Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutNCS000130_COMPLIANCE_20181219STORMWATER DIVISION CODING SHEET NCS PERMITS PERMIT NO. n! LS � 0 0 ' DOC TYPE ❑FINAL PERMIT ❑ MONITORING REPORTS ❑ APPLICATION le' -COMPLIANCE ❑ OTHER DOC DATE ❑ zol b g I I YYYYMMDD NORTH CAROLINA Fnv mnmenta1Quo[W December 20, 2018 CERTIFIED MAIL 7002 0860 0006 5836 1226 RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED Mr. Marcus L. Shockley Plant Manager Perdue Agri Business LLC Perdue Farms Incorporated 416 South Long Drive Rockingham, NC 28379 ROY COOPER Governor MICHAEL S. REGAN Secretory LINDA CULPEPPER Director RECEIVED DEC 19 2D18 CENTRAL FILES DWR SECTION SUBJECT: Assessment of Civil Penalty for Violations of the Reporting Requirements NPDES Permit NCS000130 Perdue Rockingham Plant Case No. DV-2018-0073 Richmond County Dear Mr. Shockley: This letter transmits a notice of a civil penalty assessed against Perdue Agri Business LLC in the amount of $82,354.34 (includes $3,354.34 in enforcement costs). This assessment is based upon the following facts: It was observed during an inspection conducted by the Fayetteville Regional Office on March 27, 2018, that wastewater containing chicken skin, feathers and blood had been discharged into Falling Creek (Hinson Lake, Great Falls Pond), a Class C waters in the Yadkin -Pee Dee River Basin, A follow-up visit on March 28, 2018, was conducted and wastewater containing chicken feathers, chicken skin and blood was observed entering Falling Creek. The March 27, 2018, discharge was due in part to wastewater pump malfunctions and to direct dumping into the Stormwater drain by an offal truck. Another inspection was performed on May 10, 2018, and wastewater was again observed entering Falling Creek due to poor operation and maintenance at the plant. Sampling was performed on March 27, March 28, and May 10, 2018, confirmed water quality standards violations for Dissolved Oxygen and Fecal Coliform. Perdue Agri Business LLC also failed to report any of the discharges to the Division of Water Resources by Perdue as required by permit. A Notice of Violation/Notice of Intent to Assess Civil Penalty (NOV-2018-DV-01 98) on August 14, 2018, for the following violations: - NCGS 143-215.I (a)(1) - 15A NCAC 02B .021 l (1), (2), (6), (7), and (12) - NPDES Permit NCS000130, Part 11I, Sections C.1., E.7., and E.9a. The State's enforcement costs in this matter may be assessed against Perdue Agri Business LLC pursuant to NCGS. 143-215.3(a)(9) and NCGS 143B-282.I(b)(8). Slate of North Carolina I Environmental Quality I Water Resources 1617 Mail service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699.1617 919 707 9" Case No.: DV-2018-0073 December 2018 Page 2 of 5 Based upon the above facts, the Division concludes as a matter of law that Crosby violated the terms, conditions or requirements of NPDES Permit NCS000130, in the manner and extent shown above. In accordance with the maximums established by G.S. 143-215.6A(a)(2), a civil penalty may be assessed against any person who violates the terms, conditions or requirements of a permit required by G.S. 143-215.1(a). Based upon the above findings of fact and conclusions of law, and in accordance with authority provided by the Secretary of the Department of Environmental Quality and the Director of the Division of Water Resources, the Division hereby makes the following civil penalty assessment against Crosby Utilities, Inc.: $ 79,000 For violations of NCGS 143-215.1, 15A NCAC 02B .0211 (1), 15A NCAC 02B .0211 (2), 15A NCAC 02B .0211(6), 15A NCAC 02B .0211(7), 15A NCAC 02B .0211(12), and NPDES Permit NCS000130, Part III, Section A.3., NPDES Permit NCS000130, Part III, Section C.I ., NPDES Permit NCS000130, Part III, Section E.7., NPDES Permit NCS000130, Part II1, Section E. 9a. $ 3,354.34 Enforcement C6sts $ 82,354.34 TOTAL AMOUNT DUE Pursuant to G.S. 143-215.6A(c), in determining the amount of the penalty the Division has taken into account the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and the factors set forth at G.S. 143B-282.I (b), which are: (1) The degree and extent of harm to the natural resources of the State, to the public health, or to private property resulting from the violation; (2) The duration and gravity of the violation; (3) The effect on ground or surface water quantity or quality or air quality; (4) The cost of rectifying the damage; . (5) The amount of money saved by noncompliance; (6) Whether the violation was committed willfully or intentionally; (7) The prior record of the violator in' complying or failing to comply with programs over which the Environmental Management Commission has regulatory authority; and (8) The cost to the State of the enforcement procedures. Within thirty days of receipt of this notice, you must do one of the following: Submit payment of the penalty: Payment should be made directly to the order of the Department of Environmental Quality (do not include waiverform). Payment of the penalty will not foreclose further enforcement action for any continuing or new violation(s). Please submit payment to the attention of: Division of Water Resources Wastewater Branch 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 OR 2. Submit a written request for remission or mitigation including a detailed justification for such request., Case No.: DV-2018-0073 December 2018 Page 3 of 5 Please be aware that a request for remission is limited to consideration of the five factors listed below as they may relate to the reasonableness of the amount of the civil penalty assessed. Requesting remission is not the proper procedure for contesting whether the violation(s) occurred or the accuracy of any of the factual statements contained in the civil penalty assessment document. Because a remission request forecloses the option of an administrative hearing, such a request must be accompanied by a waiver of your right to an administrative hearing and a stipulation and agreement that no factual or Iegal issues are in dispute. Please prepare a detailed statement that establishes why you believe the civil penalty should be remitted and submit it to the Division of Water Resources at the address listed below. In determining whether a remission request will be approved, the following factors shall be considered: (1) whether one or more of the civil penalty assessment factors in NCGS 143B-282.1(b) was wrongfully applied to the detriment of the petitioner; (2) whether the violator promptly abated continuing environmental damage resulting from the violation; (3) whether the violation was inadvertent or a result of an accident; (4) whether the violator had been assessed civil penalties for any previous violations; or. (5) whether payment of the civil penalty will prevent payment for the remaining necessary remedial actions. Please note that all .evidence presented in support of your request for remission must be submitted in writing. The Director of the Division of the Division of Water Resources will review your evidence and inform you of his decision in the matter of your remission request. The response will provide details regarding the case status, directions for payment, and provision for further appeal of the penalty to the Environmental Management Commission's Committee on Civil Penalty Remissions (Committee). Please be advised that the Committee cannot consider information that was not part of the original remission request considered by the Director. Therefore, it is very important that you prepare a complete and thorough statement in support* of your request for remission. In order to request remission, you must complete and submit the enclosed "Request for Remission of Civil Penalties, Waiver of Right to an Administrative Hearing, and Stipulation of Facts" form within thirty (30) days of receipt of this notice. The Division of Water Resources also requests that you complete and submit the enclosed "Justification for Remission. Request." Both forms should be submitted to the following address: Division of Water Resources Wastewater Branch 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 OR 3. File a petition for an administrative hearing with the Office of Administrative Hearings: If you wish to contest any statement in the attached assessment document, you must file a petition for an administrative hearing. You may obtain the petition form from the Office of Administrative Hearings. You must file the petition with the Office of Administrative Hearings within thirty (30) days of receipt of this notice. A petition is considered filed when it is received in the Office of Administrative Hearings during normal office hours. The Office of Administrative Hearings accepts filings Monday through Friday between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., except for official state holidays. The original and one (1) copy of the petition must be filed with the Office of Administrative Hearings. The petition may Case No.: DV-2018-0073 December 2018 Page 4 of 5 be faxed provided the original and one copy of the document is received in the Office of Administrative Hearings within five (5) business days following the faxed transmission. The mailing address for the Office of Administrative Hearings is: Office of Administrative Hearings 6714 Mail Service Center Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-6714 Telephone (919) 733-2698 Facsimile: (919) 733-3478 AND Mail or hand -deliver a copy of the petition to: General Counsel Department of Environment and Natural Resources 1601 Mail Service Center Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1601 Please indicate the case number (as found on page one of this letter) on the, petition. Failure to exercise one of the options above within thirty (30) days of receipt of this letter, as evidenced by an internal date/time received stamp (not a postmark), will result in this matter being referred to the Attorney General's Office for collection of the penalty through a civil action. Please be advised that additional penalties may be assessed for violations that occur after the review period of this assessment. If you have any questions, please contact John Hennessy at 919-707-3615 or via e-mail (john.hennessy amcdenngo_v). Sincerely, Linda Culpepper l r Director, Division of Water Resources ATTACHMENTS cc: DWR Fayetteville Regional Office NCS000130 Enforcement File w/attachments Central Files w/attachments STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY COUNTY OF RICHMOND IN THE MATTER OF ASSESSMENT ) WAIVER OF RIGHT TO AN OF CIVIL PENALTIES AGAINST ) ADMINSTRATIVE HEARING AND PERDUE AGRI BUSINESS LLC ) STIPULATION OF FACTS ) PERMIT NO. NCS000130 ) FILE NO. DV-2018-0073 Having been assessed civil penalties totaling $82,354.34 for violation(s) as set forth in the assessment document of the Division of Water Resources dated December 18, 2018, the undersigned, desiring to seek remission of the civil penalty, does hereby waive the right to an administrative hearing in the above -stated matter and does stipulate that the facts are as alleged in the assessment document. The undersigned further understands that all evidence presented in support of remission of this civil penalty must be submitted to the director of the Division of Water Resources within thirty (30) days of receipt of the notice of assessment. No new evidence in support of a remission request will be allowed after (30) days from the receipt of the notice of assessment. This the day of ADDRESS TELEPHONE SIGNATURE JUSTIFICATION FOR REMISSION REQUEST DWR Case Number: DV-2018-0073 County: Richmond Assessed Entity: Perdue Agri Business LLC Permit No.: NCS000130 Amount Assessed: $82,354.34 Please use this form when requesting remission of this civil penalty. You must also complete the "Request for Remission, Waiver of Right to an Administrative Hearing, and Stipulation of Facts " form to request remission of this civil penalty. You should attach any documents that you believe support your request and are necessary for the Director to consider in evaluating your request for remission. Please be aware that a request for remission is limited to consideration of the five factors listed below as they may relate to the reasonableness of the amount of the civil penalty assessed. Requesting remission is not the proper procedure for contesting whether the violation(s) occurred or the accuracy of any of the factual statements contained in the civil penalty assessment document. Pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 143B-282.1(c), remission of a civil penalty may be granted only when one or more of the following five factors apply. Please check each factor that you believe applies to your case and provide a detailed explanation, including copies of supporting documents, as to why the factor applies (attach additional pages as needed). ❑ (a) one or more of the civil penalty assessment factors in N.C,G.S. 143B-282.1(b) were wrongfully applied to the detriment of the petitioner (the assessment factors are listed in the civil penalty assessment document); ❑ (b) .the violator promptly abated continuing environmental damage resulting from the violation (i.e., explain the steps that you took to correct the violation and prevent future occurrences); ❑ (c) the violation was inadvertent or a result of an accident (i.e., explain why the violation was unavoidable or something you could not prevent or prepare for); ❑ (d) the violator had not been assessed civil penalties for any previous violations; ❑ (e) payment of the civil penalty will prevent payment for the remaining necessary remedial actions (i.e., explain how payment of the civil penalty will prevent you from performing the activities necessary to achieve compliance). EXPLANATION: STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA COUNTY OF RICHMOND IN THE MATTER OF PERDUE AGRI BUSINESS LLC FOR VIOLATIONS OF: (NCGS) 143-215.1 (a)(1), 15A NCAC 02B.0211 (1), 15A NCAC 02B .0211 (2), 15A NCAC 02B .0211 (6), 15A NCAC 0213.0211 (7), 15A NCAC 02B .0211 (8), 15A NCAC 02B .0211 (12), , NPDES Permit No. NCS000130 NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY CASE NO. DV-2018-0073 FINDINGS AND DECISION AND ASSESSMENT OF CIVIL PENALTIES Acting pursuant to North Carolina General Statute (G.S.) 143-215.6A,1, Jeff Poupart, of the Division of Water Resources (hereby known as DWR), make the following: FINDING OF FACT A. Perdue Agri Business LLC is a person organized and existing under the laws of the State of North Carolina. B. On December 29, 2014, Perdue Agri Business LLC was issued Individual Stormwater Discharge Permit Number NCS000130 to discharge stormwater associated with industrial activity for the Perdue Chicken Processing Plant - Rockingham Facility pursuant to the application received on February 6, 2012, in accordance with the provisions of Article 21 of Chapter 143, General Statutes of North Carolina. C. On March 27, 2018, staff from the Fayetteville Regional Office of the Division of Water Resources (DWR) conducted inspections in response to calls received by the Fayetteville Regional Office about a discharge from Perdue of wastewater to Falling Creek. The following observations were noted during the March 27, 2018, inspection: Perdue staff stated the spill was a result of malfunctions in two of the three pumps that handle wastewater. Perdue stated that one pump could not keep up with the flow of wastewater which caused the wastewater tank to overflow. The excess wastewater flowed into a storm drain that exits through a culvert into a ditch that flows to Falling Creek. • Wastewater containing chicken feathers, chicken skin, and blood was observed entering Falling Creek. • While sampling was being performed by DWR, an increased flow of fresh wastewater containing blood was observed leaving the pipe. When questioned as to the cause, Perdue informed DWR they did not know the cause and proceeded to investigate. Perdue then informed DWR that an offal truck was currently parked directly over a storm drain and was discharging wastewater into the storm drain. • DWR directed Perdue to immediately stop all wastewater flow to the storm drain and to remove wastewater from the ditch leading to Falling Creek. Sampling was performed at the source, confluence, upstream, and downstream. Field parameters and laboratory results showed the following: 3/27/2018 Source ConfluenceUpstrea Downstream BOD 1460 >1059.32 <2.00 3.74 mg/l mg/l mg/l mg/l Ammonia 25.2 18.6 mg/l 2.10 mg/l <0.500 mg/l mg/l TSS 650 410 mg/l <6.25 <6.25 mg/l mg/1 mg/l Fecal 60,000 >60,000 10 cfu per 1000 cfu per cfu per cfu per 100 100 ml 100 ml l 00 ml ml Oil and 261 109 mg/1 <5.0 mg/l <5.0 mg/l Grease mg/1 Dissolved 2.61 0.1 mg/l 8.89 mg/l 9.54 mg/1 Oxygen m 1 PH 6.65 6.38 5.79 6.10 Conductivity 978 915 SPC 31.3 SPC 32.0 SPC SPC D. On March 28, 2018, a follow-up inspection was conducted by DWR staff from the Fayetteville Regional Office to confirm clean-up activity was taking place. The following observations were noted during the March 28, 2018, inspection: Wastewater containing chicken feathers, chicken skin, and blood was observed leaving the culvert, entering the ditch, and travelling all the way to Falling Creek. Page 2 of l0 • Clean-up crews were on site but could not keep up with the flow. DWR suggested the ditch be temporarily dammed to prevent further spillage to Falling Creek. • Perdue stated the wastewater discharge was a result of flushing activities that were taking place around the storm drain to aid in the clean-up. • Sampling was performed at the source, confluence, upstream, and downstream. Field parameters and laboratory results showed the following: 3/28/2018 Source ConfluehecUpstrea Downstream BOD 874 99.0 mg/l <2.0 mg/l <2.00 mg/l mg/1 Ammonia 19.8 19.2 mg/l <0.500 <0.500 mg/l mg/l mgzl TSS 222 99.0 mg/l <1.2.5 <7.00 mg/I mg/l m ] Fecal 40,000 >60,000 <1 CFU 100 cfu per cfu per cfu per 160 per 100 100 ml 100 ml ml ml Dissolved 4.29 1.26 mg/l 8.64 mg/l 9.57 mg/l Oxygen mg1l H 6.6 6.7 6.16 6.08 Conductivity 684 55.2 SPC 31.6 SPC 33 SPC SPC E. On May 10, 2018, another inspection was performed by DWR staff frorn the Fayetteville Regional Office. The following observations were noted during the May 10, 2018, inspection: • Wastewater containing floating solids and offensive odors was observed at the discharge point, with some of the solids having a blood -colored tint. • Sampling was performed at the source. Field parameters and laboratory results showed the following: 05/10/2018 l Source BOD 32.8 mg/l Ammonia 2.73 mg/1 TSS 15.0 mg/l Fecal 53,000 cfu per 100 ml Dissolved Oxygen 4.29 mg/1 Page 3 of 10 F. A Notice of Violation, NOV-2018-DV-0198, was issued to Perdue Agri Business LLC on August 10, 2018, for violations of NCGS 143-215.1, 15A NCAC 02B .0211, and NPDES Permit NCS000130 violations. G. Perdue Agri Business LLC's response letter, dated August 28, 2018, included the following: • Perdue acknowledged that a spill occurred at the Rockingham facility on March 27, 2018. • Perdue stated that the March 27`' spill occurred when two (2) of the three (3) Gorman Rupp pumps malfunctioned in the offal area. The remaining pump could not keep up with the wastewater flow which caused the wastewater storage tank to overflow. The excess wastewater flowed out of the offal building and entered a storm water drain in the area. • Perdue acknowledged that they did not report the March 270' spill to NCDEQ. • Perdue stated that the following actions were performed to control and clean-up the spill: 1.) A drain cover was placed over the storm water drain to stop any additional wastewater from entering the drain. 2.) A contractor, EHC Environmental, was contacted and two (2) vacuum trucks were brought to the Rockingham site. 3.) Perdue's maintenance personnel replaced the drive belts to the two (2) Gorman Rupp pumps and placed them back in operation. 4.) One vacuum truck removed the backed -up water around the storm water drain. A second vacuum truck was used to clean the material from the ditch. 5.) A dam was constructed in the drainage ditch to contain the wastewater that had entered from the storm water culvert. 6.) On March 28, 2018, fresh water was used to flush the culvert piping. 7.) By the end of the day on March 28, 2018, the vacuum trucks left, and all the cleanup material was removed from the drainage ditch. • Perdue acknowledged there was an event on May 10, 2018, that resulted in a small amount of material entering a manhole that traveled through to the culvert to the drainage ditch. • Perdue called EHC Environmental for clean-up, which included flushing the culvert and cleaning up the ditch. • Perdue admits that a drain at the plant's shipping area was found to be stopped up which caused water to enter around the base of a stormwater manhole. Page 4 of 10 Perdue falsely claimed in their response letter that "no material was in danger of leaving the Perdue property". H. Perdue Agri Business LLC., is not allowed as a condition of any permit, special order or other appropriate instrument issued or entered into by the Commission under the provisions of this Article to violate water quality standards applicable to an assigned classification or to violate any effluent standard or limitation established for any point source. I. Falling Creek (Hinson Lake, Great Falls Pond), Stream Index 13-39-12-(10) is a Class C waters, in the Yadkin Pee -Dee River Basin, and is thus governed under 15A NCAC 02B .0211 Fresh Surface Water Quality Standards for Class C Waters and North Carolina General Statute (NCGS) 143-215.1(a). J. North Carolina General Statutes 143=215.1. (a) (1) states: Activities for Which Permits Required. — Except as provided in subsection (a6) of this section, no person shall do any of the following things or carry out any of the following activities unless that person has received a permit from the Commission and has complied with all conditions set forth in the permit: (1) Make any outlets into the waters of the State. K. North Carolina General Statutes 143-215.1. (a) (11) states: Activities for Which Permits Required. — Except as provided in subsection (a6) of this section, no person shall do any of the following things or carry out any of the following activities unless that person has received a permit from the Commission and has complied with all conditions set forth in the pennit: (11) Cause or permit discharges regulated under G.S. 143-214.7 that result in water pollution. L. Title 15A North Carolina Administrative Code 02B .0211 (1) states: Best Usage of Waters: aquatic life propagation and maintenance of biological integrity (including fishing and fish), wildlife, secondary recreation, agriculture, and any other usage except for primary recreation or as a source of water supply for drinking, culinary, or food processing purposes. M. Title 15A North Carolina Administrative Code 02B .0211 (2) states: Conditions Related to Best Usage: the waters shall be suitable for aquatic life propagation and maintenance of biological integrity, wildlife, secondary recreation, and agriculture. Sources of water pollution that preclude any of these uses on- either a short term or long-term basis shall be violating a water quality standard. Page 5 of 10 N. Title 15A North Carolina Administrative Code 02B .0211 (6) states: Dissolved oxygen: not less than 6.0 mg/l for trout waters; for non -trout waters, not less than a daily average of 5.0 mg/1 with a minimum instantaneous value of not less than 4.0 mg/l. O. Title 15A North Carolina Administrative Code 02B .0211 (7) states: Fecal coliform: shall not exceed a geometric mean of 200/100ml (MF count) based upon at least five consecutive samples examined during 'any 30-day period, nor exceed . 400/100ml in more than 20 percent of the samples. examined during such period. P. Title 15A North Carolina Administrative Code 02B .0211 (12) states: Oils, deleterious substances, colored, or other wastes: only such amounts as shall not render the waters injurious to public health, secondary recreation, or to aquatic life and wildlife, or adversely affect the palatability of fish, aesthetic quality, or impair the waters for any designated uses. Q. Permit No. NCS000130 contains the following relevant permit conditions: NPDES Permit NCS000130 Part III. Section A.3. Duty to Mitigate The permittee shall take all reasonable steps to minimize or prevent any discharge in violation of this permit with a reasonable likelihood of adversely affecting human health or the environment [40 CFR 122.41(d)]. NPDES Permit NCS000130 Part II1. Section C.1. Proper Operation and Maintenance The permittee shall at all times properly operate and maintain all facilities and systems of treatment and control (arid related appurtenances) which are installed or used by the permittee to achieve compliance with the conditions of this permit. Proper operation and maintenance also includes adequate laboratory controls and appropriate quality assurance procedures. This provision requires the operation of back-up or auxiliary facilities or similar systems which are installed by a permittee only when the operation is necessary to achieve compliance with the conditions of this permit [40 CFR 122.41 (e)]. NPDES Permit NCS000130 Part II1. Section E.7. Spills The permittee shall report to the local DEMLR Regional Office, within 24 hours, all significant spills as defined in Part IV of this permit: Additionally, the permittee shall report spills including: any oil spill of 25 gallons of more, any spill regardless of amount that causes a sheen on surface waters, any oil spill - Page 6 of 10 regardless of amount occurring within 100 feet of surface waters, and any oil spill less than 25 gallons that cannot be cleaned up within 24 hours. NPDES Permit NCS000130 Part III. Section E. 9.a. Twenty -Four Hour Reporting The permittee shall report to the central office or the appropriate regional office any noncompliance which may endanger health or the environment. Any information shall be provided orally within 24 hours from the time the permittee became aware of the circumstances. A written submission shall also be provided within 5 days of the time the permittee becomes aware of the circumstances. The written submission shall contain a description of the noncompliance, and its cause; the period of noncompliance, including exact dates and times, and if the noncompliance has not been corrected, the anticipated time compliance is expected to continue; and steps taken or planned to reduce, eliminate, and prevent reoccurrence of the noncompliance [40 CFR 122.41(l)(6)]. R. The cost to the State of the enforcement procedures in this matter totaled $3,354.34 Based upon the above Finding of Fact, I make the following: II. CONCLUSION OF LAW A. Perdue Agri Business LLC is a `person' within the meaning of G.S. 143-215.6A pursuant to G.S. 143-212 (4). B. Falling Creek located at the site constitutes waters of the State within the meaning of G.S. 143-212 (6). C. Perdue Agri Business LLC was issued Permit No. NCS000130 for the discharge of stonnwater from industrial activity in accordance with G. S. 143-215.1 (a) (11) and G.S. 143-214.7 that results in water pollution. D. On March 27, 2018, and May 10, 2018, Perdue Agri Business LLC violated North Carolina General Statute (NCGS) 143-215.1 (a) (1) by making an outlet into waters of the State without receiving a permit to discharge wastewater from the Commission. E. On March 27, March 28, and May 10, 2018, Perdue Agri Business LLC violated North Carolina General Statue 143-215.1 (a)(l 1) by causing or permitting discharges regulated under G.S. 143-214.1 that result in water pollution. Page 7 of 10 F. On March 27, 2018,, March 28, 2018, and May 10, 2018, Perdue Agri Business LLC violated Title 15A North Carolina Administrative Code 02B .0211 (1) and (2) by causing the waters to be unsuitable for aquatic life propagation and maintenance of biological integrity, wildlife, secondary recreation, and agriculture. G. On March 27, 2018, March 28, 2018, and May 10, 2018, Perdue Agri Business LLC violated Title 15A North Carolina Administrative Code 02B .0211 (6) by causing dissolved oxygen to measure less than a daily average of 5.0 mg/l. H. On March 27, 2018, March 28, 2018, and May 10, 2018, Perdue Agri Business LLC violated Title 15A North Carolina Administrative Code 02B .0211 (7) by causing fecal coliform to exceed a geometric mean of 200/100m1 (MF count). On March 27, 2018, March 28, 2018, and May 10, 2018, Perdue Agri Business LLC violated Title 15A North Carolina Administrative Code 02B .0211 (12) by causing oils, deleterious substances, colored, or other wastes in such amounts to impair the waters for any designated uses. On March 27, 2018, and May 10, 2018, Perdue Agri Business LLC violated NPDES Permit NCS000310, Part III, Section A.3. by failing to take all reasonable steps to minimize or prevent any discharge which had the likelihood of adversely affective human health or the environment. K. On March 27, 2018, and May 10, 2018, Perdue Agri Business LLC violated NPDES Permit NCS000310, Part III, Section C.1. by failing to at all times properly operate and maintain all facilities and systems of properly operate and maintain all facilities and systems of treatment and control (and related appurtenances) which are installed or used by the permittee to achieve compliance with the conditions of this permit. L. On March 27, 2018, and May 10, 2018, Perdue Agri Business LLC violated NPDES Permit NCS000310, Part III, Section E.T, by failing to report to the local the local DEMLR Regional Office, within 24 hours, all significant spills as defined in Part 1V of the permit. M. On March 27, 2018, and May 10, 2018, Perdue Agri Business LLC violated NPDES Permit NCS000310, Part III, Section E.9.a., by failing to report to the central office orally within 24 hours and within 5 days by writing of the time the permittee became aware of any noncompliance which may endanger health or the environment. N. Perdue Agri Business LLC may be assessed civil penalties in this matter pursuant to G.S. 143-215.6A (a)(1), which provides that a civil penalty of not more than twenty-fivethousanddollars ($25,000) per violation per day may be assessed against a person who violates any classification, standard, limitation, or Page 8 of 10 • M ' management practice established pursuant to G.S. 143-214.1, 143-214.2, or 143- 215. O. Perdue Agri Business LLC may be assessed civil penalties'iri tliis matter pursuant to G.S. 143-216.6A (a)(2). P. The State's enforcement cost in this matter may be assessed against Perdue Agri Business LLC pursuant to G.S. 143-215.3 (a)(9) and G.S. 143B-282.1(b)(8). Q. Jeff Poupart of the Division of Water Resources, pursuant to delegation provided by the Secretary of the Department of Environmental Quality'a'n4t.he Director of the Division of Water Resources, has the authority to assess civil penalties in this matter. Based upon the above Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, I make the following: III. DECISION Accordingly, Perdue Agri Business LLC is hereby assessed a civil penalty of- 019 for 2 of 2 violations of NCGS 143-215.1 (a)(l) by �n'aking an outlet by discharging wastewater into waters of the`State,without a permit. 000 3 of 3 violations of Title 15A North Carolina Administrative Code 02B .0211 (1) and (2) by causing the waters to be unsuitable for aquatic life propagation and maintenance-bf biological integrity, wildlife, secondary recreation, and agriculture. $ �1 3 of 3 violations of Title 15A North Carolina Administrative Code 02B .0211 (6) by causing dissolved oxygen to measure less than a daily average of 5.0 mg/l. $ 3 of 3 violations of Title 15A North Carolina Administrative Code 02B .0211 (7) by causing fecal coliform to exceed a geometric mean of 200/100m1 (MF count). $ 3 of 3 violations of Title 15A North Carolina Administrative Code 02B .0211 (12) by causing oils, deleterious substances, colored, or other wastes in such amounts to impair the waters for any designated uses. $ 2 of 2 violations of NPDES Permit No. NCS000130, Part II1, Section A.3. for failure to take all reasonable steps to minimize or Page 9 of 10 prevent any discharge which had the likelihood of adversely affecting human health or the environment. $ D 000 2 of 2 violations of NPDES Permit No. NCS000130, Part III, Section C.1. for failure to at all times properly operate and maintain all facilities and systems of treatment and control (and related appurtenances) which are installed or used by the permittee to achieve compliance with the conditions of the permit. 00 2 of 2 violations of NPDES Permit No. NCS000130, Part III, Section E.7. for failure of the permittee to report a significant spill within 24 hours to the local DEMLR Regional Office. $ 000 2 of 2 violations of NPDES Permit No. NCS000130, Part III, Section E.9.a. for failure of the permittee to report any noncompliance which may endanger health or the environment orally within 24 hours and within 5 days by writing of the time the permittee became aware of the circumstances to the central office or the appropriate regional office. $ TOTAL CIVIL PENALTY, authorized by G.S. 143-215.6A S $3,354.34 Enforcement Cost TOTAL AMOUNT DUE As required by G.S. 143-215.6A(c), in detennining the amount of penalty, I considered the factors set out in G.S. 14313-282.1(b), which are: 1 (1) The degree and extent of harm to the natural resources of the State, to the public health, or to private property resulting from the violations; (2) The duration and gravity of the violations; (3) The effect on ground or surface water quantity or quality or on -air quality; (4) The cost of rectifying the damage; (5) The amount of money saved by noncompliance; (6) Whether the violations were committed willfully or intentionally; t, (7) The prior record of the violator in complying or failing to comply with programs over which the Environmental Management Commission has regulatory authority; and (8) The cost to the State of the enforcement procedures Date eff Poupart Division of Water Resources Page I0 of 10 DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES- CIVIL PENALTY ASSESSMENT Violator: Perdue Agri Business LLC County: Richmond Case Number: DV-2018-0073 ASSESSMENT FACTORS ` 1) The degree and extent of harm to the natural resources of the State, to the public health, or to private property resulting from the violation; The Perdue Chicken Processing Plant -Rockingham Facility discharges to Falling Creek (Hinson Lake, Great Falls Pond), a Class C waters in the Yadkin -Pee Dee River Basin. Sampling performed on March 27, March 28, and May 10, 2018, verified that there were water quality standards violations for Dissolved Oxygen and Fecal Coliform in Falling Creek. Sampling also indicated quantitative increases for ammonia, TSS, and BOD over background`' levels. Deleterious wastes entered the stream as well. 2) The duration and gravity of the violation; - In terms of gravity, the spill contained deleterious substances such as chicken skin, feathers, and blood which posed a significant health and environmental hazard. Also, an offal truck was directly emptying into the storm drain that discharged directly into the stream. Perdue management did not react seriously enough and were unavailable to talk to DWR at the time of the spill. Additionally, the pump malfunctions and the resultant spill were not reported to DWR. In terms of duration, the effect from this spill was at least two months from end of March until the beginning of May 2018 as shown by sampling. 3) The effect on ground or surface water quantity or quality or air quality; Sampling performed on March 27, March 28, and May 10, 2018, verified that there were water quality standards violations for Dissolved Oxygen and Fecal Coliform in Falling Creek. Low dissolved oxygen and high fecal coliform levels in the water make the waters unsuitable for aquatic life propagation and are an indicator of poor water quality. 4) • The cost of rectifying the damage; Inadequate data exists to determine the exact amount of costs to rectify the damage. This would be the cost to replace two wastewater pumps and stream clean-up. 5) The amount of money saved by noncompliance; Inadequate data exists to determine the exact amount saved by noncompliance. The amount of money saved would have been the amount saved by not replacing the equipment prior to failure, the costs of not treating the wastewater, and costs of the clean-up. 6) Whether the violation was committed willfully or intentionally; For purposes of this assessment, the violations do not rise to the level of willful or intentional. However, several facts point to severe negligence by Perdue. The fact that the offal truck was discovered to be emptying directly into the drain during the site visit, shows that the contractor was either not properly trained, or not properly supervised. Perdue has a duty to ensure the wastes are disposed of properly. The facility manager going to lunch while the regional office staff were there on -site and had just witnessed the event while it was occurring is unacceptable. It raises a question as to whether this was a regular disposal process at this facility, and if was known by management to be occurring at this facility. The failure to report the violation also raises the level of seriousness of this violation. 7) The prior record of the violator in complying or failing to comply with programs over which the Environmental Management Commission has regulatory authority; and From January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2018, there have been 21 exceedances of the benchmark value (1,000 col/100mL) for Fecal Coliform. 8) The cost to the State of the enforcement procedures. $3,354.34 ❑The assessment factors listed above were considered. However, since this case pertains to the non -submittal of required information, impacts are unknown. O Date Jeff Poupart Water Quality Permitting Section Chief Division of Water Resources Department of Environmental Quality