SW7060113_HISTORICAL FILE_20191018

NORTH CAROLINA
Department of Environmental W6

STORMWATER DIVISION CODING SHEET
POST -CONSTRUCTION PERMITS
PERMIT NO.
SW
DOC TYPE
El CURRENT PERMIT
❑ APPROVED PLANS
HISTORICAL FILE
DOC DATE
YYYYMMDD

Quible
Quible & Associates, RC,
ENGINEERING • ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES • PLANNING • SURVEYING
SINCE 1959
October 16, 2019
Mr. Roger K. Thorpe
NCDEQ
Washington Regional Office
943 Washington Square Mall
Washington, NC 27988
RECEIVED OCT 1 9 2019
Re: State Stormwater Permit Renewal Application Package
Sandy Point, Phase One
State Stormwater Permit No. SW7060113
Chowan County, NC
Mr. Thorpe,
P.O. Drawer 870
Otty Hawk, NC 27949
Phone: [phone] ] 47
Fox: 252-49i-8146
wob: quOa com
On behalf of The Fund for Sandy Point North Carolina, LLC, Quible & Associates, P.C. hereby
submits for your review and approval a State Stormwater Permit Renewal Application for the
subject referenced project located in Chowan County, NC.
The following documents are included and shall be considered part of this submittal package:
• One (1) review fee check in the amount of $505.00 made payable to "NCDEQ";
• One (1) original signed copy of the completed Permit Renewal Application Form;
• One (1) copy of the NC Secretary of State business documentation for The Funds for
Sandy Point North Carolina, LLC.
A copy of the State's Renewal Letter dated 9/25/19 is also included for your reference. Please
note that construction of the project has not yet begun, and no changes have been made to the
project as permitted. An email containing electronic copies of the attached items will follow this
letter in separate correspondence.
At your earliest convenience, please review and do not hesitate to contact me by phone at (252)
491-8147 or by email at [e-mail] should you have any questions or require any
additional information.
Thank you for your attention to this project.
Sincerely,
Quible & Associates, P.C.
Dylan L. Tillett, P.E.
Encl: as stated
Cc: Sam Young, The Fund for Sandy Point North Carolina, LLC
File

Quible
Quible & Associates, P.C.
ENGINEERING • ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES • PLANNING • SURVEYING
SINCE 1959
Sam Young
The Fund for Sandy Point North Carolina, LLC
P.O. Box 789
Edenton, NC 27932-
October 8, 2012
RE: NPDES Permit #SW7060113
Quarterly Baseline Sampling (August 7, 2012)
Sam,
P.O. Drawer 870
Kitty Hawk INC 27949
1252-261-3300
1 252-261-1260
Web, yuible.com
On August 7, 2012, 1 conducted the quarterly baseline sampling in our two shallow monitoring
wells and in two locations in the Sound. Sampling parameters include: Dissolved Oxygen,
Salinity, Turbidity, Temperature, Fecal Coliform, Total Phosphorous, Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen,
Total Nitrogen and Potassium. The Water Quality Monitoring Plan associated with the NPDES
Permit specifies sampling of each of these parameters in order to assess the impact of the
future development on adjacent waterways.
The following sheets include a summary of the sampling results from this round of sampling as
well as the prior rounds of sampling. In addition, I have enclosed a copy of the Environmental
Chemists, Inc laboratory results for Fecal Coliform, Total Phosphorous, Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen,
Total Nitrogen and Potassium. The other parameters including Dissolved Oxygen, Salinity,
Turbidity and Temperature were field tested with a laboratory quality monitoring device.
We will continue to send you a copy of all NPDES sampling results and we will keep a copy in
our files. It is required that copies of this information be made available to NCDENR upon
request, but we are not required to submit this information to anyone unless there is a specific
request. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding this matter.
Sincerely,
Quible & Associates, P.C.
-?�w K�' '
Brian Rubino, P.G.
r�Dare • A. Tail• 1P '.E;
SUN 19 2V

`n:,1�sa

ti r -
r Sandy Point- Water Quality Monitoring Plan
101
r�
0
NPDES Permit #NCS000517
NCDENT SW Permit #5W7060113
16-Jan-2012
Quarterly Baseline Monitoring
R'E7C,EFfV
Afar 0' , - E0
Water Sampling
Parameter
Monitoring Well 1
Monitoring Well 2
Surface-1
ti
srob
Dissolved Oxygen`
8.65 ppt
8.75 ppt
11.07 ppt
1 .
Salinity*
0.00
0.01
1.3 ppt
1.3 ppt
Turbidity*
N/A
N/A
12 NTU
12 NTU
Temperature*
15.5 °C
16.2 °C
9.2 °C
8.0 °C
Fecal Coliform**
<1 col/100ml
<1 col/100ml
9 col/ml
9 col/ml
Total Phosphorous**
0.16 mg/L
2.15 mg/L
0.20 mg/L
0.36 mg/L
Total Nitrogen**
0.7 mg/L
9.0 mg/L
0.8 mg/L
0.9 mg/L
Total Kjeldahl
Nitrogen (TKN)**
<0.5 mg/L
2.5 mg/L
0.7 mg/L
0.7 mg/L
Potassium**
7.49 mg/L
2.24 mg/L
18.5 mg/L
18.4 mg/L
25-Apr-2012
Water Sampling
Parameter
Monitoring Well 1
Monitoring Well 2
Surface-1
Surface-2
Dissolved Oxygen*
2.92 ppt
5.83 ppt
9.88 ppt
10.29 ppt
Salinity*
0.1 ppt
0.1 ppt
0.3 ppt
0.5 ppt
Turbidity*
N/A
NIA
15 NTU
16 NTU
Temperature*
15.0 °C
15.1 *C
16.0 °C
18.8 °C
Fecal Coliform**
<2 col/100ml
<2 col/100ml
97 col/ml
31 col/ml
Total Phosphorous**
<0.04 mg/L
0.25 mg/L
0.61 mg/L
0.26 mg/L
Total Nitrogen**
2.8 mg/L
6.5 mg/L
<0.5 mg/L
<0.5 mg/L
Total Kjeldahl
Nitrogen (TKN)**
<0.5 mg/L
<0.5 mg/L
<0.5 mg/L
<0.5 mg/L
Potassium**
7.64 mg/L
2.29 mg1L
7.94 mg/L
9.40 mg/L
7-Aug-2012
Water Sampling
Parameter
Monitoring Well 1
Monitoring Well 2
Surface-1
Surface-2
Dissolved Oxygen*
7.32 ppt
7.50 ppt
7.28 ppt
6.82 ppt
Salinity*
0.1 ppt
0.1 ppt
2.7 ppt
2.8 ppt
Turbidity*
NIA
NIA
12 NTU
8 NTU
Temperature*
19.4 °C
19.4 °C
27.9 °C
27.9 °C
Fecal Coliform**
<2 col/100ml
<1 col/100ml
32 col/ml
17 col/ml
Total Phosphorous"
0.71 mg/L
<0.04 mg/L
<0.04 mg/L
<0.04 mg/L
Total Nitrogen**
4.3 mg1L
6.5 mg/L
1.3 mg/L
0.7 mg/L
Total Kjeldahl
Nitrogen (TKN)**
1.3 mg/L
<0.5 mg/L
1.2 mg/L
0.6 mg/L
Potassium**
7.57 mg/L
1.98 mg1L
31.4 mg/L
35.9 mg/L
17
Ily
LNG
* Field Tested with Horiba Water Quality Checker
** NC Certified Laboratory Tested (Environmental Chemists, Inc.)

Quible
In Quible & Associates, P.C. KnvHP Mo 279'0
NGINEERING • ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES • PLANNING • SURVEYING Phone: [phone]
fox,252-261-1260
SINCE 1959 Web; qulble com
c
(D
Sam Young
The Fund for Sandy Point North Carolina, LLC
P.O. Box 789
Edenton, NC 27932-
,January 16, 2013
RE. NPDES Permit #SW7060113
Quarterly Baseline Sampling (November 1, 2012)
Sam,
On November 1, 2012, l conducted the quarterly baseline sampling in our two shallow
monitoring wells and in two locations in the Sound. Sampling parameters include: Dissolved
Oxygen, Salinity, Turbidity, Temperature, Fecal Coliform, Total Phosphorous, Total Kjeldahl
Nitrogen, Total Nitrogen and Potassium. The Water Quality Monitoring Plan associated with the
NPDES Permit specifies sampling of each of these parameters in order to assess the impact of
the future development on adjacent waterways.
The following sheets include a summary of the sampling results from this round of sampling as
well as the prior rounds of sampling. In addition, I have enclosed a copy of the Environmental
Chemists, Inc laboratory results for Fecal Coliform, Total Phosphorous, Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen,
Total Nitrogen and Potassium. The other parameters including Dissolved Oxygen, Salinity,
Turbidity and Temperature were field tested with a laboratory quality monitoring device.
We will continue to send you a copy of all NPDES sampling results and we will keep a copy in
our files. It is required that copies of this information be made available to NCDENR upon
request, but we are not required to submit this information to anyone unless there is a specific
request. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding this matter.
Sincerely,
Quible & Associates, P.C.
Brian Rubino, P.G.
CFri W;erek A.1©ail;; P,E.

r Sandy Point- Water Quality Monitoring Plan
NPDES Permit ttNCS000517
NCDENT SW Permit #fSW7060113
Quarterly Baseline Monitoring
I "D
n
0
16-Jan-2012
Water Sampling
Parameter
Monitoring Well 1
Monitoring Well 2
Surface-1
Surface-2
Dissolved Oxygen*
8.65 ppt
8.75 ppt
11.07 ppt
10.12 ppt
Salinity`
0.00
0.01
1.3 ppt
1.3 ppt
Turbidity*
NIA
NIA
12 NTU
12 NTU
Temperature*
15.5 °C
16.2 °C
9.2 °C
8.0 °C
Fecal Coliform"
<1 col/100ml
<1 col/100ml
9 collml
9 col/ml
Total Phosphorous"
0.16 mg/L
2.15 mg/L
0.20 mg/L
0.36 mg/L
Total Nitrogen**
0.7 mg/L
9.0 mg/L
0.8 mg/L
0.9 mg/L
Total Kjeldahl
Nitrogen (TKN)**
<0.5 mg/L
2.5 mg/L
0.7 mg/L
0.7 mg/L
Potassium"
7.49 mg/L
2.24 mg/L
18.5 mg/L
18.4 mg/L
25-Apr-2012
Water Sampling
Parameter
Monitoring Well 1
Monitoring Well 2
Surface-1
Surface-2
Dissolved Oxygen*
2.92 ppt
5.83 ppt
9.88 ppt
10.29 ppt
Salinity*
0.1 ppt
0.1 ppt
0.3 ppt
0.5 ppt
Turbidity*
N/A
NIA
15 NTU
16 NTU
Temperature*
15.0 °C
15.1 *C
16.0 °C
18.8 °C
Fecal Coliform**
<2 col/100ml
<2 col/100m1
97 col/ml
31 collml
Total Phosphorous"
<0.04 mg/L
0.25 mg/L
0.61 mg/L
0.26 mg/L
Total Nitrogen**
2.8 mg/L
6.5 mg/L
<0.5 mg/L
<0.5 mg/L
Total Kjeldahl
Nitrogen (TKN)**
<0.5 mg/L
<0.5 mg/L
<0.5 mg/L
<0.5 mg/L
Potassium"
7.64 mg/L
2.29 mg/L
7.94 mg/L
9.40 mg/L
7-Aug-2012
Water Sampling
Parameter
Monitoring Well 1
Monitoring Well 2
Surface-1
Surface-2
Dissolved Oxygen*
7.32 ppt
7.50 ppt
7.28 ppt
6.82 ppt
Salinity`
0.1 ppt
0.1 ppt
2.7,ppt
2.8 ppt
Turbidity*
NIA
N/A
12 NTU
8 NTU
Temperature*
19.4 °C
19.4 'C
27.9 °C
27.9 °C
Fecal Coliform**
<2 col/100ml
<1 col/100ml
32 col/ml
17 collml
Total Phosphorous"
0.71 mg/L
<0.04 mg1L
<0.04 mg/L
<0.04 mg/L
Total Nitrogen"
4.3 mg/L
6.5 mg/L
1.3 mg/L
0.7 mg/L
Total Kjeldahl
Nitrogen (TKN)**
1.3 mg/L
<0.5 mg/L
1.2 mg/L
0.6 mg/L
Potassium**
7.57 mg/L
1.98 mg/L
31.4 mg/L
35.9 mg/L
* Field Tested with Horiba Water Quality Checker
** NC Certified Laboratory Tested (Environmental Chemists, Inc.)

0
dandy Point- Water Quality Monitoring Plan
NPDES Permit #tNCS000517
NCDENT SW Permit ##SW7060113
1-Nov-2012
Quarterly Baseline Monitoring
Water Sampling
Parameter
Monitoring Well 1
Monitoring Well 2
Surface-1
Surface-2
Dissolved Oxygen'
6.21 plat
6.69 ppt
9.98 ppt
9.12 ppt
Salinity"
0.1 ppt
0.1 ppt
0.8 ppt
1.8 ppt
Turbidity*
N/A
NIA
14 NTU
12 NTU
Temperature*
17.1 °C
17.9 °C
11.3 °C
13.1 °C
Fecal Coliform''
<1 col/100ml
<1 col/100ml
91 col/ml
20 col/ml
Total Phosphorous*"
1.36 mg/L
<0.04 mg/L
0.06 mg/L
<0.04 mg/L
Total Nitrogen"
3.7 mg/L
6.7 mg/L
1.8 mg/L
<0.5 mg/L
Total Kjeldahl
Nitrogen (TKN)'*
1.9 mg/L
<0.5 mg/L
1.6 mg/L
<0.5 mg/L
Potassium`*
7.09 mg/L
2.20 mg/L
L12.9 mg/L
23.5 mg/L
* Field Tested with Horiba Water Quality Checker
** NC Certified Laboratory Tested (Environmental Chemists, Inc.)

+� 'N
Quible
Quible & Associates, P.C.
ENGINEERING • FNV1RONr.,1ENTAL SCIENCES • PLANMNG • SUrNEMG
' SINCE 1959
Sam Young
The Fund for Sandy Point North Carolina, LLC
P.O. Box 789
Edenton, NC 27932
May 23, 2013
RE: NPDES Permit #SW7080113
Quarterly Baseline Sampling (May 8, 2013)
Sam,
P.O. Drawer 870
Kitty Hawk. NO 27949
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Wob: qulbl© com
On May 8, 2013, 1 conducted the quarterly baseline sampling in our two shallow monitoring
wells and in two locations in the Sound. Sampling parameters include: Dissolved Oxygen,
Salinity, Turbidity, Temperature, Fecal Coliform, Total Phosphorous, Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen,
Total Nitrogen and Potassium. The Water Quality Monitoring Plan associated with the NPDES
Permit specifies sampling of each of these parameters in order to assess the impact of the
future development on adjacent waterways.
The following sheets include a summary of the sampling results from this round of sampling as
well as the prior rounds of sampling. In addition, I have enclosed a copy of the Environmental
Chemists, Inc laboratory results for Fecal Coliform, Total Phosphorous, Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen,
Total Nitrogen and Potassium. The other parameters including Dissolved Oxygen, Salinity,
Turbidity and Temperature were field tested with a laboratory quality monitoring device.
We will continue to send you a copy of all NPDES sampling results and we will keep a copy in
our files. It is required that copies of this information be made available to NCDENR upon
request, but we are not required to submit this information to anyone unless there is a specific
request. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding this matter.
Sincerely,
Quible & Associates, P.C.
Brian Rubino, P.G.
CC .DereffiffiDail, R E.

"� IS'andy Point- Water Quality Monitoring Plan
NPDES Permit #NCS000517
NCDENT SW Permit #SW7060113
Quarterly Baseline Monitoring
0
1-Nov-2012
Water Sampling
Parameter
Monitoring Well 1
Monitoring Well 2
Surface-1
Surface-2
Dissolved Oxygen*
6.21 ppt
6.69 ppt
9.98 ppt
9.12 ppt
Salinity*
0.1 ppt
0.1 ppt
0.8 ppt
1.8 ppt
Turbidity*
NIA
NIA
14 NTU
12 NTU
Temperature*
17.1 °C
17.9 *C
11.3 °C
13.1 °C
Fecal Coliform**
<1 col/100ml
<1 col/100ml
91 col/ml
20 col/ml
Total Phosphorous**
1.36 mg/L
<0.04 mg/L
0.06 mg/L
<0.04 mg/L
Total Nitrogen**
3.7 mg/L
6.7 mg/L
1.8 mg/L
<0.5 mg/L
Total Kjeldahl
Nitrogen (TKN)**
1.9 mg/L
<0.5 mg/L
1.6 mg/L
<0.5 mg1L
Potassium**
7.09 mg/L
2.20 mg/L
12.9 mg/L
23.5 mg1L
12-Feb-2013
Water Sampling
Parameter
Monitoring Well 1
Monitoring Well 2
Surface-1
Surface-2
Dissolved Oxygen*
7.01 ppt
7.20 ppt
10.18 ppt
9.80 ppt
Salinity*
0 ppt
0 ppt
1.2 ppt
1.3 ppt
Turbidity*
NIA
NIA
12 NTU
12 NTU
Temperature*
15.0 °C
15.1 °C
9.1 °C
9.1 °C
Fecal Coliform**
<1 col/100ml
<1 col/100ml
10 col/ml
9 cotlml
Total Phosphorous**
0.64 mg/L
<0.06 mg/L
0.05 mg/L
<0.04 mg1L
Total Nitrogen**
1.0 mg/L
1.4 mg/L
<0.5 mg/L
<0.5 mg/L
Total Kjeldahl
Nitrogen (TKN)**
0.9 mg/L
<0.5 mg/L
<0.5 mg/L
<0.5 mg/L
Potassium**
8.48 mg/L
2.17 mg/L
11.5 mg/L
11.7 mg1L
8-May-2013
Water Sampling
Parameter
Monitoring Well 1
Monitoring Well 2
Surface-1
Dissolved Oxygen*
3.11 ppt
6.92 ppt
9.80 ppt
Salinity*
0.1 ppt
0 ppt
0.4 ppt
Turbidity*
NIA
NIA
11 NTU
Temperature*
17.6 °C
17.0 °C
22.6 °C
Fecal Coliform**
67 col/100ml
<2 col/100ml
50 collml
Total Phosphorous**
0.78 mg/L
0.07 mg/L
<0.04 mg/L
Total Nitrogen**
9.5 mg/L
6.8 mg/L
0.6 mg/L
Total Kjeldahl
Nitrogen (TKN)**
1.5 mg/L
<0.5 mg/L
0.5 mg/L
Potassium**
4.86 mg/L
1.92 mg/L
8.63 mg/L
* Field Tested with Horiba Water Quality Checker
** NC Certified Laboratory Tested (Environmental Chemists, Inc.)

;7. .
Quible
Quible & Associates, P.C.
ENGNEERING • ENVOCNIVIEWAL SCIENCES • PLANNING • SURVEYING
SINCE 1959
Sam Young
The Fund for Sandy Point North Carolina, LLC
P.O. Box 789
Edenton, NC 27932
March 19, 2013
RE: NPDES Permit #SW7060113
Quarterly Baseline Sampling (February 12, 2013)
Sam,
P.O. Drawer 870
Kihy Hawk, NC 27949
Phone:[phone]
Fcm 252-261-1260
Web: quible.com
On February 12, 2013, 1 conducted the quarterly baseline sampling in our two shallow
monitoring wells and in two locations in the Sound. Sampling parameters include: Dissolved
Oxygen, Salinity, Turbidity, Temperature, Fecal Coliform, Total Phosphorous, Total Kjeldahl
Nitrogen, Total Nitrogen and Potassium. The Water Quality Monitoring Plan associated with the
NPDES Permit specifies sampling of each of these parameters in order to assess the impact of
the future development on adjacent waterways.
The following sheets include a summary of the sampling results from this round of sampling as
well as the prior rounds of sampling. In addition, I have enclosed a copy of the Environmental
Chemists, Inc laboratory results for Fecal Coliform, Total Phosphorous, Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen,
Total Nitrogen and Potassium. The other parameters including Dissolved Oxygen, Salinity,
Turbidity and Temperature were field tested with a laboratory quality monitoring device.
We will continue to send you a copy of all NPDES sampling results and we will keep a copy in
our files. It is required that copies of this information be made available to NCDENR upon
request, but we are not required to submit this information to anyone unless there is a specific
request. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding this matter.
Sincerely,
Quibfe & Associates, P.C.
Brian Rubino, P.G.
rJ

.4 .v:
rJ
Sandy Point- Water Quality Monitoring Plan
NPDES Permit #NCS000517
NCDENT SW Permit #SW7060113
1-Nov-2012
Quarterly Baseline Monitoring
Water Sampling
Parameter
Monitoring Well 1
Monitoring Well 2
Surface-1
Surface-2
Dissolved Oxygen*
6.21 ppt
6.69 ppt
9.98 ppt
9.12 ppt
Salinity*
0.1 ppt
0.1 ppt
0.8 ppt
1.8 ppt
Turbidity*
N/A
N/A
14 NTU
12 NTU
Temperature*
17.1 °C
17.9 "C
11.3 °C
13.1 °C
Fecal Coliform**
<1 col/100ml
<1 col/100ml
91 col/mi
20 col/ml
Total Phosphorous**
1.36 mg/L
<0.04 mg/L
0.06 mg/L
<0.04 mg/L
Total Nitrogen**
3.7 mg/L
6.7 mg/L
1.8 mg/L
<0.5 mg/L
Total Kjeldahl
Nitrogen (TKN)**
1.9 mg/L
<0.5 mg/L
1.6 mg/L
<0.5 mg/L
Potassium*"
7.09 mg/L
2.20 mg/L
12.9 mg/L
23.5 mg/L
12-Feb-2013
Water Sampling
Parameter
Monitoring Well 1
Monitoring Well 2
Surface-1
Surface-2
Dissolved Oxygen*
7.01 ppt
7.20 ppt
10.18 ppt
9.80 ppt
Salinity*
0 ppt
0 ppt
1.2 ppt
1.3 ppt
Turbidity*
N/A
N/A
12 NTU
12 NTU
Temperature*
15.0 °C
15.1 *C
9.1 °C
9.1 °C
Fecal Coliform**
<1 col/100ml
<1 col/100ml
10 col/ml
9 col/ml
Total Phosphorous**
0.64 mg/L
<0.06 mg/L
0.05 mg/L
<0.04 mg/L
Total Nitrogen**
1.0 mg/L
1.4 mg/L
<0.5 mg/L
<0.5 mg/L
Total Kjeldahl
Nitrogen (TKN)**
0.9 mg/L
<0.5 mg/L
<0.5 mg/L
<0.5 mg/L
Potassium**
8.48 mg/L
2.17 mg/L
11.5 mg/L
11.7 mg/L
* Field Tested with Horiba Water Quality Checker
** NC Certified Laboratory Tested (Environmental Chemists, Inc.)

'A6
Quible
r� Quible & Associates, P.C.
(D
We
ENGINEERING • ENVIRONMEMAL SCIENCES • PLANNING • SUWFYING
SINCE 1959
Sam Young
The Fund for Sandy Point North Carolina, LLC
P.O. Box 789
Edenton, NC 27932
September 16, 2013
RE: NPDES Permit #SW7060113
Quarterly Baseline Sampling (August 14, 2013)
Sam,
P.O. Drawer 870
Kitty Howkc NC 279d9
Phone:[phone]
Fox: 252-261-1260
Web: quibe.com
On August 14, 2013, 1 conducted the quarterly baseline sampling at Monitoring Well # 2 (MW-2)
and Surface Water Location #2 (S-2). Monitoring Well #1 has been damaged and was therefore
not sampled on this occasion. Sampling parameters include: Dissolved Oxygen, Salinity,
Turbidity, Temperature, Fecal Coliform, Total Phosphorous, Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen, Total
Nitrogen and Potassium. The Water Quality Monitoring Plan associated with the NPDES Permit
specifies sampling of each of these parameters in order to assess the impact of the future
development on adjacent waterways.
The following sheets include a summary of the sampling results from this round of sampling as
well as the prior rounds of sampling. In addition, I have enclosed a copy of the Environmental
Chemists, Inc laboratory results for Fecal Coliform, Total Phosphorous, Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen,
Total Nitrogen and Potassium. The other parameters including Dissolved Oxygen, Salinity,
Turbidity and Temperature were field tested with a laboratory quality monitoring device.
We will continue to send you a copy of all NPDES sampling results and we will keep a copy in
our files. It is required that copies of this information be made available to NCDENR upon
request, but we are not required to submit this information to anyone unless there is a specific
request. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding this matter.
Sincerely,
Quible & Associates, P.C.
Brian Rubino, P.G.
CC- bt✓re' 77
R,.A-',©ail:,!IP'E

i4.a
rD
Sandy Point- Water Quality Monitoring Plan
NPDES Permit #NCS000517
NCDENT SW Permit #SW7060113
14-Aug-2013
Water Sampling
Parameter
Monitoring Well 2
Surface-2
Dissolved Oxygen*
5.32 ppt
7.13 ppt
Salinity*
0.1 ppt
0.1 ppt
Turbidity'
NIA
11 NTU
Temperature"
19.9 °C
28.4 OC
Fecal Coliform"
12 col/100ml
<1 col/ml
Total Phosphorous—
0.23 mg/L
0.07 mg/L
Total Nitrogen"
6.9 mg/L
<0.5 mg/L
Total Kjeldahl
Nitrogen (TKN)"
<0.5 mg/L
<0.5 mg/L
Potassium"*
3.63 mg/L
4.27 mg/L
Quarterly Baseline Monitoring
* Field Tested with Moriba Water Quality Checker
** NC Certified Laboratory Tested (Environmental Chemists, Inc.)

0
(D
Sandy Point- Water Quality Monitoring Plan
NPDES Permit #NCS000517
NCDENT SW Permit #SW7060113
1-Nov-2012
Quarterly Baseline Monitoring
Water Sampling
Parameter
Monitoring Well 1
Monitoring Well 2
Surface-1
Surface-2
Dissolved Oxygen*
6.21 ppt
6.69 ppt
9.98 ppt
9.12 ppt
Salinity*
0.1 ppt
0.1 ppt
0.8 ppt
1.8 ppt
Turbidity*
NIA
NIA
14 NTU
12 NTU
Temperature*
17.1 °C
17.9 °C
11.3 °C
13.1 °C
Fecal Coliform'
<1 c01/100ml
<1 col/100ml
91 col/ml
20 collml
Total Phosphorous"
1.36 mg/L
<0.04 mg/L
0.06 mg1L
<0.04 mg/L
Total Nitrogen**
3.7 mg/L "
6.7 mg/L
1.8 mg/L
<0.5 mg/L
Total Kjeldahl
Nitrogen (TKN)*"
1.9 mg/L
<0.5 mg/L
1.6 mg/L
<0.5 mg/L
Potassium**
7.09 mg/L
2.20 mg1L
12.9 mg/L
23.5 mg/L
12-Feb-2013
Water Sampling
Parameter
Monitoring Well 1
Monitoring Well 2
Surface-1
Surface-2
Dissolved Oxygen*
7.01 ppt
7.20 ppt
10.18 ppt
9.80 ppt
Salinity`
0 ppt
0 ppt
1.2 ppt
1.3 ppt
Turbidity*
N/A
NIA
12 NTU
12 NTU
Temperature*
15.0 °C
15.1 °C
9.1 °C
9.1 °C
Fecal Coliform**
<1 col/100ml
<1 col/100ml
10 collml
9 col/ml
Total Phosphorous-
0.64 mg/L
<0.06 mg/L
0.05 mg/L
<0.04 mg/L
Total Nitrogen**
1.0 mg/L
1.4 mg/L
<0.5 mg/L
<0.5 mg/L
Total Kjeldahl
Nitrogen (TKN)**
0.9 mg/L
<0.5 mg/L
<0.5 mg/L
<0.5 mg/L
Potassium"
8.48 mg1L
2.17 mg/L
11.5 mg/L
11.7 mg/L
8-May-2013
Water Sampling
Parameter
Monitoring Well 1
Monitoring Well 2
Surface-1
Dissolved Oxygen`
3.11 ppt
6.92 ppt
9.80 ppt
Salinity`
0.1 ppt
0 ppt
0.4 ppt
Turbidity*
N/A
NIA
11 NTU
Temperature`
17.6 °C
17.0 °C
22.6 °C
Fecal Coliform**
67 col/100ml
<2 col/100ml
50 col/ml
Total Phosphorous**
0.78 mg/L
0.07 mg/L
<0.04 mg/L
Total Nitrogen*"
9.5 mg/L
6.8 mg/L
0.6 mg1L
Total Kjeldahl
Nitrogen (TKN)**
1.5 mg/L
<0.5 mg/L
0.5 mg/L
Potassium**
4.86 mg/L
1.92 mg/L
8.63 mg/L
* Field Tested with Horiba Water Quality Checker
** NC Certified Laboratory Tested (Environmental Chemists, Inc.)

-I . 'qit�
Quible
Quible & Associates, P.C.
ENGINEERING • ENVIRONMENTALSCIENCES • PLANNING • SURVEYING
SINCE 19s9
Sam Young
The Fund for Sandy Point North Carolina, LLC
P.O. Box 789
Edenton, NC 27932-
October 8, 2012
RE: NPDES Permit #SW7060113
Quarterly Baseline Sampling (August 7, 2012)
Sam,
P.O. Drawer 00
Kitty Hawk, NC 27949
Phone: [phone]
Fax' 252-251-1260
Web! quible,com
ECE' Y
,,. �, D
,2 ZQ1l
'�'raRMW�4rE p�RMiTj
N(;
On August 7, 2012, 1 conducted the quarterly baseline sampling in our two shallow monitoring
wells and in two locations in the Sound. Sampling parameters include: Dissolved Oxygen,
Salinity, Turbidity, Temperature, Fecal Coliform, Total Phosphorous, Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen,
Total Nitrogen and Potassium. The Water Quality Monitoring Plan associated with the NPDES
Permit specifies sampling of each of these parameters in order to assess the impact of the
future development on adjacent waterways.
The following sheets include a summary of the sampling results from this round of sampling as
well as the prior rounds of sampling. In addition, I have enclosed a copy of the Environmental
Chemists, Inc laboratory results for Fecal Coliform, Total Phosphorous, Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen,
Total Nitrogen and Potassium. The other parameters including Dissolved Oxygen, Salinity,
Turbidity and Temperature were field tested with a laboratory quality monitoring device.
We will continue to send you a copy of all NPDES sampling results and we will keep a copy in
our files. It is required that copies of this information be made available to NCDENR upon
request, but we are not required to submit this information to anyone unless there is a specific
request. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding this matter.
Sincerely,
Quible & Associates, P.C.
Brian Rubino, P.G.
5 Der�eek NORN P E„
f�w

":%Sandy Point- Water Quality Monitoring Plan
NPDES Permit #NC5000517
NCDENT SW Permit #SW7060113
Quarterly Baseline Monitoring
0
16-Jan-2012
Water Sampling
Parameter
Monitoring Well 1
Monitoring Well 2
Surface-1
Surface-2
Dissolved Oxygen*
8.65 ppt
8.75 ppt
11.07 ppt
10.12 plot
Salinity*
0.00
0.01
1.3 ppt
1.3 ppt
Turbidity*
N/A
NIA
12 NTU
12 NTU
Temperature*
15.5 °C
16.2 *C
9.2 °C
8.0 °C
Fecal Coliform"*
<1 co11100ml
<1 c01/100ml
9 col/ml
9 col/ml
Total Phosphorous**
0.16 mg1L
2.15 mg/L
0.20 mg/L
0.36 mg/L
Total Nitrogen**
0.7 mg/L
9.0 mg/L
0.8 mg/L
0.9 mg/L
Total Kjeldahl
Nitrogen (TKN)**
<0.5 mg/L
2.5 mg/L
0.7 mg/L
0.7 mg/L
Potassium"
7.49 mg/L
2.24 mg1L
18.5 mg/L
18.4 mg/L
25-Apr-2012
Water Sampling
Parameter
Monitoring Well i
Monitoring Well 2
Surface-1
Surface-2
Dissolved Oxygen*
2.92 ppt
5.83 ppt
9.88 ppt
10.29 ppt
Salinity*
0.1 ppt
0.1 ppt
0.3 ppt'
0.5 ppt
Turbidity*
N/A
N/A
15 NTU
16 NTU
Temperature`
15.0 °C
15.1 T
16.0 °C
18.8 °C
Fecal Coliform'*
<2 col/100ml
<2 col/100ml
97 collml
31 col/ml
Total Phosphorous**
<0.04 mg1L
0.25 mg/L
0.61 mg/L
0.26 mg/L
Total Nitrogen"
2.8 mg/L
6.5 mg/L
<0.5 mg/L
<0.5 mg/L o
Total Kjeldahl
Nitrogen (TKN)**
<0.5 mg/L
<0.5 mg/L
<0.5 mg/L
<0.5 mg/L
Potassium**
7.64 mg/L
1 2.29 mg/L
1 7.94 mg/L
9.40 mg/L �
7-Aug-2012
Water Sampling
Parameter
Monitoring Well 1
Monitoring Well 2
Surface-1
Surface-2
Dissolved Oxygen*
7.32 ppt
7.50 ppt
7.28 ppt
6.82 ppt
Salinity*
0.1 ppt
0.1 ppt
2.7 ppt
2.8 ppt
Turbidity*
NIA
NIA
12 NTU
8 NTU
Temperature*
19.4 °C
19.4 °C
27.9 °C
27.9 °C
Fecal Coliform**
<2 col/100ml
<1 COO 00ml
32 col/ml
17 collml
Total Phosphorous**
0.71 mg1L
<0.04 mg/L
<0.04 mg/L
<0.04 mg/L
Total Nitrogen**
4.3 mg/L
6.5 mg/L
1.3 mg/L
0.7 mg/L
Total Kjeldahl
Nitrogen (TKN)**
1.3 mg/L
<0.5 mg/L
1.2 mg/L
0.6 mg/L
Potassium**
7.57 mg/L
1.98 mg/L
31.4 mg/L
35.9 mg/L
3 ;am
tv
u, m
N C
M
At
* Field Tested with Horiba Water Quality Checker
** NC Certified Laboratory Tested (Environmental Chemists, Inc.)

Quible
C Quible &Associates, P.C. Kitty HawkNCef870
27949
ENGINEERING • ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES • PLANNING • SURVEYING Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
SINCE 1959 Web: quible.com
0
Sam Young
The Fund for Sandy Point North Carolina, LLC
P.O. Box 789
Edenton, NC 27932-
January 16, 2013
RE: NPDES Permit #SW7060113
Quarterly Baseline Sampling (November 1, 2012)
Sam,
On November 1, 2012, 1 conducted the quarterly baseline sampling in our two shallow
monitoring wells and in two locations in the Sound. Sampling parameters include: Dissolved
Oxygen, Salinity, Turbidity, Temperature, Fecal Coliform, Total Phosphorous, Total Kjeldahl
Nitrogen, Total Nitrogen and Potassium. The Water Quality Monitoring Plan associated with the
NPDES Permit specifies sampling of each of these parameters in order to assess the impact of
the future development on adjacent waterways.
The following sheets include a summary of the sampling results from this round of sampling as
well as the prior rounds of sampling. In addition, I have enclosed a copy of the Environmental
Chemists, Inc laboratory results for Fecal Coliform, Total Phosphorous, Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen,
Total Nitrogen and Potassium. The other parameters including Dissolved Oxygen, Salinity,
Turbidity and Temperature were field tested with a laboratory quality monitoring device.
We will continue to send you a copy of all NPDES sampling results and we will keep a copy in
our files. It is required that copies of this information be made available to NCDENR upon
request, but we are not required to submit this information to anyone unless there is a specific
request. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding this matter.
Sincerely,
Quible & Associates, P.C.
-"�* cvb�'�
Brian Rubino, P.G.

0
Candy Point- Water Quality Monitoring Plan
NPDES Permit #NC5000517
NCDENT SW Permit #SW7060113
16-,fan-2012
Quarterly Baseline Monitoring
Water Sampling
Parameter
Monitoring Well 1
Monitoring Well 2
Surface-1
Surface-2
Dissolved Oxygen*
8.65 ppt
8.75 pot
11.07 ppt
10.12 ppt
Salinity*
0.00
0.01
1.3 ppt
1.3 ppt
Turbidity*
NIA
NIA
12 NTU
12 NTU
Temperature*
15.5 °C
16.2 °C
9.2 °C
8.0 °C
Fecal Coliform**
<1 col/100ml
<1 col/100ml
9 col/ml
9 collml
Total Phosphorous"
0.16 mg/L
2.15 mg/L
0.20 mg/L
0.36 mg/L
Total Nitrogen**
0.7 mg/L
9.0 mg/L
0.8 mg/L
0.9 mg/L
Total Kjeldahl
Nitrogen (TKN)**
<0.5 mg/L
2.5 mg/L
0.7 mg/L
0.7 mg/L
Potassium**
7.49 mg/L
2.24 mg1L
18.5 mg/L
18.4 mg/L
25-Apr-2012
Water Sampling
Parameter
Monitoring Well 1
Monitoring Well 2
Surface-1
Surface-2
Dissolved Oxygen*
2.92 ppt
5.83 ppt
9.88 ppt
10.29 ppt
Salinity*
0.1 ppt
0.1 ppt
0.3 ppt
0.5 ppt
Turbidity*
NIA
N/A
15 NTU
16 NTU
Temperature*
15.0 °C
15.1 °C
16.0 °C
18.8 °C
Fecal Coliform"
<2 col/100ml
<2 col/100m1
97 col/ml
31 collml
Total Phosphorous"
<0.04 mg/L
0.25 mg/L
0.61 mg/L
0.26 mg/L
Total Nitrogen*"
2.8 mg/L
6.5 mg/L
<0.5 mg/L
<0.5 mg/L
Total Kjeldahi
Nitrogen (TKN)**
<0.5 mg/L
<0.5 mg/L
<0.5 mg/L
<0.5 mg/L
Potassium"
7.64 mg/L
2.29 mg/L
7.94 mg/L
9.40 mg/L
7-Aug-2012
Water Sampling
Parameter
Monitoring Well 1
Monitoring Well 2
Surface-1
Surface-2
Dissolved Oxygen*
7.32 ppt
7.50 ppt
7.28 ppt
6.82 ppt
Salinity*
0.1 ppt
0.1 ppt
2.7 ppt
2.8 ppt
Turbidity*
N/A
NIA
12 NTU
8 NTU
Temperature*
19.4 °C
19.4 °C
27.9 °C
27.9 °C
Fecal Coliform**
<2 col/100ml
<1 col/100ml
32 collml
17 collml
Total Phosphorous"
0.71 mg/l_
<0.04 mg/L
<0.04 mg/L
<0.04 mg/L
Total Nitrogen**
4.3 mg/L
6.5 mg/L
1.3 mg/L
0.7 mg/L
Total Kjeldahl
Nitrogen (TKN)**
1.3 mg/L
<0.5 mg/L
1.2 mg/L
0.6 mg/L
Potassium"*
7.57 mg/L
1.98 mg/L
31.4 mg/L
35.9 mg/L
* Field Tested with Horiba Water Quality Checker
** NC Certified Laboratory Tested (Environmental Chemists, Inc.)

Sandy Point- Water Quality Monitoring Plan
J
NPDES Permit #NCS000517
NCDENT SW Permit #SW7060113
1-Nov-2012
Quarterly Baseline Monitoring
Water Sampling
Parameter
Monitoring Well 1
Monitoring Well 2
Surface-1
Surface-2
Dissolved Oxygen*
6.21 ppt
6.69 ppt
9.98 ppt
9.12 ppt
Salinity*
0.1 ppt
0.1 ppt
0.8 ppt
1.8 ppt
Turbidity*
NIA
NIA
14 NTU
12 NTU
Temperature*
17.1 °C
17.9 °C
11.3 °C
13.1 °C
Fecal Coliform**
<1 col/100ml
<1 co11100ml
91 collml
20 col/ml
Total Phosphorous**
1.36 mglL
<0.04 mg/L
0.06 mg/L
<0.04 mglL
Total Nitrogen**
3.7 mg/L
6.7 mg1L
1.8 mglL
<0.5 mg/L
Total Kjeldahl
Nitrogen (TKN)**
1.9 mg/L
<0.5 mg/L.
1.6 mg1L
<0.5 mg/L.
Potassium**
7.09 mg/L
2.20 mglL
12.9 mglL
23.5 mg1L
* Field Tested with Horiba Water Quality Checker
** NC Certified Laboratory Tested (Environmental Chemists, Iric.)

'-aa
Quible
Quible & Associates. PC,
ENGINEERING • ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES • PLANNING • SURVEYING
SINCE 1959
Sam Young
The Fund for Sandy Point North Carolina, LLC
P.O. Box 789
Edenton, NC 27932
May 23, 2013
RE: NPDES Permit 4SW7060113
Quarterly Baseline Sampling (May 8, 2013)
Sam,
P.O. orower 870
Fitly Hawk. NC 27949
Phone: 252-W -3300
Fax: [phone]
Web; quibIo corn
On May 8, 2013, 1 conducted the quarterly baseline sampling in our two shallow monitoring
wells and in two locations in the Sound. Sampling parameters include: Dissolved Oxygen,
Salinity, Turbidity, Temperature, Fecal Coliform, Total Phosphorous, Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen,
Total Nitrogen and Potassium. The Water Quality Monitoring Plan associated with the NPDES
Permit specifies sampling of each of these parameters in order to assess the impact of the
future development on adjacent waterways.
The following sheets include a summary of the sampling results from this round of sampling as
well as the prior rounds of sampling. In addition, I have enclosed a copy of the Environmental
Chemists, Inc laboratory results for Fecal Coliform, Total Phosphorous, Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen,
Total Nitrogen and Potassium. The other parameters including Dissolved Oxygen, Salinity,
Turbidity and Temperature were field tested with a laboratory quality monitoring device.
We will continue to send you a copy of all NPDES sampling results and we will keep a copy in
our files. It is required that copies of this information be made available to NCDENR upon
request, but we are not required to submit this information to anyone unless there is a specific
request. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding this matter.
Sincerely,
Quible & Associates, P.C.
34�
Brian Rubino, P.G.
YMQ Derek A.. Dail, P— .
101

"Tandy Point- Water Quality Monitoring Plan
NPDES Permit #NCS000517
NCDENT SW Permit #SW7060113
Quarterly Baseline Monitoring
r)
0
1-Nov-2012
Water Sampling
Parameter
Monitoring Well 1
Monitoring Well 2
Surface-1
Surface-2
Dissolved Oxygen*
6.21 ppt
6.69 ppt
9.98 ppt
9.12 ppt
Salinity*
0.1 ppt
0.1 ppt
0.8 ppt
1.8 ppt
Turbidity*
NIA
NIA
14 NTU
12 NTU
Temperature*
17.1 °C
17.9 °C
11.3 °C
13.1 °C
Fecal Coliform**
<1 col/100ml
<1 col/100ml
91 col/ml
20 collml
Total Phosphorous"*
1.36 mg/L
<0.04 mg1L
0.06 mg/L
<0.04 mg/L
Total Nitrogen*"
3.7 mg/L
6.7 mg/L
1.8 mg/L
<0.5 mg/L
Total Kjeldahl
Nitrogen (TKN)**
1.9 mg/L
<0.5 mg/L
1.6 mg/L
<0.5 mg/L
Potassium**
7.09 mg/L
2.20 mg/L
12.9 mg/L
23.5 mg1L
12-Feb-2013
Water Sampling
Parameter
Monitoring Well 1
Monitoring Well 2
Surface-1
Surface-2
Dissolved Oxygen*
7.01 ppt
7.20 ppt
10.18 ppt
9.80 ppt
Salinity*
0 ppt
0 ppt
1.2 ppt
1.3 ppt
Turbidity*
NIA
NIA
12 NTU
12 NTU
Temperature*
15.0 °C
15.1 'C
9.1 °C.
9.1 OC
Fecal Coliform'
<1 col/100ml
<1 co11100ml
10 col/ml
9 collml
Total Phosphorous"
0.64 mg/L
<0.06 mg/L
0.05 mg/L
<0.04 mg/L
Total Nitrogen*"
1.0 mg/L
1.4 mg/L
<0:5 mg/L
<0.5 mg/L
Total Kjeldahl
Nitrogen (TKN)**
0.9 mg/L
<0.5 mg/L
<0.5 mg/L
<0.5 mg/L
Potassium"
8.48 mg/L
2.17 mg/L
11.5 mg/L
11.7 mg/L
8-May-2013
Water Sampling
Parameter
Monitoring Well 1
Monitoring Well 2
Surface-i
Dissolved Oxygen*
3.11 ppt
6.92 ppt
9.80 ppt
Salinity*
0.1 ppt
0 ppt
0.4 ppt
Turbidity*
N/A
NIA
11 NTU
Temperature*
17.6 °C
17.0 'C
22.6 °C
Fecal Coliform'*
67 col/100ml
<2 co11100ml
50 collml
Total Phosphorous"
0.78 mg/L
0.07 mg/L
<0.04 mg/L
Total Nitrogen**
9.5 mg/L
6.8 mg/L
0.6 mg/L
Total Kjeldahl
Nitrogen (TKN)**
1.5 mg/L
<0.5 mg/L
0.5 mg/L
Potassium**
4.86 mg/L
1.92 mg/L
8.63 mg1L
* Field Tested with Horiba Water Quality Checker
** NC Certified Laboratory Tested (Environmental Chemists, Inc.)

n
rJ
Quible
QuiUe & Associates, P.C.
ENGINEERING • ENVIRONMENTALSClENCES • PLANNING • SURVEYING
SINCE 1959
Sam Young
The Fund for Sandy Point North Carolina, LLC
P.O. Box 789
Edenton, NC 27932
March 19, 2013
RE: NPDES Permit #SW7060113
Quarterly Baseline Sampling (February 12, 2013)
Sam,
P.O. Drawer 870
Killy Howk, NC 27949
Phone.[phone]D
Fax: [phone]
Web quble.com
On February 12, 2013, 1 conducted the quarterly baseline sampling in our two shallow
monitoring wells and in two locations in the Sound. Sampling parameters include: Dissolved
Oxygen, Salinity, Turbidity, Temperature, Fecal Coliform, Total Phosphorous, Total Kjeldahl
Nitrogen, Total Nitrogen and Potassium. The Water Quality Monitoring Plan associated with the
NPDES Permit specifies sampling of each of these parameters in order to assess the impact of
the future development on adjacent waterways.
The following sheets include a summary of the sampling results from this round of sampling as
well as the prior rounds of sampling. In addition, I have enclosed a copy of the Environmental
Chemists, Inc laboratory results for Fecal Coliform, Total Phosphorous, Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen,
Total Nitrogen and Potassium. The other parameters including Dissolved Oxygen, Salinity,
Turbidity and Temperature were field tested with a laboratory quality monitoring device.
We will continue to send you a copy of all NPDES sampling results and we will keep a copy in
our files. It is required that copies of this information be made available to NCDENR upon
request, but we are not required to submit this information to anyone unless there is a specific
request. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding this matter.
Sincerely,
Quibfe & Associates, P.C.
Brian Rubino, P.G.
CC:�'t7erekA DaiE, P} -

Sandy Point- Water Quality Monitoring Plan
0
161
NPDES Permit #NCS000517
NCDENT SW Permit #SW7060113
1-Nov-2012
Quarterly Baseline Monitoring
Water Sampling
Parameter
Monitoring Well 1
Monitoring Well 2
Surface-1
Surface-2
Dissolved Oxygen*
6.21 ppt
6.69 ppt
9.98 ppt
9.12 ppt
Salinity*
0.1 ppt
0.1 ppt
0.8 ppt
1.8 ppt
Turbidity*
NIA
NIA
14 NTU
12 NTU
Temperature*
17.1 °C
17.9 'C
11.3 °C
13.1 °C
Fecal Coliform'
<1 col/100ml
<1 col/100ml
91 col/ml
20 col/ml
Total Phosphorous"
1.36 mg/L
<0.04 mg/L
0.06 mg/L
<0.04 mg/L
Total Nitrogen**
3.7 mg/L
6.7 mg/L
1.8 mg/L
<0.5 mg/L
Total Kjeldahl
Nitrogen (TKN)**
1.9 mg/L
<0.5 mg/L
1.6 mg/L
<0.5 mg/L
Potassium**
7.09 mg/L
2.20 mg/L
12.9 mg/L
23.5 mg/L
12-Feb-2013
Water Sampling
Parameter
Monitoring Well 1
Monitoring Well 2
Surface-1
Surface-2
Dissolved Oxygen*
7.01 ppt
7.20 ppt
10.18 ppt
9.80 ppt
Salinity*
0 ppt
0 ppt
1.2 ppt
1.3 ppt
Turbidity*
N/A
N/A
12 NTU
12 NTU
Temperature*
15.0 "C
15.1 °C
9.1 °C
9.1 °C
Fecal Coliform**
<1 col/100ml
<1 coi/100ml
10 col/ml
9 col/ml
Total Phosphorous**
0.64 mg/L
<0.06 mg/L
0.05 mg/L
<0.04 mg/L
Total Nitrogen*"
1.0 mg/L
1.4 mg/L
<0.5 mg/L
<0.5 mg1L
Total Kjeldahl
Nitrogen (TKN)**
0.9 mg/L
<0.5 mg/L
<0.5 mg/L
<0.5 mg/L
Potassium**
8.48 mg/L
2.17 mg/L
11.5 mg/L
11.7 mg/L
* Field Tested with Horiba Water Quality Checker
** NC Certified Laboratory Tested (Environmental Chemists, Inc.)

"�- Q
0
Quible
Quible & Associates, RE
ENGINEERING - ENVIRONMENZAL SCIENCES • PLANNING • SuRVEYING
SINCE 1959
Sam Young
The Fund for Sandy Point North Carolina, LLC
P.O. Box 789
Edenton, NC 27932
September 16, 2013
RE: NPDES Permit #SW7060113
Quarterly Baseline Sampling (August 14, 2013)
Sam,
P.O. Drawer 870
Kitty Hawk, NC 27949
Phone: 252-261-=
Fox:252-261-126C
Web, qLA ble,corn
On August 14, 2013, 1 conducted the quarterly baseline sampling at Monitoring Well # 2 (MW-2)
and Surface Water Location #2 (S-2). Monitoring Well #1 has been damaged and was therefore
not sampled on this occasion. Sampling parameters include: Dissolved Oxygen, Salinity,
Turbidity, Temperature, Fecal Coliform, Total Phosphorous, Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen, Total
Nitrogen and Potassium. The Water Quality Monitoring Plan associated with the NPDES Permit
specifies sampling of each of these parameters in order to assess the impact of the future
development on adjacent waterways.
The following sheets include a summary of the sampling results from this round of sampling as
well as the prior rounds of sampling. In addition, I have enclosed a copy of the Environmental
Chemists, Inc laboratory results for Fecal Coliform, Total Phosphorous, Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen,
Total Nitrogen and Potassium. The other parameters including Dissolved Oxygen, Salinity,
Turbidity and Temperature were field tested with a laboratory quality monitoring device.
We will continue to send you a copy of all NPDES sampling results and we will keep a copy in
our files. It is required that copies of this information be made available to NCDENR upon
request, but we are not required to submit this information to anyone unless there is a specific
request. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding this matter.
Sincerely,
Quible & Associates, P.C.
f-D
Brian Rubino, P.G.
CC Derek A Q6il 1,P' f

Sandy Point- Water Quality Monitoring Plan
0
NPDES Permit #NC5000517
NCDENT SW Permit #SW7060113
14-Aug-2013
Water Sampling
Parameter
Monitoring Well 2
Surface-2
Dissolved Oxygen"
5.32 ppt
7.13 ppt
Salinity"
0.1 ppt
0.1 ppt
Turbidity"
NIA
11 NTU
Temperature*
19.9 °C
28.4 °C
Fecal Coliform"
12 col/100ml
<1 col/ml
Total Phosphorous"
0.23 mg/L
0.07 mg/L
Total Nitrogen"
6.9 mg/L
<0.5 mg/L
Total Kjeldahi
Nitrogen (TKN)°"
<0.5 mg/L
<0.5 mg/L
Potassium"
3.63 mg/L
4.27 mg/L
Quarterly Baseline Monitoring
* Field Tested with Horiba Water Quality Checker
** NC Certified Laboratory Tested (Environmental Chemists, Inc.)

Sandy Point- Water Quality Monitoring Plan
r�
NPDES Permit #NCS000517
NCDENT SW Permit #SW7060113
1-Nov-2012
Quarterly Baseline Monitoring
Water Sampling
Parameter
Monitoring Well 1
Monitoring Well 2
Surface-1
Surface-2
Dissolved Oxygen*
6.21 ppt
6.69 ppt
9.98 ppt
9.12 ppt
Salinity*
0.1 ppt
0.1 ppt
0.8 ppt
1.8 ppt
Turbidity*
NIA
N/A
14 NTU
12 NTU
Temperature*
17.1 °C
17.9 "C
11.3 °C
13.1 °C
Fecal Coliform**
<1 col/100ml
<1 col/100ml
91 col/ml
20 collml
Total Phosphorous**
1.36 mg/L
<0.04 mg/L
0.06 mg/L
<0.04 mg/L
Total Nitrogen**
3.7 mg/L
6.7 mg/L
1.8 mg/L
<0.5 mg/L
Total Kjeldahl
Nitrogen (TKN)**
1.9 mg/L
<0.5 mg/L
1.6 mg1L
<0.5 mg/L
Potassium**
7.09 mg/L
2.20 mg/L
12.9 mg/L
23.5 mg/L
12-Feb-2013
Water Sampling
Parameter
Monitoring Well 1
Monitoring Well 2
Surface-1
Surface-2
Dissolved Oxygen`
7.01 ppt
7.20 ppt
10.18 ppt
9.80 ppt
Salinity*
0 ppt
0 ppt
1.2 ppt
1.3 ppt
Turbidity*
NIA
NIA
12 NTU
12 NTU
Temperature*
15.0 OC
15.1 *C
9.1 °C
9.1 0C
Fecal Coliform**
<1 col/100ml
<1 col/100ml
10 collml
9 collml
Total Phosphorous**
0.64 mg/L
<0.06 mg1L
0.05 mg/L
<0.04 mg/L
Total Nitrogen**
1.0 mg/L
1.4 mg/L
<0.5 mg/L
<0.5 mg/L
Total Kjeldahl
Nitrogen (TKN)**
0.9 mg/L
<0.5 mg/L
<0.5 mg/L
<0.5 mg/L
Potassium**
8.48 mg/L
2.17 mg/L
11.5 mg/L
11.7 mg/L
8-May-2013
Water Sampling
Parameter
Monitoring Well 1
Monitoring Well 2
Surface-1
Dissolved Oxygen*
3.11 ppt
6.92 ppt
9.80 ppt
Salinity`
0.1 ppt
0 ppt
0.4 ppt
Turbidity*
N/A
NIA
11 NTU
Temperature*
17.6 °C
17.0 °C
22.6 °C
Fecal Coliform*"
67 col/100ml
<2 col/100ml
50 col/ml
Total Phosphorous"
0.78 mg/L
0.07 mg/L
<0.04 mg/L
Total Nitrogen**
9.5 mg/L
6.8 mg/L
0.6 mg/L
Total Kjeldahl
Nitrogen (TKN)**
1.5 mg/L
<0.5 mg/L
0.5 mg/L
Potassium**
4.86 mg/L
1.92 mg/L
8.63 mg/L
* Field Tested with Horiba Water Quality Checker
** NC Certified Laboratory Tested (Environmental Chemists, Inc.)

O� VAT Michael R Easley, Governor
O� QG
� William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
rNorth Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
> —i
p Alan W. Klimek, RE, Director
Division of Water Quality
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
April 18, 2006
Mr. Sam Young, President
The Fund for Sandy Point North Carolina, LLC
723 McMullan Ave. # 305
Edenton NC 27932
Subject: Permit No. SW7060113
Sandy Point, Phase One
High Density Stormwater Project
Chowan County
Dear Mr. Young:
The Washington Regional Office received a completed Stormwater Application for the subject project on
March 13, 2006. Staff review of the plans and specifications has determined that the project, as proposed, will comply
with the Stormwater Regulations set forth in Title 15A NCAC 2H.1000. We are forwarding Permit No. SW7060113
dated April 18, 2006 to The Fund for Sandy Point North Carolina, LLC for infiltration trenches, grassed swales,
bioretention areas and a wet detention pond to serve Sandy Point Phase One located on SR 1114 in Chowan
County.
This permit shall be effective from the date of issuance until April 18, 2016 and shall be subject to the
conditions and limitations as specified therein. Please pay special attention to the Operation and ,Maintenance.
requirements in this permit. Failure to establish an adequate system for operation and maintenance of the stormwater
management system will result in future compliance problems. The issuance of this permit does not resolve any
previous violations of the stormwater rules for construction without a permit.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this permit are unacceptable, you have the right to
request an adjudicatory hearing upon written request within thirty (30) days following receipt of this permit. This
request must be in the form of a written petition, conforming to Chapter 150E of the North Carolina General Statutes,
and filed with the Office of Administrative Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-6714. finless such
demands are made this permit shall be final and binding.
If you have any questions, or need additional information concerning this matter, please contact Roger
Thorpe or me at [phone],
Si ere",
L
ATH ge, egl u rvisor
Surface Water Protection Section
Washington Regional Office
cc: Quible & Associates, P.C.
Chowan County Inspections
Mike Randall
Washington Regional Office
Central Files
North Carolina Division of Water Quality Internet. One
943 Washington Square Mall Phone [phone] NorthCaxolina
Washington, NC 27889 Fax [phone] Naturally
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycied110% Post Consumer Paper
A),

State Stormwater Management Systems
Permit No. SW7060113
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
STATE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PERMIT
HIGH DENSITY DEVELOPMENT
In accordance with the provisions of Article 21 of Chapter 143, General Statutes of North Carolina as amended, and
other applicable Laws, Rules, and Regulations
PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED TO
The Fund for Sandy Point North Carolina, LLC
Sandy Point Phase One
Chowan County
FOR THE
construction, operation and maintenance of stormwater management systems in compliance with the provisions of
15A NCAC 21-1.1000 (hereafter referred to as the "stormwater rules') and the approved stormwater management
plans and specifications and other supporting data as attached and on file with and approved by the Division of Water
Quality and considered a part of this permit for infiltration trenches, grassed swales, bioretention areas, and a wet
detention pond to serve the Sandy Point Phase One located on SR 1114 in Chowan County.
This permit shall be effective from the date of issuance until April 18, 2016 and shall be subject to the following
specified conditions and limitations:
DESIGN STANDARDS
1. This permit is effective only with respect to the nature and volume of stormwater described in the application
and other supporting data.
2. This stormwater system has been approved for the management of stormwater runoff as described on page
2 of this permit, the Project Data Sheet.
3. Approved plans and specifications for this project are incorporated by reference and are enforceable parts of
the permit.
4. All stormwater collection and treatment systems must be located in either dedicated common areas or
recorded easements. The final plats for the projects will be recorded showing all such required easements, in
accordance with approved plans.
5. Phase One is permitted for 132 lots. The allowed square feet of built upon area per lot is listed in Attachment
A of this permit.

DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
PROJECT DATA
Project Name:
Sandy Point Phase One
Permit Number:
SW7060113
Location:
Chowan County
Applicant:
The Fund for Sandy Point North Carolina, LLC
Mailing Address:
723 McMullan Ave. # 305
Edenton, NC 27932
Application Date:
1/17/2006 (original)
Receiving Stream:
UT to Albemarle Sound
Classification of Water Body:
SB
Total Site Area:
27.16 ac
Total impervious:
12.79 ac
Infiltration Systems
Drainage area #: ,
A B
C
D
Size:
12.97 ac 1.88 ac
3.24 ac
9.07 ac
Impervious area:
5.96 ac 0.95 ac
1.72 ac
4.16 ac
Required Storage:
29,650 cf 4,454 cf
7,826 cf
20,720 cf
Provided Storage:
37,688 cf 4,465 cf
8,539 cf
28,494 cf
Bioretention Areas
Basin # Storage Volume
Al
686 cf
A2
686 cf
A3
686 cf
A7
1,123 cf
A8
1,023 cf
A29
223 cf
A30
10,624 cf
B2
639 cf
B3
1,391 cf
C5
3,432 cf
D15
189 cf
D24
884 of
Overflow from areas C & D flows to Wet Pond
Wet Pond Depth: 6.5 ft
Provided Storage Volume: 359,875 cf
Provided Surface Area: 79,160 sf
Controlling Orifice: 14 — 2.0 inch holes @ elevation 2.5 ft

6. No homeowner/lot ownerldeveloper shall be allowed to fill in, alter, or pipe any vegetative practices (such as
swales) shown on the approved plans as part of the stormwater management system without submitting a
revision to the permit and receiving approval from the Division.
The following items will require a modification to the permit:
a. Any revision to the approved plans, regardless of size
b. Project name change
c. Transfer of ownership
d. Redesign or addition to the approved amount of built -upon area
e. Further subdivision of the project area.
In addition, the Director may determine that other revisions to the project should require a modification to the
permit.
The Director may notify the permittee when the permitted site does not meet one or more of the. minimum
requirements of the permit. Within the time frame specified in the notice, the permittee shall submit a written
time schedule to the Director for modifying the site to meet minimum requirements. The permittee shall
provide copies of revised plans and certification in writing to the Director that the changes have been made.
II. SCHEDULE OF COMPLIANCE
The. permittee will comply with the following schedule for construction and maintenance of the stormwater
management system.
The stormwater management system shall be constructed in its entirety, vegetated and operational
for its intended use prior to the construction of any built -upon surfaces except roads.
b. During construction, erosion shall be kept to a minimum and any eroded areas of the system will be
repaired immediately.
2. The facilities must be properly maintained and operated at all times. The approved Operation and
. Maintenance Plan must be followed in its entirety and maintenance must occur at the scheduled intervals.
3. All permeable paved areas shall be vacuum swept at least twice per year (every 6 months).
4. The permittee shall at all times provide the operation and maintenance necessary to assure the permitted
stormwater system functions at optimum efficiency including, but not limited to:
a. Semiannual scheduled inspections (every 6 months)
b. Sediment removal
C. Mowing and revegetation of side slopes
d. Immediate repair of eroded areas
e. Maintenance of side slopes in accordance with approved plans and specifications
f. Debris removal and unclogging of outlet structure, orifice device and catch basins and piping.
5. Records of maintenance activities must be kept and made available upon request to authorized personnel of
DWQ. The records will indicate the date, activity, name of person performing the work and what actions were
taken.
This permit shall become voidable unless the facilities are constructed in accordance with the conditions of
this permit, the approved plans and specifications, and other supporting data.

7. Upon completion of construction and prior to operation of this permitted facility, a certification must be
received from an appropriate designer for the system installed certifying that the permitted facility has been
installed in accordance with this permit, the approved plans and specifications, and .other supporting
documentation. Mail the Certification to the Washington Regional Office, 943 Washington Square Mall,
Wash ington,'North Carolina; 27889, attention Division of Water Quality.
A copy of the approved plans and specifications shall be maintained on file by the Permittee for a minimum of
five years from the date of the completion of construction..
III. GENERAL CONDITIONS
This permit is not transferable. In the event there is a desire for the facilities to change ownership, or there is
a name change of the Permittee, a formal permit request must be submitted to the Division of Water Quality
accompanied by an application fee, documentation from the parties involved, and other supporting materials
as may be appropriate. The approval of this request will be considered on its merits and may or may not be
approved.
Failure to abide by the conditions and limitations contained in this permit may subject the Permittee to
enforcement action by the Division of Water Quality, in accordance with North Carolina General Statute 143-
215.6(a) to 143-215.6(c).
The issuance of this permit does not preclude the Permittee from complying with any and all statutes, rules,
regulations, or ordinances which may be imposed by other government agencies (local, state, and federal)
which have jurisdiction.
4. In the event that -the facilities fail to perform satisfactorily, including the creation of nuisance conditions, the
Permittee shall take immediate corrective action, including those as may be required by this Division, such as
the construction of additional or replacement stormwater management systems.
5. The permit may be modified, revoked and reissued or terminated for cause. The filing of a request for a
permit modification, revocation and reissuance or termination does not stay any permit condition.
6. The Permittee, at least six (6) months prior to the expiration of this permit, shall submit in writing a request for
an extension along with appropriate application fee.
7. The issuance of this permit does not preclude the Permittee from complying with any requirements contained
in the NPDES Phase it permit.
Permit issued this the 18 th day of April, 2006.
NORTH CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
fDrAlan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission
Permit Number SW7060113

Attachment A
SANDY POINT - PHASE
ONE
Allowable Impervious Coverage
LOT #
Allowable Coverage
1-4
3,000 sf
5
3,512 sf
6 - 16
3,115 sf
17 - 35
725 sf
36 - 37
1,506 sf
38
2,545 sf
39
2,316 sf
40
2,545 sf
41 - 42
2,371 sf
43 - 44
2,750 sf
45 - 51
2,316 sf
52
2,574 sf
53
1,964 sf
54 - 58
2,316 sf
59
2,454 sf
60 - 61
2,133 sf
fit
2,170 sf
63 - 64
2,708 sf
65
2,170 sf
66 - 86
2,145 sf
87
2,530 sf
88 - 92
2,444 sf
93
1,700 sf
94 - 95
1,506 sf
LOT #
Allowable Coverage
96 - 99
2,030 sf
100
2,519 sf
101 - 107
1,715 sf
108
2,519 sf
109
2,446 sf
110-113
1,656 sf
114 - 120
2,024 sf
121
2,599 sf
122 - 125
1,720 sf
127
2,085 sf
128 - 132
2,024 sf

The Fund for Sandy Point North Carolina, LLC — Sandy Point Phase One, Chowan County
Stormwater Permit No. SW7060113
Designer's Certification
I
as a duly
Registered Professional Engineer in the State of. North Carolina, having been authorized to observe
(periodically/weekly/full time)
the construction of the project,
for
(Project)
(Project Owner)
hereby state that to the best of my abilities, due care and diligence was used in the observation of the project
construction such that the construction was observed to be built within substantial compliance and intent of the
approved plans and specifications.
Signature
Registration Number
Date

04-06-2000 10:00am From-QUIBLE&ASSOCIATES 2522EII200 T-004 P-001/007 F-088
QUIBL E
ASSOCIATES, P.C.
Engineering - zllanni.cng - �Envirmamej,ta; Scleiuces L Surverini!
since 1959
FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL
TO:
IROM.
—D A TE: 16 TOTAL NUMBER OF PAGES,
-7� (incl«ding this page)
AS REQUESTED
FOR YOUR INFORMATION
FOR REVIEW AND COMMENT
l:OR CONSIDERATION AND
APPROVAL
COMMENTS:
NEED RESPONSE A,S,A,P_
PLEASE PHONE 10
DISCUSS
PLEASE SIGN AND
RETURN
PLEASE REPLY
FAX
PLEASE REPLY
MAIL
NOTICE OF CONFIDENTIALITY
The information contained in this facsimile transmittal is privileged And r-Qufidr
addressee only. If you are neither the intended rcoipient nor the employer or al
delivering this message to the intended recipient•, my disclosure of t1taS informs
you have reeeivcd this transmiltel in error, please notify thr person transmitting
immediately and return the transmission to the fine set out above immediately.
S Juniper Trail
Post Office Drawer 870
Kitty Hawk, North Carolina 27949-0870
Phone: [phone] Fair: [phone]
E-Mail: yuible@cartvtiukmet
1, and is intended for the
responsible for
is strictly prohibited_ if
infonnation

04-06-2006 10;00am From-QUIBLE&ASSOCIATES
2522611260 T-084 P,002/007 F-BOG
JGB IeA- !rl '7'r'
Quible
SrNcc rysY
SHEET NO.
OF
Quibb & Associates, R.C.
CALCULATED BY
DATE
'ckGINEERINC + ENkAPOWM .\I1L=[NC- - P.A:VNNG - SUMVING
iunlp6r Troll ■ R.O. drawor 870 ■ :Qhy Hawk NC 274d9
CHECKIM BY
DATE
ono 252-261-330D • FAX [phone] E-Moll; g1.jl*l6@3c&lInk,ret
SCALE
JJ f
QQ
C•
................
.
r
�. ...
r
.... .........
• 0
tor0/D:.
&
I.................. ........... :..1.. \/5.... .... ..- ...., ..
.......
.. ..
Q _ .. ..L N
..... ... . .....
.. .
:
�A
Ivor'
.......... .... ........ .
{
L.. ;ti �....A r :i� •: .: ... ......... .........:...
........ r 2e
64k .....
... ,_ ......... ... . ......:. .. � '...�.��' � ;
:_>r. Q,l�...:. �374 ....;.._
..........
Q!
�z
0
...... ..... ... : ... ...1
1
6
,.......:
........... .
. :._
.................. .. .. . .
... .,
I
i
.I
i
f

0446-2006 10 Mam From-GUIBLE&ASSOCIATES 2522611260 T-084 P.003/007 F-660
Quible
SINCF_J959
Quible & A55001crteS, P.C.
c,%,G �1@ErWNLi ' EWIRQPNIGNTP,. SCIENCES - "NNNG - $URVEYINC+
n1por Trail - P.Q. Drawer 670 - Kltty hawk NC 279d9
)ne 252-26y-33W , FAX [phone] v E•MQII: quibloftortNInk:not
JOB �%5"el " _E,
SHEET No. f
CALCULATED BY
CHSCKED By_
SCALE
OF
DATE
DATE
....
A
....
r. .... i ....... :. .... ...
.
... .. .. .
1 ..
I.
.....
..............:.....:................:... I .... _:....
:
...... „
�1
,2 1
L la'
I�z'x!i. P_6ra10�...
i
:
I I
I
r
l_ ..., .._... ....... ._.:................. ....
...... ....... . .. .
.. ............
...
...
.. 4 .... ........... . .. .. } ...,,
. N...... .... ' ...........
.... .. .. I
; ..... E c'r$ L�l�
I
.......
..... .. . .
L.
—
�` p.l 5...� F ......
d7.6..........t96 .......I
..........
0._.
..... .
iL
I
Q. `. ..
z: o .
"
:
s
`
i.... ...... ..:.
I
....._ . .. .. .. ...... ..
i
73 042 ...
:
._ .. ....
.. .. .: _ .. .. ...... .... .. .. i... ... ...... .. .... ...... ..
... .. ...:. ...� ....... :.. .:.. ............. ... ' ... . ............ ... ....
�� .... ... ... - ..
..,.. .... .. .. ... .... • ....,
.. . ...
..
. -.- ..-..-- .. : ... - .. :.., ....., ..rr
.. .... ..........,

04-06-2006 IO:Olam From-W BLEBASSOCIATES 2522611260 T-C84 P.004/007 F-009
Quible SINCE 1959
Assoolotes, P.C.
=.,CyM NC • !.W"NM'e4-AL SMNC: S • PLANNNG • SUrNNL\:G
%fPer TF&i • P.O. Drawer M - My Hd41k, NC 279AQ
f .ie 252-261-3300 • FAX [phone] • E-Mall: [e-mail]
JQ6
SHEET NO, OF _
CALCULATED BY DATE
CHECKED BY DATE
WALL
...... ...... '................................... :......
. .
: f
Y
.......... .:..............�f.d. [d........1...3... �..
.....
i
:........
:.,.....
..............
.................... ....
I
�i r.;..
y�e8a �d.:. ��
..._' ......................... . .. .. L=
X3 rMi '....ra f� G�
Y •
r
C G Ff.
'
.....
:.. . ; ..
VOL
........................... .......Q..-„ P .�.:...........
r( ...........
i
,..,,,....2.,,....... .......
_ ., ...... ,
.......... Q -..�.. 6.o
...... .... .... ; ........ .... -
9.�.5.
'2
6....... ;......
......
,. ,..
.................
... ...
:
1
,
_.
S
........
.
; .... I ..
I
..... _ ..... .

04-06-2006 10:01am From-" IBLE&ASSOCIATES 2522611260
T-094 P.005/007 F-009
Edit 51r, , Help
Reservoir N acne: Al A
D mription
5tnrag0 I uutb_r.I I Pill, , ], I Cl . _rtl�:, Dau. E-r�;.k.I
Method: I Elevation•Storage•Dutllow .71
Initial Elevation [fll 19.1
Elevation (Ft)
Slorage [aue•Feet]
Out#lnw [cfs]
A�
19.09
0.000000afla
�' o.aa
19.40
0.015971212
0.00
19.50
0.021437097
0.06
19.60
0.027152205
2.50
J
Graph
OK _ Apply Cancal

04-06-2006 10:02am From-W SLE&ASSOCIATES 25226112SO T-094 P.006/007 F-089
Edit _File Help
Reservoir Name' ,R J
D esc riptiory
Storage Ou'.]e`� L.F ^•d1.�
Method: ElevatimStorage-Duffow
Initial I Elevation fft) 17 E
Elevation (ft)
Storage
(acre-feet)
Oulfbw (0
7:59
0.000000000
0, Cris
17,90
0.015871212
0.00
10.00
0,027437097
0.86
1 B.1 o
0.027152205
2.50
J
Graph
0r, Apply Cancel

04-06-2006 M 02am From-QU1BLLIASSOCIATES 2522611260 T-064 P.007/007 F-069
Edit File Help
Rerrerwoir Name: 63R
Description
Storage101dia1Spi;l"vS-y1II:£'itlC4'!,=,_riC:
Method ; EIewati0h-Storage-Outflow J
Initial Elevation (fl) 15
Elevation (Pt)
(acre -Feet]
OLdIOw (Oft) .
15.15
0,000000000
0.00
15,50
0.019858815
0.00
15.30
a.C26786042
0.86
15.70
0,0338670813
2SO
Graph
0K Apply 1 Cancel

e-- (L,
.3 f 3
MAR 2 0 2006
n ' r -1
®�I�V��. - �.,'F awl
Roger Thorpe
Washington Regional Office
943 Washington Square Mall
Washington, North Carolina 27889
Enclosed are the Sandy Point independent evaluation from Tom Blue.
Mike Randall
mike.randall u,ncmail.net
919733-5083 x545

Sandy Point
Stormwater Management
Review Summary
18 January 2006
BL Land
UE]nfrastructure,p.Water
Civil Engineering Ecosystem Engineering Environmental Engineering
Environmental Consulting Geomatics Consulting
Land Planning Landscape Design

SANDY POINT • STORMWATER MANAGEMENT REVIEW SUMMARY
Contents
I. Executive Summary ................................................. I................... 3
II. Project Background......................................................................
A. Location and Setting ................. ........... .............. .............. I....... 3
B. Development Overview ........................................:...... ...... 4
III. System Review ........................................ '.................... ............. 8
IV. Discussion and Recommendations............................................................
A. Infiltration Potential................................................................. 8.
B. Permeable Pavements................................................................ 9
C. Bioretention Areas................................................................. 11
D. Eastern Project Area............................................................... 12
E. Western Project Area ....................................... ............... I......... 12
F. Performance Monitoring ......................................................... .13
G. As -Built Survey................................................................. 13
H. Performance Bonds .......... ....................
............. I .................... . 14
V. Conclusions........................................................................... 15
BLUE: Land, Water, Infrastructure Page 2 of 15

SANDY POINT • STORMWATER MANAGEMENT REVIEW SUMMARY
1. Executive Summary
The Sandy Point project is located along the northern shore of Albemarle Sound in Chowan County, at the
outlet of the Chowan River. The project site is divided by NC Highway 32 which crosses the Albemnle
Sound and the site in a generally north by northwesterly orientation. The site is approximately 930 acres and
currently primarily comprised of cultivated farm fields, managed timber stands, and various freshwater
wetlands.
Sandy Point is proposed by the real estate developer (The Fund for Sandy Point North Carolina LLC) as a
mixed use project, with a relatively high density urban waterfront subproject in the western portion and a
relatively low density residential subproject in the eastern portion.
The project is facilitated through legislation adopted by the State of North Carolina (Session Law 2004-117
of the North Carolina General Assembly). Session Law 2004-117 states: `The application far the National
Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit for stormwater management shall be reviewed
by two independent experts approved by the Department. This review shall be conducted at the expense of
the applicant. The permit shall require that the permittee establish and maintain water quality monitoring
systems and conduct water quality monitoring at the locations and in the detail'and frequency specified by
the permit." Thomas S Blue PE PLS is one of the two independent experts designated'for the project
(North Carolina State University being the other). This document summarizes the project National Pollutant
Discharge Elimination System stormwater management permit application review by Thomas S Blue PE
PLS. Detailed information has been provided by the real estate developer only for Phase I of the project, a
relatively high density residential, area comprising 26.4f acres of the 930f acre site. The real estate
developer has indicated the independent experts are to review the initial application and not review detailed
information for development of the remaining area. As such, the review of Thomas S Blue PE PLS is
gencrailx'lit nitedFto Plias_e:I}of the project as adequate review of the application is dependent_upon detailed
information_
The comments and concerns presented within this document have previously been related to the real estate
developer and associated design consultants. Except as indicated, these comments and concerns were
addressed by the design consultants and, as such, will not be elaborated upon. No assessment of impacts
from marine development (boats, harbo5 etc) was requested or undertaken.
H. Project Background
A. Location and Setting
The Sandy Point project is located along the northern shore of Albemarle Sound in Chowan County, at
the outlet of the Chowan River. The center of the site is located approximately 6 miles southeast of
downtown Edenton. A golf course is located less than a mile to the west of the project boundary and an
airport is located approximately 2 miles to the west of the project boundary. The project site is divided
by NC Highway 32 which crosses the Albemale Sound and the site in a generally north by
northwesterly orientation. The site is approximately 930 acres and currently primarily comprised of
cultivated farmm fields, managed timber stands, and various freshwater wetlands.
BLUE: Land, Water, Infrastructure Page 3 of 15

SANDY POINT • STORMWATER MANAGEMENT REVIEW SUMMARY
B.. Development Overview I
Figure II-1. Phase One Schematic (outlined) with Topographic Relief
The real estate developer has stated the project will proceed in phases. Only the first project phase has
been delineated. This phase is located within a strip of land on the western edge of site. This phase is
proposed as a relatively high density residential area comprising 26.4± acres. Phase I extends generally
from NC Highway 94 southward to an area adjoining the western edge of the excavated inland harbor.
A 3.1± acre stormwater management measure is also planned to be constructed north of NC Highway
94 during Phase I. This phase is depicted in Figure H-1.
The residential area of Phase I is located on the highest elevations of the site, with the possible
exception of a residential area between the adjoining excavated inland harbor and Albemarle Sound. The
soils in the Phase I area are mapped as Chapanoke silt loam and Yeopim loam, with Chapanoke
comprising most of the area. The slopes in the Phase I area generally in the 0% to 2% range. Average
annual high water table in this area is near the surface, with probable deaths of 0.5 feet to 3.0 feet. Soil
infiltration limited in this area by fines a . The Phase Iarea generally presents fewer
challenges and less obstacles to implementation of an infiltration focused strrnwater management
system than other areas of the proposed Sandy Point development.
BLUE: Land, Water, Infrastructure Page 4 of 15

SANDY POINT • STORMWATER MANAGEMENT REVIEW SUMMARY
Ill. System Review
The stormwater management system review by Thomas S Blue PE PLS focused on 4 aspects: 1) hydrologic
and hydraulic analysis; 2) treatment train configuration; 3) likelihood of success; and 4) overal I. expected
performance. Thomas Blue assessed information provided by the real estate developer and associated
design consultants and provided guidance on analysis and design of the project. Thomas Blue directly stated
any recommendation was to be taken as such and not as a requirement. The intent was to provide analysis
and design guidance while remaining an objective reviewer.
The hydrologic and hydraulic analysis of the design consultants was split into two components: 1) a
stormwater response simulation facilitated through application of the HEC-HMS modeling system (US
Army Corps of Engineers link -node watershed model); and 2) a subsurface recharge response simulation
facilitated'through application of the Visual MODFLOW modeling system (Waterloo Hydrogeologic
implementation of USGS firite difference model). The stormwater infiltration potential and subsurface
hydraulic conductivity are the most important parameters in this analysis. As the surface (HEC-HMS) and
subsurface (Visual MODFLOW) response models were not directly linked, a "failure analysis"
methodology was undertaken to assess the limits of desired system performance. The failure analysis
indicated the stormwater management system proposed for Phase I of Sandy Point will function very well if
mai
The treatment train for Phase I of Sandy Point was well conceived and well proposed. It includes multiple
steps in the stormwater flow path, providing system redundancy and a variety of mechanisms for treatment
of stormwater.
The likelihood of successful implementation of the proposed stormwater management system depends upon
close collaboration of the designer and the contractors during construction operations, enforcement of
design parameters, and lon& term assurance of system functions through inspection and associated
maintenance if required). The stormwater management systan is expected to be successfully implemented
if relevant entities are informed and educated about the system, the system is constructed as per the design,
changes are not made to the system after construction which diminish the system functions, and damage to
the system is correctly repaired. This is easily achievable with relatively minor effort and expense if properly
addressed.
The stormwater management system for Phase I of Sandy Point is integrated into the overall infrastructure
of the site. As with any built structure, there are many possibilities for problems and for a wide range of
performance outcomes. That having been stated, the stormwater management system proposed for Phase I
of Sandy Point is expected to function very well if constructed and maintained according to the design,
exceeding applicable regulatory performance requirements.
IV. Discussion and Recommendations
A. Infiltration Potential
The primary factor governing the stormwater management system success is the long term infiltration
potential of the ground. This includes any surface proposed to infiltrate stormwater. Permeable
pavements and bioretention areas are primary stormwater management components proposed for Sandy
Point. Both f t Qgt�omyonent types are fundamentallylenendent upon ground infiltration potential.
SLUE: Land, Water, Infrastructure Page 8 of 15

SANDY POINT • STORMWATER MANAGEMENT REVIEW SUMMARY
B. Permeable Pavements ..
Permeable pavements have the potential to significantly reduce stormwater runoff from traffic surfaces.
Permeable pavements are also highly susceptible to surface sealing and pore clogging. Pore clogging, in
particular, is difficult to remedy as the pavement system generally must be removed and replaced.
re ention of surface sealing and pore clogging depends on regular maintenance and prevention of
damaging su s ance spit s. etro eu s of s an greases ave a high po en is o seal
Airfaces and cog pores. Permeable pavements are high maintenance systems with a high potential for
hydraulic failure.
Figure IV-1. Coastal North Carolina Permeable Pavement Demonstration Site
A demonstration site for permeable pavement is shown in Figure IV-1. This is a small parking lot with a
very low traffic loading (less than 3 vehicles per week, generally single family type vehicles). Two
failure types are evident in this photograph. An approximately 100 square feet area has experienced
excessive differential settlement relative to other areas of the parking lot. This is most likely due to
improper compaction during construction or piping (pore erosion) of base/subbase materials after
construction. These are structural failures, not hydraulic failures - though these failures involved a
hydraulic mechanism. Hydraulic failures are improper hydraulic functioning of the permeable paver
BLUE: Land, Water, Infrastructure Page 9 of 15

SANDY POINT - STORMWATER MANAGEMENT REVIEW SUMMARY
system (primarily inadequate infiltration). Evidence of piping with subsequent_settlement at the parking
lot corner can be seen in the lower right corner of Figure IV- 1..
A full structural failure is shown in Figure IV72. This occurred during a single heavy precipitation event
less than one week after the Figure IV -I photograph was taken. The piping evident at the parking lot
corner in Figure IV-1 proceeded during the precipitation event, resulting -in this failure. Structural
failures due to piping requires adequate energy gradient beween the driving water surface and the
outlet water surface. Given the relatively flat terrain at Sandy Point, this is an unlikely scenario in most
locations. Permeable pavement installations adjacent to harbor bulkheads, retaining wed relatively
steep slopes are potential areas for such failures at Sandy Point.
Figure IV-2. Structural Failure of Permeable Pavement
Permeable pavement systems cost more to install than conventional pavement systems, cost much more
to maintain than conventional pavement systems, and are much more difficult and expensive to repair
when damaged than conventional pavement systems. Repair of failed systems generally involves
complete removal of the failed area as well as removal of adjacent adequately functioning pavement for
tie-in. Repair to permeable pavement may be required even when the system is functioning properly.
This occurs when subsurface utilities, such as sanitary sewer collection and potable water supply, below
the permeable pavement are excavated. Conventional pavement can be readily repaired at minimal cost
BLUE: Land, Water, Infrastructure Page 10 of 15

SANDY POINT • STORMWATER MANAGEMENT REVIEW SUMMARY
using standard patching procedures when this occurs. When permeable pavement must be patched,
issues such as locating and matching paver type, texture, and color arise. Patching the area with asphalt
or concrete may occur, defeating the purpose for implementing permeable pavement.
Thomas S Blue PE PLS does not recommend the use of permeable pavement in areas where there is a
significant po entia or surface sea inf4 or pore cloggin . This includes roadways and par mg ots with
regular traffic loading exceeding 10 vehicles per day, irrespective of vehicular weight, and also includes
areas which are exposed to heavy loadings of fine particles (such as clay, silt, and dust). Permeable
pavements are generally suitable and recommended for dedicated pedestrian pathways. Permeable
pavements which incorporate course aggregate or vegetation (eg grass) between pavers is generally
recommended over continuous asphalt or concrete material applications. The majority of permeable
pavement proposed for Phase I of Sandy Point will require reguar maintenance to perform as per the
design intent. It is the opinion of Thomas Blue that any stormwater system that requires regular
maintenance is almost certain to fail and generally fail on a regular basis. The more_dependent a system
is upon maintenance the higher the probability of such failure. This was related by Thomas Blue to the
developer of Sandy Point and relevant associated consultants on several occasions during the
stormwater management design process.
C. Bioretention Areas
The bioretention areas are the most important component for success of the Sandy Point Phase I
stormwater management system. The bioretention areas proposed for Phase I of Sandy Point appear
adequately designed. The proposed bioretention locations are well distributed across Phase I, dispersing
concentrated stormwater recharge in a manner which reduces soil water mounding. Analysis was
undertaken by project consultants to assess subsurface hydraulic recharge response relative to expected
soil water parameter modifications (localized changes to hydraulic conductivity, soil porosity, and other
relevant variables).
Native vegetation is proposed throughout Sandy Point, with the exception of grass turf in specific areas
(no native grasses form a turf cover). Both native vegetation and turf are proposed for bioretention
areas. Zoysia grass and Centipede grass have been recommended wherever turf is to be employed.
Zoysia does not require significant chemical application and is tolerant of heavy traffic, but is often
susceptible to diseases and is slow growing. Cutting this grass with reel mowers is recommended to
reduce disease occurrence. Periodic aeration and thatching may be necessary to maintain a healthy turf
cover. Centipede requires very little, if any, chemical application (exces4ertilization can kill Centipede).
It is very low maintenance, grows well in moderate shade to full sun, and is moderately drought
tolerant, but does not tolerate traffic well. Zoysia is proposed by the designers for Phase I of Sandy
Point. Zoysia is recommended for high traffic areas. Centipede is recommended for low traffic areas.
Establishment ealthy root matrix „and associated "topsoil" formation is key to developing and
maintaining proper infiltration potential. It is recommended that inspection of bioretention areas as well
as any associated maintenance focus on these factors.
The bioretention areas proposed for Phase I of Sandy Point are not expected to require regular
maintenance to perform as per the design intent. Regular maintenance may be required to obtain the
visual character desired.
BLUE: Land, Water, Infrastructure Page 11 of 15

SANDY POINT • STORMWATER MANAGEMENT REVIEW SUMMARY
D. Eastern Project Area. .
Conflicting information regarding the eastern project area is presented in Sandy Point development
documents. The Sandy Point Charrette Report states, "There will not be any boat docks or piers
erected out over Albemarle Sound from the Sandy Point development. Although such docks and piers
are a common practice in eastern North Carolina, they are frowned upon by environmental regulators
and are, quite simply, aesthetically unappealing. Boating activity at Sandy Point,'then, will be
centered on our upland harbors." The current master site plan indicates five piers are proposed for
Sandy Point extending from the shoreline approximately I 10 feet to 515 feet onto Albemarle Sound.
Two of these five piers are proposed for the eastern project area.
The Sandy Point Charrette Report also states, "On both the east and west sides of Sandy Point, then,
Albemarle Sound beaches are open for all to enjoy." The current master site plan indicates lots
adjoining the Albemarle Sound shoreline are proposed along approximately 73% of the Sound
waterfront in the eastern project area. These 2roposed lots would see to -promote docks over
Albemarle Sound (and restrict beaches from being `bpen for all to enjoy").
A significant portion of jurisdictional wetlands arc included within eastern project area proposed lots.
These wetlands are primarily located along the rear lot boundaries.
Lots proposed along Albemarle Sound slope towards the shoreline. Proposed lots with wetlands along
their rear boundaries appear to slope towards the wetlands. These situations present stormwater
management challenges., Individual stormwater management features will likely need to be located
within easements in the rear of the lots. Building setbacks and in&idual lot grading will need to take
stormwater management features into consideration. It is recommended that site plans be required for
all lot construction. These plans should include detailed grading and landscape features and be prepared
by a board certified engineer, landscape architect, or land surveyor licensed to practice in North
Carolina. These site plans should be submitted to a third party board certified engineer licensed to
practice in North Carolina for review and approval. This engineer should not be associated with the real
estate developer or design consultants and should be fully indepindent of any interest in the
development. It is recommended that at least two counties should be located between any office of the
engineer and Sandy Point (Chowan County).
E. Western Project Area
As with the eastern project area, conflicting information regarding the western project area is presented
in Sandy Point development documents. Lots adjoining the Albemarle Sound shoreline are proposed
along approximately 12% of the Sound waterfront in the western project area. Three piers are proposed
for the western project area. The Sandy Point Charrette Report states, "And nestled up against the
wetlands on the west side of Sandy Point are large, woodland lots that further add to the diversity of
the housing stock on this side of SR 32. " No large woodland lots are proposed in this area on the
current site master plan.
The development character of the remaining western project area outside Phase I is proposed to be very
similar in nature to that of Phase 1. Extension -of the proposed stormwater management system into the
remaining western project area is expected to focus on permeable pavements and distributed
bioretention areas.
BLUE: Land, Water, Infrastructure Page 12 of 15

SANDY POINT • STORMWATER MANAGEMENT REVIEW SUMMARY
F
24
G infiltration ential and subsurface rR
area will likely be lower, possibly significantl
ana ysis of soil water mounding anTTateral se
for Phase I.
har e along the eastern portion of the western project
lower, than such in the -Phase 1 area_ A more otailed
Attention should be given to prevention of pollutant short-circuiting from bioretention areas to adjacent
surface waters in the proposed residential area between the adjoining excavated inland harbor and
Albemarle Sound. The proximity and elevation difference of expected bioretention areas to adjacent
surface waters is analogous to the situation with the proposed excavated inland harbor relative to
proposed bioretention area A30. As with bioretention area A30, bottom grades should slope away from
surface waters.
Performance Monitoring
The proposed stormwater management'system is intended to facilitate infiltration of the entire water
volume from the majority of precipitation events. This is a system, then, that is intended to produce
surface water discharge only during relatively large and infrequent preipitation events.
To assess the proposed stormwater management system performance, monitoring should focus on
subsurface measurements. It is recommended that a serie mnnjtnrinu we e11 he installed along
transects between stormwater management measures and adjacent surface waters. Samples should be
taken from wells and the adjacent surface waters at intervals following precipitation events. Samples
should be analyzed for nitrogen, phosphorous, two metals representative of urban runoff pollutants, and
two hydrocarbons representative of urban runoff pollutants. At least six event sample sets should be
obtained and analyzed eac r.
It is recommended that at least three precipitation gauges should also be installed across the site. These
should be alitomatic recording tipTin bucket type gauges. It is also recommended that at least two
water level recorder4 be installed to mensuze thp Albemarle Sound water level. Multiple moitoring
stations are necessary for data comparison and adequate measurement system redundancy.
Those undertaking monitoring for the project should take care to regularly inspect the monitoring
equipment. Monitoring equipment is often damaged or fouled by animals and storms. Equipment can
also fail for other reasons. Data can only be considered for use when it is known that the recordng
equipment was operating properly.
As -Built Survey
It is unfortunately the case that "as -built" or "record" drawings of construction prepared by engineers
are often significantly erroneous Discrepancies between these drawings and what actually was
constructed in the field can be significant. Observed examples of this include sanitary sewer collection
extensions shown with a positive grade on "as -built" drawings while actually constructed with a
negative grade; potable water supply mains and associated appurtenances shown as installed on
"as -built" drawings while actually not having been constructed; sanitary sewer collection extensions
shown as installed on "as -built" drawings while actually not havig been constructed; and potable water
supply mains shown along the design alignment on "as -built" drawings while actually having been
constructed more than twenty feet away. An "as -built" is not truly representative of what has been
BLUE: Land, Water, Infrastructure Page 13 of 15

SANDY POINT • STORMWATER MANAGEMENT REVIEW SUMMARY
constructed unless site conditions have been determined by a field survey during construction (for
subsurface structures) and after construction is fully competed.
It is strongly recommended that an "as -built" map should be prepared from a full topographic survey of
the construction area by a board certified land surveyor licensed to practhe in North Carolina. This land
surveyor should not be associated with the real estate developer or design consultants and should be
fully independent of any interest in the development. It is recommended that at least two counties
should be located between any office of the land suHeyor and Sandy Point (Chowan County).
The "as -built" survey and associated map should include all elements indicated on the
construction/design plans as well as other prominent physical surface features, subsurface utilities,
vegetation (including all planted stock as well as dense vegetation groupings), drainage features, above
ground utilities, as well as legal and regulatory boundaries (lots, zoning, easements, setbacks, wetlands,
hazards, etc). The map should include contours at one-half foot intervals and appropriate spot
elevations to depict the land surface elevations. Electronic copies of the map should be submitted to the
NC Department of Environment & Natural Resource (NCDENR) officials and placed on the NCDENR
Division of Water Quality (DWQ) World Wide Web (W3) site for public access (download). Electronic
copies of the map should be submitted as Portable Document Format (PDF) and Drawing eXchange ..
Format (DXF) files, both open source formats. All associated field point data should also be submitted
in electronic format to NCDENR officials and placed on the NCDENR DWQ W3 site for public access
(download). Electronic copies of the field data should be submitted as standard comma delimited ASCII
text files (with header line) including point number, casting, northing, elevation, and descriptor
(N,X,Y,Z,D) followed by a carriage return. (CR) after each point entry. All spatial information should be
at State Plane Coordinates (NAD83ft and NVGD88ft).
An accurate "as -built" survey and associated map are critical for performance monitoring and permit
enforcement.
H. Performance Bonds
A significant percentage of residential real estate development projects fail and many of these fail
repeatedly under multiple ownerships. This is particularly the case with planned amenity focused .
communities (eg equestrian communities, golf communitas, lake communities). It is also the case that
the individuals inspecting and maintaining site facilities, especially stormwater management systems,
often do not have an understanding of the system being inspected and maintained. Key requirements for
proper system functioning may be completely unknown to these individuals, especially as staff turnover
in these positions is often frequent and stormwater management is generally given much lower priority
than other duties. A "wait until broken to fix" approach to stormwater management will almost certainly
result in considerable problems with the proposed function of the system.
It is strongly recommended that performance bonds be required for all project stormwater
components of e project. The performance bonds should allow a designated responsible third party
(fully independent of any interest in the developmert) to fully implement all necessary maintenance and
repairs. Clear provisions for enforcement of performance bond provisions in a timely manner is
especially important as is a facility closure clause.
BLUE: Land, Water, Infrastructure Page 14 of 15

SANDY POINT • STORMWATER MANAGEMENT REVIEW SUMMARY
V. Conclusions
The stormwater management system proposed for Phase I of Sandy Point is expected to function very well
if constructed and maintained according to the design, exceeding applicable regulatory performance
requirements. Beyond the discussion and recommendations presented, Thomas S Blue PE P1S finds no
deficit in the system design. Thomas Blue recommends approval of the Phase I stormwater management
plan contingent upon compliance with applicable local, state, and federal regulations.
It is the opinion of Thomas Blue that detailed engineering review, inspection, certification, monitoring, and
enforcement of all development on the site is needed to ensure the project is implemented correctly, This
includes all development proposed at the project site, not just limited to Phase I. Phase I is the only portion
of the proposed development for which detailed work has been presented for review.
The current master site plan conflicts with information provided in the Sandy Point Charrette Report. The
Sandy Point Charrette Report may have influenced project public opinion. It is the opinion of Thomas Blue
that the public should be notified that conflicting information has been presented by the real estate
developer.
COPY FROM ELECTRONICALLY TRANSMITTED DOCUMENT
This document originally issued and sealed
by
Thomas S Blue PE (023498) PLS (L4093)
on
2006 January 18.
This medium shall not be considered a certified document.
BLUE: Land, Water, Infrastructure Page 15 of 15

,-#Quible SINCE 1959
Quible &Associates, P.C.
ENGINEERING - ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES - PLANNING - SURVEYING
8 Juniper Trail - P.O. Drawer 8 ' 70 - Kitty Hawk. NC 27949
Phone [phone] - FAX [phone] - E-Mall: [e-mail]
JOB IRC91-- r"Pijr Tfeei, Tahn
SHEET NO.
OF
CALCULATED BY IAD DATE
CHECKED BY DATE
SCALE
. ......... . ........... ............ ........... ........... ........................... ...... .... ........... .. ........ . ........... .......... . ....
....... ... --R ME RVE, D:

SHEET NO. .Z OF
1.
f Q u A b l e SINCE 1959
CALCULATED BY DAD DATE
CHECKED BY DATE
SCALE
Quible & Associates, P.C.
ENGINEERING • ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES • PLANNING - SURVEYING
8 Juniper Frail • P.0. Drawer 870 • Kitty Hawk, NC 27949
Phone [phone] • FAX [phone] • E-Mail: [e-mail]
... ..... ......

i Q u i b l e SINC81959
Quible & Associates, P.C.
ENGINEERING • ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES • PLANNING • SURVEYING
8 Juniper Trail • P,O. Drawer 870 • Kitty Hawk, NC 27949
Phone [phone]DO • FAX [phone] • E-Mail: quibleCearthlink,net
JOB 031LYiT C1
SHEET NO.
OF
CALCULATED BYNn DATE
CHECKED BY
SCALE
DATE

DWQ/WARD Fex :252--`=+46-921S
A-4- Tr are rri i t Co of _ Report**
P. 1 Mar 8 ' 07 11: 42
Telephone Number
Mode
Start
Time
Pages
Result
Note
919193612269
NORMAL
8911:>9
2,18"
Q
* O K
AF�
NCDENR
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
WASHINGTON REGIONAL OFFICE
WASHIT;GTON, N-C. 27889
Phone:[phone] FAX:[phone]
TO: A' rA_
FAX NO. 3 .2 Ce
FROM:�fQ��
DATE; 3
NO. OF PAGES (INCLUDING COVER): S
COMMENTS:
L a
0-ru �� f�a
�-� c/q—
� �,

rSW7�601i3
" ­Z=R1ft9'U=d tr =' OFFICE USE ONLY
Date Rece' d
Fee Paid
Permit plumber
AUG 005
J 'V AR0 State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources SvMck 10-5
Division of Water Quality
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PERMIT APPLICATION FORM
This form may he photocopied for use as an original H L C E �
I. GENERAL INFORMATION JAN 1 7 2006
1. Applicants name (specify the name of the corporation, individual, etc. who owns the project): DWQ-lII ARO
The Fund for Sandy Point North Carolina, LLC
2. Print Owner/Signing Official's name and title (person legally responsible for facility and compliance):
Sam Young, President a k� E
3, Mailing Address for person listed in item 2 above: 313/14'
1023 SW 25th Avenue '7 2— 3t !h ► i« ., fi 3 0
City: Miami State: FL'' n/ c_ Zip: 33135 2 '7
Telephone Number: ( 305 ) 644-1023 .,7- s z — 4 Fr2 —
4. Project Name (subdivision, facility, or establishment name - should be consistent with project name on plans,
specifications, letters, operation and maintenance agreements, etc.):
Sandv Point, Phase One
5. Location of Project (street address):
Phase One is located to the South of NCSR 1114, approximately 4,100 ft. Southwest
of tTie—in ersec on��TC SKIL14nd 3�
City: County: Chowan
6. Directions to project (from nearest major intersection):
Phase One is located to the South of NCSR 1114, approximately 4,100 ft. Southwest
of the intersection of NC SR 1114 and 32
7. Latitude: N 36' 57.5'
Longitude: W 76' 44.5'
of project
8. Contact person who can answer questions about the project:
Name: David A. Deel, P.E. Telephone Number: ( 252 ) 261-3300
II, PERMIT INFORMATION:
1. Specify whether project is (check one): X New
i\ Form SWU-101 Version 3.99 page I of 4
Renewal Modification

2. If this application is being submitted as the result of a renewal or modification to an existing permit, list the
existing permit number and its issue date (if known)
3. Specify the type of project (check one):
Low Density X High Density Redevelop General Permit Other
4. Additional Project Requirements (check applicable blanks):
X CAMA Major X Sedimentation/Erosion Control 404/401 Permit NPDES Stormwater
Information on required stage permits can he obtained by contacting the Customer Service Center at
1-877-623-6748.
III. PROJECT INFORMATION
1. In the space provided below, surnmarize how stormwater will be treated. Also attach a detailed narrative
(one to two pages) describing stormwater management for the project.
Stormwater will be treated via distributed infiltration trenches (under roadway) with
secondary (overflow) treatment via wet basin and bioretention/filtration
2. Stormwater runoff from this project drains to the
3. Total Project Area: 27,16 acres
5. How many drainage areas does the project have? 4
Pasquotank River basin.
4. Project Built Upon Area: 47.1 %
6. Complete the following information for each drainage area. If there are more than two drainage areas in the
project, attach an additional sheet: with the information for each area provided in the same format as below.
Basin Information
Drainage Area I
Drainage Area 2
Receiving Stream Name
Receiving Stream Class
SEE ATTACHED TABLE
Drainage Area
Existing Impervious* Area
Proposed Impervious*Area
% Impervious* Area (total)
Impervious` Surface Area
Drainage Area I I
Drainage Area 2
On -site Buildings
On -site Streets
On -site Parking
SEE ATTACHED TABLE
On -site Sidewalks
Other on -site
Off -site
Total:
Total:
* Impervious area is defined as the built upon area including, but not limited to, buildings, roads, parking areas,
sidewalks, gravel areas, etc.
Form SWU-101 Version 3.99 Page 2 of

7. How was the off -site impervious area listed above derived? AutoCad Area Routine
IV. DEED RESTRICTIONS AND PROTECTIVE COVENANTS
The following italicized deed restrictions and protective covenants are required to be recorded for all
subdivisions, out parcels and future development prior to the sale of any lot. If lot sizes vary significantly, a table
listing each lot number, size and the allowable built -upon area for each lot must be provided as an attachment.
L The following covenants are intended to ensure ongoing compliance with state stormwater management permit number
as issued by the Division of Water Quality. These covenants may riot be
changed or deleted without the consent of the State.
2. No more than square feet of any lot shall be covered by structures or impervious materials,
Impervious materials include asphalt, gravel, concrete, brick, stone, slate or similar material but do riot include wood
decking or the water surface of swimrrring pools.
3. Swales shall not be filled in, piped, or altered except as necessary to provide driveway crossings.
4. Built -upon area in excess of the permitted amount requires a state stormwater management permit modification prior to
construction.
5. All permitted runoff from outparcels or future development shall be directed into the permitted storrrrwater control
system. These connections to the stornrrvater control system shall be performed in a manner that maintains the integrity
and performance of the system as permit ted.
By your signature below, you certify that the recorded deed restrictions and protective covenants for this project
shall include all the applicable items required above, that the covenants will be binding on all parties and persons
claiming under them, that they will run with the land, that the required covenants cannot be changed or deleted
without concurrence from the State, and that they will he recorded prior to the sale of any lot.
V. SUPPLEMENT FORMS
The applicable state stormwater management permit supplement: forni(s) listed below must be submitted for each
BMP specified for this project. Contact the Stormwater and General Permits Unit at [phone] for the status
and availability of these forms.
Form SWU-I0Z
Wet Detention Basin Supplement
Form SWU-103
Infiltration Basin Supplement
Form SWU-104
Low Density Supplement
Form SWU-105
Curb Outlet System Supplement
Form SWU-106
Off -Site System Supplement.
Form SWU-107
Underground Infiltration Trench Supplement
Form SWU-108
Neuse River Basin Supplement
Form SWU-109
Innovative Best Management Practice Supplement
Form SWU-101 Version 3.99 Page 3 of 4

}� VI.� SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS
Only complete application packages will be accepted and reviewed by the Division of Water Quality (DWQ).
A complete package includes all of the items listed below. The complete application package should be
submitted to the appropriate DWQ Regional Office.
1. Please indicate that you have provided the following required information by initialing in the space provided
next to each item.
Initials
• Original and one copy of the Stormwater Management Permit Application Form
• One copy of the applicable Supplement Form(s) for each BMP
• Permit application processing fee of $420 (payable to NCDENR)
• Detailed narrative description of stormwater treatment/management
• Two copies of plans and specifications, including:
- Development/Project name
- Engineer and firm
-Legend
- North arrow
- Scale
- Revision number & date
- Mean high water line
- Dimensioned property/project boundary
_ Location map with named streets or NCSR numbers
- Original contours, proposed contours, spot elevations, finished floor elevations
- Details of roads, drainage features, collection systems, and stormwater control measures
- Wetlands delineated, or a note on plans that none exist
- Existing drainage (including off -site), drainage easements, pipe sizes, runoff calculations
Drainage areas delineated
- Vegetated buffers (where required)
VII. AGENT AUTHORIZATION
If you wish to designate authority to another individual or firm so that they may provide information on your
behalf, please complete this section.
Designated agent (individual or firm): -
Mailing Address: PO Drawer 870
City: Kitty Hawk
Phone:( 252 ) 261-3300
Quible & Associates, P.C.
State: NC Zip: 27949
Fax: ( 252 ) 261-1260
VIII. APPLICANT'S CERTIFICATION c
1, (print or type name of person listed in General Information, item 2) J �U A
certify that the information included on this permit application form is, to the b st of my kn wledge, correct and
that the project will be constructed in conformance with the approved plans, that the required deed restrictions
and protective covenants will be recorded, and that the proposed project complies with the requirements of 15A
NCAC 21-4.1000.
Signatu
Date:
Form S WU- l 0l Version 3.99 Page 4 of 4

CI
Basin Information
Drainage Area A
Drainage Area B
Drainage Area C
Drainage Area D
Receiving Stream Name
Albemarle Sound
Albemarle Sound
Unnamed Tributary to
Albemarle Sound
Unnamed Tributary to
Albemarle Sound
Receiving Stream Class
SB
SB
SB
SB
Drainage Area
12.97 Ac.
1.88 Ac.
3.24 Ac.
9.07 Ac.
Existing Impervious* Area
0 Ac.
0 ac.
0 Ac.
0 Ac.
Proposed Impervious*Area
5.96 Ac.
0.95 Ac.
1.72 Ac.
4.16 Ac.
% Impervious* Area (total)
46.0%
50.5%
53.1 %
45.9%
Impervious* Surface Area
Drainage Area A
Drainage Area B
Drainage Area C
Drainage Area D
On -site Buildings
2.53 Ac.
0.56 Ac.
0.97 Ac.
1.92 Ac.
On -site Streets
2.50 Ac.
0.24 Ac.
0.49 Ac.
1.59 Ac.
On -site Parking
-
-
-
-
On -site Sidewalks
0.93 Ac.
0.15 Ac.
0.26 Ac.
0.65 Ac.
Other on -site
-
-
-
-
Off -site
-
-
-
-
Total: 5.96 Ac.
Total: 0.95 Ac.
Total: 1.72 Ac.
Total: 4.16 Ac.

Quible
Quible & Associates, P.C.
ENGINEERING • ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES • PLANNING - SURVEYING
SINCE 1959
March 9, 2006
Mr. Roger Thorpe
NC Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
943 Washington Square Mall
Washington, North Carolina 27889
RECEIVED
MAR 13 2006
DWQ-WARQ
Re: State Stormwater Permit Application (SW Project SW7050836)
Sandy Point - Phase One
Dear Mr. Thorpe:
P.O. Drawer 870
Kitty Hawk, NC 27949
Phone:[phone]
Fax: [phone]
PRINCIPALS
Sean C, Boyle, P.E.
Joseph S. Lassiter. C.E.P.
Eduardo J. ValdIvIeso. P.E.
ASSOCIATES
Joseph J. Anlauf, P.E.
Katherine C, Marchello, P.L.S.
As per our phone conversation today, enclosed, please find four revised Infiltration `french Supplements
(Drainage Areas A - D) to replace the Infiltration 'french Supplements originally submitted with the
application package. As per our discussion, these supplements are revised to re -calculate the average trench
width and re -tabulate trench volume provided. Supporting tabulations / calculations are also attatched for your
reference.
Also enclosed with this package, please find an allowable coverage per lot table. The coverage provided in
this table reflects the coverage utilized in the stonnwater model.
At your earliest convenience, please review the enclosed information and call me at [phone] with any
questions or comments. Thank you for your assistance with this project.
Sincerely,
t
ible & s ociid A. eel, PE
Encl: As stated
CC: Sam Young, The Fund for Sandy Point North Carolina

Quible
Quible & Associates, P.C.
ENGINEERING • ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES • PLANNING • SURVEYING RECEIVED
SINCE 1959
BAN 1 7 2001r6
January 13, 2006
Mr. Bill Moore DWQ-WARQ
NC Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
943 Washington Square Mall
Washington, North Carolina 27889
Re: State Stormwater Permit Application (SW Project SW7050836)
Sandy Point - Phase One
Dear Mr. Moore:
P.O. Drawer B70
Kitty Hawk, NC 27949
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
PRINCIPALS
Sean C. Boyle, P.E.
Joseph S. Lasslter. C.E.P.
Eduardo J. Voldivieso. P.E.
ASSOCIATES
Joseph J, Anlauf, P.E.
Katherine C. Morchello, P.L.S.
The enclosed application was previously submitted and returned to us due to the environmental assessment
process not being complete. We have now received a FONSI and hereby re- submit this application
package for your review.
As per our discussions, a separate NPDES Stormwater Permit Application Package for the entire Sandy
Point development has been forwarded to Bradley Bennett for his review and processing.
Enclosed with this cover letter, please find a submission package consisting of the following:
• Review Fee Check in the amount of $420.00
• Two Copies of Stormwater Management Pennit Application and Supplements
• Two Copies of Stormwater Narrative and Calculations
• Two Copies of soils reports and groundwater mounding analysis
• Two Sets of Phase One Construction Plans (24" x 36")
Recognizing that the material provided in the narrative is lengthy, I would be happy to come to your office
to provide a walk-through of the design concept and methods. Please call me if you think this would be
beneficial. At your earliest convenience, please review the enclosed documents and contact me at (252)261-
3300 with questions or comments.
Sincerely,
Q 'ble & -oci es, P.C.
David A. eel, E
Encl: As stated
CC: Sam Young, The Fund for Sandy Point North Carolina

P031 78—PH 1 —DEL. DWG
-�-
I
_ BENNETT'S COURT
(R/W VARIES)
`I
1
,
1
I 20
1.
21 22
1
!
� I
24 23
�
25
'f
JACOBS COURT
!
(R/W VARIES)
f +
; 26
! !
LIMITS i
27 j
I 28
OF PHASE 1 !
;
%
(TYP.) '
--- -
BED
1
1
!
!
f
30 29
1
31 +
1
;f
�---1
• i e4
-
— _ _ FLETCHER COURT
!
1
(R/W VARIES)
,
32
33 ---�
A
34 35 j
1
1
r
!
e
i.
RECEIVED
MAR 13 2006
PW-Q-W-ARO
Quible SINCE 1959
& Associates, P.C.
ENGINEERING * CONSULTING * PLANNING
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES * SURVEYING
Phone: (252) 261 —3300
Fax: [phone]
E—Mail: [e-mail]
j -54
72
I
71
5 5
I
7'
a
i 56
69
57
1
68
58
67
j
59
+
66
m
- _Ji
I
60
61
62
SHEET 1 OF 2
j 158
f 159
160
if 161
162
\` 164
r \ 163
t1 \
/ 100
101
H*RE5
'\ 102
�5
j 99
103
j 96 97 9S \ y 5y
5(5f1f �• 5 a
5 fll
1a4 • ;
105
BAY LANE R W VARIES '= 106ii,
J 107
1 ll5 ll4 ll3 ll2 111 110
4,
,U
Cr]
n-- --- -- ----- - 7 ----- -----
f*I
121
116 117�
118 •" '
ll9 120
122
123 i
1 � 1
STELLAR BAY LANE R W VARIES 124 !'
a 125''` !
132 131 130 129 128 j 126
',
j
m 127 C`
WOOD STREET (R/W VARIES) ,I
M`11.'

P03178—PH 1—DEL. DWG
Quible .SINCE 1959------------�--`_ J
& Associates, P.C.
ENGINEERING * CONSULTING * PLANNING
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES * SURVEYIN
Phone: [phone]
Fox: [phone]
E—Mail: [e-mail] �.
LIMITS
OF PHASE i
(TYP.)
r ---'
im
Z1cm
C'
O
Ell[
1
+ l
r
I
I:+
sr.• 2 ,
r I
i
.r
.IBC I
3 I
r
I
1 4
r
r
r
r 5
I
r
6 1
1
r I
7
r
I
rl 8
r
r�
9
r�t I
Irki:.
I
r
10 i
(Ir I
oil
+ 11 I
Ell.
+ 12
r '
i I
1
13
rli I I
r
14 j
+ 15 II
X
j.,., 16
r-`---J
� I
19 18 17
r
r,
BENNE7"T'S COURT
pr (R/W VARIES)
C+ j,
i 20 — J
I
21 22
r I
I
I ..,. 942
;w
I
95
I
37 94
93 I1
I ,
38
j + I 92
I
j 39 j
I 91
r
I I I
1 I 40 90
f
I �
I I
L__ 89
41 I
i 88
I
I ,
I , I
42
I � 87 j
L---------------J I~_
43 j' 86 J a
I
I
I � I
I I I
85
Y�F
AA I I
I
$4 j �z
I I(nR
uu1�45r , I
83
1
I
I
8
46 2
I
I
j
47 1 I
I I I
l
I so I
48
I 79
I
I I I
49 I
78
I '
- I I
ti
I 50 '� 77 I
4
4 '
I r�I
I 51 I, j 76 F;�}
I 'S
I � I
75 j
jC
I
I ?y
52 4 I
I I 74 I
S3 73
I
4-.
IL I 1
I
54 I 72 j
I j Ilr
jii� Irl,
ss
71 1
� � ,
1
I,
I I
SHEET 2 OF 2
146
147
I 148
149
150
I
i 151
152
-~�_-153--
154
155
I
156
157
158
159
160

SANDY POINT - PHASE
ONE
Allowable Impervious Coverage
LOT #
Allowable Covera >e
1 - 4 .
3,000 sf
5
3,512 sf
6 - 16
3,115 sf
17 - 35
725 sf
36 - 37
1,506 sf
38
2,545 sf
39
2,316 sf
40
2,545 sf
41 - 42
2,371 sf
43 - 44
2,750 sf
45 - 51
2,316 sf
52.
2,574 sf
53
1,964 sf
54 - 58
2,316 sf
59
2,454 sf
60 - 61
2,133 sf
62
2,170 sf
63 - 64
2,708 sf '
65
2,170 sf
66 - 86
2,145 sf
87
2,530 sf
88 - 92
2,444 sf
93
1,700 sf
94 - 95
1,506 sf
LOT #
Allowable Covera e
96 - 99
2,030 sf
100
2,519 sf
101 - 107
1,715 sf
.108
2,519 sf
109
2,446 sf
110 - 113
1,656 sf
114 - 120
2,024 sf
121
2,599 sf
122 - 126
1,720 sf
127
2,085 sf
128 - 132
2,024 sf

trYDROGEOLOG'Y
GEOLOGY
UNV1RONMEWAL SCIENCES
sons
August 4, 2005
EDWIN ANDREWS & ASSOCIATES, P.C.
CONSULTING UMROGEOLOGISTS
P.O. BOX30653
27622
RALEIGH, N.C. 27622 - 4653
PHONE: (919) 793 - 8395
PAX: (919) 783 - 0151
Mr. Sam Young, Director
The Fund for Sandy Point North Carolina, LLC
1023 Southwest 25" Ave.
Miami, Florida 33135
Re: Soil Inspection - Stormwater Infiltration Basins
Phase I - Sandy Point Development - Chowan County, NC
EAA Project No. RW-0405
Dear Mr. Young:
JAN 1 7 2006
DWQVARC
AU 7 2005
wQ-WARO
This letter includes a very generalized discussion of two soil profiles encountered on the stormwater
infiltration site at Sandy Point Development, Chowan County, North Carolina. The hydrology through
the soils to the underlying aquifer and to the backfilled areas was evaluated based on measured hydraulic
conductivity of specific soil horizons at the two soil profile sites: A model has not been made simulating
2-Dimensional drainage to the underlying aquifer (using the Richard's Equation) or the relationship to
lateral drainage. The underlying aquifer was previously analyzed in: "Infiltration Basins Analysis, Phase
I -Sandy Point Development, Modflow Simulation of a 6.8 Inch Rainfall Event, Chowan County, N.C."
June 2005. The surficial aquifer was modeled at that time to provide an estimate of groundwater
mounding beneath the soil profile.
This analysis addresses the relationship of the sand backfill to the surficial aquifer, not the relationship
of the sand backfill to the drainage of the soil. It is a premise of this letter, that the majority of soil
drainage will be vertical over a five to six foot distance rather than horizontally through the low
hydraulic conductivity soils to a drain up to several hundred feet away. It is not proposed that the sand
backfill will effectively drain the soils around the backfill, rather, the conclusion is that the surficial
aquifer accommodates the following loadings from the backfill area:
Table Basin Loading Data
AREA
LOADING
MODEL INPUT
DARE FEET
CUBIC FEET/ 1 DAY
FT/DAY
BASIN A
219,720
151795.8
1.4475
BASIN B
31,537
24,732
1.2751
BASIN C
56,482
46 374.5
1.2179
BASIN D
125.315
105.754.8
1,185
Because the site was being farmed, it was not possible to use backhoe test pits. Rather, soil borings
1

Mr. Sam Young, Director
Re: Soil inspection - Stormwater Infiltration Basins
Phase I - Sandy Point Development - Chowan County, NC
EAA Project No. RW-0405
August 4, 2005
were made at two test locations shown on the site map (Figure No. 1, Site Map). The first site appears
most similar toYeopim loam and the second site appears most like Chapanoke silt loam (Soil Profile
Descriptions attached Table No. 1). Both soils contained low permeability Bt horizons beneath the
surface Ap horizon. A compacted plow pan surface was encountered at the base of the Ap horizon .
At the time `of the test borings, water level wells were constructed so that a synoptic water level analysis
could be obtained. The water level elevations (Table No. 2, Water Level Data) confirmed the aquifer
coefficients calculated from the previously completed surficial aquifer test.
To define the hydrologic characteristics of the shallow soil horizons, the hydraulic conductivity values
were measured. These values were made to help to define estimates of the hydrologic characteristics
of each soil horizon (Table No. 3, Ksat Analyses):
Site
Depth (in)
Horizoall ayer
K(sat)
EsL K'
Model k'
(1n.)
(Ft;/Day)
(Ft./)ay)
(Ft./Day)
1-A
13-19
Bt/layer 2
0.11
0.02
0.05
1-B
3-9
Ap/layer 1
0.26
0.052
0.02
1-C
20-26
Btllayer 3
0.013
0.002
0.001
2-A
44-50
Bt-$Guyer 4
0.02
0.04
0.05
2-B
32-38
Bt/layer 3
0.02
0.04
0.02
The low hydraulic conductivity values ofthe soil horizons, topography, and rainfall intensity will induce
surface ponding and runoff. This analysis and the previously submitted model confirm that the
underlying surficial aquifer will accommodate the volume of storm water that drains through these soil
horizons viathe sand backfill. Review ofconventional drainage publications revealed that most drainage
analyses are predicated on Darcy flow draining a surficial aquifer that floods the surface layers (Typically
defined by the Hooghoudt and Kirkham equations as well as the Richard's Equation for the vertical
components of drainage. Models such as Drainmod, SWATRE and Hydrus-2D primarily address both
the vertical and horizontal relationship with a surficial aquifer system and shallow drains (typically within
the soil solum). These soils and the underlying water table aquifer function as a continuous hydrologic
unit.
The site at Sandy Point Development contains a surficial aquifer that has a water table surface beneath
2

Mr. Sam Young, Director
Re: Soil Inspection - Stormwater Infiltration Basins
Phase I - Sandy Point Development - Chowan County, NC
EAA Project No. RW-0405
August 4, 2005
the soil profile. Therefore, a significant
portion of the stormwater that occupies
interstices of the soil and ponded at the
surface can vertically drain to the water table
surface similar to a drip filter. While a small
portion of the water in the soil will drain
horizontally within the soil profile to the
backfilled area, the distance to the drain
through the low hydraulic conductivity
loamy soils to the backfill areas will limit the
potential as a drainage mechanism Instead
the water within these soils will dram
vertically through the short distance (five to
six feet) to the top of the surficial aquifer.
BadMI,M
Mp,S=d,►qukrcr
F..toMvpr
I
6
The previously submitted report entitled: "Infiltration Basins Analysis, Phase I - Sandy Point
Development, Modfiow Simulation of a 6.8 Inch Rainfall Event, Chowan County, N-C." June 2005,
determined that the surficial aquifer will remain sufficiently low to allow for infiltration through the soil.
The purpose of the previously submitted model was to analyze the backfilled area to determine the
mound at the surficial aquifer due to the total volume of stormwater introduced into the backfill area.
The backfilled sand is not constructed to act similar to a drain pipe to drain the soils horizontally.
Rather, the sand is expected to function as a vertical drain for the surface water directed into the
backfilled area.
It is the conclusion ofthis modeling effort, that the storm water infiltration Basins will accommodate the
design loading. Meanwhile, after the storm event most of the water that is ponded or in the surface
soils in areas away from the backfilled area will predominantly drain downwar,4, tTRp h the unsaturated
sand to the water table surface- qS'•```` S d �'''•
d`6 p �.
I hope that this brief analysis if beneficial to your _'` �'�' S RHO c��
C-224 =
Very truly yours,�M ' f3o R'p` p�
Edwin Andrews & Associates, P.C. r Or A. s_ 10k
Edwin E. Andrews III, P. G., N.C.L. S. S.
Consulting Hydrogeologist and Soil Scier
encl.

Mr_ Sam Young, Diredor
Re: Soil Inspection - Stormwater Infiltration Basins
Phase I - Sandy Point Development - Chowan County, NC
EAA Project No. RW-0405
August 4, 2005
Partial Bibliography
Bouwer, Herman, 1978 Groundwater H drolo ,McGraw-Hill, Inc.
Cedegren, Harry R. Seepage, Drainage and Flow Nets 1967, Third Edition 1989John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Darcy, H. 1856, Les fontaines Obliques de la ville de Di Paris, V. Dalmont 674 pp.
Dussaillant, Alejandro R.(un-dated - Internet) "Infiltration of Stormwater in a Rain Garden: Richards
Equation Numerical Model and Field Experiment." (P. Universidad Catolica, Chile, Chin H. Wu (U.
Wisconsin -Madison & Kenneth W. Potter (U. Wisconsin -Madison)
Forchheimer, Ph. 1914. Hydraulik: Leipzig. B.G, Teubner, 566 pp.
Hooghoudt, S.B_ 1940. General consideration ofthe problem offield drainage by aralle) drains, ditches,
watercourses, and channels. Publ No. 7, Bodemjundig Instituut, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Kirkham, D., Toksoz, S., & van der Ploeg, RR, 1974- Steady flow to drains and wells" Drainage for
Agriculture. J. van Schilfgaard, Agronomy Monograph No. 17, Am. Soc. Agron. Pp. 203-244.
Oztekin, Tekin,2001, "Simulating Water Flow to a Subsurface Drain in a Layered Soil," Turk J Agric
For, 26 (2020) 179-185.
Richards, LA 1931, "Capillary conduction of liquids in porous media. Physics 1, 318-333
Rutledge, A. T., Computer Programs for Describing the Recession of Ground -Water Discharge and for
Estimating Mean Ground -Water Recharge and Discharge from Streamlow Records" -Update, U.S.
Geological Survey Water Resources Investigations Report 9841148.
Skaggs, R W. 1980. A water management model for artificially drained soils. Technical Bulletin No.
276. North Carolina Agricultural Research Service, N.C. State University,
Wilderotter, Olga, August 3, 2001, An adaptive numerical method for the Richards equation with root
growth'"
Van Genuchten, M-T, 1980, A closed -form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of
unsaturated soils." Soil Science Sociatey America Journal 44, 892-898.
4

Table # 1, Soil Description
Ap - 0-8 in Light yellowish brown (1Oyr 6/4) sandy loam sub angular blocky, friable,
common fine roots;
Ap - 8 - 10 in. Light gray (10YR 7/2) loan-, with common medium distinct yellowish
brown (l OYR 6/6) clay loam, subangular blocky, friable, slightly plastic,
slightly sticky;
E - 10 - 16 in.
Yellow brown (I OYR 5/6) sandy loam, subangular blocky, friable, few clay
film on faces of peds;
Btl - 16-24 in.
Pale brown (1 OYR 6/3) clay loam; with common medium distinct light
brownish gray (I OYR 5/6), with clay film on faces of peds, few fine
distinct yellowish red 5(YR 5/8) mottles; medium subangular blocky friable
slightly plastic slightly sticky, Pale brown (10 YR 6/3) sandy loam
subangular blocky friable; common medium distinct reddish yellow (7.5YR
6/8) and few medium faint very pale brown(IOYR 8/2) clay loam
subangular blocky, very sticky, very plastic;
Btz - 24-33 in.
Pale brown (I OYR 6/3) loam, few medium distinct yellow (I OYR 6/8),
irony accumulation, subangular blocky, friable; with few medium distinct
light gray (10 YR 7/2) mottles with clay film on the faces of peds;
Bt3 - 33-38 in.
Pale brown (I OYR 613) sandy loam, common medium distinct pinkish gray
(7.5 YR 7/2)clay, few medium fine light gray (10 YR 7/2) clay loam,
subangular blocky slightly sticky slightly plastic, with clay film of faces of
peds,-
BC - 38-45 in.
IOYR 6/3 clay loam, subangular blocky, sticky and plastic, common
medium distinct (10 YR 7/2) and common medium distinct yellowish
brown (10 YR 5/8) loam mottles
C - 45 - 57 in.
Red yellow (7.5 YR 6/6) sandy loam loose with thin streaks of fine gravel
Soil Series: Most like Yeopim Landscape: Coastal Plain
Landform: Marine terrace
Parent material: Marine and estuarine sediments
Drainage class: Moderately well drained
Particle size class: Fine silty Temperature Regime: Thermic
Subgroup Classification: Aquic Hapludult
Examination Method. Hand auger Date: July 12, 2005
Weather: Cloudy Investigator: Edwin Andrews
(Ksat) Analyses - 3-9 in.; 13-19 in.; and 21-27 in. (Model Layer 1 - Ap)(Model Layer 2 -
Bti)(Model Layer 3 - Bt�)(Model Layer Bt3 or BC)
Soil Description:
Ap - 0-12 in Light brownish gray (I OYR 5/2) silt with common medium distinct (I OYR
4/8) clay subangular blocky plastic sticky with clay film on faces of peds;

Btg, - 12 - 20 in. Gray (10YR 6/1) clay loam, subangular blocky with common medium
distinct brownish yellow (10YR 6/6) mottles, subangular blocky friable
very sticky very plastic clay film on faces of peds:,
Btgz - 20-28 in. Grayish brown (10YR 5/2) clay loam; weak fine subangular blocky
structure' friable; slightly plastic slightly sticky
Btg3 - 28-36 in. Brown (IOYR 4/2) clay loam; subangular friable; slightly sticky, plastic
common medium distinct brownish yellow (10 YR 6/8)
BC - 36- 44 in. Dark grayish brown (IOYR 4/2) sandy clay loam; medium weak subangular
blocky, clay film on faces of peds
Soil Series: Most like Chapanoke Landscape: Coastal Plain
Landform: Marine terrace
Parent material: Marine and estuarine sediments
Drainage class: Somewhat poorly drained
Particle size class: Silty clays Temperature Regime: Thermic
Subgroup Classification: Aerie Endoaquultt ,
Examination Method. Hand auger Date: July 12, 2005
Weather: Cloudy Investigator: Edwin Andrews
(Ksat) Analyses - 31-38 in.; and 43-50 in. (Model Layer 3 - Btg,)(Model Layer 4 - Btg3 !BC)
Restrictive horizon 0.013 to 0.02 inch per hour or 0.026 ft/day - Model uses 0.02 ft/day for layer
3)

SANDY POINT - STORM WATER ANALYSIS
TABLE NO.2, WATER LEVEL DATA
WATER
DEPTH
T_O.C.
GROUND
MEASURED
EASTING
NORTHING
LEVEL ELEV.
WATER
WATER DEPTH
FT. NAD 83
FT. NAD 83
FL M_S.L.
FT.
FT, M.S.L.
FT. M.S.L.
FF. T.O.C.
2730087.6
933548.9
3.81
7.62
MW-1
12.46
11.43
8.65
2730408.2
931529.9
1.47
11A0
MW-2
13.80
12.47
1233
2730025.8
832147.8
2.98
7.86
MW-3
11.53
10.94
8.55
2730462.4
832569.0
2.99
7.98
MW4
11.58
10.87
8.59
2730008.1
832874.5
3.92
7.78
MW-5
12.93
11.70
9.01
2730232.6
833269.4
3.59
6.46
MW-6
1138
10.05
7.79
2730023.8
831282.9
0.74
10.19
MW-7
11.06
10.93
1032

SANDY POINT - STORM WATER
TABLE NO. 3 - A, HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY RESULTS
Conditions: CLOUDY
TEST SITE 1 A, Bt
Soil notes: CLAY LOAM
Location
Hole depth
44
water h
15
Reference
2
d
31
D
54
H1
31
Ameter
config.
Valve
On
A
cm2-2
Conver.
Factor
DTW
cm
Time
LAYER
St
TOP ON
12.55
1
1 0.001056
20
Final:
29
sorrow ON
19.05
time
(min)
d!
(min)
Rea
(cm)
dR
(ten)
DTW
(CM)
H
(an)
FACTOR
Q
(CW3Im)
Q
(cMNW)
K
(OWN)
K
(1MV)
K
(mAvk)
K
ffJDAY)
8:53
0
23.2
0
30
14
20
9:05
12
20.7
25
29
15
20
4.167
250.0
0.264
0,104
17.46
0.21
920
5
19.5
12
29
15
20
4.800
288.0
0.304
0.120
20.12
0.24
9:28
6
17.8
1.7
29
15
20
4250
255.0
0.269
0.106
17.81
0.21
09:40 AM
12
15.2
2.6
29
15
20
4.333
280.0
0.275
0.108
18,16
0.22
Ksat 0.25
0.100 17
0.20
Remarks:
TEST SITE 1-13, AP
Soil notes: SANDY LOAM
Location
Hole depth 22 water h 16
Reference 2 d 9
D 24 H1 9
Ameter
config.
Valve
On
A
cm"-2
Conver
Factor
DTW
cm
Time
LAYER
Ap
TOP @Mq
3.03
2
2 0.001056
105
Final:
7
wTromON
9.52
lima
(min)
di
(min)
Res
l�3
dR
(cm)
DTW
(cm)
H
(cm)
FACTOR
Q
(cm"3!m}
Q
(cm"3Jhrj
K
(cm/hr}
K
QFdhd
K
Gib)
K
(Ft/DAY)
927
0
22.7
0
8
14
105
9:28
1
22.5
0.2
7
15
105
21.000
1,260.0
1.331
0.524
88.01
1.05
9.29
1
22.3
0.2
1 7
15
105
21.000
1,260.0
1.331
0,5241
88.01
1.05
9:30
1
222
0.1
7
15
105
10.500
630.0
0.665
0.262
44.00
0.52
0911 AM
1
22.1
0.1
7
15
106
10.500
630.0
0.665
0.262
1 44.00
0.52
Ksat 0.1
0.260 44
0.52
Remarks.

f SANDY POINT -STORM WATER
TABLE NO. 3 - B, HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY RESULTS
Conditions: CLOUDY
TEST SITE 1C, Bt1
Sail notes: CLAY LOAM
Location
ArnebE
confi
Valve
On
A
cm"-2
Conver.
Factor
DTW
{Cm
Time
Hole depth
62
water h
15
LAYER
Bt
Reference
10
di
57
TOP Ply)
20,35
D
72
1-11
L57
1
1 0.001056
20
Final:
57
BOTTOM ON
26.84
lime
(min)
dt
(min)
Res
(cm)
dR
(cm)
DTW
(ao)
H
(cm)
FACTOR
11
(-TM3Vm)
0
(-fi3Yhr)
K
( h,)
K
GWhO
K
(Inh*
K
(VdeY)
11:50
0
42.8
0
57
14
20
12:15
25
41,2
1.6
58
15
20
1,280
76.8
0,081
0.032
5.36
0.06
12:30
15
40.8
0.4
58
15
1 20
0.533
32.0
0,034
0.013
2.24
D.03
12:45
15
40.4
0.4
58
15
20
0.533
32.0
0.034
0.013
2.24
0.03
01:00 PM
15
40
0.4
L 58
15
20
0.533
32.0
0.034
0.013
1 2.24
0.03
k"t a-03
0.013 22
0.03
Remarks:
TEST SITE 2A, Bt
Soil notes: CLAY LOAM
Location
Hole depth 116 h 15
Reference 4 d 105
D 120 H1 105
Arnek
cont
Valve
On
A
cm"-2)
Conver.
Factor
DTW
cm
Time
LAYER
St
TOP ON
43.72
1
1 0.001056
20
Final:
101
BOTTOM ON)
5o.22
Dam
(min)
dt
(min)
Res
(an)
dR
t-)
DTW
(cm)
H
(an)
FACTOR
Q
(cn03rm)
a
(an^3"
K
(-79)
K
Rd"
K
(inhvl)
K
FrIDAY)
3:50
0
32.8
0
102
14
20
4:00
10
32.3
0.5
101
15
20
1.000
60.0
0.063
0.025
4.19
0.05
4:10
10
31.9
0.4
101
15
20
0,800
48.0
0.051
0.020
3.35
0.04
4:20
10
31,5
1 0.4
1 101
15
20
0.800
48.0
0.051
0,020
3.35
0.04
04:30 AM
10
31.1
L0.4
1 101
15
1 20
0.800
48.0
0.051
0.020
3.35
0.04
Ksat 0.05
0.020 3.35
0.04
Remarks:

SANDY POINT - STORM WATER
TABLE NO.3 - C, HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY RESULTS
Conditions: CLOUDY
TEST SITE 2, Bt
Soil notes: SANDY CLAY LOAM
Location
Hole depth
88
water h
15
Reference
6
d
79
D
94
H1
79
Amew
config.
Valve
On
A
(cmk
Conver.
Factor
DTW
(cm)
Time
LAYER
Bt
TOP (IN)
31.60
1
1 0.001056
20
Final:
73
9PT mPN)
38.10
lime
dt
(�)
Ras
(—)
dR
(—)
DTVV
(—)
H
(—)
FACTOR
O
(-FWNM)
a
(an�
K
(�r)
K
( �
K
(on"
4.50
0
38.8
0
74
14
20
;DRA�JIKI]AGEE(min)
4.55
5
38.6
0.2
73
15
20
0.800
48.0
0.051
0.020
3.35
5:00
5
38.4
0.2
73
15
21)
0.800
48.0
0.051
0.021)
3.35
0.04
5:05
5
38.2
0.2
73
15
20
0.800
48.0
0.051
0.020
3.35
0.04
05:10 AM
5
38
0.2
73
15
20
0.800
48.0
0.051
0.020
3.35
0.04
Ksat 0.05
0.020 3.35
0.04
Remarks:

/
'
/
/
/
/
/
'
/
'
Pe
/
/
`
wisco"VOSKO
cm
ea
.0sandystormfiglB.dxfpohnt
Potylline
' 1B.dxfpmly0on �
�
|kleters Sandy Point/
!Figure No. 2C NRGS Soil Map.

83450"
8340C,
3335C
8330Cs
-
•s
8320( ram;
�I
8315001
131000—
{ G
i r r
l r f
12
ice' 4�� nrP � • 'll r yrr n ^ 4 • y.
r� J
y a •
I
332000]1
a31 I
2729000 2731000 273? U _n35o
2730500 2731000 2731500 2732000 2731500 2733000
I s
832200
2
831600
273D200
SANDY POINT STORM WATER INVESTIGATION
M

Water table
Storm2ioad
_.39
D.6.G3189
18
l TimelIdayl ll 264.5
❑ 2.97034
❑ 5.30679
❑ 7,64724
❑ 10.7652
13,3831
Water Levels Wet Year
Fig. No. 3H, Water Table Surface - End of 6.8 Inch Storm Event

Head vs. Time
o W-1/A(Obsenred)
°y W-1 /A(Calculated)
W-61A(Caiculated)
Time 263.20699.29097 W-2/A(Observed)
= 9.
W-21A(Calculated)
W-31A(Observed)
W-3/A(Calculatad) i
W-4/A(Obsetved)
W-MA(CafcuWled)
W-5/A(Observed)
o W-5/A(Calculated)
W-GIA(Observed)
W-6/A(Calculated)
v
Time 261.8014 I
W-6/A(Calculated) = 4,47016
cri
r
250 260 270
Time [days]
Sandy Point - Stormwater
Fig. No 3A. Tine vs. Water Level