20040586 Ver 1_COMPLETE FILE_20040413

s
.: •
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Michael F. Easley, Governor
August 3, 2004
Town of Cary, Engineering Department
Attn: Russ Overton, PE
318 NortL Academy Street
Cary, NC 27512
Subject Property: Louis-Stephens Road
UT to Crabtree Creek [03-04-02,27-33-(I), C NSW
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
DWQ Project # 04-0586
Wake County
Page 1 of 3
Approval. of 401 Water Quality Certification and Authorization Certificate per the Neuse River
Buffer Protection Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0233) with Additional Conditions
Dear Mr. Overton:
You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions and those listed below, to place fill
within or otherwise impact 0.32 acres of wetlands, 140 feet of streams and 12,842 square feet (ft2) of
protected riparian buffers for the purpose of constructing a road crossing at the subject property, as
described within your application dated May 31, 2004 including revisions received by the N.C. Division
of Water Quality (DWQ) on June 29, 2004. After reviewing your application, we have decided that the
impacts a-e covered by General Water Quality Certification Number(s) 3404 (GC3404). The
Certificat.on(s) allows you to use Nationwide Permit(s) 14 when issued by the US Army Corps of
Engineer, (USACE). This letter shall also act as your approved Authorization Certificate for impacts to
the protected riparian buffers per 15A NCAC 2B .0233. In addition, you should obtain or otherwise
comply with any other required federal, state or local permits before you go ahead with your project
including (but not limited to) Erosion and Sediment Control, and Non-discharge regulations. Also, this
approval to proceed with your proposed impacts or to conduct impacts to waters as depicted in
your application shall expire upon expiration of the 404 or CAMA Permit.
This approval is for the purpose and design that you described in your application. If you change your
project, you must notify us and you may be required to send us a new application. If the property is sold,
the new owner must be given a copy of this Certification and approval letter and is thereby responsible for
complying with all conditions. If total fills for this project (now or in the future) exceed one acre of
wetland or 150 linear feet of stream, compensatory mitigation may be required as described in 15A
NCAC 211.0506 (h). This approval requires you to follow the conditions listed in the attached
certificati m and any additional conditions listed below.
401 Wetlands Certification Unit
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650. One
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 NorthCarohna
Phone: [phone] / FAX [phone] / Internet: httg://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands Na tundl/m

Town of Cary
Page 2 of 3
August 3, 2004
The Additional Conditions of the Certification are:
1. Impacts Approved
The following impacts are hereby approved as long as all of the other specific and general
conditions of this Certification (or Isolated Wetland Permit) are met. No other impacts are
approved including incidental impacts:
Amount Approved
(Units) Plan Location or Reference
Stream 140 (feet)
404/LAMA Wetlands 0.32 (acres)
Buffers 12,842 (square ft.)
2. Erosion & Sediment Control Practices
Erosion and sediment control practices must be in full compliance with all specifications
governing the proper design, installation and operation and maintenance of such Best
Management Practices in order to protect surface waters standards:
a. The erosion and sediment control measures for the?project must be designed, installed,
operated, and maintained in accordance with the most recent version of the. North Carolina
Sediment and Erosion Control Planning and Design Manual.
b. The design, installation, operation, and maintenance of the sediment and erosion control
measures must be such that they equal, or exceed, the requirements specified in the most
recent version of the North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control Manual. The devices
shall be maintained on all construction sites, borrow sites, and waste pile (spoil) projects,
including contractor-owned or leased borrow pits associated with the project.
c. For borrow pit sites, the erosion and sediment control measures must be designed, installed,
operated, and maintained in accordance with the most recent version of the North Carolina
Surface Mining Manual.
d. The reclamation measures and implementation must comply with the reclamation in
accordance with the requirements of the Sedimentation Pollution Control Act.
3. No Waste, Spoil, Solids, or Fill of Any Kind
No waste, spoil, solids, or fill of any kind shall occur in wetlands, waters, or riparian areas beyond
the footprint of the impacts depicted in the Pre-Construction Notification. All construction
activities, including the design, installation, operation, and maintenance of sediment and erosion
control Best Management Practices, shall be performed so that no violations of state water quality
standards, statutes, or rules occur.
4. No Sediment & Erosion Control Measures w/n Wetlands or Waters
Sediment and erosion control measures shall not be placed in wetlands or waters to the maximum
extent practicable. If placement of sediment and erosion control devices in wetlands and waters
is unavoidable, they shall be removed and the natural grade restored within six months of the date
that the Division of Land Resources has released the project.

Town of Cary
Page 3 of 3
August 3, 2004
5. Certificate of Completion
Upon completion of all work approved within the 401 Water Quality Certification or applicable
Buffer Rules, and any subsequent modifications, the applicant is required to return the attached
certificate of completion to the 401/Wetlands Unit, North Carolina Division of Water Quality,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC, 27699-1650.
Violations of any condition herein set forth may result in revocation of this Certification and may result in
criminal and/or civil penalties. The authorization to proceed with your proposed impacts or to conduct
impacts to waters as depicted in your application and as authorized by this Certification shall expire upon
expiration of the 404 or CAMA Permit.
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this Certification (associated with the approved wetland or
stream impacts), you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You must act within 60 days of the date that
you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition, which conforms to Chapter 150B of
the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of Administrative Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center,
Raleigh, N.C. 27699-6714. This certification and its conditions are final and binding unless you ask for a
hearing. % Any disputes over determinations regarding this Authorization?,Certificate (associated with the approved
buffer impacts) shall be referred in writing to the Director for a'decision. The Director's decision is
subject to review as provided in Articles 3 and 4 of G.S. 150B.
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the C1ean.Water
Act and the Neuse riparian buffer protection rule as described within 15A NCAC 2B .0233. If you have
any questions, please telephone John Dorney at 919-733-9646 or Bob Zarzecki at 919-733-9726.
AWK/bs
Enclosures: GC 3404
Certificate of Completion
cc: 1JSACE Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
DWQ Raleigh Regional Office
DLR Raleigh Regional Office
File Copy
Central Files
Sincerely,
ime , E.
Filename: 04-0586 Louis-Stephens Road (Wake) 401-Neuse Buffers
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
June 2 S, 2004
W ELANDS 1401 GROUP
Mr. John Dorney JUN 2 9 2004
DWQ Wetlands/401 Unit
1650 Mail Service Center WATER QUALI Ty SECTIO
Raleigh, NC 27699 N
Re: Louis-Stephens Road UT to Crabtree Creek [03-04-02,27-33-(1), C NSW
DWQ Project # 04-0586; Response to request for more information
Dear Mr. Dorney:
We are in receipt of your June 21, 2004 letter to Mr. Russ Overton with the Town of Cary on
the above referenced project and have provided additional information as requested.
Specif ically, your letter asks for additional impact justification at station 253+00 and
discusses alternatives to avoid zone 1 impacts.
Based on your guidance, we have further reviewed the design sheets and have made the
appropriate modifications to the plans to correspond with your comments. The referenced
outlet )yipe has been shifted to better align with the existing topography. Additionally, the 24"
headwall has been moved west to serve as a retaining wall as necessary to keep the proposed
slope limits from encroaching upon zone 1 buffers. Subsequently, temporary construction
limits have also been revised to avoid encroachment upon the zone 1 buffers.
Theref ore, we agree with you that with this revision no additional buffer mitigation is
necessary at this location. The design maps have been modified to delineate these changes,
including the new (minimized) impact areas now realized as outlined in the legend of the
attaehcd (revised) maps.
Based on the modifications the new tally for pond buffer impacts at station 253+00 is as
follows:
Zone 1 0 ft'
Zone 2 2354 f e
This adjustment now revises the total buffer impacts for the project as follows:
Zone 1 7,468 if
Zone 2 5,374 fe
Total 12,842 f'
TOWN Of CARY
318 North Academy Street • Cary, NC 27513, PO Box 8005 • Cary, NC 27512-8005
te1919-469-4030 • fax [phone]• www.townofcary.org
Please remove the old design sheet for this location (i.e., station 253+00) which was included
in the revised PCN application submittal of May 31, 2004 and replace that sheet with the one
attached herein (which is revised as June 24, 2004 in the legend). Because the buffer impacts
totals have now been minimized finther, i am also copying NC EEP so that they are aware of
the new (reduced) totals for mitigation on this project since we have received approval to
mitigate through the wetland restoration fund (per correspondence from them dated April 15,
2004 attached).
Sincerely,
Michael. L. Babuin, PhD, PG
Environmental Specialist
cc: :Buss Overton/TOC
Steve Mitchell/DWQ
Carol Shaw/NCEEP
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment are Natural Resources
Michael F Easier, Governor
March 2, 2004
Mike Babuin, PhD. PG
Environmental Specialist
Town of Cary
P.O. Box 8005
Cary, NC 27512-8005
Subject: Project: Louis-Stephens Drive
County: Wake
tF/ifliarn , Ross Jr.. Secretarv

The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is willing to accept
payment for buffer and non-riparian wetlands impacts associated with the subject project. Please note that the decision by the NCEEP
to accept the mitigation requirements of this project does not assure that this payment will be approved by the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers and the N.C. Division of Water Quality Wetlands/401 Unit. It is the responsibility of the applicant to contact these agencies
to determine if payment to the NCEEP for impacts associated with this project is appropriate.
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter. If we have not received a copy of the issued 404 Permit/401
Certification within this time frame, this acceptance will expire.
Based on the information supplied by you in a letter dated January 15, 2004, the buffer and non-riparian wetlands restoration that is
necessary to satisfy the compensatory mitigation requirements for this project is summarized in the following table. The maximum
amount of mitigation that the NCEEP will accept for this project is also indicated in this table.
Stream
(linear feet) Wetlands Riparian
(acres) Wetlands Non-
Riparian (acres) Riparian Buffer
(s q. ft.)
Impact 0.29 7,009
-Mitigation Max 0.57 14,018
The buffer and non-riparian wetlands mitigation will be provided as specified in the 401 Water Quality Certification and/or Section
404 Permit for impacts associated with the subject project in Cataloging Unit 03020201 of the Neuse River Basin. The mitigation will
be performed in accordance with the Memorandum of Understanding between the N.C. Department of Environment and Natural
Resources and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers dated November 4, 1998.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Carol Shaw at [phone].
Sincerely,
Ronald E. Ferrell,
Director of Operations
cc: Cyndi Karoly, Wetlands/401 Unit
Jennifer Burdette, USACOE-Raleigh
Steve Mitchell, DENR Regional Office-Raleigh
File
NC DENIM Ecosystem Enhancement Program One
1619 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1819 NorthCarofiina
Phone: [phone] ; FAX: [phone] `; Internet: h2o.enr.state. nc.us`wro/ ;Vaturallff
QF WA
TF9
>
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P. E. Director
Division of Water Quality
Coleen H. Sullins, Deputy Director
Division of Water Quality
June 21, 2004
DWQ Project # 04-0586
Wake County
Page 1 of 2
CERTIFIED MAIL: RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Town of Cary, Engineering Department
Attn: Russ Overton, PE
318 North Academy Street
Cary, NC 27512
Subject Property: Louis-Stephen Road
UT to Crabtree Creek [03-04-02,27-33-(1), C NSW
REQUEST FOR MORE INFORMATION
Dear Mr. Overton:
On June 2, 2004, the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) received your application dated May 31,
2004 to impact 0.32 acres of wetlands and 140 feet of streams and 13,113 ft, (0.30 acres) of
buffers to construct the proposed road construction. The DWQ has determined that your
application was incomplete and/or provided inaccurate information as discussed below. The
DWQ will require additional information in order to process your application to impact protected
wetlands and/or streams on the subject property. Therefore, unless we receive the additional
information requested below, we will have to move toward denial of your application as required
by 15A NCAC 2H.0506 and will place this project on hold as incomplete until we receive this
additional information. Please provide the following information so that we may continue to
review your project.
Additional Information Requested:
1. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Under Section VII of your application you did not provide a "justification" for the impacts
as requested within this section. Station 253+00
The DWQ believes that your proposed project can be redesigned to avoid all (temporary
and permanent) Zone 1 buffer impacts at this location (possibly by using head walls or
small retaining walls). Please note that if the Zone 1 impacts are avoided as stated within or
previous letter, then no buffer mitigation will be required. Also, please redesign the outlet
of the pipe so that it discharges in the location of the existing swale bottoms. (It appears
N. C. Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
[phone] (phone), 919-733-6893 (fax), (htto://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands)
Customer Service #: 1-877-623-6748
. ,:;
Town of Cary
Page 2 of 2
June 21, 2004
that it is not discharging into the bottom of the existing swale as evidenced by the dashed
line on your plans.)
Please respond within three weeks of the date of this letter by sending this information to me in
writing and Steve Mitchell of the DWQ Raleigh Regional Office. If we do not hear from you
within three weeks, we will assume that you no longer want to pursue this project and we will
consider the project as withdrawn.
This letter only addresses the application review and does not authorize any impacts to wetlands,
waters or protected buffers. Please be aware that any impacts requested within your application
are not authorized (at this time)_by-the, DWQ. Please call Ms. Cyndi Karoly or Mr. John Dorney
at 919-733-1786 if you have any questions regarding or would like to set up a meeting to discuss
this matter.
Sincerely,
??RtiO
John Uorney,
DWQ, Wetlands / 401 Unit
JRDIbs
cc: Steve Mitchell, DWQ Raleigh Regional Office
USACE Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
File Copy
Central Files
Filename: 040586 Louis-Stephens (wake) On Hold

May 31, 2004
Mr. John Domey
Wetlands/401 Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
_D ) q4V CJ Lf-o5g 6
401 ISSUED
Re: Louis-Stephens Road; TOC Project # ST-1099
UT to Crabtree Creek [03-04-02,27-33-(1), C NSW
Dear Mr. Dorney:
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
'i
.• a,r P
..???°; ? ?? 2004
gg
?'t' i s V, J t '; ' G es `?3t`8
FNyp)'
We are in receipt of your letter dated May 14, 2004 regarding Louis-Stephens Drive and have replied
(below) to the points in the same order as identified in your letter.
1) Louis Stephens Drive - Station 207+50
Looking at the plans submitted following your letter we observed that a discrepancy did in fact
exist in the scale of the map. Checking our autocad files we could not find any flaw, then
ultimately realized that the photocopy shop subcontracted out to make the copies of the maps
reduced the images to make them fit the page better (not realizing that a change in the scale would
result). They did this without our knowledge so we are greatful for your pointing this out to us. We
since have replotted the maps ourselves, on our plotter, at the correct scale (attached). As a result,
the impacted area (rx to rx) is 140 feet as scaled. Your point on the buffer zones was also correct in
that they needed to be measured from bank to bank (it was simply an autocad glitch which we have
now corrected). We have subsequently recalculated all impacts and impact areas and tabulated
them on the maps and on the application.
2) Louis Stephens Drive - Station 247+00
To answer this question, a stream does not exist at this location. The area in question is a draw
(swale) without running water present. We originally called it a non-subject stream because the
feature is not shown on soil maps or the USGS quads, however, the term swale more accurately
depicts its status, thus we have revised our maps accordingly and have identified and labeled this
feature on the map as a "non-subject swale/no water". Additionally, Mr. Steve Mitchell/DWQ
(and a representative from the Corps) accompanied me onsite about a year ago and verbally
acknowledged the same at this location (i.e., not a stream).
3) Louis Stephens Drive -. Station 253+00
As before, the short answer is -- that a stream does not exist at this location for the same reasons as
identified in item #2 (above). The maps have been updated to more accurately reflect the boundary
of the wetlands as they approach (but do not breach) the zone 1 boundary. Therefore, there is no
wetland impact in this area.
TOWN Ot CARY
318 North Academy Street -Cary, NC 27513-PO Box 8005-Cary, NC 27512-8005
te1919-469-4030 - fax [phone]- www.townofcary.org

4) Buffer Mitigation
With respect to the comments on Station 207+50, we concur (the application has been changed to
reflect "allowable" rather than "allowable with mitigation"). (Note: this reduces the overall buffer
impacts to the project as tabulated on the maps, and, as itemized in the application).
With respect to the comments regarding Station 253+00 we appreciate the comments on this
location, but wish to explain why we felt that mitigation might be required. We agree that no
permanent impacts (or impervious surfaces) are projected in Zone 1 but the impacts associated with
the access and construction of the pipe (i.e., temporary construction impacts) would in fact impact
Zone 1, thus we felt it appropriate to mention this - however, if temporary construction access can
be dealt with without mitigation by performing certain re-vegetation provisions, we would gladly
welcome that prospect and your guidance on proceeding in that direction.
5) Additional Stream, Buffer and Wetland Impacts
The potential, future impacts realized from other portions of the site have not yet occurred. The
other portion of the site you reference is a long-term subsequent phase of the road and will be a
completely separate project one day in another fiscal budget year. The title page/location map that
was originally submitted did show the current project extent as well as the alignment of the future
project. However, that portion is not part of this application. Therefore, we have updated the 11 x
17 USGS quad title sheet to better reflect only the study area which pertains to this application.
To summarize, the minor modifications which we have made on the attached design maps (as reflected
in the PCN application) now show the following impacts. For those over the thresholds, we propose to
mitigate through the wetland restoration fund.
Impacts
Wetlands 0.32 acres
Buffer
Zone 1 7,064 112
Zone 2 5,509 f?
Total 13,113 fe (0.30 acres)
Stream Channel Impacts 1401f
Please feel free to contact me at (462-3931) or, Russ Overton (469-4036) if you have additional
questions on this application.
Sincerely,
Michael L. Babuin, PhD, PG r
Environmental Specialist
cc/ Mr. Steve Mitchell/DWQ
Mr. Russ Overton, PE/TOC
Office Use Only: Form Version May 2002
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
Louis-Stephens Road **REVISED PCN SUBMITTAL 5/31/2004**
L Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ® Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: NW 14
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (verify availability with NCWRP prior to submittal of PCN), complete
section VIII and check here: ® (Approval ltr dated March 2, 2004 from NCEEP attached)
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ?
II. Applicant Information
1. Owner/Applicant Information
Name: Russ Overton, PE
Mailing Address: Engineering Department/Town of Cary
318 North Academy Street
Cary, NC 27512
Telephone Number: 919-469-4036 Fax Number: 919-460-4935
E-mail Address: [e-mail]
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A . signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name:
Company Affiliation:
Mailing Address: UU'L qg,e? r,f "aa ap
R C? 9 4
4-u? Vd s U
Telephone Number: Fax Number: 4,4tl ;. _
E-mail Address:
Page 1 of 9
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Louis-Stephens Road
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): n/a
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): 074503043833; 0735806895; 073504946768;
074501067281;073504936885
4. Location
County: WAKE Nearest Town: CARY
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number):
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): Close to the existing intersection
of Morrisville-Carpenter Road and Carpenter Upchurch Road in rural western Wake County.
5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long): 1) LONG. -78.8647°/LAT. 35.8115°
2) LONG. -78.8644°/LAT. 35.8117°; 3) LONG. -78.8649°/LAT. 35.8223°;
4) LONG. -78.8647°/LAT. 35.8223°; 5) LONG. -78.8644°/LAT. 35.8221° (Note: all of
these coordinates are plotted on the attached maps).
(Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the
coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
6. Property size (acres): 6.45 Acres for entire proposed roadway project
7. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake: UT to Crabtree Creek
8. River Basin: NEUSE
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
Page 2 of 9
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the
project at the time of this application: Median divided curb and gutter typical section with
sidewalk.
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Construction of new road which intersects Morrisville Parkway. Mechanical roadway
construction equipment will be used; trackhoe, bulldozer, front-end loader, pan scraper, and
other standard earth moving equipment.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: Construction of a new road.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
USACOE Jurisdictional wetland determination; action ID #200320957 dated November 12,
2003 (attached).
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application. None
anticipated. However, this is but one portion of a north-south connector planned to link Cary
with RTP planned over the next 10-years.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section VII below. All proposed impacts, permanent
and temporary, must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site
plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a
delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream
evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be
included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream
mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for
listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
Page 3 of 9
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: THERE WILL BE PERMANENT
IMPACTS TO THE UT TO CRABTREE CREEK. A PORTION OF THE STREAM WILL
BE ROUTED THROUGH A CULVERT TO ACCOMMODATE THE ROAD (SEE
MAPS). TOTAL CHANNEL IMPACTS ARE PROJECTED AT 140 LF (rx to rx). SOME
Y. THERE
BUFFER IMPACTED ALONG WITH 5,509 FT` OF ZONE 2 RIPARIAN BUFFER
HvIPACTED (SEE ATTACHED MAPS) FOR A TOTAL OF 13,113 FT2 (0.30 BUFFER
IMPACT ACRES TOTAL).
2. Individually list wetland impacts below:
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma)
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres) Located within
100-year Floodplain**
(es/no) Distance to
Nearest Stream
(linear feet)
Type of Wetland***
See Maps Grading 0.32 Yes Varies (See map) Forested

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: mechanized clearing, grading, fill,
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
** 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at http://www.fema.izov.
*** List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.) Indicate if wetland is isolated (determination of isolation to be made by USACE only).
List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: 1.074 acres
Total area of wetland impact proposed: 0.32 acres
3. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts below:
Stream Impact Length of Average Width Perennial or
Site Number Type of Impact* Impact Stream Name** of Stream Before Intermittent?
(indicate on ma) (linear feet) Im act (please secif )
CULVERT 140 UT To 13FT PERENNIAL
INSTALLATION (rx to rx) CrabtreeCreek

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and associated rip-rap,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain),
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
** Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
www.usas.gov. Several intemet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., www.topozone.com,
www.Mapquest.com, etc.).
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: 140 LINEAR FEET (RX to RX)
WILL BE PERMANENTLY IMPACTED BY THE NEW CULVERTS.
Page 4 of 9
4. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.) below:
N/A
Open Water Impact Area of Name of Waterbod
y Type of Waterbody
Site Number Type of Impact* Impact (if applicable) (lake, pond, estuary, sound,
(indicate on ma) (acres) bay, ocean, etc.)

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: fill, excavation, dredging,
flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
5. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.):
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.):
Size of watershed draining to pond: Expected pond surface area:
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
Roadway construction was necessary to accommodate traffic venerated by a new Wake Count
Elementary School recently constructed. Traffic studies further indicate the need to construct a
connector road between Morrisville-Carpenter Road and the proposed extension of Morrisville
Parkway (separate project) to handle new residential development in the adjacent areas spawned
by the construction of the new school referenced above.
Additional details (station by station) are provided as follows (updated May 31, 2004):
Page 5 of 9
The impacts to the stream and wetlands at Station 207+50 are unavoidable because we have to tie to a
previously gpproved portion of the alignment that is being developed south of this project (south of
Station 206+50) as part of the Heritage Pines Development. We have also utilized the minimum
possible radius to squeeze the proposed alignment between the two (2) existing wetland areas as
indicated on the attached maps.
The impacts to the wetlands around Station 247+00 are unavoidable because the wetlands run
perpendicular to the roadway and are unavoidable regardless of the crossing location. To potentially
shift the alignment towards the west would impact significantly more wetlands, thus, we have selected
the most least intrusive alignment (months ago for this project which promotes impact minimization.
We have also shifted the alignment as westerly as possible to still be able to tie into the existing
intersection of Morrisville Carpenter Road and Koppers Road - which was another key consideration.
There are no impacts to the wetlands around Station 253+00 because we have selected an alignment that
avoids the existing wetlands around the existing pond as shown on the attached maps. In other words,
we purposely selected the optimum alignment which minimizes impacts at this location.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCWRP concurrence shall be placed on hold as
incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration
in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.ne.us/ncwetlands/stnngide.html.
Page 6 of 9
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program (NCWRP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCWRP at
[phone] to determine availability and to request written approval of mitigation prior
to submittal of a PCN. For additional information regarding the application process for the
NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at htip://h2o.enr.state.ne.us/wrp/index.htm. If use of
the NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide the
following information:
IT IS PROPOSED THAT THE IMPACTS WILL BE MITIGATED BY PAYMENT INTO
THE WETLAND RESTORATION FUND THROUGH NCEEP (SEE ATTACHED
AUTHORIZATION LETTER FROM NCEEP. NOTE THAT ACTUAL IMPACTS TO
BUFFER AND STREAM CHANNELS MAY HAVE VARIED SLIGHTLY SINCE
RECEIPT OF THE REFERENCED LETTER FROM NCEEP.
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): 1401.f.
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): 13,113 ft2 (0.30 acres)
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): n/a
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0.32 acres
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): n/a
Note: Additional impacts realized in the late design stages of the project resulted in slightly
different quantities of stream channel, wetland, and riparian buffer impacts to be mitigated
as that specified in the March 2, 2004 authorization letter from NCEEP. A follow-on letter
from the Town of Cary dated April 5, 2004 to NCEEP (attached) requesting a revised
authorization is included herein. Finally, post-PCN submittal comments from DWQ received
in early May, 2004 resulted in final design "pencil-sharpening" to minimize all impacts to the
maximum extent possible (especially buffer impacts), thus, the impacts outlined in this
revised PCN represent "maximum minimization" of environmental impacts realized for this
rp oiect.
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state) funds or the use of public
(federal/state) land?
Yes ? No ® THE PROJECT IS FUNDED ENTIRELY BY THE
TOWN OF CARY AND IS LOCATED ON TOWN
PROPERTY VIA OWNERSHIP OR VIA PROPERTY
EASEMENTS.
Page 7 of 9
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No
If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. N/A
Yes ? No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Neuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify )?
Yes ® No ? If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers.
Zone* Impact
(square feet) Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 7,604 3
2 5,509 1.5
Total 13,113 n/a
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
* * Up to 0.33 acres of buffer impacts are allowed without mitigation for road crossings.
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration/Enhancement, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0260.
A TOTAL OF 0.30 ACRES OF BUFFER WILL BE IMPACTED (I.E., BELOW THE 0.33
BUFFER THRESHOLD).
Page 8 of 9
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
downstream from the property.
SEE THE ATTACHED MAPS FOR THE PROPOSED INCREASE IN IMPERVIOUS
SURFACE RESULTING FROM PROJECT CONSTRUCTION. A COMBINED TOTAL OF
9.962 FT2 OF NEW IMPERVIOUS IS PROJECTED (SEE MAPS).
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
A
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H.0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
Yes 0 No
XIV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
n/a
Applicant/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 9 of 9
WA7'F Michael F. Easley, Governor

O .
9
Q

William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
O ?
? North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
> Alan W. Klimek, P. E. Director
"I Division of Water Quality
Coleen H. Sullins, Deputy Director
Division of Water Quality
May 14, 2004
DWQ Project No. 04-0586
Wake County
Page 1 of 2
CERTIFIED MAIL: RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Town of Cary
Russ Overton, PE
-Engineering Department
318 North Academy Street
Cary, NC 27512
Subject Property: Louis-Stephens Road, Cary, NC
UT to Crabtree Creek [03-04-02, 27-33-(1), C NSW]
REQUEST FOR MORE INFORMATION
Dear Mr. Overton:
On April 13, 2004, the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) received your application dated April 12, 2004 to impact 0.34
acres of wetlands, 112 feet of stream and 14,983 square feet (ft) (or 0.34 acres) of protected riparian buffers to construct
the proposed Louis Stephens Drive and Morrisville Parkway Extensions. The DWQ has determined that your application
was incomplete and/or provided inaccurate information as discussed below. The DWQ will require additional information
in order to process your application to impact protected wetland, streams and/or buffers on the subject property.
Therefore, unless we receive the additional information requested below, we will have to move toward denial of your
application as required by 15A NCAC 2H .0506 and 213 .0233(8) and will place this project on hold as incomplete until we
receive this additional information. Please provide the following information so that we may continue to review your
project.
Additional Information:
1. Louis Stephens Drive - Station 207+50
Your application states that you will be impacting 112 feet of perennial stream and approximately 0.28 acres of protected
riparian buffers. Scaling off the plans provided within your application, it appears that the pipe length is approximately
112 feet but the length of stream impact is close to 140 feet. Please modify your plans and provide the accurate length
of stream impact. The buffers depicted on your plans do not appear to be at a 1" = 30' scale. Also, the buffers appear
to be measured from the centerline of the stream rather than the top of the stream bank. You stated in your application
that the average stream width is 13 feet. Please modify your plans to accurately depict the location of the buffers and
top of bank of the stream.
2. Louis Stephens Drive - Station 247+00
Your plans depict a "NON-SUBJECT STREAM", within the proposed road alignment. However, you do not account for
stream impacts within your application for this location. We understand that no stream is depicted on either the USGS
topo map or Wake County Soil Survey and, therefore, any stream within this location would not be subject to the Neuse
Buffer Rules. However, if a stream does exist within this location it still would be subject to both 404 and 401
jurisdiction. Does a stream exist within this location? You may wish to contact both the US Army Corps of Engineers
(USACE) at 919-876-8441 and the DWQ Raleigh Regional Office at 919-571-4700 to schedule an on-site determination
if one has not yet be performed.
North Carolina Division of Water Quality, Wetlands/401 Unit,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
919-733-1786 (phone). 919-733-6893 (fax), http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetiands/
Town of Cary
Page 2 of 2
May 14, 2004
3. Louis Stephens Drive - Station 253+00
Your plans depict a "NON-SUBJECT STREAM", within the proposed road alignment. No jurisdictional waters are
depicted on the wetland delineation provided with your application. However, the delineation depicts a jurisdictional
area between flags 102, 103 & 104 within what appears to be the location of this "non-subject stream". Please clarify
whether a stream exists within this location or not.
4. Buffer Mitigation
Station 207+50 - Please note that because you are proposing to impact less than 150 feet and 1/3 acre of buffers
associated with the stream crossing at Station 207+50 the proposed impacts will be considered as "allowable" (not
"allowable with mitigation"). As such no buffer mitigation is required at this location.
Station 253+00 - The proposed impacts. associated with the road alignment near the pond are considered "road impacts
other than crossings", an "allowable with mitigation" use within the Neuse Buffer Rule. Therefore, the buffer impacts
associated with this road alignment will require buffer mitigation. However, if the Zone 1 impacts can be avoided, all
impervious surfaces are kept out of the buffer, only grading and fill slopes are within Zone 2 of the buffer, Zone 2 is re-
vegetated and the health of the vegetation within Zone 1 is not compromised, then we may be able to approve this
impact without requiring mitigation.
5. Additional Stream, Buffer and Wetland Impacts
The alignments of Louis Stephens Drive and Morrisville Parkway depicted on the "Project Study Areas" map provided
along with your application depict other possible stream, buffer and/or wetland impacts. Have these impacts already
occurred or are they proposed to occur sometime in the future. Please clarify.
Please respond within three weeks of the date of this letter by sending this information to me in writing and Mr. Steve
Mitchell of the DWQ Raleigh Regional Office. If we do not hear from you within three weeks, we will assume that you no
longer want to pursue this project and we will consider the project as withdrawn.
This letter only addresses the application review and does not authorize any impacts to wetlands, waters or protected
buffers. Please be aware that any impacts requested within your application are not authorized (at this time) by the DWQ.
Please call Mr. Bob Zarzecki at 919-733-9726 if you have any questions regarding or would like to set up a meeting to
discuss this matter.
Sincerely,
cc: USACE Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
DWQ Raleigh Regional Office
File Copy
Central Files
.
elands/401 Unit, DWQ
DWO04-0586
May 14, 2004
bz
MEMORANDUM
TO: John Dorney
Non-Discharge Branch
Regional Contact: Steve Mitchell
WO Supervisor:
Date:
SUBJECT: WETLAND STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Facility Name Louis-Stephens Road
Project Number 04 0586
Recvd From APP
Received Date 4/13/04 Recvd By Region
Project Type construction of new road
County Wake
County2
Region Raleigh
Certificates Stream Stream Impacts (ft.)
Permit Wetland Wetland Wetland Stream Class Acres Feet =13
Type Type Impact Score Index Prim. Supp. Basin Req. Req. 14 forested WT _0N F_ 27-33-(1) ? NSW 30,402. 0.34 112.00 112.00
I?rE?I? I3uflci? 07d'' F_ F_ F_ F__ .;C740.'_i4 F-- P-17-0 -NF-- F_ F_F_ F__ F__ F_ _. F_
Mitigation Wetland
MitigaticnType Type Acres Feet
Is Wetland Rating Sheet Attached? 0 Y 0 N Did you request more info? 0 Y 0 N
Have Project Changes/Conditions Been Discussed With Applicant? 0 Y 0 N
Is Mitigation required? 0 Y O N Recommendation: 0 Issue 0 Issue/Cond 0 Deny
Provided by Region: Latitude (ddmmss) Longitude (ddmmss)
Comments:
April 26, 2004
HOLD
Impacts appear greater than those applied for. Who did stream calls???
cc: Regional Office
Central Office Page Number 1
Triage Check List
Date: Project Name:
To: ? ARO Mike Parker `
? FRO Ken Averitte
? MRO Alan Johnson
RRO Steve Mitchell
+- ? b , ?P_ 4f C-f
DWQ#: Q !Z- ?S?CQ
County:
? WaRO Tom Steffens
? WiRO Noelle Lutheran
? WSRO Daryl Lamb
d?-S
From: LI.9?- Telephone : (919) 7,33 1
The file attached is being forwarded to your for your evaluation.
Please call if you need assistance. .
t: e 4. PY V t 1 a' 4-
Stream length impacted s
? Stream determination ?s
iar r e?v? rc.
? Wetland determination and distance to blue- ne surface waters on USFW topo maps
? Minimization/avoidance issues
Buffer Rules (Meuse, Tar-Pamlico, Catawba, Randleman)
? Pond fill
? Mitigation Ratios
? Ditching
? Are the stream and or wetland mitigation sites available and viable?
Check drawings for accuracy
? Is .the application consistent with pre-application meetings?
? Cumulative impact concern Comments:

i
CORRESP$NDENCE TO:
PURCHASWG DIVISION
420 jAhAES"JACKSON AVE.
P.O. BOX 8005
CARY, NC 27512-8005
Town of Cary
INVOICE TO:
North Carolina
TEL [phone]
DATE 02/24/04 REQ.NO.: 125974, ACCOUNT NO.:
624333
VENDOR: NC DIVISION OF WATER UALITY
1650 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
ECOSYSTEM ENHANCEMENT
RALEIGH, NC 27699-1650
FAX:
ATTN:
QUOTED BY:
TERMS: NET
CONTRACT NO:
PROJECT NO: ST 1099
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE
P.O. BOX 8005
FAX [phone] CARY, NC 27512-8005
PREPAYMENT **
062-,.0000-514.75` 10 150600
DELIVER TO: TOWN OF CAR r
EN61NEERI Ii, Df? '
P 0 BOX 8005
318 N ACADEMY ST
CARY, INC 27512-8005
ATTN: LSCHRIBER/R OVERTON
F.O.B.:
FREIGHT:
SHIP VIA:
DELIVER BY: 02/24/04
UNIT
ITEM QUANTITY MEE
ASSOF URE DESCRIPTION UNIT COST EXTENDED COST
1 1.00 EA 947 999 PCN APPLICATION FEE 475.0000 475.00
PROJECT ST1099
LOUIS STEPHENS DRIVE EXT.
SUB-TOTAL 475.00
TOTAL 475.00
REMARKS:
***** PREPAYMENT REQUIRED
PLEASE ATTACH THE WHITE COPY OF
THE PURCHASE ORDER WITH THE CHECK.
?I DO NOT COMBINE CHECKS.
Il??lt PLEASE INCLUDE PROJECT NAME ON CHECK 31F?It
PROJECT NAME: ST10`99 LOUIS STEPHENS DR EXT
WETLANDS 1401 GROUP
APR 1 .3 2004
WATER QUALITY SECTION
IMPORTANT THIS INSTRUMENT HAS BEEN PREAUDITED IN THE MANNER REQUIRED BY THE
THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THAT GOVERN THIS PURCHASE ORDER ARE PRINTED ON LOCAL GOVERNMENT BUDGET AND FISCAL CONTROL ACT.
THE REVERSE. THIS PURCHASE ORDER IS A COUNTEROFFER AND NOT AN
ACCEPTANCE. VENDORS ARE ADVISED TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED
HEREIN AND TO NOTIFY THE PURCHASING DIVISION OF DISCREPANCIES. APPLICABLE
TAXES MUST BE STATED SEPARATELY ON INVOICE. PURCHASE ORDER NUMBER AND
COMPLETE SHIP TO ADDRESS MUST APPEAR ON ALL SHIPPING LABELS AND INVOICE.
COD SHIPMENTS ARE NOT ACCEPTABLE.
EPU FINANCE OFFICER
VENDOR
' 1`.i ORDER'
'IS AND CONDITIONS

The seller agrees that the iollo b°vir , _. 3 `dill be applicable.
1. If seller reti,ses to accept VIE .l:?r e ctly,as written, he will return it at once c ith explanation.
2. Purchaser will not be respc my moods delivered without purchase order, '
3- Seller leC will i Fr;€
..,. will SGnGit 5 ,?}a'?t tt, .' r , t, sc order number. r '

4_ Seller will dsdivc.,, no, ,es.
11 ,. € ca bcaxirtl, pa£;ksrt or t - 'owed by purchaser unless Specifically authorized on the face of this

l It shall be unri,-s- ;dl th,s r u,;r period to purchaser will date from the receipt of the invoice or front the date
of the Yeceip- of
.4'
7. The risk of loss -,;red which are the s.ab;ect of this order shall rernain with the, setlpr yntil the goods
are dc
livered to the c'
s t out in the order and accepted by the purchaser or its nominee.
r. In the event of s €lt n? rte, a-td when specified, purchaser reserves the right to cancel this order, or any
part thereof, withO : pr 1[its, and seller agrees that purchaser may return part car all of any shipment
4o rtt<-ade and, rn ay char, ' ". my , expense, sustained as a result, of SUCK failure to deliver or to pertorrn.
in tfte event any article, se€ o:;e Ad, delivered and/or performed'hereunder shall .be covered by any patent,
c;opyrirht, or =„pplieation ftc € ller will indemnify and save harmless purchaser frorn any and all loss, cost or
expenses can account of any or )il c;lairns, Suits, or judgments on account of the use or sale of such article; or the use of
such service or process in viol..,un of rights under such patent, copyright, or application for either.
10, in the event any article se process sold said delivered or sold and per€ormbd hereunder shali be defective in any
respect whatsoever, sL"er lit' nriify and Save harniless purchaser from afllass or the payment of all stuns of money
by reason of all accidents, is or d@mages Tor Persons .or properly . that may happen or occur in connection with the
use or sale of such art=u'le, vt ce rar process and are cbntributed to by said -defective condition,
1 1 . if seller pc ricarrrts- se, rrc rss
L nder, `seller will indemnify and save harmless
-)struct:s, eretsr irispect.> or delivers here
buyer from ail loss or t t oaf all scants cf 'rrtoney by reason of'a'll accidents, injuries or damages to persons or
p ,, erty that may happ rt ,r -- nection therewith.
12. P ;,r reserves tlta? •nt, at purchaser's expense, an inspector or inspectors who v ,
K-' tatted to insooc f' r..eSS of manufacture, any material or) this order.
13_ lier agrees not to _ a „ t ty r- ntioning purchaser or quoting the opinion of any of purchaser's
es.
1 r Y ,r .f no i" o -,n M statute or regulations or municipal ordinance;, has been or Jill be
ed in ? ?ia, or service sold and delivered heretinder and it sklcl )non
l- or does o ._.ur, sell ; save harmless purchaser from all loss, penalties, or the payment of all yams
of -noney on account <}! si
15. Unless this contract is exe° i. - Jer the miles and regulations of the President's Corn€nittee on Equal
Employment Cppzarta!ni of Section 30i of the Executive Order No. 1092 5, dated N?arc°; 6,
1961, any subsequent c.=r the extent they may be applicable, made a part of this contract by
reference.
16. Any cvr °rKic: apply ° g shall be paid all Sales Or use taxes on materials so furnished gaitd
shall inch+n`y sw any darrtages, costs, expenses or penalties on account of such taxes.
17, Purchaser may at any bme 71 st ict i_ ';i ince with these terrns and conditions notwithstanding any fmuviour,
custom practice or course J; 'i to ti' 3t y.
18. The terms and conditions of is order govern in event of conflict with any terms of seller's proposal,
and are not subject to cha t,, -y written or verbal statements by seller or by any terms stated in seller's
acknowledgement unless sari. _?c uept...9 in writing by the TOWN OF CARY.
WETLAND` I e"" GROUP
Fi l° R i v e u u'r r" a
Office Use Only: ! Form Version May 2002
WATER QUALITY SECTION
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No. ?.
!Tr, v ,-vtirnlnr itam is not nnnlirnhle to this nrniect_ nleace enter "Not Annlicable" or "N/A".)
-` --v r
1.
II.
Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit
? Section 10 Permit ?
® 401 Water Quality Certification
040588
Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: NW 14
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (verify availability with NCWRP prior to submittal of PCN), complete
section VIII and check here: ® (Approval ltr dated March 2, 2004 from NCEEP attached)
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ?
Applicant Information
1. Owner/Applicant Information
Name: Russ Overton PE
Mailing Address: Engineeering_Department/Town of Cary
318 North Academy Street
Cart/ NC 27512
Telephone Number: 919-469-4036 Fax Number: 919-460-4935
E-mail Address: [e-mail]
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name:
Company Affiliation:
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number:
E-mail Address:
Fax Number:
Page I of 9
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Louis-Stephens Road
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): n/a
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): 074503043833; 0735806895; 073504946768;
074501067281;073504936885
4. Location
County: WAKE Nearest Town: CARY
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number):
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): Close to the existing intersection
of Morrisville-Carpenter Road and Carpenter Upchurch Road in rural western Wake County.
5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long): 1) LONG. -78.8647°/LAT. 35.8115°
2) LONG. -78.8644°/LAT. 35.8117°; 3) LONG. -78.8649°/LAT. 35.8223°;
4) LONG. -78.8647°/LAT. 35.8223°; 5) LONG. -78.8644°/LAT. 35.8221° (Note: all of
these coordinates are plotted on the attached maps).
(Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the
coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
6. Property size (acres): 6.45 Acres for entire proposed roadway project
7. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake: UT to Crabtree Creek
8. River Basin: NEUSE
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
Page 2 of 9
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the
project at the time of this application: Median divided curb and gutter typical section with
sidewalk.
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Construction of new road which intersects Morrisville Parkway. Mechanical roadway
construction equipment will be used; trackhoe, bulldozer, front-end loader, pan scraper, and
other standard earth moving, equipment.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: Construction of a new road.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued, for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
USACOE Jurisdictional wetland determination; action ID #200320957 dated November 12,
2003 (attached).
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application. None
anticipated. However, this is but one portion of a north-south connector planned to link Cary
with RTP planned over the next 10-years.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section VII below. All proposed impacts, permanent
and temporary, must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site
plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a
delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream
evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be
included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream
mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for
listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
Page 3 of 9
Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: THERE WILL BE PERMANENT
IMPACTS TO THE UT TO CRABTREE CREEK. A PORTION OF THE STREAM WILL
BE ROUTED THROUGH A CULVERT TO ACCOMMODATE THE ROAD (SEE
MAPS). TOTAL CHANNEL IMPACTS ARE PROJECTED AT 112 LF. SOME
WETLANDS (0.34 ACRES) WILL ALSO BE IMPACTED BY THE PROJECT (SEE
MAPS) ADDITIONALLY THERE WILL BE 8,314 FT' OF ZONE 1 RIPARIAN
BUFFER IMPACTED ALONG WITH 6,669 FTz OF ZONE 2 RIPARIAN BUFFER
IMPACTED (SEE ATTACHED MAPS).
2. Individually list wetland impacts below:
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma)
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres) Located within
100-year Floodplain**
(es/no) Distance to
Nearest Stream
(linear feet)
Type of Wetland***
See Maps Grading 0.34 Yes Varies (See map) Forested

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: mechanized clearing, grading, fill,
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
** 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at http://www.fema.gov.
*** List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.) Indicate if wetland is isolated (determination of isolation to be made by USACE only).
List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: 1.074 acres
Total area of wetland impact proposed: 0.34 acres
3. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts below:
Stream Impact Length of Average Width Perennial or
Site Number Type of Impact* Impact Stream Name** of Stream Before Intermittent?
(indicate on ma) (linear feet) Impact (please secif )
CULVERT 112 UT To 13FT PERENNIAL
INSTALLATION CrabtreeCreek

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and associated rip-rap,
darns (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain),
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
** Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
www.usgs.gov. Several intemet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., www.topgzone.com,
www.mapquest.com etc.).
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: 112 LINEAR FEET WILL BE
PERMANENTLY HAPACTED BY THE NEW CULVERTS.
Page 4 of 9
4. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.) below:
N/A
Open Water Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma)
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres) Name of Waterbody
(if applicable) Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound,
bay, ocean, etc.)

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: fill, excavation, dredging,
flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
5. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.):
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.):
Size of watershed draining to pond: Expected pond surface area:
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
Roadway construction was necessary to accommodate traffic izenerated by a new Wake Count
Elementary School recently constructed. Traffic studies further indicate the need to construct a
connector road between Morrisville-Carpenter Road and the proposed extension of Morrisville
Parkway (separate project) to handle new residential development in the adjacent areas spawned
by the construction of the new school referenced above.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
Page 5 of 9
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCWRP concurrence shall be placed on hold as
incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration
in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.ne.us/ncwetlands/strmgide.html.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program (NCWRP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCWRP at
[phone] to determine availability and to request written approval of mitigation prior
to submittal of a PCN. For additional information regarding the application process for the
NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htm. If use of
the NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide the
following information:
IT IS PROPOSED THAT THE WETLAND BUFFER AND STREAM CHANNEL
IMPACTS WILL BE MITIGATED BY PAYMENT INTO THE WETLAND
RESTORATION FUND THROUGH NCEEP (SEE ATTACHED AUTHORIZATION
LETTER FROM NCEEP).
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): 1121.f.
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): 14,983 ft2
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): n/a
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0.34 acres
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): n/a
Page 6 of 9
Note: Additional impacts realized in the late design stages of the project resulted in slightly
different quantities of stream channel, wetland, and riparian buffer impacts to be mitigated
as that specified in the march 2 2004 authorization letter from NCEEP. A follow-on letter
from the Town of Cag dated April S 2004 to NCEEP (attached) requesting a revised
authorization is included herein.
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state) funds or the use of public
(federal/state) land?
Yes ? No ® THE PROJECT IS FUNDED ENTIRELY BY THE
TOWN OF CARY AND IS LOCATED ON TOWN
PROPERTY VIA OWNERSHIP OR VIA PROPERTY
EASEMENTS.
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No
If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. N/A
Yes ? No ? ,
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 213 .0233
(Neuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify )?
Yes ® No ? If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers.
Page 7 of 9
Zone* Impact
(square feet) Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 8,314 3
2 6,669 1.5
Total 14,983
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
** Up to 0.33 acres of buffer impacts are allowed without mitigation for road crossings.
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration/Enhancement, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0260.
A TOTAL OF 0.34 ACRES OF BUFFER WILL BE IMPACTED. PAYMENT INTO THE
WETLAND RESTORATION FUND IS PROPOSED.
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
downstream from the property.
SEE THE ATTACHED MAPS `FOR TBEPROPOSED INCREASE IN IMPERVIOUS
SURFACE RESULTING FROM PROJECT CONSTRUCTION. A COMBINED TOTAL OF
10,082 F V OF NEW IMPERVIOUS IS PROJECTED (SEE MAPS).
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H.0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
Yes ? No
Page 8 of 9
XIV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
n/a
F1Z/
Applicant/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 9 of 9
NCDENR
Norte Carolina Department o Environment and Natural Resources
Michael F. Easley, Governer
March 2, 2004
Mike Babuin, PhD. PG
Environmental Specialist
Town of Cary
P.O. Box 8005
Cary, NC 27512-8005
Subject: Project: Louis-Stephens Drive
County: Wake
Wi!=i nn . Ross Jr- Secreta r?i
IYA q ti
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is willing to accept
payment for buffer and non-riparian wetlands impacts associated with the subject project. Please note that the decision by the NCEEP
to accept the mitigation requirements of this project does not assure that this payment will be approved by the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers and the N.C. Division of Water Quality Wetlands/401 Unit. It is the responsibility of the applicant to contact these agencies
to determine if payment to the NCEEP for impacts associated with this project is appropriate.
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter. If we have not received a copy of the issued 404 Permit/401
Certification within this time frame, this acceptance will expire.
Based on the information supplied by you in a letter dated January 15, 2004, the buffer and non-riparian wetlands restoration that is
necessary to satisfy the compensatory mitigation requirements for this project is summarized in the following table. The maximum
amount of mitigation that the NCEEP will accept for this project is also indicated in this table. `
Stream
(linear feet) Wetlands Riparian
(acres) Wetlands Non-
Riparian (acres) Riparian Buffer
(s q. ft.)
Impact 0.29 7,009
Mitigation Max 0.57 14,018
The buffer and non-riparian wetlands mitigation will be provided as specified in the 401 Water Quality Certification and/or Section
404 Permit for impacts associated with the subject project in Cataloging Unit 03020201 of the Neuse River Basin. The mitigation will
be performed in accordance with the Memorandum of Understanding between the N.C. Department of Environment and Natural
Resources and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers dated November 4, 1998.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Carol Shaw at [phone].
Sincerely,
Ronald E. Ferrell,
Director of Operations
cc: Cyndi Karoly, Wetlands/401 Unit
Jennifer Burdette, USACOE-Raleigh
Steve Mitchell, DENR Regional Office-Raleigh
File
C DENR Ecosystem Enhancement Program One
1619 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1619 NofthCarohna
Phone., 919-733-5208\ FAX: [phone] Internet: h2Q.enr.state, nc.U-
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
April 5, 2004
Mr. Ron Ferrell, Director
NC Ecosystem Enhancement Program
1619 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1619
Re: Request to pay into the wetland restoration fund/Town of Cary
Project # ST-1099: Louis-Stephens Drive (Revised Estimate of Impacts)
By this request we are asking for permission to update our previous request to pay into
the Wetland Restoration Fund for the above referenced project as follows:
Channel Impacts
Wetlands
Neuse River Buffer Zone 1
Neuse River Buffer Zone 2
TOTAL Buffer Zone Impacts
112 linear feet
14,773 ft2 (i.e., 0.34 acres)
8,314 ft2
6 669 ft2
14,983 ft
Please note that these estimates are revised estimates that have now been finalized in
design efforts since our previous request of several months ago. Please note that NCEEP
responded in a March 2, 2004 letter to us for impacts that were slightly less than those
outlined herein (and) since our original submittal we have also identified 112 linear feet
of new (unavoidable) channel impacts. It is our intent to submit the PCN application
shortly but felt it important to update you on the revised impacts realized from final
design efforts.
If you have any questions please do not hesitate to call me at [phone].
Sincerely,
I
Michael L. Ba uin, PhD, PG
Environmental Specialist sow
(attached previously submitted NCEEP payment acceptance letter dated March 2, 2004)
TOWN Ot CARY
318 North Academy Street -Cary, NC 27513-PO Box 8005-Cary, NC 27512-8005
te1919-469-4030 9 fax [phone], www.townofcary.org
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
Wilmington District
Action ID: 200320957 County: Wake
NOTIFICATION OF JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
Property Authorized
Owner Town of Cary Aaent URS, Group, Inc.
Attn: Russ Overton, P.E. Attn: Ray Bode
Address F.O. Box 8005 Address 1600 Perimeter Park Drive
Cary NC 27512 Morrisville, NC 27560
Telephone Number 919-469-4030 Telephone Number 919-461-1100
Size and Location of Property (waterbody, Highway name/number, town, etc.): The project is
located on Louis Stevens Drive between Heritage Pine and Morrisville-Carpenter Road and on Morrisville
Parkway between Preston Village North and Carpenter Upchurch Road in Morrisville, Wake County,
North Carolina.
Basis for Determination: The site contains wetlands and stream channels with indicators of ordinary
high water marks, located adjacent to an unnamed tributary of Crabtree Creek in the Neuse River Basin.
Indicate Which of the Following Apply:
There are waters of the U.S., to include wetlands, on the above described property which we strongly suggest
should be delineated and surveyed. The surveyed wetland lines must be verified by our staff before the Corps will
make a final jurisdictional determination on your property.
Because of the size'of your property and our present workload, our identification and delineation of your wetlands
cannot be accomplished in a timely manner. You may wish to obtain a consultant to obtain a more timely
delineation of the wetlands. Once the consultant has flagged a wetland line on the property, Corps staff will
review it, and, if it is accurate, we strongly recommend that you have the line surveyed for final approval by the
Corps. The Corps will not make a final jurisdictional determination on your property without an approved survey.
X The waters of the U.S., to include wetlands, on your lot have been delineated, and the limits of the Corps
jurisdiction have been explained to you. Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this
determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
There are no waters of the U.S., to include wetlands, present on the above described property which are subject to
the permit requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1344). Unless there is a change in the law
or our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the
e of this notification.
Placem t of dredged or fill material in wetlands on this property without a Department of the
Army P rmit is in most cases a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1311). A
perms s not required for work on the property restricted entirely to existing high ground. If you
have any questions regarding the Corps of Engineers regulatory program, please contact
Andrea Wade at telephone number (919) 876 - 8441 extension 31.
Project Manager Signature
Date November 12, 2003
Expiration Date November 12, 2008
SURVEY PLAT OR FIELD SKETCH OF THE DESCRIBED PROPERTY AND THE WETLAND
DELINEATION FORM MUST BE ATTACHED TO THE FILE COPY OF THIS FORM.
N()'T'1hICf17'[ON OF AUMT\1ISl R ?TIVC AI'YCAI rOI' I4?f ii I Y1rOC'I S z .,
I21+,C?UFST;1{OR APPEAL,
.,...E ..?. ,
Applicant: Town of Cary File Number: 200320957 Date:Nov 12, 2003
Attached is: See Section below
INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of permission) A
PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of permission) B
PERMIT DENIAL C
X APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION D
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION E
SECTION [ -The fo lowIllg l c ntlfI4-your l-lgtl - anCLOptlofls 1-0 '11Ii111101 1 n acll Illst ?? e appeal of the above
idecision. A(k]IIIonal nformationanay be found at http://ijsace.arn _y.millinet/functions/cvv/CCCWolre« oi-
Corpa reek-mkitions SIC _i CFP }?aTf J1.
A: INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or object to the permit.
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all rights
to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the permit.
• OBJECT: If you object to the permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you may request that
the permit be modified accordingly. You must complete Section II of this form and return the form to the district engineer.
Your objections must be received by the district engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice, or you will forfeit your right
to appeal the permit in the future. Upon receipt of your letter, the district engineer will evaluate your objections and may: (a)
modify the permit to address all of your concerns, (b) modify the permit to address some of your objections, or (c) not modify
the permit having determined that the permit should be issued as previously written. After evaluating your objections, the
district engineer will send you a proffered permit for your reconsideration, as indicated in Section B below:
B: PROFFERED PERMIT:, You may accept or appeal the permit ,
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all rights
to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the permit.
• APPEAL: If you choose to decline the proffered permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you
may appeal the declined permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of this
form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the
date of this notice.
C: PERMIT DENIAL: You may appeal the denial of a permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process
by completing Section H of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division
engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.
D: APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You may accept or appeal the approved JD or
provide new information.
• ACCEPT: You do not need to notify the Corps to accept an approved JD. Failure to notify the Corps within 60 days of the
date of this notice, means that you accept the approved JD in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the approved JD.
• APPEAL: If you disagree with the approved JD, you may appeal the approved JD under the Corps of Engineers Administrative
Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received
by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.
E: PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You do not need to respond to the Corps
regarding the preliminary JD. The Preliminary JD is not appealable. If you wish, you may request an
approved JD (which may be appealed), by contacting the Corps district for further instruction. Also you may
provide new information for further consideration by the Corps to reevaluate the JD.
SF.C,TION [t - Rf'QUES'F FOR APIJJ_AI, or 013JEC'.`1'IC)NS I (z? 1J C11 NP ED PEI 1
REASONS FOR APPEAL OR OBJECTIONS: (Describe your reasons for appealing the decision or your objections to an
initial proffered permit in clear concise statements. You may attach additional information to this form to clarify where your reasons
or objections are addressed in the administrative record.)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The appeal is limited to a review of the administrative record, the Corps memorandum for the
record of the appeal conference or meeting, and any supplemental information that the review officer has determined is needed to
clarify the administrative record. Neither the appellant nor the Corps may add new information or analyses to the record. However,
you may provide additional information to clarify the location of information that is already in the administrative record.
PO1 F ' T c FQkiQU ' 0J
If you have questions regarding this decision and/or the appeal
process you may contact:
Ms. Andrea Wade, Regulatory Specialist
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
6508 Falls of the Neuse Road, Suite 120
Raleigh, North Carolina 27615
If you only have questions regarding the appeal process you may
also contact:
Mr. Arthur Middleton, Administrative Appeal Review Officer
CESAD-ET-CO-R
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, South Atlantic Division
60 Forsyth Street, Room 9M15
Atlanta. Georgia 30303-8801
RIGHT OF ENTRY: Your signature below grants the right of entry to Corps of Engineers personnel, and any government
consultants, to conduct investigations of the project site during the course of the appeal process. You will be provided a 15 day
notice of any site investigation, and will have the opportunity to participate in all site investigations.
Date: Telephone number:
Signature of appellant or agent.
DIVISION ENGINEER:
Commander
U.S. Army Engineer Division, South Atlantic
60 Forsyth Street, Room 9M15
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-3490
y
The i?c.?,)Q he.?:eve5 '\?? ?,,to?r ??e'p°Sec?. C'z'Jcc,? C? doe A
es??.v?eA b cvo? 1 c?\t C ?porr?rv? c.4 pw? pcr-nerc1?.JY)
¢ 1, b.. ??- ? ?c ?i- ? l? cc t-.' PoSS bly b H Us
\e- a 8 L x,,t15 or s AAA rne_ RCMC l_ kk,, pc c? G re G??(aic?t? G S S4l,?cc? ?J? ?n? Ov'r P'-O 1k'C'5
la lies- i +keAft- VLO ?alAier ,M-r%),,ia,.,, c..J? 41 loe r'etaur >o
p lec,5e r'ectesy ?1r2 0 le?l- cr? ?-ke pre so ?-! ci,??c.fn?.r?co
o +? SL 4.S eWt-a C.`C-eA 6,1 ?t4L 8C.1 tX? Mer ov`_
Llv ,?r- ?J lam) •?
DWQ# O y-658(0
Plan Detail Incomplete
Date G_ 1+ Oy Who Reviewed:
%
? Please provide a location map for the project.
? Please show all stream impacts including all fill slopes, dissipaters, and bank stabilization on the site plan.
? Please show all wetland impacts including fill slopes on the site plan.
? Please indicate all buffer impacts on the site plan.
? Please indicate proposed lot layout as overlays on the site plan.
? Please indicate the location of the protected buffers as overlays on the site plan.
? Please locate all isolated or non-isolated wetlands, streams and other waters of the State as overlays on the site plan.
- ? -Please provide cross section details showing the provisions for aquatic life passage. - -
? Please locate any planned sewer lines on the site plan.
? Please provide the location of any proposed stormwater management practices as required by GC
? Please provide detail for the stormwater management practices as required by GC
? Please specify the percent of project imperviousness area based on the estimated built-out conditions.
? Please indicate all stormwater outfalls on the site plan.
? Please indicate the diffuse flow provision measures on the site plan.
? Please indicate whether or not the proposed impacts already been conducted.
Avoidance and/or Minimization Not Provided
? The labeled as on the plans does not appear to be necessary. Please eliminate the or provide additiofial
information as to why it is necessary for this project.
? This Office believes that the labeled on the plans as can be moved or reconfigured to avoid the impacts to the
. Please revise the plans to avoid the impacts.
? This Office believes that the labeled on the plans as can be moved or reconfigured to minimize the impacts to the
Please revise the plans to minimize the impacts.
? The stormwater discharges at the location on the plans labeled will not provide diffuse flow through the buffer because
Please revise the plans and provide calculations to show that diffuse flow will be achieved through the entire buffer. If it
is not possible to achieve diffuse flow through the entire buffer then it may be necessary to provide stormwater management
practices that remove nutrients before the stormwater can be discharged through the buffer.
Other
? The application fee was insufficient because over 150 feet of stream and/or over 1 acre of wetland impacts were requested. Please
provide $ . This additional fee must be received before your application can be reviewed.
? Please complete Section(s) on the application.
? Please provide a signed copy of the application.
? Please provide copies of the application, copies of the site plans and other supporting information.
Mitigation
? of compensatory mitigation is required for this project. Please provide a compensatory mitigation plan. The
plan must conform to the requirements in 15 A NCAC 211.0500 and must be appropriate to the type of impacts proposed.
? Please indicate which 404 Permit the USACE would use to authorize this project.
.. w A ®?.4 V V 1/\
laai000s Oti89I i aleaS
z -- 0 0001 0007 000 6 000 ,
opw t 0
(qb hays suior)
Ill
,
h 3,s w. V
d - r ?) r r ?y r m G?
n.
w ', 3 r
a
v
DURHAM ? - I f
• l U
s
Ws82 ?/ 71 1
10,
a .?r\ my °?? GrD
IJ r vt C 'S
+' Y
? ?' ty`n, ? { I (? 3 I ? ? Sgt -. - _ ? i . ? a .??? I? •4 ? t \? ? ?
z V,
LL)
W ?, l N _ ?? I? m \ a \ %? as \k/
Cn
(? '4i1 ? ? ?.? r? £? f? N Y _
Q r3 3 r.- se?.3 m II J.
r
-
Z I - >-,?: ?s - ? 3 to
W N ?
O V - ?. ? _ m I eR U
U i? .- ?? h II ,n'fT Y w<. P '` ° 3 ? ?rUL ••?___J-? •\ - Yf U ? " t ?` ` 'Y ?
,
., .•..' " I 4.,^ a" y,?` T;'? S ? Y-J lfr ,SJ =1 _ ? i t ??•?'?j l??{' N fti, _ ` Ut4 _
cif,. sa• '' _
fz Z5
LLJ
2 N .YyS ? .? ?_ 2? T \ ?f'(> < •YY? a \, m U'
I
C7 ? ?. III ? \-W ? i ? `?'.; 1?-.. j-? ??? ?i^ s ? `' -?? ? ???.
'? ;? f 4«a,. r13 ?;. _ ? t 'k? b'>;y:?--?'f , tit ?
'• . ?' V ? ?? L Jn /,^ '? ? L' .?? m. II t'Y m f??r ??y?er p'?T ?..
r,
U I M1
a
S / 7
w r?
o1(a 4q),gRO
Rp
co ? $
OQ H L
y0 W 1? (-
Pp i0E'Cy . O? W
CARPENTER FIRE MORR/SV/
STATION RD.
.CgRp fNr fR
E? Ro. RD
SITE MoRRISVi
czi ° PKWY'
m
c at
0
GREEN HOPE v
SCH. RD.
'PO
NOT TO SCALE
VICINITY MAP
ZOJJ'
M
iE ro
01
ti z
Zv
to '`,?HgM ovGN?
W '
)+vrY s~
SITE ® U.S.
RALEIGH
US. e+
1-40
? ? s? •s,
WAKE COUNTY
J?' ! NORTH CAROLINA
NOT TO SCALE
PROPOSED
ROAD
POND
l
SECTION 404
WETLANDS'
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 250 500 f
IN FEET SHEET 2 OF 3
1 inch = 500 ft. f
NOTES:
1. THE DEPICTED WETLANDS WERE FIELD SURVEYED
BY THIS OFFICE USING CONVENTIONAL SURVEY
METHODS.
2. THE PURPOSE OF THIS SURVEY IS TO DEPICT
SECTION 404 JURISDICTION WETLANDS ONLY.
BOUNDARY AND PROPOSED ROADWAY LINES ARE BY
OTHERS AND ARE SHOWN HERE SOLELY FOR
ORIENTATION PURPOSES. ,

PROPOSED
N.C.G.S. "CHANDLER" ROAD
N= 751,363.586
E= 2,038,140.704
ELEV- 389.53(ft)
PROPOSED
ROAD

Z?
ni
SHEET 3 OF 3 SECTION 404
C IV" WETLANDS
REED
_ STREAM
00
02M REVISED WOMD8 CEW
DATE
09.23.03 1"8c=a55E00' SECTION 404 WETLANDS SURVEY FOR:
DRAWN BY CHECKED BY
R.A.P. JAR. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
-DESCRIPTION-
ET M8DEUNEA71oNsuRm LOUIS STEPHENS DRIVE & MORRISVILLE PARKWAY EXTENSIONS
SHEET PHASE ONE
1 OF 3 CARY, WAKE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
LUCATION MAP
DATUM DESCRIPTION
THE LOCALIZED COORDINATE SYSTEM DEVELOPED FOR THIS PROJECT
IS BASED ON THE STATE PLANE COORDINATES ESTABLISHED BY
OTHERS FOR MONUMENT "GPS No.8"
WITH NAD 83 STATE PLANE GRID COORDINATES OF
NORTHING: 750,973.960(ft) EASTING: 2,041,122.480(ft)
THE AVERAGE COMBINED GRID FACTOR USED ON THIS PROJECT
(GROUND TO GRID) IS: 0.999907459
THE N.C. LAMBERT GRID BEARING AND
LOCALIZED HORIZONTAL GROUND DISTANCE FROM
"GPS No.8" TO N.C.G.S. "CHANDLER" IS
N 82" 33' 19" W 3,007.12(ft)
ALL LINEAR DIMENSIONS ARE LOCALIZED HORIZONTAL DISTANCES
VERTICAL DATUM USED IS NGVD 29
NORTH CAROLINA ch}; ft** 90 its
I'd WAKE COUNTY ?OF 't+?d ahd wIW-1.WAS
tZ? r't.?ttta pK+'su.a.rit"l-.?
This certffies that this copy of this plat need. ately dsoetavie-
boundary j Section 404 of the Clean Water
Act in the areas impacted by the present proposed activity, as
determined by the undersigned on this date. Other areas of
jurisdiction may be present on the site but have not been
delineated. Unless there Is a change In the law or our
published regulations, this determination of Section 404
jurisdiction may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five
years from this date. This determination was made utilizing the
1987 Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual.
Name• WQ_
Date: L2 - K6V 2003
?yo3 aogSrl
LAKE AID:'
Submitted by
"GPS No.W TN
n 2, 0,041,973.960122A80
E i URS Corporation - North Carollna
E= 2,
ELEV= 353.34(ft) \ 1600 Perimeter Park Drive
Morrisville. North Carollna 27560
TELEPHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
COPYR i GHT 0 2000. uRS 0O PORAT I ON. 1 NO.
"f I, JESSE J. PRICE, PROFESSIONAL LAND
SURVEYOR HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS
( SECTION 404 WETLAND SURVEY AND
SUBSEQUENTRL„A WAS MADE UNDER MY
DIRECT SU SHAT IT IS
CORREC KNOWLEDGE.
y g 23-a3
N.C. PRO .43R L-3220
T rrAN .o;RV? ? ? ?o O?A

A TerrecOn Company
ENGINEERING - SURVEYING - PLANNING
5240 GREEN'S DAIRY ROAD, RALEIGH,N.C. 27616 [phone]

?00
.o
126
PNT NORTHING EASTING
100 754784.8430 2040540.1242
101 754818.0915 2040431.2494
102 754720.7183 2040413.8431
103 754743.0992 2040354.8711
104 754703.0050 2040414.4745
105 754644.2262 2040422.6721
106 754551.7863 2040446.6108
107 754441.9745 2040459.7496
108 754367.4654 2039979.9578
109 754312.8872 2040013.3827
110 754274.9449 2040051.5706
111 754240.9015 2040132.2917
112 754216.4538 2040168.3792
113 754149.4092 2040241.2474
114 754073.7467 2040271.3728
115 754030.6671 2040308.3916
116 753992.6585 2040297.4467
117 753936.7769 2040300.6926
118 753975.1719 2040280.9444
119 753968.1443 2040218.2259
120 754103.7424 2040160.9869
121 754129.5482 2040102.7292
122 754182.5708 2040166.8734
123 754225.9388 2040119.3058
124 754240.5353 2040028.9266
125 754284.4580 2039967.0827
126 754333.6191 2039940.2651
02W REVISED MAIN CEKr

SECTION 404 WETLAND AREA:
32,449.53 SQ.FT. / 0.745 ACRE
LINE BEARING DISTANCE
L1 N73'01'06"W 113.84'
1.2 S10'08'06"W 98.92'
L3 N69'1V64"W 63.26'
L4 956'09'39"E 72.00'
L5 S07'56'22"E 59.35'
L6 S14'31'07"E 95.49'
L7 S06'49'23'E 110.59'
L8 S31'29'03"E 64.09
L9 34591'05"E 53.83'
L10 S67'0T58"E 87.61'
L11 955'53'03'E 43.59'
L12 S47'23'00"E 99.02'
L13 S21-4236"E -81.44-
L14 340'40'23"E 56.80'
L15 S16'03'56"W 39.55'
L16 S03'1 9'31"E 55.98'
L17 N2701 8V 43.18'
L18 S83'36'24"W 63.11'
L19 N22'53'08"W 147.18'
L20 N66'O6'31"W 63.72'
L21 950'25'20"E 83.22'
L22 N47'38'39"W 64.3T
L23 N80'49'33"W 91.55'
L24 N54'37'01"W 75.85'
L25 N28-3646-W 56.00'
L26 N49'32'44"E 52.18'
100

1

2 3'-03
DATE
Sw y -N
SECTION 404 WETLANDS SURVEY FOR:
09.23.03 1" =100'
DRAWN CHECKED BY
R.A.P. J.J.P. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
En.A Ds-Mm mN n1 NsuRVEY LOUIS STEPHENS DRIVE & MORRISVILLE PARKWAY EXTENSIONS
sHmT PHASE ONE
20F3 GARY, WAKE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
GRAPHIC SCALE
50 100 200
( IN FEET )
1 inch = 100 !t
Submitted by
URS Corporatlon - North Carollna
1600 Perlmeter Pork Drive
Morrisville, North Carollna 27560
TELEfwr0lE (919) 461-1 100 FAX [phone]
COPYR I G "T ® 2000. LRS OORPORAT I ON. I NC.
TrrAN j&&nA-r1 Q9tcffkl
A lerracon Company
ENGINEERING - SURVEYING - PLANNING
5240 GREEN'S DAIRY ROAD, RALEIGH N.C. 27616 [phone] ,
Iz
LINE
L BEARING
85°25'06 "E DISTANCE
99
78' LINE BEARING DISTANCE PNT NORTHING EASTING PNT NORTHING
FASTING
8
1.28
04°28'48"W
E .
8
69' 1.73 N84°13'53"W
°
58.11' 127 751156.3625 2040727.9880
128 751148.3919 2040827
4327 170 750862.9337 2040740.99! 0

1.29 S21*14*19V
.
79
72'
1.74
S53
40'09"W
°
34.64' .
129 751089.8782 2040822.8482 171 750846.6440 2040727.9173
172 750832
3588 2040711
3800

1.30

S05°11'53"IN .

84
28' L76

176 S80
30'44"W
°
'
" 43.49' 130 751015.5743 2040793.9700

131 750931
6424 2040786
3 .
.
173 750763.7766 2040639.6768

1.31
S19°2T41"W .

96A8'

L77 N22
34
32
E
°
'
"
45.37' .
.
346
132 750840.6745 2040754.1902 174 750685,8816 2040572.8407'
176 750400
5992 2040281
2713

L32
S20°42'01"W
150.45'
L78 N72
36
22
E
- N86°
' 50.48' 133 75099.9367 2040701.0088
134 750680
4089'2040661
3 .
.
177 750406.4399 2040223.4553

1.33
S63°4T42"W
44.22'

L79 1722
E
N88°49'26"E 40.52'

' .
.
319
135 750679.8046 2040404.6034 178 750385.9202 2040195.5525
179 750378.7508 2040152
6534

L34
S89051'55"W
256.73'
L80
S09°10'24"W 28.79
38 136 750735.7518 2040407.0355
137 750793.7401 2040425
0346 .
180 750420.6423 2040170.0702

L35
N02°29'21"E
56.00'
L81
S2 5°0227"E ,84
8
' .
138 75083-6974
.7119
1
50 181 750435.7332 2040218.2427
182 750438
3553 2040258
6764

L36
N17'14'38"E
60.72'
L82
S20°30OrW 3.40
90.
46 1
39 75082
.6908 2040
.8940
140 750868.4207 2040595
2648
.
.
183 7504 8.9463 2040287.4638

L37
N42°20'28"E
50.00'
1.83
N81°5
9'02'VV .

55
86' .
141 750901.3823 2040548.9170 184 750440.6505 2040056.2954
185 750365.0888 2040091
5962

1.38
S79°3721 "E
50.00'
1.84
S67°41'41W .
46AW 142 750947.7344 2040549.0540
143 750970.7381 2040650
4242 .
186 750321.1562 2040075.1887

L39
N61'51'8"E
99.08'
L85
N21.3952"W

31
.76' .
144 751009.6858 2040831,3540 187 750328.9456 2040019.8578

188 750311.3026 2039976
8510
L40 N54.'50"W
.
56.87
L86
N31°14'32"E
93.50' 145 750970.1153 2040486.6789
146 750992.9565 2040454
9127 .
189 750340.8468 2039965.2046

1.41
1.4
N00
10'10"E
°
'
46.35'
L87
N65.00'00"E
47.00' .
147 751046.4217 2040635.5141 .8989
190 750420.7874 2040013 191 750349.2934 2039857
3115
2
L43 N77
12
52"E
°
'
" 103.95'
1.88
357°25'47"E
58.28' 148 750688.7903 2040561.4724
149 750699.9541 2040574
21 ,
192 750317.9219 2039906.4221

L44
N26
05
17
W
°
'
"
43.37'
L89
^N87°13'29"E
22.11' .
01
150 750721.1782 2040591.2132 193 750318.9926 2039928.5105
194 750283
0801 2039961

S76
29
18
W
169.36'

1.90

42°"
14'48E

48
51'
151 750758.8828 2040617.6255 .
.1273
195 750282.0181 2039966
9559
1.45 N27°15'16"W 25.89'
1.91
S79°39'16"E .

5
92' 152 750773.6916 2040633.5790

153 750789.0889 2040649
5253 .
196 750288.2893 2039990.0760

L46
N73°30'33"E
188,35'

1.92

N74°49110"E .

23.96' .

164 750816.9481 04M 197 750281.7911 2040025.4847

9
6
1.47 N40
°03'43"E
143.65'
L93
S79°36'03"E
36,00 155 750852.8446 2040712.8367
156 750903.5793 2040744
9988 199 75031
2.5249 204011
8,2825

1.48
N48°46'03"E
16.94'
L94
N69°1T41'E
' .
157 750950.7033 2040743
1293 200 750329.6648 2040130.8759

L49
N38°41'56"E
27,19'

1.95

N73°16'48"E 39.38

' ,
158 751046.1148 2040717.7492 201 750334.8195 2040148.809
202 .750364.9493 2040194
4426

1.50

35°00'41"E

46.04'

L96

N36°18'22"E 58.43

21
' 159 751071.9868 2040738.4762

160 751109.3004 2040749
4365 .
203 750360.5459 2040209.9505

1.51
N47°0752"E
21.77
L97
N73°57'42"E .27
1
' .
161
2o4o767.8992
4 204 750372.2643 2040235.2934
205 750386
9a4e 2040259
1118

L52
N48°00'12"E
22.17'
1.98
N58°33'59"E 8.88
64
68' 1
62 751157.0754
20
40772.4551
163 751158,7886 2040780
9139 .
.
206 7503 9.1043 2040284.8849

L53
N47°58'53E
41.62'
1.99
S74°08'54"E .
.
18
12' .
164 751122.1094 2040781.9569 207 750382.1498 2040298.1756
208 750393.0429 2040357
2547
1.54 N42°03'40"E 48.35' 1.100 'N65°11'04"E .
27.92'
166 751103. 2040753.7483
1
66 751071.25753 2040748
0232 .

2 0 750
409

L55
N32°22'18"E
60.07'
1.101
N58°16'59"E
28
00' .
167 751045.0359 2040726.4527 50
.1944 2040444.8530
1-56 N02°16'18"W 47.16'
1.102 ° "
^N85 1754E .
25.86' 168 750949.8115 2040757.9811
169 750907.9784 2040761
9212
1.57 N1 4°53'46"W 98.73' L103 562°2243"E 15.00' .
L68 N35°53'54"E 31.94' 1.104 M9°33'11"E 60.07'
L59 N19°09'14"E 39.50' L105 N89°56'47"E 55.40'
L60 N53 °38'49"E 22.92' 1.108 N6 3°26'06"E 36,00
1.61 N07°35'27"E 34.49'
L62 S01°43'22"E 34,88
L63 S56.18'00"W 33.91'
L64 S10007 1"W 32.55'
L65 839°26'31"W 33.917
L66 S18°19'10"E 100.31'
L67 S05°22 WT 42.02'
L68 824.5601"W 49.87
L69 S38°45'38"W 20.89'
L70 S49°1(Y44"VV 21.85' ,.-
L71 S46°16'28"W 99,22' _
L72 S40'3T50"W 102.64' - - -
a``%%v4- .vip°°
s
CA
... RO

Ag-
GRAPHIC SCALE
)0
5ECTION 404
WETLAND AREA:
9,855.59 SQ.FT
0.226 ACRE
191
S? 192 193
RFq,? L89 <
1!
189
184
x
SECTION 404 WETLAND AREA:
4,501.52 SQ.FT. / 0.103 ACRE
181 L78182L79 183
176
4 oraita 1.,S
\185 179 1.75 1.&e 205 206
204 207
/} 02 ?,1tA
La7 203
186 200 201
`gg 199
( IN FEET )
1 inch = 100 rt•
STREAM ?\t
208 """ 209
,188 187
\ toz 196 vo-
95143 ? 198
-REVISIONS-
09-MO REVISED WETLANDS CERT
DATE SCALE
09-23-03 1"=10
DRAWN BY CHECKED
R.A.P. J.J.P.
-DESCRIPTION-
e WDS DELINEATION SU
SHEET
30F3
SECTION 404 WETLANDS SURVEY FOR:
ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
LOUIS STEPHENS DRIVE & MORRISVILLE PARKWAY EXTENSIONS
PHASE ONE
sh- CARY, WAKE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
210
Submitted by
URS Corporation - North Carolina
1600 Perimeter Park Drive
Morrisville North Carolina 27560
TELER-ME [phone] FAX [phone]
00PYR I G-IT 0 2000. LRS CORPORAT I ON. i NC.
T r rAN /4,
e4A
A lrerrac®n Company
ENGINEERING - SURVEYING - PLANNING
5240 GREEN'S DAIRY ROAD, RALEIGH,N.C. 27616 [phone]
PROPMPn
;r
LOUIS STEPHENS DRIVE
STATION 207+50
LONG. -78.8647°
LAT. 35.8115°
cli
6
N
54"
LIMITS OF
CONSTRUCTION
/
,'coo
y c?
49
1t,A 35.86170)

D
M
ZO
O.
NI
I
m

W
IY I O
N

WI
f P
/
E
0
/
G•
tl?
k
.c
I
/ a m
/ O ? ppW
v O F
W W UI
OZ z
/ 54" NDWALL
LIMITS OF /
CONSTRUCTION
PROPOSED 33 TONS
CLASS II RIP RAP
WITH 62 SY
FILTER FABRIC
PROPOSED 33 TONS
CLASS II RIP RAP
WITH 62 SY
FILTER FABRIC

Teoo"

i"

15 RCP

fi

a
A
FES

I
'
m
m
M

y
0
N
I o
;Q,"
N
LEVEL SPREADER
PROJECT; ST-1099
LOUIS STEPHENS DRIVE
AND
MORRISVILLE PARKWAY
EXTENSIONS
TOWN OF CARY
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
318 N. ACADEMY STREET
CARY, N.C. 27512
ENVIRONMENTAL PROJECT
SCALE: I"=30' SPECIALIST ENGINEER
APRIL 5, 2004 MIKE BABUIN RUSS OVERTO
1'IlN1'H
STREAM BUFFER IMPACTS
mm ZONE 1 (0'-30' BUFFER) IMPACT AREA = 8050 SF
a;;?;;?e; tt
:a!:'i:<: r ZONE 2 (30'-50' BUFFER) IMPACT AREA = 4180 SF
:an;asr•:+:
STREAM IMPACT LENGTH = 112 FT
EXIST. IMPERVIOUS AREAS
® ZONE 1 (0'-30' BUFFER) IMPACT AREA = 0 SF
® ZONE 2 (30'-50' BUFFER) IMPACT AREA = 0 SF
PROP. IMPERVIOUS AREAS
® ZONE 1 (0'-30' BUFFER) IMPACT AREA = 3705 SF
0 ZONE 2 (30'-50' BUFFER) IMPACT AREA = 2285 SF

LOUIS STEPHENS DRIVE
STATION 207+50 I PROPOSED 33 TONS
CLASS II RIP RAP

I WITH 62 SY .--
FILTER FABRIC
K
?
LL
m
co
(n
b
H

v
•.•. •. ••. •.•.
N
Z
Z W
Z

N z
N u)
W
..•• .• ,??•.
.••. .• ... .,••. •
I •
54" EN ALL
V
r
LONG. -78.8647°
LAT. 35.8115° . ?-
LIMITS OF
CONSTRUCTION
r
?D.SHV'-
I- Ar 35.81'J
k ?, / i GAG.
900 5 /
0
/ ZN
/ 54"
LIMITS OF
CONSTRUCTION
/
y/

N

J
- I
m
I
a
zz 2N
f/
.?Fc/]20 M 2
W'
I
ALL '
PROPOSED 33 TONS',
CLASS II RIP RAP
WITH 62 SY
FILTER FABRIC
i
® IMPACT AREA = 1101 SF

?' 15 RCP
r /
FES
PROJECT: ST-1099
LOUIS STEPHENS DRIVE
AND
MORRISVILLE PARKWAY
EXTENSIONS
TOWN OF CARY
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
318 N. ACADEMY STREET
CARY, N.C. 27512
ENVIRONMENTAL PROJECT
SCALE: I" = 30' SPECIALIST ENGINEER
9!k APRIL 5, 2004 MIKE BABUIN RUSS OVERTON
AORTH
WETLAND IMPACTS
m IMPACT AREA = 4129 SF
EXIST. IMPERVIOUS AREAS
LEVEL SPREADER
® IMPACT AREA = 0 SF
PROP. IMPERVIOUS AREAS
t
% LOUIS STEPHENS DRIVE
STATION 247+00
PROPOSED 13 TONS CLASS I RIP RAP =? I
AT PIPE ENTRANCE AND LATERAL DITCHES ro?
NTH 29 SY FILTER FABRIC TO BE PLACED
AFTER INLET SEDIMENT TRAP IS REMOVED I ?{
LIMITS OF
CONSTRUCTION
TEMPORARY
TEMPORARY ROCK SILT SILT FENCE
PROPOSED DITCH CHECK TYPE 'A' (1633.01 (TYP.)
TO BE LINED WITH
EROSION MATTING
LONG. -78.8649°
LAT. 35.8223°
PROPOSED 5' SIDEWALK
33 L.F. . 15" RCP 1
NON-SUBJECT
STREAM /
I
24" I
ENDWALL /
TEMPORARY ROCK
/ SILT CHECK TYPE
. ?.•.. 1633.01)

146
),
Ll-
................PROPOSED 5' SIDEWALK

MH

:....'.. '.:... .;:::::::::.:?. ..';:
TD
'"'"' ENDWALL
:'
.. :r :' kS
TEMPORARY SILT / ?.'.'. '. .... ; .
FENCE (TYPICAL)
TEMPORARY GRAVEL AND• •.
50 RIP RAP FILTER BASIN
?•
n (4.03). - D.A =3.0 AC. /
36'Lx3O'Wx5'D
5400 CF OF SEDIMENT
STORAGE PROVIDED
PROPOSED 3 TONS
CLASS I RIP RAP PROPOSED 10 TONS
WITH 7 SY
PROPOSED 3 TONS
CLASS I RIP RAP
WITH 7 SY
FILTER FABRIC

LONG. -78.8647°
LAT. 35.8223°
_248-00
PROPOSED 18 E SS MEDIAN
LONG. -78.8644°
LAT. 35.8 TEMPORARY ROSK_
SILT CHECK TYPE -
-- ?_ 'A' (1633.01)
TD
LIMITS OF
CONSTRUCTION
FILTER FABRIC CLASS I RIP RAP TEMPORARY GRAVEL AND
NTH 22 SY IP RAP FILTER BASIN
+?'? FILTER FABRIC (4.03). - D.A.=3.0 AC.
9 C 36'Lx3O'Wx5'D
5400 CF OF SEDIMENT
STORAGE PROVIDED
PROPOSED DITCH
TO BE LINED WITH
EROSION MATTING
PROJECT: ST-1099
LOUIS STEPHENS DRIVE
AND
MORRISVILLE PARKWAY
EXTENSIONS
TOWN OF CARY
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
318 N. ACADEMY STREET
CARY, N.C. 27512
ENVIRONMENTAL PROJECT
SCALE: 1"=30' SPECIALIST ENGINEER
APRIL 5, 2004 MIKE BABUIN RUSS OVERTON
NORTH
WETLAND IMPACTS
IMPACT AREA = 10644 SF
EXIST. IMPERVIOUS AREAS
® IMPACT AREA = 0 SF
PROP. IMPERVIOUS AREAS
rm IMPACT AREA = 2983 SF
LOUIS STEPHENS DRIVE
STATION 253+00

PROPOSED 13 TONS CLASS I RIP RAP
AT PIPE ENTRANCE AND LATERAL DITCHES 1
WITH 29 SY FILTER FABRIC TO BE PLACED 1
AFTER INLET SEDIMENT TRAP IS REMOVED )
TEMPORARY SILT /
FENCE (TYPICAL)
24" 1
- ENDWALL It 11 -'
r ft'tl i,
SiDeWALK
0

S LF. 15" RCP
LIMITS OF TEMPORARY R0_r
CONSTRUCTION 51Li?HECK fiYPE -
...........
\ A' (1633.01)
PROJECT: ST-1099
LOUIS STEPHENS DRIVE
AND
MORRISVILLE PARKWAY
EXTENSIONS
U_.._ LONG. -78.8643° I 68 L.F. 15" RCP
,E LAT. 35.8238° 1 cs
CB 66 L.F. 15" R'-P -- TOWN OF CARP
J CB
/ ~- 30 L.F. 15' RCP
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
/ NON SUBJECT 318 N. ACADEMY STREET
3 00
CB CARY, N.C. 27512
i ?
_ 5 L.F. 15' RCP
O0 ENVIRONMENTAL PROJECT
L-- I N ` _ _ Z7 SCALE: 1" = 30' SPECIALIST ENGINEER
co APRIL 5, 2004 MIKE BABUIN RUSS OVERTON
42 L.F. 15" RCP NORTH
c'?Fai1k. 8 L.F. 15" RCP
PROPOSED CB POND BUFFER IMPACTS
r _.
0 .- IDEWqLK
_ ---__ / 66 L.F. 15` RCP _y CB CB
lK:;t.f• :'.;'ll;::>:::,:_: --?_ it ip<:::7 -
- -?- g ?'•;,r.,;aZONE 1 (0'-30' BUFFER) IMPACT AREA - 264 SF
6 K.
r LF
•i
s
R
C
P
G
0
-? r,.,,;. ?• ZONE 2 (30'-50 BUFFER) IMPACT AREA - 2489 SF
F S e.,l.....:f..
C
E
F
N?
I
24"
I
PROPOSED 7 TONS i
WITH 15 SY
FILTER FABRIC
TEMPORARY GRAVEL AND ENDWALL
RIP RAP FILTER BASIN (4.03).
- D.A.=1.0 AC,25'Lx25'Wx3'D
5400 CF OF SEDIMENT r
STORAGE PROVIDED
CLASS I RIP RAP
I
. 4\
1 PREFORMED SCOUR TEMPORARY SILT-
, HOLE WITH LEVEL FENCE (TYPICAL)
SPREADER APRON
(SEE DETAIL)
L,
?NC
1q
1?2
0
1
0
N N
F s
0
Y%
A`
'J
EXIST. IMPERVIOUS AREAS
¦ ZONE 1 (0'-30' BUFFER) IMPACT AREA = 0 SF
® ZONE 2 (30'-50' BUFFER) IMPACT AREA = 0 SF
PROP. IMPERVIOUS AREAS
ZONE 1 (0'-30' BUFFER) IMPACT AREA = 0 SF
® ZONE 2 (30'-50' BUFFER) IMPACT AREA = 8 SF
LOUIS STEPHENS DRIVE
STATION 253+00
PROPOSED 13 TONS CLASS I RIP RAP
AT PIPE ENTRANCE AND LATERAL DITCHES
WITH 29 SY FILTER FABRIC TO BE PLACED
AFTER INLET SEDIMENT TRAP IS REMOVED
--- - ---_ TEMPORARY SILT
FENCE (TYPICAL)
\ 24"
- ENDWALL-
PROP
OSEp 5' SIDEWgW
-?zlt
a?
9 y
m 8 LF. 15" RCP
1
ii LIMITS OF TEMPORARY ROCK TCE
CONSTRUCTION SILT CHECK TYPE
\ 'A' (1633.01)
PROJECT: ST-1099
LOUIS STEPHENS DRIVE
AND
MORRISVILLE PARKWAY
EXTENSIONS
G. -78.8643° 66 L.F. 15'
?•_ RCP .."^..- -
LAT. 35.8238° CB - _-
66 L.F. 15° RCP
CB CB TOWN OF CARY
`` ---- __ 30 L.F. 15" RC= ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
- ?? CE 318 N. ACADEMY STREET
25 (%0
- --__ CB CARY, N.C. 27512
5 L.F. 15" RCP
- I ?? ENVIRONMENTAL PROJECT
-? U1 _ SCALE: 1" = 30' SPECIALIST ENGINEER
APRIL 5, 2004
y REV. MAY 21, 2004 MIKE BABUIN RUSS OVERTON
_ 42 L.F. 15" RCP NORTH
N REV. ,nrivE z4, z004
rD=ice _ _ P ?- 8 L.F. 15" RCP ?- -`_
t - _ PROPOSED SID CB ?? POND BUFFER IMPACTS
CB
?? ? '•F. ':i:; ,:: - ".;'?-.r.. - A 66 L.F. 15" RCP CB
._._ ,:v.,.?....... ZONE 1 (0'-30' BUFFER IMPACT AREA 0 S
:::.' .?::„7i1;i:; vr::: <•::.'.:Y:;:.:;;i :; :;:2::;.. 66 l F. 15 RCP z.,...a,
,R
I ?i -tom
S
.{.`.
IMPACT AREA 2354 S
ZONE 2 (30'-50- BUFFER)
re`
FES
C F•
I .,. ................... .......••F •......................................
PROPOSED 7 TONS
TEMPORARY GRAVEL AND ?- CLASS I RIP RAP
WITH 15 SY
RIP RAP FILTER BASIN (4.03). FILTER FABRIC
- D.A.=1.0 AC.25'Lx25'Wx3'D
540STORAGE PROVIDED 1 EXIST. IMPERVIOUS AREAS
I ?HOLE REFORMED SCOUR TEMPORARY SILT
E IT APLEVEL RON FENCE (TYPICAL) LIMITS OF ¦ ZONE 1 (0,-30 BUFFER) IMPACT AREA = 0 SF
(SEE DETAIL) N CONSTRUCTION 1 _
?? \.. G. g 1 ® ZONE 2 (30'-50' BUFFER) IMPACT AREA = 0 SF
EXISTING POND 1 PROP. IMPERVIOUS AREAS
y ® ZONE 1 (0'-30- BUFFER IMPACT AREA = 0 SF
® ZONE 2 (30'-50' BUFFER) IMPACT AREA = 8 SF

TUWN OF GAKY
316 N.Academy St. - P.O. Box 8005 7 j
Cary North Carolina 27512-8005
[phone] CHECK No-244047
mc?UPO? VOUCHER INVOICE DESCRIPTION •
02/25/200 150800 PI5526 LOUISSTEPHENS MISC SERVICES 475.00
WETLANDS/401 GROUP
APR 1 3 2004
WATER QUAL17YSEC770N

NC DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY 624333 • $*******475.00
A Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete A.. Signature ,
item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired. X ? Agent
Print your name and address on the reverse , ? Addresses
so that we can return the card to you. B. Received by (Printed Name) C. Date of Deliver
0 Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece,
or on the front if space permits.
1. Article Addressed to:
Town of Cary
318 North Academy Street
Cary, NC 27512
DWQ# 04-0586 - Wake
IAMI-, , tt 020
D. Is delivery address different from item 1? ? es
If YES, enter delivery address below: ? No
3, Service Type
Cer06fied Mail ? Express Mail
?? Registered KReturn Receipt for Merchandis
A? Insured Mail ? C.O.D.
I,4. 'Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) ? Yes
^Nrticle Number 1•
nsfer from service label) 7003 3110 0 001 3494 2125
I
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
First-Class Mail
Postage & Fees Paid
USPS
Permit No. G-10
• Sender: Please print your name, address, and ZIP+4 in this box •
NC DENR Division of Water Quality U?- HZ
Wetlands/401 Certification Unit
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250 20
Raleigh, NC 27604, 2004
. Complete items 1, 2, and. 3. Also complete
item 4 if Restricted' Delivery is desired.
Print your name and address on the reverse
so that we can return the card to you.
Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece o
or on the front if'space,permits.
1. Article Addressed to:
C ua-IC e U n+-
A. Signature
A Agent
0 Addreeee
B. Received by (Printed ame) C. Date of Deliver,
Nis delivery address dlffe ent from ftem 1? ? Yes
,,YES, enter deliver address below: 0 No
d? ; gip' ?j°??"
s
©Wn o? I?oi1? SPrti?% P
X - ? 3. service Type
g s
I I ` D 10 Certified mail 13 Express Mail
Registered AReturn ReceiptIbrMerchandle
? Insured Mail ? C.O.D.
4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) 0 Yes
Article Number 72022412 2003 0275 4452
Transfer bor'tr s?n%ice fabel?
rm 3811, August 2001 Domestic Return Receipt 10269V'
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE First-Class Mail
Postage ,& Fees Paid
LISPS.
0-I'l -2/04 1.01:: 1:4 INA T11
• Sender: Please print your name, address, and ZIP+4 in this box •
NC DENR Division of Water Quality
Wetlands/401 Certification Unit
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604
i ;1il 111llli111111}1lllilIII}'11ll1lli fkllll1lfit] J111IIIIIA
d
PROJECT: ST-1099
:. . 1•- v .
M?qR j?,???,;?'? LOUIS STEPHENS DRIVE
lr ? ( J I
pp r L ??l i
?1 AND
IS ?
°°y w ?;?1fo;
MORRISVILLE PARKWAY
CARPENTER FIRE
RI _ A \ m 341
s? EXTENSIONS
STA110N RD. j 7
??(f•
SITE. RRA
MO RISALLE
d PKWY.
K \ r t? f ?I ?n' t\ Q I
87
m ? ? ? ???, ? ti ? i ) A ? ,' ?, ?j ? V '" I??l.? ???? ?? ''where Sroe?fMd ??rr'?\ k ?(? A ?? ??, ? ?? ?? ?.. .
w s am d i r_ `\ ?\ }} 1\ ?: s
? p a • r • e 1 ? ? 1 ? f ?..J ? ? I ?? ''- ?a+--C, I ?`'? + ? '? V ? I ' ? ? f ?;? ? ? i r
GREEN HOPE
N?_?
TOWN OF CARY
y???" .-,._, < <?_,L ?ti • r v.. i? ," ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
VICINITY MAP N T TO SCALE, o STA 253+00 E r,s<,
318 N. ACADEMY STREET
GARY, N.C. 27512
STA. 247+00
M305
a 7 ,x,75 ?? ~ ?? \ l \ 3 ._ J' i u^ I \ p . ,
ENVIRONMENTAL PROJECT
SCALE:I"=2000'
SPECIALIST ENGINEER
NOb„l APR 5, 2004
r , Iti% , t, = ; ; -- - as ? 4 MIKE BABUIN RUSS OVERTON
PROJECT
STUDY AREA
lit f rI?? ?,?.>> v Z a
61
A. 207+50
\` r r PROJECT
? ,? ?? ??? ?,? , ,,, ?? :?_? -,? ` ° STUDY
`.? l.? ?? 1 n ` ,I1?..?(,/r ?-• ,`i-/'?\,?5 `/' .i? l (fi i t; -irJ?' AREAS
"1 /r F, 1r L r% [- , Ala ryyY, \\ I S! 11? \S J ` li r .? r ?1 r , ?. C? p?('?'J ,1
?I L),
t
II ?, e ,f/7? -r li V ,,? ?,?irs? '- :%_? ? t ?i?. ?, y'/ s A? 1( a
l ??•? 11 A a .?
MAP REFERENCE:
? +I
?l t USGS
\ ) 111 ?/' li l \ r I Z r ,?''
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 11A 0"
fV"'\ ;i 11 ? r cry U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
4
ti) CARY QUADRANGLE
NORTH CAROLINA
r1l
7.5-MINUTE SERIES (TOPOGRAPHIC)
CARY, NC
?? r , ?,,-?f; ? 1;1 ?' ? ??? • "' - ; • ? '? I I ` ?, rr , < ? ? ? ?, 1993
M'I
qRp
Rp
N
00 W
' 00
'SOA a
1'p FCy y
FlRE
I \xAzwl
GREEN HOPE SCH, RD.
VICINITY MAP
0
r5
d?
'RI Sh?-C"p
ITE R Ro
MO RISW
LLE
? PKW1:
O
W o
W s
o a
= o
U
D
U
a
N T TO SCALE
PROJECT
STUDY AREA
PROJECT ST 1099
LOUIS STEPHENS DRIVE
AND
N ?`?? MORRISVILLE PARKWAY
; EXTENSIONS
ff } ?- \? r =air 1? ` } °ao ?? jL.J y? `V?
}` rt\ t
??, J\ \ r t
16
V Jf
,r
II 1 M.:? 1
333 , 1?,? ?,. ? I i ? - ?ti } ? ? ? ? ?? ? ? ?? ? ?t? ?,? .. -? I ?- ?;_,; ?,`?? ,''' . ? • ? ?,?,1
t ?' ?1 > tij t', t ?,? •?, 'A q
41
TOWN OF CARY
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
(• ; STA. 253+00 t,????', t• -; ?, ?;?,?? `,? ° '{
??, . .??'' J ,? \ 4r? " ` ??( l \ ?G ?30?,?? ?? •' 318 N. ACADEMY STREET
. ` STA. 247+00?, G' 1 1 : 1 t a ?, CARY, N.C. 27512
M 905
ENVIRONMENTAL PROJECT
t`1, 1 I ,f ?t 1 % ?t? SCALE: 12000' SPECIALIST ENGINEER
APRIL 5, 2004
MIKE BABUIN RUSS OVERTON
! , ', ,. i ? ?? i ??°a < 1' Noxrx MAY 21, 2004
irk ` ?r y t, 1 1 w? 'y s
Ju
f?
1 kJ V"
1?0 1 (
t.a? ?- •'' ? i `\' i .?lj III r ? ??"'' 'y''?I ' ? ? 1 ? ?) ? ??. { ?, _ ? (f?_-_ _ l? dSp ' ??
'?? ;l! r != ?? s?,, Jt ?, r l 1 t I f
STA. 207+50
PROJECT
• ? r 7? ?,?. ??? i) Xt ?•ti k`? -k .' •. - a !?fi 1 - r 1 ? r > _r `C
STUDY
? ?? ? ? ??'???.1:' ? >i S ? ? ?? ?p '/{r,?' ? 4? ! ,_V7 ??.:; ? /-? tit . ," `1 ? ,l ? ? 1??? ?i, i ?-,?? .\`??. . %r ??•? ?,, C
AREAS
?' y? y?A'? i !?', J / /? l t l ?? f? (? l ?•?? fj _?-? t. ?'? . rf eq ,t 1,•
-J t? JJ"? I'? L„? c' .' t ` 1 t ?1t? `?9 ?e?JJJ -?? ?t \ ?(((1,1I r(
?I - i` J/y?? , ?i (.. f j? ,..{?C--•
{lW,P+r- ?)? ????11' ?CJ 1'•. (R?s I \ litr ?') 11 sn ?'
I-H
?1r `:-.`? 'i 1 t l?r, )°? r a"• `) ' )1`> " ; ' j MAP REFERENCE:
USGS
/.1 8$
4U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
-,d 1-IRK-
U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
wf''`?/,
CARY QUADRANGLE
?....''? _ }fir ,., } ?'' , ? 1, ? • ; -- ? % 7
NORTH CAROLINA
7.5-MINUTE SERIES (TOPOGRAPHIC)
CARY NC
1993
LOUIS STEPHENS DRIVE
STATION 207+50
W
A
N
54" I
LONG. -78.8647-11
I
35 811511
LIMITS OF
CONSTRUCTION
' G
35.811
O?kc?O 6 ?G/
d? i
Qµ '
N
W
LIMITS /
CONSTRUCTION
c
?I
N
ENDWALL

N
0
F
N /
W
11

y
i
to
W
PROPOSED 33 TONS
CLASS II RIP RAP
WITH 62 SY
FILTER FABRIC
OPOSED 33 TONS
CLASS II RIP RAP
WITH 62 SY
FILTER FABRIC

7,
/
FM
N
2W
? N
LEVEL SPREADER
PROJECT: ST-1099
LOUIS STEPHENS DRIVE
AND
MORRISVILLE PARKWAY
EXTENSIONS
TOWN OF CARY
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
318 N. ACADEMY STREET
CARY, N.C. 27512
ENVIRONMENTAL PROJECT
10 SCALE: 130' SPECIALIST ENGINEER
APRIL 5, 2004 MIKE BABUIN RUSS OVERTON
NORTH REV. MAY 21, 2004
STREAM BUFFER IMPACTS
m ZONE 1 (0'-30' BUFFER) IMPACT AREA = 7468 SF
M ZONE 2 (30'-50- BUFFER) IMPACT AREA = 3020 SF
STREAM IMPACT LENGTH = 140 FT
EXIST. IMPERVIOUS AREAS
¦ ZONE 1 (0'-30' BUFFER) IMPACT AREA = 0 SF
® ZONE 2 (30'-50' BUFFER) IMPACT AREA = 0 SF
PROP. IMPERVIOUS AREAS
® ZONE 1 (0'-30' BUFFER) IMPACT AREA = 3519 SF
® ZONE 2 (30'-50' BUFFER) IMPACT AREA = 2351 SF
LOUIS STEPHENS D
STATION 207+50
ROPOSED 33 TONS
CLASS it RIP RAP
WITH 62 SY
FILTER FABRIC

? /
m

F •, '•''1' •r,' -
54 ° ENDWALL

LONG. -78.8647°
LAT. 35.8115

LIMITS OF
CONSTRUCTION

/

' ? ?0n
,,gy?pp
, PRA
ka .t:
D
FM

/ N .8644°
35.8117°

a J

n
/ o
?
o
M o ?
.
N
??W
/ ' / M1?j tW
N ?_
F
W
/
5 ' ENDWALL LEVEL SPREADER

LIMITS OF
CONSTRUCTION
w
PROPOSED 33 TONS'
?
a
, N
CLASS II RIP RAP

/ WITH 62 SY
FILTER FABRIC
PROJECT: ST-1099
LOUIS STEPHENS DRIVE
AND
MORRISVILLE PARKWAY
EXTENSIONS
TOWN OF CARY
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
318 N. ACADEMY STREET
CARY, N.C. 27512
ENVIRONMENTAL PROJECT
SCALE: 1" = 30' SPECIALIST ENGINEER
APRIL 5, 2004
MIKE BABUIN RUSS OVERTON
NORTH REV. MAY 21, 2004
WETLAND IMPACTS
m IMPACT AREA = 4129 SF
EXIST. IMPERVIOUS AREAS
® IMPACT AREA = 0 SF
PROP. IMPERVIOUS AREAS
® IMPACT AREA = 1101 SF
LOUIS STEPHENS DRIVE
STATION 247+00
PROPOSED 13 TONS CLASS I RIP RAP
AT PIPE ENTRANCE AND LATERAL DITCHES
WITH 29 SY FILTER FABRIC TO BE PLACED
AFTER INLET SEDIMENT TRAP IS REMOVED
PROPOSED DITCH
TO BE LINED WITH
EROSION MATTING
-C---
146 L.F.
LIMITS OF 24"
CONSTRUCTION ENDWALL
TEMPORARY
TEMPORARY ROCK SILT SILT FENCE
CHECK TYPE 'A' (1633.01 (TYP.)
/.
/ 3I
z
W .
o`? a I
h U
o'
TEMPOR /YROCK
SILT CHECK TYPE
A' (1633.01)
PROPOSED 3 TONS
CLASS I RIP RAP
WITH 7 SY
FILTER FABRIC
LONG. -78.8649°
LAT. 35.8223°
PROPOSED 5' SIDEWALK t •' :' :'
F
33 L.F. 15" RCP ` ' -
of
PROPOSED 5' SIDEWALK
TB' ^ TD--__?
F_ TD ?`•
~ 7+0 MH
?a
V
•.'•?' ''?•'•'••'•'' ENDWALL
TEMPORARY SILT /

FENCE (TYPICAL) TEMPORARY GRAVEL AND
RIP RAP FILTER BASIN
(4.03). - D.A.=3.0 AC.
36'Lx3O'Wx5'D
5400 CF OF SEDIMENT
STORAGE PROVIDED
/
t
PROPOSED 3 TONS \
CLASS I RIP RAP PROPOSED 10 TONS
WITH 7 SY CLASS I RIP RAP
FILTER FABRIC WITH 22 SY
FILTER FABRIC

TEMPORARY GRAVEL AND
RIP RAP FILTER BASIN
(4.03). - D.A.=3.0 AC.
36'Lx3O'Wx5'D
5400 CF OF SEDIMENT
STORAGE PROVIDED
PROPOSED DITCH
TO BE LINED WITH
EROSION MATTING
LONG. -78.8647°
LAT. 35.8223°

P
_ ___ 248 pQ _
PROPOSE--_____
?
MEDIAN

LONG. -78.8644°
LAT. 35.8 TEMPORARY RQC
SILT CHECK TYPE
t_ A' (1633.01) ?-
-he? ro /? --- -FT - - - -F
/ LIMITS OF
rnnicmi irnn,i
PROJECT: ST-1099
LOUIS STEPHENS DRIVE
AND
MORRISVILLE PARKWAY
EXTENSIONS
TOWN OF CARY
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
318 N. ACADEMY STREET
CARY, N.C. 27512
ENVIRONMENTAL PROJECT
I*- SCALE: 1" = 30' SPECIALIST ENGINEER
APRIL 5, 2004 MIRE BABUIN RUSS OVERTON
NORTH REV. MAY 21, 2004
WETLAND IMPACTS
IMPACT AREA = 9637 SF
EXIST. IMPERVIOUS AREAS
® IMPACT AREA = 0 SF
PROP. IMPERVIOUS AREAS
® IMPACT AREA = 2983 SF
LOUIS STEPHENS DRIVE
STATION 253+00 Z
G
o?
PROPOSED 13 TONS CLASS I RIP RAP
AT PIPE ENTRANCE AND LATERAL DITCHES
WITH 29 SY FILTER FABRIC TO BE PLACED
AFTER INLET SEDIMENT TRAP IS REMOVED a m
p v
m
_
TEMPORARY SILT
1 FENCE (TYPICAL) /
\ (t
\ 24.
ENDWALL7-\ ii
PR OPOSED
? .DEWAU(
TO
8 LF. 15' RCP
LIMITS OF
CONSTRUCTION
TEMPORARY ROCK
SILT CHECK TYPE
A' (1633.01)
TCE
LOUIS STEP ENS7P
AND
MORRISVILLE PARKWAY
EXTENSIONS
LONG. -78.8643° 66 L.F. ircP
LAT. X8238° CB
CB
?---
SO I
_f. 15" RCP
00
-
I,.,
5 C8
- RCP

v
a _

N 42 L.I. 15" RCP
?? - CB
PROP
D
SED SIDE`W4LK
RCP _
y

I
r

R•
C
FE S
F
I
? - ` ENDWALL 7Z-
TEMPORARY GRAVEL AND
RIP RAP FILTER BASIN (4.03).
- D.A.=1.0 AC.25'Lx25'Wx3'D
5400 CF OF SEDIMENT
STORAGE PROVIDED
PROPOSED 7 TONS `PREFORMED SCOUR TEMPORARY SILT'
(LASS I RIP RAP HOLE WITH LEVEL FENCE (TYPICAL)
WITH 15 SY SPREADER APRON
FILTER FABRIC ' (SEE DETAIL)
2
title` EXISTING POND
0
y l
66 `.F 15° RCP TOWN OF CARY
CB
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
CE 318 N. ACADEMY STREET
CARY, N.C. 27512
I
GQ ENVIRONMENTAL PROJECT
SCALE: 1"=30' SPECIALIST ENGINEER
_ APRIL 5, 2004
MIKE BABUIN RUSS OVERTON
NORTH REV. MAY 21,1004
8 L.F. 15" RCP
_ POND BUFFER IMPACTS
CB
-.-_?.?_ ...... 1 (0'-30- BUFFER IMPACT AREA -
- 136 SF
;6 C8 zF {, ZONE
L wsrs,.Ens
F 15 57,
;.t?::s: ZONE 2 (30'-50- BUFFER) IMPACT AREA = 2489 SF
0
Ito
°y LIMITS OF
CONSTRUCTION
N@ _
R
EXIST. IMPERVIOUS AREAS
¦ ZONE 1 (0'-30' BUFFER) IMPACT AREA = 0 SF
® ZONE 2 (30'-50' BUFFER) IMPACT AREA = 0 SF
PROP. IMPERVIOUS AREAS
® ZONE 1 (0'-30' BUFFER) IMPACT AREA = 0 SF
® ZONE 2 (30'-50' BUFFER) IMPACT AREA = 8 SF