20040776 Ver 1_COMPLETE FILE_20070828

r?C? W A T ARP
ODW_

Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimck, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
November 18, 2004
DWQ# 04-0776
Gaston County
Mr.Mike Reeve
North Star Investors, LLC
10800 Sikes Place, Suite 250
Charlotte, NC 28277
Subject: Reflection Pointe
APPROVAL of 401 Water Quality Certification with Additional Conditions
Dear Mr. Reeve:
You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions and those listed below, to impact
0.17 acre of wetland and 561 linear (If) (295 If perennial) of five unnamed streams to Lake Wylie as
enumerated below and described in your application received by the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) on
August 3, 2004.
Purpose Approved Impact
Stream/Wetland Plan Location or Reference
Road crossing 100 linear feet/0.05 acre Im pact #1 Reflection Pt. Blvd.
Road crossing 158 linear feet/0.02 acre Im pact #2 Arbors Ford Ct.
Road crossing 139 linear feet/0.05 acre Im pact #3 Lake Pointe Dr.
Road crossing 51 linear feet/0.014 acre Im pact #4 Headlands Ct.
Road crossing 113 linear feet/0.04 acre im pact #5 Reflection Pt. Blvd.
After reviewing your application, we have determined that this project is covered by Water Quality General
Certification Number 3402, which can be viewed on our web site at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands.
The General Certification allows you to use Nationwide Permit Number 39 once it is issued to you by the U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers. Please note that you should get any other federal, state or local permits before
proceeding with your project, including those required by (but not limited to) Sediment and Erosion Control,
Non-Discharge, and Water Supply Watershed regulations.
The above noted Certification will expire when the associated 404 permit expires unless otherwise
specified in the General Certification. This approval is only valid for the purpose and design that you
described in your application. If you change your project, you must notify us in writing, and you may be
required to send us a new application for a new certification. If the property is sold, the new owner must be
given a copy of the Certification and approval letter; and is thereby responsible for complying with all
conditions.
For this approval to be valid, you must follow the conditions listed in the attached Certification, as well
as the additional conditions listed below:
1.
The work conducted at Impacts #1 and #3 to stabilize and restore the stream channels shall be monitored
for three (3) years. A written semiannual report (including photos) shall be submitted to the Wetlands Unit
One
thCarolina
NO(
,lVallma!!y
North Carolina Division of Water Quality 610 East Center Ave., Suite 301
Intemet: h2o.enr.state.nc.us
Mooresville, NC 28115 Phone [phone] Customer Service
FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer- 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
and the Mooresville Regional Office beginning in January 2005. If during the monitoring period the stream
banks are observed to be eroding, sloughing, or collapsing, DWQ shall be notified and an updated stream
stabilization plan shall be submitted for DWQ approval. If the work is not conducted according to the
submitted plan then this approval is no longer valid.
2. All constructed stormwater conveyance outlets shall be directed as diffuse flow at non-erosive velocities
through the protected stream buffer such that it will not re-concentrate before discharging into a stream or
Lake Wylie. This includes the constructed stormwater discharge outlet located on lot 36. If this is not
possible, a stormwater management plan for the project shall be provided to this Office before occupancy of
any facilities at the site. The plan shall specify all stormwater discharge points, plan details, and calculations
to indicate that diffuse flow through the protected buffer will be achieved.
3. Deed notifications or similar mechanisms shall be placed on all lots with remaining jurisdictional wetlands
and waters or areas within 50 feet of all streams and ponds on the property. These mechanisms shall be
put in place within 30 days of the date of this letter or the issuance of the 404 Permit (whichever is later). A
sample deed notification format can be downloaded from the 401/Wetlands Unit web site at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands.
4. The culverts required for this project shall be installed in such a manner that the original stream profiles are
not altered (i.e. the depth of the channel must not be reduced by a widening of the streambed). Existing
stream dimensions (including the pattern and profile) are to be maintained above and below locations of
each culvert. The culverts shall be designed and installed to allow for aquatic life movement as well as to
prevent head cutting of the streams. If any of the existing pipes are or become perched, the appropriate
stream grade shall be re-established or, if the pipes are installed in a perched manner, the pipes shall be
removed and re-installed correctly.
The applicant must submit a plan and receive written approval from this office to address any head cutting
that will occur as a result of this project (e.g., use of cross vanes downstream of the culvert).
Use of native vegetation and other soft streambank stabilization techniques must be used where practicable
instead of riprap or other bank hardening methods. If riprap is necessary, it shall not be place in the
streambed, unless approved by the DWQ.
5. We understand that you have chosen to contribute to the Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP) in order
to compensate for the stream and wetland impacts. In accordance with 15A NCAC 2R .0402 and 15A
NCAC 2B .0242(7), this contribution will satisfy our compensatory mitigation requirements under 15A NCAC
2H .0506(h) and 15A NCAC 2B .0233(10). Until the EEP receives and clears your check (made payable to:
DENR - Ecosystem Enhancement Program), the stream and wetland impacts shall not occur. Ms. Deborah
Anderson should be contacted at [phone] if you have any questions concerning the EEP. You have
one month from the date of this Certification to make this payment. For accounting purposes, this
Certification authorizes the fill of 0.17 acre of wetland and 295 linear feet of perennial stream in the Catawba
River Basin, Cataloging Units 03050101 and 03050102. Two hundred ninety five linear feet (295 If) of
stream mitigation is required. Please be aware that the EEP rules require rounding of wetland impacts to
the nearest foot/ quarter acre (15A NCAC 2R .0503(b)).
6. No waste, spoil, solids, or fill of any kind shall occur in wetlands, waters, or riparian areas beyond the
footprint of the impacts depicted in the Preconstruction Notification application. All construction activities
shall be performed so that no violations of state water quality standards, statutes, or rules occur.
7. Erosion and sediment control practices must utilize Best Management Practices (BMP) and be in full
compliance with all specifications governing the proper design, installation, and operation and
maintenance of such BMP in order to protect surface water standards:
L
8. Sediment and erosion control measures shall not be placed in wetlands or waters to the maximum extent
practicable. If placement of sediment and erosion control devices in wetlands and waters is unavoidable,
they shall be removed and the natural grade restored within six months of the date the Division of Land
Resources has released the project.
9. Upon completion of the project, the applicant shall complete and return the enclosed "Certificate of
Completion" form to the 401/Wetlands Unit of the NC Division of Water Quality.
10. Continuing Compliance. North Star Investors (NSI) shall conduct its activities in a manner consistent with
state water quality standards (including any requirements for compliance with section 303(d) of the Clean
Water Act) and any other appropriate requirements of state and federal law. If DWQ determines that such
standards or laws are not being met (including the failure to sustain a designated or achieved use) or that
state or federal law is being violated, or that further conditions are necessary to assure compliance, DWQ
may reevaluate and modify this certification to include conditions appropriate to assure compliance with
such standards and requirements in accordance with 15 A NCAC 2H.0507(d). Before codifying the
certification, DWQ shall notify NSI and the US Army Corps of Engineers, provide public notice in
accordance with 15A NCAC 2H.0503, and provide opportunity for public hearing in accordance with 15A
NCAC 2H.0504. Any new or revised conditions shall be provided to NSI in writing, shall be provided to the
United States Army Corps of Engineers for reference in any permit issued pursuant to Section 404 of the
Clean Water Act, and shall also become conditions of the 404 Permit for the project.
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this certification, you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing.
You must act within 60 days of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send a written
petition that conforms to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of Administrative
Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, N.C. 27699-6714. This certification and its conditions are final
and binding unless you ask for a hearing.
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean Water
Act. If you have any questions, please telephone Alan Johnson in the Mooresville Regional Office at 704-
663-1699 or Cyndi Karoly in the Central Office in Raleigh 919-733-9721.
Sincerely,
Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
AJ/a j
Attachments
cc: Army Corps of Engineers, Asheville
Cyndi Karoly, Wetlands Unit
Rob Gordon, Gaston SWCD
Chris Huysman
Central Files
r
NORTH CAROLINA-DIVISON OF WATER QUALITY
401 WATER QUALITY CERTIFICATION
SUMMARY OF PERMITTED IMPACTS AND MITIGATION REQUIREMENTS
040776
In accordance with 15A NCAC 2 H .0500, North Star Investors, LLC has permission as outlined below to
fill 0.174 acre of wetlands and 561 linear feet of stream in order to construct the Reflection Pointe
Development residential subdivision in Mecklenburg County, North Carolina. All activities associated with
these authorized impacts must be conducted with the conditions listed in the attached certification. THIS
CERTIFICATION IS NOT VALID WITHOUT THE ATTACHMENTS.
COMPENSATORY MITIGATION REQUIREMENT: ECOSYSTEM ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM
LOCATION:
COUNTY:
Reflection Pointe Development
Gaston
BASIN/SUBBASIN Catawba (030501 Oland 03050102)
Impacts:
0.174 acre of wetlands
295 linear feet of perennial streams (561 linear feet total)
As required by 15A NCAC 2H .0506, and the conditions of this certification, you are required to
compensate for the above impacts through the restoration, creation, enhancement or preservation of wetlands
as outlined below prior to conducting any activities that impact or degrade the waters of the state.
Mitigation:
295 linear feet of perennial streams by EEP required for the 401 Water Quality Certification. In
correspondence dated October 15, 2004, the EEP indicated that 295 linear feet of stream mitigation will be
conducted by EEP.
Note: Linear foot requirements proposed to be mitigated through the Ecosystem Enhancement Program
must be rounded to the nearest foot and acreage requirements must be rounded to one-quarter acre
increments according to 15 2r.0503(b).
One of the options you have available to satisfy the compensatory mitigation requirements is through
the payment of a fee to the Ecosystem Enhancement Fund per NCAC 2R .0503. If you choose this option,
please sign this form and mail it to the Ecosystem Enhancement Fund at the address listed below. An invoice
for the appropriate amount of payment will be sent to you upon receipt of this form. PLEASE NOTE, THE
ABOVE IMPACTS ARE NOT AUTHORIZED UNTIL YOU RECEIVE NOTIFICATION THAT YOUR PAYMENT
HAS BEEN PROCESSED BY THE EEP.
Signature Date
ECOSYSTEM ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM
DIVISON OF WATER QUALITY
1619 Mail Service Center
RALEIGH, N.C. 27669-1619
MEMORANDUM
TO: John Dorney Regional Contact: Alan Johnson
Non-Discharge Branch WQ Supervisor: Rex Gleason
Date:
SUBJECT: WETLAND STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Facility Name Reflection Pointe Subdivision c/o North Star County Gaston
Project Number 04 0776
Recvd From APP
Received Date 5111104 Recvd By Region
Project Type subdivision roads
County2
Region Mooresville
Certificates Stream
Permit Wetland Wetland Wetland Stream Class Acres Feet
Type Type Impact Score Index Prim. Supp. Basin Req. Req.
F39 forested FT-0 N 11-(123.5) WSV F B 30,834. 0.02 F
CBR Stream O Y -@N F_ F_ F__F- 30,831. __ 643.00
F_ F_ P7 _0N r
Mitigation Wetland
MitigationType Type Acres Feet

Is Wetland Rating Sheet Attached? 0 Y 0 N Did you request more info? ®0 Y 0 N
Have Project Changes/Conditions Been Discussed With Applicant? 0 Y 0 N
Is Mitigation required? 0 Y O N Recommendation: 0 Issue 0 Issue/Cond 0 Deny
Provided by Region: Latitude (ddmmss) 350927.5 Longitude (ddmmss) $10119.4
Comments:
Staff visited the site on July 1, 2004. The requested road crossings had already been installed. In
addition excessive sediment accumulations were observed in the stream channels. A NOV has been
issued and the eject placed on hold till the issues can be resolved,
cc: Regional Office
Central Office Page Number ',1
.?A?7-;FA
MCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Michael F. Easley, Governor
Mr. Mike Reeve
North Star Investors II, LLC
10800 Sikes Place, Suite 250
Charlotte, NC 28277
Dear Mr. Reeve:
WETLANDS/ 401 GROUP
SEP 14 2004
WATER QUALITY SECTION
(f
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
September 8, 2004
Gaston County
DWQ # 04-0776
On September 2, 2004 Mr. Alan Johnson and Ms. Polly Lespinasse of this office visited the
subject site to inspect the work conducted to remove sediment from the stream channels and Lake
Wylie that was observed during the initial site visit on July 7m. It was evident that some work had
been done, however, excessive sediment depositions remained at all three crossing (Impacts #1,
#2, and #3 on site plan). Specifically, the following was noted:
Impact #1: Approximately 20' downstream of the culvert, approximately 18" of sediment
was observed in the stream channel. At approximately 100' downstream of the culvert 10"
of sediment was observed. In the lake, sediment deposition covered approximately 250
square feet It also appears that the sediment removed from the stream channel was
disposed on and spread over the riparian area.
The upstream side of the culvert was to be restored to a more natural grade with vegetative
plantings. This has not been done. It also appears that additional sediment is entering the
stream from a sediment basin just upstream of the culvert.
• Impact #2: While no measurements were taken, sediment accumulations were observed in
the stream channel and cove of the lake.
• Impact #3: Approximately 30' down stream of the second check dam approximately 14" of
sediment was observed in the stream channel. Approximately 30" of sediment was noted
75' downstream of the check dam. Sediment deposition in the lake was also observed.
The upstream side of the culvert was to be restored to a more natural grade with vegetative
plantings. This has not been done.
The stormwater must be discharged as diffuse flow through the 50' buffer. Currently, the
riprap apron is located within the buffer (approximately 38' from the 569' project elevation
of Lake Wylie).
919 North Main Street, Mooresville, North Carolina 28115 One
Phone: [phone] l FAX: [phone] / Internet h2o.enr.state.nc.us NorthCarolina
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer- 50°X6 Recycled/106k Post Consumer Paper Natzaral&
Total stream impact at this location is approximately 398 linear ft. This includes the
139 'of impact for the proposed road crossing, but does not include measurement of
the stream meander.
Until the issues relating to the restoration of the stream channels (including sediment
removal) and the proper installation of the road crossing at Impact #3 have been resolved,
issuance of the 401 certification will remain on hold pursuant to 15A NCAC 2H .0507(h).
It is requested that a plan of action be submitted to this office by September 18, 2004
indicating a date of completion for the removal of the sediment and restoration of the stream
channels. Also, please provide a site plan for correcting the problems associated with Impact
#3, (the redesign of the road crossing and how the stormwater at this site will be collected and
discharged) as well as the redesign of the road crossing at Impact #5.
If you have any questions, please contact Alan Johnson at [phone] or Cyndi Karoly.
in Raleigh at [phone].
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P. E.
Surface Water Protection
Regional Supervisor
Attachments
cc: Corps of Engineers-Asheville
Cyndi Karoly - Wetlands Unit
Danny Smith
Chris Huysman
Central Files
File
- ? - --- - ?----- -• - -• - -j- -• -.

ScAzv.- .Cr6- Aepos i ? & On
i ;
`rte
Jc b
E
a.? pyvci wto l
0?01 Wc-z
„
?a c
c-4-

Se?i?,?1erlT- A-epos,+orb a-? z7m?ac+ A3 4fproxi -
cz?-e?? ?S AoL,,,,,,s?m. w\ O,? cliccL ?o wi,
rc?>ktVv"\
C?ke.c k, Ac vtl\.
bvl< 61 L
?QF W ATF9Q Michacl F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
UJ r North Carolina Department or Environment and Natural Resources
O .? Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
March 10, 2005
CERTIFIED MAIL
Return Receipt Requested
Mr. Mike Reeve D
North Star Investors II, LLC MAR 1 5 2005
10800 Sikes Place, Suite 250
Charlotte, NC 28277 DENR - WATER QUALITY
WETLANDS AND STORMWATER BRANCH
Subject: Notice of Violation
DWQ # 04-0776
Incident #200500591
NOV #SP-2005-0004
Reflection Pointe Phase I
Gaston County, NC
Dear Mr. Reeve:
On February 23, 2005, Mr. Alan Johnson and Ms. Polly Lespinasse of this office visited the subject site in
response to a notification by Mr. Chris Huysman (your consultant) regarding recent sediment impacts to the
stream at stream crossing #5.
It was observed that approximately 200 ft. of stream below the road crossing and 750 ft. of stream above
the road crossing had been impacted from sediment deposition ranging from 5" to 18" in depth. The origin of
the sediment appeared to be from the main sediment basin located under the power lines north of the main
entrance.
The sediment must be removed from the channel. While the shovel and bucket method of removal is
acceptable for the removal of the main sediment deposits, a less intrusive method (low impact) is required for
removal of the remaining sediment. The natural streambed (sand/pebble/cobble stone) must be protected.
The following items were also observed during the site visit:
• Immediately above road crossing #5 it was observed that approximately 50 ft. of channel had been
removed, as well as all vegetation adjacent to the channel. The area was left bear with no silt fence to
prevent more sediment from entering the stream. The area must be stabilized and the channel must
be restored and vegetation replanted (2" caliper, native specie trees).
• The culvert was not properly installed. The down stream end of the culvert was perched thus
preventing the movement of aquatic life upstream (Condition #9, General Certification #3402). The
culvert must be reinstalled or measures taken to facilitate the movement of aquatic life upstream and
downstream of the culvert.
• The stormwater outfall at road crossing # 3 must be reworked. Flow from the outfall must be diffused
so as to prevent erosion and scouring in the buffer.
N097` Carolina
tura!!1
North Carolina Division of Water Quality 610 East Center Ave., Suite 301 Mooresville, NC 28115 Phone [phone] Customer Service
Internet h2o.enr.state.nc.us FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer- 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
On March 4, 2005, this office received a proposal from Mr. Huysman addressing the above noted
problems. A progress report on the clean up at the site is due by April 1`t, and all work will be completed by
May 2"d. We have reviewed the clean up plan and in general have found it acceptable.
If you have any questions, please contact Alan Johnson at [phone] or Cyndi Karoly in Raleigh at
[phone].
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P. E.
Surface Water Protection
Regional Supervisor
cc: Corps of Engineers-Asheville
Cyndi Karoly - Wetlands Unit
Danny Smith
Chris Huysman
Central Files
File
O?CF W A Tp9QG
J
? W
Mr.Mike Reeve
North Star Investors, LLC
10800 Sikes Place, Suite 250
Charlotte, NC 28277
Subject: Reflection Pointe
Michael F. Easley. Govcr;
William G. Ross Jr.. Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
RD
Nov 2 D
4
n? ?;;??NN 3 200
{1C /OST!i? QU4t/7?y
APPROVAL of 401 Water Quality Certification with Additional Conditions
Dear Mr. Reeve:
Alan W. Khmcl.. F.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
November 18, 2004
DWQ# 04-0776
Gaston County
You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions and those listed below, to impact
0.17 acre of wetland and 561 linear (If) (295 If perennial) of five unnamed streams to Lake Wylie as
enumerated below and described in your application received by the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) on
August 3, 2004.
Purpose Approved Impact
Stream/Wetland Plan Location or Reference
Road crossing 100 linear feet/0.05 acre Imp act #1 Reflection Pt. Blvd.
Road crossing 158 linear feet/0.02 acre Imp act #2 Arbors Ford Ct.
Road crossing 139 linear feet/0.05 acre Imp act #3 Lake Pointe Dr.
Road crossing 51 linear feet/0.014 acre Imp act #4 Headlands Ct.
Road crossing 113 linear feet/0.04 acre Im act #5 Reflection Pt. Blvd.
After reviewing your application, we have determined that this project is covered by Water Quality General
Certification Number 3402, which can be viewed on our web site at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands.
The General Certification allows you to use Nationwide Permit Number 39 once it is issued to you by the U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers. Please note that you should get any other federal, state or local permits before
proceeding with your project, including those required by (but not limited to) Sediment and Erosion Control,
Non-Discharge, and Water Supply Watershed regulations.
The above noted Certification will expire when the associated 404 permit expires unless otherwise
specified in the General Certification. This approval is only valid for the purpose and design that you
described in your application. If you change your project, you must notify us in writing, and you may be
required to send us a new application for a new certification. If the property is sold, the new owner must be
given a copy of the Cyertification and approval letter, and is thereby responsible for complying with all
conditions.
For this approval to be valid, you must follow the conditions listed in the attached Certification, as well
as the additional conditions listed below:
1. The work conducted at Impacts #1 and #3 to stabilize and restore the stream channels shall be monitored
for three (3) years. A written semiannual report (including photos) shall be submitted to the Wetlands Unit
horthCarolina
Alaturallif
North Carolina Division of Water Quality 610 East Center Ave., Suite 301
Internet: h2o.enr.state.nc.us
Mooresville, NC 28115 Phone [phone] Customer Service
FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer- 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
and the Mooresville Regional Office beginning in January 2005. If during the monitoring period the stream
banks are observed to be eroding, sloughing, or collapsing, DWQ shall be notified and an updated stream
stabilization plan shall be submitted for DWQ approval. If the work is not conducted according to the
submitted plan then this approval is no longer valid.
2. All constructed stormwater conveyance outlets shall be directed as diffuse flow at non-erosive velocities
through the protected stream buffer such that it will not re-concentrate before discharging into a stream or
Lake Wylie. This includes the constructed stormwater discharge outlet located on lot 36. If this is not
possible, a stormwater management plan for the project shall be provided to this Office before occupancy of
any facilities at the site. The plan shall specify all stormwater discharge points, plan details, and calculations
to indicate that diffuse flow through the protected buffer will be achieved.
3. Deed notifications or similar mechanisms shall be placed on all lots with remaining jurisdictional wetlands
and waters or areas within 50 feet of all streams and ponds on the property. These mechanisms shall be
put in place within 30 days of the date of this letter or the issuance of the 404 Permit (whichever is later). A
sample deed notification format can be downloaded from the 401/Wetlands Unit web site at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands.
4. The culverts required for this project shall be installed in such a manner that the original stream profiles are
not altered (i.e. the depth of the channel must not be reduced by a widening of the streambed). Existing
stream dimensions (including the pattern and profile) are to be maintained above and below locations of
each culvert. The culverts shall be designed and installed to allow for aquatic life movement as well as to
prevent head cutting of the streams. If any of the existing pipes are or become perched, the appropriate
stream grade shall be re-established or, if the pipes are installed in a perched manner, the pipes shall be
removed and re-installed correctly.
The applicant must submit a plan and receive written approval from this office to address any head cutting
that will occur as a result of this project (e.g., use of cross vanes downstream of the culvert).
Use of native vegetation and other soft streambank stabilization techniques must be used where practicable
instead of riprap or other bank hardening methods. If riprap is necessary, it shall not be place in the
streambed, unless approved by the DWQ.
5. We understand that you have chosen to contribute to the Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP) in order
to compensate for the stream and wetland impacts. In accordance with 15A NCAC 2R.0402 and 15A
NCAC 2B.0242(7), this contribution will satisfy our compensatory mitigation requirements under 15A NCAC
2H.0506(h) and 15A NCAC 2B .0233(10). Until the EEP receives and clears your check (made payable to:
DENR - Ecosystem Enhancement Program), the stream and wetland impacts shall not occur. Ms. Deborah
Anderson should be contacted at [phone] if you have any questions concerning the EEP. You have
one month from the date of this Certification to make this payment. For accounting purposes, this
Certification authorizes the fill of 0.17 acre of wetland and 295 linear feet of perennial stream in the Catawba
River Basin, Cataloging Units 03050101 and 03050102. Two hundred ninety five linear feet (295 If) of
stream mitigationais required. Please be aware that the EEP rules require rounding of wetland impacts to
the nearest foot/ quarter acre (15A NCAC 2R .0503(b)).
6. No waste, spoil, solids, or fill of any kind shall occur in wetlands, waters, or riparian areas beyond the
footprint of the impacts depicted in the Preconstruction Notification application. All construction activities
shall be performed so that no violations of state water quality standards, statutes, or rules occur.
7. Erosion and sediment control practices must utilize Best Management Practices (BMP) and be in full
compliance with all specifications governing the proper design, installation, and operation and
maintenance of such BMP in order to protect surface water standards:
and the Mooresville Regional Office beginning in January 2005. If during the monitoring period the stream
banks are observed to be eroding, sloughing, or collapsing, DWQ shall be noted and an updated stream
stabilization plan shall be submitted for DWQ approval. If the work is not conducted according to the
submitted plan then this approval is no longer valid.
2. All constructed stormwater conveyance outlets shall be directed as diffuse flow at non-erosive velocities
through the protected stream buffer such that it will not re-concentrate before discharging into a stream or
Lake Wylie. This includes the constructed stormwater discharge outlet located on lot 36. If this is not
possible, a stormwater management plan for the project shall be provided to this Office before occupancy of
any facilities at the site. The plan shall specify all stormwater discharge points, plan details, and calculations
to indicate that diffuse flow through the protected buffer will be achieved.
3. Deed notifications or similar mechanisms shall be placed on all lots with remaining jurisdictional wetlands
and waters or areas within 50 feet of all streams and ponds on the property. These mechanisms shall be
put in place within 30 days of the date of this letter or the issuance of the 404 Permit (whichever is later). A
sample deed notification format can be downloaded from the 401/Wetlands Unit web site at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetiands.
4. The culverts required for this project shall be installed in such a manner that the original stream profiles are
not altered (i.e. the depth of the channel must not be reduced by a widening of the streambed). Existing
stream dimensions (including the pattern and profile) are to be maintained above and below locations of
each culvert. The culverts shall be designed and installed to allow for aquatic life movement as well as to
prevent head cutting of the streams. If any of the existing pipes are or become perched, the appropriate
stream grade shall be re-established or, if the pipes are installed in a perched manner, the pipes shall be
removed and re-installed correctly.
The applicant must submit a plan and receive written approval from this office to address any head cutting
that will occur as a result of this project (e.g., use of cross vanes downstream of the culvert).
Use of native vegetation and other soft streambank stabilization techniques must be used where practicable
instead of riprap or other bank hardening methods. If riprap is necessary, it shall not be place in the
streambed, unless approved by the DWQ.
5. We understand that you have chosen to contribute to the Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP) in order
to compensate for the stream and wetland impacts. In accordance with 15A NCAC 2R.0402 and 15A
NCAC 2B.0242(7), this contribution will satisfy our compensatory mitigation requirements under 15A NCAC
2H .0506(h) and 15A NCAC 2B .0233(10). Until the EEP receives and clears your check (made payable to:
DENR - Ecosystem Enhancement Program), the stream and wetland impacts shall not occur. Ms. Deborah
Anderson should be contacted at [phone] if you have any questions concerning the EEP. You have
one month from the date of this Certification to make this payment. For accounting purposes, this
Certification authorizes the fill of 0.17 acre of wetland and 295 linear feet of perennial stream in the Catawba
River Basin, Cataloging Units 03050101 and 03050102. Two hundred ninety five linear feet (295 if) of
stream mitigaboneis required. Please be aware that the EEP rules require rounding of wetland impacts to
the nearest foot/ quarter acre (15A NCAC 2R .0503(b)).
6. No waste, spoil, solids, or fill of any kind shall occur in wetlands, waters, or riparian areas beyond the
footprint of the impacts depicted in the Preconstruction Notification application. All construction activities
shall be performed so that no violations of state water quality standards, statutes, or rules occur.
7. Erosion and sediment control practices must utilize Best Management Practices (BMP) and be in full
compliance with all specifications governing the proper design, installation, and operation and
maintenance of such BMP in order to protect surface water standards:
Triage Check Dist
Date: 2?1 d Project Name: R-C_FLi?(1-n 0 Kt SOW TE S 10&1
DWQ#: n4o ? to
County: OTA SM
To: ? ARO Mike Parker ? WaRO Deborah Sawyer
? FRO Ken Averitte ? WiRO Joanne Steenhuis
MRO Mike Parker ? WSRO Jennifer Frye
? RRO Steve Mitchell
From: AI ) k.K I IMsol?l Telephone : (919)
The file attached is being forwarded to your for your evaluation.
Please call if you need assistance.
? Stream length impacted
? Stream determination
? Wetland determination and distance to blue-line surface waters on USFW topo maps
? Minimization/avoidance issues
? Buffer Rules (Meuse, Tar-Pamlico, Catawba, Randleman)
? Pond fill
? Mitigation Ratios
? Ditching
? Are the stream and or wetland mitigation sites available and viable?
? Check drawings for accuracy
? Is the application consistent with pre-application meetings?
? Cumulative impact concern ? ?v©,0\'37 4 p? Db
Imc I o F- Gov. * Sp
Comments: )I?oL A-q AS (XCU212c_a' 6A( 5 1T-?. ; '2 ?l FFUSS' t=LOLL")
NFF_ s -in -LzE_ AoAILVfI ' 1`1 w F_ AtOpP-0v:Zh ?fEnQ? LAAl9 ST8 IL)-ZAMO&I
To P, W-Wj H A- < DW Q 41 n4 -D4 7 A'f?ACit U\'? "_ 14oru?_Vg ?2 . fTr ILL N?? D j?)
AIbb2Fs5 -nA AcA ,A\(z eia, c) 2- ??,1 tAWt "anA I11??bsSi?- 14?1
C??L boa c,? ( Qu?,?-ton/S
CE
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Michael F. Easley, Governor

William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
August 2, 2004
Gaston County
DWQ # 04-0776
Mr. Mike Reeve
North Star Investors II, LLC
10800 Sikes Place, Suite 250
Charlotte, NC 28277
Dear Mr. Reeve:
"'TLANasi401 GROUP
AUG 1 0 2004
WATER QUALITy SECTION
On May 11, 2004, the NC Division of Water Quality (DWQ) received your application for a
General 401 Water Quality Certification for the construction of the Reflection Pointe Subdivision in
Gaston County.
On July 1, 2004, Mr. Alan Johnson with this office conducted a site inspection at the subject
site. On July 9, 2004 a Notice of Violation was issued for the installation of unapproved
stream/road crossings and sediment deposition in the streams.
Until the issues relating to the NOV are resolved, this office is requesting (by copy of this letter)
that the Corps of Engineers place this and related project(s) on hold. Also, this project will be
placed on hold for our processing pursuant to 15A NCAC 2H .0507(h).
Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter. If you have any questions, please contact
Alan Johnson at [phone] or Cyndi Karoly in Raleigh at [phone].
Sincerely,
cc: Corps of Engineers-Asheville
Cyndi Karoly -Wetlands Unit
Chris Huysman
Central Files
File
:l
D. Rex Gleason, P. E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
919 North Main Street, Mooresville, North Carolina 28115 One
Phone: [phone] / FAX: [phone] / Internet: h2o.enr.state.nc.us North Caroliina
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer - 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper ;Vaturaffii
AU
HCDEHR
Hb'J
64- 0.7(
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Michael F. Easley, Governor William G. Ross, Jr.. Secretary
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
WATER QUALITY SECTION
July 26, 2004
Mr. Mike Reeve
North Star Investors H, LLC
10800 Sikes Place, Suite 250
Charlotte, NC 28277
WETLANDS/ 401 GROUP
A U G 0 3 2004
WATER QUALITY SECTION
Subject: Stream Impact #3
Reflection Pointe Phase I
Gaston County, NC
Dear Mr. Reeve:
On June 22, 2004 this office received your response to the Notice of Violation (NOV) issued by
this office on July 9`b. The NOV, in part, concerned the relocation of a stream (Impact #3), and requested
a response/justification for the relocation. Based on our review of your response, we do not believe the
relocation is/was justifiable. Therefore, the stream must be returned to its original channel. The existing
discharge point can remain to handle stormwater (if in compliance with state/county buffer and watershed
rulesiregulations), however, stream flow must be diverted back to its original course and the impacted
area must be restored. It is requested that a detailed restoration plan be submitted for the above noted
impact as well as for the other impacts outlined in the previous NOV.
Please be reminded that the submitted PCN will remain on hold until the issues of the NOV have
been resolved. If you have questions regarding this matter, please contact Mr. Alan Johnson or me at
(704) 663- 1699.
Sincerely,
l
Cc: Rob Gordon - Gaston SWCD
Cyndi Karoly - Wetlands Unit
Steve Chapin - USACOE
Chris Huysman
File
D. Rex Gleason, P.E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
919 N. Main Street, Mooresville, North Carolina 28115
Phone: [phone] / FAX [phone] / Internet: h2o.enr.state.nc.us NonrthCarolina
Al _t---- _//_,
ff MCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
August 2, 2004
Gaston County
DWQ # 04-0776
Mr. Mike Reeve
North Star Investors II, LLC
10800 Sikes Place, Suite 250
Charlotte, NC 28277
Dear Mr. Reeve:
On May 11, 2004, the NC Division of Water Quality (DWQ) received your application for a
General 401 Water Quality Certification for the construction of the Reflection Pointe Subdivision in
Gaston County.
On July 1, 2004, Mr. Alan Johnson with this office conducted a site inspection at the subject
site. On July 9, 2004 a Notice of Violation was issued for the installation of unapproved
stream/road crossings and sediment deposition in the streams.
Until the issues relating to the NOV are resolved, this office is requesting (by copy of this letter)
that the Corps of Engineers place this and related project(s) on hold. Also, this project will be
placed on hold for our processing pursuant to 15A NCAC 2H .0507(h).
Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter. If you have any questions, please contact
Alan Johnson at [phone] or Cyndi Karoly in Raleigh at [phone].
Sincerely,
cc: Corps of Engineers-Asheville
Cyndi Karoly -Wetlands; Unit
Chris Huysman
Central Files
File
D. Rex Gleason, P. E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
919 North Main Street, Mooresville, North Carolina 28115 One
Phone: [phone] / FAX: [phone] / Internet: h2o.enr.state. nc.us NorthCarolina
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer- 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper Naturally

a?
6; 1
Wetland and Natural Resource
Consultants, Inc.

July 18, 2004
Bob Zarzecki
NC Division of Water Quality
401 Water Quality Certification Program WETLANDS/ 401 GROUP
2321 Crabtree Boulevard
Raleigh, NC 27604
JUL 2 , 2004
Subject Property: Reflection Pointe Subdivision
NCDWQ #04-0776 WATER QUALITY SECTION
Mr. Zarzecki:
We are writing to address your request for additional information cited in your May 18,
2004 letter (attached). We reviewed the entire permit application that was submitted,
and with the exception of an on-site evaluation, it appears that all of the requested
information was supplied in accordance with the application form or reflects design
requirements that were dictated by Gaston County. Regardless, let us address your
concerns here-in.
1) A storm water management plan is not required because the site does not exceed 30%
impervious:
• Roadways (48,000 If x 20 If)
• Lots (6,000 sf/lot x 363 lots)
• Amenity areas
960,000 or 22 acres
1,996,000 or 46 acres
200,000 or 4 acres
• Total 2,156,000 or 72 acres impervious
• 72 acres of impervious area on a 365 acres site is less than 20% impervious
2) See above, and note that 6,000 square feet of lot impacts would allow for 4000 sf of
house and deck footprint and 2,000 square feet of driveway and walkway impacts. This
would allow for homes that were 60 feet by 60 feet on the first floor and would allow for
driveways that are 100 feet by 20 feet wide. There is noway the project will exceed 30%
impervious cover. The above calculations allow for over 4 acres of impervious area within
the amenity area. As stated in the application, the project is less than the low density
requirement of 24%.
Newton Office Clyde Office
PO Box 224 wndnc.com 217 Paragon Parkway, #142
Newton, NC 28658 Clyde, NC 28721
828465-3035 828-627-0051
828465-3050 Fax [phone] Fax
3) The design engineer was specifically directed by Gaston County to design the
stormwater facilities as illustrated on the submitted drawings. The outlets are located
outside of the 50 foot riparian buffer and are sized with 1 foot diameter rip-rap and we
believe that they meet the diffuse flow requirement. Their preferred energy dissipaters
are rip-rap aprons that we had engineered in accordance with their review process. We
respectfully request that you coordinate with the County to resolve any outstanding
issues. It seems that we may now be contrary to local requirements and as such we have
no way to determine how to address this concern.
4) Attached is a letter from the NC EEP; unfortunately it took the EEP two months to
respond to our request. The Corps has agreed to the special provision allowing out-of-kind
mitigation. We have been permitted for all crossings by the Corps as attached.
5) Through coordination with Gaston County and the land planner the applicant is prepared
to add restrictive language to all lots that contain wetlands and streams.
6) Again, through coordination with their various consultants and through the approval
process the applicant identified the need for the 50' buffer to the lake; the buffer is
clearly identified on the maps that were submitted with the application.
7) We indicated in the application that there is a separate permit application being filed
for the marina. We expect that you can coordinate the concurrent review of the permit
applications in your office. Any buffer encroachment will be identified in the application
for the marina. The local approval process, which includes review by the Lake Wylie
Marine Commission, nearly eliminates the possibility of submitting the application for the
marina with the rest of the development. We understand that the permit for the marina
has been issued but have not been able to confirm it.
8) Your staff performed a site review and that during the review that three of the five
crossings were installed. One crossing was permitted by the Corps as a separate project
and the other two were installed without 401 certification. We understand that the
project is not compliant with the certification process of the Corps of Engineers permit
and we seek a quick resolution. All impacts, except Crossings 1 and 5, are of dry channels.
Therefore, avoidance and minimization, though important, are not critical and that these
crossing would likely have been certified by your office. As for the remaining stream
impacts, we are working to remove the extra inlet protection at Crossing 1 to be in
compliance with the issued permit.
Newton Office Clyde Office
PO Box 224 wndnc.com 217 Paragon Parkway, #142
Newton, NC 28658 Clyde, NC 28721
828-465-3035 828-627-0051
828-465-3050 Fax [phone] Fax
The project is currently under a Notice of Violation that was issued by the Mooresville
Regional Off ice of the Division of Water Quality and have attached the following
information in support of the pending approval.
Best regards,
r 1 s Hu'ys an
Cc: Mike Reeve, North Star Investors, II
Rex Gleason, DWQ Mooresville
Alan Johnson, DWQ Mooresville
Steve Chapin, USACE Asheville
Newton Office Clyde Office
PO Box 224 wndnc.com 217 Paragon Parkway, #142
Newton, NC 28658 Clyde, NC 28721
828465-3035 828-627-0051
828-465-3050 Fax [phone] Fax
of w A rF9
?O? QG
? r
O li? `C
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
Coleen H. Sullins, Deputy Director
Division of Water Quality
May 18, 2004
DWQ # 04-0776
Gaston County
CERTIFIED MAIL - RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mike Reeve
c/o North Star Investors U, LLC
10800 Sikes Place, Suite 250
Charlotte, NC 28277
Subject Property: Reflection Pointe Subdivision
Dear Mr. Reeve:
On May 11, 2004 the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) was notified by receipt of your application
regarding your plan to fill wetlands or waters for the purpose of constructing roads for a subdivision in
Gaston County. Approval from DWQ is required to disturb these areas. Please provide 7 copies of the
following information and refer to the DWQ # listed above in your reply. Please show these on maps of
suitable scale (for instance 1" = 100 feet) so we can begin to determine your projects' compliance with
15A NCAC 2H.0500.
1. Please provide details for the stormwater management practices as required by GC 3402 or
provide additional proof that the project will not sexed 30% impervious coverage.
2. Please specify the percent of project imperviousness area based on the estimated built-out
conditions.
3. Please indicate the diffuse flow provision measures on the site plan.
4. Please provide a letter from the ecosystem Enhancement Program stating that they are
willing to accept at least 295 feet of perennial stream mitigation.
5. Please be aware that any 401 Water Quality Certification approval will include a required
conditions that Deed Notifications be recorded on all lots containing wetlands, streams,
waters or buffers.
6. Please be aware that Lake Wylie is subject to the Catawba Buffer Rule (15A NCAC 02B
.0243). All lots containing riparian buffers protected by this Rule will need to be developed
without the need for either a minor or major variance for the Rule.
7. Proposed Marina - Please note that the property and all other impervious surfaces associated
with the proposed marina area will need to be located outside of the riparian buffers
protected by the Catawba Buffer Rule. It appears that pedestrian walkways are proposed
within the protected buffer. Please provide plan details of the proposed marina area at a scale
of 1:100 or greater and clearly show any buffer impacts. Provide the location and area of any
buffer impacts in square feet.

N. C. Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit.
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
[phone] (phone), 919-733-6893 (fax), (httv://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands)
Customer Service 4: 1-877-623-6748
S. The DWQ will need to verify the stream determination performed by you and the US Army
Corps of Engineers. Please contact DWQ staff at the Mooresville Regional Office (704-663-
1699) to schedule a meeting to verify the stream determination. Provide the results of their
determinations along with your response to this letter.
Please telephone Bob Zarzecki at 919-733-9726 if you have any questions or would require copies of
our rules or procedural materials. This project will remain on hold as incomplete in accordance with
15A NCAC 2H .0505(c). The processing time for this application will begin when this information is
received. If we do not hear from you by writing or by fax at [phone] within three (3) weeks we
will assume you no longer want to pursue the project and will consider it withdrawn.
Sincerely,
AA7 Vomey
40 Water Qualit C rtification Program
JRD/bs
cc: Mooresville DWQ Regional Office
Asheville Corps of Engineers
Central Files
File Copy
Chris Huysman, WNR, Post Office Box 224, Newton, NC 28658
,? . 1iJI
NC®ENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
P,iicnael F. E 2s ev, Goverror
June 16, 2004
Chris Huysman
Wetland & Natural Resource Consultants, Inc.
P.O. Box 224
Newton, NC 28658
Subject: Payment to Ecosystem Enhancement Program
Project: Reflection Pointe Subdivision
County: Gaston
^"Hl?,arn G. Rcss Jr.. ?ecr=ta ;
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is willing to
accept payment for stream impacts associated with the subject project. Please note that the decision by the NCEEP to
accept the mitigation requirements of this project does not assure that this payment will be approved by the U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers and the N.C. Division of Water Quality Wetlands/401 Unit. It is the responsibility of the applicant to
contact these agencies to determine if payment to the NCEEP for impacts associated with this project is appropriate.
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter. If we have not received a copy of the issued 404
Permit/401 Certification within this time frame, this acceptance will expire.
Based on the information supplied by you in a letter dated April 16, 2004 the stream restoration that is necessary to satisfy
the compensatory mitigation requirements for this project is summarized in the following table. The maximum amount of
mitigation that the NCEEP will accept for this project is also indicated in this table.
Stream
(linear feet) Wetlands Riparian
(acres) Riparian Buffer
(ft')
Impacts 295
Mitieation Maximum *See Below
The Memorandum of Agreement with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, that allows payment to the Ecosystem
Enhancement Program, requires that the compensatory mitigation performed by the NCEEP be acquired and designed
within one year from date of payment. NCEEP has studied this cataloging unit very extensively and has found limited
opportunities for traditional stream restoration. *Therefore the NCEEP is unable to accept payment for the
compensatory mitigation requirements associated with the proposed stream impact unless the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (USACE) will accept compensatory mitigation projects other than traditional stream restoration, such
as preservation of streams, riparian area restoration, urban BNIPs or combinations of these types of projects to
offset the loss of stream functions associated with the subject project. Please note that unless the USACE permits
explicitly states in the conditions of the permit that mitigation other than traditional stream mitigation is
acceptable the NCEEP will not accept responsibility for the mitigation requirements.
NC DENR Ecosystem Enhancement Program One
1619 Mad Service Center. Raleich, Norh Carolina 27699-1619 NorthCarofina
Phcne: 919-733-5208',. F*AX': 919-733-6321 Internet: h2o.enr.state. no.usi,arP; ?'V
atlara!!y
Chris Huysman
Page 2
June 16, 2004
The stream mitigation will be provided as specified in the 401 Water Quality Certification and/or Section 404 Permit for
impacts associated with the subject project in Cataloging Unit 03050101 and 03050102 (impacts 195 linear feet in
cataloging unit 03050101 and 100 linear feet in cataloging unit 03050102) (maximum mitigation 390 linear feet in
cataloging unit 03050101 and 200 linear feet in cataloging unit 03050102) of the Catawba River Basin. The mitigation
will be performed in accordance with the Memorandum of Understanding between the N.C. Department of Environment
and Natural Resources and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers dated November 4, 1998.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Carol Shaw at [phone].
Sincerely,
Deborah D. Anderson
In-Lieu-Fee Administrator
cc: Cyndi Karoly, Wetlands/401 Unit
Steve Chapin, USACOE-Asheville
Allen Johnson, DWQ Regional Office-Mooresville
File
WN ki,
Wetland and Natural Resource
Consultants, Inc.
July 18, 2004
Mr. D. Rex Gleason
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
NC DENR
919 North Main Street
Mooresville, NC 28115
RE: Notice of Violation and Recommendation For Enforcement
Incident # 200101324
NOV # 5P-2004-0006
Reflection Pointe
Gaston County, North Carolina
Dear Mr. Gleason:
North Star Investors II, LLC is in receipt of the Notice of Violation and
Recommendation for Enforcement dated July 9, 2004 and though we disagree with
some of the findings we are cooperatively responding to your request for
information. We acknowledge that impacts occurred without prior authorization
and yet we must point out that only two of the five crossings were installed
without authorization. Additionally, during our July 1, 2004 field assessment it was
Mr. Johnson that assessed the depth of the sediment to be between 15 and 18
inches deep with only one area reaching 30 inches; we are simply re-stating the
average impact not the maximum impact. We state our disagreement not because
we refute the overall findings but because as presented they have the effect of
characterizing the violation as more egregious than it may be.
We are working with Mr. Reeve, the contractor, the design engineer, and others to
bring to a closure this incident. It is not Mr. Reeve's intention to be in violation of
any regulations but as a consequence of his accelerated development timelines he
finds himself needing to restore your confidence in his firm. To that end, and
while I have been on vacation, he has commenced the clean-up of the sediment that
Newton Office Clyde Office
PO Box 224 wndnc.com 217 Paragon Parkway, #142
Newton, NC 28658 Clyde, NC 28721
828-465-3035 828-627-0051
828-465-3050 Fax [phone] Fax
overwhelmed the erosion control devises that were installed. Significant rain
events in late June exceeded the design capacity of the control devises and
resulted in the depositions that were observed in the field.
We have evaluated the impacts and have developed the following table that
identifies the extent of impacts compared to the requested impact amount. The
preliminary accounting within the table also identifies some of the corrective
actions that are proposed.
Table 1.
Impact Requested Observed Revised Corrective Measures Permitted
Impact (PCN) Impact Impact
Length / Type
Impact 1 100 perennial 115 pipe and 100 1) Remove 15 feet of Yes
rip-rap riprap at inlet and
restore grade.
2) Remove sediment
from 168 linear feet
of receiving streams.
Impact 2 158 intermit 158 158 1) Remove sediment No
from 89 linear feet of
receiving streams
Impact 3 139 intermit 140 pipe 222 1) Create stable No
82 relocated channel outlet from
storm water outlet.
'Engineered Channel'
length to be 72 linear
feet of intermittent
stream.
Impact 4 51 intermit. N/A N/A N/A No
0.04 acres
Impact 5 195 perennial N/A 113 1) Evaluating No
alternative crossings
to reduce impact by
approximately 70
linear feet.
In response to the NOV we have prepared the following written responses.
The unauthorized 82 linear feet of relocation at "Impact 3" resulted from
the design engineers desire to consolidate the storm water discharge to one
Newton Office Clyde Office
PO Box 224 wndnc.com 217 Paragon Parkway, # 142
Newton, NC 28658 Clyde, NC 28721
828465-3035 828-627-0051
828-465-3050 Fax [phone] Fax
point rather than discharging the water at two locations. The current
outlet protection was designed with the intent of reducing flow velocities
consistent with engineering practices. The flow characteristics of the
outlet are modeled to be non-erosive while spreading the flow over a
greater area.
• Attached are copies of the last 8 weeks of inspection reports. We must
point out that the attached logs from the Morgan Corporation have a
formatting error starting on April 25, 2004. From that date on, the
"General Information" portion of the "Storm Water Retention Log" has
been tabbed incorrectly for the "Yes", "No", and "N/a" entries. Thus, from
May 2, 2004 and on, the logs do not represent that the site is in fact in
good condition as validated by the corresponding Gaston County Inspection
Reports that are collated into the attached inspections. Additionally, the
Morgan Corporation records have an automatic formatting problem that has
replaced the tem "silt" with the term "silk".
• The detailed accounting of the linear feet of streams impacted by
sedimentation is found in Table 1. We have chosen this method to reduce
reproduction costs.
• We have contacted Backwater Environmental and others to draft the design
plan. Generally speaking, the channel will be constructed as a rock riffle
that will be stable for the anticipated discharges. We believe that the pre-
formed constructed riffle will provide the most stable outlet condition at
the discharge point. Interspersed within the riffle will be trees and shrubs
that are typically found adjacent to intermittent streams such as arrow
wood, dogwood, and others.
• This letter serves as notification that the streambeds are currently being
returned to the original grade. We will send photos of the work when it is
completed under our supervision.
• Again, we ask that you refer to Table 1 for the accounting of the impact for
the entirety of the project.
Newton Office Clyde Office
PO Box 224 wnrinc.com 217 Paragon Parkway, #142
Newton, NC 28658 Clyde, NC 28721
828-465-3035 828-627-0051
828465-3050 Fax [phone] Fax
Please feel free to call me and discuss this letter and to schedule an opportunity to
meet with you in your office to discuss the project.
Best regards,
(2ris Huysman
Cc: Mike Reeve, North Star Investors, II
Rex Gleason, DWQ Mooresville
Alan Johnson, DWQ Mooresville
Steve Chapin, USACE Asheville
Newton Office Clyde Office
PO Box 224 wndnc.com 217 Paragon Parkway, # 142
Newton, NC 28658 Clyde, NC 28721
828-465-3035 828-627-0051
828-465-3050 Fax [phone] Fax
C? \N A c?
?O-
3
? r
L JC
Michael F. Easin, Governor
William G. Ro&%Jr.. Sccrctarv
North Carolina Dcparimcni ofEnvimnmcnt and Natural Rerourc=
Alan 'A'. Klimch. F. E. Diicctor
Drnston of W'atcr Quality
Colccn H. Sullins. Dcpury Dircttor
• Divi.mon of Whicr Quul«v
WATER QUALITY SECTION
July 9, 2004
CERTIFIED MAIL
Return Receipt Requested
Mr. Mike Reeve
North Star Investors 11. LLC
10800 Sikes Place, Suite 250
Charlotte, NC 28277
Dear Mr. Reeve:
Subject: Notice of Violation and
Recommendation For Enforcement
Incident #200101324
NOV ;4SP-2004-0006
Reflection Pointe Phase I
Gaston County. NC
On June 11, 2004 Ms. Polly Lespinasse of this office conducted a site visit at the subject site in response to
a Preconstruction Notification (PCN) submittal for five (5) proposed stream impacts. During the site visit it was
observed that four of the five proposed impacts had already been completed. On July 1, 2004, Mr. Alan Johnson
and Ms. Lespinasse of this office, along with Mr. Robert Gordon. Gaston County Soil and Water District, Mr. Mike
Reeve, Project Manager, and Mr. Chris Huysman, consultant, conducted a follow-up investigation.
During the follow-up investigation the following impacts were observed:
• Total impacts to the streams due to the unapproved road crossings were approximately 400 feet.
• At "Impact 43" the stream had been relocated adding an additional 82 feet to the proposed stream impacts. The
relocated stream discharged not into a reconstructed stream channel, but was allowed to discharge through 12-
inch diameter rip rap and then flowed overland for approximately 70 feet into Lake Wylie.
• Sediment deposition of up to 36 inches deep was observed below impacts ""1, 42, and 43. The sediment was
observed up to 150 ft. downstream of the initial impact at impact nl and 42.
This letter is being issued as a Notice of Violation and Notice of Recommendation for Enforcement for
failure to obtain a 401 Water Quality Certification for the unapproved impacts(NCAC 15A .02H .0500) and for the
excessive sediment deposition observed in the streams affecting the aquatic habitat (15A NCAC 2B .0211 (2)).
Specifically, 15A NCAC 2B •.0211 (2) states that the preclusion of best usage, which includes "...aquatic life
propagation and maintenance of biological integrity, wildlife, secondary recreation, and agriculture; ..." represents
a water quality standard violation.
,r+h,J
iv orzh Carol i na
,/Vatura_&z1 NCDENR
N. C. Division of Water Quality. Moor-_-villc Re_tonal Oln= 919 North Main Str c Mooresville NC _'31 15 [phone] CuSomc Service
1-S-_-6Z3-6748
I
If you have an explanation for the noted violations that you wish to present, please respond in writing
within fifteen (15) days following the receipt of this notice. Your explanation will be reviewed and if an
enforcement action is still deemed appropriate, your explanation will be forwarded to the Director with the
enforcement package for his consideration. Please note that these violations and any future violations are subject to
civil penalty assessments of up to $25,000.00 per day for each violation.
In your response to this letter, it is requested that the following information also be provided:
• The reason and documentation indicating the need for the unapproved relocation of the stream channel
observed at Impact 93. Be advised the stream relocation may not be approved, which will require the stream to
be placed back into its original restored channel.
• A copy of the past eight (8) weekly, inspection reports and inspection reports conducted subsequent to a rain
event greater than 0.5 inches, including rain gauge data. Also, please provide inspection information that was
recorded with respect to measures taken to clean up any sediment that left the disturbed limits of the site.
• A map detailing the number of linear feet of stream channel impacted by the sedimentation.
• A conceptual restoration/stream channel design plan for the relocated stream at Impact 93. An approved
"engineered" stream channel design must be submitted within 90 days of receipt of this letter.
• Notification that the streambed at the installed culverts has been returned to the stream's original
elevation/grade.
• Notification of stream impacts for future phases of project.
Based on discussions at the site regarding proposed modifications to the submitted PCN and the need for
more information regarding a,stream restoration plan, and plans for the removal of the sediment deposition in the
streams, this project will be placed on hold for our processing pursuant to 15A NCAC 2H .0507(h).
If you have questions regarding this matter, please contact Mr. Alan Johnson or me at (704) 663- 1699.
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P.E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
Cc: Rob Gordon - Gaston SWCD
Cyndi Karoly - Wetlands Unit
Steve Chapin - USACOE
Chris Huysman
File
GASTON COUNTY WETL4NUS1401 GROUP
Gaston County
Soil Erosion and
Sedimentation Control
Program
??ag0:t1L ?
i n
-4
www.co.gaston.nc.usl
NaturalResources
CONTACT:
Gaston Natural
Resources Department
1303 Cherryville Hwy
Dallas, NC 28034
Telephone: [phone]
Gaston County
Belmont
Bessemer City
Cherryville
Cramerton
Dallas
Dellview
Gastonia
High Shoals
Kings Mountain
Lowell
McAdenville
Mount Holly
Ranlo
Spencer Mountain
Stanley
Mission Statement
"To provide leadership
and conservation
assistance to the
people of Gaston
County to improve and
sustain their soil,
water, air, plant and
wildlife resources:"
Gaston Natural Resources DepartmentJUC ?
1303 Cherryville Highway, Dallas, NC 28034 ?' 2004
Telephone: [phone] Fax: [phone]A1P:R n,,..
INSPECTION REPORT
Project: - it _' Watershed: Neal Branch
Person Financially Responsible: North Star Investors II, LLC
Address: 10800 Sikes Place, Suite 250
C,S,Zip Charlotte NC 29277
Project Location: South Point Road, Belmont
0 Have Pictures 0 Have Video
Site is currently under Notice of violations ? Yes 0 No
Site is currently under Notice of non compliance 0 Yes
Site is in compliance with SESCO/SPCA & Rules 0 Yes
If Violations or Non Compliance, see violations below
SECTION
No
No
VIOLATION RULES

No Approved Plan Ordinance Sec. 18(k); G.S. 113A-57(4);
G.S. 113A-54(d)(4); 15A NCAC 04B.0107
Failure to Follow Approved Plan Ordinance Sec. 18(k); G.S. 113A-61.1
Failure to Submit Revised Plan Ordinance Sec. 18(c)(k); G.S. 113A-54.1(b);
15A NCAC 0413.0118(a)

Failure to Provide Adequate Groundcover Ordinance Sec. 8(c), 9(b)(5); G.S. 113A-
57(3); 15A NCAC 04B.0107(b), 04B.0124(e)
Insufficient Measures to Retain Sediment Ordinance Sec. 7(e); G.S. 113A-57(3)
on Site
Failure to Take All Reasonable Measures Ordinance Sec. 6(c); 15A NCAC 0413.0105
Inadequate Buffer Zone Ordinance Sec. 8(a)(1
aj2), G.S. 113A-57(1);

A NCAC 04B.0125(
115
Slopes and Fills too Stee
Ground p Ordinance Sec. 8(b), 9(b)(4); G.S. 113A-
57(2); 15A NCAC 04B.0124(d)
Unprotected Exposed Slopes Ordinance Sec. 8(b), 9(b)(4); G.S. 113A-
57(2)
Failure to Maintain Erosion Control Ordinance Sec. 14; 15A NCAC 04B.0113
Measures
Other (describe)
Sedimentation damage occurred since last inspection F-J Yes 0 No
If yes, where? 0 Lake/natural watercourse on tract; ? Other property;
Lake/natural watercourse off tract.
MORGAN CORP.
Storm Water Retention Log
Project: Retlcction Point
Monitoring or Event Date: Wcek ending 3/21 /04
Inspector Nance: Brad Hu&cs
Project Designee: Craig T,. Ream - Jnh Superintendent
Date of Rain:
General Information:
Amount (inches) none

b4l<MO I
929- 4,65' 3050
1. Are all silk fences in compliance and maintained?
2. Are all inlet protection devices installed, maintained, and in compliance?
3. Are all riser basins functioning and in compliance?
4. Has capacity of all sediment ponds been monitored and maintained?
5. Are all sediment basins functioning and in compliance?
b. Are all diversion ditches functioning properly?
7. Are all check dams in compliance?
8. Are all slope drains functioning properly?
9. Are all construction entrances functioning properly and maintained?
10. Are all areas requiring stabilization being maintained?
11. Does all tree protection meet compliance?
General Noes:
Yes No N/a
x
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
All areas that lizve been cleared and grubbed have erosion devices installed and being maintained.
Sediment traps and ponds in crtical areas close to the lake water being installed first.
Lower construction entrance complete.
Upper construction entrance under construction. Waiting for grading information to complete.
ho rainfall to date on jab site. ie small shower but was all absorbed by dry conditions.
EROSION AND SEDIMZNTATION CONTROL INSPECTION:
Facility
identification Date of
Ins ection Opcrating
P-o erl l In? Ducnb= corrcctive action :aktn
Cont. Er.t. l 3/20/04 Yes
corst. Ent 3/20/04 No UndCr constrt:ctian with fill o eration.
S Pond 1 3/20104 Yes
S Pond 2 3/20/04 Yes
S Pond 3 3/20/04 Yes
S ?ond a 3120104 Yes
S Pond S 312010 4 Yes
S Pcnd 6 2/20/04 Yes
S Pend 7 3/20104 Yes
S Pond 3 Not installed
S Pond 9 Not installed
S Pond 10 Not installed
S Pond I I _ _ Not installed
S Pond 12 Not instal led
S Pond ?3 Not installed
S Pond 14 Not installed
S Pord 15 Not installcd
S Pond 16 Not installed
Pond 17 Not installed
S Pond 19 Not installed
S Pond 19 Not installed
S Pond?.0 Not installed
S Pond 21 Not Installed
S Pond 22 Not installed
S Pond 23 Not installed
SPond 24 Not installed

S Pond 25 _
Not installed
S Pond 26 Not installed
S Pond 27 Not installed
S Pond 28 Not installed
Silk =once 3120104 Yes Silk fence being install as clearing ertnits
D;t"?:• Di?ca 3!20/04 Yes Being installed as Sediment trans are c.omoleted
Diver. Berms 3/20/04 Yes I Added berms as needed

Observation of'storm water at outfalls:
siormwx;r
Discharge
IJcnufcatiun 1 Date -?
o

U4
G7
o

Z
?
a'
i y
_

ti O
I?
R
..,
C

c Z to
3

" ?
W

` If ycs, dcscribc action Uken to pterent
future releases. Describe measures taken ;o clean
1,9 sediment outside of the

disturbed Emits.
s D- 13/20 0 0 1 0 0 0 N
S Pond 1 3/20 0 0 0 0 0 N I
S Pond 2 3/20 0 1 0 i 0 0 0 N I
S Pond 3 3/20 0 0 0 O O N i
S Pond 4 3/20 0 0 0 0 0 N
S Pond 5 3/20 0 0 G 0 0 1 N
S Pond 6 3/20 0 0 0 0 0 N
S Pond 7 3/20 G 0 0 0 0 N
S Pond 8

S Pond 9 _
S Pond 10
S Pond 11

S Pond _
S Pond 13
S Pond 14
S and 15
S and 16
S and 17 I
S and 18 i 1
S and 19
S and 2C
S and 21
S and 22
S and 23
S and 24
S pond 25
S and 26
S and 27 J
S .or,d 2S
I
i

I I
1
L L
Number c.:ocle Cale ; U is lowest to 10 being the highest. N = jNo y = yes

MORGAN CORP.
Storm Water Retention Log
Project: Rttlcction Point
Monitoring or Event Date: Week ending 3i28i04
Inspector Name: Prad Hudees
Project. Designee: Craig L. Beam - Job Superintendent
Date of Rain:
General Information:
Amount (inches) none
1. Are all silk fences in compliance and maintained?
2. Are all inlet protection devices installed, maintained, and in compliance'?
3. Are all riser basins functioning and in compliance?
4. Has capacity of all sediment ponds been monitored and maintained?
5. Are all sediment basins functioning and in compliance?
6. Are all diversion ditches functioning properly?
7. Are all check dams in compliance?
3. Are all slope drains functioning properly?
9. Are all construction entrances functioning properly and maintained?
10. Are all areas requiring stabilization being maintained?
11. Does all tree protection meet compliance?
General Notes:
Yes No N/a
x
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
All areas that have been cleared and grubbed have erosion devices trstalled and being maintained.
Sediment traps and ponds in critical areas close to the lake water being installed first.
Lower constructor entrance complete.
Upper construction entrance under construction. Waiting for grading information to complete.
No rain fall to date on job site. One small shower but was all absorbed by dry conditions.
1--1.1
1111.1- - J!'.__
EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL INSPECTION:
Fscility Data of
tdcntification Inspection Orcrating Describe corrective aaion taken
Pranerl (/n)

Const. Ert. I 1 3/27104 _
Yes
Const. Err 2 13/27/04 No Under construction with fill operation.
s Pona 1 13/27104 Yes
S Pond 2 l 3/27/04 Yes
S Pono 3 13127/04 Yes
S Pond 4 3/27/04 Yes _
S Pond 3 3/27/04 Yes
S Pond 6 3127/04 Yes
S Pond 7 31271'04 Yes I
S Pond s 3127104 Yes
S Pond 9 3/27/04 Yes I
S Pond 10 3/27/04 Yes
S Pond I 1 j 3/27104 Yes
Pond 12 3/27104 Yes
S Pono 13 Not installed
S Pond 14 Not installed
5 Pond 15 i Not installed
S Pond 16 ; Not installed
S Pond 17 3127/04 Ye3
S Pond 18 3/27104 No ! Under construction
S Pond 19 Not installed
S Pond 20 Not installed
S Pond 21 Not Installed
s Pond 22 Not installed
S Pond 23 Nct installed
S Pond 24 I Not installed
S Pond 25 Not installed
d 26 Not instal led
d 27
t Not installed
d 28 Not installed
Silk Pence 3127104 Yes
I Silk fence being install as clearing permits
Diver Ditch 3127/04 Yes Being installed as Sediment Eras are completed
Diver. Berms 3127104 Ycs Added berms as needed

Observation of stut'rtz water at outfalls:
stormwarer Date
Discharge
1d.ntificauon j

j
t
I

I

i (?
-
7. } ;7
o
?.
j
u?
?
O
C

N (n
y
~

C1
:7
?
O
u

D

t

..

O
G
w

to cn
1
3 3

'

w
N

n (ryes, descMt7e acilon Uilcca to prevent
fume rcleasts. Describe measures tsken to clean
up sediment outside of the
disturbed limits.
SD-2 j 3/27 0' 0 0 0 0 N
S Pond 1 1 3/27 0 0 0 0 0 N
S Pond 2 3/27 0 0 0 0 0 N
S Pond 3 3127 i 0 0 0 0 0 N
S Pond 4 3/27 1 0 0 0 0 0 N
S Pond 5 13/27 0 0 0 0 0 N
S Pond 6 3/27 0 0 0 0 0 N
S Pond 7 3/27 0 0 0 0 0 N
S Pond 8 1 3/27 0 0 0 0 O N
S Pond 9 3/47 0 1 0 0 0, 0 N 4
S Pond 10 , 3/27 0 6 0 0 0 N
S Pond 11 1 0 0 0 0 N
S Pond 12 M 0 0 0 0 N
S Pond 13
S Pond 14 I
S pond 15

6
S and 1
S and 17 3/27 0 I 0 0" 0 0 N
S and 18
S and 19
S and 20
S and 21 i
S and 22
S and 23
S and 24
S and 25 i
S and 26 HI
S and 27 1
S and 28 I

I

i

Number Code scale : 0 is lowest to 10 being the highest. N = No Y = Yes

Vr9R6AN CORP.
Storm Water Retentiola Lo
'roject: Reflection P-Pint
Monitoring or Event Date: Week ending 04-4-2001
nspector Name: Brad HudgcS
'roject Designee: (" raiQ L Beam - Job Superintyttdent
)ate of Rain: 04-02-2004 Amount (inches) 0.4"
;eneral Information:
1. Are all silk fences in compliance and maintained?
2. Are all inlet protection devices installed, maintained, and in compliance?
3. Are all riser basins functioning and in compliance?
Has capacity of all sediment ponds been monitored and maintained?
5. Are all sediment basins functioning and in compliance?
6. Are all diversion ditches functioning properly?
7. Are all check dams in compliance?
8. Are all slope drains functioning properly?
9. Are all construction entrances functioning properly and maintained?
10. Are all areas requiring stabilization being maintained?
11. Does all tree protection meet compliance?
General Notes:
Yes No N/a
x
x
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
All areas that have been cleared and grubbed have erosion devices installed and being maintained.
Sediment traps and ponds in critical areas close to the lake water being: installed first.
Ponds # 1 thru 20 complete.
Lower construction entrance complete.
Upper construction entrance fill complete. Ready to test last lifts and install stone.
Small rain fall to date on job site. No major water in any ponds. Adjusted one diversion ditch holding water,

EROSION AND SEDIINIENTATION CONTROL INSPECTION:
acility
ientifieation Date of
Ins ection Operating ( Describe comcpve action taken
Proerl !n)
onat. En(. 1 4/02/04 Yes
onst. Ent 2 4/02/04 No Under construction with fill o erasion.
Pond 1 4/02/04 Yes

Pond 2
4/02/04 _
Yes
Pond 3 4102/04 Yes
Pond 4 4/02/04 Yes
Pond 5 4102104 Yes
Pond 6 4/02/04 Yes
Pond 7 4/02/04 Yes i
Pond 8 4/02/04 Yes

Pond9
4/02/04 _
Yes ( Removed small amount of silt at front of and
Pond 10 4/02/04 Yes 1
Pond 11 4/02/04 Yes
Pond 12 4/02/04 Yes I
Pond 13 4/02/04 Yes
Pond 14 4/02/04 Yes
Pond 15 4/02/04 Yes
Pond 16 4/02/04 Yes
Pond 17 4/02/04 Yes
?
Po t 4/02/04 Yes _ - -
Pond 19 4102/04 Yes
Pond 20 4102/04 Yes
Pond 21 under Construction
Pond 22 ; Not installed
Pond 23 Not installed
Pond24 Nat installed
Pond 25 Not installed
Pond 26 Not installed
Pond 27 Not installed
Pond 28 Not installed
iik Fence 4/02104 Yes Silk fence being install as clearing permits
jiver. Ditch 4/02/04 Yes Adjusted some ditehin where water was standing.
1ivcr. Bcrms 4/02/04 Yes Added berms as needed

Observation of storm water at outfalls:
tormwucr
IscharYe

lentification Datc

1 n

M. n

v
Cn
o rjj
C

Id
ro

y

o O

? 0

0
?

f c`

I? y' to

?

b

m Ir yes, descidta acrion Taken to prevent
future releases. I Desenba measures taken to clear.

up edimc;rt outside of tte
disturbed limits.
D-2 4102 0 0 0 0 0 N
Pond 1 4/02 2 0 0 0 0 N
Pond 2 4/02 2 0 0 U 0 N
Pond 3 4102 0 0 0 O 5 N
Pond 4 4/02 0 0 0 0 0 N
Pond 5 4102
1 0 0 0 0 0 N
Pond 6 4102 0 o- 10 0 0 N
Pond 7 4102 0 0 0 5 O N
Pond 8 4/02 0 0 0 0 0 N
Pond 9 4102 4 1 0 - 1-6- -0 N
Pond 10 402 0 0 0 0 0 N
Pond 11 4/02 0 0 0 0 0 N
Pond 12 4/02 3 1 0 0 0 N
P,- t 13 4/02 0 0 0 0 0 N
pc,.,t !4 4/02 0 0 0 0 0 N
and 15 4/02 0 0 0 0 0 N
and 16 4/02 0 0 0 0 0 N I
and I7 4/02 0 0 0 0 0 N
and I8 4102 0 0 0 0 0 N
and 19 4/02 0 0 0 0 0 N
and 20 4102 0 0 0 .0 O N
pond 21
pond 22
pond 23
and 24
and 25
and 26
and 27
and 29

I

{

I
l
'.Number Code scale: 0 i s lowest to 10 heint? the hiphesr. N . No Y a Yes

GASTON COUNTY
Gaston County
Soil Erosion and
Sedimentation Control
Program

n
n e?

www.co.gaston.nc.us/
NaturalResources
CONTACT:
Gaston Natural
Resources Department
1303 Cherryville Hwy
Dallas, NC 28034
Telephone: [phone]
Gaston County
Belmont
Bessemer City
Cherryville
Cramerton
Dallas
Dellview
Gastonia
High Shoals
Kings Mountain
Lowell
McAdenvilte
Mount Holly
Ranlo
Spencer Mountain
Stanley
Mission Statement
"To provide leadership
and conservation
assistance to the
people of Gaston
County to improve and
sustain their soil,
water, air, plant and
wildlife resources."
Gaston Natural Resources Department
1303 Cherryville_ Highway, Dallas, NC 28034
Telephone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
INSPECTION REPORT
Project:' Watershed: Neal Branch
Person Financially Responsible: North Star Investors II, LLC
Address: 10800 Sikes Place, Suite 250
C,S,Zip Charlotte NC 28277
Project Location: South Point Road, Belmont
Q Have Pictures 7 Have Video
Site is currently under Notice of violations Yes x? No
Site is currently under Notice of non compliance ? Yes
Site is in compliance with SESCO/SPCA & Rules Q Yes
If Violations or Non Compliance, see violations below
Q No
0 No
VIOLATION RULES

No Approved Flan Ordinance Sec. 18(k); G.S. 113A-57(4);
G.S. 113A-54(d)(4); 15A NCAC 04B.0107
Failure to Follow Approved Plan Ordinance Sec. 18(k); G.S. 113A-61.1
Failure to Submit Revised Plan Ordinance Sec. 18(c)(k); G.S. 113A-54.1(b);
15A NCAC 0413.01 18(a)

Failure to Provide Adequate Groundcover Ordinance Sec. 8(c), 9(b)(5); G.S. 113A.
57(3); 15A NCAC 04B.0107(b), 04B.0124(e)
Insufficient Measures to Retain Sediment Ordinance Sec. 7(e); G.S. 113A-57(3)
on Site
Failure to Take All Reasonable Measures Ordinance Sec. 6(c); 15A NCAC 04B.0105
Inadequate Buffer Zone Ordinance
))2), G.S. 113A-57(1);
6
(
NCAC 048.012

Ground Slopes and Fills too Steep Ordinance Sec. 8(b), 9(b)(4); G.S. 113A-
57(2); 15A NCAC 046.0124(d)
Unprotected Exposed Slopes Ordinance Sec. 8(b), 9(b)(4);. G.S. 113A-
57(2)
Failure to Maintain Erosion Control Ordinance Sec. 14; 15A NCAC 046.0113
Measures
Other (describe)
Sedimentation damage occurred since last inspection [-] Yes Q No
If yes, where? F] Lake/natural watercourse on tract; F? Other property;
? Lake/natural watercourse off tract.
Nf 9WGAN CORP.
Storm Water Retention Logy
Project: Reflection Point
Monitoring or Event Date: Wcek endiniz04-11-2004
Inspector Name: Brad Hudpes
Project Designee: Craig L. Beam - Jobs perintendent
Date of Rain:
General Information:
Amount (inches) 0"
1. Are all silk fences in compliance and maintained?
Z. Are all inlet protection devices installed, maintained, and in compliance'?
3. Arc all riser basins functioning and in compliance?
Has capacity of all sediment ponds been monitored and maintained?
5. Are all sediment basins functioning and in compliance?
6. Are all' diversion ditches functioning properly?
7. Are all check dams in compliance?
8. Are all slope drains functioning properly?
9. Are all construction entrances functioning properly and maintained?
10. Are all areas requiring stabilization being maintained?
11. Does all tree protection meet compliance?
General Notes:
Yes No N/a
x
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
All areas that have been cleared and grubbed have erosion devices installed and being maintained.
All ponds complete ezcapt #29.
All diversion ditches complete, some still need check dams and will be added Monday 4/12.
Lower construction entrunce complete.
Upper construction entrance fill complete and some stone applied, will complete 4/12.
EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL INSPECTION:
soility i Date'of
xntil9cation Ins euien Operating
Pro rl /n Describe corrective Action taken
onst. Ent.1 14109/04 Yes
onst. Ent 2 ; 4/09104 No Under construction with stoning process operation.
Pond ? 4/09104 Yes
Pond 2 1 4/09/04 Ycs
Pond 3 4/09/04 Yes
Pond 4 4/09104 Yes
Pond <_ 4/09/04 Yes ?
Pond 6 4109104 Yes
Pond s 1 4/09104 Yes
Pond 8 4109104 Yes
Pond 9 4/09104 Yes Cleaned out.
Pond 10 4/09/04 Yes
Pond 11 4109104 Yes I
Pend 12 4/09/04 Yes
Pond 13 4109104 Yes
Pond 14 4109104 Yes
Pond 15 4/09104 Yes
Pond 16 4/09104 Yes
Pond 17 4/09104 Yes
F P-0 4/09/04 Yes
7P,-On d t9 4/09104 Yes
Pcnd 20 4/09104 Yes
Pond 21 4/09/04 Yes
Pond 22 4/09104 Yes
Pond 23 4/09104 Yes
Pond 24 4/09/04 Yes
Pond 25 4/09/04 Yes
Pond 26 4i09/04 Yes
Pond 27 4/09/04 Yes
i Pond 28 4109104 Yes
Pond 29 4102/04 No Under construction
;ilk Ircncc 4102104 Yes Silk fence being install as clearing permits
liver. Ditch 4102/04 Yes Adjusted some ditching where water was standing.
)iver. Berms 4102104 Yes Added berms as needed

Observation of storm water at outfalls:
ormwater

sch?rge
cntification Date
f7
`rt
o

ov
O
cn
y

ro
U7
p
?-

0

p
w
?
N

a
a
6
y
e
Q7 it• yes, describe cction taken to ptxvcnt

t'uture releases. Describe measures taken to clean

up sediment outside, of the
disturbed limits.
D- 2 4/09 0 0 0 0 0 N
Pond 1 4/09 0 0 0 0 0 N E i
Pond 2 4/09 0 0 0 0 0 N
Pond 3 4/09 0 0 0 0 0 N
Pond 4 4/09 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 N
Pond 5 4/09 Q 0 0 0 0 N
Pond 6 4/09 0 0 0 0 0 N
Pond 7' 4/09 0 0 0 0 0 N
Pond 8 4/09 0 0 0 0 0 N
Pond 9 4/09 0 0 0 0 0 N
Pond 10 4/09 0 0 0 0 0 N
Pond 11 4i09 0 0 0 0 0 N
Pond 12 4/09 0 0 0 0 0 N
Pr d 13 4109 0 0 0 0 0 N
Pt,...; 14 4/09 0 0 0 0 U N
Pond 15 4i09 0 0 0 0 0 N
and 16 4109 0 0 0 0 0 N
and 17 4/09 0 0 0 0 0 N
and 18 4/09 0 0 0 0 0 N
and 19 4109 0 0 0 0 0 N
and 20 4109 0 0 0 0 0 N
and 21 4/09 0 0 0 0 0 N
and 22 4109 0 0 Q 0 0 N
and 23 4109 0 0 0 0 0 N
and 24 4/09 0 0 0 0 0 N
and 25 4109 0 0 0 0 0 N
and 26 4/09 0 0 0 0 0 N
i and 27 4109 0 0 0 0 0 N
and 28 4/09 0 0 0 0 0 N
i and 29 4/09 0 U 0 0 0 N

Number Code scale ; 0 is lowest to 10 being the highest. N = No Y = Yes

Gaston County
Soil Erosion and
Sedimentation Control
Program
clouly
84
o
RT
www.co.gaston.nc.us/
NaturaIResources
CONTACT:
Gaston Natural
Resources Department
1303 Cherryville Hwy
Dallas, NC 28034
Telephone: [phone]
Gaston County
Belmont
Bessemer City
Chenyvillo
Cramerton
Dallas
Dellview
Gastonia
High Shoals
Kings Mountain
Lowell
McAdenville
Mount Holly
Ranlo
Spencer Mountain
Stanley
Mission Statement
"To provide leadership
and conservation
assistance to the
people of Gaston
County to improve and
sustain their soil,
water, air, plant and
wildlife resources."
GASTON COUNTY
Gaston Natural Resources Department
1303 Cherryville Highway, Dallas, NC 28034
Telephone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
INSPECTION REPORT
Project , ,_; v -.t. 7 '1°r7? 1, Watershed: Neal Branch
Person Financially Responsible: North Star Investors II, LLC
Address: 10800 Sikes Place, Suite 250
C,S,ZIp Charlotte NC 28277
Project Location: South Point Road, Belmont
0 Have Pictures F-? Have Video
Site is currently under Notice of violations Yes 0 No
Site is currently under Notice of non compliance ? Yes 0 No
Site is in compliance with SESCO/SPCA & Rules Q Yes No
If Violations or Non Compliance, see violations below
VIOLATION RULES

No Approved Plan Ordinance Sec. 18(k); G.S. 113A-57(4);
G.S. 113A-54(d)(4); 15A NCAC 04B.0107
Failure to Follow Approved Plan Ordinance Sec. 18(k); G.S. 113A-61.1
Failure to Submit Revised Plan Ordinance Sec. 18(c)(k); G. S. 113A-54.1(b);
15A NCAC 0413.0118(a)

Failure to Provide Adequate Groundcover Ordinance Sec. 8(c), 9(b)(5); G.S. 113A-
57(3); 15A NCAC 04B.0107(b), 04B.0124(e)
Insufficient Measures to Retain Sediment
on Site Ordinance Sec. 7(e); G.S. 113A-57(3)
Failure to Take All Reasonable Measures Ordinance Sec. 6(c); 15A NCAC 04B.0105
Inadequate Buffer Zone Ordinance Sec. 8(a)(1)(2); G.S. 113A-57(1);
15A NCAC 04B.0125(a)
Ground Slopes and Fills too Steep Ordinance Sec. 8(b), 9(b)(4); G.S. 113A-
57(2); 15A NCAC 04B.0124(d)
Unprotected Exposed Slopes Ordinance Sec. 8(b), 9(b)(4); G.S. 113A-
57(2)
Failure to Maintain Erosion Control
Measures Ordinance Sec. 14; 15A NCAC 0413.0113
Other (describe)
Sedimentation damage occurred since last inspection F-1 Yes 0 No
If yes, where? 7 Lake/natural watercourse on tract; 7 Other property;
7 Lake/natural watercourse off tract.
MOOR AN CORP.
I Storm Water Retention Lv
Project: Reflection Point
Monitoring or Event Date: Week ending 04-18-2004
Inspector Name: Brad Hudges
Project Designee: Craig, L. Beam - Job Surezintendent
Date of Rain: 4-11 and 4-1
General Information:
Amount (inches) 0.4"
Yes No Nla
1. Are all silk. fences in compliancy and maintained? X
2. Are all inlet protection devices installed, maintained, and in compliance? X
3. Are all riser basins functioning and in compliance? X
4. Has capacity of all sediment ponds been monitored and maintained? X
5. Are all sediment basins functioning and in compliance? X
6. Are all diversion ditches functioning properly? X
?. Are all check dams in compliance? X
8. Are all slope drains functioning properly? X
9. Are all construction entrances functioning properly and maintained? X
10. Are all areas requiring stabilization being maintained? X
11. Does all tree protection meet compliance? X
General Notes:
All areas now have erosion control in place. Some silk fence to be installed. In progress.
All ponds complete.
All diversion ditches complete, some still need check dams and will be added this week.
Both Upper and Lower construction entrance complete.
First large rain event Monday and Tuesday. No problems
All devices, ditches, berms, silk fence ECT... worked great.
No excess silk wash in any ponds.
EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL INSPECTION:
aGility
dcnlific2 tion Dale of
fns cction Operating
Pro rlv( /nl Describe corrective action taken
:oast. Ent.1 4/14/04 Yes Cam feted and maintained.
:onst. Ent 2 4/14/04 Yes Completed and maintained.
c Pond 1 4/14/04 Yes
bond 2 4/14/04 Yes
Pond 3 4/14/04 Yes
Pond 4 4/14104 Yes
Pond 5 4/ 14, 04 Yes
Pond 6 4/14/04 Ycs
Pond' 4/14104 Yes,
Pond s 4/14104 Yes

Pond 9
4/14/04
Yes _
c Pond 10 4/14/04 Yes
;Pond 11 4/14/04 Yes
Pond 12 4/14104 Yes
Pond 13 4/14/04 Yes
Pond 14 4/14/04 Yes
Pond 15 4/14/04 Yes
Pont IG 4/14104 Yes
Pond 17 4/11/04 Yes
Pond IS 4/14104 Yes
Pond 19 4/14/04 Yes
Pond 20 .1/14/04 Yes
Pono 21 4/14/04 Yes
Pond 22 4114/04 Yes
Pond23 4/14104 N/A Omitted, will feed enlarged and 25 per Craig- and Robert
Pond 24 4/14/04 1 Yes Omitted, will feed enlarged and 25 per Craig and Robert
'Pond 25 4/14104 I Yes
IPond 26 4/14/04 Yes
Pond 27 4/14/04 Yes
Pond 23 4/14/04 Yes
Pond :9 4/14104 Yes
;ilk Fence 4/14/04 Yes Silk fence completed on Sat.
}fiver. Ditch 4/14/04 Yes No ditch problems. Addis 2 ditches per Rcbert
>ivcr. Berms 4/14/04 Yes No Berm problems.

Observation of storm water at outfulls:
toms water

Nsc.iuge
dentitic2lion Date (o)
qj

A

O

7

rL
Cr..
N
O C
... =r
(n [q
R
( C
ice'
I
1: Cn
F; 2.

a'
D
l79 i
I
tf yes, descnhc acuon twkcn to prevent
rUWTC %IMC5.
De scribe ine:.aures t a? en :o Rican
Up Stdintcnt OutSIdC Of the
digurbcd lirrilu,
iD-2 4114 0 0 0 0 10 N
i Pond 1 4114 0 0 0 0` 0 N
i Pond 2 4/14 0 0 0 O O N
i Pond 3 4114 0 0 0 0 0 Tyr _
Pond 4 4/14 0 0 0 0 0 N
i Pond 5 4114 0 0 0 0 0 N
Pond 6 4/14 0 0 0 1 0 O N
i Pond 7 4/14 0 1 0 0 0 0 N
i Pond 8 4/14 0; 0 0 0 0 N
i Pond 9 4/14 0; 0 0 0 0 N
i Pond 10 4114 0 i Q 0 0 0 N
Pond 11 4114 0' U 0 0 0
Pond 12 4114 0 0 0 0 0 N
> Pond 13 4114 0 0 0 0 0 N
i Pond 14 4/14 0 0 0 0 0 N
and 15 4114 0 0 0 0 0 N
and 16 4/14 0 0 0 1 0 O N
i and 17 4/14 0 0 0 0 0 N
> and 18 4/14 0 0 0 0 0 N
i and 19 4/14 0 0 0 0 0 N
i and 20 4114 0 0 0 0 0 1 N
i and 21 4/14 0 0 0 0 0 N
i and 22 4114 0 0 U 0 0 N
end 23 4114 0 U 0 0 0 N Not installed, feeds #25
> and 24 4114 0 0 0 0 0 N Not installed, feeds #25
and 25 4/14 0 0 0 0 0 N
and 26 4/14 0 0 0 0 0 N
> and 27 4/14 0 0 0 0 0 N
and 28 4/14 0 0 0 0 0 N
> and 29 4/14 0 0 0 0 0 N

Number Code scale : 0 is lowest to 10 being the highest. N = No Y = Yes
"I 1 ?;,,..-.._ CC 'f.'I I I 'i _ I ? -i1^- -.", ,11:!A` ^:I ..i:.J01J.. ,? " --, J : 1 '46 !?i I\+.
MORGAN CORP.
Storm Water Retention Lo?
Project: Reflection Point
Monitoring or Event Date: Week ending 04-25-2004
Inspector Name: Brad Hudges_
Project Designee: Craig L. Beam - Job Superintendent
Date of Rain: NONE Amount (inches) 0.0"
General Information:
Yes
1. Are all silk fences in compliance and maintained?
2. Are all inlet protection devices installed, maintained, and in compliance?
3. Are all riser basins functioning and in compliance?
4. Has capacity of all sediment ponds been monitored and maintained?
5. Are all sediment basins functioning and in compliance?
6. Are all diversion ditches functioning, properly?
7. Are al I check dams in compliance?
S. Are all slope drains functioning properly?
9. Are all construction entrances functioning properly and maintained?
10. Are all areas requiring stabilization being maintained?
11. Does all tree protection meet compliance?
General Notes:
All areas now have erosion control in place.
All ponds complete.
All diversion ditches complete.
Both Upper and Lower construction entrance complete.
NO RAIN
No Nla
x
X
X
x
x
X
X
X
X
X
X

EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL INSPECTION:
Facility '
Identification Date of
Im tion O jrating
Prorterly(1n) 7? cnhr. cormclivc. anion takcn
Const. roc. 1 4/24/04 Yes Com letcd and maintained.
cu-t. Fsnt 2 4/24/04 Yes -Completed and maintained.
S Pond 1 4/24/04 Yes
S Pond 2 4/24/04 Yes
S Pond 3 4/24/04 Yes
S Pond 4 4124/04 Yes
S fond ! 4/24/04 1 Yes
S Pond 6 4124/04 Yes
S Pond 7 4/24/04 Yes
S Pond 8 4/24/04 Yes
S Pond 9 4/24104 Yes
S Pond 10 4/24104 Yes
S Pond I 1 4/24/04 Yes
S Pond 12 4/24/04 Yes
S Pond 13 4/24/04 Yes
S Pond 14 4124/04 1 Yes
S Pond 15 4124/04 Yes
S Pond 16 4124/04 Yes
S Pond 17 4/24/04 Yes
S Pond 18 4/24104 Yes
9 Pond 19 4/24104 Yes

S Pond 20
4124/04 I Yes _
S Pond 21 4124/04 Yes
S Pond 22 4174/04 Yes
S Pond 23 4/24/04 1 N/.4 Omitted, will feed enlarged tend 25 per Craig and Robert
S R,nd 24 4/24/04 N/A Omitted, will feed enlarged and 25 per Cmi and Robert
S Pond 25 4124/04 Yes 1
S Pend 26 4/24104 1 Yes
S Pond 27 4/24/03 Yes
S Pond 28 4/24/04 I Yes
S Pond 29 4/24/04 Yes
Silk Fence 4124/04 Yes Silk fence completed on Sat.
Diver. Ditch 4/24/04 Yes No ditch tlroblems. Adding 2 ditches per Robcrt
Diver. Berms 4124/04 Yes No Berm robJems.

f

Observation of storm water at outfalls:
Storm water
Discharge
IdendfIcatlon Date ()

?.
c

as
h t?

CL
G O
•
C,4 ) = rn
?'- a 2,
H
o j a If ycs, describe action t. ken to Prevent
future rrleases, Describe tneasurts takcn to clean
up sediment out.,idc of the
disturbed limits.
SD-2 4124 0 0 0 0 0 1 N
S Pond 1 4/24 0 U 0 O O N
S Pond 2 4/24 0 0 0 1 0 U N
S Pond 3 4124 0 U U 0 0 N
S Pond 4 4/24 0 0 0 0 0 N
5 Pond 5 4/24 0 0 0 0 0 N
S Pond 6 4/24 0 0 0 0 0 N
S Pond 7 4/24 0 0 0 0 0 N
S Pond 8 4124 0 U 0 0 0 N
S Pond 9 4/24 0 0 0 0 0 N
S Pond 10 4/24 0 0 0 O O N
S Pond 11 4124 0 0 0 0 0 N
S Pond 12 4/24 0 0 0 0 0 N
S Pond 13 4/24 0 0 0 0 0 N
S Pond 14 4/24 U 0 0 U U N
5 and 15 4124 0 0 0 0 0 N
S and 16 4/24 0 0 0 0 0 N

13
and 17
S

4/24

0

0

0

0

0

N
5 and 18 1 4/24 0 0 0 0 1 0 N
S pond 19 1 4124 0 0 0 0 10 N
S pond 20 4/24 0 0 0 0 1 0 N
S pond 21 4124 0 0 0 0 10 N
S pond 22 1 4124 0 0 0 0 10 N
S pond 23 ! 4/24 0 0 0 0 i O N Not installed, feeds #25
S pond 24 i 4124 0 0 0 0 10 N Not installed, feeds 125
5 pond 25 ; 4124 0 0 0 0 10 N 1
S pond 26 ! 4/24 0 0 0 0 10 N
S pond 27 i 4/24 0 0 0 0 10 N
S pond 28 4/24 0 0 0 0 i 0 N
S rid 29 4124 0 0 0 0 10 N
i
I I

i
i
I i
Number Code scale : 0 is lowest to 10 being the highest. N = No Y = Yes
MORGAN CORP.
Storm Water Retention Lo
Project: Reflection Point
L4
Monitoring or Event Date: Week ending 05-2-20(,'
Inspector Name: Brad Hud eR s
Project Designee: Craig L. Beam - Job Superintendent
Date of Rain: NONE as of 04-30_2004 Amount (inches) 0.0"
General Information:
Yes No Nla
1. Arc all silk fences in compliance and maintained'' X
2. Are all inlet protection devices installed, maintained, and in compliance? X
3. Are all riser basins functioning and in compliance? x
4. Has capacity of all sediment ponds been monitored and maintained? x
5. Arc all sediment basins functioning and in compliance? Y
6. Are all diversion ditches functioning properly? K
7 Are all check darns in compliance? X
8. Are all slope drains functioning properly? Y
9. Are all construction entrances functioning properly and maintained? Y
10. Are all areas requiring stabilization being maintained? X
11. Does all tree protection meet compliance'? x
General Notes:
AlI areas now have erosion control in place.
All ponds complete.
All diversion ditches complete.
Both Upper and Lower construction entrance complete.
NO RAIN
EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL INSPECTION:
Facility
Identification Date of
lmvc.Ctior. Operating
LPm=lj(Xin) Describe correuive ac:ion taken
Coast. P.rit. l 4/30/04 Yes Comnleted and maintained.
cunst. U142 4130/04 Yes Completed and maintained.
S Pond 1 430/04 Yes
S Pond 2 4/30104 Yes
S Pond 3 4130/04 Yes
S Pond 4 4130/04 Yes _
S Pond 5 4130/04 Yes _
S Pond 6 4130/04 Yes
S Pond 7 4/30/04 Yes
S Puna 8 4130/04 Yes
S Pond 9 4130/04 Yes
S Pond 10 4130/04 Yes
S Pond 11 4/30/04 Yes
S Pond 12 4130/04 Yes
S Pend 13 4130/04 Yes
S Pond 14 4130104 Yes
S Pond 15 4/30104 Yes
S Pond 16 4130/04 Yes
S Pond 17 4/30/04 Yes
S Pond 18 4130104 Yes
S Pond 19 4/30/04 ' Yes
s Pond 20 4130/04 Yes
S Pond 21 4/30/04 1 Yes
S Pund 22 4/30104 Yes
S Pond 23 4/30/04 NIA Omitted, will feed enlarged and 25 per Crai and Robert
S Pond24 4130/04 N/A Omitted, will feed enlurgcd and 25 per Craig and Robert
S Pond 25 4/30104 Yes
S Pond 26 4/30/04 1 Yes
S Pond 27 4/30/04 Yes
S Pond 28 4/30/04 Yes
S Pond 29 4/30/04 Yes
Silk T'-encc 4/30104 Yes Silk fence completed on Sat.
Diver. Ditch 4/30/04 Yes No ditch problems. Adding 2 'catches per Roberi
Diver. Renns 4/30/04 Ycs No Berm problems.

Observation of storm water at outfalls:
Storm %+ratcr
Discharge
Identification Date r) qj
O cn
y 0
_ j2, Cn If yC3, dcsCnhC aclign taken to prevent
future Incases. Describe mewtimi taken to clean
up scdimCnt outaitlc of Uhc
disturbed limits.
SD - 2 4/30 0 0 0 0! 0 N
S Pond 1 4/30 0 0 0 0 10 N
S Pond 2 14130 U 0 0 U 0 N i
S Pond 3 1 4130 0 0 0 0 1 0 N
S Pond 4 1 4130 0 0 0 0. 0 N i
S Pond 5 4130 C 0 0 U 0 0 N

S Pond 6 1
4130
0
0
0
0 10
N _
S Pond 7, 4/30 0 0 0 0 i 0 N I
S Pond 8' 4/30 0 0 0 0 0 N
S Pond 9' 4130 U 0 0 0! Q N
S Pond 10 j 4/30 0 0 0 0 0 N
S Pond 11 4/30 0 0 0 0! 0 N
S Pond 12 14130 0 0 0 0, 0 N
S Pond 13 j 4130 0 0 0 0 i 0 N j
S Pond 14 14/30 0 0 0 0 10 N j
S pond 15 1 4/310 0 0 0 0' 0 N
S pond 16 4130 0 0 0 0' 0 N
S and 17 4/30 0 0 0 0 0 N
S pond 18 4130 0 0 0 0 0 N
S pond 19 4130 0 0 0 0 0 N
S pond 20 4130 0 0 0 0 0 N
S pond 21 , 4130 0 0 0 0 0 N
S pond 22 1 4/30 0 0 0 0! 0 N
S pond 23 4/30 0 0 0 0 0 N Not installed, feeds #25
S and 24
- 4130 0 0 0 0 0 N t Not installed, feeds 425
S
I'd 2' 4130 0 0 0 0 0 N I
S and 2b 4/30 0 0 0 0 0 N
S and 27 4130 0 0 0 Q Q N
S and 2$ 4130 0 0 0 0 0 N
S and 29 4130 0 0 0 0 0 N
i

Number Code scale : 0 is lowest to 10 being the highest. N - No Y = Yes

GASTON COUNTY
Gaston County
Soil Erosion and
Sedimentation Control
Program
Gaston Natural Resources Department
1303 Cherryville Highway, Dallas, NC 28034
Telephone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
INSPECTION REPORT
Project alp M+ a - !_.111 Watershed: Neal Branch
Person Financially Responsible: North Star Investors II, LLC
Address: 10800 Sikes Place, Suite 250
C,S,Zip Charlotte NC 23277
Project Location: South Point Road, Belmont
www.co.gaston.nc.us/
NaturalRosources
CONTACT:
Gaston Natural
Resources Department
1303 Cherryville Hwy
Dallas, NC 28034
Telephone: [phone]
Gaston County
Belmont
Bessemer City
Cherryville
Cramerton
Dallas
Dellview
Gastonia
High Shoals
Kings Mountain
Lowell
McAdenville
Mount Holly
Ranlo
Spencer Mountain
Stanley
Mission Statement
"To provide leadership
and conservation
assistance to the
people of Gaston
County to improve and
sustain their soil,
water, air, plant and
wildlife resources "
Q Have Pictures F'? Have Video
Site is currently under Notice of violations F-I Yes 0 No
Site is currently under Notice of non compliance ? Yes 0 No
Site is in compliance with SESCO/SPCA & Rules F-1 Yes Q No
If Violations or Non Compliance, see violations below
VIOLATION RULES

No Approved Plan Ordinance Sec. 18(k); G.S. 113A-57(4);
G.S. 113A-54(4)(4); 15A NCAC 048.0107
Failure to Follow Approved Plan Ordinance Sec. 18(k); G.S. 113A-61.1

Failure to Submit Revised Plan Ordinance Sec. 18(c)(k); G.S. 113A-54.1(b);
15A NCAC 04B.01 18(a)

Failure to Provide Adequate Groundcover Ordinance Sec. 8(c), 9(b)(5); G.S. 113A-
57(3); 15A NCAC 046.0107(b), 0413.0124(e)
X Insufficient Measures to Retain Sediment Ordinance Sec. 7(e); G.S. 113A-57(3)
on Site
Failure to Take All Reasonable Measures Ordinance Sec. 6(c); 15A NCAC 04B.0105
Inadequate Buffer Zone Ordinance Sec. 8(a)(1)(2); G.S. 113A-57(1);
15A NCAC 046.0125(a)
Slopes and Fills too Stee
Ground p Ordinance Sec. 8(b), 9(b)(4); G.S. 113A-
57(2); 15A NCAC 04B.0124(d)
Unprotected Exposed Slopes Ordinance Sec. 8(b), 9(b)(4); G.S. 113A-
57(2)
Failure to Maintain Erosion Control Ordinance Sec. 14; 15A NCAC 04B.0113
Measures
Other (describe)
Sedimentation damage occurred since last inspection Q Yes E No
If yes, where? Q Lake/natural watercourse on tract; F-1 Other property;
x? Lake/natural watercourse off tract.
'MORGAN CORP.
Storm Water Retention Lo
Project: Reflection Point
Monitoring or Event Date: Week ending 05-09-2004
Inspector Name: Brad tfudees
Project Designee: Craig L. Beam - Job Superintendent
Date of Rain: 05-02-2004 Amount (inches) 0.50"
General Information:
Yes No N/a
1. Are all silk fences in compliance and maintained? x
2. Are all inlet protection devices installed, maintained, and in compliance? X
3. Are all riser basins functioning and in compliance? X
4. Has capacity of all sediment ponds been monitored and maintained? X
5. Are all sediment basins functioning and in compliance'? X
6. Are all diversion ditches functioning properly? X
7. Are all check dams in compliance? X
8. Are all slope drains functioning properly? X
9. Are all construction entrances functioning properly and maintained? X
10. iVe all areas requiring stabilization being maintained? X
11. Does all tree protection meet compliance? X
General Antes:
Rain fell over Sat & sun. about 1/2".
All ponds and diversion ditches working and holding. Some will need to be cleaned out.
Run off thru 48" pipe at wet land area washed off rip-rap stone and finished banks allowing small
Amount of silk past the additional silk fence in creek bed.
Cleaned up and seeded as needed
Will add additional silk fence as needed per Robert (gaston county inspector)
Added OF (out fall ) structures to list below by fixture number on print.
EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL INSPECTION:
Facility
ldendtlcatlon Due of
Ins c:lon Operating
Pra eri (yhi) Dcscribc wrmaivc action "m
Const. Ent. 1 5/09/04 Yes Completed and maintained.
Const. Enr-' 5/09104 Yes Com letcd and maintained.
S Pond 1 5/09/04 Yes
S Pond2 5/09/04 N/a Removed and diverted to #1
S Pond 3 5/09/04 Yes
S Pond 4 5109104 Yes
S Pond 5 5109104 Yes
S Pond 6 5109/04 Yes
S Poud 7 5/09/04 Yes
S Pond s 5/09/04 Yes
S Pond 9 5/09/04 Yes
5 Ford 10 5/09/04 Yes
S Pond 11 5/09/04 Yes
S Pond 12 5/09!04 Yes
S Pond 13 5/09/04 Yes
S Pond 14 5/09/04 Yes
S Pond 15 5/09/04 Yes
S Pond 16 5/09104 Yes
S Pond 17 5/09/04 Yes

S Pond 18
5109/04
Yes _
S Pond 19 510104 YeS
s Pond zo 5/09/04 Yes
S Pond 21 5/09104 Yes
S Pond 22 5/09/04 Yes
S Pond 23 5/09/04 NIA Omitted, will feed enlarged and 25 per Craig and Robert
S bond 24 5/09/04 N/A Omitted, will feed eldar ed and 25 per Craig and Robert
S Pond 25 5/09/04 Yes
S Pond 26 5/09104 Yes
S Pond 27 5/09104 Yes
S Pond 2S 5/09104 Yes
8 Pord 29 5/09104 Yes
Silk hence 5109/04 Yes Silk fence completed on Sat.
Diver. Ditch 5/09/04 Yes No ditch problems. Adding 2 ditches per Robert
Divcr. Bcrm? 5109/04 Yes No Berm problems.

Obseivation of storm water at outfails:
Storm watcr ]date
Discharge
tdentitic lion
w
7.
o

C!1 ? -

%
= r
S
a IC yes. ci?c ibc action taken to prcvcnl
Future rclcascs. I D=nbc measures raken to clean
up sedir:.ent o,=ice of the
disrsrbed lirruts.
OF - 2 ! 5/09 0 0 0 0 0 ' N
OF -2-9 15/09 0 0 0 0 0 N
OF -19a 5109 2 2 1 1 0 Y Added additional silk fence ! Seeding and strawing
S Pond 1 1 5109 2 0 0 0 0 N
S Pond 2 1 5/09 0 0 0 0 0 N
S Pond 3. 5/09 3 0 0 0 0 N
S Pond 4 1 5/09 3 0 0 0 0 N
S Pond 5 5/09 2 0 0 0 0 N
S Pond 6 5/09 3 0 0 Q 0 N
S Pond 7 5/09 2 0 0 0 0 N
S Pond 8 5/09 3 1 1 0 0 N
S Pond 9 5/09 3 1 1 0 0 N

S Pond 10
5109
2
0
0
0
0
N _
S Pond 11 5/09 2 0 0 0 0 N
S Pond 12 5/09 2 0 0 0 0 N
S Pond 13 5/09 2 0 0 0 0 N
S Pond 14 5109 3 0 0 0 0 N
S pond 15 5/09 2 1 0 0 0 0 N
S and 16 5/09 3 i 1 ! 1 0 0 N
S pond 17 5/09 2 1 0 i 0 0 0 N
S pond 18 5/09 2! 0 ( 0 0 0 N
S pond 19 5109 2 10 . 0 0 0 N
S and 20 5/09 3 1; 0 Q 0 N
S 22nd 21 5/09 3 0 0 0 0 N
S pond .12 5/09 2 0 0 0 0 N
S pond 23 5109 0 0 0 Q I 0 N Not installed, feeds 425
S pond 24 5/09 0 0 0 0 0 N Not installed, feeds j#25
S pond 25 5109 2 0 0 0 0 N
S pond 26 5/09 2 0 0 0 0 N
S pond 27 5109 2 0 0 0 0 N
S pond 28 5/09 2 0 0 0 0 N
S pond 29 5/09 2 0 0 0 0 N

i

Number Code scale : 0 is lowest to 10 being the highest. N = No Y = Yes
MORGAN CORP.
Storm Water Retention Logf
Project: Reflection Point
Monitoring or Event Date: Week ending 05-16-2004
Inspector Name: 13ra?dgg5
Project Designee: cram L. 13eam - Job Su2erintendent
Date of Rain: trace by evening shower Amount (inches) trncc
General Information:
Yes No N/a
1. Are all silk fences in compliance and maintained'? X
2. Are all inlet protection devices installed, maintained, and in compliance'? X
3. Are all riser basins functioning and in compliance? X
4. Has capacity of all sediment ponds been monitored and maintained? X
5. Are all sediment basins functioning and in compliance? X
6. Are all diversion ditches functioning properly? X
7. Are all check dams in compliance? X
8. Are all slope drains functioning properly? X
9. Are all construction entrances functioning properly and maintained? X
10 . Are all areas requiring stabilization being maintained? X
11 . Does all tree protection meet compliance? X
General Notes:
Trace rain shower on one or two days.
All ponds and diversion ditches working and holding.
Cleaned out all sediment ponds.
EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL INSPECTION:
Facility
Identification Date of
(ns ction Operating
P.oo erly( /n) Descrthe. corrective action taken
Coast. at. 1 5116104 Yes Completed and maintained.
Coast. Ent 2 5/16/04 Yes Completed and maintained.
S Pond 1 5116104 Yes
S Po3d2 5/16104 N/a Removed and diverted to #1
S Pond 3 5116/04 Yes
S Pond 4 5/16104 Yes
5 Ponds 5/16/04 Yes
S Pond a 5/16104 Yes
s road 7 5/16/04 Yes
S Pond 8 5/16104 Yes
S Poid 9 5116104 Yes
s Pond 10 5116104 Yes
S Pond 11 5/16/04 Yes
S Pond 12 5116104 Yes
S Pond 13 5/16/04 Yes _
S Pond 14 5116iO4 Yes
S Pond 15 5116104 Yes
S Pond io 5/16104 Yes
S Pond 17 5116104 Yes
SPond 18 5/16104 Yes
S Pond 19 5116104 Yes
S Pond 20 5/16/04 Yes
S Bond 21 5/16/04 Yes
S Pond 22 5/16104 Yes
S Pond 23 5116104 NIA Omitted, will feed enlarged pond 25 per Craig and Robert
S Pond 24 5/16104 NIA Omitted, will feed enltlrged pond 25 per Craig and Robert
S Pond 25 5/16104 Yes
S Pond 26 5116104 Yes
S Pond 27 5/16104 Yes I
S Pond 28 5/16/04 Yes I
S Pond 29 5116104 Yes
Sill; Fcnce 5/16/04 Yes Silk fence completed on Sat.
Diver. Ditch 5116104 Yes No ditch problems, Adding 2 ditches per Robert
Diver. Bl ms 5116/04 Yes No Berm problems.

Observation of storm water at outfalls:
Nu
Storm water
Diccharae

Identification Date n

.
G

?i
CJI
O

to

?
n'
U2
_
-,

0

fu rL

n
0
av If yes, de tribe action taken to pmvent
future releases. Describe measures taken to clean
up sediment outside of the

disturbed limits.
OF - 2 5/16 0 0 0 0 0 N
OF - 29 5/16 0 0 0 0 0 N
OF - 19a 5116 2 2 1 1 0 Y Added additlonal silk fence Seeding and strawing
S Pond 1 ' 5116 2, 0 0 0 0 N I I
S Pond 2 5/16 0 0 0 0 0 N
S Pond 3 5/16 3 0 0 O O N
S Pond 4 516 3 0 0 0 0 N
S Pond 5 5/16 2 0 0 0 0 N
S Pond 6 5/16 3 0 0 0 0 N
S Pond 7 5/16 2 0 0 0 0 N
S Pond 8 5116 3 1 1 0 0 N
S Pond 9 5/16 3 1 1 0 0 N
S Pond 10 5116 2 0 0 0 0 N
S Pond 11 5116 2 i 0 i 0 0 0 N
S Pond 12 5116 2 0 1 0 0 0 N
S Pond 13 5116 2 0 0 0 0 N
S Pond 14 5/16 3 0 0 0 0 N
Spond 15 1116 2 0 0 0 0 N
S and 16 5116 3 1 1 0 0 N
S pond 17 5/16 2 0 0 0 0 N
S and 1$ 5/16 2 0 0 0 1 0 N
S ad 19 5116 2! 0 0 0 0 N
S and 20 5/16 3 1 1 1 0 0 0 N
S and 21 5116 3 1 0 0 0 0 i N
S pond 22 5/16 2 0 0 0 0 N
S pond 23 5116 0 0 0 0 0 N Not installed, feeds 425
S pond 24 5/16 0 0 0 0 0 N Not installed, feeds #i25
S and 25 5116 ' 2 0 0 0 0 N
S and 26 5/16 2 0 0 0 0 N
S and 27 5/16 2 0 0 0 0 N
S and 28 5/16 2 0 0 U O N
S and 29 5/16 2 0 0 O O N

tuber Code scale ; 0 is lowest to 10 be ine the hip-hest. N = No Y = Yes
MORGAN CORP.
Storm Water Retention L
Project: Reflection Point
Monitoring or Event Date: Week ending 05-23-2004
Inspector Name: Brian Powell
Project Designee: Craig L. Beam - Job Superintendent
Bute of Rain: none Amount (inches) 0"
General Information:
Yes No N/a
1. Are all silk fences in compliance and maintained? X
2. Arc all inlet protection devices installed, maintained, and in compliance'? X
3. Are all riser basins functioning and in compliance? X
4. Has capacity of all sediment ponds been monitored and maintained? X
5. Are all sediment basins functioning and in compliance? X
6. Arc, all diversion ditches functioning properly? X
7. Are all check dams in compliance? X
8. Are all slope drains functioning properly? X
9. Are all construction entrances functioning properly and maintained? X
10. Are all areas requiring stabilization being maintained? X
11. Does all tree protection meet compliance'? X
General Notes:
No rain.
Added 740 ft. of silk fence mostly at bottom of large fill slopes
Cleaned out all sediment ponds as needed. '
EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL INSPECTION:
Facility '
Idcnlificadon Dais of
Ins ecdcn Operating
Pmmrl (/n) Describe corrretive action taken
Coast. Ent. 1 5/23104 Yes I Completed and maintained.
Corot. Ent 2 5123/04 Yes Removed and fine adin for curb.
S Pond 1 5/23104 Yes
S Pond:! 5/23104 Nla Removed and diverted to #1
S Pond 3 5/23/04 Yes
S Pond 4 5/23/04 Yes
S Pond 5 5123104 Yes
S Pond 6 5123104 Yes
S Pond 7 5/23104 Yes
S Pond 8 5/23104 Yes
S Pond 9 5/23104 Yes
S Pond 10 5/23/04 Yes
S Pond ?1 5/23104 Yes
S Pond 12 5123104 Yes
S Pond 13 5/23101 Yes
S Pond 14 5123104 Yes
s Pond 15 5123104 Yes
S Pond t6 5123/04 Yes
S Pond 17 5123104 Yes
S Pond 13 5/23/04 Yes
S Pond 19 5/23/04 Yes
S Pond 20 5/23104 Yes
S Pond 21 15123104 Yes
S Pond 22 5123104 Yes
S Pond 23 5/23/04 NIA Omitted, will feed enlarged and 25 per Craig and Robert
SPond 24 5/23!04 NIA Omitted, will feed enlarged and 25 per Craig and Robert
S Pond 25 5/23/04 Yes
S Pond 26 5/23/04 Yes
S Pond 27 5123104 Yes
S Pond 23 j 5/23104 Yes
S Pond 29 1 5/23/04 Yes
Silk Fence 1 5123104 Yes Additional Silk fence com feted
Diver. Ditch 1 3/23/04 Yes No ditch problems. Adding 2 ditches per Robert
r)ivcr. Rcrmy 15/23/04 Yes No Berm problems.

Observation of storm water at outialls:
Storm water
Discharge
le!eniificalinn Date n
p
_T
70 0 1
1 1 cn
c

R
!3.
to O
-•

p 0

'C
O
^
ro I
?-.
L b
?..+
Ai
Qt If YcN, dcscnbc action taken to prcvcrt
future rel=xs• Describe nxasures taken to clczn
up sediment outside of the
disturbed limits.
OF - 2 5/23 0 10 0 0 0 N
OF - 29 5/23 0; 0 1 0 0 0 N
OF - 19a 5/23 0 10 0 0 0 Y Addcd additional silk fence Sccdin and strawin
S Pond 1 5/23 0; 0 0 0 0 N
S Pond 2 5/23 0 1 0 0 0 0 N

S Pond 3
5/23
U
0
0
0
0
N _
S Pond 4 5/23 0 0 0 0 0 N
S Pond 5 5123 0 1 0 0 0 0 N
S Pond 6 5/23 0 0 0 0 0 N
S Pond 7 5/23 0 0 0 0 0 N
S Pond 8 5/23 0 0 0 0 0 N
S Pond 9 5/23 0 0 0 0 0 N
S Pond 10 5/23 0 0 0 0 0 N j
S Pond 11 5/23 0 0 0 0 0 N
S Pond 12 5/23 U U 0 0 0 N j
S Pond 13 5/23 0 0 0 0 1 0 N
S Pond 14 5/23 0 0 U 0 0 N
S and 15 5/23 0 0 0 0 0 N
5/23 0 0 0 0 0 N
5/23 0 0 0 0 0 N
Mpond 5/23 0 0 0 0 0 N
5/23 0 0 0 0 0 N
S and 20 5/23 0 0 0 0 0 N
5 and 21 5/23 0 0 0 0 0 N
S and 22 5/23 0 , 0 0 0 0 N
S pond 23 5/23 0 0 0 0 0 .N Not installed, feeds ##25
S and 24 5/23 0 0 0 0 0 N Not installed, feeds #25
S and '5 5123 0 0 0 0 0 N
S and 26 5/23 0 0 0 0 0 N
S and 27 5/23 0 0 0 0 0 N
S pond 28 5/23 0 0 0 0 0 N
S and 29 5/23 4 0 0 0 0 N
I
i 1

Number Code scale : 0 is lowest to 10 being the highest. N = No Y = Yes
GASTON COUNTY
Gaston County
Soil Erosion and
Sedimentation Control
Program
C,Oulvzi
` 84
?11I1 A4
M? s°o
.d cv
fl ?
AlaiT
www.co,gaston.nc.usl
NaturalResources
CONTACT:
Gaston Natural
Resources Department
1303 Cherryville Hwy
Dallas, NC 28034
Telephone: [phone]
Gaston County
Belmont
Bessemer City Cherryville
Cramerton
Dallas
Dellview
Gastonia
High Shoals
Kings Mountain
Lowell
McAdenville
Mount Holly
Ranlo
Spencer Mountain
Stanley
Mission Statement
"To provide leadership
and conservation
assistance to the
people of Gaston
County to improve and
sustain their soil,
water, air, plant and
wildlife resources "
Gaston Natural Resources Department
1303 Cherryville Highway, Dallas, NC 28034
Telephone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
INSPECTION REPORT
Project ? .M??.R .' • ?:..' ?r Watershed: Neal Branch
Person Financially Responsible: North Star Investors II, LLC
Address: 10800 Sikes Place, Suite 250
C,S,Zip Charlotte NC 28277
Project Location: South Point Road, Belmont
Q Have Pictures F-? Have Video
Site is currently under Notice of violations Yes 0 No
Site is currently under Notice of non compliance Yes 0 No
Site is in compliance with SESCO/SPCA & Rules Yes Q No
If Violations or Non Compliance, see violations below
VIOLATION RULES

No Approved Plan Ordinance Sec. 18(k); G.S. 113A-57(4);
G.S. 113A-54(d)(4); 15A NCAC 04B.0107
Failure to Follow Approved Plan Ordinance Sec. 18(k); G.S. 113A-61.1
Failure to Submit Revised Plan Ordinance Sec. 18(c)(k); G.S. 113A-54.1(b);
15A NCAC 04B.01 18(a)

Failure to Provide Adequate Groundcover Ordinance Sec. 8(c), 9(b)(5); G.S. 113A-
57(3); 15A NCAC 046.0107(b), 04B.0124(e)
Insufficient Measures to Retain Sediment
on Site
Ordinance Sec. 7(e); G.S. 113A-57(3)
Failure to Take All Reasonable Measures Ordinance Sec. 6(c); 15A NCAC 048.0105
Inadequate Buffer Zone Ordinance Sec. 8(a)(1)(2); G.S. 113A-57(1);
15A NCAC 04B.0125(a)
Ground Slopes and Fills too Steep Ordinance Sec. 8(b), 9(b)(4); G.S. 113A-
57(2); 15A NCAC 04B.0124(d)
Unprotected Exposed Slopes Ordinance Sec. 8(b), 9(b)(4); G.S. 113A-
57(2)
Failure to Maintain Erosion Control
Measures Ordinance Sec. 14; 15A NCAC 048.0113
Other (describe)
Sedimentation damage occurred since last inspection x? Yes ? No
If yes, where? x? Lake/natural watercourse on tract; F-? Other property;
F-I Lake/natural watercourse off tract.
""ORGAN CORP.
Storm Water Retention Lo
Project: Reflection Point
Monitoring or Event Date: Week ending 05-30-2004
Inspector Name: David Normal
Project Designee: Craig-L.-Beam - Job Superintendent
Date or Ruin: none Amount (inches) 0"
General Information:
Yes
1. Are all silk fences in compliance and maintained?
2. Are all inlet protection devices installed, maintained, and in compliance?
3. Are all riser basins functioning and in compliance?
4. Has capacity of all sediment ponds been monitored and maintained?
5. Arc all sediment basins functioning and in compliance?
6. Arc 811 diversion ditches functioning properly'?
7. Are all check dams in compliance?
8. Are all slope drains functioning properly?
9. Are all construction entrances functioning properly and maintained?
10. Are all areas requiring stabilization being maintained?
11. Does all tree protection meet compliance?
General Notes:
Light thunder shower during the week. Less than .10"
Added silk fence along inlet area at wet lands per Robert Gordan
Cleaned out all sediment ponds as needed. '
All sediment ponds are dry and not :folding any water.
Grass of many areas started for stabilization.
No N/a
x
X
X
X
X
k
x
X
X
X
X
l£ c 9ID 6G6 EC, ££9 'otl!c0:? 1 '! Sig l:Z l t C 0 Z t'. 1?f (uIkl) S? I! dId0Nd !P,Odd?? 1 ;?" l'JC,d?-
-EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL INSPECTION:
Yacility
identification Date or
Ins Ilion Operating
Prorl /n) Dcwnbc corrective action taken
ConSL Ent. 1 5/30/04 Yes Completed and maintained.
Const. en; 2 5/30104 Yes Removed and fine adin for curb.
S Pond 1 5130104 Yes Removed and new weir laced around out pipe in retaining wall
S Pond 2 5130/04 N/a Removed and diverted to #1
S Pond S 5/30104 Yes
S Pond 4 5/30/04 Yes
S Pond 5 5/30/04 Yes
S Pond 6 5130104 Yes
S Pond 7 5130104 Ycs
S Pond 8 5/30/04 Yes
S Pond 9 5/30104 Yes
S Pond 10 5/30!04 Yes
S Pond 11 5130104 Yes
S Pond 12 5130104 Yes
S Pond 13 5130/04 Yes
S Pond 14 5130104 Yes
s Pond 15 5/30/04 Yes
S Pond 16 5/30104 Yes
S Pond 17 5/30104 Yes
S Pond 18 5/30104 Yes
S Pond 19 5130!04 Yes
S Pond 20 5130/04 Yes
S Pond 21 5130104 Yes I
S Pond 22 5!30104 Yes
S Pond 23 5130104 NIA Omitted, will feed e0ar ed and 25 per Craig
and Robert
S Pond 24 5/30/04 ,
N/A j Omitted, will feed enlarged and 25 per Craig and Robert
S Pond 25 5130104 Yes
S Pond 26 5130104 Yes
SRind27 513D104 Yes
S Pond 28 5130104 Yes
S Pont 29 5130104 Yes
Silk Fences 5130,104 Yes Additional Silk fence completed
Diver, Ditch 5/30104 Yes ( No ditch roblems. Adding 2 ditches per Robert
Diver. Berms 5/30104 Yes I No Berm problems.
i

I
ZG G 9D67V 0E9 'OV/GU i J: L l 11, THGC t l il^ IU.i?`; I 0 0 _0
-Observation of storm water at outfalls:
Storm water

[hsehazge
identification Date

-
-:1
o

Ln
0

ya.'
to
E

-
a
o

E.-
'

-
cs

?
to

f
f5
Ir yes, describc action t_kctt to prevent
future releases.
Describe measures taken In cicEn
up Ged, me:tt Outside of the
disturbed limits.
OF - 2 5/30 0 0 0 U O N
OF-29 5/30 0 10 0 0 0 N
OF-19a 5/30 0 I 0 0 0 0 Y Added additional silk fence Seedin¢ and strawin
S Pond 1 5/30 0 0 0 0 0 N
S Pond 2 5130 0 0 0 0 0 N
S Pond 3 5130 0 0 0 0 0 N
S Pond 4 5/30 0 0 0 0 0 N
S Pond 5 5130 0 0 0 0 0 N t
S Pond 6 5/30 0 0 0 0 0 N I
S Pond 7 5/30 0 0 0 0 0 N i

S Pond 8
5/30
0
0
0
0
0
N _
S Pond 9 5130 0 0 0 U 0 N
S Pond 10 5/30 0 0 0 0 0 N
S Pond 11 5/30 0 0 0 0 0 N
S Pond 12 5/30 0 0 0 0 0 N
S Pond 13 5/30 0 0 0 0 0 N
S Pond 14 5/30 0 0 0 0 0 N
S and 15 5/30 0 0 0 0 0 N
S pond 16 5/30 0 0 0 0 0 N
S pond 17 5/30 0 0 0 0 0 N
S pond 18 5/30 0 0 0 0 0 N
S nd 19 5130 0 0 0 0 0 N
S pond 20 5/30 0 U 0 U 0 N
S pond 21 5/30 0 0 0 0 0 N
S and 22 5/30 0 0 0 0 0 N
S and 23 5/30 0 0 0 0 0 N Not installed, feeds 425
S and 24 5130 0 0 0 0 0 N Not installed, feeds #25
S pond 25 5130 0 0 0 0 0 N
S pond 26 5/30 0 0 0 0 0 N
S and 27 5130 0 0 0 0 0 N
S and 28 5/30 0 0 0 0 0 N
S nd 29 51;30 0 0 0 0 0 N

Number Code scale : 0 is lowest to 10 being the highest. N = No Y = Yes
U d :l'V?J:;G?Gn l?l?/ v•J ..I ` l :/ V ? 1G'?v ?' ??r ?v?l!i? ^J ?'?: dV UV ito C'? V.I V(1?;
MORGAN CORP.
Storm Water Retention Lo
Project: Reflection Point
Monitoring or Event Date: Week ending 06-06-2004
Inspector Name: David Normal
Project Designee: Craig L. Beam - Job Superintendent
Date of Ruin: none Amount (inches) 0"
General Information:
Yes
1. Are all silk fences in compliance and maintained?
2. Are all inlet protection devices installed, raintained, and in compliance?
3. Are all riser basins functioning and in compliance?
4. Has capacity of all sediment ponds been monitored and maintained?
5. Are all sediment basins functioning and in compliance?
6. Are all diversion ditches functioning properly?
7. Are all check dams in compliance?
8. Are all slope drains functioning properly?
9. Are all construction entrances functioning properly and maintained?
10. Are all areas requiring stabilization being maintained'?
11. Does all tree protection meet compliance'?
General Notes:
All sediment ponds are dry and not holding any water.
Grass of many areas finished for stabilization.
No N/a
x
x
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
r? d 906Z6S9CS9 'CPJ/?O ? i 'iS,, r00? r i 1n1 (f? dt,', 'i ^`'! , ? c0d d 1P1GdkGdd
EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL INSPECTION:
Facility Date of
ldentificarion Itts ctlon Operating
Pro rl (/n) Describe corrective action taken ,
Cont. Ent. 1 5/30/04 Yes Con1 ]cted and maintained.
Com. Ent 2 5130104 Yes Removed and fine adin for curb.
S Pond 1 5!30/04 Yes Removed and new weir laced around out i in retaining wall
S Pond 2 5130104 N/a Removed and diverted to #1
S Pond , 5130/04 Yes
S Pond 4 5/30/04 Yes
S Pond 5 5130104 Yes
S Pond 6 5130104 Yes
S Pond 7 5/30104 Yes
S Pond 6 5130104 Yes
S Pond 9 5130/04 Yes
S Pond 10 1 5130104 Yes
S Pond 11 15130104 Yes
S Pond 12 15130104 Yes
S Pond 13 1 5130104 Ycs
S Pond 14 ! 5!30104 Yes
S Pond 15 5130104 Yes
S Pond 16 5130104 Yes
S Pond 17 $/30/04 Yes
S Pond 18 5130104 Yes
S Pond 19 5130104 Yes
S Pond 20 5130/04 Yes
S Pond 21 j 5130104 Yes
S Pond 22 j 5/30104 Yes
S Pond 23 5130104 N/A Omitted, will feed enlarged and 25 per Craig and Robert
s mud 24 3130104 N/A Omitted, will feed enlarged and 25 per Crai and Robert
S Pond 25 ; 51301'04 Yes
S Pnnd 26 5,130104 Yes
S Pond 27 5130104 Yes
S Pond 29 5!30,'04 Yes
S Pond 29 5130104 Yes
Silk Fence 5!30104 Yes Additional Silk fence com letcd
Diver. Ditch 5/30/04 Yes No ditch roblems. Adding 2 ditches per Robert
Diver. Bemis 5130/04 Yes No Berm problems.

GS c gp ?o>G£i ;'!S/Sl ?1 11HH tI 11''`?:n`J
Observation of storm water at outfalls:
Nut
Scorns water
Discharge
ldentiticarior; pate n

-
O
l=
C ?, O

'V, p

y

p
a
t7 lr ym dzwrib: action taken to prevent
future releases. Describe measures taken to clean
up sediment outside of the
disturbed limits.
OF - 2 5/30 0 0 0 0 0 N
OF-29 5/30 0 0 0 0 0 N
OF-19a 5/30 0 0 0 0 0 Y Added additional silk fence Seeding and strain Y
S Pond 1 5130 0 0 0 0 0 N
S Pond 2 5/30 0 0 0 0 0 N
S Pond 3 5130 0 0 0 0 0 N
S Pond 4 5130 0 0 0 0 0 N
S Pond 5 5/30 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 N
S Pond 6 5/30 0' 0 ! 0 0 0 N
S Pond 7 5/30 0 1 0 0 0 0 N
S Pond 6 5/30 0 0; 0 0 0 N
S Pond 9 5130 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 N
S Pond 10 5/30 0 1 0 ! 0 0 0 N
S Pond 11 5130 0' 0 0 D 0 N
5 Pond 12 5130 0 0 0 0 0 N
S Pond 13 5/30 0 0 0 0 0 N
S Pond 14 5/30 0 0 0 0 0 N
S pond 15 5130 0 1 0 0 0 0 N
S and 16 5/30 0 0 0 0 0 N
S and 17 5130 0 0 0 0 0 N
S and 18 5/30 0 0 0 0 0 N
S and t9 5/30 0 0 0 0 0 N
S and 20 5/30 0 0 0 a 0 N
S and 21 5/30 0 0 0 0 0 N
S and 22 5/30 0 0 0 0 0 N
S and 23 5/30 0 U 0 0 0 N Not installed, feeds 425
S and 24 5/30 0 0 0 0 0 N Not installed, feeds #f25
S and 25 5130 0 0 0 0 0 N
S and 26 5130 0 0 0 0 0 N
S and 27 5/30 0 0 0 0 0 N
S and 28 5/30 0 0 0 0 0 N
S and 29 5130 0 0 0 0 0 N
I
i
J
I !
nber Code scale : 0 is lowest to 10 be inr the hi ehest• N = No Y = Yes
98 d 905ZH9 £9 'Oti/%p:1 1 '! S!E ::! t 700? t'l lfif (GIhi; 311103d0 dc' 2dOd_d71 1Y V,10 ;
MORGAN CORP.
Storm Water Retention Lo
Project: Reflection Point
Monitoring or Event Date: _ Week ending 06-13-2004
Inspector Name: David Normal
Project Designee: Craig L. Ream - Job Superintendent
Date of Rain: none Amount (inches) 0"
General Information:
Yes
1. Arc all silk fences in compliance and maintained?
2. Are all inlet protection devices installed, maintained, and in compliance?
3. Are all riser basins functioning and in compliance?
4. Eas capacity of all sediment ponds been monitored and maintained?
S. Arc all sediment basins functioning and in compliance?
6. Arc all diversion ditches functioning properly?
7. Are all check dams in compliance?
8. Are all slope drains functioning properly?
9. Arc all construction entrances functioning properly and maintained?
10. Arc all areas requiring stabilization being maintained?
11. Does all tree protection meet compliance?
General Notes:
All sediment ponds are dry and not holding any seater.
Grass of manv areas finished for stahilization.
No Nla
x
X
X
X
X
X
x
x
X
X
_? d 90 Zc':i; 9 '0 hJ.!?0 l 'i S% 1V 1, ? l 0 0 ? -, I 'Ir)i (G3?`) S3 iI i 3dC1d iP!Od??2 ''7 i'+;N?
EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL INSPECTION:
Facility
Identification Date of
Inspection Operating
Propefly(Wn) DcaCrib: wncctive action taken
contt. Ent. 1 6/11/04 Yes Completed and inaintaincd.
Const. Ent 2 6111104 Yes Removed and fine grading for curb.
S Pond 1 6/11/04 Yes Removed and new weir laced around out 2i 2e in retaining wall
.3 Pond2 611.1/04 N/a Removed and diverted to #1
SPond 3 6/11/04 Yes
S Pond 4 6/11/04 Yes
S Pond 5 6111/04 Yes
S Pond 6 6/11/04 Yes
S Pond 7 6/11/04 YCS
S Pond b 6/11/04 Yes
S Pond 9 6/11104 Yes
S Fond 10 6111104 Yes
S Pond 11 6111104 Yes
S Pond 12 6!11104 Yes
S Pond 13 6/11/04 Yes
S Pond 10, 6111104 Yes
S Pond is 6/11/04 Yes
S Pond 16 6/11104 Yes
S Pond 17 6/11/04 Yes _
S Pond 18 6111/04 Yes
S Pond 19 6/11/04 Yes
S Pond 20 6!11104 Yes
S Pond 21 6111/04 Yes
$ Pond Z2 6111/04 Yes
S Pond 23 6111/04 NIA Omitted, will feed enlarged and 25 per Crai t and Roben
S Pond 24 1 6111/04 NIA Omitted, will Feed enlarged and 25 per Craig
and Robert
S Pond 25 11 6111 /04 Yes ,
S Pond 26 1 6/11/04 Yes
S Pond 27 1 6111104 Yes
S Pond 28 . 6111104 Yes
S Pond 29 ! 6/11/04 Yes
Sul fence 6111104 Yes Additional Silk fence completed
Diver, Ditch 1 6/11/04 Yes No ditch problems. Adding 2 ditches per Robert
Diver. nerrm 6/11/04 Yes No Berm problems.

88 d 806'6 E 8 E£ a' G P?- c 0:_' l' 1 S,' t,: -v0L-c tl lnf(03,? ) l- I I 1 ' :-d?1J'a 1 1 '1 i ca 6 : 1 1 ?I 1' ? ?
10' 11
V
Observation of storm water at outfalls:
Nu
Storm water
Discharge
Ider.fif,cauon pate n ot
O
9=

?

n
cy
y
a
v, .?

Ua
7 O
S
r,
.,
O r. C,?

O If yes, drscribc anion taker. to prevent
future rclcases. Describe. measures taker, to clean
up sediment outside of the

di;turbccllimits.
OF-2 6/11 0 0 0 U 0 N j
OF-29 6/11 0 0 0 0 0 N
OF -19a 6111 U 0 0 0 0 Y Added additional silk fence I Seeding and strawin
S Pond 1 6/11 0 0 0 0 0 N
S Pond 2 16/11 0 0 0 0 0 N
S Pond 3 1 6/11 0 0 0 0 0 N I
S Pond 4 ' 6/11 0 0 0 U 0 N
S Pond 5 6111 0 0 0 0 0 N
S Pond 6 6/11 0 0 0 0 0 N
S Pond 7 6/11 0 0 0 U 0 N
S Pond S 6/11
1 0 0 0 0 0 N
S Pond 9 6/11 0 U U U 0 N
S Pond 10 6/11 0 0 0 0 0 N
S Pond 11 6/11 0 0 0 0 0 N
S Pond 12 6/11 0 1 0 0 0 0 N
S Pond 13 6111 0! 0 10 0 0 N
S Pond 14 6/11 0 1 0 0 0 0 N
S pond 15 6/11 0 0 0 0 0 N
S and 16 6111 0 0 0 0 0 N
S and 17 6/11 0 0 0 0 0 N _
S and 18 6111 0 , 0 0 0 0 N
S and 19 6/11 0 0 0 0 0 N
S and 20 6/11 0 U U U U N
S and 21 6111 0 0 0 0 0 N
S pond 22 6/11 0 0 0 0 0 N
S pond 23 6/11 0 0 0 0 0 N Not installed, feeds #2i
S and 24 611 0 0 0 0 0 N Not installed, feeds #25
S and 25 6/11 0 0 0 0 0 N
S and 26

1 6/11 0 0 0 0 0 N-
I
S and 27 6111 0 0 0 0 0 N
S and 29 6111 0 0 0 0 0 N
S pond 29 6/11 0 0 0 0 0 N

I

mber Code scale : 0 i s lowest to 10 bei ne the hiehest, N = No Y - Yes
?£ d 2UK'HS£S9 'OPdIU l '! S/r l:! l tH ' c ."If (G3Mi S311a?dOGd 1NOdd-u ?? hL2a
MORGAN CORP.
Storm Water Retention Lo
Project: Rctlection Point
Monitoring or Event Date: Week ending 06-2(1-2004
Inspector Name: David Normal
Project Designee: Craig L Beam - Job Sop;dntendcnt
Date of Rain: 6-14 Amount (inches) 1.101,
General Information:
Yes No I'Va
1. Ate all silk fences in compliance mid maintained? X
2. Arz all inlet protection devices installed, maintained, and in compliance? X
3. Are all riser basins functioning and in compliance? X
4. Has capacity of all sediment ponds been monitored and maintained? X
5. Are all sediment basins functioning and in compliance? X
6. Arc all diversion ditches functioning properly? X
7. Are all check dams in compliance? X
8. Are all slope drains functioning properly? X
9. Are all construction cniran= functioning prcgcrly and maintained'? X
10. Are all areas requiring stabilization being maintained? X
11. Does all tree protection meetcompliance? X
General Notes:
First major rain event. Most was soaked up because of very dy conditions. No major run off
In any of the ponds.
Oh d 8069 E£?'0P-I z, l is1. r0 Gi: 2, 1f fry) S?1c:d0 1 f10
EROSION AND SEDIWNI'ATION CONTROL INSPECTION:
Facility '
Identification Date of
In.a chnn [)Pooling
Procrl v/0 Describe mrreetive action taken
Const. Ent. 1 6111104 Yes Co=lctcd and Maintainc&
j Cone. Ent 2 6/11104 YcS Removed rind fine radin for curd,
S Pond 1 6111/01 Yes Removed and new weir laced around out i in retaining wall
S Pond 2 6/11/04 N/a Removed and diverted to #1
S Pond 3 6111/04 Yes
S Pond 4 6/11/04 Yes
S Pond 5 6/11/04 Yes
S Pond 6 6/11/04 YCS
S Pond 7 6/11/04 Yes
S Pond 8 6/11/04 Yes
S Pond 9 6/11/04 Yeti
S Pond 10 6111/04 Yes
S Pond 11 6,/1154 Yes
S Pond 12 6111/04 Yes
S Pond 13 6/11/04 Yes
s pond 14 6.111/04 Ycs
S Pond 15 6111/014 Yes I
s Pond 16 6111/0 Yes ?
S Pond 17 6/11/04 Yes
S Pond 18 6/111114 YCS
S Pond 19 6111/04 Yes
S Pond 20 6111104 Yes
S Pond 21 6111/04 Yes
5Pt1110 22 6111/04 Yes
S Pond 23 6111/04 NIA Omitted, will ked enlargicd pond 25 per Crai and Robert
S Pond 24 0111104 N/A Omitted, will fecd enlarged pond 25 per Craig and Robert
S Pond 25 6/1.1/44 Yes
S Pond 26 6111/04 Yes
S Pend 27 6/11/04 Yes
S Pond 28 6111/04 Yes
S Pond 29 6/11/04 YES
silk Fence 6111/04 Yes Additional Silk fence completed
Diver. Ditch 6111/04 Yes No ditch mbiems. Adding 2 ditches per Robert
17ivcr. aem 6/11/04 Yes No Berm roblcros.

:b 9061160 V£,'0?11, 0:1 -IS", _l t'C'" tI _,n (?3MJ S31ic3dC???a 1hJ033y3!?k IV?,??
Observation of storm water at outfalls:
Sturm water
Discharge
Iden[lfl atlnn Date C1

_
o
>,'
O

n
tn-

c

?
ro a If yes, describe action ralell to rfCyCnL
future relesses. Dm fib- rtcastues taken to cleat
up sediment outside of the
disturbed limit.
OP - 2 6/11 0 0 0 0 0 N
OF - 29 0/11 0 0 0 0 0 N
OF -19a 6/11 0 10 0 0 0 Y Addod additional silk fence Seedin and strawin
S Pond 1 6111 0 0 0 0 0 N
S Pond 2 6/1.1 0 0 0 0 0 N
S Pond 3 6111 0 0 0 0 0 N
S Pond 4 6/11 0 0 0 0 0 N
S Pond 5 6/11 0 0 0 0 0 N
S Pond 6 6/11 0 0 0 0 0 N
S fond 7 6/11 0 0 0 0 0 N
S Pond 8 6/11 0 0 0 0 0 N
S Pond 9 6/11 0 0 0 0 0 N
S Pond 10 6/11 0 0 0 0 0 N
S Pond 11 6/11 0 0 0 0 0 N
S Pond 12 6111 U 0 0 0 0 N
S Pond 13 6111 0 0 0 0 0 N
S Pond 14 1 6/11 0 0 0 0 U N
S pond 15 6/11 0 0 0 0 0 N
S pond 16 6/11 0 0 0 0 0 N
S pond 17 6111 1 0 0 0 0 0 N
S pond 1S 6111 0 0 0 ( G O N
S pond 19 6111 0 0 0 0 0 N
S pond 20 6/11 0 0 0 0 0 N
S pond 21 6/11 0 0 0 0 0 N
S pond 22 6111 0 0 0 0 0 N
S pond 23 6/11 0 0 0 0 0 N Not installed, foods #25
S pond 24 6111 0 0 0 0 0 N Not installed, feeds #25
S rid 25 6111 0 0 0 0 0 N
S pond 26 6/11 0 0 0 0 0 N
S pond 27 6/11 0 0 0 0 0 N
S pond 28 6/11 0 0 1 0 0 0 N
S pond '229 6111 0 0 0 0 0 N

Number Coda siale : 0 is lowest to 10 being the highest. N=No Y=Yes

MORGA N CORP.
Storm Water Retention Lod
Project: Reflection Point
Monitoring or Event Date: Week ending 06-20-M
Inspector Name: David Nolmal
Project Designee: Craig L,13cam - Job Superintendent
Date of Rain: 6-15 & 16 Amount (inches) 2.10"
General Information:
Yes No
12. Are all silk fences in compliance and maintained? X
13. Are all inlet protection dc^ ices installed, maintained, and in compliance? X
14, Art all riser basins functioning and in compliance?
15. Hag capacity of all sediment ponds been monitored and maintained? X
16. Am all sediment basins functioning and in compliance? X
17. Are all diversion ditches functioning properly? X
18. Are all cheek darns in compliance? X
19. Are all slope drains functioning properly?
20. Are all construction entrances functioning properly and maintained? X
21. Arc all areas requiring stabilization being maintained? X
22. Dot-s all tree protection meet compliance? X
General Notes:
N/a
x
X
Rain continued Monday and Tuesday quite heavy at times. Severe sill: accumulations in several ponds.
Heavy washing in long stmt graded areas.
8i d 9?ID6?6?9£89'C:0:? iC,0 , 1 1"?^!C3h'! U
EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL INSPECTION:
Facility '
Identification Date of
Inspection Operating
Pmpcrlv(v/n) Dcscdbc cotzcctivc action taken
Const. Ent. 1 6/17/0;4 Yes Completed and maintained.
Const, Ent 2 6/17/44 Yes Removed and fine din for curb.
S Pond 1 6117/014 Yes Removed and new weir laced around out i in retaining, wall
S Pond 2 6117/04 N/a Removed and divened to #1
5 Pond 3 6117/04 Yes
S Pond 4 0117/44 Ycs
S Pond 5 6117/44 Yes
S Pond 6 611704 Yes
S Pond 7 &17N Ycs
S Pond 8 6/174A Yes I
S Pond 9 &17/D4 Yes
S Pond 10 6/17/44 Yes
S Pond I I 6117/D4 YeS
S Pond 12 6117/04 Yes
S Pond 13 N17/D4 Yes
S Pond 14 6/17/04 Yes
S Pond 15 (VIVi14 Yes
S Pond 16 6117/04 1 Yes
S Pond 17 6I17/D4 Yes
S Pond 18 6117/44 Yes
S Pond 19 6117/04 Yes
S Pond 20 ! 61/17/)4 Yes
S Pond 21 6/17/44 Ycs
S Pond 22 6/17/04 Yes
S Pond 23 6/17/04 N/A Omitted, will teed enlar ed pc)nd 25 r Craig and Robert
S Pond 24 6/17/44 N/A Omitted, will feed enlar red pond 25 r CT W and Robert
.
S Pond 25 6/17/44 Yes
S Pond 26 6117/04 Yes
S Pond 27 6/17/04 Yes
5 Pond 28 6117/44 Yes
S Pond 29 6117/44 Ycs
Silk Fen C. 6117/44 Yes Addifional Sills fen= corn leted
Diver. Ditch 6117/04 Yes No bitch problems. Adding 2 ditches per Robert
Diver. Bct:ns 6/17/44 Yes No Berm problems.

M.
tt d ;
.JOC -- s5'0,ti,70: i1'iSi?I ?? rUOc tl 1?f'?a3h4? S]!i d, ? C _
Observation of storm water at outfalls:
Storm water
Dis6targe
IdtntificHtion Date

?. ??
0
C
r?
o_ Cr

?

w n

ro

c

% it yes, describe action taken to prevent
future releases. Describe measures taken to clean
up sediment outside of the
disturbed limits,
OF-2 6/17 0 0 U 0 0 N
OF - 29 6/17 0 0 0 0 0 N
OF -19a 6/17 0 0 0 0 0 Y Added additional silk fence Seeding and strawin
S Pond 1 6/17 0 0 0 0 0 N
S Pond 2 6/17 0 0 0 D 0 N
S Pond 3 6/17 0 0 0 0 0 N
S Pond 4 6/17 0 0 0 0 0 N
S Pond 5 6117 0 0 0 0 0 N
S Pond 6 6/17 0 0 0 0 0 N
S Pond 7 6117 0 0 0 0 0 N
S fond 8 6/17 8 2 2 0 0 N I No mlcasc Dipped out
S Pond 9 1 6/17 7 2 2 0 0 N I No release out
S Pond 10 6/17 0 0 0 0 0 N
S Pond 11 6117 0 0 0 0 0 N
S Pond 12 6117 8 3 2 0 0 N No rcIease Dipped out
S Pbnd 13 6/17 0 0 0 0 0 N
S Pond 14 6117 0 0 0 0 0 N i
S Pond 15 1 6/17 0 0 0 0 0 N
S pond 16 1 6/17 0 0 0 0 0 N
S pond 17 6/17 0 0 0 0 0 N
S pond 18 6/17 0 0 0 O 0 N
S pond 19 6/17 0 0 0 0 0 N
S pond 20 0/17 6 2 2 0 0 N No rdeflse Dipped out
S pond 21 6117 0 0 0 0 0 N
S pond 22 6117 0 0 0 0 0 N
S pond 23 6117 0 0 0 0 0 N Not installed, feeds #25
S pond 24 6/17 0 0 0 0 0 N Not installed, feeds 025
S pond 25 6/17 0 0 0 0 0 N
S pond 26 6117 6 2 2 _L LO N No release Dj2ped out
S pond 27 &1 0 0 0 0 0 N
S pond 28 6/17 0 0 0 0 0 N
S pond 29 6/17 0 0 0 0 0 N

Number Code scale : 0 is lowest to 10 being the highest. N - No Y -Yes
?r C ? rGGL
r
Gaston County
Soil Erosion and
Sedimentation Control
Program
GASTON COUNTY
Gaston Natural Resources Department
1303 Cherryville Highway, Dallas, NC 28034
Telephone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
INSPECTION REPORT
Project k ( =1,-; ;' _ - ,:-, t i? _„ ? 7 777 Watershed: { Watershed: Neal Branch .77 Person Financially Responsible: North Star Investors II, LLC
Address: 10800 Sikes Place, Suite 250
C,S,ZIp Charlotte NC 28277
Project Location: South Point Road, Belmont
www.co.gaston.nc.us/
NaturalResources
CONTACT:
Gaston Natural
Resources Department
1303 Cherryville Hwy
Dallas, NC 28034
Telephone: [phone]
Gaston County
Belmont
Bessemer City
Cherryville
Cramerton
Dallas
Dellview
Gastonia
High Shoals
Kings Mountain
Lowell
McAdenville
Mount Holly
Ranlo
Spencer Mountain
Stanley
Mission Statement
"To provide leadership
and conservation
assistance to the
people of Gaston
County to improve and
sustain their soil,
water, air, plant and
wildlife resources."
Have Pictures F-I Have Video
Site is currently under Notice of violations Yes 0 No
Site is currently under Notice of non compliance Yes 0 No
Site is in compliance with SESCO/SPCA & Rules Yes 0 No
If Violations or Non Compliance, see violations below
VIOLATION RULES

No Approved Plan Ordinance Sec. 18(k); G.S. 113A-57(4);
G.S. 113A-54(d)(4); 15A NCAC 048.0107
Failure to Follow Approved Plan Ordinance Sec. 18(k); G.S. 113A-61.1
Failure to Submit Revised Plan Ordinance Sec. 18(c)(k); G.S. 113A-54.1(b);
15A NCAC 04B.01 18(a)

Failure to Provide Adequate Groundcover Ordinance Sec. 8(c), 9(b)(5); G.S. 113A-
57(3); 15A NCAC 04B.0107(b), 04B.0124(e)
X Insufficient Measures to Retain Sediment
on Site Ordinance Sec. 7(e); G.S. 113A-57(3)
Failure to Take All Reasonable Measures Ordinance Sec. 6(c); 15A NCAC 046.0105
Inadequate Buffer Zone Ordinance Sec. 8(a)(1)(2); G.S. 113A-57(1);
15A NCAC 04B.0125(a)
Ground Slopes and Fills too Steep Ordinance Sec. 8(b), 9(b)(4); G.S. 113A-
57(2); 15A NCAC 04B.0124(d)
Exposed Slo
Unprotected Pes Ordinance Sec. 8(b), 9(b)(4); G.S. 113A-
57(2)
Failure to Maintain Erosion Control
Measures Ordinance Sec. 14; 15A NCAC 0413.0113
Other (describe)
Sedimentation damage occurred since last inspection xQ Yes 0 No
If yes, where? Q Lake/natural watercourse on tract; ? Other property;
7 Lake/natural watercourse off tract.
MORGAN CORP.
Storm Water Retention Lo
Project: Reflection Point
Monitoring or Event Date: Week ending 06-27-2004
Inspector Name: David Normal
Project Designee: Craig L. Beam - Job Surcrintendent
Date of Rain: 6-15 & 16 Amount (inches) "
General Information:
Ycs No
12. Are all silk fences in compliance and maintained? X
13. Are all inlet protection devices installed, maintained, and in compliance? X
14. Are all riser basins functioning and in compliance?
15. Has capacity of all sediment ponds been monitored and maintained? X
16. Are all sedimcnt basins functioning and in compliance? X
17. Arc all diversion ditches functioning properly? X
18. Are all check dams in compliance? X
19. Arc all slope drains functioning properly?
20. Are all construction entrances functioning pmperly and maintained? X
21. Are all areas requiring stabilization being maintained? x
22. Does all tree protection meet compliance? X
General Notes:
N/a
x
X
Rain continued Monday and Tuesday quite heavy at times. Severe silk accumulations in several ponds.
Heavy washing in long street graded areas.
9 h d 9 0 o 7 C G 1 r y ', A r •I '? 1 1,1107 " ' 7 I ^ rr?fIi) `y ` .%nU Ar "U]_
y' vrC,? ?< <S/ _ v? v i • . C
EROSION AND S1EbIMCNTATTON CONTROL INSPECTION:
Facility
Identification Date of
Inspection Operating
Prorl (:n) Describe corrective action taken
Cont. Ent. 1 6/17104 Yes Completed and maintaincd.
coast. Ent 2 6117/04 Yes Removed and fine rddin for curb.
S Pond 1 6117104 Yes Removed and new weir laced around out pipe in retainin wall
S Pond 2 6/17/04 N/a Removed and diverted to #1
S Pond 3 6/17104 Yes
S Pond 4 6117104 Yes
S Pond 5 6/17104 Yes
S Pond 6 6117104 Yes
S Pond 7 6117104 Yes
S Pond 6 6/17104 Yes
S Pond 9 6117/04 Yes
S Pond 10 6/17104 Yes
S Pond I I 6117/04 Yes
S Pond 12 6/17/04 Yes
S Pond 13 6/17/04 Yes
S Pond 14 6/17104 Yes
S Pond 15 6117104 Yes
S Pond 16 6117104 Yes
S Pond 17 6117/04 Yes
S Pend 18 6/17/04 Yes _
S Amd 19 6117/04 Yes
S Pond 20 6117104 Yes
5 Pond 21 6117104 Yes
S Pond 22 0/17/04 Yes
S Pond 23 6117/04 NIA Omitted. will feed enlarged and 25 per Craig and Robert
S Pond 24 6117/04 N/A Omitted, will feed enlarged and 25 er Craig and Robert
S Pond 25 6/17/04 Yes
S Pond 26 6117/04 Yes
S Pcnd 27 6117/04 Yes
5 Pond 28 6117/04 Yes
S Pond 29 6117104 Yes
Silk Fence 6/17/04 Yes Additional Silk fence completed
Diver. Ditch 6117104 Yes No ditch problems. Adding 2 ditches cr Robert
Diver. Berns 6117/04 Yes No Berm problems.

? ? ?D6c?l e9 10?i'?0 ? `! i _ i G0% t I ^.?Ir i?iJ?_U'. i C?' i;:"?a
Observatlon of storm water at outfalls:
Storm water
Discharge
Identification Date 7

:1.
p
3

as

o rn
F

a

con rJ
-•
.ry
n
= Q

4

It
n
1.
Wit

..

p tf yes, dewrihe net ion takxn to prcycnt
futurc rclmscs. Describe measures ttkcn to clean
up sediment outside of the
disturbed limits
OF-2 6/17 0 0 0 0 0 N
OF - 29 6117 0 0 0 0 0 N
OF -19a 6117 0 0 0 0 0 Y Added additional sill: fence Seeding and strawin
S Pond 1 6/17 U U U U 0 N
S Pond 2 6/17 0 0 0 0 0 N
S Pond 3 6/17 0 0 0 0 0 N
S Pond 4 6117 0! 0 0 0 0 N
S Pond 5 6117 0 i 0 i 0 0 0 N
S Pond 6 6/17 0 10 0 0 0 N
S Pond 7 6/17 0 i 0 1 0 0 0 N
S Pond 8
1 6/17 8 1 2 2 0 0 N No release Dipped out
S Pond 9 6/17 7 1 2 2 0 0 N No release Dipped out
S Pond 10 6117 0 10 10 0 0 N
S Pond 11
1 6117 0 0 0 0 0 N
S Pond 12 6/17 8 3 2 U U N No release Dipped out
S Pond 13 6117 0 0 0 0 0 N
S Pond 14 6/17 0 0 0 0 0 N
S and 15 6/17 0 0 0 0 0 N
S pond 16 6117 0 0 0 0 0 N
S and 17 6/17 0 0 0 0 0 N
S pond 18 1 6/17 0 0 0 0 0 N
S and 19 6/17 0 1 0 0 0 0 N i
S and 20 6117 6 2 2 0 0 N No release Dipped out
S and 21 6/17 0 0 0 0 0 N
S and 22 6/17 0 0 0 0 0 N
S and 23 6/17 0 0 0 0 0 N Not installed, feeds #25 '
S and 24 1 6/17 0 0 0 0 0 N Not installed, feeds #25
S and 25 6117 0 0 0 0 0 N
S and 26 6117 6 2 2 0 0 N No release Dipped out
S and 27 6/17 0 0 0 0 0 N
S and 28 6/17 Q 0 0 U 0 N
S and 29 6/17 0 0 0 0 0 N I

I I

Number Code scale : 0 is lowest to 10 being the highest. N e No Y - Yes

H / F9QG
? r
MILAIdU r. r ablry, UUVGILLUI
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
Colcen H. Sullins, Deputy Director
Division of Water Quality
May 18, 2004
DWQ # 04-0776
Gaston County
CERTIFIED MAIL - RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mike Reeve
c/o North Star Investors II, LLC
10800 Sikes Place, Suite 250
Charlotte, NC 28277
Subject Property: Reflection Pointe Subdivision
Dear Mr. Reeve:

On May 11, 2004 the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) was notified by receipt of your application
regarding your plan to fill wetlands or waters for the purpose of constructing roads for a subdivision in
Gaston County. Approval from DWQ is required to disturb these areas. Please provide 7 copies of the
following information and refer to the DWQ # listed above in your reply. Please show these on maps of
suitable scale (for instance 1" = 100 feet) so we can begin to determine your projects' compliance with
15A NCAC 2H.0500.
1. Please provide details for the stormwater management practices as required by GC 3402 or
provide additional proof that the project will not sexed 30% impervious coverage.
2. Please specify the percent of project imperviousness area based on the estimated built-out
.conditions.
3. Please indicate the diffuse flow provision measures on the site plan.
4. Please provide a letter from the ecosystem Enhancement Program stating that they are
willing to accept at least 295 feet of perennial stream mitigation.
5. Please be aware that any 401 Water Quality Certification approval will include a required
conditions that Deed Notifications be recorded on all lots containing wetlands, streams,
waters or buffers.
6. Please be aware that Lake Wylie is subject to the Catawba Buffer Rule (15A NCAC 02B
.0243). All lots containing riparian buffers protected by this Rule will need to be developed
without the need for either a minor or major variance for the Rule.
7. Proposed Marina - Please note that the property and all other impervious surfaces associated
with the proposed marina area will need to be located outside of the riparian buffers
protected by the Catawba Buffer Rule. It appears that pedestrian walkways are proposed
within the protected buffer. Please provide plan details of the proposed marina area at a scale
of 1:100 or greater and clearly show any buffer impacts. Provide the location and area of any
buffer impacts in square feet.

N. C. Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
[phone] (phone), 919-733-6893 (fax), (http://h2o.enr.state.nc.uVncwetlands)
Customer Service #: 1-877-623-6748
The DWQ will need to verify the stream determination performed by you and the US Army
Corps of Engineers. Please contact DWQ staff at the Mooresville Regional Office (704-663-
1699) to schedule a meeting to verify the stream determination. Provide the results of their
determinations along with your response to this letter.
Please telephone Bob Zarzecki at 919-733-9726 if you have any questions or would require copies of
our rules or procedural materials. This project will remain on hold as incomplete in accordance with
15A NCAC 2H .0505(c). The processing time for this application will begin when this information is
received. If we do not hear from you by writing or by fax at [phone] within three (3) weeks we
will assume you no longer want to pursue the project and will consider it withdrawn.
Sincerely,
WIomeyy
40 Water Qualit C rtification Program
JRD/bs
cc: Mooresville DWQ Regional Office
Asheville Corps of Engineers
Central Files
File Copy
Chris Huysman, WNR, Post Office Box 224, Newton, NC 28658
7rl
I?
/
Wetland and Natural Resource r:
Consultants, Inc.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Asheville Regional Field Office
Attn: Mr. Steve Chapin
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801-5006
Re: Reflection Pointe Subdivision
Nationwide Permit 39
Gaston County, North Carolina
Mr. Chapin and Mr. Dorney:
April 16, 2004
NC Division of Water Quality
Wetlands Unit
Attn: Mr. John Dorney
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Ste 250
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
WETLANDS 1401 CROUP
l "JAY I 1 2004
WATER QUALITY SECTION
Wetland and Natural Resource Consultants, Inc. is requesting authorization for impacts to
jurisdictional Waters of the U.S. associated with the construction of subdivision roads under
Nationwide Permits 39 for North Star Investors, II.
Proposed Impacts
Permanent impacts for the project include 295 linear feet of perennial streams and 348 linear feet
of intermittent / un-important streams; the COE verified these determinations in September 2003.
Permanent stream impacts are limited to road crossings to access high ground; the current design
uses headwalls to eliminate side-slope fills as the site is constrained by steep topography. Impacts
are described and illustrated in the attached PCN and maps. We are told that the marina within
the site is currently being reviewed by either Duke Power or your office.
Mitigation
The applicant has agreed to conduct stream mitigation through the NC EEP, a copy of the request is
attached. As an additional proposed mitigative measure, the applicant will preserve all streams
within open space.
Please call with questions or to discuss the project in further detail.
Sincerely,
ris HuYsman
- 'i
Newton Office Clyde Office
PO Box 224 wnrinc.com 217 Paragon Parkway, #142
Newton, NC 28658 Clyde, NC 28721
828-465-3035 828-627-0051
828-465-3050 Fax [phone] Fax
April 16, 2004
Ecosystem Enhancement Program
Attn: Ms. Carol Shaw
320 West Jones Street
Raleigh, North Carolina 27603
Re: EEP Availability Request
Reflection Pointe Subdivision, North Star Investors II, LLC
Catawba River Basin, Gaston County, North Carolina
Ms. Shaw:
Wetland and Natural Resource Consultants, Inc. is requesting authorization for impacts to
jurisdictional Waters of the U.S. associated with the construction a residential subdivision in
Gaston County. The applicant is seeking authorization to impact 295 linear feet of perennial stream
channels.
Please provide written confirmation that your program can accept up to 600 linear feet of stream
impacts in Catawba Basin 03050101 County 071 as we are not certain of the final mitigation
requirements that will be imposed by the NC Division of Water Quality or the US Army Corps of
Engineers.
Please call with questions or to discuss the project in further detail.
Sincerely,
Chris Huysman

Copies
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Asheville Regulatory Field Office
Attn: Mr. Steve Chapin
151 Patton Ave, Rm. 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801
NC Division of Water Quality
Wetlands Unit
Attn: Mr. John Dorney
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Ste 250
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Newton Office
PO Box 224
Newton, NC 28658
828-465-3035
828-465-3050 Fax
Clyde Office
wnrinc.com 217 Paragon Parkway, #142
Clyde, NC 28721
828-627-0051
1 828-627-0052 Fax
Office Use Only: r Form Version May 2002
'3 t
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
1. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: 39
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (verify availability with NCWRP prior to submittal of PCN), complete
section VIII and check here:
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ?
II. Applicant Information
1. Owner/Applicant Information
Name: Mike Reeve
Mailing Address: c/o North Star Investors 11, LLC
10800 Sikes Place. Ste 250
Charlotte, NC 28277
Telephone Number: 704 / 363 4491 Fax Number:
E-mail Address:
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Christopher Huysman
Company Affiliation: Wetland and Natural Resource Consultants, Inc
Mailing Address: PO Box 224
Newton, NC 28658
Telephone Number: 828 / 465 3035 Fax Number: 828 / 465 3050
E-mail Address:wnrincnaol.com
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Reflection Pointe Subdivision
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): N/A
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): 201460 and 201455
4. Location
County: Gaston Nearest Town: Belmont
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): Reflection Pointe
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): Take Highway 74 to Belmont.
Go south on South Point Road (NCSR 2525). Site is west ofNCSR 2525 at power line
right of wax
5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long):35 09'27.5" N and 81 01' 19.4" W
(Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the
coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
6. Property size (acres): 365 acres
7. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake): Lake Wylie / South Fork Catawba
8. River Basin: Catawba River
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://l12o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: The site is approximately 90% forested with two power line
ROWs. There are four minor streams, and two minor wetland polygons located on the site.
The site is bounded by agricultural, residential, forest land and the Catawba River.
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The project entails the development of a residential subdivision with a clubhouse and marina.
The site development plan requires that roadways cross wetlands and streams to access
highground. No impacts are proposed in the 100 year floodplain. Streams in open space
will be buffered. Minor sewer crossings are required. Schematics illustrates the limits of the
Catawba River Buffers. 363 lots are proposed within the 365 acre tract.
Explain the purpose of the proposed work:
Work within Waters of the US is necessary to access high Pround to develop the site. Sewer
infrastructure must cross regulated areas to be efficient and effective. Sewer crossings are
within road wavs.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
USACE delineation verification and signed survev October 21, 2003 as attached.
USACE permit for road crossing iin phase 1 as attached.
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
Future applications will be needed for a marina and are within Duke Power review.
Catawba Buffer Impacts are restricted to the Marina Area.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section VII below. All proposed impacts, permanent
and temporary, must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site
plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a
delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream
evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be
included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream
mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for
listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts:
Impacts will result from the piping and filling of an unnamed tributaries to gain access to high
ground. One proposed crossing is located at a historic crossing point: however, the prior road
could not be re-constructed and meet state road requirements. Proposed impacts include rip-rap.
2. Individually list wetland impacts below:
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map)
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres) Located within
100-year Floodplain**
(yes/no) Distance to
Nearest Stream
(linear feet)
Type of Wetland***
Wetland I fill for road 0.05ac no 0 forested wetland
Wetland 2 fill for road 0.02 ac no 0 forested wetland
Wetland 3 fill for road 0.05 ac no o forested wetland
Wetland 4 fill for road 0.014 ac no 0 forested wetland
Wetland 5 fill for road 0.04 ac no 0 forested wetland

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: mechanized clearing, grading, fill,
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
** 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at http://w'ww.fcma.,ov.
*** List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.) Indicate if'wetland is isolated (determination of isolation to be made by USACE only).
List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: +/- 1 acres
Total area of wetland impact proposed: 0.17 acres
3. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts below:
Stream Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map)
Type of Impact* Length of
Impact
(linear feet)
Stream Name** Average Width
of Stream
Before Impact Perennial or
Intermittent?
(pleasespecify)
Stream 1 pipe and riprap 100 UT Lake Wylie 2 perennial
Stream 2 pipe and riprap 158 UT Lake Wylie 2 intermittent
Stream 3 pipe and riprap 139 UT Lake Wylie 3 intermittent
Stream 4 pipe and riprap 51 UT Lake Wylie 1 intermittent
Stream 5 pipe and riprap 195 UT Lake Wylie 2 perennial

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and associated rip-rap,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and alter, and net loss/gain),
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
** Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
xvv,Nv.uses.,ov. Several internet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (c.g., \v\ w.topozone.coin,
w?rw.mapquest.com, etc.).
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: 643 linear feet
4. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.) below:
Open Water Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map)
Type, ? of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres) Name of Waterbody
(if applicable) Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound,
bay, ocean, etc.)
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
* List each impact separately and identity temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: fill, excavation, dredging,
flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
5. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ® uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): excavation
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): aesthetics
Size of watershed draining to pond: N/A Expected pond surface area: 5 ac
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
Impacts required to access hiuh Rround. Impacts to perennial channels must occur as desiened
do to topographic constraints. The proposed crossings utilizes retaining walls to minimize
wetland impacts. The crossing are limited to the width of road plus a minor shoulder and
uardrails: Site has steep to_pography.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCWRP concurrence shall be placed on hold as
incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration
in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://112o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/strmi?ide.html.
Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
Buffers will be preserved adjacent to remaining regulated features within open space.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program (NCWRP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCWRP at
[phone] to determine availability and to request written approval of mitigation prior
to submittal of a PCN. For additional information regarding the application process for the
NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at http://h2o.enl.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htm. If use of
the NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide the
following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): 295 linear feet
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): N/A
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
IX.
X.
Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state) funds or the use of public
(federaUstate) land?
Yes ? No
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No ?
If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes ? No ?
Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 213 .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 213 .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify Catawba)?
Yes ? No ® If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers.
Zone* Impact Multiplier Required
(square feet) Mitigation
1 N/A 3 N/A
2 N/A 1.5 N/A
Total N/A N/A
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular liom near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0260.
N/A
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
downstream from the property.
Site is in compliance with watershed regulations and does not exceed the low density impervious
limitations. Club House & Marina are considered in the blended calculation for impervious area.
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Sanitary sewer outfall
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
Yes ? No 21
XIV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
Applicant/Agents Siglature Date'
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
N
r7
LL
f-
' 1J
V?
III
r L`clartmar T of dle "
WI•nirymn D,miR Corr v( Enjin-rv
r?
Aron; Kai }oly, Chtif flaatuiroarY D3010 +
r0 Eoac 1 M 6
WIlnl;,sm , Nvt6 ClrcGrm IMM- IBM
,tnd.
NC DM0cr-) of Yrittr C u-
A=' f obn D o rnM
2321 Crtarrrm Bhd
94klo. riot Caro". 17"-2264
Welland and Naiuml Ra sevrco
ICamcllanb,lm
4R70465;1010
t
S
f
I. de catr v 4rriovr,vr of " pwoptrrY l&cmdnrd balvw, hmebr ttv+or"a Wrrhno and
Narv-al slmotrr<r Coija.+lnvts, Inc. ED rrt on zV' babal is rr y alert ImIrl >ne proc+dn= of
pern%kJ w Ir.rpaud WeWM6 Izd W LMrl VI If1C US OW ire rrrihztd 7] dlt C;esn Wattr Aa
and th• Rij+rt lnd NarlorsAct
Fcdcrzl tnd 5=ta a1Qriu tru a jv*-'ied -c be an saM property vhm vv rrG+novd lry W edend
and Nla.ri( RMOr ra CAA71uharM InC. roXK
I 1
ill
r r.

r.l
r•-I
I:D
13
Ii IJ
I
I
r-
1 I
11
Wwkr?d tnd Natural Resowctr Can><uirartu. Inc. b sudwrirad m profi&S&W4mermi
inlorrladat »eMd far per7Yt pracesrfnl it the rwgwr c4 dre Coup& car DWQ-
fro r..,. Qwn*r -9 7, WCr4
Ad*.,r,.
A 3drrs z
Addrwsr.
?cnc NLmkr:
R ?r4' La r von.
a-,?, s(jruarre?
th'ic
f.tw,im Cd)M
ro 804 724
yjy.lcn. IRc I I W
"65 & 3E K Fox
.tncc.c rsn
to3r?. ?}f rfaccr
???irl dad, C-? ?fu
P. ;12

?? ,. 71,n b1! o>r 142
TV
04
238
62a-U7 •=2 Fro
vrrrr.t.WW.car-
o I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 h i l 0 I TI 1 1 1 1 1 I I 11°Q1 I?° iTi I f flfY`W=

•
,
'??
i / '
t
j ?

_
;
?
lk n ??Y
'/,
-
•
;, 1.
tk
??-
I
!
?
_ 1?
t",.'
Ua ?'• /. /
to

???Loprer,;ArM,s1r n8

t" ef

" ? ?
.
\ ?~

/ "
w
./' 'i/'• \ r
?Y?.
\
•
?? \?? /)
Tm'
1
- \'?
,
mar/
1
- v ,r 1? ?? x
14
? : 1
r
_.,' a ? 1 y. % ,?
\
? ? ? ?,??, \\
°
\ •_ ti -
,
?
r ;
'
-? l
I \
)
/

/

?c ('- ; , ,•.Z
l r i
?J? j ?\, ??-- - s
?, ,?• ,?,-- ? r -,? ` _??
? ?? ? ???.?. ;??•.\` ?
?tl - ??.`?J ? ?, :ter ?, }
rI 1j t ;? i
:: '?s ?-
.. ?
.l , -

?? ? ZJ `' ?`- Q ?---`?'?.` \?J l t\? ?i X10 .. 7 /.' •.. .,? ? 1 ??f' '? , / yt I y L , ?? \_\ -
` ? r ? '
''
/`?
/
,v- :
' ??
? C -fit ??' ?.i ' !
• , ?
,
? %?
. ? _
7am? Co
"UAL

r i yf `-??\ V
P f??-w ;\ V
kg
,v• t P r ?l \'Ype
;; r !?¢
!.' J t, M{+lfiL

µ
'

rri '_i•' ? ray '• i -?'; ??,?? ? `"` ?/? ?. •?- ti? ?' ?\,
LAI
i IV V- ,

?
? '
? ?`? yr . r\ :
? ?? ? l_ ??r ?' ? • ?? ? ,r' fit, I \ ; = s? ??
,`

? ? I ? ? \, ? ? ? ?? \' !, ?. ??. i
/? ? ( ,/
s

' ' ' ' ' ' ' 081°'02' 0.00' W' ' ' ' ' 081" 01' 30.00' W ' ' ' 1 1081*1011 d.00' WI I I I 1081° b0 00" W I I '0$1°'00 d.d0' W' b
Name: BELMONT Location: 035° 09'27.9' N 081° 01'19.4" W
Date: 2/26/2004 Caption: North Star Investors II, LLC
Scale: 1 inch equals 2000 feet Reflection Pointe
Inc.
LAKE WYLIE
R R W R R/
WETLAND AREA #4 DUKE POWER R/W
R/W R RnN /W R/ R/W
D
8
a
Q ?
AR #
-0
LAKE WYLIE d
2.)UU Sar41s hood North, buite A
Charlotte, North Carolina 28227
Phone: [phone], Fax: [phone]
AA0002667 EB0006691
www.mckimcreed.com
NORTH STAR INVESTORS 11, LLC
10800 SIKES PLACE, SUITE 250
CHARLOTTE, NC 28277
.00 1)
REFLECTION POINTS SUBDIVISION
WETLAND KEY MAP
do
SUMMARY
STREAM IMPACTS
AREA LENGTH
#1 100,
#2 158,
#3 yew
#4 51,
#5 195
WETLAND IMPACTS
AREA ACREAGE
#1 0.03 AC
42 0.02 AC
#3 0.05 AC
#4 0.014 AC
#5 0.04 AC
DATE: 03/02/04
MCE PROJ. Y 02473-0003
DRAWN DSB
DESIGNED BPB
CHECKED BPB
PROD. MG-R. WSR

SCALE MAC FU

HORIZONTAL' [YUwx6 WA6at
NTS
VERTICAL 1
NTS 1 Of 8
STATUS: FINAL DESIGN M"'°"
FOR REVIEW ONLY
GRIP! C 9C=
r
rr.?a
arv 1a.a w?

LtKE WYLIE
91
? /.JrY I, ` wl
\ 1
p ?r• r e,er?? ????r?
-1; L
a -?
d y, ". .?.. ,,, 7so es? iat5 lmk • ri ?v l \\ ?, \. ,
. -1y ?, ' d" ? ? z? 'r\
LAKE IVYLIE ?"'??, ?? ;\ ? ;/ ??} F flS"
. ?w.rr? ?•,1 111 'g.?9 rJ \?': ?\•...v?f ?.? /,? 1 _ ,? l//
... ?tr.r.. r.r
awr.un
?P?? .rerM
? ? ? a?rart lw
-______-_- -YUt
1 .t
r?
/
/
i

I _
f

r
1
a....r.. aun r.e...
r`a r?..wr.xra.
T ? N ra0 w..?l
o?...? ?.O?gr?M ^ t
.?.t?wa r1s M1.M a.
axrrra??y?. w?
? rr- r?i??ri?` a Y
rW r. •?r ?r3u
?`trns?r?rrrrw
?rI sY r ®?
r^?s r tx
?`=r .1' \ •'• ? \ 'rr ^ I r t 111
d,i?> r ` ?t f
1
? fr i 1 1 i ?. l ? ``, \
+??n?
s%"e9 t4:A^fb/ReDVc&wD ocwx- 2 1 oll
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual)
Project / Site: Lake Wylie Site Date: 9/2003
Applicant / Owner: Waterfront Properties County: Gaston
Investigator: Huysman State: NC
Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes ® No ? Community ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)? Yes ? No ® Transect ID:
Is the area a potential problem area? Yes ? No ® Plot ID:1000
(explain on reverse if needed)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Indicator Stratum Dominant Plant Species Indicator Stratum
1. Acer rubrum FAC tree 9. vitis spp. FAC shrub
2. Liriodendron tulipdera FAC tree 10. Campsis radicans FAC vine
3. Liquidambar styraciflua FAC+ tree 11. Eulalia viminea FAC+ herb
4. Ilex opaca FAG tree 12.
5. Salix nigra OBL tree 13.
6. Nyssa sytvatica FAC tree 14.
7. Asimina triloba FAC shrub 15.
8. Ligustrum sinense FAC shrub 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC-). 100
Remarks: Area adjacent to wetland 1000. Stong wetland community is absent. Top break to WL
HYDROLOGY
? Recorded Data (Describe In Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
? Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
? Aerial Photographs Primary Indicators:
? Other ? Inundated
? Saturated in Upper 12"
® No Recorded Data Available ? Water Marks
? Drift Lines
Field Observations: ? Sediment Deposits
? Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: 0 (in.) Secondary Indicators:
? Oxidized Roots Channels in Upper 12"
Depth to Free Water in Pit: +14 in.) ? Water-Stained Leaves
? Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: +14 (in.) ? FAC-Neutral Test
? Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: Hydrology not present. Some eveidence of infrequent flooding near to the lake
SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Chewacla Drainage Class: Poorly drained
Taxonomy (Subgroup): (Ch) Fluvaquentic Dystrochrepts Confirm Mapped Type? Yes ? No E]
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Colors Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
0=6 A 10YR 5/3 / loam
6-14 Bt 10YR 514 / clay loam

Hydric Soil Indicators:
? Histosol ? Concretions
? Histic Epipedon ? High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
? Sulfidic Odor ? Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
? Aquic Moisture Regime ? Listed On Local Hydric Soils List
? Reducing Conditions ? Listed on National Hydric Soils List
? Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors ? Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ® No ?
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes[] No
Hydric Soils Present? Yes[] No
Is the Sampling Point
Within a Wetland? Yes ? No
Remarks:
v
f'e I
?F
? I I I ° s ? I Ilia.. ? \1 `1
\ I
I III II l
.?•,'- ?/ ,; 1??\1? ICI
? 1 1 1 1 ?1 I I I I I I ?I
1
/ Is
/I 1 '• 'III (?' =\ .,??.
I I I I i/ r
I I I (III 'Ali
_ \NI I' l s `t\ \
Ill
??I ,..••? ,?. -,? fir'
:., ? / .
I Ii...? \ i J\ I I I
1 1 ! ? I t,
1 d
L'i
a
,
I?l) ` 11
I
?i11 1111
J
1 ,l 11
/i
I
? , ?g„\ 1 I I u
w i I I I I
•??\`f`•.'??`? \1 1t \1 ?.1'`.' I I X11 .• ?,?it?'?,??y?! I
,, \ ,? \ \ , 1 , •) III Y,'\ S ?` , \ i ?
?\ \\ ? ? ail! ? I I
1 1
?--
\'\
I I 1
I? E 6 I 1. ! m
I
d / , 1 w
o
' '1 i I'1 Il tl, I I I
lilt[
/////I// ^ \
%
I ,llllllll l , /,I ` I I g,`? •
I
I?
I (i ;
,r Il !'' ??,1I
(ry # \\\ \I elf \ ? `? \.? `?? \.
i? Ili II -( If ?I :I (.
J
\\ `I LI
o

e
nax7?
?e Q E
a
9
i
fS
s
q

0
FFI

D -? D
- r ?

D ?
\
\N n
1?N
C?
g q ?@B{
?i Y A
r .s
p
d
F 4
1?YBH?
?1 O
D C 0
I ' 6 Fn
Z9
-
p$y
I J
92

Y O
>

LLE

Fr
LLi i

FV

Z
L'g
f m
&k
v H
J ?z
«((7777 O
f^

O
y
N• ? W

pp
BNVC O

W .:
u F',1

'v _

J

?
ZQ

n
nng? [? , va o a
I? jg? u ?? c g? z

12. 0'
3
J

11.6'
I iia
? z

? •:
?
IN3r+3nvd S

J N
LO a
J [ ¦ pQ
-R/W- R "W
N
y
ri
v
CI 'DN 310N 33S I
-R/W R/W
I
0.11E
C) oa
s ?
/9
rr i
D,
W
I f ? x
nm
x Y

u ?f
I o,??r
a
,
a
A40
Gf 0
No
147
1 ! 1 ? C , Y ! ? ? C I t f'
_ t ?,
__ ' 6
_ s t
.
_ t ? ?
_
_
t ? 1 ? ' ?. ? ?• : ? 't o - C Z i pp
oY + s? < <: ? p
? ?r ? ? (', 'b C i ?- ? a Y
/ r
E .+ .

p
9
'sl?f ?l
? ?ij

J.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action Id. 200430050 County Gaston Quad AFT MONT
GENERAL PERMIT (REGIONAL AND NATIONWIDE) VERIFICATION
Property owner: North Star Investors II, LLC, Att'n: Mr. Mike Reeve
Address: 10800 Sikes Place, Suite 250, Charlotte, NC 23277
Telephone No: [phone]
Zone: 44 UTM or LAT/LONG: North: 3890914 East: 502047
Size and Location of project (water body, road name/ number, town, etc.): Reflection Pointe SID Phase 1 Access Road
located on 365 acre tract, on the west side of SR 2525; south of Belmont
Description of Activity: Construct a culverted access road to serve the above referenced residential
development. The road project will impact 100 LF of an unnamed tributary to Lake Wylie and 0.05 acre of
wetlands. Remaining streams on the property within open space will be protected through deed notifications.
Applicable Law: -y Section 404 (Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1344)
(check all that apply) Section 10 (River and Harbors Act of 1899)
Authorization: NW39 Nationwide Permit Number
Your work is authorized by this Regional General (RGP) or Nationwide Permit (NWP) provided it is accomplished in
strict accordance with the attached conditions and your submitted plans. If your activity is subject to Section 404 (if
Section 404 block above is checked), before beginning work you must also receive a Section 401 water quality
certification from the N.C. Division of Water Quality, telephone [phone]. For any activity within the twenty
coastal counties, before beginning work you must contact the N.C. Division of Coastal Management, telephone (919)
733-2293.
Please read and carefully comply with the attached conditions of the RGP or NWP. Any violation of the conditions of
the RGP or the NWP referenced above may subject the permittee to a stop work order, a restoration order, and/or
appropriate legal action.
This Department of the Army RGP or NWP verification does not relieve the permittee of the responsibility to obtain any
other required Federal, State, or local approvals/permits. The permittee may need to contact appropriate State and local
agencies before beginning work.
If there are any questions regarding this authorization or any of the conditions of the General Permit or Nationwide
Permit, please contact the Corps Regulatory Official specified below.
Date: March 35. 2
Corps Regulatory Official: Stephen D. Chapin Telephone No.: [phone] x 224
Expiration Date of Verification: March 25. 2006
cc: WNR (Mr. Chris Huysman) Q
cESAw Form 591
Revised July 1995
"A x.
NOV
41. M11

%
1 J \ ,
GD
o:o I \
17111
100 50 0 100 200
SCALE: 1 100'
v?M?T?VI?CREED WETLAND AREA #1
2300 Sardis Rood North, Suits A
Phone [phone], Fa.: (10+)8+1-2567
AAadaxaa 11100011691 REFLECTION POINTE SUBDIVISION OF E
Charlotte North Carolina

mq LA AREA 02
STREAM IMPACT-158 LF
Nom 1NETLAND wACT AREA m iowN N CFEEV. c)-P, az P-" WETLAND WACT- 0.02 AC
100 50 0 100 200
SCALE: 1"= 100'
MgU1&CMM WETLAND AREA #2
4W 2300 Sortl4 Rood North, Sulu A
Phone
-7 (704)841-=588 F= (704)841- 2567
REFLECTION POINTE SUBDIVISION 3 OF 6
Charlotto North Carolina
WETLAND AFEA 4 3
STREAM WACT-139 LF
NOTe WEZLAm rtAPACT AREA SHOWN N GFEEK t;2Caz" WETLAND WACT- 0.05 AC NORTH
100 50 0 100 200
SCALE: 1"= 100'
01 ``??*,WF KM&aUMD WETLAND AREA #3
2300 Sardis Rood North, Suits A
Rn«« [phone], Fay (704)8++-2587
M00a167 0000069t REFLECTION POINTE SUBDIVISION 4 OF 6
Charlotte North Carolina
WETLANI2 AFKA 4
STFIEAM WACT- 51 LF
NOTE WM AIM (1rtPACT AREA 8MM IN GMet GQCzQAy WETLAND FACT- 0.014 AC
-.10000
LAKE WYLIE
/ 233
/
/ / bgo 0
4 44-
m/
WETLAl1?PaNTS
_ a
POM

/ 226
V- r?
I
" ED
100 50 0 100 200
SCALE: 1"= 100'
A-A <B4&CREM WETLAND AREA #4
AW 23M Sardis Rood North. Sine. A
Phone [phone] Fac c704j841-2567 REFLECTION POINTE SUBDIVISION 5 OF 6
,..? ,
Charlotte North Carollna
?? 227
2<a
?
cy
WETLAND AREA 45
STREAM IMPACT-195 LF
NOTE: WETLAND MPACT AFEA 8FiOWN IN CFEEMOZ(C CA`( WETLAND UPACT- 0.04 AC NORTH
Goo_

zea

WE1LA(VD POINTS.
/

J
e?
b
A`? boo eoo e?
ro
M
237
23C --...
$
WETLAM POIN TS
asa - e?
/
/ POINTS

239 ? - •/ / ? .. a -
Al1iVC WALL
TOP EL -'584,5

(
/ o

j l

ego
LAKE W1 VF= / 8

.232
-/ 69? O y
100 50 0 100 200
SCALE: 1"= 100'
WETLAND AREA #5
4AWAJ
2300 Sardis Rood North. Sulu A
Phc?c (704)8+1-2 Fes: (704)B41-2567
REFLECTION POINTE SUBDIVISION 6 OF 6
Charlotte North Carolina
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual)
Project / Site: Lake Wylie Site Date: 9/2003
Applicant / Owner: Waterfront Properties County: Gaston
Investigator: Huysman State: NC
Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes ® No ? Community ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)? Yes ? No ® Transect ID:
Is the area a potential problem area? Yes ? No ® Plot ID:1000
(explain on reverse if needed)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Indicator Stratum Dominant Plant Species Indicator Stratum
1. Acer rubrum FAC tree 9. Comus amomum FACW+ shrub
2. Liriodendron tulipifera FAC tree 10. Campsis radicans FAC vine
3. Liquidambar styraciflua FAC+ tree 11. Lobelia cardinalis FACW+ herb
4. Platanus occidentalis FACW- tree 12. Juncus effusus FACW+ herb
5. Salrx nigra OBL tree 13. Saururus cemuus OBL herb
6. Fraxinus pennsylvanica FACW tree 14. Woodwardia areolata OBL herb
7. Alnus serrulata FACW+ shrub 15. Impatiens capensis FACW herb
8. Cephalanthus occidenta/isOBL shrub 16. Arundinaria gigantea FACW herb
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC-). 100
Remarks: Long wetland finger that extends from Lake Wylie pool up to small channel at rock outcrop
channel runs through center.
HYDROLOGY
? Recorded Data (Describe In Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
? Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
? Aerial Photographs Primary Indicators:
? Other ? Inundated
® Saturated in Upper 12"
® No Recorded Data Available ? Water Marks
? Drift Lines
Field Observations: ? Sediment Deposits
? Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: 0 (in.) Secondary Indicators:
® Oxidized Roots Channels in Upper 12"
Depth to Free Water in Pit: D Ln.) ® Water-Stained Leaves
? Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: 0 (in.) ? FAC-Neutral Test
? Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Wehadkee Drainage Class: Poorly drained
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Me) Typic Fluvaq uents Confirm Mapped Type? Yes ? No ?
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Colors Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(Inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munseli Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
0-8 A 10YR 5/3 / loam
8-14 Bt 10YR 5/1 / clay loam

Hydric Soil Indicators:
? Histosol ? Concretions
El Histic Epipedon ? High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
® Sulfidic Odor p Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
? Aquic Moisture Regime ? Listed On Local Hydric Soils List
® Reducing Conditions ? Listed on National Hydric Soils List
? Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors ? Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: Wetland soils. Close to non-wetland areas dominated by Chewacla soils
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ® No ?
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ® No E]
Hydric Soils Present? Yes ® No ?
Is the Sampling Point
Within a Wetland? Yes ® No ?
Remarks:
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual)
Project / Site: Lake Wylie Site Date: 9/2003
Applicant/ Owner: Waterfront Properties County: Gaston
Investigator: Huysman State: NC
Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes ® No ? Community ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)? Yes ? No ® Transect ID:
Is the area a potential problem area? Yes ? No ® Plot 113:1000
(explain on reverse if needed)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Indicator Stratum Dominant Plant Species Indicator Stratum
1. Acer rubrum FAC tree 9. Comus amomum FACW+ shrub
2. Liriodendran tulipdera FAC tree 10. Campsis radicans FAC vine
3. Liquidambar styraciflua FAC+ tree 11. Lobelia cardinalis FACW+ herb
4. Platanus occidentalis FACW- tree 12. Juncus effusus FACW+ herb
5. Sala nigra OBL tree 13. Saururus cemuus OBL herb
6. Fraxinus pennsytvanica FACW tree 14. Woodwardia areclata OBL herb
7. Alnus senulata FACW+ shrub 15. Impatiens capensis FACW herb
8. Cephalanthus occidentalisOBL shrub 16. Arundinana gigantea FACW herb
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC-). 100
Remarks: Long wetland finger that extends from Lake Wylie pool up to small channel at rock outcrop
channel runs through center.
HYDROLOGY
? Recorded Data (Describe In Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
? Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
? Aerial Photographs Primary Indicators:
? Other ? Inundated
® Saturated in Upper 12"
® No Recorded Data Available ? Water Marks
? Drift Lines
Field Observations: ? Sediment Deposits
? Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: 0 (in.) Secondary Indicators:
® Oxidized Roots Channels in Upper 12"
Depth to Free Water in Pit: 0 (in.) to Water-Stained Leaves
? Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: 0 (in.) ? FAC-Neutral Test
? Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Wehadkee Drainage Class: Poorly drained
Taxonomy (Subgroup): ( e) Typic Fluvaq uents Confirm Mapped Type? Yes ? No ?
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Colors Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
0-8 A 10YR 513 / loam
8-14 Bt 10YR 5/1 / clay loam

Hydric Soil Indicators:
? Histosol ? Concretions
? Histic Epipedon ? High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
® Sulfidic Odor ? Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
? Aquic Moisture Regime ? Listed On Local Hydric Soils List
® Reducing Conditions ? Listed on National Hydric Soils List
? Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors ? Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: Wetland soils. Close to non-wetland areas dominated by Chewacla soils
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ® No ?
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ® No ?
Hydric Soils Present? Yes ® No ?
Is the Sampling Point
Within a Wetland? Yes ® No ?
Remarks:
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual)
Project / Site: Lake Wylie Site Date: 9/2003
Applicant / Owner: Waterfront Properties County: Gaston
Investigator: Hussman State: NC
Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes ® No ? Community ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)? Yes El No Z Transect ID:
Is the area a potential problem area? Yes ? No ® Plot ID:2000
(explain on reverse if needed)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Indicator Stratum Dominant Plant Species Indicator Stratum
1. Acer rubrum FAC tree 9. Comus amomum FACW+ shrub
2. Liriodendron tulipifera FAC tree 10. Campsis radicans FAC vine
3. Liquidambar styraciflua FAC+ tree 11. Lobelia cardinalis FACW+ herb
4. Platanus occidentalis FACW- tree 12. Juncus effusus FACW+ herb
5. Salix nigra OBL tree 13. Saururus cemuus OBL herb
6. Fraxinus pennsylvanica FACW tree 14. Woodwardia areolata OBL herb
7. Anus sermlata FACW+ shrub 15. Impatiens capensis FACW herb
8. Rosa palustris OBL shrub 16. Arundinaria gigantea FACW herb
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC-). 100
Remarks: Small wetland polygon 800 sgft.
HYDROLOGY
? Recorded Data (Describe In Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
? Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
? Aerial Photographs Primary Indicators:
? Other ? Inundated
® Saturated in Upper 12"
? No Recorded Data Available ? Water Marks
? Drift Lines
Field Observations: ? Sediment Deposits
? Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: 0 (in.) Secondary Indicators:
Depth to Free Water in Pit: 0 Vin.) ® Oxidized Roots Channels in Upper 12"
® Water-Stained Leaves
? Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: 0 in.
( ) ? FAC-Neutral Test
? Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Wehadkee Drainage Class: Poorly drained
Taxonomy (Subgroup): (We) Typic Fluvaq uents Confirm Mapped Type? Yes ? No ?
Profile Descrintion:
Depth Matrix Colors Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
0-8 A 10YR 5/3 / loam
8-14 Bt 10YR 5/1 / clay loam
I

Hydric Soil Indicators:
? Histosol ? Concretions
? Histic Epipedon ? High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
® Sulfidic Odor ? Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
? Aquic Moisture Regime ? Listed On Local Hydric Soils List
® Reducing Conditions ? Listed on National Hydric Soils List
? Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors ? Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ® No ?
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ® No ?
Hydric Soils Present? Yes ® No ?
Is the Sampling Point
Within a Wetland? Yes ® No ?
Remarks:
c.lo?
?1 ,,1 e? ??Ic C lSr-N?ntc o a?3 _ oa?t3? . f?ct? to
cl"
V G ?J?: W Jf vbs. (.t i gcw4 ALe- Imo- L ?J?2 ,
(/???. V 1??? O1C'L?2?' ?? tn'Yt u?i S?/?{ot.?-7 q, SSG cc?i./(C? ?J??
1 ru-? n,s ¢-? v?-.c.n?n? ores, wall b be `Occ w?-S?`?-t
p <-
G tc_u,r-l.? 5? ? b v?.? ? ??-?5 , ?- p,r?,,, r ? ? t.?•?--?.+.??=-? !''? ?? c.c??,M.. ?.
qj -45
T?.L ? ?? w?l\ v?cc? lr? V c..,,? f'??. s?? c?c???w.:.?,ci•?,To?
b"\ Lvov
r {fie. V 5 ( PS ?c rs . l ?'?
1J f.j
?f c?y? 4,e `1"? dES0*5 0?1 `Y?kQJr c??i
DWQ# 0 4 0_ M Date Yti1Gy l 3 ?%yyl Y Who Reviewed: S-6c KfO??e/
Plan Detail Incomplete
? Please provide a location map for the project.
? Please show all stream impacts including all fill slopes, dissipaters, and bank stabilization on the site plan.
? Please show all wetland impacts including fill slopes on the site plan.
? Please indicate all buffer impacts on the site plan.
? Please indicate proposed lot layout as overlays on the site plan.
? Please indicate the location of the protected buffers as overlays on the site plan.
? Please locate all isolated or non-isolated wetlands, streams and other waters of the State as overlays on the site plan.
? Please provide cross section details showing the provisions for aquatic life passage.
? Please locate any planned sewer lines on the site plan.
? Please provide the location of any proposed stormwater management practices as required by GC t L
„i' C? S PCOJ 2 , vAoG u
Please provide detail for the stormwater management practices as required by GC 3`101
or, rovidG ?'? .nQa.vtNS e`Q° 4 l; p` cat will Est c z<t O)? i?`v CA
Ple e sspeci y the percent of project imperviousness area based on the estimated built-out conditions. /
V% G
? Please indicate all stormwatcr outfalls on the site plan.
1
Please indicate the diffuse flow provision measures on the site plan.
? Please indicate whether or not the proposed impacts already been conducted.
Avoidance and/or Minimization Not Provided
? The labeled as on the plans does not appear to be necessary. Please eliminate the or provide additional
information as to why it is necessary for this project.
? This Office believes that the labeled on the plans as can be moved or reconfigured to avoid the impacts to the
. Please revise the plans to avoid the impacts.
? This Office believes that the labeled on the plans as can be moved or reconfigured to minimize the impacts to the
. Please revise the plans to minimize the impacts.
? The stormwater discharges at the location on the plans labeled will not provide diffuse flow through the buffer because
. Please revise the plans and provide calculations to show that diffuse flow will be achieved through the entire buffer. If it
is not possible to achieve diffuse flow through the entire buffer then it may be necessary to provide stormwater management
practices that remove nutrients before the stormwater can be discharged through the buffer.
Other
? The application fee was insufficient because over 150 feet of stream and/or over 1 acre of wetland impacts were requested. Please
provide $ . This additional fee must be received before your application can be reviewed.
? Please complete Section(s) on the application.
? Please provide a signed copy of the application.
? Please provide copies of the application,
Mitigation
copies of the site plans and other supporting information.
? of compensatory mitigation is required for this project. Please provide a compensatory mitigation plan. The
plan must conform to the requirements in 15 A NCAC 2H .0500 and must be appropriate to the type of impacts proposed.
? Please indicate which 404 Permit the USACE would use to authorize this project.
? P b
U Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete
item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired.
© Print your name and address on the reverse
so that we can return the card to you.
® Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece,
or on the front if space permits.
1. Article Addressed to:
North Stare Investors H, LLC
10800 Sikes Place, Suite 250
Charlotte, NC 28277
DWQ# 04-0776 - Gaston
11 f..??,1-)r ;eat =fY(•1P?•)? ^3=?'/.?'.
A. S nature
(y ???I ? Agent
? Addresse
D. Received by (Printed Name) C. Plato of Deliver
D. Is delivery address different from item 1? ? Yes
If YES, enter delivery address below: ? No
3. Service Type
00 Certified Mail ? Express Mail
? Registered rVI Return Reccipt for Merchandise
? Insured Mail ? C.O.D.
4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) ? Yes
14 2. Article Number 7001 2 510 0006 3167 6111
(Transfer from service labo_ _
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE First-Class M
+_`= r ''Postage & Fey
?" USPS
`-' ?r r Permit No. G-
• Sender: Please print your name, address, and ZIP+4 in this box •
NC DENR Division of Water Quality
Wetlands/401 Certification Unit
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604
if Iif It IIIIII if III a IIif III If III IIIf III III IIt IIIIIfit III IIII
y

i '
i
fr„ ~ i . c
P
I
I
1
i
i
i
yi I I
i
. t
1
~
1
i
i
lSp? ~
y~' ggy ~y0m
(3>~ CS> ~ ~
~5 1° ~,y'1 6L5D G SR ,~y, 287 ~p ~
<3 4~ C3~~ ~4 2t)9
OLS~ tly 20[ i} LL~ Z 286 r
' LSS~ 0[33 lS ~3
,~e 285 290 ti
~ l05'Ztyl ~s, Sts 285 L~+ r
^ N ) 284 ~ 1415 S, Church St. ~ Suite i
252 253 X54 ` 284 2.91 r W Charlotte o N, Carolina o 28203
255 `s~ ~S~ 251 `a' ~ !r• ~c, L553 ( L ~ Phone: [phone] o Fax: [phone]
REM D gZS,L LSJ, ~ 5~~ ~ a ~ ~ 283 OVE LOT # 120 ~ ~ . S, 2.6 > , w3 NORTH y Sy ~ L556 283 ~ s [e-mail] 2.2 $ www.o de.com
~o, w xl~ 14S'B~ 25~ U P
S ~ 258.
S 282 282 293 a ~ ~ ~
~ W
~~J ~2, 261 ~ C 9l£~~831° ( 13 2~U 201 ~ ti 281 294 ~
118 ~ . ~ `'3~s ~ ~ N2. 262 280
280 2 5 9 0
4 • ~ l21 w V ` ~ rr 249 . S 9Z. ~°j N / P ,y 296 at Reflection Pointe Z
~°'0~ ~ ' ~ 1?2 ~ N 263 279
~ '~~~Frj~Q~, 0ti`~` 9RS6pePropoeed ~ 248~w oti yap ~ G 8!~ 9J 297
264 ~ 278 W
J~ ~Y ~ 247 l" ~ 298 ~T. ~
D 2qy, ti ^,,~'~'°t~, ~ 265 265 277
245~~y w ~ ~ c 299 Z
, 'P~ ~ ,r~ +J~.ae c ~ REVISIONS z76 O
~ s,~. 261 m otri Ztt, ~ 'KVaga ~ 266 - 300 I-
a ~ ~ ( 4 tctSt Q N0. DATE ISSUE
117 ~ ~ 222 s 24 ~ 223 ~ ~ 267 275 5~, W
„a, ~ 221 ~ ~ , ~ 224„ h„ w 4 ~ ~u Z49. 4-28-03 70 LOTS 301 ~
1~.t 225 ~ ~ Stec ~ yN. ~ 226 n a°r, ~.os, ~ 274 U 1~` 5-13-03 Chart Rev.
~'9a i3r ~ i0 s, ~ W ~ Y 9 302 ~
227 ~ ~sz~ ~ 115 m , ~ ~ rLt, `*>Q ~ 239 268 6-5-03 Entrance z39 I
123 ~ ¢ s ~ zee .9~ ~ r m b' ,,b~ l+~ ~ 273 0 ` ~g1
t14 ~ . » Rq, s ~ 23e 23a ~ 303 ~ 6-23-03 Waterfr ont
124 .9< `''e 29T I t2q, a ( ~w IB - ~ 4, "0 ~ 1 ~ y Lacs 229 ~ Laer ~aex~ ~
.3 aLa,y 23i v~ ~ X25 ,,p, ~ .~z 257 ~ 269 O ~-28-03 Phasin 3oa _ 9 737 4, 272 ~
zq~ ( 232
~ 112 ~'q, 12G s,, .23,3 ~ y~ ~ zsr - Q 9-10-03 Lots ad'. J RECREATION
Z' ~J~s ~ & 236 ~5~. 270 305 ~ 35 ~ Z 3-11-04 Ponds Trails
N 111 Marc 127 8~~~ ~ 235 ~ ~e y~9~ ` ~Qad 'a, t~' ~ Apr ~ x~, AMENITY . 271 w
1 ~ eo~ I ~ 110 45 ~ ~ e e x..28 ~sy, ~ ~
,bE2 b9i ~4 306 ~~f
i09 = 145 ~ ~ 210 325 !,R Z
s ,a~ ,6 ~ 129 m ~ ~ ,,?I ~ ~ s, 0 117 ~ ( ~ 209 s ~ 307 O
~ y~ ~ m 108 ~ ~ ~ ~3U 211 t 324
14, ~ ,E~, ~ zbE s, ~ ,os ,,N 1 323
a~° ~ ,ti , ~ ~ ,m ~ ~ ~ ti ~ ~ 14,8 ~ r >v- 1ao r. 125 30~ I ~
~ 107 1.11 212 ~ 143 r 322 ~ , ~ ~ W
~ EbE ~ ~ ~~ti _ ~ ~ 208 _ ~ L W fb~ / Lea ¢1 Vii. `.5 309 d~~°''~ C~
G 106 ~ ~ X32 ~ bC1 14°) 213 220 321 320 Q
~55'C q, P U T , "'llEd ~ ,,ti ~ q, 142 ~ ~ 20~ titi ~ 319 ~
105 ~ ~ ti G ;,yz ~ ~ ~ ~ rE 310 318 s ~J
3 1s0 1.. 3 219 5 317 ~
214 104 0 1~~~1 ~ 5x~ ~ ~ 206 311 ~ U r,
y~ 5~. ~ 326 ti~ ~ W ~a
103 ~ e~ a 134 ~ ~,o
s~ ~ ~0 ti P / 215 v;, 4ia 316 O
,ti 1102 ~ ~ '6" 315 312
205 ti N ~ ~ 152 x.35 r 328 314 ~ 328 ~ CL
101 as , > ~ t1b aaelD ~ 217 313 ~ ~ ~
~ r e~a~ 216 329 ~ o
L~ 1R8, ¢p 1 y 100 153 ti C~
P~, R ~P~ Y38 3~2~ 330 ~ ~ Z \ _
99 r2 ~°Ln 331 332 Z ,
1`4 a,, 137. y 4j, ~ ~ 202 333 ~
98 136 ~ 203 BY G , ~ 201 198 , / \ N _
yyti ~a~ 1.55 22' r ' 334 W
~ ~.y 97 PAo • ~ 13p 200 199 F°,~ sr 3" '°g ,<9' 197 RfF ~ 335 • ow
D,y G,~ wc{~ P~ p 123' / 726' I 2m ~ 96 ,w Iso , , tg, , ~ ~
G~ pG G ~ P ~ 31 9g 126 196 ~ yr} ~ 95 157 a 126 96' 196 z,,~ s~ ~
o~ '42. 158 ~ g9'
ti w~ I!~9 ~ Jg, s 94 , , ,Z 357 °s 's~
~f t49' 1110 B T 6~ 116' N q. 88, ~ ~ 358 t ` 356 J
93 92p, ~ 129 13g' ,3~ ~ ~ I61 Q ;w
bqa ^ fig, 'T 9G Sr qg, '`3' 8w 731 731. ~ z
~ ~ ~ ~ w ~ ~ 1~5 a ~ t 355 i
164 ~ 1ti6 u~ X162 ~ 163 Y .1 87 1 ~ 1=f 336 Q
ti / 67 r~ 90 89 88 r lc?8 N ~ / ~ / ~ i%0 359 354 lL8 N ~ ~ 337
D ~ 86 i2 , ~,s 1 ~ 4
~ "GG ) ~ C ~ 338 - i 1 360 J los ~ -
e ° b~ o ~ ~pgflh,~R~ ,tZ~ gae 5~ ~ a 353 339 m h
6 Ap~ J r;19~ a` ~ 340 - 361 31~ ~ ~ 2 341
~ r R/y S ~ Y ~ 352, Q 4~ ~ 75 ~ ~ 6G > s A~ r r . 4 3~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~7 ~ e, Nti ~
1 A~ w i 6231P 84 , 7 u, ~ k 65 ~ ~ ~o Sao gal 342 ~ ~ 352 W
w 2 ~ 21g' t7` 0~ti Sa, 9 ~ n 0b ~ ?p y x~ x~ 362 ~ ~
.b , 8 ~o; 9 - y a 67 a ? 83 3 73 0 ~ 23g Y, ,9G . ~i A _ ~ ~5 ~4 ~.?3 _ 138' a, i ' - o ~
~ r' ~ 691b9 ~2v~ G ~ p0ti 1, ~ rr ~4 ~ 351 Z 0 p i
~ ~ , ~9 • ti~~~ ~ 21 ~ 64 a~ i~2 ' 6~. g - ~e 72 s` r U ~ 193 ' 343
1 0~ ~ ~ f ~ 8 QQ 4 68 2 . lY V0 ~ Y 42 i 174 DJ, - o ~ 141' 43 ~ 344 ~ w
i59Z A NOTE: MARINA AND BOAT SLIPS ARE PROPOSED 1~ 8° ,9fi1 x ; y4 345 ~ ~ v a 34G W Q
AT THIS TIME. ~ ~ a a?<, ~ 71 b3 a si ~ N ~ ti3 v ~ a J m e 1~5 ~ 347 ~ ~ w
x. .11~ yb 69 209' ~ , ` ro ~ I ~6' g. 349 348 su ~ d I
CONCEPTUAL PLAT REt/ISED BY MCKIM & CREED, ~ 'sx ~ e~ 276 ~ ~W 70 • i5~ i ~ ~ ~ Z N ? 5tt ~
'~:>e ~ ,bsl ati 6~ l)))r- ey 1 ~~lZ ~09L bL SETBACK REQUIREMENTS WILL FOLLOW THE RESTRICTIONS SET FORTH IN THE GASTON COUNTY , ~ ~ ~ti t#'p~ ~ 350 ~ 185 ~ L~ ~ ~5 0~ o ~ ~ Q • ~ ~.p~ ~ ~ = ~ ~ 184 186
ORDINANCE, WHICH ARE AS FOLLOWS: i ~ ' 59 ~ A~ X8'6 • 0 ~ A % ~ ENPA~ y7'11 mm o , W~ tid ea / W
/ N ~ d REAR SETBACK: 40 b as, 6C- 1 n 41 YN~ ~ ~ X18 ~ _ o , +ai. N a N / ~ 183 ~ ~ l.L . ~ ~ 3. . ~ a~ 'o p
FRONT YARD SETBACK: 30' ~ ~ 38 . ~ ~ 1s2 ~
, 58 w g( ~ ~4 t' SIDE YARD SETBACK: 15 9g~ z ~ 4 .55 ~ 39 " ~ 187 ' 181 ~ Title ~ ail ~ r
MIN. LOT S1ZE: 12,000 s.F AMENITY CE TE N R - ~ y~1 ~t01 ~ ~Nl 180 hi, 2n
~7 ~ . I zs . ~ ~ ,179 Ys i n as 3,51 ' . aA . ~ 188 W
ALL IMPROVEMENT A '"2 ~ " S SH LL CONFORM WITH THE GASTON COUNTY ZONING ~ ~ ~ 1 4w ~ a~< < 178 ~
~ ti6 ~N tii ORDINANCE AND SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE, i b, ~ ~ ry ~s 5~ an 176 ~ 189 ~ ~ ms 5 g l . ~
,bL RESIDENTIAL ROADS ARE PROPOSED AS PRIVATE STREETS WITH A A c~ ` ~ >1 .58 ~ ~ 5; !1 ~ 6 177 ~ ~ %
G TED ENTRANCE, ~ ~ 55 r,~2 L51 ,lit U ,z~ ~
SYMBOL INDICATES LOTS WHERE FRONT YARDS FACE THE K - ~ 06~ ~C lA E EDGE. RESTRICTIONS INCLUDE ,E ~ ~ a h ~ q ~ ~ w 661 .59 11 r i , 1 ~ , ~ 4 190 ~ 5 ~ ; ,
NO GARAGES OR OTHER STRUCTURES ALLOWED BETWEEN THE PRIMARY RESIDENCE AND THE LAKE EDGE. SUBJECT TO THE BYLAWS OF THE GAS70N COUNTY LAND ORDINANCES, 54 ,ar ,g5 1, ; ; ' 195
~ ~ _ ~ ~ ,w ~ ~ \ ~ I
BOUNDARIES AND TOPO OBTAINED DIGlTALLYFROM GASTON COUNTY GIS DATA 53 ,~r ,~,-b1~'0'~ ~ ,o` 5 ~ +OZ' 85 d l7 ~ ~ 45 'i ~9L Qi~ ~ ~ _ _ ,~4 ~ U - - ,w-b a 15 j.`/ ,,-,6L ~ m, ry,, w 191 1 3 ~ _ -1 i lY \ ~ _ -
ARE APPROXIMATE AND SUBJECT TD CHANGE UPON SURI/EYING. ~gg,, ~,ue?' 2G ~ 194 ~ U,
`'2j,bb i ~ t ~ \ r 4~ , e 55 r,, ~ , d' - ~ ~t~ 1 ~ . / ~ ~ 92 ~ _
' 36, ^q8 ~ W ,41.1 m 36A yew 65 >b ~ , 1~ Y - - ,,,,a Z2 , ~ : \ _ t W ~ DATE - -
, P 1`: \ ~ 1/ ~ r Bea ,66 ~ ~ e~ , sz I A - v 193 ~ _ ~ 11 12 03 nn p'\ to 7A .J ,~1 ~`p~ r / +j ~5 x HA ~ " L.L
$ ~ ~6 ~ > ~
~ ~ ~ w N •c, o JOB N0. ~ ~ ~4 „r~ , ~ ~ Reflection Pointe 7~ ~ t~,,,,"
OWNER; ~ 35 r / rio /n 4 f~p' + t l
RANDY ALLEN • 39• 69~ ~5 r 1 i i BS, ~ e~ 38• ~ L8 ~ , . ~ ~ I ~ DWG FILE ~ - mil ~ ,K 8 ~ N , ~.i
NORTH STAR INVESTORS LLC. ~-~"=~~~,N„,,, % 34 -,~~s~a~E ,ice' ~ ~ 8 ~ ,6q~ 3A " ~ ' .y, Z y-.,
10800 SIKES PLACE, SUITE 250 ~~,„q~ F„„N~ ~oE~,~„A~s,,,,,,,~ , ~,FlaF~ ~ES~~'~ 2300 SAADIS ROAD NORTH, sui~ a 33 31 2 4 ~ ~ ,n 69'B~ ~I ~ a ..c~_..- Q DRAWN BY 32 t~, 6 e ,5e ~~:~,`ti ~o ~ CLM
CHARLOTTE NC 28 77 ` ' CHARLOTTE, He zezz7 ~P, ~ 32 ~ Phone: [phone], Fax: [phone] , ~ ~ ~1 ~ ~ .
704-847-6006 ~ i, L7 ~ iJ io 1, y 3 ~t at Reflection Pointe e CHECKED
~L-'~~ ~ CLM •--fir' e~~ sel
~ ~ a 4 ~ ~ _ ~ m ~ _ SCALE
951 ~ ~ 1 -200 ~ Z P
0 ~ ~ Z t~
N ~ 1 l CH = 200 FT. . TH PA N N N T M A i SHEET Q
P N AR N P UA i ' / I ~ ~ J
A N UJ NM NTA ~ AP A A AY a AT 0 f
0 200 2501 300 400 G00
H T W N ~ ~
RT ~ No x CONTOUR INTERVAL ~ Z
Q l~
J OF A\ ~ ,
i F
1
I.
wN .
r.. f 1
I' I
I 3
.:1. yl M
U`'.. Yff ~frr
1 i r~..h
A

iY I ;
I . n+
~ ,l
~ i ~ C
l 1
~FP ' ~V - '.A:

i
I If. k
i
' I
I
7
fry: It~ r . r"
~:IV, I. . 1 I ...,2~~
l `+y»
k~. ~l w~„~
~4 c y;R't4,~r r'.
I Y1 . _rn7 dk. '7
i ~ ~i. '11 4j

; 1'
vy
~y,,; i
Tk: ~i.. J ' ~ ~
i J 'lti
e i
J. ci a"
rte, tkr ~~~~1...
I~~~ 4- .
f{
`7~uIJ.. 4i i
r'T ;
.4 ~ ~
~p ,
I e, ~i
P)
I 158y r
c,~ ~I 989 Bgg~'
1 m
1$~ (S> ~ N
q'1 6L5b~ ql 6L 288 i''S:
Igor ~y 287 ~ r s>~ ~~a 2r~9 g Z
10LA~ tLy~4 2014 C19 z`9' 286 ~ ~ P'
~~t. ",1' _ ~ ~ „'S~
l3 'SBS 1 ~ 265 r 2&9 290 ~ I ~ -
los'ytA~ 'gym ~ li~+~ r 17
YR, W ~ ~ 1415 S, Church St, ~ Suite i 284 W Charlotte ~ N. Carolina ~ 28203 f ;
X254 ~ 284 252 ~ 253 r1 ~ r X91 ~ ~ Ptrone: 704 342 1919 o Fax: [phone] ~ ~ €~C
255 sg ~ ,~ASS~ 251 ~ cgs Contact: email @ opda.com
51~ o Igg. l83 REMOVED LOT # 120 8Z51b ~ ~ . 5. ~ 256 'fi' ,rt, ~ L~ r 292 g www.opda.com
NORTH i5 [ a` ~ vIJ" r « N> 'LQ~ r s
/ 25"~
V 258; ~ / ,.82 259, , 282 293 $ 0
LJ09 13~ ~ i~ n,, is 26U Olt ~'xJ w~ ~ ~j W
~ SF t::;, , , ; 261 281 ` 1 rg 250 , 281 294 U- ~i'.
~ 91f ~ L~dJ7 ~ s' Iti ~ f'~ . ~ ..n_ ' c~ ~ 262
118 ~g ~ h ~ 280 119 ~ ~ ~ ~ q >8- ~ 280 295 0 j;
~ x.21 q, ~ _ ~ ~ 249 ~ ~ ,i r 92~ ~i N 296 at Reflection Pointe Z ~ r; .
~~~,~M ~ 1.?,2 w k`` 263 279 ~.f:
~''*i~~4 ~ l+. ''Sf m ~ i °Mr ,~8 1~ 9S tilipv PrnpoeeJ ~ 248 ti` yo1 ~ . J o 8'' - 264 297 1-
264 278 W
~ 298
y~ ~~4 ~2c. ~ 247 O Z99~ r 277 265 Z
C N' 299 REVISIONS
f YJ40 ~ 1~ O 276 -
~r~ ~ ~Nr 1~ 1 G v~ o+m~t i r cos ~e~~g ~ 266 m ~ ~ ~y, ~ zv+ e 1~ 266 300 N0. DATE ISSUE
~ J 1L ~ 1 Q
~ ~ ' ~L Y. a 1+,~ ~ ~ 117 ~ 222 ~ 2?.3 ~ ~ ~ 275 W 267 - 4-28-03 70 LOTS
~ 221 - 224,. .FF aP ~ A r 3)g~ S, b fi~ ~ r W ~1 ` ~ 301 U
19.h ~ ~ 225 ~,8~ , ~ o ~ ~.os, 274 5-13-03 Chart Rev. ~ ti~~ w
~tbr N 9a~ ~ 226` 493~~ ' ~ z4v 'y 302 ~ 6-5-03 f
13 ~ ~f > . 8/ , a? ' ' :227 is ~ ~ ~ezi N 115 a ~ ~ ~ ~zti, 239 ~s Entrance 239 ~ 268 ! p 1 ~wt,__.
~i zor 123 ~ ~9' 99ti .v ( f , 273 6 23 03 Waterfront
s ~ ~ ~ r' ~ tie S x14 ~ ~ 1, r ,9< 'a 'i ,9~ 238 '°w 303 Z
z4z~ ~ I 1?.4 t, 1~, ati = 23~ ~ O 7-28-03 P hasing
i 1 y~' 'Bl~rg 1~ 229 ~ 231 14gr Laex ~13 125 1s~„x,, , , .y= ,1~ ~ X237 _ 269 ~ 304 - 237 ~ 272 f-
11,, ~ ~ 232 2a3• 1 Q 9-10-03 Lots adj.
112 ' ~ 12G ~ 233 234 RECREATION
<s~ ~4, er ~ 9z, 6 270 305 3-11-04 Ponds Trails X36 Z
z,, ~~s ~ x,. 235 ~ 111 3;g~ pater 127 ~ ~5 AMENITY 30 5: W 271
i3v~ ~ i 'Oea ~a. y~ '1 ~OV COr nr i, . 1 di ~ as zo,. V 9 ~m
110 d 46 ~ ~ a"e ~ x..28 ~~v. 306 ws h. .emu.
per a 145 ~ ~ 325 Z M1:
x09 ~ ~ , ~ ~ 210 ~ g29 ~ ~ O
~AC2 1;~~ m N {q.5, ~ 209 324 ~ ~F 307 ~l. , 4 ~ i
,bp2 1~0 < m 108 14~ ~ ~ 211 ,f~, .os r f 323 `z~
J ZbZ n+, ~ ~ ='e. S x ti~~ i~a ~0 0 1z5 308
107 ~ 148 ~ 9~, 1:51 - 212 322 ~~z 1~o W
ti 443 . ,bNG b3 0.~~ 200 - 11y, C~ 309
$ ~ .o ~ ~ 106 ~ E 32 ,rrt 220 321 Q 320
14~) y 213 s 319 310 -
~ „ti ~ 142 ~ ~ ~ 207 ,~ti ~ln L ~ 105 - ~ 318
N y2 n v. r ,t 133 ,rz2 , ~ 219 1.j0 6 N 317 ~ 311 U
104 ~ 214 G ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 b~ 206 ;,Nl 11> ~ 2
~ ' 326 ~ ,yeti ~ ~ e a~ \ W ~R A
~n~ ~ _ 1.34 ~ T ~ - ~ - - - 69 ~ -
ivy 1~1 ~ ~ ~ / 218 3L7 iL7 316
r ~ 1.10 215 r. y ~ oa ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ;1 12 315 3 ~
102 ~ ~ 205 314 ~ ~ ~ ~
N ~ 1.52 135 101 rN ~ ~a,~~ 217 32~ 313 ~ _ '
N ~ r 1139 p ~ ca 216 1~ ~a 1Q ; gl 329 ;
n 153 'gg' °Q 100 C~ l
' ~a, ~e 6 ~~i as , y~ ,38 ~e 330 ~ Z ~ -
99 ~ J~, 331 Z
1`4 137 ~ 202 ~ I 332 ~ ,
~ y 13G- ~ 203 98 J ~ 04 198 333 N ~
g? ~ ,o~ ~ 241 " 5aa tai 1..s 5 ~2, ~ n~ 334 ~ W
~ 97 ~e, PA ~ .5T _ 199 RFF
~FC~ 9f ; °r? r log' 149' 197 335 owo a ~ 2 0 ' ~0 ~ No
Fti ~Y V 96 1s6 ti 1~1' ~g' , , b BG CO G N 40' ~ 139' 196 196 s~ '~a : ..r~.ri.~. o
~ ~ ~ C ~ ~i yr 95 157 ~ 96' / 125' 8g' o ~ r=2, 153 ~ g9, ' so4" ros, ~ -
GA >D 1w9 ,b 3g, ~Y ~ 2~' n 9B' 12T 357 os ~s> (n
~ laP, 1.110 i 358 356 J Lr
~ 4~ llg' 1j' eg' 1 93 1 ~ l28' 758' 139' r~ Q ~ k
~ g 161 1JS j ~ d b~ ^ 78' gg, J g4 l~ z
J ~ ..d 13p Ir rd ~ ~ o~ ~ 355 ~ Q
1c~5 A ~ti ~ ~ ~ 1b4 ~ l~bd m H b 1~9. ~1(r2 ~ 1c43 " ,29, 336 ® 17~ 359 354 ~
G ~1 87 ~ 167 8L~ 1G$ / 90 89 y / lG$ 337 '
?9, ~ 86 11,' I G lZ,, ~ ~
~s L ~ Jss 9IS ~ DR' 1~J' 360 338 J ,os t71 -
x ~ b~ ° ~ 5p PRO ~ P ~ g ~ °;s' ~ 353 339 ~ m
ro ~'L~ Q 7~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~qg ~ o ~ 340 - ~ 's. ~ ~ 361 (/'J
~ ~ ~ iORlp ~ t'" r 2 ~ a'4r ~l ~ i ' ~ ~ 75 ~74 E(, ' o ,.72 341 ,r • . ~ Q
s Rte, r 7fi~,,' c~5 ~`y g4 ~ " 342 c~5 ~ ~ o ay, ' ~ s• ~e, 352 W i
77v4' ~ k pA ! 4 ~6' 218, ~ l: ` W n1 y'I M y 362 ' W
44 1'~3 c w 45 0 z~' ~ ~
~i ,9L ~ ~ ~ ;~ti Z 0 °C q~ 351 0 ~
~ f• ~ 991;9 ~Z9Z ~ ~4 ~9~ y zlg' r ~4 ~ ~ U n ,9~ 343 i o
~Z 6 72 s ~ 1 0 ~ I( 8 sgn ~ ~"~pb` ~ ~ ur 3 174 D~, - o ~ 43 344 (n ~ w ~ ~+r ~ ~ ~ 345 Q fZ
~ 0 w 1~ ~ ~ ,94Z- 9GI ~ 46 ~ . 346 W ~ Q
NOTE; MARINA AND BOAT SLIPS ARE PROPOSED ~ / g Paz ~ ~ 71 b3 ~ x AT THIS TIME. 4a ru _ ti3 ~ ~ s~ cn d ~ s "N, c ~ ra 347 ~ .s ~ N w I t 75 ~ ~
'°U ,IIZ yt 348 ~ ..1I ~ z ~ ~ , C~ 349 ,
_ x, G9 ~g, CONCEPT A PAT ~l Pow ''x 70 ~ ey U L L RE SED BY MCK1M & CREED.
'~a~e ~ ,651 ~ CI)j r ~V S I~IZ ,091 41 4`i ~ ~ ~4ti t~*4~?'~ 11 1~ 350 185 ~ 11G T 1~1g., o a ~N ,9~ ~~~.p ~z yx1 ~ 184 186
SETBACK REQUIREMENTS WILL FOLLOW THE RESTRICTIONS SET FORTH 1N THE GASTON COUNTY YM v O 6M~ ~7~4, IJJ 1 ~ A ~j a dp y!~ ~p PU. ,1"' ~ ~ W 07
59 • ~,a, ORDINANCE, WHICH ARE AS FOLLOWS: ~ 6t 41 ~ ~ ~ ,o. ,~µ2 r ~ n ~ ~ 183 „ ~ 3. n ~ a: f~ o
REAR SETBACK: 40' ~6 ~"61 9 8 g ~ 6C' 182 ~ 3$ ~ s
FRONT YARD SETBACK.' 30' ~ 58 w ?r , , ' 4$ ~ ~ 187 ,g ~ ,5a ~ 39 ~ 181 " = Title ,rAl :r " p 0
SIDE YARD SETBACK: 15 ,tial ~ ,Ig r ~ 9L '~8~ "O ,L91 ~ ,~9~ 100 pn 2n.j~
MIN, LOT SIZE.• 12,000 s.F AMENITY CENTER ;i7 , ~ ylS ) ,Z5 179 ;9, - i n as R - s Q,~ 100 i W ,Zet : - ~ ,x A o~
t2 ~ I ( .l ~•~l 1, ! b - m1 ~ ~ o~ ~ 178 ~ r
ALL IMPROVEMENTS SHALL CONFORM WITH THE GASTON COUNTY ZONING 11 ;~6 • ~ an 176 W 189 ~ ~ I~
~l ~ r ~m ORDINANCE AND SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE, ,~,1 ~xl I a .,1 " F-- ~ V~ . 177 ~1 Z
RESIDENTIAL ROADS ARE PROPOSED AS PRIVATE STREETS WITH A GATED ENTRANCE. ~ r 55 ~ ,,2 U ,G4t ,2e V ' e ,tiL ~ . ~ ~ 'L ~ ~ W
SYMBOL INDICATES LOTS WHERE FRONT YARDS FACE THE LAKE EDGE. RESTRICTIONS INCLUDE - ~ '0'~ ~ a ti s ti~`~~ ~ f3 / ~ 190
NO GARAGES OR OTHER STRUCTURES ALLOWED BETWEEN THE PRIMARY RESIDENCE AND THE LAKE 5~ w~ pll tie ~ ' ~ J _ `i , - ea ~ s f j'~ ~ 195 \
EDGE. SUBJECT TO THE BYLAWS OF THE GASTON COUNTY LAND ORDINANCES. = yst ~ ,~l ,v _ ~ ' rr K 1
M BOUNDARIES AND TOPO OBTAINED DIGlTALLYFROM GASTON COUNTY GIS DATA ~3 ,9~1 M ~ , 9 N I - - a - ';ae ^ ~ ~ ~ w"1 191 ~
ARE APPROXIMATE AND SUBJECT TO CHANGE UPON SURI/EYING, ~ '~a 2~ ~ 194 ~ Q
P~ ,6L , i ^ ~ sir-'/~ ~ KM
3G. e ,~a ~ ~ ~ 192 ~ - a~e° ,oa 22 ; , ~ ~ ~ ~ _ W DATE 11-12-03
0g8 98y~ 9bl ~ ~ ~ f \P W -~l •t ~ $ea~b as ry~ / s~ gZ, 3• f ~ ~ . 193 ~ ~ ~ ~ a
V ~ ~ d' ~ :~6 ,tia ~ " ~~zl ~ 1J q6 F.~ ~ i ~ ~4 ~ 2 , r I ~ Q ,oL ew -c,, ~ ~ ~ JOB N0. Reflection Pointe
5 \ ry/ ~3 ~ ~ ~ ; t~ ~ ~ pox+, U s
OWNER: ~ 35 f
69 L 69~ ,L ~ ~ ~ o i ~ d ~ , Q DWG FILE i3
RANDY ALLEN ~ ~ I 34 NORTH STAR INVESTORS LLC, ~~~°F~~°~~~~~~~~~ ~ ~ I i 29~ ~ , ~ ~ z
aP~„~~E~~,~„E ~ t I 31 10800 SIKES PLACE, SUITE 250 ~.s ~'~~~>~`oES~~„ saoo snROis Joao t+oRTH, sui~ ~ oI 33 32 31 r P ~ ~a. L ~ ' Q DRAWN BY 3 2 ` lL, s~ ~ 6 g ~ CLM 3 zL, ~~p, ~ ~ os c, .J
O~oenm F'~s„~~~,~~ s_~. ~nnssoc~a.e9. ii.,c CHARLOTTE, NC 28227 Yr I\ CHARLOTTE, NC 28277 Phone: [phone], Fax: [phone] gi ~ H9\ .s
704-847-6006 ` L n 5 ~ at Reflection Pointe o ~ ~ y 3 os, ~ CHECKED CLM
B` ---4Mr'' .~y
~ ~ ~z6+ gp1L ~ _ SCALE 1 "-200
/ ~ y5t Z t
0 z ~ SHEET
' ~ I 1 CH = 200 F"h Q
N T C TH P SAN N C D N T AM N T A P U 5 N AR C N PT A~ U J Il" ~ I°(
\ ~
AN U J V NM N A APPROVA AN MAY F L M A 0 Z00 150 300 400 600
H S R TON F TH WN R
' NORTH 'CONTOUR INTERVAL ~ Z
Q J OF
~
I
r