660077_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20190917

t:? Division of Water Resources
Facility Number - 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
Q Other Agency
Type of Visit:Com 'ance Inspection Operation Review Q Structure Evaluation Q Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: Routine Q Complaint Q Follow-up 0 Referral Q Emergency Q Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit:"! Arrival Time: Departure Time: County: Region:
Farm Name: IrE /Zh'n _I _ Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Title:
Phone:
Onsite Representative: V) Integrator:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Boars
Other
Other
Latitude:
Phone:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
Layer er
Non -Layer I I El
Non -
Turkey Poults
Other
Design Current
Longitude:
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Pop.
Dairy Cow
Dai Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
INon-Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
Discharges and Stream Impacts
I . Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? [:]Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? [:]YesVNo�z
❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 1/4/1015 Cominued

lFacility Number: 6 - Date of Ins ection.
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier: L% / ` j✓iAj
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed andlor managed through a
waste management or closure plan?
❑ NA ❑ NE
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 6
❑ YesNo E]NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental rent, notiry DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes N ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, andlor wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require [] Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need [a YesNo NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): C r 3� r.ti
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes[N
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and.'or land application site need improvement?
❑ YesN
NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
E]Yes
No. ❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
El Yes
No ❑ NA
E] NE
Rc uired Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yeso [3 NA E:] NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes [No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP []Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps [_1 Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application E] Weekly Freeboard E] Waste Analysis ElSoil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and I" Rainfall Inspections ❑Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 1/4/1015 Continued

Facili Number: 64 - Date of Inspection: rt
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ YesE�`No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? El Yes�N7o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and;'or document ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes �00 NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question ft Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
16-
y lry 3 31 s A UA i
( �. 12 5 C.eSs �� 5f °jv
01
�\) e_J (-13 CC-,
0111 i6,04''.) -S
ReviewcHnspector Name:
4 t,_,, rZ ,-d s
Reviewer;'Inspector Signature: 13 4zt 11
Page 3 of 3
Phone: q j °l -7 9 { -t 2 0o
Date: 61 - /7— (9
2/4/2015