NCG160114_Inspection Report_20191002

ROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Secretary
S. DANIEL SMITH
Director
Maymead Materials Inc
Attention: Sean Mackey
Post Office Box 911
Mountain City, Tennessee 37683
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
October 2, 2019
Subject: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Permit: NCG160000
Certificate of Coverage: NCG160114
Avery County, North Carolina
Dear Mr. Mackey:
Enclosed please find a copy of the Compliance Evaluation Inspection Report for the
inspection I conducted at the subject facility on September 24, 2019.
The report should be self-explanatory; however, should you have any questions
concerning this report, please do not hesitate to contact me at [phone] or by email
at [e-mail].
Sin/c'erel
Isaiah Reed, CPSWQ, PSCI, MS4CEC1
Environmental Specialist
Land Quality Section
Enclosure: Inspection Report
0.0
D_EQ�� North Carolina Department ofEnvironmental Quality I Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources
Asheville Regional Office 1 2090 U.S. Highway 70 1 Swannanoa, North Carolina 28778
�omrvcum u
r"`*'•'"""'"'°"v� 828.296.4500

Compliance Inspection Report
Permit: NGG160114 Effective: 08/01/19 Expiration: 05/31/24 Owner: Maymead Materials Inc
SOC: Effective: Expiration: Facility: Maymead Materials Inc- Plneola
County: Avery US 221 And NC 181
Region: Asheville
Pineola NC 28662
Contact Person: Sean Mackey Title: Phone:
Directions to Facility:
System Classifications:
Primary ORC:
Secondary ORC(s):
On -Site Representative(s):
Related Permits:
Inspection Date: 09/24/2019
Primary Inspector: Isaiah L Reed
Secondary Inspector(s):
Certification:
Phone:
Entry Time: 02:OOPM Exit Time: 03:OOPM
Phone: [phone]
Reason for Inspection: Routine Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Permit Inspection Type: Asphalt Paving Mixture Stormwater Discharge COC
Facility Status: 0 Compliant ❑ Not Compliant
Question Areas:
Storm Water
(See attachment summary)
Page 1 of 3

Permit: NCG160114 Owner- Facility: Maymead Materials Inc
Inspection Date: 09/24/2019 Inspection Type : Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
On September 24, 2019 this facility was inspected for compliance. I met with Sean Mackey on site. No major issues were
observed on site. The permittee is directed to continue efforts to address all secondary containment on site.
If you have any questions, please contact this office at [phone]
Page 2 of 3

Permit: NCG160114 Owner- Facility: Maymead Materials Inc
Inspection Date: 09124/2019 Inspection Type : Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
Yes No NA NE
Does the site have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan?
N
❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a General Location (USGS) map?
0
❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a "Narrative Description of Practices"?
0
❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a detailed site map including outfall locations and drainage areas?
0
❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a list of significant spills occurring during the past 3 years?
0
❑ ❑ ❑
# Has the facility evaluated feasible alternatives to current practices?
0
❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the facility provide all necessary secondary containment?
0
❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a BMP summary?
0
❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a Spill Prevention and Response Plan (SPRP)?
0
❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping Plan?
0
❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the facility provide and document Employee Training?
0
❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a list of Responsible Party(s)?
0
❑ ❑ ❑
# Is the Plan reviewed and updated annually?
0
❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a Stormwater Facility Inspection Program?
0
❑ ❑ ❑
Has the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan been implemented?
0
❑ ❑ ❑
Comment
Qualitative Monitoring Yes No NA NE
Has the facility conducted its Qualitative Monitoring semi-annually? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment:
Analytical Monitoring Yes No NA NE
Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
# Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring from Vehicle Maintenance areas? ❑ ❑ 0 ❑
Comment:
Permit and Outfalls
Yes No NA NE
# Is a copy of the Permit and the Certificate of Coverage available at the site?
0
❑ ❑ ❑
# Were all outfalls observed during the inspection?
0
❑ ❑ ❑
# If the facility has representative outfall status, is it properly documented by the Division?
❑
❑ 0 ❑
# Has the facility evaluated all illicit (non stormwater) discharges?
0
❑ ❑ ❑
Comment
Page 3 of 3