HomeMy WebLinkAbout20191284 Ver 1_Sagecroft PCN 092419 _Compiled_20190924Preliminary ORM Data Entry Fields for New Actions
SAW – 201 BEGIN DATE [Received Date]:
Prepare file folder Assign Action ID Number in ORM
1.Project Name [PCN Fm A2a]:
2.Work Type: Private Institutional Government Commercial
3.Project Description / Purpose [PCN Form B3d and B3e]:
4.Property Owner / Applicant [PCN Form A3 or A4]:
5.Agent / Consultant [PCN Form A5 – or ORM Consultant ID Number]:
6.Related Action ID Number(s) [PCN Form B5b]:
7.Project Location - Coordinates [PCN Form B1b]:
8.Project Location - Tax Parcel ID [PCN Form B1a]:
9.Project Location – County [PCN Form A2b]:
10.Project Location – Nearest Municipality or Town [PCN Form A2c]:
11.Project Information – Nearest Waterbody [PCN Form B2a]:
Authorization: Section 10 Section 404 Section 10 & 404
Regulatory Action Type:
Standard Permit
Nationwide Permit #
Regional General Permit #
Jurisdictional Determination Request
Pre-Application Request
Unauthorized
Compliance
Revised 20150602
9 132
Sagecroft
✔
PCN for a Residential Development
Century Communities
Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC / WEPG
35.0531 N /, -80.6583W, Charlotte, NC
numerous parcels - please see tax parcel map attached
Union
Indian Trail
Price Mill Creek
03050103 - Catawba
✔
✔29
1
2
Permit Application Permit Application
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form – Version 1.4 January 2009
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no. _____________
DWQ project no. _______________
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps: Section 404 Permit Section 10 Permit
1b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: or General Permit (GP) number:
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? Yes No
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
401 Water Quality Certification – Regular Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
401 Water Quality Certification – Express Riparian Buffer Authorization
1e. Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ
401 Certification:
Yes No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
Yes No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank
or in-lieu fee program.
Yes No
1g. Is the project located in any of NC’s twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1h
below. Yes No
1h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? Yes No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project:
2b. County:
2c. Nearest municipality / town:
2d. Subdivision name:
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no:
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
3b. Deed Book and Page No.
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
3d. Street address:
3e. City, state, zip:
3f. Telephone no.:
3g. Fax no.:
3h. Email address:
2019-00132
Sagecroft
Union
Indian Trail
Please refer to Tax Parcel Map
1229
Page 2 of 10
4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is: Agent Other, specify:
4b. Name:
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
4d. Street address:
4e. City, state, zip:
4f. Telephone no.:
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name:
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
5c. Street address:
5d. City, state, zip:
5e. Telephone no.:
5f. Fax no.:
5g. Email address:
Gordon Johnston
Century Communities
7401 Carmel Executive Park Drive, Suite 310
Charlotte, NC 28226
704-709-2890
Gordon.Johnston@centurycommunities.com
Daniel Kuefler
Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC - Wetlands & Environmental Planning Group
10612-D Providence Road, PMB 550
Charlotte, NC 28227
336-554-2728
daniel.kuefler@wetlands-epg.com
Developer
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form – Version 1.4 January 2009
B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
1b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): Latitude: Longitude:
1c. Property size: acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water to proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
2c. River basin:
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Yes No Unknown
Comments:
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made? Preliminary Final
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known):
Agency/Consultant Company:
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past? Yes No Unknown
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to “help file” instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? Yes No
6b. If yes, explain.
multiple parcels - please see attached tax parcel map
-80.6583
19.2
Price Mill Creek
WS-IV
03050103 - Catawba
The site is primarily an actively cultivated agricultural field, most recently cropped with soybeans, and an overhead power line right of way following a
drainage corridor It has fencerows on the northern and western perimeters, and a dirt and gravel access road bisecting it. General land use in the
vicinity is undeveloped land and residential subdivision.
0
The project consists of the installation of a sewerline to serve a proposed residential development.
Excavation and grading of the site will use standard equipment - excavator, dump trucks, track hoe, etc.
WEPG
A Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination request was approved (SAW-2019-00132) by Bryan Roden(USACE) on 6/10/19. Please refer to the
Jurisdictional Determination section for updated PJD materials and the Approvals section for information on the PJD approval.
35.0531
96
PJD approved 6/10/19 (SAW-2019-00132)
Nic Nelson
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form – Version 1.4 January 2009
C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
Wetlands Streams – tributaries Buffers Open Waters Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
Wetland impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
2b.
Type of impact
2c.
Type of wetland
2d.
Forested
2e.
Type of jurisdiction
Corps (404,10) or
DWQ (401, other)
2f.
Area of
impact
(acres)
W1
W2
W3
W4
W5
W6
2g.Total Wetland Impacts:
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
Stream impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
3b.
Type of impact
3c.
Stream name
3d.
Perennial (PER) or
intermittent (INT)?
3e.
Type of
jurisdiction
3f.
Average
stream
width
(feet)
3g.
Impact
length
(linear
feet)
S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
S6
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
3i. Comments:
Choose one
Choose one Yes/No -
Yes/No -
Yes/No -
Yes/No -
Yes/No -
Yes/No -
Excavation Stream B INT Corps 4 31
Stream E 4 65
96
All proposed impacts are for the open-cut installation of a sanitary sewer line and will be temporary in nature.
-
-
-
-
-
-
Choose one
Choose one
Choose one
Choose one
Choose one
Choose one
Choose one
Choose one
Choose one
Choose one
T
T
-
-
-
-
Excavation
Choose one
Choose one
Choose one
Choose one
INT
-
-
-
-
Corps
-
-
-
-
Page 5 of 10
4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable
4c.
Type of impact
4d.
Waterbody
type
4e.
Area of impact (acres)
O1
O2
O3
O4
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d.
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e.
Upland
(acres)
5a.
Pond ID number
5b.
Proposed use or
purpose of pond
Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated
P1
P2
5f.Total:
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required? Yes No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.Project is in which protected basin? Neuse Tar-Pamlico Catawba Randleman Other:
6b.
Buffer Impact
number –
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Stream name
6e.
Buffer
mitigation
required?
6f.
Zone 1
impact
(square
feet)
6g.
Zone 2
impact
(square
feet)
B1
B2
B3
B4
B5
B6
6h.Total Buffer Impacts:
6i. Comments:
Choose one Choose
Choose one
Yes/No
-
-
-
-
Choose one
Choose one
Choose one
Choose
Choose
Choose
Choose one
-
-
-
-
-
-
Yes/No
Yes/No
Yes/No
Yes/No
Yes/No
)
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form – Version 1.4 January 2009
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
Yes No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): DWQ Corps
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
Mitigation bank
Payment to in-lieu fee program
Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type:
Type:
Type:
Quantity:
Quantity:
Quantity:
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested: linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Due to the location of the on site streams and wetlands, opportunities to completely avoid these areas were limited. Impacts to site surface waters
associated with the proposed development were limited through site selection location, design, location/orientation of the proposed lots and access
routes and the design/location of stormwater facilities.
Construction techniques will implement approved erosion control methods to avoid/minimize impacts to onsite/adjacent offsite receiving conveyances.
All impacts proposed here are temporary in nature for the open-cut installation of a sewerline to serve the residential development.
Choose one
Choose one
Choose one
Choose one
Page 7 of 10
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) – required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation? Yes No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1 3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2 1.5
6f.Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form – Version 1.4 January 2009
E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
Yes No
1b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
Yes No
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? %
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? Yes No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government’s jurisdiction is this project?
3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs
apply (check all that apply):
Phase II
NSW
USMP
Water Supply Watershed
Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
Yes No
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
4a. Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply
(check all that apply):
Coastal counties
HQW
ORW
Session Law 2006-246
Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
Yes No
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? Yes No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? Yes No
47
Stormwater on the site will be handled by facilities shown on the attached plans. The stormwater plan has been submitted to the town of Indian Trail
for review and has been designed to meet their criteria.
Indian Trail
Indian Trail
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form – Version 1.4 January 2009
F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
use of public (federal/state) land? Yes No
1b. If you answered “yes” to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Yes No
1c. If you answered “yes” to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.)
Comments:
Yes No
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
Yes No
2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes No
2c. If you answered “yes” to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes No
3b. If you answered “yes” to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered “no,” provide a short narrative description.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Wastewater generated on the site will be transported to the nearest treatment facility via sewer lines.
Page 10 of 10
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
habitat? Yes No
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
impacts? Yes No
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? Yes No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
Yes No
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? Yes No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
_______________________________
Applicant/Agent's Signature
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization
letter from the applicant is provided.)
Date
A threatened/Endangered species assessment was conducted in which no species were identified. Habitat does exist for the Northern Long Eared Bat
but the project is exempt as noted in the included T&E report.
No essential fish habitat in this region.
SHPO's website: http://gis.ncdcr.gov/hpoweb/
No fill or changes in base flood elevation are proposed in the 100-year floodplain.
maps.co.union.nc.us; www.fema.gov
-
Daniel Kuefler 09-24-2019
Daniel
Kuefler
Digitally signed by Daniel Kuefler
DN: cn=Daniel Kuefler, o=WEPG,
ou,
email=daniel.kuefler@wetlands-
epg.com, c=US
Date: 2019.09.23 23:30:53 -04'00'
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group
Agent Authorization Letter
Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.
The purpose of this form is to authorize our firm to act on your behalf in matters related to aquatic
resource (i.e. stream/wetlands) identification/mapping and regulatory permitting. The
undersigned, who are either registered property owners or legally authorized to conduct due
diligence activities on the property as identified below, do hereby authorize associates of
Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC, Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group (WEPG) to act on my
behalf and take all actions necessary for the processing, issuance, and acceptance of applicable
permit(s) and/or certification(s).
Project/Site Name: Sagecroft
Property Address: Old Monroe Road, Indian Trail NC, 28079
Parcel Identification Number (PIN): 07090015D, 07090015rt, 07090021T, 07090017
Select one: I am an interested buyer/seller
Name: Gordon Johnston
Company: Century Communities Southeast, LLC
Mailing Address: 7400 Carmel Executive Park Drive, Suite 205, Charlotte, NC 28226
Telephone Number: 704-709-2890
Electronic Mail Address: Bordon.johnston@centurycommunities.com
Property Owner 1
Buyer * I
* The Interested Buyer/01her acknowledges that an agreement and/or format contract to purchase and/or conduct
due diligence activities exists between the current property owner and the signatory of this authorization in cases
where the property is not owned by the signatory.
Charlotte Office:
10612-D Providence Rd.
PMB 550
Charlotte, NC 28277
(704)904-2277
fen.rindnerflwetiands-epg.com
www.wetlands-epg.com
Asheville Office:
1070 Tunnel Rd., Bldg. I
Suite 10, PMB 283
Asheville, NC 28805
Maps/Plans Maps/Plans
FIGURE NO.
SAGE CROFT
Union Co., NC
͑
͑
VICINITY MAP
-WATERS OF THE U.S.
EXISTING CONDITIONS STUDY
SUBJECT TO USACE/NCDEQ VERIFICATION
͑
͑
DATE:
08/28/19
Drawn By:
LSR BLK
Reviewed By:
PROJECT BOUNDARY
STUDY LIMITS
SITE
1
FIGURE NO.
DATE:
Drawn By:
LSRBLK
Reviewed SAGE CROFT
Union Co., NC
͑
͑AERIAL MAP
-WATERS OF THE U.S.-
EXISTING CONDITIONS STUDY
SUBJECT TO USACE/NCDEQ VERIFICATION
͑
08/28/19
PROJECT BOUNDARY
STUDY LIMITS
2
FIGURE NO.
SAGE CROFT
Union Co., NC
͑
͑
USGS MAP
-WATERS OF THE U.S.-
EXISTING CONDITIONS STUDY
SUBJECT TO USACE/NCDEQ VERIFICATION
͑
͑
DATE:
08/28/19
Drawn By:
LSR BLK
Reviewed By:
LOCATION
Lat: 35.0531 ºN
Long: -80.6583 ºW
HUC: 03050103
LOWER CATAWBA
SCALE
1:24,000
ACRES
+/-
USGS QUAD
Matthews, NC
PRICE MILL
CREEK
PROJECT BOUNDARY
STUDY LIMITS
3
FIGURE NO.
SAGE CROFT
Union Co., NC
͑
͑
NRCS PUBLISHED SOILS MAP
-WATERS OF THE U.S.-
EXISTING CONDITIONS STUDY
SUBJECT TO NCDEQ VERIFICATION
͑
͑
DATE:
08/28/19
Drawn By:
LSR BLK
Reviewed By:
PROJECT BOUNDARY
STUDY LIMITS
4
FIGURE NO.
5
Sagecroft
Union Co., NC
͑
͑
TAX PARCEL MAP – WATERS OF THE U.S.
EXISTING CONDITIONS STUDY
SUBJECT TO USACE VERIFICATION
͑
͑
DATE:
9/13/19
Drawn By:
LSR DCK
Reviewed By:
PROJECT BOUNDARY
STUDY AREA
Parcel: 07090021T
Brandon Oaks Community
Association, Inc.
PO Box 1196
Matthews. NC 28106
Parcel: 07090017
Christina Besseas
149 Drexel Place
Charlotte NC 28209
Parcel: 07090015D
Queen City Land LLC
11535 Carmel Commons Blvd
Charlotte NC 28226
Parcel: 07090015A
Town of Indian Trail
PO BOX 2430
Indian Trail, NC 28079
Parcel: 07090002C
KVP Holdings LLC
1108 Crooked River Dr
Waxhaw, NC 28173
Figure No. 6
Figure No. 7
R/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/W0 1"=20' 40' 80'40'FEMA FLOODPLAINBOUNDARY (FIRM PANEL#3710540700J) (TYP.)PROP. SSMH-6 OSPROP. SSMH-5 OSOFFSITE WETLAND D: 0.4 ACOFFSITE PERENNIAL STREAM ADUKE POWER COMPANY150' R/WMAP BOOK 6 PAGE 53PLAT CABINET L FILE 713PROP. 20' SANITARYSEWER EASEMENTPROP. 30' TEMPORARYCONSTRUCTION EASEMENT8/23/2019 10:42 AM EKELLEN N:\_2018\1018284\CAD\EXHIBITS\WETLAND EXHIBITS\18284-WETLAND EXHIBITS.DWG8/23/2019 10:42 AM EKELLEN N:\_2018\1018284\CAD\EXHIBITS\WETLAND EXHIBITS\18284-WETLAND EXHIBITS.DWGSAGECROFT ▪ INDIAN TRAIL, NC ▪ WETLAND D EXHIBITPN1018284 | 08.12.2019 NO IMPACT TO OFFSITEWETLAND DCONTRACTOR TO STAYWITHIN LIMITS OF EASEMENTLEGENDAREA OF NO IMPACTAREA OF IMPACTPROJECT BOUNDARYFigure No. 8
R/WR/WR/WFEMA FLOODPLAINBOUNDARY (FIRM PANEL#3710540700J) (TYP.)PROP. SSMH-4 OSPROP. SSMH-5 OSOFFSITE WETLAND DOFFSITE PERENNIALSTREAM APROP. 20' SANITARYSEWER EASEMENTPROP. 30' TEMPORARYCONSTRUCTION EASEMENTDUKE POWER COMPANY150' R/WMAP BOOK 6 PAGE 53PLAT CABINET L FILE 713PROP. SANITARYSEWER/CHANNELCROSSINGINTERMITTENT STREAM E:65 LF OF IMPACTPROP. 20' SANITARYSEWER EASEMENTPROP. 30' TEMPORARYCONSTRUCTION EASEMENT8/23/2019 10:42 AM EKELLEN N:\_2018\1018284\CAD\EXHIBITS\WETLAND EXHIBITS\18284-WETLAND EXHIBITS.DWG8/23/2019 10:42 AM EKELLEN N:\_2018\1018284\CAD\EXHIBITS\WETLAND EXHIBITS\18284-WETLAND EXHIBITS.DWGSAGECROFT ▪ INDIAN TRAIL, NC ▪ STREAM E EXHIBITPN1018284 | 08.12.2019 0 1"=20' 40' 80'40'77°'PROP. 5 LFTEMPORARYIMPACTPROP. 40 LFPERMANENTIMPACTPROP. 20 LFTEMPORARYIMPACTNO IMPACT TO OFFSITEWETLAND DCONTRACTOR TO STAYWITHIN LIMITS OF EASEMENTLEGENDAREA OF NO IMPACTAREA OF IMPACTPROJECT BOUNDARYTEMPORARYFigure No. 9
SSSS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
EX. SSMHPROP.SMH-1 OSOFFSITE WETLAND C/CCOFFSITE PERENNIALSTREAM APROP. 20' SANITARYSEWER EASEMENTPROP. 30' TEMPORARYCONSTRUCTION EASEMENTPROP. SANITARYSEWER/CHANNELCROSSING98°'INTERMITTENT STREAM B:31 LF OF IMPACTPROP. 20' SANITARYSEWER EASEMENTPROP. 30' TEMPORARYCONSTRUCTION EASEMENT8/23/2019 10:42 AM EKELLEN N:\_2018\1018284\CAD\EXHIBITS\WETLAND EXHIBITS\18284-WETLAND EXHIBITS.DWG8/23/2019 10:42 AM EKELLEN N:\_2018\1018284\CAD\EXHIBITS\WETLAND EXHIBITS\18284-WETLAND EXHIBITS.DWGSAGECROFT ▪ INDIAN TRAIL, NC ▪ WETLAND C/CC AND STREAM B EXHIBITPN1018284 | 08.12.2019 0 1"=20' 40' 80'40'PROP. 5 LFTEMPORARYIMPACTPROP. 21 LFPERMANENTIMPACTPROP. 5 LFTEMPORARYIMPACTNO IMPACT TO OFFSITEWETLAND C/CCCONTRACTOR TO STAYWITHIN LIMITS OF EASEMENTLEGENDAREA OF NO IMPACTAREA OF IMPACTNO IMPACTS TO OFFSITE PERENNIALSTREAM ACONTRACTOR TO STAY WITHIN LIMITSOF EASEMENTPROJECT BOUNDARYTEMPORARYFigure No. 10
8/23/2019 10:42 AM EKELLEN N:\_2018\1018284\CAD\EXHIBITS\WETLAND EXHIBITS\18284-WETLAND EXHIBITS.DWG8/23/2019 10:42 AM EKELLEN N:\_2018\1018284\CAD\EXHIBITS\WETLAND EXHIBITS\18284-WETLAND EXHIBITS.DWGSAGECROFT ▪ INDIAN TRAIL, NC ▪ STREAM B CROSS SECTION EXHIBITPN1018284 | 08.12.2019 0 1"=20' 40' 80'40'EX. GRADE6156252+502+001+506306206156256306203+001+00INTERMITTENT STREAM BSTA: 1+91.50INTERMITTENT STREAM BSTA: 2+01.45Figure No. 11
8/23/2019 10:42 AM EKELLEN N:\_2018\1018284\CAD\EXHIBITS\WETLAND EXHIBITS\18284-WETLAND EXHIBITS.DWG8/23/2019 10:42 AM EKELLEN N:\_2018\1018284\CAD\EXHIBITS\WETLAND EXHIBITS\18284-WETLAND EXHIBITS.DWGSAGECROFT ▪ INDIAN TRAIL, NC ▪ STREAM E CROSS SECTION EXHIBITPN1018284 | 08.12.2019 0 1"=20' 40' 80'40'EX. GRADE6156259+509+008+5063062061562563062010+008+00INTERMITTENT STREAM BSTA: 9+34.95INTERMITTENT STREAM BSTA: 9+39.1510+50Figure No. 12
Figure No. 13
Figure No. 14
Figure No. 15
FIGURE NO.
SAGECROFT
Union Co., NC
͑
͑
STREAM BANK STABILIZATION
Typical Detail – N.T.S.
SUBJECT TO USACE/NCDEQ VERIFICATION
͑
͑
DATE:
8/26/2019
Drawn By:
LSR HAC
Reviewed By:
16
FIGURE NO.
SAGECROFT
Union Co., NC
͑
͑
STREAM BANK STABILIZATION
Typical Detail – N.T.S.
SUBJECT TO USACE/NCDEQ VERIFICATION
͑
͑
DATE:
8/26/2019
Drawn By:
LSR HAC
Reviewed By:
17
FIGURE NO.
SAGECROFT
Union Co., NC
͑
͑
STREAM BANK STABILIZATION
Typical Detail – N.T.S.
SUBJECT TO USACE/NCDEQ VERIFICATION
͑
͑
DATE:
8/26/2019
Drawn By:
LSR HAC
Reviewed By:
18
FIGURE NO.
SAGECROFT
Union Co., NC
͑
͑
STREAM BANK STABILIZATION
Typical Detail – N.T.S.
SUBJECT TO USACE/NCDEQ VERIFICATION
͑
͑
DATE:
8/26/2019
Drawn By:
LSR HAC
Reviewed By:
19
Jurisdictional Determination Jurisdictional
Determination Information
FIGURE NO.
DATE:
Drawn By:
LSR DCK
Reviewed SAGE CROFT
Union Co., NC
͑
͑DELINEATION MAP
-WATERS OF THE U.S.-
EXISTING CONDITIONS STUDY
SUBJECT TO USACE/NCDEQ VERIFICATION
͑
09/14/19
CURRENT PROJECT
BOUNDARY
(Solid Yellow Line)
Intermittent Stream E
-65 lf
Intermittent Stream B
-31 lf
LIMITS OF PJD STUDY
AREA
(Dashed White Line)
*** USACE Verification 2/26/19 ***
1-2
*** NCDEQ Verification 12/22/16 ***
USACE
UPLAND
FORM DP1
NCDEQ
STREAM
FORM B
3
4
6
5
20
Sage Croft
Union Co., NC – 12/16/16, 1/23/17
- PHOTO 1
- PHOTO 2
Sage Croft
Union Co., NC – 11/8/18
- PHOTO 3
Sage Croft
Union Co., NC – 11/8/18
Threatened & Endangered Species Report Threatened & Endangered Species
Report
Threatened / Endangered / Protected Species
Evaluation
For:Essex Homes – Sage Croft
Union County, North Carolina
By: Lisa R. Gaffney
December 27, 2016
Updated November 12, 2018
Essex Homes – Sage Croft - Threatened / Endangered / Protected Species Evaluation
222
GENERAL LANDSCAPE DESCRIPTION:
The Sage Croft project is 23+/- acres located just west of Old Monroe Road, and
just north of Wesley Chapel Road in Union County, North Carolina. It can be
found on the Matthews USGS Topographic Quadrangle Map; latitude is 35.0531
N, longitude is 80.6583 W. The site is primarily an actively cultivated agricultural
field, most recently cropped with soybeans, and an overhead power line right of
way following a drainage corridor It has fencerows on the northern and western
perimeters, and a dirt and gravel access road bisecting it. The topography is
essentially flat with the elevation ranging from 640 to 650 ft. (Figure 1).
Figure 1:
Essex Homes – Sage Croft - Threatened / Endangered / Protected Species Evaluation
3333
METHODOLOGY:
The US Fish and Wildlife Service website
http://www.fws.gov/raleigh/species/cntylist/union.html was referenced to
determine the occurrence of Threatened, Endangered and Protected species for
Union County North Carolina, the results of which are listed below (Table 1).
Maps and aerial photographs were assembled and the site was investigated
December 19, 2016 and November 12, 2018.
Table 1: Threatened / Endangered / Protected Species listed for
Union County
County: Union, NC
*Source: US Fish & Wildlife Service
**Data search on December 19, 2016
***Updated Nov 12, 2018
Group Name Status Lead Office
Clams Carolina heelsplitter
(Lasmigona
decorata)
Endangered Asheville
Ecological
Services Field
Office
Flowering
Plants
Schweinitz's
sunflower
(Helianthus
schweinitzii)
Endangered Asheville
Ecological
Services Field
Office
Flowering
Plants
Michaux's sumac
(Rhus michauxii)
Endangered Raleigh
Ecological
Services Field
Office
Birds Bald Eagle
(Haliaeetus
leucocephalus)
Protected under the
Bald and Golden
Eagle Protection Act
Great Lakes-
Big Rivers
Region (Region
3)
Essex Homes – Sage Croft - Threatened / Endangered / Protected Species Evaluation
444
Two plant species with federal protection are listed as potentially occurring in
Union County:
Schweinitz’s Sunflower (Helianthus schweinitzii), listed as Federally
Endangered, is typically found in open habitats which historically have
been maintained by wildfires and grazing bison and elk herds. Now most
occurrences are limited to roadsides, woodland and field edges, and utility
rights-of-way (ROW).
Michaux’s Sumac (Rhus michauxii), listed as Federally Endangered,
requires habitat of sandy forests and woodland edges. This species
requires periodic fire as a part of its ecology.
Two animal species with federal protection are listed as potentially occurring in
Union County:
Bald Eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus), protected by the Bald and
Golden Eagle Protection Act, typically inhabits forested areas near large
bodies of open water such as lakes, marshes, seacoasts and rivers,
where there are suitable fish populations and tall trees for nesting and
roosting.
Carolina Heelsplitter (Lasmigona decorata), listed as Federally
Endangered, is restricted to cool, clean, well-oxygenated water. Stable,
silt- free stream beds are required for this species. Typically stable areas
occur where the stream banks are well-vegetated with trees and shrubs.
RESULTS:
The site is primarily an actively cultivated agricultural field, most recently cropped
with soybeans, and an overhead power line right of way following a drainage
corridor. It has fencerows on the northern and western perimeters, and a dirt and
gravel access road bisecting it. At the time of the site investigation the soybeans
had been harvested and the field was barren except for sparsely scattered,
typical cool season weeds including Chickweed (Stellaria sp.), and Henbit
(Lamium sp.).
The fencerows are dominated by Red Cedar (Juniperus virginiana), Winged Elm
(Ulmus alata), Chinese Privet (Ligustrum sinense), Virginia Pine (P. virginiana ),
and Short-leaf Pine (Pinus echnata).
The gravel roadside and ditch, and transitional fringe along the edges of the field
and fencerows are dominated by Fescue turf grass (Festuca sp.), and common
weedy and transitional species including Johnson grass (Sorghum halepense),
Essex Homes – Sage Croft - Threatened / Endangered / Protected Species Evaluation
5555
Sericea Lespedeza (Lespedeza cuneata), Sourgrass (Rumex acetosella),
Ragwort (Packera sp.), Ragweed (Ambrosia sp.), Indian Hemp (Apocynum
cannabinum), Goldenrod (Solidago sp.), Beggars Ticks (Desmodium sp.), and
Dogfennel (Eupatorium capillifolium).
The power line/ drainage corridor is heavily overgrown with scrub/shrub thickets
dominated by Blackberry (Rubus spp.) and Chinese Privet.
Threatened & Endangered/Protected Species Results
All potential habitats for Schweinitz’s Sunflower and Michaux’s Sumac
along the roadside corridor, fields and fence edges were closely examined
and neither of these species was present.
There is no bald eagle habitat on site, and no eagles or eagle’s nests were
observed.
There is no suitable habitat on site for Carolina Heelsplitter. No mussels
were observed during the survey nor would any be expected on-site.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
I recommend further consultation with the project planners and engineers
regarding coordination with USFWS and other federal and state agencies as
needed.
Respectfully submitted,
_________________
Lisa R. Gaffney
Biologist
December 27, 2016
Updated November 12, 2018
Essex Homes – Sage Croft - Threatened / Endangered / Protected Species Evaluation
6666
Curriculum Vitae for:
Lisa R. Gaffney
Biologist / Botanist
B.S. Biology, University of North Carolina at Charlotte
Ms. Gaffney is a classically trained botanist and natural resource biologist, and
has conducted field work and investigative studies covering thousands of
cumulative acres in both North and South Carolina since 1996, including:
Cabarrus County NC Natural Heritage Inventory 1997-1998. Organized,
directed, and worked in field survey of natural areas in Cabarrus County
for the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program.
Lincoln County NC Natural Heritage Inventory 2000-2001. Organized,
directed, and worked in field survey of natural areas in Lincoln County for
the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program.
Threatened and Endangered Species Surveys and Natural Communities
Evaluation for over 45,000 acres in North and South Carolina, 1996 -
present.
Located and identified at least six previously unreported populations of
Federally Endangered Schweinitz's Sunflower (Helianthus schweinitzii).
Located and identified four previously unreported populations of
Threatened Dwarf Heartleaf (Hexastylis naniflora).
Located a previously unknown population of Federally Endangered
Schweinitz's Sunflower at Redlair Farm in Gaston County, NC. This
discovery led (in part) to the purchase of the site by the State of North
Carolina Plant Conservation Program, now called Redlair Preserve. This
population has become a Recovery Site for the species.
Participated in numerous Piedmont Prairie restoration projects in
Mecklenburg, Union, Cabarrus and Gaston Counties, North Carolina.
Approvals Approvals /
Authorizations
.PreliminaryDetermination
C.
.
RODEN
REYNOLDS.BRYAN.KENNETH.1263385574
Digitally signed by RODEN
REYNOLDS.BRYAN.KENNETH.1263385574
Date: 2019.06.10 10:08:42 -04'00'
SAW -2019-00132
NOTIFICATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL OPTIONS AND PROCESS AND
REQUEST FOR APPEAL
Applicant: Century Communities Southeast, LLC,
File Number: SAW -2019-00132
Date: 02/28/2019
Gordon Johnston
Attached is: See Section below
❑ INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT Standard Permit or Letter ofpermission) A
❑ PROFFERED PERMIT Standard Permit or Letter ofpermission) B
❑ PERMIT DENIAL C
❑ APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION D
® PRELIMINARY JUT r,DICTIONAL DL ITNATION E
SECTION I - The following identifies your rights and options regarding an administrative appeal of the above decision.
Additional information may be found at or http://www.usace.army.mil/Missions/C1viIWorks/RegulatoLyPro2ramandPermits.aspx
or the Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331.
A: INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or object to the permit.
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all
rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the
permit.
• OBJECT: If you object to the permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you may request
that the permit be modified accordingly. You must complete Section II of this form and return the form to the district
engineer. Your objections must be received by the district engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice, or you will
forfeit your right to appeal the permit in the future. Upon receipt of your letter, the district engineer will evaluate your
objections and may: (a) modify the permit to address all of your concerns, (b) modify the permit to address some of your
objections, or (c) not modify the permit having determined that the permit should be issued as previously written. After
evaluating your objections, the district engineer will send you a proffered permit for your reconsideration, as indicated in
Section B below.
B: PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or appeal the permit
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all
rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the
permit.
• APPEAL: If you choose to decline the proffered permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein,
you may appeal the declined permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of
this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days
of the date of this notice.
C: PERMIT DENIAL: You may appeal the denial of a permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by
completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division
engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.
D: APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You may accept or appeal the approved JD or provide new
information.
• ACCEPT: You do not need to notify the Corps to accept an approved JD. Failure to notify the Corps within 60 days of the
date of this notice, means that you accept the approved JD in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the approved JD.
• APPEAL: If you disagree with the approved JD, you may appeal the approved JD under the Corps of Engineers
Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the district engineer. This form
must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.
For appeals on Initial Proffered Permits send this form to:
For Permit denials, Proffered Permits and Approved Jurisdictional Determinations send this form to:
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD: 02/28/2019
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD: Century Communities Southeast, LLC, Gordon
Johnston, 7400 Carmel Executive Park Drive, Suite 205,Charlotte, NC 28226
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: Wilmington District, Sagecroft, SAW -2019-00132
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The review area is located on the
west/southwest side of Old Monroe Road; approximately 1.7 miles southeast of the intersection of Old Monroe Road
and Indian Trail Road. PINs: 07090015D, 07090017, 07090015A, and 07090021T. Reference review area description in
Jurisdictional Determination request package entitled "Figure 1, Vicinity Map" and Printed Date of 10/04/2018.
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES AND/OR
AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: NC County: Union City: Indian Trail
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): Latitude: 35.0531 Longitude: -80.6583
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody: Price Mill Creek
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
® Field Determination. Date(s): 02/26/2019
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES INREVIEW AREA WHICH "MAY BE" SUBJECT TO REGULATORY
JURISDICTION.
1) The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review
area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option to request and obtain an
approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an informed decision after having discussed the
various types of JDs and their characteristics and circumstances when they may be appropriate.
Estimated amount of
Geographic authority to
Type of aquatic
aquatic resources in
which the aquatic resource
Latitude (decimal
Longitude (decimal
resources (i.e.,
Site Number
review area (acreage
"may be" subject (i.e.,
degrees)
degrees)
wetland vs. non-
and linear feet, if
Section 404 or Section
wetland waters)
applicable
10/404)
Stream A
35.0484
-80.6604
1,550 linear feet
Non -wetland
404
Stream B
35.0483
-80.6605
50 linear feet
Non -wetland
404
Stream E
35.0497
-80.6589
75 linear feet
Non -wetland
404
Wetland C
35.0482
-80.6602
0.05 acre
Wetland
404
Wetland D
35.0498
-80.6586
0.4 acre
Wetland
404
Wetland
35.0489
-80.6594
0.1 acre
Wetland
404
NF
1) The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review
area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option to request and obtain an
approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an informed decision after having discussed the
various types of JDs and their characteristics and circumstances when they may be appropriate.
"may be" "may be"
RODEN
REYNOLDS.BRYAN.KE
NNETH.1263385574
Digitally signed by RODEN
REYNOLDS.BRYAN.KENNETH.1263
385574
Date: 2019.06.10 10:08:13 -04'00'
SAGE CROFT
Union Co., NC
͑
͑DELINEATION MAP
-WATERS OF THE U.S.-
EXISTING CONDITIONS STUDY
SUBJECT TO USACE/NCDEQ VERIFICATION
͑
11/8/18
Updated 1/18/19
WETLAND D
- 0.4 ac
WETLAND NF
- 0.1 ac
PROJECT BOUNDARY
STUDY LIMITS
WETLAND C/CC
-0. 05 ac
INTERMITTENT
STREAM B
-50 lf PERENNIAL STREAM A
- 1,550 lf
1-2
3
4
5
6
NCDEQ
STREAM
FORM A
NCDEQ
STREAM
FORM B
USACE WETAND
FORM D
USACE
UPLAND
FORM DP1
INTERMITTENT
STREAM E
-75 lf
*** USACE VERIFICATION 2/26/19 ***