SW3200601_05_SpeedwaySubstation_SAW-2019-01298_20201020

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT

Action Id. SAW-2019-02198 County: Cabarrus U.S.G.S. Quad: NC- Midland

NOTIFICATION OF JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION

Requestor: Timmons Group
Eli Wright
Address: 1001 Boulders Parkway, Suite 300
Richmond, VA 23225
Telephone Number: 804-200-6582
E-mail: [e-mail]

Size (acres) 487.9 Nearest Town Midland
Nearest Waterway Clear Creek River Basin Upper Pee Dee
USGS HUC 03040105 Coordinates Latitude: 35.215395
Longitude: -80.534499
Location description: The review area is located 1000 feet Northeast of the intersection of Cabarrus Farms Rd and Bethel Ave
Ext in Cabarrus County. PIN(s): 55432835280000, 5544213053000, 55431997310000, 55432415940000, 55434777470000, &
55433744680000.

Indicate Which of the Following Apply:
A. Preliminary Determination

There appear to be waters, including wetlands on the above described project area/property, that may be subject to Section 404
of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344) and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403). The
waters, including wetlands have been delineated, and the delineation has been verified by the Corps to be sufficiently accurate
and reliable. The approximate boundaries of these waters are shown on the enclosed delineation map dated DATE. Therefore
this preliminary jurisdiction determination may be used in the permit evaluation process, including determining compensatory
mitigation. For purposes of computation of impacts, compensatory mitigation requirements, and other resource protection
measures, a permit decision made on the basis of a preliminary JD will treat all waters and wetlands that would be affected in any
way by the permitted activity on the site as if they are jurisdictional waters of the U.S. This preliminary determination is not an
appealable action under the Regulatory Program Administrative Appeal Process (Reference 33 CFR Part 331). However, you may
request an approved JD, which is an appealable action, by contacting the Corps district for further instruction.

There appear to be waters, including wetlands on the above described project area/property, that may be subject to Section 404
of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344) and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403).
However, since the waters, including wetlands have not been properly delineated, this preliminary jurisdiction determination
may not be used in the permit evaluation process. Without a verified wetland delineation, this preliminary determination is
merely an effective presumption of CWA/RHA jurisdiction over all of the waters, including wetlands at the project area, which
is not sufficiently accurate and reliable to support an enforceable permit decision. We recommend that you have the waters,
including wetlands on your project area/property delineated. As the Corps may not be able to accomplish this wetland
delineation in a timely manner, you may wish to obtain a consultant to conduct a delineation that can be verified by the Corps.
B. Approved Determination

There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described project area/property subject to the permit
requirements of Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403) and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act
(CWA)(33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in law or our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for
a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.

There are waters, including wetlands on the above described project area/property subject to the permit requirements of Section
404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA) (33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this
determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.

We recommend you have the waters, including wetlands on your project area/property delineated. As the Corps may not be
able to accomplish this wetland delineation in a timely manner, you may wish to obtain a consultant to conduct a delineation that
can be verified by the Corps.

SAW-2019-02198
The waters, including wetlands on your project area/property have been delineated and the delineation has been verified by
the Corps. The approximate boundaries of these waters are shown on the enclosed delineation map dated 7/15/2019. We strongly
suggest you have this delineation surveyed. Upon completion, this survey should be reviewed and verified by the Corps. Once
verified, this survey will provide an accurate depiction of all areas subject to CWA jurisdiction on your property which, provided
there is no change in the law or our published regulations, may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years.

The waters, including wetlands have been delineated and surveyed and are accurately depicted on the plat signed by the
Corps Regulatory Official identified below on DATE. Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this
determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.

There are no waters of the U.S., to include wetlands, present on the above described project area/property which are subject to the
permit requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published
regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.

The property is located in one of the 20 Coastal Counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA).
You should contact the Division of Coastal Management in Morehead City, NC, at [phone] to determine their
requirements.

Placement of dredged or fill material within waters of the US, including wetlands, without a Department of the Army permit may
constitute a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC § 1311). Placement of dredged or fill material, construction or
placement of structures, or work within navigable waters of the United States without a Department of the Army permit may
constitute a violation of Sections 9 and/or 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (33 USC § 401 and/or 403). If you have any questions
regarding this determination and/or the Corps regulatory program, please contact Catherine M. Janiczak at 704-510-1438 or
[e-mail].

C. Basis For Determination: Basis For Determination: See the approved jurisdictional determination
form dated 12/5/2019.
D. Remarks: Isolated Features D, E, & F located within the review area were determined to be non-
jurisdictional.

E. Attention USDA Program Participants

This delineation/determination has been conducted to identify the limits of Corps’ Clean Water Act jurisdiction for the particular site
identified in this request. The delineation/determination may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security
Act of 1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in USDA programs, you should request
a certified wetland determination from the local office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.

F. Appeals Information (This information applies only to approved jurisdictional determinations as indicated in B.
above)

This correspondence constitutes an approved jurisdictional determination for the above described site. If you object to this
determination, you may request an administrative appeal under Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331. Enclosed you will find a
Notification of Appeal Process (NAP) fact sheet and request for appeal (RFA) form. If you request to appeal this determination you
must submit a completed RFA form to the following address:

US Army Corps of Engineers
South Atlantic Division
Attn: Philip Shannin, Review Officer
60 Forsyth Street SW, Room 10M15
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801

In order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps, the Corps must determine that it is complete, that it meets the criteria for appeal
under 33 CFR part 331.5, and that it has been received by the Division Office within 60 days of the date of the NAP. Should you
decide to submit an RFA form, it must be received at the above address by 01/31/2020.
**It is not necessary to submit an RFA form to the Division Office if you do not object to the determination in this correspondence.**

Corps Regulatory Official: ______________________________________________________

Date of JD: 12/5/2019 Expiration Date of JD: 12/3/2024
Digitally signed by JONES.MICHAEL.SCOTT.1258314073
Date: 2019.12.05 11:36:23 -05'00'
SAW-2019-02198
The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we
continue to do so, please complete the Customer Satisfaction Survey located at
http://corpsmapu.usace.army.mil/cm_apex/f?p=136:4:0

NOTIFICATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL OPTIONS AND PROCESS AND
REQUEST FOR APPEAL
Applicant: Timmons Group, Eli Wright File Number: SAW-2019-02198 Date: 12/5/2019
Attached is: See Section below
INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of permission) A
PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of permission) B
PERMIT DENIAL C
APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION D
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION E
SECTION I - The following identifies your rights and options regarding an administrative appeal of the above decision.
Additional information may be found at or http://www.usace.army.mil/Missions/CivilWorks/RegulatoryProgramandPermits.aspx
or the Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331.
A: INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or object to the permit.
x ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all
rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the
permit.
x OBJECT: If you object to the permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you may request
that the permit be modified accordingly. You must complete Section II of this form and return the form to the district
engineer. Your objections must be received by the district engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice, or you will
forfeit your right to appeal the permit in the future. Upon receipt of your letter, the district engineer will evaluate your
objections and may: (a) modify the permit to address all of your concerns, (b) modify the permit to address some of your
objections, or (c) not modify the permit having determined that the permit should be issued as previously written. After
evaluating your objections, the district engineer will send you a proffered permit for your reconsideration, as indicated in
Section B below.
B: PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or appeal the permit
x ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all
rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the
permit.
x APPEAL: If you choose to decline the proffered permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein,
you may appeal the declined permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of
this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days
of the date of this notice.
C: PERMIT DENIAL: You may appeal the denial of a permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by
completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division
engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.
D: APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You may accept or appeal the approved JD or provide new
information.
x ACCEPT: You do not need to notify the Corps to accept an approved JD. Failure to notify the Corps within 60 days of the
date of this notice, means that you accept the approved JD in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the approved JD.
x APPEAL: If you disagree with the approved JD, you may appeal the approved JD under the Corps of Engineers
Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the district engineer. This form
must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.
E: PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You do not need to respond to the Corps regarding the
preliminary JD. The Preliminary JD is not appealable. If you wish, you may request an approved JD (which may be appealed),
by contacting the Corps district for further instruction. Also you may provide new information for further consideration by the
Corps to reevaluate the JD.

SECTION II - REQUEST FOR APPEAL or OBJECTIONS TO AN INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT
REASONS FOR APPEAL OR OBJECTIONS: (Describe your reasons for appealing the decision or your objections to an initial
proffered permit in clear concise statements. You may attach additional information to this form to clarify where your reasons or
objections are addressed in the administrative record.)

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The appeal is limited to a review of the administrative record, the Corps memorandum for the
record of the appeal conference or meeting, and any supplemental information that the review officer has determined is needed to
clarify the administrative record. Neither the appellant nor the Corps may add new information or analyses to the record.
However, you may provide additional information to clarify the location of information that is already in the administrative
record.
POINT OF CONTACT FOR QUESTIONS OR INFORMATION:
If you have questions regarding this decision and/or the
appeal process you may contact:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division
Attn: Catherine M. Janiczak
Charlotte Regulatory Office
U.S Army Corps of Engineers
8430 University Executive Park Drive, Suite 615
Charlotte, North Carolina 28262

If you only have questions regarding the appeal process you may
also contact:
Mr. Philip Shannin, Administrative Appeal Review Officer
CESAD-PDO
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, South Atlantic Division
60 Forsyth Street, Room 10M15
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
Phone: [phone]
RIGHT OF ENTRY: Your signature below grants the right of entry to Corps of Engineers personnel, and any government
consultants, to conduct investigations of the project site during the course of the appeal process. You will be provided a 15 day
notice of any site investigation, and will have the opportunity to participate in all site investigations.

________________________________________
Signature of appellant or agent.
Date: Telephone number:

For appeals on Initial Proffered Permits send this form to:

District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division, Attn: Catherine M. Janiczak, 69 Darlington Avenue, Wilmington, North
Carolina 28403

For Permit denials, Proffered Permits and Approved Jurisdictional Determinations send this form to:

Division Engineer, Commander, U.S. Army Engineer Division, South Atlantic, Attn: Mr. Philip Shannin, Administrative
Appeal Officer, CESAD-PDO, 60 Forsyth Street, Room 10M15, Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
Phone: [phone]

APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
This form should be completed by following the instructions provided in Section IV of the JD Form Instructional Guidebook.
SECTION I: BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD):
%DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:&(6$:5*&KDUORWWH7LPPRQV*URXS6$:
&PROJECT LOCATION AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
State: North Carolina County/parish/borough: Cabarrus County City: MidlandCenter coordinates of site
(lat/long in degree decimal format): Lat. 35.215395°N, Long. 80.534499° W.Universal Transverse Mercator: NAD83Name
of nearest waterbody: Clear Creek
Name of nearest Traditional Navigable Water (TNW)into which the aquatic resource flows: Rocky RiverName of watershed
or Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC):
Check if map/diagram of review area and/or potential jurisdictional areas is/are available upon request.
Check if other sites (e.g., offsite mitigation sites, disposal sites, etc…) are associated with this action and are recorded on a
different JD form.
D. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
Field Determination. Date(s):
SECTION II: SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
A. RHA SECTION 10 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There Are no “navigable waters of the U.S.” within Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 329) in the
review area. [Required]
Waters subject to the ebb and flow of the tide.
Waters are presently used, or have been used in the past, or may be susceptible for use to transport interstate or foreign commerce.
Explain: .
B. CWA SECTION 404 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There Are no “waters of the U.S.” within Clean Water Act (CWA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 328) in the review area.[Required]
1. Waters of the U.S.
a. Indicate presence of waters of U.S. in review area (check all that apply): 1
TNWs, including territorial seas
Wetlands adjacent to TNWs
Relatively permanent waters2 (RPWs) that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Non-RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Wetlands directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Wetlands adjacent to non-RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Impoundments of jurisdictional waters
Isolated (interstate or intrastate) waters, including isolated wetlands
b. Identify (estimate) size of waters of the U.S. in the review area:
Non-wetland waters: linear feet: width (ft) and/or acres.
Wetlands: acres.
c. Limits (boundaries) of jurisdiction based on:1987 Delineation Manual
Elevation of established OHWM (if known): .
2. Non-regulated waters/wetlands (check if applicable):
3
Potentially jurisdictional waters and/or wetlands were assessed within the review area and determined to be not jurisdictional.
Explain:POW - 1.24, PEM - 0.07. Hydrologically disconneted from downstream waters and no significant nexus to
TNW .
1 Boxes checked below shall be supported by completing the appropriate sections in Section III below.
2 For purposes of this form, an RPW is defined as a tributary that is not a TNW and that typically flows year-round or has continuous flow at least “seasonally”
(e.g., typically 3 months).
3 Supporting documentation is presented in Section III.F.
,VRODWHG)HDWXUHV'( )

SECTION III: CWA ANALYSIS

A. TNWs AND WETLANDS ADJACENT TO TNWs

The agencies will assert jurisdiction over TNWs and wetlands adjacent to TNWs. If the aquatic resource is a TNW, complete
Section III.A.1 and Section III.D.1. only; if the aquatic resource is a wetland adjacent to a TNW, complete Sections III.A.1 and 2
and Section III.D.1.; otherwise, see Section III.B below.

1. TNW
Identify TNW: .

Summarize rationale supporting determination: .

2. Wetland adjacent to TNW
Summarize rationale supporting conclusion that wetland is “adjacent”: .

B. CHARACTERISTICS OF TRIBUTARY (THAT IS NOT A TNW) AND ITS ADJACENT WETLANDS (IF ANY):

This section summarizes information regarding characteristics of the tributary and its adjacent wetlands, if any, and it helps
determine whether or not the standards for jurisdiction established under Rapanos have been met.

The agencies will assert jurisdiction over non-navigable tributaries of TNWs where the tributaries are “relatively permanent
waters” (RPWs), i.e. tributaries that typically flow year-round or have continuous flow at least seasonally (e.g., typically 3
months). A wetland that directly abuts an RPW is also jurisdictional. If the aquatic resource is not a TNW, but has year-round
(perennial) flow, skip to Section III.D.2. If the aquatic resource is a wetland directly abutting a tributary with perennial flow,
skip to Section III.D.4.

A wetland that is adjacent to but that does not directly abut an RPW requires a significant nexus evaluation. Corps districts and
EPA regions will include in the record any available information that documents the existence of a significant nexus between a
relatively permanent tributary that is not perennial (and its adjacent wetlands if any) and a traditional navigable water, even
though a significant nexus finding is not required as a matter of law.

If the waterbody4 is not an RPW, or a wetland directly abutting an RPW, a JD will require additional data to determine if the
waterbody has a significant nexus with a TNW. If the tributary has adjacent wetlands, the significant nexus evaluation must
consider the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands. This significant nexus evaluation that combines, for
analytical purposes, the tributary and all of its adjacent wetlands is used whether the review area identified in the JD request is
the tributary, or its adjacent wetlands, or both. If the JD covers a tributary with adjacent wetlands, complete Section III.B.1 for
the tributary, Section III.B.2 for any onsite wetlands, and Section III.B.3 for all wetlands adjacent to that tributary, both onsite
and offsite. The determination whether a significant nexus exists is determined in Section III.C below.

1. Characteristics of non-TNWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNW

(i) General Area Conditions:
Watershed size: Pick List
Drainage area: Pick List
Average annual rainfall: inches
Average annual snowfall: inches

(ii) Physical Characteristics:
(a) Relationship with TNW:
Tributary flows directly into TNW.
Tributary flows through Pick List tributaries before entering TNW.

Project waters are Pick List river miles from TNW.
Project waters are Pick List river miles from RPW.
Project waters are Pick List aerial (straight) miles from TNW.
Project waters are Pick List aerial (straight) miles from RPW.
Project waters cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain: .

Identify flow route to TNW5: .

4 Note that the Instructional Guidebook contains additional information regarding swales, ditches, washes, and erosional features generally and in the arid
West.
5 Flow route can be described by identifying, e.g., tributary a, which flows through the review area, to flow into tributary b, which then flows into TNW.

.
Tributary stream order, if known: .

(b) General Tributary Characteristics (check all that apply):
Tributary is: Natural
Artificial (man-made). Explain: .
Manipulated (man-altered). Explain: .

Tributary properties with respect to top of bank (estimate):
Average width: feet
Average depth: feet
Average side slopes: Pick List.

Primary tributary substrate composition (check all that apply):
Silts Sands Concrete
Cobbles Gravel Muck
Bedrock Vegetation. Type/% cover:
Other. Explain: .

Tributary condition/stability [e.g., highly eroding, sloughing banks]. Explain: .
Presence of run/riffle/pool complexes. Explain: .
Tributary geometry: Pick List
Tributary gradient (approximate average slope): %

(c) Flow:
Tributary provides for: Pick List
Estimate average number of flow events in review area/year: Pick List
Describe flow regime: .
Other information on duration and volume: .

Surface flow is: Pick List. Characteristics: .

Subsurface flow: Pick List. Explain findings: .
Dye (or other) test performed: .

Tributary has (check all that apply):
Bed and banks
OHWM6 (check all indicators that apply):
clear, natural line impressed on the bank the presence of litter and debris
changes in the character of soil destruction of terrestrial vegetation
shelving the presence of wrack line
vegetation matted down, bent, or absent sediment sorting
leaf litter disturbed or washed away scour
sediment deposition multiple observed or predicted flow events
water staining abrupt change in plant community
other (list):
Discontinuous OHWM.7 Explain:.

If factors other than the OHWM were used to determine lateral extent of CWA jurisdiction (check all that apply):
High Tide Line indicated by: Mean High Water Mark indicated by:
oil or scum line along shore objects survey to available datum;
fine shell or debris deposits (foreshore) physical markings;
physical markings/characteristics vegetation lines/changes in vegetation types.
tidal gauges
other (list):

(iii) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize tributary (e.g., water color is clear, discolored, oily film; water quality; general watershed characteristics, etc.).
Explain: .
Identify specific pollutants, if known: .

6A natural or man-made discontinuity in the OHWM does not necessarily sever jurisdiction (e.g., where the stream temporarily flows underground, or where
the OHWM has been removed by development or agricultural practices). Where there is a break in the OHWM that is unrelated to the waterbody’s flow
regime (e.g., flow over a rock outcrop or through a culvert), the agencies will look for indicators of flow above and below the break.
7Ibid.

(iv) Biological Characteristics. Channel supports (check all that apply):
Riparian corridor. Characteristics (type, average width): .
Wetland fringe. Characteristics: .
Habitat for:
Federally Listed species. Explain findings: .
Fish/spawn areas. Explain findings: .
Other environmentally-sensitive species. Explain findings: .
Aquatic/wildlife diversity. Explain findings: .

2. Characteristics of wetlands adjacent to non-TNW that flow directly or indirectly into TNW

(i) Physical Characteristics:
(a) General Wetland Characteristics:
Properties:
Wetland size: acres
Wetland type. Explain: .
Wetland quality. Explain: .
Project wetlands cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain: .

(b) General Flow Relationship with Non-TNW:
Flow is: Pick List. Explain: Wetland surface water releases at higher rain events. Wetlands flow into the culvert and
then into the tributary.

Surface flow is: Pick List
Characteristics: .

Subsurface flow: Pick List. Explain findings: .
Dye (or other) test performed: .

(c) Wetland Adjacency Determination with Non-TNW:
Directly abutting
Not directly abutting
Discrete wetland hydrologic connection. Explain: .
Ecological connection. Explain: .
Separated by berm/barrier. Explain: .

(d) Proximity (Relationship) to TNW
Project wetlands are Pick List river miles from TNW.
Project waters are Pick List aerial (straight) miles from TNW.
Flow is from: Pick List.
Estimate approximate location of wetland as within the Pick List floodplain.

(ii) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize wetland system (e.g., water color is clear, brown, oil film on surface; water quality; general watershed
characteristics; etc.). Explain: .
Identify specific pollutants, if known: .

(iii) Biological Characteristics. Wetland supports (check all that apply):
Riparian buffer. Characteristics (type, average width): .
Vegetation type/percent cover. Explain: .
Habitat for:
Federally Listed species. Explain findings: .
Fish/spawn areas. Explain findings: .
Other environmentally-sensitive species. Explain findings: .
Aquatic/wildlife diversity. Explain findings: .

3. Characteristics of all wetlands adjacent to the tributary (if any)
All wetland(s) being considered in the cumulative analysis: Pick List
Approximately ( ) acres in total are being considered in the cumulative analysis.

For each wetland, specify the following:

Directly abuts? (Y/N) Size (in acres) Directly abuts? (Y/N) Size (in acres)

Summarize overall biological, chemical and physical functions being performed: .

C. SIGNIFICANT NEXUS DETERMINATION

A significant nexus analysis will assess the flow characteristics and functions of the tributary itself and the functions performed
by any wetlands adjacent to the tributary to determine if they significantly affect the chemical, physical, and biological integrity
of a TNW. For each of the following situations, a significant nexus exists if the tributary, in combination with all of its adjacent
wetlands, has more than a speculative or insubstantial effect on the chemical, physical and/or biological integrity of a TNW.
Considerations when evaluating significant nexus include, but are not limited to the volume, duration, and frequency of the flow
of water in the tributary and its proximity to a TNW, and the functions performed by the tributary and all its adjacent
wetlands. It is not appropriate to determine significant nexus based solely on any specific threshold of distance (e.g. between a
tributary and its adjacent wetland or between a tributary and the TNW). Similarly, the fact an adjacent wetland lies within or
outside of a floodplain is not solely determinative of significant nexus.

Draw connections between the features documented and the effects on the TNW, as identified in the Rapanos Guidance and
discussed in the Instructional Guidebook. Factors to consider include, for example:
x Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to carry pollutants or flood waters to
TNWs, or to reduce the amount of pollutants or flood waters reaching a TNW?
x Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), provide habitat and lifecycle support functions for fish and
other species, such as feeding, nesting, spawning, or rearing young for species that are present in the TNW?
x Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to transfer nutrients and organic carbon that
support downstream foodwebs?
x Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have other relationships to the physical, chemical, or
biological integrity of the TNW?

Note: the above list of considerations is not inclusive and other functions observed or known to occur should be documented
below:

1. Significant nexus findings for non-RPW that has no adjacent wetlands and flows directly or indirectly into TNWs. Explain
findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary itself, then go to Section III.D: .

2. Significant nexus findings for non-RPW and its adjacent wetlands, where the non-RPW flows directly or indirectly into
TNWs. Explain findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its
adjacent wetlands, then go to Section III.D: .

3. Significant nexus findings for wetlands adjacent to an RPW but that do not directly abut the RPW. Explain findings of
presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands, then go to
Section III.D: .

D. DETERMINATIONS OF JURISDICTIONAL FINDINGS. THE SUBJECT WATERS/WETLANDS ARE (CHECK ALL
THAT APPLY):

1. TNWs and Adjacent Wetlands. Check all that apply and provide size estimates in review area:
TNWs: linear feet width (ft), Or, acres.
Wetlands adjacent to TNWs: acres.

2. RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
Tributaries of TNWs where tributaries typically flow year-round are jurisdictional. Provide data and rationale indicating that
tributary is perennial: .
Tributaries of TNW where tributaries have continuous flow “seasonally” (e.g., typically three months each year) are
jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III.B. Provide rationale indicating that tributary flows
seasonally: .

Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft).
Other non-wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters: .

3. Non-RPWs8 that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
Waterbody that is not a TNW or an RPW, but flows directly or indirectly into a TNW, and it has a significant nexus with a
TNW is jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III.C.

Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters within the review area (check all that apply):
Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft).
Other non-wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters: .

4. Wetlands directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
Wetlands directly abut RPW and thus are jurisdictional as adjacent wetlands.
Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow year-round. Provide data and rationale
indicating that tributary is perennial in Section III.D.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is
directly abutting an RPW: .

Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow “seasonally.” Provide data indicating that tributary is
seasonal in Section III.B and rationale in Section III.D.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is directly
abutting an RPW: .

Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.

5. Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
Wetlands that do not directly abut an RPW, but when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent
and with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisidictional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III.C.

Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.

6. Wetlands adjacent to non-RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
Wetlands adjacent to such waters, and have when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent and
with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisdictional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III.C.

Provide estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.

7. Impoundments of jurisdictional waters.9
As a general rule, the impoundment of a jurisdictional tributary remains jurisdictional.
Demonstrate that impoundment was created from “waters of the U.S.,” or
Demonstrate that water meets the criteria for one of the categories presented above (1-6), or
Demonstrate that water is isolated with a nexus to commerce (see E below).

E. ISOLATED [INTERSTATE OR INTRA-STATE] WATERS, INCLUDING ISOLATED WETLANDS, THE USE,
DEGRADATION OR DESTRUCTION OF WHICH COULD AFFECT INTERSTATE COMMERCE, INCLUDING ANY
SUCH WATERS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):10
which are or could be used by interstate or foreign travelers for recreational or other purposes.
from which fish or shellfish are or could be taken and sold in interstate or foreign commerce.
which are or could be used for industrial purposes by industries in interstate commerce.
Interstate isolated waters. Explain: .
Other factors. Explain: .

8See Footnote # 3.
9 To complete the analysis refer to the key in Section III.D.6 of the Instructional Guidebook.
10 Prior to asserting or declining CWA jurisdiction based solely on this category, Corps Districts will elevate the action to Corps and EPA HQ for
review consistent with the process described in the Corps/EPA Memorandum Regarding CWA Act Jurisdiction Following Rapanos.

Identify water body and summarize rationale supporting determination: .

Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft).
Other non-wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters: .
Wetlands: acres.

F. NON-JURISDICTIONAL WATERS, INCLUDING WETLANDS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
If potential wetlands were assessed within the review area, these areas did not meet the criteria in the 1987 Corps of Engineers
Wetland Delineation Manual and/or appropriate Regional Supplements.
Review area included isolated waters with no substantial nexus to interstate (or foreign) commerce.
Prior to the Jan 2001 Supreme Court decision in “SWANCC,” the review area would have been regulated based solely on the
“Migratory Bird Rule” (MBR).
Waters do not meet the “Significant Nexus” standard, where such a finding is required for jurisdiction. Explain:Hydrologically
disconnected and do not effect the chemical, physical, or biological integrity of TNW. (Water ID - E, F) POW - 1.24, (Water
ID - D) PEM - 0.07. Hydrologically disconneted from downstream waters and no significant nexus to TNW.
Other: (explain, if not covered above): .

Provide acreage estimates for non-jurisdictional waters in the review area, where the sole potential basis of jurisdiction is the MBR
factors (i.e., presence of migratory birds, presence of endangered species, use of water for irrigated agriculture), using best professional
judgment (check all that apply):
Non-wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet width (ft).
Lakes/ponds: acres.
Other non-wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource: .
Wetlands: acres.

Provide acreage estimates for non-jurisdictional waters in the review area that do not meet the “Significant Nexus” standard, where such
a finding is required for jurisdiction (check all that apply):
Non-wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet, width (ft).
Lakes/ponds: 1.24 acres.
Other non-wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource: .
Wetlands: 0.07 acres.

SECTION IV: DATA SOURCES.

A. SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for JD (check all that apply - checked items shall be included in case file and, where checked
and requested, appropriately reference sources below):
Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant:Figure 4 (Dated 07/15/2019).
Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant.
Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report.
Data sheets prepared by the Corps: .
Corps navigable waters’ study: .
U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas: .
USGS NHD data.
USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name:Figure 1 (Dated 2016).
USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: Figure 3 (Dated 07/03/2019).
National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name: Figure 3 (Dated 07/03/2019).
State/Local wetland inventory map(s): .
FEMA/FIRM maps: .
100-year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929)
Photographs: Aerial (Name & Date): Figure 3 (Dated 08/20/2019) .
or Other (Name & Date): Site photographs.
Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter: .
Applicable/supporting case law: .
Applicable/supporting scientific literature: .
Other information (please specify): .

B. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS TO SUPPORT JD: .
APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
This form should be completed by following the instructions provided in Section IV of the JD Form Instructional Guidebook.
SECTION I: BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A.REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD):
%DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:&(6$:5*&KDUORWWH7LPPRQV*URXS6$:
&PROJECT LOCATION AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
State: North Carolina County/parish/borough: Cabarrus County City: MidlandCenter coordinates of site (lat/long
in degree decimal format): Lat. 35.215395° N, Long. -80.534499° W.Universal Transverse Mercator: NAD83
Name of nearest waterbody: Clear Creek
Name of nearest Traditional Navigable Water (TNW)into which the aquatic resource flows: Rocky RiverName of watershed or
Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC): 03040105
Check if map/diagram of review area and/or potential jurisdictional areas is/are available upon request.
Check if other sites (e.g., offsite mitigation sites, disposal sites, etc…) are associated with this action and are recorded on a
different JD form.
D. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
Field Determination. Date(s): 08/29/2019
SECTION II: SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
A. RHA SECTION 10 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There Are no “navigable waters of the U.S.” within Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 329) in the
review area. [Required]
Waters subject to the ebb and flow of the tide.
Waters are presently used, or have been used in the past, or may be susceptible for use to transport interstate or foreign commerce.
Explain: .
B. CWA SECTION 404 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There are “waters of the U.S.” within Clean Water Act (CWA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 328) in the review area. [Required]
1. Waters of the U.S.
a. Indicate presence of waters of U.S. in review area (check all that apply): 1
TNWs, including territorial seas
Wetlands adjacent to TNWs
Relatively permanent waters2 (RPWs) that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Non-RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Wetlands directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Wetlands adjacent to non-RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Impoundments of jurisdictional waters
Isolated (interstate or intrastate) waters, including isolated wetlands
b. Identify (estimate) size of waters of the U.S. in the review area:
Non-wetland waters: R4 - 2,087 linear feet, Total - 2,087 linear feet: 4 width (ft) and/or acres.
Wetlands: acres.
c. Limits (boundaries) of jurisdiction based on:1987 Delineation Manual
Elevation of established OHWM (if known): .
2. Non-regulated waters/wetlands (check if applicable):
3
Potentially jurisdictional waters and/or wetlands were assessed within the review area and determined to be not jurisdictional.
Explain: .
1 Boxes checked below shall be supported by completing the appropriate sections in Section III below.
2 For purposes of this form, an RPW is defined as a tributary that is not a TNW and that typically flows year-round or has continuous flow at least “seasonally”
(e.g., typically 3 months).
3 Supporting documentation is presented in Section III.F.
6WUHDP./012 3
SECTION III: CWA ANALYSIS
A. TNWs AND WETLANDS ADJACENT TO TNWs
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over TNWs and wetlands adjacent to TNWs. If the aquatic resource is a TNW, complete
Section III.A.1 and Section III.D.1. only; if the aquatic resource is a wetland adjacent to a TNW, complete Sections III.A.1 and2
and Section III.D.1.; otherwise, see Section III.B below.
1. TNW
Identify TNW: .
Summarize rationale supporting determination: .
2. Wetlandadjacent to TNW
Summarize rationale supporting conclusion that wetland is “adjacent”:.
B.CHARACTERISTICS OF TRIBUTARY (THAT IS NOT A TNW) AND ITS ADJACENT WETLANDS (IF ANY):
This section summarizes information regarding characteristics of the tributary and its adjacent wetlands, if any, and it helps
determine whether or not the standards for jurisdiction established under Rapanos have been met.
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over non-navigable tributaries of TNWs where the tributaries are “relatively permanent
waters” (RPWs), i.e. tributaries that typically flow year-round or have continuous flow at least seasonally (e.g., typically 3
months). A wetland that directly abuts an RPW is also jurisdictional. If the aquatic resource is not a TNW, but has year-round
(perennial) flow, skip to Section III.D.2. If the aquatic resource is a wetland directly abutting a tributary with perennial flow,
skip to Section III.D.4.
A wetland that is adjacent to but that does not directly abut an RPW requires a significant nexus evaluation. Corps districts and
EPA regions will include in the record any available information that documents the existence of a significant nexus between a
relatively permanent tributary that is not perennial (and its adjacent wetlands if any) and a traditional navigable water, even
though a significant nexus finding is not required as a matter of law.
If the waterbody4 is not an RPW, or a wetland directly abutting an RPW, a JD will require additional data to determine if the
waterbody has a significant nexus with a TNW. If the tributary has adjacent wetlands, the significant nexus evaluation must
consider the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands. This significant nexus evaluation that combines, for
analytical purposes, the tributary and all of its adjacent wetlands is used whether the review area identified in the JD request is
the tributary, or its adjacent wetlands, or both. If the JD covers a tributary with adjacent wetlands, complete Section III.B.1 for
the tributary, Section III.B.2 for any onsite wetlands, and Section III.B.3 for all wetlands adjacent to that tributary, both onsite
and offsite. The determination whether a significant nexus exists is determined in Section III.C below.
1. Characteristics of non-TNWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) General Area Conditions:
Watershed size:Pick List
Drainage area:Pick List
Average annual rainfall: 42 inches
Average annual snowfall: 4 inches
(ii) Physical Characteristics:
(a) Relationship with TNW:
Tributary flows directly into TNW.
Tributary flows through 3 tributaries before entering TNW.
Project waters are 2-5 river miles from TNW.
Project waters are 1 (or less)river miles from RPW.
Project waters are 1-2 aerial (straight) miles from TNW.
Project waters are 1 (or less)aerial (straight) miles from RPW.
Project waters cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain: .
4 Note that the Instructional Guidebook contains additional information regarding swales, ditches, washes, and erosional features generally and in the arid
West.
Identify flow route to TNW5: Unnanmed tributaries of Clear Creek flow through the review area and continue offsite,
flowing into the Clear Creek, approximately 0.63 miles south of the review area, then flowing south east into Rocky
River (Traditionally Navagable Water), approximately 1.93 miles east of Clear Creek . .
Tributary stream order, if known: .
(b) General Tributary Characteristics (check all that apply):
Tributary is: Natural
Artificial (man-made). Explain: .
Manipulated (man-altered). Explain: .
Tributary properties with respect to top of bank (estimate):
Average width: Approximately 4 feet
Average depth: 1 feet
Average side slopes: 2:1.
Primary tributary substrate composition (check all that apply):
Silts Sands Concrete
Cobbles Gravel Muck
Bedrock Vegetation. Type/% cover:
Other. Explain: .
Tributary condition/stability [e.g., highly eroding, sloughing banks]. Explain: Highly Eroding.
Presence of run/riffle/pool complexes. Explain: There is a presence of run/ruffle/pool complexes throughout the
tributaries.
Tributary geometry:Relatively straight
Tributary gradient (approximate average slope): 1-2 %
(c) Flow:
Tributary provides for:Intermittent but not seasonal flow
Estimate average number of flow events in review area/year:6-10
Describe flow regime: Intermittent.
Other information on duration and volume: .
Surface flow is:Confined.Characteristics: .
Subsurface flow:Unknown. Explain findings: .
Dye (or other) test performed: .
Tributary has (check all that apply):
Bed and banks
OHWM6 (check all indicators that apply):
clear, natural line impressed on the bank the presence of litter and debris
changes in the character of soil destruction of terrestrial vegetation
shelving the presence of wrack line
vegetation matted down, bent, or absent sediment sorting
leaf litter disturbed or washed away scour
sediment deposition multiple observed or predicted flow events
water staining abrupt change in plant community
other (list):
Discontinuous OHWM.7 Explain:.
If factors other than the OHWM were used to determine lateral extent of CWA jurisdiction (check all that apply):
High Tide Line indicated by: Mean High Water Mark indicated by:
oil or scum line along shore objects survey to available datum;
fine shell or debris deposits (foreshore) physical markings;
physical markings/characteristics vegetation lines/changes in vegetation types.
tidal gauges
other (list):
(iii) Chemical Characteristics:
5 Flow route can be described by identifying, e.g., tributary a, which flows through the review area, to flow into tributary b, which then flows into TNW.
6A natural or man-made discontinuity in the OHWM does not necessarily sever jurisdiction (e.g., where the stream temporarily flows underground, or where
the OHWM has been removed by development or agricultural practices). Where there is a break in the OHWM that is unrelated to the waterbody’s flow
regime (e.g., flow over a rock outcrop or through a culvert), the agencies will look for indicators of flow above and below the break.
7Ibid.
Characterize tributary (e.g., water color is clear, discolored, oily film; water quality; general watershed characteristics, etc.).
Explain: Water color is clear.
Identify specific pollutants, if known: .
(iv) Biological Characteristics. Channel supports (check all that apply):
Riparian corridor. Characteristics (type, average width): forested, 100+ feet.
Wetland fringe. Characteristics: .
Habitat for:
Federally Listed species. Explain findings: .
Fish/spawn areas. Explain findings: .
Other environmentally-sensitive species. Explain findings: .
Aquatic/wildlife diversity. Explain findings: Supports amphibians and fishes .
2. Characteristics of wetlands adjacent to non-TNW that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) Physical Characteristics:
(a) General Wetland Characteristics:
Properties:
Wetland size: acres
Wetland type. Explain: .
Wetland quality. Explain: .
Project wetlands cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain: .
(b) General Flow Relationship with Non-TNW:
Flow is:Pick List. Explain: .
Surface flow is:Pick List
Characteristics: .
Subsurface flow:Pick List. Explain findings: .
Dye (or other) test performed: .
(c) Wetland Adjacency Determination with Non-TNW:
Directly abutting
Not directly abutting
Discrete wetland hydrologic connection. Explain: .
Ecological connection. Explain: .
Separated by berm/barrier. Explain: .
(d) Proximity (Relationship) to TNW
Project wetlands are Pick List river miles from TNW.
Project waters are Pick List aerial (straight) miles from TNW.
Flow is from:Pick List.
Estimate approximate location of wetland as within the Pick List floodplain.
(ii) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize wetland system (e.g., water color is clear, brown, oil film on surface; water quality; general watershed
characteristics; etc.). Explain: .
Identify specific pollutants, if known: .
(iii) Biological Characteristics. Wetland supports (check all that apply):
Riparian buffer. Characteristics (type, average width): .
Vegetation type/percent cover. Explain: .
Habitat for:
Federally Listed species. Explain findings: .
Fish/spawn areas. Explain findings: .
Other environmentally-sensitive species. Explain findings: .
Aquatic/wildlife diversity. Explain findings: .
3. Characteristics of all wetlands adjacent to the tributary (if any)
All wetland(s) being considered in the cumulative analysis: Pick List
Approximately ( ) acres in total are being considered in the cumulative analysis.
For each wetland, specify the following:
Directly abuts? (Y/N) Size (in acres) Directly abuts? (Y/N) Size (in acres)
Summarize overall biological, chemical and physical functions being performed: .
C.SIGNIFICANT NEXUS DETERMINATION
A significant nexus analysis will assess the flow characteristics and functions of the tributary itself and the functions performed
by any wetlands adjacent to the tributary to determine if they significantly affect the chemical, physical, and biological integrity
of a TNW. For each of the following situations, a significant nexus exists if the tributary, in combination with all of its adjacent
wetlands, has more than a speculative or insubstantial effect on the chemical, physical and/or biological integrity of a TNW.
Considerations when evaluating significant nexus include, but are not limited to the volume, duration, and frequency of the flow
of water in the tributary and its proximity to a TNW, and the functions performed by the tributary and all its adjacent
wetlands. It is not appropriate to determine significant nexus based solely on any specific threshold of distance (e.g. between a
tributary and its adjacent wetland or between a tributary and the TNW). Similarly, the fact an adjacent wetland lies within or
outside of a floodplain is not solely determinative of significant nexus.
Draw connections between the features documented and the effects on the TNW, as identified in the Rapanos Guidance and
discussed in the Instructional Guidebook. Factors to consider include, for example:
x Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to carry pollutants or flood waters to
TNWs, or to reduce the amount of pollutants or flood waters reaching a TNW?
x Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), provide habitat and lifecycle support functions for fish and
other species, such as feeding, nesting, spawning, or rearing young for species that are present in the TNW?
x Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to transfer nutrients and organic carbon that
support downstream foodwebs?
x Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have other relationships to the physical, chemical, or
biological integrity of the TNW?
Note: the above list of considerations is not inclusive and other functions observed or known to occur should be documented
below:
1. Significant nexus findings for non-RPW that has no adjacent wetlands and flows directly or indirectly into TNWs.Explain
findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary itself, then go to Section III.D:The presence of a
significant nexus was determined by observing and ordinary high-water mark and a defined bed and bank within the channel..
2. Significant nexus findings for non-RPW and its adjacent wetlands, where the non-RPW flows directly or indirectly into
TNWs.Explain findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its
adjacent wetlands, then go to Section III.D: The presence of a significant nexus was dertermned based on adjacent wetlands being
connected and.or contiguous with waterbodies that eventually end up at TNW. These wetlands provide storgare of
floodwater/runoff, aquatic species habitat, and serve as pollutant trapping measures to prevent further contamination donwstream..
3. Significant nexus findings for wetlands adjacent to an RPW but that do not directly abut the RPW. Explain findings of
presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands, then go to
Section III.D: N/A.
D.DETERMINATIONS OF JURISDICTIONAL FINDINGS. THE SUBJECT WATERS/WETLANDS ARE (CHECK ALL
THAT APPLY):
1. TNWs and Adjacent Wetlands.Check all that apply and provide size estimates in review area:
TNWs: linear feet width (ft), Or, acres.
Wetlands adjacent to TNWs: acres.
2. RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
Tributaries of TNWs where tributaries typically flow year-round are jurisdictional. Provide data and rationale indicating that
tributary is perennial: Stream perenniality was determined using NC DWQ Stream Identificaton Form Version 4.11.

Tributaries of TNW where tributaries have continuous flow “seasonally” (e.g., typically three months each year) are
jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III.B. Provide rationale indicating that tributary flows
seasonally: Stream perenniality was determined using NC DWQ Stream Identificaton Form Version 4.11.

Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
Tributary waters: 2,087 linear feet 4 width (ft).
Other non-wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters: .

3. Non-RPWs8 that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
Waterbody that is not a TNW or an RPW, but flows directly or indirectly into a TNW, and it has a significant nexus with a
TNW is jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III.C.

Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters within the review area (check all that apply):
Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft).
Other non-wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters: .

4. Wetlands directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
Wetlands directly abut RPW and thus are jurisdictional as adjacent wetlands.
Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow year-round. Provide data and rationale
indicating that tributary is perennial in Section III.D.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is
directly abutting an RPW: .

Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow “seasonally.” Provide data indicating that tributary is
seasonal in Section III.B and rationale in Section III.D.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is directly
abutting an RPW: .

Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.

5. Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
Wetlands that do not directly abut an RPW, but when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent
and with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisidictional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III.C.

Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.

6. Wetlands adjacent to non-RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
Wetlands adjacent to such waters, and have when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent and
with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisdictional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III.C.

Provide estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.

7. Impoundments of jurisdictional waters.9
As a general rule, the impoundment of a jurisdictional tributary remains jurisdictional.
Demonstrate that impoundment was created from “waters of the U.S.,” or
Demonstrate that water meets the criteria for one of the categories presented above (1-6), or
Demonstrate that water is isolated with a nexus to commerce (see E below).

E. ISOLATED [INTERSTATE OR INTRA-STATE] WATERS, INCLUDING ISOLATED WETLANDS, THE USE,
DEGRADATION OR DESTRUCTION OF WHICH COULD AFFECT INTERSTATE COMMERCE, INCLUDING ANY
SUCH WATERS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):10
which are or could be used by interstate or foreign travelers for recreational or other purposes.

8See Footnote # 3.
9 To complete the analysis refer to the key in Section III.D.6 of the Instructional Guidebook.
10 Prior to asserting or declining CWA jurisdiction based solely on this category, Corps Districts will elevate the action to Corps and EPA HQ for
review consistent with the process described in the Corps/EPA Memorandum Regarding CWA Act Jurisdiction Following Rapanos.

from which fish or shellfish are or could be taken and sold in interstate or foreign commerce.
which are or could be used for industrial purposes by industries in interstate commerce.
Interstate isolated waters. Explain: .
Other factors. Explain: .

Identify water body and summarize rationale supporting determination: .

Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft).
Other non-wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters: .
Wetlands: acres.

F. NON-JURISDICTIONAL WATERS, INCLUDING WETLANDS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
If potential wetlands were assessed within the review area, these areas did not meet the criteria in the 1987 Corps of Engineers
Wetland Delineation Manual and/or appropriate Regional Supplements.
Review area included isolated waters with no substantial nexus to interstate (or foreign) commerce.
Prior to the Jan 2001 Supreme Court decision in “SWANCC,” the review area would have been regulated based solely on the
“Migratory Bird Rule” (MBR).
Waters do not meet the “Significant Nexus” standard, where such a finding is required for jurisdiction. Explain: .
Other: (explain, if not covered above): .

Provide acreage estimates for non-jurisdictional waters in the review area, where the sole potential basis of jurisdiction is the MBR
factors (i.e., presence of migratory birds, presence of endangered species, use of water for irrigated agriculture), using best professional
judgment (check all that apply):
Non-wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet width (ft).
Lakes/ponds: acres.
Other non-wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource: .
Wetlands: acres.

Provide acreage estimates for non-jurisdictional waters in the review area that do not meet the “Significant Nexus” standard, where such
a finding is required for jurisdiction (check all that apply):
Non-wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet, width (ft).
Lakes/ponds: acres.
Other non-wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource: .
Wetlands: acres.

SECTION IV: DATA SOURCES.

A. SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for JD (check all that apply - checked items shall be included in case file and, where checked
and requested, appropriately reference sources below):
Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant:Figure 4 (Dated 07/15/2019).
Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant.
Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report.
Data sheets prepared by the Corps: .
Corps navigable waters’ study: .
U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas: .
USGS NHD data.
USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name:Figure 1 (Dated 2016).
USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: Figure 3 (Dated 07/03/2019).
National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name: Figure 3 (Dated 07/03/2019).
State/Local wetland inventory map(s): .
FEMA/FIRM maps: .
100-year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929)
Photographs: Aerial (Name & Date): Figure 3 (Dated 08/20/2019).
or Other (Name & Date): Site photographs.
Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter: .
Applicable/supporting case law: .
Applicable/supporting scientific literature: .
Other information (please specify): .

B. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS TO SUPPORT JD: .

APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
This form should be completed by following the instructions provided in Section IV of the JD Form Instructional Guidebook.
SECTION I: BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A.REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD):
%DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:&(6$:5*&KDUORWWH7LPPRQV*URXS6$:
&PROJECT LOCATION AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
State: North Carolina County/parish/borough: Cabarrus County City: MidlandCenter coordinates of site (lat/
long in degree decimal format): Lat. 35.215395° N, Long. 80.534499°W.Universal Transverse Mercator: NAD83
Name of nearest waterbody: Clear Creek
Name of nearest Traditional Navigable Water (TNW)into which the aquatic resource flows: Rocky RiverName of watershed or
Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC): 03040105
Check if map/diagram of review area and/or potential jurisdictional areas is/are available upon request.
Check if other sites (e.g., offsite mitigation sites, disposal sites, etc…) are associated with this action and are recorded on a
different JD form.
D. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
Field Determination. Date(s): 08/29/2019
SECTION II: SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
A. RHA SECTION 10 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There Are no “navigable waters of the U.S.” within Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 329) in the
review area. [Required]
Waters subject to the ebb and flow of the tide.
Waters are presently used, or have been used in the past, or may be susceptible for use to transport interstate or foreign commerce.
Explain: .
B. CWA SECTION 404 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There Are “waters of the U.S.” within Clean Water Act (CWA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 328) in the review area.[Required]
1. Waters of the U.S.
a. Indicate presence of waters of U.S. in review area (check all that apply): 1
TNWs, including territorial seas
Wetlands adjacent to TNWs
Relatively permanent waters2 (RPWs) that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Non-RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Wetlands directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Wetlands adjacent to non-RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Impoundments of jurisdictional waters
Isolated (interstate or intrastate) waters, including isolated wetlands
b. Identify (estimate) size of waters of the U.S. in the review area:
Non-wetland waters: linear feet: width (ft) and/or acres.
Wetlands: PFO - 0.40, PEM - 0.03 acres, POW - 1.16 acres, Total - 1.60 acres.
c. Limits (boundaries) of jurisdiction based on:1987 Delineation Manual
Elevation of established OHWM (if known): .
2. Non-regulated waters/wetlands (check if applicable):
3
Potentially jurisdictional waters and/or wetlands were assessed within the review area and determined to be not jurisdictional.
Explain: .
1 Boxes checked below shall be supported by completing the appropriate sections in Section III below.
2 For purposes of this form, an RPW is defined as a tributary that is not a TNW and that typically flows year-round or has continuous flow at least “seasonally”
(e.g., typically 3 months).
3 Supporting documentation is presented in Section III.F.
)HDWXUHV$$%&**++,,-4DQG4

SECTION III: CWA ANALYSIS

A. TNWs AND WETLANDS ADJACENT TO TNWs

The agencies will assert jurisdiction over TNWs and wetlands adjacent to TNWs. If the aquatic resource is a TNW, complete
Section III.A.1 and Section III.D.1. only; if the aquatic resource is a wetland adjacent to a TNW, complete Sections III.A.1 and 2
and Section III.D.1.; otherwise, see Section III.B below.

1. TNW
Identify TNW: .

Summarize rationale supporting determination: .

2. Wetland adjacent to TNW
Summarize rationale supporting conclusion that wetland is “adjacent”: .

B. CHARACTERISTICS OF TRIBUTARY (THAT IS NOT A TNW) AND ITS ADJACENT WETLANDS (IF ANY):

This section summarizes information regarding characteristics of the tributary and its adjacent wetlands, if any, and it helps
determine whether or not the standards for jurisdiction established under Rapanos have been met.

The agencies will assert jurisdiction over non-navigable tributaries of TNWs where the tributaries are “relatively permanent
waters” (RPWs), i.e. tributaries that typically flow year-round or have continuous flow at least seasonally (e.g., typically 3
months). A wetland that directly abuts an RPW is also jurisdictional. If the aquatic resource is not a TNW, but has year-round
(perennial) flow, skip to Section III.D.2. If the aquatic resource is a wetland directly abutting a tributary with perennial flow,
skip to Section III.D.4.

A wetland that is adjacent to but that does not directly abut an RPW requires a significant nexus evaluation. Corps districts and
EPA regions will include in the record any available information that documents the existence of a significant nexus between a
relatively permanent tributary that is not perennial (and its adjacent wetlands if any) and a traditional navigable water, even
though a significant nexus finding is not required as a matter of law.

If the waterbody4 is not an RPW, or a wetland directly abutting an RPW, a JD will require additional data to determine if the
waterbody has a significant nexus with a TNW. If the tributary has adjacent wetlands, the significant nexus evaluation must
consider the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands. This significant nexus evaluation that combines, for
analytical purposes, the tributary and all of its adjacent wetlands is used whether the review area identified in the JD request is
the tributary, or its adjacent wetlands, or both. If the JD covers a tributary with adjacent wetlands, complete Section III.B.1 for
the tributary, Section III.B.2 for any onsite wetlands, and Section III.B.3 for all wetlands adjacent to that tributary, both onsite
and offsite. The determination whether a significant nexus exists is determined in Section III.C below.

1. Characteristics of non-TNWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNW

(i) General Area Conditions:
Watershed size: Pick List
Drainage area: Pick List
Average annual rainfall: inches
Average annual snowfall: inches

(ii) Physical Characteristics:
(a) Relationship with TNW:
Tributary flows directly into TNW.
Tributary flows through Pick List tributaries before entering TNW.

Project waters are Pick List river miles from TNW.
Project waters are Pick List river miles from RPW.
Project waters are Pick List aerial (straight) miles from TNW.
Project waters are Pick List aerial (straight) miles from RPW.
Project waters cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain: .

Identify flow route to TNW5: .
Tributary stream order, if known: .

4 Note that the Instructional Guidebook contains additional information regarding swales, ditches, washes, and erosional features generally and in the arid
West.
5 Flow route can be described by identifying, e.g., tributary a, which flows through the review area, to flow into tributary b, which then flows into TNW.

(b) General Tributary Characteristics (check all that apply):
Tributary is: Natural
Artificial (man-made). Explain: .
Manipulated (man-altered). Explain: .

Tributary properties with respect to top of bank (estimate):
Average width: feet
Average depth: feet
Average side slopes: Pick List.

Primary tributary substrate composition (check all that apply):
Silts Sands Concrete
Cobbles Gravel Muck
Bedrock Vegetation. Type/% cover:
Other. Explain: .

Tributary condition/stability [e.g., highly eroding, sloughing banks]. Explain: Highly Eroding.
Presence of run/riffle/pool complexes. Explain: There is a presence of run/ruffle/pool complexes throughout the
tributary.
Tributary geometry: Pick List
Tributary gradient (approximate average slope): %

(c) Flow:
Tributary provides for: Pick List
Estimate average number of flow events in review area/year: Pick List
Describe flow regime: .
Other information on duration and volume: .

Surface flow is: Pick List. Characteristics: .

Subsurface flow: Pick List. Explain findings: .
Dye (or other) test performed: .

Tributary has (check all that apply):
Bed and banks
OHWM6 (check all indicators that apply):
clear, natural line impressed on the bank the presence of litter and debris
changes in the character of soil destruction of terrestrial vegetation
shelving the presence of wrack line
vegetation matted down, bent, or absent sediment sorting
leaf litter disturbed or washed away scour
sediment deposition multiple observed or predicted flow events
water staining abrupt change in plant community
other (list):
Discontinuous OHWM.7 Explain:.

If factors other than the OHWM were used to determine lateral extent of CWA jurisdiction (check all that apply):
High Tide Line indicated by: Mean High Water Mark indicated by:
oil or scum line along shore objects survey to available datum;
fine shell or debris deposits (foreshore) physical markings;
physical markings/characteristics vegetation lines/changes in vegetation types.
tidal gauges
other (list):

(iii) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize tributary (e.g., water color is clear, discolored, oily film; water quality; general watershed characteristics, etc.).
Explain: .
Identify specific pollutants, if known: .

6A natural or man-made discontinuity in the OHWM does not necessarily sever jurisdiction (e.g., where the stream temporarily flows underground, or where
the OHWM has been removed by development or agricultural practices). Where there is a break in the OHWM that is unrelated to the waterbody’s flow
regime (e.g., flow over a rock outcrop or through a culvert), the agencies will look for indicators of flow above and below the break.
7Ibid.

(iv) Biological Characteristics. Channel supports (check all that apply):
Riparian corridor. Characteristics (type, average width): .
Wetland fringe. Characteristics: .
Habitat for:
Federally Listed species. Explain findings: .
Fish/spawn areas. Explain findings: .
Other environmentally-sensitive species. Explain findings: .
Aquatic/wildlife diversity. Explain findings: .

2. Characteristics of wetlands adjacent to non-TNW that flow directly or indirectly into TNW

(i) Physical Characteristics:
(a) General Wetland Characteristics:
Properties:
Wetland size: 1.59 acres
Wetland type. Explain: PFO, PEM, POW .
Wetland quality. Explain: Wetlands exist in mostly mixed-pine hardwood forest.
Project wetlands cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain: No.

(b) General Flow Relationship with Non-TNW:
Flow is: Intermittent flow. Explain: Wetland surface water releases at higher rain events.

Surface flow is: Discrete
Characteristics: .

Subsurface flow: Unknown. Explain findings: .
Dye (or other) test performed: .

(c) Wetland Adjacency Determination with Non-TNW:
Directly abutting
Not directly abutting
Discrete wetland hydrologic connection. Explain: .
Ecological connection. Explain: .
Separated by berm/barrier. Explain: .

(d) Proximity (Relationship) to TNW
Project wetlands are 2-5 river miles from TNW.
Project waters are 1-2 aerial (straight) miles from TNW.
Flow is from: Wetland to navigable waters.
Estimate approximate location of wetland as within the 2 - 5-year floodplain.

(ii) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize wetland system (e.g., water color is clear, brown, oil film on surface; water quality; general watershed
characteristics; etc.). Explain: water color is clear.
Identify specific pollutants, if known: .

(iii) Biological Characteristics. Wetland supports (check all that apply):
Riparian buffer. Characteristics (type, average width):forested 100+ feet.
Vegetation type/percent cover. Explain:Forested/Emergent/Scrub-Shrub/No Cover.
Habitat for:
Federally Listed species. Explain findings: .
Fish/spawn areas. Explain findings: .
Other environmentally-sensitive species. Explain findings: .
Aquatic/wildlife diversity. Explain findings:Supports amphibians.

3. Characteristics of all wetlands adjacent to the tributary (if any)
All wetland(s) being considered in the cumulative analysis: 13
Approximately ( 1.60 ) acres in total are being considered in the cumulative analysis.

For each wetland, specify the following:

Directly abuts? (Y/N) Size (in acres) Directly abuts? (Y/N) Size (in acres)
All wetlands directly abut an RPW. Please see Figure 4: Wetlands and Waters of the U.S. Delineation Map for location
and size of each wetland feature.

Summarize overall biological, chemical and physical functions being performed: .

C. SIGNIFICANT NEXUS DETERMINATION

A significant nexus analysis will assess the flow characteristics and functions of the tributary itself and the functions performed
by any wetlands adjacent to the tributary to determine if they significantly affect the chemical, physical, and biological integrity
of a TNW. For each of the following situations, a significant nexus exists if the tributary, in combination with all of its adjacent
wetlands, has more than a speculative or insubstantial effect on the chemical, physical and/or biological integrity of a TNW.
Considerations when evaluating significant nexus include, but are not limited to the volume, duration, and frequency of the flow
of water in the tributary and its proximity to a TNW, and the functions performed by the tributary and all its adjacent
wetlands. It is not appropriate to determine significant nexus based solely on any specific threshold of distance (e.g. between a
tributary and its adjacent wetland or between a tributary and the TNW). Similarly, the fact an adjacent wetland lies within or
outside of a floodplain is not solely determinative of significant nexus.

Draw connections between the features documented and the effects on the TNW, as identified in the Rapanos Guidance and
discussed in the Instructional Guidebook. Factors to consider include, for example:
x Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to carry pollutants or flood waters to
TNWs, or to reduce the amount of pollutants or flood waters reaching a TNW?
x Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), provide habitat and lifecycle support functions for fish and
other species, such as feeding, nesting, spawning, or rearing young for species that are present in the TNW?
x Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to transfer nutrients and organic carbon that
support downstream foodwebs?
x Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have other relationships to the physical, chemical, or
biological integrity of the TNW?

Note: the above list of considerations is not inclusive and other functions observed or known to occur should be documented
below:

1. Significant nexus findings for non-RPW that has no adjacent wetlands and flows directly or indirectly into TNWs. Explain
findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary itself, then go to Section III.D:The presence of a
significant nexus was determined by observing and ordinary high-water mark and a defined bed and bank within the channel..

2. Significant nexus findings for non-RPW and its adjacent wetlands, where the non-RPW flows directly or indirectly into
TNWs. Explain findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its
adjacent wetlands, then go to Section III.D: The presence of a significant nexus was dertermned based on adjacent wetlands being
connected and.or contiguous with waterbodies that eventually end up at TNW. These wetlands provide storgare of
floodwater/runoff, aquatic species habitat, and serve as pollutant trapping measures to prevent further contamination donwstream..

3. Significant nexus findings for wetlands adjacent to an RPW but that do not directly abut the RPW. Explain findings of
presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands, then go to
Section III.D: N/A.

D. DETERMINATIONS OF JURISDICTIONAL FINDINGS. THE SUBJECT WATERS/WETLANDS ARE (CHECK ALL
THAT APPLY):

1. TNWs and Adjacent Wetlands. Check all that apply and provide size estimates in review area:
TNWs: linear feet width (ft), Or, acres.
Wetlands adjacent to TNWs: acres.

2. RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
Tributaries of TNWs where tributaries typically flow year-round are jurisdictional. Provide data and rationale indicating that
tributary is perennial: .
Tributaries of TNW where tributaries have continuous flow “seasonally” (e.g., typically three months each year)are
jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III.B. Provide rationale indicating that tributary flows
seasonally: .

Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft).
Other non-wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters: .

3. Non-RPWs8 that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
Waterbody that is not a TNW or an RPW, but flows directly or indirectly into a TNW, and it has a significant nexus with a
TNW is jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters within the review area (check all that apply):
Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft).
Other non-wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters: .
4. Wetlandsdirectly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
Wetlands directly abut RPW and thus are jurisdictional as adjacent wetlands.
Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow year-round. Provide data and rationale
indicating that tributary is perennial in Section III.D.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is
directly abutting an RPW: .
Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow “seasonally.” Provide data indicating that tributary is
seasonal in Section III.B and rationale in Section III.D.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is directly
abutting an RPW: No perennial riverine systems were indentified on site. Several wetlands directly abut "seasonally"
flowing RPW. Stream perenniality was determined using NC DWQ Stream Identificaton Form Version 4.11e.
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area:1.60 acres.
5. Wetlandsadjacent to but not directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
Wetlands that do not directly abut an RPW, but when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent
and with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisidictional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III.C.

Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
6. Wetlandsadjacent to non-RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
Wetlands adjacent to such waters, and have when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent and
with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisdictional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
7. Impoundments of jurisdictional waters.
9
As a general rule, the impoundment of a jurisdictional tributary remains jurisdictional.
Demonstrate that impoundment was created from “waters of the U.S.,” or
Demonstrate that water meets the criteria for one of the categories presented above (1-6), or
Demonstrate that water is isolated with a nexus to commerce (see E below).
E.ISOLATED [INTERSTATE OR INTRA-STATE] WATERS, INCLUDING ISOLATED WETLANDS, THE USE,
DEGRADATION OR DESTRUCTION OF WHICH COULD AFFECT INTERSTATE COMMERCE, INCLUDING ANY
SUCH WATERS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):10

8See Footnote # 3.
9 To complete the analysis refer to the key in Section III.D.6 of the Instructional Guidebook.
10 Prior to asserting or declining CWA jurisdiction based solely on this category, Corps Districts will elevate the action to Corps and EPA HQ for
review consistent with the process described in the Corps/EPA Memorandum Regarding CWA Act Jurisdiction Following Rapanos.

which are or could be used by interstate or foreign travelers for recreational or other purposes.
from which fish or shellfish are or could be taken and sold in interstate or foreign commerce.
which are or could be used for industrial purposes by industries in interstate commerce.
Interstate isolated waters. Explain: .
Other factors. Explain: .

Identify water body and summarize rationale supporting determination: .

Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft).
Other non-wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters: .
Wetlands: acres.

F. NON-JURISDICTIONAL WATERS, INCLUDING WETLANDS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
If potential wetlands were assessed within the review area, these areas did not meet the criteria in the 1987 Corps of Engineers
Wetland Delineation Manual and/or appropriate Regional Supplements.
Review area included isolated waters with no substantial nexus to interstate (or foreign) commerce.
Prior to the Jan 2001 Supreme Court decision in “SWANCC,” the review area would have been regulated based solely on the
“Migratory Bird Rule” (MBR).
Waters do not meet the “Significant Nexus” standard, where such a finding is required for jurisdiction. Explain: .
Other: (explain, if not covered above): .

Provide acreage estimates for non-jurisdictional waters in the review area, where the sole potential basis of jurisdiction is the MBR
factors (i.e., presence of migratory birds, presence of endangered species, use of water for irrigated agriculture), using best professional
judgment (check all that apply):
Non-wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet width (ft).
Lakes/ponds: acres.
Other non-wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource: .
Wetlands: acres.

Provide acreage estimates for non-jurisdictional waters in the review area that do not meet the “Significant Nexus” standard, where such
a finding is required for jurisdiction (check all that apply):
Non-wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet, width (ft).
Lakes/ponds: acres.
Other non-wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource: .
Wetlands: acres.

SECTION IV: DATA SOURCES.

A. SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for JD (check all that apply - checked items shall be included in case file and, where checked
and requested, appropriately reference sources below):
Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant:Figure 4 (Dated 07/15/2019).
Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant.
Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report.
Data sheets prepared by the Corps: .
Corps navigable waters’ study: .
U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas: .
USGS NHD data.
USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name:Figure 1 (Datred 2016).
USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: Figure 3 (Dated 07/03/2019).
National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name: Figure 3 (Dated 07/03/2019).
State/Local wetland inventory map(s): .
FEMA/FIRM maps: .
100-year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929)
Photographs: Aerial (Name & Date):Figure 3 (Dated 08/20/2019) .
or Other (Name & Date): Site photographs.
Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter: .
Applicable/supporting case law: .
Applicable/supporting scientific literature: .

Other information (please specify): .

B. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS TO SUPPORT JD: .

DRAWING DESCRIPTIONPROJECT NAME & LOCATIONSHEET NUMBERSCALE1 of 5DATE07/15/2019DESIGNED BY / DRAWN BYPROJECT NAMEA. MEHFOUDSPEEDWAYgM/AAgM/gM/gM/gM/gM/gM/gM/gM/gM/gM/AAgM/gM/gM/gM/gM/gM/gM/gM/AAgM/gM/gM/AAAgM/gM/gM/gM/gM/gM/gM/gM/AAAgM/gM/gM/gM/gM/AA")M")K")N")L")O")PCulvert!(C!(B!(A!(D!(J!(I!(G!(H2!(E!(F!(Q!(A2!(G2!(H!(I2!(Q2.IsolatedFeatureIsolated FeatureSheet 2Sheet 3Sheet 4Sheet 5US Hwy 601 SWhitley RdWallaceRdKiserRdDrakewood PlDrake RdBenBlackRdCabarrus Farms RdFieldstone TrB ethel Ave Ex tFDS-25A5-1FDS-25Z7-1FDS-28E1-2FDS-28F1-1FDS-25H5-1FDS-25H5-2FDS-25H5-3FDS-28B1-1FDS-28B1-2FDS-28C1-1FDS-28E1-1FDS-25K2-225H2-625B2-625F2-725C2-925E2-725G2-425K2-2125E2-1325B2-125F2-125D5-7/PUB-25E5-125F5-225F5-825B5-1/POW25B5-1025A5-125A5-825B5-428E1-428G1-428G1-125H5-525H5-1225H5-1825H5-2725H5-3725H5-4225I5-925I5-5/PFO28B1-1128A1-628A1-1028B1-728B1-151 " = 350 'H:FIGURE 4:WETLANDS ANDWATERS OF THEU.S. DELINEATIONMAPREVISIONSMM/DD/YY#DESCRIPTION109/04/19Updated per COE site visit on 8/29/19.These plans and associated documents are theexclusive property of TIMMONS GROUP andmay not be reproduced in whole or in part andshall not be used for any purpose whatsoever,inclusive, but not limited to construction, bidding,and/or construction staking without the expresswritten consent of TIMMONS GROUP.PROJECT NUMBER43286SPEEDWAY SOLARCABARRUS COUNTY,NORTH CAROLINA1001 Boulders Parkway, Suite 300Richmond, VA 23225TEL [phone]www.timmons.com[PLANS PRINTED AS 11X17 ARE HALF SCALE0350700SCALE (FEET)Y:\805\43286-Speedway Solar\GIS\Wetland Delineation\43286-WTDM.mxd1. Waters of the U.S. within theproject study limits have beenlocated using submeter, BluetoothGPS antennas by TimmonsGroup.2.Waters of the U.S. have notbeen confirmed by the U.S. ArmyCorps of Engineers.3. Project limits are approximate.4. Topography based on USGSLiDAR.5. Cowardin StreamClassifications are based solelyon field observations. No formalStream assessment methodologywas completed to determine theseCowardin Classifications.Sheet 3Sheet 4Sheet 2Sheet 5LegendProject Study Limits - 253.6 Acres")XStream Identifier!(XWetland IdentifiergM/FlagAField Data Station CulvertIntermittent Stream (R4)Palustrine Emergent (PEM) WetlandsPalustrine Forested (PFO) WetlandsPalustrine Open Water (POW)Topographic ContoursMajor - 10 FeetMinor - 1 FootPFO(sq ft)PSS(sq ft)PEM(sq ft)POW(sq ft)R3(lf)R4(lf)R6(lf)Ditch(lf)PEM(sq ft)POW(sq ft)A2,419NT / VA2 4,412NT / NVB1,072NT / VC1,984NT / VD2,835 NT / NVE26,286 NT / NVF27,734 NT / NVG2,477NT / VG2 9,446NT / NVH2,737NT / VH2 24,813NT / NVI5,001NT / VI2 11,986NT / NVJ1,445NT / VK 161 NT / NVL 253 NT / NVM 141 NT / NVN22NT / NVO 258 NT / NVP 1,252 NT / NVQ 404NT / VQ2 1,343NT / VTotal 17,539 0 1,343 50,657 0 2,087 0 0 2,835 54,020* T=Tidal; NT=Non-tidal; V=Vegetated; NV=Non-Vegetated; PFO=Palustrine Forested Wetland; PSS=Palustrine Scrub-Shrub Wetland; PEM=Palustrine Emergent Wetland; POW= Palustrine Open Water; EIW= Estuarine Intertidal Wetlands; R3= Upper Perennial Streams; R4=Intermittent Streams; R6 = Ephemeral StreamsResource Identification Non-Isolated FeaturesResourceDescriptionNotes*Total Wetland Area = 69,539 sq ft 1.60 acIsolated FeaturesTotal Isolated Area = 56,855 sq ft 1.31 acTotal Stream Length = 2,087 lf
DRAWING DESCRIPTIONPROJECT NAME & LOCATIONSHEET NUMBERSCALE2 of 5DATE07/15/2019DESIGNED BY / DRAWN BYPROJECT NAMEA. MEHFOUDSPEEDWAYgM/AAgM/gM/gM/gM/gM/gM/gM/gM/gM/gM/A")K")LCulvert!(C!(B!(A!(D!(A2IsolatedFeature578563562
558553551550549548530579576573564557556555552546543542539565559554544540532547545541533529580577574567538534575571586572
56053753152857357056956456356256156055855655457757457156757557256856656555955759058658358158257757857658 4580
585579561560559558557556555553552551550549562554
58157856856756 6565 5635695645275255 2 9
528
526582 579580578543542541540545544566565537536550549546545571570539538539538570569568566561536535576555591548547580530
544543542553551546545
542536537535534568567567565563562553551 5485465465445345335315265885835835785 65 5665665665645635 6 2
560557555
55 4
5555555 54
554554552
552552552552551551550 5505495495495475465475475465465455455455445 44
542541539539538536533532527525
BenBlackRdB ethel A ve Ex tWallace RdFDS-25G2-1FDS-25G2-2FDS-25K2-225H2-625B2-625F2-725C2-925E2-725G2-425K2-2125D2-625E2-1325B2-125F2-11 " = 100 'H:FIGURE 4:WETLANDS ANDWATERS OF THEU.S. DELINEATIONMAPREVISIONSMM/DD/YY#DESCRIPTION109/04/19Updated per COE site visit on 8/29/19.These plans and associated documents are theexclusive property of TIMMONS GROUP andmay not be reproduced in whole or in part andshall not be used for any purpose whatsoever,inclusive, but not limited to construction, bidding,and/or construction staking without the expresswritten consent of TIMMONS GROUP.PROJECT NUMBER43286SPEEDWAY SOLARCABARRUS COUNTY,NORTH CAROLINA1001 Boulders Parkway, Suite 300Richmond, VA 23225TEL [phone]www.timmons.com[PLANS PRINTED AS 11X17 ARE HALF SCALE0100200SCALE (FEET)Y:\805\43286-Speedway Solar\GIS\Wetland Delineation\43286-WTDM.mxd1. Waters of the U.S. within theproject study limits have beenlocated using submeter, BluetoothGPS antennas by TimmonsGroup.2.Waters of the U.S. have notbeen confirmed by the U.S. ArmyCorps of Engineers.3. Project limits are approximate.4. Topography based on USGSLiDAR.5. Cowardin StreamClassifications are based solelyon field observations. No formalStream assessment methodologywas completed to determine theseCowardin Classifications.Sheet 3Sheet 4Sheet 5LegendProject Study Limits - 253.6 Acres")XStream Identifier!(XWetland IdentifiergM/FlagAField Data Station CulvertIntermittent Stream (R4)Palustrine Emergent (PEM) WetlandsPalustrine Forested (PFO) WetlandsPalustrine Open Water (POW)Topographic ContoursMajor - 10 FeetMinor - 1 FootPFO(sq ft)PSS(sq ft)PEM(sq ft)POW(sq ft)R3(lf)R4(lf)R6(lf)Ditch(lf)PEM(sq ft)POW(sq ft)A2,419NT / VA2 4,412NT / NVB1,072NT / VC1,984NT / VD2,835 NT / NVE26,286 NT / NVF27,734 NT / NVG2,477NT / VG2 9,446NT / NVH2,737NT / VH2 24,813NT / NVI5,001NT / VI2 11,986NT / NVJ1,445NT / VK 161 NT / NVL 253 NT / NVM 141 NT / NVN22NT / NVO 258 NT / NVP 1,252 NT / NVQ 404NT / VQ2 1,343NT / VTotal 17,539 0 1,343 50,657 0 2,087 0 0 2,835 54,020* T=Tidal; NT=Non-tidal; V=Vegetated; NV=Non-Vegetated; PFO=Palustrine Forested Wetland; PSS=Palustrine Scrub-Shrub Wetland; PEM=Palustrine Emergent Wetland; POW= Palustrine Open Water; EIW= Estuarine Intertidal Wetlands; R3= Upper Perennial Streams; R4=Intermittent Streams; R6 = Ephemeral StreamsResource Identification Non-Isolated FeaturesResourceDescriptionNotes*Total Wetland Area = 69,539 sq ft 1.60 acIsolated FeaturesTotal Isolated Area = 56,855 sq ft 1.31 acTotal Stream Length = 2,087 lf
DRAWING DESCRIPTIONPROJECT NAME & LOCATIONSHEET NUMBERSCALE3 of 5DATE07/15/2019DESIGNED BY / DRAWN BYPROJECT NAMEA. MEHFOUDSPEEDWAYAgM/gM/gM/gM/!(E!(F.IsolatedFeature55655555455355254754654554454354254154053853753653553453153052952855155054954853955 0
5 4 9
5485475445415365 3 2
531546545543
542538
537
5395355345335405395355305365315415375485475465455445435425415405395655635595575 66
562
5 61
5 58
5 6 4
5 6 2 55955755656156055855555455355255154854654554457056856654954755155053953756556456355455254554 3
564
5 6 3
561560556555 5575 5 6
557556547546561560559558558557546545543
5 4 2
533532
55254053854 9564547538566542541540553561557555554552552547534567
5655655 63 56156256055855 85565575 57556556556555
554554 5535535525 5 1
550550549
546
545544544544537536534534
533533554544Wallace RdFDS-25A5-125A5-125A5-828A1-628A1-101 " = 100 'H:FIGURE 4:WETLANDS ANDWATERS OF THEU.S. DELINEATIONMAPREVISIONSMM/DD/YY#DESCRIPTION109/04/19Updated per COE site visit on 8/29/19.These plans and associated documents are theexclusive property of TIMMONS GROUP andmay not be reproduced in whole or in part andshall not be used for any purpose whatsoever,inclusive, but not limited to construction, bidding,and/or construction staking without the expresswritten consent of TIMMONS GROUP.PROJECT NUMBER43286SPEEDWAY SOLARCABARRUS COUNTY,NORTH CAROLINA1001 Boulders Parkway, Suite 300Richmond, VA 23225TEL [phone]www.timmons.com[PLANS PRINTED AS 11X17 ARE HALF SCALE0100200SCALE (FEET)Y:\805\43286-Speedway Solar\GIS\Wetland Delineation\43286-WTDM.mxd1. Waters of the U.S. within theproject study limits have beenlocated using submeter, BluetoothGPS antennas by TimmonsGroup.2.Waters of the U.S. have notbeen confirmed by the U.S. ArmyCorps of Engineers.3. Project limits are approximate.4. Topography based on USGSLiDAR.5. Cowardin StreamClassifications are based solelyon field observations. No formalStream assessment methodologywas completed to determine theseCowardin Classifications.Sheet 5Sheet 4Sheet 2LegendProject Study Limits - 253.6 Acres")XStream Identifier!(XWetland IdentifiergM/FlagAField Data Station CulvertIntermittent Stream (R4)Palustrine Emergent (PEM) WetlandsPalustrine Forested (PFO) WetlandsPalustrine Open Water (POW)Topographic ContoursMajor - 10 FeetMinor - 1 FootPFO(sq ft)PSS(sq ft)PEM(sq ft)POW(sq ft)R3(lf)R4(lf)R6(lf)Ditch(lf)PEM(sq ft)POW(sq ft)A2,419NT / VA2 4,412NT / NVB1,072NT / VC1,984NT / VD2,835 NT / NVE26,286 NT / NVF27,734 NT / NVG2,477NT / VG2 9,446NT / NVH2,737NT / VH2 24,813NT / NVI5,001NT / VI2 11,986NT / NVJ1,445NT / VK 161 NT / NVL 253 NT / NVM 141 NT / NVN22NT / NVO 258 NT / NVP 1,252 NT / NVQ 404NT / VQ2 1,343NT / VTotal 17,539 0 1,343 50,657 0 2,087 0 0 2,835 54,020* T=Tidal; NT=Non-tidal; V=Vegetated; NV=Non-Vegetated; PFO=Palustrine Forested Wetland; PSS=Palustrine Scrub-Shrub Wetland; PEM=Palustrine Emergent Wetland; POW= Palustrine Open Water; EIW= Estuarine Intertidal Wetlands; R3= Upper Perennial Streams; R4=Intermittent Streams; R6 = Ephemeral StreamsResource Identification Non-Isolated FeaturesResourceDescriptionNotes*Total Wetland Area = 69,539 sq ft 1.60 acIsolated FeaturesTotal Isolated Area = 56,855 sq ft 1.31 acTotal Stream Length = 2,087 lf
DRAWING DESCRIPTIONPROJECT NAME & LOCATIONSHEET NUMBERSCALE4 of 5DATE07/15/2019DESIGNED BY / DRAWN BYPROJECT NAMEA. MEHFOUDSPEEDWAYAgM/gM/gM/gM/gM/gM/AAAgM/gM/gM/")M")N")O!(G!(H2!(G2!(H55054954354853954754654252152051751654053652251951854 5544543541539537535
546540 53853653453354 2531
5 39
538536535540537532529541534546545544539542
5 4 1
540538519
5 1 8 5155145135125205165505485465455495475465455435425445415 4 6
5 4 5
54 4
5 4 3
542545544
534532552
551548547546546545544547546547546547546543542
54 0
539 5355335335315 11
5 1 0
54 3542538537 537532 518517515514545544541538535534
52 9
52852752 5
526524523
5325305335315435 4 2
51754754351 7
535
532525 518539535532
5315 32
530 530531525
52 3 52252252051651851451155154955 0
5495495485485455475475475475435 43
54154 0
539
5365355325 3 0530530528528528
52 9
5295 2 4 52252151751 6516
5155 1 5
513549528CabarrusFarmsRdFDS-25Z7-1FDS-28B1-1FDS-28B1-2FDS-28C1-125D5-7/PUB-25E5-125F5-225F5-825B5-1/POW25B5-1025B5-428B1-1128B1-728B1-151 " = 100 'H:FIGURE 4:WETLANDS ANDWATERS OF THEU.S. DELINEATIONMAPREVISIONSMM/DD/YY#DESCRIPTION109/04/19Updated per COE site visit on 8/29/19.These plans and associated documents are theexclusive property of TIMMONS GROUP andmay not be reproduced in whole or in part andshall not be used for any purpose whatsoever,inclusive, but not limited to construction, bidding,and/or construction staking without the expresswritten consent of TIMMONS GROUP.PROJECT NUMBER43286SPEEDWAY SOLARCABARRUS COUNTY,NORTH CAROLINA1001 Boulders Parkway, Suite 300Richmond, VA 23225TEL [phone]www.timmons.com[PLANS PRINTED AS 11X17 ARE HALF SCALE0100200SCALE (FEET)Y:\805\43286-Speedway Solar\GIS\Wetland Delineation\43286-WTDM.mxd1. Waters of the U.S. within theproject study limits have beenlocated using submeter, BluetoothGPS antennas by TimmonsGroup.2.Waters of the U.S. have notbeen confirmed by the U.S. ArmyCorps of Engineers.3. Project limits are approximate.4. Topography based on USGSLiDAR.5. Cowardin StreamClassifications are based solelyon field observations. No formalStream assessment methodologywas completed to determine theseCowardin Classifications.Sheet 3Sheet 2Sheet 5LegendProject Study Limits - 253.6 Acres")XStream Identifier!(XWetland IdentifiergM/FlagAField Data Station CulvertIntermittent Stream (R4)Palustrine Emergent (PEM) WetlandsPalustrine Forested (PFO) WetlandsPalustrine Open Water (POW)Topographic ContoursMajor - 10 FeetMinor - 1 FootPFO(sq ft)PSS(sq ft)PEM(sq ft)POW(sq ft)R3(lf)R4(lf)R6(lf)Ditch(lf)PEM(sq ft)POW(sq ft)A2,419NT / VA2 4,412NT / NVB1,072NT / VC1,984NT / VD2,835 NT / NVE26,286 NT / NVF27,734 NT / NVG2,477NT / VG2 9,446NT / NVH2,737NT / VH2 24,813NT / NVI5,001NT / VI2 11,986NT / NVJ1,445NT / VK 161 NT / NVL 253 NT / NVM 141 NT / NVN22NT / NVO 258 NT / NVP 1,252 NT / NVQ 404NT / VQ2 1,343NT / VTotal 17,539 0 1,343 50,657 0 2,087 0 0 2,835 54,020* T=Tidal; NT=Non-tidal; V=Vegetated; NV=Non-Vegetated; PFO=Palustrine Forested Wetland; PSS=Palustrine Scrub-Shrub Wetland; PEM=Palustrine Emergent Wetland; POW= Palustrine Open Water; EIW= Estuarine Intertidal Wetlands; R3= Upper Perennial Streams; R4=Intermittent Streams; R6 = Ephemeral StreamsResource Identification Non-Isolated FeaturesResourceDescriptionNotes*Total Wetland Area = 69,539 sq ft 1.60 acIsolated FeaturesTotal Isolated Area = 56,855 sq ft 1.31 acTotal Stream Length = 2,087 lf
DRAWING DESCRIPTIONPROJECT NAME & LOCATIONSHEET NUMBERSCALE5 of 5DATE07/15/2019DESIGNED BY / DRAWN BYPROJECT NAMEA. MEHFOUDSPEEDWAYAAgM/gM/gM/AAAgM/gM/gM/gM/gM/gM/gM/gM/A")P!(J!(I!(Q!(I2!(Q254153 9
5375365345 32
5315285 26
524522521519518516529
527
525
523
517515535533530520540538531530528527526525524523522518537532529520519516
540538536535534533541539534533532531530526524516527525519 53552852051753051952752152 2
52 0521520519516515524522522521523 52052652554554454254354153953754 0
538526524523527
5 25522521520519518
500496495498497499494539537540538
51 5
5 14
51 3 5035015 4 5543 543541539538505502538537533532493
4 9 2543542540539539538536535514512 5 13
511
542
510
509508507
5 0 6
5 21517 5295 23522 52351852453653750254250450150049849754554053153052953052552251951851951751651751650950054 6 544544544541
54254054 1
541 54153953953 5533 533530 5315315285285215225225 22 520520517517516514515
514514510
507508507503498499496492Bethel Ave ExtFDS-28E1-2FDS-28F1-1FDS-25H5-1FDS-25H5-2FDS-25H5-3FDS-28E1-128E1-428G1-428G1-125H5-525H5-1225H5-1825H5-2725H5-3725H5-4225I5-925I5-5/PFO1 " = 100 'H:FIGURE 4:WETLANDS ANDWATERS OF THEU.S. DELINEATIONMAPREVISIONSMM/DD/YY#DESCRIPTION109/04/19Updated per COE site visit on 8/29/19.These plans and associated documents are theexclusive property of TIMMONS GROUP andmay not be reproduced in whole or in part andshall not be used for any purpose whatsoever,inclusive, but not limited to construction, bidding,and/or construction staking without the expresswritten consent of TIMMONS GROUP.PROJECT NUMBER43286SPEEDWAY SOLARCABARRUS COUNTY,NORTH CAROLINA1001 Boulders Parkway, Suite 300Richmond, VA 23225TEL [phone]www.timmons.com[PLANS PRINTED AS 11X17 ARE HALF SCALE0100200SCALE (FEET)Y:\805\43286-Speedway Solar\GIS\Wetland Delineation\43286-WTDM.mxd1. Waters of the U.S. within theproject study limits have beenlocated using submeter, BluetoothGPS antennas by TimmonsGroup.2.Waters of the U.S. have notbeen confirmed by the U.S. ArmyCorps of Engineers.3. Project limits are approximate.4. Topography based on USGSLiDAR.5. Cowardin StreamClassifications are based solelyon field observations. No formalStream assessment methodologywas completed to determine theseCowardin Classifications.Sheet 3Sheet 4Sheet 2LegendProject Study Limits - 253.6 Acres")XStream Identifier!(XWetland IdentifiergM/FlagAField Data Station CulvertIntermittent Stream (R4)Palustrine Emergent (PEM) WetlandsPalustrine Forested (PFO) WetlandsPalustrine Open Water (POW)Topographic ContoursMajor - 10 FeetMinor - 1 FootPFO(sq ft)PSS(sq ft)PEM(sq ft)POW(sq ft)R3(lf)R4(lf)R6(lf)Ditch(lf)PEM(sq ft)POW(sq ft)A2,419NT / VA2 4,412NT / NVB1,072NT / VC1,984NT / VD2,835 NT / NVE26,286 NT / NVF27,734 NT / NVG2,477NT / VG2 9,446NT / NVH2,737NT / VH2 24,813NT / NVI5,001NT / VI2 11,986NT / NVJ1,445NT / VK 161 NT / NVL 253 NT / NVM 141 NT / NVN22NT / NVO 258 NT / NVP 1,252 NT / NVQ 404NT / VQ2 1,343NT / VTotal 17,539 0 1,343 50,657 0 2,087 0 0 2,835 54,020* T=Tidal; NT=Non-tidal; V=Vegetated; NV=Non-Vegetated; PFO=Palustrine Forested Wetland; PSS=Palustrine Scrub-Shrub Wetland; PEM=Palustrine Emergent Wetland; POW= Palustrine Open Water; EIW= Estuarine Intertidal Wetlands; R3= Upper Perennial Streams; R4=Intermittent Streams; R6 = Ephemeral StreamsResource Identification Non-Isolated FeaturesResourceDescriptionNotes*Total Wetland Area = 69,539 sq ft 1.60 acIsolated FeaturesTotal Isolated Area = 56,855 sq ft 1.31 acTotal Stream Length = 2,087 lf