20060981 Ver 1_Mitigation Evaluation_20090421

f c3Lx L a
i
Mitigation Project Evaluations: Information Table
NC Division of Water Quality
Date of Office Review: 4- z_ -
Date of Report
Date of Field Review: C)
Other Individuals/Agencies Present:
Weather Conditions (today & recent)
Directions to Site:
1. Office Review Information:
Project Number: 20060981
Project Name: Modlin Property Wetland Restoration
County(ies): Martin
Basin & subbasin: Roanoke 03010107
Nearest Stream: Cooper Swamp
Water Quality Class of Nearest Stream:
Mitigator Type: Full-Delivery (EEP)
DOT Status:
Total Mitigation on Site
Wetland: 40 acres
Stream:
Buffer:
N utr. Offset:
Evaluator's Name(s):
Report for Monitoring Year: Z
Evaluator's Name(s): , » f K
Proiect Histo
Event Event Date
Report Receipt: Monitoring 5/27/2008
j Report Receipt: Monitoring 2/12/2009
4/ y
lc?
Approved mitigation plan available? Yes No
Monitoring reports available? Yes No
Problem areas identified in reports? Yes No
I
Problem areas addressed on site? Yes No
Mitigation required on site:
*Add significant project-related events: reports,
Associated impacts (if known): received, construction, planting, repairs, etc.
During office review, note success criteria and evaluate each component based on monitoring report
results. Record relevant data in Sections II and III.
On back of sheet, note other information found during office review and/or to be obtained during site visit.
II. Summary of Results:
Monitoring Success Success
Mitigation Component Year (report) (field) Resolved
20060981-1 40 acres Wetland (Riverine) Restoration
Version 1.0 (August 22, 2007) Page 1 of 2
Mitigation Project Evaluations: Information Table `
NC Division of Water Quality
MITIGATION SUCCESS:
Compared to the approved mitigation plan, this project is: successful partially successful unsuccessful
List specific reasons for lack of success for this project:
Additional comments (e.g. DWQ follow-up actions, recommendations, etc.):
I

Version 1.0 (August 22, 2007) Page 2 of 2
' Wetland Mitigation Project Evaluations: Information Table
NC Division of Water Quality
Component: 40 acres Wetland (Riverine) Restoration Component ID: 20060981-1
Description: BLH, shcrub shrub, emergent via conversion of ditch draining to Cooper Swamp
Location within project:
III. Success Criteria Evaluation:
HYDROLOGY - Approved Success Criteria: 2 L etland Hydrology Indicators: `z
Z Inundated
Saturated in upper 12 inches 720
Drift lines
Monitoring report indicates success Yes No
Observational field data agrees? Yes No Drainage patterns in wetlands
based on mitigation plan? Yes No Sediment deposits
based on wetland type? Yes No Water marks
List any remaining hydrology issues to address (e.g. remaining ditches, excessive water, etc.):
O-A Kk.ti -+K-U ? J?ar-
OILS - Approved Success Criteria: 55? w•eQ, t7be?'
'Are soils hydric or becomth ' Yes No List indicators of hYdric s", C?c.
List any remaining soil issues to address
' lP LC?iCC.!? n1 C e (e d. sion, upland areas, etc.):
cLii L0AI-CQ `*?> Zf c? -?Uj
VEGETATION - Approved Success Criteria: Dominant Plant Species
Species Story TPA/'/ cover
II I'
Monitoring report indicates success? Ye No
Average TPA for entire site (per report):_ wo
Observational field data agrees? Yes No
based on community composition? Yes No
based on TPA and/or % cover? Yes No
Vegetation planted on site? Yes No
Date of last planting:
Vegetation growing successfully? Yes No 1
Specific vegetation plots or site locations with little to no ve?atlow
Estimated acreage or site percentage of unvegetated areas:
Invasive species on site (species, location(s), and % cover):
List any remaining vegetation issues to address (e.g. plant survival, concerns, etc.):
'?'? ?1t7tstl? ??Ul?? nr ?•sl -CA- G ?vJ,? L,,?10UdJL-t 5.? wI, (&-Q
Version 1.0 (August 22, 2007) Page 1 of 2

Wetland Mitigation Project Evaluations: Information Table
NC Division of Water Quality
NCWAM - Approved Success Criteria or Evaluative Techniques: NCWAM Type on Site:
Coastal
Riverine
I
Monitoring report indicates success? Yes No Riparian
Observational field data agrees? Yes No Non-riparian (wetter)
Attach NCWAM analysis results to this report. Non-riparian (drier)
List any remaining NCWAM issues to address (e.g. functionality, developing wetland type, etc.):
MITIGATION SUCCESS:
Compared to the approved mitigation plan, this component is: successful partially successful unsuccessful
List specific reasons for lack of success for this component:
Additional comments (e.g. DWQ follow-up actions, recommendations, etc.):
During site visit, document representative conditions and areas of concern. Observe preservation and
enhancement areas that may not have specific success criteria. Label and attach photos to this report.
Attach maps showing photo locations, areas of concern, and important field observations.
Additional notes related to evaluation of this component:
. 4
Version 1.0 (August 22, 2007) Page 2 of 2