Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutNC0024406_SOC WQ S18-009 amendment application_20190612DUKE ENERGY June 12, 2019 Linda Culpepper, Director NC Division of Water Resources 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Paul Draovitch, P.E. Senior Vice President Environmental, Health & Safety 526 S. Church Street Mail Code: ECUP Charlotte, NC 28202 (704) 382-4303 Subject: SOC amendment application addendum Belews Creek Steam station NCO024406 EMC SOC WQ S 18-009 Dear Ms. Culpepper, Enclosed please find an addendum to the application for amendment of the subject Consent Order. This submittal contains additional detail as to constituents for which interim relief is being sought. If there are any questions about this matter please feel free to contact me or Shannon Langley at (919) 546-2439 or shannon.langley(aduke-energy.com. Sincerel , -P P 1 Dra witch, P.E. SVP - Environmental, Health & Safety Enclosure cc: Jim Wells - via email Richard Baker — via email Matt Hanchey — via email Joyce Dishmon/Filenet — via email Brenda Johnson — via email Reginald Anderson — Station Manager www.duke-energy.com Attachment Addendum to Application for amendment to Special Order by Consent Belews Creek Steam station Permit Number: NCO024406 Consent Order #: EMC SOC WQ S18-009 June 2019 SOC application Section II SOC Compliance History The facility has complied with all interim dates under the SOC. Significant progress is being made towards relocation of the outfall from the Lined Retention basin (LRB) away from the newly classified "unnamed tributary" (UT) to the main stem of the Dan River. Progress is being made in decanting the ash basin. As of May 26, 2018, the ash basin has been decanted to an elevation 742.8' from a starting elevation of 748.0'. Upon startup of the (LRB), the facility experienced two exceedences of the interim discharge limit for selenium from outfall 003A. The facility quickly identified the source of these exceedences and took immediate steps at significant costs to address the conditions that led to those initial exceedences associated with system startup. The facility has measured values higher than the current Interim Action levels (IAL) for total hardness, chlorides and total dissolved solids (TDS) in the UT. We believe this to largely be a result of the way the LRB operates as a batch discharge process with the source of these constituents being the FGD scrubber. Since its startup, the LRB has discharged for approximately 5 hours each day. The facility has complied with the interim discharge limits from outfall 003 however, small margin exists for selenium, sulfates and cadmium. Data received just prior to the public notice of the Order indicated a slight increase in selenium concentrations. Given the timing for SOC issuance, this data could not be included in initial interim limit development. SOC application Section IV Why an SOC amendment is needed An amendment to the SOC is needed to modify the UT Interim Action Level (IAL) for total hardness, TDS, chlorides and sulfates. Duke also requests re-evaluation of the interim limits for selenium at outfall 003 and 003A as well as cadmium and sulfates at outfall 003 now that more data is available as to the operation of these systems in their current state. The SOC was issued with IAL's identical from a previous SOC for basin seepage and without taking LRB hardness, chlorides, TDS or sulfates data into account as it was anew system that had yet to come online. Additionally, flows from the LRB — the system built to replace the ash basin — will have much lower flow rate than the historic release from the ash basin but higher concentration of total water hardness, TDS, chlorides and sulfates given that bottom ash sluice water has been removed. The FGD wastewater system now comprises a higher percentage of the total flow and consists of blowdown from a limestone slurry air emissions system required for air quality permit compliance. There is no increase in mass or new wastestream sources associated with recent system modifications but the concentration is higher at the outfall under the current configuration since some flows have been removed and the release process has been modified as permitted. It appears the cadmium permit limit for outfall 003 was developed without considering the water hardness. Duke requests that this be re-evaluated in the SOC and that a hardness dependent value be derived and used for hardness dependent metals where these constituents are limited.