NCG020013_COMPLETE FILE - HISTORICAL_20160909

Environmental
Quality
September 9, 2016
JOHN TIBERI, PRESIDENT MID -ATLANTIC DIVISION
MARTIN MARIETTA MATERIALS, INC.
2710 WYCLIFF ROAD
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27607
Dear Permittee:
PAT McCRORY
Covermsr
DONALD R. VAN DER VAART
Serrerary
Subject: Multimedia Compliance Inspection
Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. — Asheboro Quarry
Randolph County
Department of Environmental Quality staff from the Winston-Salem Regional Office conducted a
multimedia compliance inspection of Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. — Asheboro Quarry, on August 26,
2016 for permits and programs administered by the following Divisions:
Division of Air
Division of Energy,
Division of Water
Division of Waste
Quality
Mineral, and Land
Resources
Management
Resources
We appreciate your cooperation during the inspection and hope that you have enjoyed the benefit of our
initiative to provide a single inspector capable of handling multiple areas of environmental compliance at
your facility. The results of each- applicable inspection and any associated response actions or necessary
corrective measures are detailed in the inspection letters/reports attached to this transmittal sheet. If a
Division report is not attached, you may assume compliance with that particular Division's rules and
regulations at the time of inspection.
If you have any questions regarding this multimedia inspection, please contact Charles Gerstell at (704)
235-2144 or Charles.Gerstell cr,ncdenr.gov. Thank you for your cooperation.
encl: Air Quality inspection Report
Stormwater Inspection Report
DEMLR Inspection Report
cc: DAQ WSRO Files
DEMLR WSRO Files
DWR WSRO Files
DWM WSRO Files
StatrofNorth Carolina I EnvironrmitalQuality
Winston-Salem Regional Office 1 450 West I lanes Mill Road Suite 500 1 %Mnston-Salem. North Carolina 27105-7407
3'16 77617800 T 1 336 776 97R7 F

NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF
Winston-Salem Regional Office
AIR QUALITY
Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. - Asheboro Quarry
NC Facility ID 7600107
Inspection Report
County/FIPS: Randolph/151
Date: 09/06/2016
Facility Data
Permit Data
Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. - Asheboro Quarry
Permit 04270 / R14
2757 Hopewood Road
issued 5/4/2016
Asheboro, NC 27317
Expires 4/30/2024
Lat: 35d 46.1480m Long: 79d 49.5510m
Classification Small
SIC: 1423 / Crushed And Broken Granite
Permit Status Active
NAICS: 212313 / Crushed and Broken Granite Mining
and Quarrying
Current Permit Application(s) None
Program Applicability
SIP
Contact Data
Facility Contact
Authorized Contact
Technical Contact
Johnny King
John Tiberi
Jay Nivens
MACT Part 63: Subpart 6CNSPS:
Plant Manager
Division President
Sr. Environmental
Subpart 000
[phone]
[phone]
Engineer
[phone]
Compliance Data
Comments:
Inspection Date 08/26/2016
Inspector's Name Charles Gerstell
Inspector's Signature:
Operating Status Operating
Compliance Code Compliance - inspection
Action Code FCE
On -Site Inspection Result Compliance
Date of Signature: September 8, 2016
RS
Total Actual emissions -in TONS/YEAR:
TSP
S02
NOX
VOC
CO
PM10
* HAP
2015
1.38
---
---
---
---
0.5200
---
2010
1.19
---
---
---
---
0.5700
---
Highest HAP Emitted inpounds)
Five Year Violation History: None
Date Letter Type Rule Violated Violation Resolution Date
Performed Stack Tests since last FCE:
Date Test Results Test Method(s) Source(s) Tested
07/19/2016 Compliance Method 9 ES -CONVEYOR

Permitted Emission Sources:
Emission
Source ID
Emission Source
TDescription
Control
System ID
Control System
Description
Non-metallic Mineral Processing Plant, utilizing water suppression with no other control devices, including:
ES -CONVEYOR
Conveying operations
F NIA
NIA
ES -CRUSH
Crushing operations
NIA
NIA
ES -SCREEN
Screening operations
I NIA
NIA
Insignificant / Exempt Activities:
Source Exemption
Regulation
Source of
TAPS?
Source of Title V
Pollutants?
I-1 - I0,000-gallon capacity diesel fuel storage
2Q .0102
tank
(c)(1)(13)(i)
1-2 - 10,000-gallon capacity diesel fuel storage
2Q .0102
tank
(c)(1)(D)(i) !
Yes
Yes
1-3 - 3,000-gallon capacity gasoline storage tank
2Q .0102
(NESHAP CCCCCC) _
_ (c)(1)(D)(ii) 3
I-4 -gasoline dispensing process (NESHAP�
2Q .0102
CCCCCC)
(c)(l)(G)
j
Introduction:
On August 26, 2016, Charles Gerstell, NCDEQ Multimedia Inspector, contacted Mr. Jay Nivens, Sr. Environmental Engineer,
and Mr. John King, Plant Manager, of Martin Marietta Materials, Inc., for an announced multimedia inspection of the Asheboro
Quarry. The facility was previously inspected by Mr. Stephen Helms, former Environmental Specialist of DAQ-WSRO on
June 10, 2015 and reported that the facility appeared to be operating in compliance with applicable Air Quality standards and
regulations at that time. All IBEAM contacts were confirmed to be accurate.
Safety Equipment:
Site -specific personal protective equipment includes safety shoes, safety glasses, hard hat and reflective vest. Hearing
protection is needed near any operating equipment. Wheel chocks are required when leaving any vehicle unattended on -site.
Visitors are required to attend a 10-minute safety orientation prior to entering the mine area.
Applicable Regulations:
Applicable regulations listed in the air permit include Title 15A NCAC, Subchapter 2D .0202, 2D .0501, 2D .0510, 2D .0521,
2D .0524 (40 CFR 60, Subpart OOO), 2D .0535, 21) .0540, 2D .1806, 2Q .0102 and 2Q .0309. This facility is not required to
implement a risk management plan (RMP) in accordance with federal regulation 40 CFR 68, Section 112(r), because they do
not purchase, produce, use or store any of the regulated chemicals in quantities above their corresponding threshold limits.
However, the facility is subject to the General Duty clause contained in this rule.
Discussion:
The facility mines and crushes granite and slate for the construction materials industry. It typically operates Monday through
Friday, 50 hours/week, for approximately 52weeks/year. The facility was not in operation at the time of the inspection to al low
for repairs. However, product was being loaded for customers.
2

The facility operates two exempt, aboveground, 10,000-gallon diesel fuel storage tanks, 1-1 and 1-2, that dispense fuel to the
water truck, haul trucks and bucket loaders. The facility also operates an exempt, aboveground, 3,000-gallon gasoline storage
tank, I-3.
The facility owns portable, crushing, conveying, and screening equipment for this facility. None of the equipment was in
operation at the time of inspection to allow for repairs.
The facility lists several exempt sources which include; two above -ground 10,000-gallon storage tanks (1-1 & 1-2), one 3,000-
gallon gasoline storage tank (1-3) and gasoline dispensing process (I-4). All were observed during the inspection.
Specific Permit Conditions:
Condition A.2 contains 15A NCAC 2D .0202 permit renewal and emissions inventory requirements. The permit expires April
30, 2024 and the facility is required to submit a renewal request and emission inventory report for the 2023 calendar year 90-
days prior to the expiration of the permit. This condition was discussed with Mr. Nivens and Mr. King and compliance with
this condition is anticipated.
Condition A.3 contains the 2D .0501(c) equipment reporting requirements. The permittee shall maintain a complete equipment
list and flow diagram of all permitted equipment operating on the site, including identification numbers, dates of manufacture,
dimensions, process rated capacities and performance testing information. The facility is allowed to install new, or replace
existing, non -primary crushing equipment without obtaining a permit modification as long as it does not change the primary
crushing rated capacity of the facility, and as long as they provide written notification to the Division that includes a revised
equipment list and flow diagram. Since the previous inspection, the facility had placed the "36" X 143' Conv. TC 140 AggStack
Radial Stacker" (ID No. 939) into service. All documentation relating to startup and testing of the subject equipment had been
submitted to the Division. During the inspection, Mr. Nivens provided the inspector with a current equipment list and flow
diagram, demonstrating compliance.
Condition A.4 contains the requirements for 2D .0510 particulate control requirements for particles from sand, gravel, or
crushed stone operations. This condition requires the facility to take steps to reduce, to a minimum, any particulate matter from
becoming airborne to prevent exceeding the ambient air quality standards beyond the property line. This facility makes use of
wet suppression in order to control process particulate matter. A water truck is also used to control fugitive dust from roads
inside the facility. Compliance with this condition is anticipated.
Condition A.5 contains the primary crusher specifications. This condition requires the facility to submit a permit application
if any changes are made to the primary crusher other than like -far -like replacement. It also requires the facility to submit a
permit application in the event the primary crusher is replaced by a dissimilar crusher. The primary crusher is a jaw crusher
rated at 475 tons per hour at a 9-inch maximum crusher setting. Mr. King confirmed that the crusher was not set over a 4-inch
crusher setting at a rate of approximately 350 — 375-tons per hour. Compliance with this condition is anticipated.
Condition A.6 contains the 15A NCAC 2D .0521 visible emissions control requirement. This facility is limited to 20%opacity
visible emissions, for sources manufactured after July 1, 1971, when averaged over a six -minute period. According to the
equipment list observed at the time of inspection, all equipment with the exception of the 4 1 /4' Cone Crusher (ID No. 12) and
the Diester Screen #3 (ID No. 14) were manufactured after July 1, 1971. Since the facility was not operating, compliance could
not be determined.
Condition A.7 contains the 15A NCAC 2D .0521 visible emissions control requirement. This facility is limited to 40% opacity
visible emissions, for sources manufactured as of July 1, 1971, when averaged over a six -minute period. According the
equipment list observed at the time of inspection, only the 4 114' Cone Crusher (ID No. 12) and the Diester Screen #3 (ID No.
14) were manufactured prior to July 1, 1971. Since the facility was not operating, compliance could not be determined.
Condition A.8
Condition A.8 (213.0524, 40 CFR 60 Subpart 000) concerns "New Source Performance Standards." The facility is required
to submit construction and startup notifications for crushers, screens and conveyors, and conduct performance testing to
determine visible emissions on affected sources. Visible emissions from affected sources are limited to 15% opacity for
crushers, 10% opacity for conveyors and screens and 0% opacity for conveyors and screens that process saturated materials.
A test protocol and an advanced notice of the test date are also required. A provision of this condition exempts the replacement
equipment from testing if it is of equal or lesser production capacity than the existing source. For affected facilities that

commenced construction, modification or reconstruction on or after April 22, 2008, visible emissions are further restricted to
12%opacity for crushers and 7%opacity for conveyors and screens. As previously noted, the most recent installation of subject
equipment occurred in 2016 with the installation of the "36" X 143' Conv, TC 140 AggStack Radial Stacker" (ID No. 39).
Records indicate that the facility fulfilled the notification, testing and reporting requirements, demonstrating compliance at that
time. The facility is also required to perform monthly, periodic inspection to check that the water is flowing to discharge
nozzles on wet suppression systems that were constructed on or after April 22, 2008. The facility must record each inspection
including the date and corrective action taken in a logbook that can be made available to DAQ personnel upon request. Monthly
inspections on the subject equipment was verified, and the last inspection occurred on July 21, 2016. Compliance is indicated.
Condition A.9 contains the 15A NCAC 2D .0535 rules which requires the permittee to notify the director of any excess
emissions lasting longer than four hours resulting from a malfunction, breakdown of process or control equipment or any other
abnormal conditions. Mr. King and Mr. Nivens knew of no excess emissions lasting more than four hours since the previous
inspection and there were no issues registered to this facility in IBEAM indicating likely compliance.
Condition A.10 contains the 15A NCAC 2D .0540 fugitive dust control requirement. During the inspection, the water truck
was operating and appeared to effectively minimize fugitive dust emissions from operations of the loaders and haul trucks.
The inspector observed no fugitive dust emissions migrating beyond the facility's boundary during the inspection nor have any
complaints been received indicating likely compliance. concerns the control of fugitive dust emissions. The facility operates
a 40-ton water truck which was operating during the inspection. The inspector observed no fugitive dust emissions near the
property boundary and no complaints have been received, indicating likely compliance.
Condition A.11 contains the requirements for 2D .1806 control and prohibition of odorous emissions. The inspector detected
no objectionable odors at any time during the inspection and the facility does not have any previous odor complaints in [BEAM.
Compliance with this condition is indicated.
Condition A.12 (40 CFR 63, Subpart CCCCCC) concerns the control of hazardous air pollutant (HAP) emissions from gasoline
dispensing facilities. The facility operates an exempt, aboveground, 3,000-gallon gasoline storage tank, I-3, that is subject to
this rule. Section 63.1 t 116 of this rule contains the work practices and recordkeeping requirements for facilities with a gasoline
throughput less than 10,000 gallons per month. Within 24 hours of a request from this Division, the facility must make records
available that document their gasoline throughput. Mr. Nivens provided the inspector with records showing the facility
purchased 1,012.5gallons of gasoline for the 2015 calendar year, indicating likely compliance.
MACT/GACT Applicability:
As previously discussed, the facility is subject to NESHAP Subpart CCCCCC. The facility does not operate any combustion
sources and does not appear to be subject to other MACT/GACT regulations.
Permit Issues:
There appear to be no permit issues at this time.
Facility — Wide Emissions:
These actual facility -wide emissions provided from permit review R14 (Chengging Xiao, Review Engineer):
Pollutant' :.: ,
Actual: Emissions tons/ r.
Potential Emissions w/controls t6ns/r.
PM
1.38
25.35
PM10
0.52
12.07
Compliance History:
This facility has not been issued a Notice of Violation within the past five years.
Conclusion:
Based on observations and record reviews, the facility appears to be operating in compliance with applicable Air Quality
standards and regulations.

North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources,
Division of Energy, Mineral, and Land Resources, Land Quality Section
MINE INSPECTION REPORT
® PERMITTED MINE SITE ❑ UNPERMITTED MINE SITE
1. MINE NAME: Asheboro Quarry 2. MINE LOCATION: Hopewood Rd, Asheboro, NC
3. COUNTY: Randolph 4. RIVER BASIN: Cape Fear 5. CASE:
6. OPERATOR: Martin Marietta Materials, Inc.
7. ADDRESS: 8701 Red Oak Blvd., Suite 540 Charlotte. NC 28217 Attn: Jay Nivens, Environmental Engineer
8. MINING PERMIT #: 76-02 ❑ NIA 9. PERMIT EXPIRATION DATE: 7/27/2022 ❑ N/A
10. PERSON(S) CONTACTED AT SITE: Jay Nivens, Sr. Environmental Engineer, John King, Plant Mgr_
11. PICTURES? ❑ Yes ® No TAKEN BY:
12. TYPE OF INSPECTION:
❑ A. Initial Inspection (Unpermitted Mine Sites)
1. Size of affected land: ac. (attach sketch map)
2. How was this area measured? Measured by:
® B. Routine Inspection (Permitted Mine Sites)
C. Follow-up Inspection
13. Date of last inspection: 8/2/07
14. Any mining since that date? ® Yes ❑ No If yes, cite evidence of such mining activity: Mine was
active at time of inspection. Additional material had been quarried since last inspection.
15. Was mine operating at time of inspection? ® Yes ❑ No If yes, explain: Material was being loaded
for customers. However, no processing was taking place as plant was not in operation to allow for equipment repairs.
16. Is the mine in compliance with the Operating Conditions of the Permit? ® Yes ❑ No ❑ NIA If
no, explain:
17. Is the min_ a in compliance with the Reclamation Conditions of the Permit? ® Yes ❑ No ❑ NIA If
no, explain:
18. Is there any off -site damage? A. ❑ Yes B. ® No C. ❑ None observed
If A, describe the type and severity of the damage:
If B or C, is there potential for offsite damage? ❑ Yes ® No Explain:
19. Corrective measures needed and/or taken: No corrective measures needed at this time.
20. Other recommendations and comments: The proposed berm and corresponding sediment basin #6 located
west of the shop had not -yet been constructed as shown on the mine map last revised on 4/6/12.
21. Is the Annual Reclamation Report +/- map accurate? ® Yes ❑ No (Explain) ❑ Not Reviewed ❑ NIA
22. Follow-up inspection needed? ❑ Yes ® No Proposed date
23. No. of additional pages of Inspection Report 0 24. Copy of Report sent to operator 9/9/16
INSPECTED BY: Charles Gerstell DATE 8/26/16
Telephone No: _ [phone]
Copy to file Copy to operator Copy to Mining Specialist

a
Permit: NCG020013
SOC:
County: Randolph
Region: Winston-Salem
Contact Person: Jay Nivens
Directions to Facility:
System Classifications:
Primary ORC:
Secondary ORC(s):
On -Site Representative{s):
Related Permits:
Compliance Inspection Report
Effective: 05/09/16 Expiration: 09/30/20 Owner: Martin Marietta Materials Inc
Effective: Expiration: Facility: Asheboro Quarry
2757 Hopewood Rd
Inspection Date: 08/26/2016
Primary Inspector: Charles Gerstell
Secondary Inspector(s):
Randleman NC 27317
Title: Phone: [phone]
Certification: Phone:
Entry Time: 09:56AM Exit Time: 12:15PM
Phone: [phone]
Reason for Inspection: Routine Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Permit Inspection Type: Mining Activities Stormwater Discharge COC
Facility Status: Compliant Not Compliant
Question Areas:
Storm Water
(See attachment summary)
Page: 1

Permit: NCG020013 Owner - Facility: Marlin Marietta Materials Inc
Inspection Date: 08/26/2016 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
Page: 2

M
Permit: NCG020013
Inspection Date: 06/26/2016
Analytical Monitoring
Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring?
Owner - Facility: Martin Marietta Materials Inc
Inspection Typo : Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
# Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring from Vehicle Maintenance areas?
Comment: Appeared that all anyalytical monitoring was being performed as required and records were
being maintained on site.
Yes No NA NE
Permit and Outfalls Yes No NA NE
# Is a copy of the Permit and the Certificate of Coverage available at the site? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
# Were all outfalls observed during the inspection? M ❑ ❑ ❑
# if the facility has representative outfall status, is it properly documented by the Division? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
# Has the facility evaluated all illicit (non stormwater) discharges? E ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: Facility has representative outfall status granted by letter dated June 16, 2008, No concerns
were observed at the outfall.
Qualitative Monitoring
Has the facility conducted its Qualitative Monitoring semi-annually?
Comment: Faciilty has no active stormwater outfalls as all areas draining to perimeter sediment basins
have been stabilized.
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
Does the site have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan?
# Does the Plan include a General Location (USGS) map?
# Does the Plan include a "Narrative Description of Practices'?
# Does the Plan include a detailed site map including outfall locations and drainage areas?
# Does the Plan include a list of significant spills occurring during the past 3 years?
# Has the facility evaluated feasible altematives to current practices?
# Does the facility provide all necessary secondary containment?
# Does the Plan include a 13MP summary?
# Does the Plan include a Spill Prevention and Response Plan (SPRP)?
# Does the Plan include a Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping Plan?
# Does the facility provide and document Employee Training?
# Does the Plan include a list of Responsible Party(s)?
# Is the Plan reviewed and updated annually?
# Does the Plan include a Stormwater Facility Inspection Program?
Yes No NA NE
❑ ❑ E ❑
Yes No NA NE
❑ ❑ ❑
®❑❑❑
■ ❑❑❑
■❑Ell]
❑ ❑ ❑
❑ 110
■❑❑❑
❑ ❑ ❑
E ❑ ❑ ❑
® ❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ❑
■❑❑❑
■❑❑❑
■❑❑❑
Page: 3

permit NCG020013 Owner - Facility: Martin Marietta Materials Inc
Inspection Date: 08/26/2016 inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for %As€t: Routine
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
Has the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan been implemented?
Comment: SPPP was being maintained on site and appeared to be undated annually.
Yes No NA NE
❑ ❑ ❑
Page: 4

\NA7-F Michael F. Easiey, Governor
9 William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Coleen H. Sullins Director
>_ y Division of Water;)uality
❑ QY -C
June 13, 2008
CERTIFIED MAIL 7008 0150 0002 8342 J 368
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Brian K North
Martin Marietta Materials Inc
8701 Red Oak Blvd Ste 540
Charlotte NC 28217
SUBJECT: June 4, 2008 Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Martin Marietta Materials Inc
Martin Marietta -Asheboro
Permit No: NCG020013
Randolph County
Dear Mr North:
Enclosed please find a copy of the Compliance Evaluation .Inspection form from the inspection
conducted on June 5.2008. The Compliance Evaluation Inspection was conducted by Rose Pruitt
of the Winston. -Salem Regional Office. The inspection consisted of two parts: an on -site
inspection of the treatment facility and a file review. The following are the findings from the
subject inspection.
The facility was found to be in Compliance with permit NCG020013.
L Permit
Coverage under this permit is applicable to:
• Storinwater point source discharge outfalls associated with mining and quarrying of
nonmetallic minerals, land disturbance and vehicle maintenance.
• Mine dewatering wastewater discharge outfalls.
• Wastewater discharge outfalls from sand and/or gravel operations.
• Nondischarging closed loop recycle systems.
• Process recycle wastewater discharge outfalls.
The General Permit became effective on January 19, 2005 and expires on December 31, 2009,
Certificate of Coverage, NCG020013 was issued for this facility.
II. Stormwater BAIP Plan
The Permittee is responsible for developing and implementing a Stormwater Best Management
Practices Plan. All Stormwater BMPs should be inspected at least once every seven calendar days
and Nvithin 24 hours after a storm event that results in a discharge. Stomrwater BMPs should be
properly operated and maintained. A signed copy of the erosion and sedimentation control permit
issued by the Division of Land Resources should be kept on site. Compliance with the issued
permit is a requirement of this general permit.
AS.*A
NMMR_
585 Waughtown Street Winston-Salem, NC 27107 Phone [phone] Fax [phone]

Asheboro Quarry
June 13, 2008
Page 2
A Stormwater BNIP Plan has been developed for this facility. Stormwater B111P inspections
were (zurrent. A signed copy of the erosion and sedimentation control permit issued by the
Division of Land Resources was available at the inspection.
II1. Analytical and Qualitative Monitoring of Stormwater
Annual grab samples for settleable solids, total suspended solids, and turbidity are required for
Analytical monitoring .for Stormwater discharges from Land Disturbance and Process Areas as
well as pH, oil and grease, and total suspended solids for Analytical monitoring for On -Site
Vehicle Maintenance Areas. Samples should be collected at each outfall unless Representative
Outfall Status has been established.
Qualitative monitoring for color, odor, clarity, floating and suspended solids, foam, oil sheen,
deposition or erosion at or below an outfall and other obvious indicators of ston-nwater pollution
are required semi-annually at all stormwater outfalls. Qualitative monitoring is required at each
outfall regardless of Representative Outfall Status or cut-off concentrations.
This facility is compliant with Analytical and Qualitative monitoring requirements.
Representative Outfall Status (ROS) was established during this inspection, a separate letter
confirming ROS will be forthcoming and should be attached to your permit for future
reference.
IV. Effluent Limitations and Monitoring Requirements For Mine Dewatering and Process
Wastewater.
Analytical monitoring for pH, settleable solids, total suspended solids, turbidity and fecal cohform
is required quarterly for mine dewatering and/or sand/gravel mining unless effluent limits are
exceeded at which time monthly monitoring will be required for that parameter for the remaining
permit tenn. Additional monitoring requirements may apply to facilities with overflow from a
closed loop process wastewater system and overflow from process recycle wastewater systems.
This facility was found to be in compliance with analytical monitoring requirements for mine
de -watering and process wastewater. Monthly monitoring was performed for parameters
that exceeded cut-off concentrations.
The Division of Water Quality greatly appreciates your continued oversight at this facility. The
Division also encourages you to continue to be proactive in your efforts to maintain compliance.
Please refer to the enclosed inspection report for additional observations and comments. If you or
your staff have any questions, please call Rose Pruitt at 336-771-5000.
Sincerely,
Steve W. Tedder
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
Winston-Salem Regional Off -ice
Division of Water Quality
cc. Stephanie Graham, Martin Marietta Materials, PO Box 18565, Greensboro NC 27419
Central Files
WSRO

M 0�0� W A TERpG
c
Michael F. Easley, G6NTMOr
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Coleen H. Sullins. Director
Division of Water Quality
.Tune 16, 2008
Ms. Stephanie Graham
Martin Marietta Materials Inc
P.O. Box 18565
Greensboro, NC 27419
Subject: Representative Outfall Status (ROS) Approval
Permit No. NCG020013 — Martin Marietta -Asheboro
Randolph County
Dear Ms. Graham:
The Winston-Salem Regional Office staff reviewed your request for a determination that Stormwater
Discharge Outfall (SDO) 001 for Land Disturbance and Process Areas be granted representative outfall
status. Based on the information and map provided, and our site visit on June 5, 2008 by Steve Tedder,
Rose Pruitt, and George Smith, all of this office, we are making the following ROS determination.
In accordance with 40 CFR § 122.21(g)(7), you are authorized to sample outfall number 001 as a
representative outfall. This approval is effective with the next sampling event. We also want to remind
you that the permit still requires Qualitative Monitoring be performed at all SDOs, regardless of
representative outfall status.
Please annend this letter to your Stormwater Permit to document that representative outfall status has
been approved. If changes in drainage areas, structures, processes, storage practices, or other activities
occur that significantly alter the basis of this approval, notify this office for an updated ROS
determination. If you have any questions or comments concerning this letter, please contact Rose Pruitt
or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
Steve W. Tedder
Regional Supervisor
ATTACHMENT
cc: Central OfficelStormwater Permitting Unit
SWP Central Files
WSRO File NonhCarolina
,11'aturalty
North Carolina Division of Water Quality 585 WaughtowT Street Phone [phone] Customer Service
Winston-Salem Regional Office Winston-Salem, NC 27107 Fax [phone]
Internet: www.ncwaierqijality.org
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycled110% Post Consumer Paper

150
- WS,
LIPA

Compliance Inspection Report
Permit: NCG020013 Effective: 01/19/05 Expiration: 12/31/09 Owner: Martin Marietta Materials Inc
SOC: Effective: Expiration: Facility: Martin Marietta -Asheboro
C R d 1 h Pineview St Off 220 Bypa
ounty: an o p
Region: Winston-Salem
Contact Person: Brian K North Title:
Directions to Facility:
System Classifications:
Primary ORC:
Secondary ORC(s):
On -Site Representative(s):
Related Permits:
Asheboro NC 27203
Phone: [phone]
Certification: Phone:
Inspection Date: 06/04/2008 Entry Time: 10:45 AM Exit Time: 11:30 AM
Primary Inspector: Rose Pruitt Phone: [phone]
Secondary Inspector(s):
George S Smith Phone:
Steve W Tedder Phone:
Reason for Inspection: Routine Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Permit Inspection Type: Mining Activities Stormwater Discharge COC
Facility Status: ® Compliant ❑ Not Compliant
Question Areas:
Storm Water
(See attachment summary)
a
Page: 1

■ Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete
item 4 if Restricted Delivery Is desired.
a Print your name and address on the reverse
so that %ve can return the card to you.
■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece,
or -on the front if space permits.
i 1. Article Addressed to:
Brian K. North
' Martin Marietta Materials
8 701 Red Oak Blvd, Suite 540
Charlotte, NC 28217
A. Sign ure
X ❑ Agent
��vt-'J ❑ Addressee .
B. Received by tinted Na..) C Date of Delivery
iC -/do' 68
D. Is delivery address different from item 1? ❑ Yes
If YES, enter delivery address below: ❑ No
3. Service Type
WCertified Mail ❑ Express Mail
Registered Return Receipt for Merchandise
❑ Insured Mail 0 C.O.D.
' 4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Feel ❑ Yes
.1 n.. . —
7008 0150 0002 8342 1368 (!� `�J� ("ET
PS Form 3811, February 2004 Domestic Return Receipt 102595-02-M-1540
Postal
CERTIFIED �LJMAIL," RECEIPT
m (DOm85tic MaflOnly;
a _
� 'A
a L
a. i 3
Cc P
ru GertifledF
-Z
} ostmark
(EndarSameRReVrFed) 2\2 1 (n Here
Restriged Delivery Be01:3
(EndorsementRquvdjTotal l'ostage 1 oe•r r
� r 7
Brian K. North S�
Srri
o,; Martin Mari to to Materials
cm 8701 Red Oak Blvd, Suite 540 -------------
Charlotte, NC 28217

11
Permit: NCG020013 Owner - Facility: Martin Marietta Materials Inc
Inspection Elate: 06/04/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection summary:
Representative Outfall status established during this inspection
Page: 2

Permit: NCG020013 Owner - Facility: Martin Marietta Materials Inc
Inspection Date: 06/04/2008 Inspection Type : Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Analytical Monitoring
Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring?
# Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring from Vehicle Maintenance areas?
Comment:
Permit and Outfalls
# Is a copy of the Permit and the Certificate of Coverage available at the site?
# Were all outfalls observed during the inspection?
# If the facility has representative outfall status, is it properly documented by the Division?
# Has the facility evaluated all illicit (non stormwater) discharges?
Comment:
Qualitative Monitoring
Has the facility conducted its Qualitative Monitoring semi-annually?
Comment:
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
Does the site have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan?
# Does the Plan include a General Location (USGS) map?
# Does the Plan include a "Narrative Description of Practices'?
# Does the Plan include a detailed site map including outfall locations and drainage areas?
# Does the Plan include a list of significant spills occurring during the past 3 years?
# Has the facility evaluated feasible alternatives to current practices?
# Does the facility provide all necessary secondary containment?
# Does the Plan include a BMP summary?
# Does the Plan include a Spill Prevention and Response Plan (SPRP)?
# Does the Plan include a Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping Plan?
# Does the facility provide and document Employee Training?
# Does the Plan include a list of Responsible Party(s)?
# Is the Plan reviewed and updated annually?
# Does the Plan include a Stormwater Facility Inspection Program?
Has the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan been implemented?
Comment:
Yes No NA NE
■❑❑❑
❑ ❑ ❑
Yes No NA NE
■❑❑❑
❑❑❑0
■❑❑❑
❑❑0❑
Yes No NA NE
0❑❑❑
Yes No NA NE
0❑❑❑
❑❑0❑
0❑❑❑
❑❑0❑
❑ ❑ E ❑
❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ❑
❑❑■❑
❑ ❑ ❑
0❑❑❑
Page: 3

I
I
ST.
Bus
220
V
VICINITY MAP
Washed
1414aTop Elevation of Stormwater
4' Sediment Storaae Area
CC
I 10, Min.
(1' I 10, M
��Key
In Bottom ,
Layer of Rip -Rap
Carry RIP -Rap +4
Sides of Spilhay
10' Min T Min.
1' Min Freeboard
Class I Rip-Rop
_
5' Approx.
SECTION n-ROUGH BERM AND FILTER
GRAVEL RIP -RAP FILTER BASIN
NEITHER OF THE PROPOSED FRESH WATER
PONDS WILL REQUIRE DAM SAFETY APPROVAL
DUE TO THE HEIGHT OF < 15' AND
THE IMPOUNDMENT OF < 10 AC -FT.
+/- 30' 15'
X
TYPICAL FRESH WATER CROSS SECTION
�DERs
3'Lx3'Wx3'D
`�HIGHWALL
BOULDER BARRICADE
-11-
CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE
1. OBTAIN MINING PERMIT.
2. CLEAR ONLY AS NECESSARY TO INSTALL THE PROPOSED SEDIMENT BASINS
OR ROCK DAM SEDIMENT BASINS FOR THE PROJECTED WORK.
3. CALL [phone], WINSTON-SALEM REGIONAL OFFICE, LAND QUALITY SECTION, FOR ON-5ITE
INSPECTION. BEGIN CLEARING ONCE ALL SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES ARE IN PLACE..
4. THE FUTURE PIT AREA WILL BE CLEARED IN SMALL PARCELS, APPROXIMATELY 5 ACRES
EACH. BEFORE CLEARING OF THESE AREAS BEGINS, PROVIDE DIVERSION DITCHLINES
TO DIVERT SURFACE DRAINAGE TO THE EXISTING PIT, IN AREAS WHERE THE RUNOFF WILL
NOT NATURALLY DRAIN INTO THE PIT, DIVERT ALL RUNOFF TO THE RESPECTIVE
SEDIMENT BASIN.
5. MAINTAIN THE SEDIEMNT BASINS, AS NEEDED ANS CLEAN -OUT WHEN SEDIMENT
VOLUME IS 1/2 FULL..
6. THE BERMS ARE TO BE SEEDED ACCORDING TO THE SEEDING SCHEDULE UPON THEIR
COMPLETION. AFTER THE BERMS HAVE BEEN SATISFACTORILY SEEDED, THE TEMPORARY
SEDIMENT BASINS MAY BE REMOVED.
7HY FREE O
LAMBE
DORIS H. SMITH
F1
REX A. HAMLET
BASIN
DRAINAGE AREA
DISTURBED AREA
VOLUME
Q25
LENGTH
WIDTH
DEPTH
WEIR LENGTH
1 *
5.95
5.25
9450 CF
12.85 CFS
69
40'
4'
20'
2
2.96
2.96
5328 CF
6.40 CFS
50'
30'
4'
15,
SETTLING EFF.
3
2.36
2.36
4248 CF
5.10 CFS
69
40'
4'
15,
2098 SF
4
2.84
2.84
5112 CF
6.14 CFS
65'
40'
4'
15'
2524 SF
5
1.14
1.14
2052 CF
2.46 CFS
50'
25'
4'
12'
1014 SF
NOTE: CALCULATIONS BASED ON RATIONAL FORMULA, Q = CIA, C =0 30, I = 7.2 "/HR WEIR FORMULA = Q = CLH 1.5 , C = 3.0, H =1
BASIN #1 IS ROCK DAM DUE TO DRAINAGE AREA GREATER THAN 5 ACRES
SETTLING EFFICIENCY IS BASED ON Q 10, WHERE C=0.30, I=6.8 ".HR.
(PROPOSED 8' HIGH LANDSCAPING BERM WILL
FOLLOW THE SAME CROSS-SECTION AS BELOW
WITH A BOTTOM WIDTH OF +/- 50')
50'41 25'-0" 50'-0"
2%
TO PIT
125'-0"
TYPICAL BERM CROSS SECTION
-11. IL 11. 11, li=d=11=11=II=11`
•_..��71.�1[�rIl�11a=.I1.��:��J11t.ILi=a1�ILl�al:�r_' �7.
-11=11-11=11-11. 11-11=11. 11=IL=II. 11=11.-I!-II-11=11=
11r=11'=11=11=1f�1f-11�71:--11. 11=7f-If=1111=!;=11=11=11'=11G3
a=11.=11=11=1f=11=11=11� 11=11=11=11--=11-11=11.=9i=11=11.-11=11=11=1r
-�=1L ILCIf=u�1::= r_=7 Ian=li�1L-=u�11=It11=tItL :�I= 7i-3L-
ali::n n:=n: n.�lirniraic=:il 1�-'`'rl�:u��:n.n:nZn.n.�ci.=:°fai n n9111i �:u:=JREE II
LA
•.
PLACE MATERIAL FROM EXCAVATION ON
DOWNHILL SIDE OF FLOW, USE ADDITIONAL
I
2' MIN
FILL TO ACHIEVE SPECIFIED HEIGHT AND WIDTH.
FLOW
I i-III-III-I � `?l
SEED AND MUCH DIVERSION CHANNEL. AND DIKE
IMMEDIATELY AFTER CONSTRUCTION. CHOOSE
APPROPRIATE SEEDING MIXTURE FROM THE
IE
VARIES
VA
SEEDING SCHEDULE.
3,
TEMPORARY DIVERSION DITCH
V FREEBOAFD f
1' FLOOD STORAGE ZONE 5' MIN.j
d,
FILTER FABRIC
4' STORAGE ZONE
'. (TOTAL BASINCAPA CROSS SECTION
DESIGN SETTLED TOP EMERGENCY BY-PASS
OVMFSLL 6" FOR 61 BELOW SETTLED TOP
li r- V MAX 21' MIIN. I 4' MIN. SETTLEMENT OF DAM
NATURAL GROUND
STONE SECTION
ROCK DAM SEDIMENT BASIN
10
15ft. R�
6" MINIMUM STONE BED -
STONE SIZE: NCDOT #5
OR#57 WASHED STONE
NOTE:
1. NCDOT #5 stone is preferred Pod to be 50 ft. L x 20 ft. W x 6 in. thick (min.}
2. Turning radlus sufficient to accommadati large trucks.
3. Must be maintained in a condition which will prevent tracking or direct flow of mud
onto streets. Periodic topciressirg may W necessary
4. This construction entrance will be installed at all entrance and exit points to the site.
At this time the only entrance and exit shown on the site plan will be paved as part
of the initial project,
CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE
REPRESENTA ; :EVE OIUTFALL STATUS
HAS BEESFOR ALL
I A 'r�,!° AL SA %APLING PARAMETERS
v V
v
'
G
CD
�Y RCad (in101
�
I,
REX A.
MLET
,''-
F
r
CATEGORY
APPROVED ACREAGE
Tailings / Sediment Ponds
18.41,
Stockpiles
11.0L
Wastepiles (Berm)
24.51
Processing Area / Haul Roads
20.51
Mine Excavation
105.81,
Other (Undisturbed)
40.73,
TOTAL PERMITTED ACREAGE: 220.99
I ! ,ic,€ -.. - ic. to 18.41 -\c. 11,a;_.t:lti more. accurate mapping).
I.t) -le. (�i�«i on niurc acruratc mapping)
CO_\C. t(124.5 , .-A.=- lh� :u :'li !'1(71'e', i1Cl•UI'atC IT12117pnh?)
,r- d ilw: Ai . t+y _10. ' A (. i ,d on dl i� c�ti a� addition offRock
Rtia' .arc ILt ; ,tc -_i tpi ingi
C. to iti .fie ,\C i a -.eel ,m more accurate mappin -o)
1 Ac. to 4il. t_ya�cd k,i. ni,).e accurate mapping)
� yob y
Z FZW
GROUND LIFE
H N1 H
6' ANCHOR SKIRT MIN OF 6'
o PNd
ALTERIATE: IN LIEU OF BURYING SKIRT 61, 5.OF #5 STONE
MAY BE USED TO ANCHOR SKMT.
TYPICAL SILT FENCE
SEEDING SCHEDULE FOR ALL GRASSED AREAS
SEEDBED PREPARATION NOTES:
1) Surface water measures are to be installed according to plan.
2) Areas to be seeded shall be ripped and spread with topsoil (if necessary), 3"
deep. Total seedbed prepared shall be 4"-6" deep.
3) Loose rocks, roots, and other obstructions shall be removed from the surface
so as not to interfere with the establishment and maintenance of vegetation.
Surface for final seedbed preparation, at final grades shown, shall be reasonably
smooth and uniform.
4) If no soil test is taken, provide fertilizer and lime according to seeding
schedule. In addition provide 15 Ib./1000 sq. ft. of super phosphate.
5) If soil test is taken, provide fertilizer and lime according to the soil test
report. Soil testing is recommended.
6) Lime and fertilizer shall be applied uniformly and mixed with the soil during
seedbed preparation.
7) WATER all seeded areas and keep moist until new grass is established.
PLANTING DATE SEED MIX RATES, LBJACRE
April 1- August 15 Serica Lespedeza (scarified) 30
Pensacola Bahiagrass 50
Common Bermudagrass 10
Germit Millit 10
Prior to May 1 or
after August 15 Rye (Grain) 40
Fertilize seedbeds with 3 tons/acre lime and 500 Ibs/acre 10-10-10.
Mulch with 2 tons/acre clean straw or hay.
Tack with rapid setting emulsified asphalt at 10 gal./1000 sq.ft., or other
tacking agent approved by Owner.
LEGEND:
PERMIT BOUNDARY
PROPERTY LINE -�--
10-YEAR PIT LIMIT
EXISTING PIT LIMIT
I
FUTURE PIT LIMITS j
BUFFER
BERM
PROPOSED BERM
STOCKPILE
BODY OF WATER �7
STREAM/CREEK
ROCK DAM/SEDIMENT BASIN/ TRAP
TEMPORARY DIVERSION DITCH -
INDEX CONTOUR
(CONTOUR INTERVAL = 10 FEET) ---900
INTERMEDIATE CONTOUR
(CONTOUR INTERVAL = 2 FEET)
PAVED ROAD
UNPAVED ROAD
TREE LINE
BUILDING
STORAGE TANK
SILT FENCE
SCALE: 1" = 200'
Martin Marietta Aggregates
2710 W cliff Rd Raleigh, NC 27607 v-
0 100 200 400
600 800
STORMWATER BMP MAP
ASHEBORO QUARRY
FILE: ASHEBORO-MM-4-18-07.dwg
DATE
REVISION
1
3-12-02
MINE PERMIT RENEWAL REQUEST
RANDOLPH COUNTY, NC
2
5-10-05
HAMLET PROPERTY ADDITION
3
8-3-05
PER DENR COMMENTS
(�
QUARRY.
4
4 18-07
PVEWAY
2007 MODIFICATIONAN�D MAP
DRN. BY: D. BRIGHT
DAB 3-01-02
JOB NO.
CK BY:
SCALE:
1 OF 1
B. NORTH
1" - 2�
ox )Z L}

ST.
BUS
220
VICINITY MAP
Top Elevation of Stornuvater Wash
Stone
4' Sediment Storage Area
Fr,
Carry = up
Sides Rifpi Nvay
10' Min, 3' Min.
--
1' Min. Freeboard _ Class I Rip -Re
5' APProx.
SECTION THROUGH BERM AND FILTER
GRAVEL RIP -RAP FILTER BASIN
Key in Bottom ,
Layer of Rip -Rap
RAIN INVESTMENTS, INC.
RAIN INVESTMENTS, INC. i C
CLAYTON TERRY TUCKER
1�IL 1
. Y
-
t
+a�CARL D. HAMLET, JR. T
AND S.C. SMITH
i
•`Y
�9► A OF PIT
TO BE '+•
RARILY
fSti
j
�ITOCK
+
_ a♦ � ap
� r
y • I
-. 1
�+�♦�+ .III
=w
•
,
iI I
i
+
+
f
AT THE TIME THAT AN ACTIVE FACE - AT
BECOMES A DEAD WALL, INFORMATION
WILL BE SUPPLIED IN SUPPORT OF _ �. 1 i) �._ ,\°t•t+
THE DETERMINATION OF FINAL SLOPE FOR ♦ •° ,+ 1' - i 1�- f
UNCONSOLIDATED MATERIAL
(MAXIMUM SLOPE NOT TO EXCEED 3:1) 1 % •i
10' SAFETY BENCH 10' ,r 5' "._ cD 1v All�,�►
BENCH HT. VARIES
WITH ROCK ELEVATION
APPROXIMATE HEIGHT RANGE:
REBECCA A. LOFLIN `
WIDTH
VARIES -APPROXIMATELY
r L2 OF HEIGHT OF BENCH
+ FACE ABOVE
WIDTH WIDTH
PROPOSED
MAXIMUM
DEPTH r 300'
TYPICAL CROSS-SECTION - PIT _U A mTERLY
NEITHER OF THE PROPOSED FRESH WATER
PONDS WILL REQUIRE DAM SAFETY APPROVAL
DUE TO THE HEIGHT OF < 15' AND
THE IMPOUNDMENT OF < 10 AC -FT.
+/- 30' 15'
X
TYPICAL FRESH WATER CROSS SECTION
-,-iHIGHWALL
BOULDER BARRICADE
OSEY C. HARRIS
D A BBB -F
DWIGHT L. MOODY
1
a YSHOE'& BULK
'S
:
0IIUC9$i[TAMMANTr:
qi
+
1
MR
-fsa4 +
LINDA C.
1
BRINEGAR
r
LEONARD AND MARY L.
HARRISON t O ,
CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE
1. OBTAIN MINING PERMIT.
2. CLEAR ONLY AS NECESSARY TO INSTALL THE PROPOSED SEDIMENT BASINS
OR ROCK DAM SEDIMENT BASINS FOR THE PROJECTED WORK.
3. CALL [phone], WINSTON-SALEM REGIONAL OFFICE, LAND QUALITY SECTION, FOR ON -SITE
INSPECTION. BEGIN CLEARING ONCE ALL SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES ARE IN PLACE..
4• THE FUTURE PIT AREA WILL BE CLEARED IN SMALL PARCELS, APPROXIMATELY 5 ACRES
EACH. BEFORE CLEARING OF THESE AREAS BEGINS, PROVIDE DIVERSION DITCHLINE5
TO DIVERT SURFACE DRAINAGE TO THE EXISTING PIT. IN AREAS WHERE THE RUNOFF WILL
NOT NATURALLY DRAIN INTO THE PIT, DIVERT ALL RUNOFF TO THE RESPECTIVE
SEDIMENT BASIN.
5. MAINTAIN THE SEDIEMNT BASINS, AS NEEDED ANS CLEAN -OUT WHEN SEDIMENT
VOLUME IS 1/2 FULL..
6. THE BERMS ARE TO BE SEEDED ACCORDING TO THE SEEDING SCHEDULE UPON THEIR
COMPLETION. AFTER THE BERMS HAVE BEEN SATISFACTORILY SEEDED, THE TEMPORARY
SEDIMENT BASINS MAY BE REMOVED.
'HY FREE". O
LAMBE
DORIS H. SMITH
N
REX A. HAMLET
BASIN
DRAINAGE AREA
DISTURBED AREA
VOLUME
Q25
LENGTH
WIDTH
DEPTH
WEIR LENGTH
1"
5.95
5.25
9450 CF
12.85 CFS
60'
40'
4'
20'
2
2.96
2.96
5328 CF
6.40 CFS
50'
30'
4'
15'
SETTLING EFF,
3
2.36
2.36
4248 CF
5.10 CFS
60'
40'
4'
15'
2098 SF
4
2.84
2.84
5112 CF
6.14 CFS
65'
40'
4'
15'
2524 SF
5
L_
1,14
1.14
I
2052 CF
2.46 CFS
50'
25'
4'
12'
1014 SF
NOTE: CALCULATIONS BASED ON RATIONAL FORMULA, Q = CIA, C =0.30, I = 7.2 "/HR WEIR FORMULA = Q = CLH 1.5 , C = 3.0, H = I
BASIN #1 IS ROCK DAM DUE TO DRAINAGE AREA GREATER THAN 5 ACRES
SETTLING EFFICIENCY IS BASED ON Q 10, WHERE C=0.30, I=6.8 ".HR.
HIGHOINT-RANDLEMAN
ASHBORO AND SOUTHERN R. R.
EVERREADY BATTERY CO., INC.
CARL D. HAMLET, JR.
(PROPOSED B' HIGH LANDSCAPING BERM WILL
FOLLOW THE SAME CRO55-SECTION A5 BELOW
WITH A BOTTOM WIDTH OF +/- 50')
50'-0" 2T-0" 50'-0"
2%
TO PIT
2.I
2•
125'-0"
TYPICAL BERM CROSS SECTION
• • • • • • • • • • • •
..=:111=.N-11i=11=111=�
n�.0 p II�q=11,=11-h
WOE f N`
,•_X.���u.11-��II�ItI� II �LIL�LII�IL�LII��ICr=''��
II�JI=:II�IL��I�.IL�.IIE-
.. 'l1=ll=II�IC= •-11=11 II 11-11r-11=11 11 11�U II 11=11=.
11�=111=11=1�7C=11�11-11€U 11 •II�11�-II��: 11�11: ��ll •.
.�-11=11=IL'--=n=1_C-•u=1C, .I�IC-�I�u.-If=e-u-lit=a-u-u-u a=�•-
-tL=Il�I1=1L�IL 1-)�=r:t:L 111=J1=J11=11?u1=11=�iI�IL-u�-:,Ii- I At:
'11=11 JIGI=11.=11= ----11=0=11�IIt~IC=11=U'�IL-111=11=11=f1=1�= i1-ut=11=
,�_�.=JI�If�11.=11.� IL=11�11� I-nJl ��11•all�ll.i�.p i� IC;�!1`I� IL�I��IL1171�IL�II�Il1 �I�IC�i�I�_. ��,
PLACE MATERIAL FROM EXCAVATION ON
DOWNHILL SIDE OF FLOW, USE ADDITIONAL
2' MIN
FILL TO ACHIEVE SPECIFIED HEIGHTGHT AND WIDTH.
j
I -I � I--III--� 2r•!J
I
2,�� IIIIIIi�,J►{-lil-I►II�II�
III+
--III-
SEED AND MULCH DIVERSION CHANNEL AND DIKE
-III
lil
IMMEDIATELY AFTER CONSTRUCTION. CHOOSE
APPROPRIATE SEEDING MIXTURE FROM THE
VARIES
SEEDING SCHEDULE.
3' MIN
TEMPORARY bIVERSION DITCH
1' FREEBOARD I
',..., V FLOOD STORAGE ZONE MIN.
FILTER FABRIC
4' STORAGE ZONE
(TOTAL BASIN CAPAC17VY
CROSS SECTION
DESIGN SETTLED TOP OVERFILL 6" FOR
5'MAX IV MIN, SETTLEMENT
MAX
4' MIN,
'NATURAL GROUND
MIN,
STONE SECTION
ROCK DAM SEDIMENT BASIN
IERGENCY BY-PASS
BELOW SETTLED TOP
'DAM
fv
�y��yy1
dF.tW '
i
15 ft. R.
6" MINIMUM STONE BED-/
STONE SIZE NCDOT #5
OR #57 WASHED STONE
NOTE:
1. NCDOT #5 stone is preferred. Pad to be 50 ft. L x 20 ft. W x 6 in. thick (min.).
2. Turning radius sufficient to accommodate large trucks.
i i condition w '•h will d
3. Must be maintained n a toad t�,- prevent tracking or direct flow of mu
onto streets. Periodic topdressing may be necessary
4. This construction entrance will be Installed at all entrance and exit points to the site.
At this time the only entrance and exit shown on the site plan will be paved as part
of the initial project.
CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE
TA i t 4°• ( y,,: e P rya L L>
APi 1.
CATEGORY
APPROVED ACREAGE
Tailings / Sediment Ponds
18.41,
Stockpiles
1 LOL
Wastepiles (Berm)
24.51
Processing Area I Haul Roads
20.52<
Mine Excavation
105.81,
Other (Undisturbed)
40.71
TOTAL PERMITTED ACREAGE: 220.99
i E4
b �
6ROUND L1TE
m AN410R SKIRTI@C OF 6'
6"
� y0
ALTERIATE: IN LIEU OF BURYING SKIRT6', 5' OF #5 STONE
MAY BE USED TO ANCHOR SKIRT.
TYPICAL SILT FENCE
SEEDING SCHEDULE FOR ALL GRASSED AREAS
SEEDBED PREPARATION NOTES:
1) Surface water measures are to be installed according to plan,
2) Areas to be seeded shall be ripped and spread with topsoil (if necessary), 3"
deep. Total seedbed prepared shall be 4"-6" deep.
3) Loose rocks, roots, and other obstructions shall be removed from the surface
so as not to interfere with the establishment and maintenance of vegetation.
Surface for final seedbed preparation, at final grades shown, shall be reasonably
smooth and uniform.
4) If no soil test is taken, provide fertilizer and lime according to seeding
schedule. In addition provide 15 Ib./1000 sq. ft. of super phosphate,
5) If soil test is taken, provide fertilizer and lime according to the Doll test
report. Soil testing is recommended.
6) Lime and fertilizer shall be applied uniformly and mixed with the loll during
seedbed preparation.
7) WATER all seeded areas and keep moist until new grass is established,
PLANTING DATE SEED MIX RATES. LB./ACRE
April 1 - August 15 Serica Lespedeza (scarified) 30
Pensacola Bahiagrass 50
Common Bermudagrass 10
Germit Millit 10
Prior to May 1 or
after August 15 Rye (Grain) 40
Fertilize seedbeds with 3 tons/acre lime and 500 Ibs/acre 10-10-10.
Mulch with 2 tons/acre clean straw or hay.
Tack with rapid setting emulsified asphalt at 10 gal./1000 sq.ft., or other
tacking agent approved by Owner.
..:_ ' ta i hilt
_..
l It 1K
LEGEND:
PERMIT BOUNDARY
PROPERTY LINE -------- ---.__ _----.----__..__
10-YEAR PIT LIMIT
EXISTING PIT LIMIT
FUTURE PIT LIMITS
g.
BUFFER
BERM
PROPOSED BERM
F2.
STOCKPILE
BODY OF WATER
STREAM/CREEK
ROCK DAM/SEDIMENT BASIN/ TRAP
TEMPORARY DIVERSION DITCH
INDEX CONTOUR
(CONTOUR INTERVAL = 10 FEET)---900--�
INTERMEDIATE CONTOUR
(CONTOUR INTERVAL = 2 FEET)
PAVED ROAD
UNPAVED ROAD
TREE LINE
BUILDING
0
STORAGE TANK
0
SILT FENCE
_;_,-X.X.X-X-X_
SCALE : P = 200'
Martin Marietta Aggregates
2710 Wycliff Rd Raleigh, NC 27607 r
9 100 200 400
600 800
STORM W A TER BMP MAP
FILE: ASHEBORO-MM-4-18-07.dwg
ASHEBORO QUARRY
DATE
REVISION
1
3-12-02
MINE PERMIT RENEWAL REQUEST
RANDOLPH COUNTY, NC
2
5-10-05
HAMLET PROPERTY ADDITION
QUARRY:
3
8-3-05
PER DENR COMMENTS
4
4 18-07
2007MOANDIUPDATN'EDNW,iEMAP DRIVEWAY
DRN. BY: D. BRIGHT
DATE: 3-01-M
JOB NO.
CK. BY:
SCALE:
1 OF 1
B. NORTH
Y27'b
i
Box 12l M
5