Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20191295 Ver 1_Updated Figure_20190930From: Bodnar, Gregg To: Weychert, Curtis R; Pelletier, Josh R CIV CESAW CESAD (USA); Dunn, Maria T.; Scarbraugh, Anthony Cc: Carver, Yvonne Subject: FW: [External] Re: McCollister Date: Monday, September 30, 2019 7:45:00 AM Attachments: image001.pnno McCollister CAMA Maj SH3.pdf Morning all, Updated workplan showing the cross section. An error occurred on the original workplan that showed the vertical clearance at 3' instead of 4' which is noted throughout the MP -5 and the bio -report. This is the same clearance as the bridge upstream of the project site. Thanks, Gregg From: Doug Dorman <dougdaec@gmail.com> Sent: Friday, September 27, 2019 11:45 AM To: Bodnar, Gregg <gregg.bodnar@ncdenr.gov> Cc: Carver, Yvonne <yvonne.carver@ncdenr.gov> Subject: [External] Re: McCollister External email. Do no c�ic��links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as a JjWchmentto reiport.sl2am(@nc.gov Gregg, Yes it should be 4' on the drawing. Here is the updated drawing. Let me know if you need anything else. Thank you, Doug Dorman Atlantic Environmental Consultants, LLC PO Box 3266 Kitty Hawk, NC 27949 252-261-7707 office 252-599-2603 cell On Fri, 27 Sep 2019 at 11:21, Bodnar, Gregg <gregg.bodnar(@ncdenr.gov> wrote: Morning Doug, I noticed on the application that you mention on the MP -5 and other places that the vertical clearance of the bridge above NWL is 4 foot. The workplans note 3 foot. Can you verify that 4 foot is correct and provide an updated workplan? Thanks and have a great weekend, G regg GreggBodnar Assistant Major Permits Coordinator Division of Coastal Management :!:�fDEQ - :.. Department of Environmental Quality eu.�+...torro�.«�+ru�.r�` 252 808 2808 ext 215 (Office) G re-g-g.6odnar0ncdenr.-gov Emorl correspondence to and from this address is subject to the Barth Carolina Public Records taw and may be disclosed to third parties, PROPOSED GEOTEXTILE FABRIC TO PROPOSED GRAVEL DRIVEWAY BE INSTALLED UNDER #57 STONE 4" MIN. 57 STONE) 12' 77 EXISTING GRADE �, ,llJ, ,111111=— 111111=— 111111=— I lll=-111 111 111 —L� I I=1J1 ILI��=1J1 1 I_I�� 11l -1��1 I I� 11,-_�I I I—III I I—III—I I I� I I—III—III—III—III I I—III—III—III—III—III—III—III—III—I II �-fi,� 1=111�TI=III—III=—Tff=-1T=III= 1=III=III=III=III=III=III=III=III=III= � T I,,ll�l---ll1�11=—ll1=—lll„1.11, � 1111�J_I 111=—L1=1� 1—�ll---111=L1 111,;,1 i- 11-III-III—III- III,-III—III—III—III II—III=III— TYPICAL DRIVEWAY CROSS SECTION N.T.S. NOTES: 1. THE # 57 STONE IS NOT TO BE MIXED WITH OTHER AGGREGATE MATERIAL. 2. THE # 57 STONE IS TO BE LAID AT LEAST FOUR INCHES THICK. 3. THE #57 STONE IS TO BE LAID OVER GEOTEXTILE FABRIC. 4. THE #57 STONE AND GEOTEXTILE FABRIC IS NOT TO BE PLACED ON TOP OF AN IMPERVIOUS MATERIAL SUCH AS CRUSH AND RUNOR ASPHALT. 5. THE #57 STONE AREA WILL NOT USE AN UNDERDRAIN SYSTEM. 6. THE GEOTEXTILE FABRIC IS PERMEABLE AND COMPRISED OF NON -BIODEGRADABLE 7. THE SOIL ON WHICH THE #57 STONE WILL BE PLACED WIL NOT BE MECHANICALLY COMPACTED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. 12' P.T. 4"X6" FLOOR JOISTS THOUGHOUT P.T. 2"X8" DECKING 3-2"X12" P.T. GIRDER 8"x8" P.T. PILINGS 3'4"' OC --III: 111111= 111 ''—III—ITI�TI—I I r 3'4" 3'4" 3'4•• I ISI II ImmII 11 11 I�F II 1-1 I I II I II 11= I' r it 111111 ISI II I'` 1=1 I Tff - -11 IT BRIDGE CROSS SECTION N.T.S. EXISTING GRADE PROPOSED GRAVEL DRIVEWAY PROPOSED GRAVEL DRIVEWAY 4"X6" P.T. BUMPER (4" MIN. 57 STONE) (4" MIN. 57 STONE) BRIDGESABUTMENTILL TO,,, 2"X12" P.T. GIRDER NE PROPOSED WETLAND FILL I -I - --rte ---- -----=I I AREA 435 SF r I- PROPOSED BACKFILL TO _-11 BRIDGE ABUTMENT _I—I I I 1—' "- "'—' "'—' PROPOSED WETLAND FILL BRIDGE ABUTMENT AREA 30 SF 20' AVG. BRIDGE ABUTMENT 8"x8" P.T. PILINGS BRIDGE CROSS SECTION SHEET 2 OF 2 N.T.S. BRIDGE & DRIVEWAY DETAILS CAMA MAJOR PERMIT FRISCO — DARE COUNTY — NORTH CAROLINA o' NTS ArZOT/C ENIi/R0Nti1EN ,4Z CONSULTANTS, LLC GRAPHIC SCALE 1'•= NTS P.O. 90X3266, KITTY H,4W1( N.C. 27949 (252)261-7707, e-mail doagdaec®gmail. oom DATE: 7/30/19 REVISED: FILE: McCollister CAMA DRAWN BY: DAD