420010_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20190916

Facility Number L/ -
U Division of Water Resources
0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: Co,qqyrtance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 16Routine O Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral O Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: FT Arrival Time: Departure Time: County: Region:
Farm Name: _ a Wl �Z -. Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative: eV� 2�& N e e rL
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
fjw&r to Finish
Farrow to Wean 7• I IS
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Soars
Other
Other
Title:
Latitude:
Phone:
Integrator:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Design Current
Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
k
a er I I :::]on -Layer
Pullets
Other
Poults
Design Current
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Pop,
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
DaiEy Heifer
Dry Cow
,Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
Discharges and Stream Impacts
I . Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes, ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes gNo 7[[] NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Faeffl Number: tl Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ YesVNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):{,
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ YesNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes No [:]NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmZNo
rent, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes OrNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ YesNo ' ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): y) ►7,1 i A r o V
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ YesVN
❑ NA
[:]NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
0 NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes❑
NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
o
E:]NA
[:]NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
[] Yes
o
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
EyNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Waste Application [_j Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections E] Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yesw,4❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facili Number: (/I--- Date of Inspection:
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ YesN
❑ NA
[:]NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check
[] Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below,
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
No .'A
❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
1:7, J ,-,e-s-
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility9 if yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ LagoonlStorage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer'Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative?
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question ft Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations di- any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary)..
(1, J5 e Ste r1)at z•p3
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer'Inspector Signature: 0 t.. f e to 7G,y-e i (
Page 3 of 3
Phone: _�I I ` ydt O O
Date: 2—f7 —19
2/4!1015
12 r
Ve
1:7, J ,-,e-s-
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer'Inspector Signature: 0 t.. f e to 7G,y-e i (
Page 3 of 3
Phone: _�I I ` ydt O O
Date: 2—f7 —19
2/4!1015