HomeMy WebLinkAboutNCS000101_DMR_20200722 INTERNATIONAL PAPER
RIEGELWOOD MILL
JOHN L. RIEGEL ROAD
RIEGELWOOD NC 28456
July 22, 2020 RECEIVED
Attention: Central Files
Division of Energy, Minerals, and Land Resources JUL 28 2020
1612 Mail Service Center DENR-LAND QUALITY
Raleigh,NC 27699-1612 STORMWATER PERMITTING
Subject: Spring, 2020 Semi-annual Monitoring Report,NPDES Permit NCS000101
Dear Stormwater Section:
Enclosed are two copies of the Spring, 2020 semi-annual analytical monitoring report for NPDES
Permit No. NCS000101, issued December 1, 2014 to International Paper's Riegelwood Mill. Lab
results are included, as well as a mill stormwater basin map. Analytical samples were collected on
April 13, May 5, and June 10, 2020. Analytical results appear in the attached data table. During the
Spring semester of 2020, weather conditions during work hours allowed collection of three Tier 2
samples for Basin T.
Analytical Results:
Corrective Actions: Since the Fall 2019 sampling events,housekeeping has continued in an
aggressive manner in an effort to meet benchmarks in Basin T, a Tier 2 outfall.
Basins B, E, and I:
Sample results for Basin B were within benchmark values with the exception of TSS; the result was
135mg/L, above the benchmark of 100 mg/L. Annual cleanout of the area catch basins removed high
amounts of sediment, and the result of subsequent sampling was 28 mg/L, well within the
benchmark. Cleanouts will occur semi-annually going forward. Basins E and I passed all the
benchmarks.
Basin T:
• Basin T remains a Tier 2 outfall during this semester. Rainfall allowed three representative
sampling events during the semester. The April 13, 2020 sample was within all permit
benchmarks.
• On 5/5/20, Basin T was within all benchmarks except TSS. Visual examination of the 3
sample bottles collected showed noticeable variation in solids content, so the other 2 bottles
were also tested in an effort to obtain the most representative value. The test results, 159, 85,
and 66 mg/L exhibited large variances, and averaged 103mg/L, was just above the benchmark
of 100.
S/Groups/Environmental/Stormwater/Reports/2017,18, 19 rpts/fall 2019/Anal Cyr Ltr
• The 6/10/20 sample was also within benchmarks for all parameters except TSS. Similar to
the previous sample,there was a wide visual variance in the 3 samples collected from Basin
T. As before, all 3 were tested and the results averaged. Results of 125, 166, and 50 mg/L
averaged to the reported value of 114, above the benchmark of 100mg/L. Intensive
housekeeping and maintenance of the pavement and roadsides in Basin T continues in an
effort to improve runoff quality.
I certify, under penalty of law,that this document and all attachments were prepared under my
direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel
properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or
persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information,
the information submitted is,to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I
am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the
possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations.
If you have questions or need additional information, please call me at(910) 362-4753 or Wallace
Coverdale of my staff at(910) 362-4590.
Sincerely,
Kimberly W. Fail, P.E.,Environmental Compliance Manager
cc: Brian Lambe, Wilmington Regional Office
S/Groups/Environmental/Stormwater/Reports/20 17,1 8, 19 rpts/fall 2019/Anal Cyr Ltr
STORMWATER DISCHAKGE OUTFALL (SDO)
SEMI-ANNUAL SUMMARY DATA MONITORING REPORT (DMR)
Calendar Year_ SPR 2020
Individual NPDES Permit No. NCS000101
Certificate of Coverage (COC) No. NCG
This monitoring report summary of the calendar year should be kept on file on-site with the facility SPPP.
Facility Name: _International Paper
County: _Columbus
Phone Number: (910)_362-4590 Total no. of SDOs monitored 4
Outfall No. B, E,
Is this outfall currently in Tier 2 (monitored monthly)? Yes n No x
Was this outfall ever in Tier 2 (monitored monthly) during the past year? Outfalls B, I Yes x No
If this outfall was in Tier 2 last year, why was monthly monitoring discontinued? N/A
Enough consecutive samples below benchmarks to decrease frequency
Received approval from DWQ to reduce monitoring frequency
Other n
Was this SDO monitored because of vehicle maintenance activities? Yes No x
Parameter, (units)
Total
Rainfall,
inches
Benchmark N/A COD BOD TSS pH
Date Sample 120 mg/L 30 mglL 100mg/I 6-9 su
Collected,
mm/dd/yy
B 4/13/2020 0.84 28 3 135* 6.7 J
B 5/5/2020 0.92 46 4 28 7.0
E 4/13/2020 0.84 114 17 15 6.6
14/13/2020 0.84 29 2 41 6.8
SW U-264-Generic-13 Dec2012
Additional Outfall Attachment
Outfall No. T
Is this outfall currently in Tier 2 (monitored monthly)? Yes x Noll
Was this outfall ever in Tier 2 (monitored monthly) during the past year? Yes xi_ f No
If this outfall was in Tier 2 last year, why was monthly monitoring discontinued? N/A
Enough consecutive samples below benchmarks to decrease frequency n
Received approval from DWQ to reduce monitoring frequency
Other
Was this SDO monitored because of vehicle maintenance activities? Yes No x
Parameter, (units)
Total
Rainfall,
inches
Benchmark N/A COD BOD TSS pH
Date Sample 120 mg/L 30 mg/L 100 mg/L 6-9 su
Collected,
mm/dd/yy
T 4/13/20 0.84 36 7 55 6.6
T 5/5/20 0.92 46 6 103* 7.9
T 6/10/20 0.56 46 3 114* 8.1
*Value is above the benchmark
SW U-264-Generic-13 Dec2012
"I certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a
system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person
or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the
best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information,
including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
Signature
Date
For questions, contact your local Regional Office:
DWQ Regional Office Contact Information:
..\‘‘
�
FNt�rilli`.14
\f WH nyron
ASHEVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE FAYETTEVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE MOORESVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
2090 US Highway 70 225 Green Street 610 East Center Avenue/Suite 301
Swannanoa,NC 28778 Systel Building Suite 714 Mooresville,NC 28115
(828) 296-4500 Fayetteville,NC 28301-5043 (704) 663-1699
(910) 433-3300
RALEIGH REGIONAL OFFICE WASHINGTON REGIONAL OFFICE WILMINGTON REGIONAL OFFICE
3800 Barrett Drive 943 Washington Square Mall 127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Raleigh, NC 27609 Washington,NC 27889 Wilmington,NC 28405-2845
(919) 791-4200 (252) 946-6481 (910) 796-7215
WINSTON-SALEM REGIONAL OFFICE CENTRAL OFFICE
585 Waughtown Street 1617 Mail Service Center ` �o preserve•,protectWinston-Salem, NC 27107 Raleigh,NC 27699-1617 IIR _!' end enhance
(336) 771-5000 (919) 807-6300 Alorlh Carolina's water... ,
SWU-264-Generic-13Dec2012
STORMWATER DISCHARGE OUTFALL(SDO)
MONITORING REPORT
Permit Number NCS_000101 SAMPLES COLLECTED DURING CALENDAR YEAR: 2020
(This monitoring report shall be received by the Division no later than 30 days from the date the facility receives the sampling results from the laboratory.)
FACILITY NAME International Paper COUNTY Columbus
PERSON COLLECTING SAMPLE(S) Wallace Coverdale
PHONE NO. (_910)362-4590
CERTIFIED LABORATORY(S)_International Paper Lab#_140_
_Environmental Chemists, Inc. Lab# 94_
SIGNATURE OF PERMITTEE OR DESIGNEE
REQUIRED ON PAGE 2.
Part A: Specific Monitoring Requirements
Outfall Date 50050
No. Sample Total Total
Collected Flow(if app.) Rainfall
mo/dd/yr MMG inches
B 4/13/2020 0.16 0.84
B 5/5/2020 0.17 0.92
E 4/13/2020 1.11 0.84
I 4/13/2020 0.51 0.84
T 4/13/2020 0.26 0.84
T 5/5/2020 0.28 0.92
T 6/10/2020 0.17 0.56
Does this facility perform Vehicle Maintenance Activities using more than 55 gallons of new motor oil per month? yes x no not in runoff areas
(if yes, complete Part B)'
Part B: Vehicle Maintenance Activity Monitoring Requirements N/A
Outfall Date 50050 00556 00530 00400
No. Sample Total Flow Total Oil& Grease Non-polar Total pH New Motor
Collected (if applicable) Rainfall (if appl.) O&G/TPH Suspended Oil Usage
(Method 1664 Solids
SGT-HEM),if
appl.
mo/dd/yr MG inches mg/1 mg/I unit gal/mo
Form SWU-247,last revised 2/2/2012
Page 1 of 2
STORM Ev ii'I CHARACTERISTICS: 3 events: Mail Original and one copy to:
Division of Water Quality
Date: _04/13/20 Attn: Central Files
Total Event Precipitation(inches): 0.84 1617 Mail Service Center
Event Duration(hours):_N/A_(only if applicable—see permit.) Raleigh,North Carolina 27699-1617
(if more than one storm event was sampled)
Date_5/5/20
Total Event Precipitation(inches): _0.92_
Event Duration(hours):N/A (only if applicable—see permit.)
Date 6/10/2020
Total Event Precipitation(inches):_0.56
Event Duration(hours):N/A (only if applicable—see permit.)
"I certify,under penalty of law,that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a
system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person
or persons who manage the system,or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information,the information submitted is,to the
best of my knowledge and belief,true,accurate,and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information,
including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
(Signature of Permittee) (Date)
Form SWU-247, last revised 2/2/2012
Page 2 of 2
STORMWATER DISCHARGE CALCULATION WORKSHEET
Spr 2020
Total
Impervious Unpaved Area Total Gallons Gallons from Gallons from Discharge
Outfall Total Acres Area (Ac) (Ac) Rainfall (in)* Rainfall Impervious Area Unpaved Area (MG)
Basin B 4/13/20 0.57 0.34 0.23 0.84 156007 93057 62950 0.16
Basin B 5/5/20 0.57 0.34 0.23 0.92 170865 101919 68945 0.17
Basin E 4/13/20 4.04 1.01 3.03 0.84 1105733 276433 829299 1.11
Basin 14/13/20 1.88 1.78 0.1 0.84 514549 487179 27370 0.51
Basin T 4/13/20 0.95 0.9 0.05 0.84 260011 246327 13685 0.26
Basin T 5/5/20 0.95 0.9 0.05 0.92 284774 269786 14988 0.28
Basin T 6/10/20 0.95 0.9 0.05 0.56 173341 164218 9123 0.17
* Rainfall measured by onsite rain gauge.
Sample information (sampling must begin within 30 minutes of runoff flow)
Time
Time event Time sample Time event Time sample Time event sample
Outfall began collected Outfall began collected Outfall began collected
Basin B 4/13/20 approx. 9:00am 10:50am Basin B 5/5/20 approx 9:20am 9:55am
Basin E 4/13/20 approx. 9:00am 9:55am
Basin 14/13/20 approx. 9:00am 9:40am
Basin T 4/13/20 approx. 9:00am 9:30am Basin T 5/5/20 approx 9:20am 9:35am Basin T 6/10/20 approx1:15pm 1:40pm
Sample Collection Date: 4/12/2020 5/5/2020 6/10/2020
Approx. Duration of Event: n/a
Previous Repr. Event, Amount (in.): 4/8/2020 0.25 4/30/2020 1.72 5/30/2020 0.50
sq.ft/acre=43,560
Prepared by: Wallace Coverdale
I certify that this information is true and accurate to the best of my knowledge.
Signature and date:
' /� l'DAILY� TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS FORM
SAMPLE INDENTIFICATION 1,�J S'/v l 1-1 FILTERING START TIME��(�� SAMPLE INDENTIFICATION 13 AS)N FILTERING START TIME
" IS-2v FILTERING STOP TIME I- DATE COLLECTED 4-f 3^ FILTERING STOP TIME L CI
DATE COLLECTED 4 � �\
DATE ANALYZED Jw- 14 - DATE ANALYZED 4-�Z`
SAMPLE VOLUME USED 5_60. mis
FILTERING TIME MUST BE FILTERING TIME MUST BE
<10 MINUTES SAMPLE VOLUME USED 0�) ,r mis <10 MINUTES
TIME INIOUT OF OVEN-3IS 1 1 114- *Time in oven must be greater than or equal to drying TIME IN/OUT OF OVEN TIS , /1`7 1-'Time In oven must be greater than or equal to drying
time of most recent annual drying study time of most recent annual drying study
''_2_2_ /ZZ3
W TIME EIGHED v/�d TIME WEIGHED
DRY SAMPLE WT+PAPER WT - I g DRY SAMPLEWT+PAPER WT c 4-421}
g
DRIED RESIDUE MUST BE DRY FILTER PAPER WT i'T3�tri 0 g DRIED RESIDUE MUST DRY FILTER PAPER WT .432ci g
BETWEEN 0.0025 g and ( BE BETWEEN 0.0025 g
0.2000 g DRY SAMPLE WT I 0 v� 9 and 0.2000 g DRY SAMPLE WTC10q i `Z g
FACTOR(F) 1000 / SCSI = 2. FACTOR(F) 1000 / G'6 V = '.c 1-
mL of sample mL of sample
CALCULATIONS: 7r /` S 35 CALCULA7IONS: ' (f(J 2- =
TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS= 1000* * 'v b = / TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS- 1000* * =
Q I, F wt.grams 'm]gll j�A� F wt.grams mgll
SAMPLE INDENTIFICATION 10/ s i 1l tjy'� FILTERING START TIME Tt 0
SAMPLE INDENTIFICATION I-�' �"/�' FILTERING START TIM I 3
DATE COLLECTED 4-',3-''77v FILTERING STOP TIME 7-)Z DATE COLLECTED 4 _/3-26 FILTERING STOP TIME
DATE ANALYZED 4-14- `<J DATE ANALYZED 4 /4-
FILTERING TIME MUST BE FILTERING TIME MUST BE
SAMPLE VOLUME USED'" CO mis <10 MINUTES SAMPLE VOLUME USED 5 C� mis <10 MINUTES
TIME IN/OUT OF OVEN -J,5 / 1 14O `Time In oven must be greater than or equal to drying TIME IN/OUT OF OVEN 3 Ls I/fig—iO— -Time in oven must be greater than or equal to drying
time of most recent annual drying study time of most recen't7annual drying study
TIME WEIGHED 2-4- TIME WEIGHED /L
DRY SAMPLE WT+PAPER WT , 43 L;--g DRY SAMPLE WT+PAPER WT I 4-s 4 II g
DRIED RESIDUE MUST BE DRY FILTER PAPER WT ,4.31 5 g DRIED RESIDUE MUST DRY FILTER PAPER WT 9-2a1 p g
BETWEEN 0.0025 g and n BE BETWEEN 0.0025 g
C
0.2000 g DRY SAMPLE WT I UU `g and 0.2000 g DRY SAMPLE WT r.O 2 73 9
// ) . 6 7-
FACTOR(F) 1000 / l� = FACTOR(F) 1000 / _
mL of sample mL of sample
CALCULATIONS: �.U�2 4"t CALCULATIONS: �2 3 SS
TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS= 1000* S = TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS= 1000* _
F wt.grams mg/I F wLgrams mgll
SAMPLE INDENTIFICATION FILTERING START TIME SAMPLE INDENTIFICATION FILTERING START TIME
DATE COLLECTED FILTERING STOP TIME DATE COLLECTED FILTERING STOP TIME
DATE ANALYZED DATE ANALYZED
FILTERING TIME MUST BE FILTERING TIME MUST BE
SAMPLE VOLUME USED mis <10 MINUTES SAMPLE VOLUME USED mis <10 MINUTES
TIME IN/OUT OF OVEN / 'Time In oven must be greater than or equal to drying TIME IN/OUT OF OVEN I 'Time In oven must be greater than or equal to drying
time of most recent annual drying study time of most recent annual drying study
TIME WEIGHED TIME WEIGHED
DRY SAMPLE WT+PAPER WT g DRY SAMPLE WT+PAPER WT g
DRIED RESIDUE MUST BE DRY FILTER PAPER WT g DRIED RESIDUE MUST DRY FILTER PAPER WT g
BETWEEN 0.0025 g and BE BETWEEN 0.0025 g
0.2000 g DRY SAMPLE WT g and 0.2000 g DRY SAMPLE WT g
FACTOR(F) 1000 1 = FACTOR(F) 1000 / _
mL of sample mL of sample
CALCULATIONS: CALCULATIONS:
TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS= • 1000* = TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS= 1000" " =
F wt.grams mg/I F wt.gmms mgll
Class S Calibration Weight )-OCC(J g Balance Wt I yoCQ) g Effluent Duplicates Must Be Run Each Tuesday
DIFFERENCE=(2)Absolute(EFF -EFF DUP )))I(EFF +EFF DUP I'100=
EFFLUENT DUPLICATES MUST AGREE WITHIN 25%DIFFERENCE
I certify by this signature that this document is true,accurate,and complete to the best of
my knowledge. ( J,�/,
PRINTED NAME OF ANALYST C CA-1 G `/`1 C
I L� l .0
SIGNATURE OF ANALYST
Standard Methods, 2540D-1997 /`'�_,
Revisions: DATE `7A"
Pat Soles 2/26/2013
Emily Henderson 3/3/2014 `Original form will be kept in the Environmental Central File for current+3 years.
Emily Henderson 2/4/2015
(' rjS
SET OF C(,'Kid(,)) SET UP END (5-DAY) Me I setup time: l Composite date: ;"2C)
READ B'r C: 4/6)4% DAY: (,i,t eS DAY: u Ir Met I read: 2-1-' 9-9 Grab date: 4--I/l-2
CALC BY: ** TIME: C i 3 TIME: SQ- °C/mg/L) Buffered water temp(°C): 10- Cc
CHECKED BY: ** DATE: 4._,4.-20 DATE: 4_f 61 _ZQ +All samples are incubated immediately after initial D.O.and read immediately upon removal from incubator.
bugs II 9
47f4,AWck-3€r 1 0 7
SAMPLE ID GIC BOTTLE ID MLS SAMPLE INITIAL D.O. 5-DAY D.O. OXYGEN ff C MLS SEED IN BOO
(mg/1) (mg/I) LEFT(mg/I) NUTRIENT PILLOWS:Lmkt..(a�3mi LITERS WATER: l 5 BOTTLES: 4.5
Avg.Unseeded
DILUTION H2O 300 ., .. '' i ; {
'' mg/L QUALITY ASSURANCE
DILUTION H2O 300 - , _/ .[ -; l / i- , •- Unseeded dilution water,S 0.20 mg/L
POLYSEED AVERAGE org pH adj pH SAMPLE
-3 25 �% `S 2. �� S.s ) SEED CORR.
(mg/L) BOO(mg/I) BOO(mg/I) (s.u.) (s.u.) TEMP(•c) Seed Controls,0.6-1.0 mg/L
POLYSEED ( I 20 4-21-- l-f .Ci ` 4.2_3 '
r ( .' Dilution H2O DO,7.5-9.0 mg/L
POLYSEED 4t0 15 Z
_ 5 j a, 3 ` All Other Bottles DO,7-9 mg/L
GGA -; 11 6 4 . , (.- 7 Oil.H2O&Sample Temperature,20±3'C
GGA f l., 6 '-,) Z S s' , , / 1, Adj.pH,7.0-7.2 s.u.
GGA 6 -2 ,� � t /
/ 7 GGA Std.,198+/-30.5 mg/L
SEEDED BLANK 3(--- " 4.5 0. C-
p .Z4'" 791 CS 3 DO,Deplete 2.0 mg/L&Residual 1.0 mg/L
#1 CLARIFIER C ; •
f `,- ' ' �'t- Eff.Duplicates must agree within 30
#1 CLARIFIER C l i 5,, `'! ' 4 I , -',4 •;•s
#2 CLARIFIER C -4 3 c . 4 c'7 •3,l 5 2 l I to- 1 -/C 2c,•L l EFFLUENT
#2 CLARIFIER C /34 Z. -. l tJ ,
�• C- 2. l tY ( � SAMPLE TIME:Gam-ham
ASB C i'+' ` 7.0'l 2 �. I' . } PRESERVATION (°C): 0,S
ASB C )
NEW BAY C 0 sl,2 2,60 �. 6,6 5 0 , _Q 1-DAY BOO(unseeded) J 5c/
NEW BAY C /-S 2_,C> -2-Is zj,0�, 3, 1 ' 3 - I Volume Eff.Used(mL) 5 C)
SOUTH BAY G —.7/• ` a IN Sr' 2 E RESULTS
SOUTH BAY G `.' i' -/ • , 1 r
EFFLUENT C 3g-2 5C q"2 I 4. 4•O( ( .8,` 74- 2 2.0 2 Gam - l EFFLUENT C 34..3 l�-O cs 23 4 &.i 3,34- i 6,a.Si
EFFLUENT C 34 T 30 ?j. 2 1 S".`/G 2-1-s I _ ,/ S, 6 _
EFFLUENT DUP C -; 52_ toq. 2 Z 4.SS. - 3 5 / Eff dup%DIFFERENCE 5 _ 5.(I 2_
AVG FOR EFF j „ 0 , 4 Nitrate/Nitrite Test Strips
Nitrate(NO3)Nitrite(NO2)
Effluent
_ S. Bay
Must agree within 0.0 Before D.O.After '
DRIFT CHECK ±0.2 mg/L (mg/L) (mg/L)
New Bay
Standard Method 5210E-2011(5-Day BOO Test). G=GRAB C=COMPOSITE
NOTES: I certify by this signs re that this document is true,accurate,and complete to the best of my knowledge
U'1l C ) -
3 ct,IK,u / c c✓rii(-cjc- C L✓( -. /y1 Cc\<n .-, 4-44-2d/4-19.20
-c-" 5 -- S C i ANALYST PRINTED NAME ANALYST SIGNATURE DATE
SET UP B`,, ( iN,i .ti(a)( SET UP END (5-DAY) Mt. :al setup: Composite date: A) A.
READ BY: ** G I,(/edcr DAY: Ts DAY: 5 k j Meter cal read: Grab date: 41 ` 13` 2e
CALC BY: ** TIME: TIME: Buffered water temp:
CHECKED BY: ** DATE: a._ 14_ 0 DATE: 4 IC - Zv *All samples are incubated immediately after initial D.O.and read immediately upon removal from incubator.
bugs 11 '-e/II\Verner P., Z a+ z
INITIAL D.O. 5-DAY D.O. OXYGEN M *CCU IN
SAMPLE ID GIC BOTTLE ID MLS SAMPLE L.n�t 63 I 4. 5
mg/I mg/I USED mg/I NUTRIENT PILLOWS:LA , LITERS WATER: SAMPLES:
DILUTION H2O 300 Unseeded Unseeded dilution water,_‹0.2 mg/L QUALITY ASSURANCE
DILUTION H2O 300 Seed Controls,0.6-1.0 mg/L Unseeded dilution water,5 0.20 mg/L
POLYSEED 25 SEED CORR. BOO mg/I AVERAGE org pH adj pH STEPPE Seed Controls,0.6.1.0 mg/L
HOD mg/1 TEMP
POLYSEED 20 Dilution H2O DO,7.5-9.0 mg/L
POLYSEED 15 All Other Bottles DO,7-9 mglL
GGA 6 Dil.H2O&Sample Temperature,20±3*C
GGA 6 Adj.pH,7.0-7.2 s.u.
/L
GGA 6 GGA Std.,198+/-30.5 mgmg/L.DO,Deplete 2.0 mg/L&Residual 1.0 mg/
il.4'h'WL'\L:(� \J; G 1 1 I G- 5 O ,7-' (0,cS 7 3 3 - . , 4_ Eff.Duplicates must agree within 30%
`\ G 2-f 1 50 • (c(' G. U } 2.59 ...? EFFLUENT
0 G 'y, ' ! 1 - SAMPLE TIME:
‘4.-
.20 \, --4 i' i- (_ I PRESERVATION:
G L )co 4 6 G- -1 (� co ---`'' 6.1-
G 3 j 45 7_(4_ .L C c- ;.;S' f 1-DAY BOD (unseeded)
\\ G l li r, ..j Volume Eff. Used:
\ -J ( n ;'te IN RESULTS
-, .),\' 1.. \ii G S )50 `5-ceS \p, 2) Zs Z (,.cts- j.;.),+ 1
\\ G 10_1 /0 ,5 . ' -7- (c' -s- _ - 2
vA G . /,s, f, , `n . ,^ 3
\\ 1C�C1 C n `1 3 4
f ,l,tO toil t 1•' t G 1 r,i' Is - 5
I G 5 S -9-5 5- S-<- 2. C �.C� �•
G cz co k- ?ct G. 201 1, I`i -_`
\\ G (j ‘ 30 Ss 33 ��f i..f] ---''--., }
DILUTION WATER I CHECK CHECK
Standard Method 5210E-2011(5-Day BOO Test). G=GRAB C=COMPOSITE
NOTES: I certify by this signature that this document is true, accurate, and complete to the best of my knowledge
Cw4.a\( ICC-.7eac,{ Civje,cv=y_ I Chi, 6- - 4,14-2o / 4._/ct_2c
ANALYST PRINTED NAME ANALYST SIGNATURE DATE
Environmental Chemists, Inc.
envirochem 6602 Windmill Way,Wilmington,NC 28405 • 910.392.0223 Lab • 910.392.4424 Fax
710 Bowsertown Road,Manteo,NC 27954 • 252.473.5702 Lab/Fax
sn" 255-A Wilmington Highway,Jacksonville,NC 28540 • 910.347.5843 Lab/Fax
•.NALYTICAL&CONSULTING CHEMISTS info@environmentalchemists.com
International Paper-Riegelwood Date of Report: Apr 20, 2020
865 John L. Riegel Road Customer PO#:
Riegelwood NC 28456 Customer ID: 09010017
Attention: Kevin Burk Report#: 2020-06238
Project ID:
Lab ID Sample ID: Collect Date/Time Matrix Sampled by
20-15307 Site: B 4/13/2020 10:50 AM Water Client
Test Method Results Date Analyzed
COD SM 5220D 28 mg/L 04/16/2020
Lab ID Sample ID: Collect Date/Time Matrix Sampled by
20-15308 Site: E 4/13/2020 9:55 AM Water Client
Test Method Results Date Analyzed
(-OD SM 5220D 114 mg/L 04/16/2020
ib ID Sample ID: Collect Date/Time Matrix Sampled by
20-15309 Site: I 4/13/2020 9:40 AM Water Client
Test Method Results Date Analyzed
COD SM 5220D 29 mg/L 04/16/2020
Lab ID Sample ID: Collect Date/Time Matrix Sampled by
20-15310 Site: T 4/13/2020 9:30 AM Water Client
Test Method Results Date Analyzed
COD SM 5220D 36 mg/L 04/16/2020
Comment: kat(Aoha.
Reviewed by: t Dpia,
E-MAILED APR .2 0 2020
Report#:: 2020-06238 PaCIP I r,f 1
Environmental Chemist, Inc., Wilmington, NC Lab #94
6602 Windmill Way
Wilmington, NC 28405
910.392.0223
Sample Receipt Checklist
Client:-T-P Date` J `'( /e•Z U Report Numb r e .Qin oca3E
Receipt of sample: Deliverer UPS 0 FedEx 0 Other 0
CIYES NO _,_ N/A 1. Were custody seals present on the cooler? ,
❑ YES 1,0
❑ NO N/A 2. If custody were seals e e present,t,were they intact/unbroken?
Original temperature upon receipt 3_,).. 4C Corrected temperature upon receipt 2Cy
How temperature taken: 0 Temperature Blank S
IR Gun ID: Thomas Traceable S/N 192511657 IR Gun Correction Against Factor IC:Bottles0 0
,❑ YES 0 NO 3. If temperature of cooler exceeded 6'C, was Project Mgr./QA notified?
2 YES 0 NO 4. Were proper custody procedures (relinquished/received)followed?
13 YES 0 NO 5. Were sample ID's listed on the COC?
R YES 0 NO 6. Were samples ID's listed on sample containers?
( . YES 0 NO 7. Were collection date and time listed on the COC?
l:ia YES 0 NO 8. Were tests to be performed listed on the COC?
Ca YES 0 NO 9. Did samples arrive in proper containers for each test? "
$t YES 0 NO 10. Did samples arrive in good condition for each test?
YES 0 NO 11. Was adequate sample volume available?'
® YES 0 NO 12. Were samples received within proper holding time for requested tests?
YES 0 NO 13. Were acid preserved samples received at a pH of<2? *
YES 0 NO 14. Were cyanide samples received at a pH >12?
❑ YES 0 NO 15. Were sulfide samples received at a pH >9?
❑ YES ❑ NO 16. Were NH3/TKN/Phenol received at a chlorine residual of<0.5 m/L? ••
❑ YES 0 NO 17. Were Sulfide/Cyanide received at a chlorine residual of<0.5 m/L?
• TOC/Volatiles are pH checked at time of analysis and recorded on the benchsheet.
" Bacteria samples are checked for Chlorine at time of analysis and recorded on the benchsheet
Sample Preservation: (Must be completed for any sample(s) incorrectly Y preserved or with headspace)
were received incorrectly preserved and were adjusted accordingly
by adding (circle one): H2504 HNO3 HCI NaOH
Time of preservation: If more than one preservative is needed, notate in comments below Note: Notify customer service immediately for incorrectly preserved samples.Obtain a new sample or
notify the state lab if directed to analyzed by the customer.Who was notified,date and time:
Volatiles Sample(s)
were received with headspace
COMMENTS:
rl n r \A I f
ENVIRONMENT CHEMISTS, INC 6602 Windmill Way
eriviraern
Wilmington,NC 2846,
Sample Collection and Chain of Custody Phone: (910)392-0223
Esc,.`•-tvCrc CCVeSZOAL
`33`a•-\\Oze'C`'veTc-\E c `��`° .CC.)h. Fax (910) 392.4424
Client: IP Riegelwood S\"-3(x, -yc-Ao c..c�m.... wa,k_k_,Nct Ccac- ccec - co.•c1
Collected By: Report No: 0 6$
Sample Type: I=Influent, E=Effluent, W=Well, ST=Stream, SO=Soil, SL= Sludge Other-S''ccc w,k.<i -i
a 2. L „ ea, PRESERVATION
a 14 Collection a a.) .0 5 CD •e
Sample Identification 5 x e o p 'ao a C x o Icd ANALYSIS REQUESTED
'� z DATE TIME TEMP v v a-' V oz x x z
m h J G P (Sc1"- X ZZ- C 0
L.
/01) L z
4- '` /s'31)
1 2- ; ‘
Transfer Relinquished By: Date/Time Received By: Date/Time
1. lu .
1 / �4/
( /7---- w/v./An lo oll,i--,-
2.
Q
Temperature when Receive : 1. l- Accepted: Rejec d: Resample Reque tegl:
Delivered By: , - Accc Received By: j� c Date: Li 14f Time: '-:.,,p---
DAILY TOTAL.SUSPENDED SOLIDS FORM
xL SAMPLE INDENTIFICATION S��j\ Sc f , .,
FILTERING START TIME 5 SAMPLE INDENTIFICATION 6 \5�tN FILTERING START TIMES A
DATE COLLECTED -5-�G FILTERING STOP TIME 5 A.. DATE COLLECTED G'j -�� FILTERING STOP TIMES 4.
DATE ANALYZED 5--G- 6 ^^ f!\\
( DATE ANALYZED CS—Co —xV
FILTERING TIME MUST BE
SAMPLE VOLUME USED 5 C`C) mis <10 MINUTES SAMPLE VOLUME USED 5 C'C1 Os FILTERING TIME SST BE
s <10 MINUTEES
TIME IN1OUT OF OVEN Ste. /SS?j+- 'Time In oven must be greater than or equal to drying TIME IN/OUT OF OVENS< 1`bc'3 'Time in oven must be greater than or equal to drying
time of most recent annual drying study time of most recent annual drying study
TIME WEIGHED 1�C . TIME WEIGHED 1
DRY SAMPLE WT+PAPER WT dr t-\C7.7DC1' g DRY SAMPLE VJT+PAPER WI- . 1�2 r��nJg
4
DRIED RESIDUE MUST BE DRY FILTER PAPER WT c J JC 1\ g DRIED RESIDUE MUST DRY FILTER PAPER WE- -1 J 4 ' g
BETWEEN 0.0025 g and t BE BETWEEN 0.0025 g
0.2000 g DRY SAMPLE WT u L 4 \ g and 0.2000 g �.,� _
DRY SAMPLE WT 1 5�g
FACTOR(F) 1000 / -j�`Ct
mL Of sample FACTOR(F) 1000 / �at C =
mL of sample
CALCULATIONS: ' CALCULA TIONS:
TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS. 1000* a. + . "- `3- _ % TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS= 1000* . L j-'il I(e, =\I`-D9
F wt.grams mgll F wt.grams mgll
SAMPLE INDENTIFICATION �S\ �` _` a.)
Sf�. \ FILTERING START TIME SAMPLE INDENTIFICATION �S\ \ FILTERING START TIME alp
DATE COLLECTED CS"-5/ ' --`!'_ FILTERING STOP TIME A DATE COLLECTED :S / ; fb� FILTERING STOP TIME'a cDt,
ID
DATE ANALYZED ", - DATE ANALYZED _ .0 'a O
S FILTERING TIME MUST BE FILTERING TIME MUST BE
SAMPLE VOLUME USED mis <10 MINUTES SAMPLE VOLUME USED r_D 0
mis <10 MINUTES
TIME IN/OUT OF OVENC ! 16113 'Time in oven must be greater than or equal to drying a" Lv0
time of most recent annual_drying study TIME INIOUT OF OVEN,Pp 1 CJ(�vv� 'Time in oven must re greater than or equal to drying
`��� 155-}CQ}0 ,50.. �`E TIME WEIGHED 1'�` �'7-�L= time of most recent drying study
•
Q TIME WEIGHED S //�-vv�,
x \e DRY SAMPLE W7+PAPER WT .`A V1
'` 0 g DRY SAMPLE WT+PAPER WT .•41 aCA g y Fl
DRIED RESIDUE MUST BE DRY FILTER PAPER WT ,-14 a. g DRIED RESIDUE MUST DRY FILTER PAPER W7•y�l O 7./1,f1',rr1�,,�
BETWEEN 0.0025 g and `' BE BETWEEN 0.0025 g 1 g 0 ' +^Q3t
0.2000 g DRY SAMPLE WI -Cs--1�� g and 0.2000 g DRY SAMPLE WT m (Ti J g rIAA,-
FACTOR(F) 1000 / 5`'0 = . , FACTOR(F) 1000 / SO 0 _ a 6/
mL of sample mL of sample !!!��* ✓d��l\��•�����'�"'
CALCULATIONS; Q CALCULATIONS: /
TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS. 1000* t� ,L14 � = C�5 TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS- r-- « .(2) \ = �,CO
1 1000* _J \Li F wt.grams mg/I F wt.grams mgn
SAMPLE INDENTIFICATION FILTERING START TIME SAMPLE INDENTIFICATION
FILTERING START TIME
DATE COLLECTED FILTERING STOP TIME DATE COLLECTED
FILTERING STOP TIME
DATE ANALYZED
DATE ANALYZED
FILTERING TIME MUST BE FILTERING TIME MUST BE
SAMPLE VOLUME USED mis <10 MINUTES SAMPLE VOLUME USED
mis <10 MINUTES
TIME IN/OUT OF OVEN / 'Time in oven must be greater than or equal to drying
TIME IN/OUT OF OVEN / 'Time In oven must greater than or equal to drying
time of most recent annual drying study time of most recent annual drying study
TIME WEIGHED
TIME WEIGHED
DRY SAMPLE WT+PAPER WT g DRY SAMPLE WT+PAPER WT
9
DRIED RESIDUE MUST BE DRY FILTER PAPER WT g DRIED RESIDUE MUST
BETWEENDRY FILTER PAPER W7 g
0.0025 g and
0.2000 BE BETWEEN 0.0025 g
g DRY SAMPLE WT g and 0.2000 g DRY SAMPLE WT
0
FACTOR(F) 1000 / _
FACTOR(F) 1000 I =
mL of sample -
mL of sample
CALCULATIONS: CALCULATIONS:
TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS. 1000* ' = TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS-
1000 + -
F wt.grams mg/I -
F wtgrams mg/I
Class S Calibration Weight g Balance Wt g Effluent Duplicates Must Be Run Each Tuesday
DIFFERENCE=(2(Absolute(EFF -EFF DUP ())/(EFF +EFF DUP
)'100=
EFFLUENT DUPLICATES MUST AGREE WITHIN 25%DIFFERENCE
I certify by this signature that this document is true,accurate,and complete to the best of
my knowledge.
PRINTED NAME OF ANALYST
SIGNATURE OF ANALYST
Standard Methods,2540D-2011(Aqueous)
Revisions:
DATE
Pat Soles 2/26/2013
Emily Henderson 3/3/2014 'Original form will be kept in the Environmental Central File for current+3 years.
Emily Henderson 2/4/2015 0 P
Pal Soles 5/5/2018
t 5O Z
SET OF• C(,`i <NOiZ SET UP END(5-DAY) Met�__J setup time: Composite date: -S v v
READ BY: ** 6. (,J)f DAY: Wg.c_l DAY: INA.Cilf Meter cal read: L3•4 g. Grab date: S-�n- 20
CALC BY: ** TIME: cj(t TIME: SQ3 ( H'C/mglL) Buffered water temp('c): ZZ•
CHECKED BY: ** DATE: S-C,-2.0 DATE:ram'_l 1_ 2,..) •All samples are incubated immediately after initial D.O.'and reade immediatelyat upon removal from incubator.
SIGN-
bugs N-P\ L3Clie!' Pc z i Of 2-
INITIAL2.INITIAL D.O. 5-DAY D.O. OXYGEN MLS SEED IN BOD
GM ID G BOTTLE ID MLS SAMPLE //' /
(mg10 (mgll) LEFT(mg/I) NUTRIENT PILLOWS:C:utt p,(, LITERS WATER: 12- BOTTLES: 4.5
DILUTION H2O 2.13 300 Avg.Unseeded
7 4 CO C `t mgIL QUALITY ASSURANCE
DILUTION H2O 7 2 300 3 2 5S=.(rj t1C, 6, G .t' ' Unseeded dilution water,5 0.20 mg/L
f
POLYSEED 333 25 .g. 3 01 I /(�` /o SEED BOD(mg/I) AVERAGE org pH adj pH SAMPLE Seed Controls,0.6-1.0 mglL
(mg!L)lL) ROD(mgll) (s.u.) (s.u.) TEMP Cc)
POLYSEED 3 3 55 20 g.32 3.6 6 142 Dilution H2O DO,7.5-9.0 mglL
POLYSEED 3 3 C0 15 �.3 1 'et.2$ 3-S,� All Other Bottles DO,7-9 mgiL
GGA _3 71- 6 % 30 ( (C !..7 Oil.H2O&Sample Temperature,20±3'C
GGA `, ', 6 `6 3 / 3.53 - }S l S Adj.pH,7.0-7.2 s.u.
-
GGA ' j c 6 .3.3 1 � // ./ , t., OW /- i GGA Std.,198+/-30.5 mgiL
SEEDED BLANK 3 CO 4.5 3 Q T. 2•a- /. O 3 DO,Deplete 2.0 mg/L&Residual 1.0 mglL
#1 CLARIFIER C 2 j 3 yi-•3 I L/.ys > ; c'' 2 e/..2 _4 1 2.` -. Eff.Duplicates must agree within 30%
#1 CLARIFIER C c . Z % ,3+ a (r Cti ,' C., .,i 1 ; I . r
#2 CLARIFIER C /Z+ 3 g.2(0 _ 3_q 2 449- 3 -74, (Q.R. 7 I 221.IS. EFFLUENT
#2 CLARIFIER C /b y`L 2 t _2g 4-qi 7 .3) 3 3+ 3.a SAMPLE TIME:Gam-ham
ASB C lc l ,f.3 C` S 7 4 eV)(.. 20 1 9.0 f-c' 7 u.C\ PRESERVATION('C): 2 0
ASB C SIC) S•"3 0 S: 14 3 /b 2o5S" 20-
NEW BAY C c 40 1 2 I 3,Sir 4.0 3 2 4. Q. (, -- ri -1 1-DAY BOD(unseeded) /
NEW BAY C (.3 26 :. 2 S 5.,,f . 2.4$ 2.S 2(- Volume Eff.Used(mL) 56
SOUTH BAY G iiCi 'So i s.0(, .a -,r, ,1 /: i s; k c1.,-; IN cr. 3 Z RESULTS
SOUTH BAY G /10 le, 5,.1ti =>, ( `; 2 ,() 14' I:+ 1 7-0
EFFLUENT C �.3 S C., �.32 5.(C) 5.2 2 /? 3 =/ - 1 ' G2 7.32.
EFFLUENT C SS 3 TO .32 5,5`I 2. 13 ( 2. 3 Co SI Q.- j'•' .
EFFLUENT C 64 30 ee.3Z 5,1- Z-35 /3 4
EFFLUENT DUP C q 5 'b 15,.3 1 5 (00 2.. -' /2 Eff dup%DIFFERENCE 5 6.csk 13
AVG FOR EFF /3 ',_ Nitrate/Nitrite Test Strips
Nitrate(NO3)Nitrite(NO2)
Effluent
S.Bay
Must agree within n.O Before O.O.After
DRIFT CHECK t0.2 mglL (mglL) (mglL) New Bay
Standard Method 5210B-2011(5-Day BOD Test). G=GRAB C=COMPOSITE
NOTES: I certify by this signature that this document is true,accurate,and complete to the best of my knowledge
t S 50 C w !CA(0- /C.t iKAcc.2c- C W / CGS-(lam • 540-2t/ //-z-c,
Con.Lo 3-s ANALYST PRINTED NAME ANALYST SIGNATURE DATE
SET UP B., C_l,,, VAI SET UP END (5-DAY) Me.,` al setup: Composite date: /f'
READ BY: ** L V„j4116,r DAY: FA/e Ai DAY: ro A Meter cal read: Grab date: -S-2-0
CALC BY: ** TIME: TIME: Buffered water temp:
CHECKED BY: ** DATE: 1j.6__2v DATE: S_ [1 _ 20 *All samples are incubated immediately after initial D.O.and read immediately upon removal from incubator.
-bugs S 0(ntOci6 YR 2. U-C Z
J IYILS OCCY In
INITIAL D.O. 5-DAY D.O. OXYGEN
SAMPLE ID GIC BOTTLE ID MLS SAMPLE SAMPLES:
mg/I mg/I USED mg/I NUTRIENT PILLOWS: LITERS WATER: )
Avg.
DILUTION H2O 300 unseeded Unseeded dilution water,=e 0.2 mglL QUALITY ASSURANCE
DILUTION H2O 300 Seed Controls,0.6-1.0 mg/L Unseeded dilution water,S 0.20 mg/L
POLYSEED 25 SEED CORR. BOD mod AVERAGE SAMPLE
g BOD mg/1 org pH adi pH TEMP Seed Controls,0.6-1.0 mglL
POLYSEED 20 Dilution H2O DO,7.5-9.0 mg/L
POLYSEED 15 All Other Bottles DO,7-9 mglL
GGA 6 Dil.H2O&Sample Temperature,20±3•C
GGA 6 Adj.pH,7.0.7.2 s.u.
GGA 6 GGA Std.,198+/-30.5 mglL
DO,Deplete 2.0 mg/L&Residual 1.0 mg/L
t'',I i _: 1;% ( (': G ef I-- c1S.1�� 6.03• ( �� (J 1.(, 1s.c-1 Eff.Duplicates must agree within 30%
G ,� I SC3 ;.4 Z 2 . > EFFLUENT
G c1,1 tc- , )r, L 7 r/ :I ,l 2 ,. 4 SAMPLE TIME:
,,::/c .Y' r. / G .;ti / } 1 PRESERVATION:
`
1,• r. , , i G 3ZZ I C2 SS-.3-'Z 55 ( -1 cc, S,.CI -- Icv
G LI_ .:7-c; gc2 (o ( Z ;�, c 1-DAY BOD (unseeded)
G • ., 6. 1 4. i , kl- Volume Eff. Used:
— --- IN RESULTS
G 1
G 2
G 3
"—Gr---- 4
G 5
G
G
— ---a
l
DILUTION WATER CHECK CHECK
Standard Method 5210B-2011(5-Day BOO Test). G=GRAB C=COMPOSITE
NOTES: I certify by this signature that this document is true,accurate,and complete to the best of my knowledge
CL'J ao)CC I C LK - C_w(�.c, - I CL'L-(_,y s-‘, Zo I 5-I (--23
ANALYST PRINTED NAME ANALYST SIGNATURE DATE
Environmental Chemists, Inc.
envirochen . 6602 Windmill Way,Wilmington,NC 28405 • 910.392.0223 Lab • 910.392.4424 Fax
710 Bowsertown Road,Manteo,NC 27954 • 252.473.5702 Lab/Fax
5M' 255-A Wilmington Highway,Jacksonville,NC 28540 • 910.347.5843 Lab/Fax
ANALYTICAL&CONSULTING CHEMISTS info@environmentalchemists.com
International Paper-Riegelwood Date of Report: May 12, 2020
865 John L. Riegel Road Customer PO#:
Riegelwood NC 28456 Customer ID: 09010017
Attention: Report#: 2020-07388
Project ID:
Lab ID Sample ID: IP Collect Date/Time Matrix Sampled by
20-18168 Site:T 5/5/2020 9:55 AM Water W. Coverdale
Test Method Results Date Analyzed
COD SM 5220D 46 mg/L 05/11/2020
Lab ID Sample ID: IP Collect Date/Time Matrix Sampled by
20-18169 Site: B 5/5/2020 9:55 AM Water W. Coverdale
Test Method Results Date Analyzed
COD SM 52200 29 mg/L 05/11/2020
Comment: p"� (�
Reviewed by: �� L9cJ , �O6
Report#:: 2020-07388 Pace 1 of 1
Environmental Chemist, inc., Wilmington, NC Lab##94
6602 Windmill Wd,
Wilmington. NC
2840'
'10.392.022.,Sam le R ceipt Checklist Client = p Date 5
Report Numberp�� —Q 3 8
Receipt of sample Delivered UPS G
0 YES p NO FedEx 0 Other p 1
N/A 1. Were custody seals present on the cooler'❑ YES ❑ NO N/[ 2 If custody seals were present, were they intact/unbroken I
On m rat
g�nal tepeure upon receip; .-2.— °C
ow temperature taken Corrected temperature upon receipt
O Temperature Biani: ------`C
Against Bottle:
IR Gun ID:Thomas Traceable S/N 192511657
O YES D NO IR Gun Correction Factor"C: 0,0
• 3. If temperature of cooler exceeded 6°C, was Project Mgr./QA notified
YES 0 NO 4. Were proper custody
• procedures (relinquished/received) followed?
YES 0 NO 5. Were sample ID's listed on the COC?
r YES 0 NO 6. Were samples ID's listed on sample containers?
V- YES 0 NO 7. Were collection date and time listed on the COC?
L' YES 0 NO 8. Were tests to be performed listed on the COC?
•' YES 0 NO 9. Did samples arrive in proper containers for each test?
I. YES 0 NO 10. Did samples arrive in good condition for each test?
a. YES 0 NO 11. Was adequate sample volume available'
►V YES 0 NO 12. Were samples received within proper holding time for requested tests"?
■ YES 0 NO 13. Were acid preserved samples received at a pH of<2? *
►r YES 0 NO 14. Were cyanide samples received at a pH >12?
❑ YES 0 NO 15. Were sulfide samples received at a pH >97
❑ YES 0 NO 16. Were NH3/TKN/Phenol received at a chlorine residual of<0.5 m/L? *°
❑ YES 0 NO 17. Were Sulfide/Cyanide received at a chlorine residual of<0.5 m/L?
❑ YES ❑ NO 18. Were orthophosphate samples filtered in the field within 15 minutes?
` ,TOC/Volatiles are pH checked at time of analysis and recorded on the benchshee:.
"' Bacteria samples are checked for Chlorine at time of analysis and recorded on the benchshee:.
Sample Preservation: (Must be completed for any sample(s) incorrectly preserved or with headspace)
Sample(s)
were received incorrectly preserved and were adjusted accordingly
by adding(circle one): H1SO4 HNO3 HCl
Time of preservation: NaOH
If more than one preservative is needed, notate in comments below
Note:Notify customer service immediately for incorrect)
y n a new
notify the state lab if directed to analyzed by the customer.
Who wareserved ss notified,date iand time ample or
Volatiles Samples)
were received with headspace
COMMENTS:
DOC, QA.002
ern +ehem ENVIRONMENT_____, CHEIVIISTS,`INC 6602"winamW ii ay i-
Wilmington,NC 28405
Sample Collection and Chain of Custody Phone: (910)392-0223
`.Ace Covrrcoa`t
�a\\o.ce'Q `''Q ``\ - \`� cc 'c`'`'`‘ Fax (910) 392.4424
Client: IP Riegelwood c‘\0-3(0a ysgo (.1.cA. wv.‘Nclact cc,<- ctR&\- cw.c�
Collected By: DJ 0 C.0 k)c pc• i I1 Report No: �/
_Sample Type: I=Influent, E=Effluent, W=Well, ST=Stream, SO=Soil, SL=Sludge Other:SW - E cc �.e\`„c�@r U .5
a m Collection a o 1 v PRESERVATION
Sample Identification -' F H �. W .. L
►a to F" o ° V o a 0 U 6. z 9 O ANALYSIS REQUESTED
oi
z DATE TIME TEMP v u z x m I z" P
o
'`
Transfer Relinquished By: Date/Time Received By: Date/Time
1. r
°'`� ri. C£ CUoi. c,)/]1 ___ S':�•20 Z,''
2. c�5/ � l)-=3�e—
Temperature when Received: .1).) Accepted: ► .
P R' ��� �� le Reque e
Delivered By: Received By: '� Date: Time:
DAILY TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS FORM rA-x� A\\ I\L\
SAMPLE INDENTIFICATIOla 5 N./ FILTERING START TIMESS SAMPLE INDENTIFICATION P,S\ !<i FILTERING START TIME SC't
V DATE COLLECTED /�- -'r FILTERING STOP TIME v DATE COLLECTED O R�� ,{ I� ^.- 9'
� �(..,-�0- FILTERING STOP TIME
DATE ANALYZED CC- t- ac y DATE ANALYZED l.,:- \,-
FILTERING TIME MUST BE FILTERING TIME MUST BE
i SAMPLE VOLUME USED C0 mis <10 MINUTES SAMPLE VOLUME USED, .,C�(..) mis <10 MINUTES
p
TIME INIOUT OF OVEN 1G.31 `\I U "Time In oven must be greater than or equal to drying TIME IN/OUT OF OVEN a3 I(qt U *Time in oven must be greater than or equal to drying
time of most recent annual drying study time of most recent annual drying study
TIME WEIGHED I xt, Q\\ TIME WEIGHED \It��
DRY SAMPLE WT+PAPER WT rpp 1 1 D4 DRY SAMPLE WT+PAPER Wr y(0�5 g
DRIED RESIDUE MUST BE DRY FILTER PAPER WT o 4 50U g DRIED RESIDUE MUST DRY FILTER PAPER WT s`i:).Q L_`
BETWEEN 0.0025 g and ( BE BETWEEN 0.0025 g D
0.2000 g DRY SAMPLE WT q O� g and 0.2000 g DRY SAMPLE WT o f 2>�` g
FACTOR(F) 1000 / 5C'. = a FACTOR(F) 1000 I I,LG =
mL of sample mL of sample
CALCULATIONS: r_�1 CALCULATIONS: /�
TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS. 1000• &'. *- L(c-(o �,,,/
`',3 TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS- 1000* r O33\ _,fr/r
F wt.grams mg/I F wt.gramsl men
SAMPLE INDENTIFICATION U S qA\ J� FILTERING START TIME SAMPLE INDENTIFICATION FILTERING START TIME
DATE COLLECTED lam' G.V� D_. ) FILTERING STOP TIME -k, DATE COLLECTED
FILTERING STOP TIME
DATE ANALYZED (0-I 11` DATE ANALYZED
FILTERING TIME MUST BE FILTERING TIME MUST BE
SAMPLE VOLUME USED(� 4-( G mis <10 MINUTES SAMPLE VOLUME USED mis <10 MINUTES
TIME IN/OUT OF OWN "t41 r \\IL) *Time In oven must be greater than or equal to drying TIME INIOUT OF OVEN / 'Time In oven must be greater than or equal to drying
c time of most recent annual drying stud time of most recent annual drying Study
-;(-- )_ TIME WEIGHED ,, 1C
TIME WEIGHED
\\. Lk
L\`1y g
�` DRY SAMPLE NIT WT r T ` DRY SAMPLE Wi+PAPER WT g
DRIED RESIDUE MUST BE DRY FILTER PAPER WT. 43yLi g DRIED RESIDUE MUST DRY FILTER PAPER WT BETWEEN 0.0025 g and / BE BETWEEN 0.0025 g g �1Ct^�
0.2000 g DRY SAMPLE WT s(..)1�,G g and 0.2000 g DRY SAMPLE WT M.tkT�"QtZp�yn}j--��r
FACTOR(F) 1000 / a1 = FACTOR(F) 1000 / - �x�`^"�-�" I
mL of sample mL of sample y� ij
CALCULATIONS: ��/ l{ 1
TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS // �
e = TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS• 1000 CALCULATIONS: * _
1000* • r V
F wt.grams mgll F wtgrams mg/I
SAMPLE INDENTIFICATION FILTERING START TIME SAMPLE INDENTIFICATION FILTERING START TIME
DATE COLLECTED FILTERING STOP TIME DATE COLLECTED FILTERING STOP TIME
DATE ANALYZED DATE ANALYZED
FILTERING TIME MUST BE FILTERING TIME MUST BE
SAMPLE VOLUME USED mis <10 MINUTES SAMPLE VOLUME USED nits <10 MINUTES
TIME INIOUT OF OVEN 1 'Time In oven must be greater than or equal to drying TIME INIOUT OF OVEN 1 *Time In oven must be greater than or equal to drying
time of most recent annual drying study time of most recent annual drying study
TIME WEIGHED
TIME WEIGHED
DRY SAMPLE WT+PAPER WT g DRY SAMPLE WT+PAPER WT
9
DRIED RESIDUE MUST BE DRY FILTER PAPER WT g DRIED RESIDUE MUST DRY FILTER PAPER WT BETWEEN 0.0025 g and BE BETWEEN 0.0025 g g
02000 g DRY SAMPLE WT g and 0.2000 g DRY SAMPLE WT
9
FACTOR(F) 1000 / = FACTOR(F) 1000 /
mL of sample mL of sample
CALCULATIONS: CALCULATIONS:
TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS* 1000* ' = TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS,. 1000* • =
F wt.grams night F wt.grams mg/I
Class S Calibration Weight g Balance Wt a Effluent Duplicates Must Be Run Each Tuesday
DIFFERENCE=(2(Absolute(EFF -EFF DUP )))I(EFF +EFF DUP )•100=
EFFLUENT DUPLICATES MUST AGREE WITHIN 25%DIFFERENCE
I certify by this signature that this document is true,accurate,and complete to the best of
my knowledge.
PRINTED NAME OF ANALYST
SIGNATURE OF ANALYST
W Standard Methods,2540D-201 1(Aqueous)
Revisions: DATE
Pat Soles 2/26/2013
Emily Henderson 3/3/2014 *Original form will be kept in the Environmental Central File for current+3 years.
Emily Henderson 2/4/2015
Pat Soles 5/5/2018
S:\Groups\Environmental\Wastewater\Environmental Lab\Standard Operating Procedures\Forms\TSS WORKSHEETS 020415
SET UP * C.Lo Kvoy SET UP END(5-DAY) MetI setup time: 3 a� Composite date: (' 10-F CJ
READ BY: ** 0h c 5, . DAY: 'T- ,1( DAY: T„�,e5 Meter cal read: 2-"3•}( i��° I Grab date: G -1 I - zC�
�-
CALC BY: ** (/� TIME: Cj(/ TIME: a3 (°C/mg/L) Buffered water temp cc): Zl. 4-
CHECKED BY: ** DATE: DATE:
Gr -((- Z(j (c_I (,-ZU A All samples are incubated immediately after initial D.O.and read immediately upon removal from i cubator.
bugs 6VIZ- (o -(,1-1 Z Stvr,k
SAMPLE ID GIC BOTTLE ID MLS SAMPLE INITIAL D.O. 5-DAY D.O. OXYGEN A f���?/`^f MLS SEED IN BOD
(mg/I) (mg/I) LEFT(mgll) NUTRIENT PILLOWS: (0 en-L, LITERS WATER: -Crf 2. BOTTLES: 4.5
DILUTION H2O 300 Avg.unsoedod
) -_-- ( mglL QUALITY ASSURANCE
DILUTION H2O 300 7' ( 2 ; (.* C. m ( -; Unseeded dilution water,5 0.20 mg/L
'7
SEED CORK. AVERAGE org pH adj pH SAMPLE
POLYSEED 25 (6„,__.0 S 2 („3S�� (mgil.) ROD(mg/I) BOD(mg/I) (s.u.) (s.u.) TEMP(•c) Seed Controls,0.6-1.0 mg/L
POLYSEED 14- 20 .-0 4 3 . 15 4-`,ic7 f' `! / Dilution H2O DO,7.5-9.0 mg/L
POLYSEED <X 15 -.0 2_ rj 6 4 2,1 All Other Bottles DO,7-9 mg/L
GGA r
' 1. 6 n ( -3 1( /III / ! °/ Dil.H2O&Sample Temperature,20±re
GGA 1111 ?.l'( 6 :, I, / I /n -/ Adj.pH,7.0-7.2 s.u.
GGA l('' 6 ' t• ' I+/ 1-! ( GGA Std.,198+/-30.5 mg/L
SEEDED BLANK 4/2 4.5 8-0 4 0( (-.(t j DO,Deplete 2.0 mg/L&Residual 1.0 mg/L
#1 CLARIFIER -
S (I('' ' I~^ Eff.Duplicates must agree within 30%
#1 CLARIFIER •' 2 `n c-1- `: h'i s .7's
#2 CLARIFIER //2- 3 . 63- O.'22 _0 � ------ 2 EFFLUENT
#2 CLARIFIER ZG4-, 'L `� 2 S S
S U � <l 1 G 7-_5 -7 � SAMPLE TIME:Gam-ham
ASB C I" x� (;/ ' ; ( 7 MI 2 1.2 PRESERVATION (°C): e' c�
ASB C '
NEW BAY C . 4- 40 -- cI'i 3..0-33 l 6 �0 7,-( 2z`ci 1-DAY BOD (unseeded) -c
NEW BAY C <gt.) 20 F-G \ S• /( z.cjo 2 6-) Volume Eff.Used(mL) SO
SOUTH BAY G -/ r ' (*, ; , 1, IN 5s- OS- RESULTS
SOUTH BAY //i -/ r Y 1 7�S
EFFLUENT S-b 50 g,0 4•61(v '3,/2. 7 4f MI .0 2 7.i 1-
EFFLUENT S 4 _b C��� 2- / - —
G num
3 G.�ti>
EFFLUENT 3Ho 3C`1 �',0<6 S-- 7 2 3/ / 4
EFFLUENT DUP 32 ) 4-6 0 O gj,3 ' 2. / } Eff dup%DIFFERENCE 5 (p-(I� t_!�
AVG FOR EFF I /:i /--7- Nitrate/Nitrite Test Strips
Nitrate(NO3)Nitrite(NO2)
Effluent
S.Bay
Mus agree within D.0 Before D.O.After
DRIFT CHECK 30.2 mg/L (mg/L) (mg/L) I New Bay
Standard Method 5210B-2011(5-Day BOD Test). G=GRAB C=COMPOSITE
NOTES: P�
e(_}'\.i� 6,(0 I certify by this signature th t this document is true,accurate,and complete to the best of my knowledge
�/����(j{. C ��K�� C. �c cw � 411
vI b-1 C�-z-e�
- 1 ANALYST PRI NAME ' ANALYST SIG ATU E (v E
SET UP B` C_LJKA/Ox /V SET UP END (5-DAY) Mc :al setup: Composite date: 4
READ BY: ** C(,v hc yG' DAY: -�('7,u,r. DAY: I�e 5 Meter cal read: Grab date: (o U- 2-0
CALC BY: ** r TIME: TIME: Buffered water temp:
CHECKED BY: ** DATE: (0- - 20 DATE: Vr ._f L 2v *All samples are incubated immediately after initial D.O.and read immediately upon removal from incubator.
bugs 6-icsrm L-c 4ee Pct 2-Ct' 2.
INITIAL D.O. 5-DAY D.O. OXYGEN MI. aC u Iry
SAMPLE ID G/C BOTTLE ID MLS SAMPLE
mg/I mg/I USED mg/I NUTRIENT PILLOWS: LITERS WATER: SAMPLES: 4 ,
Avg.
DILUTION H2O 300 _ Unseeded Unseeded dilution water,_<0.2 mg/L QUALITY ASSURANCE
DILUTION H2O 300 Seed Controls,0.6-1.0 mg/L Unseeded dilution water,5 0.20 mg/L
POLYSEED 25 SEED CORR. BOD mg/I
BOO mg/I AVERAGE org pH adj pH
TEMP SAMPLE Seed Controls,0.6-1.0 mg/L
POLYSEED 20 Dilution H2O DO,7.5•9.0 mglL
POLYSEED 15 All Other Bottles DO,7-9 mg/L
GGA 6 Dil.H2O&Sample Temperature,20±3*C
GGA 6 Adj.pH,7.0-7.2 s.u.
GGA 6 GGA Std.,198+/-30.5 mg/L
DO,Deplete 2.0 mg/L&Residual 1.0 mglL
t• ' G ti 22. Co g.,2 p 20 2.0 - 3, 5 19, I Eff.Duplicates must agree within 30%
G 3 24-- 7 . 23 (.'? 3 /.. e_.—_—` EFFLUENT
G .2 { `,: 5; 1 - i /_ 01 SAMPLE TIME:
G JC' `;s I i / 1(- , i a PRESERVATION:
G
G 1-DAY BOD (unseeded)
G Volume Eff. Used:
IN RESULTS
G 1
G 3 _ �_,
—6--- — _
4
G 5
G
G —
DILUTION WATER CHECK CHECK
Standard Method 5210B-2011(5-Day BOD Test). G=GRAB C=COMPOSITE
NOTES: I certify by this signature that this document is true,accurate, and complete to the best of my knowledge
C 1.(C)( I CCO(--"(c? _C Lt.e-A,C I C C �� (
tr -A�---c) / G-(6-2u
ANALYST PRINTED NAME A ST SIG ATURE DATE
Environmental Chemists, Inc.
envirochem 6602 Windmill Way,Wilmington,NC 28405 . 910.392.0223 Lab • 910.392.4424 Fax
SJ 710 Bowsertown Road,Manteo,NC 27954 • 252.473.5702 Lab/Fax
255-A Wilmington Highway,Jacksonville,NC 28540 • 910.347.5843 Lab/Fax
ANALYTICAL&CONSULTING CHEMISTS info@ environmentalchemists.com
International Paper-Riegelwood Date of Report: Jun 24, 2020
865 John L. Riegel Road Customer PO#:
Riegelwood NC 28456 Customer ID: 09010017
Attention: Kevin Burk Report#: 2020-09918
Project ID:
Lab ID Sample ID: Collect Date/Time Matrix Sampled by
20-24810 Site: Basin T 6/10/2020 1:40 PM Water Kevin Burk
Test Method Results Date Analyzed
COD SM 5220D 46 mg/L 06/18/2020
Comment:
Reviewed by: !-
Report#:: 2020-09918 _
Environmental Chemist, Inc., Wilminitton, NC Lab st94
5602 Windmill Way
'Wilmington, NC 2840S
Sample Receipt Checklist 910.392.0223
Client: 1 P._ Z(t6EChODOD Datev
__Li._ ._(0 0 Report Number.Q O — 099 f-
I
Receipt of sample: Delivered 7 UPS 0 FedEx ❑ Other CIL❑ YES 0 NO N/A 1. Were custody seals present on the cooler?
I❑ YES 0 NO N/A 2. If custody seals were present,were they intact/unbroken?
Ori final temperature upon eceipt 'C CorrecAr-ted temperature upon
How temperature taken: ❑ Temperature Blank receipt •C
IR Gun ID: Thomas Traceable S/N 192511657 Against "C: s
R Gun Correction Factor C: 0.0
h,❑ YES ❑ NO 3. If temperature of cooler exceeded 6'C, was Project Mgr./QA notified?YES ❑ NO , 4. Were proper custody procedures (relinquished/received) followed?
,i
YES
YES
..,0 NO 5. Were sample ID's listed on the COC?
0 NO 6. Were samples ID's listed on sample containers?
YES ❑ NO O7. Were collection date and time listed on the COC?
YES 0 NO S. Were tests to be performed listed on the COC?
YES 0 NO 9. Did samples arrive in proper per containers for each test?
YES 0 NO r10. Did samples arrive in good condition for each test? '
isT YES ❑ NO 11. Was adequate sample volume available?'
i
;4- YES 0 NO 12. Were samples received within proper holding time for requested tests?
)g YES ❑ NO 13. Were acid preserved samples received at a pH of<2? •
+
YES 0 NO 14. Were cyanide samples received at a pH >12?
}❑ YES ❑ NO 15. Were sulfide samples received at a pH >9?
.
CIYES 0 NO 16. Were NH3/TKN/Phenol received at a chlorine residual of<0.5 m/L? ••
❑ YES 0 NO 17. Were Sulfide/Cyanide received at a chlorine residual of<0.5 m/L?
❑ YES 0 NO _ j 18. Were orthophosphate samples filtered in the field within 15 minutes?
• TOC/Volatiles are pH checked at time of analysis and recorded on the benchsheet.
•• Bacteria samples are checked for Chlorine at time of analysis and recorded on the benchsheet.
Samplit Preservation: 'Must be completed for any sample(s) incorrectly preserved or with headspace)
Sample(s) were received incorrectly preserved and were adjusted accordingly
by adding (circle one): H?SO. HNO, HCO NaOH
Time of preservation: if more than one preservative is needed, notate in comments below
Note' Notify customer service immediately for incorrectly preserved samples.Obtain a new sample or
notify the state ab' if directed to analyzed by the customer who was notified.date and time. y
Volatiles Sample(s) were received with headspace
COMMENTS:
DOC. 04.002
• .
ENVIRONMENTAtCHEMISTS INC 660
2 Way
E'I1V1I"E)C. lE_.ITI Wilmington,NC 28405
Sample Collection and Chain of Custody Phone: (910)392-0223
�.`��E Covrzo�c: W�\\o.�e,cccet0.\ C s,' 'C' e. ,cc>�. Fax (910) 392.4424
Client: IP Riegelwood c‘kd-3�a-\ 5 ccN�1/4._ wta&•,44,c� (- cced,-\- e ).-c 1
Collected By: \e j ,\'Thh0;-rC Report No:
_Sample Type: I=Influent, E=Effluent, W=Well, ST=Stream, SO=Soil, SL=Sludge Other:SU.1 -S�oc wr`„(�er
A w Collection . „ y d c
PRESERVATION
Sample Identification oa as ° : °e S '�
� x � E.; 8 ° V e ° � � � a p` p" x o w ANALYSIS REQUESTED
Z x
a DATE TIME TEMP v v a v z m 2 H c
�,\� s 44 C��M
.. , •\ )ft-(o
<0,s X C 0 <.1.
Transfer Relinquished By: Date/Time Received By: Date/Time
1. C `-=:-m CD-\L-Z6 4A1A7 4//(94, /:/s N --
2.
Temperature when Received: '1, Accepted: ,/ Rejected: Resample Reque to :
Delivered By: Cam; -c, Received By: /,_ Date: (716/.1-o Time: ?:=fScf'--