19960634 Ver 1_Mitigation Evaluation_20090609

! - 1 U?'1 X Y 1 ?'?'? 1"t? ??}lrt'C l C Ll?" 1?JOYlE?
Mitigation Project Evaluations: Information Table
NC Division of Water Quality
Date of Office Review:
Date of Report: `
Date of Field Review: CC - - 01
Other Individuals/Agencies Present:
Weather Conditions (today & recent): UL? k Surtn?
Directions to Site: S of intersection of 1-85 and NC-52 in Salisbury, NC
I. Office Review Information:
Project Number: 19960634
Project Name: Innes Street Market
County(ies): Rowan
Basin & subbasin: Yadkin
Nearest Stream: Town Creek
Water Quality Class of Nearest Stream: C
Mitigator Type: Private
DOT Status: non-DOT
Total Mitigation on Site
Wetland: 4 acres
Stream:
Buffer:
Nutr. Offset:
Project History
i 11(.t?t 1?Qflar'LC'2 fkain r ec ci ((i aj 17
'y'Y T ?eCi? ( Vii`
r.
Ot L:t k ? f :"1-I \-I VLCOS r ?l ?rLt
Approved mitigation plan available?
Monitoring reports available? Yes ?J 0)
vJ
8->? r'QCti _ -1 ° r?
'

Problem areas identified in reports? Yes No C c ?ti? t 1?L•.?i'L1tC
t?
Problem areas addressed on site? Yes , No
Mitigation required on site: *Add significant project-related events: reports,
Associated impacts (if known): , r received, construction, planting, repairs, etc.
During office review, note success criteria and evaluate each component based on monitoring report
results. Record relevant data in Sections II and III.
-y On back of sheet, note other information found during office review and/or to be obtained during site visit.
II. Summary of Results:
Monitoring Success Success
Mitigation Component Year (report) (field) Resolved
19960634-1 4 acres Wetland Creation
`_CQ Q 2- . 1.'7G u..c: L),:-+-
4NU -C*Uh : bask _U tar, uk ?. C_ V_ At 1-A 6 r_n ?X`" S j C DnS? r u. L?? - ?rti r< q
valLAA ? OC) kx tV iD 4/ ar XA -_)r iCt S rn 4 ?. c. t x ??r iii . ?i L-I l l t?vl ? t=r
? ???:?c v?tu-?uti v?•?iC?i?t}m cam.
Version 1.0 (August 22, 2007) Page 1 of 2
Evaluator's Name(s):
Report for Monitoring Year: S--}u?
Evaluator's Name(s): ` ( ZK I i j,-T-- Vt9Crrf

COD
.?
_111C
Mitigation Project Evaluations: Information Table
NC Division of Water Quality
MITIGATION SUCCESS:
Compared to the approved mitigation plan, this project is: successful partially successful unsuccessful
List specific reasons for lack of success for this project:
Additional comments (e.g. DWQ follow-up actions, recommendations, etc.):
Version 1.0 (August 22, 2007) Page 2 of 2

Wetland Mitigation Project Evaluations: Information Table
NC Division of Water Quality
Component: 4 acres Wetland Creation Component ID: 19960634-1
Description: '
Location within project: ; 1 ?• k L,-x . ?' _ -, i c r t ?'CA
6r Cu 3 ?,.c9
Ill. Success Criteria Evaluation:
HYDROLOGY - Approved Success Criteria:
soil sat. or inun. Within 12" of surafce for min. of approx 12 cons
days during early part of GS; observed evidence of inun. Or sat.
within root zone 5-12.5% of GS
Monitoring report indicates success AYe No
Observational field data agrees? No
based on mitigation plan? No
based on wetland type? No
List any remaining hydrology issues to address (e.g. remaining ditches, excessive water, etc.):
List indicators of hydric soils: J-" 1?, (-_VA Moo" ,? IQ Q Lk" LLJft L
List any remaining soil issues to address (e.g. erosion, upland areas, etc.): 'J i J}?lX V
SOILS - Approved Success Criteria: na 61?- tixa-_
Are soils hydric or becoming hydric? 6e No
VEGETATION - Approved Success Criteria:
at least 320 stems/acre survive; a minimum 75% cover after
5 yrs required for herb veg.
Monitoring report indicates success? Yes ?No
Average TPA for entire site (per report): o
Observational field data agrees? es No
based on community composition? es No
based on TPA and/or % cover? No
Vegetation planted on site? a No
Date of last planting:
Vegetation growing successfully? ?eis) No
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
v/ Inundated
,/Saturated in upper 12 inches
Drift lines
Drainage patterns in wetlands
Sediment deposits
Water marks
Dominant Plant Species
Species Story TPA/'/ cover
i ??;ut' _ `} l< "? t?? ? ??-'LI .; "M ?• tip.- ? . ,'?.? : `?_r ??
P-10 U S?(-V -- S iii pe-Y), a"A-- to L_
M
wf_"_t -Va k,c_ - sAt o; i v 1 VA : 0i
Specific vegetation plots or site locations with little to no vegetation:
C.'&J
OC?

i/L1..l-i CJ
Estimated acreage or site percentage of unvegetated areas:
Invasive species on site (species, location(s), and % cover):
List any remaining vegetation issues to address (e.g. plant survival, concerns, etc.):
LAC-(, tA.ss u 9UA ".ts? C qtul& rw? s s? ? khan p ct CK COQ . 2.,,, c.nd-
-SM
17e!siow A?gli?2 2 ?r l1'1 ?? C? Pae'f o
gf 2 " U
a_k_2 KIEV w? Lv, C h i 0.l
Wetland Mitigation Project Evaluations: Information Table
NC Division of Water Quality
NCWAM - Approved Success Criteria or Evaluative Techniques: NCWAM Type on Site:
na
Monitoring report indicates success
Observational field data agrees?
Attach NCWAM analysis results to this
List any remaining NCWAM issues
Coastal
Riverine
? 1 Yes No Riparian
Yes No Non-riparian (wetter)
port. Non-riparian (drier)
address (e.g. functionality, developing wetland type, etc.):
MITIGATION SUCCESS:
Compared to the approved mitigation plan, this component is: uccessf I partially successful
List specific reasons for lack of success for this component:
Additional comments (e.g. DWQ follow-up actions, recommendations, etc.):
unsuccessful
During site visit, document representative conditions and areas of concern. Observe preservation and
enhancement areas that may not have specific success criteria. Label and attach photos to this report.
Attach maps showing photo locations, areas of concern, and important field observations.
Additional notes related to evaluation of this component:
Version 1.0 (August 22, 2007) Page 2 of 2