Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutNCG120101_COMPLETE FILE - HISTORICAL_20180913STORMWATER DIVISION CODING SHEET NCG PERMITS PERMIT NO. I /v C.,� I a () 10 I DOC TYPE + I HISTORICAL FILE ❑ MONITORING REPORTS DOC DATE ❑ O'U 0 YYYYMMDD DUKE ENERGY. File: Mayol2520-R Ms. Bethany Georgoulias North Carolina Division of Environmental Quality 1628 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1628 Subject: Duke Energy Progress, LLC. Mayo Electric Generating Plant NPDES General Permit Renewal Guidance NCG 120101 Dear Ms. Georgoulias: Duke linergy 2500 Fairi'ax RPai Greensboro, NC 27407 RECEIVED SEP 13 2010 D1�-11R-LAND QJALITY STORMWATER PERMITTING As recently discussed, Duke Energy requests guidance and clarification on the renewal of the NCG120101 general stormwater permit for the Mayo Steam Plant Monofill. The initial certificate of coverage was issued to Duke Energy on January 6, 2014. Coverage under this general permit was issued with amended conditions requiring additional sampling. Please advise if the renewal of the general permit will continue to require this augmented sampling schedule. The NCG 120101 has been problematic with the requirement to monitor fecal coliform due to the abundant wildlife around the monofill. Duke Energy sought and received tier relief from monthly monitoring of fecal coliform from DEQ in December of 2017. Unlike the sanitary landfills the NCG12000 permit was developed for, the Mayo Monofill receives only coal combustion residuals with wildlife being the only possible source of fecal contamination. Duke Energy plans to request a modification of NPDES Industrial Storrnwater Permit NCS000580 in the near future to include the three stormwater outfalls at the Mayo Monofill currently covered by pen -nit NCG120101. The industrial activity at the monofill, transport of materials, is similar in nature to the activity at the Station's stormwater outfall 010. As you requested, included with this correspondence is all stormwater sampling data gathered under permit NCG 120101 to date from the Mayo Monofill for your review. Should you have any questions Please contact me at Lori.Tollie ngduke-ener;yv_.com or at 1-336-854-4916. Sincerely, Lori Tollie r_. CDC NCGI20101 Facilty Name Mayo Steam Plant Mono811 Discharge to Bawes Branch Units Benchmarks Units Benchmarks- Outfall No. Date Colle"ed 24 hour rainfall COD TSS As Se 0 pH Conductivity Mn Ti Fecal Coliform Total Chlorides Total Fluoride Tota! Sulfate Total Hardness inches mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/1 mg/t S/m mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L 120 mg/L - 100 mg/L 6.0 to 9.0 Mayo Lab/Pace Lab 10t1D counts per 100 mL 1 12/16/2014 0.12 8 3.1 c0,0005 c0.0005 c0.025 6.92 0.00628 <6.0005 41 1.3 <0.25 2.6 15A 2 12/29/70I4 0.47 310 149 0.0011 0.0D055 c0.025 7.38 0.00723 <0.0005 15,8 9.5 0,33 4.4 37.9 3 1 1I/17/2014 0.67 39 445 0.0021 0,0D15 <0.025 7.55 0-07707 1 <0.0005 120 26.9 0.51 18.5 103 6/3/2015 3.3 230 75.9 0.W16 0,OW44 0,0364 7.33 0.01031 0.077 <0.00005 3.1 6/3/2015 3.3 230 27.6 0 W29 0,OW38 0.084 6.97 0.006148 0.0617 <0.00005 3,1 6/3/2015 3.3 300 62.5 0.0009 0.00029 D.03357.94 0.009331 0.0348 <0.00005 152 k 10/28/201S 1.3 <12.5 49 0-00083 000029 <0.0250 8.12 0,D07384/0,00836 54.7 10/28/2015 1.3 19.0 12.1 0.OW41 0.00017 0.0255 693 0.007811/0,00838 69.8 lOY2812015 1.3 15.0 7 0.D038 0.D0044 0.112 7,95 C.020710/0,02400 38.2 5/17/2016 0.90 27.0 15.5 0.0025 0.00094 0.396 6.49 0.09866 2420 5/17/2016 0.90 32 13 0.00066 c0.00031 ❑.0304 6.62 0.00269 2 220 3 5/17/2015 0.90 1 19 441 0.0042 O.DDOS6 0.071 6.66 0,00361 2420 1 121161201G 0.21 13 7.7 0.0005 c0.00031 0.674 6.96 0.11444 89 2 12116/2016 0.71 28 12.4 0,0007 c000031 0.029 7.34 0.007 241 3 12/16/2on 0.71 43 44.8 0,0072 0.00046 0.186 B4O9 0A168 437 1 6/19/2017 0.43 15 12.5 c0.004 c0.031 <0.056 7.13 0.9098 <0.0015 212 3.5 0.069 2.1 32.3 2 6/20/2017 1.53 21 42.5 <0.004 c0.031 c0.056 7.29 0.00702 <0.0015 41500 0.98 0.052 3.7 24.9 3 6/19/2017 0.43 52 24.5 0.0054 <0.031 c0.056 7.76 0.0156 0.0022 12000 5.9 COSS 14.2 44.7 1 11/9/2017 0.95 c12.5 23.9 0.00075 0.00084 1 0,0363 7.41 1 0.00491 S20 2 11/9/2027 1 0.95 25 3.9 0655 <O.OW31 0,0333 7.38 0.00063 3800 3 11/9/2017 0.95 18 10.7 0.D0071 00493 SAS 0.00994 6000 1 4/24/2018 1.02 14 13.6 jul.0025 0007 0.9W21 0, 261 6.96 C0151 4/24/2018 1.02 31 4.1 0005 <0D0017 0.02934/24/2018 1.07210049 0.90026 Q146 8.12 0.0116 933 Outfall Nq, Date Collected 24 hour rainfall inches Sb Ba Be Cd Cr Cu Pb Hg Mo Ni Ag Zn mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/t mg/L mg/L mg/1 mg/L 1 12/16/2014 0.12 <0 0005 0.0I31 c0.00005 c0.00005 0.0012 0.0014 <0,0005 c0.DD01 <0.0D05 <0.00062 <0.0005 0.0094 2 12/29/2014 047 <0.0005 0.0906 0.00026 <0.00005 0.016 0.0215 0.0024 <0.0001 c0.0005 0.01 <0.0D05 0-0156 3 1 11/17/2014 0.67 <OOWS 0.178 0.00074 <0.00005 00358 0.0401 0,0054 <00001 0.0014 0.6198 c0000S 0.0B17 1 6/19/2017 0.43 <070 0.0184 <0.001 <0.005 00094 <0.011 c0.009 <0.00007 0.016 <0.044 <0.D07 <0.24 2 6/20/2012 1.53 10.010 0.0211 c0.901 <0.005 0,0126 <0.011 c0.009 c0.WQ07 <0.011 <0.044 <0007 <0.24 3 6/19/2017 0.43 c0,010 0,0438 c0.001 c0.005 -0009 c0.011 <0.009 c0.00007 <0.011 <0.C44 <0.007 c0.24 RECEIVED SEP 13 2018 DENR-LAND QUALITY STORMWATER PERMITTING Energy, Mineral and Land Resources ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY February 20, 2018 Duke Energy Attn: Tom Copolo 10660 Boston Road Roxboro, NC 27574 SUBJECT: NPDES Stormwater Permit: Request for Regulatory Relief Mayo Electric Generating Plant -Mayo Steam Plant Monofill General Permit No: NCG120000; COC No:tN_CG=1'201.01_-) Person County Mr. Copolo: ROY COOPER Governor MICHAEL S, REGAN secreliary WILLIAM E. VINSON, JR, Inie'inl Di,•ecior In response to your request for Regulatory Relief, NCDENR-Land Quality Section staff reviewed provided sample reports, site maps and discussed site characteristics with Lori Tollie the EHS CCP permitting and compliance officer. Monthly monitoring has been triggered by two consecutive exceedances of the Fecal Coliform benchmarks at your facility. Please keep in mind that benchmark exceedances are NOT limit violations or violations of permit conditions; however, you are obligated to follow the tiered response actions outlined in your permit. Mayo Electric Generating Plant has been following the tiered response actions and therefore is in compliance with the permit. Based on your materials inventory and certification that industrial activities at Mayo Electric Generating Plant - Mayo Steam Plant Monofill would not generate concentrated amounts of Fecal Coliform into stormwater. For that reason, we are granting regulatory relief in the form of a collapsed Tier 2 — Tier 3 response. Upon receipt of this letter, Mayo Electric Generating Plant may resume the permit specified semiannual analytical monitoring for the remainder of your current permit. Your current permit is set to expire on October 31, 2018. This decision only applies to the Fecal Coliform benchmarks. A benchmark exceedance of any other parameter listed in your permit will trigger tiered response actions as described in the general permit. You must notify this office in writing, within five business days, if you become aware of any significant source of Fecal Coliform at your facility that has the potential to be exposed to stormwater. The relief granted in this letter is contingent upon the current industrial practices at Mayo Electric Generating plant -Mayo Steam Plant Monofill. If industrial practices change and Fecal Coliform does become a significant stormwater exposure risk then this office reserves the right to withdraw this decision and reinstate the permit specified tiered response or other actions State of North Carolina } Environmental Quality I Energy; ?Mineral, and Land Resources Raleigh Regional Office 1 1628 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, NC 27609 919 791 4200 Duke Energy, ATTN: Tom Copolo February 20, 2018 Page 2 of 2 that may be warranted by the new set of circumstances. Please retain and append this letter to your Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SPPP) or permit. If you have any questions or comments concerning this letter, please contact Thad Valentine or Diane Adams at (919) 791-4200. Sincerely, William H. Denton, IV, PE Regional Engineer-RRO Enclosure ec: Bethany Georgoulias, RCO r HCDENR North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Division of Energy, Mineral, and Land Resources Land Quality Section Tracy E. Davis, PE, CPM Director January 6; 2014 William J. Thacker Duke Energy Progress, Inc. Mayo Steam Electric Plant 10660 Boston Road Roxboro, NC 27574 Pat McCrory, Governor John E. Skvarla, Ill, Secretary Subject: General Permit No. NCG120000 Mayo Steam Plant Monofill COC NCG120101 Pei son ounty Dear Mr. Thacker: In accordance with your application for a discharge permit received on September 23, 2013, we are forwarding herewith the subject certificate of coverage to discharge under the subject state - NPDES general permit. This permit is issued pursuant to the requirements of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and the Memorandum of' Agreement between North Carolina and the US Envirohmental Protection Agency dated October 15, 2007 (or as subsequently amended). - Please take notice that this certificate of coverage is not transferable except after notice to the Division of Energy, Mineral, and Land Resources. The Division may require modification or revocation and reissuance of the certificate of coverage (COC). Coverage under this General. Permit is granted with the condition that the permittee performs additional samplirig`requirements as outlined in the amended conditions to the COC. These include: (1) In addition to the parameters in NCG120000, sample each SDO semi-annually for conductivity, pH, arsenic (As), selenium (Se), and boron (B). No benchmarks apply; however, concentrations above the levels in Footnote 5 should be noted on the Stormwater Outfall Data Monitoring Reports (SDMRs) submitted to NC DENR. (2) Sample each stormwater outfall (SDO) Qnce during the fir,Nt sampling event between January 6 and June 30, 2014 and once in Ihe sampffingeveni between January 1 and June 30, 2017 (Year 5 - Period 1 in the General Permit) for the expanded list of parameters listed in Table 1 as amended on page 2 of the COC. 1612 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1612 • Telephone 919-707-92201 FAX; 919-733-2876 512 North Salisbury Street, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 - Internet: htt� nll .or!al.ncdenr.or4lweb/Jr/land-quality An Equal opportunity 1 Affiimative Action Employer — 50% Recycled 110% Post Consumer Paper f Mr. Nil,;:>-;, j.'rhacker January 6, 2014 Page 2 of,' These additional parameters include metals and other constituents which may be present in Zero Liquid Discharge (ZLD) wastewater used to condition the coal combustion residue (CCR) transported to the monofill. These sample results will provide a baseline for stormwater discharges when the monofill has just begun operation and a comparison after three years of operation. The Division will consider the data upon renewal of coverage under this General Permit. The facility may request "P%epresentative Outfall Status" for one or more ourialls at the monofill so dint fewer outfalls must be sampled. Please see Footnote 3 to Table 1 in the amended COC. A form for an ROS Request can be found on our website at http:/ f portal.ncdenr.orgJweb%;r f itpdes-stormwater (on the ".Miscellaneous Forms" tab). _ -;• We request that you provide copies of in -stream monitoring results per the approved Water Quality Monitoring Plan (WQMP) required -by the Solid Waste Permit ....for this.monofill.site to the Raleigh Regional Office. Copies of these results should be sent to the. attention of Dave Parnell in the NC DEMLR Stormwater Permitting Program. ...-.,.-,This permit does not affect the legal requirements to obtain other permits which ,may be required by the Division of Energy, Mining, and Land Resources, or permits required by.. the Division of Water Resources, Coastal Area Management Act, or any other federal or local governmental permit that maybe required. If the conditions as stipulated in the COC are unacceptable to you, you may apply for an individual NPDES stormwater permit. If you have -any questions concerning this permit, please contact Bradley Bennett at telephone number (919) 807-6378, or Bethany Georgoulias at telephone number (919) 807-6372. Sincerely, for Tracy E. Davis, A.E., CPM cc: Toby Vinson, DEMLR Land Quality Section Dave Parnell, DEMLR Raleigh Regional Office Autumn Romanski, DWR Raleigh Regional Office CSergei_Chernikov; DWR-Wdter Quality Permitt n� g Section\ � Stormwater Permitting Program Files DWR Central Files .4 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF ENERGY, MINERAL, AND LAND RESOURCES GENERAL PERMIT NO. NCG120000 CERTIFICATE OF COVERAGE No. NCGI20101 STORNMATER DISCHARGES NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCII RG£ ELIMINA' ION SYSTEM _ In compliance with the provision of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1, other lawful standards and regulations promulgated wid adopted by the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission, and the Federal Water -Pollution -Control Act, and the North Carolina Administrative Code in NCAC 15A-02H .0114(b)(1), as amended, Duke Energy Progress; Inc. is hereby authorized to -discharge stormwater from a facility located at Mayo Steam Electric Plant Monofill 10660 Boston Road -Roxboro, Person County,' to receiving waters designated as Bowes Branch, a class C water in the Roanoke River Basin, in accordance with the effluent limitations, monitoring requirements, and other conditions set forth in Parts I, I1, II1, and IV of General Permit No. NCG120000 as attached, and as amended in pages 2-3 of this Certificate of Coverage. Amended conditions 1. This Certificate of Coverage is an enforceable part of the permit. 2. In accordance with 15A NCAC 02H .0114(b)(1), the monitoring program in Part 11 Section B Table 1 Analytical Monitoring Requirements of this permit is amended as follows: Table 1 Analvtical Monitoring Rennirements Frequency ampleT &.e -Saffip , 't .Characteristics P. i' � :T 2 4, - Lbtatiofi _ Chemical Oxygen Demand mg/l_ semi-annual Grab SDO Fecal Coliform # ver 100 ml semi-annual Grab SDO Total Suspended Solids mg/I semi-annual Grab SDO Arsenic jAs)5 MR/I serni-annual I Grab j SDO ,Selenium Se)-5 L mg,l semi. -annual Grab SDO Boron (B)5 mg/l semi-annual Grab SDO 2H5 S.U. semi-annual Grab SDO Conductivity SIM semi-annual Grab SDO Antimony ny (S b), Total Grab SDO .Recoverable Barium (Ba), Total mg/1 Grab SDO ,Recoverable qer'yl ' lium'.(Be), Total mg/1 Grab SDO Recoverable Cadmium (Cd), Total mg/1 Grab. SDO Recoverable Chromium (Cr), Total Mg/l Grab SDO Recoverable Copper (Cu), Total mg/l Grab SDO Recoverable Lead (Pb), Total mg/l Grab. SDO Recoverable Once during Jan 6-Jun 30, 2014; :Mercury (Hg), To.tal mg/l Grab SDO Recoverable Once during Jar, 1-Jun 30, 2017 Molyb6hdm (Mo')',_Total mg/I Grab SDO Recoverable Nickel (Ni), Total mg/1 Grab SDO Recoverable Silver,,-(Ag), Total—, Grab SDO Recoverable a] Thallium (TI), To : t mg/l Grab SDO . Recoverable Zinc (Zn), Total..-., '-' mg/l Grab SDO Recoverable Total Chloride (Cl) ma/l Grab SDO Total Fluoride (F) mg/I Grab SDO Total Sulfafe mg/l Grab SDO Total Hardness mg/I Grab SDO Total Rainfall4 inches semi-annual Rain gauge FoQtaQjesl Measurement Frequency: Twice per year or during the specified period, during a measureable storm event. 2 1 COC No. NCG120101 effective January 6, 2014 I 2 Sample collection must begin within the first 30 minutes of discharge and continue to all outfalls until completed. 3 Sample Location: Samples shall be collected at each stormwater discharge outfall (SDO) unless representative outfall status (ROS) has been granted by NC Division of Energy, Mineral, and Land Resources (DEMLR). A copy of the DEMLR letter granting ROS must be kept on site. DEMLR's ROS letter remains in effect through the subsequent reissuance of this permit and as long as the pertinent site conditions and operations remain unchanged, unless the ROS letter provides for other conditions or duration. 4 For each sampled rueasureable storm event the torai precipitation must he recorded from an on -site rain garage. (Where isolated sues are unmanned for extended periods, a loco[ rafa gauge reading may be substitutc .,'ora7a on -site ga4gr, upon .prior DEMUR Wriue.7 appr jval.) 5 No benchmark applies for these parameters. However, levels above 0.34 mg/1 As, 0.056 mg/l Se, or outside a pH rarige df 6.0-9.0 S.0 should be noted on the Stormwater Data Monitoring Report (SDMA)- submitted to-NC°DENR.- - -- This Certificate of Coverage shall become effective January 6, 2014. This Certificate of -Coverage shall remain in effect for the duration of the General Permit. Signed this day, January 6, 2014. for Tracy E. Davis, P.E., Director Division of Energy, Mineral, and Land Resources By the Authority of the Environmental Management Commission 3 I COC No. NCG120101 effective January 6, 2014 LOCATION MAP. '� r • � 'ti�r'•.r+C_ � rr ' i. S1t ^ w}t`i �/ 1 ' �-- r .yr-- ,:, n?•.w - '�'.-;.:'Y "' - •.- '.{r^7 'u�N '.k• 1 v.,rr• •,,� 7:r,:�_ _�_--::� .. `.,� i.c. 15 'i•C,,,x,4w.-• _' �' a;M -h;�' r �� �- , ( �� , , ,t.+-N" `� -- •_ .:.�, . • . � It 1♦ �" r . � -.. ', t• � + /F 1 J 't�-�!\, q, r,h�y. �^ r .. I F � � I 1 L r- - r.33 _ • � .�\ � \r S.t � _ _ S / 'k ��' �'�--• r y.�t�•,`_ ,��. n_t.. f .!•'.''.�1 i I),4 } PC ✓l,`.lf,•: rr`i-�c�'`• jjrr �.--• �_Iy I! yFi -"`, `;t,�• r}'*Y^+�,-1-.S~"riw c"!Lt'1 cr .s'�Ilrrr a.f,` its Y- y.Gl... ,, •Ir. _L s ,.�r�r'4`.,/tl��I:;..��{- i-J �„,;�sill,fi-ti,.`_. "7..� •�"'.5'L�]�. rr� ��, .' .� , �,.'. rr� sL , tis=` ile., rtsJ _ :rl, I Ei; ,t _♦ r•.\s :fir ,,:r r• uk � tl , -�,, °r�'f � rrrfh Y`Arr +';, �.:. . \`s� 1 ! clg. C": �r a5 J � �r`r' �rR �C. � l`fr a• �f '%ram Z ¢ k `', _ �'s,, �I. \ i s ,...� r 4, '•- fr._r r,$, '�\\�ri- +r'S•A"5`'•�t^r� r'•�` �:; ;.I 7 :`,�"".A�r, r,I rt, .. Ji��`i (' Y a i4 �y a .•', r • l� -s r � I A) C C ' � .� , � �1 I i A '\ice. � r f". � JJl �� f5 �rfi lr��•-,�-� �\, � J �. �1�'� �iM �r�. .,.-.`- _a,?itf4o-"',s ,,. �j +I r-.� `It�},''4��='1 :s� '7S ,) a , f -� , ' it-�' ri-1 t t {� =. ��`5 fr,_.,,f/J�..,�_ Y � •1.� � ' tl __, {}' :v' '� J• n fi75 i' ;r! CC 'ili\4, .J' �'.: s ]f r ,� ru .cSs -r _ -.• �•Y'- ,,ti, r Z. r f 'l. (•G�� r' ', r_V.'%{ , �T I L Y_ '✓�Jr � ,fi,. r3'r,�, 5i •'rt r' ,.,;.�� r, •f it �, r' ,n t.� i,• ,v Sl -•...,/',w ?.� f« ;alb: 1 ,',J�rC�iwl,�y. ,f'tv it,! l t, �r���'t r.a •i ii. 4...�"• + f`f Ra.. s(r i�l d r 1 v +�..\. �h...,'- 1 �- l {• y ,,w/'^ k 2`\l - 1yi1 r•Kt �- I 'i I '''r i 444...�...•jf ✓ Il r .'i` �._,v `i,: , „':'r'• S%�!�•r.�, \"�-.�1�;1�_.. •i bS' J'S� -. '*r.y.'��"'s�?''r 5 r� ,,,`°:1,ti1#�':i.7,�tlr� .l�f fti 3lc?s .�:.�i,l.(_ �/ �'`-`�•'1.4;;•.�'�F ,�,Y¢¢%�r, .:?ii..i .-.. I .'4-�'iw A }. ,I�_'s� �,',?' Jam/ `'",,� 7 - i•II'r`•.' '1, r ,=r �'\rr:.i,+•,:L � �11 t% ,J'l �''�r rr r' • �-���. ' !' ,V r. ♦'ij S' ?..-._�••� � r k Y• s*`l v 1 � ' {� !� _"7 . 4 ♦ if ICY ,t 1 fl' I rr fir' ° ��4 r q ♦ r f P� J I I't' • sr 1l. .¢ �q Star %J� `r I,,i , '... = Maya Steam Electric Pfant r; �I ,.,.�J i%!\�\\ t��•� r�r`�rpr71�°:4�i #'l�n Vllll �•.l �� FKn����'�`;'3� �'rLI r I :-. tii ♦ t� w -;%: ' �' �2 ♦s, �,h'kr r,. y. _ .� -,_•, URYr!� fi.. x f�: •,'\•��.' r �/ ! l.r,,I�[ _ ry ',�' t , r � ` Y� r' ri '`!.'� � �r ��'e-±•' ' - -'I$ �• 1% ,��!.•�� y\l-, r r'a� _ }/ � IN t� { ri i.. , 4 -1 r• b, r- I. (F y ,\ , .F'',,: , /r . , 1 ti 3 '_�- c" �'Ff ,^ Y_• `l:t f'. S lr 9 : r I ti' r �y\ { . f.• cI' tl• .r 1 1, r I., F, \ r- ar K't-}I? , iJ ,7f Jl� 1 .s MR, �i1o�t iIf�11,:4//* I �.st ,��� I'�, s 0 Ja{��y��'�,�J�t. I��-. �h l' fr l`aal !•1 -r �^�'i'c`ei-Y r�4`'- -r' _1 �.,\,; ��'+�5: s.� t9, �.i �..,1' ,. ��t �,I .�\�I � j`.Y`` s4j'� Jf i �� �_._'� r•�^;;ti'�i 1, /y {1i ^ -_ I, I. •. ._ .,^. '`" 1 rr I,'rJ7:\f. !Jirt��i } `J t- �Vy.� •..`.:r, ;i!% 4� ,<y i'F VVV is :��r -y,��: s ' .• ,.= '-':,� �' r� i<� t �sL 1-.- \ Giti._ l'',:t✓'�i :�•rs pis •�� f a r r!. >,, _. c.1,, `'Rr i<y .I ,: .til'r .x„'. s _`rx-r' C y,#�``�:''• , _ ,l �r^�•4'i r•r I�1f !yr <-�.,, a .5,,, , 7'�;.•. .l.r V'%s.\ •:•� \vri�-��;.. =r '>:.S +`yk� l0 1 , ifv,,1. ,'s,. �,'�-1 r'�r.•..' ,� ,r VI r y.� ./% ,'r � tti(:/� 11 ri c -�^ �1J.: sy j t`� '.ti i •. ' `�%ir%�.=tsf %irrl�\'ril Il ~l. 7vliil��Ji,::?Y,t _jjN r `. ' '"lt r, r i• ) s\ J iI^ `11 }t:_-_�if' §. �r' I` - 5 't_ \l, _ ,.' � J Z - , � '' jj , ,!�f` s 'k l�.,,,tsr - �.,, ''��TT{�'„t• ` �-'L•-, '�.`Gr '( V. "•'= 41)r yr ��E 1' ��}._,,� C; ���t: �iL t`a�lti {:-�•f-'�i r Ir r� ''�� Ir,.�'yi5 ,/k sl t ..` ,�•' :;•t '•, �y.,. rl J;; I . -r ).� r/ � _ �\�, s ae•'� .i'.�1i14 .hL !�r �� sl l' n �y�f�,l� r, 'I tl Y, , � 5 -� ^--_ie , � it 1. I rrl J•1 tit �/ �.;:N''' r`,' s II�I'�D t�� � �, J 1 . .. �' '�:I '�, ,�' �, _: o /1 ,�J�y" 1 r{ r sJ 1' 4 -, 5' i ✓ 'I, , .�.� t I L , ♦- ;,�'! r ;. s'`I. r.. 4� '44 r j i 4 ✓;-.yy�� V ,/ ,li I i.{i F t '� :'i ,l f.�% '7 1 ` �. L ; � T` s i. �� � s. `� f. '� z 11 \� i. t I' 7: ♦ In.r '-"!•-' �r"•.S �.. + r ,.�. /. t � Q—��L`r�"t 'a ,7 I � , I�. ,• r r-=ras•\.� -.. r, � S l_• �:� '�C_?j.��r' �. '/�,;;1 =•tiff'-� �y � 1w�^5�'E,,,i:4 tC�i il: �� *��'t\,`� '\ � _ •. f., I �.� �I ��+�_' t )' r- f t /f r Y �I, 1;�:'. t�7`r, f a is :°r.�! r I''•'.'• I .1i • � r , l r%' t ,i/ I.r . .. \`.-v ,,.:..,.• . ,+ � • �;C \ r 4 J\•r. `.. 5';...� �, ,J1'- -. i`,� •/f I%.lf=� ,� �f/ I[!:i.i1t_rr,.f,.t •l� ;i?`,:Yh��S.-�I "/•'-p=5�i';'�`i,'{....,L ,+`�" ('��'s�l;:•'• ,;•,:••,I_I i� .�;_,y ', nr 1i'•::�: 1 x 7',C 4'=-_�1r1 \ `^- '-' �' GdJ'%^>,...�.;_ l .!,.. .'.�• , �lJ;,y,9�`�, 'T�'"�.; var• 1=I''r r �;•'u;-`•4-5;-,;�� ., r::JS. ..'tl•-,,.:_. _ �.�ir- � *, � ` f i..! -r r'I sN' /,0" �%� �*^ w ?.\.r ,.1':I ^J•Y�„ `'`�: ;J ` f I s�f 5''s� . rr •'rti.s r � :^ ., . r'1 1 1. .ti Y- :� G.i jrl%r,-, f-, � ` ' i ��i �J�?,\ cf'jC��•i '�� � , .\•:�,,. ,,`�L,�r'f _ _•�-t ' .+ " � +��-,` ' l r • `�::ur r _k`:r � "7r.Jl'• 'r'• .yW., `, _ 1-d:�.. _.4 •a', '--�.ti�'�,ti.'-. ` �srr _� f�: `t" _ •I�Y'�� 'r't 4��'��¢¢r! /`'a'. ?/..'� •'lr :lCy�i ;�:t�';4{.ter.-'..._ �a : ��,�': �'J-ti_ ti�1'S'�'-•%fi�. s AIII •t. •I-.. �•�:...(�`Ll": -•rs '.,15.i,,�..�� �•:5.:�� �•• JI'- I �� �r-. •�'` `.,� 1�4 `��. •�-y;if'/ '�' :�{„_ ti��1•.��' 1 � / �� '4i�� l ', �/ /,../�- s � k'f'� Ir / ,ri.T• \;. �- 1HL r. [� _ r..- s .� 5 i � '�''1 y,.�l'Jt'x':l.--'i 1)1 '5'"„-' `�i` �,/: 1 f %��,r.x.-ti rr'C�'-J4�y-+ '�I : `'..•ram >, ��y'^4,,'.;iy. r -t r e: ;�-_ 1 it �). _�_.✓ f�T , �.5 •>4� _ •''` _ `!' yi rs.•r `�- ,,A� `��i�:i.•;,'Jr: �;�'r�C�:i'. `. P -'!r, =;�`' - " F_.-,\:!•rl, 'f '* �, �� �%' - r' � ''J '- _ ,1' Irir' ��i^�,Y�•'',r;�. rr: ._.);; .��.. i' `i: LJCiIf.���-''�..� ,�'-'••�'s`�. •`^:♦t _ ��'�., ,i4 �. '�s , � fie = : , _ J ,r..._ : �' �JI `.-li '' �3s- 1 -- ••`�'' •- {' ��-. `�i' _ :'' , -s § ; �� r� h, J/ v tt:',= _a -; � •3� I . ilk , f'' \ - _ .:R .�. 4v� A�L� f�'rrl , rYt'"' �/ / .-.C-.._ '�9i�1'v,\ i_\i •: •_�� Ir5'" •i,1 ��'�_..t.!•J f I'.�,'i lJl J -III Z - 1':••`Js r r/?' 11s r'►�4 r 1� �'C�t __S�r •ti_' ryG �. '.r y _ ,�1 r� ? - _ � d, �_. 5; ` t �r , ,�•p�. y� �'r�' �T:.. � ,., � c '1 .��',. �\. -�� r'ir �v I \_ �.4 .I, � .Y .tom ,'�-1'`.�# F , fit' - .. I� � ' •;5f -�-9•-' �y� h' � � !i7 ��;:..\ , ._•�I!} 'I h;t ;.. .r,r I_' 'kk..�e'- �-, r•�..ti,f � •,i�L,�J .'}�� `�}r J�- r-5 i' `+� ,'rr-r{ -'j h4i _J.' �. �„�, _-. •IiAL �: ._ ... r rr/,� F.. c?' f, " C ,l •`,r,,.• Ir._ ,*`> h Rr ..vr ) J 1- _�, .J,� �."',: 1:' , s• Jir f�'' ,-` f'- .t ,.� r r r-• �♦ / s!I rr f 1 4c-I, r� .14Fo:�-• f,r}-^; ` rl 71� �.4'r, . f Ys " `l: J' r � rC•,.r f"' IJ' ,' x„ •�`-' I '. 7{/r ''f' ' r,l'C ii Yy^'f: "�+, r ,r J�;.�y. �'. Jn. .�%r1t..�y..5 ,J •fr` �" .:: � t': t�' �>��J'S�r:`. � i`= ,L �•� 'f��1'.I 'r .J f .�:�'tiiF'.S \ £'`'�1�'} -i•-y7: Y- I w- irk •rtl^1��• `'; R. :J....s. I xrl.`17) :,.r r,:'-';.`''='� -.( r _ �'i� �:r:', "?+a',�i' t -� " ;;�. "�_ 1,���! 5 �\' ^- �Jrf r -t S J:'.IT,i$=_..,'.:r'i.ti'"' �W' �ti;�._5 .1• ,�y '\�: r_. -,�- �,• \ `�,.: S"�_' ,'n ?; !(G ", ti ! ELT^„'- ��_,'l: ''x �J. ._"�'. �_.:iti: ,?\• �„: � ;•„li' ..iJ,�� ��'� fir:• �F.•n .i��-,r _ 4:h. ... . 4 , o {I", s��' V•' kl �` �'• �.4 'r 1 - ,l.`( l`t'A r•-f r �q 't�.. .. _ r..��<ti''` 1.��ill�,� ��•i.•.�.ti .1 �� >., F't'� t�'};''i; �l' �j' I �.- '\ r r'`\� •a. �,. - r� ,ri _ �r /,.;v': r. .. } i -. :;=� _ , (}� ,��:� I `, � _s \ �,•c � �� t 3 • 1,',i,� �\• �'�. � ��; r�;>,' ,J` /�-- i' 11-� JF rin�L ;� JJ' A>a- 3:�- '�i ,5. - I J 7 i' !'>._ t s: 1 7r �.5 �r.1` r. • , x''" }', - rl ...r� , _ i.¢'= - aL.�'ZS� �..-rk". ,r) s ,'//'} _ r �l .. S1i: r� - ' \,v -1 i.(a ^y �`1�, j•., •��. ,)h tf r.L gr.. �fk�^, � C ,i+� l'� _i.C• }.:tY `:?l"(' �L'-:,:.•i Jy� • awJ ri'Iti_'..• ��'�.- �'�r'C �);" .r�..1:� 41-; � r {��i7; �'' - l:,ri �., �' S I _ ,;r�,� a f I .� .f. ''�'�,� ice♦ r S A:, �v \�:� 1-. '�`.•�... t'';�V' 1 ,S �� � t ti I'^1 1 . �e,,," �` _ .'� '�j. r'.-�4', .iV..';' 'l l.'. I -5 s-�� il NCG120101 W E S Map Scale 1: 24, 000 Duke Energy Progress, Inc. Mayo Steam Electric Plant Monofill Latitude: 360 32' 00'1 N Longitude: 780 55' 21" W County: Person Receiving Stream: Boaves Branch Stream Class: C Sub -basin: 03-02-05 (Roanoke River Basin) Facility Location Georgoulias, Bethany From: Davis, Tracy Sent: Monday, June 12, 2017 7:23 PM To: Georgoulias, Bethany; Randall, Mike; Patterson, Robert D Cc: Vinson, Toby; Denton, Bill Subject: RE: Mayo Monofill NCG12 Application Bethany, I concur with your reasoning below and can attend a Wednesday AM meeting with you and Duke. Thanks, Tracy From: Georgoulias, Bethany Sent: Monday, June 12, 2017 3:14 PM To: Randall, Mike <mike.randall@ncdenr.gov>; Patterson, Robert D <robert.patterson@ncdenr.gov> Cc: Vinson, Toby <toby.vinson@ncdenr.gov>; Davis, Tracy <tracy.davis@ncdenr.gov>; Denton, Bill <bill.denton@ncdenr.gov> Subject: RE: Mayo Monofill NCG12 Application See Lori's email below. I will respond to her tomorrow after we have had a chance to discuss further. I disagree with her assessment. See 15A NCAC 02H .0114(b) (p. 13 of the 2H Rules) I do not think incorporating a coal ash monofill (which was never publicly noticed in the first place because it was covered under the NCG12 General Permit with augmented monitoring) into the Mayo Electric Plant individual permit (whose draft permit that went to public notice never included this coal ash monofill) can squarely fit into one of these categories that is exempt from public notice. While I don't think a public hearing is necessarily a given, it is a possibility that DEMLR should anticipate a request for during the notice process given public interest. It is helpful to remember the original COC to Mayo's Monofill was issued a month before the Dan River spill. Tracy or Toby, if you have thoughts on this matter or interpretation of the rules here before we arrange a time to talk with Lori this week, please let us know. I am available Wednesday morning and could meet with her then. Thanks, Bethany 13ethany Georgoulias Environmental Engineer Stornnvater Program, Division of Energy, Mineral, and Land Resources N.C. Department of Environmental Quality 919 807 6372 office bethany.gcorgouliasAncdcringov 1612 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1612 (mailing) 512 N. Salisbury Street, Raleigh, NC 27604 (location) Website: http://deq.nc.gov/about/divisions/energy-mineral-land-resources/stormwater Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties. ENR ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION T15A: 02H.0100 I 15A NCAC 02H .0113 1-NOTIFICATIOMORAPPLICANTS The Director shall notify an applicant -of the final decision of the applicant's -permit application. Notifications of denial shall be made by certified mail and shall specify the reasons therefor and the proposed changes which in the opinion of the Director will be required to obtain the permit. History Note: Authority G.S. 143-215.3(a)(1); 143-215.1(a); 143-215.3(a)(4); Eff. February 1, 1976; Amended Eff. October 1, 1987. 15A NCAC 02H .0114 MODIFICATION AND REVOCATION OF PERMITS (a) Any permit issued pursuant to this Section is subject to revocation or modification in whole or part pursuant to 40 CFR 122.62 or for any of the following: (1) violation of any terms or conditions of the permit; (2) obtaining a permit by misrepresentation or failure to disclose fully all relevant facts; (3) a change in any condition that requires either a temporary or permanent reduction or limitation of the permitted discharge; and (4) refusal of the pemuttee to permit the Director or his authorized representative upon presentation of credentials: (A) to enter upon permittee's premises in which an effluent source is located or in which any records are required to be kept'under terms and conditions'of the permit, (B) to have access to any copy and records required to be kept under terms and conditions of the pernut, (C) ito inspect any monitoring equipment or method required in the permit, or (D) to sample any discharge 'of pollutants. (5) '"failure to pay the annual fee for administering and compliance ,monitoring. (b) Modifications and reissuance of permits shall'be subject to ttie 'same public notice and: other. procedural requirements 'as' the issuance of permits except as follows: , (1) modifications of the monitoring program' contained in the periiut,' (2) name changes or changes in the ownership of the discharge when no other change in the permit is indicated,' • ' (3) a single modification of any compliance schedule not in excess of four months, (4) modification of compliance schedules (construction schedules) in pernuts for new sources where the new source will not begin to discharge until control,facilities'are operational, (5) modifications to include or amend pretreatment program requirements, (6) issuance of permits revoked for failure to pay the annual administering and compliance monitoring fee, }, . (7) modificationsdeterminedby.the, Director to be minor, such as typographical errors, incorrect maps, and, similar minor changes. History Note: Authority G.S. 143-215.3(a)(1); 143-215.1(b)(3); Eff, February 1, 1976; . Amended Eff. March 1, 1993; September 1, 1988; November 1, 1987. 15A NCAC 02H .0115 PUBLIC ACCESS (a) All records, reports, and information required to be subnutted to the Commission or the Director; any public comment on these records, reports or information; and the, draft and final permits shall be disclosed upon request to the public unless the person submitting the information can show,that such'information, if made public, would disclose methods or processes entitled to protection as trade secrets. (b) The Director is authorized to determine information which is entitled to confidential treatment. In the event the Director determines that such information (other than effluent data) is entitled to confidential treatment, he shall take NORTH CAROLINA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE . Effective April 1, 2003 _ - Page 13 of 34 Georgoulias, Bethany From: Tollie, Lori White <Lori.Tollie@duke-energy.com> Sent: Monday, June 12, 2017 2:39 PM To: Georgoulias, Bethany Cc: Vinson, Toby; Davis, Tracy; Denton, Bill Subject: RE: Mayo Monofill NCG12 Application Hi Bethany, Sorry I missed you last week I took a few days of vacation and went to the beach. I will be in the Archdale building this Wednesday for some other items and was wondering if you'd have a little time to discuss this further? My understanding of our current permit is that adding three existing stormwater outfalls (that are currently permitted) to our ISW permit would not constitute a major modification nor would it require a public hearing. Please let me know if sometime Wednesday will work for you. Thanks Z.ri *' Xf& Duke Energy EHS CCP Permitting & Compliance 2500 Fairfax Road Greensboro, NC 27407 Cell: (336) 408-2591 Office: (336) 854-4916 From: Georgoulias, Bethany[mailto:bethany.georgoulias@ncdenr.gov] Sent: Friday, June 09, 2017 2:59 PM To: Tollie, Lori White Cc: Vinson, Toby; Davis, Tracy; Denton, Bill Subject: RE: Mayo Monofill NCG12 Application Lori, Thank you again for the clarifying information regarding this site. This request would require a major modification to the current stormwater permit NCS000580 for Mayo Electric Plant, which was only completed and issued last year. While we realize that the Mayo Monofill currently under COC No. NCG120101 may need individual permit coverage in the near future, that General Permit does not expire until October 31, 2017. With both facilities under a current active permit, and the likelihood of a public hearing upon public notice of a major modification to Mayo's individual permit, we are not able to process a modification to NCS000580 at this time. However, if Duke Energy Progress would like to request a modification to the NCS000580 permit to include the Monofill, we will consider that request closer to the expiration of the current NCG120000 General Permit. A major modification to a minor NPDES permit is $260 (you can verify fees here htt de .nc. ov about divisions ener -mineral-land- resources ener -mineral-land- ermits stormwater- ermits fees). You may submit that request as soon as you are ready; we just want the company to be aware that it will be some time before we are able to work on it. The request should include a summary of monitoring data to date from the Mayo Monofill. I tried to phone the past couple of days and missed you, but please feel free to call me for a follow up on this next week. Best regards, Bethany Bethany Georgoulias Environmental Engineer Stormwater Program, Division of Energy, Mineral, and Land Resources N.C. Department of Environmental Quality 919 807 6372 office bethany geor oulias @ncdenr. 1612 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1612 (mailing} 512 N. Salisbury Street, Raleigh, NC 27604 (location) Website: http://deq.nc.p-ov/about/divisions/energy-mineral-land-resources/stormwater Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties. From: Tollie, Lori White [mailto;Lori.Tollie@duke-energy.com] Sent: Thursday, June 01, 2017 1:23 PM To: Georgoulias, Bethany<bethany.georgoulias@ncdenr.g_ov> Cc: Patterson, Robert D <robert.patterson@ncdenr.gov>; Randall, Mike <mike.randall@ncdenr.goy>; Vinson, Toby <tobv.vinson(a?ncdenr.gov>; Davis, Tracy <tracy.davis@ncdenr.gov> Subject: RE: Mayo Monofill NCG12 Application Bethany, The plant property is contiguous with Duke Energy owning all the property including highway 501 with the DOT rhaving a ROW. The activity is the same at the station and the monofill with it consisting of truck traffic utilizing established haul roads. I have included a drawing from the property deed and an aerial from a previous NPDES submittal for reference. The station manager Tom Copolo is the primary manager of all aspects of the entire site, including the monofill. Also, we currently send wastewater generated by the monofill to the station for processing and this is covered under our NPDES permit NCO038377. I hope this information is helpful. If you have any further questions, I'd be happy to discuss. Thank you Lori -T-.,4 V. Xf%. Duke Energy EHS CCP Permitting & Compliance 2500 Fairfax Road Greensboro, NC 27407 Cell: (336) 408-2591 Office: (336) 854-4916 From: Georgoulias, Bethany [maiIto: bethan ..aeorgoulias(&ncdenr.gov] Sent: Thursday, June 01, 2017 10:43 AM To: Tollie, Lori White Cc: Patterson, Robert D; Randall, Mike; Vinson, Toby; Davis, Tracy Subject: RE: Mayo Monoflll NCG12 Application Geor oulias, Bethan From: Georgoulias, Bethany Sent: Thursday, June 01, 2017 10:43 AM To: 'Tollie, Lori White' Cc: Patterson, Robert D; Randall, Mike; Vinson, Toby; Davis, Tracy Subject: RE: Mayo Monofill NCG12 Application Attachments: NPDES-Owner-Affiliation-Change-20170323-DEMI_R-SW.pdf Ms. Tollie, Looking at the locations of the Mayo Monofill (currently under NCG120101) and the Mayo Steam Electric Plant (NC5000580), there is quite a bit of distance between these two facilities. In the NPDES program we cannot issue one individual permit for facilities that are not contiguous (or at most, across the street from one another). Also, in the case of two different site operation managers, we would usually not issue one permit even if the company is the same. We assume these sites are also under different primary managers. Unfortunately, it does not look possible to incorporate the Mayo Monofill site into the Mayo Steam Electric Plant's NPDES stormwater permit. Redewers Related Permits Oulla9 IComments rHistory Inspections r incidents;7 Enforcements r Violations Details 1 r Details 2 r 1344nq Events Reg. Activities Etl, Guidelines •' "•r. +Affiliations . <>.. _ Permit. 'x=i1 1701 Version: i3O Status: dive Entity 'AffiliationTYpe Name Title Phone Number 8 t petalls... $emove Cagy Back Lext� sh do, � �=rj; URF—er uentacl erson opo o, om - 3137 Owner CentatlPerson Co Ran 919 774-5200 Owner Contact Person Gatld Rodney P 04 382-5591 Owner Contact Person Grant, Rick Owner ContactPerson Grant, Rick Owner ContadPerson Haynes, Jason 910 205-2101 Owner Contact Person Henderson, Kelvin (9i9 362-2000 Owner Contact Person Hutcherson, Rodney (9t9)546-2235 Owner Contact Person Jones, Reuhin 9i9}546-3459 owner ContadPerson Kapopoulos,ErnestJ.Jr... (919)362-2000 Owner Contact Person Pitts, Bob Owner ContadPerson Srnith,John F.hf (919)548-7881 •L, Owner Contact Person TTadcer,Jod (336)597-6101 � Owner Contact Person acker, William J. (336) 597-7331 Owner ContadPerson Toepfer, Jahn R. (919) 546-7683 � Owner ContaPerson ci isnant. Garry {92t3) 687-5201 ! Owner ContadPerson 2arrar, lssa Owner Has Permit Signature AuthorV CweretC George T. 919 548-6744 Owner Own'es Hillin Hamilton, Tana COOfdinatOf, E[rvlronmen... 919 862?2000 Permit Incidentally, I see that all Duke Progress Energy permits have an Owner -Owner Affiliation of Tonya Hamilton in our system. is this correct? I have asked Duke Representatives about this before, but it is still not clear whether we have the appropriate legally responsible person (aka "Owner -Owner" affiliation) for these permits. Ms. Hamilton is an Affiliation tied to MANY Duke Energy permits throughout DEQ through the owner company association, which is why it's been attached to our particular stormwater permits. Who is the correct person for legal responsibility at Mayo Monofill and at Mayo Steam Electric Plant? Attached is a form that you may return to us so we can correct this if necessary. (Note, you can check Permit Contacts here for any Duke Energy Stormwater Permit and let us know what needs to be added/removed.) We can make corrections for our Program permits specifically. If you can go ahead and do that for NCG120101, that would be very helpful! Renewal of Mayo Monofill under NCG12: It is likely that the site will need to come out from under the General Permit and gain individual permit coverage. The NCG12 permit is up for renewal this year, and we will consider whether this general permit is appropriate for landfills that accept primarily coal combustion waste. In its current form, this general permit is not (hence the augmented COC issued to the Mayo Monofill in January 2014). We have not begun work on renewing this general permit yet, but it will be publicly noticed for 30 days later this year. In light of this, it would be helpful for the company to provide us a summary of stormwater outfall discharge data collected to date for the site under NCG120101. We can then advise the company further on steps it should take to continue permit coverage or obtain individual permit coverage for this particular operation as expiration of the NCG120000 General Permit approaches. Please let me know if you have any additional questions. Best regards, Bethany Georgoulias Environmental Engineer Stormwater Program, I)ivision of Energy, Mineral, and I1and Resources N.C. Department of Environmental Quality 919 807 6372 office bethanv.eeori-youliasna.nedenr.syov 1612 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1612 (mailing) 512 N. Salisbury Street, Raleigh, NC 27604 (location) Website: httnJ/dea.ne.tov/about/divisions/cner�,-v-mineral-land-resources/stormwater Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties. From: Tollie, Lori White [ma iIto: Lori.Toliie@duke-energy.coml Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2017 11:05 AM To: Georgoulias, Bethany<bethany.georgoulias@ncdenr.gov> Cc: Patterson, Robert D <robert.patterson@ncdenr.gov> Subject: RE: Mayo Monofill NCG12 Application Ms. Georgoulias, The recent submittal was intended to be a renewal of the current NCG12 permit that will expire in October of this year. The site at 10660 Boston Rd is already permitted. Thank you for returning the application and check. Recently, we've had some internal discussion that Duke would like to explore the possibility of having the monofill stormwater permitted under the Industrial Stormwater Permit NCS000580. I have attached a monofill drawing showing the three outfalls we currently sample under the NCG12 permit and a copy of our ISW permit. I'd be happy to discuss this further at a time convenient for you. Thank you. 1.1,1W. X& Duke Energy EHS CCP Permitting & Compliance 2500 Fairfax Road Greensboro, NC 27407 Cell: (336) 408-2591 Office: (336) 854-4916 From: Georgoulias, Bethany [mailto:bethany.georgouliasCn ncdenr.gov] Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2017 10:03 AM To: Tollie, Lori White Cc: Patterson, Robert D Subject: Mayo Monofill NCG12 Application *** Exercise caution. This is an. EXTERNAL email. DO NOT open attachments or click links from unknown senders or unexpected email. *** Ms. Tollie, We received an NOI application for the Mayo Monofill in our office yesterday. We issued a COC for this site (#NCG120101) back in 2014 (see attached initial issuance and subsequent modification). The facility address appears to be the same. Is this meant to be a new application, or maybe mistakenly submitted to request renewal of that site under the NCG120000 General Permit? It is not necessary to submit a new Notice of Intent for renewal; however, we will review data for this particular site as we begin work on the NCG12 renewal to determine if coverage under the General Permit is still appropriate. We have several general permits expiring ahead of this one yet, though, so we have not begun that process. Please let me know if you have any questions. Otherwise, please confirm that we can return this application and check on the basis that this site at 10660 Boston Road in Roxboro is already permitted. Best regards, Bethany Georgoulias Environmental Engineer Stormwater Program, Division of Energy, Mineral, and Land Resources N.C. Department of Environmental Quality 919 807 6372 office bethany.georgouliasna,�ncdenr.t:ov 1612 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1612 (mailing) 512 N. Salisbury Street, Raleigh, NC 27604 (location) Website: http://deg.ne. =ova /about/divisions/ener€;y--mineral-land-resources/stormwatcr Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties. Georgoulias, Bethany From: Georgoulias, Bethany Sent: Friday, September 16, 2016 11:53 AM To: Smith, Danny Cc: Bennett, Bradley; Adams, Diane; Holley, John Subject: FW: Mayo monofill surface water sampling Attachments: 7305_20160720.pdf Hi Danny, I wanted to share this report with you on Groundwater and Surface Water monitoring for the Mayo Plant Monofill. It's under a stormwater general permit, COC #hlCG120101- Landfills (but modified to include more extensive sampling), and as part of the extra provisions, we required them to submit a copy of the surface water monitoring that they must perform for the Solid Waste Permit. Since Dave Parnell retired and Autumn Romanski is no longer there, I wasn't sure of the best DWR person to send this to, but it's mostly just FYI. I've reviewed the results for this one, and they only indicate Cu exceedances that appear to be normal for the background stream concentrations in this area. I just want to ask what we should do in the future if there is an issue identified in these report results. I've printed excepts of the report for our permit files here in Central Office, and I wanted to make sure someone from DWR was in the loop. #ho is the best person in RRO DWR to share these with, in the event a surface water quality issue arises and may need further investigation? We want to let RRO staff in DEMLR knowf Thanks for your guidance on this, Danny! Bethany Bethany Georgoulias 1---nvironmental 1-ngineer Storinwater Program, Division of Energy, Mineral, and Land Resources N.C. Department of Environmental Quality 919 807 6372 office bethany.�,yeorgoulias @ncdenr.gov 1612 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1612 (mailing) 512 N. Salisbury Street, Raleigh, NC 27604 (location) Website: http://portaI.ncdenr.org/web/Ir/stormwater �Nothing Compares --,,.- Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties. From: Bennett, Bradley Sent: Monday, September 12, 2016 11:51 AM To: Georgoulias, Bethany <bethany.georgoulias@ncdenr.gov> Subject: FW: Mayo monofill surface water sampling Bethany, Were we supposed to be getting these reports? Bradley Bennett Stormwater Permitting Program Phone: (919) 807-6378 NC Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources Fax: (919) 807-6494 1612 Mail Service Center Email: bradley.bennett@ncdenr.gov Raleigh, NC 27699-1612 Web: hdp:llportal.ncdenr.orglwebllrlstormwater Email correspondence to and from this address may be subject to public records laws From: Adams, Diane Sent: Monday, September 12, 201611:40 AM To: Bennett, Bradley <bradley.bennett@ncdenr.gov> Subject: FW: Mayo monofill surface water sampling Bradley, Are you supposed to get this, or do we keep this for our records? I did find a few SW records for this facility in the drawer, but it was not complete. Thanks Diane From: Langley, Shannon [mailto:Shannon.Langley@duke-energ_y.com] Sent: Sunday, September 11, 2016 12:26 PM To: Adams, Diane <diane.adams@ncdenr.gov> Cc: Randall, Mike <mike.randall@ncdenr.gov>; Lea Jr, Herbert M <Herbert.Lea duke-ener .com>; Muessen, Jake <Jake.Muessen@duke-energy.com>; Miller, Robert Mull <Robert.Miller@duke-energy.com> Subject: Mayo monofill surface water sampling Hi Dianne. The Stormwater permit Duke Energy has for the Mayo monofill contained a request to provide surface water sampling data obtained as part of our solid waste operating permit to the Raleigh regional office of DEQ to the attention of "Dave Parnell". I know Dave retired some time ago so I am forwarding a copy of the most recent sampling results to you as our current NCDEMLR regulatory contact in the Raleigh Regional Office. We sample twice per year in accordance with the solid waste permit. The surface water sampling results can be found in Table 6 of the attached submittal. Sampling locations are shown in Figure 2. The downstream sampling location (SW-3) continues to show generally lower concentrations for most constituents evaluated than the upstream location with no downstream samples being in excess of adopted water quality criteria. Thanks. Shannon From: Lea Jr, Herbert M Sent: Wednesday, September 07, 2016 3:08 PM To: Langley, Shannon Subject: FW: Duke Energy - Mayo Steam Electric Plant Landfill Semi -Annual Groundwater Report (Permit No. 7305- INDUS) Hey Shannon, Just checking in. I have in E-Trac reminder to assure the monofill solid waste semi-annual report is forwarded to Raleigh Regional Stormwater Program, due 9/15/2016, Is what Kim sent to Elizabeth Werner, attached, completion of the requirement? Thanks, Bert From: Witt, Kimberlee Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2016 3:46 PM To: Elizabeth Werner (elizabeth.werner@ncdenr.gov) Cc: Kyle Donovan; Jerry Wylie; Hunsucker, Tim; Sullivan, Ed M; Lea Jr, Herbert M; Miller, Robert Mull; Langley, Shannon Subject: Duke Energy - Mayo Steam Electric Plant Landfill Semi -Annual Groundwater Report (Permit No. 7305-INDUS) Elizabeth, Attached you will find reporting for the semiannual groundwater sampling performed in April 2016 at the Mayo Plant Landfill Permit No.7305 located at the Duke Energy Progress, Mayo Steam Electric Plant. The attached files include: • Environmental Monitoring Reporting Form • Semiannual Groundwater Monitoring Report • EDD (Excel file) This information will only be transmitted electronically, let me know if you need paper copies. Please feel free to contact me should you have any questions regarding the attached files. Respectfully submitted - Kim Kiniberlee Witt, PE DUKE ENERGY Sr. Engineer - Environmental Services 3191 Pine Hall Rd. Walnut Cove, NC 27009 336-215-4576 m Mayo Semiannual Groundwater Monitoring Report — April 201.6 Sampling Event July 2016 Duke Energy Progress, LLC SynTerra 3.0 RESULTS 3.1 Site Groundwater Flow Generalized groundwater surface contours and groundwater flow direction arrows for the site are shown on Figure 3. These contours were developed using the groundwater elevations measured on the date of sampling. Calculated flow velocities are presented in Table 2. Groundwater flow in the aquifer beneath the Phase 1 footprint is from the areas of higher topography located along the central and western portion of the Phase 1 footprint generally towards the reach of Bowes Branch located along the eastern boundary of the landfill. 3.2 Analytical Results A summary of the field sample collection data is presented in Table 3. The field and analytical results of groundwater samples collected from the monitoring wells are presented in Table 4. The analytical results for these samples are compared to the groundwater standards established in Title 15A NCAC 02L .0202 (g) (2L Standards). Concentrations that attain or exceed the 2L Standards are noted in Table 4 by bold font. A summary of the field and analytical results that attain or exceed the 21, Standards and a preliminary analysis of the cause and significance of the exceedances are presented in Table 5. Surface water sample location SW-1 is located on an un-named perennial stream (tributary of Bowes Branch) and surface water sampling locations SW-2 and SW-3 are located on Bowes Branch. Bowes Branch is classified by the NCDEQ Division of Water Quality as a Class C water body. As a result, the field and analytical results from these locations are compared to Title 15A NCAC Subchapter 2B Standards (2B Standards) for Class. C waters. The field and analytical results for the surface water samples are summarized in Table 6. Concentrations with values that attain or exceed the 2B Standards are noted in Table 6 by bold font. A summary of the field and analytical results that equal or exceed the 2B Standards and a preliminary analysis of the cause and significance of the exceedances are presented in Table 7. The field and analytical results for leachate sampling are summarized in Table 8. Page 5 P:\Duke Energy Progress.]026105.MAYO\ 17. 2016 Well Samping MonofilINAPRIL 2016 SOLID WASTE PERMIT REPORT\Final April 2016 Monofill Report.docx .4 Mayo Semiannual Groundwater Monitoring Report — April 2016 Sampling Event )uly 2016 Duke Energy Progress, LLC SynTerra Concentrations with values that equal to or greater than the Solid Waste Section Limits (SWSLs) are noted in Tables 4, 6, and 8 by gray -shaded cells. Select samples were diluted, as is normal laboratory practice, to bring samples within the calibrated range of the analysis. Specifics regarding the samples that were diluted, including the dilution amount, are reported in the EDD. Page 6 P:\Duke Energy Progress.1026105.MAYO\17. 2016 Well Samping Monofill\APRIL 2016 SOLID WASTE PERMIT REPORT\Final April 2016 Monofill Report.docx m11 ` ` (/ f ■fir /r/�� i l�"y:. -. %�.� l �il��✓��// � 14 • - - � ..,. •.. �EDIMENTTRAP �� � • � .� _ � � • ( z - lk U� �IRAILROAD ���.%'t�� l4 I n\ r�rs rwi`^tl l` 1 `4 , w �a C LEACHATE,,I< v _ TANKS AND ofS J / mcn ��;. . • ! �� LOAD OUT f�j ' - Mw-3 �fj _ II h k u�1�" W III STATION \ � ,•iiw �1��'r � ram' o SOIL STOCKPILE / ti „ ! PHASE I �� ^�•/v��,��II�' '�.; ! � � � o � ti �`� /(J/�� ���ACCESS•—_ ROAD' p (( I ��l1ll ��5\�.r*/,� �fSAMPLEI-14 LOCATION L1 r 5WDIRS A -2 w, SEDIMENT BAS"OF IN -� LIMIT OF WASTE r 1175 is o Z REVIEW BOUNDARY p � is I �;� fj,. �" ✓ ; � , IF LL — tI1 COMPLIANCE BOUNDARY r �r o ti - �� �' ■ ,�� \ DUKE ENERGY yPROPERTYBOUNDARY� ✓_� I �9 ` fol Zak �� l �---•---sue �-r/ �,��-��,;.. _ . - - 1' f�°�� f'1�I � � ����ll: , - t; 4, � .� �i � �Ji �' _ � }T~ . _ -! 's-.fir.-<•� - �� ,- ��o �.o "l ����1 �i�" . r•„' '`' . �% %" � fit-, �' y ,,,��I! i j�� �� � �•� V �.' � � 1l /- ��` �, Y� ,I,i11�1_ e �"���� � ^,ti\\��� � ,.�17.,''l:p� ` �� � � I'i ��■ -j, Il;y ; }f CO OURS FOR PHASE I ARE FROM GRADING PLAN -TOP OF LINER r ! !r� 1, l DRAWING NO. IFC-27 (GOLDER ASSOCIATES, INC.) I i] N 1 ��•�� / I� ��� l ���� a � � �� ; ; "���'��� ' ` L;m � GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELL `\` j I l J\`` �M{W-Tc�-4'L `-�,�;�%,�%�•,..`` _'�;���11,i1 , I _i 1 • SURFACE WATER SAMPLING LOCATION i `Z_ I `� a�•,..i \ �V '?j' c� f/�l�'--�15�I1 LIMIT OF WASTE (APPROXIMATE) ~ r \,`", ti - (; l�lir(r' _,%r�l•l�t Ytl}'1� —1 }�'�-�}� :"q,� i �!'. r _.. 1;.\`:_ L _ � LANDFILL REVIEW BOUNDARY (APPROXIMATE) ` \ / �, � _ � �/-�r� /��- � •• �f � �;,� � _ _ � LANDFILL COMPLIANCE BOUNDARY (APPROXIMATE) STREAM . � / f\` / ~ .-Sea. J-d J� • "� -, � %�.!�� ^' i �"� , �• _/�{�'��>'.� p •^ )i� - EXISTINGGROUND SURFACE CONTOUR -,1' �� - �� '• - - -•--- J^/ +����=�; • *�1. PHASE I GROUND SURFACE CONTOUR PHASE I TOP OF LINER CONTOUR (' DUKE sao 0GfU+PHICSCALE FIGURE 2 soo sao sao ENERGY SAMPLE LOCATIONS MAYO (IN FEET) STEAM ELECTRIC PLANT synTerm PROGRESS ROXBORO, NORTH CAROLINA DRAWN BY: B. YOUNG DATE: 07/IV2016 CCP LANDFILL, PHASE 1 148 RIVER STREET, SUITE 220 MAYOSTEAM ELECTRICPOWER PLANT DDNOvaN K. Da7E:O7/1�r201fi GREENVILLE•SC2MI 1DBWEIOStONRO CHECKED BY: KPERMIT NO.7305 864C1-99BB ROxRORO, NORTH CAROLINA 27574 11103ECT MANAGER: L'11 IE PYIUME ENERGY PROGRESS.1 D26= GIS BASE DATAlMAYOWIAP_DOCEISTATE_COMPLIANCEWIAYO - MONOFILL_5AMFLE_LOCADONS.MAD TABLE IS SURFACE WATER FIELD AND ANALYTICAL RESULTS MAYO CCP LANDFILL PHASE 1 - PERMIT NO. 7305 MAYO STEAM ELECTRIC PLANT DUKE ENERGY PROGRESS, LLC, ROXBORO, NC Parameter SWS ID Units Certificate Code Sample Location MDL SWSL 15A NCAC 29 Standard Federal MCL 7309 SW-1 7305 SW-2 7305 SW-3 Field pH 320 S.U. 5591 7.11 7.17 7.33 NE 6.0-9.0 6.5-8.5** 5 tint Conductance 323 pU/cm 5591 191.3 123.9 130.2 NE NE NE emperature 325 °C 5591 9.9 10.3 9.8 - NE NE NE Arsenic 14 U /L 246 <1 <1 <1 0.078 10 10 10 Barium 15 a /L 248 44 20 25 0.1 100 1000 2,000 Boron 428 y /L 248 <50 <50 <50 3.3 NE NE NE Cadmium 34 /L 248 <1 <1 <1 0.101 1 0,15• 5 Cadmium (dissolved) p /L 248 <0.080 <0.080 <0.080 0.101 1 0.15` 5 Chloride 455 y /L 248 S,000 16r000 15,000 22 NE 230,000 250,000- Chromium dissolved 51 /L 248 0.53 0.443 0,27) 0.5 1D 35 100 Chromum VI (dissolved) p /L 248 0.025 M1 0.026 0.045 0.5 10 11 100 Chromium III (dissolved) - p /L 248 <10 <10 <10 0.5 10 24 100 Copper 54 /L 248 <5 <5 <5 1 10 2.7 1,300 Copper (dissolved) y /L 248 4.7 3.3 2.0 1 10 2.7* 1,300 Fluoride 312 pqjL 248 170 240 210 17 2,000 1,800 4,000 Iron 34D y /L 24B 701 961 961 1.3 300 NE 300** Lead 131 p /L 248 <1 <1 <1 0.065 10 0.54* 15 Lead (dissolved) /L 248 0.51 0.35 0.2 0.065 10 1 0.54a 15 Manganese 342 y /L 248 191 33 124 0.2 50 NE 50** Mercury 132 W91L 24$ 0.00176 0.00178 0.00166 0.006 0.2 0.012 2 Nickel 152 ti/L 248 <5 <5 <5 0.5 50 16- NE Nickel dissolved - p /L 248 0.71 <0.50 <0.5 0.5 50 1 16` 1 NE Nitrate (as Nitrogen) 303 pg/L 248 50 <23 <23 5.4 10,000 10,000 10,000 Selenium 183 y /L 248 <1 <1 <1 0.092 10 5 50 Silver 184 VgIL 248 <5 <5 <5 0.7 10 0.06 100** Silver (dissolved) yg/L 248 <0.50 1 <0.50 <0.50 1 0.7 SO 0.06 100" Sulfate 315 yg/L 1 248 4,200 4,800 5,400 18 2S0,000 250,000 250,000-* Total Dissolved Solids 311 /L 248 140,000 78,(100 8Q,000 16,700 NE 500,000 500,000`• Zinc 213 /L 248 <5 <5 <5 2.6 10 36` 5,000-- Zinc dissolved 213 a/L 248 32.9 7.3 6.4 2.6 10 36* S 000'* O2ssa; Preparea dy: LS12y Lnecicea DY: 88 1. © - concentrations are equal to or greater than the Swst- 2. Bold Cancenitradorls are equal to or greater than the 15A NCAC 23 Standard (far pH bold indicates a measurement outside of the range). 3. Sampaes collected by smrerra Corporation on April 6, 2D16. 4. all -nitrations are presented In gVIL. S. 5wS ID - the Sand Waste Seelon Idem"kabon Number. 6. MDL - lahmatory Method Detection Umt, The MDL values presented are the lowest MDLS values for the leachme Samples. Samples with greater dilution factars Win have MDLs great than the values presented. 7. SWSL - the Sold Waste Sectwn limit. NCDENR defines the SWSL as the lowest amount of ana4yte In a sample that can be guartdabvely determined enth suitable preds m and accuracy. S. 15A NCAC 26 Standard IS UW North Carol>rra Administrat-e Code, title 15A: N=ft Subchapter 28 - Sufaca Water and Wetland Standards.' (last amended on January 1, 2015) for dam C waters 9. 15A NCAC 28 Standards are for dissolved constituents except for Arsenic, Basium, Boron, Chlonde, Fluoride, Manganese, Mercury, Selenium, Sulfate, Thallium, and Total Olssolved Sonds which are total Standards. W. stardards for Class C waters amume the n os< stringent of rreshwamr and Huanarl heath Standards 11, Bowes Branco and the perennial stream to Bowes Branch are classified as class C waters RegrlaLon 15A NCAC 02e,0211 proves water quality standwd. for class c waters. 12. MCL - Flderal haxir-rn Coritamina0l, Level a5 found In 40 CFR, Subpart G S 141.62. 13. - Standard fisted Is hardness dependent; standard Is displayed assuming a hardness of s 25 mg/L 14. -- Concentration listed Is a secondary maxlr-m contaminant level (SMCL). SMCLS are eitabildwd by EPA In the National Secondary Dnnking Water Regulations as found In 40 CFR §143.3. Is. 7305 - CCP MonofiB, Prase 1 - Permit No. 7305 15, NE - Not Established t7. S.U. - standard urns Le. p0jun - mtromllos per centimeter 19. pWL = mcrograms Der liter 20. 'J' IS used to Identify estimated concentrations which equal or are greater than the MDL but are less than the laboratruys meal" reportuq Urnit {MRL). 21. Quall6ers In nm-itaNUxed text are laboratory data gvaliflers or "flags". 'M 1" Is used for the matrix spike recovery exceeded QC limits. Batch accepted based on laboratory control samples (I -CS) recovery. P:%Duke Energy Progress.Io26105.MAY0\17. 2016 Well Samong MonofilWRIL 2016 SOLID WASTE PERMIT REPORT\Table 6 Surface water Feld and Analytical RewRs.xlsxTabfe 6 Surface Water Feld and Ana"cal ReR/ts.xisxtable 4 Page 1 of I TABLE 7 FIELD AND ANALYTICAL RESULTS EQUAL OR EXCEED 15A NCAC 2B SURFACE WATER QUALITY STANDARDS MAYO CCP LANDFILL PHASE 1 - PERMIT NO. 7305 MAYO STEAM ELECTRIC PLANT DUKE ENERGY PROGRESS, LLC, ROXBORO, NC Sample ISA Historical Parameter ID Result Units NCAC 2B Concentrations Cause and Significance Standard Copper SW-1 4.7 < 5 - < 5 Copper concentration at SW-1 is consistent with historical concentration ranges (dissolved) u9/L 2.7 * SW-2 3.3 < 5 - < 5 Copper concentration at SW-2 is consistent with historical concentration ranges Notes; 1. 15A NCAC 26 Standard is from "North Carolina Administrative Code, Title 15A: Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Subchapter 26 - Surface Water and Wetland Standards." (last amended on January 1, 2015) for Class C waters. 2. Analytical results obtained from Electronic Data Deliverable (EDD) provided by Duke Energy on May 17, 2016. 3. trg/L indicates micrograms per liter. 4. Historical concentrations based on data in Duke Energy analytical results database. 5. * Standard listed is hardness dependent; standard is displayed assuming a hardness of 5 25 mg/L. 6. Field sampling performed by SynTerra Corporation, April 6, 2016 P:\Duke Energy Progress. 1026\05.MAYO\17, 7016 Well Samping Monofill\APRIL 2016 SOLID WASTE PERMIT REPORT\Table 7 - 213 Surface water Exceedances.xlsx' Page 1 of 1 NR We ONLY; I I at!e! r Report ❑Ek b is Data - Emad CD (date looped: Yes! No) DprlEv*fd c DE 4 t Environmental Monitoring Division of Waste Management - Solid Waste Re Orlin Form This forma any n area to a me R as m 1 -1. mer.4 sea avalable for Inspec0on and examination by any person va+on negvest (NC Ganaml Slabets 132-6). Ina6vctioals: • Prepare one form for sash Individually monitored unlL • PMaw type ar prhd le91a1'• • Attach a notikation table wan values the[ enam or exceed NC 2L growrdorzOm standards or NC 2B surbas water standards. The nofdkehon must MdLKM a ptailyrnary anayals or Vm Cause and aignarranca of each valve. is.g. hsbuafy occuen ng, 6fr4ite Source, prstostNp Wndbon. eW )- • AaaCh a nom br"tion table of any gundwafer or surlaw water vzk a that equal or exossel tbs ragort: w hftu. Attach ■ wterostlan told at sme methane gas vahues that attain or exoead exMdalve pas busts- This lara,das pry structures on or nearby the foolty (NCAC 13B .la29 (4Xa)(f)- • Send 11e onglisl Signed and seabd foml any tables. and Efertmnk Data Detiverable to: CompUrKe Ural, NCOFNR-0riM, Sold YYasta Section, 154e Mat Serviu Center. Raleigh, NC 27899.1646. Solid Waste Monitoring Data Subrnlltal Information Nacre of emlty submtn:V data (Isbormory, emnsufdra, WOMY rmner(: - - - — -- HOR Engineering, Inc of theCarolirlas (Consultant) Contact for quwtfwn about dab fom a ftfng. texktls data prwpnrveo name, t "phbrne number and Email adeba," Name: VMbm M- Miller - Phone: 825491-SM Emaa: ta.mhs!Ohdmx.00m • NC tindrA Rnb: Arbul sampling dates (e.g., Fad[N rums: fatty Address: radtity Permit a f.0500 M A6001-OCldber 20.24. 20M . Duke Energy Progress Plem 10660 Boston Rtwd El KI Naysnter 13, 2014 Coo Combustion Products MoneM Roxboro. NC 27573 Envirorelwntal Stetw: (Chsck an flat aPpfyi © InUaUBackomnd Monitomg Q Defection Monitoring © Assessment. Moneweq. © Carreclhre Acton T of data Submitted: (Chaco a6 that apptyi Gmundwmer manaodrg date from monsoring welt ❑ Methane gas monaoring data Groundwater rmnaarmp data iron private water Supply welt ❑ ConeCM moon data (sPedM X teachate monde ling data dher{spatdyl x Sudam water rnonitorlrrn data Notlll—Um attached? No. No grouraWater or surface water standards were exceeded. X Yes, a notdreabon at values excesdrno a prwndw*W or Surface water standard is affacenad. 4 Includes a fat of grounc walsr and surface wmer mmetori g polrts. dates, matlacal values. NC 2L groundwater standard, NC 20 surface water standard or NC Solld Waste GWP4 and prelanh wry amyss of the nvre and sorufl an a of any corim mratkx. © Yes, a notification of values eacaedhg an expires ,re methane gas WM t &Mvhed. It end Wes Ile methane monaorkV points. dates, sample values and expkxLI a methane gas limit. Certification To 0n teat of my • statements tared• w N data me bur Va eorrset Furtfwnnon, I dye aGacfwd wmplsls MflNeaden M luny Sompllry ye(uee rrwerlrq or sxraedirnp prdundwalM st —rda Or sxPiosM pea levels, and a pregminuy ma"Is of the cacao and slpnlfkarrce of calwmra0ors mending grourxh M dandardls. t San awns firm than are significant perntbas for malting airy false aUUnrent ropneentation, or cortl1bution 1ncludIng Ute possihfiAy of a fine and imprisonnem. YNIUm M. Wier Senior Engmer (me) 8914296 facet Repreferrlrtive Name(Prind Thle (Area CodeVtelephonMWMERZ�Vxg Nmbr March 6, 2015 Af@r NC is Seal Signatnra Dab "0 S. Church Sbryu Sale 1000, Charlotte, NC 28202 Facility Reprosantatiw Address F4116 NC PE Fum License Number (a applicable effective May 1, 2009) Revised ISOM SE AL 17661 F) REPORT VERIFICATION PROJECT:. SEMIANNUAL GROUNDWATER MONITORfNG REPORT MAYO ELECTRIC'GENERATING PLANT COAL COMBUSTION PRODUCTS MONOFILL PHASE 1 PERMIT NO, 7305 TITLE: NOVEMBER 2014 SAMPLING EVENT This document has keen reviewed for accuracy and quality. commensurate with the intended application. Prepared by: Dale: G o70/ s Checked by: �y 1. n/�Ytii Date: .12& %ln,116S_ Approved by: �'� �" Date: 3 rt -ZC)t C3 Project Manager. Brooke Ahrens, PE Professional Engineer Seal: HOR Enginaering, Inc. of the Carolinas 440 South Church St., Suite 1000 Charlotte, NC 28202 North Carolina Engineering Firm Number F-01.16 nuke energy vrogreaa, rne. I Semiannual Gmuridxatar kkxdo iig ReFJ port � Mayo Ele d. Generating Plat- Coal Combustion Products Mcn Rl Phase s Navember2014 Sampkng Event CQNTrWs Contents Contents................................................................ Section 1 - Background .......................................... Section 2 - Methods ............................................... 2.1 Sampling and Analysis Methods .............. 2.2 Statement of Work ................................... Section 3 - Results ................................................. 3.1 Site Groundwater Flow ............................ 3.2 Analytical Results ..................................... Page —3 .......................... 3 ....................................................... 3 .................................................... 5 ....................................................... 5 ................................................ I...... 5 Figures 1. Site Location 2. Sample Locations 3. Generalized Groundwater Surface Contours — November 2014 Tables 1. Well Construction Information 2. Groundwater Flow Velocities 3. Field Data Parameters 4. Groundwater Field and Analytical Results 5. Field and Analytical Results that Equal or Exceed 15A NCAC 2L Groundwater Quality Standards 6. Surface Water Field and Analytical Results 7. Field and Analytical Results that Equal or Exceed 15A NCAC 2B Surface Water Quality Standards 8. Leachate Field and Analytical Results Duke Energy Progress, Inc.1 Semiannual Gmundw It Monitoring Report M��� Mayo Elednc GrJrerelarg Plaid - Coal Cvrnbusion Proucts d-Nill Ph se 1 Nowmber 2014 SampWog Event CONTENTS Appendices A. Field Sampling Forms B. Laboratory Report and Chain -of -Custody Forms Duke Energy Progress, Inc. 1 Semiannual Groundwater Monitoring Repon it Maya Eladdc Genaw,rg Plam - Coa1 Combustion Products ManolAl Ph— 1 Na—Mr 2D14 Sampbng 17v SECTION I - BACKGROUND Section 1 - Background The 727-megawatt (MW) Mayo Electric Generating Plant (station) is located at 10660 Boston Road, Roxboro, Person County, North Carolina. The station is owned and operated by Duke Energy Progress (Duke Energy) and generates electricity by combustion of coal. The landfill, Mayo Electric Generating Plant, Coal Combustion Products (CCP) Monofill, Phase 1, is located to the northwest of the station. The landfill accepts fly ash, bottom ash, flue gas desulfurization (FGD) by-products, and other by-products from coal combustion associated with power generation at the station under North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources (NCDENR) Solid Waste Permit No. 7305. NCDENR issued the Permit to Construct ;for the monofill on July 19, 2012. The permit to operate (PTO) was issued on July 10. 2014, and waste placement began on November 7, 2014. As described in the Water Quality Monitoring Plan (WOMP), the monofill is located within the Piedmont physiographic province.' The Piedmont physiographic province is comprised of several geologic belts with areas of similar rock types and geologic history. The monafill is located within the Milton Belt which includes metamorphosed volcanic and sedimentary rocks. According to the WQMP, during the Feld investigation for the monofill Design Hydrogeologic Report, three hydrogeologic units were identified on site: saprolite, partially weathered rock (PWR), and bedrock. Groundwater was generally not encountered in the saprolite unit. Groundwater was encountered in the PWR unit over much of the monofill site. The bedrock hydrogeologic unit is continuous across the monofill site. The monofill site is located on an upland area with surface water drainage features that discharge to the east and northeast into Bowe's Branch, a inbotary of the Hyco River. The surface water features to the west of the monofill site drain to the northwest to an un-named tributary of Bowe's Branch, The 104-acre disposal facility will be developed in 11 phases with Phase 1 encompassing approximately 31 acres. The monafill location and nearby area are presented on Figure 1. Figure 2 shows the Phase 1 monofill site, topography, and vicinity features. 'Water Quality Monitoring Plan —Duke Energy Progress, Inc., Mayo CCP Monofill, Permit No. 73-05, Golder Associates NC, Inc. Project No, 063-6562034, March 2014. 1 Duke Enorgy Proems, Inc. I Semiannual Gmundvmter MonVEomg Repot ��� Mayo Llednc Generating Plao - Cael Cmnbustim, Products Mmq I Phase 1 N--bnr 2014 Sampkng Ewmt SECTION i - BACKGROUND As described in the WQMP, the monitoring system for the Phase 1 portion of the monofill consists of the following: Monitoring Wells: MW-1 MW-2 M W-3 MW-4 M W-5 Surface Water Sample Locations: SW-1 SW-2 SW-3 Leachate Sample Locations: L-1 L-2 The monitoring wells, surface water sampling locations, and leachate sampling location L-1 are depicted on Figure 2. According to the WQMP, MW-1 serves as a background water quality monitoring well and is located upgradient of the monofill. The WQMP states the monitoring network is designed to monitor for releases to the uppermost aquifer at the monofill. The wells were installed with screen lengths ranging from 10 feet to 20 feet in length. Table 1 presents well construction information for the landfill monitoring wells. Surface water sampling location SW-1 is located on an un-named perennial stream (tributary of Bowes Branch) and is southwest of Phase 1. SW-1 is located upstream of where groundwater from the Phase 1 region would discharge into the un-named stream or Bowes Branch. Surface water sampling location SW-2 is located on Bowes Branch to the east of the Phase 1 monofill. Surface water sampling location SW-3 is located on Bowes Branch downstream from SW-1 and SW-2. The surface water flow on Figure 2 is generally from the south to the north. Leachate sample L-1 is collected from the facility's leachate tanks located to the west Of the Phase 1 monofill. The leachate sample is collected from an inline sampling valve linked to each of the three leachate tanks; therefore, the sample is considered a composite leachate sample. The facility has the ability to direct leachate through a force main to the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permitted scrubber blowdown pond located on the east side of NC Highway 501, Should the facility have no leachate in the leachate tank system and be diverting leachate from the monofill to the scrubber blowdown pond, the leachate sample will be collected from the end of the pipe at the scrubber blowdown pond. If the loachate sample is collected from this location, it will be identified as L-2. - Duke Energy Frog-. Semiannual Groundwater Mariloirg Repot MaFEZ Maya Ek ci-Generating Pb rn -Coal C buslwn Pmducls Monolil Phase 1 November 2014 Sampling Event SECTION r - METHODS Section 2 - Methods 2.1 Sampling and Analysis Methods The collection of samples and documentation of sampling was performed by SynTerra Corporation (SynTorra) personnel (SynTerra Field Certification #5591) according to the North Carolina Solid Waste Management Guidelines. Copies of the field sampling forms are included in Appendix A. The parameters and constituents reported were selected by Duke Energy and the NCDENR Division of Solid Waste and were analyzed by Duke Energy Analytical Laboratory (North Carolina Laboratory Certification #248). The laboratory report and chain-of-rustody forms are included in Appendix B. The groundwater and surface water samples were analyzed for the following constituents: • Barium, boron, chromium, copper, iron, manganese, nickel, silver, and zinc using U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Method 200.7 • Arsenic, cadmium, lead, and selenium using EPA Method 200.8 • Chloride, fluoride, nitrate (as nitrogen), and sulfate using EPA Method 300.0 Mercury using EPA Method 245.1 • Total dissolved solids using Standard Method (SM) 2540C Total organic carbon, biochemical oxygen demand, chemical oxygen demand, and thallium appear on the laboratory chain -of -custody form: however, these constituents are not required to be analyzed in the WQMP and were not analyzed for during the sampling event. 2.2 Statement of Work HDR completed the following tasks: • Received November 2014 field sampling information provided by Duke Energy (performed by SynTerra personnel) for monitoring wells MW-1, MW-2, MW-3, MW-4, and MW-5. Data was also received for surface water sample locations SW-1. SW-2, and SW-3, and leachate sample L-1. The samples were collected an November 13, 2014, HDR received the data on December 10, 2014, and January 8, 2015. • Reviewed the laboratory analytical results for the samples listed above. The Electronic Data Deliverable (EDD) provided by Duke Energy was adapted to conform to the format requirements of the NCDENR EDD template. HDR added an italicized J data qualifier (J) to indicate a measured concentration that is equal to or greater than the laboratory's Duke Energy Progress. Inc. I Senn onnual Gmundx tar neMonitomg Repon ! �j Mayo Eleddc Generating Plant -Coal Combustion Pmducm M i oril Phase 1 r November 201a Sampling Event SECTION 2 - METHODS Duke Energy Progress, Inc. I Semiannual Gmurdwater Monitoring Report ! Ma�jyo Elecrdc Gen —ling Plant -Coal Combustion Products Monornl Phone 1 r Nevember2014 Sampling Evenl SECTION 3- RESULTS method reporting limit (MRL) but less than the Solid Waste Section Lim112 (SWSL). A copy of the original EDD is retained in HDR's files. Section 3 -Results Developed generalized groundwater surface contour map using map data and groundwater elevation data supplied by Duke Energy. Calculated groundwater flow velocities based on groundwater surface contours. Prepared and submitted this Semiannual Groundwater Monitoring Report to Duke Energy. : The Solid Waste Section Limit (SWSL) is defined by NCDENR as the lowest amount of analyte in a sample that can be quantitatively determined with suitable precision and accuracy. The SWSL is the concentration below which reported results must be qualdSied as estimated. NCDENR Division of Waste Management Memorandum dated February 23, 2007, 4 3.1 Site Groundwater Flow Generalized groundwater surface contours and groundwater flow direction arrows for the site are shown on Figure 3. These contours were developed using the groundwater elevations measured on the date of sampling, Calculated Now velocities are presented in Table 2. Groundwater flow in the shallow aquifer beneath the Phase 1 footprint is from the areas of higher topography located along the central and western portion of the Phase 1 footprint generally towards the reach of Bowes Branch located along the eastern boundary of the monofill. 3.2 Analytical Results A summary of the field data is presented in Table 3. The field and analytical results of groundwater samples collected from the monitoring wells are presented in Table 4. The analytical results for these samples are compared to the groundwater standards established in Title 15A NCAC 02L .0202 (g) (21- Standards). Concentrations that attain or exceed the 2L Standards are noted in Table 4 by bold font. A summary of the field and analytical results that attain or exceed the 2L Standards and a preliminary analysis of the cause and significance of the exceedances are presented in Table 5. Surface water sample location SW-1 is located on an un-named perennial stream (tributary of Bowes Branch) and surface water sampling locations SW-2 and SW-3 are located on Bowes Branch. Bowes Branch is classified by the NCDENR Division of Water Quality as a Class C water body. As a result, the field and analytical results from these locations are compared to Title 15A NCAC Subchapter 2B Standards (2B Standards) for Class C waters. The field and analytical results for the surface water samples are summarized in Table 6. Concentrations with values that attain or exceed the 2B Standards are noted in Table 6 by bold font. A summary of the field and analytical results that equal or exceed the 2B Standards and a preliminary analysis of the cause and significance of the exceadances are presented in Table 7. The method detection limit (MDL) for silver results at SW-1. SW-2, and SW-3 was greater than the 2B Standard. The MDL for silver was less than the SWSL as required by the February 23, 2007, NCDENR memo. Silver was not detected at concentrations greater than the MDL in these samples and is not considered to exceed the 2B Standards. The field and analytical results for leachate sampling are summarized in Table 8. Concentrations with values that equal to or greater than the SWSLs are noted in Tables 4, 6, and 8 by gray -shaded cells. Dupe Energy Progress, i I $smiaonwi Gmundwnler Monitoring Report MayF)l o Electric Generating Plant —Coal Combustion Prodocl3 Monofill Phase I Nowmbar 2014 5—pling Even) SECTION 3- RESULTS Select samples were diluted, as is normal laboratory practice, to bring samples within the calibrated range of the analysis, Specifics regarding the samples that were diluted, including the dilution amount, are reported in the EDD. FIGURES •l a..�-tea �..�.- � �'���' - — ,,^� 1�'_$ \— a r~ i �< ti �, � �•i. J I 1 \.� \. F _j4f�i� fJ1 I 04T SITE LOCATION MAP MARCH s.zuts MAYO ELECTRIC GENERATING PLANT CCP MONOFILL, PHASE 1 F6 PERMIT NO. 7305 ♦ \ / / I ,/,/� � rJr� 6E771REM 1MP y�,"� I/irllt / Jr'isRlidilaioL '�`_�_4r �U ,11 I /- //%i� LEaCNATE LN,v do LEACHATF &IMRl L-1 4 ENEROT _\`� Ile ii��-_i�1`„- _r-__z�•A-=_=i���' va„" :a �,l[j -` �i1F, -.'rt l 1 IN171 WTEZ : `y ,-�1r �'r•r .f/ ,\isllrtrF � a 'N/ RF�j,t'-\,\, kr_ (7M/- �`�v'.� I. DA3EImr rRuvlcen I!I mwE EocnGT. ca•Ro.wsf uaE raon uaon+c DRa►:M—G W. nw- Tw , \\ \ t• li,`Y,. _ � , I Vi �y Lllu IL .. I.�ll\y` W LVER piIFC-27 EWILEF abSDUaTE]. VS. ). - /_ \iLsy\\\?� �I t„-M.7:�✓�✓✓;;'J�..��4irlll"'" ! yi ty \� L[ffi4 Gau.ex.rtRilwms<tu JI y \. -#MW 7'h., q{ r� 7 ` / ,`y sun•a w.n�s..n�Lx.ua. - � �J l l "` --^ lyr •'� )II 1� �� � •� - - � Lalona [anlu[e Wdrv1Y�n•.1 0- E-1 hptm Bawur PP M,sG G4GW GIM.[L ChROIa yll 1`\\\`. / rr � r' ' J',•� �'�_^ 5 � M.¢lTv or 4K7 CaroJ� SCALE (FEET) i ltil I I \\ \ j fIf r•\1 / / r ''/-�` "�• �`!rr ,pp 0 J00 ®0 we SAMPLE LOCATIONS wARCHe•xole MAYb ELECTRIC GENERATING PLANT CCP MONOFILL, PHASE 1 rauae PERMIT NO. 7305 2 1 SEDYENT TRAP - . � yl'i"� • •.yt��-. If l l l"l I r �r_r pALROAO `, =�' �• v'1111.,7_'. Sn LE7ICIUTE TueKs 1 j 75 \`l_-. I.14ji L4LAilON SAMPLE L-1 �';�`N �711111 /fir_ yllh% �iA1`"-"TY�Y IINTfSrOF 1 j',�S•� \ \�`x� `� l I COYPILLXCE RQI PROPERTY BOIIIiOARY TRAP Ill K ACCESS BASE NAP I 'CEO Ar bL.E FN ..r_ 2. CONTOM FW Mx I ARE FROM GRAwr PL.]N - TP w LINER ORAMM NO. IK-27 {GOLOER ASSOCIAIES. S. GROL ATER EIEVATION519EASIPEO ON Novi: O R 13. 201L, LGiRR r GxwOwxr[. ralRrwlRa wPx IxliJOl G­ E­ Iron Lmlr w N•srt 1]IVR0..1 — — L..cru>. P[v!R Bwaw.Av CArnn[.1 — - - — L•�mu co.uxR[[ eR.our raN,a.1 — - �--� OY[e EKREv PIIwEINY BPwanr SR[FN GernlxLsi[a Gra[oxxreR �M[CRrtaR _-_-_--_I—G• SWKS Cortow }4N! I G_ AMA C.r Ruse I Tw w Lnc� Cm�ow SCALE (FEET) 7G0 0 ]W eoo GENERALIZED GROUNDWATER DATE SURFACE CONTOURS N RATING R Y1LRCIia.ma MAYO ELECTRIC GENERATING PLANT CCP MONOFILL, PHASE 1 PERMIT NO.7305 3 TABLES U041- wai ccnsav000n Warm tlw eWr EnMWMM Ill Generatlnr Kent OCIP tionorm, FMw 1- Permit" 7305 r ra.+.....Nw.n 6 hw.y.,q. hnw�-raww�w. Table 2 - Groundwater Flow Velocities Duke Energy/Mayo Electric Generating Plant CCP MDnofill, Phase 1- Permit No. 7305 ..wrri Upgradient Distance Groundwater Downgradlent Between Contour Groundwater Contours Hydraulic Hydraulic Effective Groundwater Elevation Contour Elevation through Well Gradient Conductivity Porosity Velocity Well ID_ (ft) i (it) (ft/ft) Ift/dtl (%/100) _ {fyda)�_ MW-3 420 392.97 453 0.06 0.41 0.259 0.09 MW-4 420 389.30 559 0.05 0.41 0.259 0.09 Notes: 1. Linear distance measured through monitoring wells is generally perpendicular to groundwater contours, 2. At monitoring well locations where downgradient contours are not present, the groundwater elevation at the monitoring well is used as the downgradient groundwater elevation. 3. At monitoring well locations where upgradlent contours are net present, the groundwater elevation at the monitoring well is used as the upgradient groundwater elevation. 4. Monitoring wells are not listed where insufficient groundwater contour information is available to calculate velocity. 5. Hydraulic gradients and groundwater velocities are apprwimale. 6. Hydraulic conductivity presented for MW-3 and l is the geometric mean of the conductivity data for the alluvium/soil/saproitte hydrostratigraphic layer in the HDR Conductivity Database (unpublished data from Piedmont Carolina sites with foliated/layered bedrock). 7. Effective porosity presented for MW-3 and MW-4 is the mean value of the alluvium/sail/saprolite hydrostratigraphic layer estimated from sail testing using Fetter/Bear Diagrams. I Page 1 of 1 3� �3 W� a" g nngn rear a �90 imoons"' Table 5 - Field and Analytical Results that Equal or E¢ceed 15A NGC 21. Groundwater Quellty Standards Duke Enerpr/Mayo F]ectrie Generating Plant CCP Momflll, Phess 1- Pemix No. 7305 Sa-rpa O+ir- Np•enpn i]. AI. irk 3am0,ng w+nbrm.tl .Y WT.n. CPrp¢— r.r.pwr avlgr l/ R.wrR unlm Sall NGC 3L11uaMEa 1r.WW Can .... a.M w..na elPanwra n— P. M'N41 MW-4 63 0.a SV w e5 ae 61-0.3 w r e.LN-1 n..rea.M .¢h w Mpraq name a w M on• m. area a •MMHWa RM1YS ktM .m ExY w.rrqu gpnnpnn rwL e3-etl i¢W1 awn.aiml wllfi the bwnirndk a11Ta u•al war era nwkd al rrlmnprin Yen MW1 ea! If✓C ]OC Eel-L3e6 YwICaR.nbgrrin MW lrnambOPM •M MgHkM re.arpgwa Ta ,.Yw..me..n10.a N1Y. 4fM1 a M.n. Yec. wn rnL Mx4nx. MWa 5o.E pE/L `A w.a-8S6 rN•k.aYe re.ein .I ur•weil ¢.•r In• mOmrM real Dr...nE Mwe 5allp0 Wl W000 swe=."Zao6 TaeIOWMva SammrorrVamnnMwJ ePor.YvgewhNmwHalrranp qn,.a Now: L 1LMCAC h!1•n.ra nrn m Cl..n b1 EUMH¢P n Mrs n SSA NGC Oh .o3E3 fiPrnM.W prMq SUMHa., knt.MM•a.n •qY L SOl9, ]. wnlYa.we••.L.rr•1'YM nHVHwOw DYwaY lroalPwMxh Wf fwl.n l•nrrlry 83a1! ! u[n.rwaer r•IPEexrwwr. J NlU irirn•a•NaYb•wmryblWwaar Lniv a wrn•a wrenagrw an.a m al. b wY. c�,.rp.rrwv+r..+» a.rwn.. Table 0 - Surface water Field and Ma"al Results Duke Energy/Mayo Electric Generating Plant CCP MonoRll. Phase 1- Permit No. 7305 L '1elr{•M.eel•Y.Ybnpxwrru.eYrr Mr.m IYN} ]. 3ar3 D u M 3Wawxm x.Een wngr.mn nrNro.l. ], MCL N M NaorMry mallo. E.uenon tim¢ IPb MCl rWY p.xnua re M bwgr Moo wb•• 1•. M b.en•a umpq, s.Mpy wm Va•kr d•�r I.Pmn.e Iran MnLa NeH In•n M ••lua. prn.M.0. ¢erSLwIN•3WW.H•6•y.4, lm4 nWWrMMx MSwELw H•IwnlwmiMp Hr.Iaan. wnpe qrH wnw WwMwakaLimN.a.IN wX.q•pnrnM.na wwrwr. i W la'X Se Sun¢H¢Yfinn 1Wm rarnkr• Aa.YisNw [ex, Ib. 1Sc q.rrrMH fmrw.•M Hr rubrY A•.tw•>L B.wwYgrr a. sunw wal..e wire gw.au,' ErI Yn.a.•e a Ann L P¢aTYIe raw• C.•urti ► a.w• eYM arM M pwaa.l rye.. p e..x rwHr n. tle•Ma a � Cwap.E, Me/•an le. K+C a3a Mil tlrwkb.w a.b HwNv! MA•q L.wn, R.annx LSA rK/6IE,a3ppq.Inamaow •M waN. W.IlI ]rrr.rPn Iapknw mlr.N•n wmn.nY w.a.,.. a N.0 MwM.¢ IN•P0.•: MH L 3a01, i. Mfa b M f•¢Ira M.airwm Curr.nwbM L•rH a• rwn. n aG ciR, Euep•rt c. 11.LEL .rr ama a • x.ae.r m.arxrr.Hnama.al..•IaMa1 sMp. an nulwwY m [nEM M wq•a s.wM.nom.baw.e.r R.wrEon. x roma N .o nn ]u]a. .• pgart•.w rna r w.nY• L.ranwHtl M Mpiow 1SL •ICAO 0]e M1L l0. IN.yM r.YH. MEmrMq Nl.prew M a..I•r Mn M lMSL SL EW r W.• IMkq...M.. ar.t •a.N H..txtl M• ISA NGC 3e 3YMM6 13. 4L vac.m. nm.•mebn.¢. tl Wp nM iMK•Y MI Hen ,. nn inlwmHbn nvwnlw M r.Yp.tta• row, 11 W.bwnnrrlwtlul.a vn v.rmnHP a.0 4x N�p•.%-..d rwnery r.xE.nti war•eHmne.w.Pa•.nrar•r.[r•mrr.rM rpH•Ianh mar.a a•r•Nbn enn lMCLI 'Ir u�. r wn•r..].aa+aN pwwnygpr. •Iyr apral w A hq.r tlrn M upL Mt.n Mw M tln e.HwHf. wagM n.HarE es MnL M rt.IrLM fAEN. wvgrr..rlx, wY.¢ W rq¢ bnecM nM.MHYNr wnrN puH H w ea•NI Inn M r.HgHfY MEl rn ✓. rr m.r M qY]I. 1.. 4awar[m n. [w11g4•M Yar.uP'•.oP.p x M xf9f3rR ow.iM Hwnm MPn•pm•M w•.p•p, Mn tl Mlnaw b t¢we• wwafna nx W num.n IeEB1ODE,.Hw i. er W npam. sae 1•evey Iw M .nMw•E wnW u¢ inaNru•, w sw3t Mro s¢ sunaHa Mue a 1H Gr. drb,k..lm W number 3waot n Yx�n.a on H. ounnmr•M In•Lup r•epq• Iurl upar•d rn• W, 1¢lll 1J w kavra Srr.Ha unm, L0. r.•bMw �tllEtlal..Iivnrnlrw PH wrrmwrr. IP. M•yEnlnrw. agwlaE Ywn OM¢wrk C.b dMngr dWlplaewab WE• W rr M laws. a ICfi P.p1d1 3 g } 3 C � s z � m = N n O, C ip o CS 6 umi a A a a a a a a a m oo m m m m m a m 8 S -pp- s e6 gbg s m S z o 4 _ Zti x r Appendix A Field Sampling Forms 2014 GROUNDWATER MONITORING DUKE ENERGY PROGRESS, INC MAYO — MONOFILL LOW FLOW SAMPLING LOG FIELD PERSONNEL: T4. fp' a. % 1 ',r ,r,Z�.� WEATHER: o suKr� mcwuzT CI wi rnua�T� wrwar f.�5 i H eF.. ay..L S•f. Im NOTES: l a...er.swc.we+two 01M rilarra.pr.lrtra rT�Tw•.cwe— WELL ID: -IM L4_ -L—W PUMPnUBIHG INTAKE DEPTH: 49 1r71 START PURGE TIME: )1(?* MEASURING POINT: TOC START PURGE DATE: T 1 END PURGE T1ML It 6-t, WELL IXAMETER: 2 r EHD PURGE DATE •• I -S� i{ FINAL REARM TL%W-' WELL DEPTH: 39 m) TOTAL VOLUME PURGED: S iafa�y'` DEPTH TO WATER: -16.-38 _frry SAMPLE DAM 15 SAMPLE COLLECTION /! S„` PONA METI/DD: ❑rul adlorp ❑ ru12 YDk 7wq .t Pwhnlnc Pump ❑ D dk W ►i O T.Dan lr0w 0 P./,.thylww e.aw .AMPLE N TILDP• ❑ Gr—dfn Pura ❑ /2 VPk fume Pwi.bA6c Pump ❑ DNk W Pup a Teflon l�Hn [] P.N.thylm. wor *.Too Levu nowiun' Trap Wll DO eoPouerawe PH ODr ltsamrrr nAe _ Irn I.u.*I r PwLI Iw—o 4.1 P.n 1-14 r ara I �uv r �-zts 3iy. G-3 .rla•9 .a. f,,.i � b111 It It f d6S-0 Sz' 1 1 (s.ye_ 2 o.b 30 INS ZgZ,5 m1 I 3 4. 0 rS -4b 332-8 .S Z7b S /d. L I1y'3 {B-y% 1 0 fS 1 .9 3z1 , 3 �G1.� l!, fILO IE, s tuo IS'_-.-I•.8. 3i3• . U.3 zuj.3 {� ISZ 3,4 Wri X ?SS. -,1 ZUfU (D- 1 ■■■■■■■■ ■ ■ ■■■■■■ MEN Eii i ii:iMMM ■■M■■■o■■■o■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■os�■■■■■■■tee■■ COMMENTS: FIELD VEHICLE ACCESSIBLE Ey ,YES ❑ NO A sods m ;mA-6i:a D0. m«iatklry PH wlehri ranyeT (See ahbraefm si1eee fw is 5wv4e Dale) • 0 — H NO, wh10 perametM , NOTE dvt report[d data should De mnsdered .._flagged atmrdHlgiy, ' SynTerr. 1s not HC•certttN:d for Nee parametns. Data co Lected for info maUon p1w90.e1 only -- . Tr0 esDrttTlve awry LOcr w mrralr raa OOOO (f 11D O � JMO .CIBAD 1 ll a ❑ a O .nrP; iq DODo C7 a�0" 0 soet } mo. -Cl eaD C7 xMc' . WPmyea Eneryy1026M)MYO KANIM 2014 rid Samctrq MNKAMWELL SAMPLE FURMS(BLA Z)t w Ftw&0*91% Mg1pFLtdot 2014 GROUNDWATER MONITORING DUKE ENERGY PROGRESS, INC MAYO — MONOFILL LOW FLOW SAMPLING LOG' 7 41P N1ELD PERSOM7'l/,s:�iEL: T-�..... .. ..� syhTena WEATHER: [1 ovrsm 0 ,twaewTwet r v. in ,w n.w se..a.,sa. xza NOTES: pul azra,». MMaN,1,�Ma, Fa ' WELL W. mE,d - 2 KWM TUNNG tHTAKE DEPTH: J5 --,L P n START PURGE TIME: L.:9 M D11G POINT: TOO START PURGE DATE: _ _ EwD PURGETIM E: WELL 04,MlTER 2w WELL END PURGE DATE: FTruL RFALTHG TIME: /3/! WELL DEPTW TOTAL VOLUME PURGED: Jr K+ALf ;a DEPTH TO WATER: �-f I '5f.A PT, SAMPLE DATE SAMPLE[alErnow TIME: /?/ f PURGE METHOD: fir —on" N ,E YWt P. ❑ PwfitWJc Funp ❑ Dedkand Purr ❑ Taflm laf a G Paryathr,aa. laM.r SAMPLE A1ETW)D: Mr."" lq ,2 Ytlt" ❑ PsiAWk P—p ❑ D.dk—d 01n9 ❑ Tafh- laic[ ❑ P Al.Urpeaa Radar WAM UL U PWtW l TFMKRATIIK sa [a,dwTAMC! Pa W' TlMalwr'/• teat ,Pn a+A.*"L rt«w.I ara 6a'oaA tw an aa„rl r� �, Liz.nt- p 4.B1 Cr43 ,u Z(D-L, '}8•r ,Q% 1'{O tw GS2. u lscP•1- ZiYA N ys.Sl °Tq Dr9-LD 41 1 4La4•[P ;&b S1ay qo o G73 •L 1 z 90 1 U13 7.1 q3.5' x.0 l4. _. �a I 4.Li R3\ ,i -Lo 15' q- 2x I 141.0 CONSTITUENTS SANPIm NUYBLR OF CONTAINERS PRESERYAI,OH. _ T l TTALS a MMI:URY It"f , -METALS a MERCURY DYtaradl 'r / " cook rot - TM, CHLORINE, FLUORIDE, SULFATE, NITMTE , Pao COMMENTS: FIELD VEHICLE ACCESSIBLE ❑ YES IRNO Aswdated mlpdaylCsOd -day DO, ao,dr,d2Wty, pH within rw,gti l5crnlihratlon sleet for N1s sample datel sa O ua If H0, xfikh ameter '. NOTE that reported data tswtd be mrniderrd as f ac SynTem k rat NCcertified for these parameten. Rota cdteded for information p'UrpO,d only YfaLTAO PamTtTTL� I i K co Carrpt,a raa ooaD I ❑ w o,ro,t E ooaa 1 o m 1 0 Not p(g *M 1 0 am 1 o teat 1 A aoao I Ow 1 n r,aAa JAW00 I 0 am, o apt 2014 GROUNDWATER MONITORING DUKE ENERGY PROGRESS, INC MAYO - MONOFILL LOW FLOW SAMPLING LOG n" PERSONNEL: TEsynJg - Term WEATHER: 0 swan jQ oYTRrATT 0 sAa, ,vMraA,rMtpP"W y3 NOTES: WELL 0: .-3 PUMPRUNHGINTAI[EDEPTH: yt j M, START PURGE MAN- fl45 MEASURING POINT: TOL START PURGE DATE: ETD PURGE TIME: Y 3 } WELL DLAMETER: 2 nl END PURGE DATE: FIMAL R[AawG TINE: I 3 k WELL DE PT . � 5 _'L,(f MFTM TOTAL VOLUME PURGED: foul DEPTH TO WATER: L"' s 1rT,�, —LE DATE: • .3 f . SAMPLE W LLECntwLw l u 3-•1 PURGE METHOD: ❑ 61-0. ►u �qy it YOR" ❑ MbW.k Pero ❑ D-acw A porm ❑ Tatbr E.Rw ❑ PWy.IGo— B.N. SAAPLE METHOD•., 0 CrwWfw" [�j f 2 Vok" ❑ ►ww+ k Pwp ❑ Den tvd P—o 0 Tonm la/w 0 PWYMLMww lain .am Lint A1lN urz rzYPQiTlata o0 onlwKTaarE - - W - ow T rom - - - — fm 4-4^ t rc� 0-ou &-.I _ IWt an FM repro 041N5 �4� 1� I.1 �3E Y Li1•L 33S i 3S8 lfso l� f.Dl 2*r.a_3%.L lylb .bg b/ 15 —mi , P .Z33.i 2�.3 43.15 Da +S . I y� .F 2ZI.3- V� A I 1._ 4- 00 S 2Dq 8 2n1-Z R_:73 +A,S_ 200 15 2 D3 S -1-b T. 0 f 3q -u I x0aS 2ee•L 5•.53 I T , ■■■■®®■■emse®■■■■use ■es■■■■■ss■ o■■■®■eee: COMMENT•$: FIELD VEHICLE ACMURi P ❑ YES laNO Assodated middaylend•of-d&f DO; cwmkxt*ky, pH YArhln mnW. (See mllbratfan sheet lor this sample date)Ta CI t D NO, .firs parameter_. NOTE that reported data VmAd be conskWed m flagged acaordln¢ty, - — SynTma Is not NC-certtfi d for tl s parameters. Data collected for IOfwmation purposes mly - w4LTb PaOR[ThS 45M6 1Qa W fY1r[RlTf ,Ap n aAo T M]MC caoD 0 sAo O wut Daoa O inn n M 1, 1%0000 1 EL w 1 0 NO,Ia cnoo 113 B a O fit' P'VMgA=Enagy.tO2B05 MAYO PLWMOI. 2Ot4 We'$MnpM7 MarxMWELL SALIFLE FORMS WKWw FhtSo ph9 Log LOK)FILdoc P:MPapraf EMAgy.1D2MJAAY0RAN[YLE.2Dt41WOIS-*& MXMWWELL SAMPLE FORMS (BLANKS" Fb Sar*g Log MONOFEL.dcc 2014 GROUNDWATER MONITORING DUKE ENERGY PROGRESS, INC MAYO - MONOFILL 47 synTerra c ,.ar,swln caw,. ]aaR1 Ias.1 /11.MM.lEi.l a1laaay ra ww,.wwT�r.tsp,aa LOW FLOW SAMPLING LOG FIELD PERSONNEL:-rp'��•L - _ . WEATHER: a,� ovoras, o aaal rDPCMTLRE Vs.I�000=Y3'� NOTES: WELL an. kl �j-� mi-PriumG DITAKE DEPTH: tm sTADr PURGETLV.L -1518 MEASURING PONT. TOC START PURGE DATE: � � END PURGE TIME: 153 U WELL DtAMETEIL• 2. END PURGE DATE: 15 I FINAL REAMG TIME: 157(f WELL DEPTH: OT) TOTAL VOLUME PURUED:. N4LI,, OFPTLSTD WATER 'zlr,l SAMPLE DATE; SAMPLE [f]LLE[T10M 3` .4 t n L TIME: LsJl�_ PURGE METHOD: ❑ CrWraa Pultlp- j l T ven Pulp Q prrlspnlc Anp ❑ Dadkaurd Pu P Cl Tattoo Haar [3 Petyath,%- Nita SAMPLE METHOD: ❑ a.ndfal Prlp�-9 11 yal] P.mp ❑ pafWatdc help ❑ Dadlraad Pump C] T.Np1 M.aar ❑ Palyad y%-b k, am= m� �► ��■as���'®a�®ice! ■iii■■■■RI ■�!i■■■■ iii■■■■■■f0■i0�MEN iiii■■■itii■oi ■ ■■■ MC..■.i0...®■.■■■... COMMENTS; FIELD VEHICLE ACCESMI ❑ TES $1 NO Associated mlddayfentl af•day DO, catductMty, pll withil range? (See utlbrstbn sheet Ear th s sample date) o 11n If NO; which parameter . NOTE that reported data sllputd be tnnsidered m Ragged ..,Ill. SynTerra it Tat NG[ertified fw West parm m. Data wILected for Nfotmatlon purposes only - 2014 GROUNDWATER MONITORING DUKE ENERGY PROGRESS, INC MAYO - MONOFILL LOW FLOW SAMPLING LOG FIELD PERSONNEL: W , Terl_L� �/ WEATHER a 0-0 LY,orolusr a w lryer..,dar 1-9 7� IN aM.. ar.a,. sw.I20 Gwn,ar, f•� Carau,a t11a1 HOTES: laall �lty.n .1aa11 all-9rar ro �rynT.nrvp.c.., - WELL R: /AW=S PUMPITUDING INTAKE DEPTH: Im SfARTPURGETLME: liflrl . MEASURMG PIXNT: TOC START PURGE GATE: 3 END PURGE TLNE: WELL DIAMETER: 2. END PURGE DATE: FINAL READING TIME: LG71 WELL DEPTH: fr3 Im TOTAL VOWME PURGED: -SO• OEITH TO WATER: lAN - SAMPLE DATE: ! ! 3 !, SAMPLE CIti 1 F TTKM IRE- II�SI PURGE METHOD: O onaldfe. P-.p ❑ 11 volt heap 6Taltic P.np L] Do~vd P W V ❑ T~ 5,*Uw ij Pely.Inylnw to SAMPLE MEmoi Q GruMfm Pwrp ❑ 1 E YON hump Parhrmk PaM 0DP01c W Plaep ❑ T~ I tW _ ❑ Pelyelhylalw Waar w�Trs uyn now Pw,T rerTTu,vP oo ceroucraacc yn pp: ��,.' ..._ TIKE rm Wn o CC.' l t+wlLl IaHwel 1M om lw%n amn lm"> 1 u - U Cl-� 3 i 3.2Z lkkqw Zo.s'L o ! a�5A►.a 5 14S•9 �. Gig GS - oo 14 0."1, SDI .2_ _} 1V3 t-0,33 eo fy 8ls S .q -191,q f.n - ■iiii■ii�I ■.Raiiiiii _ iiiii■iii ■A ■i■ii■i0■�iCI�C� ®®�® .T, ....■■0■ii�i0ii■iii ■s■il�®i■ii®■ii1iA!■■ COMMENTS: FIELD VEHICLE ACCrUtOLE N YES E7 NO .Avac tedmWtla_ylmd- •dsy DO; conductwiy, PMwlthln range (See calWatlwl sheet for this Sample NrPjrmo Na. If ND,*I h parameter - . NOTE that reported dots shwW be canfdm d m ftnied accortftty. - SynTena t not NC-certlhtd for tr s parameter. Dau mltected for information purpa onty P,VlaV— Ene9V IMV05. MYC PLAT Ia% Aft Wei S-*q Lt MSWELL SMFLE FORUS MAHtMM Fbr SwOM Log MCOattdee PWsopaaa EIIa1pT.1D2SDS.MAYO PIAMlTlOM- TOf l was SaapRlE WIdy,WFt1 SAAFL£ FORME {9LANH51Io. Flow gami09 tag Mt_NOFLL.doc 2014 GROUNDWATER MONITORING DUKE ENERGY PROGRESS, INC MAYO — MONOFILL LOW FLOW SAMPLING LOG FIELD PERSONNEL I sjnTerra WEATHER; p kNM QFa+r T 0 MIH TLWMTVK IAPrRO[I: I's -t— 5,—. swla 7]p p..IN., —..— "Uil NOTES:: -. Iwl I=1— -14") .I1-.'W. F. - �rr..ynTrtawF.a.., WELLID; Sy,J� PUMP/TUBING INTAKE DEPTH: IFTI START PURGE TIME: MEASURING POINT: TIC START PURGE D►TE: END PURGETIME: WILL DIAIAETCR: 21H END PURGE DATE: FINAL REAgNG TMLE; WELL DEPTH: cm TOTAL VOLUME PURGED. [all DEPTH TO WATER: R-U SA,AtPLE PATE: SAMPLE COLLECTION IMEZ r TW: pp PDRrE M£Tt50o: p c—Ww Pump Q 12 volt Plap ❑ P..& Rk Pup ❑ De&.A d FI—P ❑ Tallen ba4ar ❑ PnfyHtryNn. RaRRr �I, SAMPLE METHOD: ❑ C..wdl.a Pump ❑ 12 volt Pump 0 Perlst.ltk Pump ❑ DRdltat.d Pump ❑ T.11- 5.11. ❑ PnlyatH,lano & IIM 0&&l CONSTITUENTS SAMPLED NUMUR OF CONTAR&FIS PRESERVATION E I 91 T r T V ,• I IIf t' Y e METALS R MERCURY ItMal) 1 _ METALS a MERCURY I11Rar.d 1 ✓ coo B TOC t ! TOS, CHLORIDE, FLGoRIOE, SDLFATE, HITNATEisIxI -� COMMDm; PIELD VEHICLE ACCESSIBLE [] YES (1140 ynTerra IS not NC�rttfled for tk x parameters. Data caltected I'm W nnatic wEll TA0 1 Aat15O:TRi [ASRw LOCI C,SP mwC.ETf AAO 1 i I ! 1 1 I.O.It I WAJ° i .I a 2014 GROUNDWATER MONITORING DUKE ENERGY PROGRESS, INC - MAYO — MONOFILL LOW FLOW SAMPLING LOG FIELD PEASOIHHEL: -r'?'I.��i ` .cz nTeaa, WEATHER: 0 ttlwrr'*a KR T p UN *f�IFEsarvRt Ie7rRock Y�^ 1aa RhwiD'wl. Sun. I]0 h..n.IIL, 5wu tray,. ]aaal NOTES: — - Iwl Ill�aP.• INQ IS1-aaa Fa rrr..Mirrlla.p,.rn WE'LL ID: Sw . Z PUMP/TUBING INTAKE DEPTH: Im START RIRf1 TSME: MEASURING POINT: TOC START PURGE DATE: — END PURGE TIME: WELL DIAMETER: 2 m END PURGE DATE; FINAL AEAoING TUAE: _ WELL DEPTH: Tr)TOTAL VOLUME PURGED: ,wu DEPTH TO WATER: (Fr) SAMPLE DATE: SAMPLE COLLECTION TIME: 153 Y PURGE METHOD: ❑ O-wf 5 Pump ❑ 17 %it Imp ❑ P. Z"k Plop ❑ Dpk..t.tl n.1p ❑ Tey a n- R.:. ❑ Pnrr y — Ra1NT fkok SAMPLE MEFIM: ❑ G—Idrw Aunt' © 17 Vet Pun* 6 [I►..HtaRk Pulp i.7 Dadkatad ►u np ❑ Tafldn .n O Aoly.Nyl—eMRN &,2. _,. ■■■■��■��ios■o■■set■■ COMMEMT: FIELD VEHICLE ACCESSIBLE [J YES'P(NO is mt NC-certttkd fa Chew puametelS. DKp a0cted for Infamatkn purpose anly wEu TAa � FlmrtcTlr. eATaa j Lou � � ty - � co.luerE .Ap P.JP Wn Energy 702oft.0MYO PL1N1108. 2014 Wei Samp6q Ma MWELL SAMPLE FORWOM ANKRLm FbR S-ft Lop LK MOFlLLAa PiPropins Enery AMISIM-MAYO PLANrOB_ 2014 Wd Sup" Ma�WELL BAAIPLE FARMS RTIAt KSILm Fbw SNI "Ld0 MMOFLLdx 2014 GROUNDWATER MONITORING DUKE ENERGY PROGRESS, INC MAYO - MONOFILL LOW FLOW SAMPLING LOG PtELD PERSGNNEL• �7"�y�A}.I STa v - WEATHER: G dsr.1oror�sr a wn nwcauuaan.aar.ys° �i +.s Rr.w sr.«, frle. tm MOT[S: bffrntlY, TrM [rotor tfgt I.•al w+-..ff . Ir..l Der-r•• rre WALE? SV-3 ArEAAURAUG POINT: TOC Kwfr amG INTw DEPTH: Urn START PURGE DATE: STARTPUlRGETIME: t>tD PURGE TMIE WELL DLAMETER: 2. END PURGE DATE: FINAL READING TIME: WELL DE n� TOTAL VOLUME PURGED' 1 OEM TO WATER: (M SAMPLE DAT'C r SAMPLE COLLECTION nwia.- LARGE mmoca: ❑ 0rumgM hum ❑ t 2 YA P%wp ❑ rwWmMc Pup ❑ D•dlcaad Puma d T.f1an Nair ❑ royNI.,k- a.R- N4 U mpLE acnla0: ❑ aeaedTm h.p ❑ 12 Valt P.V O P rbultk Pup O D.eludd PUMP O T~ aauar ❑ PnyathYlnx Nnu&Qq� WEE ■■ ■o■ ■o..e■m■ COMMENTS; FIELD VEHICLE ACCESSIBLE ❑ YES {ftslo Associated mlddaylerMl of•day DO cvnduciinty. Dst -thin rsege? (see aItbmtton deeet la this sarrplr di[el TOO ro. tT N0, whkh �aranleter - .NOTE NAt rtp 4 dau 4nIAd x coalde ed as nagyd ascordYtgly._ — - — • StmTema I$ not HC• tolled far Nose Wwe.M. Data coil ¢, far nlarmatkn purpme only 2014 GROUNDWATER MONITORING DUKE ENERGY PROGRESS, INC MAYO - MONOFILL 41,7 synTerra r.i Mn.r serves, swtr zm (iN) ♦llwPn. NNI.21-f10. Fu MrEL.L ID: MEASLIRIXG POINT: TOC _ WELL DIAMETER ... 2. WELL DEPTH: - Im DEPTH TO WATER {m LOW FLOW SAMPLING LOG t WEATNER; C1 wwy Ll(d tlrrArT O MM TEPM4 JuP 1 6- H0TES: PWP/T7ISTA T PUR DATE: IrTI START PURGE TIME: START PURGE DATE: END PURLS TIAeE: END PURGE DATE: FINAL READING TOME: TOTAL VOLLMME PURGED: 14W SAMPLE DATE: - UMPLE COLLECTION G TIME. PURGE METHOD: ❑ trudfm Pump ❑ r r voh Pueq ❑ Perherek Pup ❑ DPdlotr7 Pure 13 T~ arOPr SAMPLE❑ P.lylteyl•oa Rau.. fi METHOD: ❑ Grutlew h.rm ❑ 12 v Putrm ❑ P-hbW le P—p ❑ ftlftW d PUrm O Tarl.. e.a« ❑ sey.urN.n• e.twr pg CORSTMANTS SAMPLED ■e..■.■■ummur■....■ MENEM ^��EfYI �IIEiIYn•y xTT r:ri���■...®��■lowwwwomm B■■..... - - - ■■■sreo..o■�e�e■e■■ COMMENTS: FIELD YEHICLE ACCESSIBLE ;O YES ❑ NO ik^ �� Rt cD..Pr�t1 sptw , ps.„`+ grar,LLM� bL� Gv4�- s�.n_ Assectated midday/ -P Y ba, c"ox-mitt', pH wKhln range? (See a5b atwn sneer for this sample daal ro O too. If N , WhkP parameter . HOTS V aL reported data thwLd be cm 0dered as Ragged accordhily. _ • SynTerra is not NC-certlfled for Usese parmletm. Data cudmted far tnfM mtkn purposes only ML TMG P,.%-WmCrwW.lrAV5.MIeYO PLAlTnM. 2014 Wei Saomhsp Ma DWELL SAMPLE FORMS MLAFMS" Flow Smnft Lcq MONOFLLdoc PWroprem Em,^/.7016TD myo PtANLm 20H wog So rb AtmwwELL SAAftE F0Fj4 (DLAMSSII m Fran Sw"V Lug 00MOFLLdee 2014 GROUNDWATER MONITORING DUKE ENERGY PROGRESS, INC MAYO — MONOFILL 1410 synTena ,twi.L,-PEN . {ee.I.t,.PWP ru a� p LOW FLOW SAMPLING LOCI FIELD PERSONNEL• �P11;[i_ WEATHER: (� J� t-- C3 T CI aw Triw umw v r v Hams: WELL ID: Y'n IA 4� !4 PUMPRVISING NTA1Q DEPTH: Rzl START PURGE TW& MEASURING P'OrKr: Tm START RIRGE DATE: END PURGE MME,' WELL DIAMETER: let END PURGE DATE: FINAL READ" TIME: WELL DEPTH: t[Ts TOTAL VOLUME PURGED: 1TaL1 DEPTH TO WATER: Err) SAMPLE DATE: 1 y/ SAMPLE COLLECMH 7 r AIRGE A,E HM7 ❑ fiumlw Pero ❑ 11 VOR" ❑ ►wbbRlc Pure ❑ DPOkOmd Psam O Tare I& or ❑ Pe1AthElen aeRar SAVLE METHOD: ❑ orurff. P" ❑ 12 VOR ►wlo ❑ Par1MaRk Punp O D.Ok.nd herar ❑ Tan- e[Ilw 0 PdrRtMto -BMW COMMVENTS SAMPLED INN ki �wllt ■ o■ ■■■■■ ■� �T iiiii■■os ■■■■■■ COMMENTS: FIELD VEHICLE ACCESSIBLE {] YES ❑ NO Associated mlddaYleM of daY DO, tnrtatcttAN. PtN mthin nrip cAL&ration 9wet far th% Sample date) 0 rn 0 r N 40,1 kh— ran,etn .NOTE that data shmid be c idered As naSged wcordVtgty- $ynTerra knot HC�ertifi d for these parameters. Data Cdtected for infonnatfor, pvpCSP[ Orly MRL TIG reOTe[Tlre wtw Loci W [OMOST[PA► 0 s000 G eao O MOM[ 0 c 0 w [] Now[ ❑ ame O aae [] MOM[ 0 R E] uo 0— O Sow 0 u O MOM[ P.1Rvgrtw EMtgy.102671 MAYO PLANT0. 2014 WN Swr4 gMa,t>WMU SAMP(E FCRIa(UAW.$" Floe Satphq Log MONOFLLdm -, ENEGv: Analytical Laboratory 1of 29 M39 Hagers Ferry Road Hunter$ville, NC 28078-7929 McGuire Nuclear Complex - MG03A2 Phone:980-875-5245 Fax:9BM75-4349 Order Summary Report Order Number: J14100268 Project Name: MAYO LFGW customer Nama(s): J. TOEPFER, T. HUNSUCKER Custanar Address: Lab Carus: Jaam C Parkins Phase: 9e0dTS534s Rapod Arrthorla.d By: - 1 — Date: 12/912014 (Signature) n� Program Comments: Please contact the Program M a nage r (Jason C Perkins) with any questions regarding this report Data Flags A Calculations Any analytical tests or individual analyses within a test flagged with a Qualifier indicate a deviation from the method quality system or quality control requirement The qualifier description is found at the end of the Certificate of Analysis (sample results) under the qualifiers heading. All results are reported on a dry weight basis unless otherwise noted. Subcontracted data included on the Duke Certificate of Analysis is to be used as information only. Certified vendor reWts can be found in the subcontracted lab final repot Duke Energy Analytical Laboratory subcontracts analyses to other vendor laboratories that have been qualified by Duke Energy to perform these analyses except where noted. Data Package: This data package includes analytical results that are applicable only to the samples described In this narrative. An estimation of the uncertainty of measurement for the results In the report Is available upon request This report shall not be reproduced. except In full, without the written consent of the Analybeel Laboratory. Please contact the Analytical laboratorywlth any questions. The order of individual sections within this report is as follows: Job Summary Report, Sample WerYitrcation. Technical Validation of Data Package, Anao al Laboratory Cori+firate ofAnaysis, Analytical Laboratory QC Reports, Laboratory Results, Customer Speafrc Data Sheels, Reports 8 Documenialion, Customer Database Entries, Test Case Narralives, Chain at Custody (COC) CerUflcatlon: The Analytical Laboratory holds the foMewing State Certifications : North Carolina (DENR) Certificate #248, South Carolina (OHEC) Laboratory ID # 99005. Contact the Analytical Laboratory for definitive information about the certification status of specific methods. Sample ID's & Descriptions: 20128 Sample ID PhatUSlalian caklcnon 04h and Tire. Call.clad By Sample Oesedp0m 2014029400 MAYO STEAM 13-Nov-14 I t52 AM Tadd PYawv MW-1 2014029401 MAYO STEAM 13-Nov-14 1:19 PM Todd Plating MW-2 2014029402 MAYO STEAM 13-Nor-14 2:37 PM Todd Pi tirp MW-3 2014029403 MAYOSTEAM 134Jov-14 3:36 PM MW-4 2014029404 MAYOSTFAM 13Nar14 4:31 PM MW-5 2014029405 MAYOSTEAM 13•N-14 11:25 AM Todd Platting SW-1 2014029406 MAYO STEAM 13-Nov-14 3:34 PM Todd Plating SW-2 2014029407 MAYO STEAM - 131,1ow14 2:20 PM Todd Plating SW-3 2014029408 MAYO STEAM 13-Nar-14 2:37 PM Todd Plating DUP MW 3 2014029400 MAYO STEAM 13-Now14 2:40 PM Todd Platig HELD BLANK 2014032040 MAYOSTEAM 13-Nar14 5:00 PM Todd Plating Ll 11 Tonal Samples Technical Validation Review Checklist: COC and .pdf report are in agreement with sample totals Yea No and analyses (compliance programs and procedures). All Results are less than the laboratory reporting limits. Yea No AI( laboratory QAIQC requirements are acceptable. Yes ❑ No Report Sections Included: Job Summary Report N❑Sampk Ida bficabOn Fel Technical Validation of Data Package F' Analyliral Laboratory Cerdr-1e of Aralyais ❑ Alr M"I Laboratory a Report Row-d By: D$A Account 3 of 20 ✓• Sub-c ntreGed Laboratory ReauOa ❑ Customer Specific Dots Shseb, Repwta, & Documemat'on ❑ Customer Database Entries W' Chain of Custody P1 Elodmi Data Deliverable (EDD) Sere Separatei Dale: 12/9/2014 Certificate of Laboratory Analysis 4Of28 This report shall not be reproduced, except in fug. Order# J14100268 Site: MW-1 Collection Date: 13-Nov 14 11:52 AM Sample#: Matrix: 2014029400 GW W W Analyts Rsautt Unhe Qualifiers RDL DF M.th d Anatysls DatNTlms Ana"t INORGANIC IONS BY IC Chb.de 15 mg1t. 0.5 5 EPA 300.0 1V14t201417:39 BON9034 Fluoride 0.15 mg/L 0.1 1 EPA 300.0 1101$2014 17:39 OGNP034 NIIrate 0.3 MOIL 0.1 1 EPA 300.0 11114r2014 17:39 BGN9034 N4rste asN 1.D m9-N1L 0023 1 EPA 300.0 11014201417:30 RGN9034 Sutlaia 20 -9& 0.5 5 EPA 300.0 110142014 17:39 BGND034 MERCURY f W LD VAP0R7 IN WATER Merorry {Hg) 0.05 uglL 006 1 EPA 245.1 1 V212014 13:15 DNJOHN2 TOTAL RECOVERABLE METALS BY ICP Badum (Be) 0.177 mg4 0.005 1 EPA 200.7 12104/2014 11:22 VHH7131 Boron (B) .010 mg1L a 0.5 1 EPA 2W.7 1210412014 11:22 MHH7131 Chromium (Cr) < 0.005 m91L 0,005 1 EPA 200.7 121f1412014 11:22 MHH7131 Copper (Cu) < 0.005 mg& 0.005 1 EPA 200.7 12/04/2014 11:22 MHH7131 trap (Fe) 0.619 m91L 0,01 1 EPA 200.7 12104,2014 11,22 MHH7131 Varrganese (Mn) 0.022 m9k 0.005 1 EPA 200.7 12/04/2014 1112 MHH713 i Nickel (M) < 0-OOS m91L 0,005 1 EPA 200.7 1Z Wr2014 11:22 MHH7131 S2xr(Ag) <0.005 -g1L 0005 1 EPA 200.7 12104=141112 MHH7131 Zinc (Zn) 0.012 nWL B 0.OD5 1 EPA 200.7 12/O412014 11:22 MHH7131 TOTAL RECOVERABLE METALS BY ICP-MS Arsenic (AS) .1 u911. 1 1 EPA 2008 112D21)14 12:24 DJSULLi Cadmium (Cd) c 1 ug1L 1 1 EPA 200,8 112092014 12:24 DJSULLI Lead (Pb) a 1 ug1L 1 1 EPA 200.a 112D2014 12'.24 DJSULLi Solanlum (Se) .1 uglL 1 1 EPA 2W.8 il20r2014 12:24 OJSULLI TDS 220 mg4 25 1 SW540C 1111 a201414:21 GHUTCHI Certificate of Laboratory Analysis Sa1ze This report shaff not be reproduced, except in full. Order # J14100268 Certificate of Laboratory Analysis aof28 This report shaf! not be reproduced, except in U. Order# J14100268 Site: 7o W-2 Sample #: 2014029401 Site: MW-3 Sample #: 20140294U2 Collection Date: 13NDr14 1:19 PM Matrix: GW_WW Collection Date: 13-ND -14 237 PM Matrix: GW_WW Ana" Rasuh Unha QuaIIllam ROL OF Method Aadpais Dat*M- Ana" A"" R*-It Unit OualNMan ROL OF Method Anaysia OatatTlma Anelpal INORGANIC IONS BY IC INORGANIC IONS BY IC CNodde 48 m911- 1 10 EPA 300 0 1 V1412014 17:50 BGN0034 Chladde as m911. 2 20 EPA 300.0 11114rl014 18:14 BON9034 Fhtodde 0.23 m9a 0.1 1 EPA 300.0 11114r2014 Ilse RGN9034 Fluoride 0.30 mgrL 0.1 1 EPA 3000 1111412014 M14 BGN9W4 Nitrate < 0.1 mgr. D.1 I EPA 300_a 1 V1412014 17:56 BGN90M Nitrate c 0.1 m9ft 0.1 1 EPA 300.0 1 ill 412014 18:14 BGN0034 Nitrate as N < 0.023 rr VNIL 0,023 t EPA 300.0 111142014 17.511 BGN90M 144rete as N < 0.023 mg-N1L am3 1 EPA 300 0 1111412014 18:14 BGN9034 Sulfate 34 nWL 1 t0 EPA 300.0 1111420t4 17:50 BGNDM4 Sulfate 1a mg'L 0.5 5 EPA 300.0 11114=14 18:14 BON9034 MERCURY (COLD VAPORI IN WATER MERCURY (COLD VAPORI IN WATER Memory (Hg) c 0.05 ugk 0,05 1 EPA 2461 12/022014 11:15 DKJOHN2 Mercury (Hg) c 0.05 U91L 005 1 EPA 245.1 12A212014 1110 OKJOHN2 TOTAL RECOVERABLE METALS BY ICP TOTAL RECOVERABLE METALS BY ICP Rsnum (Be) 0.03a 0,91E 0005 1 EPA 200.7 12104=4 11:34 MHH7131 aerum (Ba) M17li -9rL 0.005 1 EPA 200.7 IZD412014 11:38 WH7131 Baron (B) c 0.05 m9rL 0.05 1 LPA 200.7 12MM014 11:34 MHH7131 Baron (BI -0.05 mglL 0.05 1 EPA 200.7 12N42014 11:38 MHH7131 Chmm'mm (Cr) < 0.o05 m91 0.005 1 EPA 2DO.7 I ZIDWO14 11.34 MHH7131 Chromium (Cr) -0.005 mgrL D MS 1 EPA 2W 7 121041=4 11:38 MHH7131 Capper (Cu) < 0.005 mWL 0.005 1 EPA 2D0.7 12A412014 11:34 MHH7131 Copper (Cu) -0.005 mSiL 0,005 1 EPA 200.7 12/042014 11:38 MHH7131 Imn (Fe) 0.229 mgrL 0.01 1 EPA 200.7 12A42nl4 11-34 MHH7131 Imn (Fe) 0,240 mgfL 001 1 EPA 2W 7 12AA12014 11:38 MHH7131 MarKpnana (Mn) 0.038 MgrL 0.005 1 EPA 200.7 12AM12014 11:34 MHH7131 Manganese (Mn) 0,038 m9k 0.005 1 EPA 200.7 12A 47014 11:33 MHH7131 NickeI(Ni) <0,005 m91L 0.005 1 EPA 200.7 12N4201411:34 1.WH7131 Nldd(M) <0.003 mg/L 0005 1 EPA 2D0.7 12AM=1411:3B MHH7131 61- (Ag) c 0.005 mgrL 0.005 1 EPA 2W.7 12M412014 11:34 MHH7131 SI-r (Ag) c 0.003 mqfL O.OD5 1 EPA 200.7 12A42014 11:35 MHH7131 Zinc (2n) 0.052 mgrL B 0.D05 1 EPA 200.1 12A412014 11:34 MHH7131 Zinc (Zn) 0.035 MGfL R 0,005 1 EPA 200,7 12A42014 11:38 MHH7131 TOTAL RECOVERABLE METALS BY ICPadS TOTAL. RECOVERABLE METALS BY ICF2M.§ Arsenic (As) < 1 W& 1 1 EPA 200.E 1120'2014 12:35 DJSULLi AM019C (As) .1 ugrL 1 1 EPA 200,E 11M Y2014 12:30 DJSULLI Cadmium (Cd) c 1 WIL 1 1 EPA 2013.8 1120'2014 12:35 DJSULLI Cadmium (Cd) .1 uryL 1 1 EPA 200.e WM014 12:39 DJSULLI Lead (Pb) c 1 u9R 1 1 EPA 200,8 11MOr2014 12:35 DJSULLi Lead(Pb) .1 u9& 1 1 EPA 200.8 11120M014 12.39 DJSULLI Selenium (Se) c 1 U91L 1 I EPA 200.8 111202014 12:35 DJSULLI Selenium (Se) c 1 L-it 1 1 EPA 200.8 1120'2014 17'39 DJSULLI TDS 410 m91L 25 1 SM254DC 1111WO1414,21 GFe7TCHI TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDS TDS 430 "It 25 1 SW540C 111181201414:21 GHUTCHI Certificate of Laboratory Analysis 7of 28 This report shall not be reproduced, except in full. Order # J14100268 Site: MWrl Collection Date: 13-Nou14 3:36 PM Sample#: Mat(W 2014029403 Gw W W A-" Reautt Untta OualJflera ROL OF Wtftod A-tpla Da 7l- Arra" INORGANIC tONS BY IC Chloride 65 mg1L 2 20 EPA 300.0 11114/2014 18:31 BON9034 Fluoride 0.20 mg1L 0.1 1 EPA 300.D 1101412014 18:31 BGN9034 NAMt. 0.14 mg1L 0.1 1 EPA 300.0 11/1412014 18:31 BON9034 Nitrate ea 0.03 MWN1L 0023 1 EPA 3009 IIJ74201410731 BGNW34 Sulfate 94 mglL 2 20 EPA 300.0 10142014 18:31 BGN9034 MERCURY ICOLO_VAPOR) IN WATER Mercury(HU) .0,05 ug& D.DS 1 EPA 245.1 12102201411:22 DKJOHN2 TOTAL RECOVERABLE METALS BY ICP Bam1m (Ba) 0247 nrgrL 0.005 t EPA 200.7 12/04)201411.42 MHH7t31 Bann (B) 4 0.05 -A 0-05 1 EPA 200.7 121042014 11:42 MHH7131 Chromium (Cr) -0.005 mg1L 0,005 1 EPA 200.7 1 VO4)2014 11-42 MHH7131 copper(Cu) <0.005 mWL D-D05 1 EPA 200.7 121041201411:42 MHH7131 Iron (Fe) 0.097 mgr- 0.01 1 EPA 200.1 1=0201411-42 MHH7131 Marrgsrvoie (Mn) 0.951 -(A 0-005 1 EPA 200.7 12104/2014 11:42 MHH7131 Nickel lM) -0.005 mg/L 0.005 1 EPA 200.7 12/002014 11-42 MHH7131 S wr (Ag) K 0.005 mgr- 0005 1 EPA 200.7 121D4)2014 11:42 MHH7131 Zinc (Zn) 0.08a mg4 B 0.005 1 EPA 200.7 12/0412014 11:42 MHH7131 TOTAL RECOVERABLP METALS BY ICP-145 A-mi. (Aa) c 1 uD& 1 1 EPA 200,8 1112Q'2014 12:42 DJSl1LL1 Cadmium (0d) .1 u9L 1 1 EPA 2W 8 112012014 12:42 OJSULL7 Lead (Pb) c1 ugl- 1 1 EPA 2D0-8 11r2052C1412:42 UJSULL1 Selenium (Se) .1 ugL 1 1 EPA 200.8 1 V=2014 12.42 DJSULL7 TDS 390 m94 25 1 5M2540C 1111 M141421 GHLJTCHt Certificate of Laboratory Analysis an+25 This report shall not be reproduced, except in lull. Order # J14100268 Site: MW-5 Sample #: 2014029404 Collaction Date: 13,NO,14 4:31 PM Matrix: GW_WW An." Raaott I.I.K. Q-011hi a ROL OF Method Au"hi D&WEEl- Arlin[ INORGANIC IONS BY IC Chloride 10 mg1L 02 2 EPA 30D.0 111142014 10:29 BGN9034 Fluoride 0.27 mg1L 0.1 1 EPA 300.0 11114=14 16'.29 DGN9034 NarMe <0,1 mg+L 0.1 1 EPA 300.0 11114/20141629 BGN9034 Nitrate sa N c 0.023 mg�N1L 0023 1 EPA 300 G 1111WO14 16:29 BGN9034 Sulfate 13 mgAL 02 2 EPA 300.0 111142014 10:20 BGN9034 MERCURY (COLD VAPOR) IN WATER Mercury(Hg) -0.05 ug1L 0-06 1 EPA 245.1 1 Z1021201411:25 DKJOHN2 TOTAL RECOVERABLE METALS BY ICP Rarkrm (Ba) a,00e mglL Baas (B) - 0.05 m9IL Chromium (Cr) 4 O.D05 mgtL Capper (Cu) 0.005 mg1L Iron (Fe) 0.050 mjL Mangenex(Mn) 0.034 mgrL NOA (Mi) s 0.005 mgrL SO-(Ag) <0.005 mWL Zinc (Zn) < 0.005 mglL TOTAL RECOVERABLE METALS BY ICP44S Arsenlc (As) < 1 u9L Cadmium (Cd) � 1 ug4 Lead (Ph) t 1 U91L Selerikim (Se) K 1 ug4 TOS 330 mg - 0.005 1 0,05 1 0005 1 0.005 1 001 1 0.005 1 0005 1 0,005 1 0,C05 I EPA 200.7 EPA 200.7 EPA 200 7 EPA 200,7 EPA 2W.7 EPA 200.7 EPA 20a.7 LEA 200,7 EPA 2607 1 1 EPA 200,E 1 1 EPA 200.8 1 1 EPA 200.0 1 1 EPA 200.8 25 1 SW54DC 121041201411:46 MHH7131 I ZM41201411:40 MHH7131 1V 201411:46 MHH7131 12JO41201411:4e MHH7131 12JO41201411.48 MHH7131 121042014 1 t:46 MHH7131 12JO412014 1 i:49 MHH7131 12JD4201411'46 MHH7131 1210412014 11:46 MHH7131 I I20201412.:46 DJSLAL1 11120r20141246 DJSLILLI 112=0141249 11.1SULL1 IM 201412:46 DJSULLI 111182014l1421 GHUTCHI Certificate of Laboratory Analysis get 26 This report shelf not be reproduced, except in iulf. Order# J14100268 Certificate of Laboratory Analysis 10 of 26 This report shall not be reproduced, except in NO. Order # J14100268 Site: SW-1 Sample#: 2014029405 Site: SW-2 SamDlep: 2014029406 CdlectiOn Data: 13Nov14 1125AM Matrix: GW WW Collection Date: 13-14 w14 3:34 PM Mattis: GW WW Ans" Remit Unks, 0i"Mlars ROL OF Mathed Anstpis Daldnave Ara" Am" Remit U-N. 0us11rara ROL OF Method An."I. Det rrlme Ana" IHORGANIQ IONS @X IC INORGANIC ION9 BY IC Chloride 5A mg1L 0.1 1 EPA 300,0 1 V1412014 16:12 BGN0034 Chloride 7.4 mgrL 0,1 1 EPA 300.0 11114r2014 16:47 BGN9034 Fluoride 0.10 mgL 0.1 1 EPA 300.0 11/142014 1632 BGN0034 Ruodde 0.13 m91L 0.1 1 EPA 300,0 11/1412014 16.AT DGN9034 Nitrate 0,36 mWL 0,1 1 EPA 300.0 111102014 16:12 OGN9034 Nitrate .0.1 mg(L 0.1 1 EPA 300.0 1111V2014 16:47 BGN9034 Ntmte as N 0.08 m¢411L 0.023 1 EPA 300.0 111142014 18:12 BGN0034 Nitrate as N -0.023 mg-N7L 0.023 1 EPA 300.0 1 V142014 16,47 BGN9034 Sulfato 4.1 mg1L 0.1 1 EPA 300.0 111142014 16:12 BGN0034 Sulfate 9.5 mg1L 0.1 1 EPA 300.0 11H42DI4 1647 BGN9034 MERCURY (COLD VAPOR) IN WATER MERCURY (COLD VAPOR) IN WATER Mercury (Hg) c 005 ug& 0.05 1 EPA 245,1 12X=Oi4 11:27 DKJOHN2 Memory (W c 0.05 u91L 0-05 1 EPA 245,1 121022014 1129 DKJOHN2 TOTAL RECOVERABLE METALS BY ICP TOTAL RECOVERABLE METALS BY ICP Barium (8e) 0.053 mg4 0.005 1 EPA 200.7 12AMM14 11:51 MHH7131 Barium (Be) 0.025 mg1L 0.005 1 EPA 200.7 1210412D14 11:59 MHH7131 Bara6(8) c6.05 mgrL 0.05 1 EPA 200,7 1ZM44701411:51 MHH7131 Domn(B) .0.05 m91L 0.05 1 EPA 200.7 12JD4201411:59 MHH7131 Chromium(Cr) c0.005 Mort- 0.005 1 EPA 200.7 12/0412D1411:51 MHH70i Chromium(Cr) 40.005 MOIL 0005 1 EPA 200-7 12fO412014 11 '59 MHH7131 Copper (CO 0.005 m911- 0.005 1 EPA 200.7 1 V 2014 1 t:51 kaHH7131 Copper (04 -0.005 m97L 0 OD5 1 EPA 200.7 12/042D74 11:59 WiH7131 Imn (Fe) 1.20 mg1L 0.01 1 EPA 200.7 121D4t2014 11:51 MHH7131 Iran (Fe) 0.356 mg1L 001 1 EPA 200.7 12m42014 11:59 MHH7131 W%wriese(M.) 0.3ls8 mVt. 0005 1 EPA 200,7 1ZM4r2014 1t:51 MHHM7 Marxprneae(Mn) 0.022 m9tL 0OD5 1 EPA 200.7 12104201411:59 UHH7131 Nickel (NI) -0.005 mg1L 0.005 1 EPA 200.7 12/0412014 11:51 MHH7131 Nickel (M) -0.005 mg4 O.D05 1 EPA 200.7 127 4=14 11:59 MHH7131 Si(Ag) .0.005 mWL 0005 1 EPA 2007 12M41201411 51 MHH7131 Sl-(AU) 50.006 m91L 0,005 1 EPA 2DO.7 1N042014 It 59 MHH7131 Zinc (Zn) 0.003 MOIL B 0.005 1 EPA 200.7 12/04r2014 11:51 MHH7131 Zinc (Zn) . MOOS mg4 0,005 1 EPA 200.7 12N4r2014 1160 MHH7131 TOTAL RECOVE_RA@Lt METALS BY ICP-MS TOTAL RECOVERABLE METALS BY ICP-MS Arsenic (As) . 1 u91L 1 1 EPA 200.0 112P2g14 12:49 DJSLILL1 Asenc (As) . 1 ugli 1 1 EPA 200.8 11202014 1253 DJSULLI Cadmium (Cd) . 1 ug1L 1 1 EPA 200.E 120W14 12:49 DJSLILLI Cadmium 1Cd) 4 1 ugiL 1 1 EPA 200-8 1 V202014 12:53 DJSLILLI Lead (Pb) c1 W& 1 1 EPA 200.E IIMY201412:49 DJSLL.L1 Lead (Pb) ct ug1L 1 1 EPA 2D0.8 112020141253 DJSL)Ltl Saleroom (Se) . 1 UA 1 1 EPA 200.8 11r202014 12:49 D,ISL5.L7 Selenium (Se) c 1 erg& 1 I EPA 200.8 11202014 12:53 DJSVLLI TOTAL DI380LVgfSGuos TDS ISO mG& 25 1 SM254OC 1111QT01411:41 GHUTCHI TOTAL DISSOLVED TO8 SOLIDS 100 mgrL 25 1 SM2540C 11011112014 11:41 GHLITCHI Certificate of Laboratory Analysis 11 ol2e This report shall not be reproduced, except in fuY Order # J14100268 Site: SW-3 Collection Dale: 13-Nov 1a 2:20 PM SamDle#: Matnx: 2D14029407 GW WW An*" Result Units Qua1ffiers ROL DF Method Ana"is Det*Mme Analyst INORGANIC IONS BY IC CNod7e 7.2 mg1L GA I EPA 300-0 111142014 17:04 BGN9034 Fluoride 0.12 mg1L 0.1 1 EPA 300.0 1111412014 17:04 BON0034 Nast. <0.1 mg1L 0.1 1 EPA 30D.0 11/14201417:04 BGN90M Ntrale as N 0.023 rrr9{4& 0.023 1 EPA 300.0 1 /1142014 17:04 BGN9034 Sulfate 8.7 mg& 0_1 1 EPA 300.0 111142014 17:04 BGN9034 MERCURY iCOL.D VAPOR) rN WATER Mercury (Hg) -0.05 u91L 0.05 1 EPA 245.1 12/0212014 11.44 DKJOHN2 TOTAL RECOVERABLE METALS BY ICP Barium (Be) 0.1136 mg/L 0.005 1 EPA 2W.7 lZG412014 12:28 MHH7131 Bow (B) �D.05 mg/L 0.05 1 EPA 200.7 12I041201412:28 MHH7131 Ghrornian (Cr) .0.008 mg1L O.OD5 1 EPA 200.7 12104r2014 12:20 MHH7131 Copper (Cu) <0.005 mg/L 0.005 1 EPA 200.7 12/DN201412:28 MHH7131 Iron (Fe) 0.4953 mgtL 001 1 EPA 200.7 12*412014 12:28 MHH7131 MelWn (Mn) D.004 M91L 0.005 1 EPA 200.7 12104201412:28 MHH7131 Nickel (Ni) <0,003 mg1L 0005 1 EPA 2DO.7 12ID4201412:28 MHH7131 Suer(Ag) <0.005 mgrL 0.005 1 EPA 200.7 t2104120141228 MHH7131 Zinc (Zr,) 0.009 mgL B 0.005 1 EPA Zoo 7 12JO412014 17 25 MHH7131 TOTAL RECOVERABLE METALS BY ICP-MS Arsenic (A3) < 1 ugL t 1 EPA 200.8 1120MM4 13:18 DJSLPLL7 Cadmium (Cd) .1 ugL I 1 EPA 200.0 111202014 13:18 DJSULL7 Led (Pt.) < 1 ugL 1 1 EPA 200.8 112012014 13:18 DJSt1LL1 Selenium (Se) .1 ugL 1 1 EPA 200.a 1202014 13:18 DJSULL7 Certificate of Laboratory Analysis 120128 This report shall not be reproduced, except in hill Order # A 4100268 Site: ❑l1P MW 3 SamDle #: 201402SOB Collection Date: 13-N0w14 2:37 PM Matrix: GW WW Am" Result Units Qualifiers RDL DF Mathod Anslyels Dat&M- Analyst INORGANIC IONS BY IC Chloride as -WL 2 20 EPA 30D.0 111142014 18:48 BGN9034 Fluoride 0.30 mglt 0.1 1 EPA 300.0 111142014 18:48 BGNOD4 Ntrale <0.1 mg1L 0.1 1 EPA 300.0 111t4201418:48 BGNG034 Ntrste a.N <0.023 mg-N1L 0.023 1 EPA 300.0 11114t201418:48 BGNOD34 Sulfate 1s mg1L 0.5 5 EPA 300.0 1W 4201416:48 BGND034 MERCURY (COLD VAPORI IN WATER Mowry (Hg) < 0.05 ug1L 0.05 1 EPA 245.1 1210212014 11:37 ❑KJOHN2 TOTAL RECOVERABLE METALS BY ICP Barium (Be) 0.175 mg1L 0.005 1 EPA 2DO.7 12O412014 12:03 MHH7131 Boron (B) < 0.05 mg/L 0_05 1 EPA 2W7 12/0412014 12:03 MHH7131 Chromium (Cr) < 0.005 m01L 0,005 1 EPA 200.7 121042014 12:03 MHH7131 Copper(C.) <0.005 mg7L 0,005 1 EPA 2007 12O41201412:03 MHH7131 Iron (Fe) 0.139 nrg/L 0.01 1 EPA 200.7 12AM12014 12:03 MHH7131 Mangsnese(Mn) 0.025 mglL 0,D05 1 EPA 200.7 121041201412:03 MHH7131 N"d(NI) <0.005 mg/L 0.005 1 EPA 200.7 121041201412:03 MHH7131 Sier(Ail) <0.005 MOIL 0,005 1 EPA 2W7 12/041201412:03 MHH7131 Zino(Zn) 0.032 mg1L B 0,005 1 EPA 2D07 lZNM201412:03 MHi-imi TOTAL RECOVERABLE METALS BY MEWS Arsenic (As) <1 ugtL 1 1 EPA 200,0 112012014 12M DJSl/LL1 Cadmium (Cd) < 1 ugtL 1 1 EPA 200.8 112012014 12:58 DJSULL7 Load (Pb) < 1 ug& 1 1 EPA 200.8 11202014 12:56 DJSLRL7 Selewm 15e) < 1 ug - 1 1 EPA 200.8 11202014 12.50 DJSULLI TDS Ito mgL 25 t SM2540C 1 111OW14 11-41 GFOITCHI TDS 420 MWL 25 1 swmuC 11119001411-41 GHUTCHI Certificate of Laboratory Analysis 13 of 28 This report shall not be reproduced, except in fuR. Order # J14100268 Certificate of Laboratory Analysis 14 e(28 This report shall not he reproduced, except in fug. Order # J14100268 Site: FIELD BLANK Sample 8: 2014029409 Site: L7 Sample N: 2014032048 Collection Date: 13-NOw14 2:40 PM Matrix: GW WW Collection Date: 13dkov 14 5:00 PM Matrix: GW WW Ana" Rasuh Units Gualftm ROL OF Method Analyst. DaWnma Ann" Anatyle R.-It UnRs Cluall lab. ROL OF Method Anay.is Oat.M- Analyst INORGANIC IONS BY IC INORGANIC IONS BY IC Chloride c 0.1 mgfL 0.1 1 EPA 300.0 11/14(2014 11:t4 OGN9034 Chloride 0.42 mg'L 0.1 1 EPA 3W.0 I If1 U2014 19:23 DGN9034 FI-W. c 0.1 mg1L 0.1 1 EPA 300.0 111`1412014 11:14 BGN9034 Fluoride c 0.1 mg1L 0.1 1 EPA 300,a 111142014 1923 BGN9034 Nitrate -0.1 MOIL 0.1 1 EPA 3000 111"1412014 11:14 BGN9C34 Nitrate 2.9 mglL 0.1 1 EPA 300.0 1111412D14 19:23 BGN9034 Waite as N c 0,023 mg-mn- 0 023 1 EPA 300.0 11f1412014 t 1:14 BG89034 Nitrate as N 0,65 mg -NIL 0.023 1 EPA 300.0 111142014 t923 DGN9034 S0.1. c 0A mglL 0.1 1 EPA 300.0 1101412014 11:14 DGN90, 4 Sunate 1.8 mg1L 0l I EPA 300.0 11114=14 19:23 BGN90M MERCURY (COLD VAPORI IN WATER MERCURY fCOLD VAPORI IN WATER tilarar7(Hg) <0.05 ugA 0,05 1 EPA 245.1 12M=01411:48 OKJOHN2 Manvny(Hg) <0.05 rgfL 0,05 1 EPA 245T 121=014 tt:45 DKI01-1112 TOTAL RECOVERABLE METALS BY PCP TOTAL RECOVERABLE METALS BY ICP Badum (Ba) -0.005 mg1L 0.005 1 EPA 200.7 121944-2014 12:07 MHH7131 Barium (Be) 0.000 mg4 0005 1 EPA 200.7 12J042014 t2:11 MHH7131 130mn (B) < 0.05 m94 0.05 1 EPA 200.7 12N412014 12 07 MHH7131 Boma (a) -0.05 mg1L D,05 1 EPA 2W 7 12f042014 12:11 MHH7131 chroMian(Cr) c0.005 Mg'= oom 1 EPA 200L7 IZM4r2014 t207 WH7131 Chromium(Cr) <0.005 MOIL 0.005 I EPA 200.7 12A 201412:11 MHH713i Copper (Cu) < 0.005 mglL 0,005 1 EPA 2001 12J0412014 12:07 MHH7131 Copper (Cu) -0.005 mgk (.D05 i EPA 200.7 12N42014 12:11 MHH713l Iron 1Fe) c 0.01 mgrl. 0.01 1 EPA 200.7 12f642014 1207 MHH7131 Iron (Fe) 0.023 mg1L 0.01 1 EPA 200.7 12f 2014 12:11 MHH7131 Ma ga a (Mn) <0.005 mgA- 0005 I EPA 2001 121642014 1207 MHH7131 Manganese (Mn) -0.005 M9& 0.DD5 1 EPA 200.7 12N42014 12:11 MHH7131 Nickel (Ni) c 0.005 mglL 0,005 1 EPA 200-7 12MV2014 12:07 MHH7131 Nkkal (Nit) < 0.005 mglL 0.DO5 1 EPA 200.7 12M4r2014 12: t t MHH7131 Sher(Ag) -0.005 mgrL 0.0M 1 EPA 200.7 12MW2014 12.07 MHH7131 S1wr (Ag) -0.005 mgrL 0.005 1 EPA 200.7 12JO412014 12:11 MHH7131 Zinc (Zn) 0.013 mgrL B 0.005 1 EPA 2001 12M412044 12:07 MHH7131 Zlm (Zn) 0.013 mg1L B a 9p5 1 EPA 2W.7 12M412014 12:1: t MHH7131 TOTAL RECOVERABLE METALS BY ICP•MS TOTAL RECOVERABLE METALS BY ICP-MS Arsenic (As) < I ugrL I I EPA 200.8 112(2014 13A4 13JSLJLLI A- (As) 6.51 ug1L 1 1 EPA 200.8 111207014 1,300 OJSULLt Cadmium (C(l) < I ug1L 1 1 EPA 200-8 112t 20t4 13.04 OJSULLI Cadmium (CC) < 1 u9A- 1 1 EPA 2W 8 11/20'2014 13,00 D,ISULLt Lead(Pb) cI ugL 1 1 EPA 200.8 1lr2C20141304 WSLXLI Land (Pb) <I ugfL I 1 EPA 2W8 1120201413:00 DJSVLLI selerdum (Se) < 1 ug& 1 1 EPA 2Wa 112(2014 13:04 WSULLI Salenilm (SO) 4 1 Ig& 1 1 EPA 200.8 111202014 13.00 DJSl1LL1 TOS c25 m91L 25 1 SLI2540C Ith W201411A1 GHBTCHI TOTAL D133OLVED SOLIDS TOS , 52 mgrL 25 1 SW54M 1 11%201411:41 GHUTCHI Qualifiers: B Target anslyle deteded in method blank at a abets the reporting limo. Target enayte canceraratm in mmpie is Inss than t OX the eon Mretion in the method blank. Anayte mn0entration In sample i-ld be duo to contamination_ Certificate of Laboratory Analysis 15 of 211 This report shall not be reproduced, except in full. Order# J14100268 Level 11 QC Summary Q14110302 COD CIIEJI ICAL OXYGEN DES41\D Blank # 1 Parameler kyasured F 1rel Unft. Pi fQL Rotative Co-Wratun ouafifiar COD 1.17 mgr- 1 20 12 RDL - Blank # 1 Pammeler Measured F'rml I�nils. 2 RDL Relathe Coral.[.. Quelfirer COD 3.16 mg& 1 20 RDL - IS # 1 Parameter Measured Final UmAL, DJ Seike %Recelery LrL USL O-lifie COD 104 -91 1 20 81.4 ISD # 1 PemmelerMe,5ured Final Units; !L E214 %-BeooKry LQL = BM OuelEer CA) 0 17A MWL 1 20 84.7 3.97 - IS #2 Parameter Measured Final Unrim 91 `y ilLke % Recovery 1.91 5&L Ouelifier COD 43.4 mglL 1 2D 101 - ISD # 2 Pemmeter 4 s rw FI-I QaftE Dd ik %,jj very V" RPD Qua ff COD 42.4 «g?L 1 20 063 5,00 - LCS # 1 Pammeler Measured EL Units: P-1 I n IM %Recovery I&L Qualifier COD 75.9 mgrl 1 77.9 97,4 Parameter M-$.t d Fill Un W. Dl 51ft 9L84J19120[ LGL ]jC1 ChW COD 75.0 Mgr- 1 77.9 97.4 - Certificate of Laboratory Analysis Page 100r 40 This report shall not be reproduced, except in 10. O rder # A 4100268 Level 11 QC Summary Q14110229 Diones ENORGANIC ION'S BY IC Blank # 1 Parameter Messlaed Elm Units: UPI Ba Relative Comxmmliun Qualifier Chloride 0.0440 0.0446 MDIL 1 0.1 < 12 RDL - Ruoride 0.0302 00302 rrlgrL 1 0.1 c 12 RDL Ndrate 0.0365 0.0305 mgrL 1 0.1 < D2 RDL - Sulfate -0 MIN -0-00000 mg4 1 0.1 < 112 RDL - IS N 1 Parameter Measured Fi-I Units: RII Ssike %Recovery LU.L Uhl qyWftl Chloride 10.1 10.1 mgrL 1 5 80 120 Fluoride 4.90 AIM mgr- 1 5 00 12D - Nilreie 639 5.30 mgrL 1 5 eD 120 - Surale 0.02 9.02 MWL 1 5 50 120 - ISD # t Parameter Mmsur'4 Floe! Undo: ad $12M %Rew+ery LQ U.0 RPD Quer Chloride 10.1 10.1 nWL 1 5 so 120 - Fluoride 4.97 4.97 mWL 1 5 90 120 - Nivate 5,30 5.36 M91L 1 5 so 120 - Sublie 9 9 mgrl 1 5 80 120 - LCS # 1 P".el Measured F10c1 UoAE DIl §010 %.R LSb USd QualRier Chloride 4.93 4.96 mglL 1 5 99.5 90 110 - Fluoride 5-05 505 mgA- 1 5 101 90 110 - Ndmfe 5.01 5.01 mgn- 1 5 100 90 110 - Sulfate 4,95 49e mgli- 1 5 90.2 90 110 - Certificate of Laboratory Analysis Page tIof48 This report shall not be reproduced, except in fug. Order # J14100268 Level II QC Summary Q14110346 HC 245.1 MERCURY {CO1,D VAPOR) M WATER a@ Mmumd F.MI 110AL 11 lzihg Yk Led Uct M-ry(Hg) 0783 0.763 LVL 1 1 763 70 130 - ISD # I Pa. in Me and R-1 SlL-ka; 21 %Remrerr LCL- UCL RPD 0- Marr:rry (Hg) 0.648 0.849 L9L 1 1 648 70 13D 10,6 - LCS # I Pomm0ffi Meaetaed irml il= Qy Spike % Rawrery Lq� UCL Qualifier M-ry (Hg) 1.88 1.88 UWL 1 2 94.1 65 115 - LCS tl2 Paiamaler Measured EUOj UDae: Qjl i91h9 %..Hsi+ S1f Lfl, U" -1 Merw1y (79) 1.88 1.88 uga- 1 2 94.1 85 115 - NIS H 1 Parrot Sample: 114110305 - 1014012-134 Pemmetar Measured Fine, jh= M Spike %RaCpve[Y LSL UCL Quslrrer Ma-ry(Hg) 9.99e 0,999 U91L 1 1 99.3 70 130 - h1SD 9 l Parini Sample 114119305 - 2014032234 Pon.= r hkjoyezo F1LJ UnW ag Spike % Re - LCL 99L RPD 0-1iF = Mmmry(Hg) 0.975 1 uglL 1 1 99,6 70 130 0,302 - MS M 2 Parrot Sample- 1141103D5 - 201403�2235 et M..,,ned Elml UILOL QU afiPlk9 % Reco LSd SIS& QLW Mererry{Hg) 0,9m 0.984 u90- 1 1 97.4 70 130 - hISD k 2 Parrot Sample: 1L4110305 - 1014032235 Pmameler Measured fjp,Je UDae: QP gp&n %R LSd Q" RPD Qualifier Meaerry(14g) 0075 0958 Ug4- 1 1 06.8 70 130 aria - NIS 63 Parrot Sample: J14110305 - 2014032-136 Flmmeler 4,�pa swell E&J V= Qj 12�S9 71BlL OI Lid 1K.L 1.lercrry(Hg) 0-90 0075 UYL 1 1 OB_4 70 130 - hISD ll3 Parent Searylr. A4110305 - 2014032-136 me Fig Final UDAL= Q1 Spke %Recovery L9k UCL RPD 0- Mercury 1R9) 0.975 0,907 uwt 1 1 99.6 70 130 1.21 - hI5 N 4 Parrot Smie,114110315 - 2014032 57 Pammasgi mmurw EMI VD11: Q9 E.1112 %Reomery CL1L 11CL 0- M-ry (Hg) 0,996 0,95 UWL 1 1 95.6 70 130 - hISD M 4 Parrot-' rTl- J14110315 - 2014032257 Parameter Measured Eb1 Units: Q1 50' a %Rxaaery LCL UCL RPD Oualefiar Marmry(Hal 0,975 0.947 4L 1 1 94,3 70 130 1.37 - Certificate of Laboratory Analysis Page Isaf48 This report shall not be reproduced, except in fug. Order N J14100268 Level 11 QC Summary Q14110.346 FIG 245.1 MERCURY (COLD VAPOR) IS WATER MS pis Panm Sample/14110315 - 2014032238 , Pammete Meowed R"I Uni 21 Spike % Reppvery Lid m $IE160f Mrcmy(H9) 099e 0984 Uga- 1 3 97.1 70 130 - MSD p 5 Parenu Sample 114110315 - 201403E-158 Perameler M Rr' n1 Units: J tj Spike % RecavarY LCL -VQ RPD OualRia M-ry (Hg) 0.975 a Um UD L 1 1 97.3 70 130 0,2M - MS N6 Parm Sample J1411030 - 2014032259 Pammeter Messu and Firm$ ; Spike % Remrery L&L m Qeal6w Meralry ft) 0.906 0.999 u94 1 1 98.5 70 130 - A1SD # 6 Parrot Sample: 114110315 - 2014032259 Parameter Mmauied � Unita: IL Spike % Rew LQL UQ HPIl Qualifier M-y (Hg) 0.975 0.078 LVL 1 1 06.4 70 130 2.15 - ms 07 Pumt Sample: J14110317 - 2014032261 Pammeft Measured Final Units: QA 3 iks % RQQm y Lr.L lmf Q9al {!4t Merary (Hg) 0-99a 098 uga- 1 1 98.5 70 130 - MSD 0 7 Parrot Semple J14110317 - 2DW12261 Pommetar MmaVBd Ein91 Units: Qj Spike %Re-g L" = RPD Quaifnr Mermry(Hg) 0.975 0,967 UWL 1 1 99.2 70 130 0.708 - MS H 8 I'mmi Sample: 114110317 - 2DW3Z-262 eammeter +msAi d Fi-I UDas: 211 $pike % Rappvery LrL = Quel Mermry(Hg) 0.906 0,972 uad- 1 1 97.4 70 130 - A1SD NO Pumt Sample: J14110317 - 2014012262 Pammele MJm5umd Final UnrW, IM SpM % Recwm LSri = am cwITKK Memory Mel 0975 0.904 uwL 3 1 Sae 70 130 1-22 - AS k9 Puml Sample: J14110317 - 20)4012264 Pamml:ig Messumd Ees1 Stalls: Q1 Mp v %-RSA LSd I&L Mererry Mel 0,9" 121 uwL 1 1 97.7 70 130 - MSD M9 Perm Samlle 114110317 - 2014012264 Pamlrsig (m3.wmd FkW UndE Q3 Sake % Rem e v L1'L V" Em 0e61L"R M-ry (5e) 0.975 1.22 ug'L 1 1 99,4 70 130 1.73 - MS N 10 Pwcn1Sample. 114130320 - 20MI2274 Pemmeter Mmslred Fin -I UDtw. IZ4 Spike %99lSSO( LQ.L L&L a0u err M-ry (Hg) 0.998 0.906 LVL 1 1 99.5 70 130 - hISD M 10 Perm le. 1141L0320 - :014032274 Elm Measumd Efml UnkE Q] Spike %Recmav LCL UP! RPD ¢ygfQgJ LW-ry (H9) pal$ 0075 ug4 1 1 97.4 70 130 2,13 - Certificate of Laboratory Analysis Page 10 of 40 This report shall riot be reproduced, except in full. Order # J14100268 Level 11 QC Summary Q14120048 IM 245,1 MERCURY (COLD VAPOR) IN RATER Blank 01 PROMMI M.Msumd Rml Unas 011 f iL Rolay+ C—mration Queffer Mary (Hg) -0,003 •0.003 ug1L 1 0.06 < 112 RDL - Blank # 2 Pammela Measured U-1 VaLt : 211 RUL Relathe C--Mration Oua1 fier Meraary (HU) 0,003 0.003 LVL 1 0.05 < V2 RDL - IS # I Parameter Mm- dd Fi I U= D1 Spike %Recavcry LCL UCL 0y81dID[ Mercury(Hg) 0,702 0702 UG& 1 1 69,4 70 100 - ISD 4 1 Parameter Measued Flea! Unda; Q1 Soitm % Racoeery lu U.QL RRP ()Uali I Mar-ry(Hg) 0722 0,722 U9& 1 1 714 70 130 2.84 - LCS # I Pammele Measured FVml Sl06a: DJI Spike %Racavery LCL UCL Qual Fur Merwry (Hg) 1.9 1.9 LIA 1 2 95 05 115 - LCS # 2 P.,mele 4 aei F�-1 U= QA Spike %Recavery LCL UCL 0 av 1iFier Mercury (Hg) 1.93 1.93 LIGA 1 2 96.3 85 115 - MS # 1 P..t Samgla J14110440 - 2014032935 Parameter MM3 EiWJ Units: 01 Spike %Recrovan LCL UCL U81%r M—,Y (Hg) 0.96 0.96 U91L 1 1 98.5 70 130 - MSD # 1 Pasmt Sample J14110440 - 2014032336 ParaMater M"3111d EM Una,. DU §vlha % Recvlery LQL m RRP Qualifier Merctry(HO) 0055 0.955 rrgfL 1 1 98 70 130 0519 - MS # 2 Parm1 Sample 114110402 - 2014032684 P-1010 M"Swed F)esl Slang: Qll ;i b 7ELid UQL Qw Marrvry (Hg) 0.99 099 ugfL 1 1 909 70 130 - :1ISD #2 Patrol Sample.. J14110702 - 2014032694 Parameter Mm2wW FkW Unila; 2� $Ch2 SR LU Ug& RPU 0ue1i(er M—ry(H9) 0.955 0,955 rlga 1 1 95.4 70 130 3.0 - MS Al 3 P-d Saraplf" 114110401 - 2014032683 Parameter Measured F1m1 Units; 21 ik %Reoovery LCL UCL at Mercury (Hg) 0.881 0.801 UWL t 1 85 70 130 - MSD # 3 Parrot Sample. 114110401 - 1014032693 Parameter y96pumd aw Unite: Q] Spike %Raeovaly LCL UCL RPD Qualifier Marary (Hg) 0 a5a 0 A58 rrglL 1 1 84.7 70 130. 0,354 - Certificate of Laboratory Analysis Page 20 of 40 This report shall not be reproduced, except irl full. Order# J14100268 Level 11 QC SUmman. Q14120048 I1G 245.1 MERCURY (COLD VAPOR) IS 1VATER MS 04 Parrot Saatplr_ J14100169 - 201402W8 Parameter ""3-d Fo_ml Units: Qi Spike S Ra000ery Ll;& M Quarfier Me ry (Hg) 0.968 0.968 trglL 1 1 96.3 70 130 11SD 94 Parm[Sawk J14100268 - 2014029408 Parameter (;7msu E-1 Units: 0 Spike %Rearrery LCL UCL RPU Qual y Mmeury (Hg) 0.953 0.953 WL 1 1 94.0 70 130 i.57 - NIS #5 Pawn Sample: f14100291-2014029495 Porn elpr Maaarred F1na1 S1 L EN Spike J.RQWVMV LQL JLQ QU.1�4I M-ary (Hg) 0.966 0 966 u DA- 1 1 96.4 70 130 - MSD # 5 Parrot S-pk; 114100'_'91 - 2014029495 PalamMmureol FL Unds. Q.L aMtM %Re "fv LGL US'I 2m oufl�s W- y (Hg) 0.944 0,944 UWL 1 1 94.2 70 130 2.31 - Certificate of Laboratory Analysis Page 21 of 46 This report shafl rot be reproduced, except in full. Order # J14100268 Level 11 QC Summar Q14110232 ICP_1'R.V TOTAL RECOVERABLE META1 S BY ICP Certificate of Laboratory Analysis Peg. 22 o148 This report shall not be reproduced, except in full. Order# J14100268 Level II QC Summay Q14110232 ICP-TRAI TOTAL RECOVERABLE METALS BY ICP Blank N I AISD N 1 POMMet Mea-ed Final UnM , DI B2L Rutalim Q000emmlion Qualifier Pemmefer Barium (Be) -0.000109 -0000100 mglL 1 TW5 < 11Z ROL - Iron (Fe( B 6 Boron (B) 0.000074 1 000074 mWL 1 0,05 � 12 ROL - Mang- (Mn) 5.19 5.19 Chromium(Cr) -0.0001 D9 -0000t09 mgrL 1 0,005 <V2 RM - Nickel(NV) 5.15 515 Capptr (Cu) 0.000214 0.000214 mgrL 1 0005 < 12 ROL - Slim (Ag) 0.403 0.403 Imn (Fe) -0.00034 -0.00034 mgrL 1 0.01 � 12 ROL - Zinc (Zn) 5.21 621 Mang.-(Mn) -0.00023 -0.00023 mgR 1 0.005 < 12 ROL - ASS N 2 Nickel (Ni) -0.000301 -0.D00301 m9'L 1 0.005 , 12 ROL - Pommel m mel S11wjAg) -0W212 -0OW12 m91L 1 0,005 ,tt2 ROL - Bedum (Be) 5.50 5.19 Zinc (Zn) 0.00581 0.00601 m94 1 0,005 > ROL - Borvn(B) 5 02 5.02 LCS N 1 Chmmiun (Co 521 521 PammewMeaslaed F.-I ILni : QI 2wj4 % Reaovery Lr- Im Ma115er Come, (Cu) Soo 5.06 Barh- (Be) 5.26 520 m94 1 5 105 85 115 Iron (Fe) 5.07 5.87 Be-JB) 5.11 5,11 mgrL 1 5 102 85 115 Marlgsro (km) 523 523 Chmmhan (CO 531 5.31 mo& 1 5 108 a5 115 - Nickel (Ni) 5,16 5.16 Capper Mu) 52 5.2 mgrL 1 5 104 85 115 - Si-(Ag) 0,485 0405 Imn (Fe) 5 26 5.26 mVL 1 5 105 as 115 - Zinc (Zn) 5.2 5.2 Mangan (W) 527 5.27 m9'L 1 5 105 85 115 - A15D N 2 Nickel (Ni) 5.3 53 mUIL 1 5 106 85 115 - Pir.re[841-et MeeSured Final SIW(Ag) 0.407 0.407 mQfL 1 0.5 09.3 85 115 - Baer 523 523 Zinc (Zn) 5.32 5.32 m9 1 5 106 a5 115 - (B) BoranrL lB) 5.05 5.05 NIS N 1 Pumt 5a..plc 114100268 - 2014029400 Chromium (CO 528 5.28 Paramrrler Measured F.-I ullbe QI §mU 'lLE LCL m Q1mll Copp-(Cu) 5.11 5m Bark -(Ha) 542 542 -01 1 5 l05 70 130 Imn [Fe) 54 5.9 Fio n(8) 5.13 5.13 m91L 1 5 102 70 130 - - Margeneae(Mn) 5.26 5,26 Chromium (CI 5.26 5.20 mgrL 1 5 1D5 70 130 - Nickel (Ni) 5.2 52 Copper (Cu) 5.13 5.13 mWl- 1 5 103 70 130 Sher (Ag) 0.491 0.491 Imn(Fe) 6,04 0.04 mgrL 1 5 1D8 70 00 Zim(2n) 524 524 Maroen (Mn) 524 5.24 mg& 1 5 104 70 t30 Nickel (Ni) S.10 5.1B mgrL 1 5 104 70 l30 - Slw (Ag) 0.404 0404 m9rL 1 0.5 95.7 70 MO Zinc(Zn) 5.25 5.25 mgrL 1 5 105 70 130 - MSD N 1 Pmml Smnpler 1141 D0268 - 20140294DO Pm.m Mms" FLnal Uni[s: QI 5911k9 Sk.Ba> Y LSL Sl.GL 822 QuWft Badum(821 537 5,37 m9fl- 1 5 104 7D 130 0978 - ob- (8) 5.1 6.1 m9rL 1 5 102 70 130 0.705 - Chmmium(Cr) 5-24 524 m9rL 1 5 105 70 130 04" - Copper (Cu} 5AI 5.11 mgr- 1 5 102 70 130 0.332 Pumt"-Vle 114100269 - 2014029400 Unw, QI fiC 2 %Recavery VC 1JCL RPC Quall(ler mgrL 1 5 107 70 130 0.071 - MWL 1 5 103 70 130 0,903 - mgrL 1 5 103 70 130 0,405 - mgrL 1 0.5 98.8 70 130 0,155 - mgLL 1 5 104 70 130 0,613 Parent Sample: J14100268 - -1014029407 Un1 ; Qll §wu 7<L8 LSL IKL g1$1Y�! -WL 1 5 103 70 130 - Mort- 1 5 100 70 13D - OWL 1 5 104 70 13D - Mort- 1 5 101 70 130 - mgrL 1 5 104 70 130 - MorL 1 5 103 70 130 - mgrL 1 5 103 70 130 - m9rL 1 0.5 97.3 70 130 - mgrL 1 5 104 70 130 - ParmtSample: J1410026K - 20140294D7 uJe PI k[ 14 t2 m LQL S&L RPD Qualft -WL 1 5 104 70 130 0.676 - -OFL 1 5 t01 70 130 0.590 - mgrL 1 5 t05 70 130 1.34 - UVL 1 5 102 70 130 0,004 - m9dL 1 5 10.5 70 130 0.593 OWL 1 5 103 70 130 o.099 - mg4 1 5 104 7O 130 0.714 - nwL I. 05 06.4 70 130 1.06 - -WL 1 5 106 TO 130 0,921 - Certificate of Laboratory Analysis Page 23 c148 This report shall not be reproduced, except in full. Order # J14100268 Level II QC Summan- Q14110235 IAIS_TRM TOTAL RECOVERABLE A TALS BY [CP-NIS Blank 41 Pentmeler Measued Final Units', 0 E01 Reletrve Con--Mratlon Qu lifer Aomlic (As) 0.0109 0.0169 u91L I 1 < 112 RDL - Cadmum (Cd) 00069 09089 -A 1 1 < 112 RDL - Lead (Pb) •0.0017 -0.0617 uglL 1 1 < 112 RDL - Selenium (Se) 00402 0.0402 ug+L 1 1 < 112 RDL - Thallium (TI) Law Level -0.0393 -0.0393 uglL 1 0,2 < 112 RDL - Les #I Paremelar Measured FI-I ni 91 jWhg %Reco Lr�l. �Lu QueliTier Anteni. (As) 61.3 51.3 ug& 1 50 103 65 115 - Cadmklm (cd) 62.3 52.3 uglL 1 50 l05 85 115 Lend (Pb) 51.8 51.8 ugk 1 50 ID4 65 1l5 - Selene -(se) 51 51 ug1L 1 50 102 85 115 - Thellum CTI) Low Level 51.8 51.8 r91 1 50 104 a5 115 - MS 01 Pared Sample J[41D0269 - 20]40294CO Parameter Measured Final Units: 94 Soike % Recovery Cy . UK& Qunlifi r Arsenic (As) 51 51 u94 1 50 102 70 130 - Cadmk-(Cd) 50.4 50.4 u91L 1 50 101 70 130 - Leed (Pb) 515 515 a91L 1 50 103 10 130 Selenium (se) 49.4 49.4 u171- 1 50 98A 70 130 - Thallium (TI) Lon Level 51.1 51.1 u91L 1 50 102 70 130 - MST) tl l Parrotsamrle 114lM269 - 2014029400 Pommel er 1010as14ed am U= IN Solke % ReMvery LQ U" EM Qy Ie f r Anerlic(As) 50.4 50.4 uwL 1 50 lot 70 130 1.09 Cedmium(Cd) 505 505 ug- 1 50 lot 70 130 0.198 - Laed (Pb) 50.9 50.9 LVL 1 50 102 70 130 1.23 - Sewwrm (Se) 502 502 ugrL 1 50 1J9.9 70 130 1.49 - Th.9um (TI) Low Level 50.8 50.8 uwL 1 50 101 70 130 0.747 - AIS 9 2 Parrot S,t.Vic 314100269 - 2014029407 Peremeter Meesured Final Units: 01 59M %Recrovery LCL UCA QveUer Arsenic (As) 51 51 ugiL 1 50 101 70 130 Cadmkml (Cd) 49.8 40.8 u9fL 1 50 99.5 70 130 - Leed(Ph) 51.1 51,1 uglL 1 50 102 70 130 - Selenium (Sal 52.1 52,1 ug'L 1 50 lot 70 130 - Thallium (TI) Law Level 50-9 50,9 uwL 1 50 102 70 130 - S1SD ti t Parml tiample: 114100268 - 2014029407 Pemmeler t Final Unaa Q S.ike L0L UQL EM Quo, fef Assume (A31 5D.5 50.5 u9'L t 50 101 70 13D 0,891 - Certificate of Laboratory Analysis Peg. 24 o148 This report shall not be reproduced, except in tuff. Order 0 J14100268 Level 11 QC Summary Q14110235 I?IS TR,v1 TOTAL RECOVERABLE W.-TA LS BY ICP-ATS h1SD M 2 Parrot Sanmle: J141DO268 - 2014029407 Parameter Mwsued ELel Un" IIi $olke Wt. IKL RPD Qual Cadmkxn (W) 48.8 48.0 u911- 1 50 973 70 130 1.85 - Lead (Pb) 51,2 51.2 -9A 1 50 102 70 130 0.0783 - Selenium (Se) 52,5 52.5 ugR 1 50 105 70 130 0.633 - Thellium (TI) Low Lawl 50.4 50,4 u9R 1 50 101 70 13D 0.988 - Certificate of Laboratory Analysis page 25 o140 This report shall not be reproduced, except in tuff. Order # J14100268 Level II QC Summary (214110267 TDS TOTALDISSOLVFDSOLIDS Duplicate # 1 Parrot Saalplc: 114110003 — 1014031127 PMR10V M�Sumd BOW SNP: TpS 90 mKpt 1 6.45 - Duplicate # 2 F—IS.M11 1141100D3 — 2014031132 Pa.. Mmswod Fimll UnRs: L RPD Qual�er TDS 84 ng1L 1 2.41 - PemmII14I Measured Fins1 li0l67: IN -!PI-kg 'riRecoMery LQL 1tr.L QuaFfier TDS 27 IVL 1 100,4 98,e 90 110 - Certificate of Laboratory Analysis Page 211 e149 This report shah not be reproduced, except in tuff. Order # J14100268 Level Il QC Summary Q14110290 TDS TOTAL DISSOINFD SOLIDS Blank # 1 Pasameler MASVSffi Inn units: oil fM ReWIrve QA centminn Qua TDS 0 mg(L 1 25 112 RDL Duplicate # 1 Purrs Sampte: 114100269 — ?014032048 Pemmeter Mmssaed Eh)sl Ong 1Z RPD Q11!' �q[ TITS 55 mVL 1 5.51 - Duplicate # 2 Puws S.mp1c: J141ID305 -- 2014032235 Pa�claT Meaaved Fi-1 UntS PL RPQ Qgjil Tp3 217 -91L 1 2.33 - LCS it 1 Plammete Men &W Un� Oil kitia 2j H LQL U-CL svelte TDS 09 MWL 1 1n0.4 98,6 90 110 - / a a x ^• u — F ec I mo � Usly. M r it IRd O O U o .... '"at yyn��y M •��•y.s.� Iw CGIIiAl is 4.W. ft H'Y lit G -11fi ..r+a �('�` 2fi0.siG3?2 7 0 qp� li Qm� i�toy O c e�i N � � b p� fi y. ? N C� DUNCE ENERGY. PROGRESS Mr. !lave Parnell North Carolina Division of Energy, Land and Mineral resources Raleigh Regional Office 3800 Barrett Drive Raleigh, NC 276011 File: 12520 R 12566 C Subject: Mayo Monofill Project Surface Water sampling results COC#t: NCG120101 Person County Dear Mr. Parnell: Mayo Stearn Plant Duke Energy Progress 10660 Boslon Road Roxboru, NC 27574 1UN - 9 2014 NO ,IN,, ROI(Pth Regional 0Mce In accordance with the requirement found in the subject permit, enclosed please find results from the initial surface water sampling done at the Mayo monofill. These sampling results are from the "pre- operational" samples taken in accordance with the Surface Water Quality Monitoring Plan required by the North Carolina Division of Solid Waste. Future sample results will be sent to you using this same format. Please contact Mr. Shannon Langley at (919) 546-2439 if there are any questions with this submittal. i certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with o system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. 1 am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations. Sincerely, G'V�VI/v'l William 1. cker, Plant Manager Mayo Electric Generation Plant WJ7/esl wwmduke-energy,<:orn 0 ` q.37 ♦ SEQIMENTTRAP t .' �� MW! , 5,t Z 0 Z U } RAILROADLu SEDIMENT y TRAP ALE I, �• tis`' SOIL arOC► P $ I °. 5' n•�-/ 1 � PHASE 1 asp t Y, * e/ , ACCESS ROAD we y LEACHATE ( y 111r .'v YY'q. �' •-✓",Y SAMPLE L-1 1 - %• eEs{r � LOCATION t I - O�v UNPAVEDROAD � l k 4 y 413 . _.., � •�, ,gin � � �':y`,j- : w ,,,,� � SEDIMENT BASIN �„n sr}�jt j LISIITI OIF WASIE " (APPROXIMATE) �,c NCE* v� . K• t _ *'- 111 �57 REVIEW BOUNDARY •.� , ^� N �� *' '1 w 3 � . p (APPROXIMATE) p A7 �E * if COMPLIANCE66UNQARI' - ,_:r-r'•��r',�..•-''� h ,h}'1 w' �.`-.--,—z �•- (APPROXIMATE) "� �+� s w+j-' •'p i to is Cam. � ♦'� ..ti- DUKE ENERGY y.CG C< n.i, TY BOUNDARY evPRUPEA¢�i< y � Ya r w,• •y} JJJ�,F •'difr •'fit`- p x f 131.E�?00 #, DASE MAP PPOVIDEO flY DUNE CN!IkCr. 2. CONIOUMS FOP PHASE I ARE fy}1 GRADING PLAN • TtlP OF LINER bRAWIr+G ND, IFC-27 (GOLVER ASSOCIA'ILS, INC.). SWA 'F��MW1 I,� :�r _ y ` GKUUNUxATER IlOmrvaac WELL �A� file+-t.cE WATER Snn ,ulp LU".r.riere 49;1 Lmrr OP 5vA3ie fahrwm. LhW-YLL REVIEW 90W�DuN fAr+,'+k-P; �I' r� .,h rye ti--,...ti,.,,,,.w,.-.• ---- LaNyr�,4 CoHY�.�ArFCa Oour+Unvar fA �,r�r,.) DUKE ENiRGT PRp+E9r1 flouN7n:{r STRIAm ELI1rccGaaUNpSir>i•ncsGu+Twm �7@ •'s - �y - nosi I G-,UJNO SUWACE LCN1'UyYr, Ppoi:6 17Gr or LINER tOWNR SG4l_E (FEET) 3DJ 0 SDp 00a i rrrw kti rw16 � W dW� tart. J$ntl C.Rt-lL M'. Wd77 SAMPLE LOCATIONS MAYO ELECTRIC GENERATING PLANT CCP MONOFILL, PHASE 1 PERMIT NO. 7305 JUNE 5, 2014 PICiUAE� �� 2 Table 1- Field Data Parameters -July 2013 Duke Energy/Mayo Electrkc Generating Plant CCP Monofdl, Phase 1- Permit No- 7305 WELL DEPTH TO WATER AVERAGE WELL EVAC SPECIFIC SAMPLE DEPTH WATER ELEV. PURGE PUMPRATE VOLUME VOLUME EVAC TEMP CONDUCTANCE pH TURBIDITY- ORP• Do. DATE SAMPLE ID (feeg f feet APPEARANCE ODOR METHOD m min Ilony Ilona nb do umho cm SU) (NTU) (mV-NHE m 7/10/2013 MW-1 40.26 18.40 48L78 Clear wltn Fines None LF 100 3,57 1-00 No 19.2 335.5 6.1 14.8 129.9 31.5- 7/10/2013 MW-2 7d.97 40.82 421-33 Clear with Air Bubble$ None LF 120 5.57 1.00 No 1&4 636 6.9 8.3 278 8.96 7/10/2013 MW-3 53.26 d3.85 392.27 Clear None LF 180 L53 L25 No 18.5 802 6.8 6.4 158 7,77 7/1O/2OL3 Mw-0 38.90 35,44 38&28 Clear None LF 80 0.56 0.25 No 2L6 922 6.5 i.3 -606.0•• 539 7/10/2013 MW-5 51-69 24.90 407.98 Clear None LF 100 4.40 0,25 No 244 586 7.2 1.6 226 8.17 7/10/2013 SW-1 N/A N/A N/A Not Noted None N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 24.3 247.3 6.7 N/A -63.6•' 4.09 1/10/2013 SW-2 N/A N/A NIA Not Noted None N/A N/A NIA WA N/A 25.4 146.8 7.4 N/A •97.4" 7.22 7/10/2013 SW-3 N/A N/A N/A Not Noted None N/A N/A N/A WA N/A 260 109.: 6.6 N/A -113.6rf 6.74 NoieS: L A,rge Methods. LF•LO,. Flow. LFtv)-Low Flow Modlf,ea, CP-Convenllenal Pure 13-5 wait voiumesl NP-r;v Purge (ttydraSleer,e), EOP• E4u=.pmer4 Orly Pwge. Arerrge pump fete epPUCAbte -a Lr alp LFIMVw VAK only. 2. Fail sampling performed by SynTerrd Coroorador personnel. 3. EVAC indicates whe7,ar"water level in the wait was draw n Clown to me level of L'M PUMP during pmvn& 4, uMl`Weln I' Mwtek micro nep5 per cenl,Meter. 5. mL/min irtdleales mi! ihten per Minute. 6. SU indcates S:anda d unrb 7. NTU l dreate5 NepheiumeVlb Tufbidiq Oniu. 8. Mv-NhE Indlples milTivotts-,\ormal Hycroger, F7edrode. 9. MLIL maleates rmlhgrams oef Me, 10, N/A edKatas nm 3ophe4bie, 1L - SrnTena Coroorauoe is not t.t-cerb!:ea Tor these Parafw.er Dina colkctee for �rtorrnruon purposes any. 12. •• inaleates uta- al readurgs noted during data Witeotion. meter Probe was covey mslle JQmnl durint field measuremenls 13, Informabon Provided by DukC Ener6' m October 2, 2013. page 1 of 1 Table 3 -Surface Water Field and Analytical Results -July 2013 Duke Energy/MayD Eiecuic Generating Plart CCP Monofili, Phase i - Permit M0. 7305 Sample Me: JWy i0. 2013 Lattoiamry Ce.^.ar-w' rates: SynTerra Ca=mtbn Field •M'41 Flee Sampling PDXMed W SynTesra ramoratton Wee Enerfi Analyticai Labcrattwy 4243 Pace Analytical Services, Mc.a40 ft mtttmr SW5 J0 Units CefVftcato Code Sar ;e Location SWSL 15A WCAC 2B 7305 5OV-1 73D5 SW-2 7305 SW3 Field p)i 320 So! a591 6.7 T.A 6h NE FNE 6.09.0 epeorz Cdnductantt 323 Untro/cm 5591 241 I 141 L10 NE Temperature 325 T 5591 24.3C 25AD 2aOD NE NE tLsenl: 14 PVL 248 149 1, 0.1.38 1 11561 J 10 10 Banvm 15 PUL 248 "„emsl 4'478 27,2 r .yut9Z':p 100 200.OW l BUD 316 pg/L 40 2500 U 2,0DO U 102.000 U NE NE Barn 429 WL 248 5,04 J 11'.3 J 4.1 J NE NE Cacmium 34 A911- 248 0-101 U 0.101 U 0.101 U 2 Cldaride 455 ,IIL 24a 4480 6.110 3-a30 ME 73U.te00 .arromium 51 PPA 216 2.49 J 0.5 U ?.3:4,. LO 50 COD 317 at%r'L 248 26,i0C 1 5.110 J 3,780 U � NE Copper 54 µErL 248 101 J 1.19 1 's`'tr. -- 7,m 10 7 FhmmOe 312 yg/L 248 257 f 244 / 153 f 2.000 1.800 kon 340 pgrl 248 ;v-.`SE�7M.'i! :§,.*:CI= r7 i"-3i.GU0%f 300 LOOO Lead 2,51 µg/L 248 1A2 f flA74 1 3-22 f 10 25 ASanEanr,e 342 PVL 249 ..4�S70Y x$il .Glp-q 3F3' 50 YE Mefcury 132 oErL .248 OA06 U 0.006 U 0.02 ) 0.2 0.012 Nickel 152 ug/L 248 2.11 1 05 U 225 r 50 68 Abate (as t::;;ogenl 303 4ErL 248 2, 1 f 94-5 T 922 f 70.000 WE I Selenium 183 WL 246 126 f 0,999 J Lns r ID 5 surer 184 mVL '14& 0.7 U 0.7 U 0.7 U SO OAG Surate 31S MVL 248 16,200 f 6.720 -P 4.770 f 250,000 NE Thatlium 19A MVL 248 0.123 U O.i33 U 0.133 U &5 aAT TOC 357 ;WA 248 � i2.10D 5.630 3,680 1 4E NE T&A DmsoNed Solids 311 µIL 248 2'40,000 104.000 2G6,000 riE 4E DIC 213 PVL 1 248 5.55 f 2.6 U "�K33,3_?y 1 10 1 50 dates: 1. Cancenaatrom presemetl In mraogaren an liter f oLR7- 2. SWS 0 la L9c Sofro Waste SeeWn Idert eetion Number. 3. ShrSt Is me Sufic WrI tte Section Lhnit. NCOU41 dct:r,s the SwSL as Ina In a sm-Ne drat osrr be gt rY,ai7rely de•.enviaed with svnn9le W-Aft w, Nr d accaocy. A. SSA NCAC 23 Swda,d Is Iram'Na:, Car43wa Adrmm=ej" Cage, T,de 15A--Derrarrnwc a Emtra-snent ana ruKvid Rvsw, s. S,bwpk, i g-Sur!aee W*W and fretW S•,sIV-udL- itaat X-vm ed m vt , t, 1047J tm Refs C w9 a-m 5- :ire mew" za Nyw Rna me CxSHxtl a5 C = C wad -ReLutatlan 15A NetC V8.0211 amro7es wrtn gcak V s'.anda,ec tar Crass C wA;ers- Reteretra t5A NCAC 2H .C206 Ctar, 'rmtiorrs aid water OuMty Standugs Adpdeaote m 5onace W sters riC. amtneed EtsaMv.4, May 1, 2007. fv Grayed q4hd,=O,awes that atlas, a, r-reed the SWSL mamAr". .. 7. HWd value•. Indieae v,rwes mat Kt4�n :+r eweed tfw 15A stG4L 2B Standara. 8. � ineserla rot esraot5hed. HL•N,cc,s mekyte that mere is rro mto,na0an retc ant m d,e ,es: ectl.eiaw. 9_ � flUzraars in nee .eUemd x+e are kfwa:ary data quar ..ies o Migs'. 1r Is uses to U-Vy =Lfts rmt=ereCed Al smt - brx4or3 Watt attain Vc taLb,aMWa metnx ,tewcLa Ihmj&A7LL 'r is used to akn:ry est"ated wn-m-lion. wt4m attar, a txcm6 Ne MDL cut are tali' - V. L bwal es P ckwl rmp eirq am IURLL An R&U:I" f-aL m a data culler, ae0.d by HDR In imiwr mnmw.**ons wrvz!� a7s4n w e.ceed the ta3rnamr/s MRL VA Me Jem than tee SWSL I0_.Acconi tL totrm CmWtx ens LAmkvp we7paCe an the W-DE 4R 061.3,m et waste Ltanaie"wn w-tpaye. dare is "SWSL St4:Hlerd rw Ctende asspaautd wlm CAS iur,:bOr I6S5 NXIc whin Ir Lrta CAS TIpona1 gythe cmw4rLwy to Ile anays-s c:ar„pleted. Therefore, thr SWSL SLndaro llsted It tar the cr4o:d9 wtct CAS m mhsr SwnI as stvW%d on ore Cwr MmA L4ah-ao wftomre I1aSLZW5Ud June 13. 2011L 11- SU Irmic es Standard Urals. 12-ftWdrn wawtes nWarrVlCl per Comiltetw. 1.i HOD tndifataa bk1her i al M.%m dew�. OW IrNgeates dreniftl g yten ee.QM. TOC Ired cm- mt)1 wL¢r a trDer,. 14_ Anatyee,!t reaWts db'tM and tmm Elearanie Data Deti able if:J37', arot*$ed by Duce FAerty on Dr.Ma 2, 2073. Table 5 - Field and Analytical Results that Equal or Exceed 15A NCAC 2B Surface Water Quality Standards -July 2013 Duke Energy/Mayo Electric Generating Plant CCP Monofill, Phase i - Permit No. 7305 Sample Date: July 10. 2013 Feld Sampling performed b/ SpTerra Cdrporaiion Parameter Sample ID Result Units 2B Standard HiStDrloal Concentrations Cau" and Significance Copper 1-11-3 48.7 pg& 7 48.7 This is he first sampling event at SW-3. Iron SW"1 16.700 P&A .1 16,700 This is the first sampling event at SW-1. SW-3 31,600 OWL 31,600 This is the fist sampling event at Notes! L 15A NCAC 2B Standard K Irun'.4orth Lacuna Administrative Code, Title I54 Daparment of Envi•onmon: and Natural Resources. Subchapter 28, Surface Water and Wetland Standards,' (last amended on May 1, 2007) for Class C waters. 2. Anatytical results obtained rron Electronic Data Deliverable (EDC) provided by Duke Energy on October 2. 2013. 3. pVL indi=eg micrograms per Ieer. 4. Kstoritat concentrations [lased on data in Duke Erergy reSuhS databage. Page 1 at 1 Table 6- Fleld Data Parameters -August 2013 Duke Energy/Mayo Electric Generating Plant CCP Monoff[l, Phase I - Permit No. 7305 WELL, DEPTH TD WATER AVrr�E WELL EVAC SP=lc SAMPLE DEPTH WATER ELEV. PURGE RIMP RATE VOLUME VOWA(E EV4C TZV? CONDUCTANCE vH TLIMDirY• omp. DO' DATE SAMPLE10 ff-M (feet) (mall APPEl1RANrE ODOR METt106 (TL/:rt?.-.) 22110n6) (ItiWOM) (yW'/m) (d"C) Inrrho/etn) (SLn CRTU) (rzt"wq tmyD 8/21/2013 V%1-1 40.26 1&53 4EL55 t7cv Nwe LF 90 354 1.00 NO 18.8 33J-6 6.3 141 253 L53 8/2112O13 MY-2 76.27 42.D7 42O.Oe Cle.lr None L° 140 .537 L50 Na 1&7 663 7.1 1OB 12&9 3.29 6/22.12013 6(W--3 53.26 43.69 392.A3 pear !tine LF 170 1.56 1.5O 140 :6.4 7Laa 6.9 7.94 159 3.24 W721/2013 MW-4 39,90 35.65 3S&O7 Ci44r !inn& LF 140 0.53 1.00 .ND 18.3 974 6.6 9.12 1123 1,40 8,x2V2O13 "At5 50.83 2094 411-94 Clen! None LF 100 5.05 0.25 440 1&3 572 7.4 '5.5 7.2 0.39 8/2T/2013 SW-1 NIA N/A N/A Clear with Iron Flocs Nme NIA N/A N/A N/A N/A 21.4 233.7 7.6 2L9 -9.6 4,00 9/22/2013 SW-2 N/A k/A Nti A Clear None N/A N/A NIA N(A N/A 22.3 120.4 7.5 4.29 i49.2 6.2; 8/22J2O13 SW-3 N/A NIA WA Uor: Tart None N/A N/A NIA N/A N;A 23.6 1.15 7.3 43.2 t46.2 5.93 Notes: L Purge aAevtods; LF-,.ar, Flaw, LF;ntS-Lew Flow 140E;Le0. CP-C.ant*dxw21 Purge i35 wr,9 voeares3. NP-No R=te ll+lcraSlx•e). EOP-Equc<aas[ OMI Rees, Avexe,r! Prmq raft s0pt,,Dl: to LF ar. LFi%llpL," eay. 2. f4dd Sampin C Perdrmed oy S)mTe m Cornwalran perSwh' st. _ 3. E1AC erapates.me--mr the watrr level in the +d1 was moan down to 3. WM of the pore dorlr.f.X er,r2- d. W-1,0/om Indicras -= m!MS p'_r Ceftn ves. 5. MVW mdwias MwI tan Pn mmutc. 6. St1 Standwd trnns- 7. NPJ rrsd cMes Nephelpm&M-, wwd,ty Unit, fl-mV40lE"Kate iYO,,Wirilonml Hyd.oe*r Electrode. 9- me/LMaucetea mmvams w kke 10. N/A wxweatly rut appamo a 11. - SynTwa Ceq w :l P is nct NC rWiep tw vl st pe amnt - Data celaled Iw xrdwma4an purposes w;ry- 12. Irdwmaaen pauided by Duke E.nergq an 0=tw 2, 2013. piwe 1d1 Table 8 - Surface Water Field and Analytical Results - August 2013 Duke Energy/Mayo Electric Generating Plant CCP Monoflil, Phase 1 - Permit No. 7305 Sample Date' August 21 and 22. 2013 Laboratory CerJficate Codes: SynTemn CorDQfation Field 95591 Field Sametmg performed by SynTema Corporation Ouke Energy Analytical Laboratory 0248 Pace Analytical SoMces. Inc. 640 Parameter SWS iD units Cerulldsto Coda Sample Locabon SWSL ].5A NCAC 2B 73065Wd 7305 SW-2 1 7305 SW-3 Feld pH 320 Su 5591 I 7.0 7,5 7.3 NE 6.0-9.0 SpeVIC Cbnduc-ance 323 i m. b.'. 5591 I 233.7 120.4 115 NE NE Temperahtre 325 'C 559I 23-4 22.3 23.6 NE NE Arsenic 14 PL!t 248 0.695 1 0.234 1 1.69 P 10 10 8artum 15 Wi 246 86.2 f 27.7 f 34.6 1' i0O 201 SOD 316 pgrL 40 2.000 U 2.003 L' 2.000 0 t;E NE Boron 428 VWL 248 3.3 U 10.2 1 3.3 U NE PIE Cadmium 34 p7/L 248 U.101 U 0.101 U 0.101 U 1 2 Chlonde 455 WVL 248 5.090 4,-,W 3630 NE 230.000 Chromium 51 pp/L 248 0.664 J 0.5 U 2,59 J 10 50 COD 317 pg/L 248 15,400 J 16,700 J 1';,DQO J NE NE Capper 54 i:g/L 248 1 U _82 1 4.79 1 10 7 Fluoride 312 pill 248 202 1 154 X 149 1. 20DO 1.800 Iron 34D ug/L 248 6.110 A I:SDO -d 1 2.750r1; 300 1.o00 Lrad I 131 ug;L 248 1 0.123 i 0.19 J 0.279 1 10 25 Manganese 3,12 411- 24fi 7.1.290;7 W-282r7 'lW'-'.J 50 NE Meres,rr 132 vsVL 248 l 0.006 tF 1 0.006 u 0.006 U 0.2 0.012 rbCkN 152 pg'L 248 0.515 1 0.5 U 1.63 J 50 88 Nitrate tes N-,rogen) 303 rhg;L 248 111 1, 123 1. 127 1' 10,000 NE Selenium 183 pF L 248 0.238 J 0.246 1 0.395 1 10 5 Sinter 164 p$;L 24$ 0.7 U 0.7 U I 0.7 U SO 0.06 Sulfate 315 pg7L 248 2.97D T 5.8111 1' S, 140 1' 250,000 NE Than 194 µiLm )t 248 0.133 Li 0.133 U 0.133 U' 5.5 0.41 7OC 35 7 "'IL 248 5,570 5.710 4p8p h1E NE OLs Totat sotved SWils 311 IWL 248 158,000 99.D00 115.000 NE f,E Zinc 213 PVL 248 2.6 U 2.6 U 8.78 1 10 50 motes: L CVrr IZM%an5 ,^.resented In mraoirams W axr Ipt'LL 2 SWS ID is the solid Waste Seaton Identrtration Number. - 3. SWSL is ilia Stl:d Waste Seaon Limit NCDEtvR defines lire $W$L pS :he Iowe1t Amount PS anarste ina sample that Can be gaenl:IdJYEry detenmtnN dim Slntatle n Pteaaidaria dP3lreCy. 4, 154 NCAC 2H Sandard is from -North Caroana Adminls7at- Code, live 15A: Deperment of Emtranmem and Natural Resources. Suoarapter 2E - Surfare Water and Watiand Standards: !last amended on May 1. 2007) tar Class C *a-.efs. 5. The Decennial streams to NyCo River are dassttied As Class C waters. Regulation 15A NCAC 020 .0211 Pro�ldes water truat-ty standards lot Class C raters. Relmence 15A NCAC 29 .0700 Classdicadons and Water Quality Standards APPSCeble to SurlUe waters and W,Wmda W N.C. Amended EnAc ii: saay L. 2CO1: 6. Grayed values indicate vatues that attain or eared ore SWSL Standard. 7, cold uMwes ndcate values that attain Or eyed the 15A NCAC 20 Standard, 8. NE Indicates nos esaWiyred. Blank etas indtnta mat there m no imormatwn rcrevam to the reSot a t Wr. 9. Quabfims in nonktaPmed text are laboratary data duahben or'Hap'.'U- Is iced IC aerhtCr licit ro not detected to toncen7a Jan whtct attain the labarsurts metntd detection urea{MDLl- '1' h used to iaMtth estrnated CdrhCenvationl which attain or exceed me VOL but are less than the iabwatdrys method neDomnt omit IMRLI_ An c4Matea 1-fiat Is a data gYaaitar, added by HER to Inm=e ecncerrvatidrrs wtikth attoln or wmea tin laboratory's ttRL but arc Iri1 man Ire SWSL, 10. AcDoiamt to the Convi- ant Lookup webbate CrM1the NCOENR Division of Wastr ManatdMrnl weboate. there rs rid SWSL Standard lot 0trodde azWmetl with CAS number LG887-0". at.Ch is the CA$ reported by Jte laboratory rr me anary:ea competed. Trhereture, me SWSL Slalhdard listed is la ma cfhlonde rim CAS number SW3D1 as specified on me Constituent LOdkup weboate Oast updated tune U. 20111. IL SU whdkales Standard Vann 12. romp/cm indicates mlaomfros oer centimeter. 13. 600 indicates tivdter.YCal o,yterh demand. COD tndlmies merticat aryten demand. TOC Irhdiutes total ottanic carbon. 14, Anary l results obtained from Elei:V"0C Data Oelivereble (EI)V) ptWidad oY Duhe Enerty on October 2, 2013. Page I of 1 Table 10 - Field and Analytical Results that Equal or Exceed 15A NCAC 28 Surface Water Qua ty Standards - August 2013 Duke Energy/Mayo Electric Generating Plant CCP Monotitl, Phase i - Permit No. 7305 Sample Sates: August 21'and 22. 2013 Feld Sampling pmformc-d by SynTerra Cafpo,ation Parameter Sarnp)e,O I Result (Units 2BStandard Hlstorlcalconcentrations Cause andStgsifleanoe Stnc1 6.' 10 pf/L 6.111) - 16.700 iron axfoen'rMon at SVl--1 is the lowest concentration measured over the perod of monitoring. Tnis is the second monitoring event at SW-1. Turbidity Measured at 21.9 NTIJs. SW2 1.100 pp/L 707 - i.100 Iron cwrentratitm at SW-2 is the hE�.ost Concentration rneisured over the period of monitoring, T: is is the second mar4m-i g iron iMO event at SW-2- SW-3 2-7Sa yp/L 2,700 - 31.600 Iran concentration atSW-3 is the Kest oonCentrattort measured over Jre period of monitoring, This is me smvw mot;i;onnr event at SW-3. Turbiday measured at 43.2. NTUS. Notes: 15A NCAC 20 Staxard rs f.•='North Carolina Fdmlnisuatwe Cotle, TrtM 15A., ikparrnen*. of Environment and Natural Resoumcs- Subchavter 211 -Surface Water and Wetland Sundards,' (fast ameldm M Mar 1, 2007) To, Class C Waters. 2. A,nalytieaf results oblainod from Electronic Dula Oetivnrable (EYb) provided b$ Doe Energy on Octob^r 2, 2013. 3- pWL indicates rhirnograrns per lie!. 4. H AwCdl carrcentratfotis based urn data in Dike, Energy anal>Ucal resufs database. Page 1 c+ 1 Table 11- Field Data Parameters - November 2013 Duke Energy/Mayo Electric Generating Plant CCP Monofiill, Phase 1- Permit No. 7305 WELL DEPTH TO WATER AVERAGE WELL EVAC SPECIFIC SAMPLE DEPTH WATER ELEV, PURGE PUMP RATE VOLUME VOLUME EVAC TEMP CONDUCTANCE pH TURBIDITY* GRP• Do' _DATE SAMPLE ID (feet) (feet) (feet) APPEARANCE ODOR METHO0___(MVnrrin) _ (gallons) (gallons)._ ()es/nO1_ (degp (umh0/pm) (SU) (NTU_)__. (mV-NNE) (mg/1} IVI,/2013 MW-1 40.26 1938 480.40 Clear with fines None LF 100 3.34 1.20 No 15 324 6-3 23 283 2.3 11/14/2013 MN-2 76.27 42.92 419.23 Clear None LF 130 5.23 L20 No I6 682 7,0 9.7 125 LS 11/14/2013 M'A'-3 53.26 43.81 392.31 Clear None LF 200 1.54 L20 No 15 763 6.9 8.5 '-07 1.7 11/1412013 VW-4 38.90 35.(9 388.63 Clear None LF 105 0.62 1.20 No 16 991 6.6 8.2 4 0.5 1!/14/2013 SSW-5 50.83 21,23 411.65 Clear ' None LF i10 5.00 0.24 No 16 570 7.3 5.9 78 0.4 11/15/2013 Stitt-1 N/A N/A N/A Clear weth Iron flpts None N/A N/A N/A ,N/A 7 194 6.9 36 81 5.8 11/15/2013 SW-2 N/A N/A N/A Clear None N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 6 150 7.0 2.9 179 9.9 IV1512013 SW-3 NIA N/A N/A Clear with flocs None N/A N/A .1/A N/A N/A 6 150 6.8 6.6 84 6.9 r:dtt5 L Puree MMods; LF-Low flaw. LF(M)-Law Flow. Modified, cP-Conremierud Purge 13,5 wen rrolumesl. NP-No Purga;HydraSl�e), EDP-Epuiprnerrt0rky Purge. Ave: age pump we applicable io LF and LFIM;pmong only. 2. Feld samplingperfo ed>h Synfena Corporation personnel. 3. LVAC indicates whedMr are water level in the well wec drawn down to the level of the pump during purging, 4. umno/crn irAcetes rtutro mhos per tenbnreter. S. m4lmmt indlcates miZiaers per rmnute, 6. St'' E3>deete5 Standard Un,s. 7. -'n indicates NePhelomebic Turbidp UNis. 8. mV+IHE indicates m,ffi raft No-011 Hydrogen DecOode. 9. mg'L irm,wtes m-ingrams pe, liter. 10. WA indicates not applicable. 11. ' SynTena Caooraton M not NC4ertined for tttese parameters. Data mlected for in•prrnation pww.r, bnty. 17. Inlarmatwn movrdee by Duke Enw& on December 10. 2013. Page : of 1 Table 13 -Surface Water Field and Anatytical Resufts-Nover.Ibcr 2013 Duke Energy/Mayo Electric Generating Plant' CCP Monofill, Phase 1- Permit No. 7305 Sa de Date: November 14 and 15, 2013 Sabontary Cer.:.rt:aix Comes: SynTwa Crrpotatmn Fetid 05591 FIM Samplmg perfom ed C') Sy,;Tefra Corpora^1an Puke Encrry Anahtcat Latsxa" C14fi Pact Atrat eaCel $eMCCS. Inc. a40 Paranatar sws ID uhtts Certlncffit rarla sampl7 Location S ML L5f.` A =2B 73175 SW-1 7305 SW 2 73C15 SW-3 N,td pH 320 S11 5541 6.9 7.0 l 6.8 NE 6.0.9.0 Svec#ffc CONuctance 323 ra "Icrr 5591 194 I 150 3-50 NE :8= iemperahm 3 'C 5591 7.0 8.0 5.0 NE NE 4senrc to 4VL 248 0.375 1 I 0.078 U 0.373 1 10 10 Barium l 15 Kf/L 248 69.7 J' 21.6 11-1 41.1 f 100 200,L00 EFDD 316 WL 40 2,000 it 2.000 U 2.700 NE NE Baran 428 tWL 248 3.3 U. 33 U 3.3 U raE NE Cadmbsrn 34 KgrL 24n j 0.101 L' 0.101 U j 0-SO1 U 1 2 ChWde 455 tE?L 248 5.500 7,170 6,480 NE 230.0DO Chromium 51 ugrL tab 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 1D •50 cm 317 gvt 248 j 9,760 J 9.I20 I 3=1D0 J NE NE Copper 54 py 1 248 1 U I U I U 10 7 n mride 312 ;rR+L 248 181 J' t 140 2000 I'WO 40 24 -6 ^ W2V 30 0P3bn Lead 131 vgfL 248 j 0.23R 0.065 U 1 0.065 U t0 25 Marsfanese 342 Wt 24H 72.8 Y >ir"O.i2g1'.^e.! 50 NE AtTrcvry 232 tWL 248 0.006 U 0.006 U 0.006 U 0:2 0.012 t:ickN 157 - TS1L 248 0.5 U 0.5 L' 0S u 50 I ES tlrvare (as Nrgr EZen? 303 vjVL 248 21,1 1 S.4 U 420 J' .10000 PIE solemum 333 pg>L 748 0.142 0.101 1 0.092 u 1.0 5 Wer 184 >:g,+L 24fi I 0.7 U 0.7 U 9.7 U 10 0.06 swate 315 ugrL 2a8 a,000 J• 1i5D0 f 15.700 J' 250.000 RE Thanium 194 pgJL 248 0.133 U 0.133 U j 0.133 u 5.5 OAT TDC 357 IWL 246 3.360 4,76D 5.260 t✓£ NE Teui Dmsdved 5MIds 311 sWt 248 161,ow ' 105.000 I 11.1.000 r;E NE Zinc 213 vVL 248 2.6 U 1.6 U 26 U 10 50 ,N%M L Co+r atlorts presa4ae In rituM ms par 7.tK 3:4,rLL Z. SWS i11 c the Slid v astc Sealan 1Cen:Jf .radon Nit'rrbm T. SVrK a ula Sot1 Waite Sec»n Llyra;, 14COEWR domes Ere S WSL as MK Iowea aoy4rnt of anaryta to a samofe that can Ue gi,wjMaseppeitnianed W. Su.;al}e =61itfrr a.K aP.ima ty. 4, 15A NCAC 28 Siandard is from Nr* r COoiina AdTrgHsUative Code. TC.te ZA: Depannent al Efr+tror It and Natural RCa'Cl:reei. SubMWer 2B - 5trrtate Wattt aria WtL' A Sfaffd:rrt.. Bella.• Waa an taay L 20071 fet Class C waxrs. S. The perenfrprl strWn to Hyw Rh rr ere di!s Med st Class C waters. Retutal]M ISA NCAC 026 .0211 prosWas wale, auaftty slandands for Cass C waters, S Serence 15A!:CAC ZB .0200 Clmnkatwns and Wetin Quallty Standards Apptraltrr to5uitam W a'.tei and WettaWs a1.,,X. Ammrded F:fecrr n; Mar 1, 2007. f.. GT:n^_e rak: fnOiCM slues matatmm or td Lhe SWSL 9200MCL Bail' vah� inctIte , %9 VA' allSin OF exceed tht 15A !:CAC 2e Standard 6, NE OKhztas rrot eStaOGYred. Blau+ 4aQi rrldKd>e l^a: dle[C Ana "vc<arr.Ta'Jan faJeva'ti SC Lne rCSp>'C11t ror. 3. Quatlkrt n nanAiaBC:ed test arc tabws3aY dAtl ou3lRers n'tgts'. J'rs u d tC identify rmft rrai oereexd at e4near.!ratletrs whiC attain the gSOra!oryt muU od deMc7M soati%TD4 7 h :rxe In fderro`r rt�+falfA cOncenvetlerrs »il�r ewtin ar erceyl Ltia aerial btu xre lr�s :ban SfY_ lacmatwyf nraOsoC +rscrtrdt ttnrt IsaaLl. An da'ipled J'-4at rf a data gUaldw. aGded by MDR tL indicate wnC ntal�s wn!str atTAJn or t,. a tht IrtmiatOW- MRL but air k5s Clan" SN51. 10. Attmfnit to pie Censuarea[LoaLwp w�pe;e on tie ffCOEdR Onxlw, of lvacte asarv,^crrten:,.ehpa>:e. Elerc h ro 5155E Sta+tdmC for Lrmnae assocktrJ wsm t:LS nrurrnrr i:Y.87pSfi, .sh,•l H m0 fA5 rl7orSrZt111 sx lemra!ary for CM armlysea canpki+a t7rrrScr.,. tna S1Y51 Svenaare Fseerf is to Lne, Rdande mT LAS rtunber 51v301 asspro71H ax ttt Cdn�e � _wF- � webpslF OaY, toCa'�d iu>:• 13. T0I1:. 11: 5tt ettl:eatts standara Crata- ' c2. wrlLv= rrrynraies �. aKm per witnieief. 13. COD kxZwtes W90w KW rsyl:rm der3Nnt. COO Wt zates eir =& ov,sen demand. TOC Vrairatn tntal 0mo,,, e ro W, 14. Anaty tal iest6u WtaMed limn Elactrmdc Oan Calfw &-Aa SEDD7 pro.,dw ey !hike Enemy On Dec bo, 10, 2013, Table 15 - Field and Analytical Results that Equal or Exceed 15A NCAC 2B Surface Water Quality Standards - November 2013 Duke Energy/Mayo Electric Generating Plant CCP Monofill, Phase 1- Permit No. 7305 Sarnple Dates: November 14 and 15, 2013 Freld Sampt.ng perfom>ec by SynTerra Corporaoon Parameter Sample ID Result Unrs 2EIStandard I Historical concentrations Cause and Significance Iron SW -I 3.740 ug/L 1,000 3.740-15.700 Iron concentration at SW-1 is the lowest concen•,ratsor measured over the period of monitoring. Turbidity measured at 30 NTJs. Sw3 1.020 P91L 1.020.3L600 Iron concentration at SW-3 is the lowest concentration mcasured over the oeliod of monitoring. Notes L 15A NCAC 28 Standard is trom "1Prt+Carolina AdmmrstratMe Code aitle 15A Depafinent Of Environment and Natural Resources. Subchapter 2B-Surlacs Water and Wetlard Standards; tlast amended on May I. 2007) fat Class C waters. 7 Analytical resuls obtained ham FlWtonic Daa Deliverable (EDD) provided by Duke Energr on December 10. 2013. 1 y+grL mdicates micrograms pet Mat. 4. HistoricV comemrations based on data in Duke Energy anahtical results database. Page 1 of 1 Table 16 - Field Data Parameters -April 2014 Duke Energy/Mayo Glectr[c Generating Plant CCP Moncirt% Phase 1- Permlt No. 7305 WE11. DEPTH TO WATER A tkmE WELL EVAC SPMFIC SWIPLE DEPTH WATER ELEV. 'PURGE FUMPRATE VOLUME VOLUME EVAC TEMP ODNDUCTANCE RH iLiiBMfi" ORP' DO' DATE SAf tPLE fD reef!, (Leng c APPF.tRANCE ODOR ME(HCA7 (rmin) (0114") (O3au rn IC umtq env Sin 1Hit mV-R+f 4/2/2014 mw_1 40.26 17.59 482.59 ce r Nnr} IF 136 3,70 050 No 15 330 6.1 1.7 -749 '2,700 4/2J2014 NW-2 74a7 40.9,1 421.24 Clear NOnC LF :20 5.56 0.50 %a 16 7,31 7.0 C.7 151 4w. -41212014 ..N.w-3 53.26 43.21 392.51 C(Ouoy. gray xmD a LF 190 1,64 1.75 VO 16 782 £.7 9.5 147 1.000 4/2/2014 UW-4 38.20 34.74 38898 pear with fines None LF 130 0.68 .1.00 Na 17 1,042 6.5 5-9 64 400 4/2/2014 VW-5 51.29 17.95 415.03 Care, None L 110 555 0.20 No 16 578 7-2 3.1 _83 400 4/2/20.4 SW-1 NVA N/A N/A Clear XE a N/A N/A h':A N/A N/A V 18O 6.8 N/A 265 -Um 4/2/2014 SW-2 WA N/A N/A Deaf None N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A. 20 130 7.4 WA i53 7.100 .4/2/2014 SYV-3 NIA N/A y/A C!car No^e Ti/A N/A N/A N/A NA 25 122 '7.5 N/A _73 ahoo r4olm L Purge Uaftas; iF-Lerr R-. LRMI-Law Flo--. Vaddrel (7-Ca ,,wAi W "t 13-5 .0 va4enesS. NP-No PwZ^ MYCrcSlfty , CDP-FWapme� Onh Prate. A.frste Dump r4'.e aFPkMe w LF sn LRW.,rp 9-q any. 2. REW sxq)bgt Pefenexd bq SMTdre C&PW. o PersmneL 2. EVAC trtlieem *."Ox me -TX, tml in" -A ..e! 0,2+ 0. - W Arr keel of the DLL to*M/ MgM, 4. -*Wm tollmales mvYo mhw per C mmwter. 5.'Fi/-. !nEr:alee n+ift4rL-rs pe Mro , 6. S0 crdccKn Sipndar4 Urgs 7. NFU imdiW; NvAbetomea* T -biEipr L Wr L 6. r&'4&W indiums rlydrem ELecn4e. 9-1Wt n+eraxa r3ar[ra PU hbr L 1(l. Y.JA inCirapy w oppgiPabie. 1]_' Syn'Idre%orP4r.lian : aac F'.Gcemr�ed Sn ihe.e pa.pmtterL. Uaa cNle[tetl far 1n!wmalion purpo:cs only. iz.ln',acmrion po4dad Oy Odle Exc,pon Anvil z.. 2OS4. Page 1011 Table 18 - Suda" Water rield and A.-1alytical Results - April 2014 Duke Energy/Mayo Electric Generating Plant CCP Monofill, Phase 1- Permit No. 7305 Sa Df a Date: Aprn 2, 2014 l abofatory CerVicale Codes: Syn',erra Corpo irtion vela 05591 Field SamCling performed by S"Terra COrooratan Duee Energy Ansfy'" LaGora:ary 1248 Pace Analyycaf 5crnces. Inc, -40 Parmaeter Sm 10 Vnfts CerLt7csx Code Sample Lowdon SWSL 15A NCAC 28 7305 SW-1 73D5 SW-2 I 7305 SW2-DUP T305 SAQ Fmfd pH 320 SU 5591 6.8 7.4 7.5 114E 6.0-9.0 SPeci.tC Conducranoe 323 trmhpfcm 5591 130 13V :22 !SE NE Temperature i 325 'C 5591 12 20 25 1E NE Arseruc 14 uWL 246 0-193 J 0.141 J 0.134 J 0.529 J I0 10 1 Bad= 15 vIVL 248 54.7 f 26.6 P 2e.6 r 25.6 r 1C�J 200.0p BOO 316 PLIL 40 2 U 2 U L 2 U j hE YE Boron 426 pXIL 248 f 6.63 1 10.2 } 9.67 1 6,7$ J NENE Cadrniarn 34 P9fL 248 0.101 U 1 0.101 U A 0.1ot U 1 0.101 V 1 2 Chloride 1 .155 crv' 248 5,050 9,1'_0 9,190 1 5,700 NE 230,000 Chromium 1 51 vVL 248 1-31 1 0.501 J 0.868 1 0-533 1 10 50 COD 1 317 pVL 248 13.800 3 7.130 J 11-100 J 7.760 J NE NE Copper 54 WL 248 L97 1 1.2 1 L17 J 1.4 1 I 10 7 Aaonde 312 s VL 248 1 139 f 102 f 102 91.1 J 1 2.000 L9DLt Iron 340 pVL sag ',' I'M .1 " ;480 461- .545 -o LOW Lead 131 UJIL 248 0.434 1 0'143 1 0.143 0.143 J 10 25 martsr'!Se 342. pgft 248 -� 268% 1&4 I 11 16-3 J' E . 6L2'. 5D NE Mercxrry 132 Uivi 248 0MG U 0.006 U 0.006 U 0.006 Nickel 152 WL 248 0.E03 J 0.5 L 0.624 1 0.504 1 1 50 1 E8 1v57ate (as Nitroaenl 303 I»✓1 2a8 6.i0 1 5.a U 5.4 V 2L4 } I 10.0110 NE Selenium t 183 I VVL 248 0.096 J 0.092 tl 0.102 1 O.± J 1 10 5 Sdver 164 WL 248 0.7 U 0.7 V 0.7 U 0. i U 10 D.06 Si4late 315 ag/L 24E, 6.560 IOG f L2, 100 f 10,3(10 !' 1 250,000 NE Thallium 1.94 µg/L 249 0.133 L' 0.133 U 0.133 U 0.133 U 55 0.47 TOC 357 pg1L 248 3.930 3.360 3,320 775,3 F'E NE Toni D%s5olve0 Solids 311 pg/L 248 141.D00 SJ,D00 92.000 67,000 "JE Tans 213 1 245 2.5 U 1 26 U 1 2.6 U 2.6 U L 10 550 1. Cor%centrnpvns prcaattted n n•avtrams per aia* 112rLF 2. SW'S t0 is Lit SW4 waste SCCJw, ldtrill1col1w Number. 3. SWSL is we Soled Waste Stctw Limit. NCDENR defines the SWSL a3 7x lhwest amount of anpltte'n a se-Vd that ear be qua--=!,veiy da ,"need vain wtable prcdvun and a ret2. 4. 154 NCAC 20 Standard Is?rcm'Norin C&Ohm Admwhsutrd,e Code. Title 15a ceparrnem of Envho-n avd 1latuval RM.saw , Suboy plar 28 - Surface Watm atd v: edand Sanda,es,• JISS%amendec ort stay L 2GG7) for Class C -atets. S. the Wtinr,al Soeams to r4. ( River are ctassrrled as Class C ,aie Reiulawn 15A NCAC 020 .0211 monde% -ate- avaay standwds for Class C ratan. Reference 15A =Aft 20.0200 Classlftpa'Jans tried Weser QuaAy Standards npotta%ple to Sw1p0.' Waters ens WerJo." N ttC- A. -Wed Enact%•x: i+•ar L MT, S. Grayed valuer IrM to vatues that a5rn a e.cerd 9,,e SWSL S•anda+d. 1, Bola values'rKuc to values List attain ow eaoted the 13A NCAC 28 SanCuA 8. NE ind.,caies not estabhaheC. 81artk cells Irw1wt Mal mere Is no %Wynn b: relevant to pte te=e w rov. 3. QuaClie.s in mrFnaswvet teat are laboratory data q• ldlers of 'llais'. Vis tried to Identity lasui s net dettifted at rnncentrat%ns -1t.Ct attain t e blivratan's mem4d drre4nan iwNl (MUL)- 'r LS used to ide+r5!! esdmatea Conoantra:%:ns whkh 334,n or Ex a tna AfL)L!t,A a'e less than vie IabwatONs method repwting lima fMRL)- An iWimed f-na= Is a data 4".Xet, added L+ MDR :o rndtaa`JQ ecr traanns watt attain or extted Me Iabaralorys NRL gut we less Icon 7te SYSL 10. Ac *-K to Lq CGnW. U Lop„M) -ObpKe p 7e i.'D&%A 01+as%on of W4:.a 11arHraraerd neb03M Owe a na SWSL Smnoato 1w ~de a44etlA'rd w%Ih GAS r %.er 168£7-008.'amcr'. is 71e CAS tepaltd bi the lappra'a•r Icy t" anatfsea cxin. eted. Thererwe. the SWSL Standard t6tc4 is for C%e attertde vnth CAS mrriber SSYJOI as speW.*C an Lne Consabren%Lt%ck V.` ATtWge last upaaw P" 13, 2014 11. SD mdiatbs Sarcard Una 12. u.,nW n Indicates mfaomhds per Ce:t4metm. 13. SOD inelcates biocliemicst ogfgn demand. COD fndwr'.es Memkal waters demand. 70C mdkmx total ar4xnic carbon, 14. Anayttaai resurJ eotario4 trvn Electronic Data Dchver Ne iMDl pvvlded It, Duse Fo" on Apnt 28. 2014. Page 1 of 1 Table 20 - Field and Analytiaef Results that Equal or Exceed 15A NCAC 28 Suriace'Water Quality Standards - Apdf 2014 Duke Ener&/Mayo Ek--cwc Generating Plant CCP Monotill, Phase 1- Permit No. 7305 Sampk- Owes: April 2- 2014 Irleld SargAng porfomted byrSynTerra Corporation ' Parameter Semple ID P.est3t U.ft as s-.Mdard li;torf¢aI Ccrwentra:) Cats OW Sgltnctrnea hon Sty-1 1.860 vW LIXlO 1.86t1- 15.7D0 trap com"Mation at SW-1 is the lot-_ Corw-,e=ation moasurft over ate period of rgnderlrg Tud i3Kr sneas rrd atSS12 N%L - NMS- i " 1WAC 29 Standard n !ram Ttorth Carolina Adnsa :s aWe Code. Te]e 15.10eWrmemaf En-ironmeM and rtaunal %tesav cm SoA--- pier 2B-Suriaee Viam a*W W:'A &n4f S andards.-(last amcnad an"t, 2W-.Itw Class C w4nens. 2, pnrFj7 j rsfi4 abUkmd hum E4elrame Data pftwrable IEablarowdey by Duke Enmrj on nprd 28. 2014. 3, kt't •silicates rak Qvams r e. Llwr. a. UTV cKt- les NephefaanetrF. Turhkitj Mtz S NaScx'vs[anaentrsliam based an data m Duke Erwrp xutybeai ras= daubase- Page-.1 0[ 1 T Geor oulias, Bethany From: Georgoulias, Bethany Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2014 1:37 PM To: Parnell, David Cc: Holley, John; Pickle, Ken; Bennett, Bradley Subject: RE: Mayo Monofill We discussed your questions this morning, Dave. Please see our responses below. I3elhan}, Georgoulias, Environmental Engineer NCDENR / Division of Energy. Mineral, and Land Resources Storrnwater Permitting Program 1612 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1612 512 N. Salisbury Street. Raleigh, NC 27604 919 / 807-6372 (phone); 919 / 807-6494 (fax) Website: hitp://portal,ncdenr.org/web/ii-/stormwater G'-mail correspondence w anel firm) This address nurn be s-uhlec,t to the Yorth C"orolirrcl Public Records law (mid rna)' be rliselasc d 10 lhirdparries. From: Parnell, David Sent: Friday, May 02, 2014 11:18 AM To: Bennett, Bradley; Georgoulias, Bethany Cc: Holley, John Subject: Mayo Monofill received a call from Shannon Langley of Duke Energy. He had two issues to discuss: 1. The landfill is under construction. The material will not be actually be moved to the landfill until June or later. The required first sample period is from January 6 to June 30, 2014. There may be no, or very little, material in the landfill by June 30. 1 suggested that Duke request, in writing, an extension of that first sample period, either by 3 or 6 months. I pointed out that it is important to get a valid sample of the parameters to compare to the last sample to be taken in 2017. Does SPP have a preference on this time extension? Dave, we agree with your suggested approach. Please advise Duke to submit a request to us to delay the sample period for the extended set of metals and other parameters specified for Jan -Jun 2014. The basis of the delay would be to characterize discharges appropriately at the beginning of the industrial activity, while also allowomg time for the monofill activities to get underway. We will likely revise that requirement to be the second half of the year (Jul -Dec 2014) instead. We will respond to their request with a letter since this is just a minor modification to the monitoring scheme. 2. Shannon also wanted to meet this summer with me, to talk about ROS. What is the SPP thinking on the amount of data needed from this facility, before we are to review, and possibly approve his request? I usually would like 2-5 sample periods of data in order to make a determination. After discussing, we feel like the most appropriate course here is to have them sample according to the permit until NCG12 is up for renewal in 2017, and then ask for ROS determination during the renewal process. Because the COC was issued in the middle of the NCG12'5 cycle, the monofill will sample 5-6 times by the time renewal approaches in 2017 (depending on when industrial activity of the monofill octuolly begins. From the context of the first question, it's possible they will not even have to sample in the first period if no material is moved into the monofill before June 30`h—onother factor we considered.} we typically contact permittees about renewal application —6 months prior to expiration, i.e., around April 2017 for this permit. Duke also only needs to sample for the extended suite of metals and other parameters (chlorides, fluoride, etc.) twice during this permit term. The site only has three stormwater outfalls, and so we feel like this is reasonable. Does the RRO agree? Thanks, Dave Dave Parnell Environmental Senior Specialist North Carolina Department of Environment & Natural Resources Division of Energy, Minerals, and Land Resources Raleigh Regional Office 3800 Barrett Drive Raleigh, NC 27609 0: (919) 791-4200 F: (919) 571-4718 E-mail correspondence to and From this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties. 4 Central Files: APS SWP 12/20/'f 3 Permit Number NCG1201.01 � Permit Tracking Slip Program Category NPDES SW Permit Type Landfill Stormwater Discharge COC Primary Reviewer Bethany.Georgoulias Coastal 5W Rule Permitted Flow Status Project Type In review New Project Version Permit Classification coc Permit Contact Affiliation Facility Facility Name Major/Minor Region Mayo Steam Plant Monofill Minor Raleigh Location Address County 10660 Boston Rd Person Roxboro NC 27574 Facility Contact Affiliation Dulcie F. Phillips 821 Blaylock Dairy Rd Owner Roxboro NC 275747527 Owner Name Owner Type Duke Energy Progress Inc Non -Government Owner Affiliation Paula J. Sims PO Box 1551 Dates/Events Raleigh NC 27602 Scheduled Urig issue App Received Draft initiated Issuance Public Notice Issue Effective Expiration 09/23/13 ��6�z� t /6 /7 0 l j 0 131 /Zo r 7 Regulated Activities Requested lReceiv e d Events Landfili operation RO staff report requested 11/27/13 RO staff report received Outfall 001 12/19/13 Waterbody Name Stream Index Number Current Class 5ubbasin Bowes Branch 22-58-14 C 03-02-05 N CG 120101 December 20, 2013 B. Georgoulias Duke Energy Progress, Inc. — Mayo Steam Electric Plant Monofill for Coal Combustion Residue (CCR) Summary This facility submitted a Notice of Intent (NOI) to be covered under General Permit NCG120000 (Landfills). The stormwater discharge drains to a Bowes Branch (Class C-Sw), in the Roanoke River Basin. The stream segment is not listed as impaired or subject to a Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL). This facility is located in Person County, handled by the Raleigh Regional Office. History The Mayo Steam Electric Station (separate from the Monofill site) is permitted under the NPDES wastewater permit no. NC0038377. In 2009, that permit included stormwater discharges; however, NPDES stormwater requirements have since been split out and will be permitted separately. A separate NPDES stormwater permit for the Mayo Steam Electric Plant has never been developed because of unresolved monitoring issues for coal-fired power plants. To address a diminishing capacity in Mayo's ash pond and risk of violating effluent limits in that pond discharge, the company concluded the wet ash handling system had to be eliminated. The plant began converting to a dry bottom ash handling system (which was 98 percent complete with that by late September 2013). In addition, a proprietary bioreactor system to remove Hg, Se, and As from the flue gas desulphurization (FGD) waste stream (directed to the ash pond) was installed, and new proposed effluent limits were put into the discharge permit. However, the system has not performed as expected, and the plant has not been able to meet effluent limits. In June 2012, a Special Order by Consent (SOC) was finalized to address violations of limits in NCO038377 for ash pond outfall 002. Of the remaining options to comply with the SOC, the company decided to evaporate all the water in a zero liquid discharge (ZLD) system —basically by using a very large evaporator. The evaporator will reduce water volumes to 5-10 percent of the initial volume, and what remains will be used to condition dry ash for transport to the monofill under construction. General Permit Application Review a) The permit application has been signed and sufficiently completed. Yes. b) The SIC code accurately describes this facility's activities and qualifies for coverage under this general permit. Application noted SIC 4911 (Electric Power Generation), but this NOI is for stormwater discharges from the monofill for coal combustion residue (CCR) that will be transferred from Mayo Steam Plant's new Zero Liquid Discharge (ZLD) System. The NCG12 general permit is applicable to stormwater discharges associated with landfills permitted by NC Division of Waste Management under NC G.S. 130A-294, and therefore under consideration for a Certificate of Coverage. Additional monitoring because of the nature of the material is recommended as a condition of coverage (see special notes). NCG120101 December 20, 2013 B. Georgoulias c) Other permits of interest: #1 DWM Permit No. 7305TNDUS-2012T(Permit to Construct— Phase 1) for Monofill requires surface water monitoring per the approved Water Quality Monitoring Plan (WQMP). DWM permit contacts are Larry Frost and Elizabeth Werner. See attached excerpts from the WQMP and Solid Waste Industrial Landfill Permit. Obligations require semi-annual monitoring of two upstream points and one downstream point for numerous metals, BOD, COD, TDS, TOC, pH, conductivity, and temperature. #2 NPDES Wastewater Perm RAN C0038377)Tfor Mayo Steam Plant (separate but nearby location): the draft permit requires fish tissue sampling for mercury, arsenic, selenium and thallium up- and downstream. A monitoring plan will be submitted by the company and approved by NCDENR/DWR. The draft has not been finalized because of on -going litigation. d) Regional Office input requested: 11/27/2013 (RRO contacts D. Parnell of DEMLR and A. Romanski of DWR). RO Approval received: 12/18/2013 (see attached e-mail and correspondence from A. Romanski.) DEMLR concurrence on 12/20/2013 (conference call with D. Parnell and J. Holley). e) Will a Post -Construction Permit be required? No, outside of Roxboro in Person County. No permit unless county has other requirements. f) Review of data from haul road stormwater discharge data from Mayo Steam Station: NCO038377 required semi-annual sampling and analysis for several parameters at stormwater discharge outfall 010 since it became effective on November 1, 2009. However, only three stormwater DMRs were located in Central Files. Samples were from 9/21/2013; 3/15/2012; and 8/27/2011. Shannon Langley e-mailed copies of samples from 9/21/2013 (also in CF); 5/6/2013; 2/19/2013; 10/29/2012; 6/11/2012; 3/15/2012 (also in CF); 8/27/2011(also in CF); 5/17/2011; 11/4/2010; and 4/21/2010. Sample concentrations exceeded benchmarks only once: 5/17/2011 for TSS (152 mg/1), Cu (9.4 ug/1), and Al (4430 ug/1). g) Special Notes: This site will be a fully -lined landfill (approx. 34 acres) for coal combustion residue (CCR) with potentially very high concentrations in metals. A 1-million gallon capacity leachate collection system is being installed just west of the landfill and will direct wastewater to the wastewater treatment system permitted under NC0038377. NCG120101 December 20, 2013 B. Georgoulias Access roads would be handled under the Mayo Steam Station stormwater NPDES permit [yet undeveloped.] Truck loads are to be covered, and truck wheels will be washed upon leaving the plant. h) Stormwater Permitting Recommendations: The NCG12 permit already requires monitoring for Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD), Fecal Coliform, and Total Suspended Solids (TSS). COD will also be sampled up- and downstream per the Water Quality Monitoring Plan (WQMP) in the Solid Waste Permit. Several metals will also be sampled in -stream as part of the WQMP, though not necessarily during storm events. #1: Recommend sampling all outfalis for following parameters once in the first sampling period (between Jan 1-Jun 30, 2013), and again in the sampling period before renewal application (between Jul 1—Oct 31, 2017) of the permit, without any benchmarks: Antimony (Sb) [priority metal] Lead (Pb)' [priority metal] Arsenic (As)' [prioritymetal] Mercury (Hg)' [prioritymetal] Barium (B)' Molybdenum (Mo) Beryllium (Be) [prioritymetal] Nickel (Ni)' [priority metal] Boron (B)' Selenium (Se)' [priority metal] Cadmium (Cd)' [priority metal] Silver (Ag)' [priority metal] Chloride' Sulfate' Chromium (Cr)' [prioritymetal] Total Hardness (mg/I) Copper (Cu)' [prioritymetal] Thallium (TI)' [prioritymetal] Fluoride' Zinc (Zn)' [priority metal] 'These parameters will be monitored up- and downstream semi-annually as part of the approved Solid Waste Permit WQ Monitoring Plan. RATIONALE: The first sample will yield a baseline for stormwater discharges when the monofill operation is still new, and the last sample will compare discharges after at least three years of operation. The list includes the 13 priority pollutant metals (40 CFR §423, App. A) and other constituents (chloride, sufate, etc.) that may be present in highly concentrated amounts because of ZLD water used to condition the CCR transported to the monofill. The amount of dissolved metal is hardness -dependent in many cases and determines toxicity potential. Results will also help determine whether it is appropriate to continue coverage under the General Permit at renewal. This list is based on potential CCR constituents and recommendations by.the Raleigh Regional Office DWR (A. Romanski, 12/2/2013 e-mail attached), Aluminum (AI) and manganese (Mn) were omitted because water quality standards do not apply to the receiving waters (Class C) for the monofill, and they are not priority metals. However, Mn is referenced in the SOC because effluent limits have posed a problem (NOTE: Mayo Reservoir is classified as a Water Supply water, WS-V, with a corresponding Mn standard). NCG120101 N December 20, 2013 B. Georgoulias These metals and other compounds are also associated with air pollution control technology (APC) waste streams like flue gas desulphurization systems. Molybdenum (Mo) does not have an NC WQ standard, but there is a stormwater benchmark for Mo based on acute toxicity data. Along with As, Ba, B, Cd, Cr, Hg, Sb, Se, and TI, the fate of Mo in APC residues has been studied as part of on -going research by U.S. EPA's National Risk Management Research Laboratory (Environ. Sci. Technol. 2010, 44, "Evaluating the Fate of Metals in Air Pollution Control Residues from Coal -Fired Power Plants"). For reference, the following stormwater benchmarks are associated with these parameters: Parameter Benchmark ' , Parameter' Benchmark Antimony (Sb) 0.09 mg/I Lead (Pb) 0.075 mg/1 Arsenic (As) 0.34 mg/I Mercury (Hg) 12 ng/1 Barium (B) N/A (WS std only, Nat'l Human Health Criterion) Molybdenum (Mo) 510 mg/I (no WQ std or Nat'l criterion, but some states have a std) Beryllium (Be) 0.065 mg/l Nickel (Ni) 0.335 mg/I Boron (B) N/A (Narrative Nat'l WQ criterion, 1986) Selenium (Se). 0.056 mg/I Cadmium (Cd) 0.003 mg/I Silver (Ag) 0.003 mg/1 Chloride 860 mg/I Sulfate 500 mg/I Chromium (Cr) 0.9 mg/I Total Hardness (mg/1) N/A Copper (Cu) 0.010 mg/I Thallium (TI) N/A (Nat'l Human Health Criterion) Fluoride 1 6 mg/I Zinc (Zn) 0.126 mg/I P2: Also recommend supplementing each semi-annual sampling event with analyses for conductivity, pH, arsenic, selenium, and boron. RATIONALE: Conductivity is an indicator parameter of inorganic contaminants, and regular monitoring through the permit cycle will establish values characteristic of the stormwater from this site. The pH is also an indicator parameter and important for interpreting toxicity of total recoverable metal concentrations. Both are also rapid and simple parameters to measure in the field, and offer an opportunity for prompt attention if an issue arises. Both arsenic and selenium are constituents in CCR, and Se wastewater limit violations are addressed by the SOC (per wastewater limit violations recorded in BIMS for DMRs submitted in 2011-12). There are NC Water Quality standards for both metals. Boron is a tracer for the presence of coal; regular monitoring will establish a characteristic level in the discharge and help the company identify excursions above normal ambient levels. Combining measurement of these three elements with conductivity measurements may also establish trend relationships for a more simple monitoring approach in the future. N CG 120101 December 20, 2013 B. Georgoulias Stormwater concentrations over the following benchmarks should be noted on DMRs but not trigger Tier Responses: Parameter". h :Benchmark.t Conductivity N/A Boron (B) N/A pH Between 6.0 - 9.0 Arsenic (As) 0.34 mg/I Selenium (Se) 0.056 mg/I Based on a review of the haul road stormwater data from the Mayo Steam plant, we do not anticipate these benchmarks to pose a problem unless there is a contamination issue in need of attention. Data for these additional parameters should be submitted to Central Office with the DMRs for this permit. Phone and Meeting logs 9/11/2013: Meeting with Toya Ogallo, Shannon Langley, and Steve Cahoon of Duke energy Progress to discuss project prior to N01 submittal. Questions There were only three SDMRs in Central Files; has there been semi-annual stormwater sampling of SDO 010 at Mayo Steam Plant? Yes. Shannon Langley e-mailed copies of the reports on 1111512013. Where will fish tissue sampling for Mayo Steam Plant take place? Mayo Reservoir? Most likely. Monitoring plan that requires fish tissue monitoring "near the Ash Pond discharge" will be submitted to 0WR for approval after wastewater permit finalized, and locations will be defined in the plan. Proposed NPDES WW permit language suggests As, Se, TI, and Hg will be tested. Georgoulias, Bethany From: Georgoulias, Bethany Sent: Friday, December 20, 2013 11:17 AM To: 'Langley, Shannon' Cc: Bennett, Bradley; Pickle, Ken Subject: Mayo Steam Plant Monofill NCG12 COC Hi Shannon, I wanted to update you on the status of the Certificate of Coverage for the Mayo Monofill under NCG12. We have obtained approvals from both the Raleigh Regional Office DWR and DEMLR staff. I am finalizing the COC and issuance letter before I leave today. Since Bradley and I are both out much of the rest of the year, we'd prefer to sign and issue the final permit on Monday, January 6`4, when we are both back in the office. Will that date work for you all? Bradley returns before than I do (January 2"d), if for some reason it needs to be issued that week prior. Please advise us if you feel that's necessary. We'll email you an electronic copy of the final COC once it is issued. Thanks, and I hope you have a good holiday! Bethany Bethany Georgoulias, Environmental Engineer NCDENR / Division of Energy, Mineral, and Land Resources Storrnwater Permitting Program 1612 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1612 512 N. Salisbury Street, Raleigh, NC 27604 919 / 807-6372 (phone); 919 / 807-6494 (fax) Website: http://porta1.ncdenr.org/web/Ir/stormwater E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records law and may be disclosed to third parties. -----Original Message ----- From: Langley, Shannon [mailto:Shannon.Langley@duke-energy.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2013 10:16 AM To: Georgoulias, Bethany Cc: Bennett, Bradley; Pickle, Ken Subject: RE: Question about Mayo Steam Plant Thanks Bethany. We are trying to have it complete by the end of the year. I am at home and do not have the SOC with me but my recollection is that the updated construction schedule we provided to DWR gives us a little bit more time than that. The schedule timeframe you provided should work. If we can see a draft copy, please forward. Thanks. Shannon From: Georgoulias, Bethany [bethany.georgoulias@ncdenr.gov] Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2013 9:58 AM To: Langley, Shannon Cc: Bennett, Bradley; Pickle, Ken Subject: RE: Question about Mayo Steam Plant *** This is an EXTERNAL email. Exercise caution. DO NOT open attachments or click links from unknown senders or unexpected email. *** Hi Shannon, I am close to completing a draft of the Certificate of Coverage with supplemental monitoring requirements for NCG12. It will include a few additional parameters through the cycle of the permit, with an initial larger sampling suite for just the (1) first sampling period and (2) the sampling period in 2017 prior to renewal application. We expect this to be a low risk site, and our goal is for these results to help preserve the option of continued overage under NCG12 at renewal. I'm working with both DWR and DEMLR staff at the Raleigh Regional Office before finalizing the COC, and we need to get final concurrence from DEMLR staff at the RRO. Dave Parnell was out on vacation at the end of November, but I will be checking in with him and his Supervisor this week. I plan to have a COC for internal concurrence by the end of the week and anticipate being able to issue it before the Christmas holidays, as long as DWR and DEMLR staff are in agreement. What is the expected operation date of the Monofill, and does it reflect a certain date in the SOC? Thanks, Bethany Bethany Georgouiias, Environmental Engineer NCDENR / Division of Energy, Mineral, and Land Resources Storrnwater Permitting Program 1612 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1612 512 N. Salisbury Street, Raleigh, NC 27604 919 / 807-6372 (phone); 919 / 807-6494 (fax) Website: http://portaI.ncdenr.org/web/ir/stormwater E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records law and may be disclosed to third parties. Central Files: APS SWP 12/20/13 Permit Number NCG120101 Permit Tracking Slip Program Category NPDES SW Permit Type Landfill Stormwater Discharge COC Primary Reviewer Bethany.Georgoulias Coastal SW Rule Permitted Flow Status Project Type In review New Project Version Permit Classification COC Permit Contact Affiliation Facility Facility Name Major/Minor Region Mayo Steam Plant Monofill Minor Raleigh Location Address County 10660 Boston Rd Person Roxboro NC 27574 Facility Contact Affiliation Dulcie F. Phillips 821 Blaylock Dairy Rd Owner Roxboro NC 275747527 Owner Name Owner Type Duke Energy Progress Inc Non -Government Owner Affiliation Paula J. Sims PO Box 1551 Dates/Events Raleigh NC 27602 Scheduled Orig Issue App Received Draft Initiated Issuance Public Notice Issue Effective Expiration 09/23/13 1l (712,D { i f 4l2_1114� I a r3 % /2,01-7 Regulated Activities Requested/Received Events Landfill operation RO staff report fequested 11/27/13 RO staff report received Outfal I 001 12/19/13 Waterbody Name Stream Index Number Current Class Subbasin Bowes Branch 22-58-14 C 03-02-05 f' • .i:. - NCDENR North Carolina Department of'Environm6nt and Natural Resot;rcbs ` Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources Land Quality Section, Pat,McCrory,•Govemor ' Tracy E. Davis, PE, CPM John E. Skvada, III, Secretary Director ' r- December 19,'2013 To: 'Bethany Georgoulias Y • 1 Through: John Holley From: Dave Parnell Subject: STAFKREPORT i Duke Energy Progress -'Mayo Steam Electric Plant Monofill Permit: NCG120101 (DRAFT) Permittee Contact: William J. Thacker . i Duke Energy Progress, Inc. Mayo Steam Electric'Plant 10660 Boston Road Roxboro; North Carolina•27574 'Bethany: I have reviewed the Draft Certificate of Coverage and other pertinent information and•offerthe,following comments:' -1. The draft letter and CoC permit were reviewed. As we discussed on -the phone, a minor typo.of the date for` -Analytical MO`riitoring Requirements should be change&frorn "once during Jan" l-Jun-30; 2013" to. t once during Jan 1- Jun 30, 2014" The letter',and COC were•easy to read and understand. 2. No Site Visit was conducted for this Report. 3. The DEMLR PRO staff understands. the"uniqueness of this facility and the justification for the use of the General permit; as well as the method for analytigO"monitoring. We -.will work with'tlie"fa_ciliiy during- the upcoming monitoring periods, with this understanding in,mind. 4. The DEMLR RegionaYStaff will review the Sedimentation and Erosion Control plan, whe'n•sulimitted ' assuring that all land. disturbance activities a,re.conducted' within-the`requiren.ients of'tlie DEMLR rules." Erosion Control inspections are conducted on an' as•,needed basis.. Typically,:a site,b.eing,,developed; •is i inspected ai least every six months by DEMLR'siaff. 1628 Mail service Center, Ratelgh, Nonh. Carolina 27699.1628 Location: 3600 Barrett Drive, Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 One I , Phone: 919-791.42001FAX: 91M714718 NorthCa. ollna ` . Inferrer http:poRal.ncdenr.orglwebM �"�R•��� An Equal OpportrrOy 1 Atfirmati" Action EinoMr atK Li i j r 5 r Based on the information provided, the Raleigh Regional Office has no.objection to the issuance of the.NPDES Stormwafer Permit NCG120101. I Signature Report Prepare r O�V`2. G� Date �`2 �._:_•:� l - a Signature.of Regional Supe ' Date Cc: RRO files r ! 1628 MaG Service Center, Raleigh, Noah CaroQna 27699.1628 Location: 3800 Barren Dd4; Ralegh, Noah Carolina 27669 One . Phone: 919.791.42001 FAX: 919-571.4718. T�7 1 Internet http:portaE.nodenr.oggwebllr! lNO C[ylIOIJlllc`1' An Equal opportunity l Affi nave Action Employer Natu al U /'A Georgoulias,_ Bethany From: Romanski, Autumn Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2013 7:49 AM To: Georgoulias, Bethany Subject: RE: Mayo Steam Plant CCR Monofill - NCG12 COC Issuance with Amended Conditions Bethany, Thank you for your consideration to review and research this. I agree with your call to pull out of the list Mn and Al, upon further review studies did show less likely to leach and low leach -ability and only under very specific conditions. The list is long, but well researched and applicable0 Sincerely, Autumn From: Georgoulias, Bethany Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2013 9:50 AM To: Parnell, David; Bennett, Bradley Cc: Romanski, Autumn; Halley, ]ohn; Pickle, Ken; Smith, Danny Subject: Mayo Steam Plant CCR Monofill - NCG12 COC Issuance with Amended Conditions Importance: High Dave, I hope you had a nice vacation over the Thanksgiving holiday. I'm sure you are still catching up! Attached are documents I've drafted in preparation to issue a Certificate of Coverage for NCG12 for the Mayo Steam Plant Monofill under construction in Person County. It's scheduled to begin operation early next year, and we'd like to issue it before the Christmas holidays. This is an unusual COC because it has several amended conditions based on the material (coal combustion reside sprayed with evaporator liquid waste from the ZLD system going in at Mayo Steam Plan). We have proposed additional monitoring through the permit cycle, as well as two special events with a more comprehensive list. Please see the attached DRAFT COC, This COC will be finalized before being sent to the permittee — we don't run public notices or normally provide permittees with "draft" COC's. I just wanted you to review it. I have some information about the Solid Waste Permit, but I assume there is also an E&SC plan in place for this site? Dave, if it would help to talk with you and John about any questions you have, please let us know. Bradley and I can be available to discuss. We want to make sure RRO DEMLR understands how different this site is than our usual general permits. Does the RRO [DEMLR or DWR] have any objection to proceeding with issuance of this COC? Please let us know your concurrence by December 1g`h Autumn and Danny are very familiar with the Mayo Steam Plant and the variety of issues there. She has provided a lot of information I've incorporated into my review (and by the way, please disregard the first one I sent, because I had to correct some history in there with the help of her summary below.) THANK YOU FOR ALL YOUR HELP WITH THIS ONE, AUTUMN!! Autumn and Danny, please let us know your concurrence with this proposed path forward on the COC as well. instead of putting the extra monitoring in just the cover letter, we have amended it to the actual COC and noted the COC is an enforceable part of the permit. We are also requesting in -stream sampling results from the WQMP under the solid waste permit be copied to RRO (see draft cover letter). We plan to brief Tracy and Toby in DEMLR about this permit, since there's been litigation surrounding the Mayo Steam Plant NPDES wastewater permit and so many issues with the coal fired power plants in general. Our AG's office has said we are okay to move ahead with this one since it is a separate site. We also know there are several landfills out there (many unlined, unlike this one — which we expect to be much lower risk) that are accepting coal ash. Autumn has given me info. on the Halifax County Landfill after her investigations there, and certainly there are many others. I think this will be an important aspect to consider in our NCG12 renewal, and we'll probably incorporate additional monitoring for outfalls that receive any runoff from areas where ash was/is being landfilled. Thanks so much for your prompt attention to this one, Bethany Bethanv Geoi-goulicls. Environmenlat Engineer N NCDI R / Division of Energy, Mineral, and [,and Resources Storrmvater Permitting Program 1612 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1612 i 12 N. Salisbury Street. Raleigh, NC 27604 919 1807-6372 (phone); 919 1807-6494 (fax) Webs ite: litter//portal. iicdeiir.orglwcb/ir/stormwater ti-moil correspondence to wid.from this <addr-ess ntgr he subject to the North (,arrnln a Public Records taw emd may be disclosed to third parries. From: Romanski, Autumn Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2013 2:26 PM To: Georgoulias, Bethany Subject: RE: Mayo Steam Plant CCR Monofill - 2009 file review question Bethany, This is the only signed SOC for Mayo and it took 1 Y2 years to reach a final agreement. Application dated Dec 9, 2010 with final signed June 2012. Any other SOC documents (which originate from the RRO Office and then are finalized by the CO and Director) dated earlier than June 2012 would have been drafts from 2010 to final in 2012. The modified permit currently in effect was effective November 1, 2009 and expired March 31, 2012. No reissuance, e-mail trail of permit renewal being passed from permit writer to permit writer and according to Sergei- who did the final draft in 2012-2013, the permit cannot be reissued yet due the law suit? I think Roxboro SOC draft (an application for SOC was received March 30, 2009, a second SOC draft was submitted to CO on November 9, 2009, then another draft sent to CO on February 2, 2010, none ever signed.) Eventually, the SOC was no longer needed by August/Sept 2010 since by then the treatment units were repaired. Additional sampling was required by RRO during the wastewater treatment units failures, starting in March 2008. The additional monitoring required by RRO stopped in Sept 2010 when the treatment units repairs were completed.. There is currently no SOC at Roxboro and last permit issued was modification dated 2009 and expiration date March 31, 2012. S I hope providing this timeline of events associated with 2009 and 5oc applications clears up any ambiguity from the CO file review. If not, just give a call. Autumn Georgoulias, Bethany From: Romanski, Autumn Sent: Monday, December 02, 2013 1:45 PM To: Georgoulias, Bethany Subject: RE: Mayo Steam Plant CCR Monofill Bethany, Missed you this (am) at the ITOC Meeting. I brought over the Mayo file to discuss. Can we enforce the conditions added to the general permit via the cover letter? Is there any precedence for this? The list of analytes — I would add Molybdenum, and Barium, if possible. l suggest this after reviewing the leaching data published on Fly Ash, Gypsum, and FGD. Evaluating the Fote of Metals in Air pollution control residues from coo! fired power plants Environ. Sci and Tech 2010. The other comment is that boron (already in permit), chloride, and possibly sulfate and fluoride may concentrate in wastewaters associated with the new evaporative process and be present. Would be good to have a baseline that's includes these analytes. Also going forward the Mayo investigative report identified Al, Mn, and TDS as challenges. Would be good to have Fe, Mn, Al, as these are constituents seen in many types of Landfill settings. TDS may be more helpful than conductivity as a general measure of pollutants of interest in dissolved form (in this case) but understand reporting conductivity would not require running a lab sample. Hardness would be ideal to understand — but I have yet to see any DWR movement on sampling hardness in conjunction with metals testing. I hope these comments are helpful and if you have any questions please feel free to contact me. The draft permit was well written and your work to ensure data/monitoring needs are met is greatly appreciated. Sincerely, Autumn Romanski AwLam N�=��.C,W.r-mipcow. 9aaw,.ao� ph—n0 199+I�Ist ,y;p, rK VrA9 FMfV11FJ tA.11it P.awrn No�d�ildC�CtiR GW ry,gP.iw+xwr�r a.�' Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties unless the content is exempt by statute or other regulation. NCDENR North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Division of Water Ouality Beverly Eaves Perdue Chares Wakild, P.E. Governor Dee Freeman Director Secretary June 26, 2012 Mr. Charles M. Gates, Vice President — Power Generation 1 LD r� LL Progress Energy Carolinas ! } P. O. Box 1551 f� ;� r Raleigh, NC 27602-1551 Subject: iSPECIA1 ORDER.BY-CONSENTS NC t"-=+R Raieigl� F;,,;ie•�a!'Jf�ice EMC SOC wQ S10-012 Progress Energy Carolinas, Inc. — Mayo Steam Electric Plant WWTP NPDES Permit NCO038377 Person County Dear Mr. Gates: Attached for your records is a copy of the signed Special Order by Consent approved by the Environmental Management Commission. The terms and conditions of the Order are in full effect, including those requiring submittal 'of written notice of compliance or,non�-compliance with any schedule date. ., Pursuant to.North Carolina General Statute, I43-215.3D, water -quality fees have been revised to include an annual fee for activities covered under -a Special Order by Consent. Progress Energy 'will -be subject to a fee of$500.00 on a yearly •basis•while under the Order. The initial fee payment will be invoiced at a later date, With future fee invoicing done on an annual basis. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please contact the Surface Water Protection Section staff in the Raleigh Regional Office at (919) 791-4200 or Bob Sledge at (919) 807-6398. Sincerely, Ch Crrl-�Cls- Wakild, P.E - Attachment cc: Jeanne Phillips,'ITS Central Files.: NPDES Unit — SOC File , Raleigh Regional Office, Surface Water Protection' Don Joe -- EPA Region 4 ' 1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699.1617 Location: 512 N. Salisbury St. Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 One 1 1 Phone:919.807-63004FAX: 919-807-6492 NO tllC�lrCilIllcl A, 11u t www.ncwaterquaiity.org An Equal Opppnunity 4 Altirmalive ACSan Emplaypr ` NORTH CAROLINA r: ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGENLLNT COMMISSION COUNTY OF PERSON IN THE MATTER OF } SPECIAL, ORDER BY CONSENT NORTH CAROLINA EMC SOC WQ SIO-012 CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT COMPAINY ) dlbla } PROGRESS ENERGY CAROLINAS, INC. ) MAYO STEAM ELECTRIC PLANT } NPDES PERMIT NCO038377 ) Pursuant to provisions of North Carolina'General Statute (G.S.) 143-215.2, this Special Order by Consent is entered into by Carolina Power & Light d/bla Progress Energy Carolinas, Inc.,'hereinafter referred to as Progress Energy, and the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission, an agency of the State of North Carolina created by G.S. 143B-282,, and hereinafter referred to as the Commission: 1. Progress Energy and the Commission hereby stipulate the following: a. Progress Energy operates a steam- power plant facility and holdsNPDES permit —a' NC`00� 7 to discharge process control and industrial waste streams to Mayo, Lake,Cl�, tWSr-V_waters of this state iii the -Roanoke River BaSin,.in,PersOn County ; ... b. Progress,Energy installedtwet limestone forced oxidation wee t rubbers on the operating unit at the Mayo Steam Electric Plant in response to requirements from the State of North Carolina under the Clean Smokestacks legislation. Accordingly, Progress Energy,installed a _ T —_ g.p—s CFI, ue-Gas� De �s�ulfurization {FGD) wastewater settiin and a liioreactor {a biological ffa-tment.syste`m); and`a flush`pond'to treat wastewater generatedby the recehtly'added wet scnilibers. a C. Since installation of settling -pond, flush pond and bioreactor Progress Energy has, • upgraded the ash handling system to handle fly ash at the plant as dry ash, except during maintenance outages of the dry ash system, #o reduce pollutant loading to the outfall; • investigated treatment modifications and optimizations which have resulted in: - installation and use, on an as needed basis, of a. chemical injection system to aid in the settling of mercury and other constituents in the settling pond; addition of a pH adjustment system to the inlet of the bioreactor to aid in keeping the pH of the wastewater at an optimum level for maximum treatment efficiency; ary hydrocyclones to reduce the amount of placing into service second suspended solids in the blowdown to the"settling pond. EMC SOC WQ SIO-012 p. 2 d. Since the introduction of treated.l'GD wastewater into the system and the effective, dates for certain effluent limitations, sampling of effluent from Outfall 002 (Ash Pond Treatment System) has indicated the overall treatment system is unable to consistently meet final effluent limits for Mercury Boron, Thallium Manganese and Selenium. e. Noncompliance with final effluent limitations constitutes causing or contributing to pollution of the waters of this State named above, and Progress Energy is within the jurisdiction of the Commission as set forth in G.S. Chapter 143, Article 21. f. Compliance will require study, investigation'of.the circumstances and construction.' g. .Progress Energy has committed to providing necessary funding; for, planning, designing, and constructing an enhanced wastewater handling, treatment and disposal system, which, once constructed and operated for a period of,time, Will be sufficient to -manage wastewater to such W an extent that the discharge from the Mayo Steam Electric Plant will be able to comply with final effluent limits. h. Since this Special Order is by consent, neither party will file a petition for a contested case or for judicial review concerning its terms. 2. Progress Energy; desiring to attain full compliance with the,permit and final effluent limitations (permit identified in paragraph La. above), lierebyagrees to do the following: a. Undertake the following activities in accordance with the indicated time schedule described in Attachment A:° (1) Investigations.. Conduct investigations into available treatment operations, measures or technologies that once constructed and operated for a period of time, will be expected to provide measures to such an extent that the pollutants discharged from the Mayo Electric Generating Plant will be significantly reduced,and the discharge will be able to comply - with final effluent limits. - Progress Energy must communicate in writing the results of the investigations whereby a,report of the proposed changes and installation of zero liquid discharge for certain wastewaters will illustrate how.the,reduction of the pollutants from the Mayo Electric Generating Plant NPDES discharge will be achieved (first action item of Attachment A). -Progress Energy is to'submit a .written investigations report to the Raleigh Regional, Supervisor,. Division of -Water Quality, Surface WaterProtection Section; 1628'.Mail Service Center,. Raleigh, NC,27699-1628,,and one„copy must be mailed to the Point Source Branch, Division of Water Quality; 1617,Mail Service Center, " Raleigh,.NC 27699-1617. 1 1. - r 1.% ` (2) Construction. Based upon the'data collection,,investigations,and analyses noted in 2.a. (1) above, begin construction of new.treatment facilities including zero liquid discharge for certain.wasteivaters and modification of existing facilities or processes as appropriate and secure all applicable permits'for.such activities in accordance with the schedules set forth in -Attachment A. Progress�Energy is to submit a construction schedule (second action item in Attachment A) to,the-Raleigh Regional Supervisor; Division of Water Quality, Surface Water Protection Section, 1628 Mail. Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1628, and one copy must be mailed to the Point Source Branch,. Division of Water Quality, 161-7 Mail Service'Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-16I7. This -schedule -must deiail-major 2nstniction-nailestones.and:adlrere.to.the_schedules set forth in Attachment A,( ludii7g the -end -date •ofifiis`Order: ( - 51 EMC SOC WQ S 10-012 p. 3 (3} Permit modification. Progress Energy is required to submit NPDES permit modification ' request(s)prior to decommissioning the existing treatment Facilities and/or the online use of new,treatment unit(s)/system(s): Submit.permit modificationrequests to -the Point Source Branch, Division of Water Quality, 1617 Mail Service Center; Raleigh,,NC 27699-1617. b. Undertake the following activities in accordance with.the indicated time schedule established in Attachment A and Attachment B. (1) Ouarterly Progress Reports ..'Progress.Energy will submit quarterly progress reports, detailing the work and activities undertaken with regard to schedules and activities included -in this SOC. The reports are to be submitted as follows: one copy must be mailed to the Raleigh Regional Supervisor,. Division of Water Quality, SurfaceVater Protection -Section, 1628 Mail Service Center; Raleigh, NC 27699-1628, and one copy .must be mailed to -the Point Source Branch, Division of Water Quality, 1617. Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617. The quarterly reports are due to be subinitted no later than January 31, April 30, July 31 and October 31 for the duration of this order or until permit compliance is achieved. (2) Final Written Account. The purpose of this Final Written Account is to demonstrate the reduction of pollutants discharged from the Mayo Electric -Generating Plant'and the ' respective ability of the new -wastewater facilities to,meet effluent limits.. Specifically, Progress Energy must illustrate"the differences in the waste stream characteristics (using both concentration and mass loadings) of Mercury, Selenium, Boron, Manganese,and Thallium between the current waste stream and the waste stream at the conclusion of this Order. This Final Written Account shall provide the means by which Progress Energy will demonstrate compliance with the NPDES-Permit for. the:purposes,of this Order. The Final'Written Account must be submitted,to the Raleigh Regional Supervisor, Division of Water Quality; Surface Water Protection Section, 1628 Mail Service Center, 'Raleigh, NC 27699-1628; and one copy must be mailed to the, Point, Source, Branch, ' Division of Water Quality, 1617•Mail Service Center, Raleigh.-INC 27699-1617 in accordance with Attachment A. (3) Constniction�Completion: `BLgin-and,corripl"te construction of zero liquid discharge.and modifcd-wizstewater treatinent-facilities'or other measures--in'accordance-with-th scheme'described=in.Attachmeut.As Provide written notice within 30 days.of construction completion` to the`Raleigh Regional, Supervisor, Division of Water Quality, Surface Water Protection Section, 1628 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, -NC 27699-1628, and one copy must be mailed to the Point Source Branch,'Division of Water Quality, 1611 Mail Service Center; Raleigh, NC 27.699-1617 in accordance with Attachment A. (4) Interim1imits. Comply with all terms andconditions of the NPDES Permit except those effluent limitations identified as interim limitations -in Attachment,B (Mercury, Selenium, Boron, Manganese and Thallium). During the'tirne the SOC is effective, Progress Energy shall comply with the interim effluent -limitations for'Mercury, Selenium, Boron, Manganese and Thallium as listed in Attachment'B: A written notice must be submitted .no later than fourteen (14) calendar days after failure to comply with any Interim Limits in Attachment B. Written notice must be submitted to the Raleigh Regional Supervisor, Division of Water Quality, Surface Water, Protection, Section, 1628 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1628. A.copy must also be mailed to the -Point Source Branch, 0 EMC SOC WQ S 10-012 p. 4 Division of Water Quality, i617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-1617. The written notice shall minimally include a statement of the reason(s) for noncompliance and remedial action(s) taken. (5) Written Notice. No later than fourteen (14) calendar days after any date identified.for accomplishment of any activity listed in this paragraph [paragraph 2.1 and in the schedule set forth in Attachment A, submit to the Raleigh Regional Supervisor, Division of Water Quality, Surface Water Protection Section, 1628 Mail.Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1628 written notice of noncompliance,'therein if applicable. A copy'must be mailed to the Point Source Branch, Division of Water Quality, 1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-1617. The notice shall include a statement of the reason(s) for noncompliance, remedial action(s) taken, and a statement identifying the extent to which subsequent dates or times for, accomplishment of listed activities maybe affected. (6) Effluent Limits. Attain compliance with effluent limitations in accordance with the schedule described in Attachment A. 3. Progress Energy agrees that unless excused under [paragraph 4.], it will pay the.DWQ, by check payable to the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, stipulated penalties according to the following -schedule. , - , Failure to provide written investigations report [2.a. (1)] Action item (I) in Attachment A Failure to submit construction schedule [2.a. (2)] Action' item (2) in'Attachment A I Failure to submit quarterly progress, reports as [2.b. (1)] Actabn items (3) and (S) in Attachment A Failure to -provide Final Written Account [2.b. (2)] Action item (S) in Attachment A Failure to begin construction; provide a written notice of construction completion as described in Attachment A' [2.b.(3)] Action items (3) and (4) in Attachment A Failure to comply with Interim Limits 2.b. (4) and Attachment B Failure to sample analytes at frequency required (Mercury, Selenium, Boron, Manganese and Thallium in Attachment B) Failure to provide Written Notice of noncompliance [2.b. (5)] $1,000.00' per day. $1,000.00 per day. $1,000.00 for the first violation;' doubles with each subsequent assessment for late reports. - $1,000.00,per. day. $1,000.00 per day. 5 - .$500.00 per occasion. -.$500.00 per occasion $200.00 per day for each day beyond fourteen calendar days past schedule date. , EMC SOC WQ S10-012 P. 5 Failure to achieve compliance with $10,000.00 NPDES permit by deadline established in Attachment A Action item (5) in Attachment A Failure to meet schedule dates, listed in Attachment A $1,000.00 per occasion } other than those referenced above.,. 4. Progress Energy and the Commission agree stipulated penalties are not due if Progress Energy satisfies the Division of Water Qualitysthat noncompliance, was caused solely by:. a. An act of God; b. An act of war; c. An intentional actor omission of a third party, but this defense shall not be available if the act or omission is that of an employee or agent of Progress -Energy or if the. actor omission occurs in connection with a contractual relationship with Progress Energy; d. An extraordinary event beyond Progress Energy's control. Contractor delays or failure to obtain funding will not be considered as events°beyond Progress Energy's:.control; or e. Any combination of the above causes. Failure within thirty (30) days of receipt of written demand to pay the penalties, or challenge them by a contested -case petition pursuant to G.S. 150B-23, will be grounds for a collection action, which the Attorney General is hereby authorized to initiate. The only issue in such an action will be whether the thirty (30) days has elapsed. 5. gNoncompliance.with the terms of this Special Order by. Consent is subject to enforcement action in'addition to the above stipulations, including injunctive relief pursuant to G.S. 143-215.6.C. 6. This Special Order by Consent (including Attachments) and any terms or conditions contained herein, hereby supersede any and all previous Special Orders,'Enforcement Compliance Schedule Letters, terms, and conditions contained therein issued in connection with NPDES permit NC0038377. In the event of a permit modification or renewal,,any applicable effluent limit or monitoring requirements contained therein shall supersede those contained in this Special Order by Consent, except as modified in paragraph 2.b.4 (Attachment B) above. 7. This Special Order by Consent may be amended provided Progress Energy has made good faith efforts to comply with the provisions of this Special Order_ by Consent. 8. Progress Energy, upon signature of this Special Order by Consent, will be expected to comply with all schedule dates, terms, and conditions of this document.. r. EMC SOC WQ SIO-012 p. 6 This Special Order by Consent shall expire 365 days after completion of the last permitted construction project and achievement of permit limits OR no later than September 1, 2017. For Progress Energy Carolinas, Inc.: r.�1a7/Q Charles M. Gates Date Vice President — Power Generation - PEC For the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission: —1�4-4alAhk arles Wdkild, P. :;'Director Date ' Division of Water Quality CMC SOC WQ S l 0-012 p. 7 Attachment A: Schedule Re ortfu Action Item Start End requirements Provide written indestisation`s report Within 45 days of the to RRO and Central 1 investi ations effective date of this 180 days from Start Office within 225 Order days of the effective , -date of this order see 2.a. 1. Within 60 days'of' dJ DWO'approval of Submit pro '(2)Submit Construction written investigations schedule to RRO and - Schedule Schedule report from 2.a. 1. -Central•Office scei submit the construction 2.a. 2 schedule. According to construction schedule Construction status Within 90 Days of not to exceed 1000 days must be obtaining all applicable from obtainina ail communicated in (31Begin Construction permits and permits and quarterly. report or authorizations authorizations or at 2 b 1 and 3�j maximum the end date of this order Upon com letion of Provide notice to the construction written 4 End Construction Within Dons RRO and Central notice must be uction completing construction Office provided to DW 2.b. OIL O erational Status must be communicated in uarter!y report 12.b.(1)1. Provide (5)Achieve Compliance 365 days after Final Written with NPDES Permit construction'is Account ILAL2 Limits completed. illustrating pollutant loading reduction 12.b.(2)1. within 545 days of construction completion. EMC SOC `VQ S 10-012 P. 8 ATTACHMENT B INTERIM EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS During the period beginning upon the effective date of this SOC and Iasting until expiration, the following interim (SOC) limits associated with Outfall 002 (Ash Pond Treatment System) have been established. Discharges interim limits and monitoring frequency from Outfall 002 are specified below: Outfall 'Parameter Interim Limitations Monti Average b'' Dai1V Maximum (lbs/day) Monitorin Frequency Sample Type 002 Flow Contiriuous Recording 002, Mercury 0.0037 0.0095 Weekly I Grab 002 Selenium 4.755 6.461 Weekly Composite 002 " Boron '590.7 683.0 Weekly Com o'site 002 'Man anese 1. 223 29.4 Weekly 'Composite 002 ' Thallium 0.056 0.089 Weekly Com oAte Superscripts: 1'. Compliance shall be evaluated using the daily mass loading calculated from analyses performed during a calendar day. - • C . . 2_ Calculation for Daily Mass Loading = Total Daily Discharge Flow from Outfall 002 (defined as the average flow during a calendar day, or any 24 hour period that reasonably represents the calendar day for the purposes of sampling) in MGD. x Parameter ' Concentration in mg/L (defined as the average measurement of the pollutant over u day, see Item 3. below - composite sample) x 8.34 'pounds/gallon. 3. Composite gample=A samplecollected over a 24-hour period by continuous sampling, a single, continuous sample.coliected over a 24-hour period proportional to the rate of flow. 4. The monthly average shall be calculated as the arithmetic mean of all daily mass loadings reported during a calendar.month. This is calculated as the sum of all daily mass. loadings (superscript 2 above) divided by the number of days results are reported for the . parameter during'the calcndar month. ' S. Flow shall be monitored continually except for the infrequent times when there may be maintenance activities on the flow device. To ensure accurate calculations of pollutant loadings,. Progress Energy will be required to install'a recording, totalizing flow measurement device at outfall 002 within 90 days of the effective date of the SOC. 6• EPA method 1631(low level Mercury) and appropriate clean hands sampling protocols are required. f l' 4 NORTH CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION SPECIAL ORDER BY CONSENTA EMC SOC WQ S I 0-012 ADDENDUM 1.0 On March 2, 2012, the Division of Water Quality published a public notice of intent to issue a State Consent Order for Progress Energy Carolinas, Ine.'s Mayo Steam Electric Plant, that discharges treated wastewater to Mayo Lake in.the Roanoke River Basin under the authority of NPDES permit NCO03 8377. Comments on the proposed Order received by April 6, 2012 were considered in the final determination. Accordingly, after review of the public comments, items listed in this addendum to the SOC (WQ S 10- 012) are incorporated as conditions of this Special Order by Consent. 1. Additional lake and'fish tissue monitorin . As a part of this order Progress Energy Carolinas, Inc. must comply with all terms and conditions of Attachment C, which containsadditional lake water quality and fish tissue monitoring. Sample locations are depicted on Attachment D - map. 2. Reportinrt"'The results of the monitoring noted in 1. above must be compiled in a report to be submitted by October lit of each calendar year until the expiration of the SOC. A copy -of the report must be submitted to NC DWQ Raleigh Regional Office..'in addition, copies of the reports are to be sent to: NC Wildlife Resources Commission Occupational & Environmental. Epidemiology 1721.Mail Service Center NC DHHS - Division of Pdblic Health • Raleigh NC 27699-1721 1902 Mail Service Center (attention: Shari L. Bryant) Raleigh, NC 27699-1902 (attention: Dr. Kenneth M. Rudo, Ph.D.) lf.monitoring indicates significant deviation(s) from historical or baseline data, or yields substantive individual values, this SOC may be reopened by the Director of the Division of Water 'Quality to.m4fy the monitoring requirements described in this addendum. 3. Signage. Progress Energy will provide and maintain signage in both English and Spanish discouraging fishing in/along the cove containing the NPDES outfall. Signs shall be erected in and'along the cove containing the NPDES outfall,.and at the Mayo Reservoir public boat access. For Progress Energy Carolinas, Inc.: Jr es M. Gates Date ' Vice President — Power Generation - PEC For the North Carolina Environmental Management Comrission: Charles Wakild WDDir—ec:rt;r— Division., of Water Quality i SPECIAL ORDER BY CONSENT: E M C SOC, WQ S107012 Attachment C — Monitoring Mayo Lake in,the Roanoke River Basin, Person County Water Quality Monitoring Variables*: pH Conductivity Water Chemist Monitorinjz Variables*: Total Dissolved Solids Chloride Sulfate Trace Elements total Calcium Sodium (lower reporting limit's in parentheses) Boron (50 µg/L) t Mercury (0.5 ng /L) Selenium (0.5 µg JL) Tlialliutn (0.1 µg 1L) Manganese (0.5 µg /L) , *Sampling locations for Water Quality and Water Chemistry Monitoring Variables listed above are depicted on the Mayo Reservoir Sampling Location Map as locations B, E, and G. Samples are to be collected during alternate calendar months (February, April-, June, August, October, December), each calendar year the SOC is in effect. Fish tissue monitoring **- Species Tissue Total number of fish per location Bluegill (Lepomismacrochirw) Muscle 4 Largemouth bass (Microprenrs salmoides) Muscle 4. Catfish' Muscle 4 ' Brawn bullhead targeted, but other species may be included depending upon availability ** Fish species are to be collected and tested annually each calendar year the SOC is in effect, for the following anaiytes: mercury, thallium, and selenium.'Fish collection locations are depicted on Mayo Reservoir Sampling Location Map as locations B, E. and G A Biological Study Plan for Mayo Lake was approved by DWQ on March 14, 2012. Portions of this SOC Addendum complement or are coincident to the approved annual 2012 Biological Study Plan. However, this SOC Addendum is not a modification of the approved Biological Study Plan. Conversely, future modification(s) of the Biological Study Plan will not change the conditions of this Addendum to the SOC. EMC SOC WQ S1'0-012 Progress Energy Carolinas- Inc. — Mayo Steam Electric Plant :. Attachment D -'Mayo Reservoir Sampling Location Map • I 1, Mayo Greek Ash Pond Plant She 0 1 2 _ 3 Kilometers 0 1 2 Miles 3 U 1 us 501 H t� i •-,in2 Mayo 3loam k '', !^t • :�.' !';-A Electric Pfan1 .» .. ........... .... , S y fir, NORTH CARQLINA Irrterlm Llmha esceedwKe. r tt" Vlolat" 't +� .1+'''� . tl,i� ' Interim llmfh exceedance Verbal/Wrftot Ndtke-/in Ia da Caux/Doamematlon - S+• cart •12 fluart R Due' Nacelrad. Start fn fndt Prwlde Wrtttm R 4f2 I0131/2O17 10P512013 R1912O12 2/5/2013 IV2012022 and 11/3017012 NOV-7013-LV-0776 12/5/2012 Data Subm"ed for Nalunl Cause 2/5/2013 3111/ 1/31/0013 1/18/2013 12131/2012 NOV-2013{V•Zn Vi8j2M3 Data Submitted far Natural Cause AM12019 4/23/20t3 5/31/2013 NOV•2OlMV-0037;Stlpulatad Pvm4ty Paid before lssuenta 6/21/2013 Outage -Equip-mm Cloardng 7/31/2D13 7/19/2013 10131/2033 1l31/701a 1/30/2014 7131/2014 AFMlra MMFPe f �I-LY oc—,.ac�a S1.1 f rsSti� �r✓nIK� c cT. a 13 OCT ac ILA 5;6r)As-tOzLcD ot;t .3�,ao�a (� �t r Georgoulias, Bethany From: Georgoulias, Bethany Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2013 11:45 AM To: Bennett, Bradley; Pickle, Ken Cc: Parnell, David; Romanski, Autumn Subject: Mayo Steam Plant CCR Monofill Attachments: NCG120101_N0I.pdf; NCG120101_COC.docx; NCG120101_cover!etter.docx; NCG120101 Review.docx Bradley and Ken: Let's schedule some time to talk about what I'm proposing as "conditional coverage" under General Permit NCG12 for the Mayo Monofill early next week. I have attached a draft COC and draft cover letter. I'm also attaching my review summary. I have included some information about rationale in the draft cover letter to the permittee as well, but maybe we should omit that and simply retain that in my review document. Any thoughts on the text would be helpful. Bradley, given the site and issues surrounding these facilities, I plan to have you sign the COC and letter when it's issued. Dave and Autumn: Attached is a copy of the NOI from Duke Progress Inc. for this new CCR Monofill. I've already talked with Autumn about it a couple of times since she's familiar with the site and the Wastewater Permit/SOC for this site. We are proposing to move ahead with a general permit instead of an individual permit, but with additional monitoring requirements. The details and rationale for my proposed monitoring are outlined in my review summary. This serves as our request to the Raleigh Regional Office for concurrence to move forward with a COC to cover this site under NCG120000, with the additional conditions. The monofill is scheduled to begin operation very soon —if not already —as a result of stipulations in the SOC. We appreciate your feedback and response about whether to move ahead as soon as you are able to give it attention. Thanks! Bethany 13elhany Gcorgonlias, l_nvironwewal E'n�,ineer NCDENR / Division of Energy, Mineral, and Land Resources Storrnwatcr Permitting Program 1612 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1612 512 N. Salisbury Strect. Raleigh. NC 27604 919 1 807-6372 (phone); 919 1 807-6494 (fax) Website: htti2://portal.ncdenr.oi-,e/web/lr/stormNvater E-mail correspondence !o and jronr this address near he subject to the North (.'arohna Puhlic Records law awl may he disclosed io third parlies. Georgoulias, Bethany From: Chernikov, Sergei Sent: Friday, November 15, 2013 7:40 AM To: Georgoulias, Bethany Subject: RE: Fish tissue sampling for Mayo Steam Plant in renewal permit Bethany, That is correct, below is the special condition that outlines the requirements. The sampling plan will be negotiated between the ESS and Duke, the sampling locations will be defined in the plan. Please let me know if you have any other questions. Thank you! Sergei A. (10) FISH TISSUE SANIPLING NEAR ASH POND DISCHARGE The facility shall conduct fish tissue monitoring once during the permit term and submit the results with the NPDES permit renewal application. The objective of the monitoring is to evaluate potential uptake of pollutants by fish tissue near the.t h Pond -discharge. The parameters analyzed in fish tissue shall he esraiuc, selenium, thallium and me- rcuryfThe monitoring shall be conducted in accordance with the Sampling Plan approved by the Division. Sergei Chernikov Ph.D. Environmental Engineer II Complex NPDES Permitting Unit Tel. 919-807-6393 Fax 919-807-6489 Mailing Address: 1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699 Physical Address/Express Mail: 512 N. Salisbury St., Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 From: Georgoulias, Bethany Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2013 9:43 AM To: Chernikov, Serge! Subject: Fish tissue sampling for Mayo Steam Plant in renewal permit Hi Sergei, I know that the renewal NPDES permit for Mayo Steam Plant (that stormwater is coming out of) should be getting a requirement for fish tissue sampling for Hg and Se. Is that the case? Could I find out from you where those sampling points will be? Are they in Bowes Branch? We are working on the CCR Monofill stormwater permit, and I'm trying to get a handle on all the surface water/fish tissue monitoring that will be happening in the vicinity. Thanks, Bg Bethany Georgoutias, Environmental Engineer NCDENR / Division of Energy, Mineral, and Land Resources Storrnwater Permitting Program 1612 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1612 512 N. Salisbury Street, Raleigh, NC 27604 919 / 807-6372 (phone); 919 / 807-6494 (fax) Website: htt :// ortal.ncdenr.oi-* web/h,/stormwater E-mail correspondence to and.fronr this address mqr he subject ur the North (,:arolina Public Records law arrd may be disclosed to third padres, f• k VIjI Coa[ Ash References: Literature: Coal Ash Leachate, Pore water/lake sediment EPA Chemical Specific Data: See copy Unlined Landfills: See Copy Human and Ecological Risk Assessment of Coal Combustion Waste: See EPA Site (this document is several hundred pages) Reviewing the information available, monitoring of the following analytes should be considered: Ph Conductivity- could be used as an indicator of issue, if a base rain event conductivity could be determined and the metals present were known- Require metals sampling data for permit application. COD- same as conductivity *Review the following analytes if have the metals and hardness data: Metals: As, Se, Sb, Mo, 8, Cr, Cd, Ni, Tl, and Hg Hardness (Ca), Li Environ. Sci. Technol. 2010, 44, 7351 7356 Evaluating the Fate of Metals in Air Pollution Control Residues from Coal -Fired Power Plants SUSAN A. THORNELOE,'-t DAVID S. KOSSON,* FLORENCE SANCHEZ,* ANDREW C. GARRABRANTS,t AND GREGORY HELMS§ National Risk Management Research Laboratory, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research 'Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee 37235, and Once of Resource Conservation and Recovery, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C. 20460 Received May 14, 2010. Revised manuscript received August 4, 2010. Accepted August 18, 2010. Changes in emissions control at U.S. coal-fired power plants will shift metals content from the flue gas to the air pollution control (APC) residues. To determine the potential"fate of"-J metalsthatare capturedthroughuse ofenlianced APC practices, the leaching hehavior_of_73 APC-residues-was.characteriied" following the approach of the Leaching Environmental Assessment Framework. Materials were tested over pH conditions and liquid —solid ratios expected during managementvia land disposal or beneficial use. Leachate concentrations for most metals were highly variable over a range of coal rank, facility configurations, and APC residue types. Liquid —solid partitioning (equilibrium) as a function of pH showed significantly different leaching behavior for similar residue types and facility configurations. Within a facility, the leaching behavior of blended residues was shown to follow one of four characteristic patterns. Variability in metals leaching was greater than the variability in totals concentrations by several orders of magnitude, inferring that total content is not predictive of leaching behavior. The complex leaching behavior and lack of correlation to total contents indicates that release evaluation under likely field conditions is a better descriptor of environmental performance than totals content or linear partitioning approaches. Introduction U.S. coal-fired power plants generated 320 gigawatts of electricity in 2008, producing 136 million tons of coal ash in the process (1). The annual amount of coal combustion residues (CCRs) generated is expected to growwith increasing demand for electricity and the resulting coal consumption (2). Environmental and health concerns associated with air emissions haveled towider implementation of multipollutant control to reduce air emissions from coal-fired power plants ' Corresponding author phone: (919) 541-2709; e-mail: 'rhorneloe.Susan@epa.gov. ' National Risk Management Research Laboratory, U.S. EPA. ' Vanderbilt University. 4 Office of Resource Conservation and Recovery, U.S. EPA, (3-5). These air pollution control (APC) technologies include the use of selective catalytic reduction (SCR) for postcom- bustion NO, removal, electrostatic precipitators (ESPs) or fabric filters for particulate capture, sorbent injection for increasing mercury (Hg) control, and flue gas desulfurization (FGD) or other scrubber technologies to reduce acidic gases in the stackemissions. The Supporting Information (Sp shows how these technologies integrate into the coal combustion process. With the promulgation of the U.S. EPA's Clean Air Interstate Rule (CAIR) (3-5), over half of the U.S. coal-fired capacity is projected to be equipped with SCR and/or FGD technology by 2020 (5, 6). The current practice of seasonal use of postcombustion NOx control will likely be extended to year-round implementation. In addition, coal-fired power plants, the largest source of anthropogenic Hg emissions in the U.S. (7), will likely expand the use of activated carbon injection (ACI) (8-10) to reduce Hg stack emissions. Changes in APC technologies will result in a greater amount of residue generated for each unit of electricity produced and an overall increase in the total content of Hg and other hazardous air pollutants in fly ash, FGD residues, and other APC residues (3, 8). The mobility of metals may be altered as a result of changes in material pH, carbon and chloride content, and interaction with the broader class of coal combustion residues (CCRs), for example, pyritic coal rejects from coal washing or high -sulfur coal rejects (11-14). Also, APC residues may be comanaged with residues, boiler slag, bottom ash, and other wastes from electric utilities (11, 15). Emerging APC technologies are likely to create new APC residues to be managed such as spray dryer ash or spent sorbents from Hg or postcombustion NO, control technology (11): In many cases, the properties of the APC residues and other CCRs (e.g., bottom ash and boiler slag) make them suitable for use as a replacement for natural resources or primary materials in a variety of industrial applications, reducing emissions from mining and production of those raw materials (16). As of 2008, 44% of CCRs was used in a range of applications including building roads, structural fill, mine reclamation, snow and ice control, and in the production of cement, concrete, wall board, and even toothpaste (1, 17). A breakdown of the production and utilization ofAPC residues ispresented in the SI. Fora residue to be a candidate for beneficial use, it must meet the performance requirements of the raw material it is replacing while not adversely impacting human health and the environment. Currently, there is wide disparity among the states as to how to establish if potential beneficial use applications are protective of human health and the envi- ronment (16, 18, 19). There are clear advantages to reuse of fly ash and other CCRs, as long as evaluation approaches are in place to ensure that one environmental release (i.e., air emissions from power plants) is not being traded for another (i.e., leaching of metals from coal ash through land disposal or use in engineering and commercial applications) (7). Environmental Assessment Methodologies. Historically, estimating metal release for environmental assessment has been based on the results of single -point extraction tests designed to simulate a single "mismanagement" or near - surface disposal scenario (20, 21). However, these single - point tests have come under significant criticism by many, including the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Science Advisory Board (14, 22, 23) and the National Academy of Sciences (24), due to a lack of critical data collection, overly broad application, and limited mechanistic understanding. Single -point tests often estimate metals release under 10,10211051016558 0 2010 American Chemical Society Published on web W/3112010 VOL. 44, NO. 19, 2010 1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY - 7351 leaching conditions that are unlikely to occur in actual disposal or reuse situations. Recognizing the importance of having a robust, mechanistic environmental assessment methodology, U.S. EPA conducted a review of available methods, sought Science Advisory Board input on the suitability of the available leaching test methods, and ultimately selected the tiered assessment approach (25) of the Leaching Environmental Assessment Framework (LEAF) (26). The test methods and interpretation protocols recom- mended in LEAF provide an integrated approach for evalu- ating leaching behavior of materials using a tiered approach that considers pH, liquid -to -solid ratio (LIS), and waste form properties across a range of plausible field conditions (23, 2.5). APC Residue Characterization Project. As part of a research project to investigate the fate of Hg and other RAPS resulting from more widespread use of advanced APC technologies, over 70 APC residues from 34 coal-fired power plants were sampled and characterized for leaching behavior as a function of final eluate pH and LIS following the LEAF test methods with the results published in a series of reports (12, 14, 23, 27). The objective was to understand the leaching potential of the residues generated by enhanced APC technology and ensure their appropriate disposal or reuse. The data from this project represent the largest collection of comprehensive characteristic leaching data to date. The data set is not considered statistically representative of APC residues currently being generated given that there are over 600 U.S. coal-fired power plants and continual changes in design and operation which can impact leaching charac- teristics. However, the data have been found to be adequate in suggesting trends in leaching behavior that relate to differences in materials types, APC technology, and coal rank. This paper provides an overview of results from o gn o ng �research'to'characterize the fate of Hg, anantimony (S6), arsenic (As), barium (Ba), boron_(B), cadmium,(C_d), chromium (Cr); molybdenum (Mob selenium (5e)and thallium (Tl) to APC Cresidues-across the range of potential uses. Chara' cteristic le`acliff g'behavior of Hg, As, B, Sb, and Se are presented as a function of eluate pH for residues from facilities with different APC configurations, coal ranks, and management practices. - Experimental Section APC Residues. Samples of APC residues spanning the range of coal rank and likely APC technology configuration, were collected for characterization and categorized into the following groups: {aj'fly ash_ (ti)�FGD gypsum,_(c) "other" u lusm fi. FGD residues, primarily calcite,'(d)"blended APC residues"as managed "'(i.e., miXtures of flyash and scrubber residues %iith.or_without, add ed.lime•or-mixtures•of°fly•ash� nannd-g),psum)`and-(e) wastewater filter cake. Facility Configurations. Except for a few facilities, the identities of the power plants providing APC residue samples were not disclosed and codes (e.g., Facility K) were used when referring to these facilities. Of the 34 facilities providing samples for characterization, the majority burned Eastern bituminous coal while a few facilities burned sub -bituminous Power River Basin coal and one facility burned lignite. Eastern bituminous coal is a high rank coal, whereas both lignite and sub -bituminous coals are considered "low rank" coals with the differences in the coal ranks including sulfur content, energy content, and trace metal content. Many facilities collected fly ash through cold -side ESPs (i.e., downstream of the air preheater) or hot -side ESPs (i.e., upstream of the preheater). Of the 34 fly ash samples collected, seven were from facilities utilizing sorbent technology for Hg control. Total Content Analysis. Total content of the APC residue samples was performed following EPA SW-846 Method 3052 (28) which utilizes high temperature and pressures to digest the solid matrix into a mixture of three strong acid s—hyd rofluoric (HE), nitric (HNO3), and hydrochloric (HQ. Analysis of digests was performed using inductively coupled plasma (ICP) mass spectroscopy according to SW-846 Method 6020. Total content is reported on the basis of a kilogram of solid material. Leaching Test Methods. Leaching characterization was conducted by following the test method approaches pre- sented in LEAF and drafted for review by the U.S. FPA. The two methods used in the project were precursors of following two methods currently undergoing validation by the U.S. EPA for subsequent inclusion in SW-846 and intended to characterize the liquid —solid partitioning at conditions approaching equilibrium as a function of either final extract PH or L/S. Method 1313: Liquid —Solid Partitioning as a Function of Extract pH for Constituents in Solid Materials using a Parallel Batch Extraction Procedure. This equilibrium -based leaching test is designed to provide the liquid —solid parti- tioning (LSP) curve of constituents as a function of eluate pH and consists of nine parallel batch extractions of a particle - size reduced solid material in dilute acid or base in order to achieve final extract pH values at .specific target values. Particle -size reduction facilitates the approach to I./S equi- librium during the test duration. Subsamples of solid material equivalent to a specified dry mass are added to nine extraction bottles and followed by predetermined volumes of dilute acid. Volumes of acid and base are based on the specified target pH value for each extraction and the results of a titration curve pretest. Deionized water (DI) is added to supplement the acid or base volume to a final I.IS of 10 mL/g-dry. The vessels are tumbled end -over -end for a contact time de- pendent on the particle size range of the solid. Liquid and solid phases are roughly separated via settling or centrifuga- tion prior to measurement of pH and conductivity. Analytical samples are clarified by pressure or vacuum filtration and saved for chemical analysis by ICP optical emission spec- trometry (SW-846 Method 6010). The eluate concentrations of constituents of interest are reported and plotted as a function of pH and may be compared to quality control and assessment limits for interpretation of method results. Method 13I6: Liquid —Solid Partitioning as a Function of Liquid —Solid Ratio for Constituents in Solid Materials Using a Parallel Batch Extraction Procedure. This equi- librium -based test method is designed to provide LSP of inorganic constituents at the natural pH of the solid material (i.e., no acid or base addition) as a function of the ratio of the amount of liquid per unit solid mass. At low LIS, eluate concentrations provide insight into the composition of pore solutions of either granular beds or low -permeability ma- terials. This method consists of five parallel extractions of a particle -size reduced solid material in DI water over a range of LIS from 0.5 to 10 ml, eluantlg-dry material. Extracts are tumbled in an end -over -end fashion for a specified contact time based on the particle size of the solid. Measurements of eluate pH and conductivity as well as preparation and analysis of leaching samples are handled in a manner similar to that of Method 1313. Results and Discussion Leaching test results are summarized for 34 fly ashes and'29 �FGD,gypsum-samples (`fable 1). Reported values are mini- mum•and'mazim cmu oncentrations across a pH range of 5.4 to 12.4 and LIS between 0.5 and 10 mLlg-dry (I2). Test results also include the concentrations under "natural" conditions defined as the end -point pH at equilibrium when a material is extracted with DI water at a LIS of 10 mLlg. The pH range over which the leaching results are reported is intended to reflect plausible field conditions for CCR disposal based on using a probability distribution of pH measurement data of 580 observations from 42 CCR landfill sites reflecting the fifth (pH of 5.4) and 95th (pH of 12.4) percentiles (12). 7352 • ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY 1 VOL. 44, NO. 19, 2010 TABLE 1. Range of Observed Total Content and Leaching Test Results (5.4 < pH <_ 12.4) for 34 Fly Ash Samples and 20 FGD Gypsum Samples with Initial Screening Concentrations indicator values fly ash FGD gypsum TC MCL total content leaching total content leaching concentration concentration (P910 1pg1L) (mg/kg) (pg/Q (mg/kg) (Irg/L) mercury 200 2 0.1-1.5 <0.01-0.50 0.01-3.1 <0.01-0.66 antimony - 6 3-14 <0.3-11,000 0.14-8.2 <0.3-330 arsenic 5,000 10 17-510 0.32-18,000 0.95-10 0,32-1,200 barium 100,000 2,000 50-7,000 50-670,000 2.4-67 30-560 boron - 7,000- NA 210-270,000 NA 12-270,000 cadmium 1,000 5 0.3--1.8 <0.1-320 0.11-0.61 <0.2-370 chromium 5,000 100 66-210 <0.3-7,300 1.2-20 <0.3-240 molybdenum 2000 6.9-77 <0,5-130,000 1.1-12 0.36-1,900 selenium 1,000 50 1.1-210 5.7-29,000 2.3-46 3.6-16,000 thallium - 2 0.72-13 <0.3-790 0.24-2.3 <0.3-1,100 a Indicates DWEL value rather than MCL. Bold text indicates where leaching concentrations are greater than indicator values, Indicator values shown for comparison to leaching test concentration as an initial screening only (leaching results do not include dilutionlattenuation considered in development of indicator values). 10 5% 99% 0.01 5% ii 95% AaFA(P,1,1) MCL - - - - - - - - L -Aa FC(13,1,1) �-AFA(P,1,2) --e--GAB(P,1,2) .-. `� -� � • - LAB P 1,2 -A 0.ilooi Imo. MclrowL�+ ' 0.01--; 3 d a I y �c, � a a _M4.._.._.._.. 0.00001 tAaFA(P,1,1)--AaFC(P, M L MDL I �-AFA(P,1,2) --0--GAB(P,1,2) �� I -LABP12 ..-.. .�� i o-- _O .0 0.0001 0.000001 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 PH pH 1 0.1 J E 0.01 T p 0.001 ,p 0.0001 0.00001 At I --h-AaFA(P, l,l) _.. _.._I _ _ _ ML _ --a-AFA(P, 1,2) --0-- GAB(P, 1,2) --LABP12 10 1 J E 0.1 Er •a 0.01 c a1 m in 0.001 T% MCL ML ---+-- AaFA(P,1,1) -0-AaFC(P,1,1)-- �►--AFA(P,1,2)--o--GAB(P,1,2) MCL } 2 4 6 B 10 12 14 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 PH pH FIGURE 1. Comparison of leaching as a function of pH for fly ash samples from different facilities {AaFA: cold side electrostatic precipitator (ESP) with selective catalytic reduction (SCR), Eastern bituminous coal; AeFC: hot side ESP with SCR, Eastern bituminous coal; AFA: fabric filter with selective noncatalytic reduction, Eastern bituminous coal; GAB: hot side ESP with carbon injection (COHPAC), Eastern bituminous coal; LAB: hot side ESP, Southern Appalachian bituminous coal). Leaching result with deionized water only ("natural pH") is indicated by circled data point. beaching results (Table 1) that could represent a source material and do not consider attenuation and potential concern are indicated in bold fontbased on initial dilution that may occur as a consequence of the manage - screening by comparison to "indicator" values such as ment scenario. Initial screening of fly ash results indicates toxicity characteristic values (TC; a threshold forhazardous that the leaching test eluate concentrations for some waste regulatory determinations), drinking water maxi- samples were greater than the TC for four metals (As, Ba, mum concentration levels (MCL), and the drinking water Cr, Se) and greater than the MCL or DWEL for nine metals equivalent level (DWEL; which is used for noncarcinogenic (Sb, As, Ba, B, Cd, Cr, Mo, Se, Tl). The FGD gypsum results toxicity end points) UZ 29). Such comparison is only for some samples were greater than the Tc for Se and intended as an initial screening approach in that the greater than the MCL or DWEL for eight metals (Sb, As, leaching test results represent potential release at the B, Cd, Cr, Mo, Se, Tl), VOL. 44, NO. 19, 2010 I ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY ■ 7353 Gcu. 5% 95% 10 - M J 0.1 E V 0.01 - ❑.001 0.n001 2 1 0.1 0.0001 F 0.00001 managetl —�— Fly Ash 0 �' o--o------- ML-- MDL € E ` 4 6 a 10 12 14 PH _.�..L --o-- ps managed — _ —Fly Ash p.... --,D Resid � h1CL I - --'-_-_.. �!k"�, f----- Mot 100 10 0.001 2 1 0.1 CI o.al v 0.001 4 6 8 10 12 14 PH 5% 95% M L ML I ' --�—' As managed MDL I --+—Fly Ash — FGD Residue 0.000001 0.0001 2 4 6 a 10 12 19 2 4 6 0 10 12 14 PH pH FIGURE 2. Comparison of leaching as a function of pH for fly ash, flue gas desulfurization (FGD) residue, and "as managed" material iffy ash mixed with FGD residue and lime) for samples from a single facility (Facility K). Facility K configuration was a cold side ESP with SCR and a magnesium lime, natural oxidation FGD scrubber burning sub -bituminous coal, Facility Configuration. Distinctly different leaching as a function of pH was observed for samples from the primary particulate collection devices (i.e., fly ash) from different facilities (Figure 1). These differences may be the result of coal type combusted, facility configuration, and operating conditions. However, similarities in pH -dependent leaching behavior of individual elements also were observed for samples from multiple facilities. These empirical results indicate that, while common leaching behavior may be observed for residues from multiple facilities, specific pH - dependent behavior cannot be assumed a priori for any particular facility, and there is a strong, element -specific pH dependence of observed leaching that reflects the complex chemistry of the residues. These results also indicate the need for a coupled mass -transfer and chemical speciation- based approach for evaluating long-term leaching behavior. This type of laboratory testing can be used to calibrate and validate chemical speciation-based modeling (30). APC Residue Type and Blending. Different APC residues (e.g., fly ash, FGD residues, blended materials) from a facility behave with distinctive differences as a function of pH (Figure 2). The leaching behavior of codisposed or blended materials (commonly a mixture of fly ash, FGD residue, and lime) cannot be predicted directly from the leaching behavior of the individual APC residues. The leaching behavior of the mixed residues could be (i) less than but similar to the individual residues (i.e., forAs), (ii) similar to but intermediate concentrations between the individual residues (i.e., for B), (iii) different from and greater than the individual residues (i.e,, for Hg), or (iv) clearly dominated by one of the residues blended in the mixture (i.e., for Se). Thus, leaching char- acterization of "as managed" or blended sources is important to distinguish the compatibility of individual types and sources of CCRs with potential use and disposal scenarios. Leaching Variability. Box plots can be used to evaluate the variability of leaching from APC residues, both within and between APC residue types. In the case of As (Figure 3), the far left box plot represents the maximum leaching test eluate concentrations across the pH range 5.4-12.4. The middle box plot in the figure provides leach results for the end -point pH at equilibrium when a material is extracted with DI water at a liquid to solid ratio of 10 mLlg (i.e., natural pH). Analogous summaries of leaching variability for B, Cr, Hg, Se, and Tl are provided in Sl Figures S5—S9. Laboratory leach data compare favorably to a limited range of field leaching data observations collected through the Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) (31) and previous EPA efforts (32, 33) and summarized to the right of the two sets of box plots. The EPRI data are presented using two bar graphs from field sampling of leachate from surface impoundments and ash landfills (LFs). Leaching data (or source term data) used in the EPA2007 riskassessment (33) on coal combustion waste (CCW) are presented to the far right and broken down into CCW Ash, CCW FGD, and CCW combined material. In general, the range of results from laboratory testing is consistent with the range of field observations; however, the laboratory testing provides a methodology to identify the characteristic leaching behavior of different CCRs within a facility and for different coal-fired power plants. The results presented in the tables and figures shown here indicate that a leaching response variability of several orders of magnitude exists for individual constituents across the broad range of CCR types and facility configurations. Total Content vs Leaching Behavior. Comparison of the ranges of total values and leachate data (Table 1) indicate that total content and leaching do not correlate (see Figure 4 for arsenic). Therefore, the use of total content is not a good predictor of leaching behavior and environmental 7354 ■ ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY / VOL, 44, NO, 19, 2010 ' YY J/ 105 104 103 2 o, 10 Z 101 100 1a1 102 0 Laboratory data x SDA has only two date - I — — — — — S p— — — — — — — — - voe,x�b ----9 P a o u 0 g -54i7W P 0 0 0 P a P O 9 0•. Fl o 0 gp 0 03E 8 0 ....0.T Sth%ib...............0..,,����,..,.,.............. �....,.._......_ 6.. ......_........,.,..,..., �, .,....,,. .,......... ...... o e OM%W 0-- P P p Maximum Values As axhxae 9th9111ej� Reference Data Ranges 5pQ' �,F a GQe P4r 50p GQ$ \y� `� O .c cl Qom ' �Qe �Q� ors' �0 6 FG 0� FV atA To FIGURE 3. Box plot representation of maximum arsenic concentrations from leaching as functions of pH and liquid solid ratio over pH domain 5.4-12.4 (left), concentration at natural pH of the material at an US of 10 mg/L (center), and available field data from EPRI (15, 20 (EPRI SI: surface impoundments; EPRI LF: landfills) as well as the EPA 2007 Risk Report (30). The dashed red line represents the TC indicator value and the bottom green line shows the MCL indicator value {12). 10s 0 104 C c 103 O U m i� w 102 X IQ 10t J 3 Q 0 10 10-1 101 100 101 102 103 As - Total By Digestion [pg/gj FIGURE 4. Maximum eluate concentration (5.4 s pH —< 12,4) plotted against total arsenic content by digestion for a wide variety of CCR types, assessment should not be based solely on total contents of APC residues. Furthermore, the variable response of the eluate concentrations from leaching as a function of pH (Figure 1) and L/S (see St Figure S-10) indicates that multiple LSP phenomena, including dissolution, complex ion exchange, and aqueous complexation, are responsible for the observed behavior. These results indicate that the use of total content, single -point leaching tests and linear partitioning (ap- proaches frequently used in fate and transport modeling to represent the source term) are unable to predict leaching behavior over the wide range of potential use and disposal scenarios with diverse chemical and hydraulic conditions. Through the use of the LEAF test methods, leaching behavior can be more accurately predicted resulting in the calculation of a more reliable source term for use in modeling potential impacts to human health and ecosystems. Acknowledgments The LEAF results presented in this paper are based on collaborative research of Vanderbilt University, the Energy Research Center of The Netherlands, U.S. EPA's Office of Research and Development and Office of Resource Con- servation and Recovery, with additional support provided by ARCADIS-US. We thank Dr. H. van der Sloot and O. Hjelmar who have been instrumental in the development the LEAF approach, P. Kariher, R. Delapp, L.H. Turner, and P. Seignette for analytical and data management VOL, 44, NO. 19, 2010 / ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY ■ 7355 support, and M. Baldwin for significant contributions to the program. Supporting Information Available Details on APC technologies, residue types, beneficial use, and expanded leaching test results. This information is available free of charge via the Internet at http:llpubs. acs.orgl. Literature Cited (1) American Coal AshAssociation.2008Coal Combustion Product Production and Use Statistics. Available at http:/lacaa.affinis- cape.com/associations/8003/files/2008 ACAA CCP Survey_ Repo rt_FINAL_100509.pdf (accessed January 2010). (2) U.S. Department of Energy. Annual Energy Outlook 2009 with Projections to 2030,, DOE Energy Information Administration: Washington, DC, 2009. (3) Senior, C.; Thorneloe, S.; Khan, B•; Goss, D. Fate of Mercury Collected from Air Pollution Control Devices. Environ. Manage, 2009, 15-21. (4) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Clean Air Mercury Rule. Available athttp://www.epa.gov/mercurvrulc/ (accessed March 2010), (5) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Clean Air Interstate Rule. Available at http://www.epa.gov/CAIR/ (accessed March 2010). (6) Institute of Clean Air Companies. Bid Specification and Information Requirements and Bid Evaluation Form for Acti- vated Carbon Injection Systems. Available at http:llwww.icac. comli4alpages/Index.cfm?pageid=3289#IIG-1 (accessed July 2010), (7) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. EPA's Roadmap for Mercury, EPA4HQ-OPPT-2005-0013; Office of Research and Development: Washington, DC, 2006, (8) Kilgroe, J.; Sedman, C.; Srivastava, R.; Ryan, I.; Lee, C. W.; Thorneloe, S, Control of Mercury Emissions from Coal -Fired Electric Utility Boilers: Interim Report, EPA-6001R-01-109; Office of Research and Development, National Risk Management and Research Laboratory: Research Triangle Park, NC, December 2001. (9) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Air Toxics Standards For Utilities. Available at hitp:llwww.epa.gov/ttn/atw/utility/ utilitypg.htinl (accessed April 2010). (10) U.S. Government Accountability Office. Mercury Control Tech- nologies at Coal -Fired Power Plants Have Achieved Substantial Emissions Reductions; U.S. Government Accountability Office: Washington, DC, 2009, (11) Electric Power Research institute. Impact of Air !:missions Controls on Coal Combustion Products, EPRI 1015544; EPRI: Palo Alto, CA, 2008. (12) Kosson, D. S.; Sanchez, 1%; Kariher, P.; Turner, L. H.; Delapp, R.; Seignette, P. Characterization of Coal Combustion Residuesfrom Electric Utilities - leaching and Characterization Data; EPA- 6001R-091151; EPA Office of Research and Development, National Risk Management and Research Laboratory: Research Triangle Park, NC, December 2009. (13) Sanchez, F.; Garrabrants,A.C.; Vandecasteele, C.; Moszkowicz, P.; Kosson, D. S. Environmental assessment of waste matrices contaminated with arsenic. I. Hazard, Mater, 2003, 96 (2-3), 229-257. (14) Sanchez, F.; Keeney, R.; Kosson, D. S.; Delapp, R. Characteriza- tion ofMercury-Enriched Coal Combustion Residues from Electric Utilities Using Enhanced Sorbents for Mercury Control; EPA- 6001R-061008; EPA Office of Research and Development, National Risk Management and Research Laboratory: Research Triangle Park, NC, February 2006. (151 Electric Power Research Institute. Field Evaluation of the Co - management of Utility Low -Volume Wastes with High -Volume Coal Combustion By -Products, EPRI: Palo Alto, CA, October 1997. (16) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Coal Combustion Products Partnership. Available at bttp:l/www.epa.gov/osw/ partnershipslc2p2l (accessed January 2010). (17) American Coal Ash Association. Toothpaste to railroad ties, coal combustion products use over the past four decades. ASH at Work 2008, 1, 14-16. (18) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Fossil Fuel Combustion Waste. Available at http:llwww.epa.gov/osw/nonhaz/industrialI speciallfossil! (accessed July 2010). (19) Association of State and Territorial Solid Waste Management Officials, 2006 Beneficial Use Survey Report, ASTSWMO: Wash- ington, DC, 2007. (20) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Report to Congress - Wastes from 1he Combustion of Coal by Electric Utility Power Plants, EPA1530-SW-88.002; EPA Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response: Washington, DC, 1988, (21) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Report to Congress - Wastes from the Combustion of Fossil Fuels: Vol. 2 - Methods, Findings and Recommendations, EPA 530-R-99-010; EPA Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response: Washington, DC,1999. (22) U.S. EPA Science Advisory Board. Consultation Summary. In EPA Science Advisory Board, Environmental Engineering Com- mittee Consultation with U.S. Ert vironrrrental Protectior: Agency, EPA SAB, Environmental Engineering Committee: Washington DC, 2003. This is Attachment A of Reference 14. (23) Thorneloe, S.; Kosson, D. S.; Helms, G.; Garrabrants, A. C. Improved Leaching Test Methods for Environmental Assessment of Coal Ash and Recycled Materials Used in Construction. In Proceedingsoftl to international Waste Managem en tand landfill Symposium, S. Margherita di Pula, Cagliari, Italy, 2009. (24) U.S. National Academy of Science. Managing Coal Combustion Residues in Mines; NAS: Washington, DC, 2006. (25) Kosson, D. S.; van der Sloot, H. A.; Sanchez, F.; Garrabrants, A. C. An integrated framework fur evaluating leaching in waste management and utilization of secondary materials. Environ. Eng. Sci. 2002, 19 (3), 159-204. (26) Leaching Environmental Assessment Framework (LEAF). Avail- able at http:llwww.vanderbitt.edufleaching/LFAF,html (ac- cessed July 2010). (27) Sanchez, F.; Kosson, D. S.; Keeney, R.; Delapp, R.; Turner, L.; Kariher, P.; Thorneloe, S. Characterization of Coal Combustion Residues from Electric Utilities Using Wet Scrubbers for Multi - Pollutant Control; EPA-6001R-081077; EPA Office of Research and Development, National Risk Management and Research Laboratory: Research Triangle Park, NC, July 2008. (28) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Method 3052 - Micro- wave Assisted Acid Digestion of Siliceous and Organically Based Matrices. In Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical) Chemical Methods (SW-846). Available at http://www,epa.gov/ oswlhazard/testenethodslsw8461onlinelindcx.htm. (29) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2006 Edition of the Drinking Water Standards and Health Advisories, EPA 822-R- 06-013; EPA Offico of Water: Washington, DC, updated August 2006. (30) van der Sloot, H.A.; Meeussen,l. C. L; van 7.omeren, A.; Kosson, D. S. Developments in the characterization of waste materials for environmental impact assessment purposes. J. Ceochem. Explor. 2006, 88, 72-76. (31) Electric Power Research Institute. Characterization of Field leachates at Coal Combustion Product Management Sites: Arsenic, Selenium, Chromium, and MercurySpeciation; EPRI 1012578; EPRI and U.S. DOEINETL Palo Alto, CA, 2006. (32) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Characterization and Fxaluation ofLandf ll Leachate, Draft Report, 68-W6-0068; EPA Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response: Washington, DC, September 2000. (33) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment of Coal Combustion Wastes, EPA-HQ-RCRA- 2006-0796-0009; EPA Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response: Washington, DC, 2007. ES1016558 7356 ■ ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY r VOL. 44, NO, 19, 200 N� �1c,,S _ s(nc�-.. ��vc s� i� v�� 54-aAAj�_CtV-4 1)65-0 0 N� iA5 A - 12 �)� RATIONALE FOR PROPOSED REVISION TO AQUATIC LIFE WATER QUALITY CRITERIA FOR MOLYBDENUM (NAC 445A.14 " Z�� ada Divisj, Bureau of Water Quality Planning July 2008 Table of Contents Introduction .......................................... Criteria Development Summary........... Overview Tetra Tech, Inc. Report ....... Literature Cited .................................... ...........................................................................3 ..........................................................................4 '.:.. 8 v ...... ... .............................9 List of Figures `f Figure 1. Molybdenum Acute Toxicity Values.......::: Figure 2, Molybdenum Chronic Toxicity Values......... Appendix A Draft Rationale Document for Proposed Revision to Aquatic Life Water Quality Criteria for Molybdenum -2- .......................................... 7 .....................................7 NL: 'i:�: olybdenum July 2008 RATIONALE FOR PROPOSED REVISION TO AQUATIC LIFE WATER QUALITY CRITERIA FOR MOLYBDENUM (NAC 445A.144) . W Introduction The current State of Nevada molybdenum (Mo) water quality standard for protection of aquatic life is 19 µg/L (0.019 mg/L). This standard was adopted base'on recommendations made by the N California State Water Resources Control Board (CSWRCB) in the report, Regulation of Agricultural Drainage to the San Joaquin River, (1.988) The relevance -and applicability of the molybdenum standard to Nevada surface waters has been,frequently questione& The U.S. Environmental -Protection Agency {EPA),ha ns o dev_.e1op d o� published.national_water-quality fc—riteria for molybdenum for protection of aquatic life. X"iK-is mosflikely due to-thC relati�ely� low•toxicity- and-rare-occurrence_of mo.ly, de.num in most.areas.of the-U.S.. The Nevada Division of Environmental Protection — Bureau of Water Quality Planning (NDEP- BWQP) contracted with Tetra` -Tech, Inc. to assess the existing statewide molybdenum aquatic life standard and to determine whether more recent and relevant toxicological data had been published. Basedyon the compiled data; an -evaluation was made to determine if adequate data existed toub' antide`the existing, i molybdenum aquatic life standard or to support derivation of revised criteria consistent with EPA methods. �-I1? The molybden fffi�criterionxFecommended by the CSWRCB was calculated based on toxicity data published in 8 a d 1980 on the long term effects of molybdenum on rainbow trout, narrow -mouthed toad, and Daphnia magna (an aquatic macro invertebrate), and an ambient national background level of molybdenum in surface waters. A 19 µg/L molybdenum criterion value was derived by taking the log mean of the three adverse effects levels for the above mentioned species and the average level of molybdenum in surface waters of the U.S. The average national surface water concentration of 0.68 µg/L reported in Study and Interl)retation of the Chemical Characteristics of Natural Waters (Hem, 1985) was used. Including the national background level strongly biased the calculation. The use of a surface water Draft Rationale Document for Proposed Revision to Aquatic Life Water Quality Criteria for Molybdenum -3- July 2008 background concentration is not consistent with EPA accepted criteria development methods, nor is it toxicologically -based. The CSWRCB noted in the 1988 report that the calculated molybdenum criterion should be considered preliminary subject to revision as new toxicity data became available. Assessment of the 19 µg/L molybdenum aquatic Iife threshold indicated that the criterion was developed using limited toxicity data and non-standard criteria development methods. The aquatic life toxicological data that was assembled for molybdenum by Tetra Tech, Inc. did not support the CSWRCB recommended criteria. Developffi' oof revised molybdenum aquatic life water quality criteria based on sound toxicological data and supporting information that �, A would be scientifically defensible and applicable t&&vada surface waters was determined to be appropriate. The standard protocol for use in deriving for Deriving Organisms and their for metals have been di s requirements (118'Fami critefla'�based upon tho guidance dusses the criteria develoffient. Water et al. 198 n `life watequality criteria is EPA's Guidelines Criteriafor the Protection ofAquatic ,,.Most of the current EPA aquatic life criteria th this guidance. The minimum data Rules};,for developing criteria as well as the procedures for calculating ;data are e `outlined in the guidance document. Additionally, the tests appropriate for generating data to be used in To derive criterion for protection of aquatic life and their uses, the EPA guidance document requires that toxicity tests results for at least one representative species from the following eight families be available: • Member of the family Salmonidae • Member of another family in class Osteichthyes • A third family in phylum Chrordata • A planktonic crustacean Draft Rationale Document for Proposed Revision to Aquatic Life Water Quality Criteria for Molybdenum -4- July 2008 C TABLE 2 Summary of Proposed Constituents, Analytical Methods, and Solid Waste Section Limits Progress Energy .` Maya CCP ' Monofi11 Constituent List Solid Waste Section Identification Number Analytical Method Solid Waste Section Limit Solid Waste Groundwater Protection Standard NC 21, Standard Units Arsenic 14 EPA 200.7 10 NE 10 u9A, Barium 15 EPA 200.7 100 NE 700 ug/L Biochemical Oxygen Demand 316 SM 5210B NE NE NE mg/L Boron 428 EPA 200.7 NF NE 700 ug/L Cadmium 34 EPA 200.8 1 NE 2 ug/L Chemical Oxygen Demand 317 SM 5220D NE NE NE mg/L } Chlaridel 301 EPA 300 or SM4500-Cl/E NE NE 250 mgtL Chromium 51 EPA 200.7 10 NE 10 ug/L Copper 54 EPA 200.7 10 1000 1000 ug/L Fluoride 312 SM4500 F/C 2 NE 2 mg/L Iron 340 EPA 2003 300 NE 300 ug/L Lead 131 EPA 200.7 10 NE 15 ug/L Manganese 342 EPA 200.7 50 NE 50 ug/I. Mercury 132 EPA 245.1 0.2 NE I ug/L Nickel 152 EPA 200.7 50 NE 100 ug)L Nitrate 303 353,2 or EPA 300.0 NE NE 10 mgA, Selenium 183 EPA 200.7 10 NE 20 ug/L Silver 194 EPA 200.7 10 NE 20 ug/L Sulfate 315 300 NE NE 250 mg/l, T6Ilium 194 EPA 200.8 5.5 0.2 0.2 ug/L Total Dissolved Solids 311 SM 2540C NE NE 500 mglL Total Organic Carbon 357 SM 5310B NE NE NE mg/L Zinc 213 1 EPA 2003 10 1 NE 1 1000 1 u Notes: 1. NE = not established 2. ug/L = micrograms per liter 3. mg/L — milligrams per liter 4. Solid Waste Section Limit as defined in http://www.wastenotnc.org/swlswenvmonitoringlist,asp, GC" ' p WYZ p e.• �"�-C Ste— r%P S w�-�51 co G f A Water Quality Monitoring Plan Progress Energy NJayoCCP MonoftlI Page I of I Golder Associates NC, Inc Project No, 0636562024 Progress Energy Water Quality Monitoring Plan Project No.: 063-6562024 Mayo CCP Monofill -13- November 2011 will be qualified "B" when the sample concentration is less than five times the blank concentration. For common laboratory contaminants, the results will be qualified "B" when the reported sample concentration is less than 10 times the blank concentration. The "B" qualifier designates that the reported detection is considered to represent cross -contamination and that the reported constituent is not considered to be present in the sample at the reported concentration. 5.0 SURFACE WATER MONITORING (RULE .0602) In accordance with Rule .0602 of the NCSWMR, surface water monitoring locations have been established to monitor surface water quality at the proposed CCP monofill. Two upstream monitoring points (SW-1 and SW-2) and one downstream monitoring point (SW-3) are proposed for this facility, as shown on Drawing WQMP-1. The surface water features at SW-1 and SW-2 are un-named perennial streams that approximately follow the eastern monofill boundary and SW-3 represents the downstream confluence of these other streams. The streams eventually flow from the southern boundary to the northern boundary, discharging into Bowe's Branch, a tributary of Hyco River. Samples will only be collected at each location if flowing water is observed during the sampling event. The surface water monitoring points will be sampled semi-annually for analysis of the list of constituents on Table 2 and pH, specific conductivity, and temperature. The results of the analysis of the surface water data will be .submitted to the SWS at least semi-annually in conjunction with the groundwater data. Data will be compared to applicable NC surface water standards, and those comparisons will be included with each submittal 6.0 REFERENCES The references cited below were used in the preparation of this report, and may or may not be referenced in the text. Butler, R.J., and Secor, Jr., D.T., 1991, The Central Piedmont, in Horton, J. W., Jr., and Zullo, V.A., eds., The Geology of the Carolinas: The University of Tennessee Press, pp. 59-78, NCGS (North Carolina Geologic Survey), 1985. Geologic Map of North Carolina. Scale 1:500,000. North Carolina Dept. of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources. 1995. N.C. Water Quality Monitoring Guidance Document for Solid Waste Facilities. North Carolina Dept. of Environment and Natural Resources. 2006. N.C. New Guidelines for Electronic Submittal of Environmental Monitoring Data. North Carolina Dept. of Environment and Natural Resources. 2007. N.C. Addendum to October 27, 2006, North Carolina Solid Waste Section Memorandum Regarding New Guidelines far Electronic Submittal of Environmental Monitoring Data. North Carolina Dept. of Environment and Natural Resources. 2008. N.C. Solid Waste Section Guidelines for Groundwater, Soil, and Surface Water Sampling. Golder Associates NC, Inc. J 1 a s I 6 1 7 1 6 19 T 1P I II 1 12 .iYz[. �' �x a,.� i ••.. -y'k.f - { ,�l r _ "re x, ) 'r _ SL 1� 1 1� ^f,> i. 7 ._-��- _ - yob.,--•�1;r i>. i p �, ` - - \ �\ _ ff his � ..�°' �� r - - n r.- - � ✓ � r ., /. •,;a r' �- } \ � `��^1 1, jiSa� hr _.��rliv '? i, a "� *i f f ♦ 4Q i \ f F j, s �i 39f t. ` - 1`le t i f fx r Y i f♦, i. �'�- v`'`-tea».,...'' �'i �''.� ,,,Sr %! �� \_ �_ - - e r\\�Z � 1\' II �1 d� �\`�� v..' i vl i i � I.� t 4i} is i- jjf I`a �.`� ` � � �_ .,.,s'�""'� � l 1 ♦ (� r C ? ^ •.{ t `i'_ �\ ;� l [J��' Hrfl�'�'r/ _v-'+ 7' 4 .� �.> vY�-~/ ✓ t 7. �'`�^ l fr,v E; ��4 ;� ! �,t._ _ 11 \ r� � f I L•S` . L 3 / _\ / � E _�r, a, `\ a`i �..� �' � i �, 9 T- -,-4 .� d S!F:: .,, �! r,!',•f``.-\� i_ {��'/!r :f \A f 7 �, k \ \}� 'i, �f \w `l.Y: ` I LEGEND L/IF - 1\ i�' % i \ � - S � �_: � '�_�� - � �. - � = }y ^ • Z l- � - � tI f/ . i � � 1��: - �� I t� t - . wrrcirourrnaws,r.a mm.w •. � �� � i,: i ♦a � \�, 1 � \ , 4 � - -. //`l t1 ��' - ,mot K _.I f �"' iKa 6 ' ia` J"'' - Y \ ,� ` •'� i 1 - �; t� - `':a /, re.vQ.:aa _: r rr- t � > ] `ti, , \ s \ -�� a s ^' '` - - -\ it t v 1 . . � I � - � � > > �• 420------`--- -r � _._. ,. - - :L_ �. y r j.�11 -\ ti:�1,�� \\i 3 �� � '.� .����r .II - ��� A � ��'1 ' a �"'� ���I �4,�♦r� 4 ��� u� \\ \V. \ ;`. «�✓ ,�. 1 �� Y/1 �t . [ i, � ♦ I� I rz� i � o'z-' •wr�„l,a > ,,l � -'` 1 \� ♦ ��`'.s } ]-�` ""�. ��``�-..- �t=a i 1' I.0 � .eo.;4„"-, �e.za.en. n,•,�wcwn.�vn.*eo�.u. e.snc •,`G r" _..,�� i 1.. � �.w i r I L K ! � , , � y$ y r • w-. nwwmxw.aon.rtu f r ,• 7. � ��-'-!�i/♦ / �';�.-��.�c_�4 � �_-. �1 . I v`�•. j �'ti.,.,..• .� \1 � { Cln'-, r.oraseo.wr.0 w..tn uc..raaw.wrn G j f , �.-;;� t. - # .l%, ft 'ri. - r' �I .�` `_ F Y�r 2• r.. F ti - -� NOTES r 1�.�+ k 1• 1 �jz. %1 _� _ -r t"� i' I \� •I+a•x++�.c av-nnw•rmu.: n., G PO H �` �� 1 /I� dafl ki� `-SI ,� \ / 1 > -- � } t %'r . 1 '\,�'�" : 5' r/ � arosouur.,•uc�n.�.r.vm�w,v..�i vc e�'w`�`r..c.n w.-wo�ax�avw,� .c we ' wn`�'ar.na. rFwa v«o,oewan ,uwmuauc �„ vo.wwar..c.u,t« H `� rf i � -� :'` -.;%/ .Aealoon oexaxccr•noH.�.. re ,u..rcsnw,n,. o�.. e _ - =4-' PRM-RCSS CN[RGY CAROLINe— _ PovC4 OPL'RnF10YS [R3uP _ _ Golder r -- __i — —- — - _ _ _ Associates ';,Fa' �•� ' "° aD WATU OUAU " I ' Gk[n1aF5SOC�._lcs n m - -� -0 -lti WYo CCP Yo11wf 1 2 I 3 ins-._ •.:I.. a I 5 .6� 7 8 w 9- xsla, 1: ' 12 N �.r Georgoulias, Bethany From: Werner, Elizabeth Sent: Friday, November 08, 2013 10:59 AM To: Georgoulias, Bethany Cc: Frost, Larry Subject: RE: Water Quality Monitoring Plan for Mayo Plant They are required to perform semi-annual monitoring as long as the landfill is in operation. Then after closure, they are required post -closure monitoring for 30 years. r lizaheth 5. Werner I"ermitting JJDJroSeolo;;61: Nortk Carolina ]DeFartment of E nvir-onrrrcnt anti Natriral RIesources Division of Waste Management-jolici W�aSte 5ecticrn �lu:nc; frax - 9 1 %.7o7.82n3 Fkljsical Chess: 217 wc5t ioncs jt/ Kalcigk, NC/ 276o3 Mailin AddresS: 1 b`i'O Mall `,ervicc Center/ NC/ �-7(�) j- 1 hti�F://�orE:nl.nccienr.i�rk= we�iLwm/sw 1--m++ail correspolnaence to an8 from this a,:lciresss near} ire 5u6 ect to tkc North Carolina F',-61ic f�ecor-Js Law and tkereforc mael ke � inclo, c,aJ to third Fart-ic.s. From: Georgoulias, Bethany Sent: Friday, November 08, 2013 10:56 AM To: Werner, Elizabeth Cc: Frost, Larry Subject: RE: Water Quality Monitoring Plan for Mayo Plant Thanks, Elizabeth. This is all extremely helpful! They will be doing a lot of semi-annual monitoring up and downstream - - which is what I wanted details on, since our permit deals with surface waters as well. How many years do they continue that monitoring? For the duration of their solid waste permit? Thanks again, Bethany Bethany Georgoulias, Environmental Engineer NCDENR / DEMLR / Stormwater Permitting Program 1612 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1612 512 N. Salisbury Street, Raleigh, NC 27604 9191807-6372 (phone); 919 / 807-6494 (fax) Website: http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/lr/storinwater Ii-uturl c:orrc:,.pnrdcncc ra andfrom this Address nun he suhfcc•i to fhe Nwilr C'umlinu Public Records lwv surd may= he rluck;sed to third pnriies. From: Werner, Elizabeth Sent: Friday, November 08, 2013 10:39 AM To: Georgoulias, Bethany Cc: Frost, Larry Subject: RE: Water Quality Monitoring Plan for Mayo Plant Kind of, but indirectly. There are approved documents listed in the permit that the permitee has to abide by and the WQMP is one of these listed documents. In the Monitoring section of the permit, there is language stating the permitee shall monitor the facility in accordance with the approved WQMP listed in the approved documents section. Larry, please let Bethany know if this is incorrect or add anything I may have left out. Thank you! Bethany, Larry is the permitting engineer for the Mayo Plant and is the author of their permit. F liza6Et� 5. Werner ('crmittin�fJ9Jvc�=,eolo isL North Carc)lina DcFariment- of ]—nvironment anti N3Lurr31 Re.sourccs �]nision of l�! Este �1�an:a en}ent-�U�ia Waste Section f'hysicalAaar-esi: Z 17 West,Jones 5t/ Kaki k NC/ 2760-5 11isilingr aaress: I (i46 MaiiSerfice [enter/ t:jleith, NC/276yy-1 0h� httf,://�,ortaf.ncdenr.orp/we6/wm/sw E-mail con-c,s,ponaencc to aria frorn this aaarr.sss m�t�q 6c 5u6Ject to the North Carolina Fu6lic Rccoras Lila v aria therefore Mn� ) 6e to thir,:i parLics. From: Georgoulias, Bethany Sent: Friday, November 08, 2013 9:24 AM To: Werner, Elizabeth Subject: RE: Water Quality Monitoring Plan for Mayo Plant Hi Elizabeth, Is this Water Quality Monitoring Plan part of the Solid Waste permit itself? Bethany Georgoulias, Environmental Engineer NCDENR / DEMLR / Stormwater Permitting Program 1612 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1612 512 N. Salisbury Street, Raleigh, NC 27604 919 / 807-6372 (phone); 919 / 807-6494 (fax) Website: httn:gportal.ncdenr,org/web/Ir/storniwatet- E-mad cnrre.shondence to and ,front. this address may be subject to the North carohna Public 1?, rCorils hilt. and m,ry he disclosed to third prrrrits, From: Werner, Elizabeth Sent: Friday, November 08, 2013 8:26 AM To: Georgoulias, Bethany Cc: Frost, Larry; Scott, Michael Subject: Water Quality Monitoring Plan for Mayo Plant Hi Bethany. I'm the permitting hydrogeologist for the Mayo Plant. The approved water quality monitoring plan is attached for your review. Please let me know if you need anything else. Have a great day. r 1iza6c--th 5, Werner �erntitlin>; Nya;-o�colU�ist SOLID WASTE S1CTION' Aelgust 13-,.20,12`: Mr. John Toepfer, Senior Environmental Tech. Specialist Progress Energy Carolinas, Inc. 410 S. Wilmington Street, PEB 4A Raleigh, North Carolina 27601 Subject: Permit to Construct -Phase 1, Re -issuance Progress Energy Carolinas, Inc., Mayo Electric Generating Plant, CCP Monofill Permit No. 7305-INDUS-2012, Person County, DIN .17035 Dear Mr. Toepfer: Enclosed you will find a copy of Permit No. 7305-INDUS-2012, dated August 10, 2012, DIN 16910, The Permit to Construct is the re -issuance far the Mayo Electric Generating Plant, CCP Monofill, Phase 1, located in Person County. The following are important items that remain to be accomplished; 1. This permit re -issuance includes the required deed/plat information that was not included the original issuance. 2. Note that Condition No. 20 has changed. 3. Enclosed is a certified original of your permit. It is important that the certified original permit be recorded by the Register of Deeds in Person County. It should be indexed in the grantors index under the name of the landowner. The certified original should be affixed with the Register's seal, date, book number and page number of recording. A certified original of the permit with the Register's information affixed should then be returned to me at the address at the bottom of this page. The purpose of this recordation to notify future buyers that a solid waste management facility existed on the property, in accordance with North Carolina General Statutes. 4. Read your permit carefully, it is important that you understand your permit. If you have any questions regarding the process or the permit contact me immediately. 5. The approved documents related to this permit attached and can also be found at httn:Hpoi-tal.nedeiir.oi-g/web/wm/sw Documents. Should you have any questions regarding this matter you may contact me at (828) 296-4704 or at I any.frost ncdenr. gov, Sincerely, L F ost vironmental Engineer cc: Charles Hiner — Golder Associates ec: Elizabeth Werner—SWSICO 2090 US Highway 70, Swannanoa, North Carolina 28778 Phone: 828-296-45001 Internet: htip:ltportal.ncdenr.org/web/wm/sw An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer NorthCaroliha atura!!r� ern NCDENR Facility Permit No: 7305-INDUS-2012 Permit to Construct - Reissuance Progress Energy, Mayo Steam Plant CCP Monofitl August 10, 2012 DIN:16910 Page 1 of 7 North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Division of Waste Management Beverly Eaves Perdue Dexter R. Matthews Dee Freeman Governor Director Secretary STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF WASTE MANAGEMENT SOLID WASTE SECTION INDUSTRIAL SOLID WASTE LANDFILL FACILITY Permit No. 7305-INDUS-2012 PROGRESS ENERGY CAROLINAS, INC. is hereby issued a PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT MAYO STEAM PLANT, CCP MONOFILL PHASE I Located within the Progress Energy Carolinas, Inc., Mayo Electric Generating Plant properly boundaries on Boston Road north of the City of Roxboro, Person County, North Carolina, in accordance with Article 9, Chapter 130A, of the General Statutes of North Carolina and all rules promulgated thereunder and subject to the conditions set forth in this permit. The legal description of the site is identified on the plat recorded for this property listed in Attachment No. 1 or this permit. 1 cn=Edward F. Mussler III, P. E., o=Solid Waste 5ection, 'ou=NC DWM, email=ed, mussler@ncdenr.gov, c=US 2012,08.1010:20:21-04'00' Edward F. Mussler, ill, P.E., Permitting Branch Supervisor Solid Waste Section 1646 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1646 Phone 919-707-8200 Internet: httpJ/portal.ncdenr.org/web/wm/sw An Equal Opportunity! Affirmative Action Employer - Printed on Dual Purpose Paper One NorthCarolina Mundy ATTACHMENT 1 PART I: PERMITTING HISTORY Facility Permit No: 7305-INDUS-2012 Permit to Construct — Reissuance Progress Energy, Mayo Steam Plant CCP Monofill August 10, 2012 DIN: 16910 Page 2 of 7 No. Description DIN 1. Notification of the Site Suitability, March 2012. 16265 2. Design HydrogSology Approval, Phase 1. March 2012. 16268 3. Issuance of the original Permit to Construct, Phase 1. July 2012. 16910 Permit Type Date Issued Permit to Construct — New Permit July 192 2012 PART II: LIST OF DOCUMENTS FOR THE APPROVED PLAN Industrial Solid Waste Landfill Facility No. Document Description DIN 1. Site Application, Progress Energy, Mayo Plant, Proposed Mayo CCP Monofill, 15578 Person County, North Carolina. Prepared for Progress Energy. Prepared by Golder Associates. November 2011. 2. Design Hydrogeologic Report, Progress Energy, Mayo Coal Combustion Products 15579 Monofill, Person County, North Carolina. Prepared for Progress Energy. Prepared by Golder Associates. November 2011. 3. Application for Permit to Construct, Progress Energy, Mayo Plant, Proposed Coal 15581 Combustion Products Monofill, Person County, North Carolina. Prepared for Progress EnergX. Prepared by Golder Associates. November 2011. 4. Response to Comments, Permit to Construct Application, Progress Energy, Mayo 16624 Plant, CCP Monofill, Person County, North Carolina, DIN 16048. Prepared for Progress Energy. Prepared b Golder Associates. May 2012. 5. Response to Comments, Permit to Construct Application, Progress Energy, Mayo 16907 Plant, CCP Monofill, Person County, North Carolina, DIN 16048, Prepared for Progress Ener . Prepared by Golder Associates. July 2012. Facility Permit No: 7305-INDUS-2012 Permit to Construct — Reissuance Progress Energy, Mayo Steam Plant CCP Monofill August 10, 2012 DIN:16910 Page 3 of 7 PART III: PROPERTIES APPROVED FOR THE SOLID WASTE FACILITY Person County,N.C. Register of Deeds Plat Cabinet Hanger Grantee TAcres 16 267 Mao Steam Plant, Progress Energy Carolinas, Inc.* 1651.150 Total Site Acreage: 651.150 Note * - Plat of Boundary Survey, Landfill area Parcel I, DIN 17024. PART IV: GENERAL PERMIT CONDITIONS 1. This permit is issued by the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Division of Waste Management, Solid Waste Section (Section). In accordance with North Carolina Solid Waste Management Rule 15A NCAC 13B .0201(d), a solid waste management facility permit shall have two parts: a Permit to Construct and a Permit to Operate. The Permit to Construct must be implemented in accordance with Attachment 2 of this pen -nit. The Pert -nit to Operate must be implemented in accordance with Attachment 3 of this permit. 2. The persons to whom this permit is issued ("permittee") are the owners and operators of the solid waste management facility. 3. The permit shall not be effective until the certified copy of this permit which shows current ownership and references legal descriptions for all land within the solid waste management facility boundary is recorded in the Register of Deeds office and indexed in the grantor index under the name of the owner of the land in the county or counties in which the land is located. The certified copy of the permit affixed with the Register's seal and the date, book, and page number of recording must be returned to the Section within 30 calendar days of issuance of this permit. If the Section does not receive the certified copy of the recorded permit within 30 calendar days of issuance of the permit, then and in that event, the permit is suspended and of no effect until the date the Section receives the certified copy of the recorded permit. 4. When this property is sold, leased, conveyed, or transferred in any manner, the deed or other instrument of transfer shall contain in the description section in no smaller type than that used in the body of the deed or instrument, a statement that the property has been used as a solid waste management facility and a reference by book and page to the recordation of the permit. By receiving waste at this facility the permittee shall be considered to have accepted the terms and conditions of this permit. Facility Permit No: 7305-INDUS-2012 Permit to Construct -- Reissuance Progress Energy, Mayo Steam Plant CCP Monofill August 10, 2012 DIN: 16910 Page 4 of 7 6. Operation of this solid waste management facility must be in accordance with the Solid Waste Management Rules, 15A NCAC .1313, Article 9 of the Chapter 130A of the North Carolina General Statutes (NCGS 130A-290, et seq.), the conditions contained in this permit; and the approved plan. Should the approved plan and the rules conflict, the Solid Waste Management Rules shall take precedence unless specifically addressed by permit condition. 7. This permit is issued based on the documents submitted in support of the application for permitting the facility including those identified in Attachment 1, "List of Documents for Approved Plan," and which constitute the approved plan for the facility. Where discrepancies exist, the most recent submittals and the Conditions of Permit shall govern. 8. This permit may be transferred only with the approval of the Section, through the issuance of a new or substantially amended permit in accordance with applicable statutes and rules. In accordance with NCGS 130A-295.2(g) the permittee must notify the Section thirty (30) days prior to any significant change in the identity or business structure of either the owner or the operator, including but not -limited to a proposed transfer of ownership of the facility or a change in the parent company of the owner or operator of the facility. 9. The permittee is responsible for obtaining all permits and approvals necessary for the development of this project including approval from appropriate agencies for a General or Individual NPDES Stormwater Discharge Permit. Issuance of this permit does not remove the permittee's responsibilities for compliance with any other local, state or federal rule, regulation or statute. Failure to comply may result in compliance action or permit revocation - End of Section - ATTACHMENT 2 CONDITIONS OF PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT PART 1: GENERAL FACILITY CONDITIONS This permit approves construction for Mayo Electric Generating Plant — CCP Monofill, Phase 1 and was issued on July 19, 2012. This permit shall expire July 19, 2017, pursuant to the NC Solid Waste Management Rules (Rule) 15A NCAC 13B .0201(c) and (d)(1)• 2. The initial, substantial, construction authorized by this Permit to Construct must commence within 18 months from the issuance date of this permit. If substantial construction does not begin within 18 months from the issuance date of this permit, then the permit to construct shall expire. Substantial construction includes, but is not limited Facility Permit No: 7305-INDUS-2012 Permit to Construct — Reissuance Progress Energy, Mayo Steam Plant CCP Monofill August 10, 2012 DIN: 16910 Page 5 of 7 to, issuance of construction contracts, mobilization of equipment on site, and construction activities including installation of sedimentation and erosion control structures. The permittee may reapply for the permit to construct prior to the expiration date. The re- application will be subject to the statutes and rules in effect on that date and may be subject to additional fees. 3. Construction of all solid waste management units within this facility must be in accordance with the pertinent approved plans and only for those phases of development approved for construction as described in Attachment I, Part 11 List of Documents for the Approved Plan. 4. The permitter must conduct a preconstruction meeting at the facility prior to initiating construction of any unit/cell and must notify the Section at least 10 days prior to the meeting. 5. Modifications or revisions of the approved documents or changes during construction of any landfill unit/cell require approval by the Section, and may constitute a permit modification and be subject to a permitting fee. 6. The following conditions must be met prior to operation of the Phase 1: a. The Permittee must obtain a Permit to Operate for Phase I from the Section in accordance with 15A NCAC 13B .0201(d). b. Construction Quality Assurance (CQA) documentation as well as a certification by the project engineer that the landfill was built in accordance with approved plans and the conditions of the permit must be submitted to the Section for review and approval. C. The Permittee must contact the appropriate regional environmental specialist and permitting engineer to determine whether the Section chooses to hold a pre- operative meeting with key landfill personnel and representatives of the Section. d. The edge of the waste footprint must be identified with permanent physical markers. e. Financial assurance as required by state rules and statutes must be established in accordance with applicable rules and statutes. Geologic, Ground Water and Monitoring Requirements 7. Prior to issuing the Permit to Operate, samples from new ground water monitoring wells and surface water stations shall be sampled for the Appendix 1 constituent list. 8. Prior to construction of the phase or cell(s) within the phase, all piezometers, borings, and groundwater monitoring wells within the footprint must be properly abandoned in accordance with 15A NCAC 2C .01 13 (b)(1), entitled "Abandonment of Wells." Facility Permit No: 7305-INDUS-2012 Permit to Construct — Reissuance Progress Energy, Mayo Steam Plant CCP Monofill August 10, 2012 DIN: 16910 Page 6 of 7 9. In areas where soil is to be undercut, abandoned piezometers, monitoring wells and borings must not be grouted to pre -grade land surface, but to the proposed base grade surface to prevent having to cut excess grout and possibly damage the wells. 10. A Licensed Geologist must report any pertinent geological feature(s) exposed during phase or cell excavation. Prior to placing any landfill liner, the geologist must submit to the Section hydrogeologist a written report that includes an accurate description of the exposed geological feature(s) and effect of the geological feature(s) on the design, construction, and operation of the cell, phase, or unit. 11. A Licensed Geologist must supervise installation of groundwater monitoring wells and surface water sampling stations. 12. Any modification to the approved water quality monitoring, sampling, and analysis plan must be submitted to the Section Hydrogeologist for review. 13. Within 30 days of completed construction of each new groundwater monitoring well, a well construction record (GW-I form), typical well schematic, boring log, field log and notes, and description of well development activities must be submitted to the Section. 14. The permittee must provide a plan sheet -sized, scaled topographical map, showing the location and identification of new, existing, and abandoned wells and piezometers after installation of groundwater monitoring wells. 15. Within thirty (30) days of the completed permanent abandonment of a ground -water monitoring well, the well abandonment record (GW-30 form) and any additional information included in the abandonment record) must be submitted to the Section. The well abandonment records must be submitted to the Solid Waste Section in accordance with 15A NCAC 2C .01 14(b) and be certified by a Licensed Geologist. Erosion and Sedimentation Control Requirements 16. All required sedimentation and erosion control -measures must be installed and operable to mitigate excessive on -site erosion and to prevent silt from leaving the area of the landfill unit during the service life of the facility. 17, All earth disturbing activities must be conducted in accordance with the Sedimentation Pollution Control Act of 1973 (15 NCAC 4) and consistent with any other local, state or federal requirements. 18. Facility construction, operations or practices must not cause or result in a discharge of pollution, dredged material, and/or fill material into waters of the state in violation of the requirements under Sections 401 and 404 of the Clean Water Act, as amended. Facility Permit No: 7305-INDUS-2012 Permit to Construct — Reissuance Progress Energy, Mayo Steam Plant CCP Monofill August 10, 2012 DIN:16910 Page 7 of 7 19. Modifications to the approved sedimentation and erosion control activities require approval by the North Carolina Land Quality Section. The Section must be notified of any sedimentation and erosion control plan modifications. 20. Pursuant to the NC Solid Waste Management Rules burning of land -clearing debris generated on site as a result of construction activities requires approval by the Section prior to initiating the burn. In addition, the Division of Air Quality and local fire department must approve the activity prior to burning. PART II: INDUSTRIAL SOLID WASTE LANDFILL UNIT SPECIFIC CONDITIONS 21. Pursuant to the NC Solid Waste Management Rules (Rule) 15A NCAC 13B .0201(c) and (d)(1), this permit approves construction for the Mayo Electric Generating Plant — CCP Monofill, Phase I. Phase 1 includes an area of 31.0 acres, with 1,592,000 cubic yards of air space. - End of Section - ATTACHMENT 3 CONDITIONS OF OPERATING PERMIT PARTI: GENERAL FACILITY CONDITIONS Not Applicable -End of Conditions- Permit No. NCG 120000 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY GENERAL PERMIT NO. NCG120000 TO DISCHARGE STORMWATER UNDER THE NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM for Landfills In compliance with the provisions of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1, other lawful standards and regulations promulgated and adopted by the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended, this permit is hereby issued to all owners or operators, hereinafter permittees, which are covered by this permit as evidenced by receipt of a Certificate of Coverage by the Environmental Management Commission to allow the discharge of stormwater to the surface waters of North Carolina of to a separate storm sewer system conveying discharges to surface ' waters in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth herein. Coverage under this General Permit is applicable to: ♦ All owners or operators of stormwater point source discharges associated with activities categorized as landfills, including construction and demolition debris landfills, which are permitted by the North Carolina Division of Waste Management under the provisions and requirements of North Carolina General Statute 130A-294. ♦ Stormwater point source discharges from like industrial activitiesde Division of Water Quality to be similar to these operations in the process, or the discharges, or the exposure of raw materials, intermediate products, by-products, products, or waste products. Except upon DWQ determination of similarity as provided immediately above, the following activities and associated discharges are excluded from coverage under this General Permit: ♦ Stormwater point source discharges from open dumps, hazardous waste disposal sites, land clearing and inert debris landfills, or discharges of wastes (including discharges of leachate as defined in 15A NCAC 13B .0101(11)). The General Permit shall become effective on November 1, 2012. The General Permit shall expire at midnight on October 31, 2017. Signed this day October 25, 2012. Oi iginal signed by Matt Matthews for Charles Wakild, P.E., Director Division of Water Quality By the Authority of the Environmental Management Commission Permit No. NCG120000 spilled fluids shall be cleaned up to the extent practicable and disposed of in a manner so as not to allow their entry into the waters, surface or ground, of the state, SECTION B: ANALYTICAL MONITORING REQUIREMENTS Analytical monitoring of stormwater discharges shall be performed as specified in Table 1. All analytical monitoring shall be performed during a measureable storm event at each stormwater discharge outfall (SDO). Only SDO shaving stormwater discharges associated with industrial activity must be sampled, See Definitions. A measurable storm event is a storm event that results in an actual discharge from the permitted site outfall. The previous measurable storm event must have been at least 72 hours prior. The 72- hour storm interval does not apply if the permittee is able to document that a shorter interval is representative for local storm events during the sampling period, and the permittee obtains approval from the local DWQ Regional Office. See Definitions. Table 1 Analytical Monitoring Requirements Discharge Characteristics Units Measurement Fre uenc 1 Sample Type.2 Sample Location3 Chemical Oxygen Demand mg/1 semi-annual Grab SDO Fecal Coliform # per 100 nil semi-annual Grab SDO Total Suspended Solids m 1 semi-annual Grab SDO Total Rainfall4 inches I semi-annual Rain gauge - Footnotes: 1 Measurement Frequency: Twice per year during a measureable storm event: 2 Sample collection must begin within the first 30 minutes of discharge and continue to all outfalls until completed. 3 Sample Location: Samples shall be collected at each stormwater discharge outfall (SDO) unless representative outfall status (ROS) has been granted by DWQ. A copy of the DWQ letter granting ROS must be kept on site. DW Q's ROS letter remains in effect through the subsequent reissuance of this permit and as long as the pertinent site conditions and operations remain unchanged, unless the ROS letter provides for other conditions or duration. 4 For each sampled measureable storm event the total precipitation must be recorded from an on -site rain gauge. {Where isolated sites are unmanned for extended periods, a local rain gauge reading may be substituted for an on -site gauge, upon prior DWQ written approval.) The permittee shall complete the analytical samplings in accordance with the schedule specified in Table 2 below, unless adverse weather conditions prevent sample collection (see Definitions.) Inability to sample because of adverse weather conditions must be recorded on the Discharge Monitoring Report, along with a description of the adverse conditions and their duration. Sampling is not required outside of the facility's normal operating hours. A minimum of 60 days must separate Period 1 and Period 2 sample dates unless monthly monitoring has been instituted via other requirements of this permit. The permittee must report the results of every discharge sample taken within the monitoring period (see Part III, Section E). Failure to monitor semi-annually per permit terms may result in the Division requiring monthly monitoring for all parameters for a specified time period. "No discharge" from an outfall or inability to collect a sample because of adverse weather conditions during a monitoring period, for example, does not constitute failure to monitor, as long as it is properly reported. Part 11 Page 2 of 6 A FOR AGENCY USE ONLY Division of Water Quality / Surface Water Protection Date Received Amr.'IWA Section Year Month Da L' N q CetnifcateofCovet a e NC®��� National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Check # 1 Amount NpRiar C�rIl (}EZrMEM Or aa "IdI lv E" RORMEH mo Nulxt RE RCES NCG * 20000 Permit Assigned IO y, j V v NOTICE OF INTENT National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System application for coverage under General Permit NCG 120000: STORMWATER DISCHARGES associated with activities classified as. Landfills that are permitted by the North Carolina Division of Waste Management under the provisions and requirements of North Carolina General Statute 130A — 294. The following activities are specifically excluded from coverage under this General Permit: • Stormwater discharges from open dumps, hazardous waste disposal sites, or discharge of waste (including leachate) to the wafers of the state. V l For questions, please contact the DWQ Regional Office for your area. See page 4. (Please print or type) 1) Mailing address of owner/operator (address to which all permit correspondence will be mailed): Name Mayo Steam Electric Plant Duke Energy Progress, Inc Street Address 10660 Boston Road City Roxboro State NC ZIP Code 27574 Telephone No. 919-546-2439 (corporate contact) Fax:. 919-546-4409 2) Location of facility producing discharge: Facility Name Mao Steam Plant Monofill Facility Contact Dulcie Phillips Street Address 10660 Boston Road City Roxboro County Person Telephone No. 336-597-7331 Email Dulcie.Phillios@duke-energy.com 3) Physical Location Information: State NC ZIP Code 27574 Fax: 336-597-7415 Please provide a narrative description of how to get to the facility (use street names, state road numbers, and distance and direction from a roadway intersection). US5 1 N. Left onto R.T. Hester Road (A copy of a county map or USGS quad sheet with facility clearly located must be submitted with this application.) 4) Latitude 36°31'59.93"N Longitude 78055'20.75"W (deg, min, sec) 5) This NPDES Permit Application applies to which of the following: x New or Proposed Facility Date operation is to begin estimated November 2013 ❑ Existing Page 1 of 4 SWU-227-0714D8 Last revised 7114/08 A. NCG120000 N.Q.I. 6) Standard Industrial Classification: Provide the 4-digit Standard Industrial Classification Code (SIC Code) that describes the primary industrial activity at this facility. SIC Code: 4 9 1 1 7) Provide a brief narrative description of the types of industrial activities and products manufactured at this facility: The site currently is under construction to become a NCDENR _permitted industrial materials landfill. Once the facilitv receives a permit to duerate. Coal Combustion Residues C( CR) will be transferred from the nearby Duke Energy Progress, Mao Steam Piant and placed in the newly,constructed fagh . Heavy equipment will be present on -site to conduct daily „landfill related activities. As a condition, of the NCG120000 hermit the landfill will maintain an approved sediment and erosion control plan and fulfill the storm water monitoring requirements listed in the sediment and erosion control plan and subsequent (quantitative and qualitative) monitoring requirements outlined in the NCG12000.0 permit. Additionally, the permit issued by the NC Division of Solid Waste requires sampling of surrounding surface waters for a number of constituents- 8) Discharge points 1 Receiving waters: How many discharge points (ditches, pipes, channels, etc.) convey stormwater from the property? 3 What is the name of the body or bodies of water (creek, stream, river, lake, etc.) that the facility stormwater discharges end up in? Bowes Branch Receiving water classification: „C„ Is this a 303(d) listed stream? No Has a TMDt_ been approved for this watershed? No If the site stormwater discharges to a separate storm sewer system, name the operator of the separate storm sewer system (e.g. City of Raleigh municipal storm sewer). NIA 9) Does this facility have any other NPDES permits? X No ❑ Yes _ If yes, list the permit numbers for all current NPDES permits for this facility: . 10) Does this facility have any Non -Discharge permits (ex: recycle permit)? X No ❑ Yes If yes, list the permit numbers for all current Non -Discharge permits for this facility: 11)-Does this facility employ any best management practices for stormwater control? ❑ No X Yes (Show structural BMPs on the site diagram.) If yes, please briefly describe: The facility is currently conducting construction related activities in accordance to the approved sediment and erosion control plan and has constructed/implemented the stormwater control features shown on the attached Site Diagram. am. 12) Does this facility have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan? X No ❑ Yes If yes, when was it implemented? 13) Are vehicle maintenance activities occurring at this facility? Page 2 of 4 SVVU-227-071408 Last revised 7114108 NCG120000 N.O.I. No XYes 14) Hazardous Waste: a) ' Is this facility a Hazardous Waste Treatment, Storage, or Disposal Facility? X No ❑ Yes b) Is this facility a Small Quantity Generator (less than 1000 kg. of hazardous waste generated per month) of hazardous waste? X No ❑ Yes c) is this facility a Large Quantity Generator (1000 kg. ar rnore of hazardous waste generated per month) of hazardous waste? X No ❑ Yes d) is hazardous waste stored in the 100-year flood plain? X No ❑ Yes M yes, include information to demonstrate protection from flooding. e) If you answered yes to questions b. or c., please provide the following information: Type(s) of waste: How is material stored: Where is material stored: How many disposal shipments per year: Name of transport 1 disposal vendor: Vendor address: 15) Certification: North Carolina General Statute 143-215.613(i) provides that: Any person who knowingly makes any false statement, representation, or certification in any application, record, report, plan, or other document filed or required to be maintained under this Article or a rule implementing this Article; or who knowingly makes a false statement of a material fact in a rulemaking proceeding or contested case under this Article; or who falsifies, tampers with, or knowingly renders inaccurate any recording or monitoring device or method required to be operated or maintained under this Article or rules of the Commission implementing this Article shall be guilty of a Class 2 misdemeanor which may include a fine not to exceed ten thousand dollars ($10,000). I hereby request coverage under the referenced General Permit. I understand that coverage under this permit will constitute the permit requirements for the discharge(s) and is enforceable in the same manner as an individual permit. t certify that I am familiar with the information contained in this application and that to the best of my knowledge and belief such information is true, complete, and accurate. Printed Name of Person Signing: William J. Thacker Title: _Plant Manager c) j A ar (Signature of Applicant) (Date Signed) Notice of Intent must be accompanied by a check or money order for $100.00 made payable to: Page 3 of 4 SWU-227-071408 Last revised 7114/08 Y NCG120000 N.O.L . NCDENR Final Checklist This application will be returned as incomplete unless all of the following items have been included: ❑ Check for $100 made payable to NCDENR ❑ This completed application and all supporting documents ❑ A site diagram showing, at a minimum, (existing or proposed): (a) outline of drainage areas, (b) stormwater management structures, (c) location of stormwater outfalls corresponding to the drainage areas, (d) runoff conveyance features, (e) areas where materials are stored, (f) impervious areas, (g) site property lines. ❑ Copy of county map or USGS quad sheet with location of facility clearly marked on map Mail the entire package to: Stormwater Permitting Unit Division of Water Quality 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Note The submission of this document does not guarantee coverage under the NPDES General Permit. For questions, please contact the DWQ Regional Office for your area. DWQ Regional Office Contact Information: Asheville Office ...... (828) 296-4500 Fayetteville Office ... (910) 433-3300 Mooresville Office... (704) 663-1699 Raleigh Office ........ (919) 791-4200 Washington Office ... (252) 946-6481 Wilmington Office ... (910) 796-7215 Winston-Salem ...... (336) 771-5000 Central Office ......... (919) 807-6300 Page 4 of 4 SWU-227-071408 Last revised 7114108 0.5 0.25 0 0.5 Miles PREPARED BY: FACILITY: MAia VHtrA"LV run: 97 PPROJECT �® ve Enmay� it:: " am0636562024�1y Golder SCALE: TITLE: ® �Q� 11►�7► odates 1:24,000 SITE LOCATION MAP CHECKED BY% GATE: PROPOSED MAYO CCP MONOFILL GOLDER ASSOCIATES NC, INC. THIS NAP WAS CREATED USING USA TOPOGRAPHIC MAPS REVIEWED BY S DATE: THIS FIGURE IS PROPERTY OF PRDGRESS ENERGY OF THE CAROLINAS, THE MAP IS PROJECTED USING THE NORTH AMERICAN INC. AND IS NOT TO BE REPRODUCED OR USED FOR ANY PURPOSEEFIGURE 1 DATUM tiva3j STATEPLANE NC FEET GEOGRAPHIC COOROINATE EXCEPTED AS SPECIFIED SY PROGRESS ENERGY OF THE CAROLINAS, INC. SYSTEM. Progress Energy Service Company. LLC on behalf of euka Energy subsldlades Indudstg Progress Energy, Inc. and Its subsld:anes Ro. 9ox 1551 Ralelgh, NC 2760E Check Date 09-SEP-13 K .. c .ENERGY. Check Number 227721 Vendor name N- C DENR Vendor # 11946 Invoice Number Invoice Date Adjustments Paid Amount NCDEMRSTRM9313 03-SEP-13 - I 0.00 I 100.00 I i I I I Questions4 Invoice.=nquiry@ggnmail.com $ = 19-1 $ 100.00 se e e• a o a ao a �• �J a -a ao �• o e o •e o Progress Energy Service Company, LLC on behalf of Duke Energy subsldlarles including Progress Energy; Inc, and Its subsidiaries ! ■.' DUKE Vendor Number 119a6 611 / / n r1 7 . VOID AFTER Q li9rt17,7 21 P.O. Box 1551 ENERGY. Check Date Raleigh, NC27602 09-SEP-13 227721 Pay Exactly One Hundred Dollars And 00 TO THE, N C DENR ORDER STORMWATER PERMITTING PROGRAM OF 1612 MAIL SVC CTR RALEIGH, ITC 27699 `WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. Augusta, GA '4� 4l� Signature DUKE ENERGY® PROGRESS Mr. Ken Pickle NC Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources 1612 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1612 File: 12520 B-1 12520 R 12566 D Mayo Steam Plant Duke Energy Progress 10660 Boston Road Roxboro, NC 27574 192013 �j 4 <o� 4D �a�P. ts%4r� .� Subjects: Duke Energy Progress, Inc. SST . Mayo Electric Generating Plant CCP Monofill INCH Submittal of Notice of Intent for coverage under NCG 120000 File: Dear Mr. Pickle: As discussed during a meeting held on Wednesday September 1], 2013 between you and representatives of Duke Energy, please find enclosed a completed Notice of Intent (NOI) for coverage of the Mayo Coal Combustion Products (CCP) residual Monofll. The NCG 120000 general permit states that coverage is provided to "All owners or operators of storm water point source discharges associated with activities categorized as landfills, including construction and demolition debris landfills, which are permitted by the North Carolina Division of Waste Management under the provisions and requirements of North Carolina General Statute 130A- 294." The Mayo Monofill received permit number 7305-INDUS-2012 from the North Carolina Division of Waste Management (DWM) in accordance with North Carolina General Statute 130A- 294. The DWM permit requires Duke Energy to perform twice -yearly surface water monitoring for an extensive list of constituents. As discussed, the Mayo monofill is necessary to facilitate the removal of a wastewater discharge to Mayo Reservoir in accordance with the Special Order by Consent between Duke Energy progress and the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission EMC SOC WQ S10-012. If there are any questions regarding the enclosed information, please contact Shannon Langley at (919) 546-2439. I certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qual fed personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submilting false information, including the possibility offrnes and imprisonment for knowing violations. Enclosure Sincerely, '4 / U William J. Thacker - Manager Mayo Electric Generating Plant www.duke-energy.com 11 ; 9 2013 Mr. Ken Pickle NC Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources 1612 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1612 File: 12520 B-1 12520 R 12566 D Subjects: Duke Energy Progress, Inc. Mayo Electric Generating Plant CCP Monofill Submittal of Notice of Intent for coverage under NCG120000 Cc: Danny Smith w/ enclosure Raleigh Regional Office Supervisor 1628 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1628 /o� DUKE ENERGY® PROGRESS Mr. Bradley Bennett NC Division of l3nergy, Mineral and Land Resources 1612 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1628 Subject: Duke Energy Progress, Inc. (Duke) Mayo Steam Electric Generating Plant Monofill Sampling extension request - NCG 120101 Person County FiIc: 12520 R Dear Mr. Bennett: Mayo Steam Plant Duke Energy Progress 10660 Boston Road Roxboro, NC 27574 MAY 1 4 2014 RECEIVED MAY 15 2014 DENR-LAND QUALITY tTMMWATER PERMITTING As discussed during a phone conversation between Mr. Shannon Langley of Duke Energy (Duke) and Dave Parnell of the Raleigh Regional Office on May 2, 2014, Duke hereby requests modification of the subject permit to allow for collection of the initial storm water samples analysis associated with the subject permit. Duke is making this request because, as of the date of this letter, no coal combustion residuals have been placed into the monofill. In accordance with the terms of the subject permit, storm water samples ussocruled ivit l industrial acllvlly are required to be sampled between .January 1, 2014 and June 30, 2014 and every six month period thereafter. With no industrial activity to date, we have been unable to obtain these samples to date. Additionally, prior to operation, Duke must obtain a certificate to operate the monofill from the North Carolina Division of Waste Management (NCDWM). Final submittals in order to obtain this certificate are being completed at this time. Currently, we expect to obtain this certificate in June but that is subject to change based on the review of NCDWM staff. Modifying the first sampling period to be between .July 1, 2014 and December 31, 2014 would ensure a sample associated with industrial activity could be obtained after the commissioning of the monof lf. As discussed, the Mayo monofill is necessary to facilitate the removal of a wastewater discharge to Mayo Reservoir in accordance with the Special Order by Consent between Duke Energy Progress and the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission EMC SOC WQ S10-012. If there arc any questions regarding this request, please contact Shannon Langley at (919) 546-2439. Cc: Dave Parnell DEMLR 1628 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1628 Sincerely, v v"vU William J. " sacker - Manager Mayo Electric Generating Plant www.duke-energy.com Va WR Noirth Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Pat McCrary John e. Rvarla, III Governor Secretary May 20, 2014 William J, Thacker Duke Hnergy Prggraesa, Inc, Mayo Stearn Electric Plante 10660 Boston Road Rexbovo, NC 27574 Subject; General Plermita No. 14CO12.f 0OQ Mayo Swam Plant MAnolill COC NCGI201 1 Person County Dear Mr, Thacker: We received your request to modify the monitoring provisions in the above permit Certificate of Coverage (COC) on May 15, 2014, You requested to delay the initial sampling period of several of the additional parameters by six months to allow time for the monofill to begin full operation Your request has been approved, and the modified monitoring schedule is attached. Please replace the second page of your COC with the enclosed revision. This permit does not affect the legal requirements to obtain other permits which may be required by the Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources, or permits required by the Division of Water Resources, Coastal Area Management Act, or any other federal or local governmental permit that may be required. If you have any questions concerning this permit modification, please contact Bradley Bennett at telephone (919) 807-6378, or Bethany. Georgoulias at telephone (919) 807-6372, Sincerely, for Tracy E. Davis, P,E., CPM cc: Toby Vinson, Land Quality Section Dave Parnell, Raleigh Regional Office Autumn Romanski, DWR Raleigh Regional Office Sergei Chernikov, DWR Water Quality Permitting Section Stormwater Permitting Program Piles DWR Central Files enclosure Division of Energy, Mineral, and Land Resources Energy Section - geological Survey Section • Land Quality Section 1612 Mail Service Center, Raleigh,, North Carolina 27699-1612 - 919-707.92001 FAX: 919-715.8801 612 North Salisbury Street, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 - Internet: bhp://gortal.ncdenr.org/web/lrl An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycled 110% Post Consumer Paper Table I Analytical ticall l+Ronitorin Rec uiremen1.4 ts f�,1[ifseliargMeasurerr►e`nt )�reyuenCyl5ample FSampie Cherx>ical Ox en Demand m l semi-annual Grab SDO Fecal Colifor.m #per 100 ml semi-annual Grab sn0 Total Suspended Solids mall semi annual Grab SDO Arsenic (As)5 mg/l semi-annual Grab SDO Selenium (Se)5 mg/l semi-annual Grab SDO Boron B S mg/1 semi-annual Grab SDO 5 S.U. semi-annual Grab $DO Conductivity S m semi-annual Grab SDO Antim6py (Sb), Total mg/I Grab SDO Recoverable Barium (Ba), Total mg/1 Grab SDO Recoverable - Beryllium (Be), Total mg/1 Grab 5D0 Recoverable Cadmium (Cd), Total tng/l Grab SDO Recoverable Chromium (Cr),,' Total mg/1 Grab SDO Recoverable Copper (Cu), Total mg/l Grab SDO Recoverable Lead (Pb), Total mg/l Grab SDO Recoverable Once during Jul 1-Dec 31, 2014; Mercury (Hg), Total mg/1 Grab SDO Recoverable Once during Jan 1-Jun 30, 2017 'Molybdenum (Mo), Total mg/l Grab SDO Recoverable Nickel (Ni), Total mg/l Grab $DO Recoverable Silver (Ag), Total Mg/1 Grab SDO Recoverable Thallium (TI), Total mg/1 Grab sbo' Recoverable Zinc (Zn), Total mg/l Grab SDO Recoverable Total Chloride Cl m I Grab SDO Total Fluoride F MEZI Grab SDO Total Sulfate mgzl Grab SDO Total Hardness m I Grab SDO Total RainfaI14 inches semiannual Rain gauge Footnotes: 1 Measurement Frequency: Twice per year or during the specified period, during a measureabie storm event. 2 COC No. NCG120101 effective January 6, 2014, modified May 2Q, 2014 �,DUKE f} ° ENERGY, File: Mayo 12520-R NC Division of Environmental Management Division of Water Quality ATTENTION: Central Files 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, Notih Carolina 27699-1617 jXT 1 7 2013 Mayo Steam Plant Duke Energy Progress 10661) Boston Road Roxboro, NC 27574 Subject: 1 SA N. C. Admin. Code 2B .0506 Mayo Etectric Generating Plant National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Nrrniber NC0038377 Storinwater Discharge Outfall 010 Monitoring Report Dear Sir or Madam: In accordance with Pail 1.C. Section E2 of NPDES Permit Number NC0038377, enclosed is the quarterly 2013 Stormwater Discharge Outfall 010 report for Carolina Power & Light Company d/b/a Progress Energy Carolinas, Inc., now known as Duke Energy Progress, LLC (Progress) - NPDES Permit Number NC003 83 77. 1 certify, under penally of law, that this document and all atiaclunent.s were prepared guider i nv direction or supervision in accordance wilh a sYstenr designed to assure iltal gnalifred persamel properly gather and evaluate the irrforrrratiort srtbtultterf Based on in), lnyulry of the person or persons who inanage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the itrforwation, the it jorivalion submilled is, to the best of my knowledge rind belief, trite, uccurale, and coinplete_ I am aware that there a re signtflaanf pcnallies for subrnitting false information, including the possibility offines and intprisomnent for knowing violations. Please contact Mr. Shatmon Langley at (919) 546-2439, if there are arty questions concerning the data in this submittal. Sincerely, Enclosures '�td4 j dL4" William J. Thacker- Manager Mayo Electric Generating Plant wtivvt.du ke-energy.conn Permit Number: NC STORMWATER DISCHARGE OUTFALL (SDO) MONITORING REPORT 1 COP U`e'& o P s S�7a V l NCQI)38377 SAMPLES COLLECTED DURING CALENDAR YEAR: 2013 iv-�Q a -- (This monitoring report shall be received by the Division no bier than 30 days from j N Co 6 3 $ 7j-7 —7, the date the facility receives the sampling results from the laboratory.) FACILITY NAME Mayo. Stearn Electric Plant County Person PERSON COLLECTING SAMPLFIS) Herbert M. Lea, Jr. Pho a No. 3 -597-7 9 CERTIFIED LABORATORY(S) Mayo Plant Cab Lab ## 5064 ". - P , PACE Analytical Lab # 40/503/530 (SIGNATURE OF PfRMITEE DESIGNEE) Part A: Specific Monitoring Requirements No ..Sample, Coif .. ea ect .: rrioltlttivr ;::...' 5uspendeti� � Grease Fatal; :� Total .: - '•Soilds-� <1.1 4 this signature, I certify that this report is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. U114T,at: Q04Q0:.._. 01097::: 01022 , .i rnl sm pN Ann { uell E °std. vriits 1MA::.: .`:_ ugll Alurnirtsttrs: . �5ulfate. ` tRjl .: . ttigf l Does this facility perform Vehicle Maintenance Activities using more than 55 gallons of new motor oil per month? No ( if yes complete Part B ) Part 8: NA Mail Angina an one copy to: STORM EVENT CHARACTERISTICS ( if more than one storm event was sampled) Division of Water Quafity Date 9/21/2013 Date Attn: Central Files Tota) Event Precipitation {inches) 0.45 Total Event Precipitation (inches) 1617 Mail Services Center event duration (hours): 12 event duration (hours): Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1527 I certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervislon in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based an my Inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the Information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. l am aware that there are sign'Ticant penalities for submitting false information, Including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations." William J. Thacker Date Permittee ( Sig at a of Wrmitteef r r r� Permit Number: NC NCO038377 FACILITY NAME PERSON COLLECTING SAMPLE(S) CERWIED LABORATORY(S) Part A: Speck Monitoring Requirements STORMWATER DISCHARGE OUTFACE (SDO) MONITORING REPORT Mayo Steam Electric Plant Herbert M. Lea, Jr. SAMPLES COLLECTED DURING CALENDAR YEAR: 2013 (This monitoring report shall be received by the Divislon no later than 30 days from the Gate the tacllrry receives the sampling results from the laboratory.) County Person Phone No 336r597-7 O9 Mayo Plant Lab Lab # 5064 ZPi4•r /it , PACE Analytical Lab # 40/503/530 (5[GNATURE OF PERMITEE OR IGNEE) By this signature, t certify that this report is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. Ctutfal( 17ate >.:i '=:;:01012.::: n, r - .'No fit le'. :Be Ifiu Cad `.Chrotsiiu Eeadi Nfckel.•` p ry . m..:: tTlfum m-: Zinc . CaJrt rri::.. lfected : rr►olfjdlYr uF,13.....: ":.=, tig/I r. ; ..uEli .. cif.:'... >u�/l 'u� Does this facility perform Vehicle Maintenance Activities using more than 55 gallons of new motor oil per month? No ( if yes complete Part B ) Part B: INA Marl Original and one copy to: STORM EVENT CHARACTERISTICS (if more than one storm event was sampled) Division of Water Quality Date 9/21/2013 Date Attn: Central files Total Event Precipitation (inches) 0.45 Total Event Precipitation (inches) 1617 Mail Services Center event duration (hours): 12 event duration (hours): Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 I certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attathmenes were prep@ red under my drrectian or toper ision In saordance with a system designed to assure that gtartrred pusonnel propertygatherand evaluate the inforrnatian submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or thou persons directly responsiolo for gathering the in(0MU%jprt, the informatren sibmitMif il. to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complem ISM aware that them are dgnleicant penarcies for subrnlft ng false informatiort, including the possibility of fines and irrr000rwn ant for knowing vfpbttons." William J. Thacker I—JLA. Date Permittee ( sign(ur of Permittee) DUKE ENERGY, •, 1'P �"fr5� File: Mayo 12520-R NC Division of Environmental Management Division of Water Quality ATTENTION: Central Files 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Mayo Steam Plant Duke Energy Progress 10660 Boston Road Roxboro, NC 27574 JUN 2 6 2013 Subject: 15A N. C. Admin. Code 213 .0506 Mayo Electric Generating Plant National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Number NCO038377 Slorm water Discharge Outfall 010 Monitoring Report Dear Sir or Madam: In accordance with Part I.C. Section E2 of NPDES Permit Number NCO038377, enclosed is the quarterly 2013 Slormwater Discharge Outfall 010 report for Carolina Power & Light Company d/b/a Progress Energy Carolinas, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Duke Energy Corporation - NPDES Permit Number NC0038377. 1 ecru&. under penalty of lent, that this docrrnrent and all altachments ir,ere prepared wider nay direction a• super•yision in accordance it,ith a system designed to assure that qualified per-swmel pr•aperl1, gather crud eualuale the inforvratiarr .subrrritled. Based on rrry inquii j, of the person nr persons iyho nratiage the s}stenr, err those persons directly r•espon.sible far gathering the hifni-matiwr, the infar•sratinn submitted is, to the hest of my kno»'ledge= and belief true, accto•ale, and complete, 1 am a+rrrr•e that there a re significant penalties.fin, •submiiling false infor•nrraiom including the possibility, of fines and imprisanmeut for knrnring vinlalit>ns. Please contact Mr. Shannon Langley at (919) 546-2439, if there are any questions concerning, the data in this submittal. Sincerely, Enclosures 4VA j d�ek William J. Thacker- Manager Mayo Electric Generating Plant www.duke,energy.com Permit Number: NC NCO038377 FACILITY NAME Mayo Steam Electric Plant PERSON COLLECTING SAMPLE(S) Herbert M. Lea, Jr. CERTIFIED LABORATORY(S) Mayo Plant Lab PACE Analytical Part A: Specific Monitoring Requirements STORMWATER DISCHARGE OUITFALL (SDO) MONITORING REPORT SAMPLES COLLECTED DURING CALENDAR YEAR: 2013 (This monitoring report shall be received by the Division no later than 3O days from the date the facility receives the sampling results from the laboratory.) County Person Phone No. 336�5� 97-730947— 0 Lab # S064 Lab # 40/503/530 (SIGNATURE OF PERMITEa;6R DESIGNEE) By this signature, I certify that this report is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. .. f Outfall No, Date Sample Collected 00530 00556 01002 1 01042 1 80103- 71900 01147 1 00400 1 ;01097 61022 01165 00945 Total Suspended Solids Oil and Grease Arsenic Total Copper Total COD Mercury Selenium . pH Antimony Boron Aluminum Sulfate mo/dd/yr mg/I mg/I ug.A I ug/I mg/I ug/1 ug/E 1 std. units ug/I ug/I ug/I mg/I Outfall o10 5 6 2013 20.6 <1.1 0,52 1.1 40.0 0.0108 035 6.05 <0.050 6.5 145 3.6 Does this facility perform vehicle Maintenance Activities using more than 55 gallons of new motor oil per month? - No ( if yes complete Part B ] Part B: NA Mail Original and one copy to: STORM EVENT CHARACTERISTICS ( if more than one storm event was sampled) Division of Water Quality Date 5/6/2013 Date . - Attn: Central Files Total Event Precipitation {inches) 1.9 Total Event Precipitation (inches) 1617 Mail Services Center event duration (hours): 8,25 event duration (hours): Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 "I certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel property gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalitles for submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and imprioonment for knowing violations." �,Lu, William 1. Thacker A& � aw�A' Date b Permittee (SiBblAure of Permlttee) Permit Number: NC NCO038377 FACILITY NAME PERSON COLLECTING SAMPLE(S) CERTIFIED LABORATORY(S) Part A: Specific Monitoring Requirements STORMWATER DISCHARGE OUTFALL (SDO) MONITORING REPORT Mayo Steam Electric Plant Herbert M. Lea, Jr. Mayo Plant Lab PACE Analytical Lab # SAMPLES COLLECTED DURING CALENDAR YEAR: 2013 (This monitoring report shall be received by the Division no later than 3o days from the Date the iaalrty receives the sampling results tram the laooratory,l County Person Phone No. 336-597-7309 r 5064 Lab # 40/503/530 (SIGNATURE OF PERMITEE OR DES)GNEE) By this signature, I Certify that this report is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. Outfall No. Date Sample Collected 01012 01027 1 01634 01051 01067 01077 01059 01092 00916 Beryllium Cadmium Chromium Lead Nickel Silver Thallium Zinc Calcium mo/dd/yr ug/1 ug/I ug/I ug/1 u9/1 ug/I ug/I ug/I ug/I Outfall010 5 6 2013 <0.25 1 <0.050 1.5 <0.50 2.1 <0.050 <0.050 4.2 9310 Does this facility perform Vehicle Maintenance Activities using more than 55 gallons of new motor oil per month? ( if yes complete Part B ) Part s: NA STORM EVENT CHARACTERISTICS Date 5/6/2013 Total Event Precipitation (inches) 1.9 event duration (hours): 8.25 (if more than one storm event was sampled) Date Total Event Precipitation (inches) event duration (hours): No Mail original and one copy to: Division of Water Quality Attn: Central Files 1617 Mail Services Center Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 ` I certify, under Pena Ky of law, that this document and aIt attarm+ , nts were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance wnh a system designed to assure that qualified Personnel properly gather and evatuwte the informatDon submirted. Based on my inquiry of the person or oetsons who manage the system, of those persons directly responsible far gathering the infam:atian, the information submitted is. to the best of my knowledge and Percf, true, accurate. and complete. I am aware that -here re signer nt lilies tvr ssbminirg false information, inducting the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations." William J. Thacker Date Permittee ( Signatu a Permittee) r �, � ° egress Energy Pile: Mayo 12520-R NC Division of Environmental Management Division of Water Quality ATTENTION. Central Files 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 kAR 1 7 2013 Subject: 15A N. C. Admin. Code 2B .0506 Mayo Electric Generating Plant National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Number NCO038377 Stornnwater Discharge Outfall 0)0 Monitoring Report Dear S 4r or Madam; In accordance with Part I .C. Section E2 of NPDES Permit Number NC0038377, enclosed is the quarterly 2013 Stormwater Discharge Outfall 010 report for Carolina Power & Light Company d/b/a Progress Energy Carolinas, ]no., a wholly owned subsidiary of Duke Energy Corporation - NPDES Permit Number NC0038377. l certify, wider penalhz oflmv, that this document and all attachmenrs were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance �i,llh a syslem designed to azure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the it formation submitted. Based on my inquh), of the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons dtreclly responsible for gathering tho iq onnanon, the it forrnallon subrnirled is, to the best of ►try knowledge and belief, trite, ocrurate, and complete. 1 am aware that there a re signlflcanl penalties far s:tbtrrining false informatinn, including the posslbillly offincs and imprisonment for kno►,ing violations. Please contact Mr. Steve Cahoon at (919) 546-7457, if there are any questions concerning the data in this submittal. Sincerely, Enclosures w d Prioress Emtgy Carolinas, Inc. Maim F=ant 1. 10i Ea mn na- A F:nb::w, NC :T,74 William J. Thacker- Manager Mayo Electric Generating Plant Permit Number: NC NCO038377 FACILITY NAME Mayo Steam Electric Plant PERSON COLLECTING SAMPLE(S) Herbert M. Lea, Jr. STORM WATER DISCHARGE OUTFALL (SDO) MONITORING REPORT SAMPLES COLLECTED DURING CALENDAR YEAR: 2013 (This monitoring report shalt be received by the Division no later than 30 days from the date the facility receives the sampling results from the laboratory.) County Person Phone No- 336-597-7309 CERTIFIED LABORATORY(S) Mayo Plant Lab Lab # 5064 , g, PACE Analytical Lab # 40/503/530 (SIGNATURE OF PERMITEE OR SIGNEE) ey this signature, I certify that this report is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. Part A. Specific Monitoring Requirements .4)0530.:, ::. Q0555 O1fl02, `::::.:01042 , . $0103.... 739Dt?:.: :: 01147; O(1400 {73i}97. ; :<:02022 . : 01105 ...:. 06945 No :.. Sample Total Oil anti Arsenic-`: Copper, :COD Merrtiry SBieniuin; .^ 'pH.: Antiffiony : Horan nntinurrt Sulfate Cdlected . Suspended ` .: Grease . :Total :.:.:',': 'Total mo%dd/yr :. tng jl::''. std: units- tia/1'..`: :::.u�/I: ciRLf nigh Does this facility perform Vehicle Maintenance Activities using more than 55 gallons of new motor oil per month? No ( if yes complete Part B } Part 8: NA M ail Orig inal a nd one copy to: STORM EVENT CHARACTERISTICS (if more than one storm event was sampled) Division of Water Quality Date 2/19/2013 Date Attn: Central Files Total Event Precipitation (Inches) 0.12 Total Event Precipitation (inches) 1617 Mail Services Center event duration (hours): 4 event duration (hours): Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 "I certify, under penalty of taw, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel property gather and evaluate the infofmation submitted- Based on my inqufry of the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalities far submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and imprioonment for knowing violations." /�/� , Wil liam J. Thacker la'l/I/ �./ I Date Permittee ( Signature of Permittee) T V 1 Permit Number. NC NCO038377 FACILITY NAME PERSON COLLECTING SAMPLES) CERTIFIED LABORATORY(S) Part A: Specific Monitoring Requirements STORMWATE=R DISCHARGE OUTFALL (SDO) MONITORING REPORT Ma o Steam Electric Plant Herbert M. Lea, Jr. Mayo Plant Lab Lab #t PACE Analytical Lab 9 Cliitfa{I..:. Date.:.. Of012 :, 01027.:, 1 Sample -Be urn-- �dirtiuoit . .: Ch Collected . . SAMPLES COLLECTED DURENG CALENDAR YEAR: 2013 (This monitodre reportshall be recelved by the Division na later Than 3o days from the date the tac9ity receives the sampling results tram the Iatioratory.) County Person Phone No_ 335-597-7309 + 5064 /' , -F. //" 40/503/530 (SIGNATURE OF PERMITEE O E5IGNEE) 4 this signature, l certify that this report is accurate and complete to the best of my knwMedge. )34 fl 435i :..:::` _. ' Q1(367:: `.::: 01. 077 . '--.01Q59 .:. .:.. 01092 .: nlutn Lead : :Nirel : ;..'.:Silver- ... :::.:Thallit[m zinc. • :.: Calcrtim: ifg/I. Does this facility perform Vehicle Maintenance Activities using more than 55 gallons of new motor oil per month? ( if yes complete Part 8 ) Part B: NA STORM EVENT CHARACTERISTICS ( if more than one storm event was sampled) Date 2/19/2013 Date Total Event Precipitation (inches) 0.12 Total Event Precipitation (inches) event duration (hours): 4 event duration (hours): No Mail Original and one copy to: Division of Water Quality Attn: Central files 1617 Mail Services Center Raleigh, North Carolina 77699-1617 'I certify, under penatty of haw, shot this document and all attachments wtre prepared under my 6rcmian ar wpervision in accordsmc with a system de-4rjcd to assure that cruaf fic d personnelproperty gather and evah late the k0ormation submitted. Based on my mgiAry of the person or persons who mar age the system, qr those persons iirezt3V respo=lblc for pVteriag the information, the Information ctbrnitteed ts, to the bestef my knawfe dye and belW. true, ornate, and complete. I am 3w2re that there are sienficant aena6tks for submitting false infvrrnatium indodng the p=slbditr of rmes and hr;irk manent its lehowlng viola [ions." J William J. Thacker Date �' Permittee ( Signature of Perrnitt e) iI Progress Energy NOV 2 8 2012 File: Mayo 12520-R NC Division of Environmental Management Division of Water Quality ATTf;NTION: Central Files 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Subject: 15A N. C. Admin, Code 213 .0506 Mayo Electric Generating 1'laut National Poilutant Discharge Elimination System MDES) Number NCO03 8377 Starmwater Discharge Outfall 010 Monitoring Report Dear Sir or Madam: In accordance with Part I.C. Section 1;2 of NPDES Permit Number NCO038377, enclosed is the quarterly 2012 StorniNvater Discharge Outfall 010 report for Carolina Power & Light Company d/b/a Progress Energy Carolinas, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Duke Energy Corporation - NPDES Permit Number NC0038377, ! cert jy, under penalty of late, that this document and all attachments were prepared trader no, direction or .supervision in accordance with a syslem designed to assure that grrallfredpersonno!l properly garher and evaluate the inforrrtatrorr srrbrniiied Based on m}, ingrtir y of the person or persarrs who manage the syslem, or those persons directly responsible for gaiharing the it formation, the h!forrnatirnr submitlad is, to the best gfmy knowledge and belief, tare, accrrrale, and complete; 1 am aware that !here a re significant penaltics for submitting false igformaiion, including the possibility p f flees and imprisonmetrt far knowing violations. Please contact Mr, Steve Cahoon al (919) 546-7457, if there are any questions concerning the data in this submittal. Sincerely, Enclosures �" , d J",- Progress Erimmy Cr roltrns, Inc. William J. Thacker- Manager Mayo Electric Generating Plant STORMWATER DISCHARGE OUTFALL (SDO) MONITORING REPORT Permit Number: NC NCO038377 SAMPLES COLLECTED DURING CALENDAR YEAR: 2012 FACILITY NAME Maya Steam Electric Plant PERSON COLLECTING SAMPLE(S) Herbert M. Lea, Jr. CERTIFIED LABORATORY(S) Part A: Specific Monitoring Requirements Mayo Plant Lab Lab ## PACE Analytical Lab # ('this monitoring report shair be received by the Division no later than 30 days from the date the facRtty receives the sampling resut's from the laboratory.) County Person Phone No. 336-597-730g 5064. 40/503/530 (SIGNATURE OF PERMITEE OR'OESIGNEE) By this signature, I certify that this report is accurate and complete to the best cf my knowledge. Ouffall No. Date Sample Collected 005,30: '00556.: 01002; . .:.01Q42`: ::.:80103 .: ;. .71900: :.:.01147, ....00400 . -01097 :::01022.' .,:01105 %5.. Total Suspended Solids: oil and' Grease.. Arsenio' Total :Copper. :: C00: _ .-lytercury.:;, 4letiiut� pH. :Antirnan Boron aluminum: Sulfate mo/dd/yr mgfl mg/I ugp . ugA.: r mg/1 `. .610.: 6g/1: std, units ug/I ugjl ug/1 MUI Outfal1010 10 29/ 0012 10 <1.1 0.81 4.1 cZ5.0 0.0054 0.26 6.09 0.20 11.0 472 28.4 Does this facility perform Vehicle Maintenance Activities using more than 55 gallons of new motor oil per month? ( if yes complete Part B ) Part B: NA STORM EVENT CHARACTERISTICS Date 10/29/2012 Total Event Precipitation (inches) 0.5 event duration (hours). 29 ( if more than one storm event was sampled) Date Total Event Precipitation (inches) event duration (hours): Mail Original and one copy to: Division of Water Quality Attn: Central Files 1617 Mail Services Center Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-16I7 I certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system desfgned to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submr tied. Based on my Inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directty responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and heGef, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are signiflt:ant penatittes for submitting false information, including the pussJbility of fines and imprioonment for knowing ablations." William J.'Thacker Per mittee t ig Lure of Perminee€ Date ( 'I Le Za! L Permit Number: INC NCO039377 FACILITY NAME PERSON COLLECTING SAMPLE(S) CERTIFIED LABORATORY(S) Part A: Specific Monitoring Requirements outfafi �j No. Date Sairtple Collected - 03012 Berylfiul 1 r STORMWATER DISCHARGE OUTFALL (5130) MONITORING REPORT SAMPLES COLLECTED DURING CALENDAR YEAR: 2012 (This monitoring report shall be received by the Division no tater than 3b days from the date the tacillity receives the sampling results from the taneratory.l Mayo Steam Electric Plant County Person Herbert M. Lea, Jr. Phone No. 336-597-7309 Mayo Plant Lab Lab # 5064 ! �• • .� %} ;�? < r PACE Analytical Lab # 40/503/530 (SIGNATURE OF PERMITEE OR DESIGNEE) By this signarsre. I certify that this report is accurate and complete to the best of eny knowledge. 01027 -01034 :. t11053:.:,:.-....:.. , 01067 . 02077 ; A1059 Cadmium -'Chromitini -. Lead.:.:.: :'!,Nickel 1' Silver- .Thallium:.: Zinc ug/f ..Ug/ll Awl.. ::.:-Efe .- - - :. ugfl Does this facility perform Vehicle Maintenance Activities using more than 55 gallons of new motor oil per month? ( it yes complete Part 8 ) Part 8: NA STORM EVENT CHARACTERISTICS ( if more than one storm event was sampled) Date 10/29/2012 Date Total Event Precipitation (inches) 0.5 Total Event Precipitation (incites) event duration (hours): 29 event duration (hours): No Mail Original and one copy to: Division of Water Quality Attn: Central Files 1617 Mail Services Center Raleigh, North Carolina Z7699-1617 I cer:dy, under periahyel4w, that thA doaament and all attachmgrnts were prepared under mydrectipn a sapervision in a::ordanQ with a syrrm de! i"d to assure that qualified Ketsoanet rroperly gather and evafuareoe rnronnatien submitted. Based on my mquiry of the person orperso s who manap the system, or those persons drrectlq retpornib'e for gathering the mlormauon, the infunutic n submitted is, to the Lett cf nny knowledge and belief, truer accarale, and ramotcteI t am aware that there are siynifim x ocnaIWes for tubmittin=rake infomstiomindedingthe pwitigayoffinesandin`ipri rri*mfor knowingVxLaftnr" f William J_ Thacker GCS �/LfiLc Date / t �� !L PerMittee (SiOlure of Permittee) progress Energy 5 CA4i 0 /`- . JUL 2 6 291 File: Mayo 12520-R NC Division of Environmental Management Division of Water Quality ATTENTION: Central Files 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Subject: 15A N. C. Adunin. Code 213 .0506 Mayo Electric Generating Plaint Nationai Pollutant Discharge Eliminatiun System (NPDl.S) Number NC0039377 Stormwatcr Discharge Outfall 010 Monitoring Rcport Dear Sir or Madtnn: In accordance with Part I.C. Section L2 of NPDF,S Permit Nw7iber NC0038377, enclosed is -the quarterly 2012 Siorrnwater Discharge Outfill 010 report for Progress Energy's Maya Electric Generating Plant. I certifi,. mider• penulty of'law, that this docume+rt here prepared under my direclio+r or super i�ision in accardanc•e, with as �srern designed to assure that qual�4d personnel properly gather and evaluate the igformalion suhuritred. Based nn nrY inquire gf the person Or persons who mancrge the system, or rhuse persons directly responsihle for gathering the inforwadon, the information submitted is, to the hest of mY knoivletlge and holh.,.f n'uv, accurate, and complete. I uur utisirrc that there tr rig s'i rrificaru pe+urlties'•Jo+' srthmilfi+ag false irrfbonation, including the pussihili{y of fines and imprisomuent for knowing riolations. Please contact Mr, Steve Cahoon at (9 [ 9) 546-7457, if thus are any questions concerning the data in this SilhElllttal. Sincerely, I"M I O S II FCS Prngrms Encrpy CwOnm;. Inc. ,�� j �(W� William ,I. Thacker- Mmager Mayo Liectric Generating Plant File: Mayo 12520-R NC Division of nvironmental Management Division of Water Quality AITENTIQN: Central C"iles 1617 Mail Scrvice Center Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 SubJect: l5A N. C. Admin. Code 2B .0506 Mayo Electric Generating Plant National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NpDCS) NuittbVFNC'003$377 Discharge Monitoring Report (DMR) bc: Mr. Stesve Cahoon (W/cnclosurcS) 14Is. Dulcie F. Phillips (w/enclosures) STORMWATER DISCHARGE OUTFALi_ (SDO) MONITORING REPORT Permit Number: NC NCO038377 SAMPLES COLLECTED DURING CALENDAR YEAR: 2012 FACILITY NAME Mayo Steam Electric Plant PERSON COLLECTING SAMPLE(S) Herbert M. Lea, Jr. CERTIFIED LABORATORY(S) Mayo Plant Lab Lab 4 PACE Analytical Lab ft Part A: Specific Monitoring Requirements (This monitoring repart shall be received by the Division no Pater than 30 days from the date the facility receives the sampling results from the laboratory.) County Person Phone_ No. 336-597-7309 5064 /. l 40/503/530 {SIGNATURE OF PERMITEF OR [81GNEE) By this signature, i certify that this report is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. Out€all No. Date Sample Colfected 00530 00556. 01002 01042 80103 71900 01147 00400 01097 01022 01105 00945 Total Suspended Solids Oil and Grease Arsenic Total Copper Total COD Mercury Selenium pH Antimony Boron Aluminum Sulfate mo/dd/yr mg/l mg/I. I ug/1 I ug/I mg/I ug/I ug/) 1 std, units ug/i ug/I ug/I Mg/I Outta11010 611 2012 21.5 <1.1 0.41 1.4 Q5.0 0.0028 0.33 6.58 <0.25 7.4 359 3.8 Does this facility perform Vehicle Maintenance Activities using more than 55 gallons of new motor oil per month? No ( if yes complete Part B ) Part e: NA Mail Original and one copy to: STORM EVENT CHARACTERISTICS { if more than one storm event was sampled) Division of Water Quality Date 6/11/2012 Date Attn: Centrat Files Total Event Precipitation (inches) 0.2 Total Event Precip� itation (inches) 1617 Mail Services Center event duration thours): 1.42 event duration (hours): Raleigh, North Carolina 27599-1617 " I certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments werieprepared under my direction er supervision in accordance With a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the informatioa submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person Or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible forgathering the Information, the information submitted Is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. lam aware that there are significant tlenalities far submitting false infortttatran, including the possibiiity or fines and imprioonment for knowing viofations." William J. Thar:ker '0J�'�— Date 71Z;9// Z Permittee ( Sign 61 of Pennittee) Permit Number: NC NCO038377 FACILITY NAME PERSON COLLECTING SAMPLE(5) CERTIFIED LARORATORY(S) Part A: Specific Monitoring Requirements STORMWATER DISCHARGE OUTFALL (SDO) MONITORING REPORT Maya Steam Electric Plant Herbert M. Lea, Jr. Mayo Plant Lab SAMPLES COLLECTED DURING CALENDAR YEAR: 7012 IThis monitorrnC report shall be received by the DMsion no later than 30 days from the pate the facility receives the sampling results born the ianoraiory.l County Per on P"ne No. r 336.597-73 Lab # 5064 1 i:--�. 1.�1% �r i PACE Analytical Lab # 40/503/530 {SIGNATURE OF PERMITEF OR D161 NEE) 8y this signature, i certify that this report is accurate and complete to the best of my knowiedge. Outfall Date 01012 01027 01D34 01051 01067 01077 01059 01092 No. Sample Collected Beryllium Cadmium Chromium Lead Nickel Silver Thallium Zinc mo/dd/yr 1 ug/I ug/I ug/1 ug/I ug/I ug/I ug/I ug/I Outfal1010 6 12 2012 <o.092 <0.028 1.2 0.39 1.4 <0.25 <0.050 4.5 Does this facility perform Vehicle Maintenance Activities using more than 55 gaiions of new motor oil per month? No ( if yes complete Part B ) Part 13: NA mail MigInal and one copy to: STORM EVENT CHARACTERISTICS (if more than one -storm event was sampled) Division of Water Quality Date 6/11/2012 Date Attn: Central Files Total Event. Precipitation (inches) 0.2 Total Event Precipitation (inches) 1617 Mail Services Center event duration (hours): ---177— event duration (hours): Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 " I certify, under penalty o! law, that this documcm and ail attschroeets were prapared under my dgect:oi v, supervl&W in accordan with a rystern des:gned to assure that trualdied - zersonrrei proper\t gather and evasrate the Oormat.tm submitted. Based on my rncr .ry of the person or persons who manage the systarn, or those persons d-recdy responsib:e fcrgatharote the mrorna:ion, the infarnutron submmrd n. to the best of my knoWecage and better, trwl, accurate. and co" pleto. I am aware that there are si¢n!hcanc certa8p¢s fpr subnuiting!alse inforrnatmon. ,nAtEtng the posslb'_'ty d Tres and irncri canment for Itnc—r g vie:atzans,' Witliam J. Thacker Permittee I Signat Permittee) Date r] / 2 j; 1 1 Z r-roress Energy File: Mayo 12520-R NC Division of Envirouniental Management Division of Water Quality An'r,NTION: Central Files 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 ADR 201 Subject: 15A N. C. Admin. Code 28 .0506 Mayo Electric Generating Plant National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Number NCO038377 Stormwater Discharge Oulfall 010 Monitoring Report Dear Sir or Madam: In accordance with Pars 1.C. Section E2 of NPDES Permit Number NCO038377, enclosed is the serni- annual 2012 Stormwater Discharge Outfall 010 report for Progress Energy's Mayo Electric Generating Plant, 1 cerlifi', under penall'v oflmt,, that this docrurtem and all attachments were prepared under' my direction or srtper vision a in accardnce Will a s"mlem designed to assure that qualified personnel properlygafher curd et�alrrale the information submitted. Dt+sud on my inquily of the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons direcllr responsible for gathering fire information, /be information submftled is, to the hest of tnti, knowledge and belief, true, accuraie, and complete. I am aware that there a r•e sigrriIIcant perrddlles for submitting false Arfoi,mation, including theposxibih'1Y affrrc8 and imprisonment for knowing violations. Please contact Mr. Steve Cahoon at (919) 546-7457, if there are any questions concerning, the data in this submittal. Sincerely, Enclosures Prugress Energy Cnrolinas.tnc. 1 �'r,f:h iti=a411 i q:i:11 Wit pc�4. William J. Thacker- Manager Mayo Electric Generating Plant STORMWATER DISCHARGE OUTFALL (5DO) MONITORING REPORT Permit Number: NC NCQ038377 SAMPLES COLLECTED DURING CALENDAR YEAR: 2012 FACILITY NAME Mayo Steam Electric Plant PERSON COLLECTING SAMPLE(5) Herbert M. Lea, Jr. CERTIFIED LABORATORY(5) Mayo Plant Lab PACE Analytical Part A. Specific Monitoring Requirements (This monitoring report shall be received by the Division no later than 30 days from the date the facility receives the sampling results from the [aboratory.) County Person Phape No. 336-597-7309.E Lab # 5064 i3�� �Cj�I ,,.1 , Lab # 40/503/530 (SIGNATURE OF PERMITEE OR DJ�91GNEE) ay this signature. I certify that this report is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. Outfall No. k Date Sample Collected 00530 00556.. 01002 01042 8U303: 71900 .01,147 00400 .01097 01022. 01105 D0945 Total Suspended Solids oil and: Grease Arsenio Total Copper.. Total 'COD Mercury Selenium , pH Antimony Boron- Aluminum Sulfate coo/dd/yr mg/1 mg/I u8/1 ug/l . mglE ugA ug/l I std. units ug/l ug/l ug/I I mg/1 Outfall010 3/15 2012 12.2 2.2 <0.69 2.8 46.0 0.0121, <1.1 6.42 <1.2 20.2 349 6.6 "- Above the 0.01Z ug/I limit Does this facility perform Vehicle Maintenance Activities using more than 55 gallons of new motor oil per month? No ( if yes compete Part B ) Part 8: NA Mail Original and one copy to: STORM EVENT CHARACTERISTICS (if more than one storm event was sampled) Division of Water Quality Date 3/15/2012 Date Attn: Central files Total Event Precipitation (inches) 0.12 Total Event Precipitation (inches) 1617 Mail Services Center event duration (hours): 0.5 event duration (hours): Raleigh, North Carolina Z7599-1617 'I certify, under penalty of taw, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance wish a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submined is, to the crest of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are slgntficant penarttes for submitting false information, including the possibliity of tines and imprioonment for knowing violations." William J. Thacker Permittee ba ,f ( S4-n tune of Permirtee) Date ? L 1Z Permit Number: NC NCO038377 FACILITY NAME PERSON COLLECTING SAMPLE(5) CERTIFIED LABORATORY(S) Part A. Specific: Monitoring Requirements STORMWATER DISCHARGE OUTFALL (SDO) MONITORING REPORT _Mayo Steam Electric Plant Herbert M. Lea, Jr. Mayo Plant Lab SAMPLES COLLECTED DURING CALENDAR YEAR: 2012 {This monitoring reportshall be received by the Division no later than 30 days from the date the Facility rece+ves we saaipting results tram tree taooratery.7 County Person Phone No. i 336-597-7309 Lab # 5064 `,f 7. c, PACE Analytical Lab # 40/503/530 'SIGNATURE OF PER ITEE OR DESIGVE) By this signature, I certify thar this report is accurate and complete to the best or my knowledge. Clutfall No. pate Sample ColW-cted: 01Q12 01027- 01034 01051 A31067 01077- 01U59 01092 Beryiliurh Cadmium Chromium Lead; -Nicke'l' Silver Thallium Zinc moldd/yr ug/I ug/( ug/I ug/l ug/I ug/I ug/l ug/1 outfalt 010 3 15 201Z <0.46 <0.14 2.1 1.0 1.7 <1.2 <0.25 <12.5 Does this facility perform vehicle Maintenance Activities using more than 55 gallons of new motor oil per month? No ( if yes complete Part B ) Part B; NA ;;Mail Original and one copy to: STORM EVENT CHARACTERISTICS ( if more than one storm event was sampled) Division of Water Quality Date 3/15/2012 Date Attn: Central Files Total Event Precipitation (inches) 0.12 Total Event Precipitation (inches) 1617 Mail services Center event duration (fours): 0.5 event duration (tours): Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 I reftiry, under pensltytt law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction er wperdsian in act kbnce%ith a s/xem de5!$ned to assure that quaElr:ae permrrael properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on M mquo of the person w persons who manage the system, or these persons directly responiible for gathering the infartaatim, the Kdorn ation sabrratted is, to the best of my know.edge and belief, true, accurate, and oomplele. I am aware that %here are aiyni iieatnt perrehti es for submit false information. Indudhg the pnsmisility of fines and on oeioanment for knowYng vio!a%jock.' j j William 1. Thacker ,` Date Permittee {Signature ormi{tee) + Progress Energy File: Mayo 12520-R SEP 1 6 r 011 NC Division of Environmental Management Division of Water Quality ATTENTION: Central Files 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Subject: 15A N. C. Admin. Code 2B .0506 Mayo Electric Generating Plant National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Number NC0038377 Sionnwater Discharge Outfall 010 Monitoring Report Dear Sir or Madam - In accordance with Part I,C. Section E2 of NPDES Permit Number NC0038377, enclosed is the semi- annual 2011 Stormwater Discharge Outfall 010 report for Progress Energy's Mayo Electric Generating Plant. 1 certify, under penalty of law, that this docrtrnent and all attachments uwe prepared under my direction or . supervision In accordance with a system designed to assure that grtalified poosorritel properly galher and evaluate the Information suboitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons ivho rua►rage the sJrstenr, or those persons directly responsible for gatherhtg the h for,uatlon, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief true, accurate, and complete. 1 am aware that there a re significant penalties far submlttingfolse information, including the possibility offlnes and imprisonment for- knoWng violations. Please contact Mr. Steve Cahoon at (919) 546-7457, if there are any questions concerning the data in this submittal. Sincerely, Enclosures William J. Thticker- Manager Mayo Electric Generating Plant Pra?trmn Ertarp Caridinas, Mr. Permit Number: NC NCO038377 FACILITY NAME Mayo Steam Electric Plant PERSON COLLECTING SAMPLE(S) Richard D. Nowefl CER-nFIED LABORATORY(S) Mayo Plant Lab -PACE Analytical Part A: Specific Monitoring Requirements STORMWATER DISCHARGE OU-TFALL (SDO) MONITORING REPORT SAMPLES COLLECTED DURING CALENDAR YEAR: 2011 (rhis monitoring report sNI1 be received by the Dmsiort no later than 30 days from the date the facility receives the samphng results from the laboratory.) County Person Phone No. 336-597-7 32 Lab # 5064 W,�Z,_,'P ,1�:K,�1� Lab # 40/503/530 (SIGNATURE OF PERMITEE Oft DESIGNEE) By this signature, I certify that this report is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge_ Outfall : No. ...::Date :.:: 5arrtple Collected:. ..: 00530'.:' " Q0555 s_0�002 '- .. OE142 T y..:b17. .., a1Cf�?„ _,; 0]1i35, Of195..:, 1 ntaE :. :. 5uspentled flil `anti) .: Grease >Arsenlc . rbtat CO fser COS lVt tzr�t SeJer t m p Atrttrr Y Sdrnit AfurrtlnuM r Soffaie /56 mo/dd r y ... " :- 1, : " .. .:.rn �g7( =: `:- a { .. .:. Ctt _.. l u _. glF, ..:K std tmkt5.. , u tt 1 fit Outfall010 8/27 2011 13"4 1.4 0,58 1.6 33.0 0.0043 0.41 7.05 0.086 13.8 290 16.6 Does this facility perform Vehicle Maintenance Activities using more than 55 gallons of new motor oil per month? No I if yes complete Part B ) Part B: NA Mail Originalana one copy to: STORM EVENT CHARACTERISTICS ( if more than one storm event was sampled) Division of Water Quality Date 8/27/2011 Date Attn: Central Files Total Event Precipitation (inches) 0.3 Total Event Precipitation (inches) 1617 Mail Services Center event duration (hours): 8.5 event duration (hours): Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 'I certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my drrecdon a supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the Information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is. to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant Mal [ties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and Impriconment for knowing v;olativns.' q. William I. Thacker T�k Date q i l Perm)ttee (Si at a of Permittee) ,j � s Permit Number_ NC NCO039377 EACIUTY NAME PERSON COLLECTING SAMPLE(S) CERTIFIED LABORATORY(S) Part A: Specific Monitoring Requirements STORMWATER DISCHARGE OUTFALL (SDO) MONITORING REPORT SAMPLES COLLECTED DURING CALENDAR YEAR: 2011 (This monhodng report shall be received by the E)Mslon Fro titer than M days from the date the facility receives the samptrhg reSuits from the Iaboratnryj Maya Steam Electric Plant County Person Richard D. Nowell Phone No. 336-597-7332 Mayo Plant Lab Lab # 5054 PACE Analytical Lab # 40/503/530 (SIGNATURE OF PERMITEE OR DESIGNEE) By this Signature, I Certify that this report is accurate and complete to the hest of my knowfedge- Out#akl :` IVo: Date. Sarfiple ; :{i1422 :.....: 01D27 . • . .; 01£334... D30's ....... . G1053,, `. 03Q77 �59 , 13erylflum . GarJriyum C3trott�lpi� 1e�tr1 Ntcicef SiEir�r 7ha{Iltilrti i ianC . . . lle:c Cote. d .. ..,'' '> rnoiasilyt .:::�iF :.:ugl(.:' I DUtta I1010 1 8/27120111 U.039 1 < U,U:30 I 1.0 1 U-43 1 0.97 1 < 0,070 I < 0.050 1 5.5 1 Does this facility perform Vehicle Maintenance Activities using more than 55 gallons of new motor oil per month? No ( if yes complete Part 8 ) Part a: NA Mail Original and one cagy to. - STORM EVENT CHARACTERISTSCS ( ff more than one storm event was sampled) Division of Water Quality Date 2/27/2011 Date Attn: Central Files Total Event Precipitation (inches) 0.3 Total Event Precipitation (inches) 1617 Mail Services Center event duration (hours): 415 event duration (hours): Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 I ter.Ay, under penartygf law, that this document a nd a'[ attaeirments were prepared underm &eMlan or supervision In a=DrdanCe with a system deMgned to assure that qua4fed personnel preper!y gather anal Eva 51ata the i nfor maiian syt= ci. nand on ny inquiry of the person or persom who manage the system, or those persons directly rstpor,s3ble for pthering the information, the erdorrrotion submitted is, to the bast aF my knttwIudCo and beLef, true, accurate, and cwnpiete.1 am aware that them are significant Pen antles fix submit tting false mfor nation, incWng the posdrbnity of Snes and }n, r opntnent for knowlns wb tiaras,' William 1. Thacker Date jt Permittee ( r,nature of Petmittee) Progress Energy File: Mayo 12520-R JUN 0 9 Z0 11 NC Division of Environmental Management Division of Water Quality ATTENTION: Central Files 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Subject: 15A N. C. Admin. Code 213.0506 Mayo Electric Generating Plant National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDE,S) Number NCO038377 Storrnwater Discharge Outfall 010 Monitoring Report Dear Sir or Madam, ]n.accot'dance-with Fart t.C. Section E2 of NPIYE Pertrzif Numlaer NC003$377, ericliised'is the seini� annual 2011 Stormwater Discharge Outfall 010 report for Progress Energy's Mayo Electric Generating P1a1et. 1 cert 5r, tinder penalty of law, that INN doctunent and all attachments were prepared tinder »rjl db•ection or supervision in accordance with a system designer! to assure char qualified personnel pr•oper•ly garner and evaluate the information subinitred. Based an my inquby of the person or persons who wanage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the inforntallon, the it formation subinitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, tr uc, accurate, and complete. I arrr rnvrrre that there a r e.rig,rificarat penalties far.su6» rittirrg false n formation, including the possibility of fries and inrprisonineni fa• knowing violations. Please contact Mr. Steve Cahoon at (919) 546-7457, if there are uy questions concerning the data in this submittal. Sincerely, Enclosures William J. Thacker- Manager Mayo Electric Generating Plant Progruss �norgy Corobas, laic. Permit Number: NC NCG039377 FACILITY NAME Mayo Stem Electric Plant PERSON COLLECTING 5AMPLE(5) Richard D. NOWEII STORMWATER DISCHARGE OUTFALL (SDO) MONITORING REPORT SAMPLES COLLECTED DURING CALENDAR YEAR: 2012 (This menh ng report shalt be received by the Division no later than $0 days from the datethe factllty receives tie sampling resu Its from the laboratory.) County Person Phone No, 336-597-733 CERTIFIED LABORATORY(S) Mayo Plant Lab Lab # 5064 PACE Analytical Lab # 40/503/S30 (SIGNATURE OF PERMITEE OR DESIGNEE) By this signature, i certify that this reportis accurate and completeto the best of my knowledge. Part A: Specific Monitoring Requirements outfall. No -bate;: aample .,00530.. 0MSli: 02D02:. .:'.Oltt42 8Q103 _ 7]9t)f' : 01ia7.: t)044tF f31093:;`:' t} tf2 :iri105.; 945 .` Tfltaf OIl and . Arsenee Coffer , E DD` eiury SeEenfuitt RR lkittt}pny : 8nrvii iRlurintrtfni Sulfate.:: SifspIncli :. Total 56 .. ;taEllts:ug%i 1Qutfall 010 1 5/17/20111 r 152 - .,1 < 1.1 1 1.10 1 ! 9.4 i 1 34.D 1 110175' 1 f}.b8 1 6./4 1 U.2 I 23.8 1 f 4430.0 1 7.5 1 Does thts facility perform Vehicle Maintenance Activities using more than 55 gallons of new motor oil per month? No { if yes complete Part 8 ) Part B: NA Mail Originaland one copy to: STORM EVENT CHARACTERISTICS (if more than one storm event was sampled) Division of Water Quality Date 5/17/2011 Date Attn: Central Files Total Event Predpitation (inches) 0.4 Total Event Precipitation (inches) 1617 Mail Services Center event duration (hours), 0.5 hr. event duration {hours): Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 " I certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attarhments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gativer and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiryof the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons O reedy responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am awarethet there are significant penallties for submitting false information, lacluOng the possibility of fines and impriconment for know ng violations." William 1- Thacker Permittee ( Sign a of Permitteel Date it ri 1 j 'L, N 7 STORMWATER DISCHARGE OUTFALL (SDO) MONITORIN&REPORT Permit Number: NC NCO038377 SAMPLES COLLECTED DURING CALENDAR YEAR. 2011 (This monitoring report shall be rece'ned by the Division no later than 30 days frum the Cate ute tadtrty recttrves the sampling MUMS from the laAoratarY.J FACILITY NAME Mayo Steam Electric Plant County Person PERSON COLLECTING SAMPLES) Richard D. Nowell Phone No. 336-597-7332 CERTIFIED LABORATORY(S) Mayo Plant Lab Lab # 5064 PACE Analytical Lab # 40/503/530 (SIGNATURE OF PERMffEE OR DESIGNEE) By this s<gnature, I certify that this report is accurate and cumplete to the best of my knowledge. Part A. Specific Monitoring Requirements Outfall� .:•� :::::�:aate:: ; ..:::.::ff1Q1z.: •:-�: :� � ;:010�� .:�:�-; .:,:,::Q10 Na.: Sample 13InylliuitiCasimsum {�rorr • � � `. �: � Collected :._ .: ul :.:::. _ ':_lid Does this facility perform Vehicle Maintenance Activities using more than 55 gallons of new motor oil per month? ( if yes complete Part 6 ) Part 8: NA STORM EVENT CHARACTERISTICS Date 5/17/2011 Total Event Precipitation (inches) 0.4 event duration (hours): .5 r. (if more than one storm event was sampled) Date Total Event Precipitation (Inches) event duration (hours): No Mail original and one copy to: Division of Water Quality Attn: Central Files 1617 Mail Services Center Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 " I ctnify, under penalty of law, that this document and a II attachments were prepared under my C"racmm or supervision in 2o-wcb ee with a system desVnd to assure that qua lined personnel properfy pthrr and evaluate the WormaUon subn ittrd Pissed art my inquiry o.'the person or persom who n amEe the system, or thou persons d-itecdy nssponskble forgathering the kr*,-,eatian, the information s0tw4md Ls, to the best of my knmk*e and belfef, true, accurate, and complete. tam aware that t1x a are sijnireant penafrties for s>l"tting false information, indudkas the posskdiy of hms and irnpriocnment for lzrorv,g .iolatiotts.' A I / William J. Thacker Date 6! �! Permittee ( 5ignatur Pennittee) �� Progress Energy Fite: Mayo 12520-R NC Division of Environmental Management Division oFWater Quality ATTENTION: Central Files 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-16I7 Subject: 15A N. C. Admin. Code 213 .0506 Mayo Electric Generating Plant National .Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Number NO0038377 Stormwater Discharte Outfall 010 il4onitoring Report Dear Sir or Madam: In accordance with Part I.C. Section E2 of NPDES Pennit Number NC0038377, enclosed is the serni- annual 2010 Stormwater Discharge Outfall 010 report for Progress Energy's Mayo Electric Generating Plant. I certify, under penalry of lane, that ibis doctrrnent urnd till attachments tivere prepared under rr�v direction or s'uper'vision in accordance with a slxtenr dcsigired to assure that graal fed personnel properly gather a,atl evahrate the information submitted. Based on uty iugreir.v of the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly respousrble f6r•gatherin the inforrnalion, lire it jb)-mation subinwed is, it) the best of ary knowledge rnrd belief, true, accurate, and cornplele. I ant aware dear there a re significant penalties for submittingfalse information, hwhidin,g the possibility of fines and irnpr•isomnent for luraiving violations. Please contact Mr. Steve Cahoon at (919) 546-7457, if there are any questions concerning the data in this submittal. Sincerely, Enclosures William J. Thacker- Manager Mayo Electric Generating Plant Ptogrem En orgy Carolinas. fine. ' ayn'0311 PIX;1 1(;t,'69 Eas s-i RTA yr,.Fnf.r,, N' ,I' M STORMWATER DISCHARGE OUTFALL (SDO) MONITORING REPORT Permit Number. NC NCO038377 SAMPLES COLLECTED DURING CALENDAR YEAR: 2010 (This monitoring report shall be received by the ❑ivision no later than 30days from the date the facility receives the samplrng results from the laboratory.) FACILITY NAME Mayo Steam Electric Plant County Person PERSON COLLECTING SAMPLES) Michael Talley Phone o. 3 -597-7 4 CERTIFIED LABORATORY(S) Mayo Plant Lab Lab 4 5064 PACE Analytical Lab 0 40/503/530 (SiGNATu i OF ERMI f QR DESIGNEE) ©y this signature, I certify that this report Is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge - Part A: Specific Monitoring Requirements Outfall Date 130S30 oos56. 01002 -. .. 01042- 80103 71900 01147 00900 01097 01022 01105 00945 No. sample Collected Total 5u.spended .... Solids :.Oil. and - .. Grease - . :... Arsenic Total :Copper Total :COD )Mercury Selenium pH Antimony .. Boron Aluminum . Sulfate mo/dd�yr mg/I trig/1 ug/l ug/I mg/I ug/1 ug/l. std. units ug/I u9/1 :ug/l. ni Out -fall 010 11 4 2010 8.9 <5.0 <0,5 4.8 <25.0 0.008 <0.5 5.9S* <0.50 8.3 670.0 15.1 j Does this facility perform Vehicle Maintenance Activities using more than 55 gallons of new motor oil per month? ( if yes complete Part B ) Part 8: NA STORM EVENT CHARACTERISTICS ( if more than one storm event was'sampled) Data? 11/4/2010 Date Total Event Precipitation (inches) 0.3 Total Event Precipitation (inches) event duration (hours): 6 hrs event duration (hours): * Ambient pH Value=5.29 std units No Mil Original and one copy to. Division of Water Quality Attn: Central Files 1617 Mail Services Center Raleigh, North Carolina Z7699-1617 I. certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaivate the Informaton submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manate the system, or those persons directly responsible forgathering the information, the infomtation submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalities for submitting false Information, including the possibility of fines and imp.roonment for knowing vlalattom." William J. Thacker Permittee (5ignatur ermittee) 17ate t 2 // 7 /2�r� Permit Number: NC NCO038377 FACILITY NAME PERSON COLLECTING SAMPLE(S) CERTIFIED LABORATORY(S) Part A. Specific Monitoring Requirements STORMWATER DISCHARGE OUTFALL (SDO) MONITORING REPORT Mayo Steam Electric Plant Michael Talley Mayo Plant Lab Lab # SAMPLES COLLECTED DURING CALENDAR YEAR: 2010 (This monitoring report shall be received by the Cimsion no Eater than 30 days from the date the taolrly receives we sampting results trom the taboraWry.j County Person Phon o. 3 G-597-7304 5064 , PACE Analytical tab # 40/503/530 (IGNATURE 6F PERMITEE OR IGNEE) 6y this signature, i certify that this re ari is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. Outfail Date ." 01012. 01027 01034 01051... 01.057 01077 01059 :03 92 .. No. _ '.'Saiziplei .Collected. :.Beryllium .. 1fadhfl1urr Chromium Lead.:' Nic&ef Silver Thallium, zinc` ' riio/dd/yr tug/l upA ug/l. ug/i.' . ug/l. ug/I ug/I Outfall010 111472010 <0.20 <0.080 2.20 0.81 1.4 <0.50 <0.10 10.4 Does this facility perform Vehicle Maintenance Activities using more than 55 gallons of new motor oil per month? No ( if yes complete Part B ) Part B: NA Mail Original and one copy to: STORM EVENT CHARACTERISTICS { if more than one storm event was sampled) Division of Water Quality Date 11/4/2010 Date Attn: Central Files Total Event Precipitation (inches) 0.3 Total Event Precipitation (inches) 1617 Mail Services Center event duration (hours): — —6Trs �` event duration (hours): Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 'I certiry, under pena:ty of raw, that this ecrur nt and all atwthments were prepare under my d-rett:en e- supernsian in a=dan_e vr.rh a system des!gned to assure that qua ff ed personnel property gather and eva!uate tFs 4 fo:nuucn submitted. eased on my inqu:ry of the perum cr perscns %-ho mamge the system, or those persons duect:y responsible far go therm Ow informatier:, the mfo-matim submitted a, to the test of my kr w:edge and be:ief, true, accurate, and ce plete. I ari aware that there are signAcarst Fena'!&es for submaiing false info aeon, including the poss:b,i ty of fines and ,mpmOnmert fr. KnOwmg Vlplattons' William!. Thacker Permittee { Sig(a re of Permittee) Date ! Z f I :I I ?.0 1a �*p� Progress Energy File: Mayo 12520-It NC Division of Environmental Management Division. of Water Quality ATTENTION: Central Files 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-16 l7 MAY 2 5 2010 Subject: 15A N. C. Admin. Code 2E .0506 Mayo Electric Generating Plant National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Number NCO038377 Stormwater Discharge Outfall 010 Monitoring Report Dear Sir or Madam: In accordance with Part I.C. Section E2 of NPDES Permit Number NC0038377, enclosed is the semi- annual 2010 Stormwater Discharge Outfall 010 report for Progress Energy's Mayo Electric Generating Plant. 1 certib,, under penalty of law, that this doctiment and all auachmernts were prepai•erl rtnder my directiott oe supervision in accordance with a systern designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaltiate the information submitted. Based on rrry inquiry of the person oY persons who manage the System, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the ii forniation submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, trite, accurate, and complete. 1 ain aware that there a re significant penalties for submitting false information, Including the possibility off nes and impruonmeni for knowing violations. Please contact Mr. Steve Cahoon at (919) 546-7457, if there are any questions concerning the data in this submittal. Sincerely, Enclosures Eric Northeim- Manager Mayo Electric Generating Plant Progress Energy Carolinas. Inc. 1,1di? Seem Han! I urp Hoston Poal liukam. %;,' 1ibN STORMWATER DISCHARGE OUTFALL (SDO) MONITORING REPORT Permit Number: NC NCO038377 FACILITY NAME Mayo Steam Electric Plant PERSON COLLECTING SAMPLE(S) Michael Talley CERTIFIED LABORATORY(S) Mayo Plant Lab Lab # PACE Analytical Lab # Part A: Specific Monitoring Requirements SAMPLES COLLECTED DURING CALENDAR YEAR: 2010 (This monitoring report shall be received by the Division no later than 30 days from the date the facility receives the sampling results from the laboratory,) County Person Phon No 336-597-7304 5064 40/503/530 (SIGNATURE OF PERMItEE OR DESIGNEE) By this'signature, I certify that this report is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. �: flLtfall =Date Q(353Q ,:.; _Ofl55& " :.:010p2 .:'. ..61pAz :.:'.801t3�. .,..7]:900., : ,:. 0�47 :_:;004�0., .. 01t}9%.. <01t322�• „ :Q�.1(]� � ohs., .. f!io.: Sam le : Total ©Maid :-Arsenic Cn`.per ;COD tNecu 'Selenium #�.. ;: Antiiioz� Boron., .. gltirttnurr3-. SUlfaiQ .' F Solids � Y mo(ddyyr.• ull..":. flutfall010 4/21 2010 130 <5.0 0.99 <1.9 68.0 0.011 <0.50 6.08 <0.50 9.0 244.0 <5.0 ------------- Does this facility perform Vehicle Maintenance Activities using more than 55 gallons of new motor oil per month? No ( if yes complete Part 8 ) Part B: NA IMail Original and one copy to: STORM EVENT CHARACTERISTICS (if more than one storm event was sampled) Division of Water Quality Date 4/21/2010 Date Attn: Central Files Total Event Precipitation (inches) 0-45 Total Event recitation (inches) 1617 Mail Services Center event duration (hours): 5 hrs event duration (hours): Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 " [certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qual fled person nei properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiryof the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible forgathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalities far submittfng false information, including the possribility of fines and imprioonmentfor knowing violations." % Eric M. Northeim `? J Date Permittee ( Signature of Permittee) Permit Number: NC NC0038377 FACILITY NAME PERSON COLLECTING SAMPLE(S) CERTIFIED LABORATORY(S) Part A: Specific Monitoring Requirements STORMWATER DISCHARGE OUTFALL (SDO) MONITORING REPORT SAMPLES COLLECTED DURING CALENDAR YEAR: 2010 (This monitoring report shall be received by the Division no later than 30 days from the date tee rauhty receives the sampling results from the laporatory-j MaVo Stearn- Electric Plant County Person Michael Talley Phone No. 336-597-7304 Mayo Plant Lab Lab # 5064 PACE Analytical Lab # 40/503/530 (SIGNATURE OF PERMITEE OR D EGNEE) By this signature, I certify that this report is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. Uutfah Date 43,01 01137 `._ Q1Li34 _Di1l.A7 01077..... Q� 47 9 U 92 + . -...,. _'. No....:, .:..Sant [e Ber 111um :Ci, itiltrrtt Chrornluirt>. Iead :`. , Nikkei; tivec _ThailFuFrf _ couectQd - k c r ' tvtn/ddlyr outfall010 4 21/2010 <0.20 <0,080 2.10 0.85 3.5 <0.50 <0.10 6.2 Does this facility perform Vehicle Maintenance Activities using more than SS gallons of new motor oil per month? ( if yes complete Part B ) Part S: NA STORM EVENT CHARACTERISTICS Date 4/21/2010 Total Event Precipitation (inches) 0.45 event duration (hours): `" ` r—s ( if more than one storm event was sampled) Date Total Event Precipitation (inches) event duration (hours): Wil Original and one copy to: Division of Water Quality Attn: Central Files 1617 Mail Services Center Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 "I cenify, under penahy of low, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction of supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel property gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my 1"Wry of the person at persons who manage tfu system, or those persons three%!• responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penapties for submitting false informal ion, in Judi n g the possibility of finis and l mprioonment foe knowing violations." 1--7 Eric M. Northeim k. (f ;— �v �f "-i�� Elate 5—/Z �-/ v16 Permittee { Signature of Permittee) Q� Dl.+�E ENERGY Mar. 13, 2017 Mr. Mike Randall Department of Environmental Quality 1612 - Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1612 Subject: Update of Permit file — Monofill Storm water drainage area Duke Energy Progress, LLC - Mayo Steam Electric Plant Person County Permit NCG120101 Dear Mr. Randall: ENS-CCP 410 South Wilmington Street Mail Code:NCRN15 Raleigh, NC 27601 �1 ?0 Sro����CA,U�QU 1l TER pCR�L��y, 'fli�y�b oN��b19 The Mayo Steam Electric Plant in Person County operates a CCR monofill off of Highway 501. The monofill stormwater releases are regulated by stormwater permit NCG120101. The attached drawing, prepared by Golder Associates, identifies the monofill's rain cover area and the subsequent non -contact stormwater flow to outfall 001. A review of the initial N01 submittal for this facility, in preparation for renewal of this permit, revealed this flow area was not represented on the original drawing submitted with the NOI request. There is no direct contact with CCR materials or leachate from this flow area. Duke Energy requests the Mayo permit file be updated to reflect this revised record to assure the areas tributary to each outfall are accurate in your files. If you have any questions, please contact Lori Tollie at 336.854.4916 or at Iori.tollie@duke-enerey.com. Sincerely, Tom Copolo — Manager Mayo Electric Generating Plant Cc: Diane Adams — NCDEQ w/attachment 1 2 3- 4 5 6 7 B 9 10 I1 Ic DRAINAGE AREA ei �7 • - -.. ^ r� - ~� slm��a �+�.^�1\ \� F DRA;NAr,E AREA i2 DRAJNADf AREA 91 rIDRAINAGE DRARAAGE AREA ar AREA A � DRAINAGE AREA /5 JJ _ _ • _ _ `' �\'� `� . �.. � ��.+�iYi' i ors SIMMMER BASIX Y♦, MAYO MONOFILL PHASE 1 DRAINAGE �� --��' --Cc so rm Am ♦� AREA#1 / _ �. ; ♦ ACTIVE CCR PLACEMENT AREA \\\\ \,♦ DRAINAGE AREA #4 M \' ♦ `\y ," �oA.Pt.Ta CGIflACTlq WI•C�_^ '` \\X ' `, � - - ' �, •RO.OM fM[ LIACIMi[ COIl.[CTIpY {'Yl�EY ' \ ' \ � WNFi wA�M j DRAINAGE AREA 02 SEDIMENT BASIN #1 \\\ _r` _-.. -_ .•--_..�"._.. - - t r � i RAIN COVER AREA r J' \ DRAINAGE AREA #5 - rrr[A wr ,� ; II i (' • .worrao wnx oRArA�e �u. n 1y ,. \ - 1\ ~ OUTFACE #1 � ) t 1 — a Jr �� I � 1+771+� 11 SEDIMAENT BASIN !2 IX 200 it , /r•._. ...i. `_-, - YWfALLK / 1-. lw IEET ',C_AAL SSDRtrLaTCA aCakF* - = EI:. sir _ / PE. c „-_ t DUKE ENERGY PROGRESS, INC �f DUKE POWER OPERATIONS GROUP !'ENERGY. Golder P MAYO ►aocA;rss _ _- C 15=817 MONOFILL GENERAL STORMWATER PERMIt j �aT70Cxat�J SITE DIAGRAM Q ANS{-0 1--lW MAYO CCP MONOFILL - - - 9 - IQ 21 12 tKAAA WOW A10YES J.y w nw..r • .,rr..� :arr •,r .rr+! ww+ rr. I•rwti r ww wW- Y a w rn1 [Nlwr h-MpwY Mrr .• !.r•/N nr a . ! rP1.4 r rw lrrYn ry . ..w...r a rs .rw e.. ww . r...r++•r r n. wrww rwl.r n...r w. rn. w.r. r .. rw! r .rwarwr w.rr ryrw a tiW � ..l.rr rr�wwo n.w N.aw.r wwx. w nrrr• ar .r r !. !ram a..rJ lrrr ebe.rr Jr.r, r„• S.M1 rM wr.rr • r.Yrr rr.r►J /� •••r rrr. !r• wwrrrx ry W wrw� w rNnw ww1 N xNhw•r nrpr, r r.r�rw•! 4 [ [ ! A nr ,rr,ra rw w rn ,+MN• wWYI w wra,rVr r 6•w # . rrr. wwrnr �� �+r• n rrr v rrrrH/ rwrrw•r ,rw, v an N wan. ury wr •r•.sw N rx sw yw w r,r. r ru wwn w . rlslr lNrrw 'M1M /w n•rp M r,• w ,rN rrr+r...rr •.a +.� a .yr, wrb 4 nwr r rr� — •.. W xMr Irr w rrxrr w . N Ir �. !w wrwy rl rrr N rM .� rec•eMw w•rw r�s ✓4 Yr a!� rrYr�. !Iw M1 r,w ., ti'. rbw Y rw.r r w. rr. •,•.r• rsr r!r rw.rr W nM t ar r••rr ., r ,.rw.N !../.J Nwr x ww ww. rw, rr,� rr,a r rrr r rr• a rrrw,uN :. rrv[v N [. r� r,e 1•..Yl Irr rr w, ruwar! rvrr /wwww• N W nnlrrwl r.wsr/ w rY.r+Iw r rr r.r^r•. r!. rr ,M _ .• Mr W rril,rM. rO rw N xrtrv! 4 rr rar w____ ./mY n r p. lwr� N n. r•!wJ rrr N .N, r ..rr rr/ .,r, wrlw, r ... •.•rrrr rinwn w rr, w rr. a s,rr Mr, I,1•,.. y,w . Mr r yr srr,rJ prx rwnwr w wwr! wrlr, u .� 4 f4 w-0 W !r/ o.rr .w. •M rr wrrw N • rwr r.� ,�! rrrrlr Y r./N r•a rr — — 1. •r wrNrAr pwr N ro e•M.n rarer n rrrin Y r rlrww ,n•••I .wax rr rr r.r.Mrw w.n, ,wrp. w rr w•, • Ew .+rwrwxr ,.wr wx w..rN a w .wr e wr, rr, rr . wr• r•w.r .., w..r, r.ra/ w wr• ..r .r.,r .. ar ,r..w ,.M +Mr N rw •IrNM Mr .rwr r aW u w r.I rlrr r v ! rrN Nlpr N [..rw ewer 1 t'r !Yw•w►• x NrAr,I A �� ♦ rrYw • .w.r rr! +ra Mrrr.w N ern ne r v Illr /tM p•r�r w vwrlw a d sa. r W� Ir ww ,rMq. A I,a/r n•ILNor"JrNr N t rwr rrr[r" W IW r/Iw r !!rI 1, wi/ rx, x.r. a r wl:,.w/ r..r raw, n! .rwa N br •Nww A� .... rNa .w nwrrl, r • rnNrr n nI raver +1w rr .. ra ,Iw•w.rl arO x hrrlr Lw! • ewer nMlwr ar rrr�! r W r.rrr rave. N W rwwrM• rxv! bwrtr wQ 1. rlrlr! r rrhr am err rw. bwr �..�rar� Iwr .asrw r rMMr r!x N pN, ptwN wvM• M rwrywr N w •r�r rWrrJ ' ..rurr h lr.r nr c �..... w rr a rear rw.r • u/a caw Jl.......w rr.r r. rrxr err, errN r.: �: '.: «. � . •Nr w p wr,� �.rb a wwr rr.•r+wn. rr .rave. r r raw aware! rr N a.r ti • car vw+-J .ue ..rpw r![r r•rrW rave r. w,a fwrarr r rrrrrr xryl.w NNwN M w nwr .w! �rrrwra w wwrr rwr, awA x Air ; S �; ar, ar n. M1 rN N rw+ rry rr w,r .. err• !r rwlr w rr wr A HM w a.w n.rM r ,r rw..rar ar .r ..r . •.r ♦ err r w .rr .r n! r n,r,wwa w w r,• ww. rMf s r.rrwrl rrwrwrr. reI nr. rrwrw. IwrI4 W III IrJvlr• r rIN r l4AY[Y A'/ xrMIN a r•,x.r pnI err Nr, aver !r lrw,/wa w.x ., r r.. �..[ a•sr.rr ...i . ar.r /.r.w .a..x rww w aware. aw.wJ .war ,.�J rp!{ .M! rl�• rw! wM rfw rt Irrr rryrw a w►/rrI •n� Awl M1 rY NlIN, .._. rrNrw rw .ww raw. r•v w '0•-I� "pA-!; rr., � M1 yr N rw rrJ w �w rr ..r ar .ram r. r rw wr A hw w rw..rw•!N r . wxw• r. ,,.r ti ua rw N,• w,rwN 'M1x, N a`..! Arx .'/w rarrarr ,.nr .wwr.Nl .+.. .r. rN• rr.x 4 +�/r• r.+ w vrr rr I,. r �r..ti • r yr err e•rnr.• r rrnwW rrwr•Ir r rNr.! r+rw, rwwr,w w FYIxr p Irrr CAROLINA POWER B LIGHT COMPANY'S PERSON COUNTY STEAM ELECTRIC PLANT MA YO S. / TE WOODSDALE TOWNSHIP, HOLLOWAY TOWNSHIP & ALLENSVILLE TOWNSHIP PERSON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA M r4 a wNlr.�r,y N,Nn supef✓W !NO NAYP/rG 8, MOORS, "RDNER 8 ASSOCIATES, INC. — E0NSULTIN6 ENGINEERS A5H£80RO, NORTH CAROGINA W/uua sr rt Cr AM-cwlvur! .wNuti,wl �..,r Smarr ,!k rr rw N rM rNrr N •Irrn h•rlrr� ANxy •NrrxlFr LMrlrrry M. .•/IN. Iwrh pJr MnrlrN N Y rw N ,rrwe, Mwn. w iwrrrrrr. Irwrrr. rw, r /brarrr� rNv IMIrM� ryNN wlnr lw,wr I rah rN,/x/r rn! r••• wr /rNr rMr rM lnrN./AIN rwrrxrN N / barn ,•Mwrl ! br• / r.N•lnr, rw, raw hwrN •n ! w+rn ..! ../ war .rN M ru ,rr•.w N rr�rl !M h . r, nw,Nr xnrr�r rxwrin/•v br !rr N ,rr rrrrrlw W rear wr-.ra •rear•! /... .. .larr rr •xlrr �.Iwr Y I.r.r. � rr Nam_, !fj rrrAlfi_ In r ft , r/L n,r jp& Nr N :>r..n . I//L. Mw.wW w N rap [rrrrr� err % elver 1 rwrrw, nr. r Mayo Lake Park - Google Maps Page 1 of 1 Go 9L Maps Mayo Lake Park Imagery C2017 Commonwealth of Virginia, DigitalGlobe, USDA Farm Service Agency, Map data @2017 Google 1000 ft hup,,: www,google.com/maps/place/Mayo+Lake+Park/@36.5303677,-78.909031,4398m/... 6/14/2017