20061780 Ver 2_Mitigation Evaluation_20090701

?OAAX1 S 6 lam, t' t? 11 t rYL?C)L
Mitigation Project Evaluations: Information Table
NC Division of Water Quality
Date of Office Review: `T - I - DC/ Evaluator's Name(s): 1-HI I
Date of Report: 101 D$ Report for Monitoring Year: 1
Date of Field Review: `1- I- O C) Evaluator's Name(s): 401 Z
Other Individuals/Agencies Present: ? t ? ?? ?\-tort-Oa (,J F-SX-2
Weather Conditions (today & recent): h nk l aG`s l 'Sttl
Directions to Site: From Windsor, take US Hwy 17 east for 5.3 miles. Left onto Wakelon Rd. Go 5 miles and turn right onto Bull
Hill Rd. Go 2.5 miles and turn left onto Brown School rd. Site is approx. 2.5 miles on left.
1. Office Review Information:
Project Number: 20061780
Project Name: Floogie Site
County(ies): Bertie
Basin & subbasin: Roanoke 03010107
Nearest Stream: Flat Swamp Creek
Water Quality Class of Nearest Stream: C; Sw
Mitigator Type: Full-Delivery (EEP)
DOT Status: non-DOT
Total Mitigation on Site
Wetland: 25 acres ?i
Stream: 11149 linear feet
Buffer:
N utr. Offset:
Approved mitigation plan available? a No
Monitoring reports available? Ye No
Problem areas identified in reports? Yes No
Problem areas addressed on site? Yes No
Mitigation required on site:
Associated impacts (if known):
Project History
Event Event Date
Site Visit - Wetlands 11/30/2006
Site Visit - Streams 11/30/2006
Report Receipt: Mitigation Plan 6/12/2007
Application Review - Streams 7/9/2007
Application Review - Wetlands 7/9/2007
Report Receipt: Response to Letter 1/2/2008
Site Visit - Streams 4/17/2008
Site Visit - Wetlands 4/17/2008
Report Receipt: As-Built 10/29/2008
Report Receipt: Monitoring 2/12/2009
Cc?-+on + p toa??ht?g z/
*Add significant project-related events: reports,
received, construction, planting, repairs, etc.
During office review, note success criteria and evaluate each component based on monitoring report
results. Record relevant data in Sections II and III.
On back of sheet, note other information found during office review and/or to be obtained during site visit.
II. Summary of Results:
Monitoring Success Success
Mitigation Component Year (report) (field) Resolved
20061780-1 11149 linear feet Stream (Perennial) Restoration 1/2
20061780-2 25 acres Wetland (Riverine) Restoration
Version 1.0 (August 22, 2007) Page 1 of 2
Mitigation Project Evaluations: Information Table
NC Division of Water Quality
MITIGATION SUCCESS:
Compared to the approved mitigation plan, this project is: successful partially successful unsuccessful
List specific reasons for lack of success for this project:
Additional comments (e.g. DWQ follow-up actions, recommendations, etc.):
Version 1.0 (August 22, 2007) Page 2 of 2

Wetland Mitigation Project Evaluations: Information Table
NC Division of Water Quality
Component: 25 acres Wetland (Riverine) Restoration Component ID: 20061780-2
Description:
Location within project: See map
III. Success Criteria Evaluation:
HYDROLOGY - Approved Success Criteria: Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Inundation or saturation >7% of growing season Inundated
Saturated in upper 12 inches
Monitoring report indicates success a No Drift lines
Observational field data agrees? Y No ?Drainage patterns in wetlands
based on mitigation plan? Yes No Sediment deposits
based on wetland type? Yes No Water marks
List any remaining hydrology issues to address (e.g. remaining ditches, excessive water, etc.):

'/o ??c' ;t•?ar?ut" 8 l?'1"
Z(?O? P'esul?-5 : 9 - 2-6

SOILS - Approved Success Criteria:
Are soils hydric or becoming hydric? Yes No
List indicators of hydric soils:
List any remaining soil issues to address (e.g. erosion, upland areas, etc.):

i? ? v'LVC-?} LLtl, a "ILI?C,

VEGETATION - Approved Success Criteria: Dominant Plant Species
320 spa in yr 3, 260 spa in yr 5 _Species Story TPA/'/ cover
Monitoring report indicates success? es No
Average TPA for entire site (per report): -7 CO
Observational field data agrees? -e q No
based on community composition? YiE No
based on TPA and/or % cover? I e' No V ?\,.'
Vegetation planted on site? s) No
Date of last planting J
-
:
'
Vegetation growing successfully? Yep No

Specific vegetation plots or site locations with little to no vegetation:
-7
Estimated acreage or site percentage of unvegetated areas:
Invasive species on site (species, location(s), and % cover):
V-6-1 hoir"s 0 C-Ae. - V0a*C*-- -for in-4e r? ?.Zf +0-11-"
List any remaining vegetation issues to address (e.g. plant survival, concerns, etc.):
10 species ,??x? Ole kx?-? CAAq I +?"ser\A- cis 2-008 Cowls

A._
?LdCtG?2C:.-

N v-- - ..Vvv J -- ) \-v k- %-- Y 1l CVLC J?J) %?l_-CI Vk-L'-I-) ?C 3-111kf^- sc- '
Version 1.0 (August 22, 2007) { ?, V-Z-L? i " <L3? Page 1 of 2
Wetland Mitigation Project Evaluations: Information Table
NC Division of Water Quality
NCWAM - Approved Success Criteria or Evaluative Techniques: NCWAM Type on Site:
Monitoring report indicates success?
Observational field data agrees?
Attach NCWAM analysis results to this n
List any remaining NCWAM issues to ac
Coastal
Riverine
'Yes No Riparian
Yes No Non-riparian (wetter)
Non-riparian (drier)
s (e.g. functionality, developing wetland type, etc.):
MITIGATION SUCCESS:
Compared to the approved mitigation plan, this component is: S ;s ful partially successful unsuccessful
List specific reasons for lack of success for this component:
Additional comments (e.g. DWQ follow-up actions, recommendations, etc.):
C'( -4e Se
oJ?
During site visit, document representative conditions and areas of concern. Observe preservation and
enhancement areas that may not have specific success criteria. Label and attach photos to this report.
Attach maps showing photo locations, areas of concern, and important field observations.
Additional notes related to evaluation of this component:

Version 1.0 (August 22, 2007) Page 2 of 2