NCG140369_COMPLETE FILE - HISTORICAL_20110621

STORMWATER DIVISION CODING SHEET
NCG?ERMITS
PERMITNO.
DOC TYPE
HISTORICAL FILE
❑ MONITORING REPORTS
DOC DATE
❑
YYYYMMDD

Jones, Jennifer
From:
Jones, Jennifer
Sent:
Thursday, July 21, 2011 10:36 AM
To:
Jones, Jennifer; [e-mail]
Cc:
Bennett, Bradley; Hodge, Al; Dumpor, Samir
Subject:
RE: Blank Renewal Form for NCG1400369.doc
Correction — I meant to write "Manfred" not "Manifred".
Thank you,
Jennifer Jones
Environmental Engineer
NCDENR I DWQ I Stormwater Permitting Unit
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
512 N. Salisbury St, Raleigh, NC 27604
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Website: http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/ws/su
"E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be
disclosed to third
parties."
From: Jones, Jennifer
Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2011 10:28 AM
To: hrichardsonpa(@emargmail.com
Cc: Jones, Jennifer; Bennett, Bradley; Hodge, Al- Dumpor, Samir
Subject: RE: Blank Renewal Form for NCG1400369.doc
Mr. Richardson,
I checked our files this morning to make sure that we didn't already have the correct information on file. It turns out we
did have an application for an NPDES permit, as applied for by °Manifred D. Alligood" — apparently when it was entered
into the database here it was done incorrectly. I should have checked that yesterday before calling — it was a long day
and I didn't think to do that yesterday.
I have called Mr. Alligood and told him that we do have the correct application and name for NCG140000, and he does
not need to do anything further for the NPDES ready -mixed concrete permit.
However, I did notice that Mr. Alligood olso hos a state storm water permit issued to ABHW Concrete (SW7061128). As
that was issued out of the Washington Regional Office, I can't see the actual application, but you and Mr. Alligood will
want to make sure that the applicant was "Manifred D. Alligood" for that permit as well — as the name "ABHW
Concrete" does not appear in the NC Secretary of State's database for registered companies in NC.
Again, I apologize for any inconvenience on your or Mr. Alligood's part. If you can please forward this to him for his
records I would appreciate it. I have copied my supervisor and the supervisor of the Washington Regional Office.
Thank you,

sensitivty of the mean diameter, which is 0.00008. Therefore, the value of
the mean sediment diameter used to determine the bed load rate is virtually
immaterial.
The Shiel equation is shown to be very sensitive to the slope and about
half as sensitive to the hydraulic radius, mean diameter, and flow rate, which
each have a magnitude of the relative sensitivity of approximately 1.0.
The SchoklitSCh equation is very sensitive to the slope and hydraulic
radius and very insensitive to the mean diameter. The relative sensitivities
of the inputs are identical to those of the DuBois equation.
It is interesting to note that the Goncharov equation is one of the two
equations, the other being the Shamov equation, that produce a positive value
for the relative sensitivity of the mean diameter, meaning that as the mean
diameter of the sediment increases the bed load decreases. All other
equations show a negative value for this input parameter, which means that as
the mean diameter of the sediment increases the bed load decreases. The
negative sensitivities suggest that, since an increase in sediment diameter
means larger sediment particles and thus heavier particles, then the rate of
bed -load transport would decrease since heavier particles are more difficult
to move. However, the positive sensitivities suggest that as the particles
increase in size they become heavier, so that although fewer particles are
moved, the total rate of bed load transport increases due to the heavier
weight of each particle. The Goncharov equation is also extremely sensitive
to the mean velocity and critical velocity as shown by relative sensitivity
values of 5.0 and -4.0, respectively.
The Shamov equation is fairly sensitive to the mean sediment diameter (a
positive value as discussed earlier) and extremely sensitive to the mean
velocity and critical velocity as in the Goncharov equation. Both the Shamov

Jennifer Jones
Environmental Engineer
NCDENR I DWQ I Stormwater Permitting Unit
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
S12 N. Salisbury St, Raleigh, NC 27604
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Email: iennifer [e-mail]
Website: http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq ws/su
' "E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be
disclosed to third
parties.* k
From: Jones, Jennifer
Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2011 4:30 PM
To: '[e-mail]'
Cc: Jones, Jennifer
Subject: Blank Renewal Form for NCG1400369.doc
Hello Mr. Richardson,
If you can please fill out the attached form and return it with the original signature of the owner we can renew Mr.
Alligood's permit.
All applications, reports, or information submitted to the Director shall be signed and
certified.
follows
a. All notices of intent to be covered under this General Permit shall be signed as
(1) For a corporation: by a responsible corporate officer. For the purpose of
this section, a responsible corporate officer means: (a) a president,
secretary, treasurer or vice president of the corporation in charge of a
principal business function, or any other person who performs similar
policy or decision making functions for the corporation, or (b) the manager
of one or more manufacturing production or operating facilities employing
more than 250 persons or having gross annual sales or expenditures
exceeding 25 million (in second quarter 1980 dollars), if authority to sign
documents has been assigned or delegated to the manager in accordance
with corporate procedures.
(2) For a partnership or sole proprietorship: by a general partner or the
proprietor, respectively; or
(3) For a municipality, state, federal, or other public agent
Thank you,
Jennifer Jones
Environmental Engineer
NCDENR I DWQ ! Stormwater Permitting Unit
1617 Maif Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
512 N. Salisbury St, Raleigh, NC 27604

x
and Goncharov equations are somewhat sensitive to the depth of flow. It can
be concluded by the negative relative sensitivity values that as the depth of
flow increases, the bed load rate decreases. This is supported by the fact
,that as the depth of flow increases, the flow cross -sectional area normal to
the direction of flow increases. Therefore, assuming a constant flow rate and
using the continuity equation, the mean velocity must decrease, thus
decreasing the amount of bed load capable of being transported.
The Egiazarov equation is sensitive to the slope and flow rate. It is
about 1.4 times more sensitive to the mean diameter and maximum dirameter of
sediment particles.
The Meyer -Peter equation is shown to be quite sensitive to the slope and
Slightly less sensitive to the flow rate. However, it is very insensitive to
the mean sediment diameter.
Comparison of Relative Sensitivities of Variables
As stated previously, by analyzing the rows of Table 3, the relative
sensitivities can be used to show which equations are the most or least
sensitive to particular input parameter. For example, it is apparent that the
DuBois, the Shields, and the Schoklitsch equations are all extremely
sensitive to slope, while the Egizarov and the Meyer -Peter equations are less
sensitive; also, the Goncharov and the Shamov equations do not require it as
an input. The hydraulic radius is seen to be important in the DuBois and
Schoklitscn equations and less important than in the Shield equation. The
DuBois, the Schoklitsch, and the Meyer -Peter equations are virtually
insensitive to the mean sediment aiameter, while the Shields and the Egiazarov
equations are sensitive to it. As mentioned earlier, the Goncharov and the
Shamov equations produce the only two positive relative sensitivity values for

Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Website: http://portal.ncdenr.org/webLwqlws/­5�u
"E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be
disclosed to third
parties.*"k

. 1 3..
the mean diameter. The only equation that requires the maximum diameter of
sediment particles is the Egiazarov equation. The depth of flow is a
necessary input only for the Goncharov and the Shamov equations, both of which
have moderate relative sensitivity values. The flow rate is required for the
Shield, the Egiazarov, and the the Meyer -Peter equations, with a nearly
constant relative sensitivity of about 1.0. Finally, the mean velocity and
critical velocity are required inputs for the Goncharov and the Shamov
equations only and have extreme effects on the bed load as seen by the large
relative sensitivities of approximately 4.7 and -3.7, respectively.

Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
May 9, 2007
Mr. Manfred D. Alligood, Jr.
ABHW Concrete
1935 West Fifth Street
Washington, North Carolina 27889
Subject: General Permit No. NCG140000
ABHW Concrete
COC No. NCG140369
Beaufort County
Dear Mr, Alligood:
In accordance with your application for a discharge permit received on Janurary 4, 2007,
and received again with revisions on March 19, 2007, we are forwarding herewith the subject
certificate of coverage (COC) to discharge under the subject state — NPDES general permit. This
permit is issued pursuant to the requirements of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and
the Memorandum of Agreement between North Carolina and the US Environmental Protection
Agency dated May 9, 1994 (or as subsequently amended).
Please take notice that this certificate of coverage is not transferable except after notice to
the Division of Water Quality. The Division of Water Quality may require modification or
revocation and reissuance of the certificate of coverage. This permit does not affect the legal
requirements to obtain other permits which may be required by the Division of Water Quality or
permits required by the Division of Land Resources, Coastal Area Management Act or any other
federal or local governmental permit that may be required.
An- Authorization to Construct treatment facilities has been issued concurrently with this
COC. The Washington Regional Office, telephone number [phone], shall be notified at
least forty-eight (48) hours in advance of operation of the installed facilities so that an in -place
inspection can be.made. Such notification to the regional supervisor shall be made during the
normal office hours from 8:00 a.m. until 5:00 p.m. on Monday through Friday, excluding State
Holidays.
Upon completion of construction and prior to operation of this permitted facility, a
certification must be received from a professional engineer certifying that the permitted facility
has been installed in accordance with the NPDES Permit, this Authorization to Construct, and
the approved plans and specifications. Mail the Certification (attached) to the Stormwater
Permitting Unit, 1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617, and mail a copy of the
Certification to the DWQ Washington Regional Office.
Since some of the wastewater flows at your site may commingle with stormwater flows,
please note that discharges from your wet detention pond should be reported as wastewater
discharges, on the reporting forms included with this letter. N Carolina
Naturally
North Carolina Division of Water Quality 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Phone [phone] Customer Service
Internet: h2o.enr.state.nc.us 512 N. Salisbury St. Raleigh, NC 27604 FAX [phone]
An Equal OpportuniO firmative Action Employer — 50% RecyclWl0% Post Consumer Paper

COC No. NCG 140369
Mr. Manfred D. Alligood, Jr
ABHW Concrete
May 9, 2007
One (1) set of approved plans and specifications is being forwarded to you. The Pennittee
shall maintain a copy of the approved plans and specifications on file for the life of the facility.
If you have any questions concerning this permit or Authorization to Construct, please contact
Ken Pickle at telephone number [phone] ext. 584.
Sincerely,
Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
cc: Washington Regional Office
DWQ Central Files
Stormwater Permitting Unit Files
Hood Richardson, PA, 110 West 2" d St., Washington, NC 27889
Attachments

COC No. NCG 140369
Mr. Manfred D. Alligood, Jr
ABHW Concrete
May 9, 2007
EnIlineer's Certification (COC No. NCG140369)
I, , as a duly registered Professional Engineer in the State of
North Carolina, having been authorized to observe (periodically, weekly, full time) the construction
of the project, for the
Project Name' Location
Permittee hereby state that, to the best of my abilities, due care and diligence was used in the observation
of the following installations:
• Construction of at
I certify that the construction of the above referenced project was observed to be built within substantial
compliance and intent of the approved plans and specifications.
Signature
Date
Registration No.
Mail this. Certification to: Stormwater Permitting Unit
NC Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Mail a copy to: DWQ Regional Supervisor
Washington Regional Office
943 Washington Square Mall
Washington, NC 27889

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
GENERAL PERMIT NO. NCG140000
CERTIFICATE OF COVERAGE No. NCG140369
STORMWATER AND PROCESS WASTEWATER DISCHARGES
NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM
In compliance with the provision of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1, other lawful standards and
regulations promulgated and adopted by the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission, and the
Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended,
Manfred D. Alligood, Jr.
is hereby authorized to operate a process wastewater treatment system, and is hereby authorized to discharge process
wastewater and stormwater from a facility located at
ABHW Concrete
347 South Wharton Station Road
Washington, North Carolina
Beaufort County
to receiving waters -designated as unnamed tributary to Maple Branch, a class C Sw NSW water in the Tar -Pamlico
River Basin in accordance with the effluent limitations, monitoring requirements, and other conditions set forth in
Parts I, 11, III, IV, V, and VI of General Permit No. NCG 140000 as attached.
This certificate of coverage shall become effective May 9, 2007.
This Certificate of Coverage shall remain in effect for the duration of the General Permit.
Signed this day May 9, 2007.
Alan W. Klimek, Director
Division of Water Quality
By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission

Markers
Name: Discharge Site - NCG140369
Short Name: Dschrg
Coordinates: 0350 35' 53.0" N, 0770 07' 16.8" W
Comment: ABHW Concrete, subbasin 03-03-06, Tar -Pamlico River Basin, Beaufort County,
unnamed tributary to Maple Branch, class C Sw NSW, USGS quad E30SE

Application review and basis for permitting, NCG140369, ABHW Concrete
May 7, 2007
Kbp
1. Processing history
a. First submittal: 12/1/06 NOI received; 12/4/06 Screening review & return #1135 -
inadequate plan and design basis and design details.
b. Second submittal: 1/4/07 NOI received & BIMS entry; 3/12/07 add -info letter.
c. Third submittal: 3/19/07 AI response; 5/7/07 SPU review.
2. What happens to the wastewaters?
a. High strength wastewaters include drum rinse out (and truck rinse off commingled
with it plus incident rainfall) at the recycle system chambers.
i. High pH and TSS wastes settle in three chambers and a recycle pit.
ii. Overflow from the pit enters an infiltration basin (infiltrative capacity
substantiated by Engineer's talcs) sized to take the 25-yr, 24-hr storm plus
one day of drum rinse flows, plus one foot of freeboard.
iii. Overflow from the infiltration basin and/or high -high overflow from recycle pit
will flow to wet detention basin before discharge to receiving water.
iv. Conclusion - High strength waters and stormwaters commingled with them
meet the requirement for a 25-yr, 24-hr hold without discharge. Recovery of
the design capacity is provided by the infiltration basin infiltrative losses. OK.
b. Low strength, low volume wastewaters include aggregate irrigation and loading area
washdown.
i. Engineer provides talcs to show that the site soils are sufficiently porous that
the estimated quantities of irrigation water and washdown water will not be
discharged off site under dry conditions.
ii. Engineer concludes that under wet conditions the commingled wastewater and
stormwaters will flow to the wet pond. Engineer fails to make the specific
argument that the discharge will meet TSS, pH, and settleable solids limits in
the permit. But, given the very large dilutive affect from the commingling of
the low strength wastes with the site stormwater, it is reasonable to conclude
that the wet pond discharge will meet permit limits. OK.
iii. Special provisions - Permit transmittal letter to note that the discharge from
the wet pond is to be treated as the wastewater discharge sampling point.
Engineer and applicant may not be aware that the potential for commingling of
all site stormwater with any amount of wastewater requires that what would
otherwise be viewed as just stormwater must be treated as the wastewater
discharge.
3. Conclusion - ok to permit under NCG14. Add emphasis in xsmittal letter on sampling of
wastewater.
4. Note - The site circumstances are fairly unusual. The high strength wastes receive settling in
a recycle system, infiltration sized for the 25-yr storm, and overflow treated in a wet pond.
This system would be permittable for the high strength wastes without the wet detention
pond. The extra treatment provided in the wet pond is not often provided in other designs.
END

O�OF WArFiQQG Michael F. Easley, Governor
6� y William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
'r Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
December 4, 2006
Mr. Manfred D. Alligood, Jr.
1935 West Fifth Street
Washington, North Carolina 27889
Subject: Return of NCG140000 NOI #1135
ABHW Concrete, new Washington plant
Beaufort County
Dear Mr. Alligood:
On December 1, 2006, the Division of Water Quality, Stormwater Permitting Unit received your
Notice of Intent (NOI) to be covered under North Carolina's general permit NCG140000, submitted
for your new location in Washington. Your submittal contained a check for $80, one NOI form, one
set of calculations, one copy of two site location maps, an Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan
Permit Application, and three copies of a site plan by Hood Richardson, P.A. The submittal is
significantly deficient, and we are returning it unprocessed.
The submittal is deficient in the following particulars.
1. Inadequate design basis. You have applied for a permit to discharge stormwater and
wastewater under our general permit NCG140000, and for an Authorization to Construct
treatment facilities. North Carolina rules require DWQ to conduct an engineering review of
your application. Briefly, our key design basis criteria for review for your proposed new
construction are: Does the application include engineering calculations that predict
compliance with the permit li.mits (i.e. TSS removal talcs, Settleable Solids removal talcs,
pH correction narrative) for wastewater discharges; or else, does the application include
water balance calculations that show that there will be no discharge of wastewaters from
the recycle system in response to the 25-year, 24-hour storm event? The two criteria are
stated in items 14 and 15 of the NOI that you submitted with the package. The submittal is
not approvable in that it is not based on either of the two approvable design bases. The
submitted calcs seem to be based on a design approach that may be acceptable under other
jurisdictions and under other programs (the coastal State Stormwater Management
program, for instance), but such a design approach is not acceptable for the federal NPDES
stormwater discharge permit that you have applied for.
Note also that there is no design narrative that tells us specifically how the stormwater and
wastewater flows will be generated, collected, conveyed, treated, and discharged.
Further, note that the -submittal makes no attempt to address the control of high -pH
wastewaters presumably to be discharged from the operations of your proposed ready
mixed concrete facility.
2. Inadequate site plan and engineering details. Please consider that as reviewers, we
can't tell from the site plan whether the measures you are proposing are sufficient, or not,
because the drawing does not present a complete picture of the site with respect to our
NorthCarolina
North Carolina Division of Water Quality 1617 ]Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Phone [phone] Customer Service
Internet: www.ncwaterquah1y.oM Location: 512 N. Salisbury St. Raleigh, NC 27604 Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycled/] O% Post Consumer Paper

Mr. Manfred D. Alligood, Jr.
Page 2 of 2
December 4, 2006
items of interest in a review. Specifically: we must know where the wastewater and
stormwater discharge points are - - they're not labeled as such on the site plan. We must
know where all the wastewater flows originate - - for most ready mix sites we need to see
the truck rinse off station and the overflow piping from the recycle system (neither
identified on the site plan), in addition to the drum wash out station, the recycle system,
the aggregate piles, and the batch plant (all shown.) We must see the proposed finished
grade topo lines so that we can confirm for ourselves the direction of overland flow at the
constructed facility. We must see a delineation of the contributing drainage areas that will
flow to the proposed wastewater and stormwater control measures..
Further, we must see engineering details of the configuration of the mixing drum wash pit in
order to review the volume and hydraulic operation of that structure.
Please ask your engineer to contact me for a more comprehensive explanation of the submittal--.
requirements for the NPDES stormwater discharge general permit.
Sincerely,
Ken Pickle =
DWQ Stormwater Permitting Unit
[phone]x584
ken. pickle(&ncmail.net
Enclosures: Returned application package
cc: Hood Richardson, Hood Richardson, P.A., 110 West 2nd St., Washington, NC 27889
Roger Thorpe, DWQ Washington Regional Office
SPU County Files — Beaufort County

X4.
I
NCDENNR
£fMPD.4[NT Nf� Ndt/n.� fK3Gl:AGG',
Division of Water Quality I Surface Water Protection
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
NCG1 40000
FOR AGENCY USE ONLY
Date Received
Year Month Da
`
Certificate 'ofcovera c
r I C I G L 114
Check # Apwunt
l) r
Permit Assi ed to—
l
NOTICE OF INTENT
1�
0
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System application for coverage under General Per
NCG140000:
f
STORMWATER AND PROCESS WASTEWATER DISCHARGES associated with activities clas
ak.�,
SIC (Standard Industrial Classification) Code - 3273 Ready Mixed Concrete
G
c;
For new plant;sites that will discharge or recycle process wastewater (even if commingled 0
stormwater): This NOI is also an APPLICATION FOR Authorization to Construct (ATC) waste
treatment facilities. ATC requests must be submitted at least 90 days prior to construction`.
For existiny plant sites discharging or recycling process wastewater (even if commingled with
stormwater): This NOI is also an APPLICATION FOR Authorization to continue tgopgrate wastewater
treatment facilities in place. Construction, modification, or installation of any new treatment components
at an existing Isite requires an ATC. r
Treatment facilities used to treat or recycle process wastewater inciudirt stormwaDBMP structures
y _P ( g
treating process wastewater flows commingled with stormwater) require'an ATC-prior to construction
per 15A NCAC 2H .0138. The authorization to construct or continue to operate will be issued at the
same time as the Certificate of Coverage (CoC for the NCG14 permit. Design of treatment facilities
must comply with requirements of 15A NCAC-2H .0138 & .0139.
Construction of wastewater treatment facilities (this includes recycle systems) at new or existing plant
sites requires' submission of three (3) sets of plans and specifications signed and sealed by a
Professional Engineer (P.E.) or qualified staff along with this application. A copy of the design
calculations should be included. Please see auestions 14 & 15.
1
+~r For questions, please contact the DWQ Regional Office for your area. (See page 5)
(Please print or type)
✓ 1) Mailing address of ownerloperator (address to which all permit correspondence will be mailed):
Name Manfred D. Alligood, Jr.
Street Address
City
Telephone No.
1935 West Fifth Street
Washington State NC ZIPCode 27889 /
252• 946-5899 Fax:
2) Location of facility producing discharge: .%__1
Facility Name ABHW Concrete �
Facility Contact Manfred D . Alligood
Street Address 347 South Wharton Station Road
City Washington State NC 1 ZIPCode 27889
County Beaufort r' t
Telephone No. 252 9 4 6— 5 8 9 9 Fax: N A
Page 1 of 5 ' f
'As per 15A NCAC 2H .0106
'Unless treatment;facilities are designed, constructed, and put into operation by employees internal to the company who are qualified to
perform such work for their respective companies in accordance with General statutes, 89C-25 (7), plans and specifications must be signed
and sealed by a P.E.
SWU-229-101905
Last revised 1011912005
4

�
) �
�
ti _ -r
_ j
„ _'F__��, _ � S
�
r�
,5 •�
s
3
� c
�
�'
�r.l
�-;
�
p�r--
i ;�
U 4
�.
f.
S.
11.
��—
i
i
��
�.
� ��`..
i
�
.r
�
. li
-
1�
J .1
+ ..

NCG140000 N.O.I.
✓ 3) Physical location information:
Please provide a narrative description of how to get to the facility (use street names, state road numbers, and
distance and direction from a roadway intersection). Frnm C'ratrb' s storQ on QS 264 west of
sitg is beside church.
(A copy of a county map or USGS quad sheet with facility clearly located on the map Is a required part of this application.)
4) Latitude3 5 ° 3 5 ' 5 0 " Longitude 7 7 ° 0 7 ' 17 "(deg, min, sec)
5) This NPDES Permit Application applies to which of the following:
jai] New or Proposed Facility Date operation is to begin February, 2007
❑ Existing
6) Standard Industrial Classification:
Provide the 4 digit Standard Industrial Classification Code (SIC Code) that describes the primary industrial
activity at this facility
SIC Code: � _?_ 2_
7) Provide a brief description of the types of industrial activities and products produced at this facility:
(Include a site diagram showing the process areas present at this facility.)
Ready mix concrete
B) Discharge points ! Receiving waters:
How many discharge points (ditches, pipes, channels, etc.) convey stormwater and/or wastewater from the
property? nnP_
What is the name of the body or bodies of water (creek, stream, river, lake, etc.) that the facility stormwater
and/or wastewater discharges end up in? map 1 p, Branch, Trapters Creek, TAr River
if the site stormwater discharges to a separate storm sewer system, name the operator of the separate storm
sewer system (e.g. City of Raleigh municipal storm sewer). None
Receiving -water classification (if known):( , NSW
Note: Discharge of process wastewater to receiving waters classified as WS-Il to WS-V or SA must
be approved by the N.C. Dept. of Environmental Health. If DEH does not approve, coverage
under NCG140000 cannot be granted. No new discharges of process wastewater are permitted
in receiving waters classified as WS-L or freshwater ORW.
9) Does this facility have any other NPDES permits?
R7 No
❑ Yes
If yes, list the permit numbers for all current NPDES permits for this facility: N /A
10) Does this facility have any Non -Discharge permits (ex: recycle permits)? r
r
® No
❑ Yes
If yes, list the permit numbers for all current Non -Discharge permits for this facility. N/A
11) Does this facility employ any best management practices for stormwater control?-'
❑ No
E3 Yes
If yes, please briefly describe:A wet detection basin to be approved by NC DENR.
Page 2 of 5
SWU-229-101905 Detention Last revised 10/1912005

NCG-140000 N.O.I.
12) Does this facility have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan?
❑ hlo
'r es
If ye:5, when was it implemented? The stormwasster management permit application
✓ 13) Ai a vehicle maintenance activities occFe�ing or planted at this facility?
M] IVo
❑ Yes
Wastewater Treatment Design Informatfort
14) Are discharges occurring or planned from any of the following process wastewater generating activities?
Vehicle and equipment cleaning ❑ Yes No
�
WiAling of raw material stockpiles Yes ❑ Nd
Mixing drum cleaning ® Yes ❑ No
It yes to any of the above, please describe the type of process used to treat and/or recycle the process
wastewater. See attached.
For a sufficient application, you must provide design specifics (e.g., design volume, retention time, surface
area, etc.) and calculations to demonstrate compliance with permit effluent limits (pH — 6-9 SU, Total
Suspended Solids (TSS) — 30 mgll, and Settleable Solids (SS) — 5 ml/I.) [Use separate sheet(s)].
If all these discharges are recycled, please refer to Question 15.
For plants that recycle and/or discharge process wagtewater:
When applying for this permit, you are also applying for an authorization to construct (new
treatment facilities) or authorization to continue to operate (existing treatment facilities) as
part of the NOI. For neVr sftesyou must submit three (3) sets of design plans and
specircations with this application Aild provide supporting calculations that predict
compliance of final discharge with permit limits. For qX4Ung Aligm, applicants should submit
three (3) sets of plans and specs for facilities as-bullt and provide as many design details as
possible,, or submit a detallo diagram of treatment systems in place that Includes information
such as tank volumes, dimensions, retention time, piping, settling basin details, etc.
Please note: If new treatment systems are planned for an existing site, an ATC will be required
prior to construction of those facilities. Plans/specs/calculatlons prepared by a P.E. and the
regerest for an ATC may be submitted with this NOI, or separately at a later date. DWQ may
request the status of your plans for requesting an ATC upon Issuance of the COC.
15) Oyes the facility use or plan to use a recycle system?
❑ rlo
® )'es
If yes, what size storm event is the system designed to hold before overflowing? (for example, 10-yr, 24-hr)
2 E year, 24-hr rainfall event
For a recycle system (regardless of when It overflows), please provide plans, calculations, and design specifics
(e.g., throughput assumptions/water balance, design volume, retention time, surface area, amount of
freeboard in design storm event, etc.). [Use separate sheet(s)].
—� For a sufficient application, the information must demonstrate compliance; of final discharge with permit effluent
limits (pH — 6-9 SU, Total Suspended Solids (TSS) — 30 mg/I, and Settleable Solids (SS) -- 5 ml/1), or must
demonstrate that the recycle system has sufficient capacity to contain runoff from a 25-year, 24-hr rainfall
event plus one foot of freeboard under design operating conditions.
Page 3 of 5
SWU-229-101905
Last revised 10119/2005

NCG140000 N.0.3.
16) Are wastewater treatment facilities (including recycle systems) planned in the 100-year flood plain?
No ❑ Yes if so, include information to demonstrate protection from flooding. (Minimum design
requirements for treatment works include protection from the 100-year flood, per 15A NCAC 2H .0219.)
J 17) Hazardous Waste:
a) Is this facility a Hazardous Waste Treatment, Storage, or Disposal Facility?
IN No
❑ Yes
b) Is this facility a Small Quantity Generator (less than 1000 kg. of hazardous waste generated per month) of
hazardous waste?
7 No
❑ Yes
c) is this facility a Large Quantity Generator (1000 kg. or more of hazardous waste generated per month) of
hazardous waste?
No
❑ Yes
d) If you answered yes to questions b. or c., please provide the following information:
Types) of waste: Nf A
How is material stored:
Where is material stored:
How many disposal shipments per year:
Name of transport 1 disposal vendor:
Vendor address:
18) Certification:
North Carolina General Statute 143-215.6 B(i) provides that:
Any person, who knowingly makes any false statement, representation, or certification in any application, record, report, plan, or other
document fited or required to be maintained under this Article or a rule implementing this Article; or who knowingly makes a false
statement of a material fact in a rulemaking proceeding or contested case under this Article; or who falsifies, tampers with, or knowingly
renders inaccurate any recording or monitoring device or method required to be operated or maintained under this Article or rules of the
(Environmental Management) Commission implementing this Article shall be guilty of a Class 2 misdemeanor which may include a fine
not to exceed ten thousand dollars ($10,000).
1 hereby request coverage under the referenced General Permit. I understand that coverage under this permit
will constitute the permit requirements for the discharge(s) and is enforceable in the same manner as an
individual permit.
I certify that I am familiar with the information contained in this application and that to the best of my knowledge
and belief such information is true, complete, and accurate.
Printed Name of Person Signing: Ma n f red 1) -_ Al 1 ;good , Jr
Title: 4h,,ne T _
(Signs re of Applicant) (D to Sighed)
Notice of Intent must be accompanied by a check or money order for $B0.00 made payable to:
NCDENR
Page 4 of 5
5WU-229-101905 Last revised 10/19/2005

NCG140000 N.O-I.
Final Checklist
This application will be returned as incomplete unless all of the following items have been included:
" Check for $80 made payable to NCDENR.
✓ IS� This completed application and all supporting documentation (including design details and calculations for
treatment systems).
—t If an Erosion & Sedimentation Control (E&SC) Plan is required from Division of Land Resources (DLR)
1 or local designee: documentation verifying applicant has developed and submitted that Plan to the governing
agency (required per 15A NCAC 02H .0138).
—� For new sites (or sites that will install new treatment facilities): Three (3) copies of plans and
1 specifications for wastewater treatment facilities (including recycle systems), signed and sealed by a
Professional Engineer or qualified staff meeting requirements of G.S. 89C-25 (7).
`��❑ For existing sites: three (3) copies of plans and specifications for wastewater treatment facilities (including
N/A recycle systems) as built, stamped and sealed by a Professional Engineer, or (only if plans not available) a
detailed diagram of treatment systems in place that includes information such as tank volumes, dimensions,
retention time, piping, settling basin details, etc.
A site map showing, at a minimum, (existing or proposed):
(a) outline of drainage areas, (b) stormwaterlwastewater treatment structures, (c) location of
storm waterlwastewater outfalls (corresponding to which drainage areas), (d) runoff conveyance structures,
(e) areas where materials are stored, (f) impervious areas, and (g) site property lines.
A county map or USGS quad sheet with location of facility clearly marked.
Mail the entire package to:
Stormwater Permitting Unit
Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
Note
The submission of this document does not guarantee the issuance of an NPDES permit.
For questions, please contact the DWQ Regional Office for your area.
DWQ Regional Office Contact Information:
Asheville Office ...... [phone]
Fayetteville Office ... [phone]
Mooresville Office ... [phone]
Raleigh Office ........ [phone]
Washington Office ...[phone]
Wiimington Office ... [phone]
Winston-Salem ...... [phone]
Central Office .........[phone]
Page 5 of 5 (0

70 T3 4.309;0 NLEG Tit 312�
ICI wwlJ '.N,IL
J
X 31-1
44DOom-N.
r 1, 45
A NN
5
X 26 lk
Da Cl4ape
u
P as,
41
43
35--,
I?aw
x
3942
28 ZE (�hapol .
L
1407
Sta
3 4-
Is,
7 c
� 6R
z 5
3940 ?
J
35'
> 6
�-�H!aye All
393
If
IN
WASHGTON, N- C.
'W[Ni-ry 15, QUADRANrLF-
1 - ` _ _ CSE14 CHOCo i
35077
2
1951
PHC)T(:)REVISED 1983
'
DMA 5555 ll:SF sERIES V842
-�j R.
3938
7

WI
BEAUFORT COUNTY
^' NORTH CAROLINA
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
OMSION Of YTO.'M'AYS « Gi5 UJ Tt
V.S.OEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
PEOERAI MICMwAY ADI INISTRAl10N
f ti
Y
I
1
a 1
I
143U

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Washington Regional Office
Michael F. Easley, Governor . William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
DIVISION OF LAND RESOURCES
LAND' QUALITY SECTION
December 22,..2006
LETTER OF L
Mr. Manfred D. Alligood, Jr.
1935 West Fifth Street
Washington, North Carolina 27889
RE: Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan No. Beauf-2007-010
ABHW Concrete
SR 1409 - Beaufort County
River Basin: Tar -Pamlico
Date Received: December 1, 2006
Responsible Party: Manfred D. Alligood, Jr.
Dear Mr. Alligood:
This office has completed its review of the erosion and sedimentation control plan for the
referenced 3.9 acre disturbance. Based on the information provided, we have determined the
submitted plan for the grading associaied with the construction of a commercial facility, if
properly implemented and responsibly maintained, should meet the intent and minimum
requirements of the Act. We, therefore, issue this LETTER OF APPROVAL.
In 1973, the Sedimentation Pollution Control Act (copy available upon request) was
enacted. It established a performance oriented program with the OBJECTIVE of PREVENTING
SEDIMENT DAMAGE to adjoining properties and/or natural resources resulting from land
disturbing activities through the use of reasonable and appropriate Best Land Management
Practices, based on the approved plan and changing site conditions, during the course of the
project. AS THE DECLARED RESPONSIBLE PARTY, YOUR LEGAL RESPONSIBULITY
is to understand the Act and comply with the following minimum requirements of the Act and the
above listed modifications (if any):
-- an erosion and sedimentation control plan is only valid for 3 years
following the date of initial approval, if no land -disturbing activity has been
undertaken;
943 Washington Square Mall, Washington, North Carolina 27889 Telephone [phone], FAX [phone]

Mr. Manfred D. Alligood, Jr.
December 22, 2006
Page 2
-- the LATEST APPROVED soil erosion and sediment control plan will be
used during inspection to determine compliance and a copy of the plan must
be on file at the job site;
-- erosion and sediment control measures or devices are to be installed to
safely withstand the runoff resulting from a 10 year storm event - 6.5 - 7
inches in 24 hours or at the rate of 6.5 - 7 inches in 1 hour.
-- unless the off -site borrow and/or disposal sites are identified in the erosion
control plan, no earthen material is to be brought on or removed from the
project site;
-- except in the case of a storm related emergency, a revised erosion and
sedimentation control plan must be submitted to and approved by this
office prior to initiating any significant changes in the construction,
grading or drainage plans;
a buffer zone, sufficient to restrain visible sedimentation, "lust be provided
and maintained between the land -disturbing activity and any adjacent
property or watercourse;
-- new or affected cut orfilled slopes must be at an angle that can be retained
by vegetative cover, AND musf be provided 12ith a groUndsufficient
to restrain erosion within 21 calendar days of coMnletion Q f any p as
(rough or, rail o FradinP (RYE GRASS IS NOT in the APPROVED
seeding specifications NDR is it an A substitute for the
providing of a temporary ground cover);
-- the CER77EWATE OF PLAN APPROVAL must be posted at the primary
entrance to the job site and remain until the site is permanently stabilized;
-- unless a temporary, manufactured, lining material has been specified, a
clean straw mulch must be applied, at the minimum rate of 2 tons/acre, to
all seeded areas. The mulch must cover at least 75 % of the seeded area
after it is either tacked, with an acceptable tacking material, or crimped in
place;
-- in order to comply with the intent of the Ae7, the scheduling of the land -
disturbing activities is to be such that both the area of exposure and the
time between the land disturbance and the providing of a ground cover is
minimized;

-- .
Mr. Manfred D. Alligood, Jr.
December 22, 2006
Page 3
-- a permanent ground cover. sufficient restrain erosion, must be.provided
within the shorter of 15 working or 90 calendar days after completion of
construction or development on any portion of the tract (RYE GRASS I�
NOT in the APPRUY seeding specifications SM is it an
ACCEPTABLE substitute for the providing of a nurse cover for the
permanent grass cover); and,
-- this approval is based, in part, on the accuracy of the information provided
in the Financial ResponsibiiitylOwnership form submitted with the project
plans. You are required to file an amended form if there is any change in
the information included on the form. This approval and the financial
responsibility/liability cited in it does not automatically transfer with a
change in project ownership.
Be advised that to ensure compliance with the approved plan and the program
requirements, unannounced periodic inspections will be made. If it is determined that the
implemented plan is inadequate, this office may require the installation of additional measures
and/or that the plan be revised to comply with state law. (Note: Revisions to the scope of this
project without prior approval of the plan showing the changes can be considered a violation).
Failure to comply with any part of the approved plan or with any requirements of this program
could result in the taking of appropriate legal action (civil or criminal) against the financially
responsible party (Manfred D. Alligood, Jr.). Some options are Stop Work Orders and the
assessing of a civil penalty of up to $5000 for the initial violation plus up to $5000 per day for
each day the site is out of compliance.
In recognizing the desirability of early coordination of sedimentation control, we believe
it would be beneficial for you and your contractor to arrange a preconstruction conference to
discuss the requirements of the approved erosion and sedimentation control plan. Prior to
beginning this project, YOU ARE REQUIRED TO either CONTACT THIS OFFICE TO
ADVISE Mr. Gary Novak (252-946-6481, ext. 3857) OF THE CONSTRUCTION START-UP
DATE, contractor and on -site contact person OR complete and return the attached Project
Information Sheet to the above named.
Acceptance and approval of this plan is conditioned upon your compliance with Federal
and State water quality laws, regulations and rules. In addition, the land disturbing activity
described in this plan may also require approval or permitting from other agencies - Federal, State
or local. These could include the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers under Article 4.0.4.
jurisdiction, the Division of Water Quality - Surface Water Section under stormwater regulations
(contact the Stormwater group at 252-946-6481), county, city or town agencies under other local
ordinances, or other approvals that may be required. This apprQyal does nQJ 5upernde any
other apprQv l or permit.

Mr. Manfred D. Alligood, Jr.
December 22, 2006
Page 4
Please be advised that a rule to protect and maintain existing buffers along watercourses
in the Tar -Pamlico River Basin became effective on January 1, 2000. The Tar -Pamlico River
Riparian Area Protection and Maintenance Rule (15A NCAC 2B.0259) applies to a 50 (horizontal)
foot wide zone along all perennial and intermittent streams, lakes, ponds and estuaries in the Tar -
Pamlico River basin with forest vegetation on the adjacent land or "riparian area". in riparian
areas, the rule prohibits all land disturbance, new development and fertilizer use in the first 30
(horizontal) feet directly adjacent to the stream and/or coastal wetland vegetation. With the
exception of clearing, seeding and a one-time fertilizer use to establish the grass, the rule prohibits
new development in the zone 20 feet landward of the first 30 feet of riparian area. For more
information about the riparian area rule, please contact the Division of Water Quality's
Wetland/401 Unit at 919-733-1786.
Please be advised that all land -disturbing activities affecting 1 or more acres are required
to have a (Federal) NPDES permit. Enclosed is the Construction Activities General NPDES
Permit - NCGOlOOOO for this project. The responsibility for understanding and complying with
this permit rests with you, the financially responsible party. Be aware that failure to comply with
this permit could result in both the State and Federal governments taking appropriate legal action.
Contact the Division of Water Quality - Surface Water Section at [phone] should you have
any questions regarding monitoring and record keeping requirements of the permit.
Sincerel ,
GE�
Patrick H. McClain, PE
Regional Engineer
Pm
enclosures
w/o enc. cc: Hood Richardson, PE
Alton Hodge, Division of Water Quality

' 1
[phone]
l wbs S�hof2s ? 5of tds +rz�5�rt?
2 11J 3 - Pbcut a•#U'r' ww 5oeXce57
- e +1ze e-o.,,pl t Me -&-ere Z 9c�n
�V�e&baar--4 PC�c,
4 , 3�viP.s
✓ HOOD RICHARDSON, PA
Engineers - Surveyors - Geologists
i10 West Second Street
Washington, North Carolina 27889 r
�►� r
December 26, 2006
Ready Mix Plant_Sitc
Permeability of Wash Water Pond Site
✓ A second well was drilled at the infiltration pond site on December 16, 2006
The purpose of this boring was to confirm the boring made on December 8 h, to detennine the location
of the water table d thJpercolation raft • t depth. $ . 6 {
.4 e Uzi
A hole 10.1 feet deep was bored by hand auger. A 2-inch schedule 40 PVC casing
was set with four feet of 0.01 inch slotted screen.
f6 S
On December l7's the 24 hour stabilized static water !ev 1 vas measured and detennined to be 8.6 feet
below the ground surface which is at elevation 6.4 feet. The proposed bootttom of the pond elevation is 11.5.
QJ=ts_ foot separation whichis �deqat,'¢��ua� �.� w,4 a 7
A percolation rate test was done using the slug method. Water was pored into the well and elevations
V3easured. The percolation rate is rapid with 0.6 foot over a 3-minute period of time (under saturated
conditions) whit EEt per hour. ther tests were not done because of the high rate obtained and large
quantity of water required to slug the well into saturation in order to measure the percolation rate.
fit. V This is an extremely high rate even through not unexpected in this coarse evenly sorted sand.
There was no evidence based on color, texture or accretions that there is a seasonal suspended water
table at any location other than the 6.4-foot elevation.
SUMMARY
w�
It is unlikely that the seasonal water level�rise to the bottom elevation of the proposed pond.
Therefore, the proposed pond will function well during all seasons. The increased percolation rate at depth
indicates that water in the proposed pond wrill percolate well and the pan should have a long life.
_.ram
WO
2(01A ', fvx,#/v
y ty •'r eF ''��
��
's_: •4Y
L5�Mo V �.
JAN Q 4 2007
DENR - WATER QUAI
_Wetlands & gtpm�vvater Branch

[phone]
Mai
=.r
HOOD RICHARDSON, PA
Engineers - Surveyors - Geologists
/ t 10 West Second Street
Washington, North Carolina 27889
December 08, 2006 ',
ABHW Concrete
Ready Mix Plant Site
Permeability of wash water pond site.
The purpose of this investigation is t determine the rate of infiltration at the proposed infiltration pond
site. Wash water from the truck mixing drums passes thru a three compartment: settling tank and is
the disposed"by ground absorption in the pond.
Soils at this site are Seabrook and possibly Tarboro. Both soils are medium to fine sands having
some silt and minor quantities of clay. Sands are buff colored loos�anid en.A boring was made to 5.7 feet of depth, aboutl2, feet belei the bf the proposed
infiltration pond. After passing thru the topsoil (about 8 mches) the sand was ur form to the 5.7-foot---'
depth. There was no evidence of stratification, silt or clay layers. No evidence based on color, was fo nd-f
indicate the presence of seasonal water level. No free water was encountered to the depth of 5.7 feet. '
The field observation is that this sand should have a high rate of percolation! Therefore, a simple test to
E
determine the permeability (percolation rate) was used. The lack of stratification allowed the entire hole a
bored to the tested without the need to isolate levels or strata.
The hole was filled with water and the rate of decline of the water level was'measured. The rate of
decline was rapid. Calculations from measurements indicate tha 3.96 cubic feet per square feet/per hour
of water may be disposed of
ti
Hood,1 Richaidso# P_
;fir.. =�,:�� „ ,• � � .
/VI1 CY%�Gfi� G+J.-2c5A �Ou.7
Elm@ 0 W R
JAE-WEME
2007
D R WAL

deC2r�«�%re,h �� ZuU
,�'onrncC-- .12ly-6�rL,4 114
/,4
s-e 633 57r
CV
D. D
�z
0, 3S 6.0 = o, Y 3 �- 3
U
-
3Koo
S� L�
3fL�--
rr 1 �It 1)

N
,c-,r /� Trod
Y
C Z e c,l < Iv Y / is
Oy
D 2 /ter' l C.
3, ��
QoO'-II //r
3
a-,,wt �- i;� d" e, �,4 /,c- A P, sh
f0
37
•, Pic

i v . 108 Elements of Water Supply and Waste -Water Disposal
limit has been observed even at vanishingly small hydraulic gradients
such as a few inches a mile.
' tl The value of K is expressed in various units, depending upon the
H
.}, interests of the investigator and the system of measurements em-
1'
iE, ployed. The U. S. Geological Survey has adopted as its standard
coefficient of permeabilitythe gallons per day of mate, at 60F flow-
::
• = ing through 1 sq it of cross-section under a gradient of 1 it per it
1 (100%). In the field coefficient of permeability, flow is related to the
d prevailing temperature, a cross-section 1 mile in width and 1 it in
depth, and a hydraulic gradient of 1 ft per mile. At a groundwater
i temperature of 60 F, the field coefficient and the standard coefficient
„. are identical- The coefficient of transmissibility is obtained by multi-
plying the standard coefficient of permeability by the full saturated
r height, or depth, of the aquifer.
The range in magnitude of the coefficient of permeability for various
classes of soils is shown in Figure 5-3. Individual values may be
determined (1) by laboratory experiment or field test or (2), for
granular deposits, by calculations that are based upon measurable
•
` 1 characteristics of the sail. and water. The second method is of par-
ry.
ticular importance in connection with the filtration of water and-is
discussed in Chapter 15.
I Example 5-1. (a) Estimate the velocity of flow in feet per day and the.
'.rtH,
ii
l
discharge in gallons per clay through an aquifer of very coarse sand 1,000 ft
'� i a`
I : wide and 50 it deep when the slope of the ground -water table is 20; ft per
}dt`
11 mile. -(b) Find the standard coefficient of permeability and the coefficient
.41Mr
of transmissibility on the assumption that the temperature of the ground
tivater is 60 F.
Coefficient of permeability, cm/sec at unit hydraulic gradient
102 10 1 10 1 l0 2 10-3 10-1 la 5 10 s 10-1 10-s 10-1
1 I' t I I 1 I I 1 r
Clean gravel
Clean sands;
mixtures c1 clean
sands and gravel
Very line sands; silts;
mixtures of sand, silt, and clay;
glacial till; stratified clays; etc.
Unweathered
clays
Nature of soils
Good aquifers '
Poor aquifers
Impervious
Flow characteristics
Goad drainage
Poor drainage Ron -draining
Retention characteristics
Pervious parts of dams and dikes
Impervious parts of dams and dikes
I Use in dams acd dikes
I t I I I I ' i
106 105 104 103 102 10 1 10, 1 10 2 10_ 3 i0_ 4
Standard coefficient of permeability, gpd /sq ft at gradient of 1 ft per ft
figure 5-3. Magnitude of the coefficient of permeability for different classes of soils. After
Arthur Casagrande.
all
Collection of Grot
i
[i. From Figure 5-3
i K
Since s = 20/5,280, E
per day and the discha
b. The standard cor
an}i the coefficient of tl
IT,
Measurement
measured either in t
tn'nations are more.,
arc relatively shall
17LI is are useful onl
af�proximated and a
the gathering groum
iP us materials or 1
laboratory findings s
laboratory measi
araiteters. The fallin.
materials of modera
I' -
principle of these in
and head h decline i
sekr
on A and depth
heads hi and
Horizor
of Barr
Porc

t252y 975-3472
HOOD RICHARDSON, PA
Engineers - Surveyors - Geologists
110 West Second Street
Washington, North Carolina 27889
December 18, 2006
Rate 12/16/06
By Hood L.Richardson. PG
Cased monitor well
0' - 0.8' Topsoil
0.8' - 7.9' Medium to fine buff sand
7.4' - 8.8' Medium rust colored sand
8.8' - 10.1' Course medium soil, rust colored
Water at 8.6 feet.
IVell drilled at pond spill way
0' - 0.9' Topsoil, roots
0.9' - 5.8' Medium to fine buff sand
i 5.8' - 6.1' Rust colored medium sand
6.1' - TY Light blue sandy clay
No free water observed,

ter.
NONRESIDENTIAL WELL CONSTRUCTION RECORD
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources- Division of Water Quality
WELL CONTRACTOR CERTIFICATION #
1. WELL CONT ACTW
Well Contractor (individual) Name
S'_t
Well Contractor Compan/yrName
STREET AIDDRESS r 0
WA 5 -b -,, .C. Z 7,9
City o own State Zip Code
tz;I- - (f75—j�7Z_
Area code- Pho—� number
2. WELL INFORMATION: nn
SITE WELL ID #(if applicable)R
STATE WELL PERMIT#(if applicable) HA
DWQ or OTHER PERMIT #(if applicable)
WELL USE (Check Applicable Sox) Monitoring Municipal/Public ❑
Industrial/Commercial ❑ Agricultural ❑ Recovery 0 Injection ❑
Irriga(ion[l Other ❑ (list use)
DATE DRILLED Z (6 '
TIME COMPLETED Z,3 `� �I17 AM ❑ Ptv�
3. WELL LOCATIO ' /�
CITY: A COUNTY6eAVi-p)%r
(Street Name, Numbers, Community, Subdivision, Lot No., Parcel, Zip Code)
TOPOGRAPHIC l LAND SETTING:
❑ S lope ❑ Valley Vlat ❑ Ridge p Other
(check p r pr ala box} f
LATITUDE 3aa�(� ' May be in degrees,
tninutes, seconds or
LONGITUDE Z� 0 7 12 ti, in a decimal format
Latitude/longitude source: ❑GPS ❑Topographic map
{location of well must be shown on a USGS topo map and
attached to this form it not using GPS)
FACILITY- is the name or the business where the well is located.
FACILITY ID #(if applicable) / / A
NAME OF FACILITY A _$jN W 604 CK$ CC_ -
STREET ADDRESS 3 `f'7 504H 114H►t70,l S °fit N\
WA5 , t if %r►` N 8 8 1-Y
City or Town � State Zip Code
CONTACT PERSON /I 00 A 6 f �kfqK dfDy
MAILINGADDRESS �Q WI:S 24q
City or T wn State Zip Code
�'l��- '17YjZ
Area code - Phone number
5, WELL DETAILS: /
a. TOTAL DEPTH: 10 ' r
b. DOES WELL REPLACE EXISTING WELL? YES O N0
11K
c. WATER LEVEL Below Top of Casing: l0 ' 1( FT.
(Use'+' if Above Too of Casing)
d. TOP OF CASING IS I' 7 FT, Above Land Surface'
'Top of casing terminated at/or below land surface may require
a variance in accordance with 15A NCAC 2C .0118. , /
e, YIELD (gpm): r r /4 METHOD OF TEST rr A
f. DISINFECTION: Type66�— Amount
g. WATER ZONES (depth):
From I. 6 To l D From To
From
To
From To
From
To
From To
6. CASING:
Thickness/
1 / �
Fromm t.i.To
Depth
"fa. i
Diameter �D
Ft. T
Mai riai
✓C
From
TD
Ft.
From
To
Ft.
7. GROUT:
Depth
Material
Method
From 4
To S, f
/j
Ft. R ►4 "/r rt iQ f�bj j
From
To—
Ft.
From
_ To
Ft.
$. SCREEN:
Depth
Diameter Siot Size
Material
b
r.
Z D
D V
From
To 4/0.0
Ft. in. in.
,
From
To
Ft. in. in.
From
To
Ft_ in, in.
9, SANDIGRAVEL PACK:
Depth
Size Material
r
From s Y To r`�r
Ft.
From
_,,,To
Ft.
From
_To
Ft.
10. DRILLING LOG
From To
d
Formatign Description
�Sa1I
r Ti q C, {le
a 'u _DIL4
�4AA
Ys T J (J
11. REMARKS:
r.9 S/ T,e P6W S
I DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS WELL WAS CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH
15A AC C, W LL CONSTRUCTION ST tDARDS, AND THAT A COPY OF THIS
O SN;P,.?VIP)LLOWNER. /
iG ATURE OF CERTIFIED WELL CONTRACTOR DATE
L.
PRINTED NAME OF PERSON CONSTRUCTING THE WELL
Submit the original to the Division of Water Quality within 30 days, Attn; Information Mgt., Form GW-1b
1617 Mail Service Center— Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Phone No. [phone] ext 568. Rev. 7105

STORM AND WASTEWATER TUATIVMENT
STORM W ATER
Stormwater from the 25 year 24 hour storm which is 8 inches will -be collected and treated in a pond on
Ul94�� site. Al] surface water from operations and roads is either sheet [lowed or collected by swaies and directed
`VI to the storinwater pond. Stormwater is collected and bled off by orifice over a period of two days.
f
WASTEWATER _
te sewage will be treated in a on site in a ground absorption. systenl,.permatcd.by-the.Beaufort
[Co:untyHealth Department.EP-o �/I
Wastewater from operations is generated during the wash out of truck !nixing drumins. Thiis
•��0 rzn 2.VGr18li lrrr10r7
estimated to be 6,000 gallons per day. s.**—
'Ficw
Treatment of this water passes thm a three celled settling basin arranged so that•pv 'ilgj fiolri�eid erg` �
process or storm water from the area will be disposed of in a separate absorp6ou•pond. All other
storinwater is treated in a separate stortmvater pond.
Al'�f'
Ge� e�CQur r'v
WASTEWATER BALANCE C1�v9SP,r /' 'G /"
ra ems.
This facility will be permitted to produce 90 000 cubiaf concrete per ycar cr 360 cubic yards
per single slift day on a 5 day per week operation. One hundred sixty seven pounds (20 gallons) of water
e4
are required to make one cubic yard of concrete.. Therefore, 7.200 gallons of water are required for one day
ofproduction. This is a short fall of 1,200 gallons. There will be no overflow to the xastewater absorption G
---�..�� d
pond during a nolddaybf operation.
The three chambered settling basin is a triangular shaped cross section, is 22.8 feet long at the 4.5 feet
deep. This is 10,406 gallons of storage. The settling basin is capable of holding (10..40616,000) 1.73 days
of operation..'
Water will be recycled to the concrete mixing by a pump installed in the clean end -settling basin.
Recovery of n•ater in the settling basin is accomplished by use of one-i nch
72 V 7 C_!t romp
(3 � n cy/,G ) .
x 2D�alle+as G
+ M 'd
a �
`7 � O w d Gt D (7t w1 , x q,
Co v o r r k_"2�e' w rLICLI
a
1l �@
JAN 0 4 -007
DENR - WATER QUALt
Wetlands & Stommatser Branch .

-2-
WASTE WATER AND THE 25 YEAR 2 4 HOUR STORM.
The 25 year 24 hour storm event is 8 inches of rainfall. An infiltration pond sufficient to contain this
storm for lie truck wash pad, the settling basin and one day of mixing drum wash water is provided. The
pond is sized so that the entire above described volume mill infiltrate into the ground leaving the pond
empty within 24 hours. Therefore, there is no run off from the waste water treatment pond until the
24-hour storm has been exceeded. An hourly water balance of the infiltration rate would show ilia( more
than an 8-inch 24 hour rain is required overflow the emergency spiliway. The overflow runs over the
e�29 foot long concrete 'p of the settling basin and then into the storm vater treatment pond.
s ✓ SUSPENDED SOLIDS
Suspended solids from _Nva—stew—ai—el will leave the property only during rainfall events tlr<at are more
intensive than the 25 year storm. By the time of overflow from storms of greater intensity than the 25 year
storm, solids will'have either settled in the _settling balm r have been flushed into the absorption pond.
An 8-inch 24-hour rain is sufficient to have cleaned ail land surfaces of suspended solids. fit additi
routing of the wastewater storm thru the stonnwater pond provides back-up treatment.
7
7
Suspended solids from the wastewater stream will not leave this property during normal operations and
are unlikely to be exit the property in concentration sufficient to violate the standards tiring storm events
more intense than the 25-year storm, because of the granular nature of soils and materials used to produce
concrete.
PH CONTROL
Concrete wash water normally has a high pH. There iAiIl be no water leaving the property or being
infiltrated into the ground during normal operations�As has been shown fresh make-up water will be
needed on a daily basis.
The dilutive effect from rain storms of any residual process water washed into the absorption pond. the
small volume of available process water, and the low number of overflow events will not have a
measurable impact on ground water.
` "Therefore, pH control should not be;ed at this site.
rya � �Gec
A ,
'a
i• =.., 0
�,�, ,a

U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE NORTH CAROLINA SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE
84' 8.3 82 81' 8G' 79' 7B' 77' 76'
b
IRCINIA 7
5 5.5 6 5.5 6 6.5 _—�—
w. II -
L OF\LCY
1j r !C
5 AT•VG� wIEKES -- R {. ~
TENNESSEE I vaDKIN � � V`�� ¢ (FR aN KLI � RFRSSL - 36'
_ GUILFOAD
5.5 l i [ALD' ELL I' r0 i j DaV ! ~ 0.7rI J I f / fOGECOMB E1 4eQ �V1 S 4P� . DARE
A7 �1 ` I F—.. .r^•—T' RE4�r g
0 ^ A\ t BURR `[ aELE' D.vIO50X RANDOLPH I CX.Tf W 1 w.
t^- Uuc DO -EL• /cA w.Al xOw•� i I ^' / -•-•! \ P - �• n[•u oR� XrDE '1 8.J
eu �ee1 1
XArwpOO �.f"' .�JOXXSTOX /
SWAIN . X , .�. �� L CO - 1- `/ ` f` lEE �GRF
J G 4^UfHER RDi u - _ 'CAB Uy Iy0.l 'I _ X.RN lTT WAYNE ��
f •` HEN i X sl..LY 'C� I\\ YOORE \[ •\ �
—�•1 Ja[• POIK{f1 4�„ �• V •�-✓� LE HOIR �f ✓ �46
6 CXEROt£Er'I_ N .•XIA -- — —`. c / ���'✓�y� �4Y\ ,~+• p`� '� /•I``�riYE�P.Y O� C/ 35•
J C 6 L-/ --J1 4. JOHES
3YJ• — — / 8 ! r , � �RICHM POKE \ .i0 f SAul
('j u�.IOH AHsaH DuruH
7 8 ,�T} ` �.
— � � 6 —�� 1 LV�•• \ � ^^_� GRTL PET
GEORGIA / \ 111 IN,
6.5 RaeESDN I LADEN � % �`
`� •If VENDER ' � O•L`
SOUTH CAROWNA ` r•`.✓�I,`J- O J
JCOLVM
7
a
G 25 50 75 100
RAINFALL DATA MAP
25—YEAR I DAY PRECIPITATION (INCHES) ID �3"
m H.
E7 Q'
H.
� f1'
- _._ _...__... _ ._ --- - - - - - ... - _........... .. 6-70 4—L-- 29542-13
— — ---- — -- — - — - ... O N
84' H3' 82' 8l' 8G' 79, 76• 77' 76'
W
Ut DA-5cs-AOAT was:H. ,E1. Iola R'ev. 6-70 4—L-23940-5

ABHW CONCRETE
MANFRED D. ALLIGOOD, JR.
STORMWATER TREATMENT STRATEGY
Topography on this 3.91-acre site is suited to a single stormwater treatment pond. All stormwater is
directed to the wet detention pond by grassed swales.
Temporary treatment pool is in well -established pasture grass, which will provide additional treatment.
The temporary wet detention pool stores 7590 cubic feet of water. Only -1543 cubic feet is required. This
is a 67 percent over capacity. �1�
All stormwater will flow over more than 30 feet of grassed swales or sheet flow more than 30 feet
before entering the pond.
Pond water flows about 400 feet over pasture and wooded land before entering perennial strewn.
JAN 0 4 2007
DENR - WATEa 6GALI
WeUaWs $ Stormwatsr &arch

valumt- o k4sk Aneof 6M41441 ottv�s) 4foysiooy
01
6'
z7,
X - z2.81'
�� j�,. �•,i) z 7) ��Z•R) 7•�� 3 = !D cf v% �.��aIYS
P"ck Gri'a f 4, � Ire-46Y C� v��.i rr AnkK ai TO
ua L��1� y�1�r�,�•
u rr 3 7�
3
ap�tx
ri�r
3
67 L S v t,✓� r t �.� h -a'. To µ*
o r- L,�
6 •> �'� it
�C3
r

�6� " 1- 4 �
des y,� Alhs� f ri5A l7�/z �o b
r ��Jc,1cS V�t� �OJJ �L[�ohr1 /dt�
CL
(� S-e fr .sir F.e r y �•s r� h- o F
/J4Sr f��
C 3) re, c. /J A( s zr e- d or `
W�s� li✓�T�h �l c r d AV
609c ro-itrE w4s k
- l�Yl fr z
P,eK co l.q Tc art/ Ast T eS /16 45 v^-9 d j;,�
c. c. -� o ► �. r�
Y
DJ m-e
.lu i X 14 � � At� r 4PsI /�t*s t'� Y le.s� r�.g ti! Z s !f
aJ 6A�c,4Ao4 cek e,.,,T«cr ,../ -4r,*ue,. /�6-o
ar-
�---- �l riot y Gh sZ

-..r a J 4►s'7 '� r+ � -�' 1 � � � c r't �� ►. t� � k f'p �f
c9Z
a �Z) ►r -�� -1 Z cr j f A
611
b'99'J -� Z Z92 Z = 6�9ib
uy
fey r _; £'
OIYT; f -L n 1 4 j �l 6/`Z �, Y
JiME+1 !1� `TSNM nX� a xm r+l 0VI W-V o1.S - V

A�1E 3 v r-
I a-/ -2-Yi 0 �
�ord
S� 9*- s -CIS
461�6ft.Q. or- wivfrek% ry d e- sraAA,d
V � vrr e- d ,4/ w Rs 4 w,* r•c oc 2 �A a vk,- /,.4 f;y teJ� c /
�jq_(d� ,aK� Gv1�'r4 ,oJ'td.
PL re, 0— At , 14 IL Ps., c cl-�Zt `1—
C /d Z, 6Q3
6 L— YAG
d=
z u-
v5�
C,Aec, 2.,3y Xzy o
�vN -rTvr� f L42vt r ILIN
— -5 IL
Z-
Z 7 Lb -<-r-?

J
M7-lL- 41411,
W 4r 6 rz ��/A-r/ c 4e.
ro ,s
WAS" poW-14
s rm A!
TO
^007 ft 64 yc,/a (
Fs iA-9 gay
c n-p► c, j r%
per
-
.
100 z ft-3
3LY6 fr3
Mb
�t
2
/0aZtr1
0
1 o Z-
l3YF�S r3
3
100Zfr3
3zY6fr3
YxYj
1 Z-Pr3
0
0 `JJ L
y�
`oozfr'
ZT4�r3
YXI8 --`
6
r.�(.7
v
0 IOJ 2-
8 Y��
.Tjqr= r4-r)tA r, o N cvva c , rY
�r
7� 25- r.E. A h- Z`� �J�+-- S Tvn►� r �f c�QS
X ?,; L'a I�.
,�'CIh•t M a!'�

STORM AND WASTEWATER TREATMENT
STORMWATER
Stortnwater from the 25 year 24 hour stone which is 8 inches will be collected and treated in a pond on
site. All surface water from operations and roads is either sheet flowed or collected by swales and directed
to the stonnivaler pond. Stonnwater is collected and bled off by orifice over a period of two days.
WASTEWATER
On site sewage will be treated in a on site in a ground absorption system- permitted by the Bcauforl
County Health Department.
Wastewater from operations is generated during the wash out of truck mixing drums. This
estimated to be 6,000 gallons per day.
Treatment of this water passes thru a three celled settling basin arranged so that over flow from either
process or storm water from die area will be disposed of in a separate absorption pond. All other
stortr►vater is treated in a separate stonnivater pond.
WASTEWATER BALANCE
This facility will be permitted to produce 90,000 cubic gallons of concrete per year or 360 cubic yards
per single slift day on a 5 day per week operation. One hundred sixty seven pounds (20 gallons) of water
are required to make one cubic yard of concrete. Therefore. 7,200 gallons of water are required for one dan
of production. 'l'ltis is a short fall of 1,200 gallons. There will be no ovei-11mv to the wastewater absorption
pond during a normal day of operation.
The three chambered settling basin is a triangular shaped cross section- is 22.8 feet long at the 4.5 feet
deep. This is 10,406 gallons of storage. The settling basin is capable of holding (I O,406/6,000) 1.73 days
of operation.
Water will be recycled to the concrete miring by a ptunp installed in I1►c clean end -settling basin.
t
Recoven, of water in the settling basin is accomplished by use of one -inch diameter (leveling) siplions.
DENR - WATER CAAM
Wetlands & SWmwmW Brandt

-2-
WASTE WATER AND THE 25 YEAR 2 4 HOUR STORM,
Tlie 25 year 24 hour stone event is 8 inches of rainfall. An in -filtration pond stiff icieut to contain this
storm for the truck wash pad, the settling basin and one day of mixing drimi awash water is provided. The
bond is sized so that the entire above described volume will infiltrate into the ground leaving the pond
empty within 24 hours. Tlierefore, there is no run off from the waste water treatment pond until the
24-hour storm has been exceeded. An hourly water balance of the infiltration rate would show that more
than an 8-inch 24 hour rain is required to overflow the emergency spillway. The overflow runs over the
29 foot long concrete lip of the settling basin and then into the slonnwater treatment pond.
SUSPENDED SOLIDS
Suspended solids from wastewater will leave the property only during rainfall events that are more
intensive than the 25 year storm. By the time of overflow from slonns of greater intensity than the 25 year
storm, solids will have either settled in the settling basin or have been flushed into the absorption pond.
An 8-inch 24-hour rain is sufficient to have cleaned all land surfaces of'suspended solids. fit addition the
rousing of the wastewater storm thru. the stonnwater pond provides back-up treatment.
Suspended solids from die wastewater stream will not leave this property during normal operations and
are unlikely to be exit lie property in concentration sufficient to violate the standards during stone events
more intense than the 25-year storn, because of the granular nature of soils and materials used to produce
concrete.
PH CONTROL
Concrete .wash water normally has a high pH. There will be no water ]caving die property or being
infiltrated into the ground during normal operations. As has been shown fresh make-up water will be
needed on a daily basis.
The dilutive effect from rain storms of any residual process water washed into the absorption pond. the
small volume of available process water, and the low number of overflow events will not have a
measurable impact on ground water. 4�` '� t'
'therefore, pH control should not be required at this site.ZZe
yJ�Jdp2 F5i?ln ii F�1*�4

Z�
1
F-
Vi
U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE NORTH CAROLINA SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE
64' R3' 82' 81' 80, 79' 78' 77' 76'
j L
O
ViRGINIA 7
5 5.5 �6 5.5 6 6.5
l w RxEN a�'rX
SrOKES I'CC. I !\C4
IXGX.M, / - EFIipR /I�f (ipf
5 Sw EEEIv OX!
Y I
v� I J
If /I
�«- ••--C-- L�.
1 wILnES ti f
36
TENNPSSF.E _ I v.DniX
f
_ GUILroao 'J r F 1-.-.. ! `ReX KEI / •� n4.RrIE
36•
_
5.5 1 �� - . I X.S�
//J� \yANC Y' f C•L DW EII I � O.vIE J r 1 / 1E pCECOUB E� M� GSO P�"�y
oisal+ ]` E S� ,� 7v 7-- r--T A
.• A�I�Ie y �•1 1'"4 ' O.RE
SIC r\ v�r
/'�� RuRK - `[I DELL/ Sa—Dsc. I--_ /
\ \i X. XOOL P. w. /,
CNai 41M / WiL50N \ ` _r•
C• we•
uc DOWEL 1 ROw.X
/
H—wwo au PE! '�_� E XrDE 1•
/�{]7
^SwxiX -�_
L CO T-��__---'�'/(/rL IGR ! 8.5
EE f
`l TXER RD. 1 \ }
_ _ E
J G
NEX � —t'n 'C"P U� )MOhj. 1 X.RN Er'S J WAYHE / /`� � ,q
_� 1f J"C ROLK w G• OX m STAHLY COy \ MOORE 1 l \,_ T O \W
— ( /.` .'\.fit IEXOIR / ib{I`•
/
� Ar\
35'
."ni !J
CM E RO�EE��_ —
_ 7 •
— _ 0 6 yReXM .. HOKeI a° s.MR• 1 `^oXEs
o uNIaX .X saX � ouRLIM v. �
-�
�v
J
7 8 / 9 SCOT
CURTEREt
CIEOIIGIA I
Cam_—• � OXS
/
' 6.5 \/ ROBELsom DEM j
JJ
\ 'I PE HOER
SOUTH CAHOL1NA \ 8.5
J
C01uMBu5 %'� OG��
r
34
7 J a SWICK
34•
8
$ralo In MILK
0 25 50 75 100
RAINFALL DATA MAP
25—YEAR ! DAY PRECIPITATION (INCHES)
8+1' 83' 82' 81' 80• 79' 7E- 77• 76'
L5D.-SC9 rORT wORTX, ltx, I97a
Rev. 6-70 4—L-23940-5
�x
rD �X
rD r-
rt V
r-
rr

ABH W CONCRETE
MANFRED D. ALLIGOOD, JR.
STORMWATER TREATMENT STRATEGY
Topography on this 3.91-acre site is suited to a single stormwater treatment pond. All stormwater is
directed to the wet detention pond by grassed swales.
Temporary treatment pool is in well -established pasture grass, which will provide additional treatment.
7Jie temporary wet detention pool stores 7590 cubic feet of water. Only 4543 cubic feet is required. This
is a 67 percent over capacity.
All stormwater will flow over more than 30 feet of grassed swales or sheet flow more than 30 feet
before entering the pond.
Pond water (lows about =IOU feet over pasture and wooded land before entering perennial stream.
JAN p 4 2007
NR - WATER QUALIT
ftffnwaaer Branch

valvmR-
of �% s .R Ar�efr ��r'xr�y DrL�r�,) SBTrc.t�G.. X*s<iy
IZ/t .3Ib b
,�, = 1z.d7'
(,Z 1) �l ?.Y) 7•�fY �o ��� �rl�sws
�it-a cl c Trl�►P 4 i :tA / r e j (
�oU�
� a cakl'c /4, IYa4e,-
C LCd(�% d�4rr y L✓/�r2y` /� �� J,*%e-w% sv
L tx
167 " -) d t= b✓R- r L IL - h -41- l"o
p r= Go k L rt."'Q
16? L, s 7.�i I + ,- — tY. Y8 74- .I-L
fr3

•
?" A, 1- 4 �
Gf1/4S# IAM r',EI2
r A.A ri of A v 4
61Lire It A* r TtiJc.le-s, v,()E 10ao of
C-1 (� S-e .f -i- /c.a r� �9 c ro h- o f
G 4(4 f v ✓�e w.
J) 7-d e- z. e-
WAS 1%
Q r1 rH e- G aW C 4AIA-s 4^ 4 q t
C, /%&,I.. ✓d '001-*1 by
ti-
r
�4 �+ of: � j4sj4'iV 31'
/syl fr
45 -�O
n
c.T'11/)-L- 0PA#Trory . � F� e � �v •ry Terra-.y
A C r-(L. r ri o AV), /Zf r-p- Fo I?.
QS rii c x p r i./^,e
y !
./Ll [ r-Aj At ��' �5� Mo.$ r4 Yless V yOJ izte5 It
AJ GA-i-c,4Aors c a x e-y r,,"r ,;)( r!4 r--t-e,
ou>J 5 , , j a ti t1sy x-f A ri �4 o4K c-1 /wo rs o llc lav,-� .
/L H

-14
r
C.
t/-/ G'j
dg9'0 4 21Z92
r
' vu r11 C, 9 �rrD� M r )-j 4,V 1 -7 ►,Y $9 v
Vio'
P
{ �tl+ r 1 it v 17 ► � ��� ,^ r ,,l � l c�-� � �� �r w. � �, v y✓ � a � � � a a- a I
. J-fl
gr.��r,12 l

9
, r ea4d ;-a C/-esrhtd
��Kd ANQP4Ji1
311
!J-/z`fIo�
yr wP+ rem rU d-e. s ruAL d
a vh- �,.4 ✓y i V P��
W ,o , d 4r4 ct .
Pt re H- Oki
(2- '1 Z, 60(31
J Z d z
o w Zfs� -zz-y
z
,?, 7 Lb -4�r-?

J
A17A, � V IV
-
TO -rr�
yNh�lJrlAy'J1/
WKSN powoq STORM 1%4V it6cYt,ia c,�,�►, ;ry
l�� 2 fr3 3LYb 3rt� Y21B
Z
tot) Z-.fr3 0 0 /,q a Z—
3
/00 z fr 3 3 zY6 �r� Yz Y j
9 Y ��
1o;)Z,�r1 0 /oi z
gYgs--
�oJ�fr� 3 zY6 ` )-0
yid'
r� r/CA r l o ►"Jh:--�—*
(� y o
rr ,
?� 7� 2 j �,G /� r�-- � `� � cr✓+^-- S TUrL wt �
!� � �{ c�Q1 ,
-r
f"Vi-IfiA►!'�
�I-A- a �cd �� sI Tp } hL�i l e- �d✓ ��
CA
nc
N p u
Gw/�yc�►-,�
�6� 7
s ��s
f�YBs
�Y�7

O�O� WAr�9QG Michael F. Easley, Governor
�. 7' William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
`Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
March 12, 2007
Mr. Manfred D. Alligood, Jr.
1935 West Fifth Street
Washington, North Carolina 27889
Subject: Additional Information Request
Stormwater application NCG140369
ABHW Concrete, Washington
Beaufort County
Dear Mr. Alligood:
On January 4, 2007, the Division of Water Quality, Stormwater Permitting Unit received your
second application for coverage under General Permit NCG140000, authorizing the discharge of
process wastewater and stormwater from your proposed facility in Washington. North Carolina
rules require DWQ to conduct an engineering review of your permit application, Some portions of
the submittal were unclear to us and on March 7, 2007, we contacted your engineer, Hood
Richardson PA, for clarification. We are requesting a written response in order to continue
processing your application. Please submit additional information addressing the items listed
below.
1. Site Plan and design details.
a..' I'm unclear on the purpose of the portable siphons between the cells of the wash pit,
and have some concern that they may re -suspend solids that have already settled in
the cells. Please explain their purpose or revise the design details showing the
siphons.
b: It is not clear that the wash pit structure features the 1' freeboard required in item
15 of the permit application (Notice of Intent form). Please reconcile by either
f explanation or by revising the wash pit detail elevations.
•c. Please revise the truck wash pad drawings to add curbing along two sides of the
truck wash pad in order to ensure that all wash down flows will be directed into the
wash pit.
d. It appears that the wash pit is designed to overflow at elevation 15.0'. Specifically,
three of the four cells have a ramped bottom that has a design, elevation of 15.0' at
the lip so that the cells would fill up and overflow out the front of the cells, which I
believe is the design intent. However, the top of wall for the whole structure is
identified also as elevation 15.0', meaning that the overflow would not be controlled
at the lip of the ramp into each cell, but would also overflow from the entire
structure. Please revise the design details to control overflow from just the front of.
the cells.
2. Design basis and design narrative.
a. The design narrative does not address three additional wastewaters that ready -
mixed concrete facilities typically generate: wash down waters from the truck loading.'
area, drainage from irrigation of the materials stockpiles, and truck rinse off flows.
We understand from discussions with Mr. Richardson that the truck rinse off will take
place on the truck wash pad, along with the drum rinse out, which is acceptable.
However, the two other wastewater.f lows are not addressed.; in the design narrative.
Please expand the design basis, and revise the design narrative, (and if necessary
one
Norrthcarolina
11 atimally
North Carolina Division of Water Quality 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Phone [phone] Customer Service
Internet: www.ncwaterauality.org Location: 512 N. Salisbury St. Raleigh, NC 27604 Fax [phone]-623- i748
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycled/ 10% Post Consumer Paper

Mr. M. D. Alligood
Page 2of2
March 12, 2007
the site plan and construction details), to account for the other wastewater sources
on site.
b. The recycle system volume calculations must be revised to show that the structure
can accommodate the 25-year, 24-hour storm, plus V freeboard, as per item 1.b.
above.
Please note that we need three copies of your re -submittal. No additional fee is required.
Please call me with any comments or questions.
Sincerely,
Ken Pickle, P.S.
DWQ Stormwater Permitting Unit
[phone]x584
cc: Washington Regional Office
CSPU files-
Hood Richardson, PA, 110 West Second Street, Washington, NC 27889

[phone]
HOOD RICHARDSON, PA
Engineers - SurveYors - Geologists
116 west second street
Washington, North Carolina 27889
March 15, 2007
Mr. Ken Pickle, PE
DWQ Stormwater Permit Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Re: DWQ Stormwater Permit Request
Stormwater Application NCG140369
ABHW Concrete, Washington
Beaufort County
Request letter March 12, 2007
Dear Mr. Pickle:
Responding to the above letter:
Item 1 a. I am removing the siphons.
b. J have drawn a line thru the wier at elevation 14.0 feet on page 2 of the plans. This is the
highest elevation of standing water during normal operations. This provides one foot of Gee
board.
c.'Curbing has been added.
'd. The design as submitted does not attempt to control over -flow during flooding (heavy rainfall
events) because all over flow waters will find their way to the storm water treatment pond.
However, I have raised the walls of the wash pit by 0.5 feet to force flood waters to exit over
the lip of the wash pit.
Item 2 a. Wash down water from the truck loading area is estimated not to exceed 200 gallons per day.
This water will flow along the side of the road, thru the culvert shown on the plans to the
storm water treatment pond, a distance of about 400 feet. Consider that these soils are sandy
and porous. The percolation rate for modified soils at the surface would be one gallon per
square foot per hour and below the surface as much as 3.96 cubic feet per hour per square foot
as is shown at other locations in this permit application. The average slope is 3.6 feet over 400
feet. The velocity of a small stream on an irregular surface flowing over a width of one foot is
about 0.5 feet per second. Therefore, the travel time is 800 seconds_ The estimated wash

Page 2 of 2
down titne is 15 minutes. 'Therefore, over the time period of 15 minutes plus 800 seconds or
28.33 minutes we should expect (28.33 min160 minutes per hour x lgal/hour per square foot
x 400 square feet) 188 gallons to percolate into the ground Therefore, the wash water will not
get to the treatment pond except during heavy rains. =0 1 g8 9 n L
r--
Irrigation water from the stock pile area is routed along the edge of the road
and thru the culvert (same as above). These waters are expected to reach the pond only
during heavy rain events. Consider a 40-foot diameter stone or sand pile. The area would be
1256 square feet. These soils can absorb one gallon per square foot per hour or 1256 gallon
per hour after the pile is saturated. This will require a -me of flow of about 21 gallon per
minute. Also there will be a supervisor available to turn off the water supply when surface
flow begins. There will be no adverse impact on the stormwater pond should the irrigation
water reach he pond.
Trunk rinse off will be done on the truck wash pad.
b Calculations have been revised to show freeboard.
sin y
L. Richardson, PE

?4� e, 1- 4 �
AC ! L. rti.* ri &-y
e ►t_-1 Aot T es r? E,+s v^2 irre 5y..,o
-_c��s�y_M( �p�r► sfQf�
M r X [N Y /..v wt f r'{PS IK as T'`- y lest 7 t
ly
�� ►� t1ft GI} s-P.,, �(� �° Cam/ -�Y�X Te J r

Z v�
AeLA
c�-e a A. � z e c� � �%,� i v►� ?.e rc W ! ? r4 s � ClV r'<< r^ # 0.1
. , fo 4 �, 7-o d ; spare or 6vh r-e rl- / w a E •Dry
.. A= 4^4 A or" 14 t'<<- r^lf-r(s'kv /,Yq d 6 o r ri.'t ,
ci ott /V-ep-&ol 4r 1,jw /'-^ re-
l84��r f l� oz 3:t3
�36A 2Z62,z t r�.66A
60 �;t Z
VJ 1V � t
i gqa �f) IL Zr��
Z6 fl

V
a -wr
S�
�!!� t, / �c, �•-V tifn P �� Z "f -jw a^I 4?,H M try a
1 �n1 s "a- g CXL -Wal w^l
f/£ rT d(7 S -1, !S
9 X f�}lj ram, A a ril t r ► s�► a ► p p �, �� . ,
�11T Y 'far
�
��£

1 L - — •-•Rsr'�3.7�' :�-._Yw'owo r�i..D . •' ] _ t �• d. ~h-<*n a �'.y 3.' .'�c+,.• 1.�'j i"r� sic_, v#Sw-.ryl.r }tit{ e'rrY :iiryJ" `yn•'"yw.C�•1� A`x '^�.> ,{t� Tn: - ril 17M ;
{ H
r ^,i.df'. f.•Y +7 yc'.�"''s'�
r1 tG� k •i -rt'.[ ^fi1 s!'�' ^aL, .44. r!, ( w a' w�•- i�.► x t;.`. I - cs';
Y'..+=c�; �,•{. •u q t $ $fr 7t •t k ,� 13 x .; M ;t 3s 4':
�w>•.- -4 .ay 3` r„E�yr'�.;� t, r �- s.�.. y - SSc�..t�•'- a' a� e' '��-y'�'� F i {s `.I. '-i
.i.p .S-:ii� l� a f' .(
��i► �r. +• � _ �� �. 'e�-,r" a �� -t .�' y r. t c� s a�:. :.�' '•`.c'a.�; "t5 Ti - E
y `��� •� t,F i* � � rt�; �� 3�Lr `��• 3i � � i� �l�-R� _ s� f`� r� � r`t r.<` ki S
�......-.ram.... .�,•f ..� f '.,..r ^'�wwZ2 H -- Yt' , .i...lK' ? ».-. R"" ,�„ } •CVO S -«, "yw.�� `U�
yw •- � ', c,yi3'`YL` ��V � �r f"�' s�/}��/�"�� �, «. r � !•. - 1 � ��� ii.Y "tj� •k ; �
"•.._^•"�, .^^-•+i .. „ � w.....�.-^,.�.+.•�..e n—•+..wy- _ T..r..e*___ MMMenn.,.v..�p.., ��-rrrnae.....h,J,.. .w.. ..5:......,�.:.•.w ,..w 1, y '"r�.�,,. ""-':-ti'•�!
1 �` <",•:� -rtk�r .r , r ... -<:.: ,..r ' ....,-� . .,,...,.•.-. seems : :fwkix�.r.'.?, • .r by . -.. �..� �..., sn � -� ♦ '_"^l
PRESUMES A 25 YEAR STORM EVERY OTHER DAY OVER A 6 DAY PERIOD
.` c _, ".`�_-.'-r'r'���.�{.—_.�.:r;�.•.�r......� ,�.,ey.'��.�. .r•.q�„ e'.�.i} �.."�r _ .`I",s s... y�{.S,.A
Y'�t kf " D,4,,
.�......�_._��._____�_-�._ j.�_� • : �Xi�---�-�-•.-,x _ x�•�o`-�,`` `�' t°� .�.�`.' �"":;�-." �"�h1,F���'np:wy�' ,�S�r rim,:
,;$� .WKS�i.pawr,� :�:1S:T��tM _ j'b�d,��l, �i�'/tE,r��/.a�I �c�r�tr�• �,�s,G,yr�gcr' _
..^........_..-. ---_......,_�r�l �� _ , . .• - ' r �... w.•�+r�.�!4r"r`+."�� rf - _ ,. _ �`.^ .w�.v`..M.�,."'•w^"'�„'yi+T^." i i �7"'. �•^^"�1' k ;�..+,.,rx..-�•�++ '3'r'rn+y
I r' F •a,-.s ' rr a 1 � t •t .ill r f ��_ ir-�s:::'t'1c
Z _
lot) Ztr3__
/110 Z
:..3
1ooz f3
JrXf r
y2
!p°
Yxis
--
6
(0i Z.w�
C)
0
Ica L
:'y�Yr�s1F�rF3�'
f0 7
8 �8�
18Y8s
SY�r
�6�7
8 Y8�
YY87
Cyr /'GtTr
y.LA'�' Z�% KeT�/!^-- S1y/'�/�! .� � /*� r.:f�-ems l .\A.e'" ,a'`3''t•ir
FREEBOARD = MINIMUM DAILY SURPLUS CAPACITY = 4687 j= L5 FEETAREA 481X 64'
THE MAXIMUM ELEVATION OF THE TOP OF THE WATER IN THE ABSORPTION POND `ILL"'•..;{ I�•���by�
BE 13.5 FEET WHICH IS 1.5 FEET BELOW THE OVERFLOW LIP OF THE WASH BASIN AND%
FEET BELOW THE TOP OF THE 6 FOOT WIDE CONTAINMENT BERM.��+a' S
t

Re: Concrete plant
c.whCant• Re: Concrete plant
From: Samir Dumpor <[e-mail]>
Date: Tue, 08 May 2007 13:41:28 -0400
To: Ken Pickle <[e-mail]>
CC: Bill Moore <[e-mail]>
Ken,
I visited this site on February 23, 2007, The site was undeveloped at that time.
After all my comments were addresses and revisions made, a state SW permit was issued
on March 20, 2007. 1 don't see any problems with issuing them a NCG14 permit.
Thanks
Samir
Bill Moore wrote:
Ken Pickle wrote:
Bill,
I have an NOI from ABHW Concrete; the owner is Manfred D. Alligood, Jr. He is
proposing a ready -mixed facility out Pactolus Highway, in the Wharton Station
area. Their discharge would be to an unnamed tributary to Maple Branch to
Tranters Creek, both being class C Sw NSW waters.
The proposed wastewater recycle and treatment facility meets our requirements
under NCG14 and their NOI is in order. I intend to issue them COC NCG140369,
pending your favorable concurrence. Do you want to see the NOI? Do you need
to make a site visit? (undeveloped site - 1 believe this is a new facility.)
Any comments or concerns?
Ken
Good Morning Ken,
Hope you and all the sw folks in the middle part of NC are doing well. Samir
issued state sw permit (SW7061128) for the ABHW Concrete facility on 3/20/07. I
will defer to him re. review of the NOI/NCG14 for this facility. While we are on
the subject, on 5/1/07 1 issued state sw permit (SW7061113) for the DPD Properties
ready mix plant located near Bayboro/Pamlico County. This is also a new
facility. During the review of the state sw permit, I advised the owner by letter
that a Fed sw permit would be required & provided all the necessary contact info
to obtain the NCG14. Their engr responded & stated that the owner would apply for
NCC14 prior to operation. If you need additional info re. this facility, let me
know. During the state sw review process, I am trying to determine those
facilities that require coverage under the Fed sw program and advise the owners of
the Fed requirements. But, I am not letting the Fed process hold up the issuance
of the state sw permit. Should we send copies of the state sw permits and/or the
correspondence to DWQ/Stormwater Group ? In most cases, the owners are ready to
build the minute they receive their state sw permit; but, if they haven't applied
for their Fed sw permit, I question whether they will receive their Fed sw permit
prior to beginning operation ? Another question for the "movers & shakers". Have
a great day, later.
of 1 5/9/2007 9:51 AM

COC No. NCG 140369
Mr. Manfrud D. Alligood, Jr
nBHW Concrete
May 9, 2007
Engineer's Certification COC No. NCG140369
I, lV oo L ` f "^ -10 ` as a duly registered Professional Engineer in the State of
North' Carolina, having been authorized to observe (periodically, weekly full time) the construction
Wl,or%.ro� li-i4nj-i /2f�d
of the project, A,61)w C-OKcAt& IS2 Y3vFJ^r Cct-,--f y for the
Project Name Location
Pertnittee hereby state that, to the best of my abilities, due care and diligence was used in the observation
of the following installations: -
• Constymn n of rl �e~ IPDES su,"r/�c.- �/A r-•er, %/tPijt��f at
l�-3r el eS
1 certify that the construction of the above referenced project was observed to be built within substantial
compliance and intentp h 'approved plaris'and specificatjq�s.
•".
%�5 �tN E4RO'�
Signature r�d�`�!:�,' ;registration No. _
Date
Y �S
V �2 D d 2u pry !� � r�°•;?per'! it,��� �,��,s ,�I# K r
(�• � �-d� U� r� r< -ram- �- ��r�`v�,7;<' ;�ti;
MNs✓�(�, w•fr� t v`"ir"`+r r � f'L, ,�3�i�,;,tiS;��;
ail this Certification to: Stormwater Permitting Unit
NC Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Mail a copy to: DWQ Regional Supervisor
Washington Regional Office
943 Washington Square Mall
Washington, NC 27899
7,2 }I'd'
I"