20191230 Ver 1_401 Application_20190916

■/ WithersRavenel
1iV '..r Ponnla Ynl Ir Ci irrPCC
September 13, 2019
US Army Corps of Engineers
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
Mr. James Lastinger
3331 Heritage Trade Drive
Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587
NC -Division of Water Resources
401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
Ms. Karen Higgins
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699
Re: Old Apex Road Waterline Reinforcement
1412 Old Apex Road
Cary, Wake County NC
WR Project No. 02170716.00
AID# SAW -TBD
Dear Mr. Lastinger and Ms. Higgins,
On behalf of the Town of Cary, we are requesting authorization from the USACE for the use of
NWP 12 for 20 linear feet of temporary stream impact, and 0.003 acres of temporary wetland
impacts for the replacement (reinforcement) of an existing Town of Cary waterline, located on Old
Apex Road in the Town of Cary, NC.
In addition, we are requesting 401 Certification and Riparian Buffer Authorization from the
NCDWR for the 20 linear feet of temporary stream impacts (as required under WQ General
Certification No. 4133) and for 2,189 sqft (Zone 1: 1,358 sqft; Zone 2: 831 sqft) of permanent
riparian buffer impacts associated with the project.
The project area is located within an existing Town of Cary utility easement on property located
at 1412 Old Apex Road (35.768433°N; -78.807697°W). The utility maintenance corridor for the
existing waterline is primarily within the Old Apex Road right-of-way. The proposed
reinforcement project will require moving the waterline and maintenance corridor off the existing
roadway and into a wooded area adjacent to the road. The establishment of the new maintenance
corridor will require the aforementioned impacts.
The project is located in the Neuse River basin and onsite waters drain to Crabtree Creek. The
Water Quality Classification for Crabtree Creek is C; NSW and the Stream Index Number is 27-
33-(1). The cataloging unit for the site is 03020201.
Proposed Proiect
The proposed project consists of the replacement (reinforcement) of existing 12 -inch diameter
waterline with a 16 -inch diameter waterline, located along Old Apex Road in Cary, NC. The project
extends approximately 8,300 linear feet of from an existing 20" waterline at SW Cary Parkway
and will connect to an existing 12" waterline on Maynard Road.
115 MacKenan Drive I Cary, NC 27511
19.469.3340 1 f: 919.467.6008 1 www.withersravenel.com I License No. C-083,'
Asheville I Cary I Greensboro I Pittsboro I Raleigh I Wilmington

The existing utility corridor for the project is primarily within the Old Apex Road right-of-way. In
the area of the proposed impacts, the waterline must be moved out of the right-of-way due to the
presence of an existing RCP culvert underneath Old Apex Road.
Construction techniques and equipment used will be typical of utility installations.
Project History
The proposed alignment for the waterline reinforcement project was reviewed for streams and
wetlands by WR in March 2019. The review of the proposed alignment determined that there is
an unnamed tributary (depicted on the NRCS Soil Survey of Wake County) and associated
wetlands within the project area.
The unnamed tributary is conceded to be subject to the Neuse River Riparian Buffer rules, and no
buffer determination request was submitted to NCDWR.
Information in support of the delineation is included in the Preliminary Jurisdictional
Determination Packet submitted as an attachment with this request. WR is not requesting
issuance of the PJD with the NWP approval.
Proposed Impacts
The proposed impacts required for the project include 20 linear feet of temporary stream impact,
and 0.003 acres of temporary wetland impacts, which will be restored to pre -construction
contours and seeded with a wetland seed mix. The establishment of the 20' -wide permanent utility
maintenance corridor will result in the permanent conversion of 0.003 acres of headwater forested
wetlands to herbaceous wetlands.
In addition, the project requires 2,189 sqft of permanent impacts to riparian buffers (Zone 1: 1,358
sqft; Zone 2: 831sgft) for the 20' -wide permanent maintenance corridor.
Avoidance and Minimization
Prior to planning and design of the utility, the applicant requested a detailed wetland delineation
be conducted within the proposed corridor, allowing impacts to wetlands and waters to be
minimized.
Stream and wetland impacts will be temporary, with the impact areas restored to pre -construction
contours. Impact areas will be reseeded with a wetland seed mix following completion of the
installation.
The proposed utility installation has been designed to align with the existing waterline as much as
possible along Old Apex Road. The relocation in the project area is necessary due to the presence
of an existing 30 -inch RCP culvert underneath Old Apex Road. Due to the presence of the culvert,
installation of the water line within the Old Apex Road right-of-way would include relocation and
reconstruction of the existing culvert and roadway.
Page 2 of 3

The corridor will cross the unnamed tributary at a perpendicular angle, minimizing impacts to the
riparian buffer.
Construction activities will be conducted under an Erosion and Sediment Control Plan, which will
be submitted to the NCDEMLR for approval. Construction access to the proposed corridor will
be from high ground, and equipment usage in the jurisdictional areas will be minimized as much as
possible, reducing disturbance to pre -construction contours.
Mitigation
Because the proposed crossing will result in temporary stream impacts which will be restored, and
less than 0.100 acres of temporary wetland impacts which will result in the conversion of the
headwater forested wetland to herbaceous wetland, the applicant proposes no mitigation for the
impacts. Additionally, the proposed 20' -wide maintenance corridor will result in riparian buffer
impacts to less than 40 linear feet of stream and establish a maintenance corridor of greater than
10 ft in width, the buffer impacts are considered "Allowable" and do not require mitigation.
The current request is for 20 linear feet of temporary stream impact, 0.003 acres of temporary
wetland impact, and 2,189 sq ft of permanent impacts to riparian buffers (see the attached maps
and PCN application for details).
Please feel free to call if you have questions or require additional information.
Sincerely
WithersRavenel
Martin Richmond
Environmental Scientist
Attachments:
• PCN Application
• Agent Authorization
• Aerial Photo
• Stream and Wetland Delineation Map
• Location Map
• USGS Quad Map
• Wake County Soil Survey
• PJD Supporting Information
• NC NHP Project Review Letter (Sept 4, 2019)
• Utility Design Specification Sheet
• Design Specifications and Impacts Exhibits
Page 3 of 3

40
NoOur People. Your Success.
PCN FORM

p1;ii� -.c
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Page 1 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1 a.
Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
®Section 404 Permit El Section 10 Permit
1 b.
Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: NWP 12 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑ Yes
® No
1 d.
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ® Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
❑ Yes ® No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ® No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu
fee program.
❑ Yes
® No
1g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
❑ Yes
® No
1 h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes
® No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project:
Old Apex Road Waterline Reinforcement
2b.
County:
Wake County
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
Town of Cary
2d.
Subdivision name:
N/A
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no:
N/A
3.
Owner Information
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
Town of Cary Utility Easement
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
Shuyan Tian, PE
3d.
Street address:
318 N Academy St
3e.
City, state, zip:
Cary, NC 27512
3f.
Telephone no.:
[phone]
3g.
Fax no.:
3h.
Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 1 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is:
❑ Agent ❑ Other, specify:
4b. Name:
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
4d. Street address:
4e. City, state, zip:
4f. Telephone no.:
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name:
Martin Richmond
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
WithersRavenel, Inc.
5c. Street address:
115 MacKenan Dr
5d. City, state, zip:
Cary, NC 27517
5e. Telephone no.:
[phone]
5f. Fax no.:
5g. Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 2 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
Town of Cary Utility Easement
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 35.768433° N Longitude: - 78.807697° W
1 c. Property size:
Utility easement — approximately 20 ft x 100 ft
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to
Crabtree Creek; Stream Index# 27-33-(1)
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
Class C; NSW
2c. River basin:
Neuse River Basin; HUC 03020201
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
Project area is a Town of Cary Utility Easement, located within an approximate 4.48 acre parcel at 1412 Old Apex Road
in Cary, NC. The project area is currently undeveloped woodlands in the area of the utility easement. A commercial
landscaping nursery occupies the northern portion of the 4.48 acre parcel. A railroad line is located approximately 120
feet east of the proposed corridor. Commercial businesses are located along Old Apex Road north and south of the
project area.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
0.003 acres (within utility easement).
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
20 linear feet (within utility easement).
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The proposed project consists of the replacement (reinforcement) of existing 12 -inch diameter waterline with a 16 -inch
diameter waterline, located along Old Apex Road in Cary, NC. The project extends approximately 8,300 linear feet of
from an existing 20" waterline at SW Cary Parkway and will connect to an existing 12" waterline on Maynard Road.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The existing utility corridor for the project is primarily within the Old Apex Road right-of-way. In the area of the
proposed impacts, the waterline must be moved out of the right-of-way due to the presence of an existing RCP culvert
underneath Old Apex Road. Moving the waterline off the existing roadway and into a wooded area adjacent to the road
requires the establishment of a new 20' -wide utility maintenance corridor, which will be regularly mowed and
maintained by the Town of Cary.
The establishment of the new maintenance corridor will require temporary wetland and stream impacts, which will be
restored to pre -construction contours and seeded with a wetland seed mix. The corridor will be regularly mowed and
maintained, resulting in the conversion of a headwater forested wetland to an herbaceous wetland, and permanent
removal of forested riparian buffer along the stream channel.
Construction techniques and equipment used will be typical of utility installations.
Page 3 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments: The proposed alignment for the waterline
reinforcement project was reviewed for streams and wetlands
by WR in March 2019. Information in support of the
❑ Yes ❑ No ® Unknown
delineation is included in the Preliminary Jurisdictional
Determination Packet submitted as an attachment with this
request. WR is not requesting issuance of the PJD with the
NWP approval.
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
El Preliminary El Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Agency/Consultant Company:
Name (if known):
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
❑ Yes ❑ No ® Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. If yes, explain.
Page 4 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
® Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ® Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
2b.
2c.
2d.
2e.
2f.
Wetland impact
Type of jurisdiction
number -
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
(Corps - 404, 10
Area of impact
Permanent (P) or
(if known)
DWQ - non -404, other)
(acres)
Temporary T
Impact 1
Waterline Crossing
Headwater
® Yes
® Corps
0.003
E]P ®T
Wetland
❑ No
®DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts
0.003
2h. Comments: The 0.003 acres of temporary wetland impacts will result in the permanent conversion of headwater
forested wetlands to herbaceous wetlands and requires written notification.
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
3b.
3c.
3d.
3e.
3f.
3g.
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial
Type of jurisdiction
Average
Impact
number -
(PER) or
(Corps - 404, 10
stream
length
Permanent (P) or
intermittent
DWQ - non -404,
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(INT)?
other)
(feet)
feet)
Stream Impact 1
❑ PER
® Corps
3
20
❑P®T
®INT
®DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
20
3i. Comments: The 20 If of stream impacts are temporary, and will be restored to pre -construction contours.
4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
4b.
4c.
4d.
4e.
Open water
Name of waterbody
impact number -
(if applicable)
Type of impact
Waterbody type
Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P)
or Temporary
T
01 ❑P❑T
02 ❑P❑T
03 ❑P❑T
04 ❑P❑T
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
Page 5 of 12
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5a.
5b.
5c.
5d.
5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
Stream Impacts (feet)
Upland
Pond ID
Proposed use or purpose of
(acres)
number
pond
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P1
P2
5f. Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
❑ Neuse El Tar -Pamlico El Other:
Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b.
6c.
6d.
6e.
6f.
6g.
Buffer impact
number —
Reason
Buffer
Zone 1 impact
Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P)
for impact
Stream name
mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
or Temporary
required?
T
Buffer Impact 1
El® P T
Waterline
Installation
UT to Crabtree Creek
®Nos
1,358
831
6h. Total buffer impacts
1,358
831
6i. Comments:
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Prior to planning and design of the utility, the applicant requested a detailed wetland delineation be conducted within
the proposed corridor, allowing impacts to wetlands and waters to be minimized.
Stream and wetland impacts will be temporary, with the impact areas restored to pre -construction contours. Impact
areas will be reseeded with a wetland seed mix following completion of the installation.
The proposed utility installation has been designed to align with the existing waterline as much as possible along Old
Apex Road. The relocation in the project area is necessary due to the presence of an existing 30 -inch RCP culvert
underneath Old Apex Road. Due to the presence of the culvert, installation of the water line within the Old Apex Road
right-of-way would include relocation and reconstruction of the existing culvert and roadway.
The corridor will cross the unnamed tributary at a perpendicular angle as it enters a culvert under Old Apex Road,
minimizing impacts to the riparian buffer.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Construction activities will be conducted under an Erosion and Sediment Control Plan, which will be submitted to the
Page 6 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

NCDEMLR for approval. Construction access to the proposed corridor will be from high ground, and equipment usage
in the jurisdictional areas will be minimized as much as possible, reducing disturbance to pre -construction contours.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
❑ Yes ® No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this project?
❑ Mitigation bank
❑ Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type
Quantity
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 7 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
❑ Yes ❑ No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 8 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
® Yes ❑ No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
Comments: Project is a waterline utility installation and will not result in
❑ Yes ® No
construction of impervious surface.
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
0%
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ Yes ® No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
Project involves construction of a utility corridor. No impervious surface will be constructed as part of the project.
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
® Certified Local Government
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
Town of Cary
® Phase II
3b. Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
❑ NSW
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached? Not Applicable
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HQW
4a. Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ ORW
(check all that apply):
❑ Session Law 2006-246
❑ Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 9 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

F.
Supplementary Information
1.
Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1a.
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
® Yes ❑ No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes ® No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c.
If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
❑ Yes ❑ No
letter.)
Comments:
2.
Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a.
Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B.0200)?
2b.
Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes ® No
2c.
If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3.
Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a.
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes ® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
4.
Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a.
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
N/A
Page 10 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes ® No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑ Yes ® No
impacts?
El Raleigh
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
❑ Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
WR reviewed the NC Natural Heritage Program database, located at http://www.ncnhp.org/web/nhp/home to identify if
there were any known occurrences of threatened or endangered species on or near the proposed project. The review of
the NHP data did not identify any recent occurrences of federally listed threatened or endangered species or critical
habitat on the subject property or within 1.0 miles of the project (see attached NCNHP project review letter).
Site reviews did not identify any potential habitat for bald eagle, red -cockaded woodpecker or Michaux's sumac.
The project is located in the Neuse River Basin, and therefore is not located within the known range of the Cape Fear
Shiner or Tar River spinymussel.
The project site is within the known range of the Carolina madtom, Neuse River waterdog, Atlantic pigtoe, yellow lance
and dwarf wedgemussel. Stream 1 is an intermittent stream, and therefore was not considered potential habitat for
Carolina madtom, Neuse River waterdog, Atlantic pigtoe, yellow lance and dwarf wedgemussel.
Additionally, the proposed project is located in the extreme upper reach of the Crabtree Creek Watershed, and is
upstream of several dammed impoundments, prior to the confluence of Turkey Creek and Crabtree Creek, which would
prevent migration of these species to sustain viable populations. Therefore, the onsite intermittent stream was not
considered potential habitat for the Carolina madtom, Neuse River waterdog, Atlantic pigtoe, yellow lance and dwarf
wedgemussel.
Therefore, the proposed project will have No Effect on federally listed species.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
There are no waters classified as EFH in Wake County.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
WR reviewed the NC State Historic Preservation Office's online database, located at: http://gis.ncdcr.gov/hpoweb/, to
determine if there were any known historic or cultural resources within or in the vicinity of the proposed project. The
database review identified one property, listed Knotty Pine Motor Court (Gone). The online database description noted
the listed property is has been surveyed and has been destroyed. The database also notes the property is not listed as
being on the National Register. This listed item is not within the project area.
Page 11 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplain?
❑ Yes ® No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? NCFloodmaps.com
Martin Richmond
WithersRavenel, Inc.
�%
Sept 13, 2019
Date
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Applicant/Agent's Signature
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
isprovided.)
Page 12 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

40
00 Our People. Your Success.
AGENT AUTHORIZATION

-0 WithersRavenel
`. Our People. Your Success.
AUTHORITY FOR APPOINTMENT OF AGENT
The undersigned Owner Town of Cary NC (Client) does hereby appoint WithersRavenel
Inc. as his, her, or it's agent for the purpose of petitioning the appropriate local, state and
federal environmental regulatory agencies (US Army Corps of Engineers, NC Division of
Water Quality, NC Division of Coastal Management, local municipalities, etc.) for: a) review
and approval of the jurisdictional boundaries of onsite jurisdictional areas (wetlands, surface
waters, riparian buffers, etc.) and/or; b) preparation and submittal of appropriate
environmental permit applications/requests for the Old Apex Road Waterline
Reinforcement Project, 1412 Old Apex Road, Cary NC (Wake County PIN# 0753-74-1749).
The Client does hereby authorize that said agent has the authority to do the following acts
on behalf of the owner:
(1) To submit appropriate requests/applications and the required
supplemental materials;
(2) To attend meetings to give representation on behalf of the Client.
(3) To authorize access to subject property for the purpose of
environmental review by appropriate regulatory agencies.
This authorization shall continue in effect until completion of the contracted task or
termination by the Client.
Agent's Name, Address & Telephone
WithersRavenel, Inc.
115 MacKenan Drive
Cary, NC 27511
Tel. [phone]
Date: 6/25/2019
Signature of Client:
Shuyan Tian, P.E., Project manager
(Name - Print) (Title)
(Signature)
318 N. Academy St
Mailing Address
Cary NC 27512-8005
City State Zip
Phone: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
115 MacKenan Drive I Cary, NC 27511
919.469.3340 1 f: 919.467.6008 1 www.withersravenel.com I License No. C-0832
Asheville I Cary I Greensboro I Pittsboro I Raleigh I Wilmington

40
40 Our People. Your Success.
2017 AERIAL PHOTO

3
3
A
R
e GRAPHIC SCALE
0 30 60
a II 1 inch - 60 ft.
W
CL
Q
0
J
O
D
J
l./
OLD APEX ROAD WATERLINE AERIAL - 2017 lipWithersRavenel
Engineers I Planners I Surveyors
CARY WAKE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA

40
00 Our People. Your Success.
STREAM/WETLAND DELINEATION MAP

GRAPHIC SCALE
0 30 60
1 inch = 60 ft.
4'31
/ 411
Ilk J-1
NOTES:
1) DELINEATION PREFORMED BY WR ON 03/29/2019.
2) WETLAND/STREAM/POND/BUFFER LOCATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE, BASED ON GPS
LOCATION, WAKE CO. GIS DATA AND TOPOGRAPHIC INTERPRETATION.
3) BUFFER SUBJECTIVITY BASED ON NEUSE RIVER BUFFER RULES AND TOWN OF CARY LIDO.
OLD APEX ROAD WATERLINE WETLAND/BUFFER DELINEATION EXHIBIT WithersRavenel
Engineers I Planners I Surveyors
GARY WAKE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA

40
00 Our People. Your Success.
LOCATION MAP

gRRO
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 1000 2000
1 inch = 2000 ft.
RIDf;FC RAS �9 .1 )t_1 l , Il
TRAPPERS.
w CORMWA[:LYRi7
.e � 1 � r � I� 3 � q •S+�a I
y p77
I `�
r:
w•cxnr►a f) �� Asukc 1 liI cwr -ti1An
Al
z
Kip' �T
o �^"OIDGE.DI
IAROS70HEICT," —
'�
(, m
S Ttl/y;r+
K DR
f �KdLBREC l
I-
f. - 1i
!11�IBiireynP
Lake
Dal
a
��CHIhWtYHL/ LOR-y
C7
moi.
\
i, CLFN
��
O B
o
OLD APEX ROAD WATERLINEU
SGS QUAD (2016) -
CARY
WithersRavenel
Engineers I Planners I Surveyors
CARY WAKE COUNTY
NORTH CAROLINA

40
00 Our People. Your Success.
1:24,000 USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP
CARY QUADRANGLE
2016

0
i
Lto
a,—
11111100,111111111111IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiillilljllllllIllillilillilliloe�p�
l
ROJECT AREA
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 100 200
1 inch = 200 ft.
i
�s
OLD APEX ROAD WATERLINE USGS QUAD (2016) - CARY WithersRavenet
Engineers I Planners I Surveyors
GARY WAKE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA

40
0. Our People. Your Success.
WAKE COUNTY SOIL SURVEY, 1970
MAP SHEET 56

0
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 100 200
w�
►� 1 inch = 200 ft.
i
• 1
L
i r '
i
00
B2O
0
• o
_ o
Ge -Br
OLD APEX ROAD WATERLINE WAKE CO. SOIL SURVEY (1970) - SHEET 56 1O Engineers I Planners I Surveyors WithersRavenel
CARY WAKE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA

40
0. Our People. Your Success.
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
SUPPORTING INFORMATION

Preliminary ORM Data Entry Fields for New Actions
ACTION ID #: SAW- Begin Date (Date Received):
Prepare file folder ❑ Assign Action ID Number in ORM ❑
1. Project Name [PCN Form A2a]: Old Apex Road Waterline Reinforcement
2. Work Type: ❑Private 1:1 Institutional ❑✓ Government ❑ Commercial
3. Project Description / Purpose [PCN Form B3d and B3e]:
The proposed project consists of the replacement (reinforcement) of existing 12 -inch diameter waterline with a 16 -inch diameter
waterline, located along Old Apex Road in Cary, NC. The project extends approximately 8,300 linear feet of from an existing 20"
waterline at SW Cary Parkway and will connect to an existing 12" waterline on Maynard Road.
4. Property Owner / Applicant [PCN Form A3 or A41: Town of Cary Utility Easement
5. Agent / Consultant [PNC Form A5 — or ORM Consultant ID Number]:
WithersRavenel, Inc.
6. Related Action ID Number(s) [PCN Form B5b]: None known
7. Project Location— Coordinates, Street Address, and/or Location Description [PCN Form Blb]:
1412 Old Apex Rd, Cary, NC Wake County
8. Project Location— Tax Parcel ID [PCN Form Bla]: Town of Cary Utility Easement
9. Project Location — County [PCN Form A2b]: Wake
10. Project Location — Nearest Municipality or Town [PCN Form A2c]: Town of Cary
11. Project Information — Nearest Waterbody [PCN Form B2a]: Crabtree Creek
12. Watershed / 8 -Digit Hydrologic Unit Code [PCN Form 132c]: Upper Neuse 03020201
Authorization: Section 10 ❑ Section 404 ❑✓
Regulatory Action Type:
❑ Standard Permit
✓ Nationwide Permit #
Regional General Permit #
Jurisdictional Determination Request
Section 10 and 404 ❑
❑ Pre -Application Request
❑ Unauthorized Activity
❑ Compliance
❑ No Permit Required
Revised 20150602

urisdictional Determination Reauest
US Army Corps
of Engineers
Mmington District
This form is intended for use by anyone requesting a jurisdictional determination (JD) from the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District (Corps). Please include all supporting
information, as described within each category, with your request. You may submit your request
via mail, electronic mail, or facsimile. Requests should be sent to the appropriate project
manager of the county in which the property is located. A current list of project managers by
assigned counties can be found on-line at:
http: //www. saw.usace. aM.mil/Missions/RegulatoryPermitProaram/Contact/CountyLocator. aspx,
by calling 910-251-4633, or by contacting any of the field offices listed below. Once your
request is received you will be contacted by a Corps project manager.
ASHEVILLE & CHARLOTTE REGULATORY
FIELD OFFICES
US Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801-5006
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
RALEIGH REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
INSTRUCTIONS:
WASHINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
2407 West Fifth Street
Washington, North Carolina 27889
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
WILMINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403
General Number: 910-251-4633
Fax Number: [phone]
All requestors must complete Parts A, B, C, D, E, F and G.
NOTE TO CONSULTANTS AND AGENCIES: If you are requesting a JD on behalf of a
paying client or your agency, please note the specific submittal requirements in Part H.
NOTE ON PART D — PROPERTY OWNER AUTHORIZATION: Please be aware that
all JD requests must include the current property owner authorization for the Corps to
proceed with the determination, which may include inspection of the property when
necessary. This form must be signed by the current property owner(s) or the owner(s)
authorized agent to be considered a complete request.
NOTE ON PART D - NCDOT REQUESTS: Property owner authorization/notification for
JD requests associated with North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT)
projects will be conducted according to the current NCDOT/USACE protocols.
NOTE TO USDA PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS: A Corps approved or preliminary JD
may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security Act of
1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in
USDA programs, you should also request a certified wetland determination from the local
office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
Version: May 2017 Pagc 1

0
Jurisdictional Determination Request
PARCEL INFORMATION
Street Address: 1412 Old A
City, State: Cary NC
County:
Wake
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN): Town of Cary Utility Easement
B. REQUESTOR INFORMATION
Name: Trov Beaslev
Mailing Address: 219 Station Rd, Suite 101
Wilmington, NC 28405
Telephone Number: [phone] office
Electronic Mail Address: [e-mail]
Select one:
❑ I am the current property owner.
❑ I am an Authorized Agent or Environmental Consultant'
❑ Interested Buyer or Under Contract to Purchase
❑ Other, please explain.
C. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION'
Name: Town of Cary Utility Easement
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number:
Electronic Mail Address:
1 Must provide completed Agent Authorization Form/Letter.
2 Documentation of ownership also needs to be provided with request (copy of Deed, County GIS/Parcel/Tax Record).
Version: May 2017 Page 2

Jurisdictional Determination Request
D. PROPERTY ACCESS CERTIFICATION' 4
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on-
site investigations, if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section
404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. I, the
undersigned, am either a duly authorized owner of record of the property identified herein, or
acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of record of the property.
See Attached Agent Authorization
Print Name
Capacity: ❑ Owner ❑✓ Authorized Agents
Date
Signature
E. REASON FOR JD REQUEST: (Check as many as applicable)
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all aquatic resources.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all jurisdictional aquatic resources under Corps authority.
I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps, and the JD would be used to avoid and minimize
impacts to jurisdictional aquatic resources and as an initial step in a future permitting
process.
❑✓ I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps; this request is accompanied by my permit application
and the JD is to be used in the permitting process.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities in a navigable water of the
U.S. which is included on the district Section 10 list and/or is subject to the ebb and flow of
the tide.
❑ A Corps JD is required in order obtain my local/state authorization.
❑ I intend to contest jurisdiction over a particular aquatic resource and request the Corps
confirm that jurisdiction does/does not exist over the aquatic resource on the parcel.
❑ I believe that the site may be comprised entirely of dry land.
❑ Other:
For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOT/USACE protocols, skip to Part E.
If there are multiple parcels owned by different parties, please provide the following for each additional parcel on a
continuation sheet.
5 Must provide agent authorization form/letter signed by owner(s).
Version: May 2017 Page 3

Jurisdictional Determination Request
F. JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD) TYPE (Select One)
❑✓ I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminary JD for the property identified herein.
A Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD) provides an indication that there may
be "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United States"on a property.
PJDs are sufficient as the basis for permit decisions. For the purposes of permitting, all
waters and wetlands on the property will be treated as if they are jurisdictional "waters of
the United States". PJDs cannot be appealed (33 C.F.R. 331.2); however, a PJD is
"preliminary" in the sense that an approved JD can be requested at any time. PJDs do
not expire.
❑ I am requesting that the Corps provide an approved JD for the property identified herein.
An Approved Jurisdictional Determination (AJD) is a determination that
jurisdictional "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United
States" are either present or absent on a site. An approved JD identifies the limits of
waters on a site determined to be jurisdictional under the Clean Water Act and/or
Rivers and Harbors Act. Approved JDs are sufficient as the basis for permit
decisions. AJDs are appealable (33 C.F.R. 331.2). The results of the AJD will be
posted on the Corps website. A landowner, permit applicant, or other "affected
party" (33 C.F.R. 331.2) who receives an AJD may rely upon the AJD for five years
(subject to certain limited exceptions explained in Regulatory Guidance Letter 05-
02).
❑ I am unclear as to which JD I would like to request and require additional information
to inform my decision.
G. ALL REQUESTS
Map of Property or Project Area. This Map must clearly depict the boundaries of the
review area.
✓❑ Size of Property or Review Area 100 If acres.
❑✓ The property boundary (or review area boundary) is clearly physically marked on the site.
Version: May 2017 Page 4

Jurisdictional Determination Request
H. REQUESTS FROM CONSULTANTS
❑✓ Project Coordinates (Decimal Degrees): Latitude:
Longitude
35.768433 N
-78.807697 W
❑7 A legible delineation map depicting the aquatic resources and the property/review area.
Delineation maps must be no larger than 11x17 and should contain the following: (Corps
signature of submitted survey plats will occur after the submitted delineation map has been
reviewed and approved).6
■ North Arrow
■ Graphical Scale
■ Boundary of Review Area
■ Date
■ Location of data points for each Wetland Determination Data Form or tributary
assessment reach.
For Approved Jurisdictional Determinations:
■ Jurisdictional wetland features should be labeled as Wetland Waters of the US, 404
wetlands, etc. Please include the acreage of these features.
■ Jurisdictional non -wetland features (i.e. tidal/navigable waters, tributaries,
impoundments) should be labeled as Non -Wetland Waters of the US, stream, tributary,
open water, relatively permanent water, pond, etc. Please include the acreage or linear
length of each of these features as appropriate.
■ Isolated waters, waters that lack a significant nexus to navigable waters, or non -
jurisdictional upland features should be identified as Non -Jurisdictional. Please
include a justification in the label regarding why the feature is non jurisdictional (i.e.
"Isolated", "No Significant Nexus", or "Upland Feature"). Please include the acreage
or linear length of these features as appropriate.
For Preliminary Jurisdictional Determinations:
Wetland and non -wetland features should not be identified as Jurisdictional, 404,
Waters of the United States, or anything that implies jurisdiction. These features can be
identified as Potential Waters of the United States, Potential Non -wetland Waters of
the United States, wetland, stream, open water, etc. Please include the acreage and
linear length of these features as appropriate.
Completed Wetland Determination Data Forms for appropriate region
(at least one wetland and one upland form needs to be completed for each wetland type)
6 Please refer to the guidance document titled "Survey Standards for Jurisdictional Determinations" to ensure that the
supplied map meets the necessary mapping standards. http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Regulatory-Permit-
Pro,gram/Jurisdiction/
Version: May 2017 Page 5

Jurisdictional Determination Request
✓❑ Completed appropriate Jurisdictional Determination form
• PJDs, please complete a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form' and include the
Aquatic Resource Table
• AJDs, please complete an Approved Jurisdictional Determination Form'
W1 Vicinity Map
z Aerial Photograph
FA USGS Topographic Map
Soil Survey Map
Other Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site
Plan, previous delineation maps, LIDAR maps, FEMA floodplain maps)
Landscape Photos (if taken)
F] NCSAM and/or NCWAM Assessment Forms and Rating Sheets
NC Division of Water Resources Stream Identification Forms
FOther Assessment Forms
' www.saw.usace.army.mil/Portals/59/docs/repulatorv/re,gdocs/JD/RGL 08-02_ App _ A_ Prelim_ JD_ Form_fillable.pdf
' Please see http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Re ug latory-Permit-Program/Jurisdiction/
Principal Purpose: The information that you provide will be used in evaluating your request to determine
whether there are any aquatic resources within the project area subject to federal jurisdiction under the regulatory
authorities referenced above.
Routine Uses: This information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other federal, state, and local
government agencies, and the public, and may be made available as part of a public notice as required by federal
law. Your name and property location where federal jurisdiction is to be determined will be included in the
approved jurisdictional determination (AJD), which will be made available to the public on the District's website
and on the Headquarters USAGE website.
Disclosure: Submission of requested information is voluntary; however, if information is not provided, the
request for an AJD cannot be evaluated nor can an AJD be issued.
Version: May 2017 Page 6

Appendix 2 - PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD:
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD: Troy Beasley, WithersRavenel, Inc.
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES AND/OR
AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: IVC County/parish/borough: Wake City: Cary
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format):
Lat.: 35.768433 N Long.: -78.807697 W
Universal Transverse Mercator: NAD83
Name of nearest waterbody: Crabtree Creek 27-33-(1); Class C; NSW
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
❑ Field Determination. Date(s):
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES IN REVIEW AREA WHICH "MAY BE" SUBJECT TO REGULATORY
JURISDICTION.
Site
number
Latitude
(decimal
degrees)
Longitude
(decimal
degrees)
Estimated amount
of aquatic resource
in review area
(acreage and linear
feet, if applicable)
Type of aquatic
resource (i.e., wetland
vs. non -wetland
waters)
Geographic authority
to which the aquatic
resource "may be"
subject (i.e., Section
404 or Section 10/404)
35.768433 N
-78.807697 W
20 If
Non -wetland waters
Section 404/401
'I
35.768433 N
-78.807697 W
0.003 acre
Wetlands
Section 404/401

1) The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in
the review area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option
to request and obtain an approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an
informed decision after having discussed the various types of JDs and their
characteristics and circumstances when they may be appropriate.
2) In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a
Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre-
construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non-reporting NWP or
other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an AJD for the
activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware that: (1) the permit applicant has
elected to seek a permit authorization based on a PJD, which does not make an
official determination of jurisdictional aquatic resources; (2) the applicant has the
option to request an AJD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit
authorization, and that basing a permit authorization on an AJD could possibly result
in less compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) the
applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms
and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) the applicant can
accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and
conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has
determined to be necessary; (5) undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject
permit authorization without requesting an AJD constitutes the applicant's acceptance
of the use of the PJD; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered
individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps permit
authorization based on a PJD constitutes agreement that all aquatic resources in the
review area affected in any way by that activity will be treated as jurisdictional, and
waives any challenge to such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance
or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7)
whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD or a PJD, the JD will be processed
as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered individual permit (and all terms
and conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively
appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an administrative appeal, it
becomes appropriate to make an official determination whether geographic
jurisdiction exists over aquatic resources in the review area, or to provide an official
delineation of jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review area, the Corps will
provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable. This PJD finds
that there "may be"waters of the U.S. and/or that there "may be" navigable waters of
the U.S. on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in the review
area that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following
information:

SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply)
Checked items should be included in subject file. Appropriately reference sources
below where indicated for all checked items:
❑■ Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor:
Map:
Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor.
❑ Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rationale:
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
USGS NHD data.
USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: 1:24,000 Cary Quadrangle
Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: Wake Co Soil Survey, Map 56
❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
tate local wetland inventory map(s):
FEMA/FIRM maps:
❑ 100 -year Floodplain Elevation is: .(National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
❑■ Photographs: ❑■ Aerial (Name & Date): NCOneMap 2017
or ❑ Other (Name & Date):
❑ Previous determination (s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Other information (please specify):
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily
been verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional
determinations.
Signature and date of
Regulatory staff member
completing PJD
oigitairy a,,nl, R111m c, uani
Richmond, Martin m deBeee°:m
Signature and date of
person requesting PJD
(REQUIRED, unless obtaining
the signature is impracticable)'
' Districts may establish timeframes for requestor to return signed PJD forms. If the requestor does not respond
within the established time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is
necessary prior to finalizing an action.

-0 WithersRavenel
`. Our People. Your Success.
AUTHORITY FOR APPOINTMENT OF AGENT
The undersigned Owner Town of Cary NC (Client) does hereby appoint WithersRavenel
Inc. as his, her, or it's agent for the purpose of petitioning the appropriate local, state and
federal environmental regulatory agencies (US Army Corps of Engineers, NC Division of
Water Quality, NC Division of Coastal Management, local municipalities, etc.) for: a) review
and approval of the jurisdictional boundaries of onsite jurisdictional areas (wetlands, surface
waters, riparian buffers, etc.) and/or; b) preparation and submittal of appropriate
environmental permit applications/requests for the Old Apex Road Waterline
Reinforcement Project, 1412 Old Apex Road, Cary NC (Wake County PIN# 0753-74-1749).
The Client does hereby authorize that said agent has the authority to do the following acts
on behalf of the owner:
(1) To submit appropriate requests/applications and the required
supplemental materials;
(2) To attend meetings to give representation on behalf of the Client.
(3) To authorize access to subject property for the purpose of
environmental review by appropriate regulatory agencies.
This authorization shall continue in effect until completion of the contracted task or
termination by the Client.
Agent's Name, Address & Telephone
WithersRavenel, Inc.
115 MacKenan Drive
Cary, NC 27511
Tel. [phone]
Date: 6/25/2019
Signature of Client:
Shuyan Tian, P.E., Project manager
(Name - Print) (Title)
(Signature)
318 N. Academy St
Mailing Address
Cary NC 27512-8005
City State Zip
Phone: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
115 MacKenan Drive I Cary, NC 27511
919.469.3340 1 f: 919.467.6008 1 www.withersravenel.com I License No. C-0832
Asheville I Cary I Greensboro I Pittsboro I Raleigh I Wilmington

a
s
s
I �m
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 1000 2000
1 inch = 2000 ft.
n
4 }
:NARVSTOHE CT
x x — -77
mm
[s
SToy�
!I xftiBRgLK flR CNSF
\ K l eye
AlocGre or Dou'ns c�
Lake
/Lu
p O
H;MNEY-N (pR C7
R
- N \�•`7�u� 11 i •_ ° (� _ - �.� o
OLD APEX ROAD WATERLINE USGS QUAD (2016) - CARY WithersRavenel
1/ Engineers I Planners I Surveyors
CARY WAKE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA

3
3
A
R
e GRAPHIC SCALE
0 30 60
a II 1 inch - 60 ft.
W
CL
Q
0
J
O
D
J
l./
OLD APEX ROAD WATERLINE AERIAL - 2017 lipWithersRavenel
Engineers I Planners I Surveyors
CARY WAKE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA

0
i
Lto
a,—
11111100,111111111111IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiillilljllllllIllillilillilliloe�p�
l
ROJECT AREA
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 100 200
1 inch = 200 ft.
i
�s
OLD APEX ROAD WATERLINE USGS QUAD (2016) - CARY WithersRavenet
Engineers I Planners I Surveyors
GARY WAKE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA

0
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 100 200
w�
►� 1 inch = 200 ft.
i
• 1
L
i r '
i
00
B2O
0
• o
_ o
Ge -Br
OLD APEX ROAD WATERLINE WAKE CO. SOIL SURVEY (1970) - SHEET 56 1O Engineers I Planners I Surveyors WithersRavenel
CARY WAKE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA

GRAPHIC SCALE
0 30 60
1 inch = 60 ft.
4'31
/ 411
Ilk J-1
NOTES:
1) DELINEATION PREFORMED BY WR ON 03/29/2019.
2) WETLAND/STREAM/POND/BUFFER LOCATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE, BASED ON GPS
LOCATION, WAKE CO. GIS DATA AND TOPOGRAPHIC INTERPRETATION.
3) BUFFER SUBJECTIVITY BASED ON NEUSE RIVER BUFFER RULES AND TOWN OF CARY LIDO.
OLD APEX ROAD WATERLINE WETLAND/BUFFER DELINEATION EXHIBIT WithersRavenel
Engineers I Planners I Surveyors
GARY WAKE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET – Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR -07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Old Apex Road Waterline Reinforcement City/County: Town of Cary/Wake County Sampling Date: 3/29/19
Applicant/Owner: Town of Cary State: NC Sampling Point: DP -1
Investigator(s): L Phillips and A Ricci, WithersRavenel, Inc. Section, Township, Range: Town of Cary
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Crenulation Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 1%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.768433 N Long: -78.807697 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: HrC2: Herndon silt loam, 6 to 10 percent slopes NWI classification: Headwater Forest Wetland
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes x No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes x No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
This data collection point is located within Wetland A, near Flag A5. This wetland abuts the toe of slope of the Old Apex Road roadway, and had been
recently mowed.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
_Surface Soil Cracks (136)
—Surface Water (A1) —True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
x Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
x High Water Table (A2) _
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (610)
x Saturation (A3) —Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
x Moss Trim Lines (B16)
—Water Marks (61) _
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
—Sediment Deposits (132) _
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
—Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
—Algal Mat or Crust (134) —Other
(Explain in Remarks)
—Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
—Iron Deposits (65)
x Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water -Stained Leaves (69)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
x Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes x No
Depth (inches): 2
Saturation Present? Yes x No
Depth (inches): 0
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Wetland hydrology was present at this data collection point based on Primary and Secondary indicators.
ENG FORM 6116 -4 -SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP -1
1. Lonicera japonica 40 Yes FACU
2.
3.
4.
5. Hydrophytic
40 =Total Cover Vegetation
50% of total cover: 20 20% of total cover: 8 Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Hydrophytic vegetation was present at this data collection point based on the Dominance Test. Conditional Note: The wetland area is adjacent to a
roadside fill slope, and had been mowed in the recent past.
ENG FORM 6116 -4 -SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0
Absolute Uominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 15' Radius )
% Cover Species? Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1. None
0
Number of Dominant Species
2.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A)
3.
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 3 (B)
5•
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 66.7% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
=Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15' Radius
)
FACW species 0 x 2 = 0
1. Liquidambar styraclflua
10 Yes FAC
FAC species 50 x 3 = 150
2.
FACU species 40 x4= 160
3.
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
4.
Column Totals: 90 (A) 310 (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.44
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
3 - Prevalence Index is :53.0'
10 =Total Cover
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
5 20% of total cover: 2
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 10' Radius )
-Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1. Microstegium vimineum
40 Yes FAC
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
2.
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3.
4•
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5,
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7•
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8,
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
40 =Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
20 20% of total cover: 8
height.
Woodv Vine Stratum (Plot size: 15' Radius )
1. Lonicera japonica 40 Yes FACU
2.
3.
4.
5. Hydrophytic
40 =Total Cover Vegetation
50% of total cover: 20 20% of total cover: 8 Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Hydrophytic vegetation was present at this data collection point based on the Dominance Test. Conditional Note: The wetland area is adjacent to a
roadside fill slope, and had been mowed in the recent past.
ENG FORM 6116 -4 -SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: DP -1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Types Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-14 10YR 3/2 95 7.5YR 4/6 5 C M Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
—Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
—Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
X Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
—Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Hydric soil indicators were present at this data collection point
ENG FORM 6116 -4 -SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET – Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR -07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Old Apex Road Waterline Reinforcement City/County: Town of Cary/Wake County Sampling Date: 3/29/19
Applicant/Owner: Town of Cary State: NC Sampling Point: DP -2
Investigator(s): L Phillips and A Ricci, WithersRavenel, Inc. Section, Township, Range: Town of Cary
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): Convex Slope (%): 3%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.768433 N Long: -78.807697 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: HrC2: Herndon silt loam, 6 to 10 percent slopes NWI classification: Upland
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes x No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes x No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
This dala collection point is located within uplands adjacent to Wetland A, near Flag A5.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
_Surface Soil Cracks (136)
—Surface Water (A1) —True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
—Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2) _
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (610)
_ Saturation (A3) —Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
—Water Marks (61) _
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
—Sediment Deposits (132) _
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
—Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
—Algal Mat or Crust (134) —Other
(Explain in Remarks)
—Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
—Iron Deposits (65)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water -Stained Leaves (69)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
x Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
x Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
x Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Wetland hydrology was not present at this data collection point. No Primary or Secondary Indicators were present. Saturation and water table were
not observed within 24" of land surface.
ENG FORM 6116 -4 -SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP -2
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Hydrophytic vegetation was present at this data collection point based on the Dominance Test. The Prevalence Index is 3.5, and the wetland indicator
status of all species identified is FACU or FAC.
ENG FORM 6116 -4 -SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0
Absolute Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' Radius )
% Cover Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1. Acer rubrum
10 Yes
FAC
Number of Dominant Species
2. Liquidambar styraciflua
10 Yes
FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A)
3•
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 4 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 75.0% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
20 =Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
10 20% of total cover:
4
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15' Radius
)
FACW species 0 x 2 = 0
1. Liquidambar styraclflua
10 Yes
FAC
FAC species 30 x 3 = 90
2.
FACU species 30 x4= 120
3.
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
4.
Column Totals: 60 (A) 210 (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.50
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
3 Prevalence Index is :53.0'
10 =Total Cover
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
5 20% of total cover:
2
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 15' Radius )
-Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1. None
0
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
2.
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3.
4•
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5,
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7•
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8,
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
=Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 15' Radius )
1. Lonicera japonica
30 Yes
FACU
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
30 =Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
15 20% of total cover:
6
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Hydrophytic vegetation was present at this data collection point based on the Dominance Test. The Prevalence Index is 3.5, and the wetland indicator
status of all species identified is FACU or FAC.
ENG FORM 6116 -4 -SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: DP -2
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Types Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-14 7.5YR 5/6 100 Loamy/Clayey Loam; dry, no redox
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion,
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
—Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
—Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
Remarks:
Hydric soil indicators were not present at this data collection point.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
—Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
ENG FORM 6116 -4 -SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

40
00 Our People. Your Success.
NCNHP PROJECT REVIEW LETTER

\\'I1tt tt 1�1`I t1111I t\I711♦ ♦111-► ♦t♦tttt♦♦♦1rd'7 ♦t♦t♦11'1 ♦t♦♦1rd1♦1\'I ♦t♦♦1♦\`I 1111111 P,
1�1t\'I\7\-► ♦t♦♦ 1 ,\"7 tt1I1\'I t♦\'/♦t 11♦♦1'I ♦t
hll�1 111.1�11��11,!i�1 11 /1���� 11 /l ljll P, "I 1.1111.1�I1 II111115111111111.11,!ill 11111 /111P�j11 11,11111.11,!II11111,151 11111.11.111111,11 11111111,11 P�QI P, l ��lljll 1111 II 1,!�11,�1 1111 �t111�I'5 F, X111 G�11F"I P,11111��1 115111
1' ►;�1►i1►11�►Ilil ►I lil ►I►1 �►1;��1►1
111111►;!1 1� ►111 ►I ►1;11 1' ►2.5 1 1� I ►I I /4,I 155 11
111111111111 II II11I11111111 111
1I II 11 11 11 li i1 iii 11111
►:1►;I ►l 1� ►l ►11 .. ►1 ►:11111. ►1►:1►1►;11►:11111►:1 ►l ►1.1►III . ►\,l ►;�; ►;I ►;1l ►1l ►1 ►1►111 ►11►;l ►1►1►;1►0„ 11,111 /11111111 ►t1 ►1111; ►1 ►1
11111111111111 ►;•1 1111 1111! 1�►1►�11�11;�lil�llll►I►I 1' 1' ►.111 ►1 ►I ►I►; ►I►I 1' 11111111
11 1111 11 11 II 11 II Il 11.1; II 11 / 1 11
11 111'.1.
Il ►1111 ►111►`4;•1►;11 1111►:11111 ►:i ►1 ►Ili ►:1►:1►:1111►:111►:1►:1111�1►.111►:111 ►:11111►:1►;;11►11111 11111111/�: ►l
11 1111 1111 P�jj!1
11
I►11►:�I►;�11►11►:11J►:1:i1►;�;; J►:IQ►J►.�►;;J►111►;�IUJ►:Q►:IIJ►:SIJ►:11►:Q►;�1�►;�;.palp;l►;X11►:4►:II►:1,�►;��111�►:11►:Q►;'�1�►:1►;�1�►:1;►111►:11►:�►:111�►;�11►:Ipl��1�►1111111
►1 1� ►I ►I ►I ►I /1►;1► 11:1111►;I 1111►.111 i
,►.1►;11.1 11.111.111 ►1 ►:111.11.111.111 11.. P''111 "17,71 111111 11'11 l 11 11 11 li l 111111. 11.111.111 1111\,i 111,4;11 111111
1 III!
111111 ►!1;111.41 ►1111111►111►1►1►1 11►.Illl I11►1►;11►:II►� 11►:11�►1 11►.1 111111 11►\,1111;; .1111
11.111.1 I I P,,11 11,4;11 111111111 1151111111111 1111111111111111111111111 111111.15111111111111111. ►;11 11.111.111 1111,1114;11 ►.11111
111111 Il 111 1111!! 111111111 Il 111111111111111111111 Il 11 113 li1111111111►;11 11 1111 111111 Il 111 1111!! 111111
IVA ►;1; 1;1111;111111;11Ell 111;"ll 111111II 1:1I I 1:1 ►;1; 1;111111 1:11;111;1111
I I01 11111141111111111 11 111111 1111►;1111111112111111111 1'.11'.1 11111111111 111 111 111111 111111411111111
11.111.111 11111,1111.4;11 1111;1111,11 1111.1111\,1111.1111111.1
11.111.111 11111,1111.4;11 1111;1
111111 111►;i114;11 ►I ►1/�►;1 1111.1111\,1111.1111.111
11.111.111 111►;i1►4;11►I►1V
111111 ►I►;i114;►I►1:►;1 ►I ►I/1►1►l►I►I/11•1►11111►1 1111 ►.1
111111 ►I►;i1►4;11111:
111111 ►I►;l►l;l1111:►; ►I►ul►l 111111
111111 ►IPI11F4l►111:
111111 /11�114;11►I I PI'1 ►I II ►I III II ►I II ►I1;I11 Al 1 11 111 ►111
111111 11►;1114111111�1
11.111.111 111\,1111.4;11 11111111,11 1111.1111\„ 11.1111111
11.111.111 111\,1111,4;11 111111
1:11:111111\„11.4;11IIIlllll1:1 1111.1111111
1:11:111111\„11.4;11IIIllI
11.1 (1.1 11 1� 1114;11 I1t111 t 1) 11IIIII.1 III
11.1 11.1 11 11 11 1 14;11 111111
11.111.111 111\„ 1:1;11 11,111;1 11.1;11.111.111 1111.1
11.111.111 111'„ 1:1;11 11,11
• • r„y'1 "MMlr • IlP1lr 11 Ill • P1111 1 I�r • 1 Ili'il l P1Ir FIIIrr11115 IP1Ir • 1"ir • • Fill • •11r • 1111 1
1.11.111,.;,1„x,.,111 �1 11.1 �,1111,�.1.1 �„111.1��;� X11 11��.11.� � 11,1 11111,111111 �.;� 11111.1111,
1.1.1r4rAq�l�I11J►ai l
1I 1 111 IIII1 11 111'.11I 111'.11:1 1I II 11 11 II I
1111 11'.1; 11 I�"Ill 11 1111 1111
11.11.11111.111.1111111111 11.111111; ►.1
11.111111;11 1111111'.1 1111111'.1
11111111.1
11.1 11.1 111 N1.11 11.111.1; 11.1,11
111111111.111,x;11}111.111.111.111 11.1 11.1 11.111.1111
1:11111.1
1.11.111;
11.1 11 1111.111.1;;1111.111
/i ►I /I /I E�;111.1111111:1;11.1 1111.111
11.1111111.1►;�;11 11111111.1;11.1 1111.111
I►1►1►1►;1;I'll ►111►1►:1 ►1 111111
Il 11II1i111i11 1111.11111.1.11 111111
11111111►;1,11 1111.11111.1;11.1 11.111.111
11 11.1;'111.111.1;
III:IIII:II;kll 11111111.11 111111
III:IIII:II;kll 11111111.11 111111
1:111111:11;1,11 1111111:1;11.1 1111.111
►I ►I ►I /� ►;1;111►I /1►I 11 ►1 111111
1111;11111121
11111111►;�;�111111111111 111111
11.1 :Al 111111j11 11 1111 I 111.1 1111.1 11
►:1:Al 111.1►;111 1111.11111.1;11111 1111.111
/1111111 PI1'll 1.1111111.1;11111 1111.11111
11.1 1 1 1111 1 01 110' 1111.11111.1;1111 111//1111
111 I ll I111ll ll11 1 Ill I@ I@ Il 11 1Dil l ll IIPHN 1 151,! 11111111Ii'i15ll 11 1@ 1Il I11'11! 111131111II111 11111

♦1M1♦ ♦ ♦♦ ♦I ♦ \I��I♦♦t ��5 ♦I♦ ♦ ♦I ♦♦ ♦ 11♦ 11 ♦ 1M1 ♦I \I♦ I ♦ 1+"II IIII 1+11♦ t�1 11♦ ♦ :�I♦I • N" 1i'I ♦ �'I ♦1��"I Ir
11 ♦ 11 t ♦ •t
♦♦\/♦ ♦ 11 ♦♦ � ♦ ♦♦ ♦ ♦♦ ♦ 1 X11 ♦ \1 ♦♦ ♦ ♦ ♦1I ♦♦ ♦ �� ♦\I♦♦ ♦♦1 ♦ ♦ \I ♦ \ �� ♦♦ ♦♦ ♦ \I♦ ♦ ♦ \I♦♦♦ ♦\1 ♦ ♦ ♦\I♦ ♦♦♦
1�11!,I1.I Irl IIQ� 1�1111�11�1 11Q�II II II Il�litl lily 1�� �I �l�y 111�1��11111 X111 �I,1i!��1� Il li �l ll��11111 ��� 1111 ��� 11 �1l�pll �lI II IIN 11 �I�1 X1111 l��Ijl� III ISI Il l�pli111!,QIII I�p11111�1� 111111111 Ili}I 1�� 1�� �I F' I@ Il l�lp�l�ll11 �11��!� 11 �1 �!!� 111111111 �1 ��Q�111��1111�1� N 11 IN II III II NN1111111111
I.I.pqEM

NCNHDE-10165: Old Apex Rd Waterline
,tee
<n
O 44G Ylo
P'tl9e
gh use Rd
Dry ave
lfuq�
�
�
c
a �
� ❑ _
w
Byrum St
�d�/
n°
2
n z`
4 6o rd Lake Or
[:astatic Or deer
d'af - -
Ann
Sl t
521 R Z.
`e
is r�.n Oc Geri(
H
Shirley"'
k
3 r
9'a\
Fer }(en,o
v' Meadow Di
o
-NCINo
a`Wie
O rip`
Uo rsetC�
rmand
t
.508
rp sr Or
Fd r r
m
Wee LocttC
rc
fs
olnwall Rd
E Com—I
�r
N
Rose St 13
z 4�15dcon Cr
ur Di
e ��Preri Vn / ori,_
-b
C.irna92 Ln
Food
E
OakmereCl- -_
SW Maynard RdRim
Lm
"
Heathridye I
Ln
O £ P.1-110 Or
.p O
0
Amr a!e Vt Brig
BP Ail =
4
'>ve nru ib':+'( Nonnantlao P Priixe St
°
Lote
E
G( yl(Ant/
< n ®
V.,,Iyn Cr
^v- _
s SF '
a
o Kilniayn,
s
a°
Dr
_
® -
r
Shaban]e Or
s
tot ores PI
St _
;1'v* Myrtlevv
�y In Poco Lo o c �V ,ro Ur
�
•, e N/oo
v ey(tvgh
,po not
y'
CJh' a(b
c C
o Wrenn Or
E* Or
c`
II
-
"1 01
q �\ M1Ar+ado m
x d w0
BetKd C' �. rlAF oho �. 4 O c \So JAS hopper 7
Co rlo mond Cil wy �S Rd ��YY 7C( fi r (:lens P 'OaksC iKildeMe nr2 •r' f
�Y Y 8 rw,� �s6a� flys ey Cir '9
Laurel park SW
• Vc - O c C Y Ir Caly Pkwy fi 5
N �� h -_ ialloway Or c n iaughrid ne. ^� K.Icney Or e` n _
3 00
W+Ke
E McK - - - Yynarknr- I '�nr„:c" � a o �`�ma `
-Gm
Wlll,ams Cr cue t ® u��` �, (3 F'Grl
Air C'
September 4, 2019
Project Boundary
Buffered Project Boundary
Managed Area (MAREA)
1:21,996
0 0.175 0.35 0.7 mi
0 0.3 0.6 1.2 km
Sources: Esti, HERE, Garmin, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS,
FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan,
METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), (c) OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS
User Community

40
00 Our People. Your Success.
DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS AND IMPACTS EXHIBIT

\ \ � x wine Pcaw
62+56.60 Ix"v°uxo
AIR RELEASE VALVE
62+91.98
PROPOSED 24" DIP (PC 250) WATER LINE
�F >—
�� SILT FENCE,
2
--
U 24" 45° RJ BEND�oHE WWF oa
A —
� �. siw � a'� \- .. -._ — � _ _- T � — _ — � PROPOSED 5' PUE �
w
24"45° RJ BEND Lx 5B+34.54 _ _ _ 62
24'45' RJ BEND - — — — ILL, 10' 24
E ALL
56+13.82e; SILT AND TREE PROTECTION PaEO.,ea
24"45° RJ BEND FENCE, TYP.
\ OPEN -CUT AND REPAIR
\ OPEN -CUT AND REPAIR CHECK DAM, TYP. EX. ASPHALT DRIVE
EX. ASPHALT DRIVE
14 1�41
1411 ID
11
0p
INLET PROTECTION, TYP.
n
OPEN -CUT AND REPAIR W
EX. ASPHALT PAVEMENTLu
OLD APE$�6D =
s Ex s�Oxa co
MAINTAINONE-WAY _"--
ACCESS FOR FIRE 5' MIN. _ = xce CJ
TRUCKS AT ALL TIMES ss.o p
JC
co
OPEN -CUT AND REPAIR ---
1 = EX. ASPHALT DRIVE
RJ BEND
� \ eM �suvc Baas \
I�
� � riusn.ioxw \\ exl
1 }\
I \
NOTES:
1. CONTRACTOR TO IDENTIFY EXISTING WATER AND SEWER
SERVICES AND MAINTAIN SERVICE DURING
CONSTRUCTION WITH TEMPORARY MEASURES AND
REPAIR PERMANENTLY PRIOR TO COMPLETION OF WORK
FOR EACH BLOCK.
2. FIBER OPTIC LINE EXISTS ALONG OLD APEX ROAD.
CONTRACTOR TO LOCATE, PROTECT IN PLACE AND
REPLACE IF DAMAGED.
3. CONTRACTOR TO REPLACE IN KIND ANY LANDSCAPING
DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION OF PROPOSED
WATER LINE.
MEN
OLD APEX ROAD WATERLINE PLAN AND PROFILE WitherSRavenet
CARY WAKE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA 115 A.—n- D- I NC 275111 t: 919A69.33401 lk­ *: C-0832 I —ith--nd.c..
SCALE:
1"= 40' HORIZ.
1"=4' VERT.

4
1444.0
\�
PROPOSED
X
CONSTRUCTION
W
COORIDOR
/
/ rn
N
2pNZ
eUFFFR
IMPACT TYPE
ZONE 1 BUFFER
ZONE 2 BUFFER
WETLAND
PROPOSED WATER LINE
AREA (SF)
1,358
831
148
STREAM � � � 20 LF
GRAPHIC SCALE
20 0 10 20 40
1 inch = 20 ft.
OLD APEX ROAD WATERLINEWithersRavenel
IMPACT EXHIBIT 1 1/ Engineers I Planners I Surveyors
REINFORCEMENT 115MacKenan Drivel Cary, NC 27511
t: 919.469.3340 I license #: C-0832 I—mithersravenel.com