20040929 Ver 1_Mitigation Evaluation_20090701 (2)

L9,-
Mitigation Project Evaluations: Information Table
NC Division of Water Quality
Date of Office Review: -1' - -? Evaluator's Name(s):
Date of Report: Report for Monitoring Year:
Date of Field Review: -r1?1 Evaluator's Name(s):
Other Individuals/Agencies Present: t> LLD i
Weather Conditions (today & recent): ?? -
Directions to Site: From 1-95 exit 160 (NC 561) northeast to Grapevine Road. Left/north onto Grapevine Rd to Jasmine Lane on
left. Follow Jasmine Lane to site.
I. Office Review Information:
Project Number: 20040929
Project Name: Gregory Site
County(ies): Halifax
Basin & subbasin: Tar-Pamlico 03020102
Nearest Stream: March Swamp
Water Quality Class of Nearest Stream: C; Sw
Mitigator Type: Full-Delivery (EEP)
DOT Status:
Total Mitigation on Site
Wetland: 75 acres
Stream: 6725 linear feet
Buffer:
Nutr. Offset:
Approved mitigation plan available? *. No
Monitoring reports available? Ye No
Problem areas identified in reports? Yes No
Problem areas addressed on site? Yes No
Mitigation required on site:
Associated impacts (if known):
Project History
Event Event Date
Site Visit - Streams 3/18/2008
Site Visit - Wetlands 3/18/2008
Report Receipt: Monitoring 2/12/2009
*Add significant project-related events: reports,
received, construction, planting, repairs, etc.
uunng office review, note success criteria and evaluate each component based on monitoring report
results. Record relevant data in Sections II and III.
On back of sheet, note other information found during office review and/or to be obtained during site visit.
II. Summary of Results:
Mitigation ComponenA S
Monitoring Success Success
,e GA Cc l `=)"7 i Year (report) (field) Resolved ?.
20040929-1 6725 linear feet Stream (Perennial) Restoration 1 5
20040929-2 75 acres Wetland (Riparian) Restoration
"K 5
5
??_yo
Version 1.0 (August 22, 2007) Page 1 of 2
Mitigation Project Evaluations: Information Table
NC Division of Water Quality
MITIGATION SUCCESS:
Compared to the approved mitigation plan, this project is: successful partially successful unsuccessful
List specific reasons for lack of success for this project:
Additional comments (e.g. DWQ follow-up actions, recommendations, etc.):
Version 1.0 (August 22, 2007) Page 2 of 2
Wetland Mitigation Project Evaluations: Information Table
NC Division of Water Quality
Component: 75 acres Wetland (Riparian) Restoration Component ID: 20040929-2
Description: "Coastal Plain Small Stream Swamp" ivy) Ct S'??CC_ , 6L" 4 clkAPA?i)
Location within project: See map
HYDROLOGY - Approved Success Criteria:
n u ndation/satu ration for 12.5% of growing season
Monitoring report indicates success
Observational field data agrees?
based on mitigation plan?
based on wetland type?
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Inundated
Saturated in upper 12 inches
Drift lines
Drainage patterns in wetlands
Sediment deposits
Water marks
List any remaining hydrology issues to address (e.g. remaining ditches, excessive water, etc.):
3 /1 3 Cc 4 vt?? >> ?+?? . t4 f r ?a
'RI 13 1 - ?2.??`i. ??,G??c+fC? skc ??:yCi?i?I ?,
SOILS - Approved Success Criteria: ?Je Are soils hydric or becoming hydric? No
List indicators of hydric soils:
List any remaining soil issues to address (e.g. erosion, upland areas, etc.):
VEGETATION - Approved Success Criteria:
320 spa in yr 5, per plan
Monitoring report indicates success? e? No
Average TPA for entire site (per repo _ .fit o
Observational field data agrees? Ye No
based on community composition? te No
based on TPA and/or % cover? No
Vegetation planted on site? yes/ No
Date of last planting:
Vegetation growing successfully? (Y ? No
Dominant Plant Species
Species Storv TPAP/ cover
J >
ckA-C- r?k,1-E tCa 't !J G?wc AJC,c?C
Sfi i (l ?V1'??? E?? 5 sue- S}? ?1 Lt lo'?
n,uA? -t) 6ccC'vkCLAs
Specific vegetation plots or site locations with little to no vegetation:
Estimated acreage or site percentage of unvegetated areas:
Invasive species on site (species, location(s), and % cover):
List any remaining vegetation issues to address (e.g. plant survival, concerns, etc.):

rJ t??, ? i 2 . s°l? )

Version 1.0 (August 22, 2007) Page 1 of 2
Ill. Success Criteria Evaluation:
Wetland Mitigation Project Evaluations: Information Table
NC Division of Water Quality
NCWAM - Approved Success Criteria or Evaluative Techniques: NCWAM Type on Site:
Monitoring report indicates succ s
Observational field data agrees?
Attach NCWAM analysis res to this report
Coastal
Riverine
Yes No Riparian
Yes No Non-riparian (wetter)
Non-riparian (drier)
List any remaining NCWA'-M issues to address (e.g. functionality, developing wetland type, etc.):
i
is specs is reasons or o success for this component.
??
C cue n
PV-zn r'6- Cc?ADa-ti??
Additional comments (e.g. DWQ follow-up actions, recommendations, etc.):
MITIGATION SUCCESS:
Compared to the approved mitigation plan, this component is: successful pa oiallysucce sful unsuccessful
L' t f' f lack f
During site visit, document representative conditions and areas of concern. Observe preservation and
enhancement areas that may not have specific success criteria. Label and attach photos to this report.
Attach maps showing photo locations, areas of concern, and important field observations.
Additional notes related to evaluation of this component:
Version 1.0 (August 22, 2007)
Page 2 of 2