NC0080071_Discharge Alternatives Evaluation_20190930

Potable Water Solutions
101P,m,
RECEIVED
OCT 0 2 2019
Wren Thedford NCDEQIDWRINPDES
Division of Water Resources
Water Quality Permitting Section—NPDES
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
RE: Town of Vanceboro, Craven County
Permit NCOO8O071
September 30, 2019
Dear Ms.Thedford,
Please see attached Discharge Alternatives Evaluation for the Town of Vanceboro, located in Craven
County. The renewal application form for this permit was previously submitted under separate cover.
Please contact myself or Mr. Vernon Edwards with the Town of Vanceboro if you have any questions
concerning this renewal request or if additional information is required.
'/Ie€A-7
Harry Bailey
1111/1"40414:1:1)0
n
1402 Harrington Street �v
Washington,NC 27889
252.945.8948
F [e-mail]

DISCHARGE ALTERNATIVES EVALUATION
TO. .UT,
YANG i9Rp
' itC
ii!Ii
Vanceboro WTP
NPDES PERMIT NC0080071
TOWN OF VANCEBORO
NORTH CAROLINA
SEPTEMBER 2019

TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
1.1 BACKGROUND
1.2 PURPOSE
2.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS
2.1 SOURCE WELLS AND WTP RECEIVED
2.2 DISCHARGE WASTEWATER CHARACTERISTICS
E 2.3 TOXICITY ASSESSMENT
OCT 02 2019
NCDEQ/DWR/NPDES
3.0 ALTERNATIVES EVALUATION
3.1 CONNECT DISCHARGE TO A WWTP
3.2 OBTAIN A NON-DISCHARGE PERMIT
3.3 INSTALL WASTEWATER TREATMENT
3.4 USE ALTERNATIVE WATER TREATMENT SOURCE
3.5 USE ALTERNATIVE WATER TREATMENT METHOD
3.6 DISCHARGE TO A LARGER WATERBODY/PERFORM A DILUTION MODEL
3.7 COMBINATION OF ALTERNATIVES
3.8 DISCHARGE VARIANCE
4.0 ALTERNATIVES PRESENT WORTH COSTS
5.0 PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE
5.1 ALTERNATIVE IMPLEMENTATION
5.2 PROJECT SCHEDULE

INDEX OF FIGURES
FIGURE 2.1 NPDES LOCATION MAP
FIGURE 2.2 TREATMENT & DISCHARGE SCHEMATIC
INDEX OF TABLES RECEIVED
OCT 0 2 1019
TABLE 2.1 EXISTING WELL DATA
NCDEQIDWRINPDES
INDEX OF APPENDICES
APPENDIX A NPDES PERMIT INFORMATION
APEPNDIX B TOWN OF VANCEBORO 2018 LOCAL WATER SUPPLY PLAN
APPENDIX C MAULS SWAMP STREAM CLASSIFICATION
APPENDIX D CRAVEN COUNTY 2018 LOCAL WATER SUPPLY PLAN
APPENDIX E CCPCUA DATA FOR CRAVEN COUNTY
APPENDIX F NEUSE RIVER STREAM CLASSIFICATION
APPENDIX G ROUTE FOR ALTERNATIVE DISCHARGE

1.0 BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
1.1 BACKGROUND
The Vanceboro Water Treatment Plant (WTP) is operated by the Town of Vanceboro to
provide potable water for Town customers. The WTP treats groundwater from two
wells screened in the Castle Hayne aquifer and pumps the finished water into the Town
distribution system. The current treatment techniques consist of aeration, filtration,
softening, and disinfection.
As part of the filtration and softening process, the filter vessels must undergo a
backwash process and the softening vessels must undergo a regeneration cycle. The
filtration backwash process only utilizes raw water. The softener regeneration cycle also
utilizes raw water and a salt (brine) is injected during a small portion of the cycle to
restore the softener resin.
The wastewater generated by the filtration backwash and softener regeneration is
discharged to an unnamed tributary to Mauls Swamp in the Neuse River Basin, under
NPDES Permit NC0080071. Due to failed Whole Effluent Toxicity tests (WET), the Town
is required by Part A. (3) of the permit to submit a Discharge Alternatives Evaluation
with the next permit renewal application.
Appendix A contains a copy of the existing discharge permit and the fact sheet for the
permit. According to permit requirements, the following options must be evaluated:
1. Connect Discharge to a Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP)
2. Obtain a Non-discharge Permit
3. Install Wastewater Treatment
4. Use Alternative Water Treatment Source
S. Use Alternative Water Treatment Method
6. Discharge to a Large Waterbody/Perform a Dilution Model
7. Combination of Alternatives
This evaluation is to include a present worth cost analysis for all technically feasible
options in accordance with Division of Water Resources guideline "Engineering
Alternatives Analysis Guidance Document".

1.2 PURPOSE
This evaluation is being requested to determine whether there are any economical and
technologically feasible alternatives available to the Town to address aquatic toxicity in
the plant effluent. Based upon the evaluation, please identify viable alternatives and
present an implementation schedule and project timeline for the preferred alternative.
The Town shall submit the Discharge Alternatives Evaluation to the Division along with
the submission of their next permit renewal application (due 6 months prior to permit
expiration).
2.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS
The Town of Vanceboro WTP was designed to receive and treat groundwater pumped from two
wells (Well #1 and Well #2). The location of the wells, the WTP, and the NPDES discharge
location are shown in Figure 2.1. Information of the two wells supplying the WTP is shown in
Table 2.1.
Table 2.1
Vanceboro WTP
Well #1 Well #2
Chloride (mg/I) 7 mg/I (9/11/18) 7 mg/I (9/11/18)
Current Average Daily Pumped 0.094 MGD 0.094 MGD
The average daily demand for the Town varies from 0.176 MGD to 0.218 MGD. This
information obtained from monthly operational reports and the 2018 Local Water Supply Plans
submitted to NC DEQ Water Supply Section. Appendix B contains a copy of the 2018 Local
Water Supply Plan for the Town of Vanceboro.
The current treatment train for the Town of Vanceboro WTP is shown in Figure 2.2. The existing
treatment techniques utilized at the WTP are as follows (raw to finished):
• Aerator
• Raw Water Reservoir
• High Service Pumps
• Filtration
• Cation Exchange Softener
• Chlorine Gas addition
• Discharge of Filter Backwash and Softener Regeneration water to Mauls Swamp

There are two existing filter vessels and two existing softeners at the WTP. The filter backwash
and softener regeneration cycles occur for every 300,000 gallons of water treated. The cleaning
of the filter starts with a filter backwash with a flow rate of 560 gpm for approximately 18
minutes. It is then followed by a filter rinse with a flow rate of 160 gpm for approximately 5
minutes. The regeneration cycle of the softener includes a 10-minute ion exchange backwash
with a flow rate of approximately 170 gpm, a 25-minute brine injection with a flow rate of 10
gpm, and a 30-minute ion exchange rinse with a flow rate of approximately 115 gpm. Raw
water is used for the filter backwash and softener regeneration cycle. The volume generated
during the filter backwash and regeneration cycle are reported on discharge monitoring reports
as estimated values because the cleaning processes are completed manually.
2.1 SOURCE WELLS AND WTP
DISCHARGE OF REGENERATION WASTE WATER EFFLUENT TO MAULS
SWAMP
As stated earlier, water generated during the filter backwash and regeneration cycles is
currently discharged to Mauls Swamp in accordance with the NPDES permit issued. The
discharge location is show in Figure 2.1. Based on discussions with the North Carolina
Department of Environmental Quality (NCDEQ) and USGS, Mauls Swamp has no stream
gauging station. According to NC DEQ, Mauls Swamp has a Class C freshwater
classification. Appendix C contains a copyof page 24 of the Neuse River Basin hydro
pp p g Y
order that documents this classification. Thus, the existing permit does not allow any
dilution factor for toxicity testing on the effluent at present.
2.2 DISCHARGE WASTEWATER CHARACTERISTICS
The discharge from the filter backwash and softening regeneration process produces a
wastewater that is discharged to Mauls Swamp. Data from permit Discharge Monitoring
Reports (DMR) from January 2017 to April 2017 were reviewed for flowrate and water
quality parameters to determine the character of the discharges. It is important to note
that discharge samples are representative samples and thus reflect the filter backwash
and regeneration cycle. The routine compliance sampling data indicates that the
discharge has TDS, chlorides and conductivity values characteristic of a strong brine.
In June 2012, representatives of NC DEQ Washington Regional Office met with the Town
to review the WET testing procedures. It was determined that the current procedure for
collection of samples were not adequately representing the filter backwash and
softener regeneration cycle. A new sampling procedure was created and provided to
the Town. Once the plan was implemented, the WET sample tests have since been
failures.

As part of the Evaluation project, the plan given to the Town was reviewed and
determined to be flow volume skewed with regard to the softener regeneration brine
cycle. A new plan was developed to address the flow volume discrepancies in the
current plan. This updated plan was reviewed by the WaRO staff before
implementation. The WET tests after implementation were determined to be failures.
Since the WET tests results did not improve, the updated procedures were reviewed and
sampling of the regeneration cycle was completed. The sampling determined that the
i wasdetected at the beginning of
chloride levels associated with the brine cycle injection
Y 1g g
the rinse cycle and not during the brine cycle. This is due to the low flow volume
associated with the brine injection and increased flow rate during the rinse cycle.
The sampling was revised to address this new information and data. The plan appears
to better address the chloride levels based on when they appear during the softener
regeneration cycle. To date however, the Town has not received approval from the
WaRO staff for implementation.
Based upon existing data from the DMRs, the following data represents current
discharges from the WTP:
Filter Backwash and Regeneration Volume/Cycle 16,280 gpd
Total Chlorides "'5,000 mg/L
Total Dissolved Solids "20-30 mg/L
Salinity —7 ppt
Conductivity "5,000-13,000 umhos/cm
2.3 TOXICITY ASSESSMENT
Toxicity testing is currently conducted on a composite sample of filter backwash and
softener regeneration discharge water. Due to the rating of Mauls Swamp as a zero-
flow stream, 90% effluent strength is used in the toxicity testing procedure. Toxicity
tests are conducted using Ceriodaphinia dubia (water fleas). The Town has had failures
since the representative sampling plan was modified by the WaRO staff. In general,
failure of the test occurs due to the chloride levels associated with the regeneration of
the softener.

3.0 ALTERNATIVES EVALUATION
3.1 Connect discharge to a WWTP: Determine whether the wastewater can be
discharged to a wastewater treatment plant. Approval or disapproval from the plant
operator should be acquired.
This alternative would eliminate the surface water discharge by connection to a
wastewater treatment plant (WWTP). If a discharge line to the sanitary sewer system
were constructed, this line would accept the discharge effluent flows from both the
filter backwash and the softener regeneration. The Town of Vanceboro owns and
operates a Wastewater Treatment Plant WWTP under Permit Number NC0031828. The
WWTP has a permitted capacity of 0.30 MGD and discharges into Swift Creek.
Based on discussions with WaRO staff, addition of the discharge from the WTP to the
sanitary sewer system may create issues with the WWTP effluent. It is therefore not
recommended as a viable alternative.
A possible viable option would be the blending of raw water with the WTP discharge
prior to entering the sanitary sewer system. This would reduce the chloride
concentration in the flow along with other contaminants of concern and not create any
issues with regard to permitted capacity at the WWTP. Conversations with WaRO staff
have indicated that this would not be a permitted alternative.
3.2 Obtain a Non-discharge permit: Eliminate the surface water discharge by
obtaining a non-discharge permit for spray irrigation, infiltration, or subsurface disposal
(on-site drain field, infiltration gallery, injection wells).
This option eliminates the surface water discharge by obtaining a non-discharge permit
for spray irrigation, infiltration, or subsurface disposal. In accordance with the
Engineering Alternatives Analysis (EAA) Guidance Document provided by NCDEQ, waste
streams from ion exchange treatment units do not have to be evaluated for land
application. Discharge high in salt concentration is typically not suitable for land
application, as excess salts can adversely affect plants via osmotic effect; specific ion
toxicity; and soil particle dispersion, which reduces soil permeability and the water
infiltration rate. Chloride levels above 350 mg/I and conductivity levels above 3,000
umhos/cm are considered severe potential irrigation problems for land application.

Wastewater reuse disposal alternatives include agricultural and landscape irrigation,
industrial activities, groundwater recharge, non-potable urban uses (i.e.: toilet flushing,
construction water). As explained previously, the waste brine is not suitable for
irrigation or landscape irrigation. State of North Carolina code 15A NCAC 02U.1101
prohibits discharge to saltwater wetlands, so this discharge alternative is not available.
Additionally, the quality of the discharge would prohibit the use of the discharge for
non-potable uses. The brine content does not allow the beneficial use of this waste
stream for reuse application. Wastewater reuse is not a feasible alternative for disposal
of this discharge.
3.3 Install wastewater treatment: Install improved wastewater treatment to enable
the facility effluent to consistently pass the WET test. If this is not technically feasible or
prohibitive, please explain and provide estimated costs.
cost p , p
This alternative requires installation of a wastewater treatment method to enable the
facility effluent to consistently pass the WET test. A candidate treatment technology for
removal of chlorides is reverse osmosis (RO) technology. However, with such a high
chloride content in the feed water, the RO system would need very high pressure and
the percent recovery through the process would be 75% or less. Thus, RO process
would produce a discharge with a concentrate still requiring discharge to a large water
body. There are evaporative type systems that could evaporate the water off the brine
wastewater to produce a solid (salt), but they are energy intensive and expensive. Thus,
the RO treatment and/or brine evaporation option does not solve the original discharge
problem and is not economically feasible.
3.4 Use Alternative Water Treatment Source: Obtain drinking water from another
source (nearest County, City, or Town or other wells) so the discharge or toxicity
problem is eliminated.
This alternative explores the possibility of obtaining drinking water from another source
(nearest County, City, or Town or other wells) so the discharge or toxicity problem is
eliminated. Based upon the 2018 Local Water Supply Plan, the Town of Vanceboro
average daily use ranged from 0.176 to 0.218 MGD and had a maximum day use of
0.3830 MGD (September 2018). The 2018 Local Water Supply Plan also estimated the
Town will have a 2060 average daily demand (ADD) of 0.2537 million gallons per day
(MGD). Appendix D contains a copy of the Craven County water system Local Water
Supply Plan for 2018.
The Town of Vanceboro currently has an emergency interconnection with the Craven
Countywater system NC0425055 . Craven Countyis located within the Central Coastal
Y ( )

Plain Capacity Use Area (CCPCUA) and the Craven County water system is a registered
permit holder (CU3108). Appendix E contains a copy of the CCPCUA Permit Data for
Craven County. Due to the CCPCUA Rules, the Craven County water system has been
subject to withdrawal reductions since 2008. The 2018 Local Water Supply Plan
indicates that demand as percent of supply is approximately 60% and will approach 80%
between 2040 and 2050. At this time, it does not appear that this would be viable
alternative source.
The Town of Vanceboro utilizes groundwater sources that are in the Castle Hayne
aquifer and are currently not subject to withdrawal reductions based on the Central
Coastal Capacity Use Area (CCPCUA) Rules. The Division of Water Resources may not
permit new groundwater sources located in deeper aquifers that are subject to the
CCPCUA Rules. Since there are no public water supply wells located in the deeper
aquifers in this area of Craven County, it is not known what raw water quality may exist
or what treatment may be required. This alternative would require two new
groundwater wells being installed along with the possible construction of a new water
treatment plant that would have a discharge. Due to the amount of required
infrastructure, this alternative is not financially feasible.
3.5 Use Alternative Water Treatment Method: Install alternative and/or innovative
water treatment methods or operational improvements that do not produce toxic
wastewaters. For example, install a recycle iron/manganese filtration system with no
discharge or combine discharge with WWTP or cooling water effluents.
This category includes evaluating alternative and/or innovative water treatment
methods or operational improvements that do not produce toxic wastewaters. In
effect, this would mean eliminating the softener (and ion exchange) and using a
different technology that does not produce the brine/salt discharge in the form of
reverse osmosis (RO). However, these technologies produce a brine/saline discharge in
the form of concentrate stream that must be disposed of. Thus, use of nanofiltration or
RO would need to be combined with a large water body discharge to be applicable. This
alternative does not solve the original discharge problem and is not economically
feasible.
3.6 Discharge to a Larger waterbody/Perform a dilution model: Relocate the
facility's discharge to a larger receiving waterbody to eliminate or reduce toxic impacts
to the receiving waterbody given the increased dilution. If applicable, perform a dilution
model to receive allowance for steam dilution in WET test.

In this alternative, the WTP's discharge line would be lengthened and rerouted to a
larger receiving waterbody to eliminate or reduce toxic impacts to the receiving
waterbody given the increased dilution. For any receiving body, a dilution mixing model
effort would be needed to receive allowance for dilution in WET test. A wastewater
pump station would be installed at the WTP and the pump station would discharge via a
discharge line leading to a single diffuser outlet.
The backwash and regeneration cycle volume are produced in approximately 88
minutes. The highest discharge rate during the filter backwash and softener
regeneration cycle is 560 gpm. This occurs during the initial segment of the filter
backwash.
Due to the salty nature of the discharges, the best choice for a new discharge location
would be to a tidally influenced area where the salinity of the discharge will not have as
great an impact. A larger water body around the Town of Vanceboro is the Neuse River.
The Neuse River is located south of the Town of Vanceboro. The advantage to a new
discharge into Neuse River segment 27-(96) is that it is classified SC; Sw; NSW.
Appendix F contains a copy of page 23 of the Neuse River Basin hydro order that
documents this classification. A discharge to SC waters would change the WET test
requirements and also chloride limits. A discharge force main from the WTP would be
approximately 8 miles along Mill Avenue to Hwy 17 Business and then Streets Ferry
Road to NC Hwy 55. Appendix G contains a map showing the route required. Due to
the amount of required infrastructure, this alternative is not financially feasible.
3.7 Combination of Alternatives: Employ any combination of the alternatives listed
above that would result in eliminating or decreasing toxicity until a more feasible
solution becomes available.
Each of the alternatives stated above either do not solve the original discharge problem
and/or are not financially feasible for the Town of Vanceboro. Therefore, a combination
of these alternatives would also not solve the original discharge problem and/or would
not be financially feasible.
3.8 Discharge Variance
The Town of Vanceboro may apply to the Environmental Management Commission
(EMC) for a variance to the NPDES permit discharge requirements under State Statute
143-215.3 (e). This statute reads as follows:

"Variances. —Any person subject to the provisions of G.S. 143-215.1 or 143-214.1, 143-
215, or 143-215.107. The Commission may grant such variance, for fixed or indefinite
periods after public hearing on due notice, or where it is found that circumstances so
require, for a period not to exceed 90 days without prior hearing and notice. Prior to
granting a variance here under, the Commission shall find that: (1) The discharge of
waste or the emission of air contaminants occurring or proposed to occur do not
endanger human health or safety; and (2) Compliance with the rules, standards, or
limitations from which variance is sought cannot be achieved by application of best
available technology found to be economically reasonable at the time of application for
such variances, and would produce hardship without equal or greater benefits to the
public, provided that such variances shall be consistent with the provision of the Federal
Water Pollution Control Act as amended or the Clean air Act as amended; and provided
further, that any person who would otherwise be entitled to a variance or modification
under the Federal Water Pollution Control Act as amended or the Clean Air Act as
amended shall also be entitled to the same variance from or modification in rules,
standards, or limitations established pursuant to G>S> 143-214.1, 143-215, and 143-
215.107, respectively."
If NPDES variances were to be granted for the WTPs by the DWR, the variance must be applied
for, re-evaluated by DWR, and granted every five years for each NPDES permit renewal. It is
not clear at this point what cost would be incurred for the variance requests for the WTP in the
future as the requirements are determined on a case by case basis.
4.0 ALTERNATIVES PRESENT WORTH COSTS
A present worth costs analysis was not completed because the alternatives would either not
solve the original discharge problem and/or would not be financially feasible for the Town of
Vanceboro.
5.0 PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE
This study has been conducted to meet NPDES permit requirements to assess methods for
treatment/discharge of wastewater from the WTP to avoid the toxicity impact on Mauls
Swamp. The feasibility of alternative methods was presented in Section 3. The cost of the
alternatives is significant and most do not solve the original discharge problem.
The Town would prefer to work with NC DEQ Water Resources staff on an updated sampling
plan that would assist in securing pass results for the WET tests. This is an alternative that

would not add a financial burden to the Town and should meet the goal of regulatory
compliance.
If this plan of action does not meet the goal of compliance, the next preferred method would
be the installation of a holding tank. The tank would have a volume of approximately 20,000
gallons with a mixer to properly combine the filter backwash and softener regeneration prior to
discharge. Based on calculations of the chloride loading during the brine cycle compared to the
total discharge volume, WET testing conducted using Ceriodaphinia dubia (water fleas) should
provide a pass for chronic test results.
5.1 ALTERNATIVE IMPLEMENTATION
It is important to note that the preferred alternative is not part of the seven (7) alternative
choices that are listed on page 5 of 7 of the permit. The recommended implementation steps
are as follows:
1. Contact NC DEQ Water Resources staff in the Washington Regional Office for a
meeting to discuss the representative sampling plan for collection of WET samples
from the WTP discharge.
2. Based on the results of the meeting(s), an updated sampling plan may be created for
approval of use by the Town of Vanceboro.
3. Conduct WET sampling based on the updated representative sampling plan to
determine compliance.
4. If compliance is achieved, no further actions must be taken.
5. If compliance is not achieved, or an updated representative sampling plan cannot be
secured, then a meeting with the WaRO staff will be scheduled to discuss the
possibility of utilizing a holding tank. After determining what would be required by
the State for implementation (i.e. permitting, compliance monitoring, etc.), the
Town of Vanceboro would have to review and discuss the financial viability of this
alternative.
5.2 PROJECT SCHEDULE
The project schedule for implementation steps 1 & 2 are dependent on the availability of the
NC DEQ WaRO staff, Town of Vanceboro staff, and consultant. If steps 1 & 2 can be
implemented, scheduling of step 3 is strictly based on the WET test compliance monitoring
schedule.

Figure 2.1
NPDES LOCATION MAP

• '
1 . \.1
s.
• •
I •i .Carl, 1` -.. r A
i -
� -_ ►` ,� _-= e'er—
„...4\
4„ris1144,41e ysimmitilli .. ...,,......., i
. • ....
n. y l
x
Jf•Cern' 118A i . 'r �r
K $ II . \r • �ern.---- .
1
IRO
J� ,►
i ^� p1 _ �� ! Vanceboro WTP j
N. -0 �,� {r ri !-f> !
.. •.{^.� r '' > i `Aj •\ itjyY'"* t ."� 'q iv. -./.y i 1
.„4'1.•)5.3:..4!•
,1.,..,,. -l---.,"',ii ...4-...
4 .4G m i
-. .-� •
ti` � Discharge 1 1
.44 : w. ` --,t7anceb&o 7. ..• V
` tl
/ tom"..d �..r �` �'fi} � � :y .,.\` gii .L—, 4 /r ft, p
---:...\‘')(4-.4.-- 4-g-i ) • ,(`-•-• i ,:- ' •* '*--, —
111r040 7-;r. I
"� r�/ °" -" : + , -=71
'�� US 17 U-L'44
f' tab .j#
:,„.„, .4 \ ,,,c...
,..„,,,,,:i ‘,.. , : • .
, .
..,..„. • ..,'"). , ,' ":_k,
•
/(1 • _1\:,,, iier."
-• .. m, _ �.-�... '' 6. ''�;.'.
i0/75
i ...1ia�e l '�`" `� t
:.•.�1. ��f,r --- .._ 'AO___. ..( �, ) j+--.r.�L•.-. ,' ...--, A r- •/ 1 1
•
•
-;: - e:i4 ,....z y je-.<
o�i6Q1 11 f � {�"•..-•ti •^^+•.""^"•-•- f •..�•• «`'/a,`+. ' I
i i‘ 1 r �
g
\ : ,...-. ..,.. .. ‘...r , _.
t (1 ; • t_4.' ....-
> `' .._. -fi;6----......_,.r. ,,,..... ,,, ,.., ,,,... .
SCALE:1 in-24000 ft
USGS Quad: F30SW Vanceboro,NC : . � �-
•
Outfall Facility S.'.: b
_Latitude: 35° 18' 13.6"N 35° 18' 15.1"N ,his" ; A =,r it e , -.`�4C
< ;�,> .----I-tea <0.
ngitude: 77° 8' 51.1" W 77° 8' 50.3"W '` i .,:� 3
r.� r.�.
Stream Class: C Sw NSW 1orth '`'
Facility Location 41/1
'
Subbasin: 03-04-09 HUC: 03020202 Vanceboro WTP NC0080071
Receiving Stream: UT to Mauls Swamp Craven County

Figure 2.2
TREATMENT & DISCHARGE SCHEMATIC

GAS CHLORINATION
WELL#1
AERATOR FILTER ION EXCHANGE SOFTENER ► DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM
Well #2
10,880 GALLONS 5,400 GALLONS 0.016 MGD
UNNAMED TRIBUTARY TO MAULS SWAMP
OUTFALL 001
Town of Vanceboro WTP Discharge
NC0080071

Appendix A
NPDES PERMIT INFORMATION

AT:52Z" 1/V1(
NCDEF R
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory Donald R.van der Vaart
Governor Secretary
RECENED/NCDENRIDWR
February 5,2015
E. Renee Ipok FEB 19 2015
Town of Vanceboro
P. O.Box 306 Water Quality Regional
Operati
Vanceboro,NC 28586 WashingtonReg Office
•Subject: Issuance of NPDES Permit
Permit NC0080071
Vanceboro WTP
Craven County
• Class I
Dear Ms.Ipok :
Division personnel have reviewed and approved your application for renewal of the subject
permit. Accordingly,we are forwarding the attached NPDES permit. This permit is issued pursuant to
the requirements of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and the Memorandum of Agreement
between North Carolina and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency dated October 15, 2007 (or as
subsequently amended).
Summary of Changes in Final Permit from Existing Permit
1) Removed monthly average flow limit. Weekly monitoring to continue. Applied the 2009 Water
Treatment Plant Strategy which removes the flow limit. [See A.(1.)]
2) Reduced monitoring for total chloride, total copper, total iron, and total zinc to quarterly to
coincide with chronic toxicity sampling. Edited chronic toxicity footnote. As action level
toxicity parameters of concern, these,parameters are to be evaluated in conjunction with the
Whole Effluent Toxicity (WET) test. Note, this permit may be reopened and limits added for
these parameters if WET tests continue to demonstrate aquatic toxicity. [See A.(1.)]
3) Reduced monitoring for total manganese to quarterly to coincide with chronic toxicity
sampling. Edited chronic toxicity footnote. As a toxicity parameter of concern, monitoring in
conjunction with the quarterly toxicity test was implemented. [See A.(1.)]
4) Reduced monitoring for Total Nitrogen (TN) and Total Phosphorus (TP) to semi-annual.
Removed reporting of Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen (continue to measure to determine TN),
Nitrite/Nitrate Nitrogen (continue to measure to determine. TN), and Total Nitrogen Load
Removed Calculation of Total Nitrogen Loads special condition. Removed Total Monthly Flow
footnote. The 2012 Neuse River Basin Strategy reduced nutrient requirements from monthly to
semi-annual monitoring and reporting for TN and TP. [See A.(1.)]
1617 Mat Service Center,Raleigh,North Carolina 27699-1617
Location:512 N.Salisbury St.Raleigh,North Carolina 27604
Phone:[phone] Fax:[phone]
Internet www.ncdenr.gov
An Equal OppertunityWf rmative Action Employer

E. Rene Ipok
February 5, 2015
Page 3 of 3
If you have any questions concerning this permit,please contact Ron Berry at telephone
number(919)807-6396 or at email [e-mail].
Sincerely,
p2A6(/-
ay Zimmeffn
ding Director,Division of Water Resources
Attachments
Cc: Washington Regional Office/Water Quality Programs
WSS/Aquatic Toxicology Branch/Susan Meadows(email)
Central Files
NPDES Fife
•

Permit NC0080071
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA •
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES
PERMIT
TO DISCHARGE WASTEWATER UNDER THE.
NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM
In compliance with the provision of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1, other lawful standards
and regulations promulgated and adopted by the North Carolina Environmental Management
Commission, and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended,the
Town of Vanceboro
is hereby authorized to discharge wastewater from a facility located at the
Vanceboro WTP
923 Farm Life Avenue northeast of Vanceboro
Craven County
to receiving waters designated as an unnamed tributary to Mauls Swamp in the Neuse River Basin in
accordance with effluent limitations,monitoring requirements, and other conditions set forth in Parts I,
II, and III hereof. '
The permit shall become effective March 1,2015.
This permit and the authorization to discharge shall expire at midnight on February 29,2020.
Signed this day February 5,2015.
•
k y Zimmerm •
ting Director,Division of Water Resources
By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission
Page 1 of 7

Permit NC0080071
Part I
A. (1) EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
[15A NCAC 02B .0400 et seq., 02B .0500 et seq.]
a. During the period beginning on the effective date of this permit and lasting until expiration; the
Permittee is authorized to discharge backwash/rinse wastewater from Dutfall 001. Such discharges
shall be limited and monitored 1 by the Permittee as specified below:
EFFLUENT LIMITS MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
CHARACTERISTICS Monthly Daily Measurement Sample Sample
Average Maximum Frequency Type Location
Flow,MOD Weekly Estimated 2 Effluent
Total Suspended Solids 30.0 mg/L45.0 mEffluent
1� � 2/Month Grab
pH Not les than 6.0 S.U. nor 2/Month Grab Effluent
greater than 9.0 S.U.
Total Residual Chlorine 3 17 µg/L 2/Month Grab Effluent
Salinity,ppt Monthly Grab Effluent
Conductivity, µmhos/cm Monthly .Grab Effluent
Total Dissolved'Solids,mg/L Monthly Grab Effluent _
Ammonia as Nitrogen,mg/L Monthly Grab Effluent
Turbidity,NTU Monthly Grab Effluent
Total Chloride,mg/L4 Quarterly Grab Effluent
Total Copper, µg/L4 Quarterly Grab Effluent
Total Iron,mg/L4 Quarterly Grab Effluent
Total Manganese,mg/L4 Quarterly Grab Effluent
Total Zinc, µg/L4 Quarterly Grab Effluent
Chronic Toxicity 4 Quarterly Grab Effluent
Total Nitrogen,mg/L5 Monitor&Report Semi-annual Grab Effluent
Total Phosphorus,mg/L Monitor&Report Semi-annual Grab Effluent
Footnotes:
1. No later than 270 days from the effective date of this permit,begin submitting discharge monitoring
reports electronically using NC DWR's eDMR application system.See Special Condition A.(4.).
2. Flow is estimated based on influent meter flow rates and duration of discharges events that occur
daily. Records shall be maintained and available for inspection indicating the flow rates and duration
of daily events used to calculate the reported flow.
3. Limit and monitor only if the facility adds chlorine or a chlorine derivative to water that is eventually
discharged. The Division shall consider all effluent TRC values reported below 50 µg/L to be
compliant with the permit. However, the Permittee shall continue to record and submit all values
reported by a North Carolina laboratory(including field certified), even if these values fall below 50
µgiL
4. Chronic toxicity(Ceriodaphnia dubia)@ 90%conducted in March, June, September, and December.
Sampling for total chloride,total copper,total iron,total manganese,and total zinc shall be conducted
in conjunction with toxicity testing. See Special Condition A.(2.).
5. For a given wastewater sample, TN=TKN+(NO2-N+NO3-N),where TN is Total Nitrogen,(NO2-
N+NO3-N)is Nitrite/Nitrate Nitrogen,and TKN is Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen.
b.All samples collected shall be from a representative discharge event.
c. There shall be no discharge of floating solids or visible foam in other than trace amounts.
Page 3 of 7

•
Permit NC0080071
A. (3) DISCHARGE ALTERNATIVES EVALUATION
[G.S. 143-215.3(a)(2)]
The Permittee shall assess potential alternatives to eliminate Whole Effluent Toxicity (WET) test
failures. This evaluation shall assess the feasibility of all the following alternatives:
1. Connect discharge to a WWTP: Determine whether the wastewater can be discharged to a
wastewater treatment plant. Approval or disapproval from the plant operator
should be acquired.
2. Obtain a Non-discharge permit: Eliminate the surface water discharge byobtaininga g
non-
discharge permit for spray irrigation, infiltration, or subsurface disposal (on-site
drainfield,infiltration gallery, injection wells).
3. Install Wastewater Treatment: Install improved wastewater treatment to enable the facility
effluent to consistently pass the WET test. If this is not technically feasible or
cost prohibitive,please explain and provide estimated costs.
4. Use Alternative Water Treatment Source: Obtain drinking water from another source (nearest
County, City, or Town or other wells) so the discharge or toxicity problem is
eliminated.
5. Use Alternative Water Treatment Method: Install alternative and/or innovative water treatment
methods or operational improvements that do not produce toxic wastewaters.
For example, install a recycle iron/manganese filtration system with no
discharge or combine discharge with WWTP or cooling water effluents.
6. Discharge to a Larger waterbodv/Perform a dilution model: Relocate the facility's discharge to
a larger receiving waterbody to eliminate or reduce toxic impacts to the
receiving waterbody given the increased dilution. If applicable, perform a
dilution model to receive allowance for stream dilution in WET test.
7. Combination of Alternatives: Employ any combination of the alternatives listed above that would
result in eliminating or decreasing toxicity until a more feasible solution
becomes available.
The evaluation shall include a present value of costs analysis for all technologically feasible options as
outlined in the Division's"Engineering Alternatives Analysis Guidance Document."This Document can
be found at: http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/swp/ps/npdes/permits.
This evaluation is being requested to determine whether there are any economical and technologically
feasible alternatives available to the Permittee to address aquatic toxicity in the plant effluent. Based
upon the evaluation, please identify viable alternatives and present an implementation schedule and
project timeline for the preferred alternative. The Permittee shall submit the Discharge Alternatives
Evaluation to the Division along with the submission of their next permit renewal application (due 6
months prior to permit expiration on March 1,2015)to:
NC DENR/Division of Water Resources/Water Quality Permitting
NPDES, Wastewater Branch
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh,NC 27699-1617
Page 5 of 7

•
Permit NC0080071
(Continued A. (4)ELECTRONIC REPORTING OF DISCHARGE MONITORING REPORTS)
http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/admin/bog/ipu/edmr
Regardless of the submission method, the first DMR is due on the last day of the month following
the issuance of the permit or in the case of a new facility, on the last day of the month following the
commencement of discharge.
2. Signatory Requirements [Supplements Section B. (11.)(b) and supersedes Section B. (11.)(d)1
All eDMRs submitted to the permit issuing authority shall be signed by a person described in Part II,
Section B. (11.)(a) or by a duly authorized representative of that person as described in Part II,
Section B. (11.)(b). A person, and not a position, must be delegated signatory authority for eDMR
reporting purposes.
For eDMR submissions, the person signing and submitting the DMR must obtain an eDMR user
account and login credentials to access the eDMR system. For more information on North
Carolina's eDMR system, registering for eDMR and obtaining an eDMR user account, please visit
the following web page:
http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/admin/bog/ipu/edmr
,s
Certification. Any person submitting an electronic DMR using the state's eDMR system shall make
the following certification [40 CFR 122.22]. NO OTHER STATEMENTS OF CERTIFICATION
WILL BE ACCEPTED:
"I certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were.prepared under my
direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel
properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or
persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information,
the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief true, accurate, and complete. I
am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the
possibility offines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
3. Records Retention [Supplements Section D.(6.)1 '
The permittee shall retain records of all Discharge Monitoring Reports, including eDMR
submissions. These records or copies shall be maintained for a period of at least 3 years from the
date of the report. This period may be extended by request of the Director at any time [40 CFR
122.41].
Page 7 of 7

' ----7-7(...._______ ;
r- / ,
t‘'-..-.''') '1,..e.... .....:„.....' 1
„ .a d I K =;
Pr
.../ rirr"". • •AO ........., I et-)
• `.."t` it r .1
c=i
' i --'-"/ -..* :-....., .‘ ..sj j
I;:demi . ,' VII • - L'\__./ r '),.‘..:,... ,(,,,, • 4
da -i l''.''.
l..t
. -
I. .k V irr1,'"ii (..V-„-;t,'s..e-.;,.:•,:„v!---.-...4,...
{ ', lq...:..._... ` '., •L - _, Vanceboro WTP '` <_. # ✓_.. iiI
_!
.;: •-•. .----- . 1 4?,--- '1,ivit•-, silltdititir 14 '::\ k. ''.'?,a‘
41 x44t) . ) ,•• / . .4..!.3 1 :.F4r*'-ir, ...,,.....1. ....,` lir
•
{ ,:,.,
.' v� l& Discharge ,-
�• -�=; : : -fig t477717.S : (i. NC0080071 � - 1 . ".
., -!.‘,\S,;%,.. ,-. - . , • ., 1 ,4/k. ,
.... A -,...s„ .(----s.... -4-:-. I ,--- --cmc ii: • ----..---.
,U�� - •-
^f'�/ t_ ,
i \,,,:r4'":
'� .- ' ' I . .{ .✓r�T''
`�._Jf t,,tt�� �-.; ..1.' .�. �e:`.-�/ ;��m, } 5 '."_ - "•� .a.- JJ]] LLL,II'T
_.-4 ' \-1\.4 .„, -'.--L— -05
9,,,:--":'-'
[('�J t 1 l
t"tip *'1 �..., ,, l.:::-+/-'- -
_- ,._ CO.. -•!' - -y.. `• ' "'.,.=:. A`2 W r 5 s ..
•
il '''.. -)'..,-,;,..„---' 6-,------C-,zz.7"z- ..4,_ .'"-.- .e''' -2 ,,4:4,,,r-t- ,,,,...,-;((;:-.\\..., ,, ,
1 --',,, 0 r • ,....„, ......,_•• ....., , 0 ,.
i i '' ,, '''.../''r•--...1+••7affee\- : ,7...%:.:11)jr.,1 .., ...;.:24:. i.:..'• .1.--•':-.i.k...........st. 1
Cf'( - (4. '"... ) I
'-•�.+..---1 y _.�.-..- _ -µ me �..t� ti. ...�..,,_.....+...._.�._.�a..- `# • �`` ti....�.`.. _
r ",3 AO i 4.dT f A.,,; ...
f! 1 '•k `-. '* "wfI � , •
/ h (X ,.y,It-' .
__ 1 _ f_ 7 ` 1 '., ' i - .� --�'f
- f �,
S ALE:1 in=24000 ft
USGS Quad: F30SW Vanceboro,NC ` � y* k
Outfall Facility Ar, r�;� z.,
T-atitude: 35° 18' 13.6"N 35° 18' 15.1"N .yr -, h,..r..,,t44 , '"` ,
lode: 77°8' S1.1"W 77° 8' S0.3"W �- `
4, -.€�
ngi ;.J. "+,i �,
Stream Class: C, Sw,NSW Facility Location '.,_: r
North
Subbasin: 03-04-09 HUC: 03020202 Vanceboro WTP NC0080071
Receiving Stream: UT to Mauls Swamp Craven County

Appendix B
TOWN OF VANCEBORO 2018 LOCAL
WATER SUPPLY PLAN

Vanceboro 2018 Nr
The Division of Water Resources(DWR)provides the data contained within this Local Water Supply Plan(LWSP)as a courtesy and service to our customers.
DWR staff does not field verify data.Neither DWR,nor any other party involved in the preparation of this LWSP attests that the data is completely free of errors
and omissions.Furthermore,data users are cautioned that LWSPs labeled PROVISIONAL have yet to be reviewed by DWR staff.Subsequent review may result
in significant revision.Questions regarding the accuracy or limitations of usage of this data should be directed to the water system and/or DWR.
1. System Information
Contact Information
Water System Name: Vanceboro PWSID: 04-25-020 Complete
Mailing Address: PO Box 306 Ownership: Municipality
Vanceboro,NC 28586
Contact Person: Beverly W.Drake Title: Town Clerk
Phone: [phone] Cell/Mobile: --
Secondary Contact: Mike Hit Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 100 Stroud Ave.
Pink Hill,NC 28572 Cell/Mobile: —
Distribution System
Line Type Size Range(Inches) Estimated%of lines
Asbestos Cement 8 5.00
Polyvinyl Chloride 2-6 95.00%
What are the estimated total miles of distribution system lines? 16 Miles
How many feet of distribution lines were replaced during 2018? 0 Feet
How many feet of new water mains were added during 2018? 0 Feet
How many meters were replaced in 2018? 8
How old are the oldest meters in this system? 50 Year(s)
How many meters for outdoor water use,such as irrigation,are not billed for sewer services? 0
What is this system's finished water storage capacity? 0.5500 Million Gallons
Has water pressure been inadequate in any part of the system since last update?Line breaks that were repaired quickly should not be included. No
Programs
Does this system have a program to work or flush hydrants? Yes,As Needed
Does this system have a valve exercise program? No
Does this system have a cross-connection program? No
Does this system have a program to replace meters? Yes
Does this system have a plumbing retrofit program? No
Does this system have an active water conservation public education program? Yes
Does this system have a leak detection program? Yes
As employees ride through out town they are looking leaks.
Water Conservation
What type of rate structure is used? Increasing Block
How much reclaimed water does this system use? 0.0000 MGD For how many connections? 0
Does this system have an interconnection with another system capable of providing water in an emergency? Yes
2.Water Use Information
Service Area
Sub-Basin(s) %of Service Population County(s) %of Service Population
Neuse River(10-1) 100% Craven 100%
What was the year-round population served in 2018? 1,864
Has this system acquired another system since last report? No

Water Use by Type
e
Type of Use Metered Metered Non-Metered Non-Metered
Connections Average Use(MGD) Connections Estimated Use(MGD)
Residential 428 0.0670 0 0.0000
Commercial 41 0.0080 0 0.0000
Industrial 1 0.0020 0 0.0000
Institutional 20 0.0710 0 0.0000
How much water was used for system processes(backwash,line cleaning,flushing,etc.)? 0.0150 MGD
Water Sales
Average Days Contract Required to Pipe Size(s) Use
Purchaser PWSID Daily Sold Used comply with water (Inches) Type
(MGD) MGD Expiration Recurring use restrictions?
Craven County 04-25-055 0.0000 0 Yes Emergency
3.Water Supply Sources
Monthly Withdrawals&Purchases
Average Daily Max Day Average Daily Max Day Average Daily Max Day
Use(MGD) Use(MGD) Use(MGD) Use(MGD) Use(MGD) Use(MGD)
Jan 0.2180 0.3150 May 0.1870 0.3420 Sep 0.1950 0.3830
Feb 0.1820 0.2840 Jun 0.1810 0.2950 Oct 0.1870 0.3050
Mar 0.1790 0.2720 Jul 0.1900 0.2870 Nov 0.1900 0.2810
Apr 0.1820 0.2700 Aug 0.1760 0.2750 Dec 0.1780 0.2920
The meters at the wells had not be calibrated in 20 years.This could be the the 11,000 gpd they is being used for backwash.The system is using raw water to
backwash.The ORC is going to have the well meters calibrated
vanceboro's 2018 Monthly Withdrawals & Purchases
0 1
o
2 ■ Avg Daily
a • Max Day
A
0
v`
a
c ♦
° ♦ • • • ♦ • • • ♦ • •
m
c
0
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Ground Water Sources
Average Daily Withdrawal(MGD) 12-Hour Supply
Name or Number Max Day Withdrawal(MGD) (MGD) CUA Reduction Year Offline Use Type
MGD Days Used
1 0.0940 363 0.268 0.2160 CUAO Regular
2 0.0940 364 0.249 0.2160 CUAO Regular
Ground Water Sources(continued)
Casing Depth Screen Depth(Feet)
Name or Number Well Depth(Feet) Well Diameter(Inches) Pump Intake Depth(Feet) Metered?
(Feet) Top Bottom
1 165 160 128 160 8 105 Yes
2 165 160 128 160 8 105 Yes
Are ground water levels monitored? Yes,Monthly
Does this system have a wellhead protection program? Yes
Water Purchases From Other Systems

1
Average Days Contract Required to Pipe Size(s) Use
Seller PWSID Daily Purchased comply with water
(MGD) Used MGD Expiration Recurring use restrictions? (Inches) Type
Craven County 04-25-055 0.0000 0 Yes No 8 Emergency
Water Treatment Plants
Plant Name Permitted
Capacity Is Raw Water Metered? Is Finished Water Ouput Metered? Source
Vanceboro Water Plant 0.4320 Yes Yes Groundwater Castle Haynes
Did average daily water production exceed 80%of approved plant capacity for five consecutive days during 2018? No
If yes,was any water conservation implemented? No
Did average daily water production exceed 90%of approved plant capacity for five consecutive days during 2018? No
If yes,was any water conservation implemented? No
Are peak day demands expected to exceed the water treatment plant capacity in the next 10 years? No
4. Wastewater Information
Monthly Discharges
Average Daily Average Daily Average Daily
Discharge(MGD) Discharge(MGD) Discharge(MGD)
Jan 0.2190 May 0.2030 Sep 0.2070
Feb 0.2630 Jun 0.1950 Oct 0.1680
Mar 0.2530 Jul 0.1630 Nov 0.2160
Apr 0.2370 Aug 0.2370 Dec 0.2380
Vanceboro's 2018 Monthly Discharges
01
z
T • Avg Daily
a
0
if,
0
0
C
_o
a
C
0 0
f Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
How many sewer connections does this system have? 481
How many water service connections with septic systems does this system have? 2
Are there plans to build or expand wastewater treatment facilities in the next 10 years? No
Wastewater Permits
Average Annual
Permit Number Permitted Capacity Design Capacity Daily Discharge Maximum Day Discharge Receiving Stream Receiving Basin
(MGD) (MGD) (MGD) (MGD)
NC0031828 0.3000 0.3000 0.2170 Swift Creek Neuse River(10-1)
NC0080071 0.0000 0.0000 0.0110 Maul Swamp Neuse River(10-1)
Total discharge from both plants 0.228 MGD.Maul Swamp is the discharge from water plant the 2 wells pump to one water plant.
5. Planning
Projections
2018 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060
Year-Round Population 1,864 1,875 1,914 1,949 2,017 2,111
Seasonal Population 0 0 0 0 0 0
Residential 0.0670 0.0680 0.0700 0.0730 0.0763 0.0801

Commercial 0.0080 0.0071 0.0079 0.0086 0.0095 0.0105
Industrial 0.0020 0.0021 0.0024 0.0027 0.0030 0.0033
Institutional 0.0710 0.0724 0.0797 0.0876 0.0964 0.1060
System Process 0.0150 0.0170 0.0180 0.0190 0.0200 0.0210
Unaccounted-for 0.0242 0.0247 0.0264 0.0283 0.0305 0.0328
The meters at the wells had not be calibrated in 20 years.This could be the the 11,000 gpd they is being used for backwash.The system is using raw water to
backwash.The ORC is going to have the well meters calibrated.
Demand v/s Percent of Supply
2018 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060
Surface Water Supply 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Ground Water Supply 0.4320 0.4320 0.4320 0.4320 0.4320 0.4320
Purchases 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Future Supplies 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total Available Supply(MGD) 0.4320 0.4320 0.4320 0.4320 0.4320 0.4320
Service Area Demand 0.1872 0.1913 0.2044 0.2192 0.2357 0.2537
Sales 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Future Sales 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total Demand(MGD) 0.1872 0.1913 0.2044 0.2192 0.2357 0.2537
Demand as Percent of Supply 43% 44% 47% 51% 55% 59%
JpGraph Error: 25121
l-f r.;,. ,LLry
Empty input data array specified for plot. lust have at
' least one data point.
The purpose of the above chart is to show a general indication of how the long-term per capita water demand changes over time.The per capita water demand may
actually be different than indicated due to seasonal populations and the accuracy of data submitted.Water systems that have calculated long-term per capita water
demand based on a methodology that produces different results may submit their information in the notes field.
Your long-term water demand is 36 gallons per capita per day.What demand management practices do you plan to implement to reduce the per capita water demand
(i.e.conduct regular water audits,implement a plumbing retrofit program,employ practices such as rainwater harvesting or reclaimed water)?If these practices are
covered elsewhere in your plan.indicate where the practices are discussed here.
Are there other demand management practices you will implement to reduce your future supply needs?
What supplies other than the ones listed in future supplies are being considered to meet your future supply needs?
How does the water system intend to implement the demand management and supply planning components above?
Additional Information
Has this system participated in regional water supply or water use planning? Yes,CCPCUA
What major water supply reports or studies were used for planning? CCPCUA
Please describe any other needs or issues regarding your water supply sources,any water system deficiencies or needed improvements(storage,treatment,etc.)or your
ability to meet present and future water needs.Include both quantity and quality considerations,as well as financial,technical,managerial,permitting,and compliance
issues: Radio read meters.
The Division of Water Resources(DWR)provides the data contained within this Local Water Supply Plan(LWSP)as a courtesy and service to our customers.
DWR staff does not field verify data.Neither DWR,nor any other party involved in the preparation of this LWSP attests that the data is completely free of errors
and omissions.Furthermore.data users are cautioned that LWSPs labeled PROVISIONAL have yet to be reviewed by DWR staff.Subsequent review may result
in significant revision.Questions regarding the accuracy or limitations of usage of this data should be directed to the water system and/or DWR.
1

Appendix C
MAULS SWAMP STREAM CLASSIFICATION

NC DENR-DIVISON OF WATER RESOURCES 2B.0300
.0315 NEUSE RIVER BASIN
Name of Stream Description Class Class Date Index No.
rham Swamp From source to Creeping Swamp C;Sw,NSW 05/01/88 27-97-5-3-0.5
Pollard Swamp From source to Creeping Swamp C;Sw,NSW 05/01/88 27-97-5-3-1
Palmetto Swamp From source to Swift Creek C;Sw,NSW 05/01/88 27-97-5.3
Fork Swamp From source to Palmetto Swamp C;Sw,NSW 05/01/88 27-97-5.3-1
Mauls Swamp From source to Swift Creek C;Sw,NSW 05/01/88 27-97-5.7
Swift Creek From mouth of Bear Branch to Neuse SC;Sw,NSW 05/01/88 27-97-(6)
River
Bear Branch From source to Swift Creek C;Sw,NSW 05/01/88 27-97-7
Little Swift Creek From source to Swift Creek C;Sw,NSW 05/01/88 27-97-8
Bushy Fork From source to Little Swift Creek C;Sw,NSW 05/01/88 27-97-8-1
Pine Tree Swamp From source to Little Swift Creek C;Sw,NSW 05/01/88 27-97-8-2
Kit Swamp From source to Little Swift Creek C;Sw,NSW 05/01/88 27-97-8-2.5
Fisher Swamp From source to Little Swift Creek C;Sw,NSW 05/01/88 27-97-8-3
Beaverdam Swamp From source to Fisher Swamp C;Sw,NSW 05/01/88 27-97-8-3-1
Bachelor Creek From source to mouth in Neuse River C;Sw,NSW 05/01/88 27-98
located 3.2 miles more or less
downstream from The Gut
Hollis Branch From source to Bachelor C;Sw,NSW 05/01/88 27-98-1
(Batchelder)Creek
"-Ilover Creek From source to Bachelor C;Sw,NSW 05/01/88 27-98-2
(Batchelder)Creek
ueep Branch From source to Bachelor C;Sw,NSW 05/01/88 27-98-2.1
(Batchelder)Creek
Beaverdam Branch From source to Bachelor C;Sw,NSW 05/01/88 27-98-2.2
(Batchelder)Creek
Jumping Run From source to Bachelor C;Sw,NSW 05/01/88 27-98-2.3
(Batchelder)Creek
Beech Tree Branch From source to Bachelor C;Sw,NSW 05/01/88 27-98-2.4
(Batchelder)Creek
Round Tree Branch From source to Bachelor C;Sw,NSW 05/01/88 27-98-2.5
(Batchelder)Creek
Caswell Branch From source to Bachelor C;Sw,NSW 05/01/88 27-98-2.6
(Batchelder)Creek
The Gut From source to Bachelor C;Sw,NSW 05/01/88 27-98-3
(Batchelder)Creek
Renny Creek From source to Neuse River SC;Sw,NSW 05/01/88 27-99
Mills Branch From source to Neuse River SC;Sw,NSW 05/01/88 27-99.5
Jack Smith Creek From source to Neuse River C;Sw,NSW 05/01/88 27-100
Trent River From source to mouth of Deep Gully C;Sw,NSW 05/01/88 27-101-(1)
Running Branch From source to Trent River C;Sw,NSW 05/01/88 27-101-1.5
Horse Branch From source to Trent River C;Sw,NSW 05/01/88 27-101-2
Beaverdam Swamp From source to Trent River C;Sw,NSW 05/01/88 27-101-3
;hua Creek From source to Trent River C;Sw,NSW 05/01/88 27-101-4
_ .;kyard Branch From source to Joshua Creek C;Sw,NSW 05/01/88 27-101-4-1
Bearwell Branch From source to Joshua Creek C;Sw,NSW 05/01/88 27-101-4-2
24

Appendix D
CRAVEN COUNTY 2018 LOCAL WATER SUPPLY PLAN

2018
Craven County L_
The Division of Water Resources(DWR)provides the data contained within this Local Water Supply Plan(LWSP)as a courtesy and service to our customers.
DWR staff does not field verify data.Neither DWR,nor any other party involved in the preparation of this LWSP attests that the data is completely free of errors
and omissions.Furthermore,data users are cautioned that LWSPs labeled PROVISIONAL have yet to be reviewed by DWR staff.Subsequent review may result
in significant revision.Questions regarding the accuracy or limitations of usage of this data should be directed to the water system and/or DWR.
1. System Information
Contact Information
Water System Name: Craven County PWSID: 04-25-055
Mailing Address: 406 Craven Street L Gmplete
New Bern,NC 28560 Ownership: County
Contact Person: Elliot Thomas Ttle: Water Treatment Plant Supervisor
Phone: [phone] Cell/Mobile. [phone]
Secondary Contact: Nadyne Bentley Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 2830 Neuse Blvd Cell/Mobile: [phone]
New Bern,NC 28562
Distribution System
Line Type Size Range(Inches) Estimated%of lines
Ductile Iron 4-16 1.00%
Other 6-14 1.00%
Polyvinyl Chloride 2-18 98.00%
What are the estimated total miles of distribution system lines? 650 Miles
How many feet of distribution lines were replaced during 2018? 0 Feet
How many feet of new water mains were added during 2018? 0 Feet
How many meters were replaced in 2018? 170
How old are the oldest meters in this system? 35 Year(s)
How many meters for outdoor water use,such as irrigation,are not billed for sewer services? 43
What is this system's finished water storage capacity? 3.4000 Million Gallons
Has water pressure been inadequate in any part of the system since last update?Line breaks that were repaired quickly should not be included. No
Programs
Does this system have a program to work or flush hydrants? Yes,Annually
Does this system have a valve exercise program? Yes,As Needed
Does this system have a cross-connection program? Yes
Does this system have a program to replace meters? Yes
Does this system have a plumbing retrofit program? No
Does this system have an active water conservation public education program? Yes
Does this system have a leak detection program? No
Water Conservation
What type of rate structure is used? Increasing Block
How much reclaimed water does this system use? 0.0000 MGD For how many connections? 0
Does this system have an interconnection with another system capable of providing water in an emergency? Yes
2. Water Use Information
Service Area
Sub-Basin(s) %of Service Population County(s) %of Service Population
Neuse River(10-1) 100% Craven 100%
What was the year-round population served in 2018? 36,250
Has this system acquired another system since last report? No

Water Use by Type
Type of Use Metered Metered Non-Metered Non-Metered
Connections Average Use(MGD) Connections Estimated Use(MGD)
Residential 14,470 1.9832 0 0.0000
Commercial 1,073 0.2031 0 0.0000
Industrial 0 0.0000 0 0.0000
Institutional 0 0.0000 0 0.0000
How much water was used for system processes(backwash,line cleaning,flushing,etc.)? 0.6592 MGD
Water Sales
Average Days Contract Required to pipe Size(s) Use
Purchaser PWSID Daily Sold comply with water
(MGD) Used MGD Expiration Recurring use restrictions? (Inches) Type
Cove City 04-25-045 0.0310 365 0.2500 2025 Yes Yes 6 Regular
First Craven SD 04-25-040 0.0000 0 0.0000 2050 No No 6 Emergency
Havelock 04-25-015 0.4500 14 0.0000 2050 Yes Yes 8 Emergency
Jones County 04-52-020 0.5000 5 No 8 Emergency
New Bern 04-25-010 0.0000 0 0.0000 2050 Yes No 12 Emergency
North River 04-16-197 0.1600 63 0.0000 2050 Yes Yes 6 Emergency
Town of Dover 04-25-025 0.0000 0 0.2500 2050 Yes Yes 6 Emergency
Vanceboro 04-25-020 0.0000 0 0.0000 2050 Yes No 6 Emergency
3.Water Supply Sources
Monthly Withdrawals&Purchases
Average Daily Max Day Average Daily Max Day Average Daily Max Day
Use(MGD) Use(MOD) Use(MGD) Use(MGD) Use(MGD) Use(MGD)
Jan 3.6020 5.6040 May 3.0200 5.5430 Sep 3.5760 6.2490
Feb 2.7160 3.8730 Jun 2.9030 4.0430 Oct 3.2080 4.8700
Mar 2.9240 3.9080 Jul 3.0520 4.3650 Nov 2.6720 3.5890
1 Apr 2.9710 5.3470 Aug 2.9640 4.5550 Dec 2.6380 5.0300
Craven County's 2018 Monthly Withdrawals& Purchases
0 8
t.,
E • Avg Daily
o • Max Day
6
a •
`, ♦ ♦ •
a- ♦ 0
0 4 ♦ ♦ •
L
c
- 2
f Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Ground Water Sources
Average Daily Withdrawal 12-Hour
Name or Number (MGD) Max Day Withdrawal Supply CUA Year Use
(MGD) (MGD) Reduction Offline Type
MGD Days Used
Bryan 0.3270 212 1.004 0.7200 CUA25 Regular
Bryan PD 0.0690 210 0.175 0.1120 CUAO Regular
Davis 0.2840 82 1.273 0.5760 CUA25 Regular
Davis PD 0.0660 41 0.237 0.1150 CUAO Regular
Planners Beach#2- 0.2550 342 0.805 0.5760 CUAO Regular
W13
Planners Beach#3- 0.3470 332 0.849 0.5760 CUAO Regular
W08

•
Flanners Beach#4- 0.3450 333 0.774 0.5760 CUAO Regular
W06
Flanners Beach#5-
W09 0.2380 68 0.659 0.5760 CUAO Regular
Ft Bamwell 0.3110 250 1.281 0.5400 CUA25 Regular
Ft Bamwell PD 0.0560 64 0.176 0.0860 CUAO Regular
Lewis Farm Rd#1-W11 0.3340 340 0.762 0.5760 CUAO Regular
Stately Pines#2-W12 0.2640 339 0.736 0.5760 CUAO Regular
Stately Pines#3-W10 0.3000 341 0.881 0.5760 CUAO Regular
Water Plant Well-W07 0.3380 338 0.818 0.5760 CUAO Regular
Wells 0.3640 244 1.513 0.5400 CUA25 Regular
Well 5 PD 0.0590 237 0.230 0.0940 CUAO Regular
Wintergreen 0.3270 272 1.272 0.5760 CUA25 Regular
Wintergreen PD 0.0690 45 0.169 0.1800 CUAO Regular
Ground Water Sources(continued)
Casing Depth Screen Depth(Feet)
Name or Number Well Depth(Feet) (Feet) To Bottom Well Diameter(Inches) Pump Intake Depth(Feet) Metered?
P
Bryan 804 535 535 788 10 320 Yes
Bryan PD 312 262 262 302 10 252 Yes
Davis 828 714 714 818 10 240 Yes
Davis PD 338 303 303 338 10 296 Yes
Flanners Beach#2-W13 250 250 205 245 12 100 Yes
Flanners Beach#3-W08 247 247 202 242 12 100 Yes
Flanners Beach#4-W06 250 250 205 245 12 115 Yes
Flanners Beach#5-W09 255 255 210 250 12 100 Yes
Ft Bamwell 800 495 495 698 10 270 Yes
Ft Bamwell PD 242 197 197 237 10 191 Yes
Lewis Farm Rd#1-W11 280 280 235 275 12 115 Yes
Stately Pines#2-W12 271 271 226 266 12 110 Yes
Stately Pines#3-W10 261 261 216 256 12 100 Yes
Water Plant Well-W07 280 280 235 275 12 115 Yes
Well 5 708 606 606 698 10 287 Yes
Well 5 PD 283 253 253 273 10 242 Yes
Wintergreen 800 535 535 780 10 270 Yes
Wintergreen PD 330 280 280 320 10 276 Yes
Are ground water levels monitored? Yes,Monthly
Does this system have a wellhead protection program? No
The Division of Water Resources Local Water Supply Plan database does not currently accurately track allowable groundwater withdrawals regulated by
Central Coastal Plain Capacity Use Area Permits.These allowable withdrawals are regulated by that Permit rather than the design capacity of the system's
wells.Therefore,the allowable withdrawal from the system's wells in 2018 was only 6.2283 MGD rather than the 12-hr well capacity of 8.1470 MGD.This
reduction effectively increases the Demand as Percent of Supply shown in Section 5 of the Plan from 38%to 50%.
Water Purchases From Other Systems
Required to
Average Contract
comply with Pipe
Seller PWSID Daily Days water Size(s) Use
Purchased Used MGD Expiration Recurring use (Inches) Type
(MGD) restrictions?
First Craven 0040 0.0000 0 0.0000 2050 No No 6 Emergency
Havelock 04-25-
0.0000 0 0.0000 2050 Yes Yes 8 Emergency
Jones County Regional Water 04-52- 0.0000 0 0.0000 2050 Yes Yes 8 Emergency
System 020
New Bem 010 0.0000 0 0.0000 2050 Yes Yes 8 Emergency
North River 0197 0.0000 0 0.0000 2050 No Yes 3 Emergency
Vanceboro 04-25- 0.0000 0 0.0000 2050 Yes Yes 8 Emergency
020

Water Treatment Plants
Plant Name Permitted Capacity Is Raw Water Metered? Is Finished Water Ouput Metered? Source
Bryan/PeeDee Well 0.8320 Yes Yes Black Creek/PeeDee
Craven County Water Treatment 3.0000 Yes Yes Castle Hayne Aquifer
Davis/PeeDee Well 0.6910 Yes Yes BlackCreek/PeeDee
Dover/Pee Dee Well 0.6260 Yes Yes Black Creek/PeeDee
Well#5/PeeDee 0.6340 Yes Yes Black Creek/PeeDee
Wintergreen/PeeDee Well 0.7560 Yes Yes BlackCreek/PeeDee
Did average daily water production exceed 80%of approved plant capacity for five consecutive days during 2018? No
If yes,was any water conservation implemented? No
Did average daily water production exceed 90%of approved plant capacity for five consecutive days during 2018? No
If yes,was any water conservation implemented? No
Are peak day demands expected to exceed the water treatment plant capacity in the next 10 years? No
4.Wastewater Information
Monthly Discharges
Average Daily Average Daily Average Daily
Discharge(MGD) Discharge(MGD) Discharge(MGD)
Jan 0.7106 May 0.6451 Sep 0.7814
Feb 0.5732 Jun 0.6308 Oct 0.6593
Mar 0.6347 Jul 0.6587 Nov 0.5818
Apr 0.6455 Aug 0.6038 Dec 0.5646
Craven County's 2018 Monthly Discharges
0 1
o
1
T ■ Avg Daily
A
0
`v
a
c
0
m
0
c
0 0
M Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
How many sewer connections does this system have? 0
How many water service connections with septic systems does this system have? 9,910
Are there plans to build or expand wastewater treatment facilities in the next 10 years? No
Wastewater Permits
Average Annual
Permit Number Permitted Capacity Design Capacity Daily Discharge Maximum Day Discharge Receiving Stream Receiving Basin
(MGD) (MGD) (MGD) (MGD)
NC0089460 1.2000 1.2000 0.6396 1.1920 Neuse River Neuse River(10-1)
Although we state that we have a 1.2 MGD flow limit we do not actually have a maximum flow limit.At our current production of 3 MGD,1.2 MGD would be the
most we could discharge.
5. Planning
Projections
2018 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060
Year-Round Population 36,250 35,564 41,593 48,645 56,892 62,500
Seasonal Population 0 0 0 0 0 0

Residential 1.9832 1.9560 2.2876 2.6755 3.1291 3.4375
Commercial 0.2031 0.2800 0.3300 0.3900 0.4500 0.5000
Industrial 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Institutional 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
System Process 0.6592 0.6600 0.6700 0.6800 0.6900 0.7000
Unaccounted-for 0.1925 0.3210 0.3210 0.3210 0.3210 0.3210
Future Water Sales
Contract
Purchaser PWSID Pipe Size(s)(Inches) Use Type
MGD Year Begin Year End
CCPCUA 00-00-000 0.0800 2019 2061 Regular
The sale identified as to the CCPCUA is not actually a sale but a reduction in the available supply due to the conditions of the CCPCUA Permit issued to the
County.
-..-J Demand v/s Percent of Supply
2018 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060
Surface Water Supply 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Ground Water Supply 8.1470 5.9330 5.9330 5.9330 5.9330 5.9330
Purchases 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Future Supplies 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total Available Supply(MGD) 8.1470 5.9330 5.9330 5.9330 5.9330 5.9330
Service Area Demand 3.0380 3.2170 3.6086 4.0665 4.5901 4.9585
Sales 0.0827 0.2500 0.2500 0.2500 0.2500 0.2500
Future Sales 0.0800 0.0800 0.0800 0.0800 0.0800
Total Demand(MGD) 3.1207 3.5470 3.9386 4.3965 4.9201 5.2885
Demand as Percent of Supply 38% 60% 66% 74% 83% 89%
7 JpGraph Error: 25121
Empty input data array specified for plot. Must have at
Q least one data point.
The purpose of the above chart is to show a general indication of how the long-term per capita water demand changes over time.The per capita water demand may
actually be different than indicated due to seasonal populations and the accuracy of data submitted.Water systems that have calculated long-term per capita water
demand based on a methodology that produces different results may submit their information in the notes field.
Your long-term water demand is 55 gallons per capita per day.What demand management practices do you plan to implement to reduce the per capita water demand
(i.e.conduct regular water audits,implement a plumbing retrofit program,employ practices such as rainwater harvesting or reclaimed water)?If these practices are
covered elsewhere in your plan,indicate where the practices are discussed here.
Are there other demand management practices you will implement to reduce your future supply needs? Continue to promote Water Conservation Education.
What supplies other than the ones listed in future supplies are being considered to meet your future supply needs? Our Water Treatment Plant is easily expandable by
an additional 2MGD for a total supply of 7.933MGD
How does the water system intend to implement the demand management and supply planning components above? Continue to promote Water Conservation by the
customer.Carefully monitor the growth of our customer base and plan according to large growth suddenly.
Additional Information
Has this system participated in regional water supply or water use planning? No
What major water supply reports or studies were used for planning?
Please describe any other needs or issues regarding your water supply sources,any water system deficiencies or needed improvements(storage,treatment,etc.)or your
ability to meet present and future water needs.Include both quantity and quality considerations,as well as financial,technical,managerial,permitting,and compliance
issues:
The Division of Water Resources(DWR)provides the data contained within this Local Water Supply Plan(LWSP)as a courtesy and service to our customers.
DWR staff does not field verify data.Neither DWR,nor any other party involved in the preparation of this LWSP attests that the data is completely free of errors

and omissions.Furthermore,data users are cautioned that LWSPs labeled PROVISIONAL have yet to be reviewed by DWR staff.Subsequent review may result
in significant revision.Questions regarding the accuracy or limitations of usage of this data should be directed to the water system and/or DWR.

Appendix E
CCPCUA DATA FOR CRAVEN COUNTY

Department of Errmronmr About DWR•Contact Us•Jobs•News•Calendar•Staff
Division of Water Resources GoogleSearch_
Central Coastal Plain Capacity Use Area Permit Data for Craven County Water
Permit holder Craven County Water Application Received 06/11/2019 Abbreviation Aquifer
Permit number CU3108 Application Complete 06/10/2019 S Surfiaal
Permit status Active Application Public Notice 06/19/2019 Tu Upper Tertiary
Ty Yorktown
County Craven Draft Permit Public Notice 07/09/2019 Tch Castle Hayne
Type of Use Public Supply Issue Date 08/02/2019 Tb Beaufort
Cretaceous Water Bank Yes Expiration Date 07/31/2024 Kpd Peedee
Bank Start Date 08/01/2007 Date First Issued 11/08/2004 Kbc Black Creek
Withdrawals Not Subiect to.0503 Reductions 5,767,200 Aquifer:Tch, No.of 14 Kucf Upper Cape Fear
Permitted Maximum Daily Ground Water Kpd Wells: Klcf Lower Cape Fear
Withdrawal(in GPD): Br Basement Rock
Withdrawals Subject to.0503 Reductions 952,790,700 Aquifer:Kbc, No.of 5 North Carolina--,.,fer Information
Approved Base Rate(in GPY): Kucf Wells:
Temporary Permit Withdrawal Rate(in Ground Water Management Branch web site
Future Permitted Annual Withdrawal Rates(in GPY) GPY)
August 1,2008 through July 31,2013 714,593,025 Beginning on 2019-08-02 476,395,350
August 1,2013 through July 31,2018 476,395,350
August 1,2018 238,197,675
This permittee has filed a Local Water Supply Plan.Click!c<:,to review their plan.Access this permit holder's withdrawal data formatted for Local Water Supply Planning
for all wells and individual wells.
Access any Local Water Supply Plan here.
Water Withdrawal Statistics for Craven County Water(CU3108)
Wells Not Subject to.0503 Reductions
Calendar Year Typ• Year Total(gallons)11Average Day(gallons/day)1)Maximum Day(gallons/day of Days
2009 Well! 140,516,2001 443,2691 846,9001 317
2010 Well1 146,611,3001 431,2101 811,7001 340
2011 Well 1 161,448,9001 445,9911 927,7001 362
2012 Well1 150,922,5001 412,3571 868,2001 366
2013 Wells 142,838,5001 391,3381 698,5001 365
' 2014 Well1 147,345,6001 403,6871 812,50C 365
2015 Well1 129,595,2001 372,4001 751,5001 348
1 _Well] 125,772,4001 345,5291 582,0001 364
2017 Well 1 256,876,541 703,7711 2,830,5001 365
2018 Wells 795,045,0001L 2,178,2051 3,671,20c 365
2019 Well 534,495,201 2,199,569 4,049,211 243
Wells Subject to.0503 Reductions
Au!ust 1 through July 31 Years
Year ear Total(gallons 'verage Day(gallons/day aximum Day(gallons/day of Days
8-1-1996 thru 7-31-199 345,922,551 2,203,328 8,511,101 157
:1-1997 thru 731-199c 292,234,5$$ 2,301,05• 9,178,30$ 127
8-1-1999 thru 7-31- 11. 742,550,70$ 2,911,964 12,416,401 255
:1-2001 thru 731-200. 450,194,201 2,981,419 11,970,90• 151
:1-2002 thru 731-200' 578,502,20s 3,060,858 10,807,211 189
:1-20031hru 731-21., 780,371,600 2,645,327 11,584,700 295
8-1-20041hru 7-31-200 834,865,511 2,293,587 4,105,.11 364
8-1-2005 thru 731- 1.. 846,481,501 2,331,905 7,761,401 363
8-1-2006 thru 731-200 880,057,60i 2,411,117 4,171,60$ 365
:1-2007 thru 7-31-Z00: 898,660,605 2,455,35 I 4,109, 11 366
8-1-2008 thru 7-31-200• 785,592,701 2,152,309 3,998,801 365
8-1-2009 thru 731-2011 729,595,001 1,999,164 4,011,701 365
8-1-2010 thru 731-2011 679,178,401 1,860,76 3,549,100 365
8-1-2011 thru 731-2012 733,212,201 2,014,31• 5,298,001 364
8-1-2012 thru731-201 627,253,5o. 1,718,50 3,343,100 365
8-1-2013 thru 731-201, 683,546,601 1,872,7 1 3,273,201 365
8-1-2014 thru 731-201 692,014,101 1,895,92' 3,449,901 365
8-1-2015 thru 731-201: 684,839,801 1,871,14 3,455,001 366
8-1-2016 thru 7-31-201 717,277,701_ 1,965,1 • 3,303,400 365
:1-11 thru 1- . 391,475,31• 1,072,53 3,158,101
8-1-2018 thru 7-31-201• 352,930,111 966,932 2,631,901
:1-2019 thru 7-31-202. 27,551,001 888,74 1,856,001 31
ABR Calculation
Year f Ruie.050311Year Total(gallons)f Average Day(gallons/day)�Maximum Day(gallons/day)f_ of Days
1-1-1999 thru 7-31-20,. 11 yes 11 742,550,70011 2,911,9641 12,416,40011 2551
i 1997 !1 Yes 11 638,157,05011 2,247,0321 9,178,30011 2841

Craven Count Water CU3108 Well Information
Pump Production
Land Pump Top Bottom quite Well
Capacity Well .0503 or
Surface iiamete Intake,creen Screen Top .0503 Geo Cons Pump
Source (gallons Depth •quifer(s Type Reduction Status Monitoring
levation (inches) Depth Depth Depth Depth Zone Logs Form Diagram
(feet) minper ute (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) Well?. Wel P or (GW1)
M
tBarnwe[' 4900 20 800 300 495 696 800 364 Kbc,Kuct El]Imo E'fEgo P rim .w-1 es
1 ®i� 40.00 20 1,000 300® 788 798 424 bc,Kucf 1211 EumiEzz'® P no .w-1 es
® ntergree'. 45.00 19 800 300® 780 800 430 bc,Kucf Mal MIZ■ .'® P no .w-1 es
®Elm= 41.00 20 790 240 NEE 818 828 464 bc,Kucf IEMININIMEMI® P no .w-1 no
' ®MI= 40.00 19 ME 287 606 698 708 420 Kbc,Kucf EMI`m♦TEM®_ P rm .w-1 es
mtergreer. 44.00 10 250. 280 320 330 N pd MI no Existing 0 P .sketch no
'nes 2 30.00 12 800.IIMEM®MI EMI MI no Existing 0 P no gw-1 yes
I Mill 26.00 12 800.®® 280®�CM no Existing 0 P no gw-1 yes
'Hardison 28.00 24 ®MI� 300 60 no Proposed 0 P II
0
®.tDBamwen 49.00 10 El®1121®BIM Kpd CI no Existing 0 P III sketch no
30.00 12 80t' 107=MEI®=el no Existing 0 P no gw-1 yes
_ 28.00 12 80$ 107 210 250 OM 12 no Existing 0 P no gw-1 yes
28.00 12 80.® 205 ME:®IIMICI
no Existing 0 P no gw-1 yes
ISHE 26.00 12 80.El Elm mum izi no Existing 0 P no gw-1 yes
®BM 26.00 12 80t11111 205 Mil250®MI no Existing 0 P no gw-1 yes
®IMMUNI 43.00 10 200 296 303 338 348 306 I pd ISM no Existing 0 P -sketch no
®=11= 40 00 10 250® 262 302®mil' pd MB no Existing 0 P _sketch no
® P Site 22.00 12 800®IEEE® 280 69 EMI IMMI no Existing 0 P no gw-1 yes
El.PD 41.00 10 130 M®®M .d IZZIno Existing 000 sketch no
pump intake below top of screen;pump intake below top of screen and top of aquifer,pump intake below top of aquifer
Return to the Central Coastal Plain Capacity Use Area Web Page
NC Division of Water Resources,DEQ-1611 Mail Service Center-Raleigh,NC 27699-1611 Last Modified:04.15.2019
Phone:[phone]-Fax:[phone]
Comments,questions,or problems?Please contact the DWR Webmaster.

Appendix F
NEUSE RIVER STREAM CLASSIFICATION

NC DENR-DIVISON OF WATER RESOURCES 2B.0300
. 0315 NEUSE RIVER BASIN
Name of Stream Description Class Class Date Index No.
ack Swamp From source to Little Contentnea C;Sw,NSW 05/01/88 27-86-26-2
Creek
Langs Mill Run From source to Black Swamp C;Sw,NSW 05/01/88 27-86-26-2-1
Jacob Branch From source to Black Swamp C;Sw,NSW 05/01/88 27-86-26-2-2
Oldwoman Branch From source to Little Contentnea C;Sw,NSW 05/01/88 27-86-26-3
Creek
Pinelog Branch From source to Little Contentnea C;Sw,NSW 05/01/88 27-86-26-4
Creek
Middle Swamp From source to Little Contentnea C;Sw,NSW 05/01/88 27-86-26-5
Creek
Sandy Run From source to Middle Swamp C;Sw,NSW 05/01/88 27-86-26-5-1
Eagle Swamp From source to Contentnea Creek C;Sw,NSW 05/01/88 27-86-27
Alum Springs Branch From source to Neuse River C;Sw,NSW 05/01/88 27-86.5
Grinnel Slough From soruce to Neuse River C;Sw,NSW 05/01/88 27-87
Grinnel Creek From source to Neuse River C;Sw,NSW 05/01/88 27-87.5
Halfmoon Creek From source to Neuse River C;Sw,NSW 05/01/88 27-88
Village Creek From source to Neuse River C;Sw,NSW 05/01/88 27-89
Core Creek From source to Neuse River C;Sw,NSW 05/01/88 27-90
Grape Creek From source to Core Creek C;Sw,NSW 05/01/88 27-90-1
Mill Branch From source to Core Creek C;Sw,NSW 05/01/88 27-90-2
at Swamp From source to Core Creek C;Sw,NSW 05/01/88 27-90-3
Turkey Quarter Creek From source to Neuse River C;Sw,NSW 05/01/88 27-91
Mill Run From source to Turkey Quarter Creek C;Sw,NSW 05/01/88 27-91-1
McCoy Branch From source to Mill Run C;Sw,NSW 05/01/88 27-91-1-1
Taylor Creek From source to Neuse River C;Sw,NSW 05/01/88 27-92
Greens Thoroughfare From source to Neuse River C;Sw,NSW 05/01/88 27-93
Stony Branch From source to Neuse River C;Sw,NSW 05/01/88 27-94
Pinetree Creek From source to Neuse River C;Sw,NSW 05/01/88 27-95
NEUSE RIVER From Streets Ferry to a line across SC;Sw,NSW 05/01/88 27-(96)
Neuse River from Johnson Point to
McCotter Point
Swift Creek From source to mouth of Bear C;Sw,NSW 05/01/88 27-97-(0.5)
Branch
Gum Swamp From source to Swift Creek C;Sw,NSW 05/01/88 27-97-1
Nobel Canal From source to Swift Creek C;NSW 05/01/88 27-97-2
Horsepen Swamp From source to Swift Creek C;Sw,NSW 05/01/88 27-97-3
Simmon Branch From source to Swift Creek C;Sw,NSW 05/01/88 27-97-3.5
Fork Swamp From source to Swift Creek C;Sw,NSW 05/01/88 27-97-4
Clayroot Swamp From source to Swift Creek C;Sw,NSW 05/01/88 27-97-5
iorofare Swamp From souce to Clayroot Swamp C;Sw,NSW 05/01/88 27-97-5-1
Indian Well Swamp From source to Clayroot Swamp C;Sw,NSW 05/01/88 27-97-5-2
Creeping Swamp From source to Clayroot Swamp C;Sw,NSW 05/01/88 27-97-5-3
23

Appendix G
ROUTE FOR ALTERNATIVE DISCHARGE

-44, IIlik
lor
*4
4.0. aill OA
lift: rt,
II
Je-
40klit
*]
---
441bik
Ir
1
411111111% 1
f / \
I ,I _( .4 III• 5.4j 17
Craven County GIS Vanceboro WTP 6 _3
��,,��,?11��art' 1 inch =5000 feet
Craven County does NOT warrant the information shown on this map and should be used ONLY for tax assessment purposes. Printed on September 9,2019 at 5.19:29 PM !4'�'^'!A- N
sue. 'v

NC Surface Water Clas... .ication
1111r:n eboro
)
441
fi,91
.amPbe ii'it6 4. ..
StA I s.I'
.-
....
\ le
. C.
Ir?
..i
-0.-
0.
si
\ '3
0..44 , r.,_...., -
d., Erroll
4, r--re -11
• ...--'4<' :.
—
---•-,
, N
,
‘ Nhai ..-..\\tii
(
3 2"
141411ki \1\
,
,.