20040717 Ver 1_COMPLETE FILE_20040503

uj a, #0 C?-6 -7
r7
IN["T? P;I;r
)S / 401 GPO
TY SEC'?
F<?l North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission
Charles R. FL111wood, Executive Director
MEMORANDUM
TO: Steve Chapin, Permit Coordinator
Asheville Office, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
FROM: Ron Linville, Regional Coordinator
Habitat Conservation Program Original Signed
DATE: May 5, 2004 by J. R. Linville
SUBJECT: Review of an application by Aho Development Co., LLC, UT Storey
Creek, Watauga County
The applicant is requesting a letter of concurrence from the North Carolina
Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC) to obtain a 404 permit from the U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers. The NCWRC has reviewed information provided by the applicant,
and field biologists on our staff are familiar with habitat values of the project area. These
comments are provided in accordance with provisions of the Clean Water Act of 1977
(33 U.S.C. 466 et. seq.) and the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (48 Stat. 401, as
amended; 16 U.S.C. 661-667d).
The project proposed is to develop the area into a large lot subdivision. Impacts
are indicated to three (3) tributaries of Storey Branch using arch pipe. A significant
population of wild brook trout are known in this area. In addition, Kanawha minnow,
Phenacobius teretulus (FSC, NCSC); tongue-tied minnow, Exoglossum laurae (NCSR);
Kanawha darter, Etheostoma kanawhae (NCSR); and a crayfish with no common name,
Orconectes cristavarius (NC Watch List) are known to inhabit low order headwaters, at
least seasonally (some year-round).
We urge the project proponents to use bridge structures in areas where aquatic life
or fish have been present historically. Recent drought conditions may have diminished
current populations; however, aquatic migration should restore any affected populations
during periods of normal flows providing no severe impediments are below the proposed
culvert sites. If the Corps decides to issue culvert permits and based on the information
provided by the applicant and our knowledge of the range of trout in the project area, we
recommend the following conditions:
Mailing; Address:
Division of Inland Fidictics • 1721 Mail Setvicc Center • Raleigh, N(
Telephone: [phone] cxt. 281 • Fax: [phone]
27699-1721
Aho Development Co. 2
May 5, 2004
1. Instream work and land disturbance within the 25-foot wide buffer zone
are prohibited during the brown and brook trout spawning season of
October 15 through April 15 to protect the egg and fry stages of trout from
off-site sedimentation during construction.
2. Culverts 48 inches diameter or larger should be buried a foot into the
streambed. Culverts less than 48 inches diameter should be buried to a
depth equal to or greater than 20% their size to allow for aquatic life
passage. These measurements must be based on natural thalweg depths.
3. No damming or freefalling waters should occur during low flow
conditions. The upstream and downstream stream dimensions should not
be modified.
4. Native species should be used for any streambank stabilization activities.
5. All remaining streams, wetlands and buffers should be permanently
protected as undisturbed natural areas as common areas instead of being
subdivided. If subdivided, the areas should be protected through deed
restrictions. Intermittent channels should have a minimum 50' buffer on
each side and perennial channels should have minimum buffers of 100' on
each side. In any case, buffers should be as wide as possible to protect
floodplain and biological functions.
6. Stringent erosion control measures should be installed where soil is
disturbed and maintained until project completion.
7. If concrete will be used, work must be accomplished so that wet concrete
does not contact stream water. This will lessen the chance of altering the
stream's water chemistry and causing a fish kill.
8. The applicant should contact Daryl Lamb at 336-771-4600 with the
Division of Water Quality to determine if a 401 Certification is needed for
the project. If appropriate due to density or watershed concerns, the 401
should include stormwater management conditions. We recommend Low
Impact Development (LID) methodologies. Information on LID measures
can be found at www.lowimpactdevelopment.org.
Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on this project. If you
have any questions regarding these comments, please contact me at 336/769-9453.
Cc: Daryl Lamb, DWQ-WSRO
o\NAT ?'Y
n? G
r
e

June 17, 2004
DWQ# 04-0717
Watauga County
Dr. Fred B. Lopp
Aho Development Company, LLC WETLANDS/ 401 GROUP
520 North Elam Avenue
Greensboro, NC 27403 JUN 2 4 2004
APPROVAL of 401 Water Quality Certification with Additional Conditions
WATER QUALITY SECTION
Dear Dr. Lopp:
Aho Development Company, LLC has our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions, to place
permanent fill in 83 linear feet of perennial stream in order to construct the Aho Development subdivision in
Watauga County, as described in your application received by the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) on May 3,
2004. After reviewing your application, we have determined that this fill is covered by General Water Quality
Certification Number 3402 which can be viewed on our web site at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. This
Certification allows you to use Nationwide Permit Number 39 when it is issued by the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers. In addition, you should secure any other applicable federal, state or local permits before you
proceed with your project, including (but not limited to) those required by Sediment and Erosion Control, Non-
Discharge, and Water Supply Watershed regulations. Also, this approval will expire when the accompanying
404 permit expires unless otherwise specified in the General Certification.
This approval is valid only for the purpose and design that you have described in your application. If you
change your project, you must notify us in writing, and you may be required to send us a new application for a
new certification. If the property is sold, the new owner must be given a copy of the Certification and approval
letter and is thereby responsible for complying with all conditions. If total wetland fills for this project (now or in
the future) exceed one acre, compensatory mitigation may be required as described in 15A NCAC 2H .0506
(h). For this approval to be valid, you must follow the conditions listed in the attached certification, as
well as the additional conditions listed below:
1. Deed notifications or similar mechanisms shall be placed on all lots with jurisdictional wetlands and
waters and on any commons areas within 50 feet of any jurisdictional wetlands or waters on the project
property. These mechanisms shall be put in place within 30 days of the date of this letter or the
issuance of the 404 Permits (whichever is later). A sample deed notification format can be downloaded
from the 401/Wetlands Unit web site at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands.
2. The culverts required for this project shall be installed per condition No. 9 in General Certification 3402
and in such a manner that the original stream profiles are not altered (i.e. the depth of the channel must
not be reduced by a widening of the streambed). Existing stream dimensions, including the pattern and
profile, are to be maintained above and below the location of each culvert. The culverts shall be
designed and installed to allow for aquatic life movement as well as to prevent head cutting of the
streams. If any of the existing pipes are or become perched, the appropriate stream grade shall be re-
established or, if the pipes are installed in a perched manner, the pipes shall be removed and re-
installed correctly. The Applicant must submit a plan and receive written approval from this Office to
address any head cutting that will occur as a result of this project (e.g., use of cross vanes downstream
of the culvert).
WIWI
N. C. Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
[phone] (phone), 919-733-6893 (fax), (httn://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands)
Customer Service 0: 1-877-623-6748
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
Coleen H. Sullins, Deputy Director
Division of Water Quality
It
3. Use of native vegetation and other soft stream bank stabilization techniques must be used where
practicable instead of riprap or other bank hardening methods. If riprap is necessary for energy
dissipation and scour protection, it shall be limited to the minimum dimensions specified by appropriate
engineering calculations. Riprap may only be used below the normal high water level. The original
grade and elevation of the stream's cross-section must be maintained. Riprap placed in the stream
bottom must be inserted into the bottom matrix to a depth sufficient to provide the thickness of riprap
required for scour protection. The elevation of the stream bottom must not be increased by the
placement of riprap. Placement of riprap must not result in destabilization of the streambed or banks
upstream or downstream of any crossing.
4. Concrete shall not be allowed to come in contact with any surface waters until it has completely cured.
5. Instream work and land disturbance within the 25-foot wide trout buffer zone are prohibited during the
trout spawning season of October 15th through April 15th in order to protect the egg and fry stages of
trout.
6. Upon completion of the project, the Applicant shall complete and return the enclosed "Certificate of
Completion" form to notify NCDWQ when all work included in the §401 Certification has been
completed. This certificate should be sent to the 401/Wetlands Unit of the NC Division of Water Quality
at the address listed on the form. Along with the Certificate of Completion form, please send
photographs upstream and downstream of each culvert site in order to document correct installation.
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this certification, you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You
must act within 60 days of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition
which conforms to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of Administrative
Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, N.C. 27699-6714. This certification and its conditions are final
and binding unless you ask for a hearing.
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act. If
you have any questions, please telephone Daryl Lamb in the DWQ Winston-Salem Regional Office at 336-771-
4600 or Cyndi Karoly in the Central Office in Raleigh 919-733-9721.
Sincerely,
JA
FK Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
AW K/cdl
Attachments
cc: Steve Chapin, U. S. Army Corps of Engineers, Asheville Regulatory Field Office
Winston-Salem DWQ Regional Office
Central Files
Wetlands/401 File Copy
John Vilas, E'nV Environmental Consulting Services, Inc., 3764 Rominger Road, Banner Elk, NC 28604
fpEMORANDUM
TO: John Dorney Regional Contact: Daryl Lamb
Non-Discharge Branch WO Supervisor: Steve Tedder
Date:
SUBJECT: WETLAND STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Facility Nanhe Aho Development, LLC County Watauga
Project Number 04 0717 County2
Recvd From APP Region Winston-Salem
Received DaIIe 5/3/04 Recvd By Region
Project Tye (1-2ac) Residential S/D
Certificates; Stream Stream Impacts (ft.)
Permit Wetlan Wetland Wetland Stream Class Acres Feet ME

Type Type
Impact Score Index Prim. Supp.
Basin Req. Req. _
39 O Y -@N 110-1-3-4-1- WSIV TR+ 50,701. ? 83.00 83.00 I -
F_ OY ON F_ F_ r-F- f ?? F_ 11
Mitigation Wetland
Mitigation ype Type Acres Feet
Is Wetland Rating Sheet Attached? 0 Y 0 N Did you request more info? 0 Y 0 N
Have Project Changes/Conditions Been Discussed With Applicant? 0 Y 0 N
Is Mitigation required? 0 Y 0 N Recommendation: 0 Issue 0 Issue/fond 0 Deny
Provided by Region: Latitude (ddmmss) 360952 Longitude (ddmmss) 813638
Comments:
cc: Regional Off ice
Central Office Page Number 1
Facility Name Aho Development, LLC
Project Number 04 0717
County Watauga
Regional Contact: Daryl Lamb
Date: 6/16/2004
Comments (continued from page 1):
throughout its course on the project site. There are small linear wetlands associated with all three
streams, but the proposed crossings will avoid these areas. The applicant states that there are no
mapped FMEA floodplains on the site. Applicant has done an acceptable job of avoidance and
minimization.
Approx?y 120 If of trout buffer out of - 1500 If of trout buffer onsite will be impacted by the
proposed road crossings. A lipp cant imposes to protect remaining buffered stream segments and the
wetland areas through deed restrictions.
projected impervious area at buildout is 3.8 acres, which is 9% of the total site area. Authorization to
use WOC# 3402, with additional conditions, will be issued by WSRO,
cc: Regional Office
Central Office Page Number 2
O?OFWATF9PG
> y
o c
June 17, 2004
DWQ# 04-0717
Watauga County
Dr. Fred B. Lopp
Aho Development Company, LLC
520 North Elam Avenue
Greensboro, NC 27403
APPROVAL of 401 Water Quality Certification with Additional Conditions
Dear Dr. Lopp:
Aho Development Company, LLC has our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions, to place
permanent fill in 83 linear feet of perennial stream in order to construct the Aho Development subdivision in
Watauga County, as described in your application received by the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) on May 3,
2004. After reviewing your application, we have determined that this fill is covered by General Water Quality
Certification Number 3402 which can be viewed on our web site at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. This
Certification allows you to use Nationwide Permit Number 39 when it is issued by the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers. In addition, you should secure any other applicable federal, state or local permits before you
proceed with your project, including (but not limited to) those required by Sediment and Erosion Control, Non-
Discharge, and Water Supply Watershed regulations. Also, this approval will expire when the accompanying
404 permit expires unless otherwise specified in the General Certification.
This approval is valid only for the purpose and design that you have described in your application. If you
change your project, you must notify us in writing, and you may be required to send us a new application for a
new certification. If the property is sold, the new owner must be given a copy of the Certification and approval
letter and is thereby responsible for complying with all conditions. If total wetland fills for this project (now or in
the future) exceed one acre, compensatory mitigation may be required as described in 15A NCAC 2H .0506
(h). For this approval to be valid, you must follow the conditions listed in the attached certification, as
well as the additional conditions listed below:
1. Deed notifications or similar mechanisms shall be placed on all lots with jurisdictional wetlands and
waters and on any commons areas within 50 feet of any jurisdictional wetlands or waters on the project
property. These mechanisms shall be put in place within 30 days of the date of this letter or the
issuance of the 404 Permits (whichever is later). A sample deed notification format can be downloaded
from the 401/Wetlands Unit web site at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands.
2. The culverts required for this project shall be installed per condition No. 9 in General Certification 3402
and in such a manner that the original stream profiles are not altered (i.e. the depth of the channel must
not be reduced by a widening of the streambed). Existing stream dimensions, including the pattern and
profile, are to be maintained above and below the location of each culvert. The culverts shall be
designed and installed to allow for aquatic life movement as well as to prevent head cutting of the
streams. If any of the existing pipes are or become perched, the appropriate stream grade shall be re-
established or, if the pipes are installed in a perched manner, the pipes shall be removed and re-
installed correctly. The Applicant must submit a plan and receive written approval from this Office to
address any head cutting that will occur as a result of this project (e.g., use of cross vanes downstream
of the culvert).
Aft
N. C. Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
[phone] (phone), 919-733-6893 (fax), (http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwctlands)
Customer Service #: 1-877-623-6748
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
Coleen H. Sullins, Deputy Director
Division of Water Quality
3. Use of native vegetation and other soft stream bank stabilization techniques must be used where
practicable instead of riprap or other bank hardening methods. If riprap is necessary for energy
dissipation and scour protection, it shall be limited to the minimum dimensions specified by appropriate
engineering calculations. Riprap may only be used below the normal high water level. The original
grade and elevation of the stream's cross-section must be maintained. Riprap placed in the stream
bottom must be inserted into the bottom matrix to a depth sufficient to provide the thickness of riprap
required for scour protection. The elevation of the stream bottom must not be increased by the
placement of riprap. Placement of riprap must not result in destabilization of the streambed or banks
upstream or downstream of any crossing.
4. Concrete shall not be allowed to come in contact with any surface waters until it has completely cured.
5. Instream work and land disturbance within the 25-foot wide trout buffer zone are prohibited during the
trout spawning season of October 15th through April 15th in order to protect the egg and fry stages of
trout.
6. Upon completion of the project, the Applicant shall complete and return the enclosed "Certificate of
Completion" form to notify NCDWQ when all work included in the §401 Certification has been
completed. This certificate should be sent to the 401/Wetlands Unit of the NC Division of Water Quality
at the address listed on the form. Along with the Certificate of Completion form, please send
photographs upstream and downstream of each culvert site in order to document correct installation.
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this certification, you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You
must act within 60 days of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition
which conforms to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of Administrative
Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, N.C. 27699-6714. This certification and its conditions are final
and binding unless you ask for a hearing.
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act. If
you have any questions, please telephone Daryl Lamb in the DWQ Winston-Salem Regional Office at 336-771-
4600 or Cyndi Karoly in the Central Office in Raleigh 919-733-9721.
Sincerely,
Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
AW K/cdl
Attachments
cc: Steve Chapin, U. S. Army Corps of Engineers, Asheville Regulatory Field Office
Winston-Salem DWQ Regional Office
Central Files
Wetlands/401 File Copy
John Vilas, E'nV Environmental Consulting Services, Inc., 3764 Rominger Road, Banner Elk, NC 28604
MEMORANDUM
TO: John Dorney Regional Contact:
Non-Discharge Branch WQ Supervisor:
Date:
SUBJECT: WETLAND STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Facility Name Aho Development, LLC County Watauga
Project Number 04 0717 County2
Recvd From APP Region Winston-Salem
Received Date 513104 Recvd By Region
Project Type (1-2ac) Residential S/D
Certificates Stream Stream Impacts (ft.)
Permit Wetland Wetland Wetland Stream Class Acres Feet
Type Type Impact Score Index Prim. Supp. Basin Req. Req. ME
39 F- FT-@) N F-- 10-1-3-4-1- WSIV rTR+ 50,701. F- 83.00 ? 8-3.00 F-
Mitigation Wetland
MitigationType Type Acres Feet
Is Wetland Rating Sheet Attached? Q Y 6 N Did you request more info? Q Y Q N
Have Project Changes/Conditions Been Discussed With Applicant? QQ Y Q N
Is Mitigation required? Q Y0 N Recommendation: Q Issue (0 Issue/Cond O Deny
Provided by Region: Latitude (ddmmss) 360952 Longitude (ddmmss) 813638
Comments:
Site visit made on 05/19/2004, Site Is ? 42 acres in size. Surroundina area is rid marily agricultural
with some residences nearby, This eject consists of develop'ng a residential subdivision of 36 lots
a_veragjng between 1 and 2 acres each. The propoesed impacts are associated with the main
access road, which has been routed to minimize stream crossings while roviding access to all 36
lots. No ffimpacts to streams or wetlands are pro o? sed, nor should they be necessary aim
the layout of the access road. The proposed impacts consist of three separate crossings of small
perennial streams. These crossing impacts are 28 If, 28 If, and 27 If for a total project impact of 83 If.
No wetland impacts are proposed. All three crossings will utilize corregated metal pipe arch culverts,
cc: Regional Office
Central Office Page Number 1
Facility Name Aho Development, LLC County Watauga
Project Number 04 0717 Regional Contact: Daryl Lamb
Date: 6/16/2004
Comments (continued from page 1):
Approximately 120 If of trout buffer out of - 1500 If of trout buffer onsite will be impacted by the
proposed road crossings. Applicant proposes to protect remainino buffered stream segments and the
wetland areas through deed restrictions.
Projected impervious area at buildout is 3.8 acres, which is 9% of the total site area. Authorization to
use WOC# 3402, with additional conditions, will be issued by WSRO.
cc: Regional Office
Central Office Page Number 2

Date: q- o q
To: _f5, ARO
? FRO
? MRO
? RRO
Triage Check List

Project Name:
DWQ#:
County:
Mike Parker
Ken Averitte
Alan Johnson
Steve Mitchell
?- WaRO Tom Steffens
? WiRO Ncelle Lutheran
? WSRO Daryl Lamb
Telephone : (919)
From:
The file attached is being forwarded to your for -your evaluation.
Please call if you need aimstance.
? Stream length impacted
? Stream determination
? Wetland determination and distance to blue-line surface waters on USFW topo maps
? Minim Wion/avoidanco issues
? Buffer Rules (Meuse, Tar-Pamlico, Catawba, Randleman)
? Pond fill
? Mitigation Ratios
? Ditching
?.'Are the stream and or wetland mitigation sites available and viable?
? Check drawings for accuracy
? Is the application consistent with pre-application meetings?
? Cumulative impact concern
Comments:
MD AA avy- 1? .
C

E'nV
Fmvin'N1numt l Cormoth g Services 1w.
March 24, 2004
Mr. John Dorney
NC DENR DWQ
Wetlands/401 Unit
2321 Crabtree Blvd.
Raleigh, NC 27699-1621
RE: Aho Development LLC
Watauga County
Dear Mr. Domey:
3764 Rominger Road
Banner Elk, NC 28604
Ph/Fax: [phone]
e-mail: envQboone.net
Transmitted with #hi tter are 7 copies of the 404/401 permit application for the referenced project and
a check f 1 200 cover the application fee. Impact total for this project is 83 linear feet of perennial
stream channel.
If you have any questions regarding these items please call me at 828-297-6946, thank you.
Sincerely,
Adam Williams
Bioloist, E'nV Environmental Consulting Services Inc.
cc: Aho Development LLC
Mr. Patrick Warren PE, McGill Engineering
Mr. Daryl Lamb, NC DWQ
WETLANDS 1401 GROUP

WATER QUALM SECTION

Office Use Only: W'k , Form Version April 2001
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A" rather than
leaving the space blank.
1. Processing WETL4NDS/401 GROUP
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project: MAY 0 3 2004
X Section 404 Permit
? X 401t1Wat Or Qua ty Certification WATER QUALITY sECTIOA,
? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: NWP 39
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (see section VIII - Mitigation), check here: ?
II. Applicant Information
Owner/Applicant Information
Name: Aho Development Co., LLC
Mailing Address: 530 North Elam Ave.
Greensboro NC 27403
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number:
E-mail Address:
2. Agent Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter must be
attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Aho Development Co., LLC
Company Affiliation: 530 North Elam Ave.
Mailing Address: Greensboro NC 27403
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number:
E-mail Address:
Page 3 of 12
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than I1 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Aho Development
2. T.I.P. Project Number (NCDOT Only):
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): 2828-97-5751-000
4. Location
County: Watauga Nearest Town: Blowing Rock
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number):
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): Take Hwy_ 321 south out of
Boone approximately 3 miles Take a left on Aho Rd. and continue until reaching the Blue
Ridge Parkway Take a right on the parkway and an immediate left on Sampson Rd. Once
on Sampson Rd take an immediate left on George Hayes Rd. then take a right on Brown
Stone Ridge Dr. The project site the large lot (40+ ac) on the left of Brown Stone Ridge Dr.
5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long): 36 9'52"N / 81 36'38"W
(Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the
coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
6. Describe the existing land use or condition of the site at the time of this application: Single
Family Residential
7. Property size (acres): 42 +/- acres
8. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake): Storey Branch
9. River Basin: New River
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.ne.us/admin/maps/.)
Page 4 of 12
Describe the purpose of the proposed work: To create a large lot (1-2 ac) residential subdivision._
10. List the type of equipment to be used to construct the project: Standard construction
equipment: track excavator, backhoe dump truck
11. Describe the land use in the vicinity of this project: Residential and agricultural
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
No previous USACE 404 permits or NCDENR 401 permits have been used to develop this
property
V. Future Project Plans
Are any additional permit requests anticipated for this project in the future? If so, describe the
anticipated work, and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current
application: No additional 404/401 permit requests are anticipated for any planned future
development of this property
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section VII below. All proposed impacts, permanent
and temporary, must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site
plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a
delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream
evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be
included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream
mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for
listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Wetland Impacts
Page 5 of 12
Wetland Impact
Site Number
indicate on ma
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
acres Located within
100-year Floodplain**
(yes/ o) Distance to
Nearest Stream
(linear feet)
Type of Wetland***

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: mechanized clearing, grading, till,
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
** 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at http://www.fema.gov.
*** List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.)
List the total acreage (estimated) of existing wetlands on the property: 0 ac
Total area of wetland impact proposed: 0.0
2. Stream Impacts, including all intermittent and perennial streams
Stream Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma)
Type of Impact* Length of
Impact
linear feet)
Stream Name** Average Width
of Stream
Before Impact Perennial or
Intermittent?
leasespecify)
Stream 3
(impact 1) 35"x24" CMP
arch pipe 28' UT Storey Branch 8-10' Perennial
Stream 3
(impact 2 42"09" CMP
arch ipe 28' UT Storey Branch 8-10' Perennial
Stream 2
(Impact 3 35"x24" CMP
arch pipe 27' UT Storey Branch 5-15' Perennial

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and associated rip-rap,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain),
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
** Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
www.usgs.aov. Several internet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., www.topozone.com,
www.mapquest.com, etc.).
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site
Page 6 of 12
Open Water Impacts, including Lakes, Ponds, Estuaries, Sounds, Atlantic Ocean and any
other Water of the U.S.
Open Water Impact
Site Number
indicate on ma
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
acres Name of Waterbody
(if applicable) Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound,
bay, ocean, etc.)

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: till, excavation, dredging,
flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
4. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.):
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.):
Size of watershed draining to pond: Expected pond surface area:
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
The proposed work and associated impacts are intended to allow for development of a large lot
(1-2 ac) residential subdivision with minimal impacts to streams and wetlands. Streams 2 & 3
(see Jurisdictional description have proposed impacts associated with the main road through the
property. The impacts to are due to the road accessing all 36 lots while meeting county
subdivision road standards. The road was designed to access all lots with no foreseeable
driveway impacts. Streams 1, LS, and all riparian wetlands on-site, are to be avoided with road
impacts. All remaining wetlands, streams and associated buffers on the site will be permanently
protected through deed restrictions. There are no mapped FEMA floodplain areas on the site.
Page 7 of 12
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCWRP concurrence shall be placed on hold as
incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration
in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwettands/stnngide.html.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
No mitigation is proposed
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program (NCWRP) with the NCWRP's written agreement. Check the box indicating that
you would like to pay into the NCWRP. Please note that payment into the NCWRP must be
reviewed and approved before it can be used to satisfy mitigation requirements. Applicants
will be notified early in the review process by the 401/Wetlands Unit if payment into the
NCWRP is available as an option. For additional information regarding the application
process for the NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htm. If
use of the NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide
the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): 0
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): 0
Page 8 of 12
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0
IX. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Only)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public funds or the use of public (federaVstate/local)
land?
Yes ? No X
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No ?
If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes ? No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (DWQ Only)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify )?
Yes ® No If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers.
Zone* Impact
(square feet Multiplier Required
Miti ation
1 3
2 1.5
Total
Page 9 of 12
* Zone I extends out 30 feet perpendicular from near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0260.
Approximately 1500 linear feet of perennial stream trout buffer exist on the project site. Of that
1500 linear feet approximately 120 linear feet of trout buffer will be impacted with this project.
Impacts are associated with three piped road crossings; two are associated with Stream 3 and
one with Stream 2 All remaining buffers streams and wetlands will be permanently protected
through deed restrictions
XI. Stormwater (DWQ Only)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
downstream from the property.
Total acreage on the site exists as 42 +/- acres with impervious acreage <1%. Proposed
impervious acreage is approximately 3.8 acres 9% of total acreage.
XII. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Only)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
On site septic systems will be installed in accordance with local regulation.
Xiii. Vioiations (DWQ Only)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No X
Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
Yes ? No X
XIV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
Page 10 of 12
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).

,?? d, 0
Applicant/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
US Army Corps Of Engineers rieid Offices and County Coverage
Asheville Regulatory Field Office Alexander Cherokee Iredell Mitchell Union
US Army Corps of Engineers Avery Clay Jackson Polk Watauga
151 Patton Avenue Buncombe Cleveland Lincoln Rowan Yancey
Room 208 Burke Gaston Macon Rutherford
Asheville, NC 28801-5006 Cabarrus Graham Madison Stanley
Telephone: [phone] Caldwell Haywood McDowell Swain
Fax: [phone] Catawba Henderson Mecklenburg Transylvania
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office Alamance Durham Johnston Rockingham Wilson
US Army Corps Of Engineers Alleghany Edgecombe Lee Stokes Yadkin
6508 Falls of the Neuse Road Ashe Franklin Nash Surry
Suite 120 Caswell Forsyth Northampton Vance
Raleigh, NC 27615 Chatham Granville Orange Wake
Telephone: [phone] Davidson Guilford Person Warren
Fax: [phone] Davie Halifax Randolph Wilkes
Washington Regulatory Field Office Beaufort Currituck Jones Pitt
US Army Corps Of Engineers Bertie Dare Lenoir Tyrrell
Post Office Box 1000 Camden Gates Martin Washington
Washington, NC 27889-1000 Carteret* Green Pamlico Wayne
Telephone: [phone] Chowan Hertford Pasquotank
Fax: [phone] Craven Hyde Perquimans *Croatan National Forest Only
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office Anson Duplin Onslow
US Army Corps Of Engineers Bladen Harnett Pender
Post Office Box 1890 Brunswick Hoke Richmond
Wilmington, NC 28402-1890 Carteret Montgomery Robeson
Telephone: [phone] Columbus Moore Sampson
Fax: [phone] Cumberland New Hanover Scotland
US Nish and Wildlife Service / National M arine Fishe ries Service
US Fish and Wildlife Service US Fish and Wildlife Service National Marine Fisheries Service
Raleigh Field Office Asheville Fiel d Office Habitat Conservation Division
Page 11 of 12
08V 1610.00" W 1 ° 3710-011'n. 1 ° 35 0-W' W
n rE i
Z
z j j 1 I 0 _ F r k
Ar
} ( r ?/
4Ck?
1 d e s0,
R s
Hl I en
u?Iri?
z r r. r ?ctp . l'' Q j Cem
r /. sh+d-G a Xr f? gE \ .
DBy$
t
Cem
I( { `I 1 r T ski 1 !?%? "o o
}
Off
,.; r i ;? VI\ Y Y
4 cr. ; t
r r
t f BMbT37? \ ??. f
oral Fork Fi^W Laurel'1'o Aho •?? ICY KnobV- \
Cep•?•. \ 3800
a -
r -
I J ?,
- - ?-
`? \I 3 (Xry Pphd- 7c s ,
6 z
,
Z
?eC l
CS J44)
} Y ,
7 'Ill
r `co . ? J
J-Z
t y?
7*W A.
D81 ° 0.00 681- 3T 0.00" 681- 36-10W
FName: DEEP GAP Location: 036° 09'44.2" N 081° 3632.01. W
Date: 3/18/2004 Caption: Aho Development LLC Location Map
Scale: 1 inch equals 2000 feet
Copyright (C) 1997, Maptech, Inc.
Aho Development LLC
Project Map
0
.shp
hp
?p
JURISDICTIONAL DESCRIPTION
Project Name: Aho Development LLC
Location: Blowing Rock, NC
General:
The site is located near the Sampson Rd.Blueridge Parkway intersection (see PCN report
and location map). The site is approximately 42 acres. Elevations on the site range from
3600-3800 feet above mean sea level. Four perennial streams exist on the project site,
which fall within the East Fork of the New River subbasin. Riparian wetlands exist along
Streams 1 and 2.
Streams:
Stream 1 is located near the east boundary of the project site. This perennial channel (see
DWQ Stream Classification/USACE Habitat Assessment sheets) begins at 2 springheads
and meanders downstream approximately 400 ft before leaving the project site (see site
map). The two springheads begin as 2 channels with widths varying from 5-10' each
with upland area between (see site map). As the channel meanders downstream it
becomes braided in many sections with riparian wetlands existing on either bank
(jurisdictional widths approximately 40-50'). The lower portion of Stream 1 becomes
more linear, just before leaving the project site, with widths varying from 8-10'.
Stream 2 is a perennial channel located just west of Stream 1 beginning at a rocky
springhead and meandering downstream approximately 200' before going subsurface.
The upper channel exists at a width ranging from 8-10'. Downstream, riparian wetlands
exist on either side of the channel with jurisdictional widths approximately 10-40 ft.
Moving east, Stream 3 begins at a springhead located near the southern project boundary.
This perennial channel has surface water flow for approximately 450 ft and goes
subsurface near the centerline of the proposed subdivision road (northern). The channel
goes subsurface near a rock outcrop and doesn't reappear as surface flow on or below the
project site.
Wetlands:
The majority of the riparian wetlands along Stream 1 exist when the channel becomes
braided. The wetlands also bulge out when the stream crosses the existing logging roads.
These small road grades act as a path of least resistance allowing water to flow laterally,
creating small wetlands. Juncus effusus, Caryx spp, and Rhododendron maximum
dominate these wetland areas. Soils in this wetland system typically have black surface
soils with gray/gleyed subsoils (see Wetland Data Sheets).
The riparian wetlands associated with Stream 2 are dominated by Rhododendron spp.,
Yellow Birch, and Hemlock (see Wetland Datasheet). Wetland widths are approximately
20-40 ft (including stream). Upper Stream 2 remains linear and begins to bulge out with
wetlands downstream before going subsurface. Soils in this section appear black and
rocky throughout the profile (see Wetland Datasheet).
Aho LLC Jurisdictional Description 1 of 2 3/24/2004
A linear seep (LS) exists to the northwest of upper Stream 1. This seep begins at a small
rock outcrop in a dense Rhododendron thicket. From the springhead LS flows
approximately 75 ft and goes subsurface near a boulder outcrop along a logging road.
Soils in LS were also black and rocky throughout the profile.
Soils throughout the site are mapped as Stony rough land. This is a high slope (30-60%)
soil type littered with bedrock, boulders, and cobble.
Aho LLC Jurisdictional Description 2 of 2 3/24/2004
w_
A'1,+1 vc ii
i
t.t
•
lot 11
l°t 1
llpl 6'i0F MWE
Proposed
Road Fi11
f?
s
s
?\ a
eO. \ ?
Aho Development LLC
t
PY l1 PoN
2 1 N"' I

u
.la•
w ? nm+ • 1?
ro a ?i
f•
'° x n
N NOT TO SCALE
-ao
Symbol Description
25' Trout Buffer
-•.wr Stream Centerline
O Proposed Impact
Areas
i
•n n
ul a
a
i°
"' a /
U)
Co
CD

Q ® '" L \ e LLJ

AC =3r-
o a L.
a v
U m
-'
-4-)
o
(C) 0
?
- - - - -®
C - - E
o
gig e,
8 Q
.

-? a
-
C , ® $
?C, o
S:L
1J U
v
N
_
o O

CD E
CL) -°

«- t

O
C-
a
N
L
? Dl
O
L
+.r
m N ?
a +? H m

. ? C

O a
? E O
N ~ 1D p
p a,

cu ? a

0 1,
n 11 :
T
1
r

Stream 2 Impact 3 Area
PIPE 6 ? l? \
35X P ? f
ARCH PIPE ?
S A 16+04.47
v
A C-
16+00
"27'16+6 .
ro 0 'Road
I 0O i
z
0
Relative
0
M Average Guery Description
Channel
D
F-
Type of Impact Arch Pipe
Ree Ouery Desrpon

erage Bkf Width
OtM1
Average Bk
of CM1
of Channel
l

?
5-1r?'
515
Length of Impact
Length of Impact 27"
27*
roe of moac 35"24
35x24"CMP
CMP
Arch Pipe
O O
O Cu
w
J
I- CU a
u
f0 + w
cD 11 o
Q X? o
Q O I- J z
-j U) W
41 cow Q )
C__) Q),
CO ?
Q
I---I ? C
4-) u
C
W 0\0
cu w O
0- CO
(n w o- in
Q
/mil l V +
\ ? EL X CD U' C
r-I
a ?
Q 4-J
`I- _
13,
( Q
l
CL) Q J
v
c
O
a

?
- o a

L
03
Cu a
f
U

?
0 N
x
Ill

L

3 N u
?
Q
H y,
u
?p
a

Q] w c
Y ?0 N

U
o ,F

(0
r-I N
Ong
L
QJ
L

C
01 v

T
F

Stream S Impact 2 Area
PIPE 5
42X39 CM? ARCH PIPE
STA 13+6 .24
? u
4-1 +
ap v?
p
ODDS -28" '(1105)
\ RO 1 -6.39%
as
110
I
NOT TO SCALE
N
Relative Query Description
Average Bkf Width
of Channel g-10'
Length of Impact 28'
Type of Impact 42"x39"CMP Arch Pipe
V4
NCORWO Q ?
Pr*dNmm nwm k-)"j comar. O'Nk".3¢, Evaladw. AW
DWQltojmctNe Aw Ncm*l* eIq- s4or<.•? Lsrsm 369S..)".0
Q r e?v.?
Daft 3 ?.o o 4-1 UM QUAD- 1.f mandim gt A133,10 W.
*l?.B •?r Am* Am Msdf&*AMIr.. arommu.
?.?+R?r?N1R4???E/eisa?i.?M..arJ?ar?. ?...rlydN?M?.?rn.rt...?fr?.ai..r,Aaw..-tom
raft dxwuxwbwnw*
F hon FiFidd rs: prdcamMmiwR.L*w}
inklb=Alti?lleoi9lmmow 0 1 3
? ?s'1b i?A Tae i? SlKwia+? _

M? Fd Itdi?it?•r8:4s/Kr.berpra t
gaw?m ?i0e • S C
?1suwWdOriCbWAMID
Im"MAkkamsbRam estDrq
me • S 1 1S

?oiii?Wsiira?ie@ MY
a??±rra9r?r?sa...i1 2 i
s
0 •
. y
COIWA1tYBlOLOGYDWI,CArORPOl1 W. ? L--?-S-
3 b
?TAL POINTS ?rr?+ • `?5?
L
L A`?¦t "Nk
q bImbyea*s (Orla" Fedor
c?
Projod Name: 4a De v Rivw Basin: kJc,,) Cooaty: a ?S of Ev"tor: ?W
DVQPnojeetNumb= mcwmtl' 'Strum Skolr..` LROMM
Data 3 (o o.A usm QUA& Q r y. - Laa6mft
N TEL:*risrrlrre i/wii?rpwr/Wisjh - 0 N sle?ar?oirirf??anme~pmfsmwmm rwwy.
d6o,fUisIeWo r-FAuwiadjr*m-wit??seasirerama1s?.aw?ebR•arriw?srMMiawd?ts? ?w sots?w-ah
n lwgi s w &wwn titrwa *
Prhasm Feld ILdle0m; x*d awmw*o PwLbO
Ilia Tlisea A kiffiwBml Swam dl O cli 2 3
? Is'?bs OD3QA Tabwa i alaea¦id _ , ? _
5)
2 3
iL Ekdralmw Ahmmt Waft NWdwmb Siam
1) D 7'bees A (On?walec ,,?

R.lreisQrelYiwfirrPlerl
(10 L5
9 Wc"ilLmftjaib¦iie& •?W ¦?
PAC tieNW1MC6
S 'Undly
IOw?R 9rrrirsA.?..i.r 2?
'CO)WARYBIOLOQYMIC'4TOW POINTS: a 2 t
ML wl1NT.C -?
_--mm,+ 1'•__NGbmwerlamOrAkadZ'bjgl%a-.-e"w&v ?ls.&Le4whftnwftfjwo

®r.mhdmk7 Mi t W"
yblhbTew-sf rL r*Lmmmt _.?
NCDWO stream aNdfl MIM Form
Project Name: A 1 , De v
DWQ Project Number.
River Basin: 0 QJ
Nearest Named Stream: S-V,, ( o „i
County:
Latitude: 3 6 T' Sa "X/Signature:
Date: 3 1(010-4 USOS QUAD: Longitude: 13 6' 3 cg't.11.ocation/Diccctions:
*PLEASS NOTE: B'sasis.a?r? rw,Mwwr?aati.t,rs?rnts....-..ilr itdi,.is +?sdMds?i.w tr nr.s?oanry?.
Abe, tfbrti.be pvfaaiMMWfiMbmWWfl&ff oAmOr,dwj.Nlrne8.00"w* , 0 ?atAmam.dW"*"WWft"n-*k
'W&S VOM skeam not be 0"0
Pdam Field Indicators: odeai Nmbvpwr"v)
2)h 7W U3DA Tie
b 1baa An Active (Or Bdc)
IsACMinowBed&Dss9kPae wV 0 1 UJ 3
I"
PRl1KAlYGffOBfORMOLOGYJ VDIG!7VR
IL Wdroloff Abnot WWk M2d=k ?f}"M
I) Is Tbem A Groundwater
E W UMWM VM V 0 1 3
AUM4RYXYDROL0GYJMJ'CATOR POI M.*- ?.
D

ftOIIdq'y Field bdinten: (CY?rte a?rslKm,6e,p..v x)
Does
A
SUCONDART -
ILlbolls" Aio nt Wei 4NME
1) b ibis Year's (or Lars) Lafffew
4) b Vasm 12 Ctaond Amid >C Bm Skm 0 ,g
Last aa.w Ra?2 ?aeoegL
Sj 1s 1lrese Watec rsi Chood Dodm Dq 0 S
S BC ONDA l Y, B IDS Dl l! i G I.
Wctlod t)ssals L Stteavl SAY l/ndY01iL FACN
IRI'1.tri3Ue..is? 2 I .75
LS
1.5
MIWW RALU I om* URL
0 0
WCONDARYBIOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: L
-__ ($ ir?Awe QrB?d rvl f Psis ZWfihwm.IsAtL?t?

USACE AID# DWQ
Site # (indicate on attached map)
SrR&W QUALITY ASSESSMENT WCWXSFMT S
Mdl? the fordo stream rM4 adar anessament: ?1
w
¦g
rnvide
1. Applicant's name.
?? c7
Q ¢ t ?- , t
2. Evaluator's namm W
3. Date of evaluation: 3 10 ! 0 4. Time of evaluation
S. Name of stream: wr S Nr?•^t 1'rtNt 6. River basin: / ?p•.l R,,,? r
7. Approximee drarm ge arra s ~ t d a L & Stream alder 5 }
9. Length of reach evaluated: 2'S W 10. County: W vim, ! ?
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any)-
Latitude(= 34.872312): 3 y ? , .?a " l 1
fw
I ?I
Longitude (ex 77.556611): 51 36,
Method lexatwn damn=ed (cnclq t3PS Tope Sheet Ortho (Aerial) PhoW GIS Odw GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
14. Proposed channel work (if any): N k A
15. Recent weather conditions: S ti v `^ '`` ?" ,. ^ ?r
16. Site.cooditions at time of visit: AA o; s •4' s v c),J - (0-
17. Identify any special waterway el ons irnown: Section 10 Tidal Waters Fsseactid Fisheries Habitat
rout Waters Outsta4d'mg Resource Waters _ Nutrient Sensitive Waters 'Water supply watershed jQ(I-M
18. Is theme a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES NO If yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES d§) 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: % Residential % Commercial % Industrial % Agricultural
3-x16 Forested 3(-)% Cleated / Logged %O&w ( 1
r -
22. Banldi l width: (o S? 6; , l '" S 23. Bank he W (fiam bed to top of bank)r
24. Channel slope down center of stream: Fiat (0 to 2%) Genfle (2 to 4%) Moderate (4 to 10%) e•p (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity Shaigtrt nOOccasional bends Frequent mewndea Very sinuous Braided channel
Mestroedions tar cooophliata of wasbied (laemled not page 2k Begm by determining the moat appaoprnte ecm-goon based on
location, to rrom. venctodon, stmon dsen6eabom6 eae. Every chtnae teestre most be scored us ng the some ecangrm. Assign points
to each tic widkin the range shown for the ecoregion. Pape 3 provides a brief dmrbdm of bow to review the
characteristics ides' red in the weodcsbeat. Suetres should reflect an overall asse t of the stream tetacI under evaluation. If a
cbumcieristic cannot be ervaiusned doe to she or weather cosedai=6 adw 0 in am snoring ben and provide an explanation in the
ooaoment seecdow Where there we obvious cmogzs in the cbmactr of a stream radar review (P49- the dram flaws from a pasture
into a faest)? the stream may be divided inao amei er teacI that dbpby more eosaiewity, and a aaparate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total sooree assigsed to a sham tench must range belvreen 0 and 100, with a some of 100 teptesmteg a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (f 'm reverse):
O? e5 A
Bvdoater's
11* d a nd evakadi n faanr Is inasde I fs, be and only sea a gslie to MOM lsiaw?ers add onrln¦i?1 !a in
g odwirisca tie felt asquired by the Udaed Stales Amy Corps of BagLeess to woke a pad okory anamrent of aO==
quow. The lard mass .es lai¦a kaso lie co mpkam of dds firoo, b; VdaJect to, USACB apps+svd acrd do" not imply a
P crabs or ategsiraaaent. Form s ubjecet to change- venim 06A3. To Comment, please ca11919 876-&141 x 26.

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET

1.
preesc..c bi flaw I g?xs?ct r 's ntnx::
0 5- .-
0 1'
0 5
(nry flow er aturaLan = 0; siron lluiv.=ma x o .l.
s.2 ::, Y VILTZCate of F--t•i:UM3 .=W-r:.i4,u?
' `.0
. . -
cxtcnsivc aikcrLion'-0, no aut .:uon=mix .olnts
3;
' 0 C =0 1 A-5.
m
nob4ftcr=0 contis:lo_? k,idl.buifcr=max

4 '
Vviuir. Cc.'cf nutrimt or cT:? . i ?w .I;..rb
` 0 S
0 .1
0 ti ,
T
- : ..(C•ritCIIS1VGd1:,C
?r?l tc is w p
-
3
=
U
0
4
_

. 4
0- 00-4 2
'0 -
Dint, -
no flitw ? s > =U; rxicavzvc fl a+ cl ,l. m -m l :
LitIC i' c11..t1ti l:laactw3
z omts
du
i fl
0
r
n
}
d 0-5 0-4 0-2 .
s l ma
oo
re cl:
;
:
(deeply entrc
e
I
_ -
: 0-6 . 0-4 0-2
no wcilanL = 0• large ad u t v,,ctl ac:r.= sax points)

9
'
075 0-4. 0-3 `
r:tural?:?diermax points)
(extensive ehanncliz?uicn=0•
1
0 S:t_trs, t
n 0-5 0-4` 0.-4
o ..Cdira=t = max points)
CxtcnsiVc d O lUan? 0; little ex
I1 51z a did cm:ty cf aana_itcd &:::;r..:a p -4
p 5
?r-
fine bcmc nos.-0; I-' diveWwises=max points)
12 : Zvi l ° ec of cL,--hucl

-
0-
0 ; :
-
fl 5

1-4
. =maX OlIItS
d..c 1 ...CiSCLL U;.5L.b1Cb.:<iE..ba?..?
13 're?:::cccFmulv.:fil ccs': 0-5 0-5:
l 5 :'

L4

-
a, 5tablliban..•s= max pohLs)
6cvcr6 crosan.=0- no crosi a

?
' - '.,.12COL tl.^.ilt3; ANSI. i:i.?`j z,..7 II.+.II:Li, ?• _ _-- - - ' [,?-?"'
(uo visilcroatis - 0: d a moil thmu^1zcut= max amts
'
...'Rall.ct:l.,f 'C11t+.ICj.IrYC..iGCd?.St.,. :isu"..ju-d Clam .: ..
0 5: - .
.
U--i
0-5 ?^
15 sub t,.ntinl un act=0 nocw.d=-CC =rpax m .:

lb 143
": Pr: .. cecfnL"?^c !?.?tj'la,lcainpl ,
0 3
0 J -
0-6
(Q
no iiill zl , lcs or cis O,.vcll.Jevcla W max ints
pf' 17 . ?? Isit ta.niie-xlt U G" = 0-6 ' 0 6
ats=nlaxrczints)
ci eubz
little or no b lt,s,.;t - 0 rice a 11 v
? lO `
?
1 C w. ? xC.s1 CYr . uifl.? t a'l L??]td - ? !
!. .: noshadtn vc, atlan0_cc.ntmuos&cano =miX ;oini?
0 4- 4
0-
19
(dccp
lciwe s+r eti.rc = trax
1 call. wlyd = 0 { .
J
20 ,
Prrs::.cc of strc Irr;:ri r?.1tca (=page l)

0-4

0 5.

0-5
c..!
{? ?, f
1
1 no evidence?0, corrua iuz uruus t = M= omts
21 0_4 IA -4. p 41:'
no evidcnce = 0, common, Tiui.?:c us t = max Dints pLz
22 Frc c.*, i of f a:; 0 4. 0 .. 0 S .:. . O
no evidcncc= 0, ccwmoa numerous types - max fats
23 : lv[3cccl?.z%Wlra:r s 0 6" , . 0-5 0 5... .
(no: cvidcucc tl AL nd st eF<tl rcc max points) --

_ oa -
* Tk--c chw=budsdcs = not c.; c=W in coasw str=.
2
1 USACE MW DWQ # Site # ('indicate on attached map)
5+??, tl Siv?'w
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
prevltle tke fi0o.? fiw lke at.>rsaa rotes rosier sn,oess'eo?t~ ?lw?
1. Applicant's nine- AVi be a . LL ?- Z. Evaluator s n:mne
3. Date of evaluation: 3J.Lo 0 _ 4. Time of traluatiRm
s. Name of stream: UT ' S"?.? F Nc,L 6. River basin: N r w 2t ve r
4? a stream ruder. s?
7. Approve drainage ate' ?
1Q County: Uq?w w
9. Length of reach evaluated
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any):
01 Latitude (ex 34.872312): 3 t9 Ja IW_ Longitude (ex.-77.556611):
Method location determined (circle): GPS Topo Sheet Onto (Aerial) PboWGIS Other G IS Oher
•
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location)-
14. Proposed channel work (if any 4t
15. Recent Weather' off- Sn.o?
time of visit: M o `
16. Site conditions
17. I tefy any special waterway classifications known: -Section l0 Tidal Waters Essft l Fisheries Habitat
Tmut Waters Outstmtding Resource Waters `.Nutrient Sensitive Waters t! Watdr Supply Watershed^?(I M
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES NO if yes, esthnate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? Y" 20. Does channel appear an USDA Soil Survey? YES NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: % Residential % Commercial % Industrial % Agricultulld
J j2A Forested 2Q% Cleared / Logged % Other ( i
22. Bankfull width: - I )- ? 23. Bank height (froth bed to top of banks
24. Chamel slope down ken of stream: Flat (0 to 2%) Gentle (2 to 4%) Moderate (4 to 10%) L-?>10%)
25. Chaned sinuositys traight Oceamad bends Frequent meander Very sinuous Branded channel
Iastraeddeas tsar cesnp hst of waskdmat (dwmkd on !4p 2k Begin by ddermitins the most app game a rq mn based on
location, teaam, vegetation, abeam classifiatm, ere. Every emeactetistrc must be scored using the same econ gbw s*a points
to each Characteristic within the range shown for the eoeregiem Page 3 provides a brief de»teriplion of bow to raview characteristics idco i6ied in the waedcsbeet. Series dmud l r der an overall assessmal of do strain reach under evaluation. If a
die con of be evalmled doe to she or we mho and does, eatcter 0 in the sending book and pswide an cxpluadim in the
comment sadioa Where there are obvious cbaoges in at Character of a strain under review (e g., the sAreenn funs, from a pasture;
into a forest), dw stream nary be divided solo smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate fam used to evaluate each
reach. The total soars steed to a atresnn ram taarst range bebreen 0 and 100, with a gore of 100 ieprereatieg a sltemt of the
highest 9uslihr• `? p
TN1d Scam (Iran re"WILe - ?' Gt mtc S pt ? ? ?+.,rl. a?c c.? VN
r Pes 5 ti?,S.. t
Dmft 3I +ol ray
gor's Siggabms
mentsilsinks* --min
Tbrs Cicraand eraiaadaer iantt is i¦ldelei !o he eats ? as a rdit a most Imov".- etas
tie dada redid by the UjiU d Slates AIW Coups Of ROBOWers bra tasaiee a P elknbm y asausareat of W"as
qaWW. The fatal sane , --- o6 I, ,Ike emple s Of Ab &M s aarjse t b USACE apPIsval aid ekes scut bap4? a
lam rntdw ar r, . germ subject to change - vess m 06p3_ To Caatmay plea,e call 919-9764"1 x 26.
i
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSYIENT WORKSIHEET
i Pr^. . c l.n tL.' :, I TO 5. 0_ r U 5
noilo??ar LL a'an=0 >#rc??io
Z.. i;I?ilc ., f '0-6- . U 5 . ? 5
cztL=;ivcalt=tlca= 0,rna`.....!."c:7=rn.;crnin?) =

3 Ilii:vn ,?
` 0 f 0 0 5
. CA 1t7 0 .:LCI I =7n. .
nbbuff Q
ccsratriizi, rc IE r; U c fl 0 3 L-?
.L>)'. .
e tcasivc cl7sci rv . - U, no di ' , r,, t ( D
L
.

O+:jrlL.[..,, c s,?o LLtdL? 4.-ir L?,
(n o dii,ch--me
0-ttr-_ .0-4 ..0 2....
- (n4 foaii ..1= U, L:.•;"'L.I:L.f: .t .,LL4. I. :i ... .
7 f ..ta. =rail '- c p 5-
0-4. 0-2
d 1v c 7lre;:cl c1- U f= ?t LrAit t*t.{ ::,, .; ix Imt.
g Ji'r 3 0-b 0-4 0 -2
i"=.1rax aIn
ip?
Caai d t. -
p =4 0-3
0
h

10 tyr^4y a t
i
0_5 ,
0-al ,. 0-?1
cstcnsivQ 4t ,csit;c n . O; litflc drvo L:..t i1 Ix Quits
:0 5

fine l.c I.c.?c ..c,L, - Q: L z *G di vcr.:c"? : - ->c ai , s .
I° c .cLerc a- 1i: ... a:z °::ur- 0_4 U 5
12 (l c71 LaL.::ul. llClul_;. -II1L ^?u
sf2 0_'5 0 5.;-
13 scvca: cros.i,a= 0 no cIn icn; s'?17' . a .u s- Ira :.aints

}
-
scat is i.a Ijr- Lai ,.%s
0-3
0 0 5
I` _0 z W c rust u ilYra c k ...+
.o .
v...L'41Lrnc
F .17 .fit ; u1zcl.iE,. 0-5 :.`0 5
IS
(aL1L..t?rtial firpzct=O; no c. _± a= I ...a.E.. ..
1'r _i clri Zile plc £:' 7 0 -3 0 _5-'. 0-6 i
16 na iifIIw/n (? err ols O, v, L:I L 1. IL7 . l = E )
1 : F l:it .c:ral 0-6 ' 0-6- 0-6
=:.
7 Iiltlc cr i o L.,1 'at U fit-4; .t; V..r zu.:.,Y. s=7 z. j C;?aLa)
0? 5 0 5

a =0 ccA Lulu us ?..i
c L
b i?ti .
e
7L vc
no s
19 d i CM. b":Xldc? 0, i '?L
. re ; 0_4 0-5 0 5 ..:
20 Ilae'viiYILC=O.caizinn n 7, .c.t? .w=u i Dials
1r 'cc:. rI f..:, f 3
0=4 0' 0 }
21 714 CvldmcC = 0, Gait. z4 ndxuG._ ; r w =Ti i .c:72? '
a-. o= o D
-

=n. .ts
ca' aa; n:.wrcu:.r z,
(nocviL! cc c:
7 Ii c. C o 0 s_ 0 5: 3
23 Igo L dntGlcc 0
o?

s Tb= ch._-r ctcdU':= sto nct cs:.> =d in cowl sam=,r,
USACE AWN DWQ # Site # C on attached map) I
f? STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT woRl t
Piamda the fdbvd ag id r,aaati•• for the stra.. reaelY siaier tt?/
1. Applicants nays- A0 be 1.1 C 2. Evaluator's rmme
3. Date of evaluactian 3 ? 10 h 0 y 4. Tare of evaluation
cr'
5. Name ofstieaffi? SAT - S- ?41 Q (3 ram c? 6. River basin: N e--J -R-"-J
7. arras ^-ac7aL SStromceder s+
9. Length of reach evaluated: M-? 1®. County: Ww'?N
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any): v
Latituda (ex. 34.872312): -? (,a o v '5) rs N Longitude (ex. 77.556611): 9 1 3 q ,
Method location determined (circle): OPS Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Photo/O1S Other GIS Other .
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location)',
14. Proposed channel work (if arty): , V-
`k
15. Recent weather conditions: S 0 0 VII
16. Site -conditions at time of visit _ r^^ ° r S't t s h c ?. ? o ,.? ro.,
17 fy any special waterway classifications known- Tection 10 Tidal Waters Essential Fisheries Habitat
(1-I?
ZrOlt Waters Outstanding Resource Waters _ Nutrient Sensitive Waters ?ater Supply Watershed
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the eval ' point? YES NO If yes, estimate the water srafaoe area
19. Does channel appear an USGS quad map? YES 9 20. Does chaanel appear an USDA Soil Survey? YES NO
21. Estimated watershed land use % Residential % Commercial % Industrial % Agricultural
10 % Forested Q% Cleared / Logged % Other ( )
22. Bankfull width:- t 23. Bank hei& (from bed to top ofbank):
24. Channel slope down ceftr of sham Flat (0 to 2%) Genoa (2 to 4%) Moderate (4 to 10%) (>l )
25. Channel sinuosity. Straight Occssiood bends Fregient meander Very sinuous Braided channel
Iastr edo s fir at4letdan of w+nbriect (located rm P1¢ 2): Begin by deter *bg the moat appropdow eco egam based on
location, terrain, vegetation, streams dAsdfication, etu. Every clmacienstic mast be soared using the same econegKOL Assign points
to each characteristic willan The range shown for the eeoreSkat. Page 3 provides a brief desciption of bow to review the
d =*xistias ideatdrod is the ?- mkaiee- Scares should ndlect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evabodioe. If a
characteristic cannot be evalmted doe to are or weather oooddioma eater 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
commecst section. Where daere we obvious comes in the cbnacter of a i, I under review (e.' the stream flours from a pasture
into a fiarest), the stream may be divided mw smelter reaches than display more eoatinusly, and a separate farm used to evaluate each
reach. The total score aeaiped to a strum ruck most range betvaera O and 100, with a scare of 100 vVresenting a dreem of the
highest quality-
Told Pre ("On reverse): er S s
e ._.rTr: ? i-E C.lbSStS ,at.Ct^'`C? n2? //1)pa fOF? 'j rfi
S?#
Rvahadws s wombum 1
This eiouned cn§wliaa fin is boom" in be and a* as a pile to asoit lbraiwaers araci MIfIGIMMetat ra IA
godkdmg the dda requ td by the Ud" sues Amy Carps of zR&Ccrs to and a a rrel nbuy wousaw at of soreaoc
quaft- Tlae harsh care rewWl,g tltss tae es?pldioa d till fiir>. is subject S USACR apps+aval aural dw Not ioply a
pardedw widgatim rmb or nqukvnewL Farm subject to A - version 06A3. To Comment; please call 9194176-8441 x 26.
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT VE ORKSHEET
I I'rr;.. ec c.::a I l l..r + i -0 L5^ il t, 0-

5
'7 t4
noflwrcrsaturaL'a=0,nirp.;. ilo.. - point):!:
„I;YTdc:cc Df l sit 1. r. _ tt .t =.. - d (1
0 5
0. 5
extensive alicratian =.0, no al IK iticra = rna Oants .
Wparia i c p 0 d 5
(nobitil'cr 0; contiLio , ?. ??` I e=rr t .at
Ispldi ci:;nf izutii : t Dr 0 5 `0 tt "0 4
0; T1O d : TIt L: pints)
(extensive cli charl,w --
_
G .i.: lcr
" 0 ?. : 0¢ 0 l
etc. =.n`.,r.C )tS
aD diScllal c
6
>r? two;ta

'
.
'

€

.
fl 2

I
:.
lLin d GCicasivii Fo t i it ui L;

1u tr .:.=reatllk. ' ' T 4
0-5 .
0 4`:'
0-2
dc? 1 cntizch d - 0' freeL .T+_ n. ._ . n ax pints
Ti'res.rccr€ s+ ^ _ ; ;. 0-6 0_4
no wetlands ='0, i u •c
' C an r1 "u-,Z
0-5
0-4 _
0-3
9 ext DSivechanralim-tion=d naiz, lr,. ;' r=max ,Dints
`
cxtcrosivc d osition- O; lull., cr no ......:u<r:.t=?,ax amts -
1 Sizes ., 4iti crn:ty crch ?: i r zd r °-str:Aa 0-4 0 5
1 fne,?i t=, us -0; lar?-giir;ez . su =r. ax points
Judi TC Y:C GIB' •^ -?l [:. aGr%--.1 0-5 Q .} .-. U 5 '
12 dec 1 Tntasc?d -0; ?Ac l ...l zn: 3= rnnx .oin+fs
. Pr>Ncac:cfm 4rr1: -zLLZ res.
0-5
- 0-5
t! S
13 seven cro., Ion = 0; no erosion st..b?= L•:.n+.;s= Trsax ints
1Z t 4Cy>t d C7 l 0
3. _
0
d 5-
14
nD 11SihlCrDDtS-mscrcoIrlinct=MZX ,Dint;
OIL!
El et b Zgnc,ultzirc; lttit-.fc? cr f : .r; r d rti-:.i ?
15 suhsL-in al rm °ct =O' no cvi c ° ='t Dm...
16 .i^c cf ri rL -P '?'? =l `. ' l c is rzs p ?: p 0 6' ,

-
nurim6sj/s lzs(IT pa CIS 0,1t01 l..,ciL..i=:tn . ,..ux...)
17 I7aait tc: Tll' 0 -- 0 p 0-6,,

.D;
ittlc crno hbitiit 0; ft um ; vanic-d 1;J-1-t; r.=
c ? : ly Ciiacl? ?7-;:c 0=5 O-5
18 66ii
p
-
no %hadin ' ? c C`
,
.
.
.
C% zz-
-

p--4

0-4
1cw= s;.i c? is = max !
19 • dcc • l
0
cinbcducl
,
•
Yrc ^nccDrstres;ai.en ¢ y%l ?p i,'w?,...: 0-4 0 .5 0 5 _-

20

no eviilcnce= 0 cDTra:on .r rnerr:. tvr.zs =n ax mints) J
Its .s of d-.} 0 4<:
21 no evidence = 0; canuuo:l, iiurn4lG?i:. t' ,?-.. ->i-:s outs
I'rc .z:cecfu:? ::-
22
rioevidence= 0; con=,oa; num.. n:_::: i .,v=nx cint>
: . . sin'c> c5 _ ff 0
-770 0 5. 0 5
Z3
` -o.evidence 0 ab.ird sieric n r u')

• "= charactca ti= arc pat in coastal +
2
111 ' ROAD
- COMPACTED FILL
DEPTH VARIES
12- MINIMUM
MASS ROCK RETAINING
HEADWALLS (w/ WINGIIALLS)
ON BDTH SIDES
EXISTING
CREEK
12A') PIPE IMPACT
d X P
AR H ULV
12 GA CMP, ALUMINIZED
ROAD GRADE
BANK FULL ELEVATION
- 42X29 OR 35x24
ARCH CULVERT
12 GA. CMP, ALUMINIZED
PIPE FILLED TD
20% OF DIAMETER
AT THE BASE
OF THE WINGWALL TO PRO I ECT THE
iPPAP IS TO BE PLACED
IN THE CHANNEL,
TYPICAL STREAM CROSSING AHO OEVEL_OPMENT LLC
/ RIPRAP CHECK DAM
I
i
i ,
I
~y
(~0 ,
e5 TRM TOP GF IPON
RNU EIEY = 942 8 ge O~` h A ~ ur. i' IaF
~e ~ 1 Y
P •
- ` G ~ ~ 3!0',1' IflF
~ ~ i
~J 7A 8.
9
i ~o ~ ~ 3640 ~'0 9 POINT aF
9~ p~/, BEGINNING Y /
U21' lIF \ I ~ ~ ~
0 ~ ~ 0 ~
ss
y ~ . p 3161' IRF
j ~ , i ,
9j5,~
fro CREEK RUN PHASE 1
PB 12, PG 305
NANCY COFFEY HASS RB 624, PG 110
~1
1000
3 IRF

~ ~
~~C)
~ ~ i
W ^ RIPRAP 31 • '
0 o DISSIPATOR L F, ITYPI
Lot 4 lozz. ao~ R
'0zs 5 ~ , ~ Lot 1
I
I,
IPE ~r ~ e° v b i TA ]a. ~0
I ,~a,. e 3 F !
• ~ ~ o
C ti ,~~a ~ / 0 ~o / - ,
Oe ~ ~ ~
d / ' y / / PIPE 2 C9 L t I- 1~S 18' CMP
y ~ ~ STA 2+67.65 ~ 5 / I ~
~P i ~
~ o R ~ ~C h
~ CREEK RUN
PHASE 2 I PB 13, PG 83
Lot 19
3~: IRF u PI ~ I -ri 24" CMP
Q STA 4+80.00 >S
I v2; I' IRF j \
~ 0
~ ~S'~
~'°es ~f o0
Z: I PIPE 9 ) 318:1 IRF\PA FENC COP R FILL SB" CMP /!0 ~ ~
STA 2+64.03 90~
0 RIPRAP 12 ,1251 ISSIPAIOR Lot 4 ~ ~ IiYPI 6l9:f' vRAr F EvPC RNER
_ 11351 I 1 0% ulao~ - PIj~€ a Lot 5
1125 11A- ~ ~ ~ 1 2Q' r Lot 15 _ IPE STA 5+Od.'llU I I Ot C
L U 11l`~ 1 'CMP 1~~ I, BROWN STONE RIDGE ~ _ srA 1 _ _ - - ~ p 1 ) . see Lot 7
~i5 ~ I ~ I ~o I
n o o s e ~-J \ ~ HIGH POINT Y I 3 B:I 3 B:~" IRF\PAT FENCE\PCORNER
~ STA 11+36.30 ~ W ~ (11 ELEV 1721. 6' ~ ~
~ ~ ~ I 0~ 1 2 ~ ~ ~ f J
1~l ¢ 3p H
s I w I v~s~ 3'.18:IRF
''90 ~ H
YI ~ Og 2:] ! ~ ~ 2:4 ~w
120a ~ ' /7 FILL 42 395CM ARCH PIPE PIPIPE 6 ~ ~
W (f2p0j~ I ~S~~i ST 13+6.29 ~ 35 ' 7.5:1 h210I (12051 ~ o ~~,0 1h" AR6+I04~47~ ~ foso
I 1 A Rio CUT ~~ll I~~~ ~ ~ In A 1! ~~l ~ !
L. ~ ~ ti ~ ~ ..,,122 ~ ~ ~ ~~`4p vj
Om 9), ~ ~ ~ FILL z -j225 ~
]2251 (110 U90 n RIPRAP ~ ! - 39% A AHO, LLC.
E 10 01 SSIPAIOR ' IB" P ITYPI TRACT 1
STA 9+10.5 pS ~ ~ G ~ O,g ~ (]00J 595, PG 177
7~ pt) .o
396 1~5~ 0 ' o t /1 ~ 0 ti / r11z ~ of PIE, I 60' Tot 1 s _ aroc ~ id / 16• CRP ~ Buffer 1 S
r PIPE 11 ~
1 ~ ; , ~ 18' CMP cq f.., ~ ~ srA 11+4~.4a ~ ~"V eu1 ~ ~
/ ~ v / 516:1' F GE\PCOPNE / 2: 1 ~ 1 \ 31760
V ~ FILL Jfoo
o III ~ C ~ / Vie`` / / SQL, /
3k4:1' I GQ'~ >e ~ yr> ~ Total z~~ ~
, ~ ~y B er
a ,2 X25
1325~r , / B /
,6. - RICK PnINT ~ / 7 5 I 74102.20 / / ELEV - 1272.54' f ~ / -'800
Q~Q~ ~3S
8 ~~e ~ s°a e+1T. ~ EL V = 1262. PIPE 13 / ~ 1150 1150
s, CRP 100' Tota ~ STEPS STA 10+ ENCB°,E Buffer ' ~ /
If' ~ . Width i
1 ~ ' ~ 10 s ~ ~ , 5 1 5
3,a;1 PPRE 1~0j ~ A X24 IPE 14
~ 1~ CMP ~,'R (j3 A PIPE ~V 1j26 STA 21+I1. ~ 11 srA Is s.eo s~ ~ / . o~
z:1 ti•
a STAR 19+4540 FILL ~ ~ ~ FILL ~Op ILL 200
1 2 ? \ ELEV = 1278.80' 1O ~ S (1225) LAUREL NILL
DEVELOPMENT Black B err ~ ~ ~~1z4D1
MAP Na . 2 13 ~
?a> r'zcs7 v, ` PB 3, PG ~3 lea' r Tj
14 ~ ~ ~ ai ` r1 `'has \ uz:i ~ a/ m m
V~ ~ ~8 ~ ~ - m m I N f~
1 5 1273.00' o o 1,=, N p`{ o .m
i
16 =e~s~ r
~s o I ^~~;a ,1.5:1 DSO
r=N '~o cur 17 0 CUT 3y. ~0
~ s l~I.F.
~o I 18 ~
3f4',~" IP T FE \PC~6NEP `'s
SCALE 1"=100' r-=1
~ ~ \ r `'d U 60 u
J r-,
0 1oa zoo ~ ~ nuE PEArc oarvE / 30~ aiw ~ Q
XI7H 16' ASPHA T i L p f_ PAVENEN7 F--
I 1332.00'
I RIPRAP C 3960 C
DISSIPATOR r1 "~~B:I' 6F (TYP) H
Block A v J
\ ~ y
6N \ J rEP EF IRON '~7,\ RDO ELEV = 1390 d C

Q
a0 ~ 9 GREYSTONE ~ '~'a o0
- - _ _ PB 10, PG 231 s
3/4" If a/e'Le.K IN nAe 3/4' IPF IN OAK
STUMP - - - Lot 35 STUMP
4
~ ~
516; I " 40 5/8:1 ' IRF
Lot 36
- Lot Lot 37
i
c J
i