NCG070226_Inspection Report_20210519

Compliance Inspection Report
Permit: NCG070226 Effective: Expiration: Owner : Potters Industries LLC
SOC: Effective: Expiration: Facility: Potters Industries - Thomasville
County: Davidson 513 County Line Rd
Region: Winston-Salem
Thomasville NC 27360
Contact Person: Richard Moore
Title:
Phone: [phone]
Directions to Facility:
From 1-85, Exit 106 take Finch Farm Rd. heading north for 1.1 mi. take left onto County Line Road sit is 0.25 mi on right
System Classifications:
Primary ORC: Certification: Phone:
Secondary ORC(s):
On -Site Representative(s):
Related Permits:
Inspection Date: 05/19/2021 Entry Time 01:30PM Exit Time: 02:OOPM
Primary Inspector: Blane Houck Phone: [phone]
Secondary Inspector(s):
Reason for Inspection: Routine Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Permit Inspection Type: Stone, Clay, Glass, and Concrete Products Stormwater Discharge COC
Facility Status: Compliant ❑ Not Compliant
Question Areas:
Storm Water
(See attachment summary)
Page 1 of 3

Permit: NCG070226 Owner - Facility: Potters Industries LLC
Inspection Date: 05/19/2021 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
This facility was inspected on May 19, 2021 to evaluate compliance with a recently submitted Notice of Intent. The
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) was reviewed, and it was determined to be adequate. The inspection
revealed no compliance issues, and the facility will be recommended for permit coverage.
Page 2 of 3

Permit: NCG070226 Owner - Facility: Potters Industries LLC
Inspection Date: 05/19/2021 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Reason for Visit: Routine
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
Yes No NA NE
Does the site have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan?
❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a General Location (USGS) map?
❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a "Narrative Description of Practices"?
❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a detailed site map including outfall locations and drainage areas?
❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a list of significant spills occurring during the past 3 years?
❑ ❑ ❑
# Has the facility evaluated feasible alternatives to current practices?
❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the facility provide all necessary secondary containment?
❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a BMP summary?
❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a Spill Prevention and Response Plan (SPRP)?
❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping Plan?
❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the facility provide and document Employee Training?
0
❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a list of Responsible Party(s)?
0
❑ ❑ ❑
# Is the Plan reviewed and updated annually?
0
❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a Stormwater Facility Inspection Program?
0
❑ ❑ ❑
Has the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan been implemented?
0
❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: The Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) was reviewed, and it was determined to be
adequate.
Qualitative Monitoring
Yes No NA NE
Has the facility conducted its Qualitative Monitoring semi-annually?
❑
❑ 0 ❑
Comment: Enough time has not been allotted to necessitate sampling. Technical guidance
was provided
to the site contact regarding Qualitative Monitoring requirements.
Analytical Monitoring
Yes No NA NE
Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring?
❑
❑ 0 ❑
# Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring from Vehicle Maintenance areas?
❑
❑ 0 ❑
Comment: Enough time has not been allotted to necessitate sampling. Technical guidance
was provided
to the site contact regarding Analytical Monitoring requirements.
Permit and Outfalls
Yes No NA NE
# Is a copy of the Permit and the Certificate of Coverage available at the site?
❑
❑ ❑
# Were all outfalls observed during the inspection?
❑ ❑ ❑
# If the facility has representative outfall status, is it properly documented by the Division?
❑
❑ ❑
# Has the facility evaluated all illicit (non stormwater) discharges?
❑
❑ 0 ❑
Comment: This facility has not vet been granted a Certificate of Coverage (COC). An outfall was observed
during the site visit. However, information regarding representative outfall status for this facility
has not been received by this office. Enough time has not been allotted to necessitate the
evaluation of illicit (non-stormwater) discharges in accordance with the
proposed SWPPP.
Page 3 of 3