Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutNC0004979_Regional Office Historical File Pre 2018 PAT MCCRORY Governor r ja DONALD R. VAN DER VAART Secretary Water Resources S. JAY ZIMMERMAN ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY Director November 25,2015 Mr. Brent Dueitt,General Manager II Regional Stations Duke Energy Carolinas,LLC 253 Plant Allen Road Belmont,North Carolina 28012 Subject: Toxicity Test Results Duke Energy Carolinas Allen Steam Station NPDES Permit No.NC004979 Gaston County Dear Mr. Dueitt: Enclosed is a copy of the toxicity test results relative to the samples collected at the subject facility on October 6 and 8,2015 by Mr.Wes Bell of this Office. Whole effluent samples were collected for use in a chronic Ceriodaphnia dubia pass/fail toxicity test. The test passed utilizing these samples. The report should be self-explanatory;however, should you have any questions concerning this report,please do not hesitate to contact Ms.Carol Hollenkamp at(919)743-8450 and/or Mr.Wes Bell at (704)235-2192, or at carol.hollenkamp@ncdenr.gov and wes.bell@ncdenr.gov. Sincerely, rL. Michael L.Parker,Regional Supervisor Mooresville Regional Office Water Quality Regional Operations Section Division of Water Resources,DEQ Enclosure: Toxicity Test Results cc: MSC 1617-Central Files/Basement Susan Meadows,Aquatic Toxicity Unit Gaston County Health Department WB State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality I Water Resources I Water Quality Regional Operations Division of Water Resources November 19,2015 MEMORAISIXIM To: Michael Parker Water Quality Regional Operations,MRO Through: Cindy A.Moore Supervisor,Aquatic Toxicology Branch(ATB) From: Carol Hollenkamp CM Quality Assurance Officer,Aquatic Toxicology Branch(ATB) Subject: -Whole effluent toxicity test results Duke Energy Allen Steam Station NPDES Permit#NC0004979/002 Gaston County The-aquatic toxicity test using grab samples of effluent discharged from the Duke Energy Allen Steam Station has been completed. Duke Energy Allen Steam Station has a permitted effluent discharge entering the Catawba River(7Q10 of 95 CFS). Whole effluent samples were collected on October 6 and October 8 by Wes Bell and facility representative Michael Gantt for use in a chronic Ceriodaphnia dubia pass-fail toxicity test. This test passed. Toxicity test information.follows. Test Type 3-Brood Ceriodaphnia dubia chronic pass fail Teat Concentrations 20% Test Remit Pass Control Survival 92% Control Mean Reproduction 23.25 neonates Test Treatment Survival 92% Treatment Me=Reproduction 23.0 nooMeal First Sample pH .7.21 SU First Sample Conductivity 306 miczoinhosictn First Sample Total Residual Chlorine <0.10 mg11., Second Sample pH 7.23 SU Second Sample Conductivity 309 micromhos/cm Second Sample Total Residual Chlorine <0.10 mgiL Test results for the above samples indicate that the effluent would not be predicted to have water quality impacts.These samples were split with Environmental Testing Solutions,Inc. The test conducted by Environmental Testing Solutions,Inc.,also passed. Please contact us if you have any questions or if further effluent toxicity monitoring is.desired. We may be reached at(919)743-8401. Basin: CTB34 cc: Central Files Wes Bell(IvIRO) • Aquatic Toxicology Branch Water Sciences Section fr,k/ • AA, NCDENR North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Division of Water Quality Dee Freeman Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins Secretary Governor Director May 18, 2009 Mr. Don Scruggs Duke Power Allen Steam Station 243 Plant Allen Road Belmont,North Carolina 28012 Subject: Toxicity Test Results Duke Power Allen Steam Station NPDES Permit No. NC0004979 Gaston County,NC • Dear Mr. Scruggs: Enclosed is a copy of the toxicity test results relative to the inspection conducted at the subject facility on May•5 and 8, 2009by John Lesley of this Office. Effluent samples of outfall 002 were collected on May 5 and 8, 2009 for use in a chronic Ceriodaphnia dubia pass/fail toxicity test. The test utilizing these samples resulted in a pass. The report should be self-explanatory; however, should you have any questions concerning this report, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Lesley or me at (704) 663-1699. Sincerely, • (TT: obert B. Krebs Regional Supervisor Surface Water Protection Enclosure cc: Susan Meadows, Aquatic Toxicology Unit Mooresville Regional Office Location:610 East Center Ave.,Suite 301 Mooresville,NC 28115 One Phone:(704)663-1699\Fax:(704)663-6040\Customer Service: 1-877-623-6748 NorthCarolina Internet:www.ncwaterquality.org tl(1 lhn m An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer-50%Recycledl10°%Post Consumer paper a """, ""�/ RECF h Division of Water Quality SAY , $ 2009 May 14,2009 , ;..,r iJLiNiK uvi?' DWQ-Surface Water Ploi lion MEMORANDUM To: Rob Krebs Regional Supervisor,Surface Water Protection,MRO '', y Through: Cindy A.Moore C\ Supervisor,Aquatic Toxicology Unit r/ From: Carol Hollenkamp('( Quality Assurance Officer,Aquatic Toxicology Unit ,.,qu .'y� Subject: Whole effluent toxicity test results !.'i Duke Power-Allen 002 `' NPDES Permit#NC0004979/002 "` rk Gaston County The aquatic toxicity test using grab samples of effluent discharged from Duke Power-Allen 002 has been completed. Duke Power-Allen 002has an effluent discharge permitted that is not limited entering the Catawba River(7Q10 of 95.0 CFS). Whole effluent samples were collected as grab samples on May 5 and May 8 by John Lesley for use in a chronic Ceriodaphnia dubia pass/fail toxicity test. The test using these ,' samples resulted in a pass. Toxicity test information follows. Test Type 3-Brood Ceriodaphnia d• ubia pass/fail C.c Test Concentrations 24.0%sample ., , Test Result Pass i' Control Survival 100% 4 '�$ Control Mean Reproduction 19.9 neonates Test Treatment Survival 100% 07 Treatment Mean Reproduction 20.5 neonates First Sample pH 6.32 SU First Sample Conductivity 241 micromhos/cm First Sample Total Residual Chlorine <0.0052 mg/L Second Sample pH 6.70 SU o Second Sample Conductivity 332 micromhos/cm '_,," Second Sample Total Residual Chlorine <0.0052 mg/L Test results for the above samples indicate that the effluent would not be predicted to have water quality impacts on receiving water. Please contact us if further effluent toxicity monitoring is desired. We may be reached at(919)743-8401. Basin: CTB 34 cc: Central Files John Lesley, MRO Aquatic Toxicology Unit Environmental Sciences Section W A 0 �0 qOG Michael F.Easley, vc,,, William G.Ross Jr.,Secre:.,. North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Reso O `C Alan W.Klimek,P.E. Division of Water Qua`:: July 27, 2006 Mr. Don Scruggs Duke Power Company-Allen Steam Station 253 Plant Allen Road Belmont,NC 28012 Subject: Toxicity Test Results Duke Power Allen Steam Station NPDES Permit No. NC0004979 Gaston County,NC Dear Mr. Scurggs: Enclosed is a copy of the toxicity test results relative to the inspection conducted at the subject facility on July 14, 2006 by John Lesley of this Office. Effluent Samples (outfall 002) were collected on July 11 and 14, 2006 by Division staff for use in a chronic Ceriodaphnia dubia pass/fail toxicity test. The test utilizing these samples resulted in a pass. The report should be self-explanatory; however, should you have any questions concerning this report,please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Lesley or me at(704) 663-1699. Sincerely, Ce—or D. Rex Gleason, P.E. lSurface Water Protection Regional Supervisor Enclosure cc: Central Files Kevin Bowden,Aquatic Toxicology Unit Gaston County Health Department No ®WAA e Ati* hCarolirc NCDENR Naturaif Mooresville Regional Office Division of Water Quality Phone 704-663-1699 Customer Ser la Internet: www.ncwaterqualitv.org 610 East Center Ave,Suite 301 Mooresville,NC 28115 Fax 704-663-6040 1-877-623-6748 An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer-50%Recycled/10%Post Consumer Paper Duke Power Allen Steam Station NPDES Permit No. NC0004979 Page 2 Whole effluent samples of outfall 002 were collected on July 11 and 14, 2006 by John Lesley for use in a chronic Ceriodaphnia dubia pass/fail toxicity test. Duke Power Allen Steam Station- 002 has an effluent discharge permitted at 11.6 MGD entering the Catawba River(7Q10 of 95.0 CFS). The test using these samples resulted in a pass. Toxicity test information follows: Test Type 3-Brood Ceriodaphnia dubia pass/fail Test Concentration 16% sample Test Result Pass Control Survival 100% Control Mean Reproduction 24.8 neonates Test Treatment Survival 100% Treatment Mean Reproduction 27.1 neonates First Sample pH 6.00 SU First Sample Conductivity 193 micromhos/cm First Sample Total Residual Chlorine <0.0052 mg/1 Second Sample pH 6.49 SU Second Sample Conductivity 185 micromhos/cm Second Sample Total Residual Chlorine <0.0052 mg/1 Test results for these samples indicate that the effluent would not be predicted to have water quality impacts on the receiving stream. W A 7-E Michael F.Easley.Governor -= 9 William G.Ross Jr.,Secretary_,/' �n c3 Y ` QG North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources 1- Vj ' Coleen Sullins.Director '— Division of Water Quality 0 = `C February 20, 2008 Mr. Don Scruggs Duke Power Allen Steam Station 243 Plant Allen Road Belmont,North Carolina 28012 Subject: Toxicity Test Results Duke Power Allen Steam Station NPDES Permit No.NC0004979 Gaston County,NC Dear Mr. Scruggs: Enclosed is a copy of the toxicity test results relative to the inspection conducted at the subject facility on January 22 and 25, 2008 by John Lesley of this Office. Effluent samples of outfall 002 were collected on January 22 and 25, 2008 for use in a chronic pass/fail toxicity test. The test utilizing these samples resulted in a pass. The report should be self-explanatory; however, should you have any questions concerning this report, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Lesley or me at(704)663-1699. Sincerely, for Robert B. Krebs Regional Supervisor Surface Water Protection Enclosure cc: Central Files Susan Meadows,Aquatic Toxicology Unit Gaston County Health Department 4y 1 hCarolina 40144 Naturally Nr.[1E N.C.Division of Water Quality,Mooresville Regional Office,610 E.Center Ave.Suite 301,Mooresville NC 28115 (704)663-1699 Customer Service 1-877-623-6748 Duke Power Allen Steam Station NPDES Permit No.NC0004979 Page 2 Whole effluent samples were collected on January 22 and 25,2008 by John Lesley for use in a chronic Ceriodaphnia dubia pass/fail toxicity test. Duke Power Allen Steam Station outfall 002 is discharged to the Catawba River (7Q10 of 95.0 CFS). The test using these samples resulted in a pass. Toxicity test information follows: Test Type 3-Brood Ceriodaphnia dubia pass/fail Test Concentration 24%sample Test Result Pass Control Survival 100% Control Mean Reproduction 37.6 neonates Test Treatment Survival 100% Treatment Mean Reproduction 33.4 neonates First Sample pH 6.19 SU First Sample Conductivity 203 micromhos/cm First Sample Total Residual Chlorine not available due to matrix interferences Second Sample pH 6.45 SU Second Sample Conductivity 201 micromhos/cm Second Sample Total Residual Chlorine <0.0052 mg/1 Test results for these samples indicate that the discharge would not be predicted to have water quality impacts on the receiving stream. 'r4 ,71: i Division of Water Quality , =_7CES 41./ July 24, 2006 •V JUL 2 7 2006 MEMORANDUM To: Rex Gleason t: Regional Supervisor, Surface Water Protection, MRO 1.1n From: Sandy Mort Quality Assurance Officer, Aquatic Toxicology Unit Subject: Whole effluent toxicity test results Duke Power-Allen 002 NPDES Permit#NC0004979/002 Gaston County The aquatic toxicity test using grab samples of effluent discharged from Duke Power-Allen 002 has been completed. Duke Power-Allen 002 has an effluent discharge permitted at 11.6 million gallons per day(MGD) entering Catawba River(7Q10 of 95.0 CFS). Whole effluent samples were collected on July 11 and 14, 2006 by John Lesley for use in a chronic Ceriodaphnia dubia pass/fail toxicity test. The test using these samples resulted in a pass. Toxicity test information follows. Test Type 3-Brood Ceriodaphnia dubia pass/fail Test Concentrations 16% sample Test Result Pass Control Survival 100% Control Mean Reproduction 24.8 neonates Test Treatment Survival 100% Treatment Mean Reproduction 27.1 neonates First Sample pH 6.00 SU First Sample Conductivity 193 micromhos/cm First Sample Total Residual Chlorine <0.0052 mg/L Second Sample pH 6.49 SU Second Sample Conductivity 185 micromhos/cm Second Sample Total Residual Chlorine <0.0052 mg/L Test results for these samples indicate that the effluent would not be predicted to have water quality impacts on receiving water. Please contact us if further effluent toxicity monitoring is desired. We maybe reached at (919) 733-2136. Basin: CTB34 cc: Central Files John Lesley, MRO F W AT-• Michael F.Ea. Governor „� Rp William G.Ross Jr..Secretary \�� G North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Alan W.Klimek.P.E.Director > Daja ._l Division of Water Quality p Y October 7,2004 Mr. Michael Ruhe,Manager Water Protection Duke Power Company PO Box 1006 (EC11E) Charlotte,North Carolina 28201-1006 Subject: Toxicity Test Results Duke Power Company Allen Steam Station NPDES Permit No.NC0004979 Gaston County, NC Dear Mr. Ruhe: Enclosed is a copy of the toxicity test results relative to the inspection conducted at the subject facility on September 24, 2004 by John Lesley of this Office. Effluent Samples were collected on September 21 and 24, 2004 by Division staff for use in a chronic pass/fail toxicity test. The test utilizing these samples resulted in a pass. The report should be self-explanatory; however, should you have any questions concerning this report,please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Lesley or me at(704) 663-1699. • Sincerely, D. Rex Gleason,P.E. Water Quality Regional Supervisor Enclosure cc: Central Files Kevin Bowden,Aquatic Toxicology Unit Gaston County Health Department NorthCarolina naturally LA*ALA NCDENR N.C.Division of Water Quality,Mooresville Regional Office,610 E.Central Ave.Suite 301,Mooresville NC 28115 (704)663-1699 Customer Service 1-877-623-6748 Duke Power—Allen Steam Station NPDES Permit No. NC0004979 Page 2 Whole effluent samples were collected on September 21 and 24, 2004 by John Lesley for use in a chronic Ceriodaphnia dubia pass/fail toxicity test. Duke Power Allen Steam Station outfall 002 has an effluent discharge permitted at 11.6 MGD entering Catawba River(7Q10 of 95.0 CFS). The test using these samples resulted in a pass. Toxicity test information follows: Test Type 3-Brood Ceriodaphnia dubia pass/fail Test Concentration 16 % sample Test Result Pass Control Survival 100% Control Mean Reproduction 19.5 neonates Test Treatment Survival 91.7 % Treatment Mean Reproduction 19.2 neonates First Sample pH 6.99 SU First Sample Conductivity 161 micromhos/cm First Sample Total Residual Chlorine <0.0052 mg/1 Second Sample pH 6.43 SU Second Sample Conductivity 170 micromhos/cm Second Sample Total Residual Chlorine <0.0052 mg/1 Test results for these samples indicate that the effluent would not be predicted to have water quality impacts on the receiving stream. / / Division of Water Quality 1 ac�E�� ANC October 4, 2004 1A�R „ FIC MEMORANDUM OCT 0 7 2004 To: Rex Gleason Water Quality Supervisor,MRO Through: Matt Matthews t' WATER r IOU Supervisor, Aquatic Toxicology Unit From: Sandy Mort may( / Quality Assurance Officer, Aquatic Toxicology Unit Subject: Whole effluent toxicity test results Duke Power-Allen 002 NPDES Permit#NC0004979/002 Gaston County The aquatic toxicity test using grab samples of effluent discharged from Duke Power-Allen 002 has been completed. Duke Power-Allen 002 has an effluent discharge permitted at 11.6 million gallons per day(MGD) entering Catawba River(7Q10 of 95.0 CFS). Whole effluent samples were collected on September 21 and 24, 2004 by John Lesley for use in a chronic Ceriodaphnia dubia pass/fail toxicity test. The test using these samples resulted in a pass. Toxicity test information follows. Test Type 3-Brood Ceriodaphnia dubia pass/fail Test Concentrations 16% sample Test Result Pass Control Survival 100% Control Mean Reproduction 19.5 neonates Test Treatment Survival 91.7% Treatment Mean Reproduction 19.2 neonates First Sample pH 6.99 SU First Sample Conductivity 161 micromhos/cm First Sample Total Residual Chlorine <0.0052 mg/L Second Sample pH 6.43 SU Second Sample Conductivity 170 micromhos/cm Second Sample Total Residual Chlorine <0.0052 mg/L Test results for these samples indicate that the effluent would not be predicted to have water quality impacts on receiving water. Please contact us if further effluent toxicity monitoring is desired. We maybe reached at (919) 733-2136. Basin: CTB34 Cc: Central Files Aquatic Toxicology Unit Environmental Sciences Section fsiAle-t44 State of North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Division of Water Quality 919 North Main Street Mooresville,North Carolina 28115 January 8, 2004 CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED Mr. Michael A. Ruhe 7003 2260 0001 3491 1081 Duke Energy Corporation—Allen Steam Station PO Box 1006 Charlotte,North Carolina 28201-1006 SUBJECT: NOTICE OF VIOLATION Effluent Toxicity Testing NPDES Permit No.NC0004979/002 Allen Steam Station WWTP Gaston County Dear Mr. Ruhe: This is to inform you that a review of your toxicity self-monitoring report form for the month of October 2003 indicates a violation of the toxicity limitation specified in your NPDES Permit. • You should take whatever remedial actions are necessary to eliminate the conditions causing the effluent toxicity violation(s). Your efforts may include conducting a Toxicity Reduction Evaluation (TRE) which is a site-specific study designed to identify the causative agents of effluent toxicity, isolate the sources of toxicity, evaluate the effectiveness of toxicity control options, and then confirm reductions in effluent toxicity. Please be aware that North Carolina General Statutes provide for assessment of civil penalties for violations of NPDES permit limitations and requirements. The reverse side of this Notice contains important information concerning your Whole Effluent Toxicity Monitoring and Reporting Requirements. Please note updated mailing addresses for submitting your Discharge Monitoring Reports (DMRs) and Aquatic Toxicity (AT) Test Forms. We encourage you to review this information and if it would be helpful to discuss this situation or possible solutions to resolve effluent toxicity noncompliance, please contact Mr. John Lesley with this office at (704) 663- 1699. Sincerely, D. Rex Gleason,P.E. Regional Water Quality Supervisor cc: Aquatic Toxicology Unit Central Files I tti) Michael F.Easley, e�. error William G.Ross Jr.,Secretary CO North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources > — Alan W.Klimek,P.E.,Director Division of Water Quality Coleen H.Sullins,Deputy Director Division of Water Quality • September 29, 2003 Mr. Michael Ruhe, Manager Water Protection Duke Energy Corporation Post Office Box 1006 (EC 11 E) Charlotte,North Carolina 28201-1006 Subject: Toxicity Test Results Duke Power Allen Steam Station NPDES Permit No. NC0004979 Gaston County, NC Dear Ruhe: Enclosed is a copy of the toxicity test results relative to the inspection conducted at the subject facility on September 16, 2003 by John Lesley of this Office. Effluent Samples were :3M= collected on September 16 and 19, 2003 by Division staff for use in a chronic toxicity test. The test utilizing these samples resulted in a pass. The report should be self-explanatory; however, should you have any questions concerning this report, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Lesley or me at (704) 663-1699. KLV Sincerely, Rex Gleason,P.E. <Water Quality Regional Supervisor Enclosure cc: Central Files Aquatic Toxicology Unit Gaston County Health Department vy. 4 NCDENR Mooresville Regional Office,919 North Main Street,Mooresville,North Carolina 28115 Phone 704-663-1699 Customer Service Fax 704-663-6040 1-877-623-6748 Duke Power Allen Steam Station NPDES Permit No. NC0004979 Page 2 Whole effluent samples were collected on September 16 and 19, 2003 by Division staff for use in a chronic Ceriodaphnia dubia pass/fail toxicity test. Duke Power Allen Steam Station has an effluent discharge permitted at 11.6 MGD entering the Catawba River(7Q10 of 95.0 CFS). The test using these samples resulted in a pass. Toxicity test information follows: Test Type 3-Brood Ceriodaphnia dubia pass/fail Test Concentration 16% sample Test Result Pass Control Survival 100% Control Mean Reproduction 28.8 neonates Test Treatment Survival 91.7% Treatment Mean Reproduction 26.9 neonates First Sample pH 6.84 SU First Sample Conductivity 198 micromhos/cm First Sample Total Residual Chlorine <0.0052 mg/1 Second Sample pH 6.72 SU Second Sample Conductivity 192 micromhos/cm Second Sample Total Residual Chlorine <0.0052 mg/1 Test results for these samples indicate that the effluent would not be predicted to have water quality impacts on the receiving stream. v .. Division of Water Quality we @LPi•OF ENVIRONMENT - Aquatic Toxicology Unit AND NATURAL NESOl1RC M ESIIILLEpcGIONAL OFFICE September 24, 2003 r SEP 2 9 2003 MEMORANDUM To: Rex Gleason Water Quality Supervisor,MRO SAT k Through: Matt Matthews i`1 Supervisor,Aquatic Toxicology Unit From: Sandy Mort 41)4/ Quality Assurance Officer,Aquatic Toxicology Unit Subject: Whole effluent toxicity test results Duke Power-Allen 002 NPDES Permit#NC0004979/002 Gaston County The aquatic toxicity test using grab samples of effluent discharged from Duke Power-Allen 002 has been completed. Duke Power-Allen 002 has an effluent discharge permitted at 11.6 million gallons per day(MGD)entering Catawba River(7Q10 of 95.0 CFS). Whole effluent samples were collected on September 16 and 19,2003 by John Lesley for use in a chronic Ceriodaphnia dubia pass/fail toxicity test. The test using these samples resulted in a pass. Toxicity test information follows. Test Type 3-Brood Ceriodaphnia dubia pass/fail Test Concentrations 16% sample Test Result Pass Control Survival 100% Control Mean Reproduction 28.8 neonates Test Treatment Survival 91.7% Treatment Mean Reproduction 26.9 neonates First Sample pH 6.84 SU First Sample Conductivity 198 micromhos/cm First Sample Total Residual Chlorine <0.0052 mg/L Second Sample pH 6.72 SU Second Sample Conductivity 192 micromhos/cm Second Sample Total Residual Chlorine <0.0052 mg/L Test results for these samples indicate that the effluent would not be predicted to have water quality impacts on receiving water. Please contact us if further effluent toxicity monitoring is desired. We may be reached at(919)733-2136. Basin: CTB34 cc: Central Files Environmental Sciences Branch Water Quality Section State of North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Division of Water Quality 919 North Main Street Mooresville,North Carolina 28115 December 21, 2001 3.40 DUOI `1(o33 q� CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED Mr. Michael A. Rhue Duke Power- Allen SE Power Plant 13339 Hagers Ferry Road Huntersville, North Carolina 28078 SUBJECT: NOTICE OF VIOLATION Whole Effluent Toxicity (WET)Testing NPDES Permit No. NC0004979/002 Duke Power- Allen SE Power Plant WWTP Gaston County Dear Mr. Rhue: This is to inform you that a review of your toxicity self-monitoring report form for the month of October 2001 indicates a violation of the toxicity limitation specified in your NPDES Permit. You should take whatever remedial actions are necessary to eliminate the conditions causing the effluent toxicity violation(s). Your efforts may include conducting a Toxicity Reduction Evaluation (TRE) which is a site-specific study designed to identify the causative agents of effluent toxicity, isolate the sources of toxicity, evaluate the effectiveness of toxicity control options, and then confirm reductions in effluent toxicity. Please be aware that North Carolina General Statutes provide for assessment of civil penalties for violations of NPDES permit limitations and requirements. The reverse side of this Notice contains important information concerning your Whole Effluent Toxicity Monitoring and Reporting Requirements. Please note updated mailing addresses for submitting your Discharge Monitoring Reports (DMRs) and Aquatic Toxicity (AT) Test Forms. We encourage you to review this information and if it would be helpful to discuss this situation or possible solutions to resolve effluent toxicity noncompliance, please contact Mr. John Lesley with this office at (704) 663- 1699. Sincerely, ic., D. Rex Gleason, P.E. Regional Water Quality Supervisor cc: Aquatic Toxicology Unit Central Files -"gligilliq WHOLE EFFLUENT TOXICITY MONITORING AND REPORTING INFORMATION )' The following items are provided in art effort to assist you with identifying critical and sometimes overlooked toxicity testing and reporting information. Please take time to review this information.The items below do not address or include all the toxicity testing and reporting requirements contained in your NPDES permit. If you should have any questions about your toxicity testing requirement,please contact Mr. Kevin Bowden with the Aquatic Toxicology Unit at(919)733-2136 or another Unit representative at the same number. > The permittee is responsible for ensuring that toxicity testing is conducted according to the permit requirement and that toxicity report forms are appropriately filed. > The reporting of whole effluent toxicity testing data is a dual requirement. All toxicity test results must be entered (with the appropriate parameter code) on your monthly Discharge Monitoring Report which is submitted to: North Carolina Division of Water Quality Central Files 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh,NC 27699-1617 IN ADDITION Toxicity test data(original"AT"form)must be submitted to the following address: North Carolina Division of Water Quality Environmental Sciences Branch 1621 Mail Service Center Raleigh,North Carolina 27699-1621 • Toxicity test results shall be filed with the Environmental Sciences Branch no later than 30 days after the end of the reporting period(eg,January test result is due by the end of February). • Toxicity test condition language contained in your NPDES permit may require use of multiple concentration toxicity testing upon failure of any single quarterly toxicity test. If the initial pass/fail test fails or if the chronic value is lower than the permit limit, then at least two multiple concentration toxicity tests (one per month)will be conducted over the following two months. As many analyses as can be completed will be accepted. If your NPDES permit does not require use of multiple concentration toxicity testing upon failure of any single quarterly test, you may choose to conduct either single concentration toxicity testing or multiple concentration toxicity testing per the Division's WET enforcement initiatives effective July 1, 1999. Follow-up multiple concentration toxicity testing will influence the Division's enforcement response. • Toxicity testing months are specified by the NPDES Permit, except for NPDES Permits which contain episodic toxicity monitoring requirements (eg, if the testing months specified in your NPDES permit are March, June, September,and December,then toxicity testing must be conducted during these months). > If your NPDES Permit specifies episodic monitoring and your facility does not have a discharge from January 1- June 30, then you must provide written notification to the Environmental Sciences Branch by June 30 that a discharge did not occur during the first six months of the calendar year. > If you receive notification from your contract laboratory that a test was invalidated, you should immediately notify the Environmental Sciences Branch at(919) 733-2136 and provide written documentation indicating why the test was invalidated and the date when follow-up testing will occur. If your facility is required to conduct toxicity testing during a month in which no discharge occurs,you should complete the information block located at the top of the AT form indicating the facility name, permit number, pipe number, county and the month/year of the subject report. You should also write "No Flow" on the AT form,sign the form and submit following normal procedures. > The Aquatic Toxicity Test forms shall be signed by the facility's Operator in Responsible Charge (ORC) except for facilities which have not received a facility classification. In these cases, a duly authorized facility representative must sign the AT form. The AT form must also be signed by the performing lab supervisor. ➢ To determine if your AT test forms were received on time by the Division of Water Quality,you may consider submitting your toxicity test results certified mail, return receipt requested to the Environmental Sciences Branch. t�G DEPI.OF ENViROMMEi�T Division of Water Quality AND t APTT. '��Ri:seuRcrs iW00f2ESVO,LE f:;:310t1;4L OFFICE / )J \\?\ � July 30, 2001 P °b\ AUG 0 1 2001 MEMORANDUM Water Quality Supervisor,MRO 1,Al. yS CfO Through: Matt Matthews rOCi- Supervisor, Aquatic Toxicology Unit From: Sandy Mort 614M Quality Assurance Officer, Aquatic Toxicology Unit Subject: Whole effluent toxicity test results Duke Power-Allen 002 NPDES Permit#NC0004979/002 Gaston County The aquatic toxicity test using grab samples of effluent discharged from Duke Power-Allen 002 has been completed. Duke Power-Allen 002 has an effluent discharge permitted at 11.6 million gallons per day (MGD) entering Catawba River (Lake Wylie) (7Q10 of 95.0 CFS). Whole effluent samples were collected on July 17 and 20 by John Lesley for use in a chronic Ceriodaphnia dubia pass/fail toxicity test. The test using these samples resulted in a pass. Toxicity test information follows. Test Type 3-Brood Ceriodaphnia dubia pass/fail Test Concentrations 16% sample Test Result Pass Control Survival 100% Control Mean Reproduction 29.4 neonates Test Treatment Survival 100% Treatment Mean Reproduction 28.5 neonates First Sample pH 6.76 SU First Sample Conductivity 167 micromhos/cm First Sample Total Residual Chlorine <0.1 mg/1 Second Sample pH 6.81 SU Second Sample Conductivity 165 micromhos/cm Second Sample Total Residual Chlorine <0.1 mg/1 Test results for these samples indicate that the effluent would not be predicted to have water quality impacts on receiving water. Please contact us if further effluent toxicity monitoring is desired. We may be reached at (919) 733-2136. Basin: CTB34 cc: Central Files Environmental Sciences Branch Water Quality Section