760061_Inspection_20190917

iType of Visit: 'p Compliance Inspection U Operation Review
for Visit:
Date
Arrival Time: LSlI
i
I
0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Departure Time: � Caunty:gQft U Region: �AS12-0
Farm Name: W CC A ' Q� 1 Owner Email: 1'�'b C(11;Y7I Q \c4J�(DY IV I lOt -
y,y V)'
Owner Name: �n m. C(� �_ " Phone:
Mailing Address: P� � R (, d,� ,y®QI t fG 0c,
Physical Address: )fjo' M 11 I f—ayl Pi . , a (JNc'\ 0 G' ,
Facility Contact: 6 0
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Title:
Phone:
Integrator:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Latitude: ��j y �j t ��j l , Longitude: 'Yj to
V S -2j t d t 1 S
% Raba c-e-t` an P2�� `; kk eaG+�
13vs 3 t 1
1. Q'- 9-A0x0 %+
90:- 24
(z (L dLan
1
,
Im
kh
i I
� W .,{f�
• I; Wean to Finish
Layer
1 Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder
Non -Layer
Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish
I ;j:��I�'�'C�f�f"4111
Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean_
I' '' I
( (
D Cow
Farrow to Feeder
Non -Dairy
Farrow to Finish
Layers
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -Layers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
lBeef Brood Cow
Turkeys
I —Turkey Poults
Other�nu
Other
4I
Y 4 I i� iti 't @i Ittt f -,' .
[ dlfl.+
i f��dli
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ YesN No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [—]No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
NNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
IV No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Page I of 3 21412015 Continued

Facility Number: -fol jDate of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes IR No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
C ruc re 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: OKuef ei{—
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes �] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes UN
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
o any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes n No ❑ NA � NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
[—]Yes
[—]No
NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Pending ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals
(Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge
into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved
Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
❑ No
K NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
4 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
[�f No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
f No
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? rf 5x k4b"ppropriu ox-bolow, Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
I —I. , b r_7.,. t ��
-.,�ste�4pp 'eaEi®n� Weekly Freeboard �-.�sxe'inmY�is ❑Sot Analysis ❑*Aaste4wmsfmrs �erS�de
IUI Rainfall Sto km Greg Y-i®M ❑4i@-Nfitmte-htspechons JN Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ?
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes allo ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No JANA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facility Number: 'C jDate of Inspection: Vfj j
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes 1 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes 77❑�No A NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey [:]Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
❑ Yes
IVI No
WN
❑ NA
❑ NE
[—]Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes N No ❑ NA ❑ NE
[:]Yes
JAJ
rI4V1 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
•1 /No
❑ NA
❑ NE
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAMW?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
( f exs. Mt n^ 16zvs �ciock u)� $AY2csnn lea [iSvkS .
'fla�-�11-6
• V
CA,-tCZS� r cavv� . L.t3t` �Ge c Itx1o�„
�.51vCZV1U'A wmGA-z-'�6n3'h dr�S%LC16 -t"
Wore piavis 0Qdcl-e5? Coo up-la..e's °b �lc_n , S"ht( Loof—y-;
Coy i-ac�--•RP-y--A-j ptty Cass' stav\(J--
aye e oycUxeck
,yl(k11��i SON ►COL+'zm S� nce tc, t n qZC h N) I CCOLA w r- tj( W9_ L6e
Ci�4 (YA16 wsvtl 6f MIWY-d dvnj\► V\uYrN cao-xf
Reviewer/Inspector
Reviewer/Inspector
Page 3 of 3
Phone: aj
Date:
2/4/2015