20061334 Ver 2_Mitigation Evaluation_20090423

(??) lJ\ rwLL?_Z"( s{? ILQ_., L?0 L, -? Cu'n?
x, Mitigation Project Evaluations: Information Table
NC Division of Water Quality
Date of Office Review: ?- 2.? FAA Evaluator's Name(s): i1t
Date of Report: x n utArt'C'CI Report for Monitoring Year:
%
cV Ake- + Icb-} u eo is
•' -eq j,
Date of Field Review: - ? Evaluator s ame(s):
Other Individuals/Agencies Present:
? ar Ara
Weather Conditions (today & recent): r o w,Dct
Directions to Site: From US 64 in Rocky Mount, go north on US 301 Bypass for 7.5 mi. to E. Battleboro Ave., which becomes Std
Battleboro-Leggett Rd. Left on Morningstar Ch. Rd. to Benson Farm Rd. Turn left onto dirt road across from ! L
1. Office Review Information:
Project Number: 20061334 _ Project History
Project Name. Harrell Site Event Event Date
County(ies): Edgecombe
Basin & subbasin: Tar-Pamlico 03020101
Nearest Stream: Swift Creek
Water Quality Class of Nearest Stream: C; NSW
Mitigator Type: Full-Delivery (EEP)
DOT Status: non-DOT
Total Mitigation on Site
Wetland: 15 acres
Stream: 6987 linear feet
Buffer:
Nutr. Offset:
Approved mitigation plan available? Yes No
Monitoring reports available? Yes No
Problem areas identified in reports? Yes No
Report Receipt: Mitigation Plan
Application Review - Wetlands
Application Review -Streams
Site Visit - Streams
Site Visit - Wetlands
4/4/2007
4/10/2007
4/10/2007
3/19/2008
3/19/2008
Problem areas addressed on site. Yes No
Mitigation required on site: 'Add significant pro ect-related events: reports,
Associated impacts (if known): { received, construction, planting, repairs, etc.
During office review, note success criteria and evaluate each component based on monitoring report
results. Record relevant data in Sections II and III.
On back of sheet, note other information found during office review and/or to be obtained during site visit.
II. Summary of Results:
Monitoring Success Success
Mitigation Component Year (report) (field) Resolved
20061334-1 1265 linear feet Stream (Perennial) Restoration 2
20061334-2 5722 linear feet Stream (Perennial) Restoration 2 2
20061334-3 15 acres Wetland (Riverine) Restoration 2
Version 1.0 (August 22, 2007) Page 1 of 2
Mitigation Project Evaluations: Information Table
NC Division of Water Quality
C.
MITIGATION SUCCESS:
Compared to the approved mitigation plan, this project is: successful partially successful unsuccessful
List specific reasons for lack of success for this project:
I
Additional comments (e.g. DWQ follow-up actions, recommendations, etc.):
I
c7 e?
-- LNA xcfl, -s'Ae_aDas neAz
sec k_ --o ? hec,&f?o?
-> OK-
Version 1.0 (August 22, 2007) Page 2 of 2
e a
Wetland Mitigation Project Evaluations: Information Table
NC Division of Water Quality
Component: 15 acres Wetland (Riverine) Restoration
Description: Coastal Plan Small Stream Swamp
Location within project: North of stream
III. Success Criteria Evaluation:
HYDROLOGY - Approved Success Criteria:
Monitoring report indicates success Yes No
Observational field data agrees? es No
based on mitigation plan? Yes No
based on wetland type? Yes No
List any remaining hydrology issues to address (e.g.
tou?-
Drift lines
Drainage patterns in wetlands
Sediment deposits
Water marks
remaining ditches, excessive water, etc.):
SOILS - Approved Success Criteria:
Are soils hydric or becomin is Yes No
List indicators of hydric
List any remaining soil ue to address (e.g. erosion, upland areas, etc.):
i
VEGETATION -Approved Success Criteria:
Dominant Plant Species
Species Story TPA/'/ cover
Monitoring report indicates success? Yes No
Average TPA for entire site (per report):`
Observational field data agrees? Yes No
based on community composition? Yes No
based on TPA and/or % cover? Yes No
Vegetation planted on site? Yes No
Date of last planting:
Vegetation growing successfully? Yes No
Specific vegetation plots or site locations with little to no vegetation:
Estimated acreage or site percentage of unvegetated areas:
Invasive species on site (species, location(s), and % cover):
List any remaining vegetation issues to address (e.g. plant survival, concerns, etc-)-
!l,? ?- (c o??J' ?,,cd
r t
Version 1.0 (August 22, 2007)??' A ( t ? 4_?+ Page of 2 J
J??` ???IIUJJ coo p t ash, U-) ;1ko?0,00?
+,sU-) Cvwn
1 1 i,J?u+V- c ka5s?7v ??- oc>
Component ID: 20061334-3
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Inundated
V"ISaturated in upper 12 inches
Wetland Mitigation Project Evaluations: Information Table
NC Division of Water Quality
NCWAM - Approved Success Criteria or Evalu a Techniques: NCWAM Type on Site:
Coastal
Riverine
Monitoring report indicates succ Yes No Riparian
Observational field data agrees Yes No Non-riparian (wetter)
Attach NCWAM analysis result o his report. Non-riparian (drier)
- _ - - -- -
List any remaining NCWA issues to address (e.g. functionality, developing wetland type, etc.):
MITIGATION SUCCESS:
Compared to the approved mitigation plan, this component is: successful
List specific reasons for lack of success for this component:
partially successful unsuccessful
Additional comments (e.g. DWQ follow-up actions, recommendations, etc.):
C?h_a c.Vc 2.? rn X ?i }-. (wk -' 'fi`r SvS? c'-;+ MxX -Z>

During site visit, document representative conditions and areas of concern. Observe preservation and
enhancement areas that may not have specific success criteria. Label and attach photos to this report.
Attach maps showing photo locations, areas of concern, and important field observations.
Additional notes related to evaluation of this component:
7
Version 1.0 (August 22, 2007) Page 2 of 2