20040418 Ver 1_Complete File_20040318

Eeos rht -**-
stem
PROGRAM
RECEIPT
Mike Pilo
Charlotte Country Club
2465 Mecklenburg Avenue
Charlotte, NC 28025
Re: Project: Charlotte Country Club
County: Mecklenburg
WETLANDS/ 401 GROUP
AUG 2 5 2004
WATER QUALITY SECTION
August 11, 2004
DWQ#: 04-0418
COE#: 200430113
The North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) has received a check in the amount of
$59,800.00 check number 011840, as payment for the compensatory mitigation requirements of the 401 Water Quality
Certification/Section 404 permit issued for the subject project. This receipt serves as notification that the compensatory
mitigation requirements for this project have been satisfied. Please note that you must also comply with all other
conditions of this certification and any other state, federal or local government permits or authorization associated with
this activity.
The NCEEP, by acceptance of this payment, acknowledges that the NCEEP is responsible for the compensatory
mitigation requirements associated with the subject permit and agrees to provide the compensatory mitigation as specified
in the permit. The NCEEP will restore 299 linear feet of warm water stream in Cataloging Unit 03050103 of the Catawba
River basin.
Payments to the Ecosystem Enhancement Program are NOT reimbursable unless a request for reimbursement is
received within 12 months of the date of the receipt. Requests for reimbursement must be accompanied by a letter from
the permitting agency stating that the permit and/or authorization has be rescinded.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Carol Shaw at [phone].
Sincerely,
Deborah D. Anderson
In-Lieu-Fee Administrator
cc: Cyndi Karoly, Wetlands/401 Unit
Amanda Jones, USACOE-Asheville
Allen Johnson, DWQ Regional Office-Mooresville
File
RP?tDYGK?... ... PYDt'e&&tq Oar Statt&
IVA
MWENR
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program, 1619 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1619 / 919-733-5208 / www.nceep.net
Certificate of Completion
DWQ Project No.: C?J County: Me C ?2 ,(\ 6v y'
Applicant: C ?a C? ?F CCD
Project Name: -t) ri,)kv\ , k?-Ck^CA c
?5o rJ nf??eC-T
Date of Issuance of 401 Water Quality Certification: e
Upon completion of all work approved within the 401 Water Quality Certification and Buffer mules. and
any subsequent modifications, the applicant is required to return this certificate to the 401/Wetlands Unit,
North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 1621 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC, 27699-1621. This form
may be returned to DWQ by the applicant, the applicant's authorized agent, or the project engineer. It is
not necessary to send certificates from all of these.
Applicant's Certification
I, - QEL v%i -0 hereby state that., to the best of my abilities, due care and
diligence was used in the observation of the construction such that the construction was observed to be
built within substantial compliance and intent of the 401 Water Quality Certification and Buffer Rules, the
approved plans and specifications, and other supporting materials.
Signature: V? Date:
Agent's Certification
I, , hereby state that, to the best of my abilities, due care and
diligence was used in the observation of the construction such that the construction was observed to be
built within substantial compliance and intent of the 401 Water Quality Certification and Buffer Rules, the
approved plans and specifications, and other supporting materials.
Signature:
Date:
If this project was designed by a Certified Professional
L , as a duly registered Professional
(i.e.;
Engineer, Landscape Architect, Surveyor, etc.) in the State of North Carolina, having been authorized to
observe (periodically, weekly, full time) the construction of the project, for the Permittee hereby state that,
to the best of my abilities, due care and diligence was used in the observation of the construction such that
the construction was observed to be built within substantial compliance and intent of the 401 Water Quality
Certification and Buffer Rules, the approved plans and specifications, and other supporting materials.
Signature: Registration No.: Date:

AUp
APR 06 2004
WATERQUAt/ry
® North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission rION
Charles R. Fullwood, Executive Director
MEMORANDUM
TO: John R. Dorney, Division of Water Quality
Dept. of Environment and Natural Resourc
FROM: Ron Linville, Regional Coordinator
Habitat Conservation Program
DATE: April 5, 2004
SUBJECT: Review of 401 Certification Application, Charlotte Country Club Driving
Range Extension, DWQ No. 040418, Mecklenburg County
The Country Club is requesting an after-the-fact 401 Water Quality Certification
from the North Carolina Division of Water Quality. The NCWRC has reviewed
information provided by the applicant, and field biologists on our staff are familiar with
habitat values of the project area. These comments are provided in accordance with
provisions of the Clean Water Act of 1977 (33 U.S.C. 466 et. seq.) and the Fish and
Wildlife Coordination Act (48 Stat. 401, as amended; 16 U.S.C. 661-667d).
The proposed project includes seventy-five (75) feet of unauthorized piping to an
unnamed tributary (stream A) of Briar Creek. A total of 299 linear feet of this tributary is
proposed to be piped for the driving range. Mitigation is proposed through stream
mitigation (Level II, enhancement or stabilization) at a separate stream apparently west of
the impacted area. The mitigation stream site is not contiguous due to a section that is
excluded at the end of a cul-de-sac off Dearmon Drive.
While we understand site restriction implications and the expressed need for the
project, we are concerned that extensive piping will essentially fragment upstream
aquatic habitats (above the pipe). If potential stream relocation and avoidance and
minimization cannot reduce piping impacts to a maximum of 80-100 linear feet,
additional mitigation for reduced aquatic community connectivity should be considered if
fish or mussel species are present that may be diminished by extensive culverting
activities.
Mailing Address: Division of Inland Fisheries • 1721 Mail Service Center • Raleigh, NC 27699-1721
Telephone: [phone] ext. 281 • Fax: [phone]
Charlotte Country Club 2 April 5, 2004
Driving Range
Providing that impacts to the unnamed tributary are avoided and minimized to the
maximum extent practicable, we will not object to the project providing the following
conditions are required:
1. If possible, the proposed mitigation stream segment should provide complete
and contiguous bioengineering enhancement and preservation. This entire
stream reach and restoration area should be permanently protected with deed
restrictions or conservation easements.
2. Additional mitigation should be provided by placement of the upper portions
of stream A and the floodplain of stream B into deed restrictions or
conservation easements.
3. Buffers for mitigation streams and non-mitigation streams should be as wide
as possible. We recommend preservation of entire floodplain corridors as
natural undisturbed forested areas. Minimum 100 foot buffers are
recommended for perennial streams.
4. Only native plant species should be used for bioengineering activities.
5. Pipes 48 inches diameter or larger should be buried a foot into the streambed.
Pipes less than 48 inches diameter should be buried to a depth equal to or
greater than twenty (20) percent their diameter to allow for aquatic life
passage. These measurements must be based on natural thalweg depths.
6. Golf course maintenance should follow practices recommended by Audubon
International. Information on these activities can be found at their website:
http://www audubonintl org./prog_rams/acss/golf.htm.
Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on this project. If you
have any questions regarding these comments, please contact me at 336/769-9453.
Cc: Steve Chapin, COE
Alan Johnson, DWQ-MRO
Michael F. Easlev, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W.10meL P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
Coleen H. Sullins, Deputy Director
Division of Water Quality
April 12, 2004
Mecklenburg County
DWQ No. 04-0418
CM 9 7003 1680 0004 0875 8308 1
?
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Mike Pilo WETLANDS/ 401 GROUP
Charlotte Country Club
2465 Mecklenburg Ave. APR 8 2004
Charlotte, NC 28025 WATER QUALITY SECTI
Subject: Driving Range Expansion ON
Dear Mr. Pilo:
On March 18, 2004, NC Division of Water Quality (DWQ) received your "after-the-fact" application for a
General 401 Water Quality Certification to impact 299 linear feet of stream in order to expand the golf practice
area at the Charlotte Country Club in Mecklenburg County.
On April 6, 2004 Mr. Alan Johnson with this office conducted an inspection at the site. Issuance of the 401
Certification does not appear to be a problem. However, your application requested onsite mitigation for the
impact. In discussions with your consultant, Mr. Greg Antemann, it was noted that approximately 1000 linear
feet of stream would be required to mitigate for the impact depending on the degree of the enhancement project
for the proposed stream. It was also discussed that another alternative would be a combination of stream
enhancement and paying into the Ecosystem Ecological Enhancement Program (if possible). This project will be
placed on hold until clarification is provided. Prior to issuance of the 401 Certification, it is requested that the
following be submitted/ provided:
• A more detailed conceptual plan of the proposed stream enhancement project.
• Timeline for the completion of the project. This should include completion of project design, plants and
planting schedules, and monitoring.
Thank you for your attention to this matter. If you have any questions, please contact Mr. Alan Johnson or
me at [phone].
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: Greg Antemann - Carolina Wetland Svc.
Cyndi Karoly - Wetland Unit
File
Central Files
NorthCarolina At**
)Vatura!!J`D EV
N. C. Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
(91()) 73 3-1 786 (nhane). 919-733-6R93 (faxl. flinn: h2o.ennst:ite.ne.ns neivetlanrlsl
tip A `N, r? Michael F. Easley, Governor it
r 7
19 William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
OC? QG North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
T' Also W. I?imel P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
Coleen H. Sullins. Deputy Director
WFTI ANDS 1401 GROUP Division of Water Quality
June 7, 2004
JUN 1, 5 2004 DWQ# 04-0418
Mecklenburg County
Mr. Mike Pilo
Charlotte Country Club
2465 Mecklenburg Ave.
Charlotte, NC, 28025
WATER QUALITY SECTION
APPROVAL of 401 Water Quality Certification with Additional Conditions,
Ecosystem Enhancement Program
Dear Mr. Pilo:
You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions and those listed below, to impact 299
linear feet (If) of an unnamed perennial stream to Briar Creek in order to expand and upgrade the existing
practice facility at the Charlotte Country Club in Mecklenburg County, as described in your application received
by the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) on March 18, 2004. After reviewing your application, we have
determined that this project is covered by Water Quality General Certification Number 3402, which can be
viewed on our web site at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. The General Certification allows you to use
Nationwide Permit Number 39 once it is issued to you by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACOE).
Please note that you should get any other federal, state or local permits before proceeding with your project,
including those required by (but not limited to) Sediment and Erosion Control, Non-Discharge, and Water
Supply Watershed regulations.
The above noted Certification will expire when the associated USACOE's 404 permit expires unless
otherwise specified in the General Certification. This approval is only valid for the purpose and design that you
described in your application. If you change your project, you must notify us in writing, and you may be
required to send us a new application for a new certification. If the property is sold, the new owner must be
given a copy of the Certification and approval letter, and is thereby responsible for complying with all
conditions.
For this approval to be valid, you must follow the conditions listed in the attached Certification, as well as the
additional conditions fisted below:
1. Deed notifications or similar mechanisms shall be placed on all lots with remaining jurisdictional wetlands and
waters or areas within 50 feet of all streams and ponds on the property. These mechanisms shall be put in
place within 30 days of the date of this letter or the issuance of the 404 Permit (whichever is later). A sample
deed notification format can be downloaded from the 401/Wetlands Unit web site at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands.
2. We understand that you have chosen to contribute to the Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP) in order
to compensate for the impacts the stream. In accordance with 15A NCAC 2R .0402 and 15A NCAC 2B
.0242(7), this contribution will satisfy our compensatory mitigation requirements under 15A NCAC 2H
.0506(h) and 15A NCAC 2B.0233(10). Until the EEP receives and clears your check (made payable to:
DENR - Ecosystem Enhancement Program), the stream impact shall not occur. Ms. Deborah Anderson
should be contacted at [phone] if you have any questions concerning the EEP. You have one month
No"` Carolina *sa
N44=111f
N. C. Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification tint,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
(91 91 73 3-1 786 (nheme). 919-733-6593 (fail. (hfln h^n cnr slat nc n: ne cetl:mda
V
from the date of this Certification to make this payment. For accounting purposes, this Certification
authorizes the permanent impact of 299 linear feet of perennial stream in the Catawba River Basin
(Cataloging Unit 03050103) and requires mitigation for 299 linear feet of stream. Please be aware that the
EEP rules require rounding of stream impacts to the nearest foot (15A NCAC 2R .0503(b)).
3. The culvert required for this project shall be installed in such a manner that the original stream profile is not
altered (i.e. the depth of the channel must not be reduced by a widening of the streambed). Existing stream
dimensions (including the pattern and profile) are to be maintained above and below locations of each
culvert. The culvert shall be designed and installed to allow for aquatic life movement as well as to prevent
head cutting of the streams. If any of the existing pipes are or become perched, the appropriate stream
grade shall be re-established or, if the pipes are installed in a perched manner, the pipes shall be removed
and re-installed correctly.
4. No waste, spoil, solids, or fill of any kind shall occur in wetlands, waters, or riparian areas beyond the
footprint of the impacts depicted in the Preconstruction Notification application. All construction activities
shall be performed so that no violations of state water quality standards, statutes, or rules occur.
5. Erosion and sediment control practices must utilize Best Management Practices (BMP) and be in full
compliance with all specifications governing the proper design, installation, and operation and maintenance of
such BMP in order to protect surface water standards:
a. The design, installation, operation, and maintenance of the sediment and erosion control measures
must be such that they equal, or exceed, the requirements specified in the most recent version of
the North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control Manual. The devices shall be maintained on all
construction sites, borrow pit sites, and waste pile (spoil) projects, including contractor-owned or
leased borrow pits associated with the project.
b. For borrow pit sites, the erosion and sediment control measures must be designed, installed,
operated, and maintained in accordance with the most recent version of the North Carolina Surface
Mining Manual.
c. The reclamation measures and implementation of these measures must be in accordance with the
requirements of the Sedimentation Pollution Control Act.
6. Sediment and erosion control measures shall not be placed in wetlands or waters to the maximum extent
practicable. If placement of sediment and erosion control devices in wetlands and waters is unavoidable,
they shall be removed and the natural grade restored within six months of the date the Division of Land
Resources has released the project.
7. Upon completion of the project, the applicant shall complete and return the enclosed "Certificate of
Completion" form to the 401NVetlands Unit of the NC Division of Water Quality. Please send photographs
upstream and downstream of each culvert site to document correct installation along with the Certificate of
Completion form.
8. Continuing Compliance. Charlotte Country Club (CCC) shall conduct its activities in a manner consistent
with state water quality standards (including any requirements for compliance with section 303(d) of the
Clean Water Act) and any other appropriate requirements of state and federal law. If DWQ determines that
such standards or laws are not being met (including the failure to sustain a designated or achieved use) or
that state or federal law is being violated, or that further conditions are necessary to assure compliance,
DWQ may reevaluate and modify this certification to include conditions appropriate to assure compliance with
such standards and requirements in accordance with 15 A NCAC 2H.0507(d). Before codifying the
certification, DWQ shall notify CCC and the US Army Corps of Engineers, provide public notice in accordance
with 15A NCAC 2H.0503, and provide opportunity for public hearing in accordance with 15A NCAC 21-1.0504.
Any new or revised conditions shall be provided to CCC in writing, shall be provided to the United States
Army Corps of Engineers for reference in any permit issued pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act,
and shall also become conditions of the 404 Permit for the project.
F
Page 3
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this certification, you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You
must act within 60 days of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition that
conforms to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of Administrative Hearings, 6714
Mail Service Center, Raleigh, N.C. 27699-6714. This certification and its conditions are final and binding unless
you ask for a hearing.
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act.
If you have any questions, please telephone Alan Johnson in the Mooresville Regional Office at 704-663-1699 or
Cyndi Karoly in the Central Office in Raleigh 919-733-9721.
Sincerely,
Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
AJ/aj
Attachments
cc: Amanda Jones, COE, Asheville
Cyndi. Karoly, Wetlands Unit
David Caldwll, Mecklenburg County
Greg Antemann
Central Files
File Copy
W
040418
NORTH CAROLINA-DIVISON OF WATER QUALITY
401 WATER QUALITY CERTIFICATION
SUMMARY OF PERMITTED IMPACTS AND MITIGATION REQUIREMENTS
In accordance with 15A NCAC 2 H .0500, Mr. Mike Pilo of the Charlotte Country Club, has permision as
outlined below to permanent impact 299 linear feet of perennial stream in order to upgrade and expand the
practice facility at the Charlotte Country Club in Mecklenburg County, North Carolina. All activities associated
with these authorized impacts must be conducted with the conditions listed in the attached certification. THIS
CERTIFICATION IS NOT VALID WITHOUT THE ATTACHMENTS.
COMPENSATORY MITIGATION REQUIREMENT, ECOSYSTEM ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM (EEP)
LOCATION:
COUNTY:
Charlotte Country Club
Mecklenburg
BASIN/SUBBASIN Catawba (03050103)
Impacts:
299 linear feet of perennial stream
As required by 15A NCAC 2H .0506, and the conditions of this certification, you are required to compensate for
the above impacts through the restoration, creation, enhancement or preservation of wetlands as outlined
below prior to conducting any activities that impact or degrade the waters of the state.
Mitigation:
299 linear feet of perennial streams is required by the EEP for the 401 Water Quality Certification. In
correspondence dated May 26, 2004, the EEP indicated that up to 598 linear feet of stream mitigation will be
accepted by the WRP if necessary for the 404 Permit.
Note: Linear foot requirements proposed to be mitigated through the EEP must be rounded to the nearest foot
and acreage requirements must be rounded to one-quarter acre increments according to 15 2r.0503(b).
One of the options you have available to satisfy the compensatory mitigation requirements is through the
payment of a fee to the Ecosystem Enhancement Fund per NCAC 2R.0503. If you choose this option, please
sign this form and mail it to the Ecosystem Enhancement Fund at the address listed below. An invoice for the
appropriate amount of payment will be sent to you upon receipt of this form. PLEASE NOTE, THE ABOVE
IMPACTS ARE NOT AUTHORIZED UNTIL YOU RECEIVE NOTIFICATION THAT YOUR PAYMENT HAS
BEEN PROCESSED BY THE EEP.
Signature Date
ECOSYSTEM ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM
DIVISON OF WATER QUALITY
1619 Mail Service Center
RALEIGH, N.C. 27669-1619
[phone]
SAT L-RpG
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. HIimek, P.E., Director
} Division of Water Quality
Coleen H. Sullins, Deputy Director
Division of Water Quality
April 12, 2004
Mecklenburg County
DWQ No. 04-0418
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Mike Pilo
Charlotte Country Club
2465 Mecklenburg Ave.
Charlotte, NC 28025
Subject: Driving Range Expansion
Dear Mr. Pilo:
On March 18, 2004, NC Division of Water Quality (DWQ) received your "after-the-fact" application for a
General 401 Water Quality Certification to impact 299 linear feet of stream in order to expand the golf practice
area at the Charlotte Country Club in Mecklenburg County.
On April 6, 2004 Mr. Alan Johnson with this office conducted an inspection at the site. Issuance of the 401
Certification does not appear to be a problem. However, your application requested onsite mitigation for the
impact. In discussions with your consultant, Mr. Greg Antemann, it was noted that approximately 1000 linear
feet of stream would be required to mitigate for the impact depending on the degree of the enhancement project
for the proposed stream. It was also discussed that another alternative would be a combination of stream
enhancement and paying into the Ecosystem Ecological Enhancement Program (if possible). This project will be
placed on hold until clarification is provided. Prior to issuance of the 401 Certification, it is requested that the
following be submitted/ provided:
• A more detailed conceptual plan of the proposed stream enhancement project.
• Timeline for the completion of the project. This should include completion of project design, plants and
planting schedules, and monitoring.
Thank you for your attention to this matter. If you have any questions, please contact Mr. Alan Johnson or
me at [phone].
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: Greg Antemann - Carolina Wetland Svc.
Cyndi Karoly - Wetland Unit
File
Central Files
None hCarolina
Naturally IN D ?x
N. C. Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
[phone] (phone), 919-733-6893 (fax), (ht!p://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands)
Customer Service #: 1-877-623-6748
MEMORANDUM
TO: John Dorney Regional Contact:
Non-Discharge Branch WQ Supervisor:
Date:
SUBJECT: WETLAND STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Facility Name Charlotte Country Club Driving Range Expansion
Project Number 04 0418
Recvd From APP
Received Date 3/18/04 Recvd By Region 3/29/2004
Project Type driving range expansion
County Mecklenburg
County2
Region Mooresville
Certificates Stream Stream Impacts (ft.)
Permit Wetland Wetland Wetland Stream Class Acres Feet MERRM1111111
Type Type Impact Score Index Prim. Supp. Basin Req. Req.
o Stre?u?7 77@) N 11-137 8-2
-? 30,534. 299.00 299
F
F
Mitigation Wetland
MitigationType Type Acres Feet
Stream restoration Stream F__ F_-
Is Wetland Rating Sheet Attached? O Y ON Did you request more info? 0 Y0 N
Have Project Changes/Conditions Been Discussed With Applicant? Q Y 0 N
Is Mitigation required? OQ Y 0 N
Recommendation: 0 Issue 0 Issue/Coed 0 Deny
Provided by Region: Latitude (ddmmss) 351351 Longitude (ddmmss) 804728
Comments:
Staff visited the site on A rp it 6, 2004. Applicant request approval to imnact approximately 295 ft, of
stream for golf course expansion. This is an after-the-fact application for impacts conducted small
stream on the north side of the Charlotte Country Club practice area.
Recommend approval upon receiving, and approval of, a conceptual plan for on site mitigation. The
count club's pro eply has access to approximately 1000 ft, of stream for enhancement. The
applies proposes the removal of invasive plant species within 50 ft of the approved stream, soft
impacts, and other measures necessary to comply with a Level I enhancement.
cc: Regional Office
Central Office Page Number 1
Triage Check List
Date:
3.O-OL4
Project Name: o,6i" Q erv n? ??wb ??
DWQ#: oL( - oy / k
County: ???i?urc
To: ? ARO Mike Parker ? WaRO Tom Steffens
? FRO Ken Averitte ? WiRO Noelle Lutheran
9. MRO Alan Johnson ? WSRO Daryl Lamb
? RRO Steve Mitchell
From: "g _ Telephone : (919) 2=_ 17 ec
The file attached is being forwarded to your for your evaluation.
Please call if you need assistance.
"Stream length impacted
? Stream determination
? ?W""'eiland determination and distance to blue-line surface waters on USFW topo maps
N-Nfinimization/avoidance issues
? Buffer Rules (Neuse, Tar-Pamlico, Catawba, Randleman)
? Pond fill
Mitigation Ratios
? Ditching
Are the stream and or wetland mitigation sites available and viable?
Llt-Check drawings for accuracy
F? Is the application consistent with pre-application meetings?
? Cumulative impact concern
Comments: ?oc5 V"Ae.+VQh nk,drh, seep.- OLO-fb-040aG Ar
17
1
1
1
Carolina WeT?40418
nd Services
After-the-Fact Permit Application Pursuant to
Nationwide Permit No. 39
' Charlotte Country Club Driving Range Expansion
Charlotte, North Carolina
Carolina Wetland Services Project No. 2003-0527
' March 17, 2004

i
Prepared For:
Mr. Mike Pilo
Charlotte Country Club
2465 Mecklenburg Avenue
Charlotte, North Carolina 28205
[phone]
WETLANDS / 401 GROUP
I

i

Prepared By:
Mr. Gregory C. Antemann, P.W.S.
Mr. Ron G. Johnson, W.P.I.T
Carolina Wetland Services, Inc.
5000 Nations Crossing Road, Suite 230
Charlotte, North Carolina 28217
[phone]
MAR 1 8 2004
W TL:P, 0 A 1 IT Y SECTf0N
5000 Nations Crossing Road, Suite 230 • Charlotte, NC 28217 • [phone] Office • [phone] Fax
www.carolinawetlandservices.com
Charlotte Country Club Driving Range Expansion March.17, 2004
' After-the-Fact Permit Application Pursuant to Nationwide Permit No. 39 Project No. 2003-0527
Table of Contents
Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................ ... 2
Existing Conditions ............................................................................................................................... 3
Current Land Use ............................................................................................................................... 3
Jurisdictional Delineation .................................................................................................................. 3
Agency Correspondence ........................................................................................................................ 5
' Cultural kesources ............................................................................................................................. 5
Protected Species ............................................................................................................................... 5
Purpose and Need for the Project ........................... :.............................................................................. 5
Avoidance and Minimization .............................................................................................................. .. 5
Proposed Impacts to Jurisdictional Waters .......................................................................................... .. 6
Compensatory Mitigation .................................................................................................................... .. 6
List of Attachments
t Attachment A - Figure 1. USGS Site Location Map
Attachment A - Figure 2. NRCS Soil Survey
Attachment A - Figure 3. Wetland Boundary Survey
Attachment B - Agent Certification of Authorization Form
'
Attachment C - After-the-Fact Permit Application Pursuant to a Nationwide Permit No. 39
Attachment D - Routine On-Site Data Form
Attachment E - NCDWQ Stream Classification Forms
Attachment F - USACE Stream Quality Assessment Worksheets
Attachment G - Request for Jurisdictional Determination Form
Attachment H - Representative Photographs
' Attachment I -Agency Correspondence
Attachment J - Figure 4. Proposed Impacts
Attachment J - Figure 5. Proposed Mitigation Location
1

Charlotte Country Club Driving Range Expansion March 17, 2004
' After-the-Fact Permit Application Pursuant to Nationwide Permit No. 39 Project No. 2003-0527
' Executive Summary
The Charlotte Country Club is located in Charlotte, North Carolina, approximately 1 mile
' northwest of the Central Ave. - Eastway Dr. intersection (Attachment A - Figures 1 and 2). This
project will involve upgrading and expanding the existing practice range facility. Mr. Mike Pilo is
the Golf Course Superintendent at the Charlotte Country Club and has retained Carolina Wetland
' Services, Inc. (CWS) to provide permitting services for this project. An Agent Authorization Form
has been included as Attachment B.
' The results of the on-site field investigation conducted by CWS indicate that there are two
jurisdictional stream channels (Streams A and B) and one non jurisdictional stream channel
(Channel C) located within the project limits (Attachment A - Figure 3). CWS is requesting
written verification of the jurisdictional determination of on-site features (Attachment Q.
Unavoidable impacts associated with this project total approximately 299 linear feet of Perennial
Stream A. On behalf of The Charlotte Country Club, CWS is submitting an After-the-Fact Permit
application with attachments in accordance with Nationwide Permit General Condition No. 13, and
' pursuant to Nationwide Permit No. 39 (Attachment C).

J

Charlotte Country Club Driving Range Expansion March 17, 2004
After-the-Fact Permit Application Pursuant to Nationwide Permit No. 39 Project No. 2003-0527
Existing Conditions
The Charlotte Country Club is located in Charlotte, North Carolina, approximately 1 mile
northwest of the Central Ave. - Eastway Dr. intersection (Attachment A - Figures 1 and 2). This
project will involve upgrading and expanding the existing practice range facility. Mr. Mike Pilo is
the Golf Course Superintendent of the Charlotte Country Club and has retained Carolina Wetland
Services, Inc. (CWS) to provide permitting services for this project.
Current Land Use
The land use surrounding the project area consists of an 18-hole golf course with forested areas.
Dominant vegetation within forested areas includes white oak (Quercus alba), Chinese privet
(Ligustrum sinense), sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua), southern magnolia
(Magnolia grandiflora), and willow oak (Quercus phellos). The remainder of the property is
dominated by maintained fairways and greens characteristic of most golf courses.
Jurisdictional Delineation
On December 29, 2003, CWS's Ron Johnson and Isaac Hinson determined on-site jurisdictional
waters of the U.S.' using the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) - Routine On-site
Determination Method. This method is defined in the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation
Manual? No jurisdictional wetland areas were located within the project limits
(Attachment A-Figure B). A Routine On-Site Data Form representative of on-site non jurisdictional
upland areas has been included as Attachment D. Jurisdictional waters of the U.S. were classified
according to recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ)3 and USACE guidance.
NCDWQ Stream Classification Forms and USACE Stream Quality Assessment Worksheets for on-
site streams have been included as Attachments E and F.
The results of the on-site field investigation indicate that there are two jurisdictional stream channels
(Streams A and B) and one non jurisdictional channel (Channel C) located within the project limits
(Attachment A -Figure 3). On-Site jurisdictional waters are unnamed tributaries to Briar Creek.
Briar Creek is part of the Catawba River basin W# 03050103)4 and is classified as "Class C" waters
' "Jurisdictional waters of the U.S." includes essentially all surface waters such as: all navigable waters and their tributaries, all
interstate waters and their tributaries, all wetlands adjacent to these waters, and all impoundments of these waters.
2 Environmental Laboratory. "Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual," Technical Report Y-87-1, US Army Engineer
Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Mississippi.
s North Carolina Division of Water Quality Stream Classification Method. Version 2.0. 1999.
° "HU#" is the Hydrologic Unit Code. Hydrologic Unit Map, State of North Carolina. U.S. Geological Survey. 1974.
Charlotte Country Club Driving Range Expansion March 17, 2004
After-the-Fact Permit Application Pursuant to Nationwide Permit No. 39 Project No. 2003-0527

I

I
I

by the NCDWQ. The Charlotte Country Club is requesting written verification of the jurisdictional
determination of the on-site features (Attachment G).
Stream A flows east for approximately 740 linear feet until its confluence with Stream B.
(Attachment A - Figure 3). Stream A was evaluated to be Perennial. Stream A exhibited
moderate flow during the investigation, weak sinuosity, and substrate ranging from silt to large
cobble (Attachments E and F - SCPl). Biological sampling within Stream A resulted in a
moderate presence of benthic macroinvertabrates. Perennial Stream A scored 27.5 out of a
possible 71 points on the NCDWQ Stream Classification Form and 43 out of a possible 100 points
on the USAGE Stream Quality Assessment Worksheet. A photograph of Stream A has been
included as Attachment H - Photograph A.
Stream B flows south through the center of the golf course for approximately 1,640 linear feet
(Attachment A - Figure 3). Stream B was evaluated to be Perennial and exhibited strong flow
during the investigation, weak sinuosity, strong bed and bank, and a substrate ranging from silt to
small boulders (Attachments E and F - SCP2). Biological sampling within Stream B exhibited a
weak presence of crayfish, benthic macroinvertabrates and a moderate presence of fish. Perennial
Stream B scored 41 out of a possible 71 points on the NCDWQ Stream Classification Form and 51
out of a possible 100 points on the USACE Stream Quality Assessment Worksheet. A photograph
of Stream A has been included as Attachment H - Photograph B.
Non-Jurisdictional Channel C is a grass-lined ditch that flows from behind a storage building north
of Stream A (Attachment A - Figure 3). This channel was evaluated to be non jurisdictional based
on its lack of channel substrate and groundwater discharge. This channel also lacks biological
indicators and hydric soils (Attachments E and F - SCP3). Channel C scored 9 out of a possible 71
points on the NCDWQ Stream Classification Form and a 21 out of a possible 100 on the USACE
Stream Quality Assessment Worksheet.
4

J

I
Charlotte Country. Club Driving Range Expansion March 17, 2004
After-the-Fact Permit Application Pursuant to Nationwide Permit No. 39 Project No. 2003-0527
Agency Correspondence
Cultural Resources
A letter was forwarded to the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) on January 21, 2004 to
determine if areas of architectural, historic, of archaeological significance are located within the
project area and that would be affected by the project. In a letter dated February 19, 2004, the
SHPO stated that they "are aware of no historic resources, which would be affected near the
Charlotte Country Club Driving Range Expansion Project" (Attachment I).
Protected Species
A letter was forwarded to the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) on
January 21, 2004 to determine if any federally-listed species or critical habitat were located within
the project area. In a letter dated January 22, 2004, the NCNHP stated that they "do not have any
records for rare species, high quality natural communities, or significant natural heritage areas
(SNHAs) near the Charlotte Country Club Driving Range Expansion Project" (Attachment I).
Purpose and Need for the Project
The purpose of this project is to upgrade and expand the existing practice facility. The expansion
of the existing practice range facility is necessary to accommodate future golfing events at the
Country Club. Eligibility to host these events requires certain specifications for the practice
facility. Current practice facilities are undersized and below event requirements. Additional
impacts to Stream A are necessary to accommodate maintenance vehicle access to the indoor
tennis facility.
Avoidance and Minimization
Impacts to on-site jurisdictional waters of the U.S. have been reduced to the maximum extent
practicable. Impacts have been limited to Stream A and are within the thresholds of Nationwide
Permit No. 39. Proper sediment and erosion control measures will be used to minimize disturbances
to downstream waters.
5
Charlotte Country Club Driving Range Expansion March 17, 2004
After-the-Fact Permit Application Pursuant to Nationwide Permit No. 39 Project No. 2003-0527
I

I

I
I
I
I
I
I

I
Proposed Impacts to jurisdictional Waters
Proposed impacts will total approximately 299 linear feet of Perennial Stream A. Approximately 75
linear feet of Stream A was piped prior to this application submission. Ms. Amanda Jones of the
USACE Asheville Field Office issued a Notice of Unauthorized Activity on November 24, 2003
(Action ID 200430113). Impacts will result from the expansion of the existing practice range facility
in order to accommodate future events at the Country Club (Attachment J - Figure 4). On behalf of
The, Charlotte Country Club, CWS is submitting After-the-Fact Permit application with
attachments in accordance with the written notification requirements of Nationwide Permit No. 39.
Compensatory Mitigation
Restoration activities were considered for this project to fulfill mitigation requirements. Restoration
activities including natural channel design requires a wide stream corridor. The only available
location for mitigation is located off Masonic Drive, near the southeast comer of the Charlotte
Country Club. The current stream profile at this location runs near the property boundary of the
Charlotte Country Club. The existing floodplain is not wide enough to implement this type of design
while avoiding existing residential structures and controlling flooding. Future plans for the property
just west of the stream channel involve the installation of a concrete bicycle trail to connect with
Masonic Drive. Restoration proved not to be a viable option considering the location of the available
site, future project plans, and proximity to existing structures.
Compensatory mitigation for the aforementioned impacts will be accomplished through stream
enhancement (Level II) at a 2.5:1 ratio. The proposed stream enhancement includes approximately
750 linear feet of an unnamed tributary to Briar Creek (Attachment J - Figure 5). This stream is
experiencing severe erosion and has a riparian buffer dominated by Chinese privet. Chinese privet
has a high degree of reproductive vigor and a wide range of adaptability. It can dominate the shrub
layer of an invaded habitat, thus altering species composition and natural community structure by
choking out native plant species. The proposed mitigation would remove and replace invasive plants
growing within a 50-foot buffer along the stream enhancement project with native hardwood species.
Proposed channel work would include the construction of floodplain benches and bioengineering
techniques to alleviate erosion. Table 1 is a list of proposed native riparian tree and shrub species to
be installed along the restored riparian buffer. Plants will be planted at random and on 6-foot centers.
A Nationwide Permit No. 27 will be applied for, as necessary, once the design of the proposed
mitigation plan is finalized.
1
Charlotte Country Club Driving Range Expansion March 17, 2004
After-the-Fact Permit Application Pursuant to Nationwide Permit No. 39 Project No. 2003-0527
I

Table 1. List of Native Plant Species

Quercus nigra water oak
Quercus phellos willow oak
Liriodendron tulipifera tulip poplar
Acer rubrum red maple
Liquidambar styraciflua sweetgum
Cornus amomum silky dogwood
Salix nigra black willow
Salix sericea silky willow
Populus deltoides cottonwood
Sambucus canadensis elderberry
Platanus occidentalis sycamore
' Plantings will occur in the Fall of 2005 and will be monitored for a five year period to ensure
adequate survival rates. The project will be deemed a success if a survival rate of 320 woody stems
' per acre is achieved. If adequate numbers are not present, replanting will occur until this goal is met.
CWS will prepare monitoring reports one year post planting and every successive year until the five
year monitoring period is complete. This report will be submitted to the USACE and NCDWQ on an
annual basis. These reports will be generated during the early fall of each year. Representative
' photographs of the site will be taken at permanent photographic monitoring stations established
during the initial planting and included with the reports.

I

Charlotte Country Club Driving Range Expansion March 17, 2004
After-the-Fact Permit Application Pursuant to a Nationwide Permit No. 39 Proiect No. 2003-0527
Attachment A - Figures 1-3
F
C
.
,,-
tit,,,

NII.
GoN
.=?
3
Tarly?1 %\,p F"t ii?` - Lours
)
!
Nkl
\
y,
:
Gari
- ?
?/, ry j;(??}??;-?-??
E %.;% ,i/ ?`\? `\ `?'. %?? 777; p = = / ? y ??• /j
- ?\
/r 4°ti The Plaza, ?- ?' ?j (? r
,1 I( "
'

e
?_J } Eastway Drive
-o=?v'?-tl

JE'??.r r •' / \
;If
{

1 A r
,
M
Ywood
f
'? _ Piet
dls
H
P
a
p
i
rlgt[e
gECV
i--g o?, ESL ?_s, ?o'ontry Q
i, /
V I
^ l
h N'/
yy { tify s
BelvedereAvenue
46
"

- o?-
I "A
''??

y? ?I n?zz a /? .
/
""'«C
MMM`SSSf»yyy z
l Q
a
q C?
µ ? ?J Arnold Dnve ,? Frec
?
-?-
?
i
_
R>y0 1
??
y,,-R?
-?71O
?
- LG
GNTRAL ?\
,, J
?
h7?
_
A
?
y
?
?
?
7 ?+ --- J. - v!_; Eastway 4P
ser
Ar R _
78
,
1? ?
?_ 3
L a e a• 1I W g ' - { -
lak
L __ _ q.? I C

F
j r l
-
t
1
1 ?
? f rR?L _ f I?
7 N ?
r -
i1 ?
r
?J
y ?A
oF
V `•
1
{

?? \? ?~oS$t r ` 7 F ?i /; r
?? ,Il f `'ice + T/w F =
OPP

Approximate Scale 1" = 2000'
Reference: C'SGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Map Series, Charlotte-East Quadrangle, North Carolina, dated 1991
Carolina Wetland Services Figure 1. USGS Site Location Map
5000 Nations Crossing Road, Suite 230 Charlotte Country Club Driving Range Expansion
Charlotte, North Carolina 28217 Charlotte, North Carolina i
CWS Project No. 2003-0527
i
"RI]'ARI-D BY DATE j CHECKED BY DATE
/
/f Cu3
\ Ur CUD Hu . r Cea2 HUB
CUB
V 1
\ r? CUD
NS/ MS
CUD / NS,
CUB / CUB ?! {\
j C D2 Site I _?2
Ur 1 C
CUD Ce62
\ 111 3? CUD
Mk6 /y Ur 1 CeB2
\ CeB2 Cub
Cub j "'s
1
r
CeD2 CeB2
CUD
1? . ?fM D
t CeD2 \\
r i /( MS 1 Ce82 e` 2 CUB Ms
CUB
CUD
a
CUB
J?
c"D cPis<
1 CUD
CeD2
Ur Ur r----._.1 Ur
\ ?? 1 f:uB CuC
Central Avenue
r CUB
Ceg2
CUB
a ??' ? Ur
Ur ?' Ur
T '
1 lUr i,Cuo
C /, CeD2 y ?`7 Y
`\ \ CUD ry ?CjO, PaE 1 ' t ti or
r 1
CUB ?DL
.r¢?K :MS aLaj?? _ CUB l``\ r CeB2 r
C o / -'
`dam e0
ct% M,
11/0 i
o cesz
Ur Hea
M S
D? / - -- CUB CeB2 CUB
Approximate Scale 1" = 2000'
Reference: NRCS Soil Survey of Mecklenburg County, NC, Sheet No. 7 dated 1980.
Carolina Wetland Services Figure 2. NRCS Soil Survey
1 5000 Nations Crossing Road, Suite 230 Charlotte Country Club Driving Range F,xpansion
Charlotte, North Carolina 28217 Charlotte, North Carolina
CWS Project No. 2003-0527
PREPARED BY DATE f i CHECKED 13Y DATE
JURISDICTION WATERS OF THE U.S. WERE DETERMINED AND CLASSIFIED BY
CAROLINA WETLAND SERVICES ON DECEMBER 29, 2003. JURISDICTIONAL AREAS
> HAVE NOT BEEN VERIFIED BY THE US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS.
00
00 , .
00
o0
?o ® o 0
00
B
' ? oo
? o ? ? ama
1
® Non-Jurisdictional Channel C 0
250 linear feet
oney ? ?o

Perennial Stream B
1640 linear feet
o
o P
SCP1
SCP2
o SC.
Perennial Stream A
740 linear feet
n
0
0
Club
I' LEGEND
JURISDICTIONAL STREAM CHANNEL
NON-JURISDICTIONAL STREAM CHANNEL %
Carolina Wetland Services
PROJECT BOUNDARY' Il??
5000 Nations Crossing Road, Suite 230
Charlotte, North Carolina 28217
• SCPI STREAM CLASSIFICATION POINT
REFERENCE: MECKI FNBt RG COUN T N I AND USG AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
• DP1 UPLAND DATA POINT DATED '001
0 N Figure 3. Approximate Jurisdictional Boundary
PHOTO LOCATION AND DIRECTION Field Map
Charlotte Country Club Driving Range Expansion
Charlotte, North Carolina
APPROXIMATE SCALE: 1"-200' CWS Project No. 2003-0527
PREP) DA
1
CHECKED DATE.
I
Charlotte Countrv Club Driving Range Expansion March 17, 2004
After-the-Fact Permit Application Pursuant to a Nationwide Permit No. 39 Project No 2003-0527
Attachment B - Agent Certification of Authorization Form

A
' L
' AGENT CERTMCA.TION OF AUMPRIZATION
Z,•Ib kO Pala, repre$Mtj3Ig The Claarlotrs Country Club, hereby certify that I have
authorized Gregory C- Ant==n of CarolinaWetland Sez kes, Inc. to act on my behalf
and take all actions necessary to thtc processing;, issuance, atd acceptauce of this
--- - Jwisdictional deter m natioxx and ax y and all standard and special conditi= art46tdt - -
Wd kxmby certify that the above information submitted in this application is tine ,end,
accuaate to the best of our lmowledge.
F
Applicants signature -. Agent s signat?ue
r Date Datc .
Compledon of this forrn will a110NV the agent to sign all fm ture applicatxon correspondence.
1
Charlotte Countrv Club Driving Range Expansion March 17, 2004
After-the-Fact Permit Application Pursuant to a Nationwide Permit No 39 Proiect No 2003-0527
Attachment C - After-the-Fact Permit Application Pursuant to a
Nationwide Permit No. 39
I
I
Office Use Only: Form Version April 2001
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A" rather than
leaving the space blank.
I. Processing.
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit
? Section-10 Permit
® 401 Water Quality Certification
f ? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested:
Nationwide Permit No. 39
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (see section VIII - Mitigation), check here: ?
II. Applicant Information
1. Owner/Applicant Information
Name: The Charlotte Country Club, Contact: Mr. Mike Pilo
Mailing Address: 2465 Mecklenburg Avenue
Charlotte. North Carolina 28205
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
' E-mail Address: mikepiRaol.com
2. Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter must be
attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Gregory C. Antemann, PWS
Company Affiliation: Carolina Wetland Services, Inc.
Mailing Address: 5000 Nations Crossing Road, Suite 230
Charlotte, North Carolina 28217
Telephone Number: 704-527-1177 Fax Number: 704-527-1133
E-mail Address: areQLyncarolinawetlandservices.com
?I
J
I Page 1 of 7

III. Project Information
I 1. Name of project: Charlotte Country Club Driving Range Expansion
2. T.I.P. Project Number (NCDOT Only): N/A
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): 09515147
4. Location
County: Mecklenburg Nearest Town: Charlotte
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): N/A
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): From Charlotte, take Central
Avenue west to Masonic Drive (located approximately one mile east of Eastway Drive).
' Turn left onto Masonic Drive and drive to the Charlotte Country Club maintenance facility
the end of the road.
' 5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long): N 35° 13'51"-W 80047'28"
(Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the
coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
6. Describe the existing land use or condition of the site at the time of this application:
The existing land use of the project area is an 18-hole golf course and country club.
7. Property size (acres): 8 acres project limits)
8. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake): Briar Creek
9. River Basin: Catawba
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
10. Describe the purpose of the proposed work: The purpose of this project is to upgrade and
expand the existing practice facility. The expansion of the existing practice range facility is
' necessary to accommodate future golfing events at the Country Club. Eligibility to host
these events requires certain specifications for the practice facility. Current practice facilities
are undersized and below event requirements. Additional impacts to stream A are necessary
to accommodate maintenance vehicle access to the indoor tennis facility.
11. List the type of equipment to be used to construct the project: A trackhoe and typical
excavation equipment will be used for this project.
12. Describe the. land use in the vicinity of this project: The land use surrounding the project
area consists of residential and small wooded areas.
Page 2 of 7
IV. Prior Project History
Approximately 75 linear feet of Perennial Stream A has been piped prior to this application
V. Future Project Plans
A Nationwide Permit No. 27 may be necessary to accomplish the compensatory mitigation plan
for this project.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
1. Wetland Impacts

I

I

1

Wetland Impact
Site Number
indicate on map)
(

Type of Impact*

Area of Impact
(acres) Located within

100-year *
Floodplain
(yes/no)
Distance to
Nearest Stream

(linear feet)

Type of Wetland***

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: mechanized clearing, grading, fill,
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
** 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at http://www.fema.gov.
*** List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.)
List the total acreage (estimated) of existing wetlands on the property: N/A.
Total area of wetland impact proposed: 0
2. Stream Impacts, including all intermittent and perennial streams
Stream Impact Length of Average Width Perennial or
Site Number Type of Impact* Impact Stream Name** of Stream Intermittent?
(indicate on map) (linear feet) Before Impact (pleasespecify)

Stream A
piping
299 if Unnamed Tributary to
Briar Creek
34'
Perennial

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and associated rip-rap,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain),
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. .If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
* Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
www.usgs.gov. Several internet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., www.topozone.com,
www.mapquest.com, etc.).
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: 299 linear feet
Page 3 of 7
i
i
i
i
3. Open Water Impacts, including Lakes, Ponds, Estuaries, Sounds, Atlantic Ocean and any
other Water of the U.S. N/A
Open Water Impact Area of Name of Waterbod
y Type of Waterbody
Site Number Type of Impact* Impact
(if applicable) (lake, pond, estuary, sound,
(indicate on ma
p) (acres) bay, ocean, etc.)

N/A
* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: fill, excavation, dredging,
flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
' 4. Pond Creatian
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
i Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): N/A
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): N/A
Size of watershed draining to pond: N/A
Expected pond surface area: N/A
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
' Impacts to on-site iurisdictional waters of the U.S. have been reduced to the maximum extent
practicable. Impacts have been limited to Stream A and are within the thresholds of Nationwide
Permit No. 39. Proper sediment and erosion control measures will be used to minimize
' disturbances to downstream waters.
Page 4 of 7
A
VIII. Mitigation
Compensatory mitigation for the aforementioned impacts will be accomplished through stream
' enhancement (Level II) at a 2.5:1 ratio. The proposed stream enhancement includes approximately 750
linear feet of an unnamed tributary to Briar Creek (Attachment J - Figure 5). This stream is
experiencing severe erosion and has a riparian buffer dominated by Chinese privet Chinese privet has a
high degree of reproductive vigor and a wide range of adaptability. It can dominate the shrub laver of an
invaded habitat, thus altering species composition and natural community structure by choking 0
native plant species. The proposed mitigation would remove and replace invasive plants growing withi
' a 50-foot buffer along'the stream enhancement project with native hardwood species Proposed channel
work would include the construction of floodplain benches and bioengineering techniques to alleviate
erosion. Table 1 is a list of proposed native riparian tree and shrub species to be installed along the
restored riparian buffer. Plants will be planted at random and on 6-foot centers. A Nationwide Permit
No. 27 will be applied for as necessary once the design of the proposed mitigation plan is finalized
Plantings will occur in the Fall of 2005 and will be monitored for a five year period to ensure adequate
' survival rates. The project will be deemed a success if a survival rate of 320 woody stems per acre is
achieved. If adequate numbers are not present replanting will occur until this goal is met CWS will
prepare monitoring reports one year post planting and every successive year until the five mar
monitoring period is complete. This report will be submitted to the USACE and NCDWQ on an annual
basis. These reports will be generated during the early fall of each year. Representative photographs of
the site will be taken at permanent photographic monitoring stations established during the initial
' planting and included with the reports.
1. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program (NCWRP) with the NCWRP's written agreement. Check the box indicating that
you would like to pay into the NCWRP. Please note that payment into the NCWRP must be
reviewed and approved before it can be used to satisfy mitigation requirements. Applicants
' will be notified early in the review process by the 401/Wetlands Unit if payment into the
NCWRP is available as an option. For additional information regarding the application
process for the NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at http://h2o.enr.state.ne.us/wrp/index.htm. If
use of the NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide
the following information: `
' Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): N/A
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): N/A
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
IX. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Only)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public funds or the use of public (federal/state/local)
land?
Yes ? No
' Page 5 of 7
I
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not. sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
' Yes ? No
If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or No PA final approval letter.
Yes ?
I X.
Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (DWQ Only)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify: )?
Yes ? No ® If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers. N/A
*
Zone Impact
(square feet)
Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 3
2 1.5
Total
Gone 1 extends out 30 teet perpendicular from near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or.0260.
N/A
Page 6 of 7
A
I XI. Stormwater (DWQ Only)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
downstream from the property.
' Sources of nearby pervious cover include roads, driveways, and rooftops. This project will
not cause an increase in the impervious coverage of the project area.
XII. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Only)
' Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
N/A
XIII. Violations ( DWQOnl
Y)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
' Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
Yes ® No ?
XIV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
' It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
' choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
' Compensator mitigation is scheduled to begin immediately following receipt of appropriate
permits.
7•
Applicant/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 7 of 7
Charlotte Country Club Driving Range Expansion March 17, 2004
After-the-Fact Permit Application Pursuant to a Nationwide Permit No. 39 Project No. 2003-0527

Attachment D - Routine On-Site Data Form

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: Charlotte County Club Driving Ran Eg an i Date: 21 /29/03
Applicant/Owner: Charlotte Storm Water Services County: Mecklenburg
Investigator(s): RGJ, KJK State: NC
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Yes No Community ID: inlan
d
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes No Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes No Plot ID: DPI
If needed, explain on reverse.
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species
1. Quercus alba Stratum Indicator
tree FACU Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
9. .
2. Quercus phellos tree FACW- 10.
3. Smilax rotundifolia vine FAC 11.
4. Ligustrum sinense shrub FAC 12.
5. Hedera helix vine 13.
6. Magnolia grandiflora tree FAC+ 14.
7. Liquidambar styraciflua tree FAC+ 15.
8. 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC
83%
Remarks:
More than 50% of dominant veg
etation is FAC or wetter.
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe in remarks):
- Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge
- Aerial Photographs
_ Other
X No Recorded Data Available Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators:
_ Inundated
_ Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
_ Water Marks
_ Drift Lines
Field Observations: _ Sediment Deposits (on leaves)
Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: 0 (in.) Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Depth to Free Water in Pit: N/A (in.) _ Water-Stained Leaves
_ Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: >12 (in.) _ FAC-Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
Wetland hydrology indicators are absent.
RoutineOn-Site DataForm Page I of 2 1/20/2004
SOILS.
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Cecil sandy clay loam. 2 - 8% slo pes Drainage Class well drained
Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup): thermic Ultic Ha lndnlts Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
00=3 A 10YR 4/2 N/A N/A silt loam
3-12 B SYR 4/6 NZA N/A sandy loam
Histosol _ Concretions
- Histic Epipedon - High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
_ Sulfidic Odor _ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
- Aquic Moisture Regime - Listed on Local Hydric Soils List (Inclusions)
- Reducing Conditions - Listed. on National Hydric Soils List
- Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
Hydric soil indicators are. absent.
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes sNo (Circle
Wetland Hydrology Present? iz-v (Circle)
Hydric Soils Present? Yes Is this Sampling Point Within a.Wetland? Yes No
Remarks:
Approved by HQUSACE 2/92

RoutineOn-Site DataForm Page 2 Of 2 1120/2004
Charlotte Country Club Driving Range Expansion March 17, 2004
After-the-Fact Permit Application Pursuant to a Nationwide Permit No. 39 Project No. 2003-0527
Attachment E - NCDWQ Stream Classification Forms
I
' NCDWO Stream Classification Form SCPI - Perennial Stream A
Project Name: Charlotte Country Club Driving Range Expansion River
Basin: Catawba County: Mecklenburg Evaluator(s): RGJ and IJH
DWQ Project Number: Nearest Named Stream: Briar Creek Signature(s): -=:7K
Date: 12/29/03 USGS QUAD: Charlotte East Longitude: W80147' 31" Latitude: N35° 13146-
Location/Directions: From Charlotte, take Central Avenue west to Masonic Drive (located approximately one mile east of Eastway Drive). Turn left onto
Masonic Drive and drive to the Charlotte Country Club maintenance facility at the end of the road.
*PLEASE NOTE: If evaluator and landowner agree that the feature is a man-made ditch, then use of this form is not necessary. Also, if in the best professional judgement oflhe evaluator, the feature is a
man-made ditch and not a modified natural stream-this rating system should not be used*
' Primary Field Indicators: (Circle One Number per Line)
1. Geomor holo Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1) Is There A Riffle-Pool Seauence? 0 1 121 3

2) Is The USDA Texture In Streambed
5) Is There An Active (Or Relic)
J

Secondary Field Indicators: (Circle One Number Per Line)
' II. Hydrology Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1) Is There A Groundwater
Flow/Discharge Present? 0 1 ® 3
PRIMARY HYDROLOGY INDICATOR POINTS: 2

3) Does Topography Indicate A
Natural Drainage Way? 0 0.5 Q 1.5
SECONDARY GEOMORPHOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 2.5
II. Hydrology Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1) Is This Year's (Or Last's) Leaflitter
' 2) Is Sediment On Plants Or Debris) Present? 0 10.51 I 1.5
3 Are Wrack Lines Present? 0 0.5 1 1.5
4) Is Water In Channel And >48 Hrs. Since 0 0.5 1 1.5
Last Known Rain? *NOTE. I Ditch Indicated In #9 Above Ski This Ste And #5 Below*
5) Is There Water In Channel During Dry 0 I 1.5
' Conditions Or In Growing Season)?
6) Are Hvdric Soils Present In Sides Of Channel (Or In Headcut)? Yes=1. No=0
SECONDARY HYDROLOGY INDICATOR POINTS. 5

I
1) Are Fish Present? 0.5 1 w 1.5 V
2 Are Am hibians Present? 0.5 1 1.5
3 Are A uaticTurtles Present? 0.5 1 1.5
4 Are Crayfish Present? 51 0.5 1 1.5
8) Are Wetland Plants In Streambed? SAV Mostly OBL Mostly FACW Mostly FAC Mostly FACU Mostly UPL
(* NOTE: If Total Absence Of All Plants In Streambed 2 1 0.75 0.5 0 0
' As Noted Above Skip This Step UNLESS SAV Present*).

SECONDARY BIOLOGY INDICATOR POINTS: 1
TOTAL POINTS (Primary + Secondary= 27.5 (If Greater Than Or Equal To 19 Points The Stream Is At Least Intermittent)

(*NOTE: If Bed & Bank Caused By Ditching _And WITHOUT Sinuosity Then Score=0*)
10) Is A 2°d Order Or Greater Channel (As Indicated
On Tooo Map And/Or In Field) Present? Yes=3 No?
PRIMARY GEOMORPHOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 9
PRIMARY BIOLOGY INDICATOR POINTS. 8
NCDWO Stream Classification Form SCP2 - Perennial Stream B
Project Name: Charlotte Country Club Driving Range Expansion River Basin: Catawba County: Mecklenburg Evaluator(s): RGJ and UH
DWQ Project Number: Nearest Named Stream: Briar Creek Signature(s): &T I
I 'I
Date: 12/29/03 USGS QUAD: Charlotte East Longitude: W80'47'31" Latitude: N35113'48" F
' Location/Directions: From Charlotte, take Central Avenue west to Masonic Drive (located apyrroximately one mile east of Eastway Drive). Turn left onto
Masonic Drive and drive to the Charlotte Country Club maintenance facility at the end of the road.
*PLEASE NOTE: If evaluator and landowner agree that the feature is a man-made ditch, then use of this form is not necessary. Also, if in the best professional judgement of the evaluator, the feature is a
man-made ditch and not a modified natural stream-this rating system should not be used*
' Primary Field Indicators: (Circle One Number per Line)
1. Geomor holo Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1) Is There A Riffle-Pool Sequence? 0 1 2
2) Is The USDA Texture In Streambed
5) Is There An Active (Or Relic)
I
I
Secondary Field Indicators: (Circle One Number Per Line)
' II. Hydrology Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1) Is There A Groundwater
Flow/Discharge Present? 0 1 2
PRIMARYHYDROLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 3
I
I
7
I
3) Does Topography Indicate A
Natural Drainage Wav? 0 0.5 a 1.5
SECONDARY GEOMORPHOLOGYINDICA TOR POINTS: 3.5
II. Hvdrologv Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1) Is This Year's (Or Last's) Leaflitter
' 2) Is Sediment On Plants (Or Debns) Present? 0 10.51 1 1.5
3) Are Wrack Lines Present? 0 0.5 1Q 1.5
4) Is Water In Channel And >48 Hrs. Since 0 0.5 1 1®
Last Known Rain? *NOTE: I Ditch Indicated In #9 Above Ski This Ste And #S Below*
5) Is There Water In Channel During Dry 0 0.5 1 1.5
' Conditions Or In Growing Season)?
6) Are Hvdric Soils Present In Sides Of Channel (Or In Headcud? Yes=1. No=O
SECONDARY HYDROLOGY INDICATOR POINTS: 6.5
' III. Biology Absent Weak Moderate Stron
1) Are Fish Present? 0 0.5 1 1.5

I
2 Are Amphibians Present? 0.5 I 1.5
3) Are AquaticTurtles Present? 0.5 1 1.5
4 Are Crayfish Present? 0 1 1.5
5) Are Macrobenthos Present? 0 1 1.5
6) Are Iron Oxidizing Bacteria/Fungus Present? 0 0.5 W 1.5
7) Is Filamentous Algae Present? ® 0.5 1 1.5
8) Are Wetland Plants In Streambed? SAV Mostly OBL Mostly FACW Mostly FAC Mostly FACU Mostly UPL
(*NOTE. If Total Absence Of All Plants In Streambed 2 1 0.75 0.5 0 0
As Noted Above SkiD This Step UNLESS SAV Present*).
SECONDARYBIOLOGYINDICA TOR POINTS: 3
TOTAL POINTS (Primary + Secondary)-- 41 (If Greater Than Or Equal To 19 Points The Stream Is At Least Intermittent)

J
(*NOTE: I{Bed & Bank Caused By Ditching And WITHOUT Sinuosity Then Score=0*)
10) Is A 2°d Order Or Greater Channel (As Indicated
On Tooo Map And/Or In Field) Present? Yes N0=0
PRIMARY GEOMORPHOLOGYINDICA TOR POINTS: 17
PRIMARYBIOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 8
NCDWO Stream Classification Form SCP3 - Non-Jurisdictional Channel C
Project Name: Charlotte Country Club Driving Range Expansion River Basin: Catawba County: Mecklenburg Evaluator(s): J and IJH
DWQ Project Number: Nearest Named Stream: Briar Creek Signature(s): J r?r Id
Date: 12/29/03 USGS QUAD: Charlotte East Longitude: W80'47'31" Latitude: N35°13' 48"
Location/Directions: From Charlotte, take Central Avenue west to Masonic Drive (located approximately one mile east of Eastway Drive). Turn left onto
Masonic Drive and drive to the Charlotte Countrv Club maintenance facilitv at the end of the road.
-PLEASE NOTE: If evaluator and landowner agree that the feature is a man-made ditch, then use of this form is not necessary. Also, if in the best professional judgement of the evaluator, thefeature is a
man-made ditch and not a modified natural stream-this rating system should not be used*
Primary Field Indicators: (Circle One Number per Line)
1. Geomor holo Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1) Is There A Riffle-Pool Sequence? 1 2 3
2) Is The USDA Texture In Streambed
Different From Surrounding Terrain? n 1 2 3
5) Is There An Active (Or Relic)
' 1I. Hydrology Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1) Is There A Groundwater
Flow/Discharge Present? 1 I 2 3
PRIMARY HYDROLOGYINDICATOR POINTS. 0
rrr n:i..l- Ah-t W..1, M.d-t.. ct.......
' PRIMARYBIOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS. 4
Secondary Field Indicators: (Circle One Number Per Line)
3) Does Topography Indicate A
Natural Drainage Wav? ® 0.5 1 1.5
SECONDARY GEOMORPHOLOGY INDICATOR POINTS: 0
11. Hydrology Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1) Is This Year's (Or Last's) Leaflitter
2 Is Sediment On Plants Or Debris Present? 0.5 1 N 1.5
' 3) Are Wrack Lines Present? 0.5 1 1.5
4) Is Water In Channel And >48 Hrs. Since 0.5 1 1.5
Last Known Rain? *NOTE: I Ditch Indicated In #9 Above Ski This Ste And #5 Below-
5) Is There Water In Channel During Dry 0.5 1 1.5
Conditions Or In Growing Season)?
6) Are Hvdric Soils Present In Sides Of Channel (Or In Headcut)? Yes=1.5 No=nO
SECONDAR Y HYDROLOGY INDICA TOR POINTS: 0.5
1 Are Fish Present? 0.5 _ 1 V 1.5 V
2 Are Am hibians Present? 0.5 1 1.5
3 Are A uaticTurtles Present? 0.5 1 1.5
4 Are Cra fish Present? 0.5 1 1.5
5 Are Macrobenthos Present? 0.5 1 1.5
6 Are Iron Oxidizing Bacteria/Fun us Present? 0.5 1 1.5
7 Is Filamentous Algae Present? 0.5 1 1.5
8) Are Wetland Plants In Streambed? SAV Mostly OBL Mostly FACW Mostly FAC Mostly FACU Mostly UPI,
(* NOTE: If Total Absence Of All Plants In Streambed 2 1 0.75 0 0
As Noted Above Skip This Steo UNLESS SAV Present*).
1 Are Fibrous Roots Present In Streambed? 3 1 0
2) Are Rooted Plants Present In Streambed? 3 1 0
3 Is Perih ton Present? 1 2 3
4) Are Bivalves Present? 1 2 3
SECONDARYBIOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 0.5
TOTAL POINTS (Primary + Secondary)= 9 (If Greater Than Or Equal To 19 Points The Stream Is At Least Intermittent)
(*NOTE: If Bed & Bank Caused By Ditching And WITHOUT Sinuosity Then Score=0*)
10) Is A 2"d Order Or Greater Channel (As Indicated
On Tooo Map And/Or In Field) Present? Yes=3 No=R
PRIMARY GEOMORPHOLOGY INDICATOR POINTS: 4
Charlotte Country Club Driving Range Expansion March 17, 2004
After-the-Fact Permit Application Pursuant to a Nationwide Permit No. 39 Protect No. 2003-0527
Attachment F - USACE Stream Quality Assessment Worksheets

............... ............................... _........... .................. _.......... ......................... _........................... ....... -..._..__...................................................... ............ _.................. _.................. ..... _..... ...................... _.......... _.._.............. ................. _.......... _........... .......... ......... ._........ .......... __........... .........-....................... ,-........ _..... _...._.......... _....._.
OFFICE USE ONLY: USACE AID# DWQ #
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT W®RKSIIEET Aft"
{'\
SCP1- Perennial Stream A '
1. Applicant's Name:-Charlotte-Country Club 2. Evaluator's Name: Ron Johnson and Isaac Hinson
3. Date of Evaluation: 12/29/2003 4. Time of Evaluation: 2:00 PM
5. Name of Stream: Unnamed tributary of Briar Creek 6. River Basin: Catawba
7. Approximate Drainage Area: 50 acres 8. Stream Order: First
9. Length of Reach Evaluated: Approximately 740 linear feet 10. County: Mecklenburg
11. Location of reach under evaluation (include nearby roads and landmarks): From Charlotte, take Central Avenue west to Masonic
Drive (located approximately one mile east of Eastway Drive). Turn left onto Masonic Drive and drive to the Charlotte Country Club
maintenance facility at the end of the road.
12. Site Coordinates (if known): N35°13'48" W80°47'31"
13. Proposed Channel Work (if any): Relocation
14. Recent Weather Conditions: No rain within 48 hours
15. Site conditions at time of visit: partially constructed
16. Identify. any special waterway classifications known:. -Section 10 -Tidal Waters -Essential Fisheries Habitat
-Trout Waters -Outstanding Resource Waters Nutrient Sensitive Waters -Water Supply Watershed (I-IV)
17. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES (?D If yes, estimate the water surface area: N/A
18. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YE NO 19. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES NO
20. Estimated Watershed Land Use: 50 % Residential _% Commercial % Industrial _% Agricultural
% Forested % Cleared / Logged 50 % Other ( Golf Course/Driving Range )
I
I
21. Bankfull Width: 34' 22. Bank Height (from bed to top of bank): 3'
23. Channel slope down center of stream: -Flat (0 to 2%). X Gentle (2 to 41/o) -Moderate (4 to 10%) -Steep (>10%)
24. Channel Sinuosity: Straight X Occasional Bends -Frequent Meander -Very Sinuous -Braided Channel
Total Score (from reverse): 43 Comments: Hydric soils in bed and bank
Evaluator's Signature -1? ? lef Date S 116 le 4-1
This channel evaluation form is int ded to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and a ovu nmental professionals in
gathering the data required by th United States Army Corps of Engineers in order to make a preliminary assessment of
' stream quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 05/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.

1
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET '
SCP1 -Perennial Stream A
ECOREGION POINT R AGE
(11kRACTERISTICS - - - - SCORE-
( onstal 1 Ziolrnrtill
C1nlout
I j - T _
Pr esunce of floe pcrtilstcnt pools in stre:Im 3
?I
?tI l.1I_ U .. - II1LI., I
k IJIIS
-
Fvidcnce of past hull ll Ilteratioll
?
trx ?n?l e al??satit n = U_ nr ;11rClIni n - nla? h?:lint<I ?
Krp Irian zone ? i _
i ntl ht rf:;': ,_011 tl_uCr. ? 1?1? hul!cr - u r? pt?III IS i
F? idence of nutrient or chemical discharges
0 ?
)
i?.2 Ali-?har?c it_ n l clrs?h I1 _2?; nrr, x?int?l
1
c
-- - -- ?rornul'oater disch Ir, -- - - - --
T

? -
IRO ?I1??R3i ?C -_ ?i- ?j?I1I] S tidCj? ,cCla?Qi CrC. - R1t?A OiIl fS! _ 4 1
?
` Preselice of .rdjacent ?oodplaill - - - ---
1>
71,
?Tt t?li?']dIII - (?. CAIc:lI<I ;tk?k dnlal 11 IR:1;? 1)i)L711?]
.
_..
1'.nuencllmenr I llootlplaln access _

PI csenc( of .I I I,t II t LNctlamis ? -

ctlaurl,a - 0_ lar - a,l a
j:?_Ii 111, 1:t ht-1 ,t?j ! -6

4 ?

I

C'Il lillll'I VII 1111-It -
,_ I ? 1;1.11. I'1 [lt ?lI ,
11t
Sedilnerlt input
? 2 .icn?1 1<ht„11 ?nr- ll 11t; lc ?n no ?lialcnl m.I_. 1 lnrti i
-- r

?Ve & dnersltl of Channel bed 51111611 ate - --
-----?
tine- ?nt? _cu us = l u ae ?ti?: ec(
-
FN ideuce of chanlie] Incision or ?N ii full in- ?

i-
?lr??t I u??t> a u_ c h< <I ?? ,:ln 111.1-. i" illt>) 4 5
i PrCtiellce of Irajor 11:1111, I:61ilreti _ ? - - _ --- - - -- ?
(
m ;r: (:[ITS) l
M
I I 1 fZOUC
d
depth tl?' on balll?s
l
------ i
dl'IlLtil
al
-

'-? -- --I
-- --

i
l
l
(lk Ii till ] t11, II I 1 ,
I
? _ ail
Iii
I1 11 1, 1L?1 [l?l\ Ic lull)
L
-
7 lmpnci bl agricultm e or livestock production
-
ur nlial Int
- [ Ire . idcn m?? i?? utt? () - I t) 4 1 () -
i
--
Pr cticncr of r itfle pool ripple-pool complexes
_ n ?tiI ir Il-dc nl,1X ?,1,int i

- -
- ; i
Flabltlt ConlplcNit N
n n ?
-
M ?btrl qtr ?, 11:I1hirlt
rll n 1?1 h Il i11u 11, !X ?lI t i
- ,
1
Zn
C oIy inset L,e oN a su E lllbed - - _ -
I I II I I I t I I I fI ?(P l111IrIt,1 III T u?a . 1i11111
?uhsfr ate elnbcddedncss
h cllli "IIU ILII? IIIIt,
'
, Prruncc of sfreaut In??crtchlates I I ' i
I) I I
It'. ]1LII1 I( L,I Ci 1.3_, ??`1I1 L; ) i) -1 ? ii - r)
P1 CSC-lll (: of nlllphd)I 1111 '
?.. ( 1,? ,'V 1(lt 1 - - I C ,);iltll? [l.- Mill], 1 11G hC1 - rll : Ih:I1IC?1 'I
Prescncc of fish
n -
7)( till"
_ F\ idcncc of N?ildlifc use - - --_ i
I
IC,t l
t

4
3
3 '
4
2
2 '
0
0 '
0
Total Poinrs Possihle ?ln
i
(O TA C. S( 'ORE (<tl?t, ctircr t?rz iir?t pa,L:) 43
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
2 '
2
2
1 '
0
2
0 '
2
2
3
1

_.........__...._... ._..__...__._..._.._ .............................._...................__......:.............._......................_................_......___._.........._........_.........._.._..............._._._..._.._.......__........_............ -.,........._........._._......._............._.....__......_.._....._._........_........................,......._...._............. .............. ...... _....................._.
OFFICE USE ONLY: USACE AID# DWQ #
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
SCP2 - Perennial Stream B
1. Applicant's Name: Charlotte Country Club 2. Evaluator's Name: Ron Johnson and Isaac Hinson
3. Date of Evaluation: 12/29/2003 4. Time of Evaluation: 2:30 PM
5. Name of Stream: Unnamed tributary of Briar Creek 6. River Basin: Catawba
7. Approximate Drainage Area: 140 acres 8. Stream Order: First
9. Length of Reach Evaluated: Approximately 1640 linear feet 10. County: Mecklenburg
11. Location of reach under evaluation (include nearby roads and landmarks): From Charlotte, take Central Avenue west to Masonic
Drive (located approximately one mile east of Eastway Drive). Turn left onto Masonic Drive and drive to the Charlotte Country Club
maintenance facility at the end of the road.
12. Site'Coordinates (if known): N35° 13'48" W80°47'31"
13. Proposed Channel Work (if any): none
14. Recent Weather Conditions: No rain within 48 hours
15. Site conditions at time of visit: partially constructed
16. Identify any special waterway classifications known:. -Section 10 -Tidal Waters Essential Fisheries Habitat
-Trout Waters -Outstanding Resource Waters _ Nutrient Sensitive Waters -Water Supply Watershed (I-IV)
17. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES (n If yes, estimate the water surface area: N/A
18. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES NO 19. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? (E? NO
20. Estimated Watershed Land Use: % Residential % Commercial % Industrial _% Agricultural
% Forested % Cleared / Logged 100 % Other ( Golf Course/Driving Range)
21. Bankfull Width: 10-12' 22. Bank Height (from bed to top of bank): 3'
23. Channel slope down center of stream: -Flat (0 to 2%) X Gentle (2 to 4%) -Moderate (4 to 10%) -Steep (>10%)
24. Channel Sinuosity: Straight X Occasional Bends -Frequent Meander -Very. Sinuous _Braided Channel
Total Score (from reverse): 51 Comments: Hydric soils in bed and bank, fish, crayfish sampled.
' Evaluator's Signature Date 3?/f ?®?
This channel evaluation form is 'Wended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers in order to make a preliminary assessment of
' stream quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 05/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.
1
6
STREAM (QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
SCP2 - Perennial Stream_B
EGOREGION POENT R
AGE
CII AR ACITRISTICS _
-
__ Coastal
I tcdtr1ont ?101111rlin
Pr eserrer of floNti ' persistent pools in strcaru

?. II10 ?1[, ,' uI S'II F?1110 1'1 i
- fl: SCL ???71 ??II .G = lIl?.: 10111tS -4 o

-
i
Evidence of past human alteration
-
--- t ??st Ian ?: llr_r?lu n - iJ_ l,o alrcr,d??n _mI? poulr>>
- -

Rrparian zone -_?

? (Il?? huilcl (? c??nti=ucus ?..ici? buffer ?n??, ?<?rnt,1 - Fl ) - -i
i ?
F ? uiencc of nutrienr or Chemical disci n *es
(??src? i z? tlh ?h,1rr -- i); no ?fiseh.lr_c< = m?I:? h??int; i
---
I- I
- ? oUI1dN 1 atU dlscb If ie
'
- I1t1 115 ?;11I re -= I Pr ITl
I
- ---- ? - °
?
Ptescrlcc of tdjaecnttloodplaln

F? j
?il?, i???!?I[,'Ia III - Il? .lC I1,IAC 11C??1?
Ifljalil= II1QS h?,?,IT?1 I
I
II
_
i Lntrcnchment - Iloodplam accc,s ? _
- C )l rtr?n?h ?l - I1 ?:uu?nt 11? ?dI1 r- 11 l:>x p( 1intl )
Presence of adj rcent ??etlands - - -
Jai_ :id1a,"lCd.u,,i;- :nUcl

c n?uu rl ]I? ul?t?I n?l.? I ??nus1

,i?p ti11 1,)11- !idle' u :w .'c(11111,2111 M,'I' 10111t? -i
tive ?A diNerslty of channel bed substr ale

nr- h nI _cn, ? 'i? ?n rt ?1i, _11 ,tip, -
-- -4 -
FIN uicnce of ch rnnel urcision or widcnin'-, -
i,.rnk, :11,1, hlli:li? U - f
1'resencc of major haul: failures ? ? _

Root deprh end dcjlsirToil banks I
?u o - a
- ul ? ?iil?l?? rn?Il? Il_ ?t? l;? l"r1. r? rhn?u.?htlur nt?l?. h?unrsl j
--
Impact by r r rculCUre or Irscstod' production

-- ,,tl t I:[r,tl nti ''w --
? tC n? ??

-
Pr esencc of riffle-pool ,ripple-pool complexes ?
-

IIl
--
-- -
Flabirat complcxite
? - _ ? -
= ? I
rt l? ?;r Il tl ?t Il: 1r u?nt??j l thug- ma; Print,
- 0
-
?? C'allop. Co%etal;e oNcr sircaurberl
nc, A laClll ^ I:1r1011 = Il. _'0111111Ut 1t5 JTIOP`? MJ" "UIIII'-
= -
-
Substrate cmbeddedncss
-- -- - -
-
l r
C
l
IU JIB; ? ilhC
?.
)- I ? <li ?l?lll? [17aS) ,
l
Prescncc of scream imertch[-atcs
X11
?r;u1 I ouinc , 11? t 11t I) _ ? 11 - f) - -

Presence of amphibians
?l
ntur CD L] t pc n1?l?c p?unt?l k 4 -
Pt
uwllc
of lrs
b
I
r
ctl
?'
t
i
- ----? l ?idenceof «rldble rise -

Uct1C ?: 211itL fllllr -:?1cll t. 11.1 1 h I1 _ IJ
4
2 '
2
2
2
1
2
0
3
2
3
2
2
2
4 '
4
4 '
3
2 '
3 '
0
2
0
i'irrtl Points Possi?le?(1(1 ?i ; (iU I tJll 'I Ii!) I
TOTAL SCORE (a'?I, ea ter rn ?t ?,< <>el 51
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
SCORI
2

1. Applicant's Name: Charlotte Country Club 2. Evaluator's Name: Isaac Hinson
3. Date of Evaluation: 12/29/2003 4. Time of Evaluation: 2:30 PM
5. Name of Stream: Unnamed tributary of Briar Creek 6. River Basin: Catawba
7. Approximate Drainage Area: 0.70 acre 8. Stream Order: First
9. Length of Reach Evaluated: Approximately 250 linear feet 10. County: Mecklenburg
11. Location of reach under evaluation (include nearby roads and landmarks): From Charlotte, take Central Avenue west to Masonic
Drive (located approximately one mile east of Eastwayrive). Turn left onto Masonic Drive and drive to the Charlotte Country Club
maintenance facility at the end of the road
12. Site Coordinates (if known): N35°13'48" W80°47'31"
13. Proposed Channel Work (if any): none
14. Recent Weather Conditions: No rain within 48 hours
15. Site conditions at time of visit:
16. Identify any special waterway classifications known: -Section 10 -Tidal Waters -Essential Fisheries Habitat
-Trout Waters -Outstanding Resource Waters _ Nutrient Sensitive Waters -Water Supply Watershed (I-IV)
17. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES (S If yes, estimate the water surface area: N/A
18. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YE NO 19. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES
20. Estimated Watershed Land Use: % Residential
21. Bankfull
% Forested
% Commercial _% Industrial % Agricultural
_% Cleared / Logged 100 % Other ( Golf Course/Driving Range )
22. Bank Height (from bed to top of bank): 2-4'
23. Channel slope down center of stream: X Flat (0 to 2%) -Gentle (2 to 4%) -Moderate (4 to 10%) .-Steep (>10%)
24. Channel Sinuosity: Straight X Occasional Bends -Frequent Meander -Very Sinuous -Braided Channel

1

1
Total Score (from reverse): 21 Comments: grass lined ditch
Evaluator's Signature Date
This channel evaluation form is in ended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers in order to make a preliminary assessment of
stream quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 05/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.
1
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
SCP3 - Non-Jurisdictional Channel C
-
: ?ECOREGION POINT RANGE
I ? CH.aRACTERISTICS SCO
Coastal: pJedmont. ;Mountain,
Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream
'
no flow or saturation 0; strong flow = max- points) 0 5 0 4: 0
S 1

2 Evidence of past human alteration'
'
C
extensive: alteration = 0; `no alteration -'max points) 0 6 0 5 0- 5 0
Riparian zone
0 6
0 - 4
0 5
0
no buffer = 0; contiguous, wide buffer - max points

4 Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges,
-

(extensive discharges = 0, no discharges = max points)-, 0-5 0-4 0
4 2
5 ' Groundwater discharge . ~ 0
t

(no discharge = 0; sprin

seeps, wetlands, etc. = max poiii&)
gs, O - 0 t 0
$j

6
Presence of adjacent floodplain . -
n
u flutedlam - 0; extensive flood lain may- points) 0 - 4 t) - 0

. 2" Entrenchment /'floodplain. access
O --
a?
deer) Iv entrenched = 0, freuent floodingzz max oints) 0 4
Q
-- 1
Presence of adjacent wetlands .
- -

wo v? ctLtrds - 0;large-
aj = xomts l
d acent wetlands may

0
??

O
4

0
-?

0
_
Channel"sinuosity - 0-5' 0 4
k?xlensj CLTmnehzation 0 naturalmedTI&F: max points)

10 Sediment input

-

© 5

0

? - t
T

3
g
extensive deposition= 0; little or no sediment
-maxi points .

?:
11 Size. &t diversity of channel.bed substrate
ivA*
0

fine, homogenous0; large, diverse sizes '= max points) ' t 0-4 - 0
!1 gl; 12 Evidence of channel incision or widening,
deeply incised 0; stable bed & banks max points)
13 Presence of major bank failures "0 5 0
5 0 4
a' severe erosion O; no erosion, stable banks = max oints -
34 Root depth and density on banks . 0 3 4 0?? 1
_no visible roots - 0; dense roots throng out.?= max points) .
15 Impact by agriculture or livestock production 4 6
.
substantial impact 01-no evidence max points) 5 0_ -5 4
,. -
16 Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes
0 3
0 5
0 6
0
N (no riffles/riles or pools 0; well-developed - max points)_ ...
17 Habitat complexity 0-6, 0 6 ?0 t, 0
r` little or no habitat - 0; frequent, varied habitats - max points) -
Ra'. 18 Canopy coverage over streambed .
(no shading vegetation = 0, continuous canopy - max points) 0 '5 0 5 0 1
Y
1
9
Substrate embeddedness

e

1VA*

0 4

0 1

0
dee 1 ; embedded =-0; loose structur
` max ' o„
SK' 20 Presence of stream invertebrates 0 4 0 5 0 0
no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max oints)
Presence of amphibians.
4
0-4
b 4
0
O
Y no evidennce = 0; common, numerous types max points) ?

2

Presence of fish

' 4

4
-

0 4 _

0
f -- no evidence= 0; common, numerous es = max oints)
Evidence of wildlife use
(nn evidence O? alh-indant evidence m?r< pnintsl 0 6 0 5 0 0
0", Total Points Possible IOU 100 100 100
- TOTAL SCORE (Aso enter on first [)aIge)-- - - ?? 21
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
2
Charlotte Country Club Driving Range Expansion March 17, 2004
After-the-Fact Permit Application Pursuant to a Nationwide Permit No. 39 Project No. 2003-0527
Attachment G - Request for Jurisdictional Determination Form
I
I

7

L
1

1
L
REQUEST FOR JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
DATE: March 17.2004
COUNTY Mecklenburg County, North Carolina TOTAL ACREAGE OF TRACT 8 acres
PROJECT NAME (if applicable) Charlotte Country Club Driving Range Expansion
PROPERTY OWNER/APPLICANT (name, address and phone):
Charlotte Country Club
POC: Mr. Mike Pilo at [phone]
2465 Mecklenburg Avenue
Charlotte, North Carolina 28205
NAME OF CONSULTANT, ENGINEER, DEVELOPER (if applicable):
Carolina Wetland Services, Inc.
POC: Gregory C. Antemann, PWS at [phone]
5000 Nations Crossing Road, Suite 230
Charlotte, North Carolina 28217
STATUS OF PROJECT (check one):
( ) On-going site work for development purposes
( ) Project in planning stages
(Type of project: )
( ) No specific development planned at present
( X) Project partially completed
(Type of project: piping
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED:
Check items submitted - forward as much information as is available. At a minimum, the following first two items must be
forwarded.
(X) USGS Site Location Map (Attachment A - Figure 1)
(X) NRCS Soil Survey (Attachment A - Figure 2)
(X ) Approximate Jurisdictional Boundary Field Map (Attachment A - Figure 3)
(X) Agent Certification of Authorization Form (Attachment B)
(X) After-the-Fact Permit Application Pursuant to Nationwide Permit No. 39 (Attachment C)
(X) Routine On-Site Data Form (Attachment D)
(X ) NCDWQ Stream Classification Forms (Attachment E)
(X) USACE Stream Quality Assessment Worksheets (Attachment F)
(X) Representative Photographs (Attachment H)
(X) Agency Correspondence (Attachment I).
(X) Proposed Impacts (Attachment J - Figure 4)
(X) Proposed Mitigation Location (Attachment J - Figure 5)
+ Signature of Property Owner or
Authorized Agent
Mr. Gregg Antemann, PWS

Charlotte Country Club Driving Range Expansion March 17, 2004
After-the-Fact Permit Application Pursuant to a Nationwide Permit No. 39 Project No. 2003-0527

I
Attachment H - Representative Photographs
Charlotte Countr- Club Driving Range Expansion March 17, 2004
After-the-Fact Permit Pursuant to a Nationwide Permit No. 39 Proiect No. 2003-0527

t„

yr ¢ ?,,, h'• ? ` rriy
? a t rj
if
Af i
-± Y
1
?Yf
W
Y
Photograph B. View of Perennial Stream B.
Photograph A. View of Perennial Stream A.
Charlotte Country Club Driving Range Expansion March 17, 2004
After-the-Fact Permit Application Pursuant to a Nationwide Permit No. 39 Protect No. 2003-0527

Attachment I - Agency Correspondence
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and
Michael F. Easley, Governor
January 22, 2004
Mr. Gregory C. Antemann
Carolina Wetland Services
5000 Nations Crossing, Suite 230
Charlotte, NC 28217
Natural Resources
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Subject: Charlotte Country Club, Driving Range Expansion; Charlotte, Mecklenburg County
CWS Project No. 2003-0527
Dear Mr. Antemann:
The Natural Heritage Program has no record of rare species, significant natural communities, or
' priority natural areas at the site nor within a mile of the project.area. Although our maps do not
show records of such natural heritage elements in the project area, it does not necessarily mean
that they are not present. It may simply mean that the area has not been surveyed. The use of
Natural Heritage Program data should not be substituted for actual field surveys, particularly if
the project area contains suitable habitat for rare species, significant natural communities, or
priority natural areas.
You may wish to check the Natural Heritage Program database website at
<www.ncsparks.net/nhp/`search.html> for a listing of rare plants and animals and significant
' natural communities in the county and on the topographic quad map. Please do not hesitate to
contact me at 919-715-8697 if you have questions or need further information.
' Sincerely,
' Harry E. LeGrand, Jr., Zoologist
Natural Heritage Program
' HEL/hel
One
1601 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1601 Noi thCarolina
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] Internet: www.enr.state,nc.us/ENR/ Naturally
' An Equal Opportunity / Affirmative Action Employer - 50 % Recycled 110 % Post Consumer Paper
aww
North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office

Michael F. Easley, Governor
Lisbeth C. Evans, Secretary
Jeffrey J. Crow, Deputy Secretary
Office of Archives and History
Division of Historical Resources
David L. S. Brook, Director

February 19, 2004
Gregory C. Antemann, P.W.S.
Principal Biologist
Carolina Wetland Services, Inc.
5000 Nations Crossing, Suite 230
Charlotte, NC 28217
Re: Charlotte Country Club Driving Range Expansion, Charlotte, Mecklenburg County,
' ER04-0226
Dear Mr. Antemann:
1 Thank you for your letter of January 20, 2004, concerning the above project.
' We have conducted a review of the proposed undertaking and are aware of no historic
resources which would be affected by the project. Therefore, we have no comment on the
undertaking as proposed.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation
Act and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with
' Section 106 codified at 36 CFR Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the
' above comment, please contact Renee Gledhill-Earley, environmental review coordinator, at
919/733-4763. In all future communication concerning this project, please cite the above-
referenced tracking number.
Sincerely,
i ?.
David Brook
www.hpo.dcr.state.nc.us
Location Mailing Address Telephone/Fax
' ADMINISTRATION 507 N. Blount St,-Raleigh, NC 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 276994617 [phone] •733-8653
RESTORATION 515 N. Blount St, Raleigh, NC 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-4617 [phone].715-4801
SURVEY & PLANNING . 515 N. Blount St, Raleigh, NC 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-4617 [phone] .715-4Rm
1
Charlotte Country Club Driving Range Expansion March 17, 2004
After-the-Fact Permit Application Pursuant to a Nationwide Permit No. 39 Proiect No. 2003-0527
t

Attachment J - Proposed Impacts and Mitigation (Figures 4 and 5)

JURISDICTION WATERS OF THE U.S. WERE DETERMINED AND CLASSIFIED BY
CAROLINA WETLAND SERVICES ON DECEMBER 29, 2003. JURISDICTIONAL AREAS '
HAVE NOT BEEN VERIFIED BY THE US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS.
\ ? I l: ' ,: i, ;???? ` .. I IrIC it / I I i
Iv I!
r?/r? ?????1 ?Ii??il??? III\???\.??? ?I 1????\?'yA?? \ I ? I?i I
771 a/s sH x !, ?: ', 1 ? - \\.i-._.
i / lul i / / Il i-
71-
fAINNA??\?? II ? I ? I / F.XIS?NC TREfS
Non-Jurisdictional Channel C
L \ / l \lil iX
P
Perennial Stream A
_299 It impacted ',1
t , Ir
r ?
r
rf-esao6 1
i -, 1 `
? t
\ ' ? 11 I
} \
u \ I (,\:' 11
r ? 1 't I
Perennial Stream BBB /?'r
I J I/1 !I \ S `/ / \ rA
FAlNNAT
toloxif,:L o 1J
?I

\ PRAC
\ (1
r ??
I
.I
? emsTwc
6A,srrN? \
TNFE 1
NIN
r ,
` v )
>

1
? A
y1` ?" ?y ryY
L-? I q
?_j \? IFS ?,
i ,
f,
l
PRAC79CE ".
IOYA,PDTARC6TTFE
r.,_ s.swsrr
I LEGEND
AVOIDED STREAM CHANNEL
NON-JURISDICTIONAL STREAM CHANNEL
APPROXIMATE SCALE: I"=150'
I IMPACTED STREAM CHANNEL
\ :l
------ (-
-71 I j,
/?i'•\ '.\?)•\ "i ..? J FORTH
V
I
r,l, V \t l V7\ l_ \ \ mar/ =
Charlotte Country Club
Charlotte, North Carolina
PRACTICE RANGE PLAN
September 16, 2003
s
i
Carolina Wetland Services
5000 Nations Crossing Road, Suite 230
Charlotte, North Carolina 28217
F
REERENCE: MECKLENBURG COUNTY LAND USE AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
- DATED 2002-
Figure 5. Proposed Mitigation Location
Charlotte Country Club Driving Range Expansion
Charlotte, North Carolina
CWS Pro'eet No. 2003-0527
j PREP DAT CHECKED DATE
of I