Existing pond (potential US waters) — 6 ac or 1% @
Data points
Potential Neuse River Buffer Area — 32 acres
Pholostations
k
------- Potential perennial streams — 8780 linear feet
L,\WETLANDS\2017 WETLANDS FILES\01-1 7-107W
Phobos Solar, Ryan Conchilli
SCALE 1 800'
*Boundaries are approximate and are not meant to be absolute.
91S
(when printed at 11"x17")
Map Source: 2010 World Imagery
Phobos Solar
LMG
Figure 4.
Nash County, NC
Wetland Delineation Map -
.—Imigroup.net
Post USACE Verification
MAP DATE: 03-20-18
3805 Wrightsville Avenue
Wilmington, NC 29403
Composite Map
-MG # 01 -1 7-107W
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]

*SEE
L'\WETLANDS\2017 WETLANDS FILES\01-1 7-107W --
Phobos Solar, Ryan Conchilla\MAPS
Boundaries are a te and are not meant to be absolute.
MaD Source: 2010 9`I;OWXI.MrlI lmaaery
SCALE 1 600'
(when printed at 11"x17")
Phobos Solar LMG
Nash County, NC Figure 4a.
Wetland Delineation Map -
MAP DATE: 03-20-18 www.lmgroup.net Post USACE Verification
3805 Wrightsville Avenue
Wilmington, NC 29403 Sheet 1
LIVIG # 01 -1 7-107W Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]

*SEE FIGURE 7 FOR LEGEND REFERENCE
L'\WETLANDS\2017 WETLANDS FILES\01-1 7-107W --
Phobos Solar, Ryan Conchilla\MAPS
Boundaries are a te and are not meant to be absolute.
MaD Source: 2010 9`1;0WX1.Mrl1 lmaaery
44"
14i
SCALE 1 400'
(when printed at 11"x17")
Phobos Solar LMG Figure 4b.
Nash County, NC
Wetland Delineation Map -
www.lmgroup.net Post USACE Verification
MAP DATE: 03-20-18 3805 Wrightsville Avenue
Wilmington, NC 29403 Sheet 2
-MG # 01 -1 7-107W Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]

*S
L'\WETLANDS\2017 WETLANDS FILES\01-1 7-107W --
Phobos Solar, Ryan Conchilla\MAPS
Boundaries are a te and are not meant to be absolute.
MaD Source: 2010 9`I;0WXI.MrlI lmaaery
SCALE 1 400'
(when printed at 11"x17")
Phobos Solar LLC LMG
Nash County, NC Figure 4c.
Wetland Delineation Map -
MAP DATE: 03-20-18 www.lmgroup.net Post USACE Verification
3805 Wrightsville Avenue
Wilmington, NC 29403 Sheet 3
LIVIG # 01 -1 7-107W Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]

V\
,q
A
'v
'Ij
A
PROJECT
AREA
n
4L
F
7T
f
24
j
A
r)50
tM C
Esh, HEFE,'Garlrili SIre ab, rib,t
8e
n, f- I I
4 k
L,\WETLANDS\2017 WETLANDS FILES\01 -1 7-107W Phobos Solar, Ryan Conch 111 a\MAPS SCALEV = 1,000'
*Boundaries are approximate and are not meant to be absolute. (when printed at 11"x17")
Map Source: USGS Nash County GIS Mosaic
ft
Phobos Solar LLC A
Mlll� LM G
Nash County, NC WIA-
Figure 5
.ww.lmgroup.net Topographic Map
DATE: 04-13-18 3805 Wrightsville Avenue
Wilmington, NC 29403
LIMG # 01 -1 7-107W Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]

A -
5
Legend
Elevation
Value
High: 292
Low: 205
L,\WETLANDS\2017 WETLANDS FILES\01-17-107W-- Phobos Solar, Ryan Conchilla\MAPS
Toundaries are approximate and are not meant to be absolute.
Map Source: NCDOT LiDAR data
Globa, G-E,
and tho GIS U�—
SCALE 1 700'
(when printed at 11"x17")
Phobos Solar LLC
LMG
4
Nash County, NC
I
Figure 6
.ww.lmgroup.net
LiDAR map
DATE: 04-13-18
3805 Wrightsville Avenue
Wilmington, NC 28403
LIMG # 01 -1 7-107W
Phone: 9 ..452.0001 Fax: [phone]

L,\WETLANDS\2017 WETLANDS FILES\01-17-107W-- Phobos Solar, Ryan Conchilla\MAPS
SCALE 1 700'
Toundaries are approximate and are not meant to be absolute.
(when printed at 11"x17")
Map Source: GIS Soils Data
Phobos Solar LLC
LMG
4
Nash County, NC
Figure 7
.ww.lmgroup.net
GIS Soils Map
DATE: 04-13-18
3805 Wrightsville Avenue
ILMG # 01 -1 7-107W
Wilmington, NC 29403
Phone:
910.452.0001 Fax: [phone]

F a Er
Ilk
PROJECT
AREA
FaIRI
A
ir ANIA&
Fos
r B
aB
INF
N f" E)j
Nnl3
NrIIA
L fA,:N
a Geri
Legend
FaB: Faceville loamy sand, 1-6% slopes
GeB: Georgeville loam, 2-6% slopes
GeC Georgeville loam, 6-10% slopes
GeF Georgevi le loam, 10-25% slopes
Gg B: Georgelle gravelly loam, 2-6% slopes
GoA: Goldsboro fine_sandy loam, 0-2% slopes
NnB: Nason loam, 2 6% slopes
NoB : Norfolk loamy sand, 2-6% slopes
NrB: Nopk, Georgeville, & Faceville soils, 0-2% slopes
Rak Rams fine sandy loam, 0-2% slopes, Southern Coastal Plain
W: Water
Wh: Wehadkee loam, 0-2% slopes, frequently flooded
L,\WETLANDS\2017 WETLANDS FILES\01-1 7-107W Phobos Solar, Ryan Conchilla\MAPS
SCALE 1" 1,000'
Toundaries are approximate and are not meant to be absolute.
(when printed at 11"x17")
Map Source: NIRCS Soil Survey for Nash County; Pgs 6 and 10.
Phobos Solar LLC
LMG
Nash County, NC
I
Figure 8
www.lmgroup.net
NRCS Soils Map
DATE: 04-13-18
3805 Wrightsville Avenue
ILMG # 01 -1 7-107W
Wilmington, NC 28403
Phone:
9 ..452.0001 Fax: [phone]

Legend
1 % Chance of Annual Flooding
L'\WETLANDS\2017 WETLANDS FILES\01-1 7-107W
Phobos Solar, Ryan ConchillaWAPS SCALE 1 700'
*Boundaries are a te and are not meant to be absolute. (when printed at 11"x17")
Mao Source: 2010 9"IsrowXI.MrIac, maaery
Phobos Solar LLC
LMG
Nash County, NC
Figure 9
FEMA/FIRM
DATE: 04-13-18
ww.lmgroup.net
Map
3805 Wrightsville Avenue
Wilmington, NC 29403
LMG # 01 -1 7-107W
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]

A
D
JF
01
Legend
PUBHh: Palustrine-Unconsolidated Boftom-Pennanently Flooded-Diked/Impounded
PF01A: Palustrine-Forested-Broad leaved Deciduous - Temporarily Flooded
PFOlCh: Palustrine-Forested-Broad leaved Deciduous -Temporarily Flooded
L,\WETLANDS\2017 WETLANDS FILES\01-17-107W-- Phobos Solar, Ryan Conchilla\MAPS
SCALE 1 700'
Toundaries are approximate and are not meant to be absolute.
(when printed at 11"x17")
Map Source: 2010 GIS World Imagery
Phobos Solar LLC
LMG
Nash County, NC
1
Figure 10
DATE: 04-13-18
ww.lmgroup.net
NWI Map
3805 Wrightsville Avenue
ILIVIG # 01 -1 7-107W
Wilmington, NC 29403
1 Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]

APPENDIX A
USACE Data Package

AI�LMG
AND MANAGEMENT GROUP INC.
Eovironmental Consultants
December 11th, 2017
TO: Ms. Samantha Dailey
US Army Corps of Engineers
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington NC 28403
RE: Phobos Solar Tract; 3602 Frazier Road, Middlesex, NC 27557
Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Request
Dear Samantha:
I have enclosed a PJD Request Package for the Phobos Solar Tract located in Nash
County — Middlesex, NC. The review area is Parcel ID: 007997, 007993, 007985 and
approximately 477 acres.
We look forward to meeting with you on site at your earliest convenience to review the
wetland line. Please let us know if you have any questions!
Sincerely,
Ebbza��� r3uwge,,w
Elizabeth Burgess
Staff Scientist
Land Management Group, Inc.
Encl.
cc: Kjersti McKee — Cypress Creek Renewables
www.lmgroup.net - info(klmgroup.net - Phone: [phone] - Fax: [phone]
3805 Wrightsville Ave., Suite 15, Wilmington, NC 28403

CYPRESSCREEK
AGENT AUTHORIZATION
This form authorizes state employees, federal employees, and all entities under contract �vith Cypress Creek
Renewables, LLC (CCR) to perform site assessments, site verifications, and permitting exercises on the
purchase or lease site. This form must be completed in full.
A list of CCR's third party contractors is available upon request.
Property Address: N4 :5 H Coo N-1. y
Parcel Tax 11D Number(s): PT5 7 0 D /7 PL 18 1 q
Owner Name(s): 'Q'
Address:
T
I elephone Number.
E-ma;k C--P 6-Mq / G C-t Ak
Fax (optional):
T- P-E:� �kj es 4- 1-
nAre0,,ner's ig
_-a- M Ar/ 46-69--
41, - // -,;e /
Date Signed
M550 OCEAINI PAK< BLVD. E 355 8-AIN TA NIONIICA. CAW405) 1 3 M.518'1,02�9 1; CCRENE0.0O3W-

CYPRESSCREEK
R E '.. F A' A S L E -,
AGENT AUTHORIZATION
This form authorizes state employees, federal employees, and all entities under contract with Cypress Greek
Renewables, LLC (CCR) to perform site assessments, site verifications, and permitting exercises on the
purchase or lease site. This form must be completed in full.
A list of CCITs third party contractors is available upon request.
Property Address: a mi A) C—
Parcel Tax ID Number(s): Q
_T�o �z>q q �5.� �c) 7 0 -7
Owner Name(s):
0
,)644,fo- 25114 J2?rter.YXz4
Address.
AJC—
Telephone Number:
Di— Y117—
E-mail: -SZ_4bAA- F d72-- _1� T> C-06py,4 i L- - C4 kA
Fax (optional):
In -PI -Pe -a FA 94 1
Owners Si9pature Datie Signed
I iN 3 58i
­40. CGtAN PARK BUIX, SUITE 355 S'-O' T.Mvll"..NICA CA �:'L!At�15 I �10_5 CCRE11JE1V4.00i'."'
71

jurisdictional Determination Request
A. PARCEL INFORMATION
Street Address: 3602 Frazier Road
City, State: Middlesex, NC 27557
County: Nash
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN): 007997,007993,007985
B. REQUESTOR INFORMATION
Name: Paul M. Farley - Land Manaqement Gra
Mailing Address: 3805 Wrightsville Avenue
Wilmington NC 28403
Telephone Number: 910-452-0001
Electronic Mail Address: [e-mail]
Select one:
F-1 I am the current property owner.
F4I am an Authorized Agent or Environmental Consultant'
F-1 Interested Buyer or Under Contract to Purchase
F-1 Other, please explain.
C. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION'
Name: See attached list
Mailing Address: See attached list
Telephone Number: See attached list
Electronic Mail Address: See attached list
Must provide completed Agent Authorization Form/Letter.
Documentation of ownership also needs to be provided with request (copy of Deed, County GIS/Parcel/Tax Record).
Version: May 2017 Page 2

NORTH CAROLINA
jurisdictional Determination Request
D. PROPERTY OWNER CERTIFICATION4
1, the undersigned, a duly authorized owner of record of the property/properties identified herein,
do authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps)
to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on -site investigations
and issuing a determination associated with Waters of the U.S. subject to Federal jurisdiction
under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of
1999.
44 15%r -r 7 &-3., 1— L_ C
Property Owner (please print) Dite
7,_ L-t-e_
- I- - N cA'b CrYL
,Yroperty Owner Signature
E. JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION TYPE
Select One:
FV] I am requesting that the Corps provide a Mlimin JD for the property identified herein.
This request does include a delineation.
I am requesting that the Corps provide a pLelimin JD for the property identified herein.
This request does NOT include a delineation.
LI am requesting that the Corps investigate the, property/project area for the presence or
absence of WoUS5 and provide an MpLoved ' JD for the property identified herein. This
request does NOT include a request for a verified delineation.
F-1 I am requesting that the Corps delineate the boundaries of all WoUS on a property/project
area and provide an approved ID (this may or may not include a survey plat).
I am requesting that the Corps evaluate and approve a delineation of WoUS (conducted
by others) on a property/project area and provide an =rove I JD (may or may not
include a survey plat).
For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOTIUSACE protocols, skip to Part E.
Waters of the United States
Version: December 2013 Page 4

NORTH CAROLINA
jurisdictional Determination Request
D. PROPERTY OWNER CERTIFICATION 4
1, the undersigned, a duly authorized owner of record of the property/properties identified herein,
do authorize representatives of the Wilmington Disbict, U.S. Axmy Corps of Engineers (Corps)
to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on -site investigations
and issuing a determination associated with Waters of the U.S. subject to Federal jurisdiction
under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of
1899,
'F'
'�rL�4;-(—) A, 14 1 L;V
_eAn,-yv--� 140
Property Owner (please print) Date
;P;;4w!Jn'cr LSigpnatu-rc-
Pcny
E. JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATIONTYPE
Select One:
FV] I am requesting that the Corps provide a pLel4ajn4a JD for the property identified hercin.
This request does include a delineation.
L1I am requesting that the Corps provide a pLefirningy JD for the property identified herein.
This request does NOT include a delineation.
I am requesting that the Corps investigate the: property/project area for the presence or
absence of WoUS5 and provide an �q)provcd JD for the property identified herein. This
request does NOT include a request for a verified delineation.
I am requesting that the Corps delineate the boundaries of 0 WoUS on a property/project
area and provide an LiMroved (this may ax may not include a survey plat).
F] I am requesting that the Corps evaluate and approve a delineation of WoUS (conducted
by others) on a property/project area and provide an Lipprovt I JD (may or may not
include a survey plat).
4 For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOT/USACE protocols, skip to Part E.
Waters of the United States
Version-. December 2013 Page 4

jurisdictional Determination Request
F. JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD) TYPE (Select One)
ZI am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminar JD for the property identified herein.
A Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD) provides an indication that there may
be "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United States"on a property.
PJDs are sufficient as the basis for permit decisions. For the purposes of permitting, all
waters and wetlands on the property will be treated as if they are jurisdictional "waters of
the United States". PJDs cannot be appealed (33 C.F.R. 331.2); however, a PJD is
44preliminary" in the sense that an approved JD can be requested at any time. PJDs do
not expire.
F] I am requesting that the Corps provide an qWroved JD for the property identified herein.
An Approved Jurisdictional Determination (AJD) is a determination that
jurisdictional "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United
States" are either present or absent on a site. An approved JD identifies the limits of
waters on a site determined to be jurisdictional under the Clean Water Act and/or
Rivers and Harbors Act. Approved JDs are sufficient as the basis for permit
decisions. AJDs are appealable (33 C.F.R. 331.2). The results of the AJD will be
posted on the Corps website. A landowner, permit applicant, or other "affected
party" (33 C.F.R. 331.2) who receives an AJD may rely upon the AJD for five years
(subject to certain limited exceptions explained in Regulatory Guidance Letter 05-
02).
F] I am unclear as to which JD I would like to request and require additional information
to inform my decision.
G. ALL REQUESTS
Map of Property or Project Area. This Map must clearly depict the boundaries of the
review area.
Size of Property or Review Area — 477 acres.
F-7 The property boundary (or review area boundary) is clearly physically marked on the site.
Version: May 2017 Page 4

jurisdictional Determination Request
H. REQUESTS FROM CONSULTANTS
zProject Coordinates (Decimal Degrees): Latitude: 35.880300
Longitude: -78.157610
zA legible delineation map depicting the aquatic resources and the property/review area.
Delineation maps must be no larger than I I x 17 and should contain the following: (Corps
signature of submitted survey plats will occur after the submitted delineation map has been
6
reviewed and approved).
0 North Arrow
• Graphical Scale
• Boundary of Review Area
• Date
Location of data points for each Wetland Determination Data Form or tributary
assessment reach.
For Approved Jurisdictional Determinations:
Jurisdictional wetland features should be labeled as Wetland Waters of the US, 404
wetlands, etc. Please include the acreage of these features.
Jurisdictional non -wetland features (i.e. tidal/navigable waters, tributaries,
impoundments) should be labeled as Non -Wetland Waters of the US, stream, tributary,
open water, relatively permanent water, pond, etc. Please include the acreage or linear
length of each of these features as appropriate.
Isolated waters, waters that lack a significant nexus to navigable waters, or non -
jurisdictional upland features should be identified as Non -Jurisdictional. Please
include a justification in the label regarding why the feature is non -jurisdictional (i.e.
"Isolated", "No Significant Nexus", or "Upland Feature"). Please include the acreage
or linear length of these features as appropriate.
For PreliminM Jurisdictional Determinations:
Wetland and non -wetland features should not be identified as Jurisdictional, 404,
Waters of the United States, or anything that implies jurisdiction. These features can be
identified as Potential Waters of the United States, Potential Non -wetland Waters of
the United States, wetland, stream, open water, etc. Please include the acreage and
linear length of these features as appropriate.
Completed Wetland Determination Data Forms for appropriate region
(at least one wetland and one upland form needs to be completed for each wetland type)
6 Please refer to the guidance document titled "Survey Standards for Jurisdictional Determinations" to ensure that the
supplied map meets the necessary mapping standards. http://www.saw.usace.ar -Lny.mil/Missions/Re"latoiy-Pennit-
Prouam/Jurisdiction/
Version: May 2017 Page 5

jurisdictional Determination Request
F4Completed appropriate Jurisdictional Determination form
• PJDs, please complete a PreliminM Jurisdictional Determination Formand include the
Aquatic Resource Table
• AJDs,_please complete an Approved Jurisdictional Determination Form'
W1 Vicinity Map
zAerial Photograph
z USGS Topographic Map
�7 Soil Survey Map
zOther Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site
Plan, previous delineation maps, LIDAR maps, FEMA floodplain maps)
zLandscape Photos (if taken)
F] NCSAM and/or NCWAM Assessment Forms and Rating Sheets
F-1 NC Division of Water Resources Stream Identification Forms
F-1 Other Assessment Forms
7 www.saw.usace.,qM.niil/Portals/59/docs/reaWatoa/relzdocs/JD/RGL 08-02 App A Prelim JD Form fillable.pdf
I Please see hqp://www.saw.usace.arLmy.niil/Missions/Rc"latM-Permit-Program/Jurisdiction/
Principal Purpose: The information that you provide will be used in evaluating your request to determine
whether there are any aquatic resources within the project area subjectto federaljurisdiction under the regulatory
authorities referenced above.
Routine Uses: This information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other federal, state, and local
government agencies, and the public, and may be made available as part of a public notice as required by federal
law. Your name and property location where federaljurisdiction is to be determined will be included in the
approvedjurisdictional determination (AJD), which will be made available to the public onthe District's website
and onthe Headquarters USAGEwebsite.
Disclosure: Submission ofrequested information is voluntary; however, ifinformation is not provided, the
request for an AJD cannot be evaluated nor can an AJD be issued.
Version: May 2017 Page 6

Owner contact information
Parcels 007993 & 007997
Draper Family Partnership
Attn.: Stephen Draper
1216 Glenheim Drive
Raleigh, NC 27612
919-417-2101
[e-mail]
Parcel 007985
MF& T. Properties
Attn.: Stephen Draper
1216 Glenheim Drive
Raleigh, NC 27612
919-417-2101
[e-mail]

12/5/2017 ConnectGIS Feature Report
NashCounty
VCONNECTGIS Nash Counfy Printed December 05, 2017
WE$ "e"., T North Carolina See Below for Disclaimer
Comrnunil�y,�Cros s roads
9&jnoary
NC Court�es
RecorcI5
Road Sirielos
61; vhv
'64 - Nu I I,
264 .41 t
4- Nuh
Ull
48 I;Ow
4V["
561 NO
58 �Nu
581
01,
&4 OWIV,
hp
95 NO
97 NLA,
93 �Null�
kc�ads rv.i�
-95:
Ij S 801 West el� 211"
mid paiirojj
https:llnashcounty.connectgis.com/DownloadFile.ashx?i=—ags�_map023a9l46feef4O278bl 84481 Oabd57d9x.htm&t=printid
1/3

12/5/2017
ConnectGIS Feature Report
)BJECTID
2013
Jeighborhood#
1
)wner
4 F T PROPERTIES LLC
4aifing Address
216 BLENHEIM DR
hnicall Address
602 FRAZIER RD
keeded Acres
00.7
ownsh!
errells
leed Book
592
ate Vallidigy Code
-$6 > in Excise Stamps
lat Page
hase/Section
.esidential Building Value
2870
otall Building Value
3070
ssessed Value
33940
ssessment Year
)18
olid Waste Fee
gilding Typ
esidentiall Remodel Year
esidential Total Rooms
esidential Half Bathrooms
esidentiall SMtem
esidential Structure Sjyl
Dmmercial Sq. Ft.
tgAUI
5 42A, 300 70 AC, BI BRANTLEY
lap-pj:ng Notes
PARID
007985
Route#
27570005051
Owner 2
Mailing Address 2
Descriptive Location
GIS Acres
295.99
Tax Cit
County
Deed Page
203
Sale Price
0
Subdivision Lot#
Proper!�t Upe
A -Agricultural
Commercial Building Value
0
Appraised Value
580870
Fixempt Value
0
Present Use Code
U
Regyde Fee
Residential Year Built
Residential Attic
Residential Bedrooms
Residential Heating
Residential Sto!y Height
Residential Structure Typ
Commercial Structure
Legal 2
GIS Notes
PIN
275700172817
Owner Code
130155
In Care Of
Mailing Cjjy5tateZZip
RALEIGH NC 27612
Land Taxed By
A -Acreage
Tax District
NC33
Tax Fire District
Ferrells
Sale Date
11/1/1997 12:00:00 AM
Flat Book
Subdivision Name
Land Value
547800
OBY Value
200
Deferred Value
446930
Taxable Value
133940
Pog Fee
Exempt Status
Residential Effective Year
Residential Basement
Residential Full Bathrooms
Residential Hga "nFjjel Type
Residential Heated Sq. Ft
Commercial Year Built
Total Cards
3
Legal 3
Land Width
ILand Del2th Land Width2 Land Depth2
hftps:Hnashcounty.connectgis.com/DownloadFile ashx?i= ags_map023a9l46feef4O278bl844810abd57d9x.htm&t=printid
2/3

12/5/2017
ConnectGIS Feature Report
CAMA Updated On
6/2/2017 12:00:00 AM
onneciGIS has been prepared for the inventory of real property found within this jurisdiction, and is compiled from recorded deeds, plats, and other public records a o I
Jata. Users of this system are hereby notified that the aforementioned public primary information sources should be consulted for verification of the iriforrr.'��
.ontamed in this system. Nash County, Withers & Ravenel, ConnectGIS and other mapping companies assume no legal responsibility for the information contained in
�Ihis sWern, Grid clatit 1q based on the NorLh Carolina state viane coordinate systerm 1983 North American Datum (NC NAD93).
hftps://nashcou nty.con nectg is.com/Down load File. ashx?i =—agsLmap023a9146feef4O2 78b 184481 Oa bd57d 9x. htm&t=printid 3/3

12/5/2017
ConnectGIS Feature Report
Nash
NashCounty
CONNECTGISI
AD
kj)
County
Printed December 05, 2017
North
Carolina
See Below for Disclaimer
�2376ff
,2
- JW
AL., "Av
017-1-104
ING,
AL
�tl
IF - -W - - .. .1 - W 47
Ilk
1 404 Feet
A:)drel,% P�-!r�%
* Ach" cv�r
10 '(t�s
(Ay I MQ5
Exit NI,le Will (ers
F.1
pett -Ifeb
a Cat lt'lli fx�v�j If,
171
Lease Re.-ords;
r4ogd Shiplai
23,
2FA h0l,
264 AIt
4 --Null,
4J Null
40 NIM
56,-Plijll�
5FT 1�401:�
58 !tLll -
Sal -NO.
64 NO -
l5-1 Alt
95 , Null
97 tiuv
9d , hull,
Road,
all Ot"e"OlUTS
Mid Railrc-id
hftps://nashcou nty.con nectgis. corn/Down load File. ashx? i=—ags�_map8aeb6299de274ed7893ff2fc3c851 8eex. htm&t=pri Mid 1/3

12/5/2017
ConnectGIS Feature Report
OBJECTID
PARID
PIN
24560
007997
274700782815
Neighborhood#
Route#
Owner Code
41
27470005008
100064959
Owner
Owner 2
In Care Of
DRAPER FAMILY PARTNERSHIP
Mailing Addres.
Mailinn Address 2
Mailing Q_WState/Zi
1216 BLENHEIM DR
RALEIGH NC 27612
Physical Address
Descriptive Location
Land Taxed 13
PROPHECY RD
A -Acreage
Deeded Acres
GIS Acres
Tax District
61.3
59.66
NC33
Townshi
Tax Cit
Tax Fire District
Ferrells
County
Ferrells
Deed Book
Deed Page
Sale Date
1474
722
12/30/1994 12:00:00 AM
Sale Validity Code
Sale Price
Plat Book
99-Deed Stamps
0
Plat Pag
Subdivision Lot#
Subdivision Name
Phase/Section
Property Type
Land Value
A -Agricultural
229310
Residential Building Value
Commercial Building Value
OBY Value
0
0
0
Total Building Value
Appraised Value
Deferred Value
0
229310
206590
Assessed Value
Exemwt Value
Taxable Value
22720
0
22720
Assessment Year
Present Use Code
Dog Fee
2018
U
Solid Waste Fee Recycle Fee Exemgt Status
Building Type Residential Year Built Residential Effective Year
0
Residential Remodel Year Residential Attic Residential Basement
Residential Total Rooms Residential Bedrooms Residential Full Bathrooms
Residential Half Bathrooms Residential Heating Residential Heating Fuel TyrLe
Residential System Residential Sto[y Height Residential Heated Sq. Ft.
Residential Structure Slyie Residential StructLire Ty Commercial Year Built
Commercial Sq. Ft. Commercial Structure Total Cards
I
Legal 1 Legal 2 Legal 3
C5 26, 6130 AC, EARP
Magping-Not GIS Notes Land Width
ILand Dept Land Width2 Land Depth2
hftps://nashcounty connectgis com/Down load File ashx?i=—ags_map8aeb6299de274ed7893ff2fc3c851 Beex.htm&t=printid
2/3

12/5/2017
ConnectGIS Feature Report
CAMA Updated On
6/2/2017 12:00:00 AM
onnectGIS has been prepared for the inventory of real property found within this jurisdiction, and is compiled from recorded deeds, plats, and other public records and
data. Users of this system are hereby notified that the aforementioned public primary information sources should be consulted for verification of the information
contained in this system. Nash County, Withers & Ravenel, ConnectGIS and other mapping companies assume no legal responsibility for the information contained in
this system. Grid data is based on the North Carolina state plane coordinate system, 1983 North American Datum M NADS31
hftps:Hnashcounty.connectgis.com/DownloadFile.ashx?i=—ags map8aeb6299de274ed7893ff2fc3c85l8eex.htm&t=printid 3/3

12/5/2017 ConnectGIS Feature Report
7-
NashCounty
CONNECTGIS A Nash Counfy Printed December 05, 2017
CO,
WEB HO.TI11G North Corolino See Below for Disclaimer
-137
C ty
35 3 i�
F,,umyl
365.2 C , Coul'i)�-S
�741 7 0
3
3 9 �64 lnioi�
IF
­4
!iull -
43 1 k.11
4? ,IH -
56, ��ol
5F!
llull -
5U 1 11.11
r,4
,,,4 All
-13- 6;
dO
6 1 F Mid
hftps:Hnashcounty.connectgis.com/DownloadFile.ashx?i=—ags_mapdeeeB023deO44a1b8b15042471a517bOx.htm&t=printid 1/3

12/5/2017
ConnectGIS Feature Report
OBJECTID
PARID
PIN
42858
007993
274700945430
Neighborhoodg
Route#
Owner Code
41
27470005004
100064959
Owner
Owner 2
In Care Of
DRAPER FAMILY PARTNERSHIP
Mailing Addres
Mailing Address 2
Mailing CityjS!AjeLZip
1216 BLENHEIM DR
RALEIGH NC 27612
Physical Address
Descriptive Location
Land Taxed By
VALLEY RD
A -Acreage
Deeded Acres
GIS Acres
Tax District
123.8
121.64
NC33
Towmhip
Tax Ci
Tax Fire District
Ferrells
County
Ferrells
Deed Book
Deed Page
Sale Date
1474
722
12/30/1994 12:00:00 AM
Sale Vp_��
Sale Price
Plat Book
99-Deed Stamps
0
19
Plat Page
Subdivision Lot#
Subdivision Name
232
Phase/Section
Proper!y Type
Land Value
A -Agricultural
320010
Residential Building Value
Commercial Building Value
OBY Value
0
0
0
Total Building Value
Appraised Value
Deferred Value
0
320010
274800
Assessed Value
Exempt Value
Taxable Value
45210
0
45210
Assessment Year
Present Use Code
Dog Fe
2018
U
Solid Waste Fee
Rgcycle Fee
Exempt Statu
Building Typ Residential Year Built Residential Effective Year
0
Residential Remodel Year Residential Attic Residential Basement
Residential Total Rooms Residential Bedrooms Residential Full Bathrooms
Residential Half Bathrooms Residential Heatin Residentiat Heating Fuel Type
Residential System Residential Story Height Residential Heated Sq. Ft
Residential Structure Style Residential Structure Type Commercial Year Built
Commercial-Sq. Ft. Commercial Structure Total Cards
Legal 1 Legal 2 Legal 3
123 80 AC, DOCIA MURRAY FARMS
Mapping Notes GIS Notes Land Width
Land Depth Land Width2 Land Depth2
hftps: //n ashcou nty con n ectg is co rn/Down load F i le. as hx?i=—ags_mapdeee802 3d e044a 1 b8b 150424 71 a5l 7bOx. htm &t=p ri n tid
2/3

12/5/2017
ConnectGIS Feature Report
CAMA Updated On
6/2/2017 12:00:00 AM
[onnectGIS has been prepared for the inventory of real property found within this jurisdiction, and is compiled from recorded deeds, plats, and other public records and
ata. Users of this system are hereby notified that the aforementioned public primary information sources should be consulted for verification of the information
ontained in this system. Nash County, Withers & Ravenel, ConnectGIS and other mapping companies assume no legal responsibility for the information contained in
his 5ystem. Grid data is based on the North Carolina state Wane coordinate system. 1983 North Arnarltan Datum fNC NA0811.
h ttps:fln ashcou n ty.con nectgis.com/Down load File. ashx? i =—ags�_rnapdeee8023deO44a 1 b8b 15042471 a5l 7bOx. htm&t=pri ntid 3/3

LEGEND *REFERENCE FOR PRELIMINARY
FIGURES - SHEETS 1,2,3
r-1 Project Area - 477 acres .......... Potential Intermittent Streams - 3,492 linear feet
Uplands - 430 ac or 90% .............
Potential Non -Wetland Waters of the US - 171 linear feet
Potential Wetland Waters of the US - 41 ac or 9% +
Existing Culverts
Existing Pond (potential US Waters) - 6 ac or 1% @
Data Point Locations
Potential Tar River Buffer +
Photo Station Locations
k
Potential Perennial Streams - 8,780 linear feet
L,\WETLANDS\2017 WETLANDS FILES\01-1 7-107W\datapackage\mapset.cdr
SCALE 1 800'
*Boundaries are approximate and are not meant to be absolute.
(when printed at 11"x17")
Map Source: 2010 GIS World Imagery
Phobos Solar
LMG
Figure 7
Nash County, NC
Aquatic Resources
—Imeroumnet
Map
November 2017
3805 Wrightsville Avenue
(Composite Map)
LMG # 01-17-107W
Wilmington, NC 29403
Phone:
910.452.0001 Fax: [phone]

7 DP2-
2
NE 14' DP2-UP NE 28
0
DP2 . .... .
Wetiand "A"
N 20
6
N
Perennial Stream 81
21
22
r
*SEE FIGURE 7 FOR LEGEND REFERENCE
NOTE This is not a survey. All boundaries and distances are considered approArnate.
This represents a preliminary sketch prepared from field notes. A survey of delineated
arms and review and approval by the US Army Corps of Engineers is recommended prior
to specific site planning. On -site meetings with the USACE and NC DNR have not been
scheduled at this time.
JR.
We tia n d "A" NA74
NA3
NA 53
"NA 38
NA184
We tia n d "A"
Perennial Stream "2"
NA199 NA 232'�,'—,
14
M
_j
NA211,-
We tia n d "A"
A
PF 101
J� OHIELV i
�F 85 —p—
rN1771
, 7, � PF 51
LAWETLANDS\2017 WETLANDS FILES\01-1 7-107\Mdatapackage\nnapset.cdr
SCALE 1 " = 600'
*Boundaries are aproVxgate and are not meant to be absolute.
(when printed at 11"x17")
Map Source: 2010 V rd Imagery
Phobos Solar
LMG
Nash County, NC
Figure 8
—Inngroup.net
Aquatic Resources
November 2017
3805 Wrightsville Avenue
map (Sheet 1)
LMG # 01-17-107W
Wilmington, NC 29403
Phone:
910.452.0001 Fax: [phone]

'14
*SEE FIGURE 7 FOR LEGEND REFERENCE
L,\WETLANDS\2017 WETLANDS FILES\01-1 7-107\Mdatapackage\mapset.cdr
Bou nclaries are agproximate and are not meant to be absolute.
Mao Source 2010 IS World Imaaery
nitter.
M "2))
SCALE 1 400'
(when printed at 11"x17")
Phobos Solar
LMG
Nash County, NC
Figure 9
..lmeroumnet
Aquatic Resources
November 2017
3805 Wrightsville Avenue
Map (Sheet 2)
LMG # 01-17-107W
Wilmington, NC 29403
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]

*S
L,\WETLANDS\2017 WETLANDS FILES\01-1 7-I07\Mdatapackage\mapset.cdr
ndaries are aproW%mate and are not meant to be absolute.
Source: 2010 nd Imagery
Phobos Solar LMG
Nash County, NC
I —..Imgroup.net
November 2017 3805 Wrightsville Avenue
LMG # 01-17-107W Wilmington, NC 29403
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
SCALE 1 400'
(when printed at 11"x17")
Figure 10
Aquatic Resources
Map (Sheet 3)

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Phobos Solar City/County: Nash Sampling Date: 4/19/17
Applicant/Owner: Cypress Creek Renewables State: NC Sampling Point: uplandl
Investigator(s): Paul Farley Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): convex Slope (%): I
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.881868 Long: -78.155134 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: RaA: Rains fine sandy loam, 0-2% slopes, Southern Coastal Plain NWI classification: upland
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes x No (if no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes x No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
—Surface Water (Al) —True
Aquatic Plants (B14)
—Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
High Water Table (A2)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
— Drainage Patterns (B 10)
—Saturation (A3) —Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
—Moss Trim Lines (B1 6)
—Water Marks (BI) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
— Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
—Sediment Deposits (132) —Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
—Crayfish Burrows (C8)
— Drift Deposits (B3) —Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
—Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
—Algal Mat or Crust (B4) —Other
(Explain in Remarks)
—Stunted or Stressed Plants (D 1
—Iron Deposits (B5)
—Geomorphic Position (D2)
—Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
— Microtopographic Relief (D4)
—Aquatic Fauna (B13)
— FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
x Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
x Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
x Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes— No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: uplandl
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30
% Cover Species?
1. Liriodendron tulipifera
70 Yes
2. flex opaca
30 Yes
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
100 =Total Cover
50% of total cover:
50 20% of total cover:
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15
1. He opaca
40 Yes
2. Liquidambarstyraciflua
15 Yes
3. Symplocos tinctoria
10 No
4. Vaccinium cotymbosum
5 No
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
70 =Total Cover
50% of total cover:
35 20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size:
1
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
=Total Cover
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 5
1 . Vitus rotundifolia
5 Yes
2.
3.
4.
5.
5 =Total Cover
50% of total cover:
3 20% of total cover:
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
FACU
Number of Dominant Species
FACU
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 5 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 40.0% (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
20
FAC
FAC
FAC
FACW
14
1
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species 0 X I = 0
FACW species 5 x 2 = 10
FAC species 65 x 3 = 195
FACU species 100 x 4 = 400
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
Column Totals: 170 (A) 605 (B)
Prevalence Index = BIA 3.56
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
-2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 -Prevalence Index is �3.01
-4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
-Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1 Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
SaplinglShrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
(I m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No X
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont -Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: uplandl
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type' LOC2 Texture
Remarks
0-3 10YR 3/2
Loamy/Clayey
3-16 1 OYR 4/2
1 OYR 6/3 10 D M Loamy/Clayey
10YR 5/8 20 C M
Prominent redox concentrations
16-24 10YR 5/6
10YR 6/4 15 D M Loamy/Clayey
7.5YR 5/8 25 C M
Distinct redox concentrations
IType: C=Concentration, D=Depietion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2 Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators
for Problematic Hydric Soils 3
Histosol (Al)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 1147, 1148)
2 cm Muck (Al 0) (M LRA 1147)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 1148) —Coast
Prairie Redox (Al 6)
—Black Histic (A3)
— Loamy M ucky Mi neral (F 1) (M LRA 136)
(MLRA 147,148)
— Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) —Piedmont
Floodplain Soils (F1 9)
—Stratified Layers (A5)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 1136,147)
2 cm Muck (Al 0) (LRR N)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Red Parent Material (F2 I)
—Depleted Below Dark Surface (All)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
(outside MLRA 127,147, 1148)
—Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Redox Depressions (F8) —Very
Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
—Sandy Mucky Mineral (SI)
Iron -Manganese Masses (Fl 2) (LRR N, —Other
(Explain in Remarks)
Gleyed Matrix (S4)
MLRA 136)
—Sandy
—Sandy Redox (S5)
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122,136) 31ndicators
of hydrophytic vegetation and
—Stripped Matrix (S6)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface (S7)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
This data sheet is revised from Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric
Soils, Version 8.0, 2016.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Phobos Solar City/County: Nash Sampling Date: 4/19/17
Applicant/Owner: Cypress Creek Renewables (applicant) State: NC Sampling Point: upland2
Investigator(s): Nick Howell Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): side slope Local relief (concave, convex, none): convex Slope 3-4
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.889262 Long: -78.164537 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: RaA: Rains fine sandy loam, 0-2% slopes, Southern Coastal Plain NWI classification: uplands
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes x No (if no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes x No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two recILL�
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
Water (Al) —True
Aquatic Plants (B 14)
—Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
—Surface
High Water Table (A2) —
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (BI 0)
(A3) —Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
— Moss Trim Lines (B 16)
—Saturation
Marks (B 1) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
— Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
—Water
Deposits (132) —
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
—Crayfish Burrows (C8)
—Sediment
Deposits (133) —Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
—Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
—Drift
—Algal Mat or Crust (134) —Other
(Explain in Remarks)
—Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Deposits (135)
—Geomorphic Position (D2)
—Iron
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Leaves (139)
— Microtopographic Relief (D4)
—Water-Stained
—Aquatic Fauna (1313)
X FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
x Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
x Depth (inches): 24
Saturation Present? Yes No
x Depth (inches): 24
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes— No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
No observed water table to 24"
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: upland2
Absolute
Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30
% Cover
Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1.
Liriodendron tulipifera
80
Yes
FACU
Number of Dominant Species
2.
Quercus alba
15
No
FACU
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 4 (A)
3.
Liquidambar styraciflua
5
No
FAC
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 10 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 40.0% (A/B)
100
�Total Cover
Prevalence Index worksheet:
50% of total cover:
50
20% of total cover:
20
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
Sapling Stratum (Plot size:
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
1 .
flex opaca
25
Yes
FACU
FACW species. 0 x 2 = 0
2.
Liquidambar styracfflua
15
Yes
FAC
FAC species 105 x 3 = 315
3.
FACU species 210 x 4 = 840
4.
UPL species 2 x 5 = 10
5.
Column Totals: 317 (A) 1165 (B)
6.
Prevalence Index = BIA = 3.68
40
=Total Cover
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
50% of total cover:
20
20% of total cover:
8
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Shrub Stratum (Plot size:
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
1.
Quercus alba
20
Yes
FACU
3 -Prevalence Index is --3.01
2.
Liquidambar styraciflua
10
Yes
FAC
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
3.
Carya alba
2
No
UPL
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
4.
-Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
5.
'indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
6.
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
32 =Total Cover
50% of total cover:
16
20% of total cover:
7
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
Herb
Stratum (Plot size: 5
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
1.
Polystichum acrostichoides
10
Yes
FACU
2.
Lonicera sempervirens
40
Yes
FACU
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
3.
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
4.
5.
Shrub - Woody Plants, excluding woody vines,
6.
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
7.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
8.
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
9.
3 ft (1 m) in height.
10.
11.
Woody Vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
50 =Total Cover
50% of total cover:
25
20% of total cover:
10
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:
1.
Smilax rotundifolia
25
Yes
FAC
2.
Parthenocissus quinquetolia
20
Yes
FACU
3.
Vitus rotundfolia
50
Yes
FAC
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
95
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
48
20% of total cover:
19
Present? Yes No X
Remarks: (include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: upland2
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type' LoG2
Texture Remarks
0-4 100
Loamy/Clayey
4-20 10YR 3/4 100
Loamy/Clayey
20-24 10YR 3/6 75
7.5YR 5/8 20
Loamy/Clayey
10YR 5/8 10
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2 Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric SojIS3:
Histosol (Al)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA
147,148) —2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147,148) —Coast Prairie Redox (Al 6)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (Fl) (MLRA 136) (MLRA 147,148)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F 19)
—Stratified Layers (A5)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136,147)
—2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Red Parent Material (F21)
— Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
(outside MLRA 127,147,148)
—Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
— Redox Depressions (F8)
—Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
—Sandy Mucky Mineral (Sl)
— Iron -Manganese Masses (F1 2) (LRR N, —Other (Explain in Remarks)
Gleyed Matrix (S4)
MLRA 136)
—Sandy
Redox (S5)
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122,136) 3 Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
—Sandy
—Stripped Matrix (S6)
—
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F1 9) (MLRA
148) wetland hydrology must be present,
—Dark Surface (S7)
—Red Parent Material (F2 1) (MLRA 127,
147, 148) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes— No X
Remarks:
This data sheet is revised from Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric
Soils, Version 8.0, 2016.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont —Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Phobos Solar City/County: Nash Sampling Date: 4/19/17
Applicant/Owner: Cypress Creek Renewables (applicant) State: NC Sampling Point: upland 3
Investigator(s): Paul Farley Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): sideslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): convex Slope 1-2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.868007 Long: -78.154513 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: NoB: Norfolk loamy sand, 2-6% slopes NWI classification: upland
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes x No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (if needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is reguired; check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
—Surface Water (Al) —True
Aquatic Plants (B 14)
—Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
— High Water Table (A2) —
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
—Saturation (A3) —Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
—Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
— Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
—Sediment Deposits (132) —
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
—Crayfish Burrows (C8)
— Drift Deposits (133) —Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
—Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
—Algal Mat or Crust (134) —Other
(Explain in Remarks)
—Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
—Iron Deposits (135)
— Geomorphic Position (D2)
—Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
— Microtopographic Relief (D4)
—Aquatic Fauna (1313)
— FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
x Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
x Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
x Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
No owt to 18"
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: upland 3
Absolute Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30
% Cover Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
I . Quercus nigra
40 Yes
FAC
Number of Dominant Species
2. Pinus taeda
50 Yes
FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A)
3.
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 5 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 60.0% (A/B)
90 =Total Cover
Prevalence Index worksheet:
50% of total cover:
45 20% of total cover:
18
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 30
OBL species X 1 =
I . Liquidambar styraciflua
40 Yes
FAC
FACW species x 2 =
2.
FAC species x 3 =
3.
FACU species x 4 =
4.
UPL species x 5 =
5.
Column Totals: (A) (B)
6.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
40 =Total Cover
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
50% of total cover:
20 20% of total cover:
8
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Shrub Stratum (Plot size:
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
1
3 - Prevalence Index is �3.01
2.
4 - Morphological Adaptations 1 (Provide supporting
3.
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
4.
-Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
5.
lindicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
6.
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
=Total Cover
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
I . Clethra afnifolia
10 Yes
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
2.
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
3.
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
4.
5.
Shrub - Woody Plants, excluding woody vines,
6.
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
7.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
8.
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
9.
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
3 ft (I m) in height.
10.
11.
Woody Vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
10 =Total Cover
50% of total cover:
5 20% of total cover:
2
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30
1 . Smilax spp
5 Yes
2.
3.
4.
5.
-
Hydrophytic
5 =Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
3 20% of total cover:
1
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: upland 3
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' LoC2 Texture
0-18 1 OYR 4/3
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion,
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (Al)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (Al 0) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1:
—Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
—Sandy Mucky Mineral (Sl)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
—Sandy Redox (S5)
—Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Sandy
RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147,148)
—Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147,148)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (Fl) (MLRA 136)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F1 2) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
Umbric Surface (F1 3) (MLRA 122, 136)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F1 9) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
Remarks
2 Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soil
2 cm Muck (Al 0) (M LRA 147)
—Coast Prairie Redox (Al 6)
(MLRA 147,148)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136,147)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127,147,148)
—Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
—Other (Explain in Remarks)
3 Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
This data sheet is revised from Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric
Soils, Version 8.0, 2016.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Phobos Solar City/County: Nash Sampling Date: 4/19/17
Applicant/Owner: Cypress Creek Renewables State: NC Sampling Point: upland 4
Investigator(s): Paul Farley Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): convex Slope 1
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.879774 Long: -78.151176 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: RaA: Rains fine sandy loam, 0-2% slopes, Southern Coastal Plain NWI classification: upland
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes x No (if no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes x No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (if needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
—Surface Water (Al)
—True Aquatic Plants (B14)
? Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
High Water Table (A2)
— Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (B1 0)
—Saturation (A3)
—Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
—Moss Trim Lines (B1 6)
—Water Marks (Bl)
—Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
— Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
—Sediment Deposits (B2)
—Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
—Crayfish Burrows (C8)
— Drift Deposits (133)
—Thin Muck Surface (C7)
—Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
—Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
—Other (Explain in Remarks)
—Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
—Iron Deposits (135)
— Geomorphic Position (D2)
—Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
— Microtopographic Relief (D4)
—Aquatic Fauna (B13)
— FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
No x Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes
No x Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes
No x Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes— No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont —Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: upland 4
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30
% Cover Species?
1. Pinus taeda
60
Yes
2. Liquidambar styraciflua
20
Yes
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
80
=Total Cover
50% of total cover:
40
20% of total cover:
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30
1. Quercus nigra
5
No
2. Pinus taeda
20
Yes
3. Liquidambar styraciflua
15
Yes
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
40
=Total Cover
50% of total cover:
20
20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size:
1
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8. ---
9.
10.
11.
=Total Cover
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:
1
2.
3.
4.
5.
=Total Cover
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Remarks: (include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
FAC
Number of Dominant Species
FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 4 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 4 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0% (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
16
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
FACW species 0 x 2 = 0
FAC species 115 x 3 = 345
FAC
FACU species 0 x 4 = 0
FAC
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
Column Totals: 115 (A) 345 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A 3.00
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
- Prevalence Index is !�3.01
-3
- Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
8
-4
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
-Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
11ndicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
SaplinglShrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
(1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
US Army Corps of Engineers
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: upland 4
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' LoC2 Texture Remarks
0-10 1 OYR 5/4 loamy sand
10-20 1 OYR 6/6 sc loam
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion,
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (Al)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (Al 0) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1:
—Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
—Sandy Mucky Mineral (SI)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
—Sandy Redox (S5)
—Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147,148)
—Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (FI) (MLRA 136)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F1 2) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122,136)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F1 9) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127,147,148)
2 Location: PL=Pore Lining, WMatrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soi
—2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
—Coast Prairie Redox (Al 6)
(MLRA 147,148)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F1 9)
(MLRA 136,147)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127,147,148)
—Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
—Other (Explain in Remarks)
31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
This data sheet is revised from Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric
Soils, Version 8.0, 2016.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Phobos Solar Tract City/County: Nash Sampling Date: 4/19/17
Applicant/Owner: Cypress Creek Renewables (applicant) State: NC Sampling Point: wetland 1
Investigator(s): Paul Farley Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): convex Slope 2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.88203 Long: -78.155118 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: RaA: Rains fine sandy loam, 0-2% slopes, Southern Coastal Plain NWI classification: PF01A
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes x No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes x No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes x No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes x No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes x No —
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
—Surface Water (Al) —True
Aquatic Plants (B 14)
—Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
X High Water Table (A2)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Drainage Patterns (B 10)
—Saturation (A3) —Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Moss Trim Lines (B 16)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
—Sediment Deposits (132) —Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
—Crayfish Burrows (C8)
— Drift Deposits (133) —Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
—Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Mat or Crust (134)
(Explain in Remarks)
i Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1
—Algal —Other
—Iron Deposits (135)
—Geomorphic Position (D2)
—Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
— Microtopographic Relief (D4)
—Aquatic Fauna (1313)
— FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes x No
Depth (inches): 10
Saturation Present? Yes x No
Depth (inches): 10
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont —Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: wetland 1
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30'r % Cover Species? Status
1. A cer rubrum 30 Yes FAC
2. Fraxinus pennsylvanica 30 Yes FACW
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
60 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 30 20% of total cover: 12
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30'r
1.
flex opaca
15
Yes
FACU
2.
Carpinus caroliniana
15
Yes
FAC
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
30
=Total Cover
50% of total cover:
15
20% of total cover:
6
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' r
1 .
Parthenocissus quinquefolia
5
Yes
FACU
2.
Arisaema triphyllum
8
Yes
FACW
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
13
=Total Cover
50% of total cover:
7
20% of total cover:
3
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:
1
2.
3.
4.
5.
=Total Cover
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 4 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 6 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 66.7% (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
FACW species 38 x 2 = 76
FAC species 45 x 3 = 135
FACU species 20 x 4 = 80
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
Column Totals: 103 (A) 291 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A 2.83
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
X 3 - Prevalence Index is �3.01
-4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
-Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub -Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
(1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: wetland 1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth
Matrix
Redox Features
(inches)
Color (moist)
%
Color (moist) % Type' LOC2 Texture Remarks
0-7
1 OYR 3/1
100
Loamy/Clayey
7-14
10YR 4/2
75
1 OYR 5/8 25 C M Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
14-18
5Y 6/2
90
1 OYR 5/8 10 c M Prominent redox concentrations
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
'Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric SojIS3:
Histosol (Al)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (M LRA 147, 148)
2 cm Muck (Al 0) (M LRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147,148)
—Coast Prairie Redox (Al 6)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (Fl) (M LRA 136)
(MLRA 147,148)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F1 9)
Layers (A5)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136,147)
—Stratified
2 cm Muck (Al 0) (LRR N)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
X Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
(outside MLRA 127,147,148)
—Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
Redox Depressions (F8)
—Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
—Sandy Mucky Mineral (Sl)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F1 2) (LRR N,
—Other (Explain in Remarks)
Gleyed Matrix (S4)
MLRA 136)
—Sandy
Redox (S5)
x Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA122,136)
3 Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
—Sandy
—Stripped Matrix (S6)
— Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F1 9) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
—Dark Surface (S7)
—Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes x No
Remarks:
This data sheet is revised from Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric
Soils, Version 8.0, 2016.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Phobos Solar City/County: Nash Sampling Date: 4/19/17
Applicant/Owner: Cypress Creek Renewables State: NC Sampling Point: wetland 2
Investigator(s): Nick Howell Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): drain Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope 2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.889516 Long: -78.16471 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: RaA: Rains fine sandy loam, 0-2% slopes, Southern Coastal Plain NWI classification: upland
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes x No (if no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes x No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (if needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No x within a Wetland? Yes No X
Welland Hydrology Present? Yes X No —
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
—Surface Soi I Cracks (B-6),
Water (Al)
—True Aquatic Plants (B14)
—Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
—Surface
High Water Table (A2)
—Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
— Drainage Patterns (B 10)
(A3)
—Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
— Moss Trim Li nes (B 16)
—Saturation
Marks (Bl)
—Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
— Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
—Water
Deposits (132)
—Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
—Crayfish Burrows (C8)
—Sediment
Drift Deposits (B3)
—Thin Muck Surface (C7)
—Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
—
Mat or Crust (134)
—Other (Explain in Remarks)
—Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
—Algal
Deposits (135)
x Geomorphic Position (D2)
—Iron
Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Inundation
x Water -Stained Leaves (B9)
x Microtopographic Relief (D4)
—Aquatic Fauna (B13)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
No x Depth (inches):_
Water Table Present? Yes x
No Depth (inches): 16
Saturation Present? Yes x
No Depth (inches): 16
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: wetland 2
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30
% Cover
Species?
1.
Liriodendron tutipifera
40
Yes
2.
Acer rubrum
25
Yes
3.
Liquidambar styraciflua
30
Yes
4.
Ilex opaca
10
No
5.
6.
105
=Total Cover
50% of total cover:
53 20% of total cover:
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 30
1.
Acerrubrum
20
Yes
2.
flex opaca
30
Yes
3.
4.
5.
6.
50
=Total Cover
50% of total cover:
25 20% of total cover:
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30
1 .
Acer rubrum
15
Yes
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
15
=Total Cover
50% of total cover:
8 20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30
1.
Lonicera sempervirens
20
Yes
2.
Toxicodendron radicans
20
Yes
3.
Osmunda spectablis
25
Yes
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
Indicator
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
FACU
Number of Dominant Species
FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
8 (A)
FAC
Total Number of Dominant
FACU
Species Across All Strata:
11 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
72.7% (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
21
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species 25 x 1 = 25
FAC
FACW species 0 x 2 = 0
FACU
FAC species 130 x 3 = 390
FACU species 100 x 4 = 400
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
Column Totals: 255 (A) 815 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.20
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
10
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
FAC
3 - Prevalence Index is �3.01
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
-Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
11ndicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
3
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
FACU
FAC
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
OBI
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody Plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
3 ft (1 m) in height.
Woody Vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
65 =Total Cover
50% of total cover:
33 20% of total cover:
13
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30
1 . Smilax rotundifolia
15 Yes
FAC
2. Vitus rotundifolia
5 Yes
FAC
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
20 =Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
10 20% of total cover:
4
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: wetland 2
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type' LoC2 Texture
Remarks
0-4 1 OYR 3/1
Loamy/Clayey
4-18 1 OYR 4/2 70
1 OYR 5/8 30 C M Loamy/Clayey
Prominent redox concentrations
18-24 2.5Y 4/2 65
7.5YR 5/8 35 C M Loamy/Clayey
Prominent redox concentrations
IType: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2 Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils 3
Histosol (Al)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147,148)
2 cm Muck (Al 0) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147,148) —Coast
Prairie Redox (Al 6)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (Fl) (M LRA 136)
(MLRA 147,148)
— Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) —Piedmont
Floodplain Soils (F19)
—Stratified Layers (A5)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136,147)
2 cm Muck (Al 0) (LRR N)
— Redox Dark Surface (F6) —Red
Parent Material (F21)
X Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
(outside MLRA 127,147,148)
—Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
— Redox Depressions (F8) —Very
Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
—Sandy Mucky Mineral (Sl)
— Iron -Manganese Masses (F1 2) (LRR N, —Other
(Explain in Remarks)
Gleyed Matrix (S4)
MLRA 136)
—Sandy
—Sandy Redox (S5)
3
— Umbric Surface (F1 3) (MLRA 122,136) Indicators
of hydrophytic vegetation and
—Stripped Matrix (S6)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F1 9) (MLRA 148)
wetiand hydrology must be present,
—Dark Surface (S7)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127,147,148)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
This data sheet is revised from Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include
the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric
Soils, Version 8.0, 2016.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Phobos Solar City/County: Nash Sampling Date: 4/19/17
Applicant/Owner: Cypress Creek Renewables (applicant) State: NC Sampling Point: wetland 3
Investigator(s): Paul Farley Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): depression Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope 1
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.866095 Long: -78.154573 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: NoB: Norfolk loamy sand, 2-6% slopes NWI classification: upland
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes x No (if no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes x No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (if needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No —
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required� check all that aipply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
—Surface Water (Al) —True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
—Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
X High Water Table (A2)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
— Drainage Patterns (B 10)
—Saturation (A3) —Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
—Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (B 1) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
— Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
—Sediment Deposits (132) —Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
—Crayfish Burrows (C8)
— Drift Deposits (133) —Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
—Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
—Algal Mat or Crust (134) —Other
(Explain in Remarks)
—Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
—Iron Deposits (135)
X Geomorphic Position (D2)
— Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
— Microtopographic Relief (D4)
—Aquatic Fauna (1313)
— FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
x Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes x No
Depth (inches): 1
Saturation Present? Yes x No
Depth (inches): 1
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

Sampling Point: wetland 3
VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Tree Stratum (Plot size:
30 % Cover Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1 . - Nyssa sylvatica
20
Yes
FAC
Number of Dominant Species
2. Acerrubrum
30
Yes
FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 5 (A)
3.
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 5 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0% (A/B)
50
=Total Cover
Prevalence Index worksheet:
50% of total cover: 25
20% of total cover:
10
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
Sapling Stratum (Plot size:
30
0131- species 0 x 1 = 0
1 . Nyssa sylvatica
10
Yes
FAC
FACW species 0 x 2 = 0
2. Acerrubrum
30
Yes
FAC
FAC species 100 x 3 = 300
3.
FACU species 0 x 4 = 0
4.
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
5.
Column Totals: 100 (A) 300 (B)
6.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.00
40
=Total Cover
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
50% of total cover: 20
20% of total cover:
8
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Shrub Stratum (Plot size:
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
1
X 3 - Prevalence Index is !�3.01
2.
4 - Morphological Adaptations I (Provide supporting
3.
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
4.
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
5.
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
6.
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
=Total Cover
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
Herb Stratum (Plot size:
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
1
2.
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
3.
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
4.
5.
Shrub - Woody Plants, excluding woody vines,
6.
approximately 3 to 20 ft (I to 6 m) in height.
7.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
8.
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
9.
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
3 ft (I m) in height.
10.
11.
Woody Vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
=Total Cover
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30
I . Smilax spp
10
Yes
FAC
2.
3.
4.
5.
-
Hydrophytic
10
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover: 5
20% of total cover:
2
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: wetland 3
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type' LOC2 Texture Remarks
0-10 10YR 3/1 100
Loamy/Clayey
10-18 1 OYR 4/2 90
10YR 6/8 10 c rn Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2 Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric SoiIS3:
Histosol (Al)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (M LRA 147, 148)
— 2 cm Muck (Al 0) (M LRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Thin Dark Surface (S9) (M LRA 147, 148)
—Coast Prairie Redox (Al 6)
Histic (A3)
— Loamy Mucky Mineral (F 1) (MLRA 136)
(MLRA 147,148)
—Black
Sulfide (A4)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
—Hydrogen
Layers (A5)
x Depleted Matrix (F3)
(M LRA 136, 147)
—Stratified
2 cm Muck (Al 0) (LRR N)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
X Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
(outside MLRA 127,147,148)
Dark Surface (Al2)
—Redox Depressions (F8)
—Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
—Thick
—Sandy Mucky Mineral (Sl)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F1 2) (LRR N,
—Other (Explain in Remarks)
Gleyed Matrix (S4)
MLRA 136)
—Sandy
Redox (S5)
—Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122,136)
3
Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
—Sandy
Matrix (S6)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
—Stripped
Dark Surface (S7)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127,147,148)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
This data sheet is revised from Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric
Soils, Version 8.0, 2016.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Phobos Solar City/County: Nash Sampling Date: 4/19/17
Applicant/Owner: Cypress Creek Renewables (applicant) State: NC Sampling Point: wetland 4
Investigator(s): Paul Farley Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope 1
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.879591 Long: -78.151368 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: NoB: Norfolk loamy sand, 2-6% slopes NWI classification: -upland
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes x No (if no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes x No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No —
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two require�!)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
Surface Soil Cracks (136)
— Surface Water (Al)
—True Aquatic Plants (B14)
—Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
X High Water Table (A2)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Drainage Patterns (1310)
— Saturation (A3)
—Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
—Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (B 1)
—Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
— Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
—Sediment Deposits (132)
—Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
—Crayfish Burrows (C8)
— Drift Deposits (133)
—Thin Muck Surface (C7)
—Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
—Algal Mat or Crust (134)
—Other (Explain in Remarks)
—Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1
—Iron Deposits (135)
X Geomorphic Position (D2)
—Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
— Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
—Microtopographic Relief (D4)
—Aquatic Fauna (1313)
X FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
No x Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes x
No Depth (inches): 6
Saturation Present? Yes x
No Depth (inches): 6
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Inundation was visiible in wetland, just not in sample area
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: wetland 4
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 % Cover Species?
1. Nyssa sylvatica 35 Yes
2. Fraxinus pennsylvanica 20 Yes
3. A cer rubrum 40 Yes
4.
5.
6.
95 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 48 20% of total cover:
Sapling Stratum (Plot size:
I
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
=Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Shrub Stratum (Plot size:
I
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Status
FAC
FACW
FAC
19
=Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30
1. Woodwardia areolata 10 Yes FACW
2 Osmundastrum cinnamomeum 5 Yes FACW
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
15 =Total Cover
50% of total cover:
8 20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30
1
2.
3.
4.
5.
=Total Cover
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Remarks: (include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
3
FAC
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 5 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 5 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0% (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species 0 x I = 0
FACW species 35 x 2 = 70
FAC species 75 x 3 = 225
FACU species 0 x 4 = 0
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
Column Totals: 110 (A) 295 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.68
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
I - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
X 3 - Prevalence Index is �3.01
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
-Problernatic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH)
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody Plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (I to 6 m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
3 ft (I m) in height.
Woody Vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: wetland 4
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type' LoC2 Texture
Remarks
0-12 1 OYR 6/1
loam w. mucky modifier
12-20 1 OYR 7/1
scl
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2 Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Solls3:
Histosol (Al)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147,148)
— 2 cm Muck (Al 0) (M LRA 147)
Histic E pipedon (A2)
—Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147,148)
—Coast Prairie Redox (Al 6)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (FI) (MLRA 136)
(M LRA 147, 148)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Layers (A5)
x Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136,147)
—Stratified
2 cm Muck (Al 0) (LRR N)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Red Parent Material (F21
Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
(outside MLRA 127,147,148)
Dark Surface (Al2)
Redox Depressions (F8)
—Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
—Thick
—Sandy Mucky Mineral (Sl)
—I ron-Manganese Masses (F 12) (LRR N,
—Other (Explain in Remarks)
Gleyed Matrix (S4)
MLRA 136)
—Sandy
—Sandy Redox (S5)
Umbric Surface (F1 3) (MLRA 122, 136)
3
Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
—Stripped Matrix (S6)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F1 9) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
—Dark Surface (S7)
—Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil
Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
This data sheet is revised from Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric
Soils, Version 8.0, 2016.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

Appendix 2 - PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD:
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD: P- M. Farley, Land Managment Group, 3805 Wrightsville Avenue, Suite 15, WIlmington NC 28403
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES AND/OR
AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: N C County/parish/borough: Nash city: Middlesex
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format):
Lat.: 35.874886 Long.: -78.157610
Universal Transverse Mercator: 17 S 7566639.27 m E 3973863,11 m N
Name of nearest waterbody: unnamed tributary to Driving Branch of Turkey Creek
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
F-1 Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
F-1 Field Determination. Date(s):
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES IN REVIEW AREA WHICH "MAY BE" SUBJECT TO REGULATORY
JURISDICTION.
Site
number
Latitude
(decimal
degrees)
Longitude
(decimal
degrees)
Estimated amount
of aquatic resource
in review area
(acreage and linear
feet, if applicable)
Type of aquatic
resource (i.e., wetland
vs. non -wetland
waters)
Geographic authority
to which the aquatic
resource "may be"
subject (i.e., Section
404 or Section 10/404)
Wetland A
35.877092
-78.161475
30.9 acres
wetland
Section 404
Wetland B
35.884917
-78.151508
5.3 acres
wetland
Section 404
Wetland C
35.879544
-78.151546
0.6 acres
wetland
Section 404
Wetland D
35.878614
-78.150286
3.5 acres
wetland
Section 404
Wetland E
35.869730
-78.154347
0.5 acres
wetland
Section 404
Wetland F
35.868269
-78.158897
0.3 acres
wetland
Section 404

1 ) The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in
the review area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option
to request and obtain an approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an
informed decision after having discussed the various types of JDs and their
characteristics and circumstances when they may be appropriate.
2) In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a
Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre -
construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non -reporting NWP or
other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an AJD for the
activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware that: (1) the permit applicant has
elected to seek a permit authorization based on a PJD, which does not make an
official determination of jurisdictional aquatic resources; (2) the applicant has the
option to request an AJD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit
authorization, and that basing a permit authorization on an AJD could possibly result
in less compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) the
applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms
and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) the applicant can
accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and
conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has
determined to be necessary; (5) undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject
permit authorization without requesting an AJD constitutes the applicant's acceptance
of the use of the PJD; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered
individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps permit
authorization based on a PJD constitutes agreement that all aquatic resources in the
review area affected in any way by that activity will be treated as jurisdictional, and
waives any challenge to such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance
or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7)
whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD or a PJD, the JD will be processed
as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered individual permit (and all terms
and conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively
appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an administrative appeal, it
becomes appropriate to make an official determination whether geographic
jurisdiction exists over aquatic resources in the review area, or to provide an official
delineation of jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review area, the Corps will
provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable. This PJD finds
that there "may be"waters of the U.S. and/or that there "may be" navigable waters of
the U.S. on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in the review
area that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following
information:

Estimated
amount
Site
of aquatic
Latitude
Longitude
Type
Authority
number
resource
in review
area
Open
35.882733
-78.151701
6.3 acres
Non -wetland
Section 404
water
waters
Int
35.890455
-78.155659
100 linear
Non -wetland
Section 404
stream 1
feet
waters
Int
35.885650
-78.151100
836 linear
Non -wetland
Section 404
stream 2
feet
waters
Int.
35.882594
-78.153239
1312
Non -wetland
Section 404
stream 3
linear feet
waters
Int
35.869821
-78.158400
930 linear
Non -wetland
Section 404
stream 4
feet
waters
Int
35.877241
-78.160186
413 linear
Non -wetland
Section 404
stream 5
feet
waters
P. stream
35.884497
-78.162222
5349
Non -wetland
Section 404
1
linear feet
waters
P.
35.881857
-78.157168
1490
Non -wetland
Section 404
Stream 2
linear feet
waters
P.
35.877284
-78.160256
1409
Non -wetland
Section 404
Stream 3
linear feet
Waters
P. stream
35.880713
-78.160015
442 linear
Non -wetland
Section 404
4
feet
waters
RPW
35.882905
-78.153065
171 linear
Non -wetland
Section 404
feet
waters

SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply)
Checked items should be included in subject file. Appropriately reference sources
below where indicated for all checked items:
JAI Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor:
Map:
Jill Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor.
H office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
I-] Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rationalei
F-] Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
F-1 Corps navigable waters' study:
F-1 U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas.
H USGS NHD data.
L-] USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps
[A] U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: Greenville SW 2000'
FE-
Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey Citation, NRCS GIS data
F-1 National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
F-1 State/local wetland inventory map(s):
F-] FEMA/FIRM maps:
F-] 100-year Floodplain Elevation is:
(National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
1-61 Photographs: A] Aerial (Name & Date): 2013 NC Onernap & 1988 FSA
or n Other (Name & Date):
F-] Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
F-1 Other information (please specify)�
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily
been verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional
determinations.
Signature and date of
Regulatory staff member
completing PJD
Signatur�e and date of
person requesting PJD
(REQUIRED, unless obtaining
the signature is impracticable)'
1 Districts may establish timeframes for requestor to return signed PJD forms. If the requestor does not respond
within the established time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is
necessary prior to finalizing an action.

APPENDIX B
NC DWR Buffer Determination Letter

WaterResources
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
Ap ri 15, 2018
Stephen B. Draper
MFT Properties, LLC & Draper Family Partnership
1216 Blenheim Drive
Raleigh, NC 27612
ROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Seeman-
LINDA CULPEPPER
Interint Director
Subject: Buffer Determination Letter
RRO # 18-080
Nash County
Determination Type:
Buffer
IntermittentlPerennial
ED Neuse (1 5A NCAC 2B .0233)
El Tar -Pamlico (1 5A NCAC 2B .0259)
C3 Intermittent/Perennial Determination (where local buffer
ordinances apply)
El Jordan (15A NCAC 2B.0267)
(governmental and/or interjurisdictional
projects)
Project Name:
Address. -'Location
Stream(s):
Phobos SQkr
3602 Frazier Road Middlesex
Turkey CLpek
Determination Date: March 20, 2018 Staff. Gary Kreiser
Stream
E111P*
Not
su�jcct
Subject
Start@
Stop@
Soil
Surve
USGS
Topo
A
X
Off property
Pond
X
X
B
X
Pond
Confluence
with F
X
X
C
X
X
D
X
X
E
X
Blue flagging
Confluence
with F
X
F
X
Entire length of property
X
X
G
X
X
H
X
Off property
Confluence
with F
X
X
X
X
X
X
K
X
X
Pond
N
X
Division of Water Resources, Raleigh Regional Office, Water Quality Operations Section litip.lil)ortal.iicdeiir.org/Nveb..'Wcli'aps
1628 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1628 Phone: [phone]
Location: 3800 Barrett Drive, Raleigh, NC 27609 Fax: [phone]

Phobos Solar
Nash County
April 5,2018
Page 2 of 2
*E,-'I.P - Eplienici-eit,'Intet-ntitte)tt!'P(-,i-i-,nniciI
Explanation; The stream(s) listed above has been located on the most recent published NRCS Soil Survey of Nash
County, North Carolina and -or the most recent copy of the USGS Topographic map at a 1:24,000 scale. Each
stream that is checked "Not Subject" has been determined to not be at least intermittent or is not present. Streams
that are checked "SubjecChave been located on the property and possess characteristics that qualify it to be at least
an intermittent stream. There may be other streams located on the property that do not show up on the maps
referenced above but may be considered jurisdictional according to the US Army Corps of Engineers.
This on -site determination shall expire rive (5) years from the date of this letter. Landowners or affected
parties that dispute a determination made by the DWR may request a determination by the Director. An
appeal request must be made within sixty (60) days of date of this letter. A request for a determination by the
Director shall be referred to the Director in writing. If -vending via US Postal Service: c/o Karen Higgins;
DIVR - 401 A Buffer Perinitting Unit, 1617 Alail Service Center; Raleigh, NC27699-1617. Ifsending via
delivery service (UPS, Feiffiv, etc.): Karen Higgins; DJVR - 401 & Buffer Perinitting Unit; 512 N. Safisburj,
Street, Raleigh, NC 2 7604.
This determination is final and binding unless, as detailed above, unless an appeal is requested within sixty
(60) days.
This project may require a Section 404/401 Permit for the proposed activity. Any inquiries should be
directed to the US Army Corp of Engineers (Raleigh Regulatory Field Office) at (919)-554-4884.
If you have questions regarding this determination, please feel free to contact Gary Kreiser at (919) 791424 1.
S Dincey,
Danny Smith
Supervisor, Water Quality Regional Operations Center
cc: RRO DWR File Copy
Paul Farley, Land Management Group, Inc. (via email) pl'arlevLa hns-troup.net

18-080: Phobos Solar
I I
K Not DepIcted,
Not Sub
1: Not Depicted,
Not Subject
J: Not Depicted,
Not Subject
r
IPROJT
EC
AREA
is., I
IIN P. I
.91
n
Legend:
Approximate Site Boundary: r—I
B: Subjed
4� .. P
ev
WE]
r Pond: Subject
4
C. Not Depicted,
Not Subject
.0
D: Not Depict-
ed, Not Subject
r
E, Not Depicted,
Not'Depicted,
ubject
Map provided by NCDEQ Division of Water Resources
Locabons are approximate and are provided for reference only

18-080: Phobos Solar
K: Not
Subject
1: Not Subject -
J: Not Subject
C: Not Subject
lot TATE
Legend:
Approximate Site Boundary: Map provided by NCDEQ Division of Water Resources
Locations are approximate and are provided for reference only
Sheet # 11 and 15

APPENDIX C
Nash County Correspondence

From: Nancy Nixon
To: Wes Frya
Subject: RE: Nash County - Wetland Buffer Question
Date: Tuesday, 3uly 11, 2017 5:01:34 PIVI
Wes,
We don't have local environmental buffer requirements other than the 50' riparian buffers from
surface streams, etc. the panels would need to meet normal setbacks in the appropriate zoning
district and we have a screening requirement if any part of the array is within 100 feet of a property
zoned or used residentially.
Is your site in Nash County's jurisdiction? We have a number of towns with separate rules for solar
facilities and may also have their own buffer rules.
Please let me know if you have additional questions.
Wancy -'Al. Wixon, _AJCP
Planning Director
Nash County Planning & Inspections
120 West Washington Street, Suite 2110
Nashville, NC 27856
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
nanQy.nixon(d)nashcountync.ao
From: Wes Fryar [mailto:wfryar@ lmgroup. net]
Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2017 3:39 PM
To: Nancy Nixon <[e-mail]>
Subject: Nash County - Wetland Buffer Question
Hi Ms. Nixon,
I am an environmental consultant out of Wilmington, NC and have a question regarding the county
rules in regards to setbacks/buffers off of wetlands and/or surface waters. We are working on a
potential solar site in Nash County & wanted to know if there are any environmental setbacks &/or
buffers off of ditches, streams, ponds, or wetlands. If so, what are they? I am aware of the Tar -Pam
River buffers, but want to know if there are specifically any additional county buffers/setbacks to be
aware of. Thank you for your time and assistance!
Wes Fryar I Environmental Scientist — Project Manager
Direct: 452-0001 x 1927 1 Cell: 910.471.0018 1 Fax: [phone]
Email: wfrvar(cDImaroup.net I Website: www.Imciroup.net
Land Management Group, Inc I Environmental Consultants

3805 Wrightsville Ave I Suite 15 1 Wilmington, NC 28403
2tLMGUN ID M.414AGEMEVr CROUP tw.
fewifefff"OrPRO C*MOUhIffnf4
Please note that email sent to anqfrom this address is subject to the North Carolina
Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
Nash County Government

Nash County
Adopted
October 5, 1998
Effective Date: April 1, 1999
The Wooten Company
Engineering= -Planning= -Architecture
Raleigh/Greenville, North Carolina
* '? oLVew-s
:;ot,t� 5eJ�e-�-5 A--
'0�� AVV.- exVC$-"k-4^A—

(2) All built -upon area shall be designed and located to minimize stormwater
runoff impact to the receiving waters and minimize concentrated
stormwater flow.
(3) The remainder of the tract not built upon shall remain in a vegetated or
natural state. The title to the reserved open space area shall be
conveyed to an incorporated homeowners or property owners
association for management; to a local government for preservation as a
park or open space; or to a conservation organization for preservation in
a permanent easement. Where a property association is not
incorporated, a maintenance agreement shall be filed with the property
deeds.
12-1.7 Buffer Areas
(A) A minimum thirty-foot vegetative buffer for new development activities is
required along all perennial waters indicated on the most recent versions of
USGS 1:24,000 (7.5 minute) scale topographic maps or as determined by local
government studies. A minimum one hundred foot vegetative buffer is required
for all new development activities that utilize the high density development
option authorized by Section 12-1.12. Desirable artificial streambank or
shoreline stabilization is permitted.
(B) No new development is allowed in the buffer except for water -dependent
structures, other structures such as flag poles, signs and security lights which
result in only diminutive increases in impervious areas, and public projects such
as road crossings and greenways where no practicable alternative exists.
These activities should minimize built -upon surface area, direct runoff away
from the surface waters and maximize the utilization of stormwater Best
Management Practices. Desirable artificial streambank or shoreline stabilization
is permitted.
(C) Whenever the buffer requirements of other portions of this Ordinance are in
conflict with the provisions of this Section, the more stringent requirement shall
apply.
12-1.8 Existing Development
(A) Existing development, as defined in Section 2-4, is not subject to the provisions
of the watershed overlay district requirements. Redevelopment of and
expansion to existing development is allowed as provided for herein.
(B) Redevelopment of existing development is allowed if the rebuilding activity does
not result in a net increase in built -upon area or if the redevelopment activity
includes equal or greater stormwater control than the previous development.
However, existing single-family residential development may be redeveloped
without any restrictions.
(C) Expansions to uses and structures classified as existing development must
meet the requirements of this Section provided, however, that the built -upon
Nash County UDO—Article 12
October 5, 1998 12-5

the cost of inspection and maintenance if the BMPs are not properly
maintained and certified.
(D) Contact Information
1 . Name and address of the person or organization financially
responsible for maintenance specified in the annual inspection report.
2. Emergency contact information.
12-3.3.14 Failure to Comply with the Provisions of the Maintenance Agreement
Any violation of the Maintenance agreement shall be considered a violation of the
Unified Development Ordinance and shall be enforced in accordance with Article
Xil Section 12-3 6. In addition, if the situation meets the definition of a nuisance as
defined in NCGS 153A-140 other corrective actions may be taken.
12-3.3.15 Financial Security for Stormwater Control Structures
All new stormwater control structures shall be conditioned on the posting of
adequate financial assurance for the purpose of maintenance, repairs or
reconstruction necessary for adequate performance of the stormwater control
structures and shall be done so as required in Section 12-1.14.
12-3.3.16 Requirement of Sealed Drawings for Stormwater Facilities
Developers shall be required to submit the following sealed as -built drawings:
• Drawings of any new or addition to a stormwater conveyance by a private
developer;
• Drawings of all development sites to determine compliance with the
. approved plan" and the requirements of the Tar -Pamlico Overlay District.
• As -built plans of each BMP along with a statement under seal that the BMP
as constructed complies with the approved plans and the UDO.
12-3.3.17 Amendments and Variances to the Tar -Pam Overlay District Regulations
The county may not amend the program or grant a variance in a manner that fails to
meet the minimum requirements of the rule without prior approval from DWQ.
12-3.4 RIPARIAN BUFFER REGULATIONS
Riparian buffers shall be protected because in most cases they provide a measure
of protection for surface waters by removal of nutrients from nonpoint sources. The
riparian buffer regulations are intended to protect and preserve existing riparian
buffers and maintain their nutrient removal functions within the county's river
basins.
12-3.4.1 General Requirements
All of the regulations delineated in Section 12-3.4 are intended to comply with the
requirements of 15A NCAC 2B .0259. All property located in Nash County outside
of any municipal boundary or extraterritorial jurisdiction shall comply with the
riparian buffer regulations.
12-3.4.2 Applicability
Nash County UDO—Article 12
October 5, 1998
12-50

a. The Riparian Buffer regulations shall apply to all areas of the county outside of
any municipal boundary or its extraterritorial jurisdiction.
b. Riparian Buffer Exemption — Existing and ongoing uses within the riparian
buffer, if present as of January 1, 2000, may be exempt from the riparian buffer
protection requirements according to the provisions outlined in 15A NCAC 02B
.0259. Proposed developments, which have county approval, but have not
been constructed as of January 1, 2000, may not claim an exemption to the
riparian buffer protection requirements.
12-3.4.3 Definitions
DWQ — Division of Water Quality, NC Department of Environment and Natural
Resources.
Riparian Buffe — An area within 50' of intermittent and perennial streams, ponds,
lakes and estuarine waters in the basin where development is not allowed. These
areas are shown on either the USGS 7.5 minute topographic map or the NRCS Soil
Survey map unless the owner can show that the activity has been approved by
DWQ. Certain allowable uses within the buffer are described in 15A NCAC 2B
.0259.
12-3.4.4 Riparian Buffer Protection
The purpose of this regulation is to protect and preserve existing riparian buffers to
maintain their nutrient removal functions in the entire Tar -Pamlico River Basin. As
required by 15A NCAC 02B .0259, a fifty -foot (50') wide riparian buffer shall be
maintained directly adjacent to all perennial and intermittent streams, including
lakes, ponds and other bodies of water, excluding wetlands, as indicated on the
most recent version of the 1:24,000 scale (7 5 minutes) quadrangle topographic
maps prepared by the USGS and all other surface waters as indicated by the most
recent version of the Soil Survey for Nash County, North Carolina. Where obvious
conflicts exist between actual field conditions and USGS and county soil survey
maps, appeals may be made to the North Carolina Division of Water Quality.
12-3.4.5 Delineation of Buffer Zones
The buffer is divided into two zones, moving landward from the surface water, that
are afforded different levels of protection. Zone 1, the first 30 feet, is to remain
essentially undisturbed, while Zone 2, the outer 20 feet, must be vegetated but may
be managed in certain ways, such as grading and revegetating provided that the
health of the vegetation in Zone 1 is not compromised. Zones are specifically
described in 15 NCAC 02B.0259 (4)(a and b).
For intermittent and perennial streams, Zone 1 begins at the most landward limit of
the top of the bank or the rooted herbaceous vegetation and extending landward a
distance of 30 feet on all sides of the surface water, measured horizontally on a line
perpendicular to the surface water
Nash County UDO—Article 12
October 5, 1998 12-51

For ponds lakes and reservoirs located within a natural drainage way, Zone 1 shall
begin at the most landward limit of the normal water level or the rooted herbaceous
vegetation and extend landward a distance of 30 feet, measured horizontally on a
line perpendicular to the surface water.
Zone 2 shall begin at the outer edge of Zone 1 and extend landward 20 feet as
measured horizontally on a line perpendicular to the surface water. The combined
width of Zones 1 and 2 shall be 50 feet on all sides of the surface water.
12-3.4.6 Activity Within the Buffer
Activity may take place within any riparian buffer zone as defined by 15A NCAC
02B .0259 subject to approval from DWQ. No development proposal that includes
impact to the riparian buffer shall be approved by Nash County unless it includes
one of the following:
• Certifications from DWQ that surface waters are not present as determined
by an on -site inspection.
• An Authorization Certificate from DWQ for an "allowable" use such as a road
crossing or utility line, or for a use that is "allowable with mitigation" along
with a Division -approved mitigation plan has been obtained.
• A documented opinion from DWQ that a vested right has been established
for the proposed development activity.
• A letter from DWQ documenting that a variance has been approved for the
proposed development activity.
12-3.4.7 Buffers Depicted on Development Plans
Required riparian buffers shall be shown on all plats and/or site plans submitted
with a note indicating the protected nature of the buffer and how diffuse flow is to be
maintained. When required by the Planning Board, the placement of "no mow"
signs shall be required to relay the buffer protection to the public.
12-3.4.8 Variances to the Riparian Buffer Rule
Requests for variances to the Riparian Buffer Rule shall be directed to, and
approval sought from, the Division of Water Quality, DENR.
12-3.5 CONTROL OF ILLEGAL DISCHARGES
The Tar -Pamlico River Basin Model Stormwater Program for Nutrient Control
requires that local governments establish the legal authority to control illegal
discharges. The objectives of this article are to:
(A) Regulate the discharge of substances, which may contaminate or cause
pollution of stormwater, stormwater conveyances, or waters of the State;
(B) Regulate connections to the stormwater conveyance system;
(C) Provide for the proper handling of spills; and
(D) Provide for the enforcement of same.
Nash County UDO—Article 12
October 5, 1998 12-52

the development may not begin (and no building permits may be issued)
until the Commission approves the erosion control plan.
(B) For purposes of this Section, 'land disturbing activity' means any use of the land
by any person in residential, industrial, educational, institutional or commercial
development, highway and road construction and maintenance that results in a
change in the natural cover or topography and that may cause or contribute to
sedimentation except activities that are exempt under NCGS 113A-52(6)).
Sedimentation occurs whenever solid particulate matter, mineral or organic, is
transported by water, air, gravity, or ice from the site of its origin.
12-5 COORDINATION WITH THE US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS REGARDING
WETLANDS
If a developer, corporation, private landowner or other person proposes to perform
construction/filling activities in or near a lake, stream, creek, tributary or any unnamed
body of water and its adjacent wetlands, Federal permit authorization may be required
from the US Army Corps of Engineers prior to commencement of earth -disturbing
activities. The US Army Corps of Engineers shall be notified by the developer or
person proposing such earth -disturbing activities for possible issuance of Section 404
or other permits.
12-6 AIRPORT OVERLAY DISTRICT REQUIRMENTS
It is the intent of this Section to restrain influences which are adverse to the property and
safe conduct of aircraft operations in the vicinity of Rocky Mount Wilson Airport, to prevent
creation of conditions hazardous to aircraft operation, to prevent conflict with land
development which may result in loss of life and property, and to encourage development
which is compatible with airport use characteristics within the intent and purpose of zoning.
To this end, the "AO" designation, when appended to a basic district classification is
intended to coordinate the purpose and intent of this Section with other regulations duly
established by Nash County whose primary intent is to further the purposes set out above.
12-6.1 Definitions
As used in this Section, unless the context otherwise requires�
(a) AIRPORT- Means the Rocky Mount -Wilson Airport.
(b) AIRPORT ELEVATION - The highest point of landing areas, measured in feet above
mean sea level is 158.0'.
(c) APPROACH SURFACE- A surface longitudinally centered on the extended runway
centerline, extending outward and upward from the end of the primary surface and at the
same slope as the approach zone height limitation slope set forth in Section (E). In plan,
the perimeter of the approach surface coincides with the perimeter of the approach zone.
(d) APPROACH, TRANSITIONAL, HORIZONTAL, AND CONICAL ZONES- These zones
are set forth in Section 12-6.2.
Nash County UDO—Article 12
October 5, 1998 12-61

APPENDIX D
Site Photographs

'P,
Photo Station 1: East Facing Highway -
Perennial Stream
Photo Station 2: Facing Northeast -
Jurisdictional Pond
Photo Station 3: Facing West -
12" culvert under Valley Rd
Photo Station 1: West Facing Site From
Cu Ive rt Perennial Stream
Photo Station 2: Facing Southwest
Intermittent Stream
r"o'0
e.4
OKI
-4; 10W I
Photo Station 4: Facing West -
12" culvert under Valley Road
Phobos Solar
LMG
I
Nash County, NC
LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP
1
1
Site Photographs
www.lmgroup.net
April 2017
3805 Wrightsville Avenue
LMG # 0 1 -1 7-107W
Wilmington, NC 28403
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]

40b 'V
.4 thad - -*,
Photo Station 5: Facing East-
18" culvert under Valley Rd.
Photo Station 6: Facing South-
18" concrete culvert
Photo Station 7: Facing North -
18" concrete culvert
Photo Station 6: Looking East into Site
from Prophecy Rd.
Photo Station 7: Facing East into Site -
from Prophecy Rd.
.. , *i�!O ,
Photo Station 8: Facing Northeast -
along Powerline
Phobos Solar LMG
Nash County, NC Site Photographs
www.LMGroup.net
April 2017 Phone: [phone] - Fax: [phone]
LMG # 0 1 - 1 7-107W 3805 Wrightsville Ave
I I Wilmington, NC 28403

PAW
Photo Station 8: Facing South along
perennial stream with 24" corrugated culvert
Photo Station 10: Facing North -
24" concrete culvert in stream
Photo Station 11: Facing East
Old Tram Road
! YL
A
; kin V
Photo Station 9: Facing West -
Photo Station 10: Facing South
along Perennial Stream
ILI
Photo Station 11: Facing South -
18" concrete culvert
Phobos Solar LMG
Nash County, NC
www.LMGroup.net Site Photographs
April 2017 Phone: [phone] - Fax: [phone]
LMG # 0 1 - 1 7-107W 3805 Wrightsville Ave
I I Wilmington, NC 28403

Photo Station 12: Facing West -
Wetland "NA line"
4t
Photo Station 14: Facing West -
Perennial Stream
-.000MOMI.— Ashk �
Photo Station 16: Facing Northeast -
18" outlet pipe
Photo Station 13: Facing South -
Perennial Stream
Photo Station 15: Facing East -
Intermittent Stream Point
Photo Station 16: Facing Northwest -
upland forest
Phobos Solar LMG
VIV U&NAl"INT UA WUP -
Nash County, NC t
www.LMGroup.net Site Photographs
April 2017 Phone: [phone] - Fax: [phone]
LMG # 0 1 - 1 7-107W 3805 Wrightsville Ave
I I Wilmington, NC 28403

IM
AM �' W.,
Photo Station 16: Facing Southwest -
Intermittent Stream
Photo Station 17: Facing West-
404 Wetlands and Pond
Photo Station 18: Facing West -
404 Wetlands
Photo Station 17: Facing East -
Agricultural Field
Photo Station 18: Facing North -
Intermittent Stream
Photo Station 19: Facing South -
Perennial Stream
Phobos Solar LMG
VIV U&NAl"INT UA WUP -
Nash County, NC t
www.LMGroup.net Site Photographs
April 2017 Phone: [phone] - Fax: [phone]
LMG # 0 1 - 1 7-107W 3805 Wrightsville Ave
I I Wilmington, NC 28403

Photo Station 20: Facing South -
404 Wetlands and field
Photo Station 21: Facing North -
Upland Agricultural Fields
big
Photo Station 23: Facing West -
Upland Forested Area
Photo Station 20: Facing East-
404 Wetlands
Photo Station 22: Facing Northeast -
Utility Easement
Phobos Solar LMG
VIV U&NM"INT GROUP
Nash County, NC t
www.LMGroup.net Site Photographs
April 2017 Phone: [phone] - Fax: [phone]
LMG # 0 1 - 1 7-107W 3805 Wrightsville Ave
I I Wilmington, NC 28403

TIM!
Photo Station 24: Facing North -
Along perennial stream and wetlands
Photo Station 25: Facing Southwest -
Along perennial stream
Photo Station 26: Facing South
Along intermittent stream
Phobos Solar LMG
a[
rNesh County, NC www.LMGroup.net Site Photographs
April 2017 Phone: [phone] - Fax: [phone]
L L
MG # 0 1 - 1 7-107W 3805 Wrightsville Ave
Wilmington, NC 28403