20191307 Ver 1_PCN Form Submission_20190927

DWR
MOM— of Water Resources
Site Coordinates
Latitude: Longitude:
35.767366 -78.799095
AProcessing Information U
County (or Counties) where the project is located:
Wake
Is this project a public transportation project?*
r Yes r No
1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
* Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams and waters, Clean Water Act)
r Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act)
1b. What type(s) of permit(s) do you wish to seek authorization?
rJ Nationwide Permit (NWP)
F- Regional General Permit (RGP)
F Standard (IP)
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
September 29, 2018 Ver 3
tial Review
Has this project met the requirements for acceptance
in to the review process?*
r Yes
r No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
G Yes r No
Qiange only if needed.
BIMS # Assigned *
Version#*
20191307
1
Is a payment required for this project?*
* No payment required
What amout is owed?*
* Fee received
r $240.00
r Fee needed - send electronic notification
r $570.00
Reviewing Office*
Select Project Reviewer*
Raleigh Regional Office - [phone]
Stephanie Goss:eads\szgoss
Information for Initial Review
1a. Name of project:
FY18 Sewer Interceptor Rehabilitation Project
1a. Who is the Primary Contact?*
Alexander J Wilson
1b. Primary Contact Email:*
1c. Primary Contact Phone:*
[e-mail]
[phone]
Date Submitted
9/27/2019
Nearest Body of Water
Swift Creek
Basin
Neuse
Water Classification
WS -111; NSW
Site Coordinates
Latitude: Longitude:
35.767366 -78.799095
AProcessing Information U
County (or Counties) where the project is located:
Wake
Is this project a public transportation project?*
r Yes r No
1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
* Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams and waters, Clean Water Act)
r Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act)
1b. What type(s) of permit(s) do you wish to seek authorization?
rJ Nationwide Permit (NWP)
F- Regional General Permit (RGP)
F Standard (IP)

1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
r Yes r No
Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number:
NWP Numbers (for multiple NWPS):
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
W 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular
F Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
F Individual Permit
12 - Utility Lines
1e. Is this notification solelyfor the record because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWR 401 Certification:
For the record only for Corps Permit:
r 401 Water Quality Certification - Express
r Riparian Buffer Authorization
1f. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?*
r- Yes r No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
r Yes r No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
r- Yes r No
Acceptance Letter Attachment
1h. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties?
r Yes r No
1j. Is the project located in a designated trout watershed?
O Yes r No
B. Applicant Information
1d. Who is applying for the permit?
F_ Owner W Applicant (other than owner)
1e. Is there an Agent/Consultant for this project?
r Yes r No
2. Owner Information
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
Town of Cary Utilities Department
2b. Deed book and page no.:
NA
2c. Responsible party:
NA
2d. Address
Street Address
P.O. Box 5005
Address Line 2
City
Cary
P stal / Zip Code
27512
2e. Telephone Number:
[phone]
2g. Email Address:*
Lynn. [e-mail]
3. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
3a. Name:
Alexander J Wilson
State / Ffovince / Pagion
NC
Country
USA
2f. Fax Number:
[phone]
r Yes r No
r Yes r^ No

3b. Business Name:
Frazier Engineering
3c. Address
Street Address
6592 Bob White Trail
Address Line 2
aty
Stanley
Postal / Zip Code
28164
3d. Telephone Number:
[phone]
3f. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
C. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Project Information
1b. Subdivision name:
(if appropriate)
Beacon Grove
1c. Nearest municipality/ town:
Cary
2, Project Identification
2a. Property Identification Number:
0753945361
2c. Project Address
Street Address
208 Cape Cod Drive
Address Lim 2
CKY
Cary
Postal / Zip Code
27511
3. Surface Waters
3a. Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project:*
Swift Creek
3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving water:*
WS -111; NSW
3c. What river basin(s) is your project located in?*
Neuse
3d. Please provide the 12 -digit HUC in which the project is located.
030202011001
4. Project Description and History
State / F rwince / Fbgicn
NC
Country
USA
3e. Fax Number:
[phone]
2b. Property size:
0.03 (work area)
State / F rwince / Pagion
NC
Country
USA
4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application:*
The project site is located in a residential neighborhood consisting of single-family homes. The work area is within a Town of Cary sanitary sewer easement. Access will be gained
between private residential lots.
4b. Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past?*
r- Yes r- No r Unknown
4d. Attach an 8 1/2X11 excerpt from the most recent version of the USGS topographic map indicating the location of the project site. (for DWR)
002 - USGS Topographic Map.pdf 797.86KB
4e. Attach an 8 1/2 X 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the published County NRCS Soil Survey map depicting the project site. (for DWR)
003 - NRCS Soil Survey Map.pdf 852.89KB
4f. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
0 acres
4g. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property:

86 LF
4h. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:*
To replace a damaged aerial sanitary sewer crossing.
41. Describe the overall project in detail, including indirect impacts and the type of equipment to be used:*
This damaged aerial crossing is being replaced to protect the surrounding parcels and water bodies fro potential sanitary sewerage exposure and to better convey existing flows to the
downstream sewers. This project entails excavation and backfill as necessary to remove and replace the damaged aerial crossing with a new40' steel pipe aerial crossing. No joints are
allowed within the creek. Anchored geotextile filter fabric and Class B rip rap will be used to armor the banks and contours will be returned to original elevations. See attached Detail
07000.18
4j. Please upload project drawings for the proposed project.
004 - Project Drawings and Details.pdf 441.85KB
5. Jurisdictional Determinations
5a. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the property or proposed impact areas?*
r Yes r No r Unknown
Comments:
5b. If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made?*
r Preliminary r Approved r Not Verified r Unknown r N/A
Corps AID Number:
5c. If 5a is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known):
Agency/Consultant Company:
Other:
5d1. Jurisdictional determination upload
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?*
r Yes r No
Are any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permits(s) used, or intended to be used, to authorize any part of the proposed project or related activity?
D. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1a. Where are the impacts associated with your project? (check all that apply):
F Wetlands W Streams -tributaries W Buffers
F Open Waters r Pond Construction
3. Stream Impacts
3a. Reason for impact (?) 3b.lmpact type * 3c. Type of impact* 3d. S. name* 3e. Stream Type * 3f. Type ofwidth * 3h. Impact
M Jurisdiction* length*
AllowableTem ora Excavation UT1 to Swift Creek Perennial Both 25 25
�' P ry Average (feet) (linearfeet)
31. Total jurisdictional ditch impact in square feet
0
3i. Total permanent stream impacts: 3i. Total temporary stream impacts:
0 25
3i. Total stream and ditch impacts:
25
3j. Comments:
Impacts are associated with excavation as necessary at the banks for replacement of an aerial crossing (connecting the new sewer to the existing
sewer) per Detail 07000.18 (included).
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWR)

6a. Project is in which protect basin(s)?
Check all that apply.
V Neuse r Tar -Pamlico
r- Catawba r Randleman
r- Goose Creek r Jordan Lake
r- Other
3b. Impact Type 6c. Per or Temp 6d. Stream name 6e. Buffer mitigation required? 6f. Zone 1 impact 6g. ZoneZone 2 impactimpact
411owable P 1.71 to Swift Creek No 750 10
6h. Total buffer impacts:
Zone 1 Zone 2
Total Temporary impacts: 0.00 0.00
Zone 1 Zone 2
Total Permanent impacts: 750.00 0.00
Zone 1 Zone 2
Total combined buffer impacts: 750.00 0.00
61. Comments:
Reason for Impact: (non -electric utility line perpendicular crossing) Access through buffer will be achieved along epsting sanitary sewer easement.
The permanent impact is rip rap at the stream banks. Class B rip rap and anchored geotextile filter fabric will be used to armor the banks.
Supporting Documentation
005 - Impact Map.pdf 317.76KB
E. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project:
Work is limited to only necessary areas for rehabilitation of the sewer line. Access to the work area is via epsting sanitary sewer easements. The
project will be completed during a relatively low -flow period. Any redesign would result in a greater impact to water bodies and buffer zones on site.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques:
Disturbance will be limited to the work area only as needed to replace the aerial crossing. Al ground disturbance due to access will be graded to
original contours, strawed and seeded. A pump -around will be employed and work will be done "in the dry".
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
r Yes r No
2b. If this project DOES NOT require Compensatory Mitigation, explain why:
This project is maintenance. It only replaces an already existing structure.
F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWR)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
f Yes r No
If no, explain why:
No impervious surface being added beyond bank armoring.
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's Individual NPDES permit NCS000250?"
r^ Yes r No
2b. Does this project meet the requirements for low density projects as defined in 15A NCAC 02H .1003(2)?
r Yes r No
Comments:

G. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation
1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land?*
r Yes r No
1b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State (North Carolina)
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)? *
r Yes r No
Comments:*
Local funds only.
2. Violations (DWR Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), or DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or
Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B.0200)?*
r Yes r No
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement)
3a. Will this project result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?*
r Yes r No
3b. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
Project involves service to existing infrastructure. The area around the work site is completely built out with residential subdivisions.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)
4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project?*
r Yes r Nor WA
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat?
r Yes r No
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts?*
r Yes r No
5d. Is another Federal agency involved?*
r Yes r No r Unknown
5e. Is this a DOT project located within Division's 1-8?
r Yes r No
5f. Will you cut anytrees in order to conduct the work in waters of the U.S.?
r Yes r No
5g. Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal?
r Yes r No
5h. Does this project involve the construction/installation of a wind turbine(s)?*
r Yes r No
51. Does this project involve (1) blasting, and/or (2) other percussive activities that will be conducted by machines, such as jackhammers, mechanized pile drivers, etc.?
r Yes r No
5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat?
See attachment F -5-5d
Consultation Documentation Upload
006 - Attachment F.5.5d.pdf 33.38KB
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat?*
r Yes r No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact an Essential Fish Habitat?*
Site is not within one of the 20 coastal counties.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)

7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status?*
r Yes r No
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?*
NC Historic Protection Office HPOWEB Service. No elements on or near project site. (accessed 2/6/2019)
7c. Historic or Prehistoric Information Upload
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplain?*
r Yes r No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
Existing contours will not be modified by this project.
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?*
Map No. 3720075300J Firm Panel: 0753 (effective 5/2/2006)
Miscellaneous
Comments
Miscellaneous attachments not previously requested.
v
Signature u
W By checking the box and signing below, I certify that:
• I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
• I agree that submission of this PCN form is a 'transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
• I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act');
. I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND
• I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form.
Full Name:
Alexander Jacks Wilson
Signature 4 ,
,r&-rs C J-43 ((Igvd
Date
9/27/2019

AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
PROPERTY LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
A. LOT NO. 7030 PLAN NO. BM1986, Page 2008 PARCEL ID: 0753945361
STREET ADDRESS: 208 Cape Cod Drive, Cary, NC 27511
Please print:
Property Owner: Brian J. Winter— property owner at 208 Cape Cod Drive (work is within existing
Town of Cary sewer easement).
B. LOT NO. 20 PLAN NO. BM1993, Page 1353 PARCEL ID: 0753947331
STREET ADDRESS: 139 Sterlingdaire Drive, Cary, NC 27511
Please print:
Property Owner: Moufid A. Alossi — property owner at 139 Sterlingdaire Drive (work is within
existing Town of Cary sewer easement).
C. LOT NO. 19 PLAN NO.
PARCEL ID: 0753947205
STREET ADDRESS: 137 Sterlingdaire Drive, Carv, NC 27511
Please print:
Property Owner: Peggy Boothe — property owner at 137 Sterlingdaire Drive Drive (work is within
existing Town of Cary sewer easement).
The undersigned, registered property owners of the above noted property, do hereby authorize
Alex Wilson , of Frazier Engineering, PA
(Contractor / Agent) (Name of consulting firm)
to act on my behalf and take all actions necessary for the processing, issuance and acceptance of
this permit or certification and any and all standard and special conditions attached.
Property Owner's Address (if different than property above):
Town of Cary Utilities Department, P.O. Box 8005, Cary, NC 27512
Telephone: [phone]
We hereby certify the above information submitted in this application is true and accurate to the
best of ur knowledge.
Lynn Brilz, P.E. 4'eRevels, P.E.
Senior Project Manager - Town of Cary Utilities Director — T7nof Cary
Date: Date:

AERIAL SEWER CROSSING REPLACEMENT
0
202
200
101
103
AERIAL SEWER LINE
204 TO BE REPLACED
133
0 N
129
131
126
FRI
124
N
m
r
z
122
v
in
v
120
118
127 125 123

FY18 Sewer Interceptor Rehabilitation ProjectUSGS Topographic MapAerial Creek Crossing Site Location
Soil Map—Wake County, North Carolina
(FY18 Sewer Int. Rehab. Project - Aerial Crossing)
Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey
National Cooperative Soil Survey
2/6/2019
Page 1 of 3396000039601003960200396030039604003960500396060039607003960100396020039603003960400396050039606003960700698400698500698600698700698800698900699000699100699200699300699400699500
698400 698500 698600 698700 698800 698900 699000 699100 699200 699300 699400 699500
35° 46' 13'' N 78° 48' 19'' W35° 46' 13'' N78° 47' 34'' W35° 45' 49'' N
78° 48' 19'' W35° 45' 49'' N
78° 47' 34'' WN
Map projection: Web Mercator Corner coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 17N WGS84
0 250 500 1000 1500
Feet
0 50 100 200 300
Meters
Map Scale: 1:5,150 if printed on A landscape (11" x 8.5") sheet.
Soil Map may not be valid at this scale.
MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION
Area of Interest (AOI)
Area of Interest (AOI)
Soils
Soil Map Unit Polygons
Soil Map Unit Lines
Soil Map Unit Points
Special Point Features
Blowout
Borrow Pit
Clay Spot
Closed Depression
Gravel Pit
Gravelly Spot
Landfill
Lava Flow
Marsh or swamp
Mine or Quarry
Miscellaneous Water
Perennial Water
Rock Outcrop
Saline Spot
Sandy Spot
Severely Eroded Spot
Sinkhole
Slide or Slip
Sodic Spot
Spoil Area
Stony Spot
Very Stony Spot
Wet Spot
Other
Special Line Features
Water Features
Streams and Canals
Transportation
Rails
Interstate Highways
US Routes
Major Roads
Local Roads
Background
Aerial Photography
The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at
1:24,000.
Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale.
Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause
misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil
line placement. The maps do not show the small areas of
contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed
scale.
Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map
measurements.
Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey URL:
Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857)
Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator
projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts
distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the
Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more
accurate calculations of distance or area are required.
This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as
of the version date(s) listed below.
Soil Survey Area: Wake County, North Carolina
Survey Area Data: Version 17, Sep 10, 2018
Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales
1:50,000 or larger.
Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Apr 27, 2014—May
6, 2014
The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were
compiled and digitized probably differs from the background
imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor
shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident.
Soil Map—Wake County, North Carolina
(FY18 Sewer Int. Rehab. Project - Aerial Crossing)
Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey
National Cooperative Soil Survey
2/6/2019
Page 2 of 3
Map Unit Legend
Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI
AaA Altavista fine sandy loam, 0 to
4 percent slopes, rarely
flooded
7.9 7.0%
CfC Cecil-Urban land complex, 2 to
10 percent slopes
6.1 5.4%
ChA Chewacla and Wehadkee
soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes,
frequently flooded
23.1 20.3%
GeB Georgeville silt loam, 2 to 6
percent slopes
7.8 6.9%
GeC Georgeville silt loam, 6 to 10
percent slopes
5.4 4.7%
NaD Nanford silt loam, 10 to 15
percent slopes
29.2 25.8%
NaE Nanford silt loam, 15 to 25
percent slopes
7.2 6.3%
PbD Pacolet-Urban land complex,
10 to 15 percent slopes
21.0 18.5%
Ur Urban land 2.2 2.0%
W Water 3.5 3.0%
Totals for Area of Interest 113.4 100.0%
Soil Map—Wake County, North Carolina FY18 Sewer Int. Rehab. Project -
Aerial Crossing
Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey
National Cooperative Soil Survey
2/6/2019
Page 3 of 3
Soil present at Project Site
" TABLE 1042-1
ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA FOR RIP RAP AND STONE FOR EROSION CONTROL
REQUIRED STONES SIZED, Inches
CLASS
MINIMUM
MIDRANGE MAXIMUM
A
2
4 6
B
5
8 12
1
5
10 17
2
4
14 23
END OF STEEL PIPE
NOT TO EXCEED 6"
INSIDE COUPLING
16" LONG
COUPLING SLEEVE
NON—RESTRAINED JOINT __/ \— RESTRAINED JOINT
" NCUQT 2012 STANDARD 5PEOFICAWN5 5ECTICN 1043
(STANDARD
(MEGA-LUG)
NOTES: LADPACK}
1. DETAIL MODIFIED FOR THE FY 18 SEWER INTERCEPTOR RESTRAINED JOINT (MEGA -LUG) DETAIL
REHABILITATION PROJECT.
2. INSTALL CIPP FROM SP75316082 TO SP75316101 AFTER
WORK ON THIS DETAIL IS COMPLETE.
INSTALL NEW MH
40'—D"
STEEL PIPE
CLASS 8 RIP RAP SHALL DE
KEYED INTO THE GROUND AND
THE ORIGINAL CONTOURS SHALL
BE MAINTAINE-) AS PER U.S-
ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
STREAM CHANNEL
TRANSITION COLLAR DETAIL
L
T -
SEE TRANSITION
COLLAR DETAIL
L EXISTING 8" DIP
SEE RESTRAINED JOINT
(MEGA -LUG) DETAIL
TRANSITION CCLLAT� GEOTEXTILE FILTER FABRIC ANCHORED
(CONNECTED TO MH) SECTION VIEW TO THE SLOPE (TYP.)
DETAIL No.
AERIAL CROSSING DETAIL FOR SP75316082. TO SP75316101 07000.18
(MODIFIED)

FY18 SEWER INTERCEPTOR REHABILIATION PROJECTAERIAL CROSSINGCREEK IMPACT = 25 LFZONE 1 BUFFER IMPACT = 750 SQFT
FY18 SEWER INTERCEPTOR REHABILIATION PROJECTAERIAL CROSSINGCREEK IMPACT = 25 LFZONE 1 BUFFER IMPACT = 750 SQFT
ATTACHMENT F.5.5d
FY18 Sewer Interceptor Rehabilitation Project
Between Beacon Cove and Sterling at Kildaire Farms

5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered
Species or Designated Critical Habitat?
A NC Natural Heritage Program (NHP) database search was conducted for the USGS Cary
Quadrangle (www.ncnhp.org/web/nhp/database-search) on 2/6/19. The NHP database identified
two occurrences of federally-protected species.
• The Bald Eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) was identified as having current occurrences
within the Cary quadrangle. The bald eagle is not listed as a federally endangered or
threatened species; however, it is protected under the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection
Act (BGPA).
Bald eagles live near rivers, large lakes and marshes where they can find fish and other
prey animals. Bald eagles require a good food base, perching areas, and nesting sites.
Although several small ponds/lakes are located within the vicinity of the project site, no
large water bodies are located within one mile of the project site. Based upon this
information, the project is anticipated to have NO EFFECT on this species.
• Michaux’s sumac (Rhus michauxii) is listed by the NHP as having documented
occurrences in Wake County. Michaux’s sumac is a woody shrub found in open woods in
rocky or sandy soils. The project are consists of maintained sanitary sewer/greenway
easements, all under canopy cover. No specimens of Michaux’s sumac have been
observed at the project site. Based upon this information, the project is anticipated to
have NO EFFECT on this species.
An IPac Trust Resources Report and an official threatened and endangered species list was
requested from the USFWS Environmental Conservation Online System (ECOS)
(http://ecos.fws.gov/ipac) on 2/9/19. Three federally-listed species in addition to Michaux’s
sumac were listed as having recorded occurrences in Wake County.
• The endangered Red-Cockaded Woodpecker (Picoides borealis) has historical
occurrences in southern Wake County. According to the ECOS species profile, this
species inhabits mature pine forests. The project area is composed of maintained utility
easements surrounded by single-family residential lots. No cutting of vegetation is
proposed for this project. Based upon this information, the project is anticipated to
have NO EFFECT on this species.

• The endangered Dwarf Wedgemussel (Alasmidonta heterdon) is found in creeks and
rivers in stable habitats with substrates ranging from mixed sand, pebble, and gravel, to
clay and silty sand. The unnamed tributary to Swift Creek in the project area has an
incised channel with a considerable clay loamy bedload. No suitable habitat appears
present for this species. Based upon this information, the project is anticipated to
have NO EFFECT on this species.

• The Yellow Lance (Elliptio lanceolata) is proposed as Threatened. This species is found
in medium-sized rivers and smaller creeks, usually in sand, but sometimes gravel,
substrates. This species depends on clean, moderate flowing water with high dissolved
oxygen. As described above, the unnamed tributary to Swift Creek has an incised channel
with a considerable clay loamy bedload and does not provide a suitable habitat for this
species. Based upon this information, the project is anticipated to have NO EFFECT
on this species.