510007_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20190923

Division of Water Resources
Facility Number I I .J - ® 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency 7
Type of Visit: Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: (WRoutine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: I Arrival `1al Time: qr0 Departure Time: a County: -�PRO_ Region;
}}��
Farm Name: I �2a U . E bVfiC.
Owner Name: Dftjjj
Mailing Address:
Owner Email:
Phone:
Physical Address: 251 PowhAm 9W. 0"'a--461
Facility Contact: D12n if r Title: Phone:
WAOnsite Representative:Integrator:
Certified Operator: �� �U Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: nnda _ Certification Number: f 190ROA
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Swine
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
Other
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
La er
10 0 Non -Layer
Non -L
Pullets
Other
Poults
Design Current
Discharges and Stream Impacts
I. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
?. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Pop.
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
D Cow
.Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
oil
❑ Yes P No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
[] No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
ta No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
M No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Paige I of 3 2/4/2015 Confinrred

jPZNy Number: - Date of Inspection: j
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier: ikSQ'
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): .� L
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑No ❑NA 0 N
Structure 6
❑ Yes R1 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and; or managed through a
❑ Yes
R] No
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
® No
❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental
threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
n No
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis
❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Weather Code
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
r,'RNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
Waste Application
Page 2 of 3
1/412015 Conflitued
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
� No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE_
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate ManurelSludge
into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application
Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):1�41SM8114A,f"C
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops dier from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
CR No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
[2 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
(2 No
❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
IX No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis
❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ I20 Minute Inspections []Monthly and I" Rainfall Inspections
❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
R NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3
1/412015 Conflitued

Facility Number: 5 Date of Ins ection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes No
the appropriate box(es) below.
ElFailure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, Freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Yes No ❑NA NE
❑ Yes C@ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
[:]Yes R No
❑ Yes �§ No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑ Yes
CR No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessarvl.
bol w; I ne4 � hrs CA'Is vl� ek br fire eid of dot , V rnn � # L 1�.r 9'+�yh howlsrtv rhow,
�. w 11 need. a.� )�J bWe,!�e Qd o�ih�'sy -ear t
Qy- J S ur It]��9�C�-sa �'C+�.,SI +�;t'9 4� Tr = G,3 , SGT",
f a41$
ay_ Ca I r e I t 1114 e &;a, l�ciCive�i'� Iter lQ
�fh o� 11�11� Cl rys aR'w,c� m �ead1 U9 #f
QIfit;l s11S . 1� e-.` Ais year, Chesayle
,5119 lnr�0 �$g'� C4fll d it. 1, L, 1r . C di'�� Qr8 "�
(.01 5-119 VV607 906 tr 1 -/dc
oss3o pee se new
�1MC41 i�44, taof- Naq NoM
jala is yyoo e. newl es-� x- eie,yro013b ym
,
15_stt nk on 1i